AI assistant
HAWSONS IRON LTD — Interim / Quarterly Report 2014
Apr 28, 2014
65053_rns_2014-04-28_9fe5e8ca-6475-4de1-ac7c-119e6dcba75b.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
ABN: 63 095 117 981 | ASX: CAP
Quarterly Report For the Quarter ended 31 March 2014
We find it. We prove it. We make it possible.
29 April 2014
ABOUT CARPENTARIA:
Carpentaria is an exploration company focused on discovering and developing base, precious metals and bulk commodities in eastern Australia. The company currently has interests in iron ore, tungsten, tin, gold, copper and nickel exploration projects.
CARPENTARIA’S AIM:
With a strong geoscientific team discover and build a strong cash flow generating mining operation.
DISCOVERIES TO DATE: Hawsons Iron Project - NSW Euriowie Tin Project - NSW
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: Ordinary Shares 123,987,777
Highlights
HAWSONS IRON PROJECT:
-
Development base-case of 10 Mtpa concentrate production established for bankable feasibility study
-
Maiden Indicated Resource delivered, 20% increase in total
-
Indicated plus Inferred Resource contained concentrate
-
Independent consultant endorsement of the transport plan and cost estimates
-
Flow rate tests confirm sufficient process water available from deep saline aquifer consistent with design assumptions
-
Renewed engagement of potential partners based on the new development base-case garners significant initial interest
-
Independent consultant says proposed concentrate an attractive product and likely to gain a pricing premium
CENTRAL LACHLAN GOLD EXPLORATION
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS: Silvergate Capital 18.95%
Conglin In’t Invest’ Group 9.3%
- Substantial new untested gold in soil anomaly discovered at Advene, drilling follow up scheduled for June quarter.
NEFCO 4.47%
Management, Including Unlisted Options 15.47%
FINANCIAL Cash on hand as at 31/03/2014 A$5,332,597
Level 6, 345 Ann Street Brisbane Queensland 4000
PO Box 10919 Adelaide Street, Brisbane Queensland 4000
e-mail: [email protected]
For further information contact: Quentin Hill Managing Director Phone: 07 3220 2022
Project Locations
==> picture [283 x 223] intentionally omitted <==
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
PLANNED JUNE QUARTER DEVELOPMENT & EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
Hawsons Iron Project
Carpentaria (CAP) and Pure Metals (PM) will continue exploration and feasibility study activities under the terms of the Hawsons joint venture agreement (JV).
JV to continue to progress work to increase certainty of the projects infrastructure components, including initiation of the Transgrid electricity connection process and discussions with Flinders Ports aimed at initiating additional engineering studies to progress the rail- port- marine aspects of the project.
Detailed planning and implementation of the next phase of development work for the project.
Environmental base line and other compliance studies required for the bankable feasibility study will continue to be advanced by the JV.
Central Lachlan Gold Project
At Advene a diamond drilling program is scheduled to test the highly encouraging gold in soil geochemical anomaly discovered this quarter for significant gold mineralisation.
At Barellan a power auger weathered bedrock and rock geochemical survey that is currently in progress will be completed.
At Grong Grong preliminary field reconnaissance including first pass mapping and an auger geochemical program at the Harry Smith Prospect will be planned and subject to priorities completed.
Temora Gold/Copper Project
Detailed geological mapping and investigation of potential drill testing options at the Mother Shipton Prospect will commence.
REVIEW OF MARCH QUARTER ACTIVITIES
DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Hawsons Iron Project JV (CAP 60%, Pure Metals P/L 40%)
The following significant results that will underpin the continued development of the Hawsons Iron Project were delivered.
Establishment of development base-case
A detailed study completed by GHD (ASX Announcement 19 February 2014) demonstrated that by matching project size to the existing spare port, rail and power infrastructure capacity, capital costs and development timeframes have potential for major reduction. Furthermore, the results demonstrated the potential for very competitive CFR costs (cost to land concentrate in China) and excellent investment returns, boosting the projects development credentials.
Based on the results of the GHD study the development base-case for the bankable feasibility study (BFS) is now set at 10 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) of concentrate production that is within the limits of the existing resource and most importantly utilises existing rail and port infrastructure capacity.
2
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
The study enables the BFS to target very competitive, second quartile cost curve, CFR costs that will be a significant project buffer to iron-ore price fluctuations. The target capital cost of less than $2 billion is also very globally competitive for large-scale iron-ore mining projects.
The low project capital cost target exploits the benefits of suitable existing infrastructure and the soft rock processing character of the unique Hawsons deposit.
Maiden Indicated Resource
A maiden Indicated Resource and significant upgrade to the previously published Inferred Resource (ASX Announcement 26 March 2014) was completed that demonstrates the robustness and scalability of the Hawsons deposit.
An Indicated Resource of 215 million tonnes (Mt), containing 35Mt of premium quality magnetite concentrate at 69.8% Fe and 3.0% combined silica and alumina was estimated.
The new total Inferred plus Indicated Resource estimate was expanded to 1.77 billion tonnes at a magnetite mass recovery grade of 14.9%. This is a 26% tonnage increase on the Company’s December 2010 Inferred Resource estimate.
