Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Itera Interim / Quarterly Report 2010

Jul 9, 2010

3639_rns_2010-07-09_52f02c36-e411-495a-b211-9c8c1ddb74b6.pdf

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Interim Report

Second Quarter 2010

CEO Arne Mjøs
CFO Frank Martinsen
Oslo, 9 July 2010

itera
Second Quarter 2010


→ Highlights in the second quarter

  • Flat development from Q1 2010
  • Revenues down 10% to MNOK 100 compared to Q2 2009 but flat to Q1 2010
  • EBIT down 23% but flat to Q1 2010

  • Towards a focused company

  • Transformation process according to plan
  • Positioning for larger full-life cycle customer relationships

  • Market improvement

  • Good demand in Norway and Sweden
  • Still challenging market in Denmark but the dark clouds are lifting

img-0.jpeg
Revenues
NOK million

img-1.jpeg
EBIT
NOK million

itera

Second Quarter 2010


Business Review

Second Quarter 2010

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Market environment

  • The IT market bottomed out in 2009 in Norway and Sweden but still challenging in Denmark.
  • Nordic enterprises have increased IT budgets significantly.
  • Pent-up demand for new technologies and next generation solutions is releasing as enterprises focus on new growth opportunities and increase spending plans.
  • Less intense competition but a cautious mind-set continues as the norm among most buyers.
  • Strong demand for business intelligence, software-as-a-service (SaaS) and next generation Internet (web 2.0 and social media).
  • Increasing demand for nearshore services to increase capacity driven by reduced time-to-market and revenue growth.
  • We see a strong demand for our next generation expertise

itera

Second Quarter 2010


Towards the focused One Billion Company

  • Focus on full-lifecycle relationships with large customers
  • Take a leading position in superior user experience at any device
  • Leverage seamless nearshoring for new opportunities of efficiency and growth
  • Positioning the ITERA brand in all countries we operate, leveraging The Little Big Company

  • The transformation continues according to plan with business effects to be seen from Q4 2010

Leading Nordic next generation provider in selected services segments

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ 1. Towards full lifecycle project deliverables

  • Itera Consulting is transforming into large full lifecycle project deliverables
  • Transformation program is running with business effects to be seen from Q4 2010
  • Key people recruitments in business consulting, sales, management and service delivery in place
  • Objectware is organized as a core development division
  • Strong customer wins and framework agreements
  • Nearshoring capability as part of service offerings to increase cost effectiveness

Tomorrow's business mix

Project deliverables CV's
80 % 20 %

Today's business mix

Projects Consultants (CV's)
20 % 80 %

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Case: KLP strategic partnership

  • Large existing customer based on framework agreement
  • 3+ years, 8-10 FTEs, growing volume
  • Broad services mix, such as IT consulting, project management, system development and maintenance
  • Strategic services, i.e. digital innovation workshops

  • Growing customer wallet share

  • In Q2, Itera Consulting won a tender of developing KLP’s internal corporate portal for information sharing, collaboration, cultural development and knowledge transfer

  • KLP is a typical sustainable growing customer based on strong strategic relationships and long term framework agreements

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Craftsman in Residence at Itera

  • An international industry movement
  • Software development as a Craftsmanship
  • The goal is to establish “Software Craftsman” as a hallmark
  • Itera Consulting is defining the agenda in Norway
  • Access to world’s most top competent people to work hands-on with our customers and consultants.

img-2.jpeg

img-3.jpeg
Skageri. Greg Young og adm. dir. I Itera Consulting Anders Lier (I.N). Foto: Magnus Söder.

Setter mestermerke på programvare

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ 2. Take leadership in User Experience (UX)

  • UX Innovation Lab created between Itera Gazette and Itera Consulting
  • Return on Design & Return on Investment
  • Business + communication + technology = true
  • Strong demand but fragmented vendor space
  • High attractiveness amongst key people, of which several in process with Itera.

img-4.jpeg

img-5.jpeg

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ 3. Leverage Seamless Nearshoring

  • Seamless Nearshoring is integrated into all service offerings
  • Drive innovation: Value based sourcing
  • Price pressure: More value for less
  • Resource constraints: Access to global resource pool
  • Process maturity: Build world-class distributed agile delivery model

