Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

HP INC Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2004

Feb 23, 2004

30213_psi_2004-02-23_9b9ccaea-f26c-40af-881c-1a0f544f44fd.zip

Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

DFAN14A 1 a2128182zdfan14a.htm DFAN14A

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to
Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed
by the Registrant o
Filed
by a Party other than the Registrant ý
Check
the appropriate box:
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted
by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive
Proxy Statement
o Definitive
Additional Materials
ý Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
NOVADIGM, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its
Charter)
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement,
if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
ý No
fee required.
o Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title
of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total
fee paid:
o Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount
Previously Paid:
(2) Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing
Party:
(4) Date
Filed:

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=1,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=440427,FOLIO='',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

Filed by Hewlett-Packard Company Pursuant to Rule 14a-12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Subject Company: Novadigm, Inc. Commission File No.: 000-26156

On February 4, 2004, Hewlett-Packard Company held a press conference, a transcript of which follows. The transcript was made available on February 20, 2004 on the following website: http://www.openview.hp.com/news/index.html.

This transcript contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions, that, if they were to prove incorrect, could cause the results or HP and its consolidated subsidiaries to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including but not limited to statements related to the closing of the proposed acquisitions; statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future product availability or functionality; and statements relating to the execution of integration plans. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above include the possibility that the proposed acquisition of Novadigm may not be completed on the terms, or within the timeframe, currently contemplated or at all; that the intended application of, and market for, the technologies and software products discussed herein may not develop as expected; that development and performance of these technologies and software products may not proceed as planned; employee management issues; the challenges of integrating the companies discussed herein into HP; the challenges of maintaining customers following the acquisitions; and other risks that are described from time to time in HP’s Securities and Exchange Commission reports, including but not limited to HP’s annual report for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 and subsequently filed reports. HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.

Additional Information and Where to Find It

Novadigm has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a preliminary proxy statement and other relevant materials in connection with the merger. Information regarding the identity of persons who may, under SEC rules, be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of stockholders of Novadigm in connection with the transaction, and their interests in the solicitation, is set forth in the preliminary proxy materials that were filed by Novadigm with the SEC on February 20, 2004. Before making any voting or investment decision with respect to the merger, investors and stockholders of Novadigm are urged to read the proxy statement and the other relevant materials when they become available because they contain and will contain important information about the merger. The proxy statement and other relevant materials (when they become available), and any other documents filed by Novadigm with the SEC, may be obtained free of charge at the SEC’s web site at . In addition, investors and stockholders of Novadigm may obtain free copies of the documents filed with the SEC by contacting Novadigm Investor Relations,1-800-626-6682. You may also read and copy any reports, statements and other information filed by Novadigm at the SEC public reference rooms at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 or at the SEC’s other public reference rooms in New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on public reference rooms.

Novadigm and HP and their respective executive officers and directors may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from the Novadigm stockholders in favor of the merger. Certain executive officers and directors of Novadigm have interests in the merger, including retention bonuses, severance arrangements, acceleration of vesting of stock options and their ownership of Novadigm’s common stock, and their interests are described in the proxy statement.

Transcript of Press Release

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=2,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=772945,FOLIO='',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

*Adding Powerful Automation to HP Open View: Teleconference Replay*

*Moderator: Nora Denzel*

*February 4, 2004*

*9:30 am CT*

| Operator: | Ladies
and gentlemen, thank you for attending the HP Software Teleconference to
announce the acquisitions and of Novadigm and Consera. While the conference is in session your
line will be muted. After the
presenters are finished, the lines will open for a 10-minute
question-and-answer session. It is
now my pleasure to introduce you to Nora Denzel, Senior Vice President, HP
Adaptive Enterprise. |
| --- | --- |
| Nora
Denzel: | Thank
you very much and welcome everyone.
Good morning, good afternoon or good evening. This is Nora Denzel and today HP is
announcing that it intends to acquire software companies Novadigm and Consera
Software. These are two companies
that are leaders in automated change management. These two announcements mark the fourth and fifth acquisition
of software companies by HP within the past six months and further HP’s
Adaptive Enterprise strategy. |
| | To
refresh your memory, the other three were Select Access, which provides
identify management, Talking Blocks, which provides Web services management,
and Persist, which provides lifecycle management. But today we’ll focus on the two new acquisitions and joining
me on this call and |

