Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

IGO LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2014

Nov 27, 2014

65111_rns_2014-11-27_1a257ed5-5ed5-462e-a8d3-f42a8acc0cf5.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [595 x 78] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

ASX Release
----- End of picture text -----

28 November 2014

INDEPENDENCE DELIVERS POSITIVE OPTIMISATION STUDY FOR STOCKMAN COPPER-ZINC PROJECT

Independence Group NL (“the Company”) (ASX:IGO) is pleased to announce the results of the 2014 Optimisation Study of its 100% owned Stockman Copper-Zinc Project (“the Stockman Project” or “the Project”) in North-Eastern Victoria.

Highlights

  • Optimisation Study confirms attractive base case project

  • Annual average payable metal production of 15,000t Cu, 26,000t Zn & 0.4Moz Ag

  • Increased Ore Reserve will provide a 10 year project life

  • Pre-production capital of $202M

  • Maximum cash down (initial + working capital) of $233M

  • Average annual free cash flow from operations (pre-tax) of $64M per year

  • Net cash flow (after capital, tax and royalties) of $270M

  • C1 cash costs of $1.30/lb Cu (US$1.09/Ib Cu)

The Optimisation Study has incorporated the 2013 Feasibility Study to further de-risk and improve the Project returns, along with incorporating the overarching conditions of the recently released positive Ministerial Assessment issued by the Victorian Minister for Planning. The scope of the Project encompasses concurrent development of the two underground deposits to feed a central 1.0Mtpa differential flotation concentrator that would produce an average of approximately 140,000tpa of copper and zinc concentrates over a project life of approximately ten years. The concentrate products would be exported to customer smelters in the southern Asia region.

The key outcomes of the 2014 Optimisation Study are summarised in the table below:

Item 2014 Optimisation Study 2014 Optimisation Study
Average annual metal production (payable) 15,100 t Cu 26,300 t Zn
441,300 oz Ag 5,700 oz Au
Life of mine C1 cash costs US$1.09/lb Cu $1.30/lb Cu
Pre-production capital $202M
Net operatingcashflow(post-tax)(1) $529M
Net operatingcashflow less capital(post-tax)(1) $270M
Internal Rate of Return(post tax)(1) 18%

(1) At IGO Ore Reserve metal price assumptions of US$6,591/t Cu, US$2,979/t Zn, US$20.17/oz Ag and US$1,146/oz Au and an A$:US$ exchange rate of 0.84.

Independence Group NL Managing Director, Peter Bradford, said “The Stockman Project represents a viable development project for the Company that has been significantly de-risked with the completion of the Optimisation Study and recent Ministerial Assessment approval. The operating skills and capital requirements sit comfortably within the capabilities of the Company, which remains committed to advancing the Project to the next milestone gating decision. The Company will continue to advance the Project with the critical path being to secure a range of licenses from the Commonwealth and the various Victorian decision making authorities, which could take 12-18 months.”

Under the Victorian system the Ministerial conditions provide an overarching guide to the Decision Making Authorities (“DMAs”), but are not binding. Therefore, the Company needs to advance securing these licenses to further de-risk the Project before the IGO Board makes any project sanction decision. Although the full licensing process could take an estimated twelve to eighteen months, it is expected that the critical elements will be

==> picture [579 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

A

secured by October 2015. It would be at this milestone the Company would make a decision, in the context of the markets at that time, on whether or not to advance to engineering, procurement and construction activities.

2015 2015 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 2017 2017 2017 2017 2018 2018 2018 2018
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Detailed Licensing phase
Accommodation Village
Plantsite Earthworks
TSF Earthworks
Process Plant Construction
Process Plant Commissioning
Mine Development
Throughput Ramp-up
Recovery Ramp-up

The initial critical path (red) Detailed Licensing phase

On completion of the proposed work programme, the Project would be further de-risked, such that, subject to market conditions and IGO Board approval, engineering, procurement and construction activities could commence.

Further detail on the Stockman Project is contained in the background information attached to this announcement.

For further information contact :

Peter Bradford Managing Director Independence Group NL Telephone: 08 9238 8300

Tony Walsh Company Secretary/General Manager Corporate Independence Group NL Telephone: 08 9238 8300

Note : All currency amounts in this announcement are Australian Dollars unless otherwise noted

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 2

==> picture [595 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

A
----- End of picture text -----

ATTACHMENT

STOCKMAN PROJECT OPTIMISATION STUDY BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Location

The Project is situated on the sloping Eastern Highlands of Victoria at elevations between 650 and 1200 metres, located approximately 460 kilometres by road north-east of Melbourne.

The town of Omeo is approximately one hour by road from the Project. Greater Omeo has a population of approximately 470 and provides a range of government and commercial services including a district hospital, police station and emergency services base.

The Project encompasses two copper-zinc-lead-silver-gold deposits, Wilga and Currawong, which were discovered in 1978 and 1979. The larger Currawong deposit is undeveloped, whilst the Wilga deposit was previously mined between 1992 and 1996.

==> picture [357 x 484] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [210 x 8] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Location map including the Mining Tenement MIN5523
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 3

A

Permitting and Tenure

The Stockman project has extensive granted tenure as shown in the table below:

Tenement Name Area (ha)
MIN5523 MIN - Mining Licence 4,244
EL5045 EL - Exploration Licence 25,200
EL5391 EL - Exploration Licence 17,100
EL5392 EL - Exploration Licence 27,600
EL5463 EL - Exploration Licence 52,200
Total 126,344

MIN5523 is a granted mining licence that covers the Wilga and Currawong deposits and several exploration prospects. The existing Tailings Storage Facility (“TSF”), currently managed by the State of Victoria, is not included in MIN5523 and will be secured under a separate Infrastructure Mining Licence.

Permitting

The Victorian Minister for Planning’s positive assessment of the Stockman Environmental Effects Statement (“EES”) and Inquiry Panel report was released on 30 October 2014 and represents a major project milestone.

The assessment report was also provided at the same time to the Commonwealth Minister for Environment for his consideration under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. The Federal decision is expected to be announced by early 2015.

The Victorian Minister’s assessment concluded;

“In relation to both the relevant legislation and policy framework and the project’s overall benefits, the potentially significant environmental effects and risks of the Stockman Project are acceptable, provided the appropriate mitigation and management measures, consistent with the findings of this Assessment and the Inquiry Report, are implemented.

The Stockman Project will provide a net benefit to the State of Victoria, having regard to both long term and short term economic, environmental and social considerations.

The Stockman Project should proceed in a manner consistent with this Assessment, including the following responses to the recommendations of the Inquiry.”

Our review of the Minister’s Assessment document has shown that there are no material requirements in the proposed conditions beyond those proposed by Independence. The specific detail of the various licenses that are required for project operations will now be scoped and agreed with Government agencies. It is expected that detailed licensing will take approximately fifteen months.

Mineral Resources

The Mineral Resource Statement has remained unchanged from that most recently reported in August 2014 (IGO ASX release 28th August 2014), and is shown below.

The Currawong Mineral Resource estimate is based on 230 drill holes for approximately 66,000m of predominantly diamond drilling on nominal 25m x 25m spacing. The Wilga resource estimate is based on 261 holes for approximately 26,700m of predominantly diamond drilling also on nominal 25m x 25m spacing.

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 4

A

Stockman Project – June 2014 Mineral Resource Statement

Tonnes (Mt) Cu % Zn % Ag g/t Au g/t
Currawong
Measured - - - - -
Indicated 9.58 2.0 4.2 42 1.2
Inferred 0.78 1.4 2.2 23 0.5
sub total 10.33 2.0 4.0 40 1.1
Wilga
Measured - - - - -
Indicated 2.99 2.0 4.8 31 0.5
Inferred 0.67 3.7 5.5 34 0.4
sub total 3.66 2.3 4.9 32 0.53
Grand Total 13.97 2.1 4.3 38 1.03

Notes:

  1. All Mineral Resources tonnes have been rounded to the nearest one thousand tonnes and grade to the nearest 1/10[th] percentage/gram per tonne.

  2. Mineral Resources include massive sulphide and stringer sulphide mineralisation. Massive sulphide Mineral Resources are geologically defined; stringer sulphide resources are reported above cut-off grades of 0.5% Cu.

  3. Gold (Au) grades for Wilga are all inferred due to paucity of Au grade data in historic drilling.

  4. Block modelling used ordinary kriging grade interpolation methods within wireframes for all elements and density.

  5. Mining depletion as at end of historic mine life (1996) has been removed from the Mineral Resource estimate for Wilga.

  6. Mineral Resources are inclusive of Ore Reserves.

  7. The Competent Persons statement is incorporated in the JORC Code (2012) Competent Persons Statements section of this report.

  8. See IGO’s ASX Release of 28 August 2014 for JORC Code (2012) Table 1 Parameters.

Mining method

The Stockman Project would employ conventional mechanised sublevel open stoping with cemented paste backfill as the primary mining method. The key mining fleet would consist of modern hydraulic development jumbo’s and long hole stope drills, 17t capacity loaders, 50t to 60t dump trucks, as well as a variety of ancillary equipment.

==> picture [261 x 231] intentionally omitted <==

Currawong mine layout showing all planned development and stopes

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 5

A

The Wilga deposit has an existing decline access that was partially refurbished in 2011 and remains accessible reducing the pre-production development requirements significantly. Typical decline access will be 5.5m wide by 5.8m high.

Ground conditions are generally good and water ingress is low. Both the Currawong and Wilga deposits are relatively shallow for underground mines and therefore the haulage and ventilation requirements are modest and development lead times short.

