HELIX RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2025

Mar 27, 2025

ASX Announcement 28 March 2025

==> picture [195 x 88] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [25 x 24] intentionally omitted <==

Helix Diversifies with Acquisition of White Hills Copper-Gold Project, Arizona.

• Helix enters conditional binding agreements to acquire the White Hills copper-gold project in Arizona, USA comprising a total of 7 tenements over 23 km[2] .

• Located in the Arizona Arc, a belt prospective for copper-gold porphyry and IOCG deposits, which also lies within the southern part of the Nevada Walker Lane gold trend, host to several multi-million ounce gold deposits in Arizona.

• Previous work undertaken included soil and rock chip sampling, airborne geophysics (magnetics and radiometrics), ground gravity, airborne hyperspectral, and 10 historical drillholes that were only analysed for gold. Rock chip and soil samples contain multiple areas of copper and gold anomalism.

• The project is easily accessible year-round with a 1.5 hours road journey from Las Vegas and has excellent infrastructure, being ~50 km from the revitalised Mineral Park copper porphyry mining operation.

• The acquisition is viewed as complimentary to Helix’s existing Cobar copper-gold assets. Helix continues to undertake a whole of project review of the Cobar assets to obtain the best outcomes for shareholders, which may include joint ventures.

Helix’s Executive Chairman, Mike Povey commented:

“The addition of the White Hills project in Northern Arizona provides the Company with an exciting opportunity in a part of the world renowned for producing world-class copper/gold deposits. The results of geochemical exploration to date has provided compelling evidence of a copper/gold system that is the best candidate that I have seen in many years for more intensive exploration efforts.

Our intention is to move as quickly as possible in our evaluation of White Hills and the vendors, two highly experienced geologists with an intimate knowledge of working in the western USA, will be of great help in our exploration efforts.

The board and management remain entirely focused on building long-term value for our shareholders, and we are confident this acquisition will play a key role in that growth. We look forward to progressing this outstanding opportunity”

Helix Resources Ltd ABN 27 009 138 738 | Level 4 225 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 | +61 8 93212644 ASX: HLX

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

SUMMARY

Helix Resources Limited (ASX: HLX) ( Helix or the Company ) is pleased to advise that it has entered into conditional binding letter agreements ( Binding Agreements ) with Centric Minerals Management (USA) Inc ( Centric ) and White Hills Exploration LLC (“ White Hills Exploration ”), (the Vendors ) to acquire the White Hills Project, a strategic portfolio of copper-gold tenements in Arizona, USA ( Figure 1 ) (the Project ).

The region hosts world class porphyry copper deposits and is also prospective for Iron Oxide Copper Gold (IOCG) deposits. The White Hills Project is located 50 km from the Mineral Park porphyry copper-molybdenum-silver mine operated by Waterton Copper[1] ( Figure 1 ) and comprises a package of 7 highly prospective adjoining tenements totalling 23 km[2] ( Figure 2 ) entailing:

• Five Private Mining Sublease claims (under farm-in agreement by Centric with Newmont), and

• Two State Leases held by White Hills Exploration.

==> picture [387 x 387] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: White Hills copper-gold project location in Arizona.

1 Waterton Copper is investing approximately US$600 million to execute Phase 2 of its operating plan, which will bring the site to over one hundred million pounds of copper equivalent annually. https://www.wheatonpm.com/portfolio/development-projects/mineral-park/default.aspx

2

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [391 x 538] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: White Hills Tenements showing Private Minerals Land (5 Mining Sublease claims under farm-in by Centric) and two State leases (held by White Hills Exploration).

Key Commercial Terms of the Binding Agreements (refer Appendix B for further details)

Helix entered non-binding exclusivity agreements with the Vendors in February this year and is pleased to have now reached Binding Agreements with the Vendors. The completion of the Agreement ( Settlement ) is subject to several conditions including the Company entering into formal agreements with the Vendor. Appendix B sets out the key commercial terms of each Binding Agreement, with a short high-level summary included below.

3

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Acquisition of 100% White Hills Exploration LLC: White Hills Exploration Inc holds two State leases located in Northern Arizona ( Figure 2, Table 2 ).

Acquisition of 100% of Centric Minerals Management USA Inc: Centric holds a farm-in agreement for five Mining Sublease claims held by Newmont ( Figure 2, Table 3 ). Centric is required to spend US$500,000 by 5th January 2026 in order to secure 100% of the Mining Sublease claims.

Under the agreement with the Vendors Helix can acquire 100% of the project by:

• i. Payment of A$100,000 (including A$40,000 paid to date as the exclusivity fee) for claims fee and A$60,000 on signing a Binding Letter Agreement.

• ii. A$100,000 after Formal Agreements are signed and a Capital raising by Helix of not less than A$1.0 million.

• iii. Issue of Helix FPO shares to the value of A$1.3M within 30 days of confirmation by Newmont of Helix completing the farm-In requirements of the Newmont Agreement (referenced below).

• iv. Newmont Agreement Obligations, Royalty and Buy Back Rights:

• a. Spending US$500,000 on the Mining Sublease claims by 5th January 2026 (meeting the farm in obligation so that the Mining Sublease claims will become 100% owned by Centric).

• b. Upon delivery by the Company to Newmont of a Positive Feasibility Study, the Company shall pay US$500,000 to Newmont.

• c. If the Company progresses to a pre-feasibility study (PFS) then Newmont has the right to back in. Newmont will pay to the Company 1.5 times the exploration expenditure to that point and form a 51:49% JV to develop the project.

• d. Newmont retains a production royalty of 2.5% net smelter return from the Property.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Geology and mineralisation

The White Hills project is located in the Arizona Arc ( Figure 1 ), a belt prospective for world class copper-gold porphyry and IOCG deposits[2] , which also lies within the southern part of the Nevada Walker Lane gold trend, host to several multi-million ounce gold deposits in Arizona[3] .

Originally explored for gold, the project also contains copper anomalies (refer to Historical Exploration below) that have not been adequately followed up. Given both copper and gold are present, the project is considered to have potential for porphyry or IOCG mineralisation.

Historical Exploration

Soil Sampling

Two soil programs have been undertaken in the tenements by the previous owners ( Figure 2):

• Centric (2022): 462 soil samples (incl. duplicates) undertaken on a 100m grid spacing. Sampling, analytical, and QAQC procedures are described in JORC Table 1.

2 Barton, M. 2009. IOCG Deposits: A Cordilleran Perspective. Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial SGA Meeting, Townsville 2009.

3 Barnett, C and Williams P. 2006. Mineral Exploration using modern data mining techniques. 2006 Society of Economic Geologists Special Publication 12, Chapter 15 pp 295;-310. Refer to Table 1: Deposits Exceeding 1 Moz of Gold in the Walker Lane.

