Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

IRIS METALS LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2024

Oct 8, 2024

65139_rns_2024-10-08_fe251976-2d01-47f0-a8e2-9d4db2df7bfe.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [139 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

ASX:IR1 - ASX RELEASE I 9 October 2024

Iris Achieves High Purity Spodumene Concentrate from Beecher Project

IRIS Metals Limited (ASX: IR1) (“IRIS” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce that the Company has received results from metallurgical test work completed on spodumene bearing pegmatites from the Beecher Project, located in South Dakota, USA which has demonstrated the ability to achieve a high purity spodumene concentrate, exceeding 6.0% lithium oxide (Li2O) content.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Metallurgical test program from the Beecher Project has produced a 6.1% Li2 spodumene concentrate, with lithium recovery exceeding 82%

  • Testing produced high purity spodumene concentrate, with samples yielding as low as 0.25% Fe2O3, considerably below industry specifications for concentrate of <1.3% Fe2O3

  • IRIS is currently planning next steps which include bulk sample processing with Dense Media Separation (DMS) and further refinement of the spodumene concentrate from the Beecher Project into lithium carbonate

IRIS Metals President of U.S. Operations, Matt Hartmann, commented:

“The results of our metallurgical test work at the Beecher Project are very exciting. IRIS has now demonstrated the ability to develop a high purity spodumene concentrate, confirming the processing viability of our South Dakota deposits that host some of the largest spodumene crystals in the world.

The South Dakota team is quickly moving to further refine our process flow sheet and complete process test work on additional spodumene bearing pegmatites, with the potential of a near-term bulk sampling effort. IRIS is advancing efforts on several fronts as we continue to unlock value across our substantial holdings in South Dakota.”

Beecher Project Metallurgical Testing

The primary objective of the metallurgical testing program was to assess the liberation and recovery of lithium rich spodumene within the Beecher pegmatite within the Beecher Project area and confirm the Company’s ability to produce a spodumene concentrate that meets market specifications. The heavy liquid separation (HLS) testing employed is a lower-cost and more rapid methodology for testing the applicability of a Dense Media Separation (DMS) process flow sheet,

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

which is done at a much larger scale and within a continuous process. Flotation testing on the non-magnetic HLS tailings was also included in the process flow sheet to ensure the highest possible lithium recoveries and determine the best course of development for future process test work.

Material for the test was sourced from PQ-sized drill hole BDD-24-022, which penetrated the full thickness of the Beecher pegmatite, and allowed for a variety of sample mineralogies and composites from across the mineralised interval. One-half of the PQ-sized drill core was processed for metallurgical testing. A total of five (5) samples were developed for the program, with test work completed by SGS Canada Inc. at their facility in Lakefield, Ontario. Three samples were developed from continuously cored zones through the Beecher pegmatite, representing high- and low-grade materials, with head grades ranging from 0.65 % Li2O to 1.72% Li2O. The remaining two samples were composited to form representative run-of-mine (ROM) material and averaged 1.10% Li2O.

Samples were crushed to -6.35mm (-1/4”), with the HLS feed screened to remove the fines (- 0.85mm). The HLS test work entailed performing separation at different specific gravity (SG) cut points at set intervals between SG 3.2 and 2.60 to determine ideal SG cut-points for the first (to reject silicate gangue as tailings) and second (concentrate production) passes, which would result in minimal lithium losses and production of on specification concentrate. The findings determined that global lithium recoveries between 45% and 59% were possible from all pegmatites sampled as similar SG cut points between 2.87 and 2.89. The similarity in SG cut point and recoveries indicate that all tested mineralogies have a similar lithium liberation at a crush of -6.35mm, and a strong indication that that all samples can produce on-specification spodumene concentrate under similar DMS operating conditions.

The HLS middlings, and -.85mm bypass fractions were combined and the ground to 100% passing -0.3mm for flotation testing. The flotation flowsheet included several process stages including desliming, magnetic separation, pyrite and mica pre-flotation, alkaline scrubbing, high-density fatty acid conditioning, and spodumene rougher and cleaner flotation. Flotation proved successful in recovering a significant portion of the remainder of the lithium bearing fraction of the materials, with total overall lithium recoveries following both HLS and flotation ranging from 62.9% to 82.3% based on mass balance calculations, with all but one sample achieving mid-70% or higher. Sample 1 was an outlier in flotation recovery and Fe2O3 content due to overall low feed grade and variability in the flotation test process as the first sample run through the program.

Table 1 presents the results of the HLS and flotation testing, including head grades, the recovery of lithium by each of the two major process stages in the flow sheet.

