Grounded Lithium Corp. - Audit Report / Information 2021

NI 43-101

TECHNICAL REPORT

On the

HOOK BAY PROPERTY

Alberni Mining Division VANCOUVER ISLAND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA

Located Within:

NTS Sheet: 092F 006/016

Centered at Approximately:

Latitude 49°5.6' North by Longitude 124°52.9' West UTM: 362605 m E, 5439519 m N, Zone 10N

Report Prepared for: CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL PHARMA CORP.

2489 Bellevue Avenue, West Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V7V 1E1

Report Prepared by:

Luke Van Der Meer, B.Sc., P. Geo.

Consulting Geologist 614-360 Robson Street Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6B 2B2

Effective Date: 18 November 2020

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

1	SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 1-1	SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 1-1
	1.1	Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1-1
	1.2	Property Ownership ................................................................................................................... 1-1
	1.3	Property Description .................................................................................................................. 1-2
	1.4	Status of Exploration .................................................................................................................. 1-2
	1.5	Geology and Mineralization ....................................................................................................... 1-3
	1.6	Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................................................................... 1-4
2	INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 2-1
	2.1	Purpose of Report ...................................................................................................................... 2-1
	2.2	Terms of Reference .................................................................................................................... 2-1
	2.3	Sources of Information .............................................................................................................. 2-1
	2.4	Details of Personal Inspection .................................................................................................... 2-2
	2.5	Abbreviations and Units of Measurement ................................................................................. 2-2
3	RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ................................................................................................... 3-1
4	PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION .................................................................................. 4-1
	4.1	Location ...................................................................................................................................... 4-1
	4.2	Mineral Titles ............................................................................................................................. 4-1
	4.3	Mineral Rights in British Columbia ............................................................................................. 4-4
	4.4	Property Legal Status ................................................................................................................. 4-5
	4.5	Nature of Title to Property ......................................................................................................... 4-5
	4.6	Surface Rights in British Columbia ............................................................................................. 4-6
	4.7	Permitting .................................................................................................................................. 4-7
	4.8	Environmental ............................................................................................................................ 4-7
5	ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY .............. 5-8
	5.1	Accessibility ................................................................................................................................ 5-8
	5.2	Climate ....................................................................................................................................... 5-8
	5.3	Local Resources .......................................................................................................................... 5-9
	5.4	Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................. 5-9
	5.5	Physiography .............................................................................................................................. 5-9
6	HISTORY .................................................................................................................................... 6-1
	6.1	Historical Exploration Activity .................................................................................................... 6-1
7	GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION ........................................................................... 7-1
	7.1	Regional Geology ....................................................................................................................... 7-1
	7.1.1 The Wrangellia Terrane ...................................................................................................... 7-1
	7.1.2 Regional Stratigraphy ......................................................................................................... 7-1
	7.2	Property Geology ....................................................................................................................... 7-4
	7.2.1 Property Rock Descriptions ................................................................................................ 7-6
	7.2.2 Mineralization .................................................................................................................... 7-8
8	DEPOSIT TYPE ............................................................................................................................ 8-1
	8.1	Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Style Deposit ........................................................................... 8-1

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

8.2 Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Porphyry Style Deposit .................................................................. 8-3
9 EXPLORATION ........................................................................................................................... 9-1
9.1 2020 Field Program .................................................................................................................... 9-1
9.1.1 Results Overview ................................................................................................................ 9-1
9.1.2 Rock Sample Results .......................................................................................................... 9-2
9.1.3 Soil Sample Results ............................................................................................................ 9-6
9.1.4 Stream Sediment Sample Results .................................................................................... 9-15
9.1.5 Interpretation of Results .................................................................................................. 9-18
9.2 2020 Satellite Imagery Survey .................................................................................................. 9-18
9.2.1 Data Acquisition Procedures ............................................................................................ 9-18
9.2.2 Interpretation of Results .................................................................................................. 9-19
10 DRILLING ................................................................................................................................. 10-1
11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSIS, AND SECURITY .................................................................. 11-1
11.1 Sample Preparation ................................................................................................................. 11-1
11.2 Chain of Custody ...................................................................................................................... 11-2
11.3 QA/QC ...................................................................................................................................... 11-2
11.4 Sample Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 11-2
11.5 Adequacy of Procedures .......................................................................................................... 11-2
12 DATA VERIFICATION ................................................................................................................ 12-1
12.1 Author’s Site Visit ..................................................................................................................... 12-1
13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ........................................................... 13-3
14 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES ............................................................................................. 14-3
23 ADJACENT PROPERTIES ........................................................................................................... 14-1
23.1 Macktush Property ................................................................................................................... 14-1
23.2 Nahmint Property .................................................................................................................... 14-1
24 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION .......................................................................... 24-1
25 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................... 25-1
26 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 26-1
26.1 Proposed Exploration Programs .............................................................................................. 26-1
26.2 Preliminary Budget .................................................................................................................. 26-2
27 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 27-1
28 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................... 28-1
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON ............................................................................................... 28-2

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

i i

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1: Preliminary Summary Budget for Phases 1 and 2. .................................................................... 1-6 Table 2-1: Abbreviations and Units of Measure ........................................................................................ 2-3 Table 4-1: Hook Bay Project Mineral Tenures ........................................................................................... 4-2 Table 4-2: B.C. Work Requirements for Mineral Tenures .......................................................................... 4-5 Table 4-3: B.C. Cash-in-lieu for Mineral Tenures ....................................................................................... 4-5 Table 5-1: Driving Distances to the Property ............................................................................................. 5-8 Table 5-2: Climate Data for Port Alberni-Cox Lake Weather Station (Environment Canada) ................... 5-9 Table 6-1: Work History of Mineral Occurrences on or near the Hook Bay Property ............................... 6-3 Table 9-1: 2020 Rock Sample Assay Results .............................................................................................. 9-3 Table 9-2: 2020 Soil Sample Results .......................................................................................................... 9-6 Table 9-3: 2020 Stream Sediment Sample Results .................................................................................. 9-15 Table 11-1: Laboratory Analytical Methods ............................................................................................. 11-2 Table 12-1: Authors Rock Sample Assay Results...................................................................................... 12-2 Table 23-1: Macktush Property Historical Resource Estimates by Vein/Zone ........................................ 14-1 Table 26-1: Preliminary Proposed Two-Phase Summary Exploration Budget. ........................................ 26-2 Table 26-2 Phase 1 Proposed Detailed exploration budget. ................................................................... 26-3

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

i i i

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 4-1: Hook Bay Property Location Map ............................................................................................ 4-1 Figure 4-2: Hook Bay Property Claim Block ............................................................................................... 4-3 Figure 6-1: Hook Bay Property Footprint of Historical Work ..................................................................... 6-7 Figure 6-2: Historical 1982 Work Program over the Hook Bay Property ................................................... 6-8 Figure 6-3: Hook Bay Property Regional Geophysics Residual Total Field ................................................. 6-9 Figure 6-4: Hook Bay Property Regional Geophysics First Vertical Derivative ........................................ 6-10 Figure 7-1: Stratigraphic Nomenclature for Vancouver Island .................................................................. 7-2 Figure 7-2: Hook Bay Property Regional Geology Map.............................................................................. 7-3 Figure 7-3: Hook Bay Property Geology ..................................................................................................... 7-5 Figure 7-4: Rock Outcrops Found on the Hook Bay Property during the 2020 Field Season .................... 7-7 Figure 7-5: Hook Bay 1 Showing ................................................................................................................ 7-9 Figure 7-6: Hook Bay 1 Showing .............................................................................................................. 7-10 Figure 8-1: Schematic Cross Sections of Various VMS Deposit Types (showing host rocks, alteration and mineralization) ........................................................................................................................................... 8-2 Figure 8-2: Zoned Porphyry System Model ............................................................................................... 8-4 Figure 9-1: 2020 Hook Bay Property Rock Sample Locations and Copper in Rock Results (ppm) ............. 9-5 Figure 9-2: 2020 Hook Bay Property Soil Sample Locations and Copper in Soil Results (ppm) ............... 9-13 Figure 9-3: 2020 Hook Bay Property Soil Sample Locations and Gold in Soil Results (ppm) ................... 9-14 Figure 9-4: 2020 Hook Bay Property Stream Sediment Sample Locations and Copper in Sediment Results (ppm) ........................................................................................................................................................ 9-16 Figure 9-5: 2020 Hook Bay Property Stream Sediment Sample Locations and Gold in Sediment Results (ppm) ........................................................................................................................................................ 9-17 Figure 9-6: 2020 Satellite Imagery Survey over the Hook Bay Property .................................................. 9-20

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

i v

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

1 SUMMARY

1.1 Introduction

This Technical Report provides an independent review of the mineralization on the Hook Bay Property (Property) for Canadian International Pharma Corp. (CIPC), a Canadian company involved in mineral exploration and development. The Property is located in British Columbia, Canada in the Alberni Mining Division on Vancouver Island.

The Hook Bay Property is characteristic of volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) and copper-goldmolybdenum porphyry style mineralization.

This report was prepared by Luke van der Meer, P. Geo. Van der Meer is an independent qualified person (QP) as defined by Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43‐101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101) and as described in Section 28 (Date and Signature Page) of this report.

1.2 Property Ownership

The Property consists of one unpatented mineral claim covering 1,078.85 ha. The online registry currently shows that the Hook Bay mineral claim is 100% owned and registered in the name of James Rogers.

There is a bare trust agreement in place between Longford Capital Corp. (Longford Capital) and Rogers dated February 1, 2020; it names Rogers as the bare trustee of the Hook Bay claim for Longford Capital, the Beneficial Owner.

As of the date of this report, the claim is in good standing.

CIPC (the Optionee) and Longford Capital (the Optionor) are parties to an option agreement dated October 30, 2020 pursuant to which Longford Capital has agreed to grant CIPC an exclusive option to acquire 100% undivided right, title, ownership, and beneficial interest in and to the Hook Bay Property, free and clear of any encumbrances for the following considerations:

Within five days of closing date, issue 2.2 million shares to Longford Capital and provide cash payment of $50,000.
Within 30 days of closing date, complete a minimum of $100,000 expenditure on the Property.
Within 18 months of the closing date, complete an additional $300,000 expenditure on the Property and issue 500,000 shares to Longford Capital.

As part of this agreement, the Optionor shall be granted a 2% net smelter return (NSR) royalty on the Hook Bay Property claim following commencement of commercial production. The Optionee may exercise the right to reduce the NSR to 1% at any time prior to commencement of commercial production by making a cash payment of $1.5 million to the Optionor.

In addition to the terms outlined here, the option agreement contains a 5 km area-of-interest provision pursuant to which any claims staked by either party (Optionor or Optionee) within 5 km of the Hook Bay Property boundary (as defined by the Hook Bay Property claim) will automatically be included in the agreement and subject to the NSR.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

There are no other royalties, back-in rights, payments, or other agreements to which the Hook Bay Property is subject.

1.3 Property Description

The Property is located approximately 34 km south of the town of Port Alberni along Alberni Inlet, near Nahmint Bay, on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. The Property lies in the Alberni Mining Division within NTS map sheets 092F 006 and 092F 016 and is centred at approximately 49°5.6'N latitude, 124°52.9'W longitude.

1.4 Status of Exploration

The first documented work at the Hook Bay Property was carried out in 1982 on the Contented Claim Group (consisting of the Contented 1 and Contented 2 claims) held by Mattagami Lake Exploration Ltd. (Mattagami). Noranda Exploration Company, Ltd. (Noranda Exploration), who optioned the Property from Mattagami, carried out a geological mapping and geochemical soil sampling program during which two zones of mineralization (Zone 1 and Zone 2) were defined and staked as the Contented Claim Group. Samples of disseminations, fracture fillings, veinlets, massive pods of pyrite-pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite in sheared basalts returned values up to 36.85 g/t Ag and 5.8% Cu. Soil sampling carried out over Zone 1 produced poor and sporadic copper anomalies; the highest returned assays were 220 ppm Cu, one isolated sample returning 80 ppb Au, and no anomalous silver values. The second area identified by Noranda Exploration, referred to as Zone 2, was characterized by a 10 cm wide flat-lying pyrrhotite-pyritechalcopyrite vein that appeared to follow a basalt lapilli tuff contact. Samples of this vein returned assays of 0.54 oz/t Ag and 8.4% Cu. Soil geochemistry was reportedly inconsistent over Zone 1 suggesting a sporadic nature of mineralization, whereas several strong copper anomalies (up to 960 ppm) were defined in Zone 2. The soil sampling in the vicinity of Zone 2 identified the following four anomalous areas off road 2500:

Area 1: 50 m, 220 to 420 ppm Cu
Area 2: 250 m, 390 to 580 ppm Cu
Area 3: spot anomaly, 960 ppm Cu
Area 4: spot anomaly, 260 to 760 ppm Cu

In December 2010, Del Ferguson (Ferguson) staked Hookie Claim (near Hook Bay 1 showing) and the Cookie Claim (closer to Cook Creek) which comprised the Hook Bay Property. Road construction continued into 2011 which resulted in the discovery of local malachite stains by Ferguson along a newly constructed road.

