Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Himatsingka Seide Ltd. Call Transcript 2018

Nov 16, 2018

59230_rns_2018-11-16_cfd221cf-2806-48e5-a99d-ff2d2526f416.pdf

Call Transcript

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Himatsingka Seide Limited

10/24, Kumara Krupa Road, High Grounds, Bangalore - 560 001, India.

Ref: SEC:0001:2:1158:KGN

November 16, 2018

BSE Ltd Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers Dalal Street Mumbai - 400 001

National Stock Exchange of India Ltd Exchange Plaza, 5 th Floor, Plot No. C/1 G Block,Bandra-Kurla Complex,Bandra(E) Mumbai - 400 051

Dear Sirs,

Sub: Transcript of conference call.

Please find enclosed a copy of transcript of conference call held on November 5, 2018.

Please also note that the transcript of conference call will also be available on our website www.himat ingka.com

This is for your information & records.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully, For Himatsingka Seide Limited

Encl: as above

Earnings Call Transcript Bengaluru, November 05, 2018

Q2 FY19 Earnings Conference Call

November 05, 2018

Moderator: Good evening
ladies and gentlemen, I am Shyamala, moderator for the
conference call.
Welcome to Himatsingka Seide 2Q FY19
post results
Conference Call
hosted by Batlivala & Karani Securities India Private Limited.
At this moment all participants are
in listen-only mode, later we will conduct a
question and answer session.
At that time if you have a question, please press *
and
1 on your telephone keypad.
Please note this conference is recorded.
I would
now
like to hand over the floor to Ms. Prerna Jhunjhunwala.
Over to you ma'am.
Prerna Jhunjhunwala: Thank you Shyamala.
Good evening everyone.
On behalf of B&K Securities
Limited, I would like to welcome
you all for 2Q FY19 post result
conference call
of Himatsingka Seide Limited.
From the Company we have with us the senior
management, including Mr. Shrikant Himatsingka, Managing Director and CEO
of the Company, Mr. Ashok Sharma, CFO –
Strategic Finance and Company
Secretary, Mr. K.P. Rangaraj, President –
Finance and Group CFO, Mr. T G S
Gupta, Senior Vice President –
Finance and CFO –
Manufacturing and
Operations and Mr. Sachin Garg –
Associate Vice President –
Finance and
Treasury and Investor Relations.
I would now like to hand over the call to the
management.
Over to you Sir!
K.P. Rangaraj: Thank you Prerna. Good evening ladies and gentlemen. My name is Rangaraj. On
behalf of the Company we would like to welcome you all on the earnings call for
the quarter ended September 2018. As usual we start this call with a business
update, followed by updates on the financials and some key accounting
treatments.
So, this will be the sequence of the call.
On the business update
section, the integration of the recently acquired brand
licenses is progressing well. The revenue uptick is visible. However, the
manufacturing integration is underway. As indicated earlier, we expect the
integration exercise
to continue through the end of FY19.
The operating progress
of the new
Spinning unit has been satisfactory and the performance parameters
are now aligned with our expectations.
The construction of the Greenfield Terry
Towel facility is progressing as per schedule and the plant is expected to come on
stream during H1 FY20, as communicated earlier.
This facility will have an
installed capacity of 25,000 metric tonnes per annum. The utilization levels at our
Sheeting facility remained stable during the quarter and we expect utilization
levels to be range bound during the H2 FY19 as well.
Revenue contribution from
brands continued its upward trend in Q2 FY19. During the quarter, revenue from
brands stood at Rs. 567 crores.
I will move on to the next section which is the consolidated financial performance
for
the quarter ended September 2018. The consolidated total income increased
by 18.0% for the quarter and stood at Rs. 698.89 crores versus Rs. 592.27 crores
for the previous year.
The consolidated EBITDA for Q2 FY19 increased by
36.1% to Rs 154.13 crores versus Rs. 113.22 crores in the previous year.
EBITDA Margin improved to 22.1%, as compared to 19.1% in the previous year,
an increase of 294 bps.
The consolidated EBIT for Q2 FY19 was up by 33.8% to
Rs. 127.86 crores versus Rs. 95.56 crores in Q2 FY18.
The consolidated PBT for

Q2 FY19 was up by 23.4% to Rs. 87.20 crores versus Rs. 70.65 crores in Q2 FY18. The consolidated PAT for the quarter was up by 4.3% and stood at Rs. 52.73 crores versus Rs. 50.56 crores in the previous year. The consolidated cash profit for Q2 FY19 was up by 15.8% to Rs. 79.00 crores versus Rs. 68.21 Crores in Q2 FY18.

