INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2026

Feb 8, 2026

ASX Announcement Released 9 February 2026

==> picture [111 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

First batch of assay results received from the Phase 2 drilling program at the Portland Creek Uranium Project, covering holes PCDD25-007 to PCDD25-018 (excluding -011A).

Assays confirm uranium mineralisation across holes PCDD25-008, 10, 12, 14 and 16 spanning across >2 km strike length, up to 347 ppm U3O8.

The multiple broad spaced drillholes encountering low levels of uranium mineralisation indicate a significant hydrothermal event through the district.

Assays establish a direct correlation between uranium levels encountered in drillholes and the fracturing levels of the host rock, consistent with Infini’s exploration model of a shear-hosted mineralisation system.

Phase 2 drill program, together with past soil assays up to 74,997 ppm U3O8, confirms an enriched uranium system is present at Portland Creek and major focus will be on intersecting favorable fractured / brecciated structure which has emplaced the high-grade system.

Polymetallic signatures confirmed in laboratory assays, including uranium associated with molybdenum, zinc and copper, supporting the presence of a fertile hydrothermal system.

Portland Creek airborne geophysics survey results expected in Q1 CY2026 to drive target refinement for an expanded 2026 exploration and drilling campaign.

Infini Resources Ltd (ASX: I88, “Infini” or the “Company”) has received the first batch of laboratory assay results from the Phase 2 diamond drilling program at its flagship Portland Creek Uranium Project in Newfoundland, Canada. The assays cover drillholes PCDD25-007 to PCDD25-018 (excluding PCDD25-011A) from the completed Phase 2 drilling program.

The assay results identified anomalous uranium (25 – 347 ppm U3O8) in 5 adjacent drillholes (PCDD25010, 12, 14, 16 and 17) defining a mineralised zone trending NE-SW with a maximum downhole thickness of 300m. These results validate geological logging and guidance from scintillometer and portable XRF readings reported during drilling. The association of uranium with fractures within sheared granite are consistent with a structurally controlled shear-hosted uranium system.

In addition to uranium mineralisation, laboratory assays confirm localised enrichment, zinc and copper, reinforcing the interpretation of a fertile hydrothermal system at Portland Creek.

Infini’s Chief Executive Officer, Rohan Bone, said: "The first batch of assays from Phase 2 drilling provides strong validation of our exploration model at Portland Creek, confirming uranium mineralisation across multiple holes and targets within a structurally controlled hydrothermal system. Importantly, these results represent only a portion of the broader opportunity at Portland Creek. Large areas of the Project remain untested, including the source of the exceptionally high uranium-in-soil anomalies identified at Falls Lake, which continue to represent a compelling target.

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

As we integrate these assay results with geological observations and the high-resolution airborne EM, magnetic and radiometric data being acquired, we expect to significantly improve our understanding of the mineralising system, its primary fluid pathways and structural controls. This combined dataset will be critical in refining target prioritisation and designing a more focused and higher-impact exploration and drilling program in 2026. We believe Portland Creek has substantial upside, and these next steps position Infini well to unlock the full potential of the Project.”

Uranium Mineralisation Confirms the Presence of a Structurally Controlled System

Assay results from Phase 2 drilling confirm the presence of uranium mineralisation and a fertile hydrothermal system across multiple drillholes within the Falls Lake Prospect and the broader Trident Lake Zone. While grades are variable, uranium has been consistently identified in multiple locations, providing confirmation that uranium-bearing fluids have circulated through a broad structural framework at Portland Creek.

Laboratory assays validate earlier indications from surface geochemistry, radiometric data and downhole observations, demonstrating that the exploration targeting applied during Phase 2 drilling is effective in identifying mineralised zones. Uranium mineralisation is predominantly hosted within fractures, joints, breccias and cavity zones developed within granitic host rocks, often coincident with zones of enhanced brittle deformation. This distribution is consistent with uranium precipitation from structurally focused fluid flow, rather than stratigraphically controlled mineralisation.

Collectively, the results confirm the presence of a broader uranium mineralising system and establish a sound geological framework for continued exploration. While Portland Creek remains a greenfield project, the confirmation of uranium mineralisation across multiple targets materially reduces geological uncertainty and supports further systematic evaluation of the Project.

