AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

Impact Developer & Contractor S.A.

Annual Report May 30, 2012

2316_10-k_2012-05-30_7d30f1f1-235c-401b-923a-96e2a0c3c7f4.pdf

Annual Report

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

$\bar{z}$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

SC IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR SA

Consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Contents

$\hat{\boldsymbol{\gamma}}$

Page
Balance Sheet $3 - 4$
Income Statement 5
Statement of Changes in Shareholder's Equity 6
Cash Flow Statement $7 - 8$
Notes to the Financial Statements $9 - 62$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

31 December 2011 31 December 2010
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 5,070 4,970
Investment property 60,997 70,086
Investments 539 1,236
Intangible assets 27 50
66,634 76,342
Current assets
Inventories 42,994 47,670
Trade receivables 11,341 13,939
Prepayments and other 51 44
receivables
Cash and cash equivalents 2,121 7,742
56,507 69,394
Total Assets 123,140 145,736
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Capital and reserves
Issued capital 56,846 57,340
Capital paid in excess of par value 19,455 19,683
Revaluation surplus 1,991 2,072
Accumulated result - profit 14,175 26,007
92,468 105,101
Minority interest -7 21
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings 14,992 22,990
Deferred incomes 4,808 6,540
19,800 29,529
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 4,072 4,626
Short term borrowings 0 0
Current portion of interest-bearing 6,248 5,956
borrowings
Provisions 559 502
10,879 11,084
Total Equity and Liabilities 123,140 145,736

IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

The consolidated financial statements along with the Notes to the financial statements presented from page 9 to page 62 have been authorised to be issued on 18 May 2012 by the Executie Manager and signed by:

Carmen Sandulescu

Lidia Varzaru

Chief Accounting Officer

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

2011 2010
Turnover 2,267 6,169
Effects from IAS 40 - revenue/(cost) $-8,251$ $-23,756$
Other operating income 3,362 3,068
Change in inventory of finished goods and
work in progress
$-6,580$ $-5,293$
Work performed by the enterprise and
capitalised
5,816 2,454
Raw material and consumables $-714$ $-532$
Staff costs $-392$ $-674$
Depreciation and amortization expenses $-414$ $-474$
Other operating expenses $-6,647$ $-8,334$
Net finance cost $-1,601$ $-412$
Income from associates -8 293
Profit before tax $-13,161$ $-27,492$
Income tax 1,679 3,856
Profit after tax $-11,482$ $-23,636$
Minority interest 23 $-3$
Net profit for the period $-11,459$ $-23,639$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Description Share
capital
Capital paid in
excess of par
value
Revaluation
surplus
Retained
earnings
Translation
adjustments
Total
Balance as at
Dec. 31, 2010
57,340 19,683 2,072 37,981 $-11,974$ 105,102
Investimob $-390$ 6 $-384$
Exchange diff. (*) $-159$ $-81$ 143 $-132$ $-229$
Net result of the
period
$-11,459$ $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ $-11,459$
Dividends distributed $\mathbf 0$
Losses from shares
redeemed
$-69$ $-69$
Losses related to
equity instruments
$-494$ $-494$
Revaluation reserved $\mathbf 0$
Decrease in fixed
assets value,
previously recognised
in revaluation surplus
$\bf{0}$
Balance as at
Dec. 31, 2011
56,846 19,455 1,992 26,275 $-12,100$ 92,468

Statement of Changes in Equity

$\bar{z}$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

2011 2010
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before taxation $-13,161$ -27,492
Adjustments for:
Translation adjustments $-647$ $-1,608$
Revenues from investment property 8,251 23,756
Minority interest $-4$ $-11,599$
Depreciation 414 474
Loss / (profit) on disposals of non-current assets 6 $-222$
Increase / (Decrease) in provisions for risks and charges 202 486
Increase / (Decrease) in allowances for bad debts 41 546
Increase / (Decrease) in allowances for inventories 3 0
Increase / (Decrease) in impairment for participations 713
Interest income $-480$ $-1,379$
Interest expenses 1,370 1,544
Other finance (income)/expenses, net -8 -3
Operating profit before working capital changes $-3,301$ $-15,496$
Decrease / (Increase) in trade and other receivable 4,754 1,090
Decrease / (Increase) in inventories 3,845 8,893
Increase / (Decrease) in trade and other payable $-446$ $-2,028$
Cash generated from operations 4,852 $-7,541$
Income tax paid $-24$ $-47$
Net cash from operating activities 4,828 $-7,588$
Cash flows from investing activities
Aquisition of other financial assets $-16$
Purchase of property, plant and equipment $-3,176$ 8,481
Proceeds from sale of non current assets 1,533 516
Net cash used in investing activities $-1,660$ 8,997
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance capital $\Omega$ 122
Movements in long term loans $-7,697$ $-5,076$
Movements in leasing contracts -8 $-62$
Interest (paid)/received, net $-1,033$ $-10$
Other finance expenses paid, net 8 3
Dividends paid/profit share to employees $-60$ $-3$
Net cash used in financing activities $-8,789$ $-5,026$
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $-5,621$ $-3,617$
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 7,742 11,395
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 2,121 7,742

Statement of Cash Flows by the Indirect Method

Note 1. ORGANIZATION and OPERATIONS

Impact Developer & Contractor S.A. is one of the first private companies active in this industry, having been founded in 1991 by public subscription. Initially, its main activities were the lease and maintenance of luxury villas in the Bucharest area. In 1995, Impact introduced the concept of the "residential compound" to the Romanian market and thereafter progressively evolved into a pure real estate developer. Since 1996, Impact has been the only local developer to be listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange (BSE). In 2006, the company's shares were promoted to the first tier of the stock market, becoming the first company in the real estate development and building sector to do so.

Initially a developer of small, residential properties in Bucharest, Impact now focuses mainly in the development of large-scale projects having initiated mixed-use projects in Bucharest.

Since 1995, Impact has expanded its activities nationally and developed over 2,200 dwellings as well as 25,000 sqm of office and retail space. Impact completed 16 small and medium projects in the last 19 years. The company is currently involved in four developments, each with a distinct project time frame and at a different stage of completion. Its pipeline is dominated by one major project: the Greenfield developments from Bucharest.

In 2011 the total number of the contracts signed for residential dwellings increased from 118 contracts signed in 2010 to 150 contracts signed in 2011. From the total number of 150 dwellings, 69 were sales contracts paid in full or paid in installments, and the rest of 81 dwellings were rented. The renting contracts increased with 84% compared with the previous year, so in 2011 there was registered a preference for renting over purchasing residential units comparing with 2010. In 2011 there were also sold small land plots for housing and small businesses in Bucharest-Ilfov and Ploiesti, totaling 6350 sqm.

Management keeps an eye on the market's pulse and responds appropriately to any changes in demand by adapting very quickly to the market changes.

In 2011, in the fourth year of the financial crisis, Romania's strong performance in industrial production, as well as its solid export performance helped the recovery of the country's GDP. Favorable economic conditions, including lower unemployment rates started a slight recovery in domestic demand. Although sentiment has improved globally with sharp declines showing signs of leveling off, both investors and lenders remain risk averse and investment and lending activity remain very restrictive.

Regarding the company strategy, IMPACT, in 2011 had as goals:

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

  • $\triangleright$ To focus on capitalizing on the finished dwellings and redesigning the estates in different stages of execution, allowing changes such as to best possibly fulfill the market requirements, adapting the sale strategy to the market conditions by introducing new selling solutions (Home Upgrade and Max Avantai);
  • $\triangleright$ To offer for sale small land plots to individuals and small companies for the development of houses and/or small businesses. As a result, in 2011 there were sold over 6000 sqm of land plots in Bucharest, and Ploiesti.
  • $\triangleright$ To release two new innovative products: KALEIDOSCOPE multifunctional dwelling "3 in 1" that offer three living functions in one space, and ACTIVE HOME - a house with independent solutions for utilities, which is based on an integrated system for water, sewage, heating and electricity;
  • $\triangleright$ To identify partners at the project level in order to diminish the risk of the projects to be developed

Company Organisation

IMPACT Company is led by the General Shareholders' Meeting which, through the Managing Board chosen by the shareholders, takes the decisions pertaining to the company's strategy. The executive power is exercised by the CEO of the company. The company has also an executive director.

Mission

IMPACT must identify a clean setting, linked to the city by modern roads, must offer level plans and facades which can cover a larger area of the financial possibilities of its clients, accomplish durable and high quality construction and fittings, grant performance guarantees and more flexible payment mechanisms, adapted to the financial availability of the clients.

In order to draw respect and exceed the expectations of the real estate market, the corporation IMPACT promotes its values, abiding by them in any activity.

The Company's organisational culture has as a basis the following set of values:

• Client satisfaction – translated as client orientation, by the provision of high quality products, adapted to its needs:

• Communication - we believe that efficient communication is at the core of development;

. People - concern for people is translated through the attention offered to representing the interests of our employees and shareholders;

  • . Pro-activity or product choice based on the identification of opportunities;
  • Continuous learning is the essential leverage for being competitive on a market with incessant development;
  • . Business ethic granting safety to clients and suppliers

The most effective management system

IMPACT Developer & Contractor is permanently concerned for the quality of the products and services that it provides but also for the improvement of the life quality of its employees and for the protection and development in a systematical and conscientious mode of the environment.

The company was ISO certified in 2005: ISO 9001: 2000 and 2004: ISO 14001, the integrated management system being re-acknowledged by an auditing survey in the 2006.

By the implementation of this integrated management system IMPACT Developer& Contractor S.A succeeded in ensuring the coherence of the three aspects (quality, environment, occupational health and security) inside the processes, in minimizing the dissipation of responsibilities and, at an equal extent, in having a unitary vision upon the development projects or upon the provided products and services. Also, the integrated management system allowed the constitution of the framework for the putting into application in an efficient way of the specific concepts and techniques of project management.

On external plan, the concern for quality, environment, occupational health and security took shape by an attentive keeping under control of the outsourced processes for the execution of construction works and of installations afferent to these. Thus, IMPACT Developer& Contractor S.A imposed to all its partners to apply consequently its quality, environment and occupational health and security policies.

Company history

Impact has successfully developed a diverse range of projects in the Northern part of Bucharest, allowing it to become the most prominent residential developer in Northern Bucharest.

Starting with 2003 Impact expanded also in Constanta, Ploiesti and Oradea and developed more that 500 units in this locations also.

On-going Projects

The company is currently involved in four developments, each with a distinct project time frame and with a different completion stage. Its pipeline is dominated by one major project: the GreenfieldProject.

Greenfield Project in Bucharest

Greenfield, one of the largest mixed-use development projects in Romania, is located in the northern area of Bucharest, bordered on two sides by Baneasa Forest and Tunari Forest. This provides a relaxed and unpolluted environment together with landscaped green areas.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Greenfield is based on a "neighbourhood" concept, providing all types of facilities required by habitants of a modern city: residential neighbourhoods – flats, office buildings, shopping malls and commercial galleries, hotels, public facilities - schools, health care facilities, kindergarten, and leisure areas - tennis courts, playgrounds, parks.

The project was conceived in two phases, Greenfield 1 (phase 1) and Greenfield 2 (Phase 2 - Phase which is divided in 7 sub-phases).

Greenfield I (phase 1) is located in the South-Eastern part of the project and is developed on 9 ha. It is a residential project and it comprises over 670 residential units divided in 5 compounds:

Rubin, Topaz, Blue, Onix and Quartz

Rubin, Topaz and Onix compounds were finalized in 2008, Blue compound in 2009 and the Quartz compound was finalized in July 2010. The dwellings from Quartz compound can be delivered either completely finished or without finishing depending on the client's choice.

