Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

IMAGE RESOURCES NL Investor Presentation 2017

Jul 18, 2017

65117_rns_2017-07-18_8d9f14a0-593e-4c57-be87-fac61a9a81aa.pdf

Investor Presentation

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Boonanarring Mineral Sands Project: The next cab off the mineral sands rank

==> picture [293 x 198] intentionally omitted <==

Noosa Mining Conference 19-21 July 2017 Peppers Noosa Resort Noosa, QLD

Patrick Mutz Managing Director Image Resources NL ASX: IMA

==> picture [301 x 49] intentionally omitted <==

2

Forward Looking Statement

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Certain statements made in connection with this communication, including, without limitation, those concerning the economic outlook for the mining industry, expectations regarding prices, exploration or development costs and other operating results, growth prospects and the outlook of Image’s operations contain or comprise certain forward looking statements regarding Image’s operations, economic performance and financial condition. Although Image believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to be correct.

Accordingly, results could differ materially from those set out in the forward looking statements as a result of, among other factors, changes in economic and market conditions, success of business and operating initiatives, changes that could result from future acquisitions of new tenements, the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including industrial accidents, environmental hazards or geologically related conditions), changes in the regulatory environment and other government actions, risks inherent in the ownership, exploration and operation of or investment in mining properties, fluctuations in prices and exchange rates and business and operations risks management, as well as generally those additional factors set forth in our periodic filings with ASX. Image undertakes no obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

3

Forward Looking Statement Company Description and Focus

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Image Resources NL

ASX: IMA

Emerging mineral sands producer

Actively focused on fast-tracking the development of its 100%-owned, high-grade and high-zircon flagship Boonanarring mineral sands project in the North Perth Basin in Western Australia.

First production targeted for early 2018.

CONVENTIONAL, CONVENTIONAL, CONVENTIONAL Dry open cut mining Coarse grained mineralisation

Standard suite of products

4

Forward Looking Statement Project Location

q LOCATION

Ø North Perth Basin in Western Australia

Ø 80 km north of Perth CBD

Ø Proven mineral sands address

§ Including majors Iluka and Tronox

Ø Infrastructure rich

§ paved roads, power, gas pipeline water, telecommunications etc.

Ø Local communities and landowners experienced with, and accepting of, mineral sands mining.

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [229 x 439] intentionally omitted <==

5

Projects Types and Locations

Ø 1,000 km [2] tenements portfolio Ø 100% focus on mineral sands Ø Strandline (dry open cut mining) projects Ø Dredge mining projects

==> picture [84 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [326 x 433] intentionally omitted <==

6

Forward Looking Statement Projects Pyramid - Dredgeable Mineral Resources – Accessible by Dredge Mining Projects ranked by HM Grade

Bidaminna 45Mt; 3.0%HM; 6.5% Zr+Ru

25-67% Leucoxene; 90+%VHM; <5% slimes; 100Mt exploration target

Titan-Telesto 140Mt; 1.9%HM; 12.8% Zr+Ru

Calypso 51Mt; 1.7% HM; 15.9% Zr+Ru

Total 236Mt; 2.1%HM; 11.5% Zr+Ru

7

Forward Looking Statement Projects Pyramid – Strand Deposits Mineral Resources – Accessible by Dry Open-Cut Mining Projects ranked by combined Zircon plus Rutile

Boonanarring 43.8Mt; 5.6%HM; 20.7% Zr+Ru Atlas 18.1Mt; 6.0%HM; 15.8% Zr+Ru

Focus of BFS

Red Gully 6.0Mt; 7.7% HM; 15.5% Zr+Ru Regans Ford 9.9Mt; 9.6%HM; 14.3% Zr+Ru (ELA) Cooljarloo North 15.2Mt; 5.3%HM; 14.0% Zr+Ru Gingin South 8.1Mt; 6.1%HM; 13.5% Zr+Ru Gingin North 2.4Mt; 5.5%HM; 9.1% Zr+Ru

Total 103Mt; 6.2%HM; 17% Zr+Ru

8

Boonanarring Project Comparison

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

High HM, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers

M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers

H
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
SFX
IMA
WTR
Tronox (Jurien)
MRC
ILU (Perth
Basin)
BSE
AZC
Tronox
(Dongara)
MZI
Tronox
(Cooljarloo)
MDL
Zircon (%)
HM Grade (%)
VHM Grade
Zircon %
Image Resources (IMA)
Boonanarring project
21.5Mt @ 8.3% HM
and up to 24.5% Zircon
Murray
Zircon
HM grade Zircon grade
VHM
IMAGE
VHM Grade
Zircon %
Image Resources (IMA)
Boonanarring project
21.5Mt @ 8.3% HM
and up to 24.5% Zircon
H
H
SFX IMA
IMAGE

==> picture [78 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

Source: Released on 4[th] May 2015 – Morgan’s Research Note. VHM added by Image.