Ferguson commissioned Aztec Geoscience Inc. (Aztec Geoscience) to carry out exploration work over the claim group between 2011 and 2013. Work consisted of prospecting, mapping, and soil sampling. Aztec Geoscience identified a local, 25 m wide zone of sheared and iron-stained basalts which were bounded by two faults, both striking 230° and containing quartz-chalcopyrite-pyrite-hematite veinlets spaced 0.5 to1 m apart. On the west side of the zone, a 30 cm wide vein (lens) of massive chalcopyrite-pyritepyrrhotite was identified; it appeared to follow a similar strike. A grab sample from the lens (DD-1) returned assays of 5.995% Cu and 18.2 g/t Ag.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

In March 2020, Longford Exploration Services Ltd. (Longford Exploration) completed a 12-day geological mapping, prospecting, and sampling program. The 2020 field program set out to validate historical sample grades, test Property access, and understand the mineralization pathways within the Karmutsen basalts relating to the intrusive granodiorite of the Island Plutonic Suite. During the field program, 39 rock grab samples were collected across the Property, 280 soil samples were collected at a 25 × 25 m grid spacing, and 14 stream sediment samples were collected from north and south of the Cook Creek drainage.

The 2020 field program returned significantly higher grades than had previously been sampled along road 250J in 2014. Three rock samples (3294560, 3294564 and 3294559) assayed 2.12% Cu, 5.53% Cu, and 7.41% Cu, respectively. It should also be noted that two of these samples returned gold grades of 0.47 g/t Au and 0.30 g/t Au, indicating the additional potential for the Property to host gold mineralization.

In November 2020, Longford Exploration commissioned PhotoSat Information Ltd. (PhotoSat) to produce a satellite orthophoto over the Hook Bay Property. PhotoSat produced an 11 km[2] survey over the Property using photos that were acquired on September 28, 2020. The one-metre satellite survey (at a 50 cm precision) produced an orthophoto for 100 km[2] . The image was produced by PhotoSat using its proprietary geophysical satellite surveying process, which is known for producing some of the highest quality and most accurate stereo satellite surveys and precision orthophotos in the world.

1.5 Geology and Mineralization

Three zones of mineralization have been identified on the Hook Bay Property located within the Upper Triassic Karmutsen Formation (Vancouver Group) basalts in association with the underlying Island Intrusive granodiorites of the Lower Jurassic Island Plutonic Suite.

The Contented 1 showing consists of massive sulphide pods and disseminated sulphides associated with linear shears, which may be the result of sulphides leaching from country rock. The area consists of fine to coarse-grained, sporadic pyrite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite as disseminations, fracture fillings, veinlets, and occasional massive pods within sheared basalts. These pods can be up to 15 cm wide are exposed to a height of approximately 1 m and consist of 80 to 90% sulphides. Grab samples of sulphide pods collected by Noranda Exploration in 1982 reported assays of up to 45.57 g/t Ag and 5.8% Cu (Stewart, 1983).

The mineralization at the Contented 2 showing is characterized by a 10 cm flat-lying vein structure of massive pyrrhotite-pyrite-chalcopyrite; however, it has been suggested that this structure could possibly be related to an exhalative lens of sulphides (Stewart, 1983). Grab samples collected by Noranda Exploration in 1982 reported assays of up to 18.51 g/t Ag and 8.4% Cu (Stewart, 1983).

The Hook Bay 1 showing is described as a local, 25 m wide zone of sheared and iron-stained basalts which were bounded by two faults, both striking 230° and containing quartz-chalcopyrite-pyrite-hematite veinlets spaced 0.5 to 1 m apart. On the west side of the zone, a 30 cm wide vein (lens) of massive chalcopyrite-pyrite-pyrrhotite was identified; it appeared to follow a similar strike. A grab sample from the lens (DD-1) returned assays of 5.995% Cu and 18.2 g/t Ag (Ferguson, 2012).

In 2020, Longford Exploration discovered two narrow veins, approximately 470 to 650 m to the east of the Hook Bay 1 showing. These samples returned assays of 1.41% Cu and 1.76% Cu. Approximately 30 m

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 - 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

south of the Hook Bay 1 showing, sample 3294556 assayed 1.3% Cu, indicating possible continuity of mineralization from the main showing.

In addition, Longford Explorations results returned higher grades than had been previously sampled in 2014 along road 250J. Three rock samples assayed 2.12% Cu, 5.53% Cu and 7.41% Cu (3294560, 3294564 and 3294559, respectively). As a result, Longford Exploration declared this new location to be the “Hook Bay 2 showing”. Mineralization at the Hook Bay 2 showing contains massive sulphides hosted within three 20 to 40 cm highly sheared, sub-vertical quartz-carbonate veins striking at 351°.

Mineralization throughout the Property is generally associated within shear zones and consists of pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite as fine-grained disseminations, fracture fillings, quartz calcite epidote veinlets and pods of massive sulphides hosted in the Karmutsen Formation.

1.6 Conclusions and Recommendations

As a first pass exploration program, Longford Exploration identified multiple narrow, mineralized veins/pods striking between 210° and 348°. Rock samples taken from the Hook Bay 1 showing confirmed previous high-grade samples from Aztec Geoscience’s 2012 and 2014 programs, but the historical grab samples from Noranda Exploration’s 1982 Contented 1 and Contented 2 showings still require verification. Stream sediment samples taken directly below the Contented 2 showing indicate a strong source of copper and silver (up to 164 g/t Ag); these are in line with Noranda Exploration’s 1983 findings from the 600 m outcrop located directly above. The stream sediment samples collected from the northern drainages are generally weak in copper; this is thought to be due to significant slope failure and burial upstream from the sample collection site.

The 2020 field program established more mineralized areas, namely sample 3294556 (40 m south of the Hook Bay 1 showing) and samples 3294582 and 3294583 (470 to 650 m southeast of the Hook Bay 1 showing). Elevated copper is present in soil across the Hook Bay 1 showing, trending along a northeastsouthwest shear. It should be noted that many of these soil horizons were poorly developed, and, therefore, the copper in soil may be higher than that recorded. A strong anomaly, with soil samples up to 349 ppm Cu, exists directly south of the Hook Bay 1 showing. These samples may be contaminated through fall-out of boulders along the road cut; however, given the recovered grade from rock sample 3294556 in that area, it is possible that the anomaly indicates a continuation of sub-surface mineralization.

The 2020 field program returned higher grades than had been previously sampled along road 250J in 2014. Three rock samples (3294560, 3294564 and 3294559) assayed 2.12% Cu, 5.53% Cu and 7.41% Cu, respectively. It should also be noted that two of these samples returned gold grades of up to 0.47 g/t Au and 0.30 g/t Au, indicating the potential for the Property to also host gold mineralization, as seen similarly within the Macktush and Nahmint properties to the north and south, respectively.

It is unclear at this stage of exploration whether the control on mineralization is confined to a shear zone at the contact between the Karmutsen basalt and Island Plutonic Suite granodiorite or if it is part of a larger mineralized system. Given the presence of epithermal veining, multiple felsic dykes, sheeted vein complexes, and several weakly argillic-propylitic altered units throughout the Property, it is conceivable that a porphyry system at depth is feeding the mineralized structures at surface.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 - 4

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Based on the evaluation of available data, the author of this Technical Report recommends a multi-phase exploration program for the Hook Bay Property.

Preliminary and field components of Phase 1 investigations should include the following:

A preliminary, detailed review of historical data, including complete digitization of the information from historical work, mapping, and sampling to provide a modern context to advance exploration efforts. Focus on an increased understanding of the nature and extent of mineralization using the existing geochemical and geophysical datasets.
Detailed mapping and prospecting as well as systematic surface sampling across the mineral showings to delineate the extent, thickness, and characteristics of any mineralized zones. Work should include stream sediment, soil/till and/or moss mat sampling, and channel sampling of visible surface mineralization.

Phase 2 recommendations are conditional on the results of Phase 1, and include the following:

Ground and/or airborne geophysics, with specific techniques determined by the Phase 1 results (for example, an IP survey should be conducted within the vicinity of the Hook Bay 1 showing).
Further artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML) studies.
Technical data reviews by third-party experts in porphyry copper and VMS target generation that could support a preliminary diamond drilling program (3,500 m).

A preliminary budget for future exploration work on the Hook Bay Property is summarized in Table 1.1.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 - 5

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Table 1-1: Preliminary Summary Budget for Phases 1 and 2.

Phase	Description	Estimated Cost (CAD$)
1	Exploration program (14 day 4-person) • Digitizing historical results • Prospecting • Geologic mapping • Geochem orientation • Stream sediment, soil/till and/or moss mat sampling • Site visit (QP/Senior Project Manager)	125,535
2	Exploration program (TBD) • Ground geophysics - Allowance • Airborne geophysics - Allowance • Third-party technical studies – Allowance • Diamond drilling program (3,500 m) - Allowance	50,000 200,000 20,000 1,100,000
GRAND TOTAL		$1,495,535

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 - 6

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 Purpose of Report

This report has been prepared for Canadian International Pharma Corp. (CIPC) of 2489 Bellevue Avenue, West Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V7V 1E1. CIPC is a Canadian company involved in mineral exploration and development.

This technical report describes the results of the 2020 exploration program completed on the Hook Bay Property. The program included the collection of 41 rock samples from accessible road cuts and rock outcrops, 280 soil samples on a 25 × 25 m grid spacing, and 14 stream sediment samples from accessible streams on the Property. This work was completed by Longford Exploration Services Ltd. (Longford Exploration). All samples were analyzed by Bureau Veritas in Vancouver, B.C.

This report has been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) guidelines, and its purpose is to provide the basis for an informed opinion as to the status and nature of mineralization on the Hook Bay Property (the Property). This report is intended to fulfill CIM’s disclosure requirements under Canadian Securities laws, including NI 43‐101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and to support CIPC’s application to the TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV) for listing on the TSXV exchange.

2.2 Terms of Reference

On October 30, 2020, CIPC (the Issuer) engaged the services of the author, Luke van der Meer, to prepare an independent NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Hook Bay Property, south of Port Alberni, B.C.

Luke van der Meer is an independent qualified person (QP) as defined by Canadian Securities Administrators NI 43-101 and as described in Section 28 (Date and Signature Page) of this report.

This report is based on the author’s personal examination of all available reports and data on the Hook Bay Property. The author has not relied on other experts in the preparation of this report. The sources of information and data contained in the technical report or used in its preparation are provided in Section 27 (References) of this report.

2.3 Sources of Information

The author has reviewed geological data obtained from British Columbia’s provincial government reports and several papers published in scientific journals as referenced in Section 27 (References) of this report.

The author reviewed publicly available information from the British Columbia Mineral Titles Branch website, Mineral Titles Online (MTO), for historical property assessment reports and mineral tenure information as well as its digital publication database for regional geological data and mineral occurrence information. Climate information was obtained from Environment Canada, and population and local information for the Project area was obtained from Wikipedia. The author also reviewed on information provided by Longford Exploration field personnel prior to the site visit.

This report is based on personal examination, by the author, of all available reports and data on the Hook Bay Property. The author visited the Property on March 20 and 21, 2020 to evaluate the geological

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

environment and assess the Property. The information, opinions and conclusions contained herein are based on:

Information available to the author at the time of preparation of this report.
Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report.
Data, reports, and other information supplied by the Company and other third-party sources.
The author’s visit of the Property on March 20 and 21, 2020.
The author’s review of all available reports and legal documents.

The Property title and mineral rights to the Hook Bay Property appear to be in good standing as indicated at the British Columbia Mineral Titles Branch website, Mineral Titles Online (MTO). The QP most recently accessed the MTO website to review the Property title on November 18, 2020.