Note 2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The summary of significant accounting policies and principles adopted in preparation of the accompanying financial statements is as follows:

$2.1$ Reporting entity

Impact Developer & Contractor SA (the Company) presents these consolidated financial statements. These consolidated financial statements incorporate the results of the Company and its subsidiaries: Bipact 1995 SRL, Hobbit Intermediere Asigurari SRL, Actual Invest House SRL, Millenium Consult Invest 2002 SRL, Intop Construction SRL and Clearline SA as detailed in Note 23 "Principal subsidiaries".

$2.2$ Basis of presentation, reporting currency and translation

The accompanying financial statements are prepared in accordance with and comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These financial statements have been prepared under the going concern assumption on the basis of the statutory accounts. They are not the statutory accounts of the Group.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

The Group companies maintain and prepare their statutory records ("Statutory Financial Statements") in accordance with Romanian Law and Romanian Accounting Standards ("RAS") and practice, in Romanian historical currency ("RON"). The accompanying financial statements ("IFRS Financial Statements") are based on RAS records, which are maintained under the historical cost convention with adjustments and reclassifications recorded for the purpose of fair presentation in accordance with IFRS.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except as disclosed in the accounting policies below.

IAS 21 "The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates" requires that the financial statements of a foreign entity that reports in the currency of a hyperinflationary economy should be restated in accordance with IAS 29 "Financial reporting in the Hyperinflationary Economies" before being translated into a different reporting currency. The restatement of financial statements in accordance with IAS 29 requires the use of a general price index that reflects changes in general purchasing power of reporting currency.

It is a consensus that Romania ceased to be a hyperinflationary economy during the year 2004. Therefore, the Group companies discontinue the preparation and presentation of the financial statements in accordance with provision of IAS 29, but according to provision of IAS 21 it will use for reporting purposes the amounts expressed in the measuring unit current at the date of discontinuation (31 December 2003) as historical cost for translation into EUR.

The primary guidelines followed in translation of the financial statements of the Group companies are as follows:

  • Assets and liabilities for all balance sheet presented (including comparatives) are translated at the closing exchange rates existing at the date of each balance sheet presented (4.3197 RON/EUR as at December 31, 2011 and 4.2848 RON/EUR as at December 31, 2010).
  • Income and expense items for the current reporting period are translated at the average exchange rates $\bullet$ RON/EUR for the reporting period (4.2379 RON/EUR). Comparative figures in the income statement have been derived by applying the RON/EUR exchange rate as at December 31, 2010 to the amounts expressed in current monetary units as of that date (4.2099 RON/EUR).
  • Equity items, other than net profit and loss for the period that is carried forward, which have been contributed or accumulated before date of discontinuation are restated from their historical cost by applying

the general price index to 31 December 2003 before being translated at the closing exchange rates existing at the date of each balance sheet presented.

All exchange differences resulting from the translation of the current year financial statements are recognized directly to the equity while the effect of translation on the Company's net monetary position until date of discontinuance was included in the income statement as translation gain or loss.

Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Estimates have principally been made in respect of estimated impairment allowance, provisions for risks and charges, allowances for doubtful debts and for old and slow moving inventories and deferred tax. Although these estimates are based on the management's best knowledge of current events and actions, actual results may differ from these estimates.

$2.3$ Summary of significant accounting policies

(a) Property, plant and equipment

Non-current tangible assets are stated in the balance sheet by applying the closing exchange rate RON/EUR rates existing at the date of each balance sheet presented to their either historical costs or revaluated value in RON. Historical cost for the assets acquired until date of discontinuance is expressed the measuring unit current at the 31 December 2003 before being expressed in EUR.

When assets are sold or retired, their cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss resulting from their disposals is included in the income statement. The initial cost of property, plant and equipment comprises its purchase price, including import duties and non-refundable purchase taxes and any direct attributable costs of bringing the asset to its working condition and location for its intended use.

Straight-line depreciation is recorded based on the following estimated useful lives:

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Years
Buildings 40
Equipment, furniture and fixtures $3 - 12$
Vehicles

(b) Intangible assets

Intangible assets are stated in the balance by applying the same approach as for Property, plant and equipment. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over 3 years.

(c) Impairment of assets

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Whenever the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized in income for items carried at cost.

The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's net selling price and value in use. The net selling price is the amount obtainable from the sale of an asset in an arm's length transaction while value in use is the present value of estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the continuing use of an asset and from its disposal at the end of its useful life. Recoverable amounts are estimated for individual assets or, if it is not possible, for the cashgenerating unit.

Reversal of impairment losses recognized in prior years is recorded when there is an indication that the conditions leading to the impairment losses recognized for the asset no longer exist or has decreased. The reversal is recorded in income.

(d) Investment properties

The Group has ownership over properties that are not held for a specific purpose. The properties consist in land held in different locations. The Group has adopted in 2006 for the first time the provisions of IAS 40 "Investment properties". As disclosed in Note 11 "Revenues from investment properties", the changes in value of the investment properties are reported directly to the income statement.

(e) Group accounting

Subsidiaries, which are those entities in which the Group has an interest of more than one half of the voting rights or otherwise has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, are consolidated. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are presently exercisable or presently convertible are considered when

IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

assessing whether the Group controls another entity.

Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and are no longer consolidated from the date that control ceases. The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries. Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated; unrealised losses are also eliminated unless cost cannot be recovered. Where necessary, accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.

If some subsidiaries do not have significant influence to the Group figures then the subsidiary's figures have not been consolidated. The investment of parent company in those subsidiaries is presented at cost under "Financial investment" line in balance sheet. Also, the investments in companies where the voting rights are below fifty percent are presented at cost under the same line in balance sheet.

(f) Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of acquisition/production cost and net realizable value, after provision for obsolete items. Cost is calculated on a first-in-first-out (FIFO) basis.

According to the economic reality and the policy of Impact, land being intended for sale to their greatest extent, they are considered raw materials. Due to their special character, the method to calculate the cost is the Weighted Average Cost (WAC) and includes besides the proper acquisition cost other expenses as well caused by their bringing into the shape intended for sale.

Where necessary, an allowance is created for slow moving and obsolete inventories in order to arrive at the net realizable value, so a 50% provision for inventories without any movement for a period of three months.

Net realizable value is the selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the costs of completion, marketing and distribution. Obsolete inventories are identified individually and provided in full.

For slow moving inventories the allowance is created based on an estimation of the age of inventories by each main category is made, considering the stock turnover by each main category and inventories older than one year, estimated as described above.

(g) Receivables

Receivables are stated at cost net of a provision for doubtful debts, estimated based on known relevant factors affecting collectability. Ultimate losses may vary from the current estimates.

(h) Cash

Cash includes cash on hand and cash with banks. The cash in bank and in hand in foreign currencies was reevaluated with the exchange rate communicated by the National Bank of Romania at the end of the period. The exchange differences related to the revaluation were recorded in the Income Statements.

(i) Provisions

A provision is recognized when, and only when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event and it is probable (i.e. more likely than not) that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Provisions are reviewed at each balance sheet date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimates. Where the effect of the time value of money is material, the amount of a provision is the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation. When discounting is used, the increase in provision reflecting the passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

(j) Revenue and expense recognition

Revenue is recognized when it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the enterprise and the amount of the revenue can be measured reliably.

Revenue from sale of goods is recognized when all the following conditions, including the above, have been satisfied:

  • The enterprise has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and rewards of ownership of goods;
  • The enterprise retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with the ownership nor effective control over the goods sold;
  • The amount of revenue can be measured reliably;
  • The costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

Revenues and expenses exclude Value Added Tax and are recorded on an accrual basis.

(k) Financing Costs

Interest is charged to income statement on accrual basis.

(I) Income taxes

The taxation charge is calculated in accordance with Romanian taxation regulations and is based on the results reported in the income statement of the Company prepared under RAS after adjustments for tax purposes. Current income taxes are provided on statutory income, as adjusted for certain items by tax legislation, at a rate of 16%.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Deferred Taxation

In accordance with IAS 12 ("Income Taxes (revised)"), deferred tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the tax effects attributable to differences between the tax and book bases of assets and liabilities (i.e. future deductible or taxable temporary differences) and carry forwards, using the currently enacted tax rates. The measurement of deferred tax assets are then reduced, if necessary, by the amount of any tax benefits that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

For the deferred tax we applied a current rate of 16%.

(m) Related party

For the purpose of the accompanying financial statements, the parent company and the companies identified by the Company as being associated with it are considered and referred to as related parties.

(n) Contingencies

Contingent liabilities are not recognised in the accompanying financial statements. They are disclosed unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote.

A contingent asset is not recognized in the accompanying financial statements but disclosed when an inflow of economic benefits is probable.

(o) Employee benefits

The Company does not sponsor any pension or other post retirement benefits plans for its employees. All the employees of the Company are members of pensions plan sponsored by the Romanian government. The Company has no further obligations with respect to pension plan.

(p) Comparatives

Where necessary, the comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in presentation in the current year.

Share sales to the employees

The shares included into the loyalty program developed by IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR S.A. have a nominal value of 1 RON. The company's shares are traded on the category I of the Bucharest Stock Exchange.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Description Land&
Buildings
Investment
property
Plant &
equipment,
Vehicles
Office
equipment
Fixed assets
under
construction
TOTAL
Cost
At 31.12.2010 4,629 70,086 1,686 199 46 76,646
Exchange diff $-37$ $-566$ $-14$ $-2$ $\Omega$ $-619$
Additions 9,420 1,708 49 $\overline{0}$ 5,582 16,760
Change in
investment $-8,251$ $-8,251$
property (*)
Disposals $-8,926$ $-1,980$ $-37$ $-11$ $-5,629$ $-16,583$
At 31.12.2011 5,086 60,997 1,685 187 $\bf{0}$ 67,954
Depreciation
At 31.12.2010 204 0 1,248 138 $\bf{0}$ 1,590
Exchange diff $-2$ 0 $-10$ $-1$ 0 $-13$
Charge 655 0 121 25 $\overline{0}$ 801
Disposals $-468$ 0 $-23$ $-1$ $\overline{0}$ $-492$
At 31.12.2011 389 $\bf{0}$ 1,336 161 $\bf{0}$ 1,886
Impairment
At 31.12.2011 0 0 $\overline{0}$ 0 $\overline{0}$ $\bf{0}$
Net Book Value
31.12.2010 4,425 70,086 438 61 46 75,056
31.12.2011 4,697 60,997 349 25 $\bf{0}$ 66,068

Note 3. Property, plant and equipment

The Group's tangible assets have been revaluated in 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009 and 2010.

At the end of the year 2011 there took place a revaluation of construction-type fixed assets. The revaluation was made by Parker Lewis for the land and by the valuation expert Vasile Monica for the rest of the properties. The revaluation was made on the basis of real value. Following this revaluation there resulted both positive and negative differences, cumulatively the value of assets decreasing. According to the accounting regulations, when the revaluation result is a decrease of net accounting value, this is treated as an expense with the entire depreciation value, when in the revaluation reserve is not registered an amount related to that asset.

IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

(*) The Group decided to adopt starting with 2006 the alternative treatment recommended by IAS 40 "Investment properties", recording part of the land owned and the rented units at their market value. An authorised external evaluator has revaluated these properties. The difference between the historical cost of the land and the revaluated amount has been recognised directly to income statement.

In the year 2011, due to the existing economic context, work was done only in order to finish the started units from the residential compounds. For this reason, the value of the construction works compared to the preceding year is much diminished. In the range of the products offered by the company there are included both completely finished dwelling units, and some dwelling units on red stage, and others on plaster, so as the clients may purchase the products that are the most fit for their needs.

In August 2011 there were finished the approaches for the sale of a new real estate type P+3 within the Greenfield assembly, with a total built area of 919 sqm placed on the afferent land, plus a land plot with a surface of 693 sqm adjacent to the construction. The transaction was concluded on the date of 1st August, having a value of 1 million Euros plus V.A.T. The concluded transaction consolidates the existing advantages for the inhabitants of the Greenfield urban pole, as it allows the expansion of the volume and range of services afferent to education, sports and free time available for the children of the families in the area. On the third quarter there were terminated the contracts afferent to 33 constructions following the beneficiary entering liquidation. Following this termination there was recorded a minus per revenues from the sale of products in an amount of 12.07 mil lei. At present these constructions were recorded in inventories, 17 constructions with a value of 5.12 mil lei as finished products and 16 constructions with a value of 4.19 mil lei as tangible assets.