Ore Reserves

An updated Ore Reserve estimate has been completed as part of the 2014 Optimisation Study. It has been estimated on a Net Smelter Return (“NSR”) basis with payable metals being copper, zinc, silver and gold, to estimate the mine-gate value of ore. The Ore Reserve table including a comparison to the previous June 2014 Ore Reserve Declaration is shown below.

Stockman Project – November 2014 Ore Reserves Statement (and June 2014 comparison)

Deposit Class Ore Reserve
28 November 2014
Ore Reserve
28 November 2014
Ore Reserve
28 November 2014
Ore Reserve
28 November 2014
Ore Reserve Ore Reserve Ore Reserve
30 June 2014
Tonnes
(Mt)
Cu
%
Zn
%
Ag
g/t
Au
g/t
Tonnes
(Mt)
Cu
%
Zn
%
Ag
g/t
Au
g/t
Currawong Proved - - - - - - - - - -
Probable 7.4 2.1 4.3 40 1.2 7.3 2.2 4.1 40 1.2
sub total 7.4 2.1 4.3 40 1.2 7.3 2.2 4.1 40 1.2
Wilga Proved - - - - - - - - - -
Probable 1.6 2.1 5.6 31 0.53 1.1 2.5 5.3 30 0.53
Sub total 1.6 2.1 5.6 31 0.53 1.1 2.5 5.3 30 0.53
Grand Total 9.0 2.1 4.5 39 1.13 8.4 2.3 4.3 39 1.13

Notes:

  1. All Ore Reserves tonnes are rounded to the nearest one hundred thousand tonnes and grade to the nearest 1/10[th] percentage/gram per tonne.

  2. Gold (Au) grades are Inferred at Wilga due to a paucity of gold assays in historic drilling. Revenue from Au in the Wilga ore was included in the estimation of the Ore Reserve. The contribution to Revenue of this Au was estimated to be $8.65 per gram of Au in situ . This inclusion was not material to the value of the mining envelopes considered and did not warrant downgrading of any portion of the Ore Reserve attributable to Wilga. The contribution from Wilga represents 18% of the total Ore Reserve.

  3. Historic mining depletion for Wilga has been removed from the Ore Reserve estimate.

  4. The Competent Persons statement is provided under the Competent Persons section at the end of this report.

  5. JORC (2012) Table 1 Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria is attached in Appendix 1 of this release.

Metallurgy and Processing

The Stockman concentrator would be designed for a nominal throughput rate of 1.0Mtpa and uses standard industry technologies to produce a saleable copper and zinc concentrates.

The process is summarised as:

  • three stage crushing circuit;

  • ball mill and IsaMill grinding circuit;

  • differential copper - zinc flotation circuit;

  • concentrate thickening and filtration;

  • concentrate storage, blending and containerised transport to port; and

  • tailings thickening and paste backfill manufacture &/or sub-aqueous TSF disposal.

The crushing and grinding circuit are capable of producing a fine primary grind (P80 = 25µm) whilst concentrate regrinds (P80 = 15µm) are required to liberate the minerals for efficient recovery and rejection of gangue minerals.

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 6

A

The flotation circuit would also use a standard approach to differentially float the chalcopyrite minerals from the sphalerite minerals in the copper circuit, and then float the sphalerite minerals in the zinc circuit. The copper circuit would consist of rougher/scavenger flotation, regrinding of the rougher/scavenger concentrate and two stages of cleaning (with the first stage in open circuit). The zinc circuit would consist of rougher/scavenger flotation, regrinding of the rougher/scavenger concentrate and three stages of cleaning (with the first stage in open circuit).

==> picture [477 x 260] intentionally omitted <==

An illustration of the proposed Stockman processing plant

Testwork demonstrated that both the zinc concentrate and copper concentrate would have normal properties with good thickening, filtration and materials handling characteristics. Likewise, the tailings, despite the fine grind, can be classified, thickened and filtered to high densities that are appropriate for use as underground paste backfill. Tailings settle rapidly in a sub-aqueous discharge TSF.

Extensive metallurgical testwork has been undertaken resulting in a high degree of process certainty. Life of mine recovery to concentrate is estimated to be 81.5% for copper and 76.4% for zinc. Silver recovery across both the copper and zinc concentrates averages 59% life of mine, and gold recovery into the copper concentrate averages 21% life of mine. Opportunity exists to do further work to enhance silver and gold recoveries.

The concentrate specifications are readily acceptable to market with concentrate grades of 21% Cu and 50% Zn respectively and low to negligible penalty elements.

Infrastructure

The site is well serviced by State and Shire road networks. The final approximately 15 kilometres of road to the Project site is unsealed and would require widening. Onsite, only minor upgrades are required to existing roads linking the Wilga deposit to the main Currawong area.

Power would be generated onsite via an island-mode gas-fired station with 16MW of installed capacity. Natural gas (CNG or LNG) would be trucked to site. It is planned to contract out the power supply to a third-party under a Build-Own-Operate arrangement.

The site water balance is near neutral. A potential borefield has been identified some 33 kilometres from site on the plains surrounding the Benambra Township, which can be readily developed if required. A substantial capacity of water currently exists in the TSF and numerous options for supplemental water supply exist between these two locations.

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 7

A

It is planned to expand and re-use the existing TSF near the proposed Currawong plant site. The TSF was built in 1992, contains some 700,000t of Wilga tailings and is designed as a modern water retaining structure. The available monitoring data for the existing TSF suggests that it has performed to design, and post rehabilitation water quality has shown substantial improvement to near-natural background levels without active treatment. Currently tenure to the TSF is held by the State and approval will be sought to carry out detailed site investigations to verify the quantitative and observational monitoring data.

It is expected that approximately 50% of tailings will be used to make a cemented paste backfill for use in supporting underground mined voids, and the other 50% will be stored in the TSF.

A 170-room village is proposed to be established on freehold land approximately 10 kilometres from Currawong. It is planned to operate the project on a drive-in/drive-out rostered basis. It is expected that the majority of the workforce will live in regional areas.

Site infrastructure would include administration offices, workshops, stores, explosives magazines, fuel storage and an assay laboratory.

==> picture [451 x 293] intentionally omitted <==

Stockman project site showing areas – Wilga, Currawong and TSF

Exploration

Significant exploration potential exists on the Project with the vast majority of drilling completed during the 2013 Feasibility Study having been focused on resource definition. The extensive tenure of the Stockman Project hosts several prospects that require additional exploration.

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 8

==> picture [595 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

A
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [425 x 276] intentionally omitted <==

Project area showing drill hole collars and geochemical surface signatures. Note the highlighted isolated anomalous assay results and significant surface geochemical anomalies that are yet to be drill tested.

Recent discoveries include the Bigfoot and Eureka prospects which are not included in the Mineral Resource. As both prospects are close to the planned Currawong decline access, they have the potential to be included into the Project with minimal extra capital development. Bigfoot especially is an exciting discovery, as it has precious metals values well in excess of either Wilga or Currawong and provides a potential target for further high-NSR value exploration.

Due to the rugged and steep topography, airborne geophysical techniques only provide limited usefulness, but the combination of surface geochemistry and surface and downhole Electro Magnetic has been shown to be very effective at locating mineralisation. Key learnings from 2013 exploration work programs have been that all known mineralisation is overlain by an identifiable geochemical signature, and to date, all significant geochemical signatures that have been drill tested have intersected mineralisation. Several significant geochemical signatures remain to be properly drill tested.

Capital costs

The maximum cash negative position of the Project is estimated at $233M (initial capital expenditure plus working capital). The costs are inclusive of all infrastructure and indirect costs required for the Project and includes a contingency of approximately $20M. The nominal engineering accuracy of the estimate is ±15%.

The basis of the capital estimation includes the following:

  • Owner-operator workforce and leased mobile plant;

  • Engineering, Procurement and Construction (“EPC”) construction model for non-mining infrastructure;

  • Owner-operator processing facilities and workforce with leased mobile plant;

  • Build-Own-Operate third-party power supply ($/kWh basis);

  • Leased buildings and contract operated village ($/man-day basis);

  • Contract concentrate road haulage, portside aggregation and ship loading ($/t basis); and

  • Expansion and upgrading of existing TSF.

The table below shows a breakdown of the life of mine capital estimation for both the 2013 Feasibility Study (“2013 FS”) and 2014 Optimisation Study (“2014 OS”). The maximum cash down statistic represents the pre-

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 9

A

production capital plus working capital. It should be noted that the 2013 Feasibility Study did not contemplate standard leasing arrangements as a financing tool, thus all 2013 Feasibility Study costs shown are as direct capital expenditure.

Capital Costs Units 2014 OS 2013 FS
Plant $M 140 158
Infrastructure $M 46 102
Paste backfill plant $M 13 16
Mining $M 40 71
Rehabilitation & other $M 19 10
Total Capital $M 259* $359
Maximum cash down $M 233 324
  • rounding errors may occur in the summation of the parts – totals are correct.

Operating costs

The average total operating costs for the Project are estimated at approximately $169/t of ore. The operating costs were developed in conjunction with the project design criteria, process flow sheet, mass and water balance, mechanical and electrical equipment lists, and labour costs data. The estimation includes payment of leasing costs as operating costs. The breakdown for both the 2013 Feasibility Study (2013 FS) and 2014 Optimisation Study (2014 OS) are shown in the table below on a “tonnes of ore basis”.

