AI assistant
IMAGE RESOURCES NL — Investor Presentation 2017
Jul 18, 2017
65117_rns_2017-07-18_8d9f14a0-593e-4c57-be87-fac61a9a81aa.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Boonanarring Mineral Sands Project: The next cab off the mineral sands rank
==> picture [293 x 198] intentionally omitted <==
Noosa Mining Conference 19-21 July 2017 Peppers Noosa Resort Noosa, QLD
Patrick Mutz Managing Director Image Resources NL ASX: IMA
==> picture [301 x 49] intentionally omitted <==
2
Forward Looking Statement
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Certain statements made in connection with this communication, including, without limitation, those concerning the economic outlook for the mining industry, expectations regarding prices, exploration or development costs and other operating results, growth prospects and the outlook of Image’s operations contain or comprise certain forward looking statements regarding Image’s operations, economic performance and financial condition. Although Image believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to be correct.
Accordingly, results could differ materially from those set out in the forward looking statements as a result of, among other factors, changes in economic and market conditions, success of business and operating initiatives, changes that could result from future acquisitions of new tenements, the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including industrial accidents, environmental hazards or geologically related conditions), changes in the regulatory environment and other government actions, risks inherent in the ownership, exploration and operation of or investment in mining properties, fluctuations in prices and exchange rates and business and operations risks management, as well as generally those additional factors set forth in our periodic filings with ASX. Image undertakes no obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
3
Forward Looking Statement Company Description and Focus
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Image Resources NL
ASX: IMA
Emerging mineral sands producer
Actively focused on fast-tracking the development of its 100%-owned, high-grade and high-zircon flagship Boonanarring mineral sands project in the North Perth Basin in Western Australia.
First production targeted for early 2018.
CONVENTIONAL, CONVENTIONAL, CONVENTIONAL Dry open cut mining Coarse grained mineralisation
Standard suite of products
4
Forward Looking Statement Project Location
q LOCATION
Ø North Perth Basin in Western Australia
Ø 80 km north of Perth CBD
Ø Proven mineral sands address
§ Including majors Iluka and Tronox
Ø Infrastructure rich
§ paved roads, power, gas pipeline water, telecommunications etc.
Ø Local communities and landowners experienced with, and accepting of, mineral sands mining.
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [229 x 439] intentionally omitted <==
5
Projects Types and Locations
Ø 1,000 km [2] tenements portfolio Ø 100% focus on mineral sands Ø Strandline (dry open cut mining) projects Ø Dredge mining projects
==> picture [84 x 28] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [326 x 433] intentionally omitted <==
6
Forward Looking Statement Projects Pyramid - Dredgeable Mineral Resources – Accessible by Dredge Mining Projects ranked by HM Grade
Bidaminna 45Mt; 3.0%HM; 6.5% Zr+Ru
25-67% Leucoxene; 90+%VHM; <5% slimes; 100Mt exploration target
Titan-Telesto 140Mt; 1.9%HM; 12.8% Zr+Ru
Calypso 51Mt; 1.7% HM; 15.9% Zr+Ru
Total 236Mt; 2.1%HM; 11.5% Zr+Ru
7
Forward Looking Statement Projects Pyramid – Strand Deposits Mineral Resources – Accessible by Dry Open-Cut Mining Projects ranked by combined Zircon plus Rutile
Boonanarring 43.8Mt; 5.6%HM; 20.7% Zr+Ru Atlas 18.1Mt; 6.0%HM; 15.8% Zr+Ru
Focus of BFS
Red Gully 6.0Mt; 7.7% HM; 15.5% Zr+Ru Regans Ford 9.9Mt; 9.6%HM; 14.3% Zr+Ru (ELA) Cooljarloo North 15.2Mt; 5.3%HM; 14.0% Zr+Ru Gingin South 8.1Mt; 6.1%HM; 13.5% Zr+Ru Gingin North 2.4Mt; 5.5%HM; 9.1% Zr+Ru
Total 103Mt; 6.2%HM; 17% Zr+Ru
8
Boonanarring Project Comparison
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
High HM, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers
| M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers | M, VHM and Zircon grades relative to peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% SFX IMA WTR Tronox (Jurien) MRC ILU (Perth Basin) BSE AZC Tronox (Dongara) MZI Tronox (Cooljarloo) MDL Zircon (%) HM Grade (%) VHM Grade Zircon % Image Resources (IMA) Boonanarring project 21.5Mt @ 8.3% HM and up to 24.5% Zircon Murray Zircon HM grade Zircon grade VHM IMAGE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| VHM Grade Zircon % Image Resources (IMA) Boonanarring project |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21.5Mt @ 8.3% HM and up to 24.5% Zircon |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| H | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| H | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SFX | IMA IMAGE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
==> picture [78 x 80] intentionally omitted <==
Source: Released on 4[th] May 2015 – Morgan’s Research Note. VHM added by Image.