Overall, the completed metallurgical test work has provided very positive results for the Beecher pegmatite, with lithium recovery yields for high-grade material in excess of 82%, and test work has demonstrated the Company’s ability to produce a high-purity 6% Li2O spodumene concentrate. Furthermore, the combined HLS and flotation performance with the composite samples confirmed strong amenability to a hybrid DMS and flotation flowsheet for average ROM materials, with overall lithium recoveries of 77% and 80% at concentrate grades of 6.06% and 6.32% Li2O with <1.0% Fe2O3. These results exceed current market specifications for 6% Li2O spodumene concentrate (SC6), which require <1.3% Fe2O3.

IRIS is now planning the next steps in development of the process flowsheet that will be successful across the multiple spodumene bearing pegmatite bodies to support a “hub and

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

spoke” operations model for the Company’s South Dakota projects. IRIS anticipates testing of additional pegmatites at the Beecher Project and the Tin Mountain Project, as work also proceeds on developing a demonstration mining program and bulk sample collection at the Beecher Project.

In addition, IRIS is currently investigating paths to refine spodumene concentrate from its projects into lithium carbonate or lithium hydroxide within the United States. Now that the Company has spodumene concentrate samples in house, it is expected that testing with potential processing partners will occur in the near future.

Table 1. Results of HLS and flotation testing of mineralized material from the Beecher pegmatite.

Feed Test Product Weight Weight Assays (%) Assays (%) Assays (%) Distribution (%) Distribution (%)
g % Li **Li2O ** Fe2O3 Li Fe2O3
Sample 1 **Head Grade = 0.65% Li2O **
HLS Concentrate 527.5 5.3 2.75 5.92 2.5 50.3 8.6
Flotation 3rdCleaner Concentrate 292.2 2.9 1.23 2.65 1.5 12.6 2.9
Combined HLS & Flot. Conc. 819.7 8.2 2.21 4.76 2.2 62.9 11.5
Combined HLS & Flot. Mags (Tails) 287.3 2.9 0.35 0.75 25.7 3.5 47.3
Combined HLS & Flot. Tailings 8039.6 80.4 0.10 0.21 0.41 27.5 20.9
Sample 2 Head Grade = 1.72% Li2O
HLS Concentrate 1228.1 12.3 2.86 6.16 0.3 46.7 7.3
Flotation 3rdCleaner Concentrate 962.5 9.6 2.78 5.98 0.3 35.6 4.7
Combined HLS & Flot. Conc. 2190.6 21.9 2.83 6.08 0.3 82.3 11.9
Combined HLS & Flot. Mags (Tails) 123.3 1.2 1.02 2.21 8.6 1.7 23.0
Combined HLS & Flot. Tailings 6949.8 69.5 0.12 0.25 0.27 10.9 40.9
Sample 3 Head Grade = 0.71% Li2O
HLS Concentrate 467.7 4.7 2.85 6.13 0.7 41.0 2.8
Flotation 3rdCleaner Concentrate 451.3 4.5 2.27 4.89 0.6 32.1 2.7
Combined HLS & Flot. Conc. 919.0 9.2 2.57 5.53 0.6 73.1 5.6
Combined HLS & Flot. Mags (Tails) 237.4 2.4 0.42 0.91 19.4 3.1 43.2
Combined HLS & Flot. Tailings 7722.9 77.2 0.07 0.14 0.4 15.8 29.2
Composite 1 Head Grade = 1.10% Li2O
HLS Concentrate 870.1 7.3 2.95 6.35 0.8 43.4 5.8
Flotation 3rdCleaner Concentrate 648.7 5.4 2.87 6.18 0.4 33.6 2.2
Combined HLS & Flot. Conc. 1518.8 12.7 2.93 6.32 0.6 77.0 8.0
Combined HLS & Flot. Mags (Tails) 303.6 2.5 0.86 1.86 17.7 4.5 47.0
Combined HLS & Flot. Tailings 8758.4 73.3 0.08 0.17 0.28 11.8 21.3
Composite 2 Head Grade = 1.10% Li2O
HLS Concentrate 1005.3 8.0 2.87 6.18 0.3 47.0 3.6
Flotation 3rdCleaner Concentrate 729.7 5.8 2,73 5.88 0.4 33.0 2.9
Combined HLS & Flot. Conc. 1735.0 13.7 2.82 6.06 0.3 80.0 6.5
Combined HLS & Flot. Mags (Tails) 304.3 2.4 0.82 1.77 13.6 4.1 44.1
Combined HLS & Flot. Tailings 9059.1 71.7 0.06 0.12 0.3 8.3 27.3

Beecher Drill Program and Mineral Resource Estimate

In late September 2024, IRIS successfully completed the diamond drilling program at the Beecher Project, having drilled 56 diamond core holes totaling 7,775 meters throughout the year. The Company plans to release the remaining laboratory assay results as they become available.