Operating Costs Units 2014 OS 2013 FS
Mining $/t ore 46 44
Mine geology $/t ore 3 1
Processing & TSF $/t ore 40 38
G&A $/t ore 14 17
subtotal on-site $/t ore 103 100
Road haulage & handling $/t ore 17 15
Shipping $/t ore 12 8
Treatment charges / Refining charges $/t ore 38 16
subtotal off-site $/t ore 66 38
Total operating cost $/t ore 169 138

Project business case

The Stockman Project represents a substantial base metals project, producing readily marketable products, in a low-risk jurisdiction. The operating skills and capital requirements sit comfortably within the capabilities of Independence. Significant value has been added to the Project with the completion of the 2014 Optimisation Study and the recent Ministerial Approval. The Project economics are most sensitive to revenue inputs (metal prices, exchange rate, TC/RCs) and capital cost as shown in the graph below. The Project is therefore relatively highly leveraged to the future rising zinc price forecast by most industry analysts.

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 10

==> picture [595 x 66] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

A
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [436 x 282] intentionally omitted <==

Sensitivities of the Projects IRR (post tax) on revenue inputs.

Work program

Following receipt of the positive Ministerial Assessment on 30 October 2014, Independence has reviewed the ministerial conditions and found that they are generally in accordance with the triple bottom line (i.e. economic, social and environmental) operating regime proposed in the EES. The Commonwealth assessment is based upon the documentation submitted for the Victorian EES, and a decision is expected by early 2015.

The Project now enters a detailed licencing phase where a variety of department-specific permits and approvals will be progressed with the various Victorian State Decision Making Authorities (“DMAs”) in relation to the key project elements shown in the table below. Independence will progress the permitting tasks that add value to the Project by shortening the overall implementation as the activities are on the critical path and materially decreasing project risk.

Typically, ministerial conditions are generalised in scope thus it is imperative to ensure DMA agreement with the translation of those requirements into specific Acts, regulation and policy which will provide clarity to the licencing prerequisites and deliverables. It is also important to ensure that both State and Commonwealth requirements are satisfied by the same set of deliverables.

The majority of critical path permitting tasks are associated with the TSF including:

  • detailed site investigations of the existing impoundment;

  • design and performance criteria of the new structure;

  • the downstream water quality and biodiversity monitoring program; and

  • vegetation clearance offsets.

The estimated duration of the licencing period is shown on the summary schedule below. As the Victorian licencing system does not incorporate statutory timelines the estimate may vary. A progress review of the Project (i.e. a stage-gate assessment with an explicit outcome of continue, recycle or stop) will be undertaken before any engineering, procurement or construction activities are commenced.

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 11

A

2015 2015 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 2017 2017 2017 2017 2018 2018 2018 2018
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Detailed Licensing phase
Accommodation Village
Plantsite Earthworks
TSF Earthworks
Process Plant Construction
Process Plant Commissioning
Mine Development
Throughput Ramp-up
Recovery Ramp-up

Initial critical path (red) Detailed Licensing phase

The initial critical path (red) Detailed Licensing phase is highlighted above. A “stage-gate” progress review will be made of the Project and licensing progress prior to any further internal works approvals.

Key project data

The table below presents the life of mine production schedule for the Stockman Project

Physicals
Units
Total
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Year
4
Year
5
Year
6
Year
7
Year
8
Year
9
Year
10
Ore Processed
'000 t
9,018
787 1,003 990 1,011 1,015 900 1,000 1,028 804 480
Concentrate hauled
Cu concentrate hauled
'000 wmt
829
Zn concentrate hauled
'000 wmt
695
73
63
88
97
100
85
103
82
106
79
85
75
103
65
73
73
56
50
42
24
Concentrate shipped
Payable Cu in Cu concentrate
'000 t
149
Payable Ag in Cu concentrate
'000 oz
4,136
Payable Au in Cu concentrate
'000 oz
56
Payable Zn in Zn concentrate
'000 t
259
Payable Agin Zn concentrate
'000 oz
206
13
301
3
23
11
16
528
6
38
0
18
532
6
32
0
18
495
8
30
0
19
521
9
30
2
16
486
5
28
5
18
437
6
24
27
14
429
6
28
58
10
264
4
19
69
7
142
2
8
34

The table below presents key project physical and financial data showing the comparison between the 2013 Feasibility Study (2013 FS) and the 2014 Optimisation Study (2014 OS).

Item Material Units 2014 OS 2013 FS
Production
Annualised mining&processingrate Ore Mtpa 1.0 1.0
LOM(incl. ramp-up) Duration Years 10.1 9.1
LOM mining&processing Ore Mt 9.0 8.4
LOM headgrade Ore % Cu 2.1 2.2
Ore % Zn 4.5 4.3

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 12

A

Item Material Units 2014 OS 2013 FS
Ore g/t Ag 39 39
Ore g/t Au 1.1 1.1
LOMproduction Cu concentrate dmt 746,600 724,400
Cu concentrategrade % Cu 21 21
Cu rec. into Cu conc. % 81.5 80.4
Cu metal(payable) dmt 148,600 144,100
Zn concentrate dmt 620,300 549,800
Zn concentrategrade % Zn 50 50
Zn rec. into Zn conc. % 76.4 76.4
Zn metal(payable) dmt 258,800 228,800
Silver metal(payable) oz 4,341,800 4,122,100
Gold metal(payable) oz 55,900 44,300
Average annualproduction(payable) Cu metal dmt 15,100 15,900
Zn metal dmt 26,300 25,200
Silver metal oz 441,300 453,700
Gold metal oz 5,700 4,900
Metalprices
Average LOM Cu USD t 6,591 8,069
Average LOM Zn USD t 2,979 2,072
Average LOM Ag USD oz 20.17 32.32
Average LOM Au USD oz 1,146 1,687
Exchange rate ratio AUD:USD 0.84 1.05
Treatment & refining charges (LOM)
Copper conc. - treatment charge USD dmt conc. 89.18 65.00
Copper conc. - refiningcharge USD lbpayable 0.089 0.065
Zinc - treatment charge USD dmt conc. 310.77 133.62
Silver - refiningcharge USD ozpayable 0.35 0.40
Gold - refiningcharge USD ozpayable 4.00 5.00
Operating Costs
Mining $/t ore 46.29 44.32
Minegeology $/t ore 3.10 1.09
Processing& TSF $/t ore 40.01 37.81
G&A $/t ore 13.66 16.99
Road haulage & handling $/t ore 16.56 14.61
Shipping $/t ore 11.65 7.50
Treatment charges / Refiningcharges $/t ore 38.18 16.05
Total Op. Cost $/t ore 169.44 138.36

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 13

A

Item Material Units 2014 OS 2013 FS
Capital Costs
Maximum cash down with leasing $M 233 324
Plant with leasing $M 140 158
Infrastructure with leasing $M 46 102
Paste backfillplant with leasing $M 13 16
Mining with leasing $M 40 71
Rehabilitation & other with leasing $M 19 10
Total Capital with leasing $M 259 n/a
Total Capital without leasing $M 324 359
Financials
Net operatingcashflow pre tax $M 654 541
post tax $M 529 473
Internal Rate of Return(IRR) pre tax % 25 10
post tax % 18 7
Average annual operational cashflow pre tax $M 64 55
post tax $M 51 48
LOM net cashflow(after capital) pre tax $M 396 182
post tax $M 270 116
Paybackperiod start ofprocessing Years 3.3 5.3
NPV10% pre tax $M 146 0
NPV7.5% pre tax $M 191 32
NPV5% pre tax $M 246 71
C1 - cash cost net of by-products $/lb Cu 1.30 1.63
C2 - cash cost net of by-products $/lb Cu 2.20 2.71
C3 - total cost net of by-products $/lb Cu 2.34 2.83

Note : All currency amounts in this table are Australian Dollars unless otherwise noted.

Competent Persons Statements

The information in this report that relates to the Stockman Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Bruce Kendall who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and is a full-time employee of the Company. Mr Kendall has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the JORC Code. Mr Kendall consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to the Stockman Project Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Geoff Davidson. Mr Davidson is a Consultant for Mining And Cost Engineering Pty Ltd and is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Davidson has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Davidson consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

This document may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning Independence Group NL’s planned exploration program and other statements that are not historical facts. When used in this document, the words such as "could," "plan," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "potential," "should," and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Independence Group NL believes that its expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that actual results will be consistent with these Forward Looking statements.

Appendix 1 follows on next page.