4

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

• Historical samples (~2004). 3,225 soil samples undertaken on various grid spacings. No information is available on sample and QAQC procedures, however analytical protocols are known and are described in JORC Table 1.

The results from the Section 2 prospect show a 1.2 km long and 500 m wide zone of anomalous (>20 ppb) gold.

==> picture [413 x 585] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 : Location of gold in soil results within the White Hills project

5

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Rock Samples

A database of historical rock samples is available that contains 633 samples for the White Hills project ( Figure 3 ). This is unverified historical data and no information is available regarding the sampling and QAQC protocols. Individual samples are likely selective. Some samples were collected from trenches but it has not been confirmed if sampling was selective or from continuous channels. More than half (348) rock samples out of a total of 633 samples in the historical database contain gold >0.1g/t and 115 rock samples out of 633 samples in the historical database contain copper >0.1%. The highest-grade gold and copper rock chip samples respectively contain 23 g/t gold and 0.8 % copper (Sample No: 46558E69463N) and 5.7 % copper and 6.1 g/t gold (Sample No: 45502E70018N-VCU) which Helix considers as compelling evidence that a copper and gold system is present at White Hills ( Figure ). Historical rock chip samples are reported above a 0.1 g/t gold cut off in Appendix B.

==> picture [382 x 524] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3 : Location of rock samples in the White Hills project

6

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Drilling

Historical drilling (10 diamond drillholes) was completed to test the soil and rock geochemistry anomalies at White Hills ( Figure 4 , Table 1 ). The holes were only analysed for gold and an example of the gold drill intercepts is shown in Figure 5 (Drill section from DDH006). As these are historical drillholes the drilling and sampling protocols are not known, however the samples were analysed at an accredited laboratory. Helix has not verified the historical drill results.

==> picture [414 x 556] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4 : Location of drillholes in the White Hills project

7

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1 : Table of collars for drillholes.

Hole ID	Grid	UTM_East	UTM_North	UTM_RL	Az_Grid	Dip	Tot_Depth
DDH-1	WGS84 Z 11N	745213	3970188	1183.234	180	-45	99.06
DDH-2	WGS84 Z 11N	745213	3970188	1183.234	0	-90	57.912
DDH-3	WGS84 Z 11N	745209	3970126	1199.083	0	-90	137.4648
DDH-4	WGS84 Z 11N	745181	3970109	1202.741	270	-70	92.6592
DDH-5	WGS84 Z 11N	745183	3970110	1202.741	90	-70	45.72
DDH-6	WGS84 Z 11N	745173	3970027	1193.597	0	-90	69.4944
DDH-7	WGS84 Z 11N	745132	3970081	1210.97	0	-90	80.772
DDH-8	WGS84 Z 11N	745081	3970086	1211.885	0	-90	91.44
DDH-9	WGS84 Z 11N	744901	3970079	1200.912	140	-65	67.056
DDH-10	WGS84 Z 11N	745142	3970194	1189.33	220	-65	91.44

==> picture [463 x 434] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

1,175mRL 1,175mRL
1,150mRL 1,150mRL
1,125mRL 1,125mRL
745,150mE 745,175mE 745,200mE
745,150mE 745,175mE 745,200mE
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 5 : Cross Section of drillhole DDH-6 (drilled to ~70m depth) that shows typical downhole distribution of gold mineralisation in oxide rocks. Note that copper was not analysed for in drillholes.

8

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

It is the opinion of the Competent Person that the unverified historical Exploration Results (soils, rocks and drill) are reliable for a number of reasons (described further in JORC Table 1) and warrant follow-up work:

• Historical samples were analysed at accredited laboratories including American Assay Laboratories (AAL) in Nevada.

• Sampling, QAQC and analytical protocols where they are known are described in JORC Table 1.

• The 2022 soil sampling program undertaken by Centric effectively validated the presence of copper and gold in the earlier 2004 soil program.

• Gold is present in all sample mediums (rock chips, soil and drilling). Copper is present in rock chips and soil.

Geophysics and Hyperspectral Surveys.

Newmont flew a helicopter radiometric and magnetic survey plus a ground gravity survey in 2018 and has provided various modelled outputs of the data plus the raw data to Centric. These data files have been provided to an independent geophysicist for modelling with results expected in the coming month.

Centric completed an airborne hyperspectral survey in 2022 and has copies of the various raw and modelled data from the SWIR and LWIR surveys. These data sets are currently being re-modelled and interpreted with results from this work to be combined with the modelled geophysics and a report expected in the coming month.

Forward Work Programs

Following completion of Formal Agreements, Helix intends to commence preparation for a drill program testing coincident geophysical and geochemical targets. It is anticipated 2000m of diamond core will be drilled in 4 x 250m holes to confirm previously identified gold mineralisation.

Helix has undertaken to the Vendors that it will fund the programs by a capital raising of not less than A$1.0 million. This is expected to be undertaken in the second quarter 2025.

Table 2 : Two Arizona State Leases held by White Hills Exploration LLC.

==> picture [303 x 63] intentionally omitted <==

9

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Table 3 : Five Arizona Mineral Permits.

==> picture [273 x 281] intentionally omitted <==

COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT

The information in this report that relates to exploration results and geological data for the White Hills projects is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation prepared by Dr Kylie Prendergast who is an employee and shareholder of the Company. Dr Prendergast is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Dr Prendergast has sufficient experience that is relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration and to the activities being undertaken to each qualify as Competent Person(s) as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Dr Prendergast has consented to the inclusion of this information in the form and context in which it appears in this report. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in this release and that all material assumptions and technical parameters in the announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.

Forward Looking and Cautionary Statements

Some statements in this report regarding estimates or future events are forward looking statements. They include indications of, and guidance on, future earnings, cash flow, costs and financial performance. Forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements preceded by words such as “planned”, “expected”, “projected”, “estimated”, “may”, “scheduled”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “potential”, “could”, “nominal”, “conceptual” and similar expressions. Forward looking statements, opinions and estimates included in this announcement are based on assumptions and contingencies which are subject to change without notice, as are statements about market and industry trends, which are based on interpretations of current market conditions. Forward looking statements are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied on as a guarantee of future performance. Forward looking statements may be affected by a range of variables that could cause actual results to differ from estimated results, and may cause the Company’s actual performance and financial results in

10

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

future periods to materially differ from any projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to liabilities inherent in mine development and production, geological, mining and processing technical problems, the inability to obtain any additional mine licenses, permits and other regulatory approvals required in connection with mining and third party processing operations, competition for among other things, capital, acquisition of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel, incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions, changes in commodity prices and exchange rate, currency and interest fluctuations, various events which could disrupt operations and/or the transportation of mineral products, including labour stoppages and severe weather conditions, the demand for and availability of transportation services, the ability to secure adequate financing and management’s ability to anticipate and manage the foregoing factors and risks. There can be no assurance that forward looking statements will prove to be correct.