As of the date of this report, the author is not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of this technical report that is not presented herein, or which the omission to disclose could make this report misleading.

2.4 Details of Personal Inspection

The author visited the Property site on March 20 and 21, 2020 to evaluate the geological environment, assess the Property, and confirm the technical and geological information presented herein.

2.5 Abbreviations and Units of Measurement

Metric units are used throughout this report and all dollar amounts are reported in Canadian dollars (CAD$) unless otherwise stated. Coordinates within this report use EPSG 26910 NAD83 UTM Zone 10N unless otherwise stated. A list of abbreviations used in this report are shown in Table 2.1.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Table 2-1: Abbreviations and Units of Measure

Description	Abbreviation or Acronym
percent	%
three dimensional	3D
silver	Ag
gold	Au
Aztec Geoscience Inc.	Aztec
degrees Celsius	oC
Canadian dollar	CAD$
Canadian International Pharm Corp.	CIPC
Canadian Institute of Mining,Metallurgyand Petroleum	CIM
centimetre	cm
copper	Cu
diamond drill hole	DDH
east	E
electromagnetic	EM
degrees Fahrenheit	oF
gram	g
gramsper tonne	g/t
billionyears ago	Ga
Global PositioningSystem	GPS
Geological Surveyof Canada	GSC
gigawatt hours	GWh
hectare	ha
hydrochloric acid	HCl
mercury	Hg
heavymineral concentrate	HMC
Hook BayProperty	Hook Bay
inductivelycoupledplasma	ICP
inductivelycoupledplasma-mass spectrometry	ICP-MS
inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry- mass spectrometry	ICP-OES/MS
inducedpolarization	IP
kilogram	kg
kilometre	km
Longford Capital Corp.	Longford Capital
Longford Exploration	Longford Exploration Services Ltd.
metre	m
millionyears ago	Ma
Mattagami Lake Exploration Ltd.	Mattagami
millimetre	mm
molybdenum	Mo
million ounces	Moz
million tonnes	Mt
megawatt	MW
north	N
not applicable	n/a
North American Datum	NAD
National Instrument 43-101	NI 43-101
Noranda Exploration Company,Ltd.	Noranda Exploration

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 - 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Description	Abbreviation or Acronym
net smelter return	NSR
National Topographic System	NTS
ounce	oz
ouncesper tonne	oz/t
lead	Pb
Professional Geoscientist	P.Geo.
partsper billion	ppb
partsper million	ppm
Hook Bay	Property
qualityassurance/qualitycontrol	QA/QC
qualifiedperson	QP
south	S
specificgravity	SG
tonne	t
to be determined	TBD
volcanogenic massive sulphide	VMS
west	W
zinc	Zn

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 - 4

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS

The report was prepared by Luke van der Meer, P. Geo. Van der Meer is a qualified person for the purposes of NI 43-101, and he fulfills the requirements of an “independent qualified person”.

The author has not relied on the opinion of non-qualified persons in the preparation of this technical report. All opinions expressed in this technical report are those of the author based on a review of historical work completed on the Property.

As described in sections 1.2 and 4.5 the author has relied on information regarding ownership, permits, licenses, environmental concerns, as described in purchase agreements between Canadian International Pharma Corp. and Longford Capital Corp. (Longford Capital) were reviewed by the author in the document titled “Option Agreement; Canadian International Pharma Corp. and Longford Capital, dated 30[th] October 2020.” The bare trust agreement document titled “Bare Trust Agreement; James Douglas Rogers and Longford Capital, dated 1[st] February 2020” was also reviewed; both documents were provided to the author by Longford Capital.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

3 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

4.1 Location

The Hook Bay Property is located approximately 34 km south of the city of Port Alberni along Alberni Inlet, near Nahmint Bay, on Vancouver Island, B.C. (Figure 4-1). The Property lies in the Alberni Mining Division on NTS map sheets 092F 006 and 092F 016 and is centred at approximately 124°52.9'W longitude, 49°5.6'N latitude.

==> picture [460 x 356] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4-1: Hook Bay Property Location Map

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

4.2 Mineral Titles

The Property consists of one unpatented mineral claim (Figure 4-2) located in the Alberni Mining Division totalling 1,078.85 ha. The online registry currently shows that the Hook Bay mineral claim is 100% owned and registered in the name of James Rogers who is the bare trustee for Longford Capital, the Beneficial Owner. As of the date of this report, the claim is in good standing (Table 4.1).

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

4 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

The Order of the Chief Gold Commissioner took unprecedented measures on March 27, 2020 to extend all active mineral claims with an expiry date prior to December 31, 2021. These claims will retain their current expiry dates, however, work filing requirements have been extended to December 31, 2021. These changes do not effectively change the Good to Date of the claim but maintains the claim in a “Protected Status” and allows title holders additional time to complete and file the work. Sufficient work expenditures must be spent on the Hook Bay Property prior to December 31, 2021 to renew claims for the first (2021-2022) and second anniversary years (2022-2023) of the claims. These measures have been put in place as a direct result of safety and travel restrictions put in place to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus.

The author has not researched Property title or mineral rights to the Hook Bay Property and expresses no opinion as to the ownership status of the Property other than verifying the good-to date (Table 4.1) of the claim comprising the Hook Bay Property using the British Columbia Mineral Titles Branch website, Mineral Titles Online (MTO), at www.mtonline.gov.bc.ca. The QP most recently accessed the MTO website to review the Property title on November 18, 2020.

Table 4-1: Hook Bay Project Mineral Tenures

Title Number	Claim Name	Issue Date	Good-to Date	Status	Area (ha)
1074273	Hook Bay	2020/JAN/31	2021/JAN/21	GOOD	1,078.85
				TOTAL	1,078.85

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

4 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [468 x 606] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4-2: Hook Bay Property Claim Block

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

4 - 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

4.3 Mineral Rights in British Columbia

Mineral Claims in British Columbia are subdivided into two major categories: placer and mineral. Both are acquired using the Mineral Titles Online (MTO) system. The online MTO system allows clients to acquire and maintain (register work, payments, etc.) mineral and placer claims. Mineral Titles can be acquired anywhere in the province where there are no other impeding interests (other mineral titles, reserves, parks, etc.).

The interactive map allows users to select single or multiple adjoining grid cells. Cell sizes vary from approximately 21 ha (457 m × 463 m) in the south to approximately 16 ha at the north of the province. Cell size variance is due to the longitudinal lines that gradually converge toward the North Pole.

MTO calculates the exact area in hectares according to the selected cells and calculates the required fee. The fee is charged for the entire cell, even though a portion may be unavailable due to a prior legacy title or alienated land. The fee for Mineral Claim registration is $1.75 per hectare.

Upon immediate confirmation of payment, the mineral rights title is issued and assigned a tenure number for the registered claim. Email confirmation of the transaction and title is sent immediately.

Rights to any ground encumbered by existing legacy claims will not be granted with the cell claim except through the Conversion process. However, the rights held by a legacy claim or lease will accrue to the cell claim if the legacy claim or lease should terminate through forfeiture, abandonment, or cancellation, but not if the legacy claim is taken to lease. Similarly, if a cell partially covers land that is alienated (park, reserve, etc.) or is a reserve, no rights to the alienated or reserved land are acquired. But, if that alienation or reserve is subsequently rescinded, the rights held by the cell expand over the former alienated or reserve land within the border of the cell.

Upon registration, a cell claim is deemed to commence as of that date (Date of Issue) and is good until the Good-to Date (Expiry Date) that is one year from the date of registration. To maintain the claim beyond the expiry date, exploration and development work must be performed and registered, or a payment, instead of exploration and development, may be registered. If the claim is not maintained, it will forfeit at the end of the Expiry Date and it is the responsibility of every recorded holder to maintain their claims; no notice of pending forfeiture is sent to the recorded holder.

A mineral or placer claim has a set expiry date, and to maintain the claim beyond that expiry date, the recorded holder (or an agent) must, on or before the expiry date, register either exploration and development work that was performed on the claim, or a payment, instead of exploration and development. Failure to maintain a claim results in automatic forfeiture at the end (midnight) of the expiry date; there is no notice to the claim holder prior to forfeiture.

When exploration and development work or a payment instead of work is registered, the claim may be advanced forward to any new date. With a payment, instead of work, the minimum requirement is six months, and the new date cannot exceed one year from the current expiry date; with work, it may be any date up to a maximum of ten years beyond the current anniversary year. “Anniversary year” means the current period from the last expiry date to the next immediate expiry date.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

4 - 4

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

All recorded holders of a claim must hold a valid Free Miners Certificate (FMC) when either work or a payment is registered on the claim.

Clients need to register a certain value of work or a "cash-in-lieu of work" payment to their claims in MTO. Tables 4.2 and 4.3 outline the costs required to maintain a claim for one year.

Table 4-2: B.C. Work Requirements for Mineral Tenures

Anniversary Year	Work Requirements ($ per hectare)
1 and 2	5
3 and 4	10
5 and 6	15
7 and subsequent	20

Table 4-3: B.C. Cash-in-lieu for Mineral Tenures

Anniversary Year	Cash Payment-in-Lieu of Work ($ per hectare)
1 and 2	10
3 and 4	20
5 and 6	30
7 and subsequent	40

4.4 Property Legal Status

The Mineral Titles Online (MTO) system confirms that the Hook Bay Property claim as described in Table 4.1 is in good standing as at the date of this report and that no legal encumbrances are registered with the Mineral Titles Branch against the titles at that date. The author makes no further assertion regarding the legal status of the Property.

The Property has not been legally surveyed to date and no requirement to do so has existed.

The Order of the Chief Gold Commissioner took unprecedented measures on March 27, 2020 to extend all active mineral claims with an expiry date prior to December 31, 2021. These claims have been amended from their current expiry date and have been extended to December 31, 2021. These measures have been put in place as a direct result of safety and travel restrictions put in place to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus. These measures will allow title holders the additional time required to carry out assessment work on claims to keep them in good standing.

4.5 Nature of Title to Property

The Hook Bay mineral claim covers 1,078.85 ha. The online registry currently shows that the Hook Bay mineral claim is 100% owned and registered in the name of James Rogers, the bare trustee for Longford Capital (the Beneficial Owner). There is a Bare Trust Agreement in place between Longford Capital and James Rogers dated February 1, 2020 which names James Rogers as the bare trustee of the Hook Bay claim for Longford Capital. The QP is independent of Longford Exploration, Longford Capital and CIPC.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

4 - 5

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

CIPC (the Optionee) and the Longford Capital (the Optionor) are party to an option agreement dated October 30, 2020 pursuant to which Longford Capital has agreed to grant CIPC an exclusive option to acquire 100% undivided right, title, ownership, and beneficial interest in and to the Hook Bay Property, free and clear of any encumbrances for the following considerations:

Within five days of closing date, issue 2.2 million shares to Longford Capital and provide cash payment of $50,000.
Within 30 days of closing date, complete a minimum of $100,000 expenditure on the Property.
Within 18 months of the closing date, complete an additional $300,000 expenditure on the Property and issue 500,000 shares to Longford Capital.

As part of this agreement, the Optionor shall be granted a 2% NSR on the Hook Bay Property claim following commencement of commercial production. The Optionee may exercise the right to reduce the NSR to 1% at any time prior to commencement of commercial production by making a cash payment of $1,500,000 to the Optionor. Payment may be made by way of certified cheque or bank draft payable to the Vendor (or other method of payment acceptable to the Optionor) along with written notice of the Optionee’s intent to exercise Buy-Back-In-Right.

In addition to the terms outlined here, the option agreement contains a 5 km area-of-interest provision pursuant to which any claims staked by either parties (the Optionor or the Optionee) within 5 km of the Hook Bay Property boundary (as defined by the Hook Bay Property claim) will automatically be included in the agreement and subject to the NSR.

There are no other royalties, back-in rights, payments, or other agreements to which the Hook Bay Property is subject.

4.6 Surface Rights in British Columbia

Surface rights are not included with mineral claims in British Columbia. However, the Mineral Tenure Act (British Columbia) allows persons holding a valid free miner certificate (free miner) to enter mineral lands to explore for minerals whether surface is owned privately or by the Crown. Right of entry onto these lands does not include land occupied by a building, the area around a dwelling house, orchard land or land under cultivation, protected heritage property or land in a park.