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 14

A

APPENDIX 1

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria Commentary
Sampling
techniques
A total of 37 additional diamond drill holes were drilled at Currawong since the previous resource estimate in
2011. An additional 34 diamond drill holes were drilled into Wilga, from both surface and underground. A
total of 13,803.8m of additional drilling has been completed at Currawong and Wilga as part of the 2011/2012
drilling program. All new holes at Wilga were infill holes. New holes at Currawong were a mixture of infill
and extension drilling with a maximum drill spacing of 25m X 25m. Only diamond drilling has been utilised
for resource estimation at Stockman. Sampling of mineralised zones was predominantly half core with a
nominal 1msamplelength.
Diamond drilling is solely used at Stockman to ensure a high quality of sampling. All sampling and check
samplingis conducted toindustry best practiceinaccordancewith IGO QAQC protocols.
The 2010-2012 drilling campaigns included a combination of sawn half-core NQ or quarter-core HQ, with a
typical sample length of 1m. A minimum sample length of 0.15m and maximum sample length 1.5m in
mineralised domains were adjusted to geological boundaries. All massive sulphide intercepts have been
sampled and sampling generally extends 10m into waste rock. All drill core to be sampled from the Jabiru
Metals Ltd (Jabiru) and Independence Group NL (IGO) holes, was marked up by the geologist. The
sampling book was filled out detailing the from and to depths for each sample, the corresponding sample
numbers as well as which standard to insert at which point and where to insert blank samples. Field
technicians cut the core using an Almonte automated core cutting machine. The core was systematically cut
1cm off the orientation line to allow the orientation line to remain in the core tray.
JML and IGO samples were cut, dried and pulverised for analysis by 4 acid digest, ICP/OES (Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag,
Fe, S) and fire assay FA/AAS (Au) at and independent laboratory.
Historic sampling involved crushing, with a sub-sample pulverised, followed by three or four acid digest with
AAS or ICP determination. All samples apart from the WMC samples were prepared and analysed at
independentlaboratories. WMC andDenehurst didnotroutinely analysefor Au.
Drilling techniques All JML and IGO holes were diamond drilled for the entire hole using a combination of HQ and NQ core
sizes. Historical holes were principally diamond drilling with the exception of several RC precollars drilled by
Denehurst and Austminex. None of the RC samples have been used in the resource estimates. The surface
diamond drilling is a mixture of HQ, NQ and BQ core sizes, with BQ occurring only in the older WMC holes.
Thehistoric undergroundholes atWilgawere drilledLTK46 (Ø=35.6mm).
Drill sample
recovery
Drill sample recovery is logged and recorded by field technicians and subsequently entered into the acQuire
database. Core sample recovery was good to excellent. Some lost core intervals have been recorded,
particularly where structures such as faults or underground workings (Wilga) were intersected by the drilling.
Theseintervals donot affect theresource estimate.
The diamond drill core is reconstructed in the core yard as part of the orientation process and metre marks
are checkedagainst driller’s depth blocks.
One small area of poor sample recovery at Wilga has been identified and isolated. This area corresponds
with the presence of chalcocite and its classification has been downgraded to Inferred. Recent core
recoveries are reviewed annually to ensure there are no new areas of poor sample recovery. There is no
evidence of bias or preferential loss or gain of material in samples except for the chalcocite zone mentioned
above.
Logging Entire holes were logged and photographed by the various companies completing the drilling programs.
Geological and geotechnical logging is very thorough and more than adequate for resource estimation.
Logging has previously been on paper logs, which were data entered and then loaded into the Acquire
database. Paper logs were scanned and stored on the IGO Perth server. Starting in 2011, drillholes have
been logged straight into a digital format via Acquire data entry objects which were then uploaded directly
into the database. Acquire data entry objects have built-in rules that allow for validation of data as it is
logged.
Detailed logging routinely consisted of lithology, alteration, mineralisation, veining, structure, deformation and
oxidation state and was recorded using the JML logging codes. JML/IGO core has been photographed both
wet and dry. Historicalgeologicalcodeswere converted to JMLcodesin 2008.
Alldrill holeswereloggedin full.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample preparation
Mostly cut half-core samples of NQ, BQ and LTK46, or quarter-core samples of HQ varying in length up to
1.3m in the massive sulphide and adjusted to geological boundaries. Some quarter-core NQ samples by
Austminex where core was needed for metallurgical testwork. The JML/IGO drilling campaigns included a
combination of cut half-core NQ or quarter-core HQ, with a typical sample length of 1m. A minimum sample
length of 0.3m and maximum sample length 1.5m in mineralised domains were adjusted to geological
boundaries. All massive sulphide intercepts have been sampled and JML/IGO sampling generally extends
10m into waste rock. The samples were routinely taken from the same side of the core in relation to the
orientation lines.
Nonon-core sampleswere taken inthe2010-2012JML/IGO drilling.
Samples from the 2010-2012 JML/IGO diamond drillholes were sent to Genalysis Adelaide for sample
preparation and analysis. Sample preparation consisted of drying the core for 8 hours at 121°C then jaw
crushing to a nominal minus 10mm size. Pulverising then occurred in a LM5 pulverising machine for 5
minutes to 85% passing75microns. The entire sample undergoes pulverisingintheLM5machines,

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 15

A

Criteria Commentary
resulting in no coarse rejects, only bulk pulp rejects. The sample preparation technique is normal industry
practice and is considered suitable for Stockman samples.
Quality control procedures during JML/IGO sampling included the insertion of certified reference standards
and blanks (1 in 20 samples) as well as the inclusion of barren quartz washes between every sample.
Historic drilling containedverylittle QAQCwork.
Apart from 62 duplicate samples collected by Macquarie Resources there were no field duplicates collected
prior to the JML/IGO programs. JML/IGO field duplicates were taken during the 2010-2012 drilling
campaigns. In addition, pulp repeats, bulk pulp repeats and cross lab pulp checks were completed on ~5%
of the samples. All these quality control measures confirmed that sampling and sub-sampling techniques
used were appropriate for the style of mineralisation and that samples were representative of the in situ
material.
The sample sizeis considered appropriatefor massive sulphidemineralisation.
Quality of assay
data and laboratory
tests
All samples were crushed and a sub-sample pulverised followed by three or four acid digest with AAS or ICP
determination. All samples apart from the WMC samples were prepared and analysed at independent
laboratories. The assay techniques by JML/IGO are for total digestion of the sulphides and are considered
appropriate for this type of mineralisation. For the JML/IGO drill programs, all samples were assayed at
Genalysis Adelaide Laboratory using a 4 acid ore grade digest with an ICP-OES finish. Au was assayed
using a fire assay 50g charge. Lower detection limits were to 50ppm for Cu, Pb, Zn, 1ppm/5ppm for Ag and
0.005ppm for Au.
No geophysicalor handheldXRF instrument datawere usedinthisresource estimate.
In comparison with modern requirements, minimal quality control procedures were adopted by companies
completing the drilling programs before JML (eg. inclusion of only 17 field standards, 62 duplicates, 84
external laboratory checks in total). This shortfall was recognised by JML and more rigorous check sampling
programs were implemented. For the JML/IGO drill programs, comprehensive QAQC programs were
completed following company QAQC guidelines, which include the insertion of standards, blanks, duplicates
and cross-lab checks. Results indicate that sample contamination is kept at a minimum and that assay
values are within acceptable accuracy. In 2011, IGO also implemented particle sizing checks to be
completed at the laboratory on 10% of the samples submitted for assay. These tests were to determine the
pulverising quality ofthe samples.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
All significant intersections were verified by alternative company personnel. No independent personnel
verified anyintersections.
A total of 10 holes were drilled as twin holes by JML/IGO (4 at Wilga and 6 at Currawong). These showed
that there was no bias between the twin and original holes but they did indicate that the degree of sulphide
developmentis quitevariable evenovershort distances.Consequentlymetalgrades are quitevariable also.
An acQuire database was used by JML/IGO which includes all drilling information. Data are entered into the
database mainly through acQuire data entry objects which have the required filters and validation rules built
in. Data entry objects with built in validation tables are used to capture collar information, survey information
(single shot), sampling information, geotech, and all geological logging information. Excel spreadsheets are
used to capture downhole survey (multi-shot) data, surveyed collars and density information. All data entry
objects and Excel spreadsheets were sent to the Database Administrator in Perth for uploading into acQuire.
Assays received from laboratories were imported by the Database Administrator using customised acQuire
importers thus alleviating any data entrymistakes.
No adjustmentsweremade to any assay data usedinthis estimate.
Location of data
points
Most historic drillhole collar positions were surveyed by licensed or company surveyors. The JML/IGO
(2008-2012) drillhole collar positions were located using RTK GPS equipment with a horizontal accuracy of
+/-10mm and a vertical accuracy of +/-20mm.
Historical drilling includes generally good quality surveys using downhole camera shots at about 30m
intervals. Initial JML/IGO downhole surveys were taken by the drillers every 30m using the ORI-Shot digital
camera. The results from the downhole camera were checked at the end of every hole and prior to
uploading into the acQuire database. In addition, at the end of hole, a multi-shot survey was taken which
recorded a reading every 6m. These multi-shot surveys were transferred to the site geologists digitally at the
end ofeveryhole, and thenuploadedinto the acQuire database.
Since 2008, all drilling information has been converted into Stockman Regional Grid (SRG). This grid was
created by JML in 2008 and extends over the Currawong and Wilga deposits. All holes were collar surveyed
in MGA94grid and transformed to SRGin MapInfo using transformationties.
Topographic surface is a DTM created from height measurements collected during an aeromagnetic survey
during 2008. All historical drillhole collars were surveyed by a surveyor and all JML/IGO drillhole collars were
surveyed upwithan RTKGPSwithanominal height accuracy of +/-20mm.
Data spacing and
distribution
No exploration results areincludedinthisreport.
Diamond drill coverage in the massive sulphide at Wilga and Currawong is on a nominal 25x25m pattern. In
the stringer sulphide lenses of both deposits, drillhole spacing ranges from 25x25m to 50x50m. Minimum
hole spacing ~10m and maximum hole spacing ~70m. In general, drillhole spacing of less than 50x50m is
classed as Indicated whereas drillhole spacing greater than this is classed as Inferred. No part of the
resource at Currawong is classified Measured due to the nominal required drillhole spacing of 25x25m in the
massive sulphide, as well as existence of multiple generations of drilling. The data spacing and distribution
is more than sufficient to establish geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource
estimationprocedure and classificationapplied.
Drillholeswere composited to1mdownholewith lengthand densityweighting. Face sampling atWilga and