At the end of the month of December 2011 there existed a number of 395 houses and apartments of which 216 units are rented or held for lease, 176 units are held in stock for sale and 3 units are fixed assets.

In the year 2009 there was started a new assembly in Greenfield - RFR, with 46 apartments in the first phase. For the moment the capitalized costs comprise design, taxes, advices, etc. The investment afferent to the Dealul Lomb project is in an amount of 4,473 keuro representing investments in Dealul Lomb project (PUZ, roads, water and electricity networks etc). These were established by the framework contract no. 55423/04.07.2007 concluded between Impact Developer&Contractor SA and Cluj-Napoca Local Council as a prerequisite for the establishment of the company Clearline Development (former Lomb SA). In the year 2011 Impact summons for trial the Local Council of the Municipality Cluj-Napoca (file 79/1285/2012) requesting its obligation to pay damages and the afferent legal interest. According to the estimates of an independent law office there are significant chances that these costs would be recovered from the Cluj-Napoca Local Council.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Note 4. Inventories

The inventories consist of the followings:

Description 31 December
2011
31 December
2010
Land and advances for land 17.971 17,971
Raw materials and production supplies 3 419
Allowance for old and slow moving raw
materials and production supplies
$-271$ $-322$
Work in progress 12,779 13,078
Finished goods 12,458 13,099
Merchandise 0 3,350
Advance payments 55 75
Total 42.994 47.670

Note 5. Trade and other receivables

The accounts receivable comprise:

Description 31 December
2011
31 December
2010
Trade accounts and notes receivable 9,264 9,567
Allowance for bad and doubtful debts -696 $-358$
Income tax receivable 694 698
Sundry debtors 1,183 2.471
Allowance for sundry debtors -485 -638
VAT and other state budget receivable 886 1,019
Interest receivable 30 45
Short term investments (*) 0 567
Advances to suppliers 466 570
Total 11,341 13,939

(*) Short term investments position is containing own shares bought by the Group from the stock market, at market value.

IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

On 26 May 2011, according to the decision of the BoD as of 27.04.2011 Impact Developer&Contractor SA alienates the receivables held to the Pasteur Institute to Sortway LTD for the amount of 1,500,000 Euros, that makes that the balance of the "Sundry Debtors" account would decrease by the amount of 6,913,637 lei on 31 December 2011. This receivable assignment had as its purpose the insurance of immediate liquidities to the company, without recording a loss related to the amounts registered in the books, resulting only a small loss due to the exchange rate difference from the payment performance moment and the moment of collecting the amounts related to the receivable assignment.

Prepayments Note 6.

Description 31 December
2011
31 December
2010
Prepayments 51 44
Total 51 44

Cash and cash equivalents Note 7.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:

Description 31 December
2011
31 December
2010
Cash in bank 2,090 3,227
Short term investments 0 4,502
Cash and cash equivalents 30 13
Total cash and cash equivalents 2,121 7.742

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Note 8. Share capital

  • amounts in this table are in RON -
31 December
2011
31 December
2010
Nominal share capital
Inflation adjustment to share capital
197,866,574
47,691,754
245,558,328
200,000,000
45,690,586
245,690,586
Closing exchange rate: 4.3197 4.2848
Share capital in EUR: 56,846,153 57,340,036

SC Impact SA was established in the year 1991, on the grounds of Law 31/1990. On the date of 04.10.2006 the company moves its registered office from Bucharest 1st District in Ilfov, the town Voluntari in the Construdava Business Centre. Also on this date the company changes its denomination as well. The identification data of the company are:

Denomination: IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR SA

Address : Voluntari, Pipera-Tunari Road no. 4C, Construdava Business Center, fl. 6, Ilfov County

Tel.: 021-230.75.70/71/72, fax: 021-230.75.81/82/83

Registered with the O.R.C. from T.M.B. under no. J 23/1927/2006

C.I.F. RO1553483

The subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company as at $31st$ of December 2011 is of 197,866,574 RON. The nominal value of a share is of 1 RON.

On the date of 11 October 2011, the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders approved the decrease of the share capital, from the amount of 200,000,000 RON, respectively 200,000,000 shares, by the cancellation of the shares acquired by the company in a number of 2,133,426 shares. The share capital of the company, following this operation, became 197,866,574 RON. The registration date approved by EGMS was 28.10.2011, and the operation of the share capital decrease with Depozitarul Central SA took place as at 06.02.2012.

The structure of the shareholding as at $31st$ of December 2011 was the following:

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Shareholder Holding $-$ according to
the statement of
Depozitarul Central
Holding - corroborated
with the D.EGMS for
share capital decrease
Popp loan Dan 16.34% 16.52%
Sandulescu Carmen Daniela 9.59% 9.69%
SALINK LIMITED 10.00% 10.10%
Artio International Equity Fund 8.46% 8.55%
TEMPLETON G.I.T-T.EM.MKTS SMALL CAP FUND 6.09% 6.15%
FONDUL DE PENSII ADMINISTRAT PRIVAT ING 5.81% 5.88%
Other legal entities, out of which 23.79% 22.97%
- foreign entities 15.38% 15.55%
Other natural persons, out of which 19.92% 20.14%
- foreign pers 0.44% 0.45%
Total 100.00% 100.00%

The company Impact Developer & Contractor SA has been traded to the Bucharest Stock Exchange since the year 1996, and beginning from the year 2006 its shares, at present in a number of 197,866,574, have been quoted in the 1st category.

25.93% of the company shares were held, as at 31.12.2011, by the company management.

Information Regarding Employees, Administrators and Directors

Structure of Personnel Expenses

In the year 2011 the number of employees decreased from 51 to 27, a decrease also reflected in the expenses with personnel remuneration.

Description 31.12.2010 31.12.2011
indemnifications for the Board of Directors 81,624 151,814
salaries of directly productive employees 132,994 9,042
salaries of TESA 1,469,350 750,491
exp. with social insurances and protection 425,863 217,081
TOTAL 2,028,207 1,128,428

Company Management

The current members of the Board of Directors were reelected by the Decision of GMS no. 3/11.10.2011, for a mandate of four years, except for Mr. Radu Bugica that was elected in the position of administrator for a mandate of four years by the Decision of GMS no. 1 / 16.04.2011.

Until 25.04.2012, Mr. Dan Ioan Popp occupied the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors. After this date, this possision is occupied by Mr. Dimitris Sophocleous who is the former finance director of mobile division Romtelecom.

The rights, powers and operating mode of the Board of Directors are in accordance with art. 8, art. 9, respectively art. 10 in the Articles of Association of the company Impact Developer & Contractor SA.

According to the Decision of GAS nr. 1/25.04.2012, the members of the BoD have the right to a monthly gross allowance with a value of 5,000 RON t, and the chairman of the Board of Directors has the right to a monthly gross allowance with a value of 10,000 RON.

Administrators at the end of December 2011

Name Position Identification
Data
Popp Ioan Dan Chairman of BoD 1570411400459
2. Ionescu Valeriu Nicolae Administrator 1520411400095
3. Bugica Radu Administrator 1651213384184

Executive Management

Citizenship
Surname Name Position
Sandulescu Carmen Daniela Executive Director Romanian
(Economic)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Note 9. Borrowings

Description 31 December
2011
31 December
2010
Long and medium term bank loans 20,637 28,169
Bonds - long term 0 0
Financial leases 4 12
Guarantees - long term 599 765
Total borrowings 21,240 28.946

The statement of the credits under performance at the end of the month of December 2011 is presented below.

At chapter subsequent events there appears the statement as at 31.03.2012 of the balance of credits.

1. Piraeus Bank

Credit contract no. 301/30.08.2006 Value: 12,807,256 EUR Due date: 31.07.2015

Object: financing in a proportion of 85% of the acquisition of a land plot situated in Bucharest, 6th district, Prelungirea Ghencea no. 402 - 412.

Interest: EURIBOR at 3 months plus a margin of 6 percentage points per year, the calculation of interests will be performed for the daily balance of the credit account and will be reported to a 360-days year.

Penalties: Annual rate by 6 percentage points higher than the interest rate.

The balance of drawings from this credit as at 31.12.2011 is of: 9,605,441.74 EUR

Reimbursement: the reimbursement of the Facility will be made according to the reimbursement schedule annexed to the Contract and an integral part hereto.

Guarantees: 3 blank promissory notes with the mention without protest and movable real guarantee upon the balance of all the current accounts opened by Impact with Piraeus Bank and mortgages on lands according to the situation below

2. Piraeus Bank

Credit contract no. 10/11.01.2007 Value : 257,927 EURO Due date 03.10.2012

Object : issue of two security letters with a value of 257,926.57 EURO, with a maturity on 03.10.2012.

Interest: EURIBOR at 3 months plus a margin of 3.15 percentage points per year.

Penalties : Annual rate by 6 percentual points higher than the interest rate

Reimbursement : reimbursement of the Facility will be made integrally on the due date.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

The statement of the mortgaged assets for Piraeus Bank is presented below:

Type of receivable Cadastral No. Mortgaged
surface
No. of Mortgage Contract Real
estate
Address/Residential
compound
first rank mortgage;
second rank
mortgage
6515/2/6/1 258,925.36 2781/31.08.2006; second
rank by 129/23.01.2009
land Bucharest,
Prelungirea Ghencea
no. 402-412, District 6
first rank mortgage;
second rank
mortgage; third rank
mortgage; fourth
rank mortgage; fifth
rank mortgage
$10252 -$
Constanta
31,400.00 2044/08.07.2005; second
rank by 129/23.01.2009;
third rank by
273/05.05.2011; fourth
rank by 274/05.05.2011;
fifth rank by
583/23.08.2011
land Constanta, Constanta
county, P VN 269
first rank mortgage;
second rank
mortgage; third rank
mortgage; fourth
rank mortgage; fifth
rank mortgage
10250
Constanta
9,100.00 2044/08.07.2005; second
rank by 129/23.01.2009;
third rank by
273/05.05.2011; fourth
rank by 274/05.05.2011;
fifth rank by
583/23.08.2011
land Constanta, Constanta
county, P VN 264
first rank mortgage;
second rank
mortgage; third rank
mortgage; fourth
rank mortgage; fifth
rank mortgage
10253-
Constanta
13,600.00 2044/08.07.2005; second
rank by 129/23.01.2009;
third rank by
273/05.05.2011; fourth
rank by 274/05.05.2011;
fifth rank by
583/23.08.2011
land Constanta, Constanta
county, P VN 267/2

3. Bancpost

Contract of credit facility on term no. 58/23.09.2005

Value: "First subfacility" in an amount of up to 4,500,000 EUR; "Second subfacility" in an amount of 4,600,000 EUR; "Third subfacility" in an amount of 2,000,000 EUR; "Third subfacility bis" in an amount of 5,000,000 EUR; "Fourth subfacility" in an amount of 2,900,000 EUR. The undrawn amounts from the "first subfacility" will supplement "the fourth subfacility" "Fifth subfacility" in an amount of 2,000,000 EUR; Validity: 7 years from the signing date of the credit contract.

Interest: EURIBOR at 3 months plus a margin of 3 percentage points per year.

The interest will be calculated as of the drawing date on the basis of the number of effective days reported to a 360-day year and is due and payable monthly, on the last day of the current month. The interest will be

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

accumulated daily, being calculated on the basis of the following formula: (credit balance x interest rate provided for in the previous paragraph)/360 days.

If the Borrower does not reimburse on the due date any part of the credit drawn from the Facility, the outstanding amount will lead to the payment of an increased interest rate equal to the amount of the provided interest rate and a margin of 3%.

