IMAGE RESOURCES NL — Regulatory Filings 2015

Jun 8, 2015

==> picture [297 x 49] intentionally omitted <==

ASX Code: IMA 9 June 2015

Suite 4a, 5 Mumford Place Balcatta WA 6021 PO Box 1075 Balcatta WA 6914 Telephone 08 9485 2410 Facsimile 08 9240 7845 www.imageres.com.au Image Resources NL ABN 57 063 977 579

New drilling programme aimed at adding mine life from two separate fronts

The Stage 1 drilling programme commenced in November 2014 and 181 holes totalling 7,043 metres have been drilled out of the 376 holes planned for this phase.

The ASX release (25th March 2015) highlighted 2 new discoveries. Firstly a new parallel strand, named the East Gingin North strand has a new mineralised zone of 2.4km length some 300m west of the Boonanarring deposit. This current programme of 40 holes is designed to test for an 8km target, potentially extending the 2.4km mineralised zone in both a northern and southern direction (Fig.2) Furthermore the Gingin North Deposit (refer to Resource Table) starts directly south of this 8 km target zone and may be a direct extension.

Secondly the ASX release (25[th] March 2015) highlighted a very high grade intersection of 14m @17.9% HM some 1.3km north of the Boonanarring Deposit (refer to Resource Table). The current programme of 34 Air Core holes is designed over 4 lines potentially looking for a 3.7km northern extension from the Boonanarring Deposit (Fig.3).

Image is also carrying out a 100 km ground magnetic programme within our Bibby Springs tenement directly SSE of our Helene Deposit (refer to Resource Table). Some preliminary results are encouraging as 4.5km of new targets have been identified and further results will be released when the survey is completed (Fig.5).

All the drilling costs for the 74 holes planned for this stage 1 programme have been pre-paid by a placement to a major WA drilling company. The drilling programme started on the 14 November and these priority targets will be tested.

==> picture [452 x 606] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [446 x 24] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Figure 1 Drilling programmes completed on Image Resources Gingin to Red Gully region in the North
Perth Basin
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [435 x 682] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 Boonanarring to Gingin North Strand Interpretations

==> picture [431 x 671] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [196 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Figure 3 Gingin South Strand Interpretations
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [435 x 679] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4 Boonanarring North to Red Gully Strand Interpretations

==> picture [439 x 639] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [309 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Figure 5 Bibby Springs Completed & Proposed Ground Magnetics
----- End of picture text -----

Table 1 AC Holes drilled Nov-Feb 2015	Table 1 AC Holes drilled Nov-Feb 2015	Table 1 AC Holes drilled Nov-Feb 2015
Project	# Holes	Metres drilled	# Holes planned	Budget
Boonanarring South*	57	2,045	Up to 22	$29,000
Chandala	12	344	-
Gingin South*	21	812	4	$9,500
Red Gully	16	622	-
Boonanarring*	50	2,111	18	$29,000
Blue Lake*	25	1,109	Up to 34	$37,000
Total	181	7,043	Up to 78	$104,500

• *Landowners affected by planned drill holes:

• Boonanarring South: Dalla Riva, Panara Farms

• Gingin South: Technidraw

• Boonanarring: Giglia, Brunnings

• Blue Lake: Clifford, Central Stockcare

For more information visit imageres.com.au Please direct enquiries to:

George Sakalidis Exploration Director M: +61 411 640 337 E: george@imageres.com.au

Collis Thorp Chief Executive Officer M: +61 413 705 075 E: cthorp@imageres.com.au

COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT – EXPLORATION RESULTS AND MINERAL RESOURCES AND RESERVES

Information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by George Sakalidis BSc (Hons) who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. At the time that the Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves were compiled, George Sakalidis was a director of Image Resources NL. He has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. George Sakalidis consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in this report.

COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT – RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The information in this report that relates to mineral resources and is based on information compiled by Lynn Widenbar BSc, MSc, DIC MAIG, MAusIMM employed by Widenbar & Associates who is a consultant to the Company. Lynn Widenbar has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code of Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Lynn Widenbar consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made during or in connection with this communication, including, without limitation, those concerning the economic outlook for the mining industry, expectations regarding prices, exploration or development costs and other operating results, growth prospects and the outlook of Image’s operations contain or comprise certain forward looking statements regarding Image’s operations, economic performance and financial condition. Although Image believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct.

Accordingly, results could differ materially from those set out in the forward looking statements as a result of, among other factors, changes in economic and market conditions, success of business and operating initiatives, changes that could result from future acquisitions of new exploration properties, the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including industrial accidents, environmental hazards or geologically related conditions), changes in the regulatory environment and other government actions, risks inherent in the ownership, exploration and operation of or investment in mining properties, fluctuations in prices and exchange rates and business and operations risks management, as well as generally those additional factors set forth in our periodic filings with ASX. Image undertakes no obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after today’s date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Reserve Summary
Project Area	HM Tonnes Category Volume Tonnes % HM % SLIMES						VHM Ilmenite Leucoxene Rutile Zircon
							(%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Boonanarring Atlas	Probable 7,160,000 14,420,000 8.3% 17.0% 1,190,000 80.3% 46.9% 5.5% 3.3% 24.5% Probable 4,760,000 9,600,000 8.1% 15.5% 780,000 74.1% 55.0% 1.0% 7.0% 11.0%
Total NPB Reserve	11,920,000 24,020,000 8.2% 16.4% 1,970,000 77.8% 50.1% 3.7% 4.8% 19.1%
Mining Inventory (incl Inferred)	13,330,000 26,880,000 8.0% 16.5% 2,135,000 78.3% 50.1% 4.2% 5.1% 19.0%
High Grade Resources @ 2.5%	HM Cut-off
Resource	VHM Ilmenite Leucoxene Rutile Zircon (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) % SLIMES HM TONNES Resource Category BCM TONNES % HM
Atlas Atlas	Measured Indicated	4,810,000 520,000	9,700,000 1,080,000	8.5 3.2	15.3 19.2	820,000 34,000	76 74	52 53	5 8	8 7	11 6
Atlas Total		5,330,000	10,780,000	7.9	15.7	854,000	76	52	5	8	10
Boonanarring Boonanarring	Measured	1,680,000	3,000,000	7.8	10.1	230,000	70	49	1	3	17
	Indicated	7,000,000	14,300,000	9	17.2	1,270,000	80	49	6	3	22
Boonanarring	Inferred	2,100,000	4,200,000	6.5	17.4	270,000	83	51	8	7	18
Boonanarring Total		10,780,000	21,500,000	8.3	16.2	1,770,000	79	49	6	4	21
Gingin Nth	Indicated	680,000	1,320,000	5.7	15.7	80,000	75	57	9	3	5
Gingin Nth	Inferred	580,000	1,090,000	5.2	14	60,000	78	57	11	4	6
Gingin Nth Total		1,260,000	2,410,000	5.5	15	140,000	77	57	10	3	6
Gingin Sth	Measured	870,000	1,530,000	4.4	7.2	67,000	79	51	15	6	8
Gingin Sth	Indicated	3,240,000	5,820,000	6.5	7.1	380,000	91	68	10	5	8
Gingin Sth	Inferred	400,000	730,000	6.5	8.4	48,000	92	67	8	6	11
Gingin Sth Total		4,510,000	8,080,000	6.1	7.3	495,000	89	65	10	5	8
Helene	Indicated	5,600,000	11,500,000	4.6	18.6	520,000	84	70	1	3	11
Hyperion	Indicated	1,800,000	3,700,000	7.8	19.3	290,000	71	56	0	6	9
Cooljarloo Nth Total		7,400,000	15,200,000	5.3	18.7	810,000	79	64	0	4	9
Red Gully	Indicated	1,930,000	3,410,000	7.8	11.5	270,000	90	66	8	3	12
Red Gully	Inferred	1,455,000	2,570,000	7.5	10.7	190,000	90	66	8	3	12
Red Gully Total		3,385,000	5,980,000	7.7	11.2	460,000	90	66	8	3	12
Grand Total	32,665,000 63,950,000 7.1% 13.9% 4,529,000 80 57 6 5 13