With the drilling phase concluded, IRIS is now focused on developing the initial mineral resource estimate for the Beecher Project, anticipating its completion by the first quarter of 2025.

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

IRIS Metals has secured mining permits covering the entire Beecher Project, allowing mining operations to commence at the company’s discretion. The Project’s location provides excellent infrastructure, including nearby road, rail, and power, in a mining-friendly jurisdiction within one of the most significant and largest lithium markets in the world. Recognising lithium as a critical mineral, the US government is offering substantial financial support to bolster local supply and reduce reliance on international sources.

Additional Ongoing Activities

The IRIS technical team has expanded exploration efforts across a large portion of the Company’s South Dakota project areas.

IRIS recently commenced drilling operations at the Tin Mountain Project, with activities there continuing through the fall. Site preparation continues at the Edison Project, with exploration permitting advancing in anticipation of commencing a drill program there in 2025.

Comprehensive regional exploration activities, focusing on geologic mapping and gridded soil surveys, are underway across the Company’s extensive mineral holdings. These efforts aim to identify promising targets on Federal mineral claims for future drilling.

Once identified, the targets will be prioritised, and the drill permit process will commence to ensure a steady workflow. IRIS will report on this workflow once sufficient data has been generated to support interpretations and subsequent decisions.

About The South Dakota Project

The Black Hills of South Dakota are famous for historic lithium mining dating back to 1898 when Li-bearing spodumene, and amblygonite was first mined near the township of Custer. IRIS has staked 2,387 federal mineral claims and has agreements over two patented claim blocks.

Existing project areas include:

  • ➢ Beecher Project – including Longview and Black Diamond

  • ➢ Tin Mountain

  • ➢ Edison Project

  • ➢ Helen Beryl Project

  • ➢ Tinton Project

  • ➢ Keystone Project

The Beecher pegmatite trend was mined sporadically between the 1920’s and 1950’s for lithium, beryllium, tantalum, mica and feldspar. Limited amounts of lithium spodumene ore from the Beecher mines was shipped to Hill City during the 1940’s where it was processed through a flotation circuit.

IRIS’ local partner has been granted mining licenses permitting lithium pegmatite mining for these patented claims.

These mining licenses, permitted by the State of South Dakota, enable IRIS to fast-track all exploration and mining activities including the right to explore and mine lithium bearing pegmatites.

==> picture [246 x 264] intentionally omitted <==

Location of IRIS’ projects within South Dakota

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

ENDS

This announcement was approved for release by the Board of Iris Metals.

For further information, please contact:

COMPANY

INVESTORS & MEDIA

Peter Marks Melissa Tempra E. [email protected] E. [email protected]

About IRIS Metals (ASX: IR1)

IRIS Metals Ltd (ASX: IR1) is an exploration company with an extensive suite of assets considered to be highly prospective for hard rock lithium located in South Dakota, United States (US). The company’s large and expanding South Dakota Project is in a mining friendly jurisdiction and provides the company with strong exposure to the battery metals space, and the incentives offered by the US government for locally sourced critical minerals.

The Black Hills have a long and proud history of mining dating back to the late 1800s. The Black Hills pegmatites are famous for having the largest recorded lithium spodumene crystals ever mined. Extensive fields of fertile LCT-pegmatites outcrop throughout the Black Hills with significant volumes of lithium spodumene mined in numerous locations.

To learn more, please visit: www.irismetals.com

Forward looking Statements:

This announcement may contain certain forward-looking statements that have been based on current expectations about future acts, events and circumstances. These forward-looking statements are, however, subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause those acts, events and circumstances to differ materially from the expectations described in such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, commercial and other risks associated with exploration, estimation of resources, the meeting of objectives and other investment considerations, as well as other matters not yet known to IRIS or not currently considered material by the company. IRIS accepts no responsibility to update any person regarding any error or omission or change in the information in this presentation or any other information made available to a person or any obligation to furnish the person with further information.

Not an offer in the United States:

This announcement has been prepared for publication in Australia and may not be released to US wire services or distributed in the United States. This announcement does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities in the United States or any other jurisdiction. Any securities described in this announcement have not been, and will not be, registered under the US Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the United States except in transactions exempt from, or not subject to, the registration requirements of the US Securities Act and applicable US state securities laws.