Statements regarding plans with respect to the Company’s mineral properties may contain forward looking statements in relation to future matters that can only be made where the Company has a reasonable basis for making those statements.

This announcement has been prepared in compliance with the JORC Code (2012) and the current ASX Listing Rules.

This ASX release was authorised by the Board of Directors of Helix Resources Ltd.

ABN: 27 009 138 738 Board of Directors: HLX ASX: HLX. HLXO

Mike Povey – Executive Chairman Kylie Prendergast – Non-executive Director Kevin Lynn – Non-executive Director

Contact Details: Helix Resources Limited Level 4, 225 St Georges Terrace, Company Secretary Perth, WA, 6000 Ben Donovan

==> picture [24 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

Investor Contact: Mike Povey

PO Box 7237 Cloisters Square PO Perth, WA 6850

==> picture [20 x 20] intentionally omitted <==

Email: helix@helixresources.com.au Web: www.helixresources.com.au Tel: +61 (0)8 9321 2644

About Helix Resources

Helix Resources is an ASX-listed resources company which is exploring for copper in the prolific copper producing regions of Cobar, NSW. The Company possesses a sizable ground position (~3,000 km[2] ) which is largely untested despite being located proximal to significant copper and gold producing operations.

• Helix is the operator of the Helix-Legacy earn-in which is located 10 km west of the Cobar township. The area, which hosts several operating gold, copper and base metal mines, is prospective for Cobar-style copper-gold base metal deposits.

• The Western Tenement has 30km of prospective strike and a pipeline of wholly owned copper opportunities, as well as the Canbelego JV Project.

• A 5 km by 1.5 km historical gold field is being evaluated on the Muriel Tank tenement. The Eastern Tenement Group encompasses more than 100km of prospective strike.

• The company has defined an extensive zone of new anomalies considered prospective for Tritton-style copper-gold deposits.

11

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix A: Key Commercial Terms of Binding Agreements

Acquisition

Item	Title	Terms
1	Assets	The Farm-In Agreement and associated Claims/leases located in the Gold Basin /White Hills region of Arizona USA listed inTable 2andTable 3. (theProject).
2	The Parties	Vendors: Charles Straw of 1827 The Escort Way, Borenore NSW 2800 and Calvin Heron of 1470 Shewmaker Ct. Reno NV 89509 United States of America
		Purchaser: Helix Resources Limited (Helix) (ABN 27 009 138 738) of Level 4, 225 St Georges Terrace, Perth, WA 6000.
3	Transaction Overview	Acquisitionof 100% interest in White Hills Exploration LLC and Centric Minerals Management USA Inc (Centric) a.Centric Minerals Management USA Inc and White Hills Exploration LLC (collectively Centric)) are the 100% registered and beneficial holder ofthe White Hills Farm-in Agreement and associated private minerals claims and leases detailed inTable 2and Table 3). (collectively, theProject) b. Settlementto take place in Perth on a mutually agreed date subject to satisfaction or waiver of all Conditions Precedent and Conditions .
4	Consideration	Stage 1 –Acquisition of 100% Helix to acquire 100% of White Hills Exploration LLC for the Consideration made up of: i. Payment of A$100,000 including A$40,000 paid to date for claims fee and A$60,000 on signing this Binding Letter Agreement. ii. A$100,000 after Formal Agreements are signed pursuant to clause 4c and a Capital raising by Helix of not less than A$1.0 million Stage 2- Acquisition of 100% Centric Minerals Management USA Inc iii. Issue of Helix FPO shares to the value of A$1.3M to the Vendors or their Nominee within 30 days of confirmation by Newmont, of Helix completing the farm-In requirements of the Newmont Agreement referenced in Schedule 3. iv. Helix shares are to be subject to voluntary escrow arrangements, such that no more than 1/3 of the Helix shares issued as per 4{iii} above may be sold by Centric (or its nominee/s) in each three-month period following Settlement; and v. subject to and conditional on the receipt of shareholder approval by Helix.

12

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Item	Title	Terms
5	Undertakings By Centric	a. From the date of this Agreement until the date of Settlement (Settlement Date) or the date of termination of this Agreement (whichever is earlier), Centric must (and, where relevant, will, as applicable): vi. provide all reasonable assistance to Helix with any action that Helix may take in the course of its due diligence enquiries, as required, including the transfer of all technical data in respect of the Project. vii. maintain the Project in full force and keep the Project Claims and Gold Basin (Arizona) Inc in good standing. viii. not sell, transfer, assign or otherwise deal with its interest in the Project (or part of the Project), without first obtaining Helix’s’ written consent. ix. not agree to relinquish or surrender any part of the Project or do any further act which may render any part of the Project liable to forfeiture, cancellation, revocation, termination or suspension; x. not create or allow any encumbrance over any part of the Project without Helix’s prior written consent. xi. comply with the terms of any third-party agreements in respect of the Project and not do or cause to be done anything that may cause any breach of Centric’s or Centric’s obligations under such third-party agreements (as applicable); and xii. pass on to Helix any material notices or communications that it receives about the Project (or any part of the Project) or its rights under, or any parties’ compliance with, any third-party agreements in respect of the Project from time to time. b. On the Settlement Date, Centric must: i. Deliver all Centric exploration accounts, agreements and technical data to Helix, as appropriate. ii. Procure that Charles Straw to remain a member of the Joint Venture management committee for the first earn-in phase to ensure continuity of technical knowledge, landowner and traditional owner relationships. iii. retain (or procure that any nominee receiving Helix shares retains) on an ongoing basis at least 10% of any Helix shares issued on the Centric balance sheet unless the shares are subject to an “in species” distribution issue to Centric shareholders iv. The Parties acknowledge and agree that a complete set of undertakings which are considered standard for a transaction of this nature in connection with the Project will be provided by Centric in the Formal Agreements.
8	Undertakings by Helix	a. Helix must: i. on Settlement, on payment in Helix shares, procure Helix to issue a cleansing statement in accordance with the s708A(5) of the Corporations Act or in circumstances where Helix is unable to lodge a ‘cleansing statement’, procure Helix to lodge a ‘cleansing prospectus’ under section 708A(11) of the Corporations Act.