Dredge Resources at 1.0% HM cut-off
Project Area Resource Category Volume TONNES % HM	% Slime HM TONNES VHM %	Ilmenite % Leucoxene % Rutile % Zircon % Ilmenite Leucoxene Rutile Zircon VHM Tonnes
Titan Indicated 10,300,000 21,200,000 1.8 Titan Inferred 58,500,000 115,400,000 1.9	22.1 380,000 84.4 18.9 2,210,000 84.3	71.9 2.0 1.0 9.5 270,000 7,000 5,000 36,000 318,000 71.8 2.0 1.0 9.5 1,592,000 45,000 22,000 210,000 1,869,000
Titan Total 68,800,000 136,600,000 1.9	19.4 2,590,000 84.4	71.9 2.0 1.0 9.5 1,862,000 52,000 27,000 246,000 2,187,000
Telesto Indicated 1,700,000 3,500,000 3.8 Calypso Inferred 27,100,000 51,500,000 1.7 Sub Total Indicated 12,000,000 24,700,000 2.1	18.4 130,000 82.6 13.7 850,000 84.6 21.6 510,000 86.1	67.5 3.4 2.2 9.5 100,000 5,000 3,000 13,000 121,000 68.8 3.5 1.6 10.6 585,000 30,000 14,000 90,000 719,000 72.5 2.4 1.6 9.6 370,000 12,000 8,000 49,000 439,000
Sub Total Inferred 85,600,000 166,900,000 1.8	17.3 3,060,000 84.6	71.1 2.5 1.2 9.8 2,177,000 75,000 36,000 300,000 2,588,000
Cooljarloo Total 97,600,000 191,600,000 1.9	17.8 3,570,000 84.8	71.3 2.4 1.2 9.8 2,547,000 87,000 44,000 349,000 3,027,000
Bidaminna Inferred 26,300,000 44,600,000 3.0	3.6 1,350,000 96.0	82.4 7.2 1.0 5.4 1,113,000 97,000 13,000 73,000 1,296,000
Total Dredge 123,900,000 236,200,000 2.1	15.1 4,920,000 84.3	65.6 4.6 2.9 11.3 3,660,000 184,000 57,000 422,000 4,323,000

1 Refer to the 31 May 2013 release http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130531/pdf/42g6v9v0jxn3hg.pdf for full details of the Boonanarring Mineral Resource/Reserve Estimate for full details of the Boonanarring Mineral Resource/Reserve Estimate

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailedinformation.	• All drill holes reported in this release are vertically oriented, reverse- circulation air-core (RCAC) drill holes.
Drilling techniques	• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).	• All RCAC drill holes are drilled vertically using an NQ-sized (63.5 mm diameter) drill bit. • Water injection is used to convert the sample to a slurry so it can be incrementally sampled by a rotary splitter.