1

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=3,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=270808,FOLIO='1',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| available
for questions-and-answers are Albion Fitzgerald, the CEO of Novadigm, Frank
Artale, who is the CEO of Consera Software, and also Russ Daniels, our Vice
President and CTO of HP Software Global Business Unit. |
| --- |
| So
what are we announcing? This morning
prior to the opening of the market, HP issued a press release stating that
we’ve signed a definitive agreement to acquire Novadigm and Consera Software,
which add power data center automation capabilities to OpenView for unified
management of the complete enterprise IT environment. This technology is key to further the
delivery of the vision of Adaptive Enterprise, which is where business and IT
are synchronized to capitalize on change. |
| Novadigm
is a publicly traded company with a worldwide presence and more than 500
customers. They are headquartered in
the United States in New Jersey. The
agreement is an all-cash transaction where HP will pay $6.10 in cash for each
outstanding share of Novadigm common stock.
The transaction is expected to close by the end of the first half of
calendar 2004 and it is pending of Novadigm shareholder approval. |
| Consera
Software is a privately held company based out of Bellevue, Washington, which
is also in the United States. The
close is expected to be within 30-days and after closing, both the Novadigm
and Consera teams will become part of the HP Software Global Business
Unit. Their products will be branded
and sold as OpenView software products and they will be available to be sold
through HP, its partners, direct by our sales force, and as a part of our
ProLiant server essential software. |
| So
as I mentioned, these acquisitions build upon recent HP software
announcements as we round out our offerings to help customers build an |

2

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=4,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=288661,FOLIO='2',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| Adaptive
Enterprise. But before we talk about
the distinct capabilities of the software, I wanted to spend a minute on just
why management is so important. |
| --- |
| Management
software is crucial to customers that want to become more agile. For example, at HP we now have over
500,000 IT changes per week, all triggered by business decisions. These business decisions could be pricing
changes, organizational changes, hiring decisions, government regulations,
etc. |
| In
many environments, IT changes are very manual. It’s estimated by IDC that enterprises will spend $174 billion
dollars on ongoing operations and management in IT infrastructure. And in a typical Fortune 500 company, a
systems administrator is typically tasked with managing only 20 to 30 servers
each. It was the irrefutable law of
computing where companies had to keep adding IT staff as they added capacity. |
| So
this is where management software comes in.
Management software can automatically manage IT and automatically
manage IT supply to the changes in business demands. This is a huge market and according to
IDC, it’s expected to be an over $10 billion dollar opportunity for software
by 2007. |
| So
management software is the next big battleground for IT and HP is playing in
this area in a big way and positioned to lead. It’s really a race to provide CIOs with an automated integrated
management to increase their business agility. I’d like to describe the functions of Novadigm and Consera by
using an analogy. You can think about
this as IT management on cruise control. |
| Now
on cruise control, you need — and it’s in addition to having a steering wheel
– and there are times in IT when you want to have manual control over
changes, such as you do when you’re driving your car, and you want to |

3

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=5,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=327778,FOLIO='3',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| manually
control the acceleration and steering — perhaps when they’re nonstandard IT
changed or one of a kind. But for a
large majority of changes, just like a car that you put into cruise control,
IT is looking for a way to automate changes and have repeatable changes
enacted based on business rules. |
| --- |
| In
this analogy, Consera provides the model of how the car’s components —
whether it’s gas, the engine, and the wheels – how they all interact. And then can call Novadigm to set the
desired acceleration for your car or the desired state. One would then use the traditional
OpenView products to monitor the car – for example, checking to see how fast
the wheels are turning, whether there are changes in the elevation, or how
much gasoline is in the tank. |
| Consera
is integrated with the monitoring tools to determine when to change the
acceleration in order to maintain the desired speed. If changes are needed, Novadigm can then
make the changes consistently and error free without human intervention. |
| We
chose Novadigm because as we were looking for desired state management,
Novadigm had the most proven technology expertise with over 13-years of
engineering experience. They are
recognized as the industry leader and they’re very complimentary to
OpenView. Our visions of where IT was
headed are fully aligned and it’s a product that is a natural extension for
our existing sales force and services organization to sell to our customers. |
| We
are also a big Novadigm customer. We
manage thousands of trade and internal servers and have huge plans to use
Novadigm to manage our more than 150,000 desktops and laptops. |