9
Forward Looking Statement Ore Reserves
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
q QUALITY ORE RESERVES Ø JORC Code (2012) Compliant Ø High HM, VHM and very high zircon at Boonanarring
Ore Reserves Summary in accordance with JORC Code
| y (2012) |
y (2012) |
y (2012) |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve | Category | Volume | Tonnes | % HM | **% SLIMES ** | HM Tonnes | VHM | **Ilmenite ** | Leucoxene | Rutile | Zircon |
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |||||||
| Boonanarring2 | Proved | 3,125,000 | 5,829,000 | 9.1 | 14.2 | 527,000 | 74.2 | 48.5 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 21.6 |
| Boonanarring2 | Probable | 7,460,000 | 14,155,000 | 6.3 | 17.4 | 905,000 | 79.3 | 52.2 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 22.8 |
| Total Boonanarring | 10,585,000 | 19,984,000 | 7.2 | 16.5 | 1,432,000 | 77.4 | 50.8 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 22.4 | |
| Atlas2 | Probable | 5,000,000 | 9,477,000 | 8.1 | 15.5 | 770,000 | 73.3 | 50.7 | 4.5 | 7.5 | 10.6 |
| Total Atlas | 5,000,000 | 9,477,000 | 8.1 | 15.5 | 770,000 | 73.3 | 50.7 | 4.5 | 7.5 | 10.6 | |
| Total Ore Reserves | 15,585,000 | 29,461,000 | 7.5 | 16.2 | 2,202,000 | 76.0 | 50.8 | 2.7 | 4.2 | 18.3 | |
10
Forward Looking Statement Ore Reserves Comparison
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [56 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
IMAGE
----- End of picture text -----
Source: TZMI; May 2017
11
Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Base Assumptions
Ø Start mining at Boonanarring
-
Ø Dry, open-cut mining
-
Ø Production rate - 500 dry tonnes per hour
-
3.7M dry tonnes per year
-
Ø Conventional gravity separation using spirals
-
Ø Product: Heavy Mineral Concentrate (HMC)
-
Production rate: avg. approx. 220K tonnes/annum
-
• Truck to Bunbury for bulk shipments to China
12
Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Key Financial Metrics[1]
Ø Pre-Tax NPV A$135M (8% discount rate)
Ø Pre-Tax IRR 64%
-
Ø Mine life 8+ years
-
Ø Project capital cost A$52M
-
includes ~$8M for land
Ø Payback period 22 months
1. Refer ASX Announcement 30 May 2017 “STRONG BFS RESULTS FOR BOONANARRING / ATLAS ”
13
Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Sensitivity Analysis
==> picture [654 x 354] intentionally omitted <==
14
Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Monthly Revenue, Costs and Cash Flow
==> picture [693 x 344] intentionally omitted <==
15
Forward Looking Statement Project Capital Comparison
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Source: TZMI; May 2017
16
Forward Looking Statement Start-up Capital / Revenue Ratio
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Source: TZMI; May 2017
17
Forward Looking Statement Bankable Feasibility Study
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Other Key Project Metrics
-
Ø Binding offtake contract for heavy mineral
-
concentrate (HMC)
-
100% of production for life of project
-
Market-based pricing model
-
Full credit for TiO2 products
-
No minimum product specifications
-
Ø Capital equipment already acquired
-
From run-of-mine ore feed through to HMC product
18
Plant and Equipment (select examples)
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [190 x 189] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [216 x 162] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [253 x 139] intentionally omitted <==
Wet Concentration Plant
Mineral Separation Plant (Option)
Slurry Booster Stations & pipelines
==> picture [196 x 148] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [242 x 182] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [248 x 176] intentionally omitted <==
Power poles, wires & transformers
Mine Slurry Unit
Plus much, much more.
