IMAGE RESOURCES NL — Regulatory Filings 2015

Jan 26, 2015

==> picture [297 x 49] intentionally omitted <==

ASX Code: IMA 27 January 2015

Suite 4a, 5 Mumford Place Balcatta WA 6021 PO Box 1075 Balcatta WA 6914 Telephone 08 9485 2410 Facsimile 08 9240 7845 www.imageres.com.au Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579

New Boonanarring strand delineated by recent first pass drilling

Image Resources NL (ASX: IMA) announces that 116 holes totalling 4,254 metres have been completed of the 257 holes planned in the Stage 1 drilling programme (Figure 1 and Table 1). Initial assay results for 52 of these holes have been received to date, and are looking very promising with a new parallel strand (named East Gingin North strand) delineated by initial drilling over a 1.5 km length. This new strand is being investigated further along strike over 8 km potentially linking the eastern side of the Gingin North Resource to the western side of the Boonanarring Resource ( Figure 2 and Table 2 ) . Some of the better results include 3 m @ 23.3% HM from 16m in drill hole IX00067 and 6m @ 6.4% HM from 14 m in drill hole IX00060. This mineralisation is shallower than the Boonanarring Resource mineralisation even though it is at the same Relative Level (RL) due to the effect of the scarp covering the Boonanarring Resource.

The aim of the drilling is to make Boonanarring a long life standalone operation and concurrently expand other projects into potential parallel operations for Image and or other producers (Figure 1). All holes drilled in this current programme are within the Red Gully-Boonanarring-Gingin North- Gingin South-Chandala region.

Another important new target just east of the 5.5km Gingin South Resource area has the potential for an eastern parallel strand that is up to 14 km long. The assay results from the first 52 holes confirm that the Gingin South Resource continues further east and is shown up on five separate lines spaced 200 to 400 m apart (Figure 3 and Table 3). Some of the better results include 6m @ 10.0%HM from 27m in drill hole IX00021 and 6m @ 4.8%HM from 31m in drill hole IX00018. The significance of this eastern 14km long parallel strand may be similar to what has occurred at Boonanarring where the eastern strand has a much higher average HM grade and zircon percentage than the western strand and also has the potential to significantly increase the resource size at Gingin South.

The third target being tested by Image in the current programme is the northern extension of the high grade and high zircon Eastern Strand of the Boonanarring deposit, where the average grade in the Block A 210 East strand is estimated to have an Indicated Mineral Resource[1] grading 19.2% HM with the HM containing 26.4% Zircon. Image has completed 12 new drill holes near this northern extension, and assay results are pending (refer Figure 4). Additionally and importantly, a number of drill lines completed in the 1990s are 2 km and 5 km along strike from the northern end of the Boonanarring Mineral Resource. Significantly, the high grade zones drilled from the 1990s drilling include 6 m grading 6.7% HM (Iluka drill hole RG0045 from 27 m down hole), which correlates with the predicted NNW extension of Boonanarring.

1 Refer to the 31 May ASX release http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130531/pdf/42g6v9v0jxn3hg.pdf for full details of the Boonanarring Mineral Resource/Reserve Estimate

Importantly, some of the previous drilling did not drill to the target depth of mineralisation and further infill and deeper holes are required to test the grade, thickness of this potential extension. Note in some cases these planned holes are very close to the Brand highway and permission for access will be required

Other areas drilled in this campaign include Red Gully, Chandala and some infill drilling within the Boonanarring Resource. These assay results are pending.

The Director of Exploration George Sakalidis commented:

“I am very excited with the early success of the first part of the Stage 1 drilling programme in outlining new discoveries and targets in the vicinity of the Boonanarring Resource which will potentially allow the Company to develop this project as a major long life operation. Ensuing drilling programmes will be predominately concentrating and following up these results. Access and POW (Programme of Works) are progressing well which will permit the company to be able to test these new exciting Target zones over the next few months.”

All the drilling costs for the 257 holes planned for this stage 1 programme have been pre paid by a placement to a major WA drilling company. The drilling programme started on the 14 November and these priority targets will be tested over several months.

