AI assistant
Hapag-Lloyd AG — Investor Presentation 2015
Mar 27, 2015
199_ip_2015-03-27_657b2dc9-f39d-4a2e-851c-106d47af4704.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
3.Elbe dredging (European Court of Justice etc) 4.Employee information (7.001 Investor Presentation 10.949, 4th region) – Full Year Results 2014
27 March 2015
Executive summary
- Operating performance in 2014 clearly below previous year dissatisfying result caused by persistently strong competition and one-off expenses
- Key highlight in 2014 was the merger of Hapag-Lloyd and CSAV container shipping activities
- "New" Hapag-Lloyd is the #4 global container shipping company
- Net synergies of approx. USD 300 m p.a. integration progressing well
- Strengthened capital structure with strong anchor shareholders
- Hapag-Lloyd has defined clear strategic measures to significantly improve profitability based on this Hapag-Lloyd intends to achieve an EBITDA margin of 10%-12% until 2017
- The start of 2015 has been satisfactory business has developed in accordance with expectations and the results have improved significantly compared to previous year
- For 2015 as a whole, Hapag-Lloyd plans to achieve a clearly positive operating result (EBIT adj.) EBITDA is expected to increase considerably on the basis of first synergy realizations, further cost savings, continuous volume growth and improvement of result quality
- A. Financials 2014
- B. Market Update
- C. Our Way Forward
Hapag-Lloyd revenues increase to EUR 6.8 bn in 2014 – CCS activities consolidated as of 2 December 2014
Transport volume [TTEU]
Freight rate [USD/TEU]
Revenue [EUR m]
1) Incl. CCS (1M) of USD 267 million
4
Comments
- Hapag-Lloyd transport volume rose by +4.7% in 2014 in line with market (excl. CCS)
- Average freight rate was disappointing with 1,434 USD/TEU in 2014 (-3.2% excl. CCS)
- Revenue slightly increased to EUR 6,607 m in 2014 (+0.6% excl. CCS)
Source: Company information
Transport volume [TTEU]
1) Excl. CCS (1M)
5
Source: Company information
Freight rate1) [USD/TEU] vs. bunker price2) [USD/t]
1) Hapag-Lloyd average freight rate per year, excl. CCS (1M) 2) Hapag-Lloyd average consumption price per year, excl. CCS (1M)
Source: Company information
Hapag-Lloyd further optimized its cost base in 2014 – Transport expenses reduced by -32 USD/TEU1)
CCS (1M) HL (12M)
7
Transport expenses [EUR m] Transport expenses per TEU [USD/TEU]
1) Incl. CCS (1M) of USD 231 million
Source: Company information
EBIT adjusted at EUR -112 m in 2014 (incl. CCS for 1 month) – High non-recurring one-off effects due to CSAV transaction
Operational KPIs
| FY 2014 |
FY 2013 |
∆ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transport volume [TTEU] | 5,907 | 5,496 | 411 |
| 1) Freight rate [USD/TEU] |
1,434 | 1,482 | -48 |
| 1) Bunker price [USD/t] |
575 | 613 | -38 |
| Exchange rate [EUR/USD] | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0 |
| Revenue [EUR m] | 6,808 | 6,567 | +241 |
| EBITDA [EUR m] | 99 | 389 | -290 |
| EBIT adjusted [EUR m] | -112 | 67 | -179 |
| EAT [EUR m] | -604 | -97 | -506 |
| Investments [EUR m]2) | 334 | 741 | -407 |
EBITDA bridge [EUR m]
EBIT bridge [EUR m]
1) Excl. CCS (1M) 2) Investments in PPE 2) Purchase price allocation (charter adj. only for EBITDA) 3) Transactions and restructuring costs
Source: Company information
Hapag-Lloyd considerably strengthened its capital structure and gained an additional strong anchor shareholder
Strengthened liquidity reserve
Strong shareholder base
Agenda
- A. Financials 2014
- B. Market Update
- C. Our Way Forward
Container shipping has been and continues to be a growth industry – Global order book currently on low levels
Source: IMF (Jan 2015), IHS Global Insight (Jan 2015), MDS Transmodal (various years), Lloyd's List (15/30 Jan 2015), Alphaliner (29 Jan 2015)
Short-term freight rate pressures and volatilities remain in the container shipping industry
Shanghai – Latin America (SCFI)
Comments
- Shanghai Containerized Freight Index (SCFI) only reflects Shanghai outbound rate development
- Freight rates on Asia / Europe trade remain volatile