12

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drill sample recovery	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailedinformation.	• At the drill site, Image’s geologist estimates sample recovery qualitatively (as good, moderate or poor) for each 1 m down hole sampling interval. Specifically, the supervising geologist visually estimates the volume recovered to sample and reject bags based on prior experience as to what constitutes good recovery. • Image found that of the 157 samples (that have a grade ≥ 2.5% HM) that are the subject of this release, 144 (92%) have good recovery, 3 have moderately good recovery and 10 have poor recovery. • Image also monitors recovery through the mass of the laboratory sample, which is recorded prior to despatch and again on delivery to the laboratory. The mass variation in the laboratory samples can then be correlated back to the original total sample.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	• Image’s supervising geologist logs the sample reject material at the rig and pans a small sub sample of the reject, to visually estimate the proportions of sands, heavy mineral sands, ‘slimes’ (clays), and oversize (rock chips) in each sample, in a semi-quantitative manner. • The geologist also logs colour, grainsize, an estimate of induration (a hardness estimate) and sample ‘washability’ (ease of separation of slimes from sands by manual attrition). • To preclude data entry and transcription errors, the logging data is captured into a digital data logger at the rig, which contains pre-set logging codes. No photographs of samples are taken. • The digital logs are downloaded daily and emailed to Image’s head office for data security and compilation into the main database server. • Samples visually estimated by the geologist to contain more than 0.5% HM (by weight) are despatched for analysis along with the 1 m intervals above and below the mineralised interval. • The level and detail of logging is of sufficient quality to support any potential future Mineral Resource Estimates. • All (100%) of the drilling is logged. • Geotechnical logging is not possible for the style of drilling used, however the logging is acceptable for metallurgical sample selection if required.

13

• Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sub-sampling • If core, whether cut or sawn and • All drilling samples are collected over 1 m down hole intervals, with techniques and whether quarter, half or all core taken. sample lengths determined by 1 m marks on the rig mast. sample • If non-core, whether riffled, tube • The sample from the internal RC rods is directed to a cyclone and then preparation sampled, rotary split, etc and whether through a ‘rotating-chute’ custom-built splitting device. This device sampled wet or dry. allows different fraction splits from the cyclone sample stream to be

• • For all sample types, the nature, quality directed to either 25 cm by 35 cm calico bags (as the laboratory and appropriateness of the sample despatch samples) or to large plastic polyweave bags for the sample preparation technique. rejects. The rotary splitter directs ≈10 increments from the stream to

• • Quality control procedures adopted for the laboratory despatch samples, for a 1 m long down hole sampling all sub-sampling stages to maximise interval. representivity of samples. • Two (replicate) 1/8 mass splits (each ≈ 1.25 kg) are collected from the

• • Measures taken to ensure that the rotary splitter into two pre-numbered calico bags for each 1 m down sampling is representative of the in situ hole interval. A selection of the replicate samples are later collected material collected, including for instance and analysed to quantify field sampling precision, or as samples results for field duplicate/second-half contributing to potential future metallurgical composites. sampling. • To monitor sample representation and sample number correctness,

• • Whether sample sizes are appropriate Image weighs the laboratory despatch samples prior to despatch. The to the grain size of the material being laboratory then weighs the received sample and reports the mass to sampled. Image. This quality control ensures no mix up of sample numbers and is also a proxy for sample recovery.

• • Image considers the nature, quality and size of the sub samples collected are consistent with best industry practices of mineral sands explorers in the Perth Basin region.