Miners entering on private lands must serve notice in the prescribed manner and compensate the landowner for any loss or damages resulting from the mining activities including prospecting, mapping, sampling, geophysical surveys, as well as any activities that disturb the surface. Landowners must be notified prior to persons entering onto private land for any mining activity and may not begin until eight days after giving notice to the owners of the surface area where the activity will take place. Notice must include the dates when the activities will take place, where the activity will occur, the names and addresses of the free miner or recorded holder and of the on-site person responsible for the operations. Details describing the activities that will be carried out, the number of people that will be on-site including a map or written description of where the activities will take place. Notices may be emailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the landowner. Any substantial changes to the activity described in the notice must be

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

4 - 6

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

given to the landowner in an amended notice and work may not begin until eight days after the amended notice has been delivered.

4.7 Permitting

Any work which disturbs the surface by mechanical means on a mineral claim in British Columbia requires a Notice of Work (NOW) permit under the British Columbia Mines Act (Mines Act). This includes but is not limited to the following types of work: drilling, trenching, excavating, blasting, construction of a camp, demolition of a camp, induced polarization surveys using exposed electrodes, and reclamation.

Exploration activities which do not require a NOW permit include prospecting with hand tools, geological/geochemical surveys, airborne geophysical surveys, ground geophysics without exposed electrodes, hand trenching, and the establishment of grids.

The Issuer does not currently hold any permits pertaining to exploration on the Property.

4.8 Environmental

As of the date of this report, there are no known environmental liabilities to which the Hook Bay Property is subject and no other known significant factors and risks that may affect access, title, or the right or ability to perform work on the Hook Bay Property.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

4 - 7

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

5.1 Accessibility

The Hook Bay Property can be accessed from Port Alberni by driving northwest on the Pacific Rim Highway (Highway 4) for 3 km, turning left onto Tsuma-as Drive, and continuing south onto the Canal Main for 18 km. An extensive network of smaller decommissioned forestry service roads provides only limited access to much of the Property because many of these roads are unmaintained and have become overgrown.

Road distances from the Property to select cities and ports are summarized in Table 5.1.

Table 5-1: Driving Distances to the Property

Location (population)	Description	Distance to Property (km)
Port Alberni (17, 678)	Nearest town with services	34
Nanaimo (90,505)	Port, mining services centre	115
Victoria (85,795)	Nearest international airport	276

Source: 2016 Census Canada, 2020.

5.2 Climate

This region is characterized by an oceanic or maritime climate, typical of western coastal areas in higher middle latitudes of a continent. This type of climate generally produces cool summers (relative to its continental mid-latitude counterparts) and mild winters with significant annual rainfall, and few extremes of temperature.

Average daily temperatures in the summer range from 15 to 18 °C, and 3 to 6 °C in the winter (Table 5.2). The total average annual rainfall for the Port Alberni area is 2,115 mm with the most significant amount of precipitation occurring between October and March. Spring and summer months are considerably drier, providing ideal conditions for the entire exploration season.

Based on available data and knowledge of the general area, an eight-month operating (field) season could reasonably be expected. Year-round drilling operations may be possible if suitable road access can be established to the drill site.

The nearest active weather station to the Property is the Port Alberni-Cox Lake weather station, 34 km northeast of the Hook Bay Property.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

5 - 8

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Table 5-2: Climate Data for Port Alberni-Cox Lake Weather Station (Environment Canada)

Climate Data	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec	Year Total
Daily Average (°C)	2.8	3.8	5.8	8.9	11.8	14.6	17.3	17.6	15.2	9.9	5.7	3	9.7
Record High (°C)	5.4	7.6	10.2	14.5	17.8	20.6	24.1	24.8	22.6	14.7	8.7	5.2	14.7
Record Low (°C)	0.3	0	1.4	3.2	5.7	8.5	10.3	10.2	7.6	5	2.7	0.8	4.7
Avg Precip. (mm)	366.6	216.8	228.4	145.4	89.5	70.3	31.3	57.6	59.5	214.9	375.7	342.8	2,198.5
Avg Rainfall (mm)	340.2	202.9	217.1	144.2	89.5	70.3	31.3	57.6	59.5	214.3	369.5	318.2	2,114.7
Avg Snowfall (cm)	26.4	13.9	11.2	1.1	0	0	0	0	0	0.6	6.1	24.5	83.8

Source: 1981 to 2010 Canadian Climate Normals Port Alberni-Cox Lake weather station data; 49°12'06.002" N, 124°45'06.005" W, 100.00 m

5.3 Local Resources

General and skilled labour is readily available in the City of Port Alberni (population 17,678). The city is 34 km by road from the Property and offers year-round charter and scheduled fixed-wing service, B.C. Provincial Police detachment, hospital, ambulance, fuel, lodging, restaurants, and equipment. The higher elevations of the Project have limited 3G cellular service coverage.

5.4 Infrastructure

There is no developed infrastructure on the Property other than previously established forestry service roads that are infrequently maintained.

There are four hydroelectric power systems, with six generating stations located on Vancouver Island with a total capacity of 459 megawatts (MW). The B.C. power station closest to the Property is in Jordan River, B.C., approximately 100 km to the south.

Any potential areas for mine infrastructure, such as mill sites and tailings disposal sites, have not been considered in the context of this report.

5.5 Physiography

The Hook Bay Property lies northwest of Mount Spencer on the western side of Alberni Inlet on Vancouver Island. The Property is generally mountainous with elevations ranging from 150 to 1,020 m. The Property is divided by Cook Creek, a northwest-trending, V-shaped stream valley that drains to the east into Alberni Inlet. The mountain ridge north of Cook Creek valley rises to 1,020 m and, to the south of Cook Creek, the ridge rises to 980 m. Mountain slopes range between 20 degrees to subvertical, with the steepest slopes occurring in the northern portion of the claim block on the northeast facing slope, with numerous impassable cliffs throughout the Property.

Numerous seasonal tributaries drain the valley into Cook Creek which then drains into Alberni Inlet, to the north of Nahmint Bay. Most tributaries have steep gradients resulting in poor sediment deposition; therefore, silt and heavy mineral concentrate sampling are only marginally effective.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

5 - 9

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

The Property has variable soil cover; the best soil development occurs on the flat-ridge tops and valley bottoms, the mountainous slopes dominated by deposits of talus fines.

This region is populated by first and second growth forests of predominantly native fir, hemlock, spruce, cedar, and some arbutus in the drier areas. The forest floor is covered with salal, ferns, mosses, a variety of berry bushes and fungi. Vancouver Island has been a site of active logging for numerous decades and continues to be actively logged resulting in expansive areas of second and third generation growth, and revegetated areas of variable age and density. The southern portion of the Property has an extensive area that has been recently clear cut.

The fauna in the area is typical of Vancouver Island and includes deer, elk, moose, black bears, cougars, wolves, coyotes, and bald eagles, and smaller mammals, birds, and invertebrates.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

5 - 1 0

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

6 HISTORY

6.1 Historical Exploration Activity

The first documented work on the Hook Bay Property was carried out in 1982 over the Contented Claim Group (consisting of the Contented 1 and Contented 2 claims) held by Mattagami Lake Exploration Ltd. (Mattagami). Noranda Exploration Company, Ltd. (Noranda Exploration), who optioned the Property from Mattagami, carried out a geological mapping and geochemical soil sampling program during which two zones of mineralization were defined and staked as the Contented Claim Group. The first identified area of mineralization, referred to as Zone 1 (Contented 1 showing), comprised several linear shear zones containing pyrrhotite-pyrite-chalcopyrite mineralization with associated silver values in basalt. Samples of disseminations, fracture fillings, veinlets and massive pods of pyrite-pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite in sheared basalts returned values up to 1.3 oz/t Ag and 5.8% Cu. In addition, 550 m east of the Contented 1 showing along road 2510K, samples R-23404 and R-23405 returned values of 1.63% Cu and 2.34% Cu, respectively (Stewart, 1983).

Soil sampling carried out over Zone 1 produced poor and sporadic copper anomalies; highest assays returned were 220 ppm Cu, one isolated sample returning 80 ppb Au, and no anomalous silver values (Stewart, 1983). The second area identified by Noranda Exploration, referred to as Zone 2, was characterized by a 10 cm wide flat-lying pyrrhotite-pyrite-chalcopyrite vein that appeared to follow a basalt lapilli tuff contact. Samples of this vein returned assays of 0.54 oz/t Ag and 8.4% Cu (Stewart, 1983). Soil geochemistry was reportedly poor over Zone 1 suggesting a sporadic nature of mineralization, whereas several strong copper anomalies (up to 960 ppm) were defined in Zone 2 (Stewart, 1983). The soil sampling in the vicinity of Zone 2 identified the following four anomalous areas off road 2500 (Stewart, 1983):

Area 1: 50 m; 220 to 420 ppm Cu
Area 2: 250 m; 390 to 580 ppm Cu
Area 3: spot anomaly; 960 ppm Cu
Area 4: spot anomaly; 260 to 760 ppm Cu

In 2010, new forestry roads were constructed along the steep ridge on the west side of the claims allowing greater access to the south end of the Hook Bay Property. In the fall of the same year, Dave Preedy discovered quartz veinlets and associated quartz-carbonate “blowouts” of chalcopyrite, pyrite and bornite which were exposed in veinlets through altered basalt pyroclastics along a recently completed road (HB100). These were described as very narrow to hairline veinlets which appeared to pinch and swell into pods.

In December 2010, Del Ferguson (Ferguson) staked the Hookie Claim (near the Hook Bay 1 showing) and the Cookie Claim (closer to Cook Creek), which comprised the Hook Bay Property. Road construction continued into 2011 resulting in the discovery of local malachite stains by Ferguson along a newly constructed road.

Between 2011 and 2014, Ferguson commissioned Aztec Geoscience Inc. (Aztec Geoscience) to carry out various exploration work.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

In October 2011, Aztec Geoscience conducted an initial prospecting survey over the Hookie and Cookie Claims. Two parallel approximately 10 to 20 cm wide epidote-calcite-quartz veinlets roughly 2.5 m apart, striking 010°/vertical through a brecciated basalt outcrop, was identified along the road (03632281/5438156). A second occurrence was discovered along the road (0363137/5438179) which showed a light grey-green lapilli tuff dissected by epidote-calcite-quartz veinlets and “blow-outs”. This roughly 10 m wide altered zone was reportedly in contact (200°/80°W) with a light-beige rhyolite porphyry dyke. An approximately 25 m wide zone of highly sheared and iron-stained basalts bounded by two faults (striking 230°) was also discovered which contained several 0.5 to 1 m spaced quartz-calcite-pyritehematite-chalcopyrite veinlets (Ferguson, 2012). On the west side of the zone, an approximately 30 cm wide vein (lens) of massive chalcopyrite-pyrite-pyrrhotite was identified; it appeared to follow a similar strike. A grab sample of this lens (DD-1) assayed 5.995% Cu with trace gold and silver (Ferguson, 2012).

In June 2012, Ferguson added claim DCS3 to the southwestern edge of the Hook Bay Property (Ferguson, 2013).

In May 2013, Aztec Geoscience carried out a geological mapping and prospecting survey over the DCS3 claim and collected 10 rock samples. This survey confirmed that the claim was exclusively underlain by the Karmutsen Formation amygdaloidal basalts. Results from the rock grab sample of quartz-epidotehosted disseminated pyrite mineralization (#1615110) showed copper values of 65.2 ppm; results from the heavy mineral stream sediment sample (#1615111) showed copper values of 124 ppm (Ferguson, 2013).

In July 2013, Aztec Geoscience followed up with prospecting work along old, deactivated roads throughout the northern portion of the claims. This program revealed a zone of strong copper mineralization over a 185 m length on road 2510K with apparent indications of an east-west striking zone perpendicular to the road heading. Note: In 1983, samples R-23404 and R-23405 returned 1.63% Cu and 2.34% Cu, respectively (Stewart, 1983). In 2013, four of the nine collected grab samples returned values between 2,572 to 8,195 ppm Cu with trace values of zinc and gold (Ferguson, 2014).

Table 6.1 summarizes the history of work carried out on or near the Hook Bay Property, and Figure 6-1 outlines the exploration footprints of historical work reported within the BC Assessment Report Database.

