AI assistant
IMAGE RESOURCES NL — Regulatory Filings 2018
Sep 17, 2018
65117_rns_2018-09-17_750dbf86-c835-4dc3-95b5-3350cfb2079a.pdf
Regulatory Filings
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
18 September 2018
==> picture [212 x 35] intentionally omitted <==
20 METRE SHALLOW GOLD INTERSECTION AT IMAGE RESOURCES’ ERAYINIA PROSPECT
Highlights
-
Encouraging initial results from EYRC01 20m @ 0.7g/t Au from 40m, Including 4m @ 1.2g/t Au from 48m and 4m @ 1.0g/t Au from 56m
-
7km untested strike northwest of drillhole EYRC01. Follow-up 60 AC holes planned to map out gold enhanced supergene zone prior to deeper RC drilling
-
At least 16 separate other enhanced gold enriched supergene zones identified for follow-up with deeper RC drilling
Erayinia gold drilling
Image Resources is pleased to announce encouraging results from its first-pass drilling of 6 reverse circulation (RC) drill holes totalling 650 metres at Image’s 100%-owned Erayinia prospect (E28/1845 and E28/2742 totalling 106.7 sq. km), located 130km ESE of Kalgoorlie and numerous other operating gold mines (Fig.1) The drill programme has been successful in identifying strike continuity of the King mineralisation (historically drilled by WMC in 199899 and Integra 2003-07*), which starts 350 metres to the south.
Image Resources’ drilling (Figs.2, 3 and 4) show a number of gold mineralised zones within the first 3 southern RC holes (EYRC001, 2 and 3). The best intersection is 20m at 0.7g/t Au from 40m (Table 1 and Table 2) within a sheared, bleached and silicified mafic unit. The mineralisation is interpreted to occur as west dipping stacked pyrite, quartz, and carbonate lodes within a package of Archaean mafic and sedimentary rocks.
A seven km strike length to the north of the King mineralisation remains virtually untested with only 3 deep RC holes (EYRC004, 5 and 6) completed 400m to the north by Image Resources, which intersected siliceous metasediments. Hole EYRC05 intersected a 16m zone of semi-massive sulphides from 47m in a brecciated cherty quartzite, however preliminary analyses are low and are being checked by a more rigorous fire assay method. This area shows a complex sigmoidal-shaped magnetic feature, interpreted to be a dolerite. Further air-core (AC) drilling is proposed to outline the extent of the mineralisation prior to deeper RC drilling.
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872
Page 1 of 12
Future work will include 60 AC drill holes spaced 50m on 200m spaced lines and to a depth of 40m, to help identify and map the anomalous Au within the clay/bedrock interface where the supergene gold is present, prior to deeper RC drilling. The King mineralisation to the south is similar in style and all the RC drilling was sited on a supergene enhanced layer that was first identified by shallow AC drilling.
Further work is required elsewhere on the tenements to follow up on very encouraging positive results from shallow drilling and in some cases deeper RC. There are 16 anomalous Au zones identified mainly from previous AC drilling that will require follow up to ascertain potential Au extensions. These targets vary from 100ppb to 2860ppb (2.86g/t Au) as shown in Table 3.
Notwithstanding these encouraging early gold results at Erayinia, Image remains primarily focussed on exploration activities aimed at adding to the mineral sands mineral resources and ore reserves to increase the overall life-of-mine around the Boonanarring and Atlas Deposits. Plans include a further 119 drill holes totalling 2,872 metres to be drilled in October 2018. Other mineral sands related activities include plans for botanical surveys and drilling 23 holes totalling 900 metres at Bidaminna and Woolka, which are Image’s leading potential upside projects.
Notes: * WAMEX Open File Report A61649 – WMC Annual Technical Report for the Karonie Project October 2000. * WAMEX Open File Report A79824 – Integra Surrender Report for the Aldiss Project October 2008.
==> picture [219 x 309] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1 Location of Erayinia and operating gold mines in the Kalgoorlie region.
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 2 of 12
==> picture [408 x 577] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2. Ground Magnetics merged with Aeromagnetic Image with current RC drilling and historical AC and RC holes.
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 3 of 12
==> picture [453 x 508] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3. Ground Magnetics merged with Aeromagnetic Image with current RC drilling and historical AC and RC holes.