==> picture [329 x 342] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Photo of split core from drillhole PCDD25-014 (470462E, 5558025N, UTM Zone 21, sample ID H091491) demonstrating visual uraninite mineralisation along joint surfaces and along fractures in split drill core from at downhole depth of 28m. Laboratory analysis of a 1m interval including this sample returned 124 ppm U3O8 (refer to Appendix 1).

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au InfiniResources 2

ABN 77 656 098 583

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [460 x 628] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Phase 2 drillhole locations with logged visible uranium across multiple drillholes and multiple priority targets, demonstrating the emerging potential district-scale uranium system at Portland Creek.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources 3

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

Hydrothermal Alteration and Structural Controls on Mineralisation

Phase 2 drilling intersected widespread hydrothermal alteration across much of the drilled area, with alteration assemblages dominated by sodic alteration (albite ± quartz), locally overprinted by hematite and trace chlorite. Uranium mineralisation is most commonly associated with hematite-rich zones, particularly along the surfaces of suspected reactivated shear planes, indicating a close relationship between alteration, structure and mineralisation.

At Target 2, drilling intersected zones of moderate uranium mineralisation spatially associated with these hematite-altered structures. Although drillhole PCDD25-014 itself returned only limited uranium mineralisation, it intersected a broad zone of faulting characterised by shearing and brecciation, refer to Figure 3. This structural corridor is interpreted to represent a significant fluid pathway and is also independently identified in the first vertical derivative (1VD) magnetic interpretation, where it trends approximately 040[o] and is interpreted to dip steeply to the southeast. Oriented core data confirms the steep structural geometry observed in the geophysical interpretation.

Importantly, uranium mineralisation observed in nearby drillholes appears to be marginal to, rather than centrally within, this major structure, suggesting that mineralisation may be focused along subsidiary fractures or structural splays adjacent to the primary fault zone. This relationship is consistent with structurally controlled hydrothermal systems, where mineral deposition commonly occurs in zones of enhanced permeability peripheral to major fault cores.

Laboratory assays have also identified elevated copper (up to 479 ppm), molybdenum (up to 321 ppm) and zinc (up to 676 ppm) within the drill core. A notable interval in PCDD25-009A from 151.59 m returned a 5.11 m interval averaging 303 ppm copper, 166 ppm molybdenum and 202 ppm zinc, along with elevated pathfinder elements. These polymetallic associations are consistent with hydrothermal fluid activity and support the interpretation of a broader mineralising system at Portland Creek.

While results to date confirm the presence of a coherent hydrothermal system, the bedrock source responsible for the exceptionally high uranium-in-soil anomalies at Falls Lake (up to 7.5% U ₃ O ₈ ) remains unresolved. Phase 2 drilling has focused on selected targets within the Falls Lake Prospect and the broader Trident Lake Zone; however, the origin of these extreme soil anomalies remains a key area for further investigation.

Numerous untested structural, geochemical and geophysical targets remain across the Portland Creek Project, including extensions of interpreted structural corridors and secondary fault splays beyond the current drill coverage. These features represent important exploration opportunities as the Company continues to refine its understanding of the mineralising system and also represent significant exploration upside.

Unlocking the Next Phase of Growth at Portland Creek

With Phase 2 drilling completed and initial assay results in hand, Infini is now focused on advancing the Project through integrated interpretation and target refinement ahead of the next phase of exploration.

Key upcoming milestones include:

• Final batch of Phase 2 drill assays expected in Q2 CY2026, due to current congestion and extended turnaround times within laboratory assay services.

• Completion of detailed integration of assay results with geological logging, structural interpretation and existing geophysical datasets.

• Completion and interpretation of the airborne EM-magnetic-radiometric survey, with results expected in Q2 CY2026.

• Field program at Portland Creek commencing in Q2 CY2026 to ground-truth priority targets through detailed geological mapping, structural measurements and focused surface geochemical sampling in areas highlighted by drilling and geophysical interpretation

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources 4

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

• Refinement and prioritisation of new and existing targets, including untested structural corridors associated with the highest uranium-in-soil anomalies.

Design of an expanded exploration and drilling program for H2 CY2026, aimed at testing the principal fluid pathways and structural traps interpreted to control uranium mineralisation.