Total Inferred plus Indicated contained iron concentrate has risen by 20% to 263 million tonnes compared to the December 2010 inferred estimate of 220Mt. A premium grade of 69.7% Fe and just 3.1% combined silica and alumina has been maintained for the new total resource.
Infrastructure
Subsequent events to the end of the quarter included the delivery of a transport review from infrastructure advisory Balance Resources (ASX Announcement 28 April 2014).
Balance concluded, on the basis of available data, that Carpentaria’s transport plan for concentrate from the Hawsons Iron Project contains no fatal flaws for product transport to port. In addition, Balance considers it represents the lowest and most efficient capital and operating cost option that is currently available.
Balance Resources also estimated the transport cost being used in the feasibility study modelling for rail loading at Broken Hill to ship loading offshore at Port Pirie of approximately $21 per tonne are reasonable for the project.
As a result of the development base-case parameters being set, the joint venture has commenced detailed discussions with infrastructure providers and is actively working to increase the certainty and costs of provision for all infrastructure.
Product Marketing
The iron ore market group, Ferrum Consultants, provided a review of the proposed Hawsons concentrate and its likely markets. Ferrum concluded:
-
The concentrate product will be suitable as a pellet feed
-
The product is potentially a very attractive input to steelmakers from a chemical perspective because of its high iron, low combined silica and alumina and “very little other deleterious content”. The product would have the ability to offset the “gradual quality decline evident in the ores of the major producers”.
-
The preliminary CSIRO pelletising test work done by the joint venture produced positive physical results. Further metallurgical testing of pellet products to facilitate additional marketing is recommended.
3
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
- Analysis of pricing data from Chinese industry publications Umetal makes Ferrum believe that based on the 7 March 2014 reference price of USD $115 for PB Fines, a 69% fines product should achieve a price of USD $141.
==> picture [155 x 268] intentionally omitted <==
Ferrum’s analysis confirms that Carpentaria’s existing project pricing estimates that do not apply a premium on the iron unit price are conservative. Ferrum’s pricing estimate demonstrates there is significant upside in pricing and project revenues.
Carpentaria expects premiums for higher grade, lower impurity product could increase in the longer term due to gradual decline of the major producer’s ore quality and the efficiency improvements provided by higher grade feed that will be keenly sought as incentives to reduce pollution gain momentum in steel producing countries including China.
Water Supply and Environmental
Water bore drilling and pumping tests have been completed at the chosen two sites (Figures 1 and 2). Both eight-hour step tests and six-day long pumping tests were carried out at each of two bore sites. In addition, monitoring of surrounding existing wells was also completed.
The results are comparable or better than assumptions used in project studies with sustainable flow rates of 100- 150 litres per second expected to be available for any future mining operations. Water quality testing of this deep aquifer also confirmed that water quality will not be suitable for use as long term stock water.
Figure 1. Hawsons location plan and proposed and existing site infrastructure
==> picture [169 x 126] intentionally omitted <==
These results give the joint venture confidence sufficient, agriculturally unsuitable, water is available from the targeted deep aquifer and will continue to engage government regarding allocation and pricing during the environmental impact statement (EIS) process. Ground water modelling will be carried out as part of the EIS however these pumping test results have not changed prior estimates that acceptable drawdown of surrounding bores is expected.
Other specialist studies continued as part of the EIS.
Figure 2. Pumping test site March 2014
Corporate
Following the return of the positive results from the GHD study and the setting of the 10 Mtpa development base-case the JV has significantly increased its engagement with potential equity and strategic partners.
The JV is pursuing steel makers and financial investors in China, India and other Asian countries. Carpentaria is delighted with the strong interest already gained in the early stage of presenting 10 Mtpa development base-case and will continue to pursue suitable opportunities as a priority.
About Hawsons Iron Project
The Hawsons Iron Project is located 60 km southwest of Broken Hill (Figure 2) and includes total Inferred and Indicated magnetite Resources of 1.8Bt at a Davis Tube Recovery (DTR) of 15% (12% cut off) containing 263 million tonnes of high grade (69.7% Fe) concentrate.
4
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
The project is exceptionally well located, with existing power, water, rail and port infrastructure available for a conceptual 10 Mtpa start–up operation and a mining lease application has been lodged.
Hawsons soft rock is a very different concept to traditional hard rock magnetite and requires fundamentally different thinking to the typical magnetite mining and processing challenges, both technical and cost. The soft rock enables simple liberation of premium magnetite product without complex and expensive flow sheets.
Central Lachlan Gold Project
EL 8095 Advene 100% CAP – Gold
Josephine Moulder
During the quarter a significant power auger weathered bedrock and hand tool C-horizon soil geochemical program was completed following earlier promising high tenor gold rock chip analyses.
==> picture [214 x 305] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3. Central Lachlan location plan
==> picture [304 x 370] intentionally omitted <==
Results of a soil survey, reported in February (ASX announcement 6 February 2014), identified a significant geochemical anomaly at the western edge of the survey area with very high gold and silver in soil concentrations (Figure 4).
This very encouraging result was followedup with a 475 hole power auger weathered bedrock (WBR) geochemical survey that extended the soil anomaly 200m to the north east and 200m to the east. The soil anomaly contains a maximum concentration of 1.56 g/t Au and 34 sites with greater than 0.1 g/t (100ppb) Au.
