AI assistant
HASTINGS TECHNOLOGY METALS LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2021
Jan 20, 2021
65037_rns_2021-01-20_e5b41263-6b6b-406e-beb3-6f5e06f4fffb.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
21 January 2021
YANGIBANA INFILL DRILLING CONFIRMS
EXTENSIONS TO OREBODY
Hastings Technology Metals Limited ABN 43 122 911 399
ASX Code: Shares - HAS
Address:
Level 8, Westralia Plaza 167 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000
-
Results from the extension drilling program at Bald Hill, the largest deposit at the Yangibana Rare Earths Project, confirm continuation of mineralisation along strike to the south connecting to the 4km long Simon’s Find - Frasers trend.
-
Drilling comprised 68 holes to a maximum depth of 144m following up previous intercepts targeting areas outside of the current resource envelopes.
-
The majority of holes reported significant intercepts of grades above the lower economic TREO cut-off grade for Bald Hill.
-
Bald Hill South East deposit has been extended by at least 850m and remains open down-dip to the east and along strike.
PO Box 6 Westralia Plaza 167 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000
-
High-grade and shallow intersections from Bald Hill include:
-
4m @ 3.26% TREO from 63m
-
4m @ 1.90% TREO from 63m
-
4m @ 1.53% TREO from 6m
-
3m @ 1.01% TREO from 0m
-
2m @ 1.02% TREO from 36m
Board
- The Bald Hill Resource Estimate will be updated during Q1 2021.
Charles Lew (Executive Chairman)
________
Introduction
Guy Robertson (Finance Director)
Jean Claude Steinmetz (Non-Exec Director)
Neil Hackett (Non-Exec Director and Company Secretary)
Australia’s next pure rare earths producer Hastings Technology Metals Limited ( ASX: HAS ) ( Hastings or the Company ) is pleased to announce drill results at the Bald Hill deposit as part of the Company’s 2020 Exploration Drilling Program across the Yangibana Rare Earths Project in Western Australia’s Gascoyne region.
Mal Randall (Non-Exec Director)
Bruce McFadzean (Non-Exec Director)
Bald Hill is the largest Yangibana deposit in terms of estimated Mineral Resources and calculated Ore Reserves and forms a key component to the overall Yangibana start-up.
This phase of drilling had two main objectives:
www.hastingstechmetals.com
-
to follow up on previous resource drilling to infill existing geological gaps and knowledge; and
-
to delineate further strike potential to the south towards Simon’s Find.
1
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
In line with previous announcements with regards to drilling at Yangibana during 2020, the majority of the holes released as part of this announcement intersected economic intervals above the minimum cut-off for Bald Hill with a number of intercepts well above the average resource grade for Bald Hill calculated at 0.96% TREO.
Hastings Technology Metals Chief Operating Officer Andrew Reid commented:
“This is further confirmation that the unique geology at Yangibana is capable of underpinning a highquality, long-life operation. Given the extremely high success rate of drilling to date, there is clear potential for further Mineral Resource expansion across the entire Yangibana project area.
“These drilling results continue to demonstrate the potential scale and quality not just of Bald Hill but other Yangibana deposits and we estimate that the project has additional growth potential. Further drilling results are expected over the coming weeks. In the meantime, we have begun the process of updating the Mineral Resource estimates and Ore Reserves.”
Bald Hill Deposit
The Bald Hill deposit is the single most important orebody forming the Yangibana project. Key project infrastructure, including the beneficiation plant and tailings storage facilities, have been placed in close proximity to this deposit.
The results from this drilling further confirm the strategic importance of Bald Hill and the potential for further resource expansions with further drilling programs. Of particular note is a series of holes drilled along the down-dip southern flank of Bald Hill (Figure 1). Numerous shallow high-grade intercepts were recorded in this area, which may add to the Mineral Resource estimate.
To the south, a series of drill lines has extended the Bald Hill South East deposit by an additional 850m and there is now a clear connection into the northern mineralisation of the 4km-long Simon’s Find – Frasers trend.