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 16

A

Criteria Commentary
recent probe drillholes at Wilga were not used for grade interpolation nor were the down plunge holes at
Currawong.
Orientation of data
in relation to
geological
structure
Surface drilling intersects the massive sulphide lenses almost perpendicular to the lens orientation at both
Currawong and Wilga. The underground fan drilling at Wilga has some intercepts that are almost dip
parallel. Some sample bias will occur in the Wilga deposit due to this fan drilling orientation but most of the
affected area has already been mined and is excluded from the resource estimate. Two down-plunge or
down-dip holes were drilled at Currawong however these were excluded from the estimate. They were
drilled to detect offsetting faults, cross-cutting intrusions and test the grade continuity along strike. In the
resource estimate they were used solely for geometry purposes. No down-plunge or down-dip holes were
drilled atWilga.
Three of the 2012 stringer drillholes at Wilga were drilled at low angles to the mineralisation due to the lack of
more appropriate drilling locations. These holes also do not represent a large volume of the resource
estimate and arenot consideredmaterial.
Sample security Drill core was transported from the drilling site to the Stockman core yard by JML/IGO personnel on a daily
basis. All samples are stored in the Stockman core yard which is either manned or locked at all times. They
are then transported to the assay laboratory in Adelaide using Toll IPEC. All deliveries are tracked using
consignment numbers. Once they are received at the laboratory, the samples are reconciled against the
sample despatch.
Audits or reviews The Stockman database was rigorously checked during a data compilation and validation stage in 2008.
Since then, routine validation of the database has been conducted in-house.
M Wild (IGO Principal Resource Geologist) completed an onsite review of drilling and sampling techniques in
February, 2012. The procedures in place were considered to be of a suitable standard for the drilling data to
be included in this resource estimate.
In addition, laboratory audits were completed for the Genalysis Adelaide Laboratory by B Kendall (IGO
Principal Geologist – Advanced Projects) in February 2010, and by M Wild (IGO Principal Resource
Geologist) and K Kitchen (Stockman Senior Project Geologist) on the 29th February, 2012. No major issues
wereidentified during thesevisits.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status
The Currawong and Wilga deposits are both within MIN5523 held by Stockman Project Pty Ltd, a wholly
owned subsidiary of IGO. There are no native title claims registered over the lease, but an agreement is in
place with a previous claimant group that makes provision for both the previous claimants and/or other
indigenous groups who may assert an interest in the future. The tenement is located on crown land
administered by the Department of Sustainability & Environment. The area is rugged and heavily forested
with no significantheritage sitesidentified.
The tenurewas secure at the time ofthisreport. No significantimpediments are believed to exist.
Exploration done
by other parties
Exploration at the Stockman Project was initially carried out by WMC in the early 1970s, WMC discovered
both Currawong and Wilga deposits. Subsequent exploration has been completed by Macquarie Resources,
Denehurst,Austminex, JMLandIGO.
Geology Currawong and Wilga are V(H)MS style deposits, occurring as polymetallic (pyrite-sphalerite-chalcopyrite)
massive sulphide lenses with stringer feeder zones within a volcano-sedimentary succession. Wilga is a
single stratabound lens whereas Currawong comprises multiple stratabound lenses with a series of faults
offsetting and stacking thelenses.
Drill hole
Information
There are no exploration results reported for the immediate Currawong and Wilga areas.
Data aggregation
methods
There are no exploration results reported for the immediate Currawong and Wilga areas.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept lengths
There are no exploration results reported for the immediate Currawong and Wilga areas.
Diagrams There areno exploration resultsreportedfortheimmediate Currawong andWilga areas.
Balanced reporting There areno exploration resultsreportedfortheimmediate Currawong andWilga areas.
Other substantive
exploration data
There are no exploration results reported for the immediate Currawong and Wilga areas.
Further work Nofurther work is planned.

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Criteria Commentary
Database integrity An acQuire database is used by IGO which includes all drilling information. Data are entered into the
database mainly through acQuire data entry objects which have the required filters and validation rules built
in. Data entry objects are used to capture collar information, surveyinformation(single shot), sampling

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 17

A

Criteria Commentary
information, geotech, and all geological logging information.
Excel spreadsheets are used to capture downhole survey (multi-shot) data, surveyed collars and density
information.
All data entry objects and Excel spreadsheets were sent to the JML/IGO Database Administrator in Perth for
uploading into acQuire. Assays received from laboratories were imported by the Database Administrator
using customised acQuire importers thus alleviating any data entry mistakes.
The acQuire database for the Stockman Project is exported to an Access database for resource estimation
work.
Ongoing data validation checks include visual checks in Surpac of collar, downhole surveys as well as
checks between logging and assays received. Most of the data validations occur during the importing
process and are builtinto the acQuire database.
Site visits The competent person for this report, Bruce Kendall (IGO Principal Geologist - Advanced Projects) was
employed at the Stockman Project as Project Manager until January 2012. Whilst at the Stockman Project,
he was closely involved in the planning and management of the drilling programs. Another site visit by Bruce
Kendall was conducted in August 2012, where the resource estimate was reviewed. There has been no
furtherdrilling since that date.
Geological
interpretation
Confidence in the geological interpretation for Wilga is high, with the mineralisation and geological setting
being simple and the availability of underground drilling, mapping and plans confirming the interpretation.
Currawong is more structurally complex and whilst confidence in the geological interpretation is good,
additional drilling and further data review may result in modifications to the detail of the geological model, but
thisis unlikely tohave an impact onthe estimate.
Thorough geological logging of all drill holes formed the basis of the geological interpretations. East-West
sections were used to create mineralisation wireframes of both deposits. Several of the mineralisation
wireframes were also constrained by shear planes, particularly at Currawong. At Wilga, historic backs
mapping ofdevelopment driveshas beenused to confirm mineralisationboundaries.
The confidence in the geological interpretation, in particular of the mineralisation domain, is high. All infill
drilling completed has supported the current geological interpretation. It is thought that any alternative
interpretationswill nothave an impact onthis estimate.
Both deposits have been modelled using the massive sulphide as the main geological constraint. The main
factors controlling continuity at Currawong are a series of post-mineralisation faults which are interpreted as
disrupting the lenses. Controls on stringer mineralisation are essentially independent of the host sequences
andlithologywasnot used to constraintheresource estimation forthe stringer mineralisation.
At Wilga, minor structures within the massive sulphide have been mapped which affect the distribution of the
high grade copper massive sulphide, otherwise this is a continuous lens. At Currawong, faulting has
controlled the geometry of the Currawong mineralisation. Some stacking may be the result of early growth
faults during the formation of the massive sulphide lenses. Observed D2 shearing has dislocated many
lenses and appears to be responsible for the termination of some. The extent of the D3 faulting is less
certainbutis thought to terminate the downdip portionofsomelenses.
Dimensions Currawong (Main Lens) is approximately 300m long, 240m wide (down-dip), up to 35m thick and located
100-300m below surface. Wilga is about 400m long, 220m wide (down-dip), up to 35m thick and located 50-
150mbelowsurface.
Estimation and
modelling
techniques
Ordinary kriging was used for grade estimation utilising Surpac software (v6.2) for Cu%, Pb%, Zn%, Fe%, Ag
ppm, Au ppm and As ppm. Bulk density values were interpolated as for the other elements. Search
parameters were based on variogram models for each element and density (variography also completed
using Surpac v6.2 software). The various mineralisation wireframes were intersected with the drillholes in
the database and the resulting intervals were written to tables in the Access database. Density weighted 1m
composites were created using the lens coding as the control with a minimum passing of 50%. Grade
estimation was constrained to the massive sulphide lens and stringer sulphide lens wireframes. At Wilga and
Currawong, additional, internal subdomains of high grade Cu and Zn (Cu>1.2%, Zn>3%) were included in
the massive sulphide lenses. No dilution was included in the resource models for Wilga or Currawong.
Grade estimation for Au at Wilga may not be reliable due to a paucity of Au assays in the historic sample
data and so Au is classified as Inferred at Wilga. Mild top-cut grades have been used for some elements
where required.
For Currawong, variography was performed on the M Lens massive sulphide (the largest of the massive
sulphide lenses) and the kriging parameters obtained from M Lens variography were applied to the other
massive sulphide and all the subordinate sulphide lenses. This approach was used as all the massive
sulphide lenses are interpreted to be originally part of the same massive sulphide horizon which has
subsequently been structurally disturbed into the different lenses. Variography for the stringer domain was
conducted on the main stringer zone.
For Wilga, variography was conducted on the main massive sulphide lens (most massive sulphide
mineralisation is within the one lens) and the main stringer zone.
Variographywas conducted onCu,Pb,Zn,Ag,Au,As andFe aswellas density.
There is a 10% increase in global tonnage compared with the previous 2011 estimate due to additional
drilling at bothdeposits. The gradesremained consistentwiththe previous estimate.
No assumptionsweremaderegarding therecovery ofby-products.
As part of this estimate, the deleterious element As was estimated along with the economic elements. Fe
was also estimated asitisimportantfromametallurgicalperspective.
Currawong 10mX, 10mY, 10mZ parent cell size as this is approximately ½ the average drill hole spacing. At
Wilga 10mX, 10mY, 5mZ parent cell size was used as this is approximately ½ the average drill hole spacing.
Forbothdeposits, subcelling to1.25m inalldirectionswas used to ensure adequate delineationof

