Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

IRON BEAR RESOURCES LTD Capital/Financing Update 2022

Feb 23, 2022

65091_rns_2022-02-23_11bf2e74-a499-4267-8c93-40939fba953c.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX Announcement

24 February 2022

==> picture [198 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

ACQUISITION OF HIGHLY PROSPECTIVE GOLD, COPPER, NICKEL AND PGE PROJECTS IN NEW ZEALAND

Highlights

  • Cyclone to acquire 100% of Grand Port Resources Pty Ltd ( Grand Port ), which holds 6 highly prospective gold, copper, nickel and PGE projects in New Zealand, with a further 2 lithium and REE project applications being submitted shortly;

  • Grand Port’s projects covering 1,140km[2 ] , are all either near operating mines and facilities, or other resources companies;

  • The projects are Macraes South, Muirs, Mareburn, Longwood Range, Waikerikeri and Drybread, and all are considered underexplored by modern exploration methods;

  • Muirs Reef Gold Project , contains a non-JORC foreign inferred resource estimate of 222koz Au @ 1.34g/t*, with significant exploration upside, historic drilling results include[1] :

  • 11.0m at 11.0 g/t Au from 48m incl. 2.0m @ 38.4g/t Au (MSDDH009)

  • 0.7m at 17.0 g/t Au from 92.2m (TP6);

  • Mareburn Gold Project , contains a number of initial walkup extension drill targets to previous results[2] :

  • 10m at 2.4/t Au from 38m (RCH4535), including 3m @ 7.1g/t Au from 38m

  • 10m @ 1.99g/t Au from 2m (MEH21), including 6m @ 3g/t Au from 5m

  • 2m at 3.04g/t Au from 2m (RCH4542);

  • Acquisition conditional on shareholder approval at a General Meeting expected to be held in April 2022,

  • Following Completion, Cyclone plans to undertake a maiden JORC compliant mineral resource estimate at Muirs and commence first-pass drilling at Muirs and Mareburn.

Cyclone Metals Limited (ASX: CLE ) ( Cyclone or the Company ) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a binding term sheet with Grand Port Resources Pty Ltd ( Grand Port ) to acquire 100% of the issued share capital of Grand Port which owns and has applications over a diversified portfolio of gold, copper, nickel and PGE assets in New Zealand (together, the Acquisition ).

1 Note: these are a selection of intercepts which have been chosen to demonstrate the prospectivity of the Muirs and Mareburn projects. Full results are set out in Table 3 and Table 4

  • Non-JORC foreign estimate (2013) by Glass Earth Limited on the Muirs Reef Project, were summarised in a 2013 NI43-101 Technical Report on Resources at Muirs Project, Te Puke, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand, Glass Earth Gold Limited. The foreign estimates are not reported in accordance with the JORC Code and a competent person has not done sufficient work to classify the foreign estimates as mineral resources in accordance with the JORC Code. It is uncertain that following evaluation and further exploration work that the foreign estimates will be able to be reported as mineral resources in accordance with the JORC Code.

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

New Zealand is now a premier investment destination for resources with successful explorers and new mines being approved. The Acquisition is aligned with Cyclone’s strategy to acquire and invest in strategic, value add projects around the world.

In addition to the current projects Grand Port will make applications for lithium projects in New Zealand to further diversify the portfolio with this strategic mineral.

Following completion of the Acquisition Cyclone plans to undertake a maiden JORC compliant mineral resource estimate at Muirs and commence first-pass drilling at Muirs and Mareburn. It is anticipated that settlement of the Acquisition will complete in the coming weeks.

Cyclone Executive Director, Tony Sage, commented: “Grand Port owns an impressive portfolio of brownfield precious and base metal assets in New Zealand, which we believe, we can add significant value through our hands on approach and strong contacts in-country. Other ASX companies are experiencing success in New Zealand and we look forward to developing these assets in the coming months to realise value for Cyclone’s shareholders.”

Grand Port’s Projects

Grand Port’s Projects comprise of a portfolio of highly prospective precious and base metals projects on the North and South Islands of New Zealand, with locations shown in Figure 1.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 2 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [442 x 524] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Location of Grand Port Projects

South Island

Longwood Range Gold Copper PGE Project (application pending) is situated 40km west of Invercargill, New Zealand and covers 424km[2] . Historic production includes: ~88koz Au and 1,500oz of platinum. Previous drilling intersected a PGE reef with no follow up work and the project area has been identified as being fertile for copper and nickel by Otago University. There has been only 4 historic drill holes to date on the project. On-ground work will kick off with a geochemical sampling program that will generate the maiden drill program.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 3 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

The Mareburn Gold Project and Macraes South Gold Project (granted) c overs 464km[2] within the Otago Goldfield of the South Island, which has 10Moz of proven historical gold production. Mareburn sits 8km north of the producing Macraes Gold Mine and processing plant, New Zealand’s largest producing gold mine, and ~2km from the Coronation open pit. Macraes South is contiguous to the south of the Macraes Gold Mine and processing plant. These areas have been significantly underexplored using modern exploration techniques.

Mareburn Gold Project , covers 30km[2] and is located ~8km from the Macraes gold mine, and contains a number of initial walkup extension drill targets to previous results[2] :

  • 10m at 2.4/t Au from 38m (RCH4535), including 3m @ 7.1g/t Au from 38m

  • 10m @ 1.99g/t Au from 2m (MEH21), including 6m @ 3g/t Au from 5m

  • 2m at 3.04g/t Au from 2m (RCH4542)

Macraes South Gold Project , covers 434km[2] and is contiguous to the 10Moz Macraes gold mine. No modern exploration techniques or drilling has been undertaken and the project requires immediate attention.

The Drybread – Waikerikeri Gold Project (application pending) covers ~198km[2] and crosses over Santana Minerals Limited’s (ASX: SMI) Bendigo-Ophir Project in Central Otago and contains historical alluvial workings contiguous to that project. The area has been underexplored for hard rock potential with no primary gold exploration undertaken.