4

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=6,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=179933,FOLIO='4',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| In
terms of technology, Novadigm offers scaleable, policy-based architecture for
managing IT resources to desired states.
They have already got heterogeneity.
They also support servers and desktop systems and mobile and wireless
systems, strong inventory capability, very extensible technology, and
finally, very easy to customize.
Novadigm boasts 500 customers worldwide including 7-Eleven, Schlumberger,
British Telecom, and the U.S. and U.K. governments for example. |
| --- |
| Consera,
on the other hand, when we were looking for the intellectual property for the
orchestration of IT changes, we didn’t want only a policy manager. Policy managers that provide script-based
automation were cumbersome. They are
very services-intensive and brittle and Consera went way beyond policy
management and guided to more having the IT to be able to create a
model. So it’s state-of-the-art
technology for presenting a service-model’s view of IT and that’s the infrastructure
that can then be used to drive change. |
| We
felt that modeling manages change better then all the other approaches
because IT infrastructure is then visibly linked to automation. Scripting-based automation is 20th Century
technology, where modeling-based scripting is for the 21st Century. The Consera IP includes complete IT work
flow and the ability to standardize repetitive tasks and encapsulate best
practices for IT operations. |
| By
using Consera, customers get error-free results, which greatly improve the
success of IT changes. Consera was
also highly flexible in extensible technology, supporting everything from
bare metals to applications. I wanted
to give you a real-world example that could be applicable to last week. Say, for example, a virus affects a sequel
server and the desktop PCs connected throughout the enterprise. It’s a very likely scenario. |

5

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=7,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=469132,FOLIO='5',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| The
typical IT response today is the IT operator goes from machine to machine or
over the network or physically installing new patches and removing the
virus. Now, with Consera and Novadigm
as a part of OpenView, patch configuration would be incorporated into a
service-model that represents both servers and the desktops. |
| --- |
| Based
on the updated model, patches would be deployed automatically to all of the
appropriate servers and desktops. The
automatic deployment would standardize and upgrade configurations, remove the
virus, and add updated versions of software that patch holes and provide
security. And as new desktops and
servers are added to the enterprise, they would automatically be configured
and updated with the patch. |
| And
so the benefits of this is that it eliminates known software vulnerability
quickly and reliably, it optimizes the security and stability of managed
systems, provides value for business continuity initiatives, and it
significantly reduces the cost through approved IT operation efficiencies. |
| So
your customers, our joint customers – Novadigm and Consera customers –
understand the need for automated management and also believe in supporting
multivendor environments. HP is known
for premier service and support, longevity, and vendor stability. Novadigm is a very proven technology. It’s the industry-recognized software that
gives HP customers leadership and automated change management. And Consera’s service modeling masks the
underlying complexity of all the IT resources that comprise the business
service. |
| So,
in conclusion, before we turn it over to questions-and-answers, we’ve really
covered a lot of exciting new ground today and we can’t tell you how |

6

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=8,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=943242,FOLIO='6',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| | excited
we are to lead the industry with these additions to the OpenView family. Combining Novadigm and Consera with
OpenView gives us leading edge automated change management capabilities in
addition to our award-winning portfolio of management software. This combination helps our customers
evolve into an adaptive enterprise much faster. |
| --- | --- |
| | We
now have 14-minutes for questions-and-answers and so what we’ll do is turn it
over to the Operator for questions-and-answers. And I’ll remind you that we have both CEOs of Novadigm, Albion
Fitzgerald, and Consera, Frank Artale, on the line as well as the CPO of HP
Software, (Russ Daniels). Operator? |
| Operator: | Ladies
and gentlemen, thank you. We are
opening the lines for questions.
Please indicate to the Operator that you have a question by pressing
Star then the number 1 and your line will be unmuted. Please hold for your first question. Your first question comes from (Andy
Shrofer). |
| (Andy
Shrofer): | Hi
and congratulations on the transaction.
Many of us on this call probably have been saying for a while that you
needed to make an acquisition here so I’ll jump right in with the
question. You have two partners right
now – Alteris and Opsware – that kind of are similar to some of these
technologies that you are acquiring.
Any comments on the impact this will have on those partnerships? How quickly that might happen? |
| Nora
Denzel: | Yeah,
great, thanks, (Andy). So your
question is about Alteris and Opsware.
First of all, these acquisitions don’t change HP’s normal stance of
partnering with whom our customers want to partner with. So we do have relationships with Alteris,
Opsware, AccelaNet through our HP services organization as well as some of
our product divisions. |