The reimbursement date of the last installment of the Facility, according to the schedule, is 22.09.2012.

On 31.12.2011 there remained in the balance the value of 683,925.09 EUR from the second subfacility, intended for the financing of the "Europa" residential project. The other due subfacilities were integrally reimbursed on the 25.07.2007, summing up 12,795,602 EUR, for their payment being contracted other two credits with Banca Romaneasca.

The statement of mortgaged assets for Bancpost is presented below:

Type of
receivable
Cadastral
No.
Mortgaged
surface
No. of Mortgage Contract Real estate Address/Residential
compound
first rank
mortgage
1916/3/70 25,245.90 747/16.03.2007 Euros;
2864/21.10.2005 Euros
land Voluntari, 50/Junior,
Drumul Bisericii St.
first rank
mortgage
1916/3/6 498.45 747/16.03.2007 Euros;
2283/04.10.2005 Euros
land Voluntari, 50/Junior,
Drumul Bisericii St.
first rank
mortgage
1916/3/5 1,376.76 747/16.03.2007 Euros;
2283/04.10.2005 Euros
land Voluntari, 50/Junior,
Drumul Bisericii St.
first rank
mortgage
1916/3/7 235.52 747/16.03.2007 Euros;
2283/04.10.2005 Euros
land Voluntari, 50/Junior,
Drumul Bisericii St.
first rank
mortgage
1916/3/1 1,376.78 747/16.03.2007 Euros;
2283/04.10.2005 Euros
construction Voluntari, 50/Junior,
Drumul Bisericii St.
first rank
mortgage
1916/3/2 498.45 747/16.03.2007 euro;
2283/04.10.2005 Euro
construction Voluntari, 50/Junior,
Drumul Bisericii St.
first rank
mortgage
1916/3/4 223.42 747/16.03.2007 Euros;
2283/04.10.2005 Euros
construction Voluntari, 50/Junior,
Drumul Bisericii St.
first rank
mortgage
1916/3/11 143.5 747/16.03.2007 Euros;
2864/21.10.2005
$land +$
construction
Voluntari, 50/Junior,
Drumul Bisericii St.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

4. Banca Romaneasca

Contract for investment credit 50070065/25.07.2007. Value : 7,993,204 EUR. Validity: 7 years, 25.07.2007 -24.07.2014 Object:

a) Refinancing of some credit facilities being in balance at SC BANCPOST SA, credit facilities that had as a destination the financing of the different real estate projects/real estate acquisitions or acquisition of shares in companies that owned such real estates.

b) Financing of the commission for anticipated reimbursement charged by Bancpost in case of credits that follow to be taken over from Bancpost by the present facility. Interests:

a) Current interest rate: EURIBOR $(1M) + 2.5\%$ p.y.

b) Penalty interest rate: Current interest rate plus 50% of the Current interest rate

Reimbursement: the credit facility will be reimbursed on a quarterly basis, in equal installments.

5. Banca Romaneasca

Contract for investment credit 50070066/25.07.2007. Value: 22,306,796 EUR. Validity: 7 years, 25.07.2007 -24.07.2014. Object:

a) Refinancing of credits being in balance at SC BANCPOST SA, credits that had as an object the financing of the construction works for the Project;

b) Financing of the commission for anticipated reimbursement charged by Bancpost in case of credits that follow to be taken over from Bancpost by the present facility;

c) Financing / refinancing of construction costs related to the Project under development;

d) The amount of 3,000,000 EUR from the total of the present credit facility may be also used for the financing in a proportion of up to 100 % of the acquisition cost afferent to some lands where the Project will be developed, including for the acquisition by the Borrower of shares issued by companies that own such lands, but only on the prior agreement of the Bank.

Grace period: 18 months from the date of the first use

a) Current interest rate: EURIBOR (1M) + 2.5% p.y. The current interest is calculated according to the used balance of the credit facility, beginning with the date of the first use and is paid until the integral reimbursement of the Facility.

b) Penalty interest rate: Current interest rate plus 50% of the Current interest rate

Reimbursement: The credit facility will be reimbursed on a quarterly basis in equal installments after the finish of the grace period. Also, the credit facility will be reimbursed on a pro-rata basis from the collections related to the sale of each apartment/villa that is a part of the project.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

The ratio that defines pro-rata is the following: Amount to be reimbursed = Value of Credit Facility * surface of apartment/villa sold according to the sale-purchase contract signed by the Borrower with the final client / Total surface of the Project.

On the date of 31.12.2011 the amount to be paid in balance afferent to these credits from Banca Romaneasca was of 9,746,194.30 EUR.

Guarantees:

  • assignment of receivables from commercial contracts;
  • assignment of receivables on all the rights that result from the insurance contracts;
  • real movable guarantee coming from the guarantees that will be constituted by the constructor/ subcontractor
  • assignment of the rights that come from the bank guarantee letters;
  • pledge on the current accounts;
  • 2 promissory notes issued without protest.

The statement of the assets mortgaged to Banca Romaneasca is presented below:

Type of
receivable
Cadastral No. Mortgage
d surface
No. of Mortgage
Contract
Real estate Address/ Residential
compound
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007; land and Padurea Neagra no.
mortgage 20254 6,732.86 2049/09.07.2008 constructions 52-54
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007; land and Padurea Neagra no.
mortgage 23574 4,837.44 2049/09.07.2008 constructions 52-54
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007; land and Padurea Pustnicu no.
mortgage 22705 12,373.22 2049/09.07.2008 constructions 125-135
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007; land and Padurea Neagra no.
mortgage 21763 23,959.37 2049/09.07.2008 constructions 56-64
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007;
mortgage 18217/2/1 17,053.00 2049/09.07.2008 land Bucharest, district 1

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Type of
receivable
Cadastral No. Mortgage
d surface
No. of Mortgage
Contract
Real estate Address/ Residential
compound
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007;
mortgage 18217/2/2 3,817.00 2049/09.07.2008 land Bucharest, district 1
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007;
mortgage 18217/2/3 23,041.00 2049/09.07.2008 land Bucharest, district 1
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007;
mortgage 18216/2 19,931.00 2049/09.07.2008 land Bucharest, district 1
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007;
mortgage 26525/1 22,166.00 2049/09.07.2008 land Bucharest, district 1
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007;
mortgage 26525/2 2,186.00 2049/09.07.2008 land Bucharest, district 1
first rank
mortgage;
second rank 2648/25.07.2007;
mortgage 26525/3 33,074.00 2049/09.07.2008 land Bucharest, district 1

6. Banca Transivania

Credit contract no. 15/21.07.2009 value 9,000,000 RON, due date 20.07.2014.

Object: financing of current activity - finish of the projects being under development.

Interest: ROBOR at 6 months to which there is added the bank margin of 5.94%. The annual interest rate is fluctuating, being able to modify during the entire credit duration, according to the evolution of interests on the banking market.

Penalties: the penalty interest to credit is of 20%/an.

Reimbursement: The credit will be reimbursed in monthly instalments, according to the reimbursement schedule.

The anticipated reimbursement can only be made with the prior and express agreement of the Bank.

The balance afferent to the drawings from this credit as at 31.12.2011 is of 2,596,310.79 RON.

For the purpose of fulfilling the obligations that derive from the credit contract, between Impact and Banca Transilvania there were signed a series of receivable assignment contracts by which Impact constitutes in favour of the bank first rank guarantees having as an object the present and future receivables.

The statement of the assets mortgaged to Banca Transilvania is presented below:

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Type of
receivable
Cadastral No. Mortgage
d surface
No. of Mortgage
Contract
Real
estate
Address/ Residential
compound
first rank
mortgage
20254/36/1;2;6 101.91 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 52-
54
first rank
mortgage
20254/36/1;3;8 109.84 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 52-
54
first rank
mortgage
20254/40/2;1;3 90.61 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 52-
54
first rank
mortgage
23574/1/1/6 22.01 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 22-
28
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/6/2/1;1;6 59.60 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/6/2/1;2;9 59.60 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/7/2/1;2;9 53.48 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/7/2/2;2;8 40.45 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/9/2/1;2;8 44.60 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/9/2/2;1;4 74.85 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/10/2/2;2;9 63.70 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/11/2/1;1;5 46.99 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/11/2/1;2;7 49.83 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
21763/1/2/11/2/2;2;7 78.97 218/21.07.2009 land and
constructi
ons
Padurea Neagra no. 56-
64 and Padurea Pustnicu
no. 145
first rank
mortgage
7603 321.00 218/21.07.2009 Land and
constructi
ons
26, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor
first rank 7604 375.00 218/21.07.2009 Land and 26, George Palade St.,

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Type of
receivable
Cadastral No. Mortgage
d surface
No. of Mortgage
Contract
Real
estate
Address/Residential
compound
mortgage constructi
ons
Oradea, Bihor
first rank
mortgage
153317 220.00 218/21.07.2009 Land and
constructi
ons
38, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor
first rank
mortgage
153318 83.00 218/21.07.2009 Teren 38, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor
first rank
mortgage
7610 200.00 218/21.07.2009 Land and
constructi
ons
40, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor
first rank
mortgage
7613 200.00 218/21.07.2009 Land and
constructi
ons
46, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor
first rank
mortgage
7689 342.00 218/21.07.2009 Land and
constructi
ons
95, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor
first rank
mortgage
7537 470.00 305/04.06.2010 Land and
constructi
ons
152, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor
first rank
mortgage
7752 200.00 305/04.06.2010 Land and
constructi
ons
131, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor
first rank
mortgage
7541 325.00 120/09.03.2010 Land and
constructi
ons
160, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor
first rank
mortgage
7540 362.00 120/09.03.2010 Land and
constructi
ons
158, George Palade St.,
Oradea, Bihor

In total, the total accounting value of the assets mortgaged to the banks is of about 213.5 million RON. During the year 2011 there were finished the controls of the Bucharest District 1 local authorities with regard to the mode of establishment and payment of the local taxes owed for the buildings and lands held under property. The differences established by the control bodies were to recover 200,860 lei tax on land paid in addition, from District I.

Deferred tax Note 10.

Deferred tax consists in:

Description 31 December
2011
31 December
2010
Deferred tax 4,808 6,540
Total 4,808 6,540

The movement on the deferred tax liabilities is as follows:

Description 31 December
2011
31 December
2010
As at 1 st of January 6.540 10.509
Foreign exchange difference -53 -139
Charge / (Release) $-1.679$ $-3,830$
As at 31st of December 4,808 6.540

The temporary differences arise from: the re-measurement of land treated according IAS 40 (see Note 3) and from the different depreciation rule applied in accounting comparing to fiscal purposes.

Cumulative effect of temporary differences is:

a) IAS 40 1,320
b) Provision for taxes 359
Total 1,679

Currently, enacted tax rate of 16% is used to determine deferred income tax.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Trade and other payables Note 11.

Trade and other payables consist in:

Description 31 December
2011
31 December
2010
Trade accounts and notes payable 2,369 2,826
Suppliers of non current assets 1 1
Advances from customers 168 116
Dividends payable 31 91
Accrued interest 11 169
Accruals related to employees 184 188
Income tax payable 0 19
Liabilities to State Budget 111 137
Deferred income 900 965
Other creditors 100 -91
Guarantees 196 205
Total 4,072 4.626

Note 12. Turnover

The Group has recorded its net turnover as follow:

Sales of services 312 587
Sales of merchandise 204 30
Sales of finished goods 1,751 5,552
Description 2011 2010

Revenue from IAS 40 Note 13.

The Group decided to adopt starting with year 2006 the alternative treatment recommended by IAS 40 "Investment properties", recording a part of the land owned and the rented units at their market value. An authorised external evaluator has revaluated these properties. The difference between the historical cost of the land and the revaluated amount has been fully recognised directly to income statement.