HMC Stackers
19
Forward Looking Statement Image Wet Concentration Plant
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [720 x 326] intentionally omitted <==
20
Forward Looking Statement Offtake Agreement
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Advantages of HMC Offtake vs Zircon Offtake
Ø results in securing 100% of revenue instead of 65-70% for zircon only;
Ø provides faster access to revenue;
-
letters of credit can be converted to cash as soon as each shipment of HMC departs the Bunbury port, compared to having to wait until the HMC is processed into final products and the zircon is loaded and departs the port of loading;
-
Ø reduces total working capital requirements by A$7-8M (due to the faster receipt of revenue); and
-
Ø eliminates risks and potential extra costs associated with HMC processing (separation) including processing and delivery schedules, product quality issues, administration and marketing.
-
Ø Reduces overall project capital (no capital contribution for HMC processing)
21
Forward Looking Statement Upside Potential
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Upside potential at and near Boonanarring
Ø Confirmed potential to extend mine life with high grade mineralisation;
-
Ø Potential to process lower grade overlying layer of mineralisation;
-
Ø Several other deposits with high grade mineral resources in the vicinity.
22
Boonanarring Deposit Extensions
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
ASX Announcement 13 March 2017
New Drilling Results (Feb 2017)
-
Ø Confirm 5.6km northern extension of Boonanarring mineralisation
-
Ø Outstanding high-grade intersections:
-
§ 8m @ 23.8% HM in IX00245
-
§ 8m @ 21.1% HM in IX00244 and
-
§ 8m @ 16.3% HM in IX00250
==> picture [325 x 449] intentionally omitted <==
23
Potential Royalty from Tronox
Royalty agreement in place as of Ø A$50,000 cash received
Ø Sliding-scale royalty on production
Avg. HM Grade Royalty 2.5% 1.25% 3.0% 2.50% 3.5% 3.75% 4.0% 5.00%
Ø Potential for future arrangements with Tronox or others based on large area of potential dredge mining mineralisation within Image’s tenements in the vicinity of Tronox’s historic dredge operations.
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [274 x 445] intentionally omitted <==
24
Forward Looking Statement Project Approvals
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
q PROJECT APPROVALS
ü Mining Lease & General Purpose Lease ü Part IV, Environmental Protection Act (WA) – PER ü EPBC Act (Commonwealth) ü Land acquisition for processing plant siting ü Groundwater Abstraction Licence (Dept of Water and Dept Parks & Wildlife) ü Interim groundwater licence – site establishment (DoW) ü Mining Proposal – incl. MCP, EMS & ASS Mgmt Plan (DMP) Works Approval (Dept of Environment Regulation) Application filed Project Management Plan/Radiation Management Plan (DMP) Plan filed ü Atlas Project Gap Analysis – Environmental Studies & Approvals
25
Project Development Schedule
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Targeting first production in early 2018
| Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | Simplified Boonanarring Project Development Schedule -(high level) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | ||||
| Finalisation of Transaction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Complete BFS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Approvals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HMC Toll or Sale Agreement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project Financing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WCP & Equipment Relocation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pre-Stripping | Equity | Decision to M | ine T | arget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ore Mining | ~~Transaction~~ ~~w/Murra Zircon~~ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ~~y~~ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plant Commissioning | Completed |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ~~8 June~~ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production |
26
Contact Historic Commodity Pricing
==> picture [720 x 417] intentionally omitted <==
27
Contact Commodity Prices on the Rise
Zircon-