North Island

The Muirs Reef Gold Project (application pending) covers 52.6km[2] and is close to Oceania’s Hauraki Gold Field with 45Moz proven historical gold production. With the same geology as Hauraki, Muirs Reef has a non-JORC foreign inferred resource estimate of 222,000oz @ 1.34g/t* Gold Resource, and silver yet to be estimated. Muirs Reef is ~100km from the Waihi Gold Mining operations and is drill target ready.

Muirs Gold Project , contains a non-JORC foreign inferred resource estimate of 222koz Au @ 1.34g/t*, with significant exploration upside.

  • Historic drilling results include[2] :

  • 11.0m at 11.0 g/t Au from 48m incl. 2.0m @ 38.4g/t Au (MSDDH009)

  • 0.7m at 17.0 g/t Au from 92.2m (TP6)

  • 14.0m at 2.76 g/t Au from 54m (RC22)

  • 12.0m at 2.36 g/t Au from 79.0m (RC39)

1 Note: these are a selection of intercepts which have been chosen to demonstrate the prospectivity of the Muirs and Mareburn projects.

  • Non-JORC foreign estimate (2013) by Glass Earth Limited on the Muirs Reef Project, were summarised in a 2013 NI43-101 Technical Report on Resources at Muirs Project, Te Puke, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand, Glass Earth Gold Limited. The foreign estimates are not reported in accordance with the JORC Code and a competent person has not done sufficient work to classify the foreign estimates as mineral resources in accordance with the JORC Code. It is uncertain that following evaluation and further exploration work that the foreign estimates will be able to be reported as mineral resources in accordance with the JORC Code.

Cyclone Metals Limited

ASX: CLE

Page: 4 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

  • 9.0m at 2.70 g/t Au from 29.0m (RC02)

  • 28.0m at 1.57 g/t Au from 48.0m (RC30)

Acquisition Terms

The material terms of the Acquisition are as follows:

  1. Consideration : the Company will issue Grand Port (or its nominees) 900,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares in the capital of the Company in two tranches:

  2. a. 500,000,000 to be issued under the Company’s existing placement capacity under Listing Rule 7.1 ( Tranche One ); and

  3. b. 400,000,000 to be issued following receipt of shareholder approval ( Tranche Two );

  4. Conditions precedent : completion of due diligence by Cyclone on Grand Port’s business, assets and operations, including but not limited to its mineral tenements, expected to be within 30 days;

  5. Board nominee : Grand Port will have the right to nominate one person to the board of Cyclone; and

  6. Shareholder approval : A notice of meeting will be put to Cyclone shareholders to approve the Acquisition and Tranche Two shares.

Completion of the Acquisition is also conditional upon:

  • Cyclone receiving written evidence that the relevant minister has consented to the Acquisition proceeding pursuant to the Overseas Investment Act 2005 (NZ);

  • Cyclone receiving written evidence that the relevant minister has consented to the change in effective control of Grand Port Resources Pty Ltd pursuant to the Crown Minerals Act 1991 (NZ); and

  • Other conditions considered customary for a transaction of this nature.

Placement

In addition to the above, prior to completion of the Acquisition, Cyclone also proposes to undertake a capital raising to raise $500,000 via the issue of 100,000,000 shares to sophisticated and professional investors, at an issue price of $0.005 per share ( Placement Shares ) with one free attaching option for every 4 shares at an exercise price of $0.006 expiring 31 March 2024 ( Placement Options ) (together, the Placement ). The Placement Shares will be issued under the Company’s existing placement capacity under Listing Rule 7.1A and the Placement Options using the Company’s capacity under Listing Rule 7.1. Funds raised from the Placement will be applied toward initial work on Grand Port’s projects, costs of the Acquisition and general working capital.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 5 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

This announcement has been approved by the Company’s board of directors.

Yours faithfully Cyclone Metals Limited

Terry Donnelly Non-Executive Chairman

For further information please contact:

Investor Relations Follow us +61 (0) 8 9380 9555 @cyclonemetals [email protected] cyclone-metals

Competent Persons Statement

The Information in this report that relates to exploration results, mineral resources or ore reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Allan Younger, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Younger is a consultant of the Company. Mr Younger has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposits under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the `Australian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (the JORC Code). Mr Younger consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in this report.

The information in this report that relates to non-JORC Foreign Estimates is based on information compiled by Mr Allan Younger, a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. The information in this announcement provided under ASX Listing Rules 5.12.2 to 5.12.7 is an accurate representation of the available data and studies for the Muirs Reef Project. Mr Younger is a consultant of the company. Mr Younger consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. References and source of information:

  • January 2013 NI43-101 Technical Report on Resources at Muirs Project, Te Puke, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand, Glass Earth Gold Limited.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 6 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Details of non-JORC Foreign Resource Estimates in relation to ASX LR Chapter 5, for Muirs Reef Gold Project

Sections 5.10 to 5.12: Requirements applicable to reports of foreign estimates and foreign estimates of mineralisation for material mining projects.