==> picture [428 x 562] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Cross-section of holes PCDD25-012 (470459E, 5557965N, UTM Zone 21) and PCDD25-014 (470462E, 5558025N, UTM Zone 21) illustrating uranium mineralisation observed in nearby drillholes appears to be marginal to, rather than centrally within, a broad zone of faulting characterised by shearing and brecciation.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources 5

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

References

1. ASX Release, Infini Resources, Extensive Downhole Uranium Intersected at Portland Creek , 9[th] October 2025.

2. ASX Release, Infini Resources, Multiple Uranium-Bearing Zones Encountered Across Multiple Drill Holes at Portland Creek , 21[st] November 2025.

3. ASX Release, Infini Resources, Phase 2 Drilling Complete and Airborne Survey Initiated at Portland Creek , 12[th] December 2025.

[END]

Release authorised by the Board of Infini Resources Ltd.

Contacts

Rohan Bone Chief Executive Officer E: info@infiniresources.com.au

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources 6

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

About Portland Creek Uranium Project

The Portland Creek Uranium Project spans 328 km² and lies within the Precambrian Long-Range Complex of the Humber Tectonic-Stratigraphic Zone. The geology consists of metaquartzite and a suite of paragneisses, intruded by leucocratic granite, which are believed to have been thrust westward over Paleozoic carbonate-dominant sediments.

The project area covers a large regional uranium anomaly, first identified in the 1970’s through a Newfoundland government lake sediment sampling program. Originally, one uranium showing was recorded in the Newfoundland Mineral Deposit Index, reporting 2,180 ppm U ₃ O ₈ . A compilation of historic and recent exploration data has since delineated a 6 km zone of anomalous uranium and radon gas in lake sediments, soils and in an airborne radiometric survey. This anomaly closely follows a prominent fault scarp, marking the edge of a granitic plateau interpreted as a deep-seated fault.

Since listing, the Company has verified historical uranium anomalies and completed a soil sampling grid over the Falls Lake Prospect (formerly the Talus Prospect). This work defined a ~800 m x 100 m highgrade uranium anomaly, with a peak result of 74,997 ppm U ₃ O ₈ . This anomaly is located down-ice and west of a 1.5 km radiometric anomaly. Additionally, Infini has identified a southern 500 m-wide cluster of high-grade soil samples, which includes a peak of 1,500 ppm U ₃ O ₈ and lies 1.5 km from the recently completed Phase 2 drill program.

==> picture [458 x 299] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Overview of prospective exploration areas at Portland Creek, demonstrating the occurrence of soil sampling assays up to 74,997 ppm U ₃ O ₈ , anomalous radiometric data and Infini’s package of tenements.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources 7

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

About Infini Resources Ltd (ASX: I88)

Infini Resources Ltd is an Australian energy metals company focused on mineral exploration in Canada and Western Australia for uranium and lithium. The company has a diversified and highly prospective portfolio of assets that includes greenfield and more advanced brownfield projects. The company’s mission is to increase shareholder wealth through exploration growth and mine development.

JORC 2012 Mineral Resource Deposit	JORC 2012 Classification	Tonnes and Grade
Des Herbiers (U)	Inferred Combined Resource	162 Mt @ 123ppm U3O8(43.95mlb)

==> picture [463 x 261] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Overview of Infini's portfolio of projects and global footprint.

Competent Person & Compliance Statement

The information in this report that relates to exploration results for the Portland Creek Project is based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation compiled and evaluated by Mark Couzens, Principal Geologist for the Company who is a Member of the AusIMM. Mr. Couzens has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation, type of deposit under consideration, and the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources, and Ore Reserves (JORC Code). Mr. Couzens consents to the inclusion of the information in the form and context in which it appears. The information in the market announcement is an accurate representation of the available data and studies for the Portland Creek Project.

This announcement contains information on the Portland Creek Project extracted from ASX market announcements dated 10 January 2024, 15 January 2024, 29 January 2024, 19 February 2024, 28 May 2024, 1 July 2024, 10 July 2024, 22 July 2024, 14 October 2024, 23 December 2024, 26 March 2025, 4 July 2025, 14 July 2025, 28 July 2025, 30 July 2025, 3 September 2025, 11 September 2025, 9 October 2025, 13 October 2025, 21 November 2025 and 12 December 2025 reported in accordance with the 2012 edition of the “Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (JORC Code). The original market announcements are available to view on www.infiniresources.com.au and www.asx.com.au. The Company is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources 8

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 34] intentionally omitted <==

This report contains information regarding the Des Herbiers Mineral Resources Estimate extracted from the Company’s Prospectus dated 30 November 2023 and released to the ASX market announcements platform on 10 January 2024, reported in accordance with the 2012 edition of the “Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (JORC Code). The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in any original announcement and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the original market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. The original market announcements are available to view on www.infiniresources.com.au and www.asx.com.au.