==> picture [452 x 606] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 Drilling programmes completed on Image Resources Gingin to Red Gully region in the North Perth Basin

==> picture [397 x 620] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 Boonanarring to Gingin North Strand Interpretations

==> picture [398 x 622] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [173 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Figure 3 Gingin South Strand Interpret
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [397 x 622] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4 Boonanarring North to Red Gully Strand Interpretations

Table 1

AC Holes drilled Nov to Dec 2014

Project Area	Holes	Metres
Boonanarring South Chandala Gingin South Red Gully	67 12 21 16	2,476 344 812 622
Total	116	4,254

Table 2 Boonanarring South - East Gingin North strand

Hole ID	Easting*	Northing*	From (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	Average OS %	Average SL %	Average HM%
IX00034	389939	6542291	7	9	2	18.99	27.70	4.25
			14	19	5	11.77	20.45	3.71
IX00035	389863	6542248	16	20	4	10.76	15.56	3.35
			28	30	2	1.96	11.09	4.54
IX00036	390040	6541885	23	26	3	0.56	22.74	3.22
IX00037	390107	6541916	12	18	6	10.45	20.63	4.72
IX00038	390189	6541935	9	15	6	11.53	30.73	4.35
			23	25	2	1.77	10.75	3.64
IX00039	390255	6541982	7	9	2	15.91	29.73	4.36
IX00040	390331	6542013	36	38	2	7.12	12.82	3.18
IX00043	390211	6541508	20	23	3	0.07	20.35	4.68
IX00050	390324	6541131	14	21	7	5.52	16.68	4.00
IX00052	390357	6541146	17	21	4	2.19	15.10	6.51
IX00053	390384	6541158	17	19	2	0.08	15.23	5.67
IX00055	390468	6541196	20	22	2	9.96	16.27	3.63
IX00057	390608	6541263	3	6	3	22.96	16.17	7.48
IX00060	390432	6540926	14	20	6	3.24	17.34	6.36
IX00061	390465	6540937	17	20	3	2.73	16.53	6.54
IX00067	390447	6540935	16	19	3	1.02	15.87	23.30
IX00068	390462	6540851	18	20	2	7.01	13.68	8.31
IX00069	390516	6540860	4	6	2	2.96	16.43	3.04
Notes
*Coordinates are in Datum		GDA 94 Projection	MGA zone 50
** The data aggregation of		reported intercepts	is computed using Micromine software				algorithms by	compositing
1 m sample intervals using		criteria of a ≥ 2.5% HM threshold, minimum length of 2 m,					and internal dilution set to
zero

Table 3 Gingin South

Hole ID	Easting*	Northing*	From (m)	To (m)	Width (m) Average OS %	Width (m) Average OS %	Average SL %	Average	HM %
IX00013	397418	6526394	25	27	2	5.99	12.35		10.69
IX00015	397524	6526180	32	34	2	1.85	8.53		4.55
IX00017	397601	6526200	11	13	2	30.88	19.29		5.10
IX00018	397545	6526183	31	37	6	5.18	13.26		4.76
IX00021	397543	6526016	27	33	6	7.47	13.71		10.01
IX00022	397576	6526022	13	15	2	27.94	14.24		7.74
			17	19	2	24.76	23.69		3.13
IX00025	397731	6525791	18	20	2	13.77	18.79		7.59
			36	43	7	17.68	13.74		4.37
IX00026	398558	6523864	15	18	3	29.03	22.74		8.71
			32	34	2	21.06	26.04		3.82
IX00033	397956	6525209	35	37	2	34.63	17.87		7.76
Notes
*Coordinates are in Datum GDA 94 Projection MGA zone 50
Significant intercepts 2.5%HM over 2m (1m samples) with no internal dilution**
** The data aggregation of reported intercepts is computed using Micromine software algorithms by compositing 1									m
sample intervals using criteria of a≥2.5% HM threshold, minimum length of 2 m, and							internal dilution set to zero

For more information visit imageres.com.au Please direct enquiries to:

George Sakalidis Exploration Director M: +61 411 640 337 E: george@imageres.com.au

Collis Thorp Chief Executive Officer M: +61 413 705 075 E: cthorp@imageres.com.au

COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT – EXPLORATION RESULTS AND MINERAL RESOURCES AND RESERVES

Information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by George Sakalidis BSc (Hons) who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. At the time that the Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves were compiled, George Sakalidis was a director of Image Resources NL. He has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. George Sakalidis consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in this report.

COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT – RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The information in this report that relates to mineral resources and is based on information compiled by Lynn Widenbar BSc, MSc, DIC MAIG, MAusIMM employed by Widenbar & Associates who is a consultant to the Company. Lynn Widenbar has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code of Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Lynn Widenbar consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made during or in connection with this communication, including, without limitation, those concerning the economic outlook for the mining industry, expectations regarding prices, exploration or development costs and other operating results, growth prospects and the outlook of Image’s operations contain or comprise certain forward looking statements regarding Image’s operations, economic performance and financial condition. Although Image believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct.

Accordingly, results could differ materially from those set out in the forward looking statements as a result of, among other factors, changes in economic and market conditions, success of business and operating initiatives, changes that could result from future acquisitions of new exploration properties, the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including industrial accidents, environmental hazards or geologically related conditions), changes in the regulatory environment and other government actions, risks inherent in the ownership, exploration and operation of or investment in mining properties, fluctuations in prices and exchange rates and business and operations risks management, as well as generally those additional factors set forth in our periodic filings with ASX. Image undertakes no obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after today’s date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

==> picture [650 x 383] intentionally omitted <==

Dredge Resources at 1.0% HM cut-off
Project Area Resource Category	Volume TONNES % HM % Slime HM TONNES VHM % Ilmenite % Leucoxene % Rutile % Zircon % Ilmenite Leucoxene Rutile Zircon VHM Tonnes
Titan Indicated Titan Inferred	10,300,000 21,200,000 1.8 22.1 380,000 84.4 71.9 2.0 1.0 9.5 270,000 7,000 5,000 36,000 318,000 58,500,000 115,400,000 1.9 18.9 2,210,000 84.3 71.8 2.0 1.0 9.5 1,592,000 45,000 22,000 210,000 1,869,000
Titan Total	68,800,000 136,600,000 1.9 19.4 2,590,000 84.4 71.9 2.0 1.0 9.5 1,862,000 52,000 27,000 246,000 2,187,000
Telesto Indicated Calypso Inferred Sub Total Indicated	1,700,000 3,500,000 3.8 18.4 130,000 82.6 67.5 3.4 2.2 9.5 100,000 5,000 3,000 13,000 121,000 27,100,000 51,500,000 1.7 13.7 850,000 84.6 68.8 3.5 1.6 10.6 585,000 30,000 14,000 90,000 719,000 12,000,000 24,700,000 2.1 21.6 510,000 86.1 72.5 2.4 1.6 9.6 370,000 12,000 8,000 49,000 439,000
Sub Total Inferred	85,600,000 166,900,000 1.8 17.3 3,060,000 84.6 71.1 2.5 1.2 9.8 2,177,000 75,000 36,000 300,000 2,588,000
Cooljarloo Total	97,600,000 191,600,000 1.9 17.8 3,570,000 84.8 71.3 2.4 1.2 9.8 2,547,000 87,000 44,000 349,000 3,027,000
Bidaminna Inferred	26,300,000 44,600,000 3.0 3.6 1,350,000 96.0 82.4 7.2 1.0 5.4 1,113,000 97,000 13,000 73,000 1,296,000
Total Dredge	123,900,000 236,200,000 2.1 15.1 4,920,000 84.3 65.6 4.6 2.9 11.3 3,660,000 184,000 57,000 422,000 4,323,000

Refer to the 31 May ASX release http://[1] Refer to the 31 May ASX release http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130531/pdf/42g6v9v0jxn3hg.pdf for full details of the Boonanarring Mineral Resource/Reserve Estimate for full details of the Boonanarring Mineral Resource/Reserve Estimate

JORC Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure ofdetailedinformation.	• All drill holes reported in this release are vertically oriented, reverse- circulation air-core (RCAC) drill holes.
Drilling techniques	• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).	• All RCAC drill holes are drilled vertically using an NQ-sized (63.5 mm diameter) drill bit. • Water injection is used to convert the sample to a slurry so it can be incrementally sampled by a rotary splitter.

