INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS INC /TX/

Annual Report • Nov 8, 2005

10-K/A 1 d30153e10vkza.htm AMENDMENT TO FORM 10-K e10vkza PAGEBREAK

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Mark One)

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 5(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

*For the fiscal year ended* December 31, 2004

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 001-14784

Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	75-2615944
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)
1755 Wittington Place, Suite 340, Dallas, Texas	75234
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code 214-750-5800

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Common Stock, $0.01 par value Name of each exchange on which registered American Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the shares of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the closing sales price of the Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange as of June 30, 2004 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $4,034,394 based upon a total of 298,844 shares held as of June 30, 2004 by persons believed to be non-affiliates of the Registrant. The basis of the calculation does not constitute a determination by the Registrant as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, such calculation, if made as of a date within sixty days of this filing, would yield a different value. As of March 18, 2005, there were 1,389,345 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE None

PAGEBREAK

AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

The undersigned Registrant hereby further amends the following items, exhibits, or other portions of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as set forth below and as reflected in the substituted pages attached hereto which replace the same numbered pages in the original filing as previously amended by Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 (this Amendment No. 5 is necessitated by virtue of an oral request/comment of the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2005):

| • | Pages 29-54 — Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The Reports of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms (Pages 30-32) have been updated for a
subsequent review. The consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations,
consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and consolidated statements of cash flows
(Pages 33-38) and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Pages 39-55) have been
revised to consolidate all prior amendments to this Item. |
| --- | --- |
| • | Exhibit 31.1 — Certification required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) (refiled as required by Rule 12b-15). |
| • | Exhibit 32.1 — Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (refiled as required
by Rule 12b-15). |

2

PAGEBREAK

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Amendment to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly-authorized.

Date: November 7, 2005.

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
By:	/s/ R. Neil Crouch, II
	R. Neil Crouch, II, Executive Vice President
	and Chief Financial Officer and Acting

3

PAGEBREAK

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms	30
Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2004 and 2003	33
Consolidated Statements of Operations—Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002	34
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity—Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002	36
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002	37
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	39
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation	52
Schedule IV—Mortgage Loans on Real Estate	54

All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, are not applicable or the information required is included in the Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

29

PAGEBREAK

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for year ended December 31, 2004. We have also audited the schedules listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and the schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and schedules are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and schedules. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and schedules. We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for year ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the schedules referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Swalm & Associates, P.C.

Swalm & Associates, P.C. Plano, Texas March 2, 2005, except for the effects of the changes contained in Note 18, which is dated August 19, 2005

30

PAGEBREAK

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for year ended December 31, 2003. We have also audited the schedules listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and the schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and schedules are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and schedules. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and schedules. We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for year ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the schedules referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Farmer, Fuqua & Huff, P.C.

Farmer, Fuqua, & Huff, P.C. Plano, Texas March 12, 2004, except for the effects of the changes contained in Note 18, which is dated August 19, 2005

31

PAGEBREAK

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flow of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002. We have also audited the schedules listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and the schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in Note 17, Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.’s management has indicated its intent to both sell income producing properties and refinance or extend debt secured by real estate to meet its liquidity needs.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002 , in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the schedules presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Dallas, Texas March 21, 2003

32

PAGEBREAK

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31, — 2004	2003
	(dollars in thousands,
	except per share)
	(Restated)	(Restated)
Assets
Real estate held for investment	$ 34,988	$	56,367
Less — accumulated depreciation	(3,620	)	(6,002	)
	31,368		50,365
Notes and interest receivable	54,911		45,531
Investment in real estate partnerships	604		607
Cash and cash equivalents	399		58
Receivables from affiliates	261		479
Other assets	3,095		4,053
	$ 90,638	$	101,093
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Notes and interest payable	$ 44,571	$	60,825
Payables to affiliates	1,248		—
Other liabilities	1,529		1,615
	47,348		62,440
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity
Common Stock, $.01 par value;
authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued
and outstanding and 1,389,345 shares in
2004 and 1,438,945 shares in 2003	14		14
Paid-in capital	61,983		62,774
Accumulated deficit	(18,707	)	(24,135	)
	43,290		38,653
	$ 90,638	$	101,093

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

33

PAGEBREAK

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Years Ended December 31, — 2004	2003		2002
	(Restated)	(Restated)
	(dollars in thousands, except per share)
Property revenue
Rents	$ 5,905	$	5,224	$	5,298
Property expense
Property operations	3,129		3,331		2,748
Operating income	2,776		1,893		2,550
Other income
Interest	3,325		626		270
Equity in income (loss) of equity partnerships	(3	)	(7	)	862
Recovery of loss provision on receivable from related party	—		1,569		—
	3,322		2,188		1,132
Other expense
Interest	3,570		1,812		1,457
Depreciation	740		816		748
Advisory fee to affiliate	741		424		714
Net income fee to affiliate	440		109		169
Provision for loss on receivable from related party	—		—		1,568
Provision for Asset Impairment	—		848		—
General and administrative	563		779		1,038
	6,054		4,788		5,694
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	44		(707	)	(2,012	)
Discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from operations	(89	)	(1,771	)	(3,055	)
Gain on sale of real estate by equity investees	—		—		383
Gain on sale of operations	5,473		3,824		6,769
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations	5,384		2,053		4,097
Net income (loss)	$ 5,428	$	1,346	$	2,085

34

PAGEBREAK

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (cont.)