13

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Item	Title	Terms
		ii. after Settlement, maintain tenements in good standing and provide Centric with reports recording Western Australian Mines Dept Form 5 expenditures every six months i.e. the submission version and a half-yearly interim year to date version. b. If there is any relinquishment or divestment of any part of the Project within 24 months of the Settlement Date, then Centric will have a first right of refusal in accordance with the provisions to be set out in the Formal Agreement. c. The Parties acknowledge and agree that a complete set of undertakings which are considered standard for a transaction of this nature in connection with the Project will be provided by Helix in the Formal Agreements.
9	Representations & Warranties	The Parties acknowledge and agree that the Formal Agreements will include representations, warranties and indemnities on behalf of the Parties considered customary for agreements of such nature, which shall include, but not limited to, the following seller warranties to be given by Centric (which may be varied as considered necessary by Helix following progress of its due diligence investigations): a. Proper authorisations b. Sole, legal and beneficial ownership of the Project (including in respect of licences and applications) c. Confirmation of no ‘pending’ actions or third-party claims against Centric or the Project d. Solvency of Centric e. Full disclosure of all information that any prospective purchaser would reasonably require to make a decision on acquiring the Project.

Appendix B: Significant results in rock samples (reported >0.1 g/t Au).

Sample_No#	UTM_E_WGS84	UTM_N_WGS84	ExplorCo	ExplorYear	Au ppm	Ag_ppm	Cu_%	Fe %
46558E69463N	746479	3969661	NPMC	2003-2010	23.2	60.0	0.8	2.96
45285E69909N	745206	3970107	NPMC	2003-2010	18.3	1.4	0.0	12.7
45150E69911N	745071	3970109	NPMC	2003-2010	15.0	0.7	0.0	11.1
45283E69907NAS	745204	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	14.6	0.0	0.0	8.84
45249E-69891N	745170	3970089	NPMC	2003-2010	14.4	1.5	0.1	5.51
45286E-69965N	745207	3970163	NPMC	2003-2010	10.0	18.7	4.4	3.61
46821E-70255N	746742	3970453	NPMC	2003-2010	9.2	1.3	1.0	7.8
45288E-69962N	745209	3970160	NPMC	2003-2010	8.9	4.3	1.8	3.4
45297E69926N	745218	3970124	NPMC	2003-2010	7.9	13.9	1.3	7.98
45289E69908N	745210	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	7.9	0.0	0.0	8.07
46029E69864N	745950	3970062	NPMC	2003-2010	7.7	2.0	0.3	8.39
45287E69926N	745208	3970124	NPMC	2003-2010	6.5	1.2	2.9	8.88

14

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Sample_No#	UTM_E_WGS84	UTM_N_WGS84	ExplorCo	ExplorYear	Au ppm	Ag_ppm	Cu_%	Fe %
227293	745716.18	3970272.7	NPMC	Pre-2003	6.2	0.4	0.0	0
45502E70018N-VCU	745423	3970216	NPMC	2003-2010	6.1	1.1	5.7	9.83
46037E69868N	745958	3970066	NPMC	2003-2010	6.0	1.5	2.0	9.66
45285E69938NA	745206	3970136	NPMC	2003-2010	5.8	0.0	2.3	5.56
45248E69888N	745169	3970086	NPMC	2003-2010	5.7	0.0	0.1	7.15
45284E69947NA	745205	3970145	NPMC	2003-2010	5.3	0.0	1.4	5.08
745470E-970042N	745391	3970240	NPMC	2003-2010	5.3	2.4	1.7	8.92
AB-11-3-7	745581	3970023	NPMC	2003-2010	5.0	1.0	0.0	7.37
5500-70020	745421	3970218	NPMC	2003-2010	4.3	1.6	4.8	7.65
AB-11-2-2	745521	3970218	NPMC	2003-2010	4.3	1.6	4.8	7.65
45247E69885N	745168	3970083	NPMC	2003-2010	4.1	0.0	0.0	4.04
45287E-69921N	745208	3970119	NPMC	2003-2010	3.8	9.5	1.1	5.92
45255E69909N	745176	3970107	NPMC	2003-2010	3.7	0.0	0.1	6.911
45212E-69858N	745133	3970056	NPMC	2003-2010	3.6	-0.3	0.0	4.28
45286E69926NA(36)	745207	3970124	NPMC	2003-2010	2.9	0.0	0.9	5.29
45247E69881N	745168	3970079	NPMC	2003-2010	2.8	0.0	0.0	5.8
46053E69906N	745974	3970104	NPMC	2003-2010	2.8	0.5	1.4	9.21
E45147E69913N	745067	3970112	NPMC	2003-2010	2.7	-0.3	0.0	11
AB-11-4-7	745636	3970080	NPMC	2003-2010	2.7	5.0	0.9	5.79
46556E-69468N	746477	3969666	NPMC	2003-2010	2.6	1.7	0.0	3.32
45248E69890N	745169	3970088	NPMC	2003-2010	2.5	0.0	0.0	4.88
45285E69953N	745206	3970151	NPMC	2003-2010	2.5	0.0	1.1	3.83
5500E-70023N B	745421	3970221	NPMC	2003-2010	2.4	1.1	3.8	8.48
45307E-69944N	745228	3970142	NPMC	2003-2010	2.3	3.4	0.1	3.2
45286E-69966N	745207	3970164	NPMC	2003-2010	2.3	5.5	1.1	3.16
45507E70010N	745428	3970208	NPMC	2003-2010	2.2	-0.3	0.0	3.28
45377E69755N	745298	3969953	NPMC	2003-2010	2.2	0.4	0.0	3.31
45328E-69933N	745249	3970131	NPMC	2003-2010	2.2	22.6	1.1	3.95
45473E69464N	745394	3969662	NPMC	2003-2010	1.9	-0.3	0.2	3.83
45147E69893N	745068	3970091	NPMC	2003-2010	1.9	0.9	0.0	7.13
46208E-68850N	746129	3969048	NPMC	2003-2010	1.8	0.7	0.0	9.71
745500E-970024N	745491	3970240	NPMC	2003-2010	1.8	0.6	3.0	6.66
45249E69878N	745170	3970076	NPMC	2003-2010	1.7	2.2	0.0	3.42
45147E69918N	745068	3970116	NPMC	2003-2010	1.7	0.0	0.1	7.54
45376E69757N	745298	3969956	NPMC	2003-2010	1.5	0.8	0.0	4.44
45505E70013N	745426	3970211	NPMC	2003-2010	1.5	-0.3	0.0	3.18
45380E69835N	745301	3970033	NPMC	2003-2010	1.5	0.0	0.3	6.931
45286E69921N	745207	3970119	NPMC	2003-2010	1.4	0.5	2.7	5.49
5517E10024N	745438	3970222	NPMC	2003-2010	1.4	0.4	1.5	4.53
45146E69912N	745067	3970110	NPMC	2003-2010	1.4	0.0	0.0	5.48
45871E69745N	745792	3969943	NPMC	2003-2010	1.3	0.6	1.8	4.4
46557E69472N	746478	3969670	NPMC	2003-2010	1.2	12.4	0.0	2.64
45293E-69953N	745214	3970151	NPMC	2003-2010	1.2	20.3	2.8	5.44
45286E69908N	745207	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	1.2	0.0	0.0	4.64
45285E69911N	745206	3970109	NPMC	2003-2010	1.2	0.0	0.0	6.12
45271E69907NA	745192	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	1.1	0.0	0.0	4.331