2020 Exploration Program
Hastings commenced the 2020 drilling program with a Reverse Circulation (RC) rig mobilised to site in mid-June. The program, which was completed in the December 2020 Quarter, was designed to achieve three goals:
-
Validate the existing Bald Hill Mineral Resource Estimates with close spaced grade control drilling;
-
Increase the Yangibana Project’s Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource; and
-
Obtain core samples for additional metallurgical test work and ore characterisation studies.
2
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [446 x 641] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1. Bald Hill extension drilling 2020 results.
3
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
This announcement was authorised for release by the Company’s Board of Directors.
For further information please contact:
Charles Lew, Executive Chairman: +65 6220 9220 Andrew Reid, Chief Operations Officer: +61 432 740 975
For investor and media queries, please contact:
Peter Klinger, Cannings Purple: +61 411 251 540 Peter Kermode, Cannings Purple: +61 411 209 459
About Hastings Technology Metals Limited
Yangibana Project
Hastings Technology Metals Limited (ASX:HAS, Hastings or the Company) is Australia’s next pure Rare Earth producer and is advancing its flagship Yangibana Rare Earths Project in the Upper Gascoyne Region of Western Australia towards production. The proposed beneficiation and hydro metallurgy processing plant will treat rare earths deposits, predominantly monazite, hosting high neodymium and praseodymium contents to produce a mixed rare earths carbonate that will be further refined into individual rare earth oxides at processing plants overseas.
Neodymium and praseodymium are vital components in the manufacture of permanent magnets which is used in a wide and expanding range of advanced and high-tech products including electric vehicles, wind turbines, robotics, medical applications and others. Hastings aims to become the next significant producer of neodymium and praseodymium outside of China.
Hastings holds 100% interest in the most significant deposits within the overall project, and 70% interest in additional deposits that will be developed at a later date, all held under Mining Leases. Numerous prospects have been identified warranting detailed exploration to further extend the life of the project.
Brockman Project
The Brockman deposit, near Halls Creek in Western Australia, contains JORC Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources, estimated using the guidelines of JORC Code (2012 Edition).
The Company is also progressing a Mining Lease application over the Brockman Rare Earths and Rare Metals Project.
Hastings aims to capitalise on the strong demand for critical rare earths created by the expanding demand for new technology products.
For further information on the Company and its projects visit www.hastingstechmetals.com
4
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Table 1. Significant Intersections: results from Bald Hill.
| Hole-ID | Depth | Depth | Intercept | TREO % | Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 | Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From | To | % | % of TREO | |||
| BHRC460 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 1.53 | 0.65 | 44% |
| BHRC461 | 22 | 30 | 8 | 0.75 | 0.30 | 40% |
| BHRC462 | 36 | 47 | 11 | 0.49 | 0.20 | 40% |
| BHRC464 | 26 | 30 | 4 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 39% |
| BHRC465 | 44 | 50 | 6 | 0.82 | 0.33 | 40% |
| BHRC466 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 41% |
| and | 10 | 11 | 1 | 0.35 | 0.15 | 42% |
| BHRC474 | 17 | 18 | 1 | 0.32 | 0.14 | 42% |
| BHRC475 | 32 | 33 | 1 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 39% |
| BHRC478 | 67 | 69 | 2 | 0.28 | 0.13 | 46% |
| BHRC479 | 16 | 17 | 1 | 0.44 | 0.16 | 37% |
| BHRC481 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0.27 | 0.10 | 37% |
| and | 14 | 15 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 36% |