This main – Jospehine Moulder (JM) - anomaly is a previously unknown geochemically anomalous feature of 600m x 450m. The anomaly is open to the north west (Figure 4) and displays a 200m wide central northern zone with concentrations exceeding 100ppb Au. The northern sub-
Figure 4. Compiled Advene auger gold in soil results, computer generated colour (minimum curvature grid)
5
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
zone is coincident with an interpreted breccia logged in auger chips.
Detailed structural and petrographic studies have also been undertaken and observations are consistent with Carpentaria’s intrusion related gold system (IRGS) exploration model and demonstrate the prospect is highly prospective for large scale intrusion derived fault related and replacement style gold mineralisation.
This newly defined, untested, large weathered bedrock/soil Au geochemical anomaly, when considered in conjunction with the high grade rock chip results previously reported, provide great potential for discovery of significant gold mineralisation that will be tested by scheduled drill testing during the June quarter.
Regional Exploration
Significantly, results of reconnaissance rock chip sampling from the December quarter has identified a new zone of mineralisation 12km to the north of JM, at the Avoca workings (Figure 5). A maximum rock chip result of 3.66 g/t was returned from a grab sample of historical workings. A full table of the results is provided in the Appendix.
The identification of the Avoca Prospect defines a 15km long mineralised corridor north from JM, along the Yalgogrin Fault system. These results will be followed up in due course.
About Advene
The Advene licence is prospective for intrusion related and structural orogenic gold systems (IRGS & OGS). The licence contains a number of known gold occurrences along the regional Yalgogrin Fault system.
The known gold occurrences at Advene all display sulfide mineralised vein and breccia sheets developed along north-south striking fault/ crush zones that are also anomalous in silverbismuth-tellurium-lead-arsenic.
==> picture [208 x 309] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5. Advene tenement aeromagnetic plan
The Yalgogrin Fault System is largely unexplored and consists of relatively well exposed, deformed and contact metamorphosed Ordovician mud-rocks that form a north-south trending ridge that runs for approximately 20 km south of the Lachlan River.
The Ordovician strata are interpreted to form a mildly magnetic and potentially altered roof to an underlying buried Siluro-Devonian granite intrusion, evident in regional aeromagnetic and gravity data as a discrete and homogeneously low amplitude feature. The geological setting is consistent with intrusion related gold system exploration model.
– EL 7896 Barellan (100% CAP) Gold, Antimony
During the quarter, rock chip sampling, power auger sampling and cleaning and sampling of a contour drain at the site of historically known anomalies is underway and results will be presented next quarter. Follow up work details will be subject to results.
6
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
The Barellan prospect is a surface rock goldantimony-arsenic bedrock anomaly that contains hairline quartz-sulfide vein stock-work hosted by phyllite, interpreted to be situated in the roof-zone of buried granite with potential for stock-work, replacement or other structurally (fault, shear) controlled intrusion related gold mineralisation.
Historical results at the Barellan prospect include: 60m at 1.5g/t Au including 10m at 4.5g/t Au, in a drainage channel and 12m at 0.43g/t Au in a single percussion drill hole (Figure 6).
EL 8189 Grong Grong (100% CAP) - Gold
Scout geological mapping and first pass reconnaissance sampling is underway. A small auger survey has been designed and is planned for the June quarter.
==> picture [263 x 249] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6. Barellan prospect summary plan
The Grong Grong licence contains known prospects and poorly explored, near surface regional geological potential for IRGS and orogenic sulfide fault replacement gold lodes.
The licence abuts the historically mined Ardlethan leases that cover what was the largest hard rock tin deposit in mainland Australia, with approximately 30,000t contained tin metal. IRGS deposits often have a spatial association with granite-hosted tin and tungsten mineralisation, further highlighting the prospectivity of the Grong Grong licence.
The larger than usual Harry Smith occurrence, located within the licence, has historically recorded shallow hard rock gold production of over 16,000oz to a reported depth of only 70m.
==> picture [262 x 182] intentionally omitted <==
Highlighted intersections from the Harry Smith prospect are significant and include 21m @ 2.5 ppm Au (CG95-2) and on the same section 20m @ 2.2 ppm Au (CG95-13) at the northern end of the northnorthwest striking Golden Splay fault section of the prospect (Figure 7).
In addition to Harry Smith, both the Mallee Hen (several thousand ounces of historically recorded gold production) and the extensive Belmore line of north-northwest striking small historical workings have not been fully investigated or drill tested in the past and will also be the subject of reconnaissance work.
Figure 7. Cross section of Harry Smith prospect
Braemar JV (CAP earning in) and South Dam (CAP 100%)
EL 5181, EL 4395
The Braemar South Project, comprising the contiguous Braemar JV (EL 5181) and 100% South Dam (EL 4395) licences, is located at the southern end of the highly prospective magnetite-bearing Braemar Iron Formation, 200km north-east of Adelaide (Figures 8 and 9).