Forward Looking Statements

This announcement may contain certain forward-looking statements and projections. Such forward looking statements/projections are estimates for discussion purposes only and should not be relied upon. Forward looking statements/projections are inherently uncertain and may therefore differ materially from results ultimately achieved. Infini Resources Limited does not make any representations and provides no warranties concerning the accuracy of the projections and disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements/projects based on new information, future events or otherwise except to the extent required by applicable laws. While the information contained in this report has been prepared in good faith, neither Infini Resources Limited or any of its directors, officers, agents, employees or advisors give any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information, opinions and conclusions contained in this announcement.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources 9

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 1: Intersections of anomalous uranium observed in the first batch of assays from Phase 2 drilling at Portland Creek

Table 1: Material drill hole samples (mineralised intervals >100 ppm U3O8) taken from the Phase 2 drilling program at Portland Creek demonstrating localised uranium intercepts. Intervals are down hole length. True width not known.

Hole number	UTM East	UTM North	UTM Elevation	**Azimuth (o) **	**Dip (o) **	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Sample ID	U3O8 (ppm)
PCDD25-008	470730	5559405	128	320	-45	143.00	143.30	0.30	L458639	229
PCDD25-010	470291	5557916	123	170	-45	79.28	80.00	0.59	L458896	103
PCDD25-010	470291	5557916	123	170	-45	114.22	114.56	0.36	L458919	110
PCDD25-010	470291	5557916	123	170	-45	159.69	160.12	0.52	L458956	108
PCDD25-010	470291	5557916	123	170	-45	160.62	161.50	0.72	L458958	176
PCDD25-010	470291	5557916	123	170	-45	161.50	162.50	0.34	L458959	142
PCDD25-010	470291	5557916	123	170	-45	261.40	262.40	0.43	H091463	110
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	35.51	36.10	0.88	H091026	108
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	54.12	54.48	1.00	H091042	116
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	54.48	55.00	1.00	H091043	104
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	143.13	143.62	1.00	H091156	112
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	144.50	145.00	0.49	H091159	116
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	145.00	145.50	0.50	H091161	114
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	171.75	172.23	0.50	H091196	120
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	214.91	215.91	0.48	H091258	106
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	228.18	228.62	0.44	H091275	124
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	254.27	254.85	0.58	H091311	347

==> picture [12 x 12] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

10

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Hole number	UTM East	UTM North	UTM Elevation	**Azimuth (o) **	**Dip (o) **	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Sample ID	U3O8 (ppm)
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	254.85	255.15	0.30	H091312	171
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	255.15	255.80	0.65	H091313	113
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	255.80	256.15	0.35	H091314	342
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	257.15	257.52	0.37	H091316	209
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	257.52	258.02	0.50	H091317	218
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	258.02	258.52	0.50	H091318	129
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	258.52	259.52	1.00	H091319	104
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	262.30	262.80	0.50	H091324	267
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	267.80	268.00	0.20	H091331	150
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	269.60	269.90	0.30	H091334	252
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	270.30	271.30	1.00	H091336	105
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	277.70	278.38	0.68	H091346	324
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	281.38	282.40	1.02	H091351	153
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	291.00	291.40	0.40	H091367	152
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	296.47	297.47	1.00	H091375	134
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	297.47	298.47	1.00	H091376	142
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	298.47	299.38	0.91	H091377	120
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	299.38	300.38	1.00	H091378	107
PCDD25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	305.40	305.94	0.54	H091385	165
PCDD25-014	470462	5558025	131	170	-45	27.70	28.05	0.35	H091491	124
PCDD25-016	470515	5558036	133	170	-45	50.64	51.22	0.58	H091644	143