Reference to previous announcement or compliance in current
ASX Listing Rule

**draft **
For the qualified non-JORC foreign estimates included in this market

release, Cyclone is not required to comply with Listing Rule 5.6 (JORC
5.10 - An entity reporting historical estimates or foreign estimates of
Code) as all relevant and requested disclosures are stated in the report
mineralisation in relation to a material mining project to the public is not

and tabulated below.

required to comply with rule 5.6 (The JORC Code) provided the entity

complies with rules 5.12, 5.13 and 5.14.
The Company complies with 5.12, 5.13 and 5.14 requirements for

statement of non-JORCforeign resource estimates, as tabled below.
5.11- An entity must not include historical estimates or foreign

estimates (other than qualifying foreign estimates) of mineralisation in

Cyclone is not applying any economic analysis or commentary to the

an economic analysis (including a scoping study, preliminary feasibility


foreign resource estimates in this market release.

study, or a feasibility study) of the entity’s mineral resources and ore

reservesholdings.
5.12 - Subject to rule 5.13, an entity reporting historical estimates or The same foreign resource estimates were previously reported to the

foreign estimates of mineralisation in relation to a material mining
TSX and NZSX in February 2013.

project must include all of the following information in a market
announcement and give it to ASX for release to the market.
The NI 43-101 Summary Report on Muirs was sourced from both Sedar

and New Zealand Petroleum and Mining Department database
5.12.1 - The source and date of the historical estimates or foreign • 30 January 2013 – Technical Report on Resources at Muirs Project, Te

estimates.
Puke, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand, Glass Earth Gold Limited.
Reference to the category of mineralisation at the time was defined as
5.12.2- Whether the historical estimates or foreign estimates use
“Inferred” and comparable to the current JORC Code.

categories of mineralisation other than those defined in Appendix 5A

(JORC Code) and if so, an explanation of the differences.
The foreign estimates for the gold deposit is relevant and material to
5.12.3 - The relevance and materiality of the historical estimates or

Cyclone’s planned exploration efforts at Muirs Reef, as it pertains to a

foreign estimates to the entity.

project that could potentially be economicallyviableforthe Company.
The historical data was supported by extensive data reviews, and
5.12.4 - The reliability of the historical estimates or foreign estimates,
discussions with the Competent Person Peter Grieve for the January

including by reference to any of the criteria in Table 1 of Appendix 5A

2013
NI
43-101
Mineral
Resource
Estimate

(JORC Code) which are relevant to understanding the reliability of the
The Competent Person views the foreign estimates as providing

historical estimates or foreign estimates.

reasonable indications of the potential size and grade of the gold deposits
inthe area based onthe amount ofdrilling completed.
The non-JORC foreign estimate is based on data from Glass Earth

Limited and historical data from BP Minerals dating back to the 1980’s.

BP Minerals 1986 Diamond 6 holes 659.9m (MR646)

BP Minerals 1988 Diamond and RC 6 holes 782.65m (MR667)

BP Minerals 1989 RC 6 holes 624m (MR685)

BP Minerals 1989 RC 3 holes 294.6m (MR686)

Otter Minerals Exploration Limited 1995 RC 7 holes 1,145m (MR 3374)

Glass Earth Limited completed 24 trenches with 281 samples from 510m
5.12.5 - To the extent known, a summary of the work programs on
total length, 16 diamond drillholes of 3141.25m combined length, 2 RC

which the historical estimates or foreign estimates are based and a

drillholes of 463m combined length. The historical drilling consisted of 7

summary of the key assumptions, mining and processing parameters

channel samples taken from surface and underground workings for a

and methods used to prepare the historical estimates or foreign

total of 253m combined, 12 diamond drillholes with a combined length of

estimates.

1739m and 40 RC drillholes with a combined length of 3966m.
Assays for BP Minerals diamond drilling for performed by W Grayson and

Associates, Auckland. A 30g fire assay for gold with AAS finish was

utilized and a 5g aqua regia digest for silver and arsenic with AAS finish

Assays for RC drilling conducted by MRNZL were performed by SGS

laboratories in Waihi, NZ and the author has viewed copies of assay

certificates (MR3374). All gold assays were performed using the 50g fire

assay method with AAS finish. Silver assays were carried out using aqua

regia digestfroma 30g samplewith AASfinish.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 7 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Assays for Glass Earth Limited samples were performed by SGS

laboratories in Waihi. All gold assays were performed using the 50g Fire

assay method with AAS finish (FAA515). Silver assays were carried out

using aqua regia digest from a 30g sample with ICP-MS finish (ARM111).

Both the GEGL database and the historical databases were judged to be

of sufficient quality to enable a estimate to be undertaken.

Three drilling and sampling campaigns from separate companies were

used for the estimate. Thirty one channel samples with a combined length

of 768m were included, twenty eight diamond drillholes with a combined

length of 4,931m and 42 RC drillholes with a combined length of 4,565m.

This
gives
a
total
length
of
sampling
of
10,265m.



All reference to historical results were sourced from publicly available

documents.
No mineral test work or recovery testing has been carried out.

No economic parametershave beenconsidered.
5.12.6 - Any more recent estimates or data relevant to the reported There are no more recent estimates, and Cyclone is planning to convert

mineralisationavailable to the entity.

MuirsReef foreignestimate to JORC2012.
5.12.7 - The evaluation and/or exploration work that needs to be Further exploration field work is required including surveying all historical

completed to verify the historical estimates or foreign estimates as

drillholes, closer-spaced/deeper drilling at and along strike extensional

mineral resources or ore reserves in accordance with Appendix 5A

drilling targeting extensions to known mineralisation, and targets defined

(JORC Code)

using geophysics.
Cyclone is currently consolidating data so that when the Muirs permit is

granted, on ground work can be undertaken to generate a JORC 2012
5.12.8 - The proposed timing of any evaluation and/or exploration work

Mineral Resource Estimate. The Company is also looking to reprocess

that the entity intends to undertake and a comment on how the entity


geophysical
data
to
improve
structural
interpretation.

intends to fund that work.