The effect of changing the treatment to fair value model is presented below:

Description Area
(sqm)
Cost of
acquisition
(RON)
Revalued
amount
31.12.2010
(RON)
Difference
(RON)
Difference
(EUR)
Teisani (Buc, Sector 1) 205,495 25,810,172 109,431,279 83,621,107 19,731,732
Zenit (Constanta) 38,000 6,877,620 12,728,908 5,851,288 1,380,705
Prelungirea Ghencea (Buc, Sector
6)
180,000 37,629,000 65,317,677 27,688,677 6,533,584
Faget (Oradea) 24,460 1,446,564 4,565,923 3,119,359 736,062
Europa (Oradea) 644 42,709 83,457 40,748 9,615
Neptun (Constanta) 37,562 1,896,879 5,067,008 3,170,129 748,042
TOTAL LAND 486,161 73,702,944 197,194,252 123,491,307 29,139,741
216 housing units held for renting 65,549,330 66,294,875 745,545 175,923
Net effect of IAS 40 139,252,274 263,489,126 124,236,852 29,315,664

The amount of 29.316 thousand EUR is divided as follows:

Description Amount
$(k$ EUR)
Revenue recognized until 31
December 2010 37.945
Exchange differences (*) -378
Revenues recognized in 2011 $-8,251$
ΤΟΤΑΙ 29,316

(*) The exchange differences are determined based on annual average exchange rates used in calculation of Euro amounts.

Note 14. Other operating income

Other operating incomes includes as follows:

Description 2011 2010
Revenue from sundry services 753 996
Sales of residual goods 1 1
Rent 546 420
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets 71 516
Proceeds from sales of investments 1,462
Penalties from customers 420 258
Miscellaneous 109 877
Totai 3.362 3.068

Note 15. Raw material and consumables

Raw material and consumables costs includes as follows:

Description 2011 2010
Raw material 283 293
Auxiliary materials 159 92
Merchandise 222 88
Packing materials 0 0
Other consumables 51 60
Total 714 532

Note 16. Staff costs

The structure of staff costs is presented in the table bellow:

Description 2011 2010
Wages and salaries 266 491
Civil contract staff 46 44
Social security expenses 80 139
Total 392 674

Note 17. Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets

This position in the income statement includes as follow:

Description 2011 2010
Depreciation 346 419
Amortization - impairment
$\sim$
68 55
Total 414 474

Other operating expenses Note 18.

Other operating expenses includes as follows:

Description 2011 2010
Third parties services 2,084 2,987
Heat, light and power 609 728
Rent 480 975
Commissions and fees 48 56
Promotion and advertising 158 126
Taxes to State Budget 281 758
Bad and doubtful debts 44 546
Protocol
Disposals at net book value 77 294
Foreign exchange differences (gain) /
loss
358 408
Bank commissions 142 120
Working inventories 35 29
Maintenance and repairs 140 99
Provision for risks and charges 202 486
Insurance 105 139
Postage and telecommunication 61 97
Transport of goods and personnel 12 32
Travel $\Omega$ 3
Penalties and fines 14 75
Cost of disposed investments 1,380 24
Penalties for commercial contracts $\Omega$ 0
Old and damages inventories 0 0
Miscellaneous 416 350
Total 6,647 8,334

Note 19. Finance cost, net

The table below details the finance (income) / costs:

Description 2011 2010
Interest income -480 $-1,379$
Interest expenses 1,370 1,544
Other finance income -8 -3
Other finance expenses 0 244
Discount received 6 7
Impairment losses of participations 713
Total 1.601 412

Note 20. Income tax

Description 2011 2010
Income tax expenses
Differed tax expense/ (income)
9
$-1,688$
30
$-3,886$
Total -1,679 $-3,856$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Note 21. Related parties

Nature of Relationships

In the year 2011, the company IMPACT SA realised trade relationships with a number of companies that are related parties. The list of the related parties with which Impact realised trade relationships is the following:

Number and date of
Denomination of company-
contract
related party:
Type of services/products
purchased
J3009/30.12.2011 Supplier (construction services)
SMART FIN INTERNATIONAL CC/20.05.2011 Supplier
AD CONSULT LAND J2780/31.10.07 Supplier (management services)

The prices of the contracts concluded with the affiliated party companies are established under market conditions. In the year 2011, the company realised transactions with the related parties, as follows:

Sales to: 31.12.2011 31.12.2010
SMART FIN INTERNATIONAL 0.62 1.25
AD CONSULT LAND 1.21 0.29
Total 1.82 1.55
Purchases from: 31.12.2011 31.12.2010
SMART FIN INTERNATIONAL 8.16 25.28
AD CONSULT LAND 97.04 116.02
TOTAL 105.20 141.30

Following the transactions with the related party companies, there resulted the following balances as at 31st of December 2011:

Receivables from/Advances granted to: 31.12.2011 31.12.2010
SMART FIN INTERNATIONAL በ በՋ
AD CONSULT LAND

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

$\sim$
т.
--
--------------------------------------
-----
$\sim$
-------
----
------------------
____
PERSONAL PROPERTY AND INCOME.
TOTAL
---------------
___
---------------------------------------

л
л
4.LO
--------------------------------------
____
~
------
Debts to/Advances received from: 31.12.2011 31.12.2010
SMART FIN INTERNATIONAL
AD CONSULT LAND 9.70
TOTAL $\sim$ 9.70

Note 22. Subsequent events

Bank Credits

On the date of 31st of March 2012, the statement of the banking loans was the following:

No. of Contract Name Currency Val. of
contract
Balance as
эt
31.12.2011
Balance as
at
31.03.2012
Piraeus Bank Greece, Londra
301/30.08.2006 br. EURO 12,807,270 9,605,441.74 8.965,078.96
58/23.09.2005 Bancpost Floreasca EURO 21,000,000 683,925.09 513,275.88
50070065/25,07,2007 Banca Romaneasca EURO 7,993,204 3,140,187.22 2,854,715.65
50070066/25,07,2007 Banca Romaneasca EURO 22,306,796 6,606,007.08 6,411,546.13
15/21.07.2009 Banca Transilvania RON 9,000,000 2,596,310.79 2,155,712.33

In March 2012 on the request of the representative of the Public Ministry, the court of the Bucharest Tribunal disposed the institution of the ensuring distraint upon the goods of Impact Developer& Contractor SA up to the accomplishment of the amount of 16,823,946 lei in favour of ANAF. Against this decision the company filed for recourse. During the last two weeks there were made significant approaches for the clarification of the situation created by the court by the mode the session conclusion was made on the date of 28/03/2011, so as the activity of the company would not be blocked. On the 10th of April ANAF signed a pledge on a land of 52,234 sq.m located in Bucharest, district I which covers 150% from the amount asked by the Public Ministry

Note 23. Other Legal and Economic Information

During the period 7 December 2011 - 27 March 2012 the company was subject to a fiscal Inspection for V.A.T. reimbursement, a control that was ended on the date of 2 April 2012. The checked period was 01.01.2009 -30.09.2011. By the taxation decision no. F-MC 91/30.03.2012 communicated on 2 April 2012 there was established V.A.T. to be reimbursed with a value of 1,807,123 lei.

With regard to the project Business Support Centre - Greenfield 2 of SC MILLENIUM CONSULT INVEST 2002 SA, on the first quarter of 2012, following the second visit on site from December 2011, the project financing was dismissed, because of the fact that a portion of approximately 400 m of the public road Aleea Teisani, District 1, Bucharest, being under the administration of the City Hall of the Municipality Bucharest, where the access to the designed project is provided, is not accomplished on a rigid structure (asphalt, concrete, pavings, cubic stone).

SC MILLENIUM CONSULT INVEST 2002 SA challenged the decision of AM POR for the project financing dismissal, because AM POR did not take into account the fact that the modernization / execution of a public road cannot be put in the charge and control of a private petitioner / economic operator. On the other hand, AM POR issued regulations regarding the characteristics of the access road, subsequently to the project submission, and these cannot be opposable to the project, retroactively, according to the law norms in force.

Impact also launched in February 2012 the product houses on land, in the extension from Junior and in the Amber area in Greenfield.

The Board of Directors proposed the issue of convertible bonds that is on the agenda of GMS as of 25 April 2012. According to the Call the amount proposed for the issue of bonds is of about 10 million EUR, that should cover the need of liquidities until the half of the year 2014, a moment on which most of the credit contracts will be reimbursed.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Note 24. Principal subsidiaries

The principal subsidiaries consolidated within the Group, including the degree of control exercised by Impact Developer&Contractor SA, are as follows:

Entity December 31, 2011 December 31, 2010
% share % share
Actual Invest House SRL 100% 99%
Bipact 1995 SRL 63% 63%
Hobbit Intermediere Asigurari SRL 95% 95%
Investimob SA 0% 99%
Intop Construction SRL 99% 99%
Clearline 100% 100%
Development&Management SRL
Millenium Consult Invest SRL 45% 45%
BIZ-AR SRL 0% 95%
Prest RV 2003 SRL 0% 95%

During the year 2011, according to the decisions of the BoD from the year 2010 and from May 2011, in order to decrease the participations of Impact in other companies, the companies Biz-ar and Prest RV were closed, Prest RV in February 2011 on the basis of the resolution no. 16047 as of 24.02.2011 and Biz-Ar in April 2011 on the basis of the resolution no. 35838 as of 21.04.2011. Following liquidation, the profit of Impact was negatively influenced by the amount of 380 RON.

Investimob was merged in 2011 into Rot Apact. Along this merger, Intop Construction, initial owner of Investimob, got a 42% of the respective company. In December 2011, Intop sold its participation in Rot-Apact to several natural persons, and consequently, Investimob was not included in consolidation process.

On the basis of the same decisions to restructure the holdings of Impact, in December 2011 the Board of Directors of Impact decides the alienation to their nominal value of 36 social parts that it holds in Bipact 1995 SRL, from the total participation of 975 lei. Following this transaction, the participation held by Impact in Bipact decreased from 63% to 4.83%, respectively from 975 to 75 lei.

Impact owns shares with a pair value of 539 keuro (45%) in Millennium Consult Invest 2002 S.A. The applicabil standard is IAS28, Investments in Associates.

IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

The company SC Millenium Consult Invest 2002 SA is the titulary of a project that supposes the accomplishment and operation of a business support structure that would offer services for the SMEs in the Region Bucharest-Ilfov. It is about the Business Support Centre - Greenfield 2, a project submitted to be cofinanced from the European Regional Development Fund, by the Regional Operational Programme.

The project was submitted in March 2010, in April 2010 the administrative compliance and project eligibility assessment were successfully finished, and in November 2010 the project was declared accepted for financing. In January 2011 the technical design compliance was finished, and in April 2011 there took place the visit on site, before the signing of the financing contract.

During the period May - November 2011 the contracting process was suspended because of a notice received from the owner of a land plot situated a few hundreds of meters far from the implementation place of the above mentioned project, that claimed the existence of some litigations with regard to the Zoning Plan.

The person that made the notice to the Bucharest-Ilfov Regional Development Agency filed for several actions in court, requesting the cancellation of the Zoning Plan, against Impact Developer & Contractor - the beneficiary of the PUZ, actions that he lost.

During the project contract suspension period the Management Authority for the Regional Operational Programme documented with regard to the case appeared and following the ascertainment of the eligibility conditions, it disposed the continuation of the contracting process with the remake of the visit on site (at the moment of the AM POR decision to continue the contracting, the sentences regarding the dismissal of the petitioner's actions were not ruled yet).

At the end of November 2011, the contracting process was resumed, and in this respect the visit on site was remade in December 2011.

Following the second visit on site from December 2011, the project financing was dismissed, because of the fact that a portion of approximately 400 m of the public road Aleea Teișani, District 1, Bucharest, being under the administration of the City Hall of the Municipality Bucharest, where the access to the designed project is provided, is not accomplished on a rigid structure (asphalt, concrete, paving, cubic stone).