14

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.	• The laboratory despatch samples are prepared by Western Geolabs (in Bellevue Western Australia) by first, wet weighing, then drying the sample for 5 to 8 hrs in an oven at 110°C. The dry weight is then recorded using a laboratory digital scale. • The dried sample is then crushed (using manual pummelling) until all clay and sand materials in the sample pass through a 3.3 mm screen. In samples where (>3.3 mm) rock fragments are found after pummelling and screening, the mass of the fragments is recorded and the material discarded. • The <3.3 mm sample is then hand mixed prior to splitting through a single tier riffle splitter (16 chutes each with 8 mm aperture), as many times as required to prepare a 100 g ± 5 g sub sample. The actual mass retained is recorded using a laboratory digital scale. • The riffle splitter sub sample is then wetted, undergoes further manual attrition to break up clays, before the <63µm clays (slimes) are washed from the sample (de-sliming) using a jet wash and 63µm screen. • The <63µm slimes (clays) are discarded and the >63µm sub sample is placed in a metal tray and oven dried. When dry, the >63µm sub sample is put through a 1 mm sieve and the mass of the screen oversize (>1 mm) is recorded on a digital balance. The oversize is then discarded. • The de-slimed sand fraction (>63µm & < 1mm) sub sample is then weighed on a digital scale before being separated into two fractions by mixing the sample in a glass separation funnel with a heavy liquid (TBE) of density 2.95 g/cm3. • Once sufficient time has passed to allow the sample to separate and settle, the <2.95 g/cm3, ‘floats’ fraction is collected and discarded. • The <2.95 g/cm3, ‘sinks’ fraction is collected from the funnel into a filter paper, then washed with acetone to remove the TBE. The sinks are then dried and the mass recorded on a digital scale. • From the process above the laboratory reports the wet mass received, dry received mass, the mass of (>3.3 mm) rock fragments or coarse oversize (if any), the mass of the 100 g± 5 g, sub sample, and the mass of the (HM) sink fraction. • The procedure can be considered a total analysis for mass concentration of heavy minerals in each sample. The method is also consistent with best industry practices employed by mineral sands explorers in the Perth Basin region. • For quality control the laboratory: • Uses certified masses to verify daily the accuracy of all laboratory mass scales. • Prepares a replicate sample at a frequency of 2 for every 25 routine samples analysed. • Uses a hydrometer to test daily the density of the TBE used for HM separation • For each laboratory despatch (ranging from≈150 to≈350 samples) Image includes blind standard reference samples (SRMs) that contain known (to Image) concentrations of heavy and valuable heavy minerals. Image inserts the SRMs, at a frequency of 1 in 30 sample submitted to the laboratory. • Image is yet select and analyse field-replicate samples from field- sample replicates collected to quantify field sampling precision. This work will be completed at the end of the current field programme along with external laboratory checks. Laboratory replicate sample results are being reviewed. • Blanks samples for testing of cross contamination are not deemed necessary for the style of mineralisation under consideration.

15

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Verification of sampling and assaying	• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	• The logging of significant intersections reported in this release has been verified by alternative company personnel. • No twin holes have been drilled in the current programme. • Logging is captured at the rig using a data recorder, downloaded daily and emailed to head office data services for incorporation into the main database. • Assay results from the laboratory are received by email in standard spreadsheet templates and merged with logging results in-house. • There are no adjustments to original laboratory results.
Location of data points	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	• The drill hole collar locations are captured by one of Image’s rig team following the completion of each drill hole, using a hand held GPS with nominal accuracy of≈±15 m. Elevations have also been determined with hand-held GPS. More accurate locations will be determined in future by a registered surveyor using DGPS equipment. • The grid system for reporting results is the MGA Zone 50 projection and the GDA94 elevation datum. • No topographic control has been considered at this time.
Data spacing and distribution	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied.	• The drill holes reported in this release are located on≈200 m spaced drill lines along the strike of mineralised strands, and at≈20 m intervals across strike intervals. • No mineral resources have been estimated from the reported drilling but the spacing is commensurate with that used to define Inferred Mineral Resources in Image’s other projects in the region. • No sample compositing has been applied – all results are from 1 m long down hole sample intervals.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	• All drill holes are vertical and intersect sub-horizontal strata. As such Image considers that it is highly unlikely that the orientation of drilling relative to the well understood structure of minerals sands strands, would result in a sampling bias.
Sample security	• The measures taken to ensure sample security.	• All samples are collected from site by Image’s staff as soon as practicable once drilling is completed and then delivered to Image’s locked storage sheds. • Image’s staff also deliver samples to the laboratory and collect heavy mineral floats from the laboratory, which are also stored in Images locked storage • Image considers there is negligible risk of deliberate or accidental contamination of samples. Occasional sample mix-ups are usually corrected using Images checking and quality control procedures.
Audits or reviews	• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	• The results and logging have been reviewed internally by Images senior exploration personnel including checking of masses despatched and delivered, checking of SRM results, and verification logging of significant intercepts.