- Freight rates on Transpacific trades tend to be somehow less volatile
- USEC freight rate increased to about 5,000 USD/FEU due to USWC strikes
Global capacity management
Source: Alphaliner weekly newsletter; MDS Transmodal (various months); Clarksons
Bunker price and EUR/USD rate have significantly decreased – LSF to be used in emission control areas as of Jan 2015
Source: MDS Transmodal January 2015 plus HL internal data, only vessels >399 TEU, Alphaliner
New cooperation in Latin America
- Our increased presence in Latin America since integration of CSAV container shipping activities has resulted in a new cooperation with Hamburg Süd, CMA CGM and CSCL
- MoUs have already been signed implementation between Latin America and Asia will start from July 2015 onwards
Compelling rationale
- New product between Asia and Latin America with reliable weekly services
- Three loops to/from South America West Coast, two loops to/from South America East Coast
- Best transit times to and from main Asian locations
- Extensive port coverage in Mexico (Pacific), SAWC, SAEC
- New 9,300 TEU ships deployed in the trade, overall improved capacity deployment
- Increase of average vessel size to well above 8,000 TEU
- Competitive cost level other carriers will have difficulty matching
- High reefer plug capacity to offer best in class reefer product
- Comprehensive and reliable inland service in Latin America through rail and trucking network
Agenda
- A. Financials 2014
- B. Market Update
- C. Our Way Forward
Short- and mid-term initiatives
1 Project CUATRO Close deal and integrate CSAV business
2 Project OCTAVE Short-term profit improvement in 8 modules
3 Structural Improvements Align board structure and responsibilities
4 Close the Cost Gap Improve profitability in light of new alliances
5 Compete to Win
New commercial approach (multi-year effort)
Significantly improve earnings and achieve an EBITDA margin of 10-12% by 2017
Synergies of approx. USD 300 m p.a.
Optimized and enlarged network
Competitive and flexible fleet
- Average age of the combined fleet roughly 8 years as of 31 December 2014
- 65% of combined capacity younger than 10 years, only 5% older than 20 years
- Average vessel size for "New" Hapag-Lloyd fleet 5,271 TEU compared to 4,717 TEU for Top 20 and 3,077 TEU as industry average
- Ownership structure well balanced: 54% of combined fleet owned and 46% chartered
- Delivery of 5 further 9,300 TEU vessels in H1 2015 specialized for Latin America trade
Integration status
Organization and staffing – New organization implemented, staff selection nearly completed
Office set-up & IT infrastructure – Offices selected, infrastructure set-up progressing
Customer and vendor information – Customers and vendors informed
Training – Global training in progress and on track
Voyages cut-over – Ramp-up of bookings according to schedule, first services cut over
Integration monitoring – Integration KPIs continuously monitored, integration on track
| Hapag-Lloyd improvement areas | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procurement & | Inland Pricing & Steering | ||||
| Inland | Bunker Procurement | ||||
| Fleet & Network |
Fleet Renewal | Targeted cost |
|||
| Fleet Refurbishment | savings: Low three |
||||
| Service Structure | digit USD million figure |
||||
| Sales & Product Portfolio |
Utilization | for 2015 already |
|||
| Special Cargo | |||||
| Spot Market |
Vessel fleet structure as of 31 December 2014
| Owned1) | Chartered | Current fleet |
Orderbook | Fleet ownership [%] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity [TEU] | 131,674 | 131,674 | |||||
| >10,000 TEU | Vessels | 10 | 10 | ||||
| Capacity [TEU] | 197,114 | 68,036 | 265,150 | 46,500 | 45% | chartered 46% 55% |
|
| 8,000 – 10,000 TEU |
Vessels | 23 | 8 | 31 | 5 | 54% owned |
|
| Capacity [TEU] | 49,743 | 66,240 | 115,983 | ||||
| 6,000 – 8,000 TEU |
Vessels | 7 | 10 | 17 | |||
| Capacity [TEU] | 105,238 | 257,525 | 362,763 | Orderbook: 3 deliveries in |
Average vessel size [TEU]4) | ||
| 4,000 – 6,000 TEU |
Vessels Fleet renewal: |
23 | 54 | 77 | Q1, remaining 2 in Q2 2015 |
+554 | +1,640 |