7
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
==> picture [197 x 194] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 8. Location of Hawsons Iron Project and Braemar South Project (EL4395 and EL5181)
==> picture [256 x 193] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 9. Magnetic image showing the Braemar Iron Formation and CAP’s Braemar South Project licences
The project contains an Exploration Target in the range of 1.7 to 3.1 billion tonnes, with an estimated magnetite mass recovery (DTR) of 12 to 27% for between 200 million tonnes and 850 million tonnes of iron concentrate at 63-67% iron (ASX Announcement 29 November, 2013). The term "Target" should not be misunderstood or misconstrued as an estimate of Mineral Resources and Reserves as defined by the JORC Code (2012), and therefore the terms have not been used in this context. It is uncertain if further exploration or feasibility study will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource or Mining Reserve
Davis Tube analytical results and petrographic observations confirm that the Braemar South Project magnetite is finer grained than that at Hawsons and may require different and potentially higher cost processing than that proposed for Hawsons. However, relatively simple processing to produce a saleable concentrate from this project is still possible, and Carpentaria is currently investigating all processing options.
The project is close to key existing transport infrastructure, being 45km south-west of the national rail line and highway and 150km east of Port Pirie in South Australia. In contrast to other South Australian Braemar Iron province projects, both of Carpentaria’s Braemar South licences are located upon perpetual leasehold land titles where Native Title has been extinguished.
Review of metallurgical data was carried out this quarter.
– Temora Project (100% CAP) Gold, Copper
ELs 6901, 7375 & 7680
Following the final access determination for the Mother Shipton Prospect access to undertake exploration and evaluation of the prospect is secured. Provisional surface disturbance notice drafting to enable any future drilling of the prospect is in train.
About Temora
This 510 km[2] project is located within the Lachlan Fold Belt of NSW approximately 80 km north of Wagga Wagga (Figure 3). The project contains the key Mother Shipton Prospect, within the historical Temora goldfield, located along the highly prospective component of the western Macquarie Arc which contains a number of major porphyry and/or volcanic related copper and/or gold ore deposits including Cowal and North Parkes.
8
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
Tooloom 100% CAP – Gold
EL 8082
The Tooloom EL is located in the New England Fold Belt (NEFB) 50km north east of Tenterfield. The licence covers 130 mineral occurrences, of which nearly 100 are gold. The NEFB regionally contains mineralisation associated with Permo-Triassic age intrusions.
There has been no field work undertaken during the quarter.
Broken Hill Tin and Tungsten/Base Metal Project (100% CAP)
ELs 6936, 7829, 7921, 7957
The Broken Hill Tin-Tungsten Project contains the Yanco Glen Prospect, which has an Inferred Resource of 3.4 Mt @ 0.11% WO3 (at 0.05% WO3 cut-off) containing 3,950 t WO3 (refer ASX announcement 18 October, 2012). It is located 30km north of Broken Hill.
A preliminary mining concept study has been completed and identified that additional resources and/or an increase in the tungsten price will be required to enhance its prospects for development.
– Koonenberry (100% CAP) Nickel, Platinum Group Elements
ELs 7735, 7736, 7737, 7738, 7739 & 7740
This project is located approximately 120km north of Broken Hill and contains a number of prospects for further investigation including Wyuna Tank where Carpentaria intersected anomalous nickel and copper mineralisation in RC drilling early in 2012 (30 m at 0.11% Ni and 10 m at 0.18% Ni). Carpentaria is reviewing options for this project.
No field activities were completed during the quarter.
– Mount Agate (ActivEX Ltd earning 75%) Copper, Gold
EPM 14955
The Mt Agate licence south of Cloncurry was farmed out to ActivEX Ltd in April 2010. Exploration is targeting iron oxide copper and gold (IOCG) deposits similar to the Ernest Henry deposit.
No field activities were conducted by ActivEX on EPM 14955 this quarter.
McDougalls/Torrowangee (100% CAP) – Iron Ore
ELs 7655, 7656, 7657, 7741 &7823
The McDougalls project is centred 100km north of Broken Hill. No work was conducted on these licences this quarter.
==> picture [100 x 44] intentionally omitted <==
Quentin Hill Managing Director +61 7 3220 2022
We find it. We prove it. We make it possible.