15

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Sample_No#	UTM_E_WGS84	UTM_N_WGS84	ExplorCo	ExplorYear	Au ppm	Ag_ppm	Cu_%	Fe %
45147E69928N44M	745068	3970126	NPMC	2003-2010	1.1	0.0	0.0	3.69
45244E69876N	745165	3970074	NPMC	2003-2010	1.1	0.0	0.0	3.66
45285E69917NA	745206	3970115	NPMC	2003-2010	1.0	0.0	0.0	5.19
45245E69938N	745166	3970136	NPMC	2003-2010	1.0	0.0	0.0	4.64
45146E69941N	745067	3970139	NPMC	2003-2010	0.9	0.7	0.0	4.74
45146E69892N	745067	3970090	NPMC	2003-2010	0.9	0.0	0.0	4.86
45471E69384N	745392	3969582	NPMC	2003-2010	0.9	-0.3	0.0	3.84
45285E69955N	745206	3970153	NPMC	2003-2010	0.9	0.0	0.7	3.57
45280E69907N	745201	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.9	0.0	0.0	4.111
45284E69932N	745205	3970130	NPMC	2003-2010	0.8	0.0	0.2	4.35
45145E69891N	745066	3970089	NPMC	2003-2010	0.8	0.0	0.0	4.48
46418E-69820N	746339	3970018	NPMC	2003-2010	0.8	0.5	1.8	2.74
45247E69991N	745168	3970189	NPMC	2003-2010	0.8	0.0	0.0	2.5
45247E69973N-B	745168	3970171	NPMC	2003-2010	0.8	0.0	0.0	2.3
T5 45504E-70010N	745425	3970208	NPMC	2003-2010	0.8	0.0	0.0	1.24
45289E-69961N	745210	3970159	NPMC	2003-2010	0.8	-0.3	0.0	3.84
T5 45498E-70019N	745419	3970217	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.0	0.1	2.14
45853E69827N	745774	3970025	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	-0.3	0.1	3.62
5712E-9883N	745633	3970081	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.4	0.2	6.511
45148E69939N	745069	3970137	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.0	0.1	3.16
45289E69908NA	745210	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.0	0.0	4.78
5401E9942N	745322	3970140	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.8	0.0	3.91
45323E-69941N	745244	3970139	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.4	0.1	3.28
45285E69935N	745206	3970133	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.0	0.1	4.09
45285E69972N	745206	3970170	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.0	0.1	3.01
45146E69895N	745067	3970093	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.0	0.0	3.57
45246E69926N	745167	3970124	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.0	0.0	2.04
45248E69948N	745169	3970146	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.0	4.1	7.73
45147E69913N	745068	3970111	NPMC	2003-2010	0.7	0.0	0.0	8.39
227294	745588.55	3970140.15	NPMC	Pre-2003	0.7	0.1	0.0	0
AB-11-2-4	745456	3970311	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.3	0.0	4.271
45247E69917NA	745168	3970115	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.0	0.0	3.24
45147E69942N	745068	3970140	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.0	0.1	3.01
AB-11-3-3A	745646	3970073	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	1.6	1.1	5.6
46727E70220N	746648	3970418	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	-0.3	0.0	4.19
45145E69934N	745066	3970132	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.0	0.3	3.66
5787E-9924N	745708	3970122	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.4	0.4	3.62
45274E69908N	745195	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.0	0.0	3.83
45148E69920N	745069	3970118	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.0	0.0	4.2
45258E-69899N	745179	3970097	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	-0.3	0.0	3.46
45249E69876N	745170	3970074	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	1.5	0.0	2.23
AB-9-13-1	746338	3970016	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	1.9	0.1	3.29
45258E69909N	745179	3970107	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.0	0.0	4.48
45145E69908N	745066	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.0	0.0	3.46
45285E69964N	745206	3970162	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.0	0.0	3.59
5874E-9747N	745795	3969945	NPMC	2003-2010	0.6	0.5	0.8	2.88

16

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Sample_No#	UTM_E_WGS84	UTM_N_WGS84	ExplorCo	ExplorYear	Au ppm	Ag_ppm	Cu_%	Fe %
45284E69950NA	745205	3970148	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.5	7.21
45247E69805N-A	745168	3970003	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.4	1.2	3.86
45284E69947N	745205	3970145	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.2	4
45247E69874N	745168	3970072	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.1	3.43
45284E69914N	745205	3970112	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.0	4.3
T6 45378E-69808N	745299	3970006	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.5	0.0	1.41
45248E69872N	745169	3970070	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.4	0.1	3.13
45301E69988N	745222	3970186	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.9	1.8	8.24
45286E69923N	745207	3970121	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.1	3.49
45246E69952N	745167	3970150	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.0	2.141
T5 45500E-70017N	745421	3970215	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.1	1.44
45276E-69922N	745197	3970120	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.4	0.5	3.881
45285E69958N	745206	3970156	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.1	3.96
T5 45508E-70004N	745429	3970202	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.0	1.35
5151E-9895N	745072	3970093	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.7	0.0	3.66
45841E-69963N	745762	3970161	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.8	0.0	12.1
T6 45376E-69752N	745297	3969950	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.0	1.73
45245E69956N	745166	3970154	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.1	2.55
45246E69914N	745167	3970112	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.0	3.93
45149E69915NA	745070	3970113	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.1	5.07
45147E69920N	745067	3970119	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.4	0.0	4.21
45286E69967N	745207	3970165	NPMC	2003-2010	0.5	0.0	0.0	3.58
5515E9950N	745436	3970148	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	-0.3	0.1	2.37
45292E69908N	745213	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	3.92
45249E69913N	745170	3970111	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.7	0.0	4.75
45247E69959N	745168	3970157	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	2.49
45284E69929N	745205	3970127	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.1	4.15
5468E-70041N	745389	3970239	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	-0.3	0.2	7.98
5546E10039N	745467	3970237	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.3	0.1	2.14
45147E69922N	745068	3970120	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	3.92
45498E70023N-BTM	745419	3970221	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	-0.3	0.0	4.2
45150E69883N	745071	3970081	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	3.52
45147E69925NA40.4M	745068	3970123	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	4.24
5701E-9849N	745622	3970047	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	-0.3	0.0	5.72
45284E69981N	745205	3970179	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	4.5
45308E69906N	745229	3970104	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	3.65
45503E70015N	745424	3970213	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	-0.3	0.0	3.23
AB-11-3-2	745463	3970202	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.2	0.2	4.41
T6 45379E-69835N	745300	3970033	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	2.8
45286E69961N	745207	3970159	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.1	4.13
45631E70225N	745552	3970423	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	-0.3	0.0	2.65
45284E69941N	745205	3970139	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.1	3.17
45247E69903N	745168	3970101	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	4.27
45277E69907N	745198	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.4	0.0	0.0	4.58
45897E69767N	745818	3969965	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.7	0.3	4.111
45146E69936N	745067	3970134	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	3.32