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872
Page 4 of 12
Table 1. RC Drillhole Locations
| Table 1. RC Drillhole Locations | Table 1. RC Drillhole Locations | Table 1. RC Drillhole Locations | Table 1. RC Drillhole Locations | Table 1. RC Drillhole Locations | Table 1. RC Drillhole Locations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hole ID Easting Northing Depth(m) Dip Azimuth MGAz51 MGAz51 Metres Degrees Degrees |
|||||
| EYRC01 | 471965 | 6526902 | 120 | -58 | 98 |
| EYRC02 | 471880 | 6526907 | 120 | -60 | 94 |
| EYRC03 | 471799 | 6526904 | 120 | -60 | 96 |
| EYRC04 | 471743 | 6527301 | 109 | -60 | 88 |
| EYRC05 | 471658 | 6527309 | 99 | -60 | 94 |
| EYRC06 | 471831 | 6527305 | 57 | -60 | 94 |
Table 2. RC Drilling Assays > 0.2g/t Gold
| Table 2. RC Drilling Assays >0.2g/t Gold | Table 2. RC Drilling Assays >0.2g/t Gold | Table 2. RC Drilling Assays >0.2g/t Gold | Table 2. RC Drilling Assays >0.2g/t Gold | Table 2. RC Drilling Assays >0.2g/t Gold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hole ID From To Width Gold Metres Metres Metres ppm |
||||
| EYRC01 | 40 | 44 | 4 | 0.694 |
| EYRC01 | 44 | 48 | 4 | 0.398 |
| EYRC01 | 48 | 52 | 4 | 1.152 |
| EYRC01 | 56 | 60 | 4 | 1.04 |
| EYRC01 | 76 | 80 | 4 | 0.203 |
| EYRC02 | 68 | 72 | 4 | 0.567 |
| EYRC02 | 104 | 108 | 4 | 0.43 |
| EYRC02 | 112 | 116 | 4 | 0.541 |
| EYRC03 | 92 | 96 | 4 | 0.633 |
| EYRC03 | 96 | 100 | 4 | 0.338 |
Table 3. Follow up – Untested with Deep Drilling Anomalous Gold Intercepts
| Table 3. Follow up –Untested with Deep Drilling Anomalous Gold Intercepts | Table 3. Follow up –Untested with Deep Drilling Anomalous Gold Intercepts | Table 3. Follow up –Untested with Deep Drilling Anomalous Gold Intercepts | Table 3. Follow up –Untested with Deep Drilling Anomalous Gold Intercepts | Table 3. Follow up –Untested with Deep Drilling Anomalous Gold Intercepts | Table 3. Follow up –Untested with Deep Drilling Anomalous Gold Intercepts | Table 3. Follow up –Untested with Deep Drilling Anomalous Gold Intercepts | Table 3. Follow up –Untested with Deep Drilling Anomalous Gold Intercepts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hole ID Hole Type EOH Depth Easting Northing From To Max Gold Metres MGAz51 MGAz51 Metres Metres ppm |
|||||||
| SISC1466 | AC | 56 | 468844 | 6540483 | 55 | 56 | 0.13 |
| SISC1483 | AC | 49 | 468750 | 6539840 | 32 | 36 | 0.25 |
| ISRC1029 | RC | 184 | 468669 | 6539513 | 106 | 107 | 1.76 |
| SISC1235 | AC | 52 | 469031 | 6538991 | 48 | 51 | 0.23 |
| SISC1236 | AC | 42 | 468975 | 6538937 | 32 | 36 | 0.24 |
| ROE0968 | AC | 54 | 469641 | 6538647 | 32 | 34 | 0.35 |
| SISC1581 | AC | 24 | 469074 | 6537465 | 16 | 20 | 0.1 |
| ROE1234 | AC | 30 | 469240 | 6534300 | 24 | 26 | 1.28 |
| ROE0339 | AC | 40 | 471697 | 6526757 | 34 | 36 | 0.61 |
| KRR019 | RAB | 10 | 473837 | 6526157 | 7 | 8 | 0.84 |
| KRR071 | RAB | 37 | 474357 | 6525157 | 18 | 22 | 0.96 |
| ROE0345 | AC | 57 | 474677 | 6525157 | 22 | 24 | 0.19 |
| ROE0346 | AC | 45 | 474757 | 6525157 | 40 | 42 | 0.34 |
| ROE0347 | AC | 49 | 474837 | 6525157 | 22 | 24 | 0.23 |
| ROE0700 | AC | 51 | 473637 | 6524557 | 28 | 30 | 2.86 |
| KRR136 | RAB | 37 | 474737 | 6524357 | 24 | 30 | 0.39 |
| ROE0356 | AC | 47 | 473097 | 6524037 | 30 | 32 | 1.36 |
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 5 of 12
==> picture [447 x 271] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4. Cross section showing IMA RC and historical (Integra 2004) air-core drilling
For further information, please contact:
George Sakalidis Exploration Director M: +61 411 640 337 [email protected]
COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT – EXPLORATION RESULTS, MINERAL RESOURCES AND ORE RESERVES
The information in this report is based on information compiled by George Sakalidis BSc (Hons), who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. George Sakalidis is a Director of Image Resources NL. George Sakalidis has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. George Sakalidis consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in this report.