| and | 63 | 67 | 4 | 3.26 | 1.20 | 37% |
| BHRC482 | 63 | 67 | 4 | 1.90 | 0.63 | 36% |
| BHRC483 | 39 | 43 | 4 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 36% |
| and | 48 | 57 | 9 | 0.87 | 0.31 | 36% |
| and | 65 | 68 | 3 | 0.66 | 0.31 | 46% |
| BHRC484 | 58 | 59 | 1 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 39% |
| BHRC485 | 27 | 30 | 3 | 0.70 | 0.25 | 36% |
| BHRC493 | 15 | 16 | 1 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 40% |
| and | 22 | 23 | 1 | 1.75 | 0.66 | 38% |
| and | 48 | 50 | 2 | 0.43 | 0.16 | 36% |
| BHRC495 | 97 | 104 | 7 | 0.97 | 0.34 | 35% |
| BHRC498 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.02 | 0.38 | 37% |
| and | 49 | 50 | 1 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 35% |
| and | 79 | 81 | 2 | 0.31 | 0.13 | 39% |
| BHRC499 | 79 | 86 | 7 | 0.74 | 0.31 | 41% |
| BHRC500 | 91 | 97 | 6 | 0.56 | 0.22 | 40% |
| BHRC501 | 21 | 22 | 1 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 41% |
| and | 23 | 24 | 1 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 39% |
| and | 30 | 33 | 3 | 0.38 | 0.13 | 35% |
| BHRC502 | 36 | 38 | 2 | 1.02 | 0.37 | 37% |
| BHRC504 | 75 | 81 | 6 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 39% |
| BHRC508 | 6 | 11 | 5 | 0.82 | 0.32 | 37% |
| BHRC510 | 16 | 20 | 4 | 0.53 | 0.23 | 42% |
| BHRC511 | 23 | 27 | 4 | 0.38 | 0.16 | 40% |
| BHRC512 | 35 | 36 | 1 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 45% |
| and | 38 | 44 | 6 | 0.73 | 0.33 | 46% |
| BHRC513 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 39% |
| BHRC514 | 20 | 25 | 5 | 0.47 | 0.20 | 42% |
5
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| BHRC515 | 38 | 46 | 8 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 42% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHRC516 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 40% |
| BHRC518 | 27 | 30 | 3 | 0.47 | 0.20 | 43% |
| BHRC519 | 6 | 11 | 5 | 0.51 | 0.21 | 42% |
| BHRC520 | 29 | 32 | 3 | 1.01 | 0.43 | 43% |
| BHRC522 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.10 | 43% |
| BHRC522 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0.29 | 0.11 | 36% |
| BHRC523 | 22 | 26 | 4 | 0.51 | 0.23 | 45% |
==> picture [446 x 218] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2. Section A-A’, Cross-section (see plan) looking north-west through Bald Hill mineralisation.
==> picture [446 x 217] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3. Section B-B’, Cross-section (see plan) looking north-west through Bald Hill mineralisation.
6
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Sampling
Samples were sent to Genalysis Intertek in Perth for analysis using techniques considered appropriate for the style of mineralisation. Samples were analysed for the range of rare earths, rare metals (Nb, Ta, Zr), thorium and uranium and a range of common rock-forming elements (Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, Mn, P, S, Si, Sr).
Substantial delays are currently being experienced by commercial laboratories in Perth with respect to assay turnaround. Greater than 5-week turnaround time is currently expected.
Once assay data were returned, the elemental values were converted to oxides using standard factors.
Table 2. Bald Hill Drill hole location and status.
| Hole | Drill | Depth | Easting |
Northing | RL | Survey | Assay | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Type | (m) | (m) | (m) | (m) | Type | Dip | Status |
| BHDD528 | DD | 26.25 | 428605 | 7355018 | 400 | GPS | -89 | no results |
| BHDD529 | DD | 17.45 | 428357 | 7356020 | 400 | GPS | -90 | pending |
| BHDD530 | DD | 86.1 | 427950 | 7356325 | 400 | GPS | -90 | pending |
| BHDD531 | DD | 53.2 | 428317 | 7356652 | 400 | GPS | -89 | pending |
| BHRC460 | RC | 90 | 428604 | 7355217 | 336 | GPS | -61 | reported |
| BHRC461 | RC | 90 | 428574 | 7355217 | 336 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC462 | RC | 90 | 428549 | 7355213 | 337 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC463 | RC | 90 | 428604 | 7355242 | 336 | GPS | -60 | pending |