We forecast two more quarterly increases of +$100/t and then two further $50/t increases. That would take the price from around $860/t at the start of 2017, to $1350/t by 2H18, our forecast price peak. (Source: FNZC Market Daily, 29 May 2017) (Credit Suisse)
==> picture [330 x 204] intentionally omitted <==
Rutile price forecast lifted from 2019 (Source: FNZC Market Daily, 29 May 2017)
==> picture [327 x 201] intentionally omitted <==
28
Contact Commodity Prices on the Rise
We increase our ilmenite forecasts and now expect them to double YoY by 3Q17. Given the Chinese impetus behind ilmenite, we forecast ilmenite prices will essentially double in 2017, from $80/t in early 2016 to $160/t FOB by 3Q17. We see further increases towards $200/t by 2019, due to expected ongoing solid demand from China. (Source: FNZC Market Daily, 29 May 2017)
TiO2 pigments – pigment price rise picking up pace. Price increases are getting stronger and a new round of price hikes is coming by mid-year. Cristal announced global price rises of $250/t for most regions, and €350/t in Europe. (Source: FNZC Market Daily, 29 May 2017)
==> picture [324 x 198] intentionally omitted <==
29
Transition from Explorer to Producer Contact
Generalisation of Transition from Explorer to Producer
10 9 Production 8 (realisation Discovery Project 7 of full value) & Resource Development 6 Delineation (feasibility Study Period 5 (excitement; (uncertainty; results; Exploration growth; mine decision; 4 (high risk; Investor costly; project funding; dilution) 3 speculative) profit) more certainty; 2 lower risk) 1 Image was here (?) 12/2016 6 months later (?) 6/2017 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 Time
30
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Corporate Snapshot Image Corporate Snapshot Diverse and experienced Board and Management
Share Code: IMA Share Price: A$0.10 12 Month Price Range: A$0.04 – 0.12 Shares on Issue: 537.6m Market Cap: A$52m Cash on hand: A$1.4m* Debt (short-term): *A$4.0m Top 20 Shareholders: 68%
Board of Directors
Bob Besley – Independent Chairman Patrick Mutz – Managing Director Chaodian Chen - Non-Executive Director Aaron Chong Veoy Soo – Non-Executive Dir George Sakalidis – Executive Director Peter Thomas – Non-Executive Director Fei (Eddy) Wu – Non-Executive Director
==> picture [364 x 201] intentionally omitted <==
Key Management
Patrick Mutz – CEO
George Sakalidis – Exploration Director John McEvoy – Chief Financial Officer Todd Colton – General Manager – Dev.
-
- as at 10 July 2017
-
* - as at 30 June 2017; $3M placement announced 12 July
31
Contact For further information
==> picture [302 x 50] intentionally omitted <==
Patrick Mutz Managing Director Image Resources NL
[email protected] Office: +61 8 9485 2410
Ground Floor, 23 Ventnor Avenue West Perth, WA 6005 PO Box 469, West Perth, WA 6872
www.imageres.com.au
32
Compliance Statements Forward Looking Statement
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT FOR BOONANARRING AND ATLAS DEPOSITS ORE RESERVES
The Ore Reserves statements for the Atlas and Boonanarring deposits have been compiled in accordance with the guidelines of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral – Resources and Ore Reserves (The JORC Code 2012 Edition). The Ore Reserves have been compiled by Jarrod Pye, Mining Engineer and full-time employee of Image Resources, under the direction of Andrew Law of Optiro, who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Law has sufficient experience in Ore Reserves estimation relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Law consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters compiled by him in the form and context in which it appears.
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT FOR EXPLORATION
Information in this presentation that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by George Sakalidis BSc (Hons) who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. At the time that the Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves were compiled, George Sakalidis was a director of Image Resources NL. He has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. George Sakalidis consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in this report.
