AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

ICL Group Ltd.

Regulatory Filings Oct 27, 2016

6843_rns_2016-10-27_2526f194-1dda-4854-9c37-004f60782412.pdf

Regulatory Filings

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

S&P DOWNGRADES ICL'S INTERNATIONAL RATING TO BBB- WITH STABLE OUTLOOK

Tel Aviv, Israel, October 27, 2016 – ICL (NYSE and TASE: ICL) today announced, further to its announcement dated June 20, 2016 (reference number 2016-02-053574), that Standard & Poor's Global Ratings ("S&P") has lowered the company's international corporate credit rating to BBB- with stable outlook. S&P's downgrade primarily reflects the weakened state of the global fertilizers market and follows downgrades to several of ICL's peer companies over the past year. ICL's rating remains investment grade. According to the company's estimate, the impact on its financial expenses will be negligible, if at all.

The S&P rating is attached.

Name of the authorized signatory on the report and name of authorized electronic reporter: Lisa Haimovitz Position: SVP, Global General Counsel and Company Secretary Signature Date: October 27, 2016

INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACT PRESS CONTACT Limor Gruber Gadi Ohana Head of Investor Relations, ICL Debby Communications +972-3-684-4471 +972-3-5683000 [email protected] [email protected]

______________________________________________________________________________________

תרגום נוחות – הנוסח המחייב הוא נוסח הדיווח באנגלית

P&S מורידה את דירוגה הבינלאומי של כיל ל--BBB עם תחזית דירוג יציבה

תל אביב, 27 באוקטובר 2016 – כיל )סימול בורסאי NYSE ו-TASE: ICL )הודיעה היום כי, בהמשך להודעתה מיום 20 ביוני 2016 )מספר אסמכתא 2016-02-053574(, חברת דירוג האשראי Ratings Global s'Poor & Standard, הורידה את דירוג האשראי הבינלאומי של החברה ל-BBB- עם תחזית דירוג יציבה. הורדת הדירוג כאמור משקפת בעיקר את מצבו המוחלש של שוק הדשנים העולמי ובאה בהמשך להורדת דירוגן של מספר חברות אחרות בענף בשנה האחרונה. דירוגה של כיל נותר בדירוג השקעה )grade investment). להערכת החברה, השפעת הורדת הדירוג על הוצאות המימון שלה, ככל שתהיה, זניחה.

דוח הדירוג מצורף.

שם מורשה חתימה על הדיווח ושם מורשה חתימה אלקטרונית: לייזה חיימוביץ תפקיד: סמנכ"ל בכיר, יועצת משפטית גלובאלית ומזכירת החברה תאריך החתימה: 27 באוקטובר 2016

קשרי משקיעים קשרי עיתונות לימור גרובר גדי אוחנה ראש מחלקת קשרי משקיעים, כיל דבי תקשורת 03-5683000 03-6844471 [email protected] [email protected]

______________________________________________________________________________________

S&P Global Ratings

RatingsDirect®

Research Update:

Chemicals And Fertilizer Producer Israel Chemicals Downgraded To 'BBB-' On Weak Performance; Outlook Stable

Primary Credit Analyst: Oliver Kroemker, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-160; [email protected]

Secondary Contact: Matan Benjamin, RAMAT-GAN 972-3-7539731; [email protected]

Table Of Contents

Overview

Rating Action

Rationale

Outlook

Ratings Score Snapshot

Related Criteria And Research

Ratings List

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT

Research Update:

Chemicals And Fertilizer Producer Israel Chemicals Downgraded To 'BBB-' On Weak Performance; Outlook Stable

Overview

  • · Weaker fertilizer industry conditions are significantly affecting Israel Chemicals' performance indicators.
  • · We now believe that Israel Chemical's weaker earnings, as a result of the lower selling prices, will push leverage higher than our previous expectations, and that management will not be able to reduce leverage to levels commensurate with our current ratings.
  • · We are therefore lowering our ratings on Israel Chemicals to 'BBB-' from 'BBB' and removing them from CreditWatch negative.
  • · The stable outlook reflects our expectations that the company will maintain adjusted debt to EBITDA at 3.5x amid the current depressed pricing environment, while generating positive free operating cash flow in 2016-2018.