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Result, Exploration Targets and Resources is based on information compiled by Q.S. Hill who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has had sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Q.S.Hill is a full-time employee of Carpentaria and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
9
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
Carpentaria Exploration Tenement Schedule at End of 2014 March Quarter
| Licence Name Original Grant Date Expiry Date EL 6246 Glen Isla 24/05/2004 24/05/2014 EL 6901 Combaning 8/10/2007 8/10/2015 EL 6936 1 Euriowie 7/11/2007 7/11/2015 EL 6979 2, 3 Redan 11/12/2007 11/12/2016 EL 7208 3 Burta 22/09/2008 22/09/2015 EL 7375 Dirnaseer 30/07/2009 30/07/2015 EL 7504 3, 4 Little Peak 8/04/2010 8/04/2014 EL 7574 Gundong 5/07/2010 5/07/2014 EL 7655 McDougalls C 6/12/2010 6/12/2015 EL 7656 McDougalls A 6/12/2010 6/12/2015 EL 7657 McDougalls B 6/12/2010 6/12/2015 EL 7680 Ilabo 11/01/2011 11/01/2015 EL 7735 Koonenberry 1 16/05/2011 16/05/2016 EL 7736 Koonenberry 2 16/05/2011 16/05/2016 EL 7737 Koonenberry 3 16/05/2011 16/05/2016 EL 7738 Koonenberry 4 16/05/2011 16/05/2016 EL 7739 Mt Shannon 16/05/2011 16/05/2016 EL 7740 Wertago 16/05/2011 16/05/2016 EL 7741 McDougalls D 16/05/2011 16/05/2016 EL 7829 Yanco Glen 2/09/2011 2/09/2016 EL 7841 Hawsons Knob 20/09/2011 20/09/2016 EL 7896 4 Barellan 6/02/2012 6/02/2014 EL 7921 4 Kantappa 19/04/2012 19/04/2014 EL 7957 Corona 29/06/2012 29/06/2014 EL 8082 Tooloom 1/05/2013 1/05/2016 EL 8095 Advene 28/05/2013 28/05/2015 EL 8189 Grong Grong 29/10/2013 29/10/2016 EL 5181 5 Braemar 10/12/2007 9/12/2014 EL 4395 South Dam 10/12/2009 9/12/2014 EPM 14955 6 Mount Agate 29/06/2006 28/06/2016 MLA 460 7, 8 Hawsons Iron Under application Under application Totals 31 licences and applications |
Equity 100% 100% 100% 60% 60% 100% 60% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% |
Sub-blocks 12 154 16 62 100 41 14 20 24 19 34 18 29 21 15 8 46 29 13 50 88 75 42 47 100 100 148 76 30 55 n/a 1486 |
**Area (km2) ** |
|---|---|---|---|
33.9 435.8 46.9 179.8 289.7 115.9 40.6 47.5 70.7 55.8 100.2 50.8 86.3 62.3 44.4 23.7 137.1 85.5 38.3 146.2 255.1 212.5 123.3 137.9 297.4 287.1 418.7 218.0 86.0 176.0 187.0 4,490.4 |
-
100% Willyama Prospecting Pty Ltd (wholly owned subsidiary of Carpentaria).
-
1.5% NSR royalty to Perilya Broken Hill Pty Ltd.
-
JV farm-out; Pure Metals Pty Ltd.
-
Under renewal process.
-
JV farm-in; Maosen Australia Pty Ltd.
-
JV farm-out; ActivEX Ltd.
-
MLA made on 18 October 2013; tenement application subject to unspecified grant date and conditions. Subject to the Hawsons Joint Venture with Pure Metals Pty Ltd.
10
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
EL 8095 sampling table as per ASX & JORC requirements
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
| Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data | Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data |
|---|---|
| Criteria | Commentary |
| Sampling techniques. | * 475, vertical, less than 12m deep, 4 inch diameter powered auger hole obtained at refusal in weathered bedrock and/or C-horizon soil, – 25mm + 1.00mm sieved, chip samples, approximately 2 kgeach,were collected on a 100 x 20m spacedgrid at theglobal Advene Prospect within EL 8095. |
| * 28 rock chip samples were collected by Carpentaria. Rock chips were collected along 1m, 8m, 10m, 12m & 25m channels approximately2 kg per sample. |
|
| Drilling techniques. | * Geochemical weathered bedrock/ C-horizon geochemical survey was facilitated by shallow, near surface only, powered augur drilling as described above in Sampling techniques & was used entirely for the purposes of facilitating collection of single point grid based geochemical survey point samples,not samplingof bedrock mineralisation. |
| * Not relevant to rock chipchannel samples | |
| Drill sample recovery. | * Down the hole, subsurface bedrock samples were not taken, therefore recovery is not relevant. Pointgeochemical surveysamples only. |
| * Not relevant to rock chipchannel samples | |
| Logging. | * All powered augur geochemical survey weathered bedrock/ C-horizon soil samples were sample site characteristic and lithologically logged by the company’s geologist. All data was recorded manually in the field and then entered into computer software spread sheets for later importation into a digital database. |
| * All rock chip channel samples were logged by the company’s geologist with respect to lithology, mineralisation, sample site quality and sample quality. All data was recorded in excel spread sheets and imported in to an Access database. |
|
| Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation. |
* Auger samples were collected from bottom of hole (refusal) then sieved to a -25mm +1mm fraction which was despatched for multi-element geochemical analysis at a laboratory. A bulk representative library sample was also collected at each site. * Duplicates & replicates ofpowered auger samples were also collected for laboratoryanalysis. |
| * Rock chipchannel samples were confined to 2 kgsample | |
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests. |
* All rock chip and powered augur samples, including blanks (washed sand), duplicates & replicates, were analysed by ALS Chemex laboratories using methods Au-AA21, AA25 (fire assay DL 0.002, 0.005, 0.01 ppm) and ME-MS61. (Induced Couple Plasma Mass Spectometry). |
| Verification of sampling and assaying. |
* Powered augur samples blanks (washed sand), duplicates & replicates were used to verify analytical precision. Internal Laboratorystandards and duplicates were analysed and reported. |
| * No duplicate rock samples were submitted | |
| Location of data points. | * All rock chip sample & Powered augur sample sites were located using hand a held GPS; accuracy within 5 m. |
| Data spacing and distribution. | * Powered augur sample sites were located upon a nominal but locallyvariable 100 m x 20mgrid. |
| * Rock chipchannel samples were collected randomly. | |