The 1982 historical work program is summarized in Figure 6-2, and regional geophysics are shown in Figures 6-3 and 6-4.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Table 6-1: Work History of Mineral Occurrences on or near the Hook Bay Property

Year	Title Holder	Report	Claim	Over Property	Author	Operator	Summary	Comments	Reference
1983	Mattagami Lake Exploration Ltd.	12044	Contented	Yes	Stewart, C.	Noranda Exploration Company, Ltd.	1 HMC sample 169 soil samples 41 stream sediments samples 35 rock samples	In 1982, sampling defined two zones of mineralization known as Contented Claim Group. Zone 1 comprises several linear shear zones containing pyrrhotite-pyrite- chalcopyrite mineralization with associated silver values in basalt. Zone 2 comprises a 10 cm wide pyrrhotite-pyrite-chalcopyrite vein that appeared to follow a basalt lapilli-tuff contact. Soil geochemistry was poor over Zone 1, indicating sporadic nature; several strong copper anomalies (up to 960 ppm) were defined in Zone 2.	ARIS_12044, 1983, Stewart, C., Contented Claim Report #1 Report on Geology and Geochemistry for Assessment Purposes for Noranda Exploration Company, Ltd.
2006	SYMC Resources Ltd.	28497	Macktush	No	Houle, J.	SYMC Resources Ltd.	(DIGHEM EM/Resistivity/Magnetic/Radiometric) over 1,661 line-km	Very few anomalies in the survey block are typical of massive sulphide responses. However, the survey was successful in locating numerous weak or broad responses that may warrant additional work. Most anomalies in the area are moderately weak and poorly defined. Many have been attributed to conductive overburden or deep weathering, although several are associated with magnetite-rich rock units. The weak magnetite-hosted responses could also reflect skarn-type mineralization.	ARIS_28497, 2006, Technical Report for the 2005 Diamond Drilling Program and the Airborne Geophysical Survey on Contiguous Properties, for SYMC Resources Ltd.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Year	Title Holder	Report	Claim	Over Property	Author	Operator	Summary	Comments	Reference
2007	SYMC Resources Ltd.	28989A	Macktush	No	Houle, J.	SYMC Resources Ltd.	11 diamond drill holes (total depth 982 m) detailed mapping and chip sampling prior to drilling 288 rock samples 66 soil samples 26 stream sediment samples	Rocks are variably block-faulted and represent ideal settings for clustered copper- gold-silver-molybdenum porphyry, skarn and epithermal vein deposits. Four of five clusters of combined magnetic, electromagnetic and radiometric anomalies were prospected and tested using combinations of rock, soil and stream moss mat sampling, with significant new copper-silver-gold mineralization discovered in outcrop at five locations in two clusters, Rex and Cous. Significant copper- gold-silver mineralization was in a float sample from the West cluster, and no significant values were obtained from the Macktush cluster.	ARIS_28989A, Houle, J., Technical Report for: The 2006 Diamond Drilling Program and The 2006 Prospecting Program on the Macktush Property for SYMC Resources Ltd.
2007	SYMC Resources Ltd.	28989B	Macktush	No	Houle, J.	SYMC Resources Ltd.	Volume 2: Figures	Maps	ARIS_28989B, Houle, J., Technical Report for the 2006 Diamond Drilling Program and The 2006 Prospecting Program on the Macktush Property for SYMC Resources Ltd.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 4

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 )

H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Year	Title Holder	Report	Claim	Over Property	Author	Operator	Summary	Comments	Reference
2011	G4G Resources Ltd	32297	Macktush	No	Hills, L., and Sanabria, R.	G4G Resources Ltd.	soil and rock samples	All grab samples were anomalously high in copper. Highest results were from Samples G4G-001, G4G-002 and G4G-003 and ranged from 4.02% Cu to 6.76% Cu. All three were obtained from chalcopyrite-rich quartz veins previously mined by small adits. The shear zone sample returned much lower values of copper and other metals. Best soil sample values were 1,350 ppm Cu from sample F-40 and 0.8 ppm Ag from sample F-26. Copper was by far the most elevated metal in the soil sample results.	ARIS_32297, Hills, L., Sanadria, R., 2011, 2011 Geological and Geochemical Technical Exploration Report on the Macktush Copper Project for G4G Resources Ltd.
2012	Nahminto Resources Ltd.	33140	Macktush	No	Auracle Geospatial Science, Inc.	Nahminto Resources Ltd.	mapping thermal analysis modelling	A digital elevation model, (DEM) covering the entire area of interest (AOI) and beyond was generated to an elevation accuracy of ±10 m vertical located within a 7.5 m radius area. This greatly improves elevation and spatial accuracy of existing topographic data, currently available at 1:50 0000 scale, at ±25 m vertical and located within a 30 m radius area.	ARIS_33140, Auracle Geospatial Science, Inc., 2012, Technical Report for the Macktush Project for Nahminto Resources Ltd.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 5

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Year	Title Holder	Report	Claim	Over Property	Author	Operator	Summary	Comments	Reference
2012	Ferguson, D.W.	33232	Hook Bay	Yes	Ferguson, D.W.	Aztec Geoscience Inc.	3 rock samples	On the west side of the zone, a ~30 cm wide vein (lens) of massive chalcopyrite-pyrite- pyrrhotite appeared to follow a similar strike. A grab sample of this lens (DD-1) reported assays of 5.995% Cu and trace gold and silver. At the north end of the ridge (northeast of long pond 0362974/5438272), a grab sample was obtained from a 20 cm wide oxidized zone (060°/90°) in basalt containing quartz- carbonate veining and disseminated pyrite- chalcopyrite. This sample (DD-2) showed 393.3 ppm Cu and very trace gold and silver.	ARIS_33232, Ferguson, D.W., 2012, Prospecting Survey Report: Hook Bay Cu Property for Aztec Geoscience Inc.
2013	Ferguson, D.W.		Hook Bay	Yes	Ferguson, D.W.	Aztec Geoscience Inc.	35 rock samples & thin section descriptions 6 stream samples 303 soil samples 1:5000 scale mapping	Rock grab sample of quartz-epidote-hosted, disseminated pyrite mineralization (#1615110) showed copper values of 65.2 ppm Cu. Heavy mineral stream sediment sample (#1615111) showed copper values of 124 ppm Cu.	ARIS_34302, Ferguson, D.W., Geological Mapping and Prospecting Report: DCS3-Hook Bay Cu Property for Aztec Geoscience Inc.
2014	Ferguson, D.W.		Hook Bay	Yes	Ferguson, D.W.	Aztec Geoscience Inc.	9 rock samples	Strong copper mineralization found over a 185 m length of road 2510K, with indications of an east-west-striking zone perpendicular to the road heading. Four of the nine samples taken in 2013 ranged from 2,572 to 8,195 ppm Cu. Two other areas ~200 m apart, 800 m south of the road 2510K showing, produced copper values of 8,852 and 1,090 ppm Cu.	ARIS_34542, Ferguson, D.W., Prospecting Survey Report: Hook Bay Cu Property for Aztec Geoscience Inc.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 6

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [551 x 425] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6-1: Hook Bay Property Footprint of Historical Work

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 7

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [551 x 425] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6-2: Historical 1982 Work Program over the Hook Bay Property

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 8

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [551 x 425] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6-3: Hook Bay Property Regional Geophysics Residual Total Field

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 9

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [551 x 425] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6-4: Hook Bay Property Regional Geophysics First Vertical Derivative

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

6 - 1 0

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION

7.1 Regional Geology

Vancouver Island is located within the Insular Superterrane of Western British Columbia, an amalgamation of the Wrangellia Terrane and the Alexander Terrane that eventually accreted to North America between the mid-Jurassic and mid-Cretaceous. This was followed by the accretion of the Pacific Terrane and the Crescent Terrane during the mid-Tertiary time-period. The Hook Bay Property is situated in the southern portion of Vancouver Island and is underlain by rock assemblages of the allochthonous Wrangellia Terrane

7.1.1 The Wrangellia Terrane

The Wrangellia Terrane extends discontinuously north of Vancouver Island through the Queen Charlotte Islands towards central Alaska and is characterized by rocks of the Upper Paleozoic to Lower Mesozoic. In the late Carboniferous Wrangellia collided and amalgamated with the Alexander Terrane in Alaska to form the Insular Superterrane and subsequently accreted to the inboard terranes of the Coast and Intermontane belts as late as the mid-Cretaceous, or as early as the mid-Jurassic (Nixon et al., 2006).

Prior to its accretion, Wrangellia comprised the Paleozoic Sicker and Buttle Lake Groups and the Middle Triassic Karmutsen Formation. The Sicker and Buttle Lake groups are composed of Devonian to early Permian island-arc volcanic, volcaniclastic, and sedimentary rocks which are known to host VMS deposits, such as Myra Falls. The Karmutsen Formation is an approximately 6,000 m thick oceanic plateau which conformably overlies the Sicker and Buttle Lake groups; it is composed of tholeiitic flood basalts, minor pillow basalts, pillow breccia and tuff as well as inter-volcanic limestone which underlie approximately 50% of Vancouver Island (Nixon et al., 2006). Conformably overlying the Karmutsen Formation is a shallow-water carbonate layer known as the Quatsino Formation. The Quatsino Formation is composed of massive to bedded bioclastic limestone which formed during the waning stages of the Karmutsen volcanism and associated subsidence. Continued sedimentation and deeper water resulted in the deposition of the impure limestone and siliciclastic rocks of the Parsons Bay Formation (Nixon et al. 2006).

A period of quiescence followed by a renewed phase of island-arc magmatism and sedimentation produced the volcanic, volcaniclastic and epiclastic strata of the Bonanza Group, along with the coeval intrusions of the Island Plutonic Suite (Nixon et al., 2006).

7.1.2 Regional Stratigraphy

Figure 7-1 shows the regional stratigraphy found on Vancouver Island, B.C.

The regional geology for the Hook Bay Property is shown in Figure 7-2.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [432 x 537] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7-1: Stratigraphic Nomenclature for Vancouver Island

Source: Muller et al., 1974; Nixon, 2011

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [548 x 423] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7-2: Hook Bay Property Regional Geology Map

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

7.2 Property Geology

The Hook Bay Property is predominantly underlain by Upper Triassic Karmutsen Formation basalts of the Vancouver Group. The eastern border of the Property has been intruded by the Early Jurassic to Middle Jurassic granodiorites of the Island Plutonic Suite. The geology for the Hook Bay Property is shown in Figure 7-3.

Minimal geological mapping work has been carried out over the Property area; however, a small portion of the historical Contented Claim Group was mapped in detail in 1983 by Noranda Exploration in the northern and central portion of the Hook Bay Property. The predominant lithology reported by Stewart (1983) was described as a dark grey-green basalt which has been variably altered. It was also reported that minor amounts of rhyolite porphyry, granodiorite and basalt lapilli-tuff were also observed on the Property. The basalt showed variable competency and texture due to significant mechanical and chemical alteration in the area. Zones of mechanical shearing have introduced carbonate, ± silicate, ± epidote, ± sulphides resulting in zones of variable composition. Variability within these zones is characterized by competent rocks adjacent to zones of significant shearing and carbonate-rich basalts flanking carbonatepoor basalts, and it is possibly the result of a cyclical fluid movements through shear zone conduits. Several 1 to 20 m wide outcrops of rhyolite porphyry intruding the basalt were also observed on the Property; these were often associated with mineralization within an approximate 100 m wide surrounding area. This was observed at the Hook Bay 1 showing and at the northeast of the Property along road 2510. The main, 30 cm wide mineralized lens at the Hook Bay 1 showing, trends at 210°, approximately on strike with mineralized veins at 215°, to the north along road 250J.

Prior to 2020, the southernmost portion of the Hook Bay Property had not been extensively explored; however, a 2011 prospecting program by Aztec Geoscience reported variable rock types in the area, including volcanic agglomerates, lapilli-tuffs, porphyritic dykes, massive basalts and highly sheared and oxidized basalts. Minerals such as pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite were reported as disseminations and stringers in thin calcite-quartz-epidote veinlets and fracture fillings and shears hosted in the Karmutsen basalt. During the 2020 field program, Longford Exploration noted several epithermal quartz-epidote veins located in the southwest of the Property along the Hook Bay road 1000. These veins follow a strike between 180° and 200° dipping sub-vertically to the west. A minor number of brecciated and argillic altered epithermal veins were additionally observed in this area (Figure 7-4A).

Several 5 to 15 m wide felsic intrusions (rhyolite porphyry and granodiorite) are present in the eastern section of the Property. Many of these intrusions show weak-to-moderate sericite alteration, in addition to bleaching and the inclusion of sheeted quartz-carbonate-epidote stockwork assemblages (1 to 2 mm wide stringers).