| BHRC464 | RC | 40 | 428570 | 7355241 | 335 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC465 | RC | 54 | 428537 | 7355242 | 336 | GPS | -61 | reported |
| BHRC466 | RC | 30 | 428600 | 7355191 | 337 | GPS | -61 | reported |
| BHRC467 | RC | 30 | 428590 | 7355162 | 338 | GPS | -61 | pending |
| BHRC468 | RC | 30 | 428583 | 7355136 | 339 | GPS | -90 | no samples |
| BHRC472 | RC | 30 | 428610 | 7355037 | 343 | GPS | -90 | no samples |
| BHRC473 | RC | 25 | 428626 | 7355013 | 343 | GPS | -89 | pending |
| BHRC474 | RC | 30 | 428653 | 7354940 | 343 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC475 | RC | 50 | 428627 | 7354942 | 342 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC476 | RC | 90 | 427674 | 7356427 | 347 | GPS | -88 | no samples |
| BHRC477 | RC | 90 | 427750 | 7356449 | 348 | GPS | -89 | no samples |
| BHRC478 | RC | 90 | 427800 | 7356448 | 349 | GPS | -90 | reported |
| BHRC479 | RC | 90 | 427850 | 7356475 | 349 | GPS | -88 | reported |
| BHRC480 | RC | 90 | 427850 | 7356500 | 350 | GPS | -89 | no samples |
| BHRC481 | RC | 90 | 427899 | 7356499 | 351 | GPS | -89 | reported |
| BHRC482 | RC | 78 | 427950 | 7356525 | 353 | GPS | -88 | reported |
| BHRC483 | RC | 85 | 427950 | 7356550 | 354 | GPS | -88 | reported |
| BHRC484 | RC | 75 | 428000 | 7356600 | 356 | GPS | -88 | reported |
| BHRC485 | RC | 90 | 427952 | 7356576 | 354 | GPS | -88 | reported |
| BHRC486 | RC | 70 | 428100 | 7356597 | 363 | GPS | -87 | no samples |
| BHRC487 | RC | 65 | 428048 | 7356563 | 359 | GPS | -88 | no results |
| BHRC488 | RC | 75 | 428025 | 7356550 | 358 | GPS | -89 | no samples |
7
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| BHRC489 | RC | 75 | 428037 | 7356653 | 357 | GPS | -88 | no results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHRC490 | RC | 85 | 427950 | 7356650 | 353 | GPS | -89 | no samples |
| BHRC491 | RC | 75 | 428050 | 7356625 | 359 | GPS | -89 | no results |
| BHRC492 | RC | 100 | 427775 | 7356426 | 349 | GPS | -89 | no samples |
| BHRC493 | RC | 100 | 428199 | 7355921 | 343 | GPS | -88 | reported |
| BHRC495 | RC | 104 | 428175 | 7355900 | 342 | GPS | -89 | reported |
| BHRC496 | RC | 85 | 428224 | 7355849 | 342 | GPS | -89 | pending |
| BHRC497 | RC | 90 | 428248 | 7355824 | 341 | GPS | -89 | pending |
| BHRC498 | RC | 85 | 428238 | 7355875 | 342 | GPS | -90 | reported |
| BHRC499 | RC | 144 | 428300 | 7355824 | 342 | GPS | -90 | reported |
| BHRC500 | RC | 102 | 428301 | 7355776 | 342 | GPS | -88 | reported |
| BHRC501 | RC | 50 | 428451 | 7355660 | 341 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC502 | RC | 60 | 428420 | 7355660 | 341 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC503 | RC | 50 | 428405 | 7355700 | 342 | GPS | -60 | no results |
| BHRC504 | RC | 84 | 428375 | 7355700 | 342 | GPS | -90 | reported |
| BHRC505 | RC | 80 | 428336 | 7355726 | 343 | GPS | -90 | no samples |
| BHRC506 | RC | 24 | 428794 | 7354890 | 344 | GPS | -60 | no samples |
| BHRC507 | RC | 16 | 428774 | 7354867 | 343 | GPS | -59 | no samples |
| BHRC508 | RC | 16 | 428864 | 7354868 | 343 | GPS | -61 | reported |
| BHRC509 | RC | 60 | 428846 | 7354842 | 343 | GPS | -60 | pending |
| BHRC510 | RC | 40 | 428965 | 7354807 | 344 | GPS | -61 | reported |
| BHRC511 | RC | 60 | 428955 | 7354797 | 344 | GPS | -61 | reported |
| BHRC512 | RC | 60 | 428939 | 7354780 | 344 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC513 | RC | 24 | 429064 | 7354752 | 346 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC514 | RC | 42 | 429044 | 7354738 | 345 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC515 | RC | 66 | 429021 | 7354718 | 345 | GPS | -61 | reported |
| BHRC516 | RC | 20 | 429161 | 7354663 | 346 | GPS | -61 | reported |
| BHRC517 | RC | 40 | 429151 | 7354653 | 346 | GPS | -60 | pending |
| BHRC518 | RC | 60 | 429140 | 7354643 | 345 | GPS | -61 | reported |