  • Ukraine is recognized as the most attractive Nearshore destination

  • Low IT salaries
  • Strong R&D heritage from the Sovjet past
  • High tech education
  • Innovation
  • Available pool of IT resources.
Country M/E environment Innovation Innovative business models IP Security SD Costs Availability of IT resources Average score
Ukraine 3 5 5 3 5 5 4,3
Belarus 3 3 3 3 3 4 3,1
Russia 4 4 3 3 3 5 3,6
Poland 5 4 4 4 4 3 4
Romania 4 4 4 4 3 4 3,8
Hungary 4 3 3 5 4 3 3,6

Source: European IT Outsourcing Intelligence Report 2010, IT Sourcing Europe Ltd

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Case: FINN.no with Nearshoring from Itera

  • FINN.no is a recognized as a leading Lean SW development environment
  • Itera Consulting selected amongst 13 vendors
  • SCRUM-based approach
  • Maintenance, enhancement and development of selected tasks of Finn.no portal based on SCRUM with seamless nearshoring
  • Starting up with a team of 5 FTE’s from Ukraine

img-6.jpeg

img-7.jpeg

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ 4. The new Itera structure

itera

img-8.jpeg

  • The new Itera brand across group companies was launched in June.

itera

Second Quarter 2010

Page 12


→ Devestment of Promis AS

  • Strategic discussion about Promis’s role in the new Itera structure
  • Promis is working mostly as independent advisor on behalf of the customer
  • Potential conflict of interests with other group companies at the vendor side
  • Resignation by CEO and other key people

  • Itera to strengthen its strong project management capability as part of Itera Consulting instead

  • Working as advisor and vendor is normal, i.e. Accenture, where conflict of interests are addressed according to industry best practices
  • In addition, focus on agile project management, new collaboration patterns and global delivery model

  • Promis sold to employees at a price of MNOK 16 with effect from 1st July 2010

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ A growing number of framework agreements and increasing customer wallet share

img-9.jpeg

img-10.jpeg

DnB NOR

img-11.jpeg

img-12.jpeg

Oslo kommune

  • Itera is increasing the total customer value, creating longer sustainable relationships with key customers.

itera

Second Quarter 2010


Financial Review

Second Quarter 2010

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Key figures

Q2 2010 Q2 2009 Change % 1H 2010 1H 2009 Change % FY 2009
Operating revenue MNOK 100.1 111.5 -10 200.3 223.5 -10
EBITDA MNOK 8.4 10.1 -17 16.6 21.0 -21
EBITDA margin 8.4 % 9.0 % -7 8.3 % 9.4 % -12
Operating profit (EBIT) MNOK 5.1 6.7 -23 10.2 14.3 -29
EBIT margin 5.1 % 6.0 % -14 5.1 % 6.4 % -20
Profit before taxes MNOK 5.6 6.9 -18 11.1 14.7 -24
Profit for the period MNOK 4.0 4.9 -18 8.0 10.6 -24
Earnings per share (EPS) NOK 0.05 0.06 -17 0.10 0.13 -23
Net cash flow from operations MNOK 5.4 17.3 2.7 20.0
Cash and cash equivalents MNOK 51 59 51 59
Equity ratio 49 % 47 % 49 % 47 %
Number of employees at end of period 375 391 -4 375 391 -4
Number of employees in average 374 391 -4 373 391 -5

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Income statement

NOK Million Q2 2010* Q2 2009 Change %* 1H 2010* 1H 2009 Change %* FY 2009
Operating revenue 100.1 111.5 -10 200.3 223.5 -10 411.5
Cost of sales 19.5 21.2 -8 39.1 38.4 2 67.0
Personnel expenses 64.2 71.2 -10 128.5 145.6 -12 268.3
Depreciation 3.2 3.4 -4 6.4 6.7 -4 13.1
Other operating expenses 8.1 9.1 -12 16.1 18.5 -13 36.5
Total operating expenses 95.0 104.9* -9 190.1 209.2* -9 385.0
Operating profit (EBIT) 5.1 6.7* -23 10.2 14.3* -29 26.5
Net financial income 0.5 0.2 150 0.9 0.4 136 2.8
Profit before taxes 5.6 6.9* -18 11.1 14.7* -24 29.3
Income taxes 1.6 1.9 -18 3.1 4.1 -24 8.7
Net profit for the period 4.0 4.9* -18 8.0 10.6* -24 20.6