	For the Years Ended December 31, — 2004	2003		2002
	(Restated)	(Restated)
	(dollars in thousands, except per share)
Earnings per share
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$ 0.03	$ (0.49	)	$ (1.40	)
Discontinued operations	3.88	1.43		2.85
Net income (loss)	$ 3.91	$ 0.94		$ 1.45
Weighted average shares of Common Stock
used in computing earnings per share	1,389,345	1,438,945		1,438,945

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

35

PAGEBREAK

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Shares		Amount		Paid-in — Capital	Deficit			Stockholders' — Equity
(dollars in thousands, except shares)
Balance, January 1, 2002	1,438,945		14	62,774		(27,566	)	35,222
Net income	—		—	—		2,085		2,085
Balance, December 31, 2002	1,438,945		14	62,774		(25,481	)	37,307
Net income (as restated)	—		—	—		1,346		1,346
Balance, December 31, 2003 (as restated)	1,438,945	$	14	$ 62,774	$	(24,135	)	$ 38,653
Repurchase of Common Stock	(49,600	)	—	(791	)	—		(791	)
Net income (as restated)	—		—	—		5,428		5,428
Balance, December 31, 2004 (as restated)	1,389,345	$	14	$ 61,983	$	(18,707	)	$ 43,290

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

36

PAGEBREAK

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Years Ended December 31, — 2004	2003		2002
	(dollars in thousands)
	(Restated)	(Restated)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Rents collected	$ 8,106	$	10,671	$	10,554
Payments for property operations	(5,086	)	(5,903	)	(7,131	)
Interest collected	2,413		262		291
Interest paid	(3,885	)	(3,702	)	(4,339	)
Advisory and net income fee paid to affiliate	(1,110	)	(451	)	(868	)
General and administrative expenses paid	(562	)	(785	)	(1,029	)
Distributions from equity partnerships’ operating cash flow	—		—		25
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(124	)	92		(2,497	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Real estate improvements	—		—		(365	)
Deposits on pending purchases and financings	—		—		—
Proceeds from sale of real estate	5,680		9,582		19,230
Distributions from equity partnership’s investing cash flow	—		—		752
Funding of note receivable (including $5,109 in 2002 to
related party)	—		(1,567	)	(7,109	)
Collection of note receivable	—		—		500
Payments from (to) advisor and affiliates	(3,866	)	(7,955	)	(6,244	)
Net cash provided by investing activities	1,814		60		6,764
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from notes payable	1,193		917		23,152
Payments on notes payable	(1,435	)	(603	)	(26,308	)
Deferred financing costs	(316	)	(418	)	(1,167	)
Retirement of Treasury Stock	(791	)	—		—
Net cash used in financing activities	(1,349	)	(104	)	(4,323	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	341		48		(56	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year	58		10		66
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$ 399	$	58	$	10

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

37

PAGEBREAK

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

	For the Years Ended December 31, — 2004		2003	2002
	(dollars in thousands)
	(Restated)		(Restated)
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities
Net income	$ 5,428		$ 1,346	$	2,085
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in
operating activities
Depreciation and amortization	1,392		2,165		1,867
Gain on sale of real estate	(5,473	)	(3,824	)	(7,152	)
Impairment of asset	—		848		—
Equity in (income) loss of partnerships	3		2		(862	)
Distributions from equity partnerships’ operating cash flow	—		—		25
Provision for loss	—		—		1,568
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable	(807	)	(368	)	5
(Increase) decrease in other assets	(781	)	1		774
Increase (decrease) in interest payable	(168	)	29		(9	)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities	282		(107	)	(798	)
Net cash (used in) provided by Operating activities	$ (124	)	$ 92	$	(2,497	)
Schedule of noncash investing and financing activities
Notes payable from purchase of real estate	$ —		$ 18,687	$	—
Notes payable assumed by buyer on sale of real estate	15,844		9,637		—
Notes receivable collected by affiliates	—		—		5,541
Notes receivable collected from affiliates	8,339		44,706		—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

38

PAGEBREAK

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and consolidated entities were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the most significant of which are described in NOTE 1. “SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES.” The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. The data presented in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are as of December 31 of each year and for the year then ended, unless otherwise indicated. Dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.

Certain balances for 2003 and 2002 have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation.

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and business. Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (“IORI”) is the successor to a California business trust organized on December 14, 1984, which commenced operations on April 10, 1985. IORI invests in real estate through direct ownership, leases and partnerships and it also may invest in mortgage loans on real estate.

Basis of consolidation. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of IORI and controlled subsidiaries and partnerships. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Accounting estimates. In the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, it is necessary for management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the year then ended. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent accounting Pronouncements. SFAS No. 151 — In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS No. 151”). SFAS No. 151 amends ARB 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) be recognized as current period charges. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of IORI.

SFAS No. 152 — In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 152, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions” (“SFAS No. 152”). SFAS No. 152 amends FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, to reference the financial accounting and reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that is provided in AICPA Statement of Position 04-2, Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions (“SOP 04-2”). This Statement also amends FASB Statement No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, to state that the guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs incurred to sell real estate projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is subject to the guidance in SOP 04-2.

SFAS No. 152 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, and is to be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The adoption of SFAS No. 145 is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of IORI.

39

PAGEBREAK

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

SFAS No. 123 — In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Share-Based Payment, revised (“SFAS No. 123R”). SFAS No. 123R addresses the accounting for share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options. Under the new standard, companies will no longer be able to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Instead, companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the expense in the consolidated statement of income. SFAS No. 123R will be effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and allows, but does not require, companies to restate the full fiscal year of 2005 to reflect the impact of expensing share-based payments under SFAS No. 123R. The Company has not yet determined which fair-value method and transitional provision it will follow. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

SFAS No. 153 — In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 (“SFAS No. 153”). The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of IORI.

Real estate held for investment and depreciation. Real estate held for investment is carried at cost. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (“SFAS No. 144”) requires that a property be considered impaired, if the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the property. If impairment exists, an impairment loss is recognized by a charge against earnings equal to the amount by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds the fair value of the property. If impairment of a property is recognized, the carrying amount of the property is reduced by the amount of the impairment and a new cost for the property is established. Such new cost is depreciated over the property’s remaining useful life. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over estimated useful lives, which range from 2 to 40 years.