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 18

A

Criteria Commentary
mineralisation boundaries. The size of the search ellipses was determined from the variography for each
element.
No selectivemining unitswere assumedinthis estimate.
Correlation matrices were produced for each separate mineralisation domain. In general, As, Ag, Au and Pb
display good positive correlations in all mineralisation styles. Grades were interpolated independently into
the block model, assumingno correlation witheachother, and based on variographyforeachelement.
The individual massive sulphide and stringer sulphide wireframes were used to code the block model with a
unique identifier. The composite files for each domain were then used to estimate only the blocks which
were attributed the samezone coding.
No cut-off grades have been applied to the massive sulphide outer boundary but cut-off grades were applied
to help delineate the high grade Cu mineralisation (1.2%Cu) and the high grade Zn mineralisation (3%) within
the massive sulphide zones for both deposits. Cut-off grades were also used to delineate the stringer
mineralisation at both Wilga and Currawong. These cut-off grades were 0.5% Cu or 2% Zn.
Mild top-cut grades have been used for elements where the Co-efficient of Variation was > 1.0. The top-cut
grades were determined from disintegration points on log probability plots. (Currawong massive sulphide 8%
Pb, 10g/t Au, no top-cut for Zn, Ag or Cu; Currawong stringer sulphide 3% Pb, 13.9% Zn, 106g/t Ag, 10g/t
Au, no top-cut for Cu; Wilga massive sulphide 26% Cu, 4% Pb, 31% Zn, 110g/t Ag, 2.6g/t Au; Wilga stringer
sulphide 15% Cu, 1% Pb, 11% Zn, 120g/t Ag, 0.95g/t Au). A geological constraint (the massive sulphide
zone) has been used as it is stable and will not vary over time, unlike cut-off grades. Mineralisation within
boththemassive sulphide and stringer lenseshas been reported.
Initial visual validation was completed by comparing drillhole assays with modelled values. A comparison
was also completed to ensure the volumes of the wireframes closely resembled the block modelled volumes.
The interpolated block grades were compared to the composited sample data and the declustered sample
data (obtained via a nearest neighbour model created in Surpac) for each of the lenses by easting and by
elevationto check ifanymodelbiashas been introduced.
Moisture Tonnages have been estimated using densities some of which were dry (those analysed at external
laboratories) and others that contained natural moisture. The natural moisture of the Stockman massive
sulphidesis typicallylow(<0.5%).
Cut-off parameters No cut-off grades have been applied to the massive sulphide outer boundary but cut-off grades were applied
to help delineate the high grade Cu mineralisation (1.2% Cu) and the high grade Zn mineralisation (3% Zn)
within the massive sulphide zones for both deposits. Cut-off grades were also used to delineate the stringer
mineralisation at both Wilga and Currawong. These cut-off grades were 0.5% Cu or 2% Zn.
Mild top-cut grades have been used for elements where the Co-efficient of Variation was > 1.0. The top-cut
grades were determined from disintegration points on log probability plots. (Currawong massive sulphide 8%
Pb, 10g/t Au, no top-cut for Zn, Ag or Cu; Currawong stringer sulphide 3% Pb, 13.9% Zn, 106g/t Ag, 10g/t
Au, no top-cut for Cu; Wilga massive sulphide 26% Cu, 4% Pb, 31% Zn, 110g/t Ag, 2.6g/t Au; Wilga stringer
sulphide 15% Cu, 1% Pb, 11% Zn, 120g/t Ag, 0.95g/t Au). A geological constraint (the massive sulphide
zone) has been used as it is stable and will not vary over time, unlike cut-off grades. Mineralisation within
boththemassive sulphide and stringer lenseshas been reported.
Mining factors or
assumptions
Mining of the Currawong and Wilga deposits is planned to occur using underground mechanised mining
techniques.
No assumptions regarding minimum mining width or dilution have been made. The resource estimate is
undiluted.
Metallurgical
factors or
assumptions
A detailed metallurgical testwork program has been completed using samples from drill holes drilled during
the period 2008-2011. Results indicate all styles of mineralisation are amenable to being recovered by
flotation with no issues apparent due to deleterious elements.
Environmental
factors or
assumptions
Investigations are ongoing into suitable waste and tailings disposal options for the Stockman Project. A
preferred option for both tailings and waste was selected as part of the Feasibility Study. Although these are
yet to be approved by the regulating authorities, they have been fully informed of the preferred option.
Bulk density Many samples had measured densities using either water immersion or air pycnometer techniques. All
JML/IGO samples were measured for density using water immersion techniques. For those samples with no
density measurement, a calculated density was applied to the sample. The assays for Cu, Pb, Zn and Fe
were compared with the measured densities and a second power regression curve developed for each
deposit and for each mineralisation style. Densities were used in the sample compositing. Tonnages have
been estimated using densities some of which were dry (those analysed at external laboratories) and others
that containednatural moisture, expected to be<1%.
No sampleswere sealed priorto bulkdensity determinationdue tolowporosityinthemineralisedzones.
Density was kriged into the block model in a similar method as was used for all other elements. However, a
density regression formula was required in order to assign densities to historical samples which did not
already have a density measurement. This was achieved in excel by ascertaining a multi element regression
formula based onthe existing assays and theircorrespondingmeasured densities.
Classification Classification was based on sample density and confidence in the geometry of the lenses. All of the major
massive sulphide lenses in both deposits were classified as Indicated. Stringer sulphide was classified as
Indicated or Inferred or sometimes left as Unclassified if there is limited repeatability across sections.
Generally, where the sample density was 50x50m or less the resource was classified as Indicated, where the
spacing was greater than 50x50m the resource was classified as Inferred. The Au grades at Wilga are
consideredInferred due to a paucity ofgold assaysinthehistoric drilling data.

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 19

A

Criteria Commentary
The classification has taken into account the quality, quantity and distribution of the input data. In addition,
thehighconfidenceinthe geological interpretationandmodelling parameterswere taken into account.
The Mineral Resource estimate reflects the Competent Person’s view of the Currawongand Wilga deposits.
Audits or reviews No audits or reviews have been completed on this particular Mineral Resource Estimate. The previous
estimate (2011) was reviewed by Cube Consulting Pty Ltd and several recommendations were implemented
inthis update. No significantissueswereidentified.
Discussion of
relative accuracy /
confidence
The 2009 and 2011 resource estimates were independently reviewed and the classification and resource
estimation method of Ordinary Kriging were deemed to be appropriate. The same estimation methods
including recommendations made during previous reviews were implemented in this resource estimation.
The 2012 Mineral Resource estimate correlates well with previous resource estimates.
There are no known significant factors that might impact the accuracy and confidence of the estimate.
Mineralisation has been classified as Indicated and Inferred. No mineralisation has been classified as
Measured.
The statementrelates to globalestimates oftonnes and grade.
No production data are available for Currawong as it has not been mined previously.
There is a slight discrepancy between the historic total reported tonnes mined at Wilga (956kt) and the
calculated tonnes mined using the volumes of underground void models (802kt), with the reported tonnes
being greater. During 2012, Wilga was re-opened and all voids above the current water table checked to see
if the wireframes were accurate. Below the water table several holes were drilled to test for the presence of
voids which were not indicated by the void wireframes, in areas of high grade. Although some discrepancies
were identified they do not entirely account for the difference. The difference, since revision of the void
model after probe drilling and access to the underground workings down to the water table, is 154kt, only
4.2% of the Wilga resource tonnage.
This Mineral Resource estimate assumes the void model as being correct and the resource model was
depleted accordingly.
Resource Model
Numbers
CU_RSC_2012_07 and WG_RSC_2012_07

Section 4 Estimation and Reporting of Ore Reserves

Criteria JORC Code explanation
Mineral Resource
estimate for
conversion to Ore
Reserves
Mineral Resource estimates were created using Ordinary Kriging. Variography was completed on Cu, Pb, Zn,
Fe, Ag, As, Au and density
The Mineral Resources reported are inclusive of the Ore Reserves.
The Mineral Resource estimate was completed in June 2012 and covers both Wilga and Currawong
deposits.
This Ore Reserve was derived from resource block model currawong_2012.mdl and resource block model
wilga_2012.mdl.
Site visits The site was visited by Mr Geoff Davidson in August 2008. During the site visit diamond drill core for
Currawong was inspected, visits were made to the existing TSF of Lake St Barbara , the old plant site at
Waxlip spur, existingWilga portaland site ofthe proposed Currawong portal..
Study status This Ore Reserve was based on designs and estimates consistent with a detailed Feasibility Study. The
costs were derived from Vendor estimates specific to the project and are considered to be within +/- 15%
order of accuracy.
A detailed mine plan was developed from which a practical mining schedule was determined. Standard
modifying factors associated with the selected mining method have been applied. The mining method will
use long hole stoping techniques to recover economic mineralisation. Amongst others, the study included
geotechnical analysis of the mine openings and detailed analysis and design of the paste backfill and its
application intheminingmethod.
Cut-off parameters The Net Smelter Return (NSR) method was used to determine the economic cut-off for the mineralisation.
The NSR values were calculated on a ‘mine gate’ sale basis and incorporate metal pricing current at the
time. The NSR value was adjusted for transport costs, port handling charges and TC/RC on all payable
metals. Payable metals are copper, zinc, gold and silver.
The cut-off NSR value was determined from the site operating costs including mining, processing and site
administration and overhead costs. The cut-off was estimated to be between $97 and $105 per tonne
processed. An incremental cut-off of $60 per tonne was also estimated as a subset of these costs and
represented theminimum value of materialeconomic to process once delivered to the surface stockpile.
Mining factors or
assumptions
The Ore Reserve was determined by digitising practical stope wireframes around contiguous blocks of
Indicated material above the cut-off value. The wireframes include a nominal 0.5 m of unplanned mining
dilution from over-break. An additional 2% dilution was included for all stopes due to fall off from paste walls.
A further 2% dilution allowance was applied to secondary stopes which will have more than one exposed wall
of paste backfill during mining. A nominal 5% ore loss was applied to account for losses such as under-
break, unrecovered bridges and toe, ore lost due to excessive dilution from fall dirt. In addition, any
development outside the stope wireframes which reported an average value above an incremental NSR cut-
off of $60 per tonne was also included in the Reserve.
The Ore Reserves for both Currawong and Wilga were determined on the basis of long hole open stoping
using cemented paste backfill. This mining method and associated parameters used to estimate the Ore
Reserve were deemed to be appropriate for the nature and geometry of the deposits at Currawong and
Wilga.
Stope spans and otherground supportrequirementswere determinedfromanalysis conducted by