| BHRC519 | RC | 24 | 429290 | 7354556 | 345 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC520 | RC | 48 | 429267 | 7354536 | 345 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC521 | RC | 60 | 429243 | 7354512 | 346 | GPS | -60 | pending |
| BHRC522 | RC | 30 | 429398 | 7354491 | 340 | GPS | -60 | reported |
| BHRC523 | RC | 50 | 429375 | 7354470 | 340 | GPS | -59 | reported |
| BHRC524 | RC | 40 | 428539 | 7355663 | 340 | GPS | -61 | pending |
| BHRC525 | RC | 40 | 428513 | 7355663 | 340 | GPS | -60 | pending |
| BHRC526 | RC | 40 | 428483 | 7355662 | 341 | GPS | -61 | pending |
| BHRC527 | RC | 60 | 428386 | 7355661 | 342 | GPS | -60 | pending |
8
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Competent Persons and Qualifying Persons Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results in relation to the Yangibana Project is based on information compiled by Mr. Andrew Reid BSc (Hons) MSc FAUSIMM, a Competent Person, who is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr. Reid is a full-time employee of the company and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves. The Qualified Person has verified the data disclosed in this release, including sampling, analytical and test data underlying the information contained in this release. Mr. Reid consents to the inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
9
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Yangibana project deposits
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling |
• Samples used to assess the Bald Hill and Bald Hill |
| techniques | (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or | South East deposits of the Yangibana Project (reported |
| specific specialised industry standard | in this announcement have been derived from reverse | |
| measurement tools appropriate to the | circulation (RC) drilling. | |
| minerals under investigation, such as | • Samples from reverse circulation drilling were |
|
| down hole gamma sondes, or handheld | collected from each metre from a rig mounted cyclone | |
| XRF instruments, etc.). These examples | and split using a 3-level riffle splitter from which 2-4kg | |
| should not be taken as limiting the broad | samples were sent for analysis Field duplicates, blanks | |
| meaning of sampling. | and Reference Standards were inserted at a rate of | |
| • Include reference to measures |
approximately 1 in 25. | |
| taken to ensure sample representivity and | • Diamond Drill core is logged and marked for |
|
| the appropriate calibration of any |
sampling. Prospective zones are sawn into half along | |
| measurement tools or systems used. | the length of the drill core. One half is then further sawn | |
| • Aspects of the determination of |
in half. One quarter of the drill core is sent for analysis. | |
| mineralisation that are Material to the | Assayed intervals are based on geology with a minimum | |
| Public Report. | length of 0.2m. |
• Diamond Drill core is logged and marked for sampling. Prospective zones are sawn into half along the length of the drill core. One half is then further sawn in half. One quarter of the drill core is sent for analysis. Assayed intervals are based on geology with a minimum length of 0.2m.
-
In cases where ‘industry standard’
-
work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
• Samples are prepared by drying, crushing, weighing splitting and pulverising the split samples to produce a representative sample for sodium peroxide fusion and ICP-MS, ICP-OES analysis.
• Field duplicates, blanks and Reference Standards were inserted at a rate of approximately 1 in 20.
Drilling • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse techniques circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). Drill sample • Method of recording and recovery assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
• Reverse Circulation drilling at the various targets utilised a nominal 5 ¼-inch diameter face-sampling hammer.
• Recoveries are recorded by the geologist in the field at the time of drilling/logging.