JORC Table 1

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drill sample recovery	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure ofdetailedinformation.	• At the drill site, Image’s geologist estimates sample recovery qualitatively (as good, moderate or poor) for each 1 m down hole sampling interval. Specifically, the supervising geologist visually estimates the volume recovered to sample and reject bags based on prior experience as to what constitutes good recovery. • Image found that of the 157 samples (that have a grade ≥ 2.5% HM) that are the subject of this release, 144 (92%) have good recovery, 3 have moderately good recovery and 10 have poor recovery. • Image also monitors recovery through the mass of the laboratory sample, which is recorded prior to despatch and again on delivery to the laboratory. The mass variation in the laboratory samples can then be correlated back to the original total sample.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	• Image’s supervising geologist logs the sample reject material at the rig and pans a small sub sample of the reject, to visually estimate the proportions of sands, heavy mineral sands, ‘slimes’ (clays), and oversize (rock chips) in each sample, in a semi-quantitative manner. • The geologist also logs colour, grainsize, an estimate of induration (a hardness estimate) and sample ‘washability’ (ease of separation of slimes from sands by manual attrition). • To preclude data entry and transcription errors, the logging data is captured into a digital data logger at the rig, which contains pre-set logging codes. No photographs of samples are taken. • The digital logs are downloaded daily and emailed to Image’s head office for data security and compilation into the main database server. • Samples visually estimated by the geologist to contain more than 0.5% HM (by weight) are despatched for analysis along with the 1 m intervals above and below the mineralised interval. • The level and detail of logging is of sufficient quality to support any potential future Mineral Resource Estimates. • All (100%) of the drilling is logged. • Geotechnical logging is not possible for the style of drilling used, however the logging is acceptable for metallurgical sample selection if required.

JORC Table 1

• Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sub-sampling • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether • All drilling samples are collected over 1 m down hole intervals, with techniques and quarter, half or all core taken. sample lengths determined by 1 m marks on the rig mast. sample • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, • The sample from the internal RC rods is directed to a cyclone and then preparation rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet through a ‘rotating-chute’ custom-built splitting device. This device or dry. allows different fraction splits from the cyclone sample stream to be

• • For all sample types, the nature, quality directed to either 25 cm by 35 cm calico bags (as the laboratory and appropriateness of the sample despatch samples) or to large plastic polyweave bags for the sample preparation technique. rejects. The rotary splitter directs ≈10 increments from the stream to

• • Quality control procedures adopted for all the laboratory despatch samples, for a 1 m long down hole sampling sub-sampling stages to maximise interval. representivity of samples. • Two (replicate) 1/8 mass splits (each ≈ 1.25 kg) are collected from the

• • Measures taken to ensure that the rotary splitter into two pre-numbered calico bags for each 1 m down sampling is representative of the in situ hole interval. A selection of the replicate samples are later collected material collected, including for instance and analysed to quantify field sampling precision, or as samples results for field duplicate/second-half contributing to potential future metallurgical composites. sampling. • To monitor sample representation and sample number correctness,

• • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to Image weighs the laboratory despatch samples prior to despatch. The the grain size of the material being laboratory then weighs the received sample and reports the mass to sampled. Image. This quality control ensures no mix up of sample numbers and is also a proxy for sample recovery.

• • Image considers the nature, quality and size of the sub samples collected are consistent with best industry practices of mineral sands explorers in the Perth Basin region.