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 20

A

Criteria JORC Code explanation
geotechnical consultants Mining One Pty Ltd. Grade control methods would entail methods used by
Independence Group NL (IGO) at their existing operations in WA and will include stope definition diamond
drilling, face and stockpile sampling.
The Mineral Resource model was originally prepared and reported by IGO geologists in accordance with the
JORC Code (2004), and was recently updated to comply with the JORC Code (2012) reporting requirements.
Ordinary Kriging was used to estimate the grade of key elements such as Cu, Zn, Au, Ag, Pb and Fe within
wireframe constraints.
Sufficient detailed analysis was carried out to provide confidence in key assumptions such as stability of
stope spans and mining rate. Recent testwork of the paste backfill using cycloned tailings to remove the
ultrafine fraction of the tailings stream has demonstrated over time (260 days) that a number of 4% binder
mixes can achieve acceptable early strengths, good long terms strengths with no signs to date of fill
degradation. The next and final tests will be at 365 days due in February 2015.
The total dilution (planned plus unplanned) included in the stope wireframes was estimated to be 14% at
grades reported from the Mineral Resource model and within the diluted stope wireframe envelopes. The
mining method requires total extraction within the stoping envelope; therefore, no losses will occur from
sterilisation of ore in pillars. A nominal 5% ore loss was applied for reasons as described above. An
approximate minimum mining width of 3 m (true width) was used when creating the stope wireframes.
The underground capital infrastructure will include decline access and primary ventilation shafts and tunnels
as well as services infrastructure such as electrical distribution, air and water reticulation, dewatering
facilities, communications, and workforce refuge chambers. In addition, a backfill paste plant will need to be
constructed and paste reticulated throughout the stoping areas of the Currawong mine. At Wilga, tailings filter
cake will be trucked to from Currawong to a surface stockpile adjacent to the portal where it will be used to
produce paste on surface, then pumped into the mine and reticulated throughout the workings.
Inferred Mineral Resources were not included in the Ore Reserve.
The Wilga Ore Reserve was derived from the Indicated Mineral Resource. The Indicated classification was
based on the confidence in copper, zinc and silver grades; however, gold grades within these blocks were
considered to be Inferred due to a paucity of gold assays in historic drilling. Revenue from gold in the Wilga
ore was included in the estimation of the Ore Reserve. The contribution to Revenue of this gold was
estimated to be $8.65 per gram of gold in situ and within the mining envelope. This inclusion had no material
impact to the value of the mining envelopes considered and did not warrant downgrading of any portion of
the Ore Reserve attributable to Wilga. The tonnage contribution from Wilga represents 18% of the total Ore
Reserve tonnage.
Metallurgical
factors or
assumptions
The metallurgical process will use differential flotation to produce separate concentrates of copper and zinc
minerals. The method is commonly used throughout the world for the style of mineralisation that exists at
Stockman and is currently being used at IGO’s Jaguar operations.
Numerous composite samples have undergone batch testing. The samples tested were selected from
different geological domains from both Currawong and Wilga deposits. Geo-metallurgical algorithms were
developed for the mineralisation at Stockman; therefore, recoveries vary depending on the combination of
minerals present in the feed at any increment in time.
The life of mine average recoveries for copper concentrate were as follows:
Copper = 81.5%
Silver = 40.7%
Gold = 20.4%
The life of mine average recoveries for copper concentrate were as follows:
Zinc = 76.4 %
Silver = 18.5%
Metallurgical test work has demonstrated that marketable concentrates of both copper and zinc can be
produced from both deposits. Marketable electrolytic grade zinc concentrates are produced from both
deposits when treating lower lead grade feeds (<1% Pb). Arsenic is low (<0.25%), iron is acceptable (8-
10%), lead relatively low (<2%) and silica is also acceptable (<1.5%)
The penalty element assays were generally low, but where slightly elevated, remained in the negotiable
range for settlement. Deductions for penalty elements were applied in the cash flow model in the periods
where threshold values were exceeded. The life of mine estimated cost of penalties represents < 1% of the
project operating cost.
Locked cycle tests, which are designed to simulate a continuous and stable condition of the proposed
flotation process, were conducted on a range of composited samples considered to be representative of the
various types of mineralisation, including a blend representative of the first 5 years production. Locked cycle
test results by previous owners observed similar results to those conducted by IGO.
Bulk flotation testwork was carried out on ten 50 kg samples as part of the 2014 EFS. The testwork
demonstrated the geo-metallurgical algorithms to be reliable.
Economic concentrations of minerals were defined by their intrinsic value derived through beneficiation to
produce concentrates within marketable specifications. The commercial value was determined through the
application of an economic cut off, as described above. No other mineralogical specifications were applied in
determining the Ore Reserve however charges were applied to the concentrate product where the estimated
level of penalty elements exceeded threshold levels. These penalty elements included Zn and Pb for Copper
concentrate andFefor Zinc concentrate.
Environmental No permanent waste rock landforms will be created during operations. All material determined to be potential
acid forming (PAF) or containing soluble metals will be either returned underground as backfill for workings
or disposed of sub-aqueously in the tailings storage facility (TSF).
Tailings produced from on-site processing will be either returned to the underground workings as backfill or
disposed of inanapprovedTSF. The existing decommissionedTSF willbereinstated to accept the tailings

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 21

A

Criteria JORC Code explanation
from operations. The proposed TSF has been designed in accordance with the Australian National
Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD) guidelines. Detailed geotechnical and hydrogeological assessment of
the proposed TSF impoundment is still to be carried out to validate the design parameters. No material
changes to the design parameters are anticipated.
Water produced from dewatering the underground workings will be treated and recycled for use in the mining
or processing operations. Surplus water will be discharged into the TSF.
An Environment Effects Statement (EES) was compiled as a requirement of the Victorian state government
project approval process. The project also triggers Commonwealth assessment which utilises the Victorian
EES via a State-Federal bilateral agreement. The EES prepared for the Stockman base metals project
provides a comprehensive and integrated assessment of the potential environmental, social and economic
impacts of project implementation. Technical studies conducted for the project provided confidence that the
project can be implemented in a way that is consistent with relevant Victorian and Commonwealth
government environmental and social policy objectives.
Project licensing and approval, including permitting of the TSF is subject to a favourable assessment by the
Victorian Minister for Planning of the EES and approval by the federal Environment Minister under the EPBC
Act. The Victorian Minister for Planning has provided a positive assessment of the EES and associated
Inquiry Panel report. The approval process by the federal Environment Minister is still in progress.
There are no known impediments to the outstanding portions of the approval process; however, the review
and approval process is still in progress and project development will be subject to the conditions placed on
the project by respective regulators.
Under the Victorian permitting system, the Ministerial Assessment provides overarching guidance for the
various Decision Making Authorities (DMAs) that actually issue the operational licenses i.e. the various State
government agencies that regulate such things as land clearing, mining operations, workplace safety, water
usage & discharge, etc. The DMAs are not legally bound by the Ministerial Assessment but must consider
theAssessmentintheirdecisions.
Infrastructure The project will be supported by limited existing infrastructure. The project is currently serviced by an existing
access road which will be upgraded to accommodate increased traffic and concentrate transport.
Telecommunications are available within the wider area which will need to be upgraded to bring these
services to the site. Power will be generated on site using natural gas sourced from the Victorian natural gas
infrastructure. Water balance modelling has indicated the project will have a near neutral requirement for
supplemental water; however, contingent sources of groundwater have been identified beneath the
Benambra plains and various locations adjacent to the site access road. The availability of labour is limited in
the immediate area and an accommodation village will be constructed to house a drive-in drive-out workforce
with most personnel expected to commute from regional population centres.
IGO currently holds the mining lease on which the Stockman project is located (MIN5523). Land access to
other support infrastructure is the subject of various draft agreements and Memoranda of Understanding
(MOU’s) with respective land holders. The site for the TSF is currently located within an Exploration
Exemption area and application to have this lifted will be subject to approval of the proposed facility by state
and federal regulators. Any new tenement covering the current Exploration Exemption area, if granted, would
be as a separate tenement toMIN5523. There arenoknown impediments to the granting ofthislicense.
Costs Capital costs for the project were based on budget quotations provided by potential vendors based on design
and scope specific to the project. Where vendor quotations were not available, cost estimates were provided
by consultants with expertise in their specific field or were built-up from first principals based on IGO
operational experience.
Mining capital and operating costs were estimated from first principals using vendor quotations for materials
and equipment running costs. Productivities were based on internal industry experience.
Labour costs were based on an assessment of similar mining projects within Victoria.
Provision was made within the cash flow analysis for the penalties applied to deleterious elements in excess
of the limits proposed by independent metal traders.
Road transport costs and port handling charges were based on vendor quotations specifically for the project
scope of work. Sea freight charges were based on market assessment by logistics consultants with expertise
in this industry.
Treatment charges, refining costs and element penalties were based on forecasts provided by recognised
market analysts.
Victorian government standard state royalties were applied to Copper, Zinc and Silver. No royalty was
applied to Gold. Under Part 2, Section 7 of the Mineral Resources Development Regulations 2002, State
royalties do not apply to gold.
No third partyroyalties are applicable to this project.
Revenue factors The project head grade was determined on a month by month basis from a detailed schedule of mining of the
Ore Reserve. The schedule incorporated a logical development and extraction sequence of the Ore Reserve
and utilised productivity rates considered to be commensurate with Australian industry standards.
Provision was made within the cash flow analysis for the penalties applied to deleterious elements in excess
of the limits proposed by independent metal traders.
Transport costs, port handling charges and sea freight charges have been discussed in the section on Costs.
Smelter recoveries, treatment charges, refining costs and element penalties were based on budget
quotations provided by recognised metal traders and were in line with standard contracts for copper and zinc
concentrates. Consideration was also given to existing contracts in place at the IGO’s Jaguar operations.
The commodity prices and exchange rates used for the cash flow model were applied as real pricing and
were based on forecast pricing provided by recognised market analysts. The project is therefore leveraged to
the rising future zinc price forecast by most industry analysts.
The averageLife of Minemetalprices andforeignexchangerate usedinthe cash flow model included the