Rating Action

On Oct. 27, 2016, S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term corporate credit rating on Israel-based chemicals and fertilizer manufacturer Israel Chemicals Ltd. (ICL) to 'BBB-' from 'BBB' . The outlook is stable.

At the same time, we lowered our issue rating on ICL's senior unsecured debt to 'BBB-' from 'BBB', in line with our corporate credit rating.

We removed all ratings from CreditWatch with negative implications, where we placed them on June 20, 2016.

Rationale

The downgrade reflects our expectation that ICL's leverage will continue to be higher than our previous projections, and that the company's free operating cash flow (FOCF) will be absorbed by sustained, though stable capital expenditures (capex) and dividends. This will lead to neutral to negative discretionary cash flow. In particular, we expect that S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA will remain above 2.5x--the level commensurate with our 'BBB' rating -- over the next couple of years.

ICL's higher debt is due to its joint venture with Chinese phosphate producer Yunna Yuntianhua. In addition, the company's weaker earnings have constrained

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT

credit metrics, which has prompted today's rating action. Additionally, though management has implemented further cost-cutting initiatives--including reducing the dividend payout ratio to 50% of net profits from 70% previously, and limiting capex to \$650 million per year -- these measures are not sufficient to protect the credit metrics, in our view.

So far this year, potash prices have been \$30-\$40 below our projections, with Israel Chemicals' competitor JSC Belaruskali signing key benchmark contracts with major customers from India and China at \$227 per metric ton and \$219 per metric ton, respectively. This pressure on prices has stemmed from weakened supply-demand equilibrium and expectation of further capacity start-ups in 2017-2018.

Because the weak supply-demand balance is likely to continue, we believe that prices are unlikely to recover significantly through 2018 from current spot levels. We believe this will be the case, given that capacity additions in 2017 will likely overcompensate currently announced production curtailments and outages of about 5 million metric tons. Furthermore, capacity additions in 2018 and 2019 could intensify pressure on prices.

Our assessment of ICL's business risk profile is mainly based on ICL's leading position in the potash, phosphate, and bromine markets; its broad geographical and product diversification; and competitive cost position due to competitive production and raw material costs leading to above-average profitability. These strengths are partly offset by the continued weakness in the fertilizer industry, reflected by the falling potash prices. Though we expect potash prices to stabilize at current spot price levels for 2016 and 2017, we expect additional industry capacity coming on stream, notably from competitors K+S and Eurochem, among others, to weigh on prices.

Under our base case, we assume:

  • · Annual revenues of \$5.4 billion-\$6.0 billion in 2016-2018.
  • · Gradual improvement in profitability in 2017, resulting from implementation of the cost-cutting initiatives, which are expected to save \$125 million by the end of 2016 with additional savings potential of \$100 million per year until the end of 2018, leading to EBITDA of about \$1.0 billion in 2016 and \$1.2 billion in 2017.
  • · Annual net investment of about \$650 million in 2016-2017.
  • · Annual dividend payout of about 50% of net profit, down from our previous assumption of 70%, in 2016-2017.

Based on these assumptions, we arrive at the following credit measure:

· S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA of about 3.5x in 2016 and 3.0x-3.5x in 2017.

Liquidity

We view ICL's liquidity as adequate, based on our estimate that the ratio of liquidity sources to uses will exceed 1.2x over the 12 months started June 30, 2016. We also take into account ICL's demonstrated access to financing from global and Israeli financial institutions.

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT

For the 12 months started June 30, 2016, we estimate that principal liquidity sources include:

  • · Cash and cash equivalents of \$242 million as of June 30, 2016;
  • · Operating cash flow according to our base case of approximately \$840 million; and
  • · Undrawn committed credit lines of approximately \$790 million.

We estimate the following principal liquidity uses for the same time period:

  • · \$265 million in debt maturities;
  • · Net investments of \$650 million per year; and
  • · Dividends of \$250 million reflecting a payout ratio of 50% of net profit.