• If poor sample recovery is encountered during drilling, the geologist and driller have endeavoured to
10
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Criteria
JORC Code explanation Commentary
-
Measures taken to maximise
-
sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.
• Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
rectify the problem to ensure maximum sample recovery. Visual assessment is made for moisture and contamination. A cyclone and splitter were used to ensure representative samples and were routinely cleaned.
• Sample recoveries to date have generally been reasonable, and moisture in samples minimal. Insufficient data is available at present to determine if a relationship exists between recovery and grade.
• Hole FRRC197 returned low sample weights on some 1m samples within the significant intercept most likely related to cavities.
Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
Sub-sampling • If core, whether cut or sawn and techniques whether quarter, half or all core taken. and sample • If non-core, whether riffled, tube preparation sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.
• For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.
• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.
• All drill chip samples are geologically logged at 1m intervals from surface to the bottom of each individual hole to a level that supports appropriate future Mineral Resource studies.
• Logging (geological) is considered to be semiquantitative given the nature of reverse circulation drill chips.
• All RC drill holes in the previous programme were logged in full.
• Diamond drill core is marked up using the drillers reported measurements of each coring run. Lengths of core are measured and compared to reported and where any loss has occurred. Recoveries are calculated as a percentage of the drilled interval.
• The RC drilling rig is equipped with an in-built cyclone and triple tier riffle splitting system, which provided one bulk sample of approximately 25kg, and a sub-sample of 2-4kg per metre drilled.
• All samples were split using the system described above to maximise and maintain consistent representivity. Most samples were dry. For wet samples the cleanliness of the cyclone and splitter was constantly monitored by the geologist and maintained to avoid contamination.
• Bulk samples were placed in green plastic bags, with the sub-samples collected placed in calico sample bags.
• Field duplicates were collected directly from the splitter as drilling proceeded through a secondary sample chute. These duplicates were designed for lab checks as well as lab umpire analysis.
11
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| • A sample size of 2-4kg was collected and |
||
| considered appropriate and representative for the | ||
| grain size and style of mineralisation. |
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and |
|---|---|
| assay data and | appropriateness of the assaying and |
| laboratory | laboratory procedures used and whether |
| tests | the technique is considered partial or |
| total. | |
| • For geophysical tools, |
|
| spectrometers, handheld XRF |
|
| instruments, etc., the parameters used in | |
| determining the analysis including |
|
| instrument make and model, reading | |
| times, calibrations factors applied and | |
| their derivation, etc. | |
| • Nature of quality control |
|
| procedures adopted (e.g. standards, | |
| blanks, duplicates, external laboratory | |
| checks) and whether acceptable levels of | |
| accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision | |
| have been established. |
-
Verification of • The verification of significant sampling and intersections by either independent or assaying alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
-
Discuss any adjustment to assay
-
data.
-
Location of • Accuracy and quality of surveys data points used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
-
Specification of the grid system
-
used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
• Genalysis (Perth) was used for all analysis work carried out on the 1m drill chip samples and the rock chip samples. The laboratory techniques below are for all samples submitted to Genalysis and are considered appropriate for the style of mineralisation defined at the Yangibana REE Project: FP6/MS
• Blind field duplicates were collected at a rate of approximately 1 duplicate for every 20 samples that are to be submitted to Genalysis for laboratory analysis. Field duplicates were split directly from the splitter as drilling proceeded at the request of the supervising geologist.
• At least two company personnel verify all significant intersections.
• All geological logging and sampling information is completed firstly on to paper logs before being transferred to Microsoft Excel spreadsheets and subsequently a Microsoft Access database. Physical logs and sampling data are returned to the Hastings head office for scanning and storage. Electronic copies of all information are backed up daily.
• No adjustments of assay data are considered necessary.
• Final drillhole collars completed during 2014 were collected by MHR Surveyors using DGPS utilising a locally established control point. Accuracies of the drillhole collar locations collected by MHR Surveyors is better than 0.1m. Drillhole collar positions from 2015 onwards were collected using a Trimble RTX R1 GNSS receiver, with accuracy of approximately 50cm.