7

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=9,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=1026749,FOLIO='7',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| | It
is not intended that these announcements would significantly change those
relationships in any material fashion.
We will still continue to use Alteris in our PSG Division and in our
Personal Systems Group and Opsware, if customers demand it, you know, from
our services organization. We still would
be capable to install it as we do today, as our services organization is
quite heterogeneous, and it’s a way that our customers appreciate it and we
appreciate it as well. |
| --- | --- |
| (Andy
Shrofer): | Okay,
thank you. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Thank
you. |
| Operator: | Your
next question comes from (Richard Peterson). |
| Nora
Denzel: | Yes,
Richard, please go ahead. |
| (Richard
Peterson): | Hi,
Nora. Yeah, maybe you could just give
us a little more detail on what you mean by significantly change the
relationship with Alteris. It does
look like there’s quite a bit of product overlap and I know people are very
curious if there’s any change at all.
So if you could maybe qualify what you mean by “significantly
change”? Will there be any change at
all? |
| Nora
Denzel: | It’s
not intended that there will be any change in the relationship so if I
categorize the Alteris relationship, they really work with us on three
levels. First, in our HP services
organization for those customers that want the Alteris functionality along
with service representatives to help you do the installation, the
configuration and roll it out across an enterprise. That won’t change. |
| | Our
services organization behaves like a global systems integrator and they
partner with whom the customer wants to partner with. And we have very |

8

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=10,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=145707,FOLIO='8',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| | good
firewalls and relationships with our HP services organization and – I don’t
know if that’s you, Richard – but we have the capability to have our services
organization – for example, they can service Sun servers, they can sell
competitors OpenView just like any global services organization can. So we don’t expect that relationship to
change. |
| --- | --- |
| | And
in the second place, Alteris has been a very valued partner for HP Personal
Systems Group. They give the client
management capabilities that make HP PCs easy to manage and there are no
plans to change its relationship and we’re seeking to continue to have a
significant relationship in that area. |
| | The
third relationship they have with HP is with our ProLiant industry standard
servers. We do ship a considerable
amount of product called the ProLiant Essentials Rapid Deploy and we intend
to make no changes to that arrangement whatsoever. It’s a valuable function that they provide and we will continue
to ship it as part of our ProLiant Essentials Pack. So if you look at HP, we’re pretty good. We really have a core competency of
partnering in the Company and so I don’t expect any material changes to that
relationship as a result of this. |
| (Richard
Peterson): | Okay,
thanks very much, Nora. |
| Operator: | Your
next question comes from Judith Hurwitz from Hurwitz & Associates. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Hi,
Judith. |
| Judith
Hurwitz: | Hi,
Nora. Congratulations. A question for you: How tightly will you
be integrating these two products into OpenView? Will you see them as separate complimentary products or over
time will they be additional modules within the OpenView family? |

9

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=11,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=530712,FOLIO='9',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| Nora
Denzel: | Great
questions, Judith. Well, everything
will be branded OpenView and as with the OpenView tradition, it will all be
modular so you can take only Consera, only Novadigm, or both Consera and
Novadigm. You know, you can take our
monitoring and Consera and then use somebody else instead of Novadigm, for
example. |
| --- | --- |
| | So
just like OpenView is today, they will be done in a modular fashion; however,
it will all be better together.
Meaning that if you take it from HP, you’re assured that if you have
any problems, there is one neck to choke.
There are a lot of pricing considerations we can give. We’ll have our own services offerings as
well as offerings from our other partners so it will be much better
together. But we do understand
customers have a choice and should they choose other products that compete —
in the OpenView fashion where we have over 150 partners now – that won’t be
an issue. Does that answer what you
were getting at, Judith? |
| Judith
Hurwitz: | Yes,
thank you. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Thank
you. |
| Operator: | Your
next question comes from (Frank Gillette) with Forester Research. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Hey,
(Frank Gillette). |
| (Frank
Gillette): | Hi,
how are you all doing today? |
| Nora
Denzel: | Fine,
thank you. |