Revenue recognition on the sale of real estate. Sales of real estate are recognized when and to the extent permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate” (“SFAS No. 66”). Until the requirements of SFAS No. 66 for full profit recognition have been met, transactions are accounted for using either the deposit, the installment sale, the cost recovery or the financing method, whichever is appropriate. See NOTE 2. “REAL ESTATE.”

Investment in noncontrolled partnerships. The equity method is used to account for investments in partnerships which IORI does not control. Under the equity method, an initial investment, recorded at cost, is increased by a proportionate share of the partnership’s operating income and any additional advances and decreased by a proportionate share of the partnership’s operating losses and distributions received.

Operating segments. Management has determined reportable operating segments to be those that are used for internal reporting purposes which disaggregates operations by type of real estate.

Fair value of financial instruments. The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of notes receivable and payable. For notes receivable the fair value was estimated by discounting future cash flows using current interest rates for similar loans. For notes payable the fair value was estimated using year end interest rates for mortgages with similar terms and maturities.

Cash equivalents. For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.

Earnings per share. Income (loss) per share is presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 “Earnings Per Share.” Income (loss) per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during each year.

40

PAGEBREAK

NOTE 2. REAL ESTATE

In 2004, IORI sold the following properties:

Property	Location	Sq.Ft.	Sales — Price	Net Cash — Received	Debt — Discharged	Gain/(Loss) — on Sale
Office Building
Akard Building	Dallas, TX	42,258 Sq.Ft.	$ 3,900	$ 2,007	$ 1,849	$ 427
Yeager Building	Chantilly, VA	60,060 Sq.Ft.	$ 7,600	$ 2,174	$ 5,230	$ 1,939
Residential Building
Treehouse (San Antonio)	San Antonio, TX	88,957 Sq.Ft.	$ 5,400	$ 1,437	$ 3,747	$ 3,091
Treehouse(Irving)	Irving, TX	153,072 Sq.Ft.	$ 7,500	—	$ 5,018	—
Land
Frankel Land	Midland County, TX	1 Acre	$ 63	$ 61	—	$ 16

Concentration of investment risk. IORI has a high concentration of investment risk on properties in the Southwest region of the United States. This risk includes, but is not limited to changes in local economic conditions, changes in real estate and zoning laws, increases in real estate taxes, floods, tornados and other acts of God and other factors beyond the control of management. In the opinion of management, this investment risk is partially mitigated by the diversification of property types in other geographical regions of the United States, management’s review of additional investments, acquisitions in other areas and by insurance.

NOTE 3. NOTES AND INTEREST RECEIVABLE

Junior Mortgage Loans. Junior mortgage loans are loans secured by mortgages that are subordinate to one or more prior liens either on the fee or a leasehold interest in real estate. Recourse on the loans ordinarily includes the real estate which secures the loan, other collateral and personal guarantees of the borrower.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,222,500 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Parkside Crossing, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $112,878 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,053,616 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Temple, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $98,338 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $835,658 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Terrell, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $80,223 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,770,000 given by UHF for Housing for Seniors of Lewisville, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $174,640 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On May 24, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $2,990,000 given by UHF for UHM to Transcontinental Eldorado, Inc. was assigned from TCI to IORI as a partial payment for TCI’s repurchase of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Treehouse-IR from IORI.

On December 30, 2003, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $6,363,360 given by Humble to NLP was assigned from ARI to IORI as a paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On December 30, 2003, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $2,000,000 given by Humble to NLP was assigned from ARI to IORI as additional paydown of certain intercompany receivables.

On October 14, 2003, IORI purchased, sold, and conveyed an office building known as One Hickory Centre, and sold 202 acres of unimproved real property known as the Travelers Land in Dallas County, Texas to Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. The sale price for One Hickory Centre was $12,200,000 and Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. executed a wrap-around promissory note in the amount of $11,973,025 payable to the order of IORI secured by a

41

PAGEBREAK

Deed of Trust encumbering One Hickory Centre. The remaining difference of which was as a result of prorations and various expenses paid by IORI in connection with the closing of the transaction. The note bears interest at 5.5% per annum. The sale price for the Travelers Land was $25,000,000. At closing, Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. executed an all inclusive wrap-around promissory note payable to the order of IORI in the principal amount of $22,801,987 secured by a Deed of Trust covering the Travelers Land sold and delivered cash to IORI in the amount of $1,946,715. As with the prior transaction, the difference between the purchase price and the promissory note represented adjustments for various prorations. The note bears interest at 5.5% per annum. Subsequently, IORI made a loan to Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. in the amount of $1,567,232 payable upon demand or if no demand is made prior thereto on June 30, 2006 with a market rate of interest. Encino Executive Plaza, Ltd. executed and delivered a promissory note payable to the order of IORI in the stated principal amount of $1,567,232. The note bears interest at 5.5% per annum.

NOTE 4. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY METHOD PARTNERSHIPS

Investments in equity method partnerships consisted of the following:

Nakash Income Associates (“NIA”)	402	2003 — 341
TCI Eton Square, L.P. (“Eton Square”)	202	266
$	604	$ 607

IORI owns a 40% general partner interest in NIA. NIA’s only asset is a wraparound mortgage note receivable secured by a shopping center in Maulden, Missouri. TCI owns the remaining 60% general partner interest in NIA.

IORI also owns a 10% limited partner interest in Eton Square, which at December 31, 2004, owned the Eton Square Building in Tulsa, Oklahoma. TCI owns a 90% general partner interest in Eton Square.