==> picture [12 x 12] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

11

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Hole number	UTM East	UTM North	UTM Elevation	**Azimuth (o) **	**Dip (o) **	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Sample ID	U3O8 (ppm)
PCDD25-016	470515	5558036	133	170	-45	57.54	58.00	0.46	H091649	106
PCDD25-016	470515	5558036	133	170	-45	80.63	81.19	0.56	H091662	245
PCDD25-016	470515	5558036	133	170	-45	113.00	114.00	1.00	H091689	297
PCDD25-016	470515	5558036	133	170	-45	124.88	125.88	1.00	H091706	106

==> picture [12 x 12] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

12

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 2: Intersections of anomalous elements associated with hydrothermal fluids observed in the first batch of assays from Phase 2 drilling at Portland Creek

Table 2: Material drill hole samples (mineralised intervals >100 ppm Cu, or >100 ppm Mo, or >100 ppm Zn) taken from the Phase 2 drilling program at Portland Creek demonstrating localised intercepts of elements associated with hydrothermal fluids. Intervals are down hole length. True width not known.

Hole number	UTM East	UTM North	UTM Elevation	**Azimuth (o) **	**Dip (o) **	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Sample ID	Cu (ppm)	Mo (ppm)	Zn (ppm)
PCDD25-008	470730	5559405	128	320	-45	27.17	27.48	0.31	L458585	1	2	262
PCDD25-008	470730	5559405	128	320	-45	35.68	36.15	0.47	L458591	0	1	173
PCDD25-008	470730	5559405	128	320	-45	44.00	45.00	1.00	L458597	29	1	101
PCDD25-008	470730	5559405	128	320	-45	45.00	46.08	1.08	L458598	28	1	101
PCDD25-008	470730	5559405	128	320	-45	69.00	70.00	1.00	L458612	2	1	334
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	151.00	151.59	0.59	L458769	47	48	135
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	151.59	152.00	0.41	L458771	273	220	676
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	152.00	152.33	0.33	L458772	318	256	220
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	152.33	152.66	0.33	L458773	479	186	273
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	152.66	153.00	0.34	L458774	387	104	99
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	153.00	153.33	0.33	L458775	290	54	452
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	153.33	153.66	0.33	L458776	275	121	179
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	153.66	154.00	0.34	L458777	413	280	207
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	154.00	154.33	0.33	L458778	338	139	64
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	154.33	154.66	0.33	L458779	450	321	67
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	154.66	155.00	0.34	L458781	175	110	68
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	155.00	155.73	0.73	L458782	125	150	50

==> picture [12 x 12] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

13

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Hole number	UTM East	UTM North	UTM Elevation	**Azimuth (o) **	**Dip (o) **	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Sample ID	Cu (ppm)	Mo (ppm)	Zn (ppm)
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	155.73	156.70	0.97	L458783	119	54	65
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	180.76	181.76	1.00	L458794	16	3	143
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	181.76	182.76	1.00	L458795	9	3	128
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	210.00	210.30	0.30	L458798	5	2	213
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	221.00	221.30	0.30	L458799	8	2	147
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	283.25	284.00	0.75	L458813	18	3	108
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	284.00	285.00	1.00	L458814	98	6	390
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	285.00	285.49	0.49	L458815	55	3	407
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	285.49	286.13	0.64	L458816	76	9	259
PCDD25-009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	298.92	299.92	1.00	L458834	102	2	55
PCDD25-010	470291	5557916	123	170	-45	79.28	80.00	0.72	L458896	5	240	26
PCDD25-010	470291	5557916	123	170	-45	127.00	128.00	1.00	L458928	1	154	7
PCDD25-014	470462	5558025	131	170	-45	424.41	425.03	0.62	H091557	39	4	105
PCDD25-015	470488	5556666	118	170	-45	278.00	279.00	1.00	H091606	35	1	130
PCDD25-015	470488	5556666	118	170	-45	281.00	282.00	1.00	H091607	64	2	110
PCDD25-015	470488	5556666	118	170	-45	286.31	287.00	0.69	H091611	183	25	103
PCDD25-015	470488	5556666	118	170	-45	288.00	289.00	1.00	H091613	22	1	141
PCDD25-015	470488	5556666	118	170	-45	295.41	296.00	0.59	H091614	49	4	225
PCDD25-015	470488	5556666	118	170	-45	296.00	296.66	0.66	H091615	27	1	168
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	30.00	30.30	0.30	H091947	5	1	102
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	40.00	40.30	0.30	H091948	6	1	110