| 16 vessels Capacity [TEU] ("Old Ladies") |
38,843 | 54,624 | 93,467 | 5,271 | 4,717 | ||
| 2,300 – 4,000 TEU |
reclassified as Vessels held for sale |
13 | 19 | 32 | |||
| Capacity [TEU] | 12,226 | 27,548 | 39,774 | 3,077 | |||
| <2,300 TEU | Vessels | 6 | 18 | 24 | |||
| Capacity [TEU] | 534,8382) | 473,9733) | 1,008,811 | 46,500 | |||
| Total | Vessels | 822) | 1093) | 191 | 5 | Hapag Lloyd |
Top 20 World Fleet |
23 1) Incl. 5 financial leases 2) Incl. 1 chartered-out 3) Incl. 2 chartered-out 4) MDS Transmodal January 2015 Source: Company information
Transport volume by trade, 31 Dec 2014 Fleet considerations
- "New" Hapag-Lloyd has a leading presence within the Latin American routes
- To retain / enhance this position, "New" HL considers to order or charter new ships
-
Decision is planned for Q2 2014
-
The new ships would be deployed primarily on Latin American routes
- New ships would optimize network / product
- − Bundle services / redesign cooperation
- − Participate in reefer growth
- − Generate considerable slot cost advantages
- Best ship design for the trade intended
- − Optimized hull shape (less draft)
- − Fuel efficient engine room setup
- − ≥2,000 reefer plugs anticipated
Hapag-Lloyd expects a significant improvement in profitability in 2015
| Guidance for 2015 | Comments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transport volume |
Increasing moderately |
CCS for 2014 – |
Guidance for 2015 based on pro-forma inclusion of effects not taken into account in the guidance |
however, one-off volume and rate |
| Freight rate |
Decreasing moderately | • CCS transport volume in 2014 at 1,924 TTEU • CCS avg. freight rate 2014 at 1,174 USD/TEU In the consolidated financial statements CCS only included from 2 December 2014 (i.e. one month) |
||
| EBITDA | Clearly increasing |
Sensitivities for 2015 | ||
| Operating result1) |
Clearly positive | Transport volume Freight rate |
+/- 100 TTEU +/- 50 USD/TEU |
+/- USD <0.1 bn +/- USD ~0.4 bn |
| Liquidity | Bunker price | +/- 100 USD/t |
+/- USD ~0.3 bn |
|
| reserve | Remaining adequate | EUR / USD | +/- 0.1 EUR/USD |
+/- USD <0.1 bn |
CCS = CSAV container shipping activities
1) EBIT adjusted
25
Source: Company information
| 2014 | 2013 | ∆ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transport volume [TTEU] | 5,907 | 5,496 | 411 |
| Freight rate without CCS activitites [USD/TEU] | 1,434 | 1,482 | -48 |
| Revenue | 6,808 | 6,567 | 240 |
| Other operating income | 117 | 156 | -40 |
| Transport expenses | 6,060 | 5,773 | 287 |
| Personnel expenses | 403 | 365 | 38 |
| Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment |
482 | 325 | 156 |
| Other operating expenses | 393 | 252 | 142 |
| Operating result | -414 | 8 | -422 |
| Share of profit of equity-accounted investeees | 34 | 37 | -3 |
| Other financial result | -3 | 19 | -22 |
| Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) | -383 | 64 | -447 |
| Interest result | -210 | -154 | -56 |
| Earnings before income taxes | -593 | -90 | -503 |
| Income taxes | 11 | 8 | 4 |
| Group profit/loss | -604 | -97 | -506 |
Income statement Transport expenses
| 2014 | 2013 | ∆ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transport expenses | 6,060 | 5,773 | 287 |
| Cost of raw materials, supplies and purchased goods | 1,362 | 1,437 | -74 |
| Cost of purchased services | 4,698 | 4,337 | 361 |
| Thereof: | |||
| Port and terminal costs | 2,030 | 1,831 | 199 |
| Chartering, leases and container rentals | 694 | 653 | 40 |
| Container transport costs | 1,841 | 1,691 | 150 |
| Maintenance / repair / other | 133 | 161 | -28 |
EBIT bridge
| 2014 | 2013 | ∆ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) | -383 | 64 | -447 |
| Purchase price allocation | 13 | 23 | -10 |
| Transaction and restructuring costs | 107 | 0 | 107 |
| Impairments | 127 | 0 | 127 |
| Individual items One-off effects |
23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sale of Montreal Gateway Terminals Ltd. Partnership, Montreal |
0 | -19 | 19 |
| Underlying EBIT | -112 | 67 | -179 |
1) CSAV container shipping activities are included in the 2014 figures from the date of consolidation (2 December 2014) onwards