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure. |
* The powered augur geochemical survey sample sites were sited on a grid with lines oriented orthogonal to the enveloping geological strike determined from surface mapping. |
| * Rock chips were collected randomly to test Au concentrations in different lithologies. | |
| Sample security | * Robust in the field dual independent manual entry sample number recording is used. All samples are despatched in numbered bags into which a separate matching, one time only use, ticket is also inserted. Independently recorded bag numbers, geological logs and ticket book records are routinely checked to ensure they match. * Individual samples are collected in tight weave, string tied, metal inert calico bags placed in polyweave transport bags in lots of ten to twenty marked with the relevant sample number range. Laboratory sample description and instructions are despatched with every sample lot which is transported overland bytruck to the laboratorylocated approximatelythree hours drive distant. |
| Audits or reviews. | _* _Results were internally scrutinised and nothing effecting the materiality the results were identified |
11
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
| Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results | |
| Criteria | Commentary |
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status. |
_* _Exploration licence EL8095 is 100% owned by Carpentaria Exploration Ltd. The licence is located approximately 40km west of Condobolin in central NSW. The licence is in good standing with no known impediments over the area of sampling. |
| Exploration done by other parties. | 1982 Aberfoyle Resources collected 37 composite rock chip samples laboratory tested for gold silver & tin. Best sample 21m @ 4.1g/t Au Aberfoyle drilled five percussion holes for 513 metres with sampling at 1.5m intervals along hole. Best intersection 7.5m from 91.5 mbc @ 0.52 g/t Au (hole A-P1) _1986 Transit Pty Ltd collected surface samples from old dumps confirming anomalous gold values recorded by Aberfoyle 1988 Lachlan Resources rock chip sampling maximum 3.2 ppm Au at Mt Wilga shaft _1998 Compass resources soil grid maximum 44 ppb Au |
| Geology. | * The EL lies within the bounds of the Cargelligo 250k Map sheet and Tullibigeal 100k map sheet within the central zone of the Early to Middle Paleozoic Lachlan Fold Belt within the Wagga-Omeo Structural Belt. The EL covers the meridional Goobothery Ridge and flanking plains. The Goobothery Ridge contains exposures of complexly faulted, tightly folded and steeply dipping Ordovician, Wagga Group, Clements Formation and overlying Ordovician, Bendoc Group, Currawalla Shale. The Clements Formation contains metamorphosed, interbedded quartzose-sandstone and shale, whilst the overlying Curawalla Shale contains metamorphosed laminated black shale and mudstones. These rock types are situated within the regional Yalgogrin Fault Zone and are consequently tightly folded and faulted. The strata on the Goobothery Ridge are surrounded by plan comprising Cenozoic talus apron concealing regolith cover. Isolated rare exposures of biotite granodiotite are known in the adjacent plains and much of regolith covered area is interpreted to be underlain by the Ungarie Granite Batholith,which ispart of the Silurian S-type KoetongSuper-suite |
| Drill hole Information | _* _Down the hole, subsurface bedrock samples were not taken. The auger sampling is part of a surface geochemical survey & not to sample/test bedrock mineralisation, therefore only auger site locations and sample results are relevant drill hole information. These data arel tabled in Appendix 1. |
| * Not relevantfor rock chip samples | |
| Data aggregation methods. | * Not relevant - There was no data aggregation of auger samples |
| * Not relevantfor rock chip samples | |
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths. |
* Not relevant - There are no widths and intercept lengths reported from auger samples or rock chip samples |
| Diagrams. | * Refer Figure 10 and table in Appendix 1 for location of auger sites,and relevant results |
| * None provided – refer table in Appendix 1 for location of rock chip channel sites, and relevant results |
|
| Balanced reporting. | * All auger and rock chip results for the survey have been reported – refer Tables in Appendix 1 |
| Other substantive exploration data. | _* _All substantive exploration data has been reported in this, or previous, ASX announcements |
| Further work. | _* _Further sampling is planned to further define the extent of the substantial JM Au geochemical anomalyreported in this announcement. |
12
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
Figure 10. Location of all auger sampling EL 8095
==> picture [436 x 611] intentionally omitted <==
13
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
Table 2 – EL 8095 2014 Auger samples
All samples over 10ppb gold (samples <10ppb are not material and locations are shown in Figure 10 of Appendix providing context)
==> picture [509 x 510] intentionally omitted <==
14
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
Table 3 – EL 8095 December 2013 rock chip samples
| E_GDA | N_GDA | Zone | Sample_Type | Au_ppb | Ag_ppb | As_ppm | Bi_ppm | P_ppm | Pb_ppm | Sn_ppm | Te_ppm | Zn_ppm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 472545 | 6338225 | 55 | Rock Chip | 5 | 250 | 15.7 | 0.48 | 20 | 6.8 | 0.2 | -0.05 | 2 |
| 472444 | 6338225 | 55 | Rock Chip | 4 | 150 | 151 | 2.35 | 90 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 0.06 | 7 |
| 472477 | 6338280 | 55 | Rock Chip | 7 | 210 | 71.3 | 1.05 | 230 | 8.2 | 5.2 | -0.05 | 9 |
| 472457 | 6338512 | 55 | Rock Chip | 25 | 80 | 31.1 | 2.5 | 180 | 8.6 | 1.4 | 0.06 | 41 |
| 472461 | 6338601 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
413 | 380 | 604 | 12.7 | 160 | 18.8 | 6.5 | 0.3 | 68 |
| 472493 | 6338657 | 55 | Rock Chip | 709 | 280 | 1850 | 2.29 | 150 | 50.5 | 12.9 | 0.26 | 17 |