==> picture [12 x 12] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

14

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [111 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Hole number	UTM East	UTM North	UTM Elevation	**Azimuth (o) **	**Dip (o) **	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Sample ID	Cu (ppm)	Mo (ppm)	Zn (ppm)
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	50.00	50.30	0.30	H091949	6	1	127
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	81.91	83.00	1.09	H091958	13	1	101
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	83.00	84.00	1.00	H091959	11	1	123
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	84.00	85.00	1.00	H091961	54	2	106
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	85.00	86.00	1.00	H091962	10	2	130
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	86.00	87.00	1.00	H091963	8	2	124
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	89.00	90.00	1.00	H091966	12	1	125
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	90.36	91.00	0.64	H091968	12	2	137
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	91.00	91.54	0.54	H091969	7	2	103
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	91.54	92.06	0.52	H091971	4	3	156
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	92.06	92.51	0.45	H091972	16	3	146
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	103.31	104.00	0.69	H091976	8	1	129
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	104.00	105.00	1.00	H091977	8	1	132
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	105.00	105.96	0.96	H091978	8	2	129
PCDD25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	237.94	238.31	0.37	H097128	17	1	436
PCDD25-018	470718	5558182	131	3	-45	16.00	17.00	1.00	H097292	6	1	169
PCDD25-018	470718	5558182	131	3	-45	20.98	22.00	1.02	H097293	10	2	203
PCDD25-018	470718	5558182	131	3	-45	22.00	24.00	2.00	H097294	9	1	131

==> picture [12 x 12] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

15

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	• Details of Infini’s soil sampling and historic lake sediment sampling have been reported previously (ASX 1stJuly 2024 & 10thJuly 2024). • Core was also analysed using a portable XL3t gold+ XRF devide (pXRF) at every meter marker as well as at random locations. Where spot mineralisation exceeded 200 ppm the core is tested at 25 cm spacing in the preceding and following meter of core. • Based upon the scintollometer and pXRF readings sample size for the drill core was selected. Sample sizes ranged from 0.3m up to just over 2m.
Drilling techniques	• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).	• Details of Infini’s drilling have been reported previously (ASX 28thJuly 2025, 30thJuly 2025, 3rdSeptember 2025, 9th October 2025 and 21stNovember 2025). • Drilling was undertaken by one heli-transportable diamond drill rig. The core was NG gauge on a single 10m core tube. The core was oriented with a ACT III RD tool.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources 16

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Drill sample	•	Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample	•	Core recovery was based on depths assigned by the
recovery		recoveries and results assessed.		drillers and measurement of core for that interval by Infini’s
	•	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure		contractors and recorded in a spreadsheet.
		representative nature of the samples.	•	Recovery was generally better than 95%, so no special
	•	Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to		measures were required. In areas with lower recovery, core loss was assigned to the intervals with broken and faulted
		preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.		core.
			•	No relationship between sample recovery and grade was
				established.
Logging	•	Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and	•	Core was visually logged, which is qualitative in nature.
	•	geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature.	• •	All core was photographed and the imagery imported into an online database (Imago) Each hole was logged in its entirety
		Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.
	•	The total length and percentage of the relevant
		intersections logged.
Sub-sampling	•	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all	•	Core samples were cut in half with a core splitter.
techniques and sample preparation	•	core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.	• •	Each sample interval consisted of one half of the cut NQ drill core. Each sample was bagged with a numbered tag. Prep-31 was
	•	For all sample types, the nature, quality and		completed on each sample:
		appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.	1.	PUL-QC Pulverizing QC Test
	•	Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling	2.	CRU-31 Fine crushing – 70% <2mm
		stages to maximise representivity of samples.	3.	SPL-21 Split sample – riffle splitter
	• •	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	4. • •	PUL-31 Pulverize up to 250g 85% <75 µm Analysis was completed using ME-MS61L, with selective PbIS for Pb isotopes. Select samples were also tested for gold mineralization using Au-AA23.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