So, I will now move on to the next section on H1 FY19 performance. Consolidated total income increased by 17.4% for the half year ended FY19 and stood at Rs. 1,300.27 crores versus Rs. 1,107.43 crores for H1 FY18. The consolidated EBITDA, excluding non-recurring expense, for the half year increased by 31.1% to Rs. 295.43 crores versus Rs. 225.37 crores in H1 FY18. EBITDA Margin, excluding the non-recurring expense stood at 22.7% as compared to 20.4% in the previous year, an increase of 237 bps. The nonrecurring expense incurred in Q1 FY19 stood at Rs.6.99 crores towards the recent brand acquisition, which we had mentioned to you earlier. Consolidated EBIT: The consolidated EBIT excluding non-recurring expense for H1 FY19 was up by 27.3% to Rs. 242.86 crores versus Rs. 190.71 crores in H1 FY18. Consolidated PBT: Consolidated PBT, excluding the non-recurring expense, for the half year ended 30th September,2018 was up by 17.8% to Rs. 165.65 crores versus Rs. 140.58 crores in H1 FY18. The consolidated PAT for the half year stood at Rs. 97.30 crores versus Rs. 101.19 crores in the previous year. The consolidated cash profit for the half year was up by 10.3% to Rs. 149.86 crores versus Rs. 135.84 crores in the previous year.

I will now move on to the debt profile section. The consolidated gross debt as of 30th September 2018 stood at Rs. 2,510 crores. The total term debt stood at Rs. 1,564 crores and the working capital debt stood at Rs.946 crores. The cash and cash equivalent as of 30th September 2018 was Rs.242 crores. Consequently, the company's net debt outstanding as of 30th September stood at Rs. 2,268 crores.

I will now focus on leverage ratios which have been computed on a TTM basis. The net debt excluding the project work in progress debt, to EBITDA stood at 3.97 time for the quarter ended 30 September 2018, as against 4.2 times at the end of FY18. The debt service coverage ratio(DSCR) stood at 2.28 times at the end of Q2 FY19 as against 2.34 at the end of FY18. Interest service coverage ratio(ISCR) at the end of Q2 FY19 was 3.41 times as against 3.80 times for FY18. The Net debt to Equity ratio stood at 1.76 times at the end of Q2 FY19 versus 1.63 times at the end of FY18. The Net Debt, excluding the project work in progress debt, to equity ratio stood at 1.65 times at the end of Q2 FY19 versus 1.59 times at the end of FY18.

Capital efficiency ratios computed on a TTM basis. The Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), excluding the capital employed in projects work in progress, for the quarter ended 30th September 2018 stood at 14.6% compared to 13.9% at the end of the previous year. The Return on Equity ratio stood at 16.4% at the end of Q2 FY19, compared to 17.6% at the end of FY18. On an annualized basis, the Return on Capital Employed, excluding the capital employed in projects work in progress, stood at 15.9% and the Return on Equity ratio on an annualized basis stood at 17.0% at the end of the first half of the year.

I will move on to the last section, which is our comment and observations on the financial results for the quarter and the half year.

Forex: We continue to witness headwinds on the forex realization front, despite recent depreciation of the rupee. We expect to witness the pressure on the forex realization till the Q3 of FY 19 due to our forex hedging policy that typically covers forex exposure on a rolling twelve months' basis.

Other income: The other income of Rs.32.93 crores should be considered as a part of revenue from operations, as it predominantly arises from foreign exchange movements relating, pertaining to the sales realizations, such classification is arising out of applicable accounting standards.

Lastly, the tax rates. The effective tax rate for Q2 FY 19 is higher on account of non-availability of deferred tax in subsidiaries.

With this, I would like to complete my update. We will be happy to take on your questions now. I now hand over to our Managing Director, Mr. Shrikant Himatsingka.

Shrikant Himatsingka: Please go ahead with your questions.

Moderator: Ladies and gentlemen, if you have any questions, please press * and 1 on your telephone keypad.

