Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund Regulatory Filings 2013

Jan 23, 2013

31504_prs_2013-01-23_d254ee24-4754-47e0-900c-f6a3d3e83a9b.zip

Regulatory Filings

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

424B3 1 d472113d424b3.htm SUPPLEMENT Supplement

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)

Registration No. 333-180878

POWERSHARES DB COMMODITY INDEX TRACKING FUND

SUPPLEMENT DATED JANUARY 23, 2013 TO PROSPECTUS DATED APRIL 23, 2012

This Supplement updates certain information contained in both the Prospectus dated April 23, 2012 (the “Prospectus”) and the Supplement dated September 17, 2012 (the “September Supplement”), as supplemented from time-to-time of PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (the “Fund”). All capitalized terms used in this Supplement have the same meaning as in the Prospectus.

Prospective investors in the Fund should review carefully the contents of this Supplement, the September Supplement and the Prospectus.


All information in the Prospectus is restated pursuant to this Supplement, except as updated hereby.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission

has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this Prospectus is

truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT PASSED UPON THE MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN THIS POOL NOR HAS THE COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.

DB COMMODITY SERVICES LLC

Managing Owner

I. Page 29 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted and replaced, in its entirety, with the following:

“ Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund

Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool

Inception of Trading: February 2006

Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of December 31, 2012 1 : $9,993,457,238

Net Asset Value as of December 31, 2012 2 : $6,607,539,424

Net Asset Value per Share as of December 31, 2012 3 : $27.72

Worst Monthly Drawdown 4 : (23.77)% October 2008

Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown 5 : (57.34)% June 2008 – February 2009 6

Monthly Rate of Return — January 3.73 3.66 9 (7.64 ) (5.18 ) 3.24
February 5.43 3.92 3.61 (5.61 ) 11.21
March (2.15 ) 2.96 0.03 5.32 (0.61 )
April (1.08 ) 4.55 3.61 (1.54 ) 4.46
May (11.20 ) (5.19 ) (10.35 ) 16.50 8.32
June 2.14 (3.79 ) (1.09 ) (3.02 ) 10.64
July 6.09 3.88 5.77 2.58 (10.61 )
August 5.20 (0.23 ) (3.00 ) (3.39 ) (5.97 )
September (0.03 ) (14.23 ) 8.35 (0.31 ) (11.01 )
October (3.93 ) 7.37 4.45 6.17 8 (23.77 )
November 1.77 (0.79 ) (0.48 ) 4.65 (10.38 )
December (1.35 ) (2.83 ) 10.06 (0.03 ) (6.71 ) 6
Compound Rate of Return 10 3.32 (2.68 ) 11.85 % 15.08 % (31.91 )%

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Footnotes to Performance Information

  1. “Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions” is the aggregate of all amounts ever contributed to the pool.

  2. “Net Asset Value” is the net asset value of the pool as of December 31, 2012.

  3. “Net Asset Value per Share” is the Net Asset Value of the pool divided by the total number of Shares outstanding as of December 31, 2012.

  4. “Worst Monthly Drawdown” is the largest single month loss sustained since inception of trading. “Drawdown” as used in this section of the Prospectus means losses experienced by the relevant pool over the specified period and is calculated on a rate of return basis, i.e., dividing net performance by beginning equity. “Drawdown” is measured on the basis of monthly returns only, and does not reflect intra-month figures. “Month” is the month of the Worst Monthly Drawdown.

  5. The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from June 2008 – February 2009 includes the effect of the $0.34 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. “Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown” is the largest percentage decline in the Net Asset Value per Share over the history of the pool. This need not be a continuous decline, but can be a series of positive and negative returns where the negative returns are larger than the positive returns. “Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown” represents the greatest percentage decline from any month-end Net Asset Value per Share that occurs without such month-end Net Asset Value per Share being equaled or exceeded as of a subsequent month-end. For example, if the Net Asset Value per Share of a particular pool declined by $1 in each of January and February, increased by $1 in March and declined again by $2 in April, a “peak-to-valley drawdown” analysis conducted as of the end of April would consider that “drawdown” to be still continuing and to be $3 in amount, whereas if the Net Asset Value per Share had increased by $2 in March, the January-February drawdown would have ended as of the end of February at the $2 level.

  6. The December 2008 return of (6.71)% includes the $0.34 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pool’s return for December 2008 was (5.23)%.

  7. The December 2007 return of 3.76% includes the $0.76 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pool’s return for December 2007 was 6.23%.

  8. As of October 19, 2009, the Fund commenced tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index–Optimum Yield Diversified Excess Return™, or the Interim Index. Prior to October 19, 2009, the Fund tracked the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index–Optimum Yield Excess Return™.

  9. Effective January 1, 2011, the Fund commenced tracking DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return™, or the Renamed Index. The Fund’s Renamed Index is identical to the Interim Index except with respect to the name of Index. The inception date of January 2007 remains identical. Except as provided in the immediately preceding sentence, all prior underlying formulae, data (e.g., closing levels, measure of volatility, all other numerical statistics and measures) and all other characteristics (e.g., Base Date, Index Sponsor, inception date, rolling, etc.) with respect to the Renamed Index are identical to the Interim Index.

  10. “Compound Rate of Return” is based on an initial net asset value per share of $24.25 and is calculated by multiplying on a compound basis each of the monthly rates of return set forth in the chart above and not by adding or averaging such monthly rates of return. For periods of less than one year, the results are year-to-date.”

2