• Collar positions are surveyed by RM Surveys (formerly MHR Surveys) and accuracies are better than 0.1m.
• Elevation data was recorded by both MHR Surveyors and the Trimble receiver, but the topographic control for all drillholes is based on the
12
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| high-resolution DTM undertaken by the Company, with | ||
| Relative Level (RL) assigned to each borehole based on | ||
| the DTM using Mapinfo Discover 3D. | ||
| • Down hole surveys are conducted by the drill |
||
| contractors using a Reflex electronic single-shot camera | ||
| with readings for dip and magnetic azimuth nominally | ||
| taken at the top and bottom of drill holes. The | ||
| instrument is positioned within a stainless-steel drill rod | ||
| so as not to affect the magnetic azimuth. | ||
| • Grid system used is MGA 94 (Zone 50) |
||
| Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of |
• Substantial areas of the Bald Hill deposit have |
| and | Exploration Results. | been infill drilled at a staggered 25m x 50m pattern, |
| distribution | • Whether the data spacing and |
giving an effective 40m x 40 spacing. In general, and |
| distribution is sufficient to establish the | where allowed by the kriging parameters and data | |
| degree of geological and grade continuity | quality, this would allow portions of the deposit to be | |
| appropriate for the Mineral Resource | classified in the Measured category. Areas of 50m x | |
| and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) | 50m spacing are generally classified as Indicated, while | |
| and classifications applied. | zones with wider spacing or where blocks are | |
| • Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
extrapolated are generally classified as Inferred category. |
|
| • No sample compositing of RC samples is used in |
||
| this report, all results detailed are the product of 1m | ||
| downhole sample intervals. DD holes were composited | ||
| to 1m intervals in order to provide for equivalent | ||
| samples. | ||
| Orientation of | • Whether the orientation of |
• Most drill holes in the recent programme are |
| data in | sampling achieves unbiased sampling of | angled and collared at -60o or -90o in order to |
| relation to | possible structures and the extent to | appropriately intersect the mineralization. Orientation |
| geological | which this is known, considering the | is towards the east for the southernmost area within |
| structure | deposit type. | the Mineral Resource and towards to northeast in the |
| • If the relationship between the |
remaining two areas. | |
| drilling orientation and the orientation of | ||
| key mineralised structures is considered | ||
| to have introduced a sampling bias, this | ||
| should be assessed and reported if | ||
| material. | ||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure |
• The chain of custody is managed by the project |
| security | sample security. | geologist who places calico sample bags in polyweave |
• The chain of custody is managed by the project geologist who places calico sample bags in polyweave sacks. Up to 10 calico sample bags are placed in each sack. Each sack is clearly labelled with:
-
Hastings Technology Metals Ltd
-
Address of laboratory
-
Sample range
13
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC | Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| • Samples were delivered by Hastings personnel to |
|||
| the Nexus Logistics base in order to be loaded on the | |||
| next available truck for delivery to Genalysis | |||
| • The freight provider delivers the samples directly |
|||
| to the laboratory. Detailed records are kept of all | |||
| samples that are dispatched, including details of chain | |||
| of custody. | |||
| Audits or | • | The results of any audits or | • An audit of sampling has been is in the final |
| reviews | reviews of sampling techniques and data. | stages of completion. Additional umpire sampling is | |
| underway. A new source of standards is being used to | |||
| cross-check data from existing standards and assayed | |||
| samples that were acquired in the drilling programs | |||
| comprising the resource. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC | Code explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • | Type, reference name/number, | • The results are from the Hastings Technology |
|
| tenement and | location and ownership |
including | Metals Ltd Yangibana REE Project, Bald Hill Area which | |
| land tenure | agreements or material issues | with third | lies within Mining Licence M09/157. This tenement is | |
| status | parties such as joint |
ventures, | wholly owned by Yangibana Pty Ltd, a wholly entity of | |
| partnerships, overriding royalties, native | Hastings Technology Metals. | |||
| title | interests, historical sites, wilderness | • The tenement is in good standing and no known |
||
| or | national park and environmental | impediments exist. | ||
| settings. | ||||
| • | The security of the tenure held at | |||
| the | time of reporting along | with any | ||
| known impediments to obtaining a | ||||
| licence to operate in the area. | ||||