We have the first question coming from Mr. Nitin Dharmavat from RM Capital. Please go ahead with your question.

since the prices might have softened a bit? So, I just wanted to know from that

Nitin Dharmavat: Thank you for the opportunity. Just wanted to know the trend in the cotton prices now during the quarter and also the impact on our realizations, if we are already maintaining some inventory, how would it impact given the immediate and the next quarter?

Shrikant Himatsingka: The cotton prices have seen an uptick during Q1 and Q2. So, it has had a marginal impact on our operating numbers. But, the prices are now stable. And we feel that looking through into H2, they are likely to be stable from where they are presently.

Nitin Dharmavat: Okay, got it. And will there be any impact due to the inventory that we maintain,

perspective as well.

Shrikant Himatsingka: No, the numbers we are seeing are after the inflation that we have seen on the cotton front. And so I don't think there will be any specific inventory impact as such.

Nitin Dharmavat: Okay, got it.
Thank you.
Moderator: Thank you Sir.
We have the next question coming from Mr. Nihal Jham from
Edelweiss.
Please go ahead with your question.
Nihal Jham: Hi
Sir.
First of all, I wish the entire management team a very Happy Diwali.
Sir,
the
first question was in the revenue growth that we are seeing, is there any
impact of the recent acquisitions or is all the growth purely organic growth?
Shrikant Himatsingka: No, there is an impact of the recent acquisition and so I think it is fair to say that
there is both
organic and an impact of the recent acquisition.
So, we are seeing
both together.
And so we are quite happy with the revenue uptick, because it is
the highest revenue we have clocked for a quarter.
But, as far as the brand
acquisition is concerned, while the revenue uptick is visible, the manufacturing
integration is currently underway.
As I said earlier, we will probably see this in
manufacturing integration carry on through until the end of FY19.
Nihal Jham: Sir, is it possible to say what was the organic growth for this quarter?
Shrikant Himatsingka: We can't you give you specific break up.
But, we did share with you all that the
revenue portfolio of the brands that we acquired was in the region of \$60 million.
And the revenues were likely to be largely back ended on an annualized basis.
Please do recall that we acquired the brands only effective end of May, so we lost
the first couple of months, so that
needs to be suitably adjusted.
So, we
are
tracking online with those portfolio numbers vis-à-vis the acquisition.
And we are
also seeing healthy organic
growth
rates during the quarter.
Nihal Jham: Okay, sure Sir.
What was the quantum of the forex income in our other income
for this quarter specifically?
Shrikant Himatsingka: There is nothing called forex income.
As Mr. Rangaraj, our Group CFO
explained, other income is an integral part of the total revenue, because lots of the
forex movements, some of them sit in
revenue and some as per accounting
standards sit in other income.
So, it cannot be looked at in isolation as foreign
exchange income.
There is no such concept.
Nihal Jham: But, I believe we do classify it under a separate item
as well it is clubbed, so just
wanted
to understand the quantum, that is
the
only thing for comparison
purposes.
Shrikant Himatsingka: Other than some
treasury income, it is largely, foreign exchange led, which
we
will be happy to explain to you offline.
Nihal Jham: Okay, sure sir.
And if I had to just check on our expenses, I see that there has
been an increase in the employee expenses, if I look at it sequentially.
Is this
related to say, a higher ramp up in the spinning unit or is there some other reason
for it?
Shrikant Himatsingka: No, I guess it is across, because we are also seeing an uptick in revenue.
So, we
have seen some come from spinning, some from our recent acquisitions and so
on.
So, I think it is a factor of several buckets, but nothing in particular to report
home about.
Nihal Jham: Okay.
And just last set of questions on the spinning unit, is the utilization of say,
close to 100% or full capacity that we can achieve on the unit or is there still
room for that to improve?
Shrikant Himatsingka: So, there is some, as we had said in our update, the operating performance of the
spinning unit is now aligned to our expectations.
So, there could be some
marginal movement from here.
But, it has broadly aligned.
While this journey has
unfolded in terms of stabilizing the spinning unit, some of our more specialized
businesses have also seen some
headwinds.
For example, our Drapery and
Upholstery
manufacturing division and some of our niche brands have also seen
some headwinds.
So, it has taken away some of the sheen from the operating
performance that spinning brought in.
But, hopefully going forward we will be
gradually addressing that.
Nihal Jham: Sir, absolutely.
Sir, my last question was just on that, when I say compare your
numbers, it is still the benefit of spinning is
still to be seen in the EBITDA
accruing.
So, could the explanation be, as you mentioned that maybe the drapery
and the niche brands are
somehow not performed as per track, but spinning is still
giving us the contribution EBITDA that we have been expecting?
Shrikant Himatsingka: You are removing the other income and looking at the numbers.
Please don't do
that.
It will give you misleading statistics.
If you see the EBITDA, it has gone
from, let's say if I look at
Q2 FY18, from 113 crores to 154 crores.
And we have
seen, even if you look at the standalone, which I don't urge you to look at in
isolation, but since you have asked this question, Q2 FY18 standalone EBITDA
was 102 crores, which is now at 142 crores.
So,
it is not like the spinning
EBITDA is not coming through.
Please do not subtract other income and look at
numbers.
It will give you misleading estimates vis-à-vis the current, given the
current accounting standards that are in force with regards to the FX
income and
so on.
So, spinning EBITDA is absolutely coming through.
But, I would like to