10

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=12,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=935029,FOLIO='10',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| (Frank
Gillette): | One
of the things that we’ve been trying to digest in looking at the
announcement, is understanding how you are going to take the Consera
technology, which is clearly aimed at Windows environments only, and take it
out to what is a substantially different environment – the UNIX
environment. The Novadigm stuff makes
more sense to us. The Consera one,
we’re kind of scratching our heads and saying, “Looks like there’s a bunch of
work to do there.” |
| --- | --- |
| Nora
Denzel: | Well,
we don’t believe so. I mean we’ve
been all over these guys, all over every line of code. It is the ultimate solution and Consera
service-modeling works across platforms and we’re going to expand its
workflow capabilities for additional out-of-the-box capabilities that support
heterogeneous environments. And after
looking at how they’ve done the design, we don’t believe that that will be
huge. |
| | And,
(Russ) and (Frank), you know, you’re up there in Seattle, if you want to
comment to (Frank Gillette). |
| (Frank
Gillette): | Yeah,
I’d be interested just to understand it so I’m less worried about, you know,
which platform it’s hosted on and more interested in what environment it sort
of can manage and model. |
| Frank
Artale: | Right. This is Frank Artale speaking. When we designed our service-model and
resource-model in a platform agnostic way, our first implementation target
was Windows because of the volume opportunity there. But the service and resource-model is
designed from the bottom up of the platform agnostic, even beyond Windows and
Linux. It can really automate
anything that can be modeled by using our resource manager. |

11

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=13,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=441674,FOLIO='11',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| (Frank
Gillette): | Great. And any thoughts on the ability to closed
loop management? In other words to
take that cross-platform capability and be able to sort of convert physical
resources servers from, say, UNIX box to Windows box and back, based on a
dynamic load? I mean what we’re
really talking about is sort of automated orchestration of policy and not
just sort of, you know, policy management make all servers X but, in fact,
sort of dynamically do that. |
| --- | --- |
| Frank
Artale: | Right. And the way our resource-model works is that
we have a certain amount of what we call abstract classes and the
implementation of those classes can be on any target platform. So when you define something like a file
server, for example, that could be a Windows file server, NFS, it could be a
cross-version of Windows. |
| | So,
for example, we can move resources across versions of Windows, the same
technique can be used to move from one operating system to another. So, yes, that was definitely a design
point for us. (Russ Daniels) has a
comment. |
| (Russ
Daniels): | Yeah. And, (Frank), it’s (Russ Daniels)
here. And we think that this
technology is very well suited for exactly the kind of uses that you are
describing. We talk about these
generically in the adaptive management spaces of controllers – of resource
controllers being able to control, you know, the various types of resources:
servers, storage, network applications — service controllers being able to do
the same thing in modeling at the service level rather than at the physical
resource level. And our intent and
directions are to build products that embody exactly those capabilities. |
| (Frank
Gillette): | Okay. I’ll pass up and come back, but that’s an
area I’d like to speak more about later. |

12

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=14,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=585280,FOLIO='12',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| (Russ
Daniels): | You
bet. |
| --- | --- |
| Operator: | Your
next question comes from (Steven Elliott) from IDC. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Yes,
(Steven). |
| (Steven
Elliott): | Yes,
hi. A quick question: Are the
executive teams of both companies going to continue to stay with HP? And then, secondarily, you paid roughly
$6.10 a share for Novadigm. It seems
a little pricey when you look at sort of the revenue stream and where those revenues
are headed. Any comments? Thanks. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Thank
you. We obviously have done the
appropriate amount of work to make sure that the right people stay in the
Company for the right length of time so we really can’t comment on individual
people or individual positions. But
I’m very excited that we’ll have stellar additions to the HP team upon deal
close. |
| | In
terms of the price, Novadigm will benefit from a vast 150,000-employee
company that’s in 160 countries. We
have a velocity software channel that they didn’t have a lot of access to in
our ProLiant Essentials line. We have
a direct sales force that’s dedicating, which is – I don’t know how many
times bigger than the Novadigm — as well as we have an extensive set of
partners. |
| | Over
60% of the OpenView revenue today comes from our partners. That’s something that Novadigm hadn’t
really broken into in an extensive way at that point. So I think we’ve done the math every
different way and we don’t believe that it’s pricey at all. |
| (Steven
Elliott): | Thanks. |