Source: Company information
| 31.12.2014 | 31.12.2013 | ∆ | 31.12.2014 | 31.12.2013 | ∆ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwill | 1,375.6 | 664.6 | 711.0 | Equity | 4,169.6 | 2,915.1 | 1,254.5 |
| Other intangible assets | 1,309.7 | 529.7 | 780.0 | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 5,176.0 | 4,067.6 | 1,108.4 | Provisions | 807.3 | 279.8 | 527.5 |
| Investments in equity-accounted investees | 384.9 | 332.8 | 52.1 | Financial debt | 3,717.1 | 2,935.0 | 782.1 |
| Inventories | 152.1 | 168.9 | -16.8 | ||||
| Trade acocunts receivables | 716.0 | 473.3 | 242.7 | Derivative financial instruments | 23.8 | 6.7 | 17.1 |
| Other assets | 263.1 | 148.5 | 114.6 | Trade accounts payable | 152.1 | 168.9 | -16.8 |
| Derviative financial instruments | 19.6 | 99.6 | -80.0 | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 711.4 | 464.8 | 246.6 | Other liabilities | 157.8 | 112.9 | 44.9 |
| Assets | 10,108.4 | 6,949.8 | 3,158.6 | Equity and liabilities | 10,108.4 | 6,949.8 | 3,158.6 |
Assets Equity and liabilities
| 31.12.2014 | 31.12.2013 | ∆ | 31.12.2014 | 31.12.2013 | ∆ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity ratio | 41% | 42% | -1 ppt | |||
| Rate USD/EUR | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.16 |
Consolidated statement of financial position CCS [EUR m]
| Dec 2, 2014 | |
|---|---|
| Other intangible assets | 745 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 733 |
| Investments in equity-accounted investees | 50 |
| Inventories | 37 |
| Trade accounts receivable | 218 |
| Other assets | 51 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 70 |
| Assets | 1,904 |
| 621 | |
| Equity Provisions |
337 |
| Financial debt | 536 |
| Trade accounts payable | 381 |
| Other liabilities | 29 |
| USDm | EURm | |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase price | 1,531 | 1,227 |
| Equity | 621 | |
| Goodwill | 757 | 607 |
COMMENTS
- First time consolidation figures at fair value
- Includes purchase price allocation
Purchase price allocation [USD m]
| Dec 2, 2014 | |
|---|---|
| Purchase price | 1,531 |
| Equity acquisition (at book value) | 890 |
| Elimination of Goodwill and others positions | -807 |
| Net equity acquired | 83 |
| Preliminary difference | 1,448 |
| Intangible assets | |
| Brand | 41 |
| Customerbase | 882 |
| Container advantageous lease contracts | 4 |
| Container sub-lease-out advantageous contracts | 3 |
| Software | 6 |
| Share of profit of equity-accounted investees (CNP) | 51 |
| Provisions | |
| Vessels charter contracts | -181 |
| Container disadvantageous lease contracts | -107 |
| Contingent liabilities | -9 |
| Sum of adjustments | 690 |
| Acquired net assets (at fair value) | 774 |
| Goodwill | 757 |
COMMENTS
- Assets are regularily depreciated
- The purchase price allocation identified mainly intangible assets as shown in the table
- Vessels and containers were already accounted for at fair value
- Provisions refer to disadvantageous contracts; the future release has a positive impact on EBIT (less lease expenses)
- Goodwill ist tested anually for impairments
Cash flow 2014 [EUR m]
Hapag-Lloyd is one of the world's leading container shipping companies
1) Pro-forma inclusion of CCS in 2014 2) Excl. CCS
Hapag-Lloyd at a glance
- Pure play container shipping company
- Headquartered in Hamburg, Germany
- Founding member of Grand and G6 Alliance
- 191 container ships with TEU 1 million
- Transport volume of 7.7 million TEU in 20141)
- 588 sales offices in over 113 countries
- Approx. 19,100 customers around the world2)
- Employing 10,949 staff worldwide
Top #4 in reefer equipment capacity
Top market share in Latin America
Top market share in Transatlantic
Growth of above 5% projected for the coming years
Global container trade [TEU m]
2019e 2018e 2017e 2013 2012 2011 2016e 2015e 2014 2007 2006 2005 2001 2000 2010 2009 2008 2004 2003 2002 *Compound Annual Growth Rate (e)
Source: IHS Global Insight (January 2015)
Annual net capacity development [TEU m]