add that some of our smaller divisions have given us some headwinds and has
taken some of the sheen off, in addition I would also like to remind investors that
the numbers that you have seen for both Q1 and Q2 on a YoY basis, we have an
impact of approximately 200 basis points on manufacturing revenue.
We have
impact of approximately 200 basis points, which is the result of the retraction of
certain incentives on the export front.
In addition, we are also suffering YoY with
regards to foreign exchange realizations, because we have a simple hedging
policy wherein we had hedged approximately a year forward.
So, as Rangaraj
mentioned in his update, we are not realizing the
full benefit of the Rupee or
anywhere close to it.
In fact YoY we are impacted by the Rupee.
So, if you look
at the YoY, our EBITDA increase is despite the lower realization on the Rupee
and despite approximately 200 basis points being taken away on export
incentives and despite other headline inflation numbers that are in the ordinary
course of business.
Nihal Jham: Okay, sure.
I will take this offline with you and I will get back in the queue.
Thank you.
Moderator: Thank you Sir.
Ladies and gentlemen, if you have any questions, please press *
and 1 on your telephone keypad.
We have the next question coming from Mr. Tushar Jain from India Infoline
Securities.
Please go ahead with your question.
Tushar Jain: Hello.
Hi
Sir, thank you for the opportunity.
Sir, I just wanted to understand the
classification
of the purchase of traded goods and cost of material consumed, like
what all products are in those two categories.
And have we reclassified last
quarter's numbers?
Shrikant Himatsingka: Typically purchases of
stock and trade are products that the Group has not
manufactured.
And obviously the cost of raw materials consumed is with regard
to what we have consumed within the group.
So, that is really the difference in
the classification.
Tushar Jain: And have we reclassified it from the last quarter?
Shrikant Himatsingka: Yeah.
There might have been some reclassifications.
Please get in touch and the
team will explain it to you off line.
Tushar Jain: Okay.
Thank you Sir.
Moderator: Thank you sir.
We have the next question coming from Mr. Raunak from Value
Quest.
Please go ahead with your question Raunak sir.
Raunak: Good evening sir.
Sir, I would like to know,
what is the non-recurring expense
that
has happened in this quarter?
Shrikant Himatsingka: Raunak, the non-recurring expense was incurred in Q1 to the tune of Rs.6.99
crores, which was sitting in other expenses, but was non-recurring in nature,
because those expenses related to the acquisition that we carried out during the
quarter.
Raunak: Sir, but if you look
at your numbers, your EBITDA comes to around Rs.121
crores in
terms
of
the absolute numbers, if you exclude the other income from
it.
Shrikant Himatsingka: Raunak, please do not subtract other income from the computations, because it
will give you a skewed view.
The other income is an integral part of revenue.
Given the current accounting standards, a lot of the foreign exchange movements
in the ordinary course of business rests
in the other income line.
And therefore
that is what the standard prescribes.
Some of it sits in sales and some in the other
income.
So, it is an integral part.
My request is not to look at it without other
income please.
Raunak: Sir, in this quarter there is no onetime non-recurring expense?
Shrikant Himatsingka: That is correct.
Raunak: Okay sir.
Thanks a lot and all the best.
Moderator: Thank you Sir.
We have the next question coming from Mr. Hardik Solanki from
Moneybee Investment Advisors.
Please go ahead with your question.
Hardik Solanki: Sir, congratulations on a good set of numbers.
Shrikant
Himatsingka:
Thank you.
Hardik Solanki: There are couple of questions from my side.
First one is relating to what would be
the break up between the trading goods and our own manufacturing?
Secondly,
what would be our current capacity, your utilization rate of bedding, Sheeting?
Shrikant Himatsingka: So, I will attempt to answer both these questions as accurately as I can.
As far as
your first question is concerned with regards to the break up between materials
consumed and purchase of stock in trade, ideally about 75% of the Group's
requirements are in-house sourced and 20% to 25% of the required goods
are not
sourced in-house, because typically those products
are something that we do not
manufacture.
The current numbers during H1 may not be reflective of that ratio,
because the recent acquisition of the brand portfolio which we announced during
the last quarter.
As I said earlier, the manufacturing integration
is still underway.
In other words, we have not started making the amount of goods for the acquired
brand portfolio that we should.
The transition is currently underway and that
should reduce the traded goods quantum vis-à-vis that portfolio.
But, on a stable
state basis, we presume that we will be in the region of 75% in-house and 25%
outsourced.
With regard to your second question on sheeting utilization numbers,
so the sheeting utilization numbers remains steady during the first half.
And we
expect it to
be range bound during the second half.
When we had commissioned
the plant, we had spoken with investors and subsequently as well we have spoken
with investors saying that approximately 40% to 50% of the plant's incremental
capacity that was coming on stream was likely to be placed upon commission,
which is what we had achieved.
So, basically we had doubled the capacity as you
recall from 23 to 46
MMPA.
And of the incremental 23 MMPA, close to let's say
11½-12 MMPA was something that we had said
we would place, which is the
case.
Over and above that over the last few quarters, we have crept up a little
further.
And we continue to look for profitable opportunities to increase
utilization.
And the manufacturing integration that is currently underway for the
brands will aid that effort.
So, we will see marginal increase in utilization going
forward.
And also, I would also like to let investors know that we have the ability