9

Forward Looking Statement Ore Reserves

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

q QUALITY ORE RESERVES Ø JORC Code (2012) Compliant Ø High HM, VHM and very high zircon at Boonanarring

Ore Reserves Summary in accordance with JORC Code

y
(2012)
y
(2012)
y
(2012)
Reserve Category Volume Tonnes % HM **% SLIMES ** HM Tonnes VHM **Ilmenite ** Leucoxene Rutile Zircon
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Boonanarring2 Proved 3,125,000 5,829,000 9.1 14.2 527,000 74.2 48.5 1.9 2.2 21.6
Boonanarring2 Probable 7,460,000 14,155,000 6.3 17.4 905,000 79.3 52.2 1.7 2.6 22.8
Total Boonanarring 10,585,000 19,984,000 7.2 16.5 1,432,000 77.4 50.8 1.8 2.4 22.4
Atlas2 Probable 5,000,000 9,477,000 8.1 15.5 770,000 73.3 50.7 4.5 7.5 10.6
Total Atlas 5,000,000 9,477,000 8.1 15.5 770,000 73.3 50.7 4.5 7.5 10.6
Total Ore Reserves 15,585,000 29,461,000 7.5 16.2 2,202,000 76.0 50.8 2.7 4.2 18.3

10

Forward Looking Statement Ore Reserves Comparison

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [56 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

IMAGE
----- End of picture text -----

Source: TZMI; May 2017

11

Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Base Assumptions

Ø Start mining at Boonanarring

  • Ø Dry, open-cut mining

  • Ø Production rate - 500 dry tonnes per hour

  • 3.7M dry tonnes per year

  • Ø Conventional gravity separation using spirals

  • Ø Product: Heavy Mineral Concentrate (HMC)

  • Production rate: avg. approx. 220K tonnes/annum

  • • Truck to Bunbury for bulk shipments to China

12

Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Key Financial Metrics[1]

Ø Pre-Tax NPV A$135M (8% discount rate)

Ø Pre-Tax IRR 64%

  • Ø Mine life 8+ years

  • Ø Project capital cost A$52M

  • includes ~$8M for land

Ø Payback period 22 months

1. Refer ASX Announcement 30 May 2017 “STRONG BFS RESULTS FOR BOONANARRING / ATLAS

13

Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Sensitivity Analysis

==> picture [654 x 354] intentionally omitted <==

14

Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Monthly Revenue, Costs and Cash Flow

==> picture [693 x 344] intentionally omitted <==

15

Forward Looking Statement Project Capital Comparison

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Source: TZMI; May 2017

16

Forward Looking Statement Start-up Capital / Revenue Ratio

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Source: TZMI; May 2017

17

Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Other Key Project Metrics

  • Ø Binding offtake contract for heavy mineral

  • concentrate (HMC)

  • 100% of production for life of project

  • Market-based pricing model

  • Full credit for TiO2 products

  • No minimum product specifications

  • Ø Capital equipment already acquired

  • From run-of-mine ore feed through to HMC product

18

Plant and Equipment (select examples)

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [190 x 189] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [216 x 162] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [253 x 139] intentionally omitted <==

Wet Concentration Plant

Mineral Separation Plant (Option)

Slurry Booster Stations & pipelines

==> picture [196 x 148] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [242 x 182] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [248 x 176] intentionally omitted <==

Power poles, wires & transformers

Mine Slurry Unit

Plus much, much more.

HMC Stackers

19

Forward Looking Statement Image Wet Concentration Plant

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [720 x 326] intentionally omitted <==

20

Forward Looking Statement Offtake Agreement

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Advantages of HMC Offtake vs Zircon Offtake

Ø results in securing 100% of revenue instead of 65-70% for zircon only;

Ø provides faster access to revenue;

  • letters of credit can be converted to cash as soon as each shipment of HMC departs the Bunbury port, compared to having to wait until the HMC is processed into final products and the zircon is loaded and departs the port of loading;

  • Ø reduces total working capital requirements by A$7-8M (due to the faster receipt of revenue); and

  • Ø eliminates risks and potential extra costs associated with HMC processing (separation) including processing and delivery schedules, product quality issues, administration and marketing.