17

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
			•	Flourine analysis was also completed using F-IC881.
			•	ALS Global laboratories performed the analytical work.
Quality of	•	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying	•	At the start of each day the pXRF was calibration checked
assay data		and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique		and both a silica blank (blank) and uranium certified
and laboratory		is considered partial or total.		reference material analysed (CRM). Blanks and CRMs
tests	•	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the		were inserted every 30 samples, and a calibration check was completed.
		analysis including instrument make and model, reading	•	Blanks and certified reference materials were inserted
		times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.		every 30 samples, respectively. QAQC samples were
	•	Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks)		reviewed for contamination or failure, defined as 3x SDV of the reference material with was ISO certified.
		and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias)	•	Samples of core from the drilling program were submitted
		and precision have been established.		to ALS Global for trace element assays, in line with ALS
				Global’s QA/QC processes.
Verification of	•	The verification of significant intersections by either	•	Verification of encountered intersections was conducted by
sampling and		independent or alternative company personnel.		Infini Resources’ Exploration Manager.
assaying	•	The use of twinned holes.	•	Data collected was completed using a logging program MX
	• •	Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	•	Deposit. Logs were uploaded each evening and stored on a cloud server. Internal data checks and quality control were built into the logging software to ensure no gaps or incorrect coding was used. pXRF measurements were taken to indicate any uranium
				mineralisation from a spot sample as an indicator only with
				core assays confirming the true amount of any uranium
				mineralisation.
Location of	•	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes	•	All drillhole and sample co-ordinates relate to NAD83 UTM
data points		(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings		Zone 21N.
		and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.	•	Collar and soil sample locations were surveyed using
	•	Specification of the grid system used.		handheld GPS.
	•	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	•	LIDAR data flown by Infini was used to establish collar RL

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

18

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Data spacing	•	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	•	Soil sample spacing was considered appropriate at this
and distribution	•	Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity	•	stage of exploration Drillhole collar spacing was designed to intersect the
		appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve		source of anomalous uranium in soil and not determine a
		estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.		resource estimate.
	•	Whether sample compositing has been applied.	•	Not applicable as no Mineral Resource and Ore Reserves
				are reported.
			•	No sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of	•	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased	•	Drilling was oriented perpendicular to the interpreted
data in relation		sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this		geological structures inferred from UAV magnetics.
to geological structure	•	is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the	•	Relationship between drilling orientation and mineralised structures is currently unknown.
		orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to
		have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed
		and reported if material.
Sample	•	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	•	NQ drill core was transported by helicopter from the drill site
security				to the core logging facility. All drill core was logged,
				photographed and the altered intervals were tagged for
				sampling. The core was then split. Groups of samples were
				sealed in large bags with lab security tags attached to
				maintain a chain of custody. Samples were stored in a locked
				facility and shipped using a bonded courier. All sample
				preparation and analysis was performed by ALS
				Laboratories in Vancouver, BC.
Audits or	•	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques	•	None carried out to date.
reviews		and data.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

19

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Mineral	•	Type, reference name/number, location and ownership	•	The Falls Lake prospect is located on 036683M and
tenement and		including agreements or material issues with third parties		036684M.
land tenure status		such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.	•	The Portland Creek uranium project comprises thirteen mineral claims (036683M, 036684M, 036685M, 037492M, 037490M, 037496M, 037495M, 039752M, 039753M,
	•	The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along		039754M, 039755M, 036831M and 036832M). The
		with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to		company first staked the project in 2023/24 before
		operate in the area.		expanding the footprint in October 2025 and December
				2025 (100% ownership). A 2% Net Smelter Return (NSR)
				Royalty is applicable on tenements 036831M and
				036832M. The company is not aware of any other royalties
				existing on the claims or impediments to obtaining a
				license to operate in the area. The claims are currently live
				and in good standing.
Exploration	•	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other	•	Exploration between 1976 and 1980 was carried out by the
done by other		parties.		Conwest Canadian Uranium Exploration JV. Work included
parties				radon gas (Track Etch) sampling, a ground scintillometer
				survey, and VLF-EM and ground magnetic surveys. Follow-
				up drilling using a portable “Pionjar” drill capable of drilling
				to 8 m depth identified a small, high grade uranium anomaly
				(so-called “loam deposit”). Only very sparse details survive
				on this drilling program with no assay results or location
				data. Five diamond holes were drilled. Partial results have
				been found for only one of these, which reported
				unmineralised granite.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