Numerous well-defined shears ranging in width from 0.1 to 3 m were also identified on the Property; the orientation of these structures ranged between a strike of 110° and 120° with dips ranging between 70° and 90° SE (Stewart, 1983). Stewart also reported that the majority of major shears occurred over a 40 m interval, where 12 shears were mapped along road 2510 in the northeast of the Property.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 4

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [554 x 428] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7-3: Hook Bay Property Geology

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 5

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

7.2.1 Property Rock Descriptions

The following rock descriptions were reported from Stewart (1983) during the Noranda Exploration program on the Contented 1 and Contented 2 showings:

BASALT

Dark grey-green, weathers medium grey-green and rust brown. Very fine to fine grained with few minerals discernible. Epidote occurs as fracture fillings and crystal aggregates throughout. Outcrops exhibit blocky to tabular fracture patterns. The basalt unit forms are resistant well-defined outcroppings across the Property, which are variable because of mechanical and chemical alteration.

a) Recrystallized Calcareous Basalt Dark grey-green, weathers light tan to grey-brown. Abundant calcite in matrix. Unit very well-lithified. Evidence of recrystallization includes presence of well-defined, fine-grained subhedral biotite, hornblende, and plagioclase crystals in addition to distinct flow bands and separation of mafic/felsic components.

b) Sheared-Altered Basalt Dark grey-green, weathers light to medium grey, brown, rust, and pale. Highly fractured, crumbly. More intensely sheared areas are typically dark brown, recessive, and friable, intensely fractured with well-developed slickenside and very lustrous sheared surfaces. Many minerals are unrecognizable in hand specimen. Calcite veining and salvage alteration varies from zone to zone with up to 10% by volume in some areas.

Localized mineralization is generally associated with the shear zones and consists of pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite as fine-grained disseminations, fracture fillings, veinlets, and pods of massive sulphides.

c) Calcareous Basalt Dark grey, weathers rusty brown. Fine-grained, massive, resistant but variable sheared. Calcite to approximately 15% as very fine-grained matrix material, fracture fillings and veinlets. Pyrite and chalcopyrite to 5% combined typically associated with calcite.

RHYOLITE PORPHYRY

Light greenish-grey, weathers white and tan. Very resistant and highly siliceous with sharp conchoidal fracture patterns. Mafic mineralogy comprises 15 to 20% of rocks and includes biotite (5%) as very finegrained, anhedral crystal aggregates and hornblende (10 to 15%) as prismatic, euhedral phenocrysts to 4 mm long, (average 1 to 2 mm). Approximately 50% of unit composed of sub/to anhedral plagioclase and K-feldspar phenocrysts to 4 mm. Matrix is aphanitic and highly siliceous.

Mineralization is lacking and alteration is restricted to a poorly defined, 30 cm wide contact metamorphic aureole along basalt/porphyry boundary.

GRANODIORITE

Only a cursory examination was performed along the western margin of the claim group. Most notable feature is consistent, intense shearing and fracturing.

BASALTIC LAPILLI-TUFF

Thought to form the footwall to the noted shear zone at Zone 2. Medium to dark grey-green, weathers darker green. Soft, fragmental with calcareous matrix. Calcite and epidote occur as fracture filling. Chalcopyrite to 1% as disseminations and fine-grained crystal aggregates.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 6

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Rock outcrops found on the Hook Bay Property during the 2020 field program are shown in Figure 7-4.

==> picture [469 x 469] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7-4: Rock Outcrops Found on the Hook Bay Property during the 2020 Field Season

(A) 0.5 m sinistral off-set of sub-vertical brecciated epithermal veins

(B) Micro-brecciated argillic epithermal vein
(C) Sheeted-quartz stockwork in altered felsic porphyry
(D) Island Plutonic Suite granodiorite intrusion within Karmutsen basalt

Source: Photos provided by Longford Exploration Services, 2020, and Luke van der Meer taken during the 2020 site visit.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 7

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

7.2.2 Mineralization

Three main zones of mineralization have been identified on the Hook Bay Property located within the Upper Triassic Karmutsen Formation (Vancouver Group) basalts in association with the underlying Island Intrusive granodiorites of the Lower Jurassic Island Plutonic Suite.

The Contented 1 showing ( BC Minfile 092F 195 ) is located on the ridge between Cook and Macktush Creek, approximately 4 km southwest of the Macktush Creek mouth. Mineralization consists of massive sulphide pods and disseminated sulphides associated with linear shear zones, possibly the result of sulphides leaching from country rock. The area consists of fine to coarse grained, infrequent pyrite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite as disseminations, fracture fillings, veinlets, and massive pods within sheared and fractured basalts. Disseminations and fracture fillings are found in the more competent basalts and the sulphide pods occur discontinuously within the shear zones. These pods can be up to 15 cm wide and are exposed to a height of approximately 1 m and consist of up to 80% to 90% sulphides. Historical grab samples of sulphide pods collected in the local area by Noranda Exploration (1982), assayed up to 45.57 g/t Ag and 5.8% Cu. In addition, 550 m east of the Contented 1 showing along road 2510K, samples R-23404 and R- 23405 returned assays of 1.63% Cu and 2.34% Cu, respectively (Stewart, 1983).

The Contented 2 showing ( BC Minfile 092F 615 ) is located on a northerly flowing tributary of Cook Creek, approximately 2 km northwest of the creek mouth on the Alberni Canal. Mineralization is characterized by a 10 cm flat-lying vein structure of massive pyrrhotite-pyrite-chalcopyrite; however, it has been suggested that this structure could possibly be related to an exhalative lens of sulphides (Stewart, 1983). Grab samples collected by Noranda Exploration in 1982 reported assays of up to 18.51 g/t Ag, and 8.4% Cu (Stewart, 1983).

The Hook Bay 1 showing (Figure 7-5) is described as a locally, 25 m wide zone of sheared and iron-stained basalts which are bounded by two faults, both striking 230° and containing quartz-chalcopyrite-pyritehematite veinlets spaced 0.5 to 1 m apart. On the west side of the zone, a 30 cm wide vein (lens) of massive chalcopyrite-pyrite-pyrrhotite was identified; it appeared to follow a similar strike (Figure 7-6, left ). A grab sample from the lens (DD-1) returned assays of 5.995% Cu and 18.2 g/t Ag (Ferguson, 2012).

In 2020, Longford Exploration discovered two narrow veins, approximately 470 to 650 m to the east of the Hook Bay 1 showing (Figure 7-6, right ). These samples returned assays of 1.41% Cu and 1.76% Cu. Approximately 30 m south of the Hook Bay 1 showing, sample 3294556 assayed 1.3% Cu, indicating possible continuity of mineralization between the showings.

In addition, Longford Exploration returned higher grades than had previously been sampled along the road 250J in 2014. Three rock samples (3294560, 3294564 and 3294559) assayed 2.12% Cu, 5.53% Cu and 7.41% Cu, respectively. As a result, Longford Exploration declared this new location to be the “Hook Bay 2 showing”. Mineralization at the Hook Bay 2 showing contains massive sulphides hosted within three 20 to 40 cm highly sheared, sub-vertical quartz-carbonate veins striking at 351°.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 8

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [528 x 396] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7-5: Hook Bay 1 Showing

Note: Flagging tape center right and center bottom of image (white arrows); showing the locations of mineralized pods (and samples locations) of massive sulphides, including pyrite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite within localized intense shear zone segregations, and adjacent to outcroppings of rhyolite.

Source: Photo provided by Longford Exploration Services, 2020

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 9

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [545 x 402] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7-6: Hook Bay 1 Showing

Note: 30 cm wide lens of massive sulphides at sharp contact with rhyolite dyke (left). Similar mineralization to Hook Bay 1 showing (sample 3294582) located on road southeast of the Hook Bay 1 showing (right).

Source: Photos provided by Longford Exploration Services, 2020

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

7 - 1 0

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

8 DEPOSIT TYPE

The Hook Bay Property is located within the Coastal Mountain belt of Vancouver Island, and two styles of mineralization are thought to be possible on the Property: volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) and copper-gold-molybdenum porphyry style of mineralization.

8.1 Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Style Deposit

Volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits (Figure 8-1), also known as volcanic-hosted massive sulphide, volcanic-associated massive sulphide, or seafloor massive sulphide deposits, are important sources of copper, zinc, lead, gold, and silver. These deposits form at or near the seafloor where circulating hydrothermal fluids driven by magmatic heat are quenched through mixing with bottom waters or porewaters in near-seafloor lithologies. Massive sulphide lenses vary widely in shape and size and may be pod-like or sheet-like. They are generally stratiform and may occur as multiple lenses. Deposits range in size from small pods of less than a ton (which are commonly scattered through prospective terrains) to supergiant accumulations (Shanks et al., 2012).

Massive ore in VMS deposits consists of >40% sulphides, usually pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and galena; non-sulphide gangue typically consists of quartz, barite, anhydrite, iron oxides, chlorite, sericite, talc, and their metamorphosed equivalents. Ore composition may be lead-zinc-, copperzinc-, or lead-copper-zinc-dominated, and some deposits are zoned vertically and laterally.

Many deposits have stringer or feeder zones beneath the massive zone that consist of crosscutting veins and veinlets of sulphides in a matrix of pervasively altered host rock and gangue. Alteration zonation in the host rocks surrounding the deposits is usually well-developed and include advanced argillic (kaolinite, alunite), argillic (illite, sericite), sericitic (sericite, quartz), chloritic (chlorite, quartz), and propylitic (carbonate, epidote, chlorite) types (Bonnet and Corriveau, 2007).

An unusual feature of VMS deposits is the common association of stratiform “exhalative” deposits precipitated from hydrothermal fluids emanating into bottom waters. These deposits may extend well beyond the margins of massive sulphide and are typically composed of silica, iron, and manganese oxides, carbonates, sulphates, sulphides, and tourmaline.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

8 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [471 x 456] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 8-1: Schematic Cross Sections of Various VMS Deposit Types (showing host rocks, alteration and mineralization)

Source: Galley et al., 2007; Barrie & Hannington, 1999; Franklin et al., 2005

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

8 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

8.2 Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Porphyry Style Deposit

The Hook Bay Property is likely associated with a widespread distal hydrothermal copper-goldmolybdenum porphyry style deposit (Figure 8-2). The mineralized zones are located within and adjacent to basalts of the Karmutsen Formation and the contacts between the Island Plutonic Suite granodiorites on the Property.

The formation of this style of deposit is related to orogenic belts at convergent plate boundaries (subduction-related magmatism) or extension settings related to strike-slip faulting or back arc spreading during continent margin accretion. It is generally recognized that copper-gold-molybdenum porphyry deposits are associated with granodiorite, quartz monzonite, quartz diorite granitoid rock types. Coppergold-molybdenum porphyries tend to occur as large zones of hydrothermally altered host rock and are closely related to island-arc volcano-plutonic suites. Composition of intrusions range from basalt-andesite volcanic and gabbro-diorite-quartz-diorite associations. These deposits are characterized by quartz stockworks, veins, sulphide-bearing veins (pyrite, chalcopyrite, bornite, with lesser molybdenum), closely spaced fractures, and fracture selvages. These subvolcanic intrusions are commonly emplaced by multiple successive intrusive phases and a wide variety of breccias. Grain size may range from coarse-grained phaneritic to porphyritic.

The timing of gold mineralization within these systems can be early or late and is related to magmatic or circulating meteoric waters. Early gold mineralization is typically strongly associated with the potassic alteration zone and late bornite mineralization is typically associated with pyrite and either sericitic, advanced argillic or skarn-destructive argillic alteration (Gendall, 1994). These deposits may be present in stockwork veins, skarns, or as carbonate and non-carbonate replacement (Gendall, 1994). Copper-gold style porphyries tend to be smaller in size compared to copper-molybdenum style porphyries (Gendall, 1994). Regional structures and structural lineaments act as mineralization controls in these systems, and, therefore, the degree of fracturing and veining tends to favour the concentration of copper and gold in these areas (Gendall, 1994).