Set forth below are summarized financial data for the partnerships accounted for using the equity method:

Notes receivable	2004 — $ 902	$	902
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation ($2,146 in 2004 and $1,631 in 2003)	14,595		13,753
Other assets	(262	)	(262	)
Notes payable	(10,054	)	(10,206	)
Other liabilities	(2,154	)	(677	)
Partners’ capital	$ 3,027	$	3,510

Rents	2004 — $ 1,365		2003 — $ 1,233		2002 — $ 2,981
Interest income	156		156		156
Interest expense	(739	)	(685	)	(1,119	)
Property operations expense	(775	)	(802	)	(1,453	)
Depreciation	(475	)	(400	)	(628	)
Loss before gains on sale of real estate	(468	)	(498	)	(63	)
Gain on sale	—		—		1,054
Net income (loss)	$ (468	)	$ (498	)	$ 991

42

PAGEBREAK

IORI’s equity share of:

Income (loss) before gains on sale of real estate	2004 — $ (3	)	2003 — $ (7	)	2002 — $ 862
Gain on sale of real estate	—		—		383
Net income (loss)	$ (3	)	$ (7	)	$ 1,245

• Includes the $1.3 million gain from the sale of IORI’s investment in Tri-City.

NOTE 5. NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE

Scheduled notes payable principal payments are due as follows:

2005	6,446
2006	6,101
2007	717
2008	2,833
2009	742
Thereafter	27,503
$	44,342

Notes payable at December 31, 2004, bear interest at rates ranging from 4.48% to 9.56% and mature between 2005 and 2012. The mortgages are collateralized by deeds of trust on real estate with a net carrying value of $31.4 million. As indicated in the foregoing schedule, the book value of notes payable decreased $16.1 million in 2004 from 2003 due to retirement of notes payable resulting from sale of four properties during 2004. See ITEM 7. “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Obligations and Commitments” and ITEM 7A. “QUANTIFICATIVE AND QUALIFICATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK—Liabilities.”

In April 2002, the Company transferred all of its residential properties to partnerships formed with Metra Capital LLC (“Metra”). The properties included the 60-unit Brighton Court, the 92-unit Del Mar, the 68-unit Enclave, the 280-unit Meridian, the 57-unit Signature, and the 114-unit Sinclair, all located in Midland, Texas, and the 106-unit Treehouse located in San Antonio, Texas. Innovo Realty, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovo Group, Inc. (“Innovo”) is a limited partner in the partnerships that purchased the properties. A former director of ARI, a related party, controlled approximately 11.67% of the outstanding common stock of Innovo. The transfer constituted 23% of the total assets of the Company as of December 31, 2001. The transfer price for the properties totaled $26.2 million, of which the Company received $5.3 million in cash after the payment of $15.9 million in debt and various closing costs. Management determined to account for the transaction as a refinancing transaction (rather than a sale) in accordance with SFAS 66 “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” At the time of the transaction in April 2002, ARI was a related party to the Company by virtue of ARI’s subsidiaries’ ownership of approximately 28.5% of the then outstanding common stock of the Company, and the fact that ARI and the Company had the same persons as executive officers. The compensation price for the properties transferred totaled $26.2 million and possible additional contingent consideration depending upon the sale price of the properties by the Metra partnerships. The Company also received $5.2 million in value of 8% in non-recourse, non-convertible preferred stock of Innovo. Based upon the prospect of additional consideration, ultimate continued involvement through the preferred stock and the related-party nature of the former ARI director’s involvement, as well as the Company retaining a right to approve the price of any ultimate sale by a Metra partnership of the properties, and a process by which the Company effectively guaranteed a preferential return to the Metra investors, management determined that the transaction must be classified as a financing transaction and not a sale. The Company continued to be able to exert control over the Metra partnerships, and no sale was recorded. The Treehouse property was subsequently sold to a non-related party in February 2004, and all of its debts have been repaid to the lenders at the time of the sale. During August 2004, certain entities, including the Company, instituted an action in a Texas state court against Innovo and Metra and others over the process, as well as distribution questions. During April 2005, a resolution of the litigation occurred settling all liabilities remaining from the original partnership arrangements which included a return of the Metra investor equity, prepayment of prospective asset management fees and miscellaneous fees and transaction costs from the Company and the other plaintiffs as a payment of the Preferential Return along with the delegation of management to another entity. Of the payment made, the Company recognized expense of $56,000 and a reduction of $1,476,000 in liabilities during the second quarter of 2005.

43

PAGEBREAK

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

In 2004, IORI refinanced the following property:

Property	Location	Sq.Ft/ — Acres	Debt Incurred	Debt Discharged	Received/ — (Paid)	Interest — Rate	Maturity — Date
Office Building
Chuck Yeager	Chantilly, VA	60,060	$5,500	$4,307	$1,193	5.25%(1)	1/07

(1) Variable Rate

NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,222,500 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Parkside Crossing, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $112,878 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown in the same amount of certain intercompany receivables due to IORI.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,053,616 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Temple, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $98,338 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown in the same amount of certain intercompany receivables due to IORI.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $835,658 given by UHF for Unified Housing of Terrell, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $80,223 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown in the same amount of certain intercompany receivables due to IORI.

On September 30, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,770,000 given by UHF for Housing for Seniors of Lewisville, LLC to Regis I and the accrued interest receivable of $174,640 were assigned from Regis I to IORI as a paydown in the same amount of certain intercompany receivables due to IORI.

On May 24, 2004, a Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $2,990,000 given by UHF for UHM to Transcontinental Eldorado, Inc. was assigned from TCI to IORI as a partial payment for TCI’s repurchase of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Treehouse-IR from IORI.

On December 30, 2003, a Promissory Note in the amount of $6.3 million given by Humble to NLP was assigned from ARI to IORI. On December 30, 2003, a Promissory Note in the amount of $2.0 million given by Humble to NLP was assigned from ARI to IORI. These assignments were payments aggregating $8.3 million plus accrued interest of $386,000 on certain intercompany receivables due to IORI.

On September 19, 2002, IORI’s Board of Directors authorized the Chief Financial Officer of the Company to advance funds either to or from the Company, through the advisor, in an amount up to $5.0 million on the condition that such advances shall be repaid in cash or transfers of assets within 90 days.