to debottleneck our capacities
to 60-61 million meters per annum, should it be
required with a very marginal Capex.
Hardik Solanki: Okay.
Thank you Sir. On
Terry Towel, so just
in case I missed out, at what stage
are we there in our Terry towels
expansion plant
and have we completed our
Capex?
Shrikant Himatsingka: Yeah.
The Capex
for the Terry Towel project is on schedule.
We had
communicated with the investors that the plant is likely to be commissioned
during the first half of FY
2020.
We believe we are on schedule
and the progress
on the project is satisfactory.
Hardik Solanki: Okay.
And sir, what volume can we catch on this 25,000 tons in terms of revenue
wise?
Shrikant Himatsingka: It depends on the product mix.
So, there is no specific number I can attach to the
revenues, potential revenue stream that can arise from a capacity of this kind.
But, let's say, the industry has an average realization of close to 4.5
to 5 dollars a
kg on the Terry front, on the thumb rule basis, is what the industry might clock.
So, that should give you a broad idea.
Normally we do better than
industry, like
in the case of Sheeting, while we don't share specific realization numbers, our
Sheeting realization numbers are materially superior to the industry.
Hardik Solanki: Okay.
That was helpful.
Thank you sir and I will get back in the queue.
Moderator: Thank you sir.
We have the next question coming from Mr. Hem Agrawal, an
Individual Investor.
Please go ahead with your question.
Hem Agrawal: Good evening
Sir.
Shrikant Himatsingka: Good evening.
Hem Agrawal: Sir, I would like to know, we spoke earlier about the European business
reorganization.
So, I would like to know what is the status of it and from when
can we expect some revenue and margins profits
from that business sir?
Shrikant Himatsingka: It is a good question Hem.
We are still at it.
Obviously this is not an assignment.
It is a journey that is going to unfold.
The Group is leveraging its brand portfolio
and other strengths to address the European market.
It is more fragmented than
the market in the
North America.
There is no doubt about it.
We are also doing
some reorganization work around our Bellora
brand and bringing it onto a new
sort of
platform in terms of model products, brand profile and so on.
So, I think
the focus on Europe is as intense as it was.
But, the results
in terms
of revenue
from Europe look
like they are a little slower than we anticipated.
So, the efforts
are on.
And it remains an area of focus.
Hem Agrawal: Okay.
But, the business potential, you can see,
it is just a question of time, is it?
Shrikant Himatsingka: Yes, there is definitely potential on the European front.
It is just that the results
from Europe are
not as quick as one would have wanted.
But, we do believe
Europe is a very major region, which it is.
And we do believe that we have
enormous potential to grow there.
And we are working on ways to harness our
potential in that region.
Hem Agrawal: Okay sir.
Thank you very much and keep up the good work sir.
Always a
pleasure.
Moderator: Thank you Sir.
We have the next question coming from Mr. Yash Pal Madan, an
Individual Investor.
Please go ahead with your question.
Yash Pal Madan: Good evening Mr. Himatsingka.
Shrikant Himatsingka: Good evening Sir.
Yash Pal Madan: If
I see for last many quarters, the top line was stuck between Rs.550 crores to
Rs.600 crores.
After a long time,
it has gone beyond 600 and 700.
My first
question is what had been the growth drivers, number one?
And second,
is it
sustainable in the future?
Can we see this kind of growth continuing in the
coming quarters also?
And third, what kind of EBITDA you think you will be
able to sustain if this growth is going to continue?
Shrikant Himatsingka: Okay.
Lot of loaded questions Yash Pal, but all of them are very fair and
reasonable questions.
So, as far as our uptick on revenue
is concerned, as I shared
with an investor earlier, this is primarily arising out of two factors.
One is, the
recently acquired brand portfolio, which we concluded during the first quarter of
FY19.
And the second is just underlying organic volume led
growth that we are
seeing.
And probably the third which I forgot to add was some translation impact
as well.
But, the largest of these three contributors is probably the brand
acquisitions and our organic growth.
So, that is what is driving the revenues.
And
we are also happy to see it come out of the 500 to 600 zone and come to the point
that it is at.
Going forward while we do not share any revenue guidance, the