| 472497 | 6338701 | 55 | Rock Chip | 104 | 280 | 468 | 0.78 | 260 | 13.2 | 1.8 | 0.05 | 54 |
| 472509 | 6338768 | 55 | Rock Chip | 330 | 3780 | 1050 | 72.4 | 380 | 1460 | 9.5 | 0.91 | 202 |
| 472516 | 6338806 | 55 | Rock Chip | 3660 | 2540 | 474 | 25.4 | 190 | 59.8 | 12.6 | 0.5 | 17 |
| 472477 | 6340161 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
33 | 340 | 96.5 | 0.64 | 160 | 17.1 | 2.7 | -0.05 | 38 |
| 473465 | 6325751 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 12m) |
13 | 90 | 72.7 | 0.23 | 110 | 4.9 | 1.1 | -0.05 | 4 |
| 473426 | 6325842 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 25m) |
26 | 130 | 45.2 | 0.13 | 280 | 10 | 1.4 | -0.05 | 15 |
| 473400 | 6325943 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 10m) |
3090 | 720 | 74.9 | 10.4 | 170 | 25.8 | 1.2 | 0.14 | 13 |
| 473310 | 6326119 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 10m) |
30 | 130 | 17.1 | 0.2 | 140 | 3.3 | 1 | -0.05 | 3 |
| 473308 | 6326220 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 10m) |
7 | 90 | 13.8 | 0.11 | 200 | 16.6 | 1 | -0.05 | 10 |
| 473314 | 6326253 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 10m) |
113 | 250 | 94 | 1.89 | 80 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 0.06 | 3 |
| 473298 | 6326255 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 12m) |
6 | 100 | 12.4 | 0.08 | 170 | 7 | 0.7 | -0.05 | 4 |
| 473371 | 6326039 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 8m) |
311 | 440 | 35.2 | 0.95 | 100 | 3.9 | 1.1 | -0.05 | 3 |
| 473130 | 6326029 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
7 | 610 | 59.2 | 0.31 | 210 | 20.6 | 3.1 | -0.05 | 14 |
| 473127 | 6326031 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
15 | 260 | 10.2 | 0.44 | 250 | 15.8 | 2.8 | -0.05 | 39 |
| 473124 | 6326033 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
11 | 290 | 16.3 | 0.57 | 200 | 12.6 | 2.5 | -0.05 | 52 |
| 473120 | 6326031 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
7 | 400 | 23.6 | 0.67 | 220 | 16.7 | 2.8 | -0.05 | 59 |
| 473115 | 6326033 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
25 | 870 | 116 | 0.25 | 910 | 55.5 | 3.2 | 0.05 | 340 |
| 473112 | 6326033 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
185 | 1170 | 161.5 | 0.6 | 650 | 54.6 | 6.2 | 0.06 | 206 |
| 473102 | 6326065 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
121 | 2370 | 1120 | 0.24 | 150 | 1880 | 2.6 | -0.05 | 20 |
| 473102 | 6326074 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
378 | 2570 | 335 | 0.23 | 130 | 294 | 4.3 | -0.05 | 34 |
| 473103 | 6326062 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
3370 | 5000 | 989 | 0.32 | 190 | 1675 | 4.1 | -0.05 | 19 |
| 472552 | 6340193 | 55 | Rock Chip (Channel 1m) |
9 | 50 | 10.9 | 0.56 | 140 | 20 | 0.7 | -0.05 | 3 |
15
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
==> picture [70 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 1/7/96. Origin: Appendix 8. Amended 1/7/97, 1/7/98, 30/9/2001 ,01/06/2010.
Name of entity
Carpentaria Exploration Limited
ACN or ABN Quarter ended (“current quarter”) 63 095 117 981 31-Mar-14
Consolidated statement of cash flows
| 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 |
Cash flows related to operating activities Receipts from product sales and related debtors |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Year to date (9 months) $A’000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | ||
| Payments for | |||
| (a) exploration and evaluation (b) development (c) production (d) administration |
(408) | (1,492) | |
| - | - | ||
| - | - | ||
| (501) | (2,016) | ||
| Dividends received | - | - | |
| Interest and other items of a similar nature received | 35 | 131 | |
| Interest and other costs of finance paid | - | (4) | |
| Income taxes received | - | - | |
| Other (provide detail if material) | - | 4 | |
| Net Operating Cash Flows | (874) | (3,377) | |
| Cash flows related to investing activities Payment for purchases of: |
|||
| (a)prospects (b)equity investments (c) other fixed assets |
- | - | |
| - | - | ||
| (3) | (6) | ||
| Proceeds from sale of: (a)prospects (b)equity investments (c)other fixed assets |
|||
| - | 2,905 | ||
| - | - | ||
| - | 11 | ||
| Loans to other entities | - | - | |
| Loans repaid by other entities | - | - | |
| Other - Exploration Advance | - | - | |
| Net investing cash flows | (3) | 2,910 | |
| Total operating and investing cash flows (carried forward) | (877) | (467) |
+See chapter 19 for defined terms
Appendix 5B Page 1
30/9/2001
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
==> picture [70 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
| 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 |
Total operating and investing cash flows (brought forward) | (877) | (467) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flows related to financing activities | |||
| Proceeds from issues of shares, options, etc. | 69 | 1,931 | |
| Proceeds from sale of forfeited shares | - | - | |
| Proceeds from borrowings | - | - | |
| Repayment of borrowings | (20) | (84) | |
| Dividends paid | - | - | |
| Share issue costs | (76) | (185) | |
| Net financing cash flows | (27) | 1,662 | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash held | (904) | 1,195 | |
| Cash at beginning of quarter/year to date | 6,236 | 4,137 | |
| Exchange rate adjustments to item 1.20 | |||
| Cash at end of quarter | 5,332 | 5,332 |
Payments to directors of the entity and associates of the directors
Payments to related entities of the entity and associates of the related entities
| Payments to directors of the entity and associates of the directors Payments to related entities of the entity and associates of the related entities |
||
|---|---|---|
| 1.23 1.24 |
Current quarter $A'000 |
|
| Aggregate amount of payments to the parties included in item 1.2 | 130 | |
| Aggregate amount of loans to the parties included in item 1.10 | - |
- 1.25 Explanation necessary for an understanding of the transactions
Item 1.23 relates to Directors Remuneration, Fees and Superannuation Contributions.