20

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation		Commentary	Commentary	Commentary	Commentary	Commentary	Commentary
	• •	Publicly available data was sourced from the Canadian Airborne Geophysical Database (CAGD) for an airborne magnetic and radiometric geophysics survey conducted over the Great Northern Peninsula (North Arm) that was flown by a fixed-wing aircraft in 1987 at a height of 250m and line spacing of 1,000m for a total of 11,892 line km. Subsequent exploration in 2007 included an airborne IMPULSE EM, magnetic and radiometric survey flown on behalf of Ucore Uranium Inc. and collection of 8 rock samples. The property was abandoned shortly after.
Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	•	The target uranium deposit type is likely to be shear-zone hosted (albitite-type) hosted in altered granite.
Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: • easting and northing of the drill hole collar • elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • dip and azimuth of the hole • down hole length and interception depth • hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	• • • •	Locations and results of most holes drilled by the Conwest JV are unknown. The limited historical exploration records are publicly available in the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s GeoScience OnLine system under the report IDs: 012I/03/0125 and NFLD/3082. All drill hole collar locations and mineralised intercepts have been reported in this report for all holes completed to date. No relevant data has been excluded from this report. Drill hole details: UTM East UTM North UTM Elevation (m) Azi- muth Dip Length (m) 470745 5559555 131 160 -45 130 470730 5559405 128 320 -45 200 470740 5559787 132 184 -45 317
	Hole	UTM East	UTM North	UTM Elevation (m)	Azi- muth	Dip	Length (m)
	PCDD 25-007	470745	5559555	131	160	-45	130
	PCDD 25-008	470730	5559405	128	320	-45	200
	PCDD 25- 009A	470740	5559787	132	184	-45	317

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

21

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation			Commentary	Commentary	Commentary
	PCDD 25-010	470291	5557916	123	170	-45	263
	PCDD 25- 011A	470291	5557915	123	170	-65	161
	PCDD 25-012	470461	5557972	123	170	-45	350
	PCDD 25-013	470635	5558966	128	340	-45	221
	PCDD 25-014	470462	5558025	131	170	-45	446
	PCDD 25-015	470488	5556666	118	170	-45	332
	PCDD 25-016	470515	5558036	133	170	-45	425
	PCDD 25-017	4706700	5557873	135	327	-45	491
	PCDD 25-018	470718	5558182	131	3	-45	251
	PCDD 25-019	470808	5558973	127	106	-60	323
	PCDD 25-020	470701	5559211	133	35	-55	314
	PCDD 25-021	470727	5559029	125	120	-60	380
	PCDD 25-022	470888	5557033	118	180	-45	320
	PCDD 25-023	470898	5557131	123	350	-50	386

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

22

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Data	•	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging	•	No aggregation methods have been used as assay data
aggregation		techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations		not yet received.
methods		(eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
		Material and should be stated.
	•	Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of
		high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results,
		the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated
		and some typical examples of such aggregations should be
		shown in detail.
	•	The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent
		values should be clearly stated.
Relationship	•	These relationships are particularly important in the	•	Only downhole lengths are reported.
between		reporting of Exploration Results.	•	Insufficient intersections have been made thus far to
mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	• •	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg	•	establish a relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths. Geometry of target mineralisation has not been verified.
		‘down hole length, true width not known’).
Diagrams	•	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations	•	Appropriate diagrams are included in the main body of this
		of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery		report. No significant discovery is being reported.
		being reported These should include, but not be limited to a
		plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate
		sectional views.
Balanced	•	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is	•	Reporting of all geochemical results is considered balanced
reporting		not practicable, representative reporting of both low and		with results of both low and high analytes reported.
		high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid
		misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

23

Assays Confirm Structurally Controlled Uranium System at Portland Creek

==> picture [112 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria		JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Other	•	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should	•	No meaningful and material exploration data has been
substantive		be reported including (but not limited to): geological		excluded from this report.
exploration		observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical
data		survey results; bulk samples – size and method of
		treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,
		groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;
		potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work	•	The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for	•	Drilling will continue testing the 12 exploration targets, with
		lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-		future holes aimed at identifying presence of uranium
		out drilling).		mineralisation within the exploration targets.
	•	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible	•	Planned hole locations have been provided in the ASX
		extensions, including the main geological interpretations and		announcement dated 28thJuly 2025.
		future drilling areas, provided this information is not
		commercially sensitive.

==> picture [12 x 11] intentionally omitted <==

Infini Resources Limited

www.infiniresources.com.au

ABN 77 656 098 583

InfiniResources

24