absolute numbers of the revenues that we clocked, what I would probably say is
500 crores to 600 crores range will look little revised and maybe higher than that
band definitely at an absolute level.
The growth numbers are different question
altogether, because that is reflective and it is dependent on the denominator of the
previous year's numbers that you are comparing it with.
So, I will say that the
absolute numbers look like they are reset from the 500
crores to 600
crores zone,
look like they will be more buoyant
than that, because the acquisition effect has
kicked in as well and the organic rates
continue.
So, that is on the revenue front.
On the EBITDA front, I think our consolidated EBITDA margins should be range
bound from where we are.
It would vary from quarter to quarter a little bit based
on the product profile or the seasonality of the quarter and so on.
But, I think that
it should be range bound from here.
Yash Pal Madan: So, what percentage of cotton you buy locally or you import?
Shrikant Himatsingka: We
cannot specifically address that question Yash Pal, because our raw material
mix is sensitive in terms of information.
But, we do procure a substantial amount
of US cotton as well.
And we also consume a large amount of domestic cotton.
So, we do both.
Yash Pal Madan: I see.
So, have you been utilizing your capacity 90% plus in the last few quarters
and currently also of your production capacity?
Shrikant Himatsingka: We also don't share utilization numbers.
But, the investors just prior to you had
asked the same question.
So, our spinning capacity utilization is full.
There is no
doubt in the matter, because it is a captive unit.
As for the Sheeting capacity is
concerned, other than the 40% to 50% of the incremental capacity that
we were
supposed to utilize post commissioning the plant and which we did, post that we
have clawed
at an organic growth rate on the utilization front.
So, we have some
more utilization headroom in the Sheeting plant.
And as I shared, we have the
ability to debottleneck the plant from the 46 MMPA number to 61 MMPA at very
short notice and extremely marginal Capex.
Yash Pal Madan: I have one simple request or suggestion, if you wish to consider.
As we track
other companies also in the sector, when it comes to utilization, they do share the
numbers.
That gives some idea to the investors somewhere what kind of growth
potential the company
has.
Let's say if somebody is already utilizing 95%-100%
capacity, then definitely the
top line growth is least expected, so
then
the investor
can decide what the investor wants to do.
I think you are keeping so much
information with you and not sharing it in presentation or in the conference call,
which doesn't give us any futuristic view.
Even if you don't want to give the
numbers or the projections, it is fine.
But, at least these numbers I think are basic
which lot of companies share.
Shrikant Himatsingka: Fair
point Yash Pal, we will definitely think about this feedback of yours and
come back with some suggestions and thoughts.
Yash Pal Madan: Thanks a lot.
Thank you.
All the best.
Moderator: Thank you sir.
Ladies and gentlemen, if you have any questions, please press *
and 1 on your telephone keypad.
We have the next question coming from Mr. Venkat Subramaniyan
from Organic
Capital.
Please go ahead with your question.
Venkat Subramaniyan: Thanks for the opportunity sir.
Our judgment is that we have a couple of nice
headwinds appear, nice tailwinds for us beginning next year.
But, can we
probably get to 2.5
kind of number for debt to EBITDA by the next year, just as a
broad indication?
We have currency in our favor.
We will have a Terry Towel
capacity in place.
Shrikant Himatsingka: When you measure debt to EBITDA, you take Net debt to EBITDA or gross?
Venkat Subramaniyan: What would be
it actually on either one of them, because our PAT is just about
250 crores, right?
Shrikant Himatsingka: Yeah.
So, what we track is
Net debt to EBITDA.
And on an annualized basis, as
Rangaraj
pointed out it is heading towards 3.6 number on an annualized basis.
On
a TTM basis it is 3.97.
So, all I would say is that it should head south from here
after the Capex is complete, maybe 2.5
is a little aggressive.
Venkat Subramaniyan: But, south of 3 is very possible, right?
Shrikant Himatsingka: I wouldn't say that either.
I wouldn't comment yes or no.
I am saying that from
3.97 it will start heading south after the Capex is complete.
Naturally, because
our
Capex schedule will stand completed vis-à-vis this phase of
expansion and
the EBITDA from the assets that have been commissioned will kick in.