Mineralized zones occur at depths of 1 km or less, and within an area of up to 5 km of the causative source of the mineralization; they are typically associated with the development of brecciated zones or preferential replacement in host rocks with a high degree of primary permeability. Ore-grade stockworks are linked to zones of intensely developed fractures that are coincident or intersect multiple fracture sets. Propylitic alteration halo is widespread and generally surrounds an early potassic alteration core (which is commonly well mineralized). Overprinting of early mineralization by later (younger) mineralized phyllic alteration is also common. Pyrite is typically the predominant sulphide mineral, and the predominant ore minerals are chalcopyrite, molybdenite, lesser bornite and rare (primary) chalcocite. Subordinate minerals may include tetrahedrite/tennantite, enargite and minor gold, electrum and arsenopyrite.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

8 - 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 )

H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [412 x 583] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 8-2: Zoned Porphyry System Model

Source: Holliday and Cook, 2007

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

8 - 4

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

9 EXPLORATION

CIP (the Issuer) has not carried out any exploration activities on the Property as of the date of this report.

Longford Exploration Service has conducted the following exploration work on the Hook Bay Property. Exploration activities conducted by previous owners can be found in Section 6 (History).

9.1 2020 Field Program

Longford Exploration Services Ltd. (Longford Exploration) mobilized a crew of four from Vancouver, B.C. on March 11, 2020 and completed a 12-day geological mapping, prospecting, and surface sampling program. The field program ran from March 11 to 22, 2020. The crew was dispatched daily from the nearest town of Port Alberni. The Property was accessed by driving 45 minutes along the Canal Main road and taking several westward-branching logging roads to access the Property.

The 2020 field program set out to validate historical sample grades, test Property access, and understand the mineralization pathways within the Karmutsen basalts relating to the intrusive granodiorite of the Island Plutonic Suite.

Several historical copper showings are known to exist on the Hook Bay Property; however, only the Hook Bay 1 and Hook Bay 2 showings were prospected during this field program. Due to the poor conditions of deactivated/unmaintained logging roads, and seasonal snow at elevation, the Contented 1 showing was not visited. The Longford Exploration crew reached the Contented 2 showing area late in the day, and only one rock sample was collected from unmineralized wall rock at this location.

9.1.1 Results Overview

Forty-one rock grab samples were collected throughout the Property. Two hundred and eighty soil samples were collected over a 25 x 25 m grid spacing. The soil sampling grid covered an approximate 25 m wide shear zone that hosts the Hook Bay 1 showing in the southern portion of the Property. Fourteen stream sediment samples from north and south of the Cook Creek drainage were also collected.

As a first pass exploration program, multiple narrow, mineralized veins/pods striking between 210° and 348°. Rock samples taken from the Hook Bay 1 showing confirmed the previous high-grade samples from Aztec Geoscience’s 2012 and 2014 programs, but the historical grab sample results from Noranda Exploration’s 1982 Contented 1 and Contented 2 showings still require verification. Stream sediment samples taken directly below the Contented 2 showing indicate a strong source of copper and silver (up to 164 g/t Ag); these are in line with Noranda Exploration’s 1983 findings from the 600 m outcrop located directly above. The stream sediment samples collected from the northern drainages are generally weak in copper; this is thought to be due to significant slope failure and burial upstream from the sample collection site.

The 2020 field program established new mineralized areas, namely sample 3294556 (40 m south of Hook Bay 1 showing) and samples 3294582 and 3294583 (470 to 650 m southeast of Hook Bay 1 showing). Elevated copper is present in soil across the Hook Bay 1 showing, trending along a northeast-southwest shear. It should be noted that many of these soil horizons were poorly developed, and, therefore, the copper in soil may be higher than that recorded. A strong anomaly, with soil samples up to 349 ppm Cu,

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

exists directly south of the Hook Bay 1 showing. These samples may be contaminated through fall-out of boulders along the road cut; however, given the recovered grade from rock sample 3294556 in the same area, it is likely that the anomaly indicates a continuation of sub-surface mineralization.

9.1.2 Rock Sample Results

Thirty-nine rock grab samples were collected throughout the Property.

The 2020 field program returned significantly higher grades than had been previously sampled along road 250J in 2014. Three rock samples (3294560, 3294564 and 3294559) assayed 2.12% Cu, 5.53% Cu and 7.41% Cu, respectively. It should also be noted that two of these samples returned gold grades of 0.47 g/t Au and 0.30 g/t Au, indicating the potential for the Property to host gold mineralization, as seen within the Macktush and Nahmint properties to the north and south, respectively. Given these results, in the context of this report this new location to be the “Hook Bay 2 showing”.

Table 9.1 outlines the geochemical rock (grab) results returned from the 2020 preliminary survey of the Property, and the locations and results are shown in Figure 9-1.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Table 9-1: 2020 Rock Sample Assay Results

Sample ID	Type	Lithology	Cu (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)	Description
3294551	Outcrop	Basalt	5889.40	4.90	41.30	Lens or vein of sulphide-rich basalt (Karmutsen) with hornfelsed margin. 10% euhedral pyrite; 5-7% chalcopyrite occurring in blebs; 2% bornite. Highlysheared outcropshowingfrom road. Vein/lens@210/90.
3294552	Outcrop	Basalt	7912.70	4.80	33.40	Lens or vein of sulphide-rich basalt (Karmutsen) with hornfelsed margin. 10% euhedral pyrite; 5-7% chalcopyrite occurring in blebs; 2% bornite. Highlysheared outcropshowingfrom road. Vein/lens@210/90.
3294553	Outcrop	Basalt	324.10	0.10	15.10	Wall rock to the south of mineralized vein. Quartz-carbonate stringers with 2% disseminated pyrite.
3294554	Outcrop	Rhyolite	65.60	0.05	15.60	Fine-grained rhyolite intrusive (light) margin to mineralized vein. Weakly reactive to HCl due to interstitial calcite. Trace and disseminated pyrite and presence of vesicles.
3294555	Outcrop	Basalt	30490	25.20	96.50	High-grade basalt taken from the same vein/lens as samples 3294551 and 3294552. Malachite staining present, in addition to quartz-carbonate veining (vuggy).
3294556	Outcrop	Basalt	13030	40.00	24.40	Basalt directly below and on trend with main South Hook Bay showing. Trace and disseminated pyrite with malachite staining. Weakly sheared @ 210.
3294557	Outcrop	Basalt	62.20	0.05	3.40	Quartz-carbonate vein/stringers along a small shear ~240 strike subvertical dip. Weathered and oxidized with open boxwork in quartz vein; 1% pyrite; 2% weathered limonite.
3294558	Outcrop	Basalt	210.30	0.05	4.10	Karmutsen basalt with prehnite vesicle infill; >1% pyrite; weathered limonite infill in vugs.
3294559	Outcrop	Basalt	74080	4.60	301.90	Sample of massive pyrite and chalcopyrite in 5 cm quartz epidote carbonate vein. 210/subvertical undulating shear structure. 70% sulphides in basalt host (5/5 magnetism). Pyrrhotite,chalcopyrite,bornite and black highlydisseminated sulphide which is magnetic.
3294560	Outcrop	Basalt	21170	1.60	470.40	Sample of massive pyrite and chalcopyrite in 10 cm quartz epidote carbonate vein. 215/subvertical undulating shear structure. 20% sulphides in basalt host (5/5 magnetism). Pyrrhotite,chalcopyrite,bornite and black highlydisseminated sulphide which is magnetic.
3294561	Outcrop	Basalt	5918.30	0.50	24.90	Epidote vein 3-7 cm with 7% pyrite and 5% chalcopyrite in the Karmutsen vesicular basalt.
3294562	Outcrop	Basalt	7645.70	0.60	25.00	Epidote vein 3-7 cm with 2% pyrite and 7% chalcopyrite in the Karmutsen vesicular basalt.
3294563	Outcrop	Basalt	2082.60	0.10	9.80	Wall rock of Karmutsen basalt with minor >5% chalcopyrite and pyrite in vesicles.
3294564	Outcrop	Ore	55340	3.10	220.10	High-grade sample of sulphide lens/vein of 3294559.
3294565	Outcrop	Basalt	126.50	0.05	0.25	Karmutsen basalt with chaotic quartz epidote stringers; >1% pyrite; weathered limonite infill in vugs.
3294566	Outcrop	Basalt	535.20	0.20	8.50	Karmutsen basalt with chaotic blebs (2-5 cm) of quartz, epidote, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and bornite in a brittle fault zone ~10 m wide with a north-south orientation.
3294567	Outcrop	Basalt	1050.70	0.20	4.10	Karmutsen basalt with chaotic blebs (2-5 cm) of quartz, epidote, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and bornite in a brittle fault zone ~10 m wide with a north-south orientation.
3294568	Outcrop	Basalt	179.70	0.10	2.70	Karmutsen basalt with chaotic blebs of quartz with rim of sulphides (mostly pyrite) and minor chalcopyrite.
3294569	Outcrop	Basalt	290.20	0.05	1.80	Green fine-grained amygdaloidal basalt with trace disseminated chalcopyrite + pyrite throughout; mineralization is along a structure with orientation of 230/55.
3294570	Outcrop	Basalt	9.20	0.05	2.00	Green fine-grained amygdaloidal basalt with trace disseminated chalcopyrite + pyrite in contact with felsic intrusive with quartz carbonate and open vugs.
3294571	Outcrop	Basalt	5035	6.60	26.80	Sulphide-rich Karmutsen basalt. 10% euhedral pyrite; 5-7% chalcopyrite occurring in blebs; 2% bornite. Highly sheared outcrop showing from road. Vein @ 210/90.
3294572	Float	Basalt	374.80	0.40	5.40	Highly weathered basalt boulder with goethite and limonite weathering in large open vugs.
3294573	Outcrop	Basalt	439.80	0.05	17.00	Bleached-white fault zone 20 cm wide within the green fine-grained amygdaloidal basalt with trace disseminated pyrite.
3294574	Outcrop	Basalt	115.50	0.05	3.30	Quartz epidote vein 4 cm with 5% pyrite and 2% chalcopyrite in the Karmutsen vesicular basalt with a strike of 269/90.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Sample ID	Type	Lithology	Cu (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)	Description
3294575	Outcrop	Basalt	225.50	0.10	12.80	Sample of Karmutsen basalt with 5 cm quartz vein breccia (340/90) and open vugs.
3294576	Outcrop	Basalt	94.80	0.05	0.25	Sample of Karmutsen basalt with 20 cm massive quartz vein breccia.
3294577	Float	Basalt	76.90	0.05	2.60	Massive quartz vein breccia float with open boxwork and rusty weathered sulphides.
3294578	Outcrop	Basalt	48.10	0.05	4.90	Sample of Karmutsen basalt with 20 cm quartz vein breccia (235/75) and open vugs.
3294579	Outcrop	Basalt	126.80	0.05	0.25	5 cm quartz vein in green fine-grained amygdaloidal basalt (220/50).
3294580	Outcrop	Basalt	144.30	0.05	3.80	3 cm quartz and epidote vein crosscutting sample 3294579 at 10/45.
3294581	Outcrop	Basalt	119.00	0.05	7.10	Sample of Karmutsen basalt with 5 cm quartz epidote lens and open vugs.
3294582	Outcrop	Basalt	14,110	1.70	19.60	Vein of sulphide-rich epidote and quartz within the basalt (Karmutsen). 10% euhedral pyrite; 5-7% chalcopyrite occurring in blebs; 2% bornite and malachite staining.
3294583	Outcrop	Basalt	17,660	1.60	7.30	Vein of sulphide-rich epidote and quartz within the basalt (Karmutsen). 5-7% chalcopyrite occurring in blebs; 5% bornite and malachite staining.
3294584	Outcrop	Granodiorite	26.40	0.05	0.25	Sample of medium-grained granodiorite (Island Plutonic Suite) with stockwork of quartz veinlets over outcrop face (3 m) with chaotic orientation.
3294585	Outcrop	Basalt	354.00	0.10	19.40	Karmutsen basalt with chaotic blebs (2-5 cm) of quartz, epidote, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and bornite.
3294586	Outcrop	Granodiorite	50.00	0.05	0.25	Medium-grained equigranular granodiorite with weak sericite alteration and joint set at 220/75 and 170/70.
3294587	Outcrop	Granodiorite	8.80	0.05	0.25	Medium-grained equigranular granodiorite with weak sericite alteration and potassic alteration along shear 328/80.
3294588	Outcrop	Granodiorite	12.90	0.05	0.60	Medium-grained equigranular granodiorite with weak sericite and limonite alteration along quartz stringers.
3294589	Outcrop	Granodiorite	7.30	0.05	0.25	4 cm rusty quartz vein with open boxwork and limonite at 60/50 within the medium-grained equigranular granodiorite.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 4

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [554 x 428] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9-1: 2020 Hook Bay Property Rock Sample Locations and Copper in Rock Results (ppm)

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 5

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

9.1.3 Soil Sample Results

Two hundred and eighty soil samples were collected over a 25 x 25 m grid spacing. The soil sampling grid covered an approximate 25 m wide shear zone that hosts the Hook Bay 1 showing in the southern portion of the Property.