Cyclone is an ASX-listed Company and will fund exploration work in
compliance with listing rules, its constitution, market conditions and

appropriate shareholderapproval.
The following cautionary statement has been inserted in the report
5.12.9 - A cautionary statement proximate to, and with equal

proximal to mention of foreign resources on page X: “Non-JORC foreign

prominence as, the reported historical estimates or foreign estimates

estimate (2013) by Glass Earth Limited on the Muirs Reef Project, were

stating that: the estimates are historical estimates or foreign estimates

summarised in a 2013 NI43-101 Technical Report on Resources at Muirs

and are not reported in accordance with the JORC Code; a competent

Project, Te Puke, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand, Glass Earth Gold Limited.

person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimates

The foreign estimates are not reported in accordance with the JORC

or foreign estimates as mineral resources or ore reserves in

Code and a competent person has not done sufficient work to

accordance with the JORC Code; and it is uncertain that following

classify the foreign estimates as mineral resources in accordance

evaluation and/or further exploration work that the historical estimates


with the JORC Code.It is uncertain that following evaluation and

or foreign estimates will be able to be reported as mineral resources or


further exploration work that the foreign estimates will be able to be

ore reserves in accordance with the JORC Code

reported as mineral resources inaccordance with the JORC Code”.
Allan Younger, a Geologist and consultant to the Company, is acting as

the Competent Person for this report - The following statement has been

included in the Competent Person section:The information in this

report that relates to non-JORC Foreign Estimates is based on
5.12.10 - A statement by a named competent person or persons that

information compiled by Mr Allan Younger, a Member of the

the information in the market announcement provided under rules


Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. The information in this

5.12.2 to 5.12.7 is an accurate representation of the available data and


announcement provided under ASX Listing Rules 5.12.2 to 5.12.7 is

studies for the material mining project. The statement must include the

an accurate representation of the available data and studies for the

information referred to in rule 5.22(b) and (c).

Muirs Reef Project. Mr Younger is a consultant to the company. Mr

Younger consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters

based on this information in the form and context in which it
appears.”

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 8 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

APPENDIX 1.

The following Tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition) requirements for the reporting of Exploration Results at the Muirs Gold Project .

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section applies to all succeeding sections)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
channels,
random
chips,
or
specific
specialised industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
All drilling and sampling was undertaken in an industry standard
manner.
Core samples were collected with a diamond rig drilling mainly NQ2
diameter core.
After logging and photographing, NQ2 drill core was cut in half, with
one half sent to the laboratory for assay and the other half retained.
Holes were sampled over mineralised intervals to geological
boundaries on a nominal 1m basis.
Sample weights ranged from 2-4kg
RC holes were sampled on a 1m basis
with samples collected from a cone splitter mounted on the drill rig
cyclone. 1m sample ranges from a typical 2.5- 4kg
The independent laboratory pulverised the entire sample for
analysis as described below.
Industry prepared independent standards are inserted.
The independent laboratory then takes the samples which are
dried, split, crushed and pulverised prior to analysis as described
below.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
Sample sizes are considered appropriate for the material sampled.
The samples are considered representative and appropriate for this
type of drilling. Diamond core and RC samples are appropriate for
use in a resource estimate.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation
that are Material to the Public Report. In
cases where ‘industry standard’ work has
been done this would be relatively simple (eg
‘reverse circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was
pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire
assay’). In other cases more explanation
may be required, such as where there is
coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems.
Unusual
commodities
or
mineralisation types(eg submarine nodules)
may
warrant
disclosure
of
detailed
information.
Reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples.
Diamond Drilling also used 1 m lengths or where stated, lithological
contacts were used.
All samples were pulverized from 2-4kg of sample, to produce a 50
g charge for fire assay for Au and a 30g charge for aqua regia for
Ag.
Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic etc) and details (e.g. core
diameter, triple of standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type,
whether core is orientated and if so, by what
method, etc).
Reverse Circulation (RC) hammer drilling, Rotary Air Blast (RAB),
and Diamond drilling have been undertaken at Muirs Reef Project.
Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core
and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
Geotechnical logging and petrology were completed on Diamond
core with recovery being recorded.
RC drilling had recovery recorded along with ground water.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 9 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative nature
of the samples.
Not Known.
Whether a relationship exists between sample
recoveryand grade and whether sample
bias may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
No relationship to bias has been noted.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
The entire hole has been geologically logged and core was
photographed by the then Company geologists, with systematic
sampling undertaken based on rock type and alteration observed.
RC and diamond sample results are appropriate for use in a
resource estimation.
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
Logging is completed for all types of geological data capture,
whether Diamond core, RC, RAB or trenching.
Core is photographed.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
A total of 9,712.75m of drilling and trenching were logged, which is
100% of all work.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
Core was cut in half and half core was assayed.
RC drilling rig was equipped with a rig-mounted cyclone and static
cone splitter, which provided one bulk sample of approximately 20-
30 kilograms, and a representative sub-sample of approximately 2-
4 kilograms for every metre drilled.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or
dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality
and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all
sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
Not Known.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling
is representative of the in-situ material
collected,including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
Not Known.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
grain size of the material being sampled.
The sample size of 2-4 kilograms is appropriate and representative
of the grain size and mineralisation style of the deposit.
Quality of assay data
and laboratory tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of
the assaying and laboratory procedures used
and whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
Assays for BP Minerals diamond drilling for performed by W
Grayson and Associates, Auckland. A 30g fire assay for gold with
AAS finish was utilized and a 5g aqua regia digest for silver and
arsenic with AAS finish
Assays for RC drilling conducted by MRNZL were performed by
SGS laboratories in Waihi, NZ and the author has viewed copies of
assay certificates (MR3374). All gold assays were performed using
the 50g fire assay method with AAS finish. Silver assays were
carried out using aqua regia digest from a 30g sample with AAS
finish.
For
geophysical
tools,
spectrometers,
handheld
XRF
instruments,
etc,
the
parameters used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and model,
reading times, calibrations factors applied
and their derivation, etc.
Assays for Glass Earth samples were performed by SGS
laboratories in Waihi. All gold assays were performed using the 50 g
fire assay method with AAS finish (FAA515). Silver assays were
carried out using aqua regia digest from a 30 g sample with ICP-MS
finish (ARM111).
Stream Sediment sampling analysis was done using bulk cyanide
leach extractable gold method (BLEG) by ALS Chemex in Perth,
Western Australia. Detection limits of 0.1 ppb for gold were used.
Glass Earth’s 2005 CVR airborne geophysical survey was
conducted using a fixed wing aircraft equipped with a Scintrex CS-2
Cesium Vapour Magnetometer. The aircraft also carried a GR-820
Gamma Ray Spectrometer which collected radiometric data along
flight lines. Magnetic field (total magnetic intensity) was digitally
recorded at a resolution of 0.001nT at 10Hz or 0.1 second reading
intervals. Radiometric data was digitally recorded at 1.0 second