16

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	• Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	• The 181 drill holes that are the subject of this public report are drilled within following prospect area tenements. Tenure details are given in each case: o Boonanarring:  100% Image Resources NL  Exploration licences: • 57 holes within E70/3041 (expiry 9/6/2018) • 25 holes in E70/3720 (expiry 29/12/2015)  Mining Leases: • 4 holes within M70/1194 (expiry 15/12/2026) • 46 holes within M70/1311 (expiry 11/03/2034) o Chandala:  80% Image Resources NL (manager) and 20% Derby Mines Pty Ltd. Image entered into a farm- in agreement with Derby on 18 November 2008 whereby Image earned 60% interest by spending $80,000 within 2 years and a further 20% interest by spending $350,000 within 6 years.  Exploration Licence: • 12 holes within E70/2742 (expiry 1/05/2015) o Gingin South:  100% Image Resources NL  Exploration Licence • 9 holes within E70/3032 (expiry 14/10/2018)  Mining Lease: • 12 holes within M70/0448 (expiry 06/05/2032) o Red Gully  100% Image Resources NL  Mining Lease • 16 holes within M70/1192 (expiry 19/05/2030) o Bidaminna Park:  90% Image Resources NL  Exploration Licence • 4 holes within E70/3298 (expiry 25/03/2019) • All drilling publicly reported is on freehold land, with no known native title interests, historical sites, wilderness parks or national parks, or environmental settings effected. • At the time of this public report, Image has security of tenure for all tenements drilled, and is not aware of any material impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration done by other parties	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	• No work has been completed by other parties for this public report.

17

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	• Image is targeting discovery of heavy mineral sands strand deposits that have formed on ancient shore lines on the eastern margin of the Swan Coastal Plain in sediments Pleistocene to Holocene age in the north of the Perth Basin. • The Boonanarring deposit occurs in the Yoganup Formation and is interpreted to have formed during periods of sea level stability within a cycle of shoreline regression. The high grade strands in Boonanarring are interpreted to have formed against a notch in the local basement, possibly an ancient sea cliff. • The current programme of drilling is targeting possible new strands, and extensions of known strands between the Boonanarring and Gingin Mineral Resources and also north of Boonanarring, to the Red Gully region.
Drill hole Information	• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	• In this public report, Image has reported only the drill holes with significant intercepts that confirm the discovery of new strand lines or possible extensions of known strand lines. • The Competent Person does not consider a full listing of the barren and low grade mineralisation is material for the drill holes that are the subject of this public report. However, the figures attached to the public report do give the context of the significant intercepts with respect to results reported by Image in previous public reports.
Data aggregation methods	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	• Image prepared the lists of significant intercepts in this public report using the data aggregation algorithms available in Micromine software. The criteria for reporting included compositing criteria for 1 m intercepts of: o A starting threshold of ≥ 2.5% HM o Minimum down hole composite length of ≥ 2 m o No internal dilution (no 1 m intervals included if grades are < 2.5% HM). • Generally the grades of individual results contributing to significant intercepts are of similar tenor. • There are no metal equivalent assumptions relevant to the style of mineralisation under consideration.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg‘down holelength, truewidth notknown’).	• All holes are drilled vertically through a horizontal stratigraphy. There is low risk of grade bias due to the angle of intersection and geometry of the style of mineralisation under consideration.
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	• Refer to the figures in the public report.
Balanced reporting	• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	• The Competent Person does not consider a full listing of the barren and low grade mineralisation is material for the drill holes that are the subject of this public report. However, the figures attached to the public report do give the context of the significant intercepts with respect to results reported by Image in previous public reports.

18

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Other substantive exploration data	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potentialdeleterious orcontaminating substances.	• Not applicable for this release.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	• At the time of this public report, Image has planned further holes but actual locations may vary depending on results received as the Stage 1 programme progresses. • Refer to the maps and diagrams in the ASX release where extents and new targets are identified.

19