JORC Table 1

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.	• The laboratory despatch samples are prepared by Western Geolabs (in Bellevue Western Australia) by first, wet weighing, then drying the sample for 5 to 8 hrs in an oven at 110°C. The dry weight is then recorded using a laboratory digital scale. • The dried sample is then crushed (using manual pummelling) until all clay and sand materials in the sample pass through a 3.3 mm screen. In samples where (>3.3 mm) rock fragments are found after pummelling and screening, the mass of the fragments is recorded and the material discarded. • The <3.3 mm sample is then hand mixed prior to splitting through a single tier riffle splitter (16 chutes each with 8 mm aperture), as many times as required to prepare a 100 g ± 5 g sub sample. The actual mass retained is recorded using a laboratory digital scale. • The riffle splitter sub sample is then wetted, undergoes further manual attrition to break up clays, before the <63µm clays (slimes) are washed from the sample (de-sliming) using a jet wash and 63µm screen. • The <63µm slimes (clays) are discarded and the >63µm sub sample is placed in a metal tray and oven dried. When dry, the >63µm sub sample is put through a 1 mm sieve and the mass of the screen oversize (>1 mm) is recorded on a digital balance. The oversize is then discarded. • The de-slimed sand fraction (>63µm & < 1mm) sub sample is then weighed on a digital scale before being separated into two fractions by mixing the sample in a glass separation funnel with a heavy liquid (TBE) of density 2.95 g/cm3. • Once sufficient time has passed to allow the sample to separate and settle, the <2.95 g/cm3, ‘floats’ fraction is collected and discarded. • The <2.95 g/cm3, ‘sinks’ fraction is collected from the funnel into a filter paper, then washed with acetone to remove the TBE. The sinks are then dried and the mass recorded on a digital scale. • From the process above the laboratory reports the wet mass received, dry received mass, the mass of (>3.3 mm) rock fragments or coarse oversize (if any), the mass of the 100 g± 5 g, sub sample, and the mass of the (HM) sink fraction. • The procedure can be considered a total analysis for mass concentration of heavy minerals in each sample. The method is also consistent with best industry practices employed by mineral sands explorers in the Perth Basin region. • For quality control the laboratory: • Uses certified masses to verify daily the accuracy of all laboratory mass scales. • Prepares a replicate sample at a frequency of 2 for every 25 routine samples analysed. • Uses a hydrometer to test daily the density of the TBE used for HM separation • For each laboratory despatch (ranging from≈150 to≈350 samples) Image includes blind standard reference samples (SRMs) that contain known (to Image) concentrations of heavy and valuable heavy minerals. Image inserts the SRMs, at a frequency of 1 in 30 sample submitted to the laboratory. • Image is yet select and analyse field-replicate samples from field- sample replicates collected to quantify field sampling precision. This work will be completed at the end of the current field programme along with external laboratory checks. Laboratory replicate sample results are being reviewed. • Blanks samples for testing of cross contamination are not deemed necessary for the style of mineralisation under consideration.

JORC Table 1

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Verification of sampling and assaying	• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	• The logging of significant intersections reported in this release has been verified by alternative company personnel. • No twin holes have been drilled in the current programme. • Logging is captured at the rig using a data recorder, downloaded daily and emailed to head office data services for incorporation into the main database. • Assay results from the laboratory are received by email in standard spreadsheet templates and merged with logging results in-house. • There are no adjustments to original laboratory results.
Location of data points	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	• The drill hole collar locations are captured by one of Image’s rig team following the completion of each drill hole, using a hand held GPS with nominal accuracy of≈±15 m. Elevations have also been determined with hand-held GPS. More accurate locations will be determined in future by a registered surveyor using DGPS equipment. • The grid system for reporting results is the MGA Zone 50 projection and the GDA94 elevation datum. • No topographic control has been considered at this time.
Data spacing and distribution	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied.	• The drill holes reported in this release are located on≈200 m spaced drill lines along the strike of mineralised strands, and at≈20 m intervals across strike intervals. • No mineral resources have been estimated from the reported drilling but the spacing is commensurate with that used to define Inferred Mineral Resources in Image’s other projects in the region. • No sample compositing has been applied – all results are from 1 m long down hole sample intervals.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	• All drill holes are vertical and intersect sub-horizontal strata. As such Image considers that it is highly unlikely that the orientation of drilling relative to the well understood structure of minerals sands strands, would result in a sampling bias.
Sample security	• The measures taken to ensure sample security.	• All samples are collected from site by Image’s staff as soon as practicable once drilling is completed and then delivered to Image’s locked storage sheds. • Image’s staff also deliver samples to the laboratory and collect heavy mineral floats from the laboratory, which are also stored in Images locked storage • Image considers there is negligible risk of deliberate or accidental contamination of samples. Occasional sample mix-ups are usually corrected using Images checking and quality control procedures.
Audits or reviews	• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	• The results and logging have been reviewed internally by Images senior exploration personnel including checking of masses despatched and delivered, checking of SRM results, and verification logging of significant intercepts.