13

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=15,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=437757,FOLIO='13',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| Operator: | Your
next question comes from (Paul Roberts) with IDT News Service. |
| --- | --- |
| (Paul
Roberts): | Yes,
could you give us some indication — because it’s not in the press release –
what the price for Consera will be?
What the total price of these two purchases will be? I’m estimating, and you can correct me if
I’m wrong, that the total price of the Novadigm purchase is around $122
million dollars? If I’m way off on that
let me know. And I would like to know
what the ballpark is on the Consera purchase. |
| Nora
Denzel: | The
Consera acquisition is obviously private and those details are not
available. We expect it to close in
30-days and it doesn’t require either shareholder approval by us or them as I
would say as they are a private entity.
In terms of Novadigm, it was $6.10 a share. |
| | If
you do the math times the outstanding shares, you come up to about 121 and HP
also owns 5% of the company already, so you’d have to do that math to figure
out how that would work because we wouldn’t pay ourselves then. We own 5% of the shares already. One twenty-one is fair to say if you could
take outstanding share times $6.10. |
| (Paul
Roberts): | So
you’re not willing to give us a ballpark on the total amount of the
purchases? |
| Nora
Denzel: | No. That’s HP confidential information. |
| (Paul
Roberts): | Okay. |
| Nora
Denzel: | But
thank you. |

14

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=16,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=117165,FOLIO='14',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| Operator: | Your
next question comes from (Nina Lyton) with Open Systems Advisors. |
| --- | --- |
| Nora
Denzel: | Nina. |
| (Nina
Lyton): | Nora. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Good
afternoon. No it isn’t afternoon –
whatever time that it is. |
| (Nina
Lyton): | Tell
me, what lessons have you already learned or best practices that you can
share from the Talking Blocks acquisition and maybe that of Persist that
you’ll be using to integrate these two new companies? |
| Nora
Denzel: | Yeah,
you know, (Nina), we did a lot of best practices from the Compaq merger. We’ve had a full-time integration team
since March even though we didn’t begin any formal integrations until
about September. That team has been
in the planning, you know, the preplanning every single meeting with Carly,
etc. |
| | So
that was a huge lessons learned that you don’t give the integration to people
that have regular day jobs. We
believe that we’ve got the industry standard on how to merge technology
integration, having come through one of the biggest – I don’t know if it’s
over yet, but it’s been declared pretty successful by almost every single
financial and industry analyst — of the Compaq/HP merger and we certainly
benefited from that and used people from Carly’s strategic change office to
consult with us on how to do it. |
| | So
revenue is already flowing from both Talking Blocks and Select Access. They were on the price list within 30-days
and they are fully integrated into the OpenView organization and it’s really
going well. Later we can take you |

15

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=17,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=608990,FOLIO='15',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| | through
all the steps that we took and it’s really – we’re really learned a lot from
the Compaq acquisition and it’s really helping us a lot on these. |
| --- | --- |
| (Nina
Lyton): | Okay,
thanks. |
| Operator: | Your
next question comes from (Glen O’Donnell) with Medigroup. |
| (Glen
O’Donnell): | Good
morning, Nora, and it appears that all of us has questions about the Alteris
twist and that’s already been addressed, but let me ask a question about
Consera. It seems like this is a good
move as far as getting some automated workflow and stuff into the whole
strategy. Where do you see that
fitting in to the OpenView family per se? |
| Nora
Denzel: | Frank,
do you want to? |
| Frank
Artale: | Sure,
I can start. Enterprise management
has historically been pretty heavily dominated by monitoring and the OpenView
product suite is very strong there.
We’ve also, of course, have service desk so IT service management
capabilities – that is we’ve been executing on our strategy since the
merger. We’ve been focusing on
building in more and more automation capabilities. |
| | When
you look at the driver of IT costs then you find that the people applying
manual tasks – both the costs of the people involved and in the fact that
manual tasks are more likely to be error-prone and have a very high
multiplier in those costs — so the importance of automation has not been lost
on us at all. |
| | Consera
is actually a great technology to help us bring together again — sort of
being able to tie together what we monitor.
What kinds of deep and rich actions we can take with Novadigm and
being able to create very rich models that can automate the connection of
those two things. |