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Cash flow statement

NOK Million Q2 2010 Q2 2009 1H 2010 1H 2009
Cash flow from operating activities
Cash flow from operations (EBITDA) 8.4 10.1 16.6 21.0
Change in balance sheet items -2.9 7.3 -13.9 -1.0
Net cash flow from operating activities 5.4 17.3 2.7 20.0
Net cash flow from investment activities -3.5 -3.2 -6.3 -6.4
Cash flow from financing activities
Purchase of own shares 0.0 0.0 -0.4 -0.1
Exercise of stock option programs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
External dividend paid -16.5 -16.7 -16.5 -16.7
Net cash flow from financing activities -16.5 -16.7 -16.9 -16.9
Net change in bank deposits and cash -14.6 -2.6 -20.5 -3.3
Bank deposits at the end of the period 50.6 58.5 50.6 58.5

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Cash flow from operations

  • Reduced cash flow from operations in 1H 2010
  • MNOK 3, down from MNOK 20 in 1H 2009
  • Lower operating revenues
  • Work in progress and accounts receivable up by MNOK 4
  • Public duties payable down by MNOK 8
  • Good control and visibility of accounts receivable
  • No loss in 1H 2010

img-13.jpeg

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Quarterly development

img-14.jpeg
Operating revenue
NOK million

img-15.jpeg
Employees
End of period

img-16.jpeg
EBITDA and margin
NOK million

img-17.jpeg
EBIT and margin
NOK million

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Shares, options and dividend

  • Dividend of NOK 0.20 per share paid in Q2 2010.
  • 2.8 million (3.3 %) number of own shares at end of period
  • Average price of NOK 3.12 per share
  • The stock option program are not in the money
End of period number of shares 85 340 346
End of period number of shares diluted 82 560 462
End of period number of own shares 2 779 884
End of period number of stock options. 0
  • A dividend payment of NOK 0.20 per share in Q2 2010.

itera

Second Quarter 2010


Outlook

Second Quarter 2010

itera

Second Quarter 2010


→ Outlook 2010

  • A normalized macroeconomic environment in 2010 should support a return to modest growth in IT spending
  • Recruitment will continue in Norway, Sweden and Ukraine, but awaiting a stabilized market situation in Denmark
  • Transformation towards a focused company assumes to show business effects from Q4 2010
  • Devestment of Promis will have effect from 1st July, reporting a profit of MNOK 11 in Q3 2010
  • Itera does not give any forecasts

  • Itera will continue to prioritize quality, profit and growth, in that order

itera
Second Quarter 2010
Page 23


itera
Second Quarter 2010
Page 24
3

itera


→ Top 20 shareholders

Name: ITERA CONSULTING GROUP ASA
Security type: AK
Date: 08.07.2010

Holding → Percentage ‡ Name ‡ Account type ‡ Citizenship ‡
15,718,298 18.42 ARNE MJØS INVEST AS NOR
3,020,000 3.54 PEDERSEN OLAV WERNER NOR
3,003,000 3.52 DELPHI NORGE JPMORGAN EUROPE LTD, NOR
2,800,057 3.28 DNB NOR SMB VPF NOR
2,755,000 3.23 EIKESTAD A/S C/O PARTNER REVISJON NOR
2,400,000 2.81 RBC DEXIA INVESTOR S S/A LUX-NON-RESIDENT NOM LUX
2,256,100 2.64 STOREBRAND LIVSFORSI P980, AKSJEFONDET NOR
2,200,000 2.58 JØSYRA INVEST AS NOR
2,084,996 2.44 ITERA CONSULTING GRO NOR
2,031,588 2.38 MARXPIST INVEST AS NOR
1,632,000 1.91 BRØDRENE JOHANSSEN H NOR
1,420,000 1.66 BOINVESTERING AS NOR
1,301,663 1.53 STOREBRAND VEKST JPMORGAN EUROPE LTD, NOR
1,017,700 1.19 STOREBRAND NORGE I JPMORGAN EUROPE LTD, NOR
756,177 0.89 AANESTAD PANAGRI AS NOR
697,700 0.82 STOREBRAND NORGE H JPMORGAN EUROPE LTD, NOR
694,888 0.81 OBJECTWARE AS NOR
608,100 0.71 AS NORSKE SHELLS PEN P857AK NOR
600,000 0.70 ULLALAND MALVIN NOR
591,164 0.69 DANSKE BANK A/S 3887 OPERATIONS SEC. NOM DNK

47,588,431 55.75

itera
Second Quarter 2010
Page 25


→ Notes

itera

Second Quarter 2010

Page 26


→ Notes

itera

Second Quarter 2010

Page 27


→ Notes

itera

Second Quarter 2010

Page 28


→ Notes

itera

Second Quarter 2010

Page 29


→ Notes

itera

Second Quarter 2010

Page 30


itera
Second Quarter 2010
Page 31
2010/2011

itera