44

PAGEBREAK

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Accounts Receivable from Affiliates as of December 31, 2004.

Balance, December 31, 2003 (as restated)	324		Regis I — (473	)	ARI — $ 367	$	261
Cash transfers	11,530				—		—
Cash repayments	(5,831	)			(367	)	—
Other additions	192		1,075		—		—
Other repayments	(7,463	)	(602	)	—		—
Balance, December 31, 2004 (as restated)	(1,248	)	$ —		$ —	$	261

Returns on Metra Properties. As described in Note 5, IORI sold all of its residential properties during 2002 to partnerships controlled by Metra. The partnership agreement for each of these partnerships states that the Metra Partners, as defined, receive cash flow distributions at least quarterly in an amount sufficient to provide them with a fifteen percent cumulative compounded annual rate of return on their invested capital, as well as a cumulative annual amount of 0.50% of the average outstanding balance of the mortgage indebtedness secured by any of these residential properties. These distributions to the Metra Partners are to have priority over distributions to any of the other partners.

NOTE 7. DIVIDENDS

While IORI was a REIT, dividends of $685,000 ($.45 per share) were paid in 2000. It was reported to the Internal Revenue Service that 100% of the dividends paid in 2000 represented capital gains.

In December 2000, the Board of Directors determined not to pay a fourth quarter dividend to holders of IORI’s Common Stock. The non-payment decision was based on the Board determining that IORI needed to retain cash for acquisitions that were anticipated in 2001 and that IORI had no REIT taxable income that required a distribution.

No quarterly dividends were declared or paid in 2004, 2003 or 2002. Management expects to pay no cash dividends in 2005.

NOTE 8. RENTS UNDER OPERATING LEASES

Operations include the leasing of office buildings. The leases thereon expire at various dates through 2012. The following is a schedule of minimum future rents on non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2004:

2005	1,134
2006	867
2007	638
2008	529
2009	176
Thereafter	446
$	3,790

NOTE 9. ADVISORY AGREEMENT

SWI is 100% owned by Gene E. Phillips. Mr. Phillips is Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of SWI, and is involved in daily consultation with the officers of SWI and has significant influence over the conduct of SWI’s business, including the rendering of advisory services and the making of investment decisions for itself and for IORI.

Under the Advisory Agreement, SWI is required to annually formulate and submit for Board approval a budget and business plan containing a twelve-month forecast of operations and cash flow, a general plan for asset sales and purchases, borrowing activity and other investments. SWI is required to report quarterly to the Board on IORI’s performance against the business plan. In addition, all transactions require prior Board approval, unless they are explicitly provided for in the approved business plan or are made pursuant to authority expressly delegated to SWI by the Board.

45

PAGEBREAK

The Advisory Agreement also requires prior Board approval for the retention of all consultants and third party professionals other than legal counsel. The Advisory Agreement provides that SWI shall be deemed to be in a fiduciary relationship to the stockholders and contains a broad standard governing SWI’s liability for losses incurred by IORI.

The Advisory Agreement provides for SWI to be responsible for IORI’s day-to-day operations and to receive an advisory fee comprised of a gross asset fee of .0625% per month (.75% per annum) of the average of the gross asset value (total assets less allowance for amortization, depreciation or depletion and valuation reserves) and an annual net income fee equal to 7.5% per annum of net income.

The Advisory Agreement also provides for SWI to receive an annual incentive sales fee. SWI or an affiliate of SWI is to receive an acquisition commission for supervising the purchase or long-term lease of real estate. SWI or an affiliate of SWI is to receive a mortgage or loan acquisition fee with respect to the purchase of any existing mortgage loan. SWI or an affiliate of SWI also is to receive a mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fee for obtaining loans or refinancing of IORI’s properties. In addition, SWI receives reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by it, in the performance of advisory services for IORI.

The Advisory Agreement requires SWI or any affiliate of SWI to pay to IORI one-half of any compensation received from third parties with respect to the origination, placement or brokerage of any loan made by IORI.

Under the Advisory Agreement all or a portion of the annual advisory fee must be refunded by SWI if the Operating Expenses of IORI (as defined in the Advisory Agreement) exceed certain limits specified in the Advisory Agreement. The effect of this limitation was to require SWI to refund $-0- of the 2004 annual advisory fee, $227,000 of the 2003 annual advisory fee, and $68,000 of the 2002 annual advisory fee.

Additionally, if management was to request that SWI render services other than those required by the Advisory Agreement, SWI or an affiliate of BCM would be separately compensated for such additional services on terms to be agreed upon from time to time. As discussed in NOTE 10. “PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,” Triad Realty Services, Ltd., an affiliate of BCM, provides property management services and, as discussed in NOTE 11. “REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE,” Regis Realty I, LLC., provided, on a non-exclusive basis, brokerage services.

SWI may assign the Advisory Agreement only with the prior consent of IORI.

NOTE 10. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

Triad provides property management services for a fee of 6% or less of the monthly gross rents collected on residential properties and 3% or less of the monthly gross rents collected on commercial properties under its management. Triad subcontracts with other entities for property-level management services at various rates. The general partner of Triad is BCM. The limited partner of Triad is Highland. Triad subcontracted to Regis, which is owned by Highland, the property-level management and leasing of IORI’s five office buildings and the commercial property owned by Eton Square, until December 2002. Since January 1, 2003, Regis I, which is also owned by Highland, provided property management services. Regis was and Regis I is entitled to receive property and construction management fees and leasing commissions in accordance with the terms of its property-level management agreement with Triad.

NOTE 11. REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE

Regis also provided brokerage services on a non-exclusive basis until December 2002. Regis was and Regis I is entitled to receive a commission for property purchases and sales in accordance with a sliding scale of total brokerage fees to be paid by IORI.