SC MILLENIUM CONSULT INVEST 2002 SA challenged the decision of AM POR for the project financing dismissal, because AM POR did not take into account the fact that the modernization / execution of a public road cannot be put in the charge and control of a private entity / economic operator. On the other hand, AM POR issued regulations regarding the characteristics of the access road, subsequently to the project submission, and these cannot be opposable to the project, retroactively, according to the law norms in force.

IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

S.C. LOMB S.A. was established in the year 2008 as a share trade company that had as shareholders the Local Council of the Municipality Cluj-Napoca (51%) and S.C. IMPACT DEVELOPER & CONTRACTOR S.A. (49%). Impact subscribed in the year 2008 the amount of 45,445,027.51 RON to the share capital of the project company Lomb SA. This was the cash participation of Impact, that represented the participation of 49%, the Cluj-Napoca Local Council having the obligation to bring the land to the share capital of the project company.

In the autumn of the year 2010, due to the fact that the shareholder the Cluj-Napoca Local Council did not fulfil its obligation to deposit to the share capital the 179 ha of land that represented the land subscribed by the Cluj-Napoca Local Council, the Board of Directors of SC Lomb SA decided the cancellation of the shares of the Local Council in accordance with the provisions of Law 31/1990 with its subsequent modifications. Following this fact the share capital of LOMB SA was diminished, and at present Impact holds shares in a percentage of 100% in the company Lomb SA. On the date of 03 June 2011 following the Extraordinary General Assembly of Shareholders there was decided the decrease of the share capital up to the value of 26,900,000 lei, the change of the legal form from share company in limited liability company with a sole associate. The denomination of the company was changed from S.C. Lomb S.A. to S.C. Clearline Development & Management SRL.

Auditors

RSM SCOT SRL is a company that develops its business in the field of professional services of financial accounting and audit, supplied in accordance with the Romanian and international accounting standards and also with the international audit standards.

RSM SCOT ensures to its clients fiscal consultancy and assistance, and also any other professional services specific to the activity field.

The team of RSM SCOT is composed by professionals, chartered accountants and financial auditors.

RSM SCOT has its headquarters in Bucharest and was set up by Otilia and Dan Schwartz in the year 1994, by the merger of the clients of two small consultancy companies where the two were associates.

RSM SCOT is a member of the Romanian Association of Chartered and Certified Public Accountants (C.E.C.C.A.R.) since 1994 and of the Romanian Chamber of Auditors since its set-up in 1999.

(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Contingents Note 25.

Next, we will present the list of significant litigations (according to the Bucharest Stock Exchange Code) where the company is a party.

- "more impact has the quality of a plaintim.
--------------------------------------
r
ency
Curr
RON RON RON EUR
Claims of
parties
16,025,023 14,855,309 13,442,674 2,500,000
Observations challenges. Impact made a challenge for a
receivable in an amount of approximately
IDC formulated a request of admission to
RECORD of Impact IN THE PRELIMINARY
the creditor group. For the judgment of
15,000,000 RON. THE PROVISIONAL
TABLE OF THE RECEIVABLE OF
15,047,995.76 LEI
suspended according to art. 36 Law
85/2006
IDC recorded to the creditor group with
the amount of $13,442,674$ lei
action for return of advance and damages
PASTEUR SA, admits the appeal declared
and the cancellation of pre-contract; IDC
The action was modified from action to
unstamped the appeal declared by the
oblige Pasteur to sell the land to us to
appealing defendant S.N. INSTITUTUL
assigned the receivable; Cancels as
Term 06-Apr-12 no term $31 - 1an - 12$ no term
Trial stage instance
first
nstance
First
instance
first
leadde
Adverse party Romconstruct Romconstruct (former Summa
Construction
Romania SA)
Floreasca
Institutul
Pasteur
đ
Position
Impact plaintiff-
creditor
plaintiff plaintiff recurring
plaintiff-
【^:::: ハ ト フ ::: ハ :::: ス :::::::::::::::::::::::: Object insolvency procedure delay of execution of the
delay penalties for the
Romconstruct to pay
constructions in the
Rubin assembly
Obligation of
insolvency procedure 5988/2/2 obligation to make
o.
No. of
€⊪ 7034/10
5/2010
39469/3/
2008
63835/3/
2011
011
Court Tribunal
Prahova
Bucharest
Tribunal
Bucharest
Tribunal
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
Pos. $\overline{\mathbf{c}}$ $\omega$

$-46-$

ì
t
j
í
į
i
i
ľ
í

(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Curr ency RON RON RON RON
Claims of parties 7,602,445 6,149,792 4,008,222 3,403,000
Observations according to the penal clause. Obliges the
28,475.5 lei legal expenses (stamp charge
respect that it admits the second request
reason as well and obliges the defendant
1,250,000 Euros representing damages
commercial sentence attacked in the
by the appellant - plaintiff SORTWAY
to pay to the plaintiff the amount of
appellant - defendant to pay to the
appellant - plaintiff the amount of
LIMITED. Partially changes the
in appeal)
dismisses the action/appeal. Impact
declared recourse
challenge to the forced execution begun
no. 14.519/02.07.2004". Dismosses the
according to the joint venture contract
by CLO for amounts as "penalties
recourse as ungrounded.
115/19.05.2010 and the fiscal inspection
resulted following the revaluation of the
respectively with regard to the tax on
Partially admits the challenge. Partly
profit in an amount of 760,957 lei
land purchased and resold by SC
cancels the taxation decision no.
report no. 33.364/18.05.2010
Term $17 - Oct - 12$ no term $11 -$ Apr-12 no term
stage
Trial
recourse recourse instance
lfirst
instance
first
Adverse party Romania SA
SC Summa
Local Council of
Mun. Oradea
Local Council of
Municipality
Jui
the
ANAF
Position of
Impact
recurring plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff
Object action for finding Challenge to execution 79/1285/ termination of contract obligations established in
administrative document
regarding the additional
fiscal inspection report
underwritten by the
the charge of the
cancellation of
payment fiscal
os
No. of
tie
23619/3/
2009
4376/27
1/2010
2012 11833/2/
2010
Court High Court
and Justice
Cassation
Court of
Oradea
$\epsilon$
Tribunal
đuj
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
Pos. in, Ф $\overline{\phantom{1}}$ $\infty$

$-47-$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

ency
Curr
EUR
200,000
RON
772,979
RON
559,503
RON
485,408
RON
113,091
Claims of
parties
Observations to the solving mode of the challenge with
decision no. 266/29.09.2010 with regard
regard to the previously mentioned tax.
Patagonia Invest SRL. Partly cancels
With recourse in 15 days from
communication
term for transaction dismisses the challenge of execution for
moratory damages deriving from
execution contract. Irrevocable.
execution itself and the cancellation of all
involved parties to pay to the challenger
forced execution. Dismisses the request
expenses. With right of recourse within
the execution documents performed in
Disposes the cancellation of the forced
remaining without object. Obliges the
constituted at B.E.J. Georgiana Jalbă,
being cancelled the right to request
the amount of 8,090.63 lei, as legal
Admits the challenge to execution.
to suspend forced execution, as
the execution file no. 8E/2011
15 days from communication.
dismisses the request. Amicable
settlement.
dismisses the recourse as ungrounded.
Irrevocable
Term 02 Apr 12 no term no term no term no term
stage
Trial
instance
first
instance
First
instance
first
instance
first
nuled in
first
Adverse party Tomis / Orban
Lucian and
Steluta
PIRAEUS BANK,
CONSTNATIN
BEJ G JALBA
BODOGAN
AUREL &
Bodogan Aurel
and Bodogan
Constantin
Consulting SRL
Keops
Bodogan Aurel
and Bodogan
đ
Impact
Position
plaintiff plaintiff challenger plaintiff plaintiff
Object dec. that take place to v-
c/obligation to make
Challenge of forced
execution
challenge of exec, with
prov. susp.
payment ordinance challenge of execution
No.of
tile
15426/1
18/2011
00/2010
11725/3
16650/2
99/2011
41894/3/
2010
11874/3
00/2009
Court
Pos.
Constanta
Tribunal
O)
District 2
Court of
Law of
$\overline{a}$
District 1
Court of
Law of
$\overline{1}$
Bucharest
[ribunalu
$\overline{2}$
Court of
law of
$\frac{3}{11}$

$-48-$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Curr ency RON RON RON RON RON
Claims of parties 100,222 100,123 73,916 72,931 71,850
Observations 85/2006, ascertains there intervened the
On the grounds of art. 36 in Law no.
suspension of right of trial first term after refusal in civil section. Suspended by art. 36 in Law 85/2006 we periodically collect 3,800 RON until the complete payment acc. to
reorganization plan.
Obliges the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the amount of 43,539 lei, representing the countervalue of the rent owed for the period January 2009 December 2010, the amount of 24,711.22 lei, representing delay penalties afferent to the amount of 43,539 lei, and the amount of 4,681.31 lei, representing amounts owed according to the administration contract concluded between the parties. Obliges the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the amount of 4,346 lei, as legal expenses, representing stamp and judicial tax. PARTIALLY ADMITS THE ACTION ASCERTAINS THE RIGHT OF THE PLAINTIFF TO USE THE AREA WITHOUT THE PAYMENT OF THE USE TAX BEGINNING FROM THE DATE OF 1.01.2009. OBLIGES THE DEFENDANT TO
PAY TO THE PLAINTIFF THE AMOUNT OF
Term no term no term no term no term 02-Apr-12
Trial stage instance instance
first
first instance First instance first instance recourse
Huma Andreea Huma Danut
Adverse party Constantin Romania SA
Summa
SC Summa Romania SA Dafora Structuri Vasilica and CNADR
$\overline{5}$
Position
Impact plaintiff plaintiff- defendant plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff- recurring
Object claims deriving from
incompliant works,
executed by SUMMA claims, legal expenses bankruptcy claims, lease contract action for the return of tax paid for the gas pipe in Boreal
No.of file
Fil
10191/3
2010
21136/2 99/2009 305/137 1/2008 4393/94/ 2011 13729/1 18/2010
Court District 2 Bucharest
Tribunal
$\overline{4}$
Court of
District 1
Law of
Mures
$\overline{5}$
Tribunal Court of
$\overline{17}$
Law of Buftea Constanta
$\frac{8}{10}$
Court of Appeal

$-49-$

(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Curr ency RON RON RON RON RON RON RON
Claims of parties 50,292 50,000 43,997 39,210 33,782 33,486 31,222
Observations 30,940.78 LEI AS A USE TAX FOR ROAD
AREA PENALTIES, LEGAL INTEREST
On the grounds of art. 36 in Law no. 85/2006, ascertains as intervened the
suspension of right of trial
dismisses the complaint. First term of
recourse.
evidence reconventional request as ungrounded.
Dismisses the main request as
ungrounded. Dismisses the
Recourse was filed for.
judgment of reason 3 of request. Obliges
amount of 2034.27 lei representing legal
the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the
plaintiff 22480 lei representing rent and
7591.46 lei delay penalties. Ascertains
Obliges the defendant to pay to the
the waiver of the plaintiff to the
expenses.
admits the action/undrafted decision.
Irrevocable by the cancellation of the
ecourse as unstamped
evidence
Term no term 11-Sep-12 24-Apr-12 $18 - Jan - 13$ no term no term 09-Apr-12
Trial stage first instance instance
first
instance
first
instance
first
instance
First
instance
First
Adverse party Floreasca (former Summa
Romania SA)
Construction
Cofaru Dumitru
Gabriel
Ciubotaru Pavel recourse Manu Elena PATURESCU
CORNEL
Position of Impact plaintiff ANRE
plaintiff
plaintiff recurring
plaintiff-
plaintiff plaintiff Cominstal
Group
plaintiff
Object claims of incompliant works contraventional
complaint
claims-green spaces recoveries of receivables,
price index according to
the contract
claims, lease contract ndex communicated by
Action for claims for
recovering the price
INS, according to
contract
Recovery of expenses
that came to Impact
incompliances of
following the
No.of de 9807/94/ 2010 8499/94/
2011
00/2010
12758/3
8274/29
9/2009
4392/94/
2011
14599/3
00/2008
37677/3/
2010
Court Court of
$\overline{a}$
Law of
Buftea
Tribunal
llfov
$\mathcal{L}$
District 2
Court of
Law of
$\overline{21}$
Bucharest
Tribunal
$\overline{2}$
Court of
Law of
Buftea
$\overline{23}$
District 2
Court of
Law of
$\frac{1}{2}$
Bucharest
Tribunal
25