| Exploration | • | Acknowledgment and appraisal of | • All RC and Diamond Drilling on the tenement has |
|
| done by other | exploration by other parties. | been undertaken by Hasting’s Technology Metals. The | ||
| parties | discovery and delineation of Mineral Resources at Bald | |||
| Hill is entirely the result of work performed by Hastings | ||||
| Technology Metals. | ||||
| Geology | • | Deposit type, geological setting | • REE mineralisation at the Yangibana REE Project |
|
| and | style of mineralisation. | is hosted within carbonatites and associated phoscorite | ||
| dykes emplaced within a variety of rock types but | ||||
| predominantly in granites. | ||||
| • Economic mineralisation is hosted within in the |
||||
| completely weathered and oxidised portions of the | ||||
| carbonatite-phoscorite rocks which occur as |
||||
| ironstones. |
14
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
• The nature of weathering and oxidation means that all resources occur in the near surface. Transitional zones from completely weathered ironstones to primary carbonatite have rarely been intersected in drilling across the Yangibana REE Project as drilling has focused primarily on relatively shallow mineralisation.
- Drill hole • A summary of all information Information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:
• All relevant information material to the understanding of exploration results has been included within the body of the announcement or as appendices. • No information has been excluded.
- easting and northing of the drill hole collar
-
elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar
-
▪ dip and azimuth of the hole of down hole length and
-
▪ hole depth
-
• If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
-
Data • In reporting Exploration Results, aggregation weighting averaging techniques, methods maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.
-
No top-cuts have been applied.
-
• No metal equivalent values are used for reporting exploration results.
-
The assumptions used for any
-
reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.
Relationship • These relationships are • True widths are generally estimated to be about between particularly important in the reporting of 70% of the down-hole width. mineralisation Exploration Results. widths and • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill
15
==> picture [190 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary | Commentary | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intercept | hole angle is known, its nature should be | ||||||
| lengths | reported. | ||||||
| • If it is not known and only the |
|||||||
| down hole lengths are reported, there | |||||||
| should be a clear statement to this effect | |||||||
| (eg ‘down hole length, true width not | |||||||
| known’). | |||||||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections |
• | See diagrams included. | ||||
| (with scales) and tabulations of |
|||||||
| intercepts should be included for any | |||||||
| significant discovery being reported | |||||||
| These should include, but not be limited | |||||||
| to a plan view of drill hole collar locations | |||||||
| and appropriate sectional view. | |||||||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting |
• | All | significant intersections are reported. All drill | |||
| reporting | of all Exploration Results is not |
hole | locations from the Bald Hill 2020 drill program are | ||||
| practicable, representative reporting of | reported. | Additional information on | assays will be | ||||
| both low and high grades and/or widths | reported from these holes as results become available. | ||||||
| should be practiced to avoid misleading | |||||||
| reporting of Exploration Results. | |||||||
| Other | • Other exploration data, if |
• | See release details. | ||||
| substantive | meaningful and material, should be | ||||||
| exploration | reported including (but not limited to): | ||||||
| data | geological observations; geophysical |
||||||
| survey results; geochemical survey |
|||||||
| results; bulk samples – size and method | |||||||
| of treatment; metallurgical test results; | |||||||
| bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical | |||||||
| and rock characteristics; potential |
|||||||
| deleterious or contaminating substances. | |||||||
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned |
• | Further work will include infill, step out and twin- | ||||
| further work (eg tests for lateral | hole | drilling. This work will be designed to | improve | ||||
| extensions or depth extensions or large- | confidence in, and test | potential extensions to the | |||||
| scale step-out drilling). | current resource estimates and to provide necessary | ||||||
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the |
sample | material for |
additional | and | ongoing | ||
| areas of possible extensions, including | metallurgical studies | ||||||
| the main geological interpretations and | |||||||
| future drilling areas, provided this | |||||||
| information is not commercially |
|||||||
| sensitive. |
16