16

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=18,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=194735,FOLIO='16',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| (Glen
O’Donnell): | Okay,
thank you. It looks like a good move
and I think that’s, you know, rolling it into the service desk area makes
sense but we’ll talk about more of that later. |
| --- | --- |
| Nora
Denzel: | Yeah,
we have that analyst security meeting in March where we’re go through it
all. |
| (Glen
O’Donnell): | Right. Thank you. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Thank
you. Okay? |
| Operator: | Your
next question comes from Amy Wall from Wall & Associates. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Hello,
Amy. |
| Amy
Wall: | Hi,
Nora, how are you? |
| Nora
Denzel: | I’m
good. How are you? |
| Amy
Wall: | Good. I’d like to revisit the question that Judy
asked you about integration. You
answered that largely sort of a business perspective saying, for instance,
that it would give the customers one neck to choke and that you would handle
pricing and so forth in an administrative way. But I’m more into asking about from a software integration
perspective. |
| | Do
you actually intend to work at trying to integrate the way the software works
together? And, if so, is that
something that’s it’s already doing given that these are products that HP is
using itself internally or is that something that’s going to take a little
while to accomplish? |

17

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=19,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=266642,FOLIO='17',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| Nora
Denzel: | Well,
it was a great question and, first, Amy, on Novadigm – because they’ve been a
partner with us for years, the integration is already done. And so we feel really comfortable that,
you know, as you know, OpenView, one of it’s strengths is that it has a
common object and data model so you can share all the relationships in your
environment together. And so Novadigm
integration has largely been done so it will just be a practice of getting
that thing on the price list and blowing it through our channels. |
| --- | --- |
| | In
terms of Consera, Novadigm – not Novadigm – OpenView was created with
integration in mind and so the integration shouldn’t be that difficult. But as I mentioned before to someone
earlier, if you just want the design portion and you just want to do the
model, but you don’t use a Novadigm, for example, for deployment — and
OpenView, for example, for the operation — we will still allow that as well
but we will integrate with common messages. |
| | Consera
will be in the common object and data model, common branding, common
services, etc. So it will be much
easier if you take them together but should you have already chosen one of
the three legs of the design, deploy an operations tool, you can still, you
know, take it without taking the other two pieces. And also the other thing, the big integration with Consera will
obviously be with the user interface but having looked at the code
extensively, we don’t believe that will be a big issue. |
| Amy
Wall: | So
is that something that we could expect to see by mid-year or by the end of
the year? |
| Nora
Denzel: | I
don’t know if the new General Manager is on the line but I’ll certainly
commit that we will have an integrative product roadmap on the day that this
thing closes. |

18

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=20,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=158080,FOLIO='18',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004'

| Amy
Wall: | Okay,
great. |
| --- | --- |
| Nora
Denzel: | And
we’ve got the right people – but I think that’s an admirable goal and we’ll
call you back if I get any trouble on it. |
| Amy
Wall: | Okay,
terrific. Thank you very much. |
| Nora
Denzel: | Thank
you. |
| Operator: | That
concludes today’s teleconference.
Thank you again for attending the HP Software Teleconference. A replay of this call will be available at
1-800-642-1687 or 706-645-9291. The
ID Code number is 5357712. Should you
require additional information or are interested in speaking more with an HP
executive regarding today’s news, please contact Kristin Bleier at
408-497-3759 or (Kathleen Irvin) at 415-225-9474. You may disconnect at this time. |

END

19

ZEQ.=1,SEQ=21,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1",CHK=285179,FOLIO='19',FILE="DISK012:[04PAL4.04PAL1064.EDGAR]14A_1064.CHC",USER="DNICHOL",CD='Feb 23 14:07 2004' SEQ=,FILE='QUICKLINK',USER=DNICHOL,SEQ=,EFW="2128182",CP="HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY",DN="1" TOCEXISTFLAG