46

PAGEBREAK

NOTE 12. ADVISORY FEES, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FEES, ETC.

Fees and cost reimbursements to SWI/BCM and affiliates:

	2004	2003	2002
Fees	(Restated)	(Restated)
Fees Advisory	$ 741	$ 424	$ 714
Net income	440	109	169
Commission on property sale	301	473	—
Mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing	518	547	262
Property & Construction Mgt. & Leasing Comm	120	323	0
	$ 2,120	$ 1,876	$ 1,145
Cost reimbursements	$ 78	$ 173	$ 246

NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES

For the year 2002, IORI elected and qualified to be treated as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”), as defined in Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and as such, was not taxed for federal income tax purposes on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to stockholders. Due to the completion of the tender offer by ARI, an affiliate, and the resulting concentration of ownership, IORI no longer met the requirements for tax treatment as a REIT under the Code as of January 1, 2003, and is prohibited for re-qualifying for REIT status for at least five years.

IORI had net income for federal income tax purposes before the application of operating loss carryforwards in 2004, 2003 and 2002. Therefore, IORI recorded no provision for income taxes. IORI’s tax basis in its net assets differs from the amount at which its net assets are reported for financial statement purposes, principally due to the accounting for gains and losses on property sales, depreciation on owned properties and investments in joint venture partnerships.

Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary timing differences between carrying amounts of assets and liabilities reflected on the financial statements and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The tax effects of temporary differences and net operating loss carryforwards that give rise to the deferred tax assets are presented below:

	December 31, — 2004	2003
Deferred tax assets
Basis difference in preferred stock	$ 1,542	$	1,960
Accumulated Depreciation and amortization	284		449
Basis difference in Metra assets and liabilities	425		219
Other	182		—
Federal benefit of net operating loss carryforward	122		855
Deferred tax asset	2,555		3,483
Less valuation allowance	(2,555	)	(3,483	)
Total deferred tax asset	—		—

Recognition of the benefits of the deferred tax assets will require the Company to generate future taxable income. There is no assurance that the Company will generate earnings in future years. Therefore the Company has established a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of approximately $2,555,000 and $3,483,000 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.

In prior years the Company had losses, which resulted in net operating losses carryforwards for tax purposes amounting to approximately $321,000 at December 31, 2004 that may be offset against future taxable income. These carryforwards expire in 2021.

47

PAGEBREAK

The following table presents the principal reasons for the differences between the Company’s effective tax rate and the United States statutory income tax rate of 35%.

Federal income tax at statutory rate	1,922		623		730
State tax expense	100		41		110
Gain on sale differences	(1,261	)	(243	)	62
Other	(36	)	(106	)	282
Utilization of net operating loss carryforward	(725	)	(315	)	(1,184	)
Income tax expense	—		—		—
Effective income tax rate	0	%	0	%	0	%

NOTE 14. OPERATING SEGMENTS

Significant differences among the accounting policies of the operating segments as compared to the Consolidated Financial Statements principally involve the calculation and allocation of general and administrative expenses. Management evaluates the performance of the operating segments and allocates resources to each of them based on their operating income and cash flow. Items of income that are not reflected in the segments are interest and equity in partnerships totaling $3.3 million, $2.2 million, $1.1 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Expenses/(Gains) that are not reflected in the segments are general and administrative expenses, advisory and net income fees, provision for loss, and provision for asset impairment totaling $1.8 million, $2.2 million, and $3.5 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Excluded from operating segment assets are assets of $59.3 million at December 31, 2004, $50.8 million at December 31, 2003, and $15.4 million at December 31, 2002, which are not identifiable with an operating segment. There are no intersegment revenues and expenses and all business is conducted in the United States.

Presented below is the operating income of each operating segment.

2004 (as restated)	Land	Commercial — Properties	Apartments	Total
Rents	$ —	$ 1,244	$ 4,661	$ 5,905
Property operating expenses	—	673	2,456	3,129
Operating income (loss)	$ —	$ 571	$ 2,205	$ 2,776
Depreciation	$ —	$ 294	$ 446	$ 740
Interest	996	874	1,700	3,570
Real estate improvements	—	—	—	—
Assets	—	12,998	18,370	31,368

Property Sales	Land	Commercial — Properties	Apartments	Total
Sales price	$ 63	$ 11,500	$ 12,900	$ 24,463
Cost of sale	47	9,134	9,809	18,990
Gain on sale	$ 16	$ 2,366	$ 3,091	$ 5,473

2003 (as restated)	Land	Commercial — Properties	Apartments	Total
Rents	$ —	$ 718	$ 4,506	$ 5,224
Property operating expenses	—	389	2,942	3,331
Operating income	$ —	$ 329	$ 1,564	$ 1,893
Depreciation	$ —	$ 456	$ 360	$ 816
Interest	—	217	1,595	1,812
Real estate improvements	—	494	—	494
Assets	44	22,105	28,216	50,365

48

PAGEBREAK

Property Sales	Land	Commercial — Properties	Apartments	Total
Sales price	$ 63	$ 11,500	$ 12,900	$ 24,463
Cost of sale	47	9,134	9,809	18,990
Gain on sale	$ 16	$ 2,366	$ 3,091	$ 5,473

2002	Land	Commercial — Properties	Apartments	Total
Rents	$ —	$ 778	$ 4,520	$ 5,298
Property operating expenses	—	360	2,388	2,748
Operating income	$ —	$ 418	$ 2,132	$ 2,550
Depreciation	$ —	$ 320	$ 428	$ 748
Interest	—	149	1,308	1,457
Real estate improvements	—	240	—	240
Assets	24,929	28,688	21,133	74,750

Property Sales	Commercial — Properties	Total
Sales price	$ 19,230	$ 19,230
Cost of sale	12,461	12,461
Gain on sale	$ 6,769	$ 6,769

NOTE 15. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Effective January 1, 2002, IORI adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which established a single accounting model for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, including discontinued operations. This statement requires that the operations related to properties that have been sold or properties that are intended to be sold be presented as discontinued operations in the statement of operations for all periods presented, and properties intended to be sold are to be designated as “held-for-sale” on the balance sheet.