1) Orderbook not yet complete, Forecasts of delayed deliveries or scrappings not included
36
Source: MDS Transmodal February 2015 and previous years , only vessels >399 TEU
Example
Nominal vs. effective capacity Example
Existing nominal capacity
- Newbuildings to be delivered this year
– Scrappings
- = New nominal capacity
- Requirements for long-distances services
- Operational constraints
- Infrastructure & productivity constraints
– Slow steaming
= Effective capacity
Imbalances: Hapag-Lloyd outperforms the market
1) This ratio reflects the imbalance in the market (industry average) vs. Hapag-Lloyd imbalance of transport volumes (the higher the ratio, the more balanced in both directions). Ratio has been rounded
Source: IHS Global Insight December 2014; Hapag-Lloyd FY 2014; market data adapted to Hapag-Lloyd trade lane definition
Long-standing and diversified customer base of blue chip customers and a diversified base of goods transported
Balanced portfolio of goods transported … … in a diversified customer portfolio1)
Source: Company information
Highly diversified customer base1) Strong relationship with blue chip customers
- Diversified exposure
- Freight forwarders secure volumes in both directions, optimizing trade flows
- Direct customers better visibility on future volumes
1) Based on FY 2014 volumes 2) Others: FAK = Freight of all kinds
Alliances allow Hapag-Lloyd to leverage its fleet, increase utilization and ensure a worldwide presence
The average freight rates decreased over all trades
41 Source: Company information 1) Excl. CCS (1M)
COMMENTS
- At 1,434 USD/TEU1) HL average freight rate in 2014 remained 48 USD/TEU below 2013 (1,482 USD/TEU)
- Main contributors to overall freight rate decrease are high volume trades Far East (-6.1%) and Atlantic (-2.7%)
- Highest year-on-year freight rate decrease on Australasia trade (-6.7%)
Change in regulation
- As of 2015, stricter regulations apply in designated SECAs – vessels must use higher-quality fuels with sulphur content of no more than 0.1% (previous limit: 1.0%)
- The change affects all services covering North America and Northern Europe
- LSF costs more than the fuel previously used and will lead to a relative increase in bunker costs as share of low sulphur fuel of total fuel consumption increases
- Hapag-Lloyd introduced a LSF additional to pass on increased costs to customers
Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs)
Blue line indicates where vessels need to start switching to LSF before entering the SECAs
Decreasing bunker consumption due to economies of scale – Bunker consumption per TEU decreased by further 4.5%
1) Average nominal deployed capacity in TEU (excl. CCS) 2) Transport volume (5,757 TTEU excl. CCS) 3) Excl. CCS
COMMENTS
- Over the last few years significant decreases in bunker consumption per slot due to economies of scale stemming from larger vessels (increased average vessel size)
- Additionally, reduced bunker consumption due to the introduction of slow steaming in 2009
- Bunker consumption per TEU decreased by 4.5% in FY 2014 vs. FY 2013
| EUR Bond 2019 | EUR Bond 2018 | USD Bond 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Hapag-Lloyd AG | Hapag-Lloyd AG | Hapag-Lloyd AG |
| Volume | EUR 250 m | EUR 400 m | USD 250 m |
| Minimum order | 100,000 EUR | 100,000 EUR | 150,000 USD |
| Issue date | November 20, 2014 | September 20, 2013 | October 01, 2010 |
| Maturity date | October 15, 2019 | October 01, 2018 | October 15, 2017 |
| Redemption prices | as of Oct 15, 2016: 103.750% as of Oct 15, 2017: 101.875% as of Oct 15, 2018: 100% |
as of Oct 01, 2015: 103.875% as of Oct 01, 2016: 101.938% as of Oct 01, 2017: 100% |
as of Oct 15, 2014: 104.8750% as of Oct 15, 2015: 102.4375% as of Oct 15, 2016: 100% |
| Coupon | 7.50% | 7.75% | 9.75% |
| Coupon payment | April 15 and October 15 | January 15 and July 15 | April 15 and October 15 |
| ISIN | XS1144214993 | XS0974356262 | USD33048AA36 |
| WKN | A13SNX | A1X3QY | A1E8QB |
| Listing | Open market of the LxSE | Open market of the LxSE | Open market of the LxSE |
| Trustee | Deutsche Trustee Company Limited | Deutsche Trustee Company Limited | Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch |