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Competent Persons Statement:

The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results is based on information reviewed by Matt Hartmann, IRIS’ President of U.S. Operations, and a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM) (318271), a Registered Member of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (RM-SME) (4170350RM). Matt Hartmann is a geologist and mining engineer with over 23 years’ experience in mineral exploration and project development, including lithium exploration, resource definition, and project engineering in the western United States, and has sufficient experience in the styles of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Matt Hartmann has consented to the inclusion in this Public Report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (eg
cut channels, random chips, or
specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools
appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the
broad meaning of sampling.
Core sampling protocols meet
industry standard practices.
The fve (5) samples processed for
metallurgical sampling were
comprised of saw-cut, one-half core
intervals and collected from drill hole
BDD-24-022
The metallurgical samples are
considered an appropriate for
preliminary evaluation of DMS and
fotation processes for the Beecher
pegmatite. Samples were selected
and composited to be as
representative aspractical.
Include reference to measures
taken to ensure sample
representivity and the appropriate
calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to
the Public Report.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
Drilling techniques Drill type (eg core, reverse
circulation, open-hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (eg core
diameter, triple or standard tube,
depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether
core is oriented and if so, by what
method, etc).
The samples utilized half-core PQ size
drill core.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing
core and chip sample recoveries
and results assessed.
Core recovery is very good and
typically exceeds 90%

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Measures taken to maximise
sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the
samples.
Standard core drilling practices were
utilized to maximize core recovery.
Whether a relationship exists
between sample recovery and grade
and whether sample bias may have
occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
No known core drilling recovery bias
exists at the Beecher Project. Core
recovery typically 90%.
Logging Whether core and chip samples
have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level of
detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
All drill holes are routinely logged by
Senior geologists with extensive
experience in LCT pegmatites.
Upon receipt at the core shack, all
drill core is pieced together, oriented
to maximum foliation, metre marked,
geotechnically logged (including
structure), alteration logged,
geologically logged, and sample
logged on an individual sample basis.
Core box photos are also collected of
all core drilled, regardless of
perceived mineralization. Specifc
gravity measurements of pegmatite
are also collected at systematic
intervals for all pegmatite drill core
using the water immersion method,
as well as select host rock drill core.
The logging is qualitative by nature,
and includes estimates of
spodumene grain size, inclusions,
and model mineral estimates.
These logging practices meet or
exceed current industry standard
practices.
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography.
Logging is considered qualitative in
nature. The geological logging
adheres to the Company policy and
includes lithological, mineralogical,
alteration, veining and weathering.
The core logging is qualitative by
nature, and includes estimates of
spodumene grain size, inclusions,
and model mineral estimates.
The total length and percentage of
the relevant intersections logged.
All holes were logged in full.

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and
whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
Drill core sampling follows industry
best practices. Drill core was saw-cut
with half-core sent for metallurgical
testing, one-quarter sent for assay,
and one-quarter of the core
remaining in the box for reference.
The same side of the core was
sampled to maintain
representativeness.
Sample sizes are appropriate for the
material being assayed.
All protocols employed are considered
appropriate for the sample type and
nature of mineralization and are
considered the optimal approach for
maintaining representativeness in
sampling.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc and
whether sampled wet or dry.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
For all sample types, the nature,
quality and appropriateness of the
sample preparation technique.
Samples for metallurgical testing
were collected in bulk sample bags
and homogenized over upper, middle,
and lower intervals for drill hole BDD-
24-022
Quality control procedures adopted
for all sub-sampling stages to
maximise representivity of samples.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in
situ material collected, including for
instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
Whether sample sizes are
appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.
The sample sizes are considered
appropriate for an initial
metallurgical testing program.

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Quality of assay
data and laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and
appropriateness of the assaying
and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
Core samples collected were shipped
to SGS Canada’s metallurgical
laboratory in Lakefeld, ON.
SGS was responsible for selecting the
appropriate analytical method (NaO2
fusion, followed by ICP-OES) and
ensuring adequate QA/QC protocols
were followed, and IRIS has relied
upon this practice.
SGS is independent of the Company.
The assay techniques are considered
appropriate for the nature and type of
mineralization present, and result in
a total digestion and assay for the
elements of interest.
For geophysical tools,
spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc, the parameters
used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation,
etc.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (eg standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
and precision have been
established.
Assays of materials at various stages
in the metallurgical testing were
subject to the SGS QA/QC program.
SGS is independent of the Company.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant
intersections by either independent
or alternative company personnel.
Assays were completed and verifed
by SGS Canada.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data,
data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage (physical
and electronic) protocols.