For 2004, 2003, and 2002, income (loss) from discontinued operations relates to two properties that IORI sold during 2002, four properties sold during 2003, and five properties sold during 2004. The following table summarizes revenue and expense information for these properties sold.

	2004
Revenue
Rental	$ 1,771	$	4,581	$	5,101
Property operations	981		3,087		3,582
	790		1,494		1,519
Interest Income	—		462		—
Expenses
Interest	556		2,987		3,457
Depreciation	323		740		1,117
	879		3,727		4,574
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations	(89	)	(1,771	)	(3,055	)
Gain on sale of real estate	5,473		3,824		6,769
Equity in gain on sale of real estate by equity investees	—		—		383
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations	$ 5,384	$	2,053	$	4,097

49

PAGEBREAK

NOTE 16. QUARTERLY DATA

The following is a tabulation of quarterly results of operations for the years 2004, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited).

2004 (as restated)	Three Months Ended — March 31	June 30		September 30		December 31
Rents	$ 1,448	$	1,469	$	1,428	$	1,560
Property expense	842		764		902		621
Operating income	606		705		526		939
Interest income	598		605		1,017		1,105
Income (loss) in equity partnerships	(1	)	11		(20	)	7
Other expense	1,820		1,453		1,274		1,507
Net loss from continuing operations	(617	)	(132	)	249		544
Discontinued operations	3,131		466		15		1,772
Net income (loss)	$ 2,514	$	334	$	264	$	2,316
Earnings per share Net income (loss)	$ 1.81	$	0.24	$	0.19	$	1.67

2003 (as restated)	Three Months Ended — March 31		June 30	September 30			December 31
Rents	$ 1,319		$ 1,297	$	1,321		$ 1,287
Property expense	670		729		873		1,059
Operating income	649		568		448		228
Recovery of A/R written off	—		1,569		—		—
Interest income	—		614		12		—
Income (loss) in equity partnerships	(15	)	—		(13	)	21
Other expense	1,015		1,723		1,071		979
Net loss from continuing operations	(381	)	1,028		(624	)	(730	)
Discontinued operations	(546	)	(372	)	(455	)	3,426
Net income (loss)	$ (927	)	$ 656	$	(1,079	)	$ 2,696
Earnings per share Net income (loss)	$ (0.64	)	$ 0.46	$	(.75	)	$ 1.87

2002	Three Months Ended — March 31	June 30			September 30		December 31
Rents	$ 1,271	$	1,280		$ 1,444		$ 1,303
Property expense	557		618		854		719
Operating income	714		662		590		584
Interest income	37		310		185		(262	)
Income (loss) in equity partnerships	(17	)	48		60		771
Other expense	2,076		1,184		724		1,710
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	(1,342	)	(164	)	111		(617	)
Discontinued operations	6,415		(723	)	(1,352	)	(243	)
Net income (loss)	$ 5,073	$	(887	)	$ (1,241	)	$ (860	)
Earnings per share Net income (loss)	$ 3.53	$	(0.62	)	$ (0.86	)	$ (0.60	)

In the first quarter of 2004, the Treehouse (San Antonio) Building was sold and $3.1 million gain on sale was recognized. In the second quarter of 2004, Treehouse (Irving) Building was sold and $150,000 deferred gain on sale was recognized. In the third quarter of 2004, Akard Building was sold and $427,000 gain on sale was recognized. In the fourth quarter of 2004, Frankel Land and Yeager Building were sold. $16,000 gain was recognized on the sale of Frankel Land, and $1.9 million gain was recognized on the sale of Yeager Building.

50

PAGEBREAK

NOTE 17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES AND LIQUIDITY

Olive Litigation. In February 1990, IORI, together with National Income Realty Trust, Continental Mortgage and Equity Trust, which subsequently merged with and into TCI, and TCI, three real estate entities with, at the time, the same officers, directors or trustees and advisor as IORI, entered into a settlement (the “Settlement”) of a class and derivative action entitled Olive et al. v. National Income Realty Trust et al. (the “Olive Litigation”), relating to the operation and management of each of the entities. On April 23, 1990, the Court granted final approval of the terms of the Settlement. The Settlement was modified in 1994 (the “Modification”), which was amended on January 27, 1997 by Amendment to the Modification effective January 9, 1994 (the “First Amendment”).

In October 2000, plaintiffs’ counsel asserted that a stock option agreement to purchase TCI shares (which was entered into by IORI and an affiliate of IORI, ARI, in October 2000 with an investment fund) breached a provision of the Modification. As a result of this assertion, IORI assigned all of its rights to purchase the TCI shares under this stock option agreement to ARI.

The Board believes that all provisions of the Settlement, the Modification and First Amendment terminated on April 28, 1999. However, in September 2000, the Court ruled that certain provisions of the Modification continue to be effective after the termination date. This ruling was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by IORI and TCI.

On October 23, 2001, IORI, TCI and ARI jointly announced a preliminary agreement with the plaintiff’s legal counsel for complete settlement of all disputes in the lawsuit. In February 2002, the court granted final approval of the proposed settlement (the “Second Amendment”). Under the Second Amendment, the appeal was dismissed and ARI agreed to either (i) acquire all of the outstanding shares of IORI and TCI not currently owned by ARI for a cash payment or shares of ARI preferred stock or (ii) make a tender offer for all of the outstanding common shares of IORI and TCI not currently owned by ARI. At the time, IORI had the same board as TCI and the same advisor as TCI and ARI. Earl D. Cecil and Ted P. Stokely who served as Directors of IORI and TCI, were also directors of ARI.