  • Ø Reduces overall project capital (no capital contribution for HMC processing)

21

Forward Looking Statement Upside Potential

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Upside potential at and near Boonanarring

Ø Confirmed potential to extend mine life with high grade mineralisation;

  • Ø Potential to process lower grade overlying layer of mineralisation;

  • Ø Several other deposits with high grade mineral resources in the vicinity.

22

Boonanarring Deposit Extensions

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

ASX Announcement 13 March 2017

New Drilling Results (Feb 2017)

  • Ø Confirm 5.6km northern extension of Boonanarring mineralisation

  • Ø Outstanding high-grade intersections:

  • § 8m @ 23.8% HM in IX00245

  • § 8m @ 21.1% HM in IX00244 and

  • § 8m @ 16.3% HM in IX00250

==> picture [325 x 449] intentionally omitted <==

23

Potential Royalty from Tronox

Royalty agreement in place as of Ø A$50,000 cash received

Ø Sliding-scale royalty on production

Avg. HM Grade Royalty 2.5% 1.25% 3.0% 2.50% 3.5% 3.75% 4.0% 5.00%

Ø Potential for future arrangements with Tronox or others based on large area of potential dredge mining mineralisation within Image’s tenements in the vicinity of Tronox’s historic dredge operations.

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [274 x 445] intentionally omitted <==

24

Forward Looking Statement Project Approvals

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

q PROJECT APPROVALS

ü Mining Lease & General Purpose Lease ü Part IV, Environmental Protection Act (WA) – PER ü EPBC Act (Commonwealth) ü Land acquisition for processing plant siting ü Groundwater Abstraction Licence (Dept of Water and Dept Parks & Wildlife) ü Interim groundwater licence – site establishment (DoW) ü Mining Proposal – incl. MCP, EMS & ASS Mgmt Plan (DMP) Works Approval (Dept of Environment Regulation) Application filed Project Management Plan/Radiation Management Plan (DMP) Plan filed ü Atlas Project Gap Analysis – Environmental Studies & Approvals

25

Project Development Schedule

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Targeting first production in early 2018

Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level)
2016 2017 2018
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Finalisation of Transaction
Complete BFS
Project Approvals
HMC Toll or Sale Agreement
Project Financing
WCP & Equipment Relocation
Construction
Pre-Stripping Equity Decision to M ine T arget
Ore Mining ~~Transaction~~
~~w/Murra Zircon~~
~~y~~
Plant Commissioning Completed
~~8 June~~
Production

26

Contact Historic Commodity Pricing

==> picture [720 x 417] intentionally omitted <==

27

Contact Commodity Prices on the Rise

Zircon-

We forecast two more quarterly increases of +$100/t and then two further $50/t increases. That would take the price from around $860/t at the start of 2017, to $1350/t by 2H18, our forecast price peak. (Source: FNZC Market Daily, 29 May 2017) (Credit Suisse)

==> picture [330 x 204] intentionally omitted <==

Rutile price forecast lifted from 2019 (Source: FNZC Market Daily, 29 May 2017)

==> picture [327 x 201] intentionally omitted <==

28

Contact Commodity Prices on the Rise

We increase our ilmenite forecasts and now expect them to double YoY by 3Q17. Given the Chinese impetus behind ilmenite, we forecast ilmenite prices will essentially double in 2017, from $80/t in early 2016 to $160/t FOB by 3Q17. We see further increases towards $200/t by 2019, due to expected ongoing solid demand from China. (Source: FNZC Market Daily, 29 May 2017)

TiO2 pigments – pigment price rise picking up pace. Price increases are getting stronger and a new round of price hikes is coming by mid-year. Cristal announced global price rises of $250/t for most regions, and €350/t in Europe. (Source: FNZC Market Daily, 29 May 2017)

==> picture [324 x 198] intentionally omitted <==

29

Transition from Explorer to Producer Contact

Generalisation of Transition from Explorer to Producer

10 9 Production 8 (realisation Discovery Project 7 of full value) & Resource Development 6 Delineation (feasibility Study Period 5 (excitement; (uncertainty; results; Exploration growth; mine decision; 4 (high risk; Investor costly; project funding; dilution) 3 speculative) profit) more certainty; 2 lower risk) 1 Image was here (?) 12/2016 6 months later (?) 6/2017 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 Time