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 10 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
intervals (1.0Hz).
Nature
of
quality
control
procedures
adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and whether
acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
and precision have been established.
There is no documentation supplied of quality assurance (QA)
procedures used by any BP Minerals Exploration or MRNZL in the
handling and treatment of analytical samples, or the use of blanks,
duplicates, and standards inserted into the assay pulp stream.
Reliance must be placed on the historic professional levels of
expertise and sample handling that were expected of technical staff
and assay labs of the time. The certification of analytical labs to ISO
9001/9002 standards was not in effect in the 1980’s or 1990’s.
Glass Earth Limited conducted a QA program which consisted of
blanks and standards inserted routinely into sample batches. Blanks
were inserted at the start of each batch to check for contamination
from prior assay work and certified standards were inserted every
30 samples. Duplicates were only taken from RC samples. Certified
standards were supplied by Rocklabs Ltd.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant intersections
by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
No known.
The use of twinned holes. No holes have been twinned at this stage.
Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic)protocols.
Not known for work programs pre 2004. Glass Earth kept digital
copies and hardcopy of all work programs.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. No adjustments have been made.
Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other
locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Drill holes have been surveyed with a hand held GPS.
NZTM
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Data spacing and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
Data spacing is variable from 200m to 50m spacing.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate
for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and classifications
applied.
Data spacing has produced a Non-JORC estimate that has been
reported in this news release using Chapter 5. The resource will be
converted to JORC once on ground work can be undertaken.
Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
Not Known.
Orientation of data in
relation to geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiasedsampling of possible structures and
the extent to which this is known, considering
the deposit type.
Drilling is perpendicular to the main known strike of the gold bearing
reefs.
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be
assessed and reported if material.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 11 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
Not Known.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
Glass Earth Limited undertook audits and reviews on all data when
added into the exploration database. This included 24 blank
standards and 153 certified assay standards for Glass Earth Limited
drilling and trenching programs.

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and
land tenure status
Type, reference name/number, location and
ownershipincluding agreements or material
issues with third parties such as joint
ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.
Midway Resources Limited is the 100% owner of Exploration Permit
application EP60671 at Muirs Reef.
There are no third-party royalties or agreements.
The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting
along
with
any
known
impediments to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.
No perceived risk with tenure or with applications not being granted,
under the NZP&M system. Under the NZ system the application
process is competitive and the best application is awarded the
application with the right to move to grant.
Mareburn has been granted with all other permits moving towards
grant.
Exploration done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
A history of exploration is included under the header Previous
Exploration. The quality of exploration work is high, with
acknowledgement by some parties that structural understanding is
the path forward.
A resistivity survey and ground magnetic surveying was also
conducted by Otter Minerals in 1995 (MR3355).
Glass Earth Gold held the Muirs Reef area under permit EP40667
and part of EP40768 from 2004 to 2013, where they conducted a
range of intensive exploration during this period, building on the
interpretation of the mineralised system developed from previous
geophysics
(airborne
and
ground),
geological
mapping,
geochemical sampling and drilling. The work included additional
drilling, trenching, resource modelling and the commencement of
conceptual approaches to mining.
An airborne magnetic geophysical survey was conducted as part of
Glass Earths 2005 CVR airborne geophysical project.
A 2013 ground based Gradient Array Resistivity Survey was also
carried out with a line spacing of 20 m between electrodes along
900-1,000 m spreads.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style
of mineralisation.
The Central Volcanic Region (CVR) also known as the Taupo
Volcanic Zone (TVZ) is a tectonic-volcanic region 30-50 km wide
NNE from Mt Ruapehu to White Island. It is the main region of
quaternary volcanism and geothermal activity in New Zealand
occupying a major graben structure infilled by rhyolitic intrusive and
extrusive rocks and volcanic derived sediments underlain by
westerly dipping basement greywacke. Structurally the formation of
the CVR is controlled by subduction of the westerly dipping Pacific
plate beneath the Indian plate. Hydrothermal activity in the
application area appears to have predated the Mamaku Ignimbrite.
The major style of mineralisation in the area is fissure filling quartz
lodes of higher-level epithermal type. Quartz veinlet “stockworks”
are closely spatially associated with these lodes, but it is not clear if
they are contemporaneous, nor whether they are affected by the

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 12 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
same structural controls as the fissure lodes.
Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to
the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the
following information for all Material drill
holes:
Refer Table 2 for Muirs Reef drill hole information.