On November 15, 2002, ARI commenced, through subsidiaries, a tender offer for shares of common stock of TCI and IORI. The price per share was $17.50 for TCI shares and $19.00 for IORI shares. The tender offers were completed on March 19, 2003. ARI acquired 265,036 shares of IORI (which were subsequently contributed to a subsidiary and later acquired by SWI) and 1,213,226 TCI shares. The completion of the tender offer fulfilled the obligations under the Second Amendment and the Olive Litigation was dismissed with prejudice.

Liquidity. Management anticipates that IORI will generate excess cash from operations in 2005 due to increased rental rates and occupancy at its properties, however, such excess may not be sufficient to discharge all of IORI’s debt obligations as they mature. Management intends to selectively sell income producing assets, refinance real estate and/or incur additional borrowings against real estate to meet its cash requirements.

Other Litigation. IORI is also involved in various other lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Management is of the opinion that the outcome of these lawsuits will have no material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

NOTE 18. CORRECTION OF PREVIOUSLY FILED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company identified an accounting error in the financial statements related to the total Metra transactions. The error involved the establishment of a process involving the deferral of operating income or expense from the Metra properties until the sale of the property. The result is that the Company concluded that changes should be made to its financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2003 and for the year ending December 31, 2004. The resulting impact in these financial statements was to decrease net income for the year ending December 31, 2004 by $64,000 from a reported $5,492,000 to $5,428,000, an overall decrease in net income per share by $0.04 from a reported $3.95 per share to $3.91 per share. This decrease resulted from an increase in interest expense of approximately $79,000, decrease of net income fee to affiliate of $13,000, and a decrease of advisory fee to affiliate of $2,000. Total assets decreased by approximately $563,000 due to a decrease in other assets ($458,000 in 2003 and $105,000 in 2004), and total liabilities decreased by $62,000 due to a decrease in payable to affiliate of $38,000 other liabilities of $24,000.

The changes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 were a decrease in net income by $436,000 from a reported $1,782,000 to $1,346,000, and a decrease on a per share basis from a reported $1.24 per share to $0.94 per share. This decrease resulted from an increase in interest expense of approximately $458,000, decrease of net income fee to affiliate of $21,000, and a decrease of advisory fee to affiliate of $1,000. Total assets decreased by approximately $51,000 due to an increase of receivable from affiliate for $22,000 and a decrease in other assets of $73,000, and total liabilities increase by $385,000 due to a decrease in other liabilities of $385,000.

51

PAGEBREAK

Landscape

SCHEDULE III

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION December 31, 2004

											Life on
											Which Depreciation
				Cost	Gross Amount			Accumu-			in Latest
		Initial Cost		Capitalized	Carried at End of Year(1)			lated	Date of		Statement
	Encum-		Building &	Subsequent to		Building &		Depreci-	Construc-	Date	of Operation
Property/Location	branches	Land	Improvements	Acquisition	Land	Improvements	Total	ation	tion	Acquired	is Computed
(dollars in thousands)
Properties Held For
Investment
Apartments
Brighton Court,
Midland, TX	$ 2,843	$ 339	$ 3,051	$ —	$ 339	$ 3,051	$ 3,390	$ 344	1983	06/00	40 years
Del Mar, Midland, TX	2,725	324	2,919	—	324	2,919	3,243	328	1983	06/00	40 years
Enclave, Midland, TX	2,882	324	2,919	—	324	2,919	3,243	328	1983	06/00	40 years
Meridian, Midland, TX	4,502	1,138	4,553	—	1,138	4,553	5,691	569	1983	12/99	40 years
Signature Place,
Midland, TX	2,410	265	2,388	—	265	2,388	2,653	269	1983	06/00	40 years
Sinclair Place,
Midland, TX	2,054	221	1,990	—	221	1,990	2,211	224	1983	06/00	40 years
Office Buildings
2010 Valley View,
Farmers Branch, TX	2,426	120	479	2,979	120	3,458	3,578	1,423	1998	09/97	5-40 years
Parkway Ctr,
Farmers Branch, TX	1,631	333	3,511	—	333	3,511	3,844	88	1979	12/03	5-40 years
Industrial Warehouse
Eagle Crest, Farmers
Branch, TX		2,129	1,906	—	2,129	1,906	4,035	47	—	12/03	5-40 years
Land
3 Hickory Ctr,
Farmers Branch, TX	—	2,804	—	296	3,100	—	3,100	—	—	—
	$ 21,473	$ 7,997	$ 23,716	$ 3,275	$ 8,293	$ 26,695	$ 34,988	$ 3,620

52

PAGEBREAK

SCHEDULE III (Continued)

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

	2004
	(dollars in thousands)
Reconciliation of Real Estate
Balance at January 1,	$ 56,367	$	82,252	$	95,190
Additions
Acquisitions and Improvements	—		15,365		677
Deductions
Retirements	—		—		(462	)
Sale of real estate	(21,379	)	(41,250	)	(13,153	)
Balance at December 31,	$ 34,988	$	56,367	$	82,252
Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation
Balance at January 1,	$ 6,002	$	7,502	$	7,875
Additions
Depreciation	1,063		1,552		1,867
Deductions
Retirements	—		—		—
Sale of real estate	(3,445	)	(3,052	)	(2,240	)
Balance at December 31,	$ 3,620	$	6,002	$	7,502

53

PAGEBREAK

SCHEDULE IV

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

	2004			2002
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance at January 1,	$ 45,531	$	—	$ 500
Additions
New mortgage loans	8,655		45,531	7,109
Interest receivable on mortgage loans	913		—	—
Deductions
Amounts charged off	(188	)	—	(1,568	)
Collections of principal by IORI	—		—	(500	)
Collections of principal by affiliates	—		—	(5,541	)
Balance at December 31,	$ 54,911	$	45,531	$ —

54