$-50-$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

No.of Object
Position
Adverse party Trial Term Observations Claims of Curr
tile Impact stage parties ency
Cominstal works
12633/9
4/2011
contraventional
complaint
plaintiff ANRE instance
first
19-Mar-12 first term 25,000 RON
5235/21
2/2011
contraventional
complaint
petitioner dues and other
CL Constanta,
Serv of taxes,
revenues
recourse 04-Apr-12 evidence 25,000 RON
2010 10402/3/ eviction/termination for
failure to observe lease
contract
plaintiff Draghici Jenica
Laura
instance
First
no term partially admits the action. Irrevocable by
not declaring recourse.
25,000 RON
4785/29
9/2009
failure to pay utilities and
claims deriving from
rent
plaintiff SC Patru Ace
ដូ
instance
first
11-Feb-13 partially admits the action. First term of
the recourse declared by them
22,389 NON
13314/1
11/2011
action for ascertaining plaintiff Compania de
Apa Oradea
instance
first
03-Apr-12 evidence 20,000 RON
2269/94/
2011
contraventional
complaint
petitioner Sistem de Gosp
Apele Romane-
Administratia
a Apelor Ilfov
instance
first
08-May-12 first term of recourse. 17,500 RON
2010 6946/94/ termination of lease
contract/claims
plaintiff Florentin
Muscalu
Teodor
instance
first
no term admits the action/decision not drafted.
No data about declaring recourse.
13,310 RON
34961/2
99/2010
claims, rents plaintiff Patru Ace SRL instance
first
02-Dec-12 drafted. Impact declared recourse.
dismisses the action. Decision not
12,142 RON
4372/94/
2010
contravention protocol,
cancellation of
cash register
plaintiff MEF-GFIIfov recourse no term dismisses the recourse as ungrounded. 8,000 RON

$-51 -$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

ency
Curr
RON N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Claims of
parties
5,500 3,629 RON $N/A$ $N/A$ N/A N/A
Observations dismisses the request Dismisses the action. IDC declared
recourse
suspend the decision of ANRE with regard
to the electric power distribution service
supply in the Class compound. Dismisses
DC requested to the court to cancel
the recourse as ungrounded
206/04.02.2010. Oblies the defendant to
approval of distribution tariffs in the ass.
amount of 15,146.8 lei as legal expenses
approve the tariffs for the activity of the
plaintiff of electric power distribution as
expertise report drafted in the case and
of Voluntari; Admits the action. Cancels
the response to objections. Obliges the
the Decision of the ANRE president no.
IDC requested the cancellation of the
defendant to pay to the plaintiff the
results from the judicial accounting
ANRE decision with regard to the
dismisses the request. dismisses the request. dismisses the recourse as ungrounded.
Term no term 21-Nov-12 no term no term $22 - Feb - 12$ 22-Feb-12 no term
stage
Trial
instance
first
recourse instance
first
instance
First
instance
first
instance
first
Recourse
Adverse party IPCT Instalatii Coca Adina ANRE ANRE ANRE ANRE Consumatorului
CJ, CR pentru
Protectia

Impact
Position
debtor recurring
plaintiff-
plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff recurring
plaintiff-
Object Payment call claims 834/2010/suspension of
cancellation of ANRE
documents, decision
decision
Attack of decision
206/2010 ANRE
complaint/cancellation of
documents issued by
ANRE
complaint/cancellation of
documents issued by
ANRE
contravention prot.
cancellation of
To.of
50746/3/
2011
5700/30
0/2009
2927/2/2
010
2975/2/2
OIO
6390/2/2
$\frac{1}{10}$
6391/2/2
$\overline{c}$
18/2010
12377/1
Court
pos.
Bucharest
Tribunal
$\frac{1}{35}$
Bucharest
Tribunal
$\frac{1}{36}$
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
$\overline{5}$
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
$\frac{1}{38}$
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
39
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
$\frac{1}{4}$
Constanta
Court of
Appeal
$\overline{11}$

$-52-$

(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Curr ency N/A N/A $\frac{4}{\sqrt{2}}$ $\sum_{i=1}^{n}$
N∕
N/A N/A $\frac{4}{2}$ $\frac{4}{2}$ N/A N/A
Claims of parties $\frac{4}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{4}{2}$ $\frac{4}{2}$
Observations admits the recourse of Impact. dismisses the recourse. there is judged the ascertainment of termination of contracts no. 878P/01.01.2008 și 879P/1.01.2008.
8761/1.01.2008, 867P/01.01.2008,
administration of evidence: documents +
examination
first term, after disjunction other procedural interventions, intervention requests. Dismisses the specified action as
ungrounded
IDC requested to the court to ascertain contract termination; partially admits the
that there intervened the execution
request first term.
Term no term no term $19 - Apr - 12$ 01-Mar-12 23-Apr-12 no term no term 06-Nov-12
Trial stage first instance Recourse recourse First instance defendan instance
First
First instance instance
first
Adverse party ANAF ANRE Public Service of Sewage and Water Public Service of Sewage and
Water
Regia Nationala a Padurilor- Forest Directorate Bucharest Pusca loan MTS Leasing; Ban Liviu Ionescu Elena
Ani Mihaela
đ
Position
Impact plaintiff plaintiff- recurring plaintiff- recurring plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff
Object suspension of execution, decision
administrative act
35/15/12/2010
cancellation of ANRE decision 485/2010 contract termination contract termination obligation to make compensatory damages eviction/termination Action for ascertainment eviction
No. of tile 465/2/20 $\overline{1}$ 3191/2/2 010 11416/9 4/2010(4 0089/3/2
(010)
11416/9 4/2011 9122/29 9/2007 99/2010
55912/2
10401/3,
2010)
3555/11 1/2010 25336/3/
2011
Court
Pos.
High Court
$\overline{5}$
and Justice
Cassation
5
High Court
$\overline{43}$
$\overline{\circ}$ and Justice
Cassation
Court of
$\frac{1}{4}$
law of
Buftea
Court of
45
Law of
Buftea
Court of
$\overline{46}$
Law of District 1 Court of
Law of
$\overline{4}$
District 1 Bihor
$\frac{8}{48}$
Tribunal Bucharest
Tribunal
$\frac{6}{4}$

$-53-$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

ă ency $N/A$ $N/A$ AINIA $\frac{4}{2}$ $\frac{4}{2}$ N/A N/A $\frac{4}{N}$
$\frac{1}{2}$
Claims of parties
Observations 29-Nov-12 first term 26-Nov-12 first term. admits the action, disposes the eviction
of the defendant.
evidence.
Term no term 24-Apr-12 27-Mar-12 first term
Trial stage instance
first
instance
first
instance
first
first instance
First
of Adverse party Hristeno
Nicolae
Stefan Costin
Mihalache
Exquisite SRL
DF Broker
Construction Srl instance
Rothav
Apele Romane
Position Impact plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff
Object termination/claims
33822/3/ eviction action,
Court of Law of Buftea
49736/3/ eviction-refused from
62268/3/ Subscription termination
No.of file
F
29651/3/ eviction
2011
29652/3/ eviction
2011
2010 2011 2011
Court 50 Bucharest
Tribunal
51 Bucharest
Tribunal
52 Bucharest
Tribunal
53 Bucharest
Tribunal
54 Bucharest
Tribunal
s.
2

B. List of litigations where impact has the quality of defendant:

$B_{\cdot \cdot \cdot}$

ă
ency
Claims of
parties
16,823,946 RON 9.155,118 RON 9,138,140 RON
Observations 16-Mar-12 administration of evidence Dismisses the appeal as ungrounded.
With recourse
Cancels the attacked sentence and sends
the case, to be rejudged, to the first
court. Impact declared recourse
Term no term 24-May-
$\mathbf{r}$
Adverse party Trial stage instance
first
leədde recourse
±

Management
SC Brooklyn
Property
Management
SC Brooklyn
Property
รี่ยี่
Position of
Impaci
civil liable
party
Object takeover by assignment
receivables of Summa
Romania from contr.
by the plaintiff of
42/2007
takeover by assignment
receivables of Summa
Romania from contr.
by the plaintiff of
6/2007
No.of
e
#
60772/3/ $ $ Civil liability
2011
32826/3/ Claims coming from the defendan
2010
2010
Court 1 Bucharest
Tribunal
2 Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
3 High Court $\,$ 32874/3/ Claims coming from the $\,$ defendan
and Justice
Cassation
á

$-54-$

ׇ֘֝֬֝
ď
t
i
Ī
ļ
li
T
ľ

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

ency
$\overline{a}$
RON EUR EUR EUR RON EUR
Claims of
parties
8,018,174 1,250,000 490,940 317,422 234,119 34,692
Observations for administration of evidence anymore in this file as it assigned the
evidence; IDC does not have quality
quality of defendant
dismisses the request as ungrounded.
With appeal in 15 days from the
communication
dismisses the recourse as ungrounded,
suspension until the final solving of file
maintains the measure of case
23619/3/2009
main action and obliges impact to pay the
approximately 160,000 RON by the forced
amount of 8080.96 lei, as legal expenses.
the recourse as ungrounded. Obliges the
Partially changed the appealed sentence
execution procedure return. Dismisses
in the respect that partially admits the
admits the appeal declared by Impact.
execution accomplished by intimates,
Impact has to recover the amount of
recurring to pay to the intimate the
amount of 102,784. Following the
dismisses the action.
Term $11-Apr-12$ 25-Apr-12 no term no term no term no term
Trial stage instance
first
instance
First
recourse instance
First
recourse lesdde
Adverse party Romconstruct
& BRD SG
Institutul
Pasteur
ROMANIA SA
SC SUMMA
ROMANIA SA
SC SUMMA
Constantin and
Bodogan
Aurel
Peter John
Leigh
ŏ
Impact
Position
defendant defendant defendant detendant defendant defendant
Object Action for contractual
damages
IP requests the payment
the failure to conclude
of damages following
the sale-purchase
contract
return of the guarantee
action by which there
letter countervalue
was requested the
Return of guarantee
etter countervalue
claims (legal expenses) return of advance and
penalties
No.of
iie
2011(19)
35939/3/
105/201
$\delta$
30348/3/
2010
45882/3/
2009
45886/3/
2009
5028/94/
2009
10892/3/
2010
Court Bucharest
Tribunal
Bucharest
Tribunal
Bucharest
Tribunal
$\overline{6}$
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
N
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
$\infty$
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
Ō,
pos. $\blacktriangleleft$

$-55-$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

ency
Curr
RON EUR RON RON RON N/A N/A
Claims of
parties
131,446 26,186 39,923 35,000 31,824
Observations dismisses the action amount of 13519.61 lei representing legal
action. Dismisses the action of plaintiff as
CONTRACTOR SA. Entirely changes the
action. Obliges the intimate plaintiff to
appealed sentence in the respect that
being prescribed the material right to
appellant SC IMPACT DEVELOPER &
prescription of the material right to
admits the exception regarding the
expenses for appeal. With recourse
pay to the appellant defendant the
Admits the appeal declared by the
the plaintiff gave up the action first term of the recourse declared by
impact ruled
Dismisses the action as ungrounded cancels the appeal as unstamped.
Term $24-0ct-11$ 29-May-
$\overline{1}$
no term 14-Dec-12 no term no term
Trial stage instance
First
instance
First
instance
first
cassation
instance
after
first
instance
first
first
Adverse party Peter John
Leigh
ROMANIA SA
STYLE MODA
consulting srl
Farming
Stefanica
Mihaela
Bobeica Andrei
Sorin
Nicolae si Visan instance
Visan Petre
đ
Impact
Position
defendant defendant defendant
defendar
defendant سه
defendan
Object under private signature
Termination of SPC
and payment of
penalties
claims/contract
termination
claims (damages for
construction vices)
servitude by authentic
delay of constituting
document
decis. authentic SPC
No.of
file
45236/3/
2010
48002/3/ return of land value
2009
2278/94/
2011
15895/3
99/2006
32099/2
(2010)
claims-damages for
6283/94/
2010
18/2010
17735/1
Court
Pos.
Bucharest
Tribunal
$\overline{a}$
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
$\mathbf{H}$
Court of
Law of
Buitea
$\overline{12}$
Bucharest
Tribunal
$\overline{3}$
Court of
Law of
Buftea
$\overline{4}$
Genica
Constanta
Tribunal
15