easting and northing of the drill hole
collar

elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres)
of the drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and interception
depth

hole length.
Coordinates are reported in NZTM.
If the exclusion of this information is
justified on the basis that the information
is not Material and this exclusion does not
detract from the understanding of the
report, the Competent Person should
clearly explain why this is the case.
Refer Table 2 for Muirs Reef drill hole information.
Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (eg. cutting of
high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.
No top cuts have been applied.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
short lengths of high-grade results and
longer lengths of low grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
All intervals reported are composed of 1 metre down hole intervals
for Reverse Circulation drilling, and 1m intervals for Diamond core
unless stated, and length weighted.
No upper or lower cut-off grades have been used in reporting
results.
The assumptions used for any reporting
of metal equivalent values should be
_clearly stated. _
No metal equivalent calculations are used in this report.
Relationship between
mineralisation widths
and intercept lengths
These
relationships
are
particularly
important in the reporting of Exploration
Results.
If
the
geometry
of
the
mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
angle is known, its nature should be
reported. If it is not known and only the
down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect
(eg ‘down hole length, true width not
known’).
True widths of mineralisation have not been calculated for this
report, and as such all intersections reported are down-hole
thicknesses.
A better understanding of the deposit geometry will be achieved on
thorough interpretation of the data. True thicknesses may be
reported at a later date if warranted. Due to the moderately to
steeply dipping nature of the mineralised zones, it is expected that
true thicknesses will be less than the reported down-hole
thicknesses.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
should be included for any significant
discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate
sectional views.
Appropriate diagrams and Figures are contained in the body of the
news release.
Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and
high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
_Exploration Results. _
Reporting of Exploration Results is considered balanced and all
work has been reported.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 13 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but
not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical
survey results; bulk samples – size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test
results;
bulk
density,
groundwater,
geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.
A history of exploration is included under the header Previous
Exploration. The quality of exploration work is high, with
acknowledgement by some parties that structural understanding is
the path forward.
Further work The nature and scale of planned further
work (eg. tests for lateral extensions or
depth extensions or large-scale step-out
drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible extensions, including the main
geological
interpretations and
future
drilling areas, provided this information is
not commercially sensitive.
Stage 1

Detailed structural mapping from existing Gradient Array
Resistivity survey and high resolution magnetic survey,
and field checking, in association with Ionic LeachTM
geochemistry sampling as a first pass. Collection of LiDar
(ultra-detailed
DEM)
may
substantially
improve
understanding of the mineralisation.

Petrographic studies on existing diamond core focusing
on fluid inclusion temperature studies would assist in
defining potential gold deposition levels.
Stage 2

Infill and step out drilling is recommended using diamond
core drilling at both Massey Reef and Muirs Reef to
expand the resource, and test targets identified in Stage 1
work.

Convert thenonJORC estimate to JORC (2012

The following Tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition) requirements for the reporting of Exploration Results at the Mareburn Gold Project .

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section applies to all succeeding sections)

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
channels,
random
chips,
or
specific
specialised industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.







Every metre drilled was sampled at the drill rig using a rig
mounted static cone splitter to collect 2 – 3kg sub samples.
3m composites through the geologically determined non-
mineralised zones were collected using the pipe/spear
method of sampling the coarse reject sample collected in
standard green bags, which remain at the drill site.
Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample
representivity and the appropriate
calibration of any measurement tools or
systems used.
Standard reference material, sample duplicates were used
as per industry standard.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation
that are Material to the Public Report. In cases
where ‘industry standard’ work has been done
this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In
other cases more explanation may be
required, such as where there is coarse gold
that has inherent samplingproblems. Unusual
commodities
or
mineralisation types
(eg
submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure
of detailed information.












A combination of RC 1m split and 3m composite samples
RAB drilling.
Assaying at commercial NZ laboratory W Grayson &
Associates and at the Macraes Gold Mine assay laboratory
for crushing, splitting and analysis.
Analysis was undertaken for gold assay by 50g fire assay.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 14 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Drilling
techniques
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic etc) and details (e.g. core
diameter, triple of standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type,
whether core is orientated and if so, by what
_method, etc). _



Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling, and 9 RAB drill holes.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and
chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.

Drill recovery was routinely recorded via estimation of the
comparative percentage of the volume of the sample bag
by the company geologist. The sample recovery was
deemed adequate for representative assays.
Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative nature
of the samples.
A qualitative estimate of sample weight was undertaken
to ensure consistency of sample size and to monitor
samplerecoveries at the time ofdrilling.
Whether a relationship exists between sample
recoveryand grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.


Drill sample recovery and quality is considered to be
adequate for the drilling technique employed.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.



All holes have been geologically logged for lithology,
mineralisation and weathering.
A brief description of each drilling sample was recorded.
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
Lithology codes have been interpreted by a geologist for
consistency across the project.
The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
Veining, shearing and mineralisation noted in lithological
logs.
Sub-sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
A sub sample from the RC drill rig of approximately 2- 4kg
was taken from a rig mounted riffle splitter off the cyclone.
Samples were pulverised to 95% passing 75 microns.
From this a 50g charge was taken for fire assay with AAS
finish.
These
assaying
techniques
are
considered
appropriate for this style of mineralisation.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or
dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all
sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
QAQC data is not known.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling
is representative of the in-situ material
collected,including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.

The use of fire assay with 50g charge for all RC drilling
provides a level of confidence in the assay database. The
sampling and assaying in considered representative of the
in-situ material.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
grain size of the material being sampled.
The sample size of 2-4 kilograms is appropriate and
representative of the grain size and mineralisation style of
the deposit.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of
the assaying and laboratory procedures used
and whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
For
geophysical
tools,
spectrometers,
handheld
XRF
instruments,
etc,
the
parameters used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and model,
reading times, calibrations factors applied
and their derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted
(eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external
laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and
precision have been established.







The laboratory techniques below were for all samples
submitted and are considered appropriate for the style of
mineralisation defined within the Mareburn area: Samples
above 3Kg were riffle split.
Samples were dried, crushed to -6mm then pulverised to
95% passing 75 microns, a 250 gm split sample was roll
mixed and subsampled for a 50-gram Fire Assay with AAS
finish - Au.
Verification of
sampling and

The verification of significant intersections
by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
Unknown

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 15 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

assaying The use of twinned holes. The use of twinned holes. No twinned holes were drilled.

Data were found to be of high quality and in accordance
with contract specifications.
Laboratory standards and blank samples were inserted at
regular intervals and some duplicate samples were taken
for QC checks.
No adjustments were made to assay data.