30

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Corporate Snapshot Image Corporate Snapshot Diverse and experienced Board and Management

Share Code: IMA Share Price: A$0.10 12 Month Price Range: A$0.04 – 0.12 Shares on Issue: 537.6m Market Cap: A$52m Cash on hand: A$1.4m* Debt (short-term): *A$4.0m Top 20 Shareholders: 68%

Board of Directors

Bob Besley – Independent Chairman Patrick Mutz – Managing Director Chaodian Chen - Non-Executive Director Aaron Chong Veoy Soo – Non-Executive Dir George Sakalidis – Executive Director Peter Thomas – Non-Executive Director Fei (Eddy) Wu – Non-Executive Director

==> picture [364 x 201] intentionally omitted <==

Key Management

Patrick Mutz – CEO

George Sakalidis – Exploration Director John McEvoy – Chief Financial Officer Todd Colton – General Manager – Dev.

  • - as at 10 July 2017

  • * - as at 30 June 2017; $3M placement announced 12 July

31

Contact For further information

==> picture [302 x 50] intentionally omitted <==

Patrick Mutz Managing Director Image Resources NL

[email protected] Office: +61 8 9485 2410

Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Avenue West Perth, WA 6005 PO Box 469, West Perth, WA 6872

www.imageres.com.au

32

Compliance Statements Forward Looking Statement

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

COMPLIANCE STATEMENT FOR BOONANARRING AND ATLAS DEPOSITS ORE RESERVES

The Ore Reserves statements for the Atlas and Boonanarring deposits have been compiled in accordance with the guidelines of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral – Resources and Ore Reserves (The JORC Code 2012 Edition). The Ore Reserves have been compiled by Jarrod Pye, Mining Engineer and full-time employee of Image Resources, under the direction of Andrew Law of Optiro, who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Law has sufficient experience in Ore Reserves estimation relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Law consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters compiled by him in the form and context in which it appears.

COMPLIANCE STATEMENT FOR EXPLORATION

Information in this presentation that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by George Sakalidis BSc (Hons) who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. At the time that the Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves were compiled, George Sakalidis was a director of Image Resources NL. He has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. George Sakalidis consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in this report.

33

Mineral Resources – Strand Deposits Forward Looking Statement

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Strand Deposits 1 of 2

High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off
Project/Deposit Category Volume Tonnes % HM **% Slimes ** HM Tonnes VHM **Ilmenite ** Leucoxene Rutile Zircon
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Boonanarring1 Measured 4,105,263 7,800,000 8.2 14 639,600 71.5 47.3 1.9 2.2 20.1
Boonanarring1 Indicated 13,736,842 26,100,000 5.3 18 1,383,300 73.3 49.6 2.0 2.5 19.2
Boonanarring1 Inferred 5,210,526 9,900,000 4.5 21 445,500 69.2 50.3 3.5 3.5 11.9
Boonanarring Total 23,052,632 43,800,000 5.6 18 2,468,400 72.1 49.1 2.2 2.6 18.1
Atlas1 Measured 5,210,526 9,900,000 7.9 16.1 782,000 71.0 49.1 4.2 7.2 10.5
Atlas1 Indicated 3,368,421 6,400,000 3.7 17.3 237,000 56.5 41.6 3.4 4.7 6.8
Atlas1 Inferred 947,368 1,800,000 4.0 19.9 72,000 41.5 29.0 3.3 4.4 4.8
Atlas Total 9,526,316 18,100,000 6.0 16.9 1,091,000 65.9 46.1 4.0 6.5 9.3
Sub-Total Atlas/Boonanarring 32,578,947 61,900,000 5.7 17.7 3,559,400 70.2 48.2 2.8 3.8 15.4