The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcements. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement. This announcement contains forwardlooking statements which involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. These statements reflect current expectations, intentions or strategies regarding the future and assumptions based on currently available information. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties materialise, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary from the expectations, intentions and strategies described in this announcement. No obligation is assumed to update forward looking statements if these beliefs, opinions and estimates should change or to reflect other future developments.
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 6 of 12
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 2 report template
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, | • | Sampling and QAQC procedures are |
| techniques | random chips, or specific specialised industry | carried out using Image’s protocols as per | ||
| standard measurement tools appropriate to the | industry sound practice. | |||
| minerals under investigation, such as down hole | • | RC drilling was used to obtain bulk 1 | ||
| gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). | metre samples from which composite 4m | |||
| These examples should not be taken as limiting | samples were prepared by spear | |||
| the broad meaning of sampling. | sampling of the bulk 1m samples. 3kg of | |||
| • | Include reference to measures taken to ensure | the composite sample was pulverized to | ||
| sample representation and the appropriate | produce a 10g charge for aqua | |||
| calibration of any measurement tools or systems | regia/ICPMS determination for gold and | |||
| used. | pathfinder elements. The analytical | |||
| • | Aspects of the determination of mineralisation | results of the composite samples are | ||
| that are Material to the Public Report. | used to determine which 1m samples | |||
| • | In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been | from the rig’s cyclone and splitter are | ||
| done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse | selected for fire assay. | |||
| circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples | ||||
| from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g | ||||
| charge for fire assay’). In other cases more | ||||
| explanation may be required, such as where there | ||||
| is coarse gold that has inherent sampling | ||||
| problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation | ||||
| types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant | ||||
| disclosure of detailed information. | ||||
| Drilling | • | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole | • | Reverse circulation (RC) drilling was |
| techniques | hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) | carried out using a face sampling | ||
| and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard | hammer with a nominal diameterWheel | |||
| tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or | of Fortune. No duplicate samplesof | |||
| other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by | 140mm. | |||
| what method, etc). | ||||
| Drill sample | • | Method of recording and assessing core and chip | • | RC recoveries are visually estimated |
| recovery | sample recoveries and results assessed. | qualitatively on a metre basis. | ||
| • | Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and | • | Various drilling additive (including muds | |
| ensure representative nature of the samples. | and foams) have been used to condition | |||
| • | Whether a relationship exists between sample | the RC holes to maximize recoveries and | ||
| recovery and grade and whether sample bias may | sample quality. | |||
| have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of | • | Insufficient drilling and geochemical data | ||
| fine/coarse material. | is available at the present stage to | |||
| evaluate potential sample bias. Drill | ||||
| samples are sometimes wet which may |
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 7 of 12
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| result in sample bias because of | ||||
| preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse | ||||
| material. | ||||
| Logging | • | Whether core and chip samples have been | • | RC chips and chip trays are being |
| geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of | geologically logged. | |||
| detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource | • | Lithology, alteration and veining is | ||
| estimation, mining studies and metallurgical | recorded and imported into the Image | |||
| studies. | Resources central database. The logging | |||
| • | Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in | is considered to be of sufficient standard | ||
| nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) | to support a geological resource. | |||
| photography. | • | Logging of RC drillholes records lithology, | ||
| • | The total length and percentage of the relevant | mineralogy, mineralisation, weathering | ||
| intersections logged. | and colour, and is qualitative in nature. | |||
| • | All drillholes were logged in full. | |||
| Sub-sampling | • |
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, | ||
| techniques | half or all core taken. | |||
| and sample preparation |
• | If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. |
||
| • | For all sample types, the nature, quality and | |||
| appropriateness of the sample preparation | ||||
| technique. | ||||
| • | Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- | |||
| sampling stages to maximise representation of | ||||