17

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Sample_No#	UTM_E_WGS84	UTM_N_WGS84	ExplorCo	ExplorYear	Au ppm	Ag_ppm	Cu_%	Fe %
45131E69986N	745052	3970184	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	-0.3	0.1	2.63
45882E69748N	745803	3969946	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	10.8	1.1	4.76
45249E69917N	745170	3970115	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	-0.3	0.0	2.88
T5 45500E-70016N	745421	3970214	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	1.3
45147E69890N	745068	3970088	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	3.84
45868E69745N	745789	3969943	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.4	0.3	3.68
45285E-69970N	745206	3970168	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	-0.3	0.0	3.51
45243E69908N	745164	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	2.91
T14 45312E-70040N	745233	3970238	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	1.83
45248E69972N	745169	3970170	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	3.3
T6 45376E-69750N	745297	3969948	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	1.85
T5 45506E-70007N	745427	3970205	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	1.16
45246E69962N	745167	3970160	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	1.511
45149E69886N	745070	3970084	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	2.88
45246E69955N	745167	3970153	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	-0.3	0.0	3.681
45252E69909N	745173	3970107	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	3.64
45570E-69951N	745491	3970149	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.8	0.8	5.43
45285E69959N	745206	3970157	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	3.33
AB-11-2-5	745439	3970190	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.3	1.6	6.43
5318E-9972N	745239	3970170	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.6	0.1	5.26
T6 45377E-69832N	745298	3970030	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	2.08
T6 45379E-69818N	745300	3970016	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	1.49
45244E69893N	745165	3970091	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	3.45
45246E69923N	745167	3970121	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	1.1	0.0	4.7
45295E69909N	745216	3970107	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	4.271
AB-10- 20 - 2	745640	3970131	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.4	0.1	3.66
45248E69977N	745169	3970175	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	2.1
45246E69965N	745167	3970163	NPMC	2003-2010	0.3	0.0	0.0	2.31
45246E69968N	745167	3970166	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	2.2
5396E-9947N	745317	3970145	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.0	4.96
45377E69852N	745298	3970050	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.0	3.32
T6 45376E-69757N	745297	3969955	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	1.91
T5 45510E-70000N	745431	3970198	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.1	1.47
45145E69808N	745066	3970006	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	3.79
45592E70092N	745513	3970290	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.0	1.96
45248E69905N	745169	3970103	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	3.35
6267E9750N	746188	3969948	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.4	0.0	2.73
47103E-70390N	747024	3970588	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.3	0.1	7.25
T14 45317E-70040N	745238	3970238	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	1.8
T6 45378E-69811N	745299	3970009	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.3	0.0	1.84
45502E70016N-BTM	745423	3970214	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.0	3.32
45147E69920N	745068	3970118	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	3.66
45735E-69882N	745656	3970080	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	1.9	0.0	1.47
45751E-69907N	745672	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.2	1.97
45248E69883N	745169	3970081	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	2.73
45284E69944N	745205	3970142	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	4.67

18

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Sample_No#	UTM_E_WGS84	UTM_N_WGS84	ExplorCo	ExplorYear	Au ppm	Ag_ppm	Cu_%	Fe %
45246E69919N	745167	3970117	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	3.75
T6 45376E-69846N	745297	3970044	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	1.49
T6 45380E-69814N	745301	3970012	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.4	0.1	1.78
45516E69997N	745437	3970195	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.0	2.47
45285E69935N	745206	3970133	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.4	3.27
45510E70005N	745431	3970203	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.0	2.37
45311E69907N	745232	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	3.94
45286E69920N	745207	3970118	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.1	4.65
5542E-70006N	745463	3970204	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.4	0.3	7.08
45478E69441N	745399	3969639	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.0	3.98
5775E-9922N	745696	3970120	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.1	5.12
45149E69945N	745070	3970143	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	4.031
45248E69879N	745169	3970077	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.4	0.0	1.64
45323E69908N	745244	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	3.33
45246E69971N	745167	3970169	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	2.7
46197E 68837N	746118	3969035	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.2	0.0	3.03
46195E68602N	746116	3968800	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.4	0.0	2.82
T14 45310E-70035N	745231	3970233	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	1.62
45248E69980N	745169	3970178	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	3.12
45246E69948N	745167	3970146	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	1.981
45264E69908N	745185	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	3.45
46450E69903N	746371	3970101	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.0	14.4
45248E69986N	745169	3970184	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	0.0	0.0	1.95
5802E-9924N	745723	3970122	NPMC	2003-2010	0.2	-0.3	0.0	2.75
45377E69825N	745298	3970023	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.21
6075E9789N	745996	3969987	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.5	0.0	4.77
5860E-9741N	745781	3969939	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	4.23
45285E-69938N	745206	3970136	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.4	0.2	3.161
45154E69899N	745075	3970097	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.36
45248E69909N	745169	3970107	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.46
T6 45378E-69830N	745299	3970028	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.6	0.0	1.94
T6 45376E-69838N	745297	3970036	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	1.63
5535E-70002N	745456	3970200	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.1	6.13
45246E69980N	745167	3970178	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	1.6
T5 45497E-70021N	745418	3970219	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.14
5458-69657	745379	3969855	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.2	0.2	3.08
AB-11-2-3	745479	3969855	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.2	0.2	3.08
T25 45248E-69805N	745169	3970003	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.2	2.01
45376E69836N	745297	3970034	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.05
45317E-69906N	745238	3970104	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	4.09
45145E69901N	745066	3970099	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.57
45248E69992N	745169	3970190	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.36
46215E-68845N	746136	3969043	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	4.6
45248E69885N	745169	3970083	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.3	0.1	3.4
T14 45311E-70037N	745232	3970235	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.3	0.0	1.6
45267E69907N	745188	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.51