34

Mineral Resources – Strand Deposits Forward Looking Statement

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Strand Deposits 2 of 2

Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off
Project/Deposit Category Volume Tonnes % HM **% Slimes ** HM Tonnes VHM **Ilmenite ** Leucoxene Rutile Zircon
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Gingin Nth3 Indicated 680,175 1,318,642 5.7 15.7 75,163 75.4 57.4 9.3 3.2 5.5
Gingin Nth3 Inferred 580,000 1,090,000 5.2 14.0 57,116 78.4 57.3 11.3 3.7 6.0
Gingin Nth Total 1,260,175 2,408,642 5.5 15.0 132,279 76.7 57.3 10.2 3.4 5.7
Gingin Sth3 Measured 872,830 1,526,122 4.4 7.2 67,149 79.4 50.7 15.3 5.6 7.8
Gingin Sth3 Indicated 3,241,835 5,820,480 6.5 7.1 377,167 90.6 67.6 9.8 5.1 8.1
Gingin Sth3 Inferred 398,573 732,912 6.5 8.4 47,566 91.6 67.4 7.5 5.8 10.9
Gingin Sth Total 4,513,238 8,079,514 6.1 7.3 491,882 89.2 65.3 10.3 5.2 8.3
Helene3 Indicated 5,568,110 11,466,106 4.6 18.6 522,854 88.7 74.6 0.0 3.6 10.5
Hyperion3 Indicated 1,786,781 3,742,471 7.7 19.3 286,673 69.4 55.8 0.0 6.3 7.3
Cooljarloo Nth Total 7,354,891 15,208,577 5.3 18.8 809,528 81.9 67.9 0.0 4.6 9.4
Red Gully3 Indicated 1,930,000 3,409,768 7.8 11.5 265,962 89.7 66.0 8.3 3.1 12.4
Red Gully3 Inferred 1,455,000 2,565,631 7.5 10.7 192,422 89.0 65.4 8.2 3.0 12.3
Red Gully Total 3,385,000 5,975,399 7.7 11.2 458,384 89.4 65.7 8.2 3.1 12.4
Sub-Total Other 16,513,304 31,672,132 6.0 14.1 1,892,073 85.2 66.0 5.4 4.3 9.6
Historic Deposit - Strand deposit (Under EL application)
Project/Deposit Category Volume Tonnes % HM **% Slimes ** HM Tonnes VHM **Ilmenite ** Leucoxene Rutile Zircon
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Regans Ford4 Indicated 4,505,285 9,024,226 9.9 16.8 893,398 94.3 70.0 10.0 4.3 10.0
Regans Ford4 Inferred 455,933 918,536 6.5 18.5 59,705 90.5 68.3 7.7 4.4 10.1
Regans Ford Total 4,961,218 9,942,762 9.6 17.0 953,103 94.1 69.9 9.9 4.3 10.0

35

Mineral Resources – Dredge Deposits Forward Looking Statement

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Dredge Deposits 1 of 1

Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off
**Project/Deposit ** Category Volume Tonnes **% HM ** % Slimes HM Tonnes **VHM ** **Ilmenite ** **Leucoxene ** **Rutile ** Zircon
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Titan3 Indicated 10,335,053 21,163,741 1.8 22.1 378,831 86.0 71.9 1.5 3.1 9.5
Titan3 Inferred 58,517,775 115,445,391 1.9 18.9 2,205,007 85.9 71.8 1.5 3.1 9.5
Total Titan Total 68,852,828 136,609,132 1.9 19.4 2,583,838 85.9 71.8 1.5 3.1 9.5
Telesto3 Indicated 1,716,328 3,512,204 3.8 18.4 134,499 83.3 67.5 0.7 5.6 9.5
Calypso3 Inferred 27,113,647 51,457,008 1.7 13.7 854,186 85.6 68.1 1.6 5.1 10.8
Bidaminna3 Inferred 26,260,000 44,642,000 3.0 3.6 1,339,260 96.8 83.11 7.2 1.0 5.5
Total Dredge **123,942,803 ** 236,220,344 2.1 15.2 4,911,783 88.7 74.1 3.1 2.9 8.6

36

Compliance Statements Mineral Resources Forward Looking Statement

==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

COMPLIANCE STATEMENT FOR MINERAL RESOURCES

1. COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Boonanarring/Atlas Mineral Resources

The information in this presentation that relates to the estimation of Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mrs Christine Standing, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mrs Standing is a full-time employee of Optiro Pty Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mrs Standing consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears.

  1. COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT – MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

The information in this presentation that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Lynn Widenbar BSc, MSc, DIC MAusIMM MAIG employed by Widenbar & Associates who is a consultant to the Company. Lynn Widenbar has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 edition of the ‘Australasian Code of Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Lynn Widenbar consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears.

4. HISTORIC INFORMATION – REGANS FORD DEPOSIT

The information in this presentation that relates to tonnes, grades and mineral assemblage is based on historic information published by Iluka Resources Limited and indicating the mineral resources were compiled in accordance with the JORC Code (2004).