Non-cash financing and investing activities
-
Details of financing and investing transactions which have had a
-
2.1 material effect on consolidated assets and liabilities but did not involve cash flows
-
2.2 Details of outlays made by other entities to establish or increase their share in projects in which the reporting entity has an interest
+See chapter 19 for defined terms
Appendix 5B Page 2
30/9/2001
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
==> picture [70 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
Financing facilities available
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the position.
| 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 |
Amount available $A’000 |
Amount used $A’000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Loan facilities | 30 | 30 | |
| Credit standby arrangements | - | - | |
| Estimated cash outflows for next quarter | $A’000 | ||
| Exploration and evaluation* | 630 | ||
| Development | 0 | ||
| Production | 0 | ||
| Administration | 285 | ||
| Total | 915 | ||
| Reconciliation of cash | |||
| Reconciliation of cash at the end of the quarter (as shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the accounts is as follows. Cash on hand and at bank |
Current quarter $A’000 |
Previous quarter $A’000 |
|
| 5,332 | 6,226 | ||
| Deposits at call | 0 | 0 | |
| Bank overdraft Other (provide details) |
|||
| Total: cash at end of quarter(item 1.22) | 5,332 | 6,226 |
Changes in interests in mining tenements
6.1 Interests in mining tenements relinquished, reduced or lapsed
| Tenement Reference |
Nature of interest | Interest at beginning of quarter |
|---|---|---|
| (note (2)) | Interest at end of quarter |
|
| EL7476lapsed | - | 100%/Nil |
| EL6936reduced | - | 100%/50% |
| EL7841reduced | - | 100%/50% |
| EL7896reduced | - | 100%/75% |
6.2 Interests in mining tenements acquired or increased
+See chapter 19 for defined terms
Appendix 5B Page 3
30/9/2001
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
==> picture [70 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter
Description includes rate of interest and any redemption or conversion rights together with prices and dates.
| 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 7.11 7.12 |
Number quoted | Issue price per security (see note 3) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference +securities (description) Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Decreases through returns of capital, buy-backs, redemptions |
|||
| +Ordinary securities Quoted | 123,887,777 | ||
| Options Quoted | |||
| +Ordinary securities Un-Quoted(restricted) Changes during quarter |
|||
| (a) Increases through issues | |||
| (b) Decreases through returns of capital, buy-backs | |||
| +Convertible debt securities(description) Changes during quarter (a) Increases through issues (b) Exercise of Options |
|||
| Options (description and conversion factor) Unlisted Options CAPAK |
Number | Exercise price Expirydate |
|
| 2,600,000 | 0.290 15-Dec-14 |
||
| Unlisted Options CAPAO | 1,500,000 | 0.440 29-Nov-15 |
|
| Issued during quarter | |||
| Exercised during quarter | |||
| Expired during quarter | |||
| Debentures | - | ||
| (totals only) Unsecured notes(totals only) |
- |
+See chapter 19 for defined terms
Appendix 5B Page 4
30/9/2001
Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity quarterly report
==> picture [70 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
Compliance statement
-
1 This statement has been prepared under accounting policies which comply with accounting standards as defined in the Corporations Act or other standards acceptable to ASX (see note 4).
-
2 This statement does give a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
_______ 24-04-14 Company Secretary Chris Powell
-
1 The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity wanting to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes attached to this report.
-
2 The “Nature of interest” (items 6.1 and 6.2) includes options in respect of interests in mining tenements acquired, exercised or lapsed during the reporting period. If the entity is involved in a joint venture agreement and there are conditions precedent which will change its percentage interest in a mining tenement, it should disclose the change of percentage interest and conditions precedent in the list required for items 6.1 and 6.2.
-
3 Issued and quoted securities The issue price and amount paid up is not required in items 7.1 and 7.3 for fully paid securities .
-
4 The definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report.
-
5 Accounting Standards ASX will accept, for example, the use of International Accounting Standards for foreign entities. If the standards used do not address a topic, the Australian standard on that topic (if any) must be complied with.
+See chapter 19 for defined terms
Appendix 5B Page 5
30/9/2001