So, the
number will start going south as it already has, because at the end of FY18,
during the same quarter it stood at 4.2 times, which is now 3.97 times.
Venkat Subramaniyan: But, I don't know whether
we are getting more aggressive than yours, but
currency, since you are fully hedged for the current year, it will become a very
meaningful tailwind for us, so that the rate of drop should be lot more meaningful
than just the 0.3?
Shrikant Himatsingka: Yeah, I think I shared my thoughts on this.
The rest of the math is your
computation.
Venkat Subramaniyan: Okay Sir.
Thanks.
Moderator: Thank you Sir.
We have the next question coming from Mr. Rajesh
from Alpha
Accurate Advisors.
Please go ahead with your question.
Rajesh: Good evening Sir.
Shrikant Himatsingka: Good evening.
Rajesh: Sir, my question is while your currency has depreciated and there might be some
benefit at some point of time, I am sure the clients are efficient enough and
therefore beyond a point you have to pass it on the currency benefit to remain
competitive.
So, do you think it is a sustainable benefit or is it, do you think it is
more of a one off, onetime benefit maybe for three-six months at some point of
time
as your hedging
gets over?
But, ultimately the new pricing that you are
entering will be lower in INR terms although it might be same in
dollar terms?
Shrikant Himatsingka: It is a fair question.
This
is my own thinking and thoughts on this matter.
It may
or may not apply to the industry obviously.
Typically,
large foreign exchange
movements are not sustainable in terms of benefits.
And some of it gets eroded
away in terms of re-pricing and so on.
So, I would think that currency
movements, being export oriented currency movements are ordinary costs
movements that we see from time to time.
And the one we have recently
witnessed will give some tailwinds and maybe some of that tailwind
will get
eaten away and some will remain.
How much remains and how much gets eaten
away, we will know as we get closer to the time
periods.
But, typically some
benefits tend to stay in the system,
which are organic in nature.
So, organic FX
movements, 4%, 5%, 7% tend to be sustainable.
As we see it sometimes, beyond
that gets eaten away.
But, that remains to be seen as we get closer to the quarter.
Rajesh: Understood.
And just one little bit technical question in nature that we see lot of,
within the shareholders, what I would say, promoters or family disclosure to the
exchanges, lot of transactions.
Can you little bit clarify on this?
How much
percent
stake is still there and how much is yet to
be sold or something like that,
in case if you have any idea if it is a defined
kind of thing?
Shrikant Himatsingka: No, the promoters have disclosed whole
47.57%.
We have not sold anything.
And we have no transactions of any sort.
So, I don't know what you are referring
to.
Rajesh: No, they may not be
classified as promoters, but same
family, there are some
members, am I right, in the disclosure?
Shrikant Himatsingka: For any
family members, who are public shareholders and are not part of the
family, are not part of the promoter group, their shareholding and or their selling
and buying activities are not something we are privy to.
And it is entirely public
shareholding matter.
We have no knowledge of this to share with you.
Rajesh: Okay Sir.
Fair enough.
Thank you very much.
Moderator: Thank you Sir.
Ladies and gentlemen, if you have any questions, please press *
and 1 on your telephone keypad.
We have the next question coming from Ms. Prerna.
Please go ahead with your
question ma'am.
Prerna: Thank you.
Sir, I would like to understand the question of EBITDA margin
sustainability going forward.
What would be the sustainable EBITDA margin?
You have answered this question earlier, but I wanted to understand that even
after Spinning plant
has come up and taking away, and keeping the forex related
cost or income aside, shouldn't our sustainable EBITDA margin be a
little higher
than the current rate?
Shrikant Himatsingka: No Prerna, if I see on a consolidated basis, our EBITDA margin
was
approximately, we are in the 22% region as we saw.
And I shared with the
investor earlier that we should be range bound from here vis-à-vis the 18% we
used to see, 18.0%-18.5% we used to see earlier.
So, we have added a good 300-
350 basis points from there.
But, I
see it range bound from here.
Prerna: Okay.
Any particular cost that you are seeing, which would be impacting the
numbers, because
apart from export incentives if I see, cotton costs have gone up,