19

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Sample_No#	UTM_E_WGS84	UTM_N_WGS84	ExplorCo	ExplorYear	Au ppm	Ag_ppm	Cu_%	Fe %
45244E69905N	745165	3970103	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.11
45509E70006N	745430	3970204	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.52
45511E70003N-BTM	745432	3970201	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.07
45538E-69949N	745459	3970147	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.1	4.73
45246E69922N	745167	3970120	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.08
5032E9688N	744953	3969886	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.95
T25 45250E-69810N	745171	3970008	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	1.59
45246E69807N	745167	3970005	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.88
45500E70021N	745421	3970219	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.86
5537E-70019N	745458	3970217	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.1	2.51
45147E69907N	745068	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.731
45299E69908N	745220	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.62
45261E69909N	745182	3970107	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.35
6051E9879N	745972	3970077	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.4	0.0	6.8
45280E-9894N	745201	3970092	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.5	0.0	4.04
45015E69809N	744936	3970007	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.5
5536E10116N	745457	3970314	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.3	0.0	2.17
45268E69907N	745189	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.89
46196E68797N	746117	3968995	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.6	0.1	7.54
45261E69908N	745182	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.72
45247E69989N	745168	3970187	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.24
T6 45377E-69844N	745298	3970042	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.4	0.0	1.71
45146E69940N	745067	3970138	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.7	0.0	5.57
45952E69786N	745873	3969984	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.3	0.3	5.9
45074E69813N	744995	3970011	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	4.98
45145E69807N	745066	3970005	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.5
5391E-9921N	745312	3970119	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.6	0.0	6.03
45148E69699N	745069	3969897	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.83
46584E-69511N	746505	3969709	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.1	5.85
45147E69895N13M	745068	3970093	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.95
45246E69945N	745167	3970143	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.161
T3 45286E-69975N	745207	3970173	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	1.96
45521E69989N-E	745442	3970187	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.421
45248E69920N	745169	3970118	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	6.8	0.0	3.36
46046E69924N	745967	3970122	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.72
AB-11-3-8	745521	3970002	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.2	0.0	4.21
45320E69907N	745241	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.75
45239E-69851N	745160	3970049	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.62
45246E69933N	745167	3970131	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.1	2.28
45248E69896N	745169	3970094	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.84
45520E69991N-BTM	745441	3970189	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.46
45247E69945N-72.4N	745168	3970143	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.18
45751E-69862N	745672	3970060	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	1.15
T5 45501E-70013N	745422	3970211	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	1.74
T6 45379E-69805N	745300	3970003	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.4	0.0	1.41
45518E69989N	745439	3970187	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.93

20

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Sample_No#	UTM_E_WGS84	UTM_N_WGS84	ExplorCo	ExplorYear	Au ppm	Ag_ppm	Cu_%	Fe %
45673E70101N	745594	3970299	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	4.82
T5 45512E-69996N	745433	3970194	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.1	1.31
5524E10118N	745445	3970316	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.3	0.0	3.25
46231E67474N	746152	3967672	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.21
45152E-69888N	745073	3970086	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	1.36
45146E69904N	745067	3970102	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.42
46216E68399N	746137	3968597	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.4	0.0	2.6
45378E69831N	745299	3970029	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.27
5546E10005N	745467	3970203	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.4	0.1	2.78
45160E-69880N	745081	3970078	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	1.39
45745E-69973N	745666	3970171	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	1.92
5471E-70039N	745392	3970237	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	7.35
46491E70021N	746412	3970219	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	4.22
45149E69919N	745070	3970117	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	4.58
45246E69951N	745167	3970149	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.4	0.0	3.92
45376E69839N	745297	3970037	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.96
46832E70212N	746753	3970410	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	1.6	1.2	3.82
45375E69780N	745296	3969978	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.75
AB-9-14-3	745616	3970226	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.02
AB-9-14-1	745707	3970258	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.22
46024E69930N	745945	3970128	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	4.26
45950E69846N	745871	3970044	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	6.05
45827E69859N	745748	3970057	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	5.9
45246E69947N	745167	3970145	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.3	0.0	3.93
AB-11-3-1	745456	3970314	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.1	0.0	3.03
AB-11-4-1	745837	3970058	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.1	0.1	6.97
5549E-9751N	745470	3969949	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.88
45248E69813N	745169	3970011	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	5.21
45522E69987N	745443	3970185	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.671
45829E-69946N	745750	3970144	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.5	0.0	4.43
47029E72745N	746950	3972943	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	4.3	0.0	3.15
5810E9975N	745731	3970173	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.18
45958E69795N	745879	3969993	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.5	0.1	11.2
45248E69898N	745169	3970096	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.01
45327E-70033N	745248	3970231	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.36
45249E69908N	745170	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.65
45129E-69884N	745050	3970082	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.6	0.0	5.54
45248E69983N	745169	3970181	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.17
5802E-9837N	745723	3970035	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.4
46325E-67676N	746246	3967874	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.3	0.0	4.25
45244E69934N	745165	3970132	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.55
45317E69907N	745238	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.13
45246E69929N	745167	3970127	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	2.41
45302E69908N	745223	3970106	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	4.001
T6 45377E-69823N	745298	3970021	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.5	0.0	2.05
46297E69996N	746218	3970194	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.62

21

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Sample_No#	UTM_E_WGS84	UTM_N_WGS84	ExplorCo	ExplorYear	Au ppm	Ag_ppm	Cu_%	Fe %
5377E-69878N	745298	3970076	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.36
45145E-69806N	745066	3970004	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.44
45121E69787N	745042	3969985	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.28
45248E69895N	745169	3970093	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.04
45828E-69964N	745749	3970162	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.5	0.1	4.29
45305E69907N	745226	3970105	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	3.33
45247E69901N	745168	3970099	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	2.71
45653E-70333NEXTRA	745574	3970531	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.3	0.0	3.39
45464E70166N	745385	3970364	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	7.1
45273E69327N	745194	3969525	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.6	0.0	5.66
45247E69939N	745168	3970137	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	4.18
45149E69947N	745070	3970145	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	0.0	0.0	5.45
45152E69910N	745073	3970108	NPMC	2003-2010	0.1	-0.3	0.0	3.02

22

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

ATTACHMENT 1: JORC Code Table 1

White Hills Project

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sounds, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	• Helix has not undertaken any sampling. • Results of work undertaken by previous explorers includes: 2022 Soil Samples • 462 soil samples undertaken on a 100 m grid spacing. • Sampling protocols: The top few centimetres of organic and soil/sand/lag material were discarded, and a small pit was dug using a shovel to 15cm to 20cm deep. The remaining material was sampled into numbered plastic bags. Samples were sieved to -2mm. No information was provided in the unpublished sub-contractor reports regarding sample weights. • QAQC procedures: 2004 Soil Samples • 3225 soil samples undertaken on various grid spacings. • No information is available on sample and QAQC procedures, Rock Samples: • 633 rock samples • No information is available on sample and QAQC procedures, • Individual samples are likely selective. Some samples were collected from trenches but it has not been confirmed if sampling was selective or from continuous channels. Drilling • No information is available on sample and QAQC procedures