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Discuss any adjustment to assay
data.
Location of data
points
Accuracy and quality of surveys
used to locate drill holes (collar and
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine
workings and other locations used
in Mineral Resource estimation.
Sample locations were recorded
using a handheld GPS using the
NAD83_13 Datum.
Specification of the grid system
used.
Quality and adequacy of
topographic control.
Data spacing and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of
Exploration Results.
The metallurgical test samples were
taken from the full length of the BDD-
24-022 drill core.
Whether the data spacing, and
distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of geological
and grade continuity appropriate for
the Mineral Resource and Ore
Reserve estimation procedure(s)
and classifications applied.
Drill hole BDD-24-022 penetrated the
full thickness, and associated
zonation of the Beecher pegmatite.
The distribution of the collected
material is considered suitable for
preliminary metallurgical testing.
Whether sample compositing has
been applied.
Sample composites were generated
to create Samples 4 and 5. These
composites were created from the
material within Samples 1, 2, and 3 to
create samples that could be
representative of ROM materials, at a
grade of 1.10% Li2O. Sample 4 is a
composite of Samples 1 and 2, while
Sample 5 is a composite of Samples
2 and 3.
All compositing was completed by
SGS. SGS is independent of the
Company.
Orientation of data
in relation to
geological structure
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of
possible structures and the extent
to which this is known, considering
the deposit type.
No bias is determined.

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

If the relationship between the
drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised
structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure
sample security.
Chain of custody is maintained by Iris
personnel on site and sent in sealed
pallets and bags to the Laboratory.
Shipping completed by a third party,
and tracked by the Company.
Upon arrival at SGS, the shipment
was cross referenced with the
manifest to confrm all samples were
accounted for. All samples were
evaluated for tampering and
damage/loss bySGS.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews
of sampling techniques and data.
Results were reviewed and deemed
reliable for the nature of the testing.
Section 2 Reportingof Exploration Results

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number,
location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with
third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical
sites, wilderness or national park
and environmental settings.
The project is in South Dakota USA,
the project comprises free-hold
patented claims owned by Iris Metals
The security of the tenure held at
the time of reporting along with any
known impediments to obtaining a
licence to operate in the area.
No known impediments.
Exploration done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
No modern exploration has been
conducted at this Project
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and
style of mineralisation.
LCT-pegmatite hosted lithium
spodumene mineralisation similar in
nature to other zoned lithium
pegmatite deposits mined around the
world
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information
material to the understanding of
the exploration results including a
tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill
holes:
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
easting and northing of the drill
hole collar
elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres)
of the drill hole collar
dip and azimuth of the hole
down hole length and interception
depth
hole length.
If the exclusion of this information
is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this
exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (eg cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are
usually Material and should be
stated.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high-
grade results and longer lengths of
low-grade results, the procedure
used for such aggregation should
be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
No metal equivalents have been
reported.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and intercept
lengths
These relationships are particularly
important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
If the geometry of the
mineralisation with respect to the
drill hole angle is known, its nature
should be reported.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
If it is not known and only the down
hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this
effect (eg ‘down hole length, true
width not known’).
NA – Metallurgical testing reported
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections
(with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being
reported These should include, but
not be limited to a plan view of drill
hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1

==> picture [595 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of
all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative reporting
of both low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced avoiding
misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
No metallurgical test results were
omitted in the reporting.
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if
meaningful and material, should be
reported including (but not limited
to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results;
geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test
results; bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential
deleterious or contaminating
substances.
Various mandates required for
advancing the Project towards
economic studies have been or are
about to be initiated, including but
not limited to, metallurgy,
geomechanics, hydrogeology,
hydrology, stakeholder engagement,
geochemical characterization, as well
as transportation and logistical
studies.
The Company how now completed
preliminary metallurgical testing
indicating that 80% lithium recovery ,
and production of a 6+% Li2O
spodumene concentrate from the
Beecher pegmatite at the Beecher
Project. The data suggests a hybrid
DMS and fotation fowsheet will
likelybe applicable to thisproject.
Further work The nature and scale of planned
further work (eg tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).
The company intends to complete
additional metallurgical testing on
additional pegmatites at the Beecher
Project.
Diagrams clearly highlighting the
areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is
not commercially sensitive.
NA – Metallurgical testing reported

IRISMETALS.COM

ASX:IR1