and various obligations and so on.
So, while you attempt to look at the standalone
to get a better feel of the Indian assets, what I am saying is, you are more than
welcome to do that, but you may land up making some erroneous inferences.
So,
my request is to please look at consolidated financials.
Prerna: Okay.
So, this has been helpful sir.
Thank you.
Shrikant Himatsingka: Yes, thank you.
Moderator: Thank you ma'am.
We have the next question coming from Mr. Sunil Jain from
Nirmal Bang Securities.
Please go ahead with your question sir.
Sunil Jain: Good evening
Sir.
My question relates to working capital loan.
In the past
we
have seen that because of GST that has increased, so is there any scope for it to
come down in the coming period?
Shrikant Himatsingka: Can you please repeat your question?
Sunil Jain: We saw working capital loan increasing because of GST also in the past.
You
explained that in the previous calls that because of GST our working capital cycle
has increased.
So, is that reverting back or are we still impacted by
GST?
Shrikant Himatsingka: No, I think the GST thing is largely normalized.
And working capital has also
corrected a little bit over the last couple of quarters.
There could be some
movement because of the recent acquisition and its working capital requirements.
But, there is no GST congestion like there used to be at the end of Q4 FY18.
Sunil Jain: The second question is relating to your,
whatever acquisitions which you have
done.
You will be definitely doing manufacturing
integration, so that should
increase your utilization or Sheeting
capacity
in the second half.
Am I correct or
not?
Shrikant Himatsingka: That is correct.
Sunil Jain: So, will that be very minimal or it can be substantial?
Shrikant Himatsingka: It could be material.
Sunil Jain: Great sir.
And
sir, last question is relating to Terry Towels.
Sir, this Terry Towels
whatever the production will be coming, they will be, are we sourcing it from a
third party and then replacing it with other production or how the function will
be?
Shrikant Himatsingka: No, we will be manufacturing it in-house.
Currently because the plant is under
construction we are sourcing it from third parties.
Of course that is not a very
large amount, because the segment for that is small.
But, as soon as our plant is
ready, we will be making it in-house and we will be focused on ramping up that
segment.
Sunil Jain: Okay.
Great Sir.
Thank you very much.
Shrikant Himatsingka: Thank you.
Moderator: Thank you Sir.
That will be the last question for the day due to time constraints.
Now, I hand over the floor to the management team for closing comments.
Over
to you Sir!
Shrikant Himatsingka: Thank you everybody for taking the time for this call this evening.
If there are any
questions that have remained unanswered or we have requested you to reach us
offline, please do so.
We will be happy to clarify all your queries and doubts.
And we look forward to our next interaction with you.
Thank you very much.
Moderator: Thank you Sir.
Ladies and gentlemen this concludes your conference call for
today.
Thank you for your participation and for using Door Sabha's conference
call service.
You may all disconnect your lines now.
Thank you and you all have
a great day.