$8.2.$

$-56 -$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Curre 'nςγ €UR EUR RON RON RON RON
Claims of parties 1,487,001 500,000 584,713 110,000 RON 100,123 59,116 49,357
Observations term for evidence dismisses the action, with appeal For solving the litigation in an amicable
Vew
admits the exception for the prescription
of action material right. Dismisses the
action as prescribed.
registration to the creditor group counterclaim formulated by Impact in the
approximately 65,000 RON. Cancels the
appellant to pay to the intimate the
amount of 2480 lei, legal expenses
appeal, as unstamped. Obliges the
action was dismissed. Admits the
respect that obliges the plaintiff-
defendant to pay the amount of
representing the lawyer fee
first term of recourse.
Term $29-MaV$ -
$\overline{c}$
no term 20 Apr 12 no term no term no term 23-May-
$\mathfrak{a}$
Trial stage instance
first
instance
first
cancellatio
arbitral
ruling
n of
nstance
first
instance
first
appeal instance
first
Adverse party Oradea prin
Municipiul
Primaria
Oradea
Sava Mircea
Aurelian
Construdava
Degi
SRL
Dumitrescu
Doina
Romania SA
SC Summa
Plescan Petruta Georgescu
Maricica
ð
Position
Impact defendant defendant defendant defendant plaintiff-
defendant

defendan
plaintiff
defendant
Object request to pay contractual
penalties
claims grounded on sale-
respectively interests for
payment in installments,
purchase contract with
installments paid in
advance and moral
damages
commercial arbitration-
claims for construction
vices Degi
claims of damages for
vices
claims resolution of contract for
payment of outstanding
vices, IDC formulated
counterclaim for the
nstallments
document cancellation
dismembering
No.of 9297/1
11/201
$\circ$
212/20
40442/
$\overline{a}$
9761/2
/2011
5876/3
/2010
299/20
21136/
$\overline{9}^*$
3/2010
20014/
5540/9
4/2007
Court
Tribunal
Oradea
$\overline{91}$
Constanta
Tribunal
$\mathbf{L}$
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
$\overline{3}$
Bucharest
Tribunal
$\frac{9}{1}$
District 1
Court of
Law of
$\overline{5}$
Court of
Ploiesti
Appeal
$\overline{1}$
Court of
law of
$\overline{21}$

$-57-$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Curre ρčγ RON RON RON RON RON $\frac{1}{2}$
Claims of parties 33,150 30,811 15,182 11,611 4,552 $\frac{1}{2}$
Observations for the performance of technical expertise
of constructions
dismisses the ordinance request as
ungrounded.
intimate the amount of 1200 lei expense.
Dismisses the recourse as ungrounded.
Obliges the recurring to pay to the
suspended according to art. 36 Law
85/2006
value of each request reason according to
the plaintiff was requested to specify the
report to establish the stamping to this
the value established by the expertise
value
dismisses the action as inadmissible; the
plaintiffs declared appeal
Term 30-Apr-12 no term no term no term 29-Mar-
$\mathbf{1}^{\mathbf{2}}$
28-Mar-
12
Trial stage cassation
after
cassation
instance
after
first
instance
first
recourse instance
First
instance
First
appeal
Adverse party Petcuta Danut Viab Consulting
Antonescu
Adrian
Romconstruct
$\mathfrak{F}$
S,
Contabilitate
Maricica
S.C.Isac
Radio Consult,
Paicu Claudia,
& Amariucai,
Ispas Daniel,
Ermis Ioana,
Humeniuc,
Stanescu,
Salom,
៉ិ
Position
Impact defendant defendant J.
defendant
recurring
defendant defendant $\mathcal{F}$
defendani
intimate
Object documents)/claims to make; countervalue of
claims (reason separated
lack of use)
there is requested the
payment call by which
amounts for which
payment of some
services were not
supplied
Action for penalty claim Action for recovery of
incompliant works
claims deriving from
construction vices
Mihailesc
Networks
No.of file from the file for obligation
11190./
299/20
G
297/94
/2011
3/2011
44218/
4/2010
7602/9
81/118
/2009
4/2010)
3/2010(
1003/9
31608/
Court Buftea District 1
Court of
law of
$\overline{23}$
Court of
Law of
Buftea
24
Bucharest
Tribunal
25
Court of
Buftea
ho wel
26
Constanta
Tribunal
27
Bucharest
Court of
Appeal
$\overline{28}$

$-58-$

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)

Curre
řεγ
N/A N/A N/A N/A $\frac{d}{dz}$ $\frac{d}{dz}$
Claims of
parties
Observations remained to be ruled dismisses the recourse as ungrounded.
CGMB and lonita Florian made a
challenge for cancellation
dismisses the action as ungrounded.
Term 14-Mar-
57
no term $21 - Dec-11$
instance
first
Recourse
Adverse party Trial stage Go West, Flash
Man, Timpu A,
Mihai, Clinciu,
Majed Samer,
Rotaru, Oeru,
Maftei, Paul
Ionel, Paun
SC Rudyal,
Naftanaila
Grigoriu C,
Antonesc,
Ciocan D,
Cristinel,
Onirom,
Models
Ionita Florian CGMB / Mayor
Municipality
Bucharest/
of the
Ionita
Ionita Florian -
municipiului
Bucharest
General al
Consiliul
đ
Impact
Position
Cioaca, intimate defendant intervenient
Object resolution of prosecutor
complaint against
Nup
Decision of the General
Cancellation of the
no. 263/2008
administrative document
cancellation of
No. of
file
299/20
/15067
$\vec{a}$
(6108/2 Council of Mun. Bucharest
3/2009
23136/
(2011)
3/2009)
(43654)
5415/3
/2009
Court District 1
Court of
Law of
$\overline{29}$
Bucharest
Tribunal
ន្ត
Bucharest
Tribunal
$\overline{51}$

$-59-$

(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise)
STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
lated as significant, the company also has ongoing a number of litigations with different debtors of
Besides the above presented litigations appreci
the company coming from the supply of utilities or other small receivables as value. These litigations (approximately 100) comprise a total value of IDC
claims of approximately 120,000 RON.
In order to better understand the situation of the litigations, these are grouped in some more important categories, namely:
$\overline{1}$ e of the present notes drafting, remained only two, are litigations coming from two construction
Litigations with Romconstruct that, on the dat
execution contracts concluded in the year 2006, their cause being the very long delays of the constructor in the finishing of the works and its claims
œ
orks. The litigations are in the following situation: At position 1 in the litigations where Impact is
to receive amounts of money for unfinished w
plaintiff by which there was admitted the provisional registration of Impact to the creditor group of Romconstruct for the amount of 16,025,023
delays of the works were recognized, and respectively at position 4 in the situation of the litigations
RON, so the claims of Impact coming from the
where Impact is a defendant, where Romconstruct requests the countervalue of the unpaid works and penalties. This file is pending on the dockets
of the Bucharest Tribunal. A third file, from position 2 on list A, where Impact requests the payment of the delay penalties was suspended, being
found in fact in the file from position 1 on list A;
$\dot{\mathbf{c}}$ Summa Romania SA) and respectively Brooklyn Property Management SRL come from execution
Litigations with Floreasca Construction (former
contracts signed in the year 2006 where Summa was executant and Impact beneficiary. These contracts were very much delayed and appeared
from the part of Impact requests for penalties and from the part of Summa the request for the payment of some executed works. In the year 2008
Summa assigned the receivables to the company in the Brooklyn Group, that is a party in some of the trials that have the same origin. At present
there are files on the list A, litigations from positions 5, 14, 15 and 19, that are either suspended due to the beginning of the insolvency procedure,
in the amount with which Impact is registered to the creditor group of Summa, respectively position
or under recourse, but whose values are found
3 in list A. On list B1 at positions 2, 6, 7 there appear claims of Summa/Brooklyn that were dismissed until at present.
$\vec{a}$ 5 where there was taken over the trial quality by Sortway Ltd following the assignment of
Litigations with Pasteur from positions A 4 and B1
receivable and sale of litigious rights that took place in the year 2011

$-60-$

stated otherwise)
STATEMENTS
(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
Litigations with the Oradea Local Council coming from the so-called "penalties according to the joint-venture contract as of 02.07.2004" from
$\vec{r}$
position B2 16 for which the forced execution was also attempted by the CL Oradea, that was dismissed (position A6).
uni Litigations with CL Cluj by which Impact requests amounts coming from the investments accomplished by Impact and respectively the project
SRL for the accomplishment of the Lomb project to which CL Cluj-Napoca did not bring the land, so
company Clearline Development&Management
he total amount requested until at present is of over 21 million lei plus legal interests, but that does
the project cannot be accomplished anymore. Ti
not include the unaccomplished benefit requested by Impact by the conciliation call. For these amounts a separate action follows to be filed for.
Ġ Litigations with ANAF following the protocol drafted in the year 2010 by which Impact challenged the amounts and penalties established by the
in the first instance, from the total amount afferent to the main reason, the action of Impact was
control document. Following the court decision
admitted for the amount of 760,957 lei, so, also the penalties of 1,214,786 lei afferent to this amount are not due. Thus, from the total amount
only the difference of 1,427,257 lei;
there remained to be challenged in the recourse
$\ddot{\sim}$ Litigations with Bodogan Aurel and Bodogan Constantin for amounts requested as penalties, positions A 10, 11, 13 and B1 8, are litigations that
have begun from 2008, for which Impact was executed for amounts as penalties, but in the year 2011 there was admitted the request of Impact
from position A 11 and the procedures for execution return were begun;
that these amounts are no longer due in the file
$\dot{\infty}$ There is also a number of litigations with authorities for certain issued documents or illegal sanctions, positions A 18, 20, 26, 27, 34, 37, 38, 39,
40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 54 and B2 30. These litigations do not have significant value, but the management has the obligation to attack all the illegal
administrative documents;
o, There is also a number of litigations with smaller values by which Impact requests damages and rents until the release of the real estates for the
installments that were terminated: positions A 17, 24, 29, 33, 50, 51, 52, 53
lease contracts or the contracts with payment in
ere impact is called to be liable as a civil liable party for deeds performed by other persons, facts
10. With regard to the file being at position B1, wh
beed administered evidence in the file, the representative of the Prosecutor's Office requested the
unconfirmed by court decisions, without having
16,823,946 lei upon the goods of Impact, reasoned by the fact that the goods of the defendant
institution of the distraint for the amount of

$-61-$

(all amounts are expressed in thousands EUR, unless stated otherwise) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

the distraint upon the patrimony of Impact for the entire amount of 16,823,946 lei, the company Impact declared recourse. The companies Fondamento Forte and Patagonia Invest were called in this file as civil liable parties for the deed of Mrs. Stegaru Ruxandra. As the companies Fondamento Forte and Patagonia do not exist anymore, Impact was summoned as a successor in rights of the two companies that it absorbed (Stegaru Ruxandra) upon which the distraint was put are insufficient to cover the prejudice. Against the measure disposed by the court to institute

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.