23

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drilling techniques	• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open- hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).	• Helix has not undertaken any drilling. • 10 diamond drillholes have been drilled.
Drill sample recovery	• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	• Helix has not undertaken any drilling. • Details of historical drill core recovery are not available. • Historical Sample bias is not known.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	• Helix has not undertaken any drilling. • Geological logs are available for the entirety of the drillholes. Due to the absence of sample QAQC these drillholes would not be utilised in resource estimation. • No core photography is available

24

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation	• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages tomaximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected including for instance results forfield, duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	• Helix has not undertaken any drilling. • Details of historical drill core sampling technique are not available. • QAQC procedures are not known for historical 2004 soils, rocks or drill sampling programs. • QAQC comprising duplicates, blanks was undertaken for the 2022 Centric program and included 1 in 50 frequency. • Drill sample intervals are known however representivity is not known.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysisincluding instrument make and model, readingtimes, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.	• Helix has not undertaken any drilling. • Details of historical drill core sampling technique are not available. • QAQC procedures are not known. 2022 Soil Samples • Analytical Laboratory and elements: • ALS Chemex Laboratory in Reno. The laboratory techniques were partial extraction as per below: • Aqua regia digest for Au and multielements with an ICP-MS and ICP-OES finish for a 50 element suite. • Quality control samples, including blanks, duplicates and standards are not available. 2004 Soil Samples • American Assay Laboratories (AAL) was used for sample analysis: • The laboratory techniques were partial extraction as per below: • Aqua regia digest for Au and multi elements with an ICP-MS and ICP-OES finish for a multi element suite. Qualitycontrol samples,includingblanks,duplicates and standards are not

25

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Quality control samples, including blanks, duplicates and standards are not available. Rock Samples: • American Assay Laboratories (AAL): • The laboratory techniques were partial extraction as per below: • Acid digest for Au and multielements with an ICP-MS and ICP-OES finish for a multi element suite. • Quality control samples, including blanks, duplicates and standards are not available. Drilling • Analytical Laboratory and elements: • ALS Chemex Laboratory in Reno. The laboratory techniques were partial extraction as per below: • Fire Assay with 30g charge. • Quality control samples, including blanks, duplicates and standards are not available.
Verification of sampling and assaying	• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	• This is an early stage exploration project. • Assay data were not adjusted. • Geochemical mapping is based on raw assay data • Significant intersections reported in this announcement are based on historical data. • Helix has not undertaken verification (by resampling) as drill core is not available. • No information is available of documentation process. • No adjustments have been made to the assaydate.
Location of data points	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	• No Mineral Resource estimation is being undertaken. Due to the absence of QAQC information for the historical drill samples they are not suitable for resource estimation. • Unable to confirm locations of historical soil and rock chip samples • Several trenches are locatable in the field and trench rock chips are reportedly (according to former owner) align with these. Helix has not verified this. • Grid system inWGA84, Zone 11N UTM. • Topographic control is by existing topographic maps. The project area is flat lyingwith topographic control for the 2022 soilprogramprovided bythe GPS

26

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		and government topographic maps at 1:100,000 scale.
Data spacing and distribution	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied.	• Helix has not undertaken any drilling or sampling. • The following data spacings are present in historical data: - Rock chip samples are selective sampling (no specific spacing) - 2004 Soil sampling was undertaken on a variety of grids that range from (~20m) - 2022 Centric soil sampling was undertaken on a 100m grid - Drilling was scout drilling (no specific data spacing). • No Mineral Resources are being reported so no sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	• The lithological and structural trends in the area sampled vary, with a broad regional NW/SE trend. • Drilling was conducted -60 degrees to 310 degree or on several different orientations. The drill holes may not be exactly perpendicular to the interpreted FLEM plate model and interpreted surface geochemical results as a guide • True widths are not known.
Sample security	• The measures taken to ensure sample security.	• Not known for all historical sampling. • 2022 Centric Soil samplingon 100mgrid
Audits or reviews	• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	• Not known

27

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	• Type, reference name/number, location andownership including agreements or materialissues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	• Refer to tables in the body of this report which summarise the tenements. • All tenements are in good standing and there are no known impediments to operating in this area.
Exploration done by other parties	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	• All tenements have been the subject of previous exploration by numerous companies, notably Newmont and Centric. • Previous exploration data has been compiled and reviewed and is summarised in this announcement. • Detailed assessment of previous exploration data is ongoing. • the Exploration Results (soils, rocks and drill) are considered reliable for a number of reasons: - All samples were analysed at an accredited Laboratories - Sampling, QAQC and analytical protocols are described in JORC Table 1. - The 2022 soil sampling program undertaken by Centric effectively validated the presence of copper and gold in the earlier 2004 soil program. - Gold is present in all sample mediums (rock chips, soil and drilling). Copper ispresent in rock chips and soil.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	• The tenements are prospective for Porphyry and IOCG copper gold deposits.
Drill hole Information	• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole	• No new drilling in this report. • Details of previous drilling reported in this report are: • Refer to table 1 in report for collar locations of historical holes

28

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
Data aggregation methods	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, theprocedure used for such aggregation shouldbe stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.	• No cutting of high grades has been employed • Cut off grades applied to the data reported are appropriate for exploration and include: • Soil: 20 ppb Au • Rock: 0.1 g/t Au • Drilling 0.1 g/t Au • Aggregate lengths in drillhole reporting -5 foot samples were collected and converted into meters. Typical example of intercepts and gold grade in drilling is shown in Cross Section provided in report.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true _width not known’). _	• No new drilling in this report • Historical Drilling is considered early-stage scout drilling. • The geometry of the mineralisation relative to the drill hole is unknown at this stage.
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	• Plan view of historical drillhole locations has been included in this report. • A cross section of historical hole DDH006 is included in the report
Balanced reporting	• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	• The reporting is balanced, and all material information has been disclosed. • Representative reporting of high and low grades has been undertaken. • Modelling of historical geophysical data is underway and when available the results willprovided in a subsequent report
Other substantive	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations;geophysical	• The report is of a general nature and no new exploraton results are beingreported.

29

==> picture [18 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
exploration data	survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.	• Relevant geological, and historical geochemical data have been included in the Figures and tables in this report to provide context. • Geophysical data is available for the area (magnetics and radiometrics) and is being evaluated. • Ground gravity and airborne hyperspectral data is available and will be evaluated in context of historical data review.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the maingeological interpretations and future drillingareas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	• Further work will include modelling of geophysical data, diamond drilling and further geochemical sampling. • Diagrams show location of gold mineralisation identified to date. Further evaluation will be undertaken to identify areas of possible extensions.

30