JORC Table 1

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	• Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	• The 116 drill holes that are the subject of this public report are drilled within following prospect area tenements. Tenure details are given in each case: o Boonanarring:  100% Image Resources NL  Exploration licences: • 46 holes within E70/3041 (expiry 9/6/2018) • 11 holes in E70/3720 (expiry 29/12/2015)  Mining Leases: • 4 holes within M70/1194 (expiry 15/12/2026) • 7 holes within M70/1311 (expiry 11/03/2034) o Chandala:  80% Image Resources NL (manager) and 20% Derby Mines Pty Ltd. Image entered into a farm- in agreement with Derby on 18 November 2008 whereby Image earned 60% interest by spending $80,000 within 2 years and a further 20% interest by spending $350,000 within 6 years.  Exploration Licence: • 12 holes within E70/2742 (expiry 1/05/2015) o Gingin South:  100% Image Resources NL  Exploration Licence • 8 holes within E70/3032 (expiry 14/10/2018)  Mining Lease: • 13 holes within M70/0448 (expiry 06/05/2032) o Red Gully  100% Image Resources NL  Mining Lease • 16 holes within M70/1192 (expiry 19/05/2030) • All drilling publicly reported is on freehold land, with no known native title interests, historical sites, wilderness parks or national parks, or environmental settings effected. • At the time of this public report, Image has security of tenure for all tenements drilled, and is not aware of any material impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration done by other parties	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	• No work has been completed by other parties for this public report.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	• Image is targeting discovery of heavy mineral sands strand deposits that have formed on ancient shore lines on the eastern margin of the Swan Coastal Plain in sediments Pleistocene to Holocene age in the north of the Perth Basin. • The Boonanarring deposit occurs in the Yoganup Formation and is interpreted to have formed during periods of sea level stability within a cycle of shoreline regression. The high grade strands in Boonanarring are interpreted to have formed against a notch in the local basement, possibly an ancient sea cliff. • The current programme of drilling is targeting possible new strands, and extensions of known strands between the Boonanarring and Gingin Mineral Resources and also north of Boonanarring, to the Red Gully region.

JORC Table 1

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drill hole Information	• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	• In this public report, Image has reported only the drill holes with significant intercepts that confirm the discovery of new strand lines or possible extensions of known strand lines. • The Competent Person does not consider a full listing of the barren and low grade mineralisation is material for the drill holes that are the subject of this public report. However, the figures attached to the public report do give the context of the significant intercepts with respect to results reported by Image in previous public reports.
Data aggregation methods	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	• Image prepared the lists of significant intercepts in this public report using the data aggregation algorithms available in Micromine software. The criteria for reporting included compositing criteria for 1 m intercepts of: o A starting threshold of ≥ 2.5% HM o Minimum down hole composite length of ≥ 2 m o No internal dilution (no 1 m intervals included if grades are < 2.5% HM). • Generally the grades of individual results contributing to significant intercepts are of similar tenor. • There are no metal equivalent assumptions relevant to the style of mineralisation under consideration.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg‘down holelength, truewidth notknown’).	• All holes are drilled vertically through a horizontal stratigraphy. There is low risk of grade bias due to the angle of intersection and geometry of the style of mineralisation under consideration.
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	• Refer to the figures in the public report.
Balanced reporting	• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	• The Competent Person does not consider a full listing of the barren and low grade mineralisation is material for the drill holes that are the subject of this public report. However, the figures attached to the public report do give the context of the significant intercepts with respect to results reported by Image in previous public reports.
Other substantive exploration data	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potentialdeleterious orcontaminating substances.	• Not applicable for this release.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	• At the time of this public report, Image has planned further holes but actual locations may vary depending on results received as the Stage 1 programme progresses. • Refer to the maps and diagrams in the ASX release where extents and new targets are identified.