| samples. | ||||
| • | Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is | |||
| representative of the in situ material collected, | ||||
| including for instance results for field | ||||
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | ||||
| • | Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain | |||
| size of the material beingsampled. | ||||
| Quality of | • | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the | • | RC samples were dispatched to |
| assay data | assaying and laboratory procedures used and | MinAnalytical laboratory in Perth where | ||
| and laboratory tests |
• | whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld |
the samples were pulverized and a 10g sub sample analysed using an aqua regia digest and determination of Au (lower |
|
| XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in | limit of detection 1ppb), Ag, As, Bi, Cu, | |||
| determining the analysis including instrument | Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Te, W and Zn by ICPMS. | |||
| make and model, reading times, calibrations | Aqua regia will dissolve most oxides, | |||
| factors applied and their derivation, etc. | sulphides and carbonates but will not | |||
| • | Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg | totally digest refractory and silicate | ||
| standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory | minerals. In a weathered, oxidized | |||
| checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy | environment aqua regia digestion is | |||
| (ie lack of bias) and precision have been | considered adequate for exploration | |||
| established. | purposes. QA/QC measures included | |||
| repeat analyses and the use of internal |
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 8 of 12
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lab standards which indicated acceptable | ||||
| levels of accuracy and precision although | ||||
| in rare cases there is some indication of | ||||
| the presence of coarse gold. | ||||
| • | Industry standard standards and | |||
| duplicates are used by the NATA | ||||
| registered laboratory conducting the | ||||
| analyses. | ||||
| Verification of | • |
The verification of significant intersections by | • | Where duplicate analyses of individual |
| sampling and | either independent or alternative company | samples were made the analytical results | ||
| assaying | personnel. | were averaged. | ||
| • | The use of twinned holes. | • | No twin holes have been drilled. | |
| • | Documentation of primary data, data entry | • | Primary data is entered into an in-house | |
| procedures, data verification, data storage | database and checked by the database | |||
| (physical and electronic) protocols. | manager. | |||
| • | Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | • | No adjustment of assay data other than | |
| averagingof repeat and duplicate assays. | ||||
| Location of | • | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill | • | RC drill collars were located using a hand- |
| data points | holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, | held GPS with an accuracy of +- 4m. | ||
| mine workings and other locations used in Mineral | • |
Grid system: GDA94 | ||
| Resource estimation. | • | Topographic control using regional DEM | ||
| • | Specification of the grid system used. | data. | ||
| • | Qualityand adequacyof topographic control. | |||
| Data spacing | • | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | • | RC drilling was carried out at 80m |
| and distribution |
• | Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and |
• | spacings on two lines 400m apart. Not for ore resource estimation. |
| grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral | • | 4m compositing was applied | ||
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) | ||||
| and classifications applied. | ||||
| • | Whether sample compositinghas been applied. | |||
| Orientation of | • | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves | • | Drilling of inclined (-60deg) RC holes 90° |
| data in | unbiased sampling of possible structures and the | to east or orthogonal to the target strike. | ||
| relation to geological structure |
• | extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation |
||
| and the orientation of key mineralised structures | ||||
| is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, | ||||
| this should be assessed and reported if material. | ||||
| Sample | • | The measures taken to ensure sample security. | • | Samples were taken to the laboratory |
| security | Kalgoorlie depot prior to dispatch to | |||
| Perth using a commercial freight | ||||
| company. |
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 9 of 12
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audits or | • | The results of any audits or reviews of sampling | • | The sampling techniques and results have |
| reviews | techniques and data. | not been subject to audit. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • | Type, reference name/number, location and | • Erayinia is situated on exploration licence |
|
| tenement and | ownership including agreements or material | E28/1895 and E28/2242 108.6sqkm and is | ||
| land tenure status |
issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title |
held by Image Resources NL. The licence is granted with no known impediments to |
||
| interests, historical sites, wilderness or national | obtaining a licence to operate. | |||
| park and environmental settings. | ||||
| • | The security of the tenure held at the time of | |||
| reporting along with any known impediments to | ||||
| obtaininga licence to operate in the area. | ||||
| Exploration | • | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by | The King prospect area has been subject to | |