Survey methods prior to 2000 are unknown, post 2000
collars were picked up by licensed surveyor.
NZTM and NZ49
Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic)protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other
locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Data spacing and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of
Exploration Results.
Collar information or the reported holes is provided.
Rockchip samples were randomly collected and were
appropriate given the objectives of the program.
Whether
the
data
spacing
and
distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree
of
geological
and
grade
continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
procedure(s)
and
classifications
applied.




Intercepts given are downhole widths with the true widths
not determined.
Whether sample compositing has been
applied.

Single metre sampling used within mineralised zones.
Orientation of data
in relation to
geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiasedsampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.



Drill holes and have generally been drilled vertically, on
NW orientated grid defined by the Macraes Gold Mining Grid
Geochemical sampling has also used this grid.
Future work by Cyclone intends to use a N-S grid.
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.




Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
Sample security measures for historical drilling are
unknown.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
Audit reviews are unknown.

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement
and
land tenure status
Type, reference name/number, location
and ownershipincluding agreements
or material issues with third parties
such as joint ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites,wilderness or

Midway Resources Limited is the 100% owner of Exploration
Permit application EP60663 at Mareburn.
There are no royalties or third-party agreements.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 16 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary




















national park and environmental
settings.
The security of the tenure held at the
time of reporting along with any
known impediments to obtaining a
licence to operate in the area.



No perceived risk with tenure or with applications not being
granted, under the NZP&M system. Under the NZ system
the application process is competitive and the best
application is awarded the application with the right to move
to grant.
Mareburn has been granted with all other permits moving
towards grant.
Exploration done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
A history of exploration is included under the header
Previous Exploration for each of the project areas, Muirs,
Mareburn, and Longwood Range. The quality of exploration
work is high, with acknowledgement by some parties that
structural understanding is the path forward.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and
style of mineralisation.
Mineralisation
in
the
application
area
has
formed
predominantly low-angle (dip < 20°), grey-white quartz
veins with associated silicified and brecciated schist (±
arsenopyrite ± gold), of between 4- to 30 cm thickness
(Teagle et. al., 1990). They are commonly subparallel to the
bounding fractures and concordant with the foliation of the
host schist. Veins are lensoidal in both length and breadth
and no one lens appears to be continuous for more than 10
to 15 m either along strike or down-dip. In cross section
these veins appear to be sinuous, thickened on the
shallowly dipping parts of faults and at bends, with
decreased thicknesses of mineralisation in the steeper
segments. The schist surrounding quartz veins is commonly
silicified (Teagle et. al., 1990).
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information material
to
the
understanding
of
the
exploration
results
including
a
tabulation of the following information
for all Material drill holes:

easting and northing of the drill
hole collar

elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in
metres) of the drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and
interception depth

hole length.



See Table 5 for drill hole information.
NZTM
If the exclusion of this information is
justified
on
the basis
that
the
information is not Material and this
exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.




Data aggregation
methods
In
reporting
Exploration
Results,
weighting
averaging
techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations
(eg.
cutting
of
high
grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.




No cut offs have been used.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 17 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Where
aggregate
intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high-
grade results and longer lengths of
low grade results, the procedure used
for such aggregation should be stated
and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in
detail.




The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
No metal equivalents being used.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and intercept
lengths

These relationships are particularly
important
in
the
reporting
of
Exploration Results. If the geometry of
the mineralisation with respect to the
drill hole angle is known, its nature
should be reported. If it is not known
and only the down hole lengths are
reported, there should be a clear
statement to this effect (eg ‘down
hole length, true width not known’).







Drilling is vertical into low angle mineralisation with shear
zones, so is thought to be near true width. Even with this
interpretation, without diamond core, it is still unknown
whether the interpretation is correct.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
should be included for any significant
discovery
being
reported
These
should include, but not be limited to a
plan view of drill hole collar locations
and appropriate sectional views.





Appropriate diagrams and Figures are contained in the body
of the news release.
Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low
and
high
grades
and/or
widths
should
be
practiced
to
avoid
misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.



All results have been reported.
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if meaningful
and material, should be reported
including
(but
not
limited
to):
geological observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey
results; bulk samples – size and
method of treatment; metallurgical
test
results;
bulk
density,
groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious
or contaminating substances.










A history of exploration is included under the header
Previous Exploration. The quality of exploration work is
high, with acknowledgement by some parties that structural
understanding is the path forward.
Further work The nature and scale of planned
further work (eg.tests
for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the
areas
of
possible
extensions,
including
the
main
geological
interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is not
commercially sensitive.






An initial orientation survey to trial some newer techniques
(Ionic LeachTMgeochemistry) and “fingerprint” multi-
element analysis of mineralised rock chip samples.
Sub-Audio-Magnetics (SAM) survey to define structural
corridors in a non-magnetic environment.
Drill testing of targets generated from the above work
programs, particularly focusing on structure perpendicular
to the main Hyde -Macraes Shear zone.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 18 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

The following Tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition) requirements for the reporting of Exploration Results at the Longwood Range Gold Project .

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section applies to all succeeding sections)
Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,
random chips, or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments,
etc). These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.






No sampling being reported.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure
sample representivity and the appropriate
calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used.
No sampling being reported.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that
are Material to the Public Report. In cases where
‘industry standard’ work has been done this would
be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling
was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg
was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire
assay’). In other cases more explanation may be
required, such as where there is coarse gold that
has
inherent
sampling
problems.
Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types(eg submarine
nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information.











No sampling being reported.
Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-
hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple of
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether core is
orientated and if so, by what method, etc).




4 diamond drill holes were completed by Anzex
Limited in the late 90’s, but this drilling is not
being reported. There is no other known drilling
within the project.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and chip
sample recoveries and results assessed.
No drilling being reported.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery
and ensure representative nature of the
samples.
No drilling being reported.
Whether a relationship exists between sample
recoveryand grade and whether sample bias may
have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.