We anticipate that the company will maintain substantial headroom under its covenants. The company's bank lines are subject to various maintenance financial covenants, including net debt to EBITDA below 3.5x and EBITDA to net interests above 3.5x

Outlook

The stable outlook on ICL reflects our expectations that, based on its favorable cost position and leading position in its core markets, ICL will preserve a ratio of adjusted debt to EBITDA at 3.5x amid the current depressed pricing environment and will generate positive FOCF between 2016 and 2018. We expect the company will maintain a balance between leverage and investment levels, acquisitions, and shareholder remuneration. During mid-cycle conditions, we view a ratio of adjusted debt to EBITDA of about 3.0x as commensurate with the current rating.

Upside scenario

We will consider a positive rating action if ICL strengthens its financial risk profile and its ratio of adjusted debt to EBITDA to less than 2.5x consistently .

Downside scenario

We will consider a negative rating action if the company exceeds its ratio of adjusted debt to EBITDA of 3.5x without prospects of recovery, and its operating performance deteriorates contrary to our expectations. In our view, this scenario is possible if ICL implements aggressive business or financial policies, whether by a significant deviation from its publicly stated dividend policy or by sizable leveraged acquisitions. Further deterioration in market conditions that endanger operating results could also lead to a downgrade.

Ratings Score Snapshot

Corporate Credit Rating: BBB-/Stable/ --

Business risk: Satisfactory

  • · Country risk: Intermediate
  • · Industry risk: Moderately high
  • · Competitive position: Satisfactory

Financial risk: Significant · Cash flow/Leverage: Significant

Anchor · hhh -

Modifiers

  • · Diversification/Portfolio effect: Neutral (no impact)
  • · Capital structure: Neutral (no impact)
  • · Liquidity: Adequate (no impact)
  • · Financial policy: Neutral (no impact)
  • · Management and governance: Fair (no impact)
  • · Comparable ratings analysis: Neutral (no impact)

Stand-alone credit profile: bbb-

Related Criteria And Research

Related Criteria

  • · General Criteria: National And Regional Scale Credit Ratings September 22. 2014
  • · Criteria Corporates General: Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global Corporate Issuers - December 16, 2014
  • · Criteria Corporates General: Standard & Poor's Maalot (Israel) National Scale: Methodology For Nonfinancial Corporate Issue Ratings -September 22, 2014
  • · Criteria Corporates Industrials: Key Credit Factors For The Commodity Chemicals Industry - December 31, 2013
  • · General Criteria: Methodology: Industry Risk November 19, 2013
  • · General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology November 19, 2013
  • · Criteria Corporates General: Corporate Methodology November 19, 2013
  • Criteria Corporates General: 2008 Corporate Criteria: Rating Each Issue - April 15, 2008
  • · General Criteria: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities And Insurers - November 13, 2012
  • · General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Short-Term And Long-Term

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT

OCTOBER 27, 2016 5 1745446 | 301658873

Ratings For Corporate, Insurance, And Sovereign Issuers - May 07, 2013

  • · General Criteria: S&P Global Ratings | National And Regional Scale Mapping Tables - June 01, 2016
  • · General Criteria: Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions -November 19, 2013
  • · General Criteria: Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks September 14, 2009

Related Research

· Israel Chemicals 'BBB' Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative Due To Weaker Credit Metrics - June 20, 2016

Ratings List

Downgraded; CreditWatch Action

o From
Israel Chemicals Ltd.
Corporate Credit Rating BBB-/Stable/-- BBB/Watch Neq/ --
Senior Unsecured BBB- BBB/Watch Neg

Additional Contact:

Industrial Ratings Europe; [email protected]

Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.globalcreditportal.com and at spcapitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on the S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. Alternatively, call one of the following S&P Global Ratings numbers: Client Support Europe (44) 20-7176-7176; London Press Office (44) 20-7176-3605; Paris (33) 1-4420-6708; Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-225; Stockholm (46) 8-440-5914; or Moscow 7 (495) 783-4009.

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT

OCTOBER 27, 2016 6 1745446 | 301658873 Copyright © 2016 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standal Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABLITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any direct, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form of format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsover arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.globalcredit.org.com (subscription) and www.spcapitalig.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

STANDARD & POOR'S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC.

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT

OCTOBER 27, 2016 7 1745446 | 301658873

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.