HL Bonds continously trade above par
Source: Citigroup, 25 March 2015
Strong and highly experienced management team and committed shareholder base
A global market leader with strong strategic alliances and a global footprint – fourth largest container shipping company worldwide
Well balanced market positions in high-volume trades – more resilient business model
Flexible and competitive fleet structure of homogeneous design
Long-standing customer relationships with a diversified blue-chip customer base
Industry-leading freight information system underpinning operational excellence and yield management
Henrik Schilling
47
Senior Director Investor Relations
Tel +49 40 3001-2896
Fax +49 40 3001-72896
http://www.hapag-lloyd.com/en/investor_relations/overview.html
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
This presentation is provided to you on a confidential basis. Delivery of this information to any other person, the use of any third-party data or any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Hapag-Lloyd is prohibited.
This presentation contains forward looking statements within the meaning of the 'safe harbor' provision of the US securities laws. These statements are based on management's current expectations or beliefs and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors (including, but not limited to, future global economic conditions, market conditions affecting the container shipping industry, intense competition in the markets in which we operate, potential environmental liability and capital costs of compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards in the markets in which we operate, diverse political, legal, economic and other conditions affecting the markets in which we operate, our ability to successfully integrate business acquisitions and our ability to service our debt requirements). Many of these factors are beyond our control.
This presentation is intended to provide a general overview of Hapag-Lloyd's business and does not purport to deal with all aspects and details regarding Hapag-Lloyd. Accordingly, neither Hapag-Lloyd nor any of its directors, officers, employees or advisers nor any other person makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to, and accordingly no reliance should be placed on, the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information contained in the presentation or of the views given or implied. Neither Hapag-Lloyd nor any of its directors, officers, employees or advisors nor any other person shall have any liability whatsoever for any errors or omissions or any loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of this information or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith.
The material contained in this presentation reflects current legislation and the business and financial affairs of Hapag-Lloyd which are subject to change and audit, and is subject to the provisions contained within legislation.
The distribution of this presentation in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Persons into whose possession this presentation comes are required to inform themselves about and to observe any such restrictions. In particular, this presentation may not be distributed into the United States, Australia, Japan or Canada.
This presentation constitutes neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation to buy any securities in the United States, Germany or any other jurisdiction. Neither this presentation nor anything contained herein shall form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any offer or commitment whatsoever. In particular, this presentation does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities of Hapag-Lloyd in the United States. Securities of Hapag-Lloyd may not be offered or sold in the United States of America absent registration or an exemption from registration under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Hapag-Lloyd does not intend to conduct a public offering or any placement of securities in the United States.