| done by other | other parties. | systematic surface sampling by previous | ||
| parties | explorers mainly including WMC and Integra. | |||
| Air-core drilling was carried out by WMC | ||||
| Resources and a total of 129 holes for 5402 m | ||||
| were drilled at the King and K5 prospects. | ||||
| Integra drilled 25 RC holes for 2860m and 43 AC | ||||
| holes totalling 1600m between 2003-2007 in the | ||||
| King Prospect. Available historical data has been | ||||
| compiled over all the tenements and the main | ||||
| companies include Goldfields (201 AC & 22 RC), | ||||
| Integra(427 AC & 35 RC)and Newmont(52 AC). | ||||
| Geology | • | Deposit type, geological setting and style of | Erayinia is underlain by a moderate to | |
| mineralisation. | strongly foliated, mafic volcano-sedimentary | |||
| sequence intruded by differentiated | ||||
| dolerites and variably metamorphosed to | ||||
| upper amphibolite facies conditions. | ||||
| Numerous felsic porphyries also intrude the | ||||
| sequence. These Archaean rocks are | ||||
| overlain by sedimentary rocks of Proterozoic | ||||
| to Cainozoic age. The Proterozoic rocks are | ||||
| part of the Woodline Beds and are | ||||
| characterized by carbonate-pyrite-bearing | ||||
| quartz pebble conglomerates. | ||||
| Drill hole | • | A summary of all information material to the | A total of 6 RC holes (EYRC01 to EYRC06 | |
| Information | understanding of the exploration results including | totaling 625m) were drilled at Erayinia. The |
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 10 of 12
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a tabulation of the following information for all | details of material drillholes are reported in | ||||
| Material drill holes: | Table 1 and Table 2. | ||||
| • | easting and northing of the drill hole collar | ||||
| • | elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above | ||||
| sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar | |||||
| • | dip and azimuth of the hole | ||||
| • | down hole length and interception depth | ||||
| • | hole length. | ||||
| • | If the exclusion of this information is justified on | ||||
| the basis that the information is not Material and | |||||
| this exclusion does not detract from the | |||||
| understanding of the report, the Competent | |||||
| Person should clearlyexplain whythis is the case. | |||||
| Data | • | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | • | No weighting or cutting of gold values, other | |
| aggregation | averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum | than averaging of duplicate and repeat | |||
| methods | grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and | analyses. | |||
| cut-off grades are usually Material and should be | • | No metal equivalents have been used. | |||
| stated. | |||||
| • | Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short | ||||
| lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of | |||||
| low grade results, the procedure used for such | |||||
| aggregation should be stated and some typical | |||||
| examples of such aggregations should be shown in | |||||
| detail. | |||||
| • | The assumptions used for any reporting of metal | ||||
| equivalent values should be clearlystated. | |||||
| Relationship | • | These relationships are particularly important in | • | Not applicable. | |
| between | the reporting of Exploration Results. | ||||
| mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
• • |
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths |
|||
| are reported, there should be a clear statement to | |||||
| this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not | |||||
| known’). | |||||
| Diagrams | • | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and | • | Refer to text. | |
| tabulations of intercepts should be included for | |||||
| any significant discovery being reported These | |||||
| should include, but not be limited to a plan view | |||||
| of drill hole collar locations and appropriate | |||||
| sectional views. | |||||
| Balanced | • | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration | • | Anomalous ranges used are stated in the | |
| reporting | Results is not practicable, representative reporting | text. | |||
| of both low and high grades and/or widths should | |||||
| bepracticed,to avoid misleadingreportingof |
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 11 of 12
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exploration Results. | |||||
| Other | • | Other exploration data, if meaningful and | • | Ground Magnetic survey by Image | |
| substantive | material, should be reported including (but not | Resources. | |||
| exploration data |
limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk |
||||
| samples – size and method of treatment; | |||||
| metallurgical test results; bulk density, | |||||
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock | |||||
| characteristics; potential deleterious or | |||||
| contaminatingsubstances. | |||||
| Further work | • | The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. | • |
Detailed air-core drilling is planned on a | |
| tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or | 400mx50m grid over the prospective areas | ||||
| large-scale step-out drilling). | mainly north of hole EYRC01. | ||||
| • | Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible | ||||
| extensions, including the main geological | |||||
| interpretations and future drilling areas, provided | |||||
| this information is not commerciallysensitive. |
Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579 Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 | PO Box 469 West Perth WA 6872 T: 08 9485 2410 | F: 08 9486 8312 www.imageres.com.au
Page 12 of 12