33
Mineral Resources – Strand Deposits Forward Looking Statement
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Strand Deposits 1 of 2
| High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | High Grade Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) @ 2.0% HM Cut-off | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project/Deposit | Category | Volume | Tonnes | % HM | **% Slimes ** | HM Tonnes | VHM | **Ilmenite ** | Leucoxene | Rutile | Zircon |
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |||||||
| Boonanarring1 | Measured | 4,105,263 | 7,800,000 | 8.2 | 14 | 639,600 | 71.5 | 47.3 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 20.1 |
| Boonanarring1 | Indicated | 13,736,842 | 26,100,000 | 5.3 | 18 | 1,383,300 | 73.3 | 49.6 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 19.2 |
| Boonanarring1 | Inferred | 5,210,526 | 9,900,000 | 4.5 | 21 | 445,500 | 69.2 | 50.3 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 11.9 |
| Boonanarring Total | 23,052,632 | 43,800,000 | 5.6 | 18 | 2,468,400 | 72.1 | 49.1 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 18.1 | |
| Atlas1 | Measured | 5,210,526 | 9,900,000 | 7.9 | 16.1 | 782,000 | 71.0 | 49.1 | 4.2 | 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Atlas1 | Indicated | 3,368,421 | 6,400,000 | 3.7 | 17.3 | 237,000 | 56.5 | 41.6 | 3.4 | 4.7 | 6.8 |
| Atlas1 | Inferred | 947,368 | 1,800,000 | 4.0 | 19.9 | 72,000 | 41.5 | 29.0 | 3.3 | 4.4 | 4.8 |
| Atlas Total | 9,526,316 | 18,100,000 | 6.0 | 16.9 | 1,091,000 | 65.9 | 46.1 | 4.0 | 6.5 | 9.3 | |
| Sub-Total Atlas/Boonanarring | 32,578,947 | 61,900,000 | 5.7 | 17.7 | 3,559,400 | 70.2 | 48.2 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 15.4 |
34
Mineral Resources – Strand Deposits Forward Looking Statement
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Strand Deposits 2 of 2
| Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Strand Deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 2.5% HM Cut-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project/Deposit | Category | Volume | Tonnes | % HM | **% Slimes ** | HM Tonnes | VHM | **Ilmenite ** | Leucoxene | Rutile | Zircon |
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |||||||
| Gingin Nth3 | Indicated | 680,175 | 1,318,642 | 5.7 | 15.7 | 75,163 | 75.4 | 57.4 | 9.3 | 3.2 | 5.5 |
| Gingin Nth3 | Inferred | 580,000 | 1,090,000 | 5.2 | 14.0 | 57,116 | 78.4 | 57.3 | 11.3 | 3.7 | 6.0 |
| Gingin Nth Total | 1,260,175 | 2,408,642 | 5.5 | 15.0 | 132,279 | 76.7 | 57.3 | 10.2 | 3.4 | 5.7 | |
| Gingin Sth3 | Measured | 872,830 | 1,526,122 | 4.4 | 7.2 | 67,149 | 79.4 | 50.7 | 15.3 | 5.6 | 7.8 |
| Gingin Sth3 | Indicated | 3,241,835 | 5,820,480 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 377,167 | 90.6 | 67.6 | 9.8 | 5.1 | 8.1 |
| Gingin Sth3 | Inferred | 398,573 | 732,912 | 6.5 | 8.4 | 47,566 | 91.6 | 67.4 | 7.5 | 5.8 | 10.9 |
| Gingin Sth Total | 4,513,238 | 8,079,514 | 6.1 | 7.3 | 491,882 | 89.2 | 65.3 | 10.3 | 5.2 | 8.3 | |
| Helene3 | Indicated | 5,568,110 | 11,466,106 | 4.6 | 18.6 | 522,854 | 88.7 | 74.6 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 10.5 |
| Hyperion3 | Indicated | 1,786,781 | 3,742,471 | 7.7 | 19.3 | 286,673 | 69.4 | 55.8 | 0.0 | 6.3 | 7.3 |
| Cooljarloo Nth Total | 7,354,891 | 15,208,577 | 5.3 | 18.8 | 809,528 | 81.9 | 67.9 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 9.4 | |
| Red Gully3 | Indicated | 1,930,000 | 3,409,768 | 7.8 | 11.5 | 265,962 | 89.7 | 66.0 | 8.3 | 3.1 | 12.4 |
| Red Gully3 | Inferred | 1,455,000 | 2,565,631 | 7.5 | 10.7 | 192,422 | 89.0 | 65.4 | 8.2 | 3.0 | 12.3 |
| Red Gully Total | 3,385,000 | 5,975,399 | 7.7 | 11.2 | 458,384 | 89.4 | 65.7 | 8.2 | 3.1 | 12.4 | |