No drilling being reported.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a level
of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.




No drilling being reported.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
No drilling being reported.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.
No drilling being reported.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 19 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Commentary
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter,
half or all core taken.
No drilling being reported.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-
sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
No drilling being reported.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in-situ material collected,
including
for
instance
results
for
field
duplicate/second-half sampling.



No drilling being reported.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain
size of the material being sampled.
No drilling being reported.
Quality of assay
data and
laboratory tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld
XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in
determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy
(ie
lack of bias) and precision have been
established.



No drilling being reported.




No drilling being reported.




No drilling being reported.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.
No drilling being reported.
The use of twinned holes. No drilling being reported.
Documentation
of
primary
data,
data
entry
procedures, data verification, data storage (physical
and electronic)protocols.

No drilling being reported.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. No drilling being reported.
Location of data
points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate
drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys),
trenches, mine workings and other locations used
in Mineral Resource estimation.
No drilling being reported.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Data spacing and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Exploration is at too early a stage to comment on
data spacing.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 20 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological and
grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource
and
Ore
Reserve
estimation
procedure(s) and classifications applied.




No data density to enable any estimation for an
MRE.
Whether sample compositing has been applied. No compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data
in relation to
geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiasedsampling of possible structures and the
extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.



Too early to comment on orientation.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation
and the orientation of key mineralised structures
is considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed and reported if material.



No drilling being reported.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. No drilling being reported.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling
techniques and data.
No
review
of
sampling
techniques
for
geochemistry, 4 diamond drill holes, geophysics,
has been undertaken.

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary


















Mineral tenement
and
land tenure status
Type, reference name/number, location and
ownershipincluding agreements or material
issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites,wilderness or
national park and environmental settings.

Midway Resources Limited is the 100% owner of 3
permits that make up Longwood Range.
Prinz
Exploration
Permit
application
EP60694,
Longwood
Tops
Prospecting
Permit
application
PP60693 and Merivale Exploration Permit application
EP60692.
There are no royalties or third-party agreements.
Longwood Tops and Merivale are within Department of
Conservation (DOC) administered land. This requires
consents from DOC as well as the District council for
ground disturbing activities such as drilling and
trenching.
The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments
to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.


No perceived risk with tenure or with applications not
being granted, under the NZP&M system. Under the NZ
system the application process is competitive and the
best application is awarded the application with the
right to move to grant.
Exploration done by
other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration
by other parties.
A history of exploration is included under the header
Previous Exploration for each of the project areas,
Muirs, Mareburn, and Longwood Range. The quality of
exploration work is high, with acknowledgement by
some parties that structural understanding is the path
forward.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
Structurally controlled Au deposits and Intrusion
Related Gold deposits (IRG), that are the potential
source of the significant amount of alluvial Au obtained
in the region.
Potential IRG deposit styles being investigated are
Sanukitoids/high magnesium diorites.
Midway
is
also
interested
in
hard
rock
PGE
mineralisation within the Hekeia Gabbro, which is wholly
containedwithin LongwoodRange. Alluvialplatinum has

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 21 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
been recovered with alluvial Au operations in the area.
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results
including
a
tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill holes:

easting and northing of the drill hole
collar

elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and interception depth

hole length.


4 diamond drill holes were completed at Longwood
Range by Anzex and target geological models and Pt Pd
geochemical anomalies. These holes are referred to
briefly, but results are not included in this news release.
No drilling being reported.
If the exclusion of this information is justified
on the basis that the information is not
Material and this exclusion does not detract
from the understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly explain why
this is the case.





No drilling being reported.
Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging
techniques,
maximum
and/or
minimum grade truncations (eg. cutting of
high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.


No data aggregation is being used.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
lengths of high-grade results and longer
lengths of low grade results, the procedure
used for such aggregation should be stated
and
some
typical
examples
of
such
aggregations should be shown in detail.




No aggregation of mineralised intercepts is being
reported.
The assumptions used for any reporting of
metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
No metal equivalents are being used or reported.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept lengths
These relationships are particularly important
in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the
geometry of the mineralisation with respect to
the drill hole angle is known, its nature should
be reported. If it is not known and only the
down hole lengths are reported, there should
be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down
hole length, true width not known’).




Mineralisation widths not being reported. 4 diamond
drill holes completed by ANEX are not being reported.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)
and tabulations of intercepts should be
included for any significant discovery being
reported These should include, but not be
limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.




Appropriate diagrams and Figures are contained in the
body of the news release.
Balanced reporting Where
comprehensive
reporting
of
all
Exploration
Results
is
not
practicable,
representative reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be practiced to
avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.



This news release contains information on all past
exploration and production from the permits and is
considered to be balanced.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 22 of 23

ASX Announcement 24 February 2022

==> picture [143 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but
not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical
survey
results;
geochemical
survey results; bulk samples – size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test
results;
bulk
density,
groundwater,
geotechnical
and
rock
characteristics;
potential
deleterious
or
contaminating
substances.









A history of exploration is included under the header
Previous Exploration. The quality of exploration work is
high, with acknowledgement by some parties that
structural understanding is the path forward.
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work
(eg. tests for lateral extensions or depth
extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is not
commercially sensitive.






Cyclone plans to undertake Ionic LeachTMgeochemistry
as a first pass, and then focus on high-resolution
magnetics and structural modelling. The previous work
by explorers, is available in NZP&M reports and data,
and although difficult to JORC, it gives Midway the
indicators of where to focus exploration efforts in the
short term.
Cyclone will also consider an airborne electromagnetic
survey looking for higher sulphidation areas for copper
sulphides.

Cyclone Metals Limited ASX: CLE

Page: 23 of 23