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 22

A

Criteria JORC Code explanation
following:
Copper $US 6,591 per tonne of copper metal
Zinc $US 2,979 per tonne of zinc metal
Gold $US 1,146 per ounce troy of gold
Silver $US 20.17 per ounce troy of silver
Exchange rate of $0.84 $AU per $US
The cash flow wasmodelledin realterms andno price orcost escalation was applied.
Market assessment In its September 2014 “Q3 2014 Global copper long-term outlook”, Wood Mackenzie forecast the need for a
long-term incentive price of US$3.50/lb Cu (in 2014 dollars) to encourage sufficient investment in mine
capacity to ensure the market does not slip into structural deficit. This equates to a tonnage price of
US$7,700/t Cu (in 2014 dollars).
In its September 2014 “Q3 2014 Global zinc long-term outlook”, Wood Mackenzie forecast the need for a
long-term incentive price to encourage mine development to address market deficits. For the period between
2013 to2035WoodMackenziehasforecast the price to average US$2997/t (in 2014dollars).
Economic A detailed cash flow model was created using the design case commodity pricing described above. The cash
flow included detailed schedule of Capital and Operating cost expenditures for each of the project cost
centres. Revenue from product sales were modelled by shipment with 90% payable in the month of loading
and the balance paid the following month. Typical off take contracts were incorporated in the cash flow and
were based on input parameters determined by recognised market analysts. The cash flow was modelled in
real terms, hence no price or cost escalation was applied. A discount rate of 10% was applied to determine a
Net Present Value (NPV) from the project cash flow.
The cash flow analysis demonstrated a positive return for the project with a pre-tax internal rate of return of
25%.
Input costs were considered to be accurate to within +/- 15%. Costs were taken either directly from vendor
quotes or consultant estimates for specific scopes of work. Mining costs were developed from first principals
on an owner operator basis.
Various sensitivity analyses were carried out on the cash flow model. Key parameters were varied by +/-
15%. These parameters included process plant feed grade, capital and operating costs, metal prices, foreign
exchange rate. The results were evaluated on the basis of pre-tax NPV. All parameters tested returned a
positiveNPVovertherange.
Social There are currently no Native Title claims or determinations over the Stockman project area. A license for the
mining lease has been granted.
A program of community engagement has been undertaken and will continue through the life cycle of the
project. This has included the establishment of a “shop front” to facilitate two-way communications with the
public. No material objections to the project have been received throughout the community engagement
process and the general consensus is one of positive economic benefit to the local community.
An MOU has been executed between IGO and the East Gippsland Shire Council. The MOU commits both
parties to working in collaboration to identify and progress opportunities that will deliver social and economic
development benefits for the region whilst, through endeavouring to maximise the efficiency and robustness
of the project’s operations, not compromising or placing an unnecessary financial burden on IGO as a
companywithobligations toits shareholders.
Other IGO currently holds the mining lease on which the Stockman project is located. Land access to other support
infrastructure is the subject of various draft agreements and MOU’s with respective land holders. The site for
the proposed TSF is currently located in an Exploration Exemption area. An application for an Infrastructure
Mining Licence will be made following project approval by IGO. There are no known impediments to the
granting of this license.
The project is located in state forest and prone to bushfires. Analysis of the risk has been undertaken by
independent consultants WSP and mitigation measures recommended including the establishment of fire
protection zones and fire-resistant construction materials. In addition, procedures and training for bushfire
events will be implemented as part of the project Work Plan and procedures.
Land access agreements and MOU’s for required external infrastructure have been tabled in draft form to the
following stakeholders:
Local pastoralist for land access to the Stockman Village site and a potential borefield site.
East Gippsland Shire Council for road improvements and maintenance, land (road verge) access for a
potential borefield pipeline and high voltage underground power cable.
The project will require vegetation offsets for ground required to be disturbed for construction and mining.
These offsets have largely been identified and secured in part or subject to a draft heads of agreement with
existing land holders. There are no known impediments to securing the final calculated offsets required for
the project.
The Victorian Minister for Planning’s positive assessment of the Stockman Environmental Effects Statement
(EES) and Inquiry Panel report was released on 30 October 2014. The Minister’s Assessment contains no
unexpected conditions that are material to the project. The specific detail of the various licenses that are
required for project operations will now be scoped and agreed with Government agencies. It is expected that
detailed licensing will take approximately 12 months.
The Victorian Minister for Planning’s assessment report was also provided at the same time to the
Commonwealth Minister for Environment for his consideration under the Environment Protection and
Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. The Federal decision is expected to be announced by early 2015,
and no significant issues are foreseen.
There are currentlyno unresolvedmatterswiththird parties.
Classification The Ore Reserve was classified in accordance with the guidelines in the JORC Code (2012). Standard
modifyingfactors and conversionswere applied as described above. All IndicatedMineral Resourcewithin

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 23

A

Criteria JORC Code explanation
the mining envelope was converted to Probable Ore Reserve. No known issues existed at the time which
required the levels of confidence of the Ore Reserve to be downgraded. The Mineral Resource does not
contain any material classified as Measured and therefore no material could be considered for classification
as Proved Ore Reserve.
Gold (Au) grades are Inferred at Wilga due to a paucity of gold assays in historic drilling.
The Ore Reserve estimation and classification methods used are considered by the Competent Person to be
appropriateforthe style andnature ofthe deposit.
Audits or reviews The Ore Reserve estimate has been subject to internal peer review.
Discussion of
relative
accuracy/confiden
ce
The Ore Reserve is a global estimate derived from the global Stockman Mineral Resource.
The Stockman Ore Reserve was classified as Probable only and includes only Mineral Resources classified
as Indicated. No downgrading was applied to economic material within the mining envelope. The accuracy
of the Ore Reserve is reflected in the classification of the Ore Reserve and the classification of the underlying
Mineral Resources upon which it is based.
A sensitivity analysis was conducted on the cash flow model over a +/-15% range of variability of key
parameters including Cu and Zn grade, capital and operating cost, Cu and Zn price and exchange rate. The
results were evaluated on the basis of pre-tax cash flow. All parameters tested returned a positive pre-tax
cash flow over the range.
The nature of the deposit is such that the economic mining envelope is dependent on metal price and foreign
exchange assumptions. Material changes in price assumption could alter the outcome of the Ore Reserve
estimate.
Discrepancy exists between the historical tonnes reported as mined at Wilga (circa 956 kt) and those
accounted for in current digital wireframe of the workings (circa 802 kt).The reason for the discrepancy
remains unclear and reconciliation between the digital model and the actual mined areas is ongoing, subject
to further drilling or access to areas of the workings that are currently flooded. This discrepancy represents
<2% of the Ore Reserve and was not considered material to the viability of the project.
Gold (Au) grades are classified as Inferred at Wilga due to a paucity of gold assays in historic drilling.
Vendor quotation used in the cost estimates were requested on the basis of +/-10% to 15% accuracy.
Revenue assumptions were based on real forward pricing calculated by combining Consensus forecasts
(sourced from eight separate banks &/or research firms) and Wood Mackenzie forecasts. Forecast periods
varied across the sources, ranging from two years to eight years. Where the project life exceeded a
reasonable number of available forecasts, the last period price was held constant (or “flat-lined”) in the cash
flow model to the end of the project.
The Life of Mine (LoM) average forward copper pricing (US$6,591/t) is 11% below the September 2014 long
term forecast copper pricing by Wood Mackenzie which covers the mine production period (US$7,446/t).
The LoM average forward zinc pricing (US$2,979/t) is 1% below the September 2014 long term forecast zinc
pricing by Wood Mackenzie which covers the mine production period (US$3,020/t).
The foreign exchange rate used the IGO-derived consensus rate calculated by combining forecasts from
three separate bank &/or research firm’s forecasts. As with the copper and zinc pricing, the foreign exchange
ratewasflat-linedfromthelast periodforecast to the end ofthe project.

==> picture [595 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

PAGE | 24