| Sub-Total Other | 16,513,304 | 31,672,132 | 6.0 | 14.1 | 1,892,073 | 85.2 | 66.0 | 5.4 | 4.3 | 9.6 | |
| Historic Deposit - Strand deposit (Under EL application) | |||||||||||
| Project/Deposit | Category | Volume | Tonnes | % HM | **% Slimes ** | HM Tonnes | VHM | **Ilmenite ** | Leucoxene | Rutile | Zircon |
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |||||||
| Regans Ford4 | Indicated | 4,505,285 | 9,024,226 | 9.9 | 16.8 | 893,398 | 94.3 | 70.0 | 10.0 | 4.3 | 10.0 |
| Regans Ford4 | Inferred | 455,933 | 918,536 | 6.5 | 18.5 | 59,705 | 90.5 | 68.3 | 7.7 | 4.4 | 10.1 |
| Regans Ford Total | 4,961,218 | 9,942,762 | 9.6 | 17.0 | 953,103 | 94.1 | 69.9 | 9.9 | 4.3 | 10.0 |
35
Mineral Resources – Dredge Deposits Forward Looking Statement
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Dredge Deposits 1 of 1
| Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | Previously Reported Mineral Resources - Dredge deposits; in accordance with JORC Code (2004) @ 1.0% HM Cut-off | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Project/Deposit ** | Category | Volume | Tonnes | **% HM ** | % Slimes | HM Tonnes | **VHM ** | **Ilmenite ** | **Leucoxene ** | **Rutile ** | Zircon | |
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | ||||||||
| Titan3 | Indicated | 10,335,053 | 21,163,741 | 1.8 | 22.1 | 378,831 | 86.0 | 71.9 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 9.5 | |
| Titan3 | Inferred | 58,517,775 | 115,445,391 | 1.9 | 18.9 | 2,205,007 | 85.9 | 71.8 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 9.5 | |
| Total Titan | Total | 68,852,828 | 136,609,132 | 1.9 | 19.4 | 2,583,838 | 85.9 | 71.8 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 9.5 | |
| Telesto3 | Indicated | 1,716,328 | 3,512,204 | 3.8 | 18.4 | 134,499 | 83.3 | 67.5 | 0.7 | 5.6 | 9.5 | |
| Calypso3 | Inferred | 27,113,647 | 51,457,008 | 1.7 | 13.7 | 854,186 | 85.6 | 68.1 | 1.6 | 5.1 | 10.8 | |
| Bidaminna3 | Inferred | 26,260,000 | 44,642,000 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 1,339,260 | 96.8 | 83.11 | 7.2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | |
| Total Dredge | **123,942,803 ** | 236,220,344 | 2.1 | 15.2 | 4,911,783 | 88.7 | 74.1 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 8.6 |
36
Compliance Statements Mineral Resources Forward Looking Statement
==> picture [164 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT FOR MINERAL RESOURCES
1. COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Boonanarring/Atlas Mineral Resources
The information in this presentation that relates to the estimation of Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mrs Christine Standing, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mrs Standing is a full-time employee of Optiro Pty Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mrs Standing consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears.
- COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT – MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES
The information in this presentation that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Lynn Widenbar BSc, MSc, DIC MAusIMM MAIG employed by Widenbar & Associates who is a consultant to the Company. Lynn Widenbar has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 edition of the ‘Australasian Code of Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Lynn Widenbar consents to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears.
4. HISTORIC INFORMATION – REGANS FORD DEPOSIT
The information in this presentation that relates to tonnes, grades and mineral assemblage is based on historic information published by Iluka Resources Limited and indicating the mineral resources were compiled in accordance with the JORC Code (2004).