Table 9.2 outlines the geochemical soil sample results returned from the 2020 preliminary survey of the Property, and the locations and results are shown in Figures 9-2 and 9-3.

Table 9-2: 2020 Soil Sample Results

Sample ID	Colour	Soil Horizon	Grain Size*	Depth (cm)	Cu (ppm)	Pb (ppm)	Zn (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)
3294601	Orange brown	B	mg	40	84.3	2.5	27	0.1	4.3
3294602	Orange brown	B	mg	30	92.6	3.2	42	0.05	1.5
3294603	Orange brown	B	cg	30	36.4	4.5	28	0.05	1.7
3294604	Orange brown	B	cg	30	50.7	4.3	30	0.05	3.3
3294605	Orange brown	B	cg	30	51.7	5.5	53	0.05	0.25
3294801	Orange brown	B/C	mg	35	33.8	4.4	14	0.05	1.4
3294802	Orange brown	B	fg	25	78.5	4	33	0.05	3.8
3294803	Orange brown	C	cg	20	78.2	3.4	35	0.05	40.3
3294804	Orange brown	B	cg	40	56.8	3.4	32	0.05	0.9
3294805	Orange brown	B	cg	15	26.5	4.2	18	0.05	1.3
3294806	Orange brown	B	mg	45	24.5	4.2	20	0.05	2.4
3294807	Light Grey	B/C	mg	35	60.3	3.3	32	0.05	1.8
3294808	Orange brown	B/C	mg	40	53.3	4.9	37	0.05	0.6
3294809	Orange brown	B	fg	30	31.8	5.1	31	0.05	1.3
3294810	Orange brown	B	mg	35	48.5	5.2	30	0.05	16.6
3294811	Orange brown	B	cg	40	84.5	3.5	42	0.05	6.6
3294812	Yellow grey	B/C	fg	35	51.5	6.2	17	0.05	0.25
3294813	Orange brown	B	cg	45	28.1	3.7	21	0.05	2.8
3294814	Orange brown	B	cg	30	47.6	3.5	27	0.05	1.4
3294815	Orange brown	B	cg	30	78.6	3.6	39	0.05	2.3
3294816	Orange brown	B	cg	35	76.1	3.8	30	0.05	2.4
3294817	Orange brown	B	cg	45	189.9	2.6	40	0.05	5.9
3294818	Orange brown	B	cg	35	63.6	3.8	37	0.05	2
3294819	Orange brown	B	cg	40	35.7	5.2	25	0.05	0.25
3294820	Orange brown	B	cg	40	27.3	5.4	21	0.05	3.7
3294821	Orange light brown	B	mg	40	31.7	5.3	23	0.05	2.1
3294822	Orange light brown	B	mg	40	17.1	4.6	15	0.05	3.7
3294823	Orange light brown	B	mg	50	92	4.9	32	0.1	2.2
3294824	Orange brown	B	mg	45	53.1	3.8	38	0.05	1.3
3294825	Orange brown	B/C	cg	25	42.3	5	25	0.05	2.7
3294826	Orange brown	B/C	cg	15	20.9	6.4	21	0.05	4.4
3294827	Orange brown	B	mg	45	83	4	40	0.05	3.4
3294828	Orange brown	B	mg	40	32.6	5.4	26	0.05	1.1

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 6

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Sample ID	Colour	Soil Horizon	Grain Size*	Depth (cm)	Cu (ppm)	Pb (ppm)	Zn (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)
3294829	Orange brown	B	fg	10	66	5.5	66	0.05	1.9
3294830	Orange brown	B	fg	10	98.2	2.3	47	0.05	3
3294831	Orange brown	B	fg	15	92.8	5	55	0.1	1.8
3294832	Brown	B	fg	10	132.7	3.4	45	0.05	1.9
3294833	Brown	B	vc	10	189.9	4.1	56	0.05	2.6
3294834	Orange brown	B/C	mg	15	54.5	4.3	31	0.05	1.8
3294835	Orange brown	B	mg	45	58.2	4.4	42	0.05	1
3294836	Orange brown	B	mg	35	49	5.9	24	0.05	2.7
3294837	Orange brown	B/C	mg	20	19	8.3	30	0.05	2.6
3294838	Orange brown	B	mg	45	90.3	3.9	57	0.05	7.2
3294839	Orange brown	B/C	mg	45	21.3	6.5	20	0.05	1.2
3294840	Orange brown	B/C	mg	45	24.1	6.6	21	0.05	0.8
3294841	Brown grey	B	cg	25	6.9	4.6	9	0.05	5
3294842	Light grey	B/C	mg	25	8	3.8	14	0.05	0.25
3294843	Orange brown	B	fg	45	6.3	5.5	11	0.05	6
3294844	Orange brown	B	cg	35	39.7	3.7	21	0.05	1.3
3294845	Orange brown	B	cg	40	51.3	4.1	37	0.05	3.1
3294846	Orange brown	B	cg	45	79.5	3.8	37	0.05	3
3294847	Orange brown	B	mg	35	81.2	3.7	47	0.05	1.7
3294848	Orange brown	A/B	vfg	140	13.3	1.4	6	0.05	1.8
3294849	Orange brown	B	cg	25	90.9	3.2	46	0.2	1.9
3294850	Orange brown	B	cg	25	114.9	3.7	52	0.05	5.6
3294851	Orange brown	B	cg	35	64.4	4.5	38	0.05	2.2
3294852	Orange brown	B	cg	20	42	5.3	37	0.05	5.8
3294853	yellow grey	B	mg	30	100.1	2.3	49	0.05	4.3
3294854	Orange brown	B	cg	40	127.8	3.9	57	0.05	2.3
3294855	Orange brown	B	cg	40	53.9	5	40	0.05	1.9
3294856	Orange brown	B	mg	35	221.8	3.1	61	0.1	7
3294857	Orange brown	B	cg	35	177.7	2.8	64	0.05	3.2
3294858	Orange brown	B/C	cg	30	72.3	5	33	0.05	1.9
3294859	Orange brown	B	mg	35	67.7	4.2	35	0.05	13.7
3294860	Orange brown	B	mg	35	66.9	4.4	33	0.05	3.3
3294861	Orange brown	B/C	cg	30	25.1	7.3	24	0.05	3.5
3294862	Orange brown	B	mg	35	84.7	3.8	50	0.1	4.7
3294863	Light grey	B/C	fg	20	74.7	4.3	32	0.05	1
3294864	Orange brown	B	cg	45	72.8	5	43	0.05	4.5
3294865	Orange brown	B	mg	45	110.6	3.6	42	0.05	0.25
3294866	Orange brown	B	mg	40	51.6	4.3	33	0.05	0.5
3294867	Orange brown	B	mg	50	13.5	4	14	0.05	0.25
3294868	Orange brown	B	mg	35	32.8	4.5	30	0.05	16.3
3294869	Orange brown	B	cg	30	23.8	5.1	28	0.05	2.5
3294870	Orange brown	B	mg	40	122.9	2.8	41	0.05	0.25

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 7

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Sample ID	Colour	Soil Horizon	Grain Size*	Depth (cm)	Cu (ppm)	Pb (ppm)	Zn (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)
3294871	Orange brown	B	mg	36	73.2	4.2	42	0.05	1.2
3294872	Orange brown	B/C	mg	35	48.8	5.7	35	0.05	0.5
3294873	Red brown	B/C	mg	15	32.9	6.6	24	0.05	0.25
3294874	Orange brown	B	mg	35	53.7	4.9	46	0.05	1.2
3294875	Grey brown	B	cg	40	130.6	3.2	59	0.05	2.6
3294876	Orange brown	B	cg	40	52.1	4.7	26	0.05	0.25
3294877	Grey brown	B/C	cg	15	25.3	7.7	20	0.05	3.3
3294878	Orange brown	B	mg	30	61.5	4.4	34	0.05	0.6
3294879	Orange brown	B	mg	40	61.6	5	37	0.05	0.25
3294880	Orange brown	B	mg	40	62.6	5.1	33	0.05	0.6
3294881	Orange brown	B/C	mg	15	59.6	5.2	39	0.05	0.25
3294882	Orange brown	B	mg	45	50.1	4.2	33	0.05	0.25
3294883	Light grey	B/C	cg	15	6.1	3.5	29	0.05	0.25
3294884	Orange brown	B	mg	40	25.6	4.3	29	0.05	12.4
3294885	Orange brown	B	cg	35	18.3	5.1	20	0.05	0.25
3294886	Orange brown	B/C	fg	20	6.3	4.5	18	0.05	0.25
3294887	Brown	B	fg	40	278.4	5.7	272	0.4	1.9
3294888	Orange brown	B	fg	30	25.6	3.8	37	0.1	0.25
3294889	Orange brown	B	mg	30	117.2	5	72	0.3	0.25
3294890	Orange brown	B	mg	35	82.2	4.1	53	0.2	1.1
3294891	Orange brown	B	mg	40	131.1	3.7	66	0.2	8.4
3294892	Redlight brown	B/C	mg	30	49.9	6.8	25	0.1	6.6
3294893	Orange brown	B	cg	45	118.4	4.7	39	0.2	1.4
3294894	Yellow brown	B/C	fg	30	52.7	4.5	26	0.05	4
3294895	brown grey	B	mg	45	22.2	3.9	20	0.05	0.6
3294896	Orange brown	B	cg	40	67.6	4.6	44	0.05	3.5
3294897	Orange brown	B/C	cg	25	69.9	4.4	29	0.05	11.7
3294898	Orange brown	B	cg	55	27.8	3.6	22	0.05	0.25
3294899	Orange brown	B	cg	40	76.4	3.3	34	0.05	0.7
3294900	Orange brown	B	cg	40	77.5	3.2	36	0.05	3.7
3294901	Orange brown	B	mg	45	68	3.8	29	0.05	3.2
3294902	Orange brown	B	cg	40	31.6	4.6	25	0.05	2.4
3294903	Orange brown	B	cg	50	64.6	3.6	36	0.05	3.6
3294904	Orange brown	B	cg	30	47.5	3.7	28	0.05	1.1
3294905	Orange brown	B	cg	30	68.9	4	38	0.05	2.3
3294906	Orange brown	A/B	mg	40	13.8	5.1	14	0.05	1.5
3294907	Orange brown	B	cg	45	15.1	4.8	15	0.05	7.3
3294908	Orange brown	B	cg	15	36.7	3.9	25	0.05	3.7
3294909	Orange brown	B	mg	40	27.7	4.9	16	0.05	4.2
3294910	Orange brown	B	mg	50	55.5	4.1	39	0.05	0.7
3294911	Orange brown	B	mg	50	31.1	4.6	15	0.05	0.8
3294912	Orange brown	B	mg	60	90.7	4	37	0.05	1.4

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 8

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Sample ID	Colour	Soil Horizon	Grain Size*	Depth (cm)	Cu (ppm)	Pb (ppm)	Zn (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)
3294913	Orange brown	B	mg	60	118.4	4.6	31	0.2	0.7
3294914	Orange brown	B	mg	60	94.4	3.1	34	0.1	2
3294915	Orange brown	B	cg	60	30.5	4.8	20	0.05	1.6
3294916	Orange brown	A/B	mg	40	52.7	3.7	40	0.05	0.8
3294917	Orange brown	A/B	mg	40	29.5	5.3	24	0.05	7
3294918	Orange brown	b/c	cg	50	81.9	3.9	38	0.05	4.5
3294919	Orange brown	B	cg	30	103.4	4.3	44	0.2	413
3294920	Orange brown	B	cg	30	104.6	4.2	44	0.1	23.6
3294921	Orange brown	B	cg	50	44.1	4.8	33	0.1	2.3
3294922	Dark brown	A/B	cg	30	46.6	6.5	36	0.05	2
3294923	Dark brown	A/B	cg	30	39.3	5.5	27	0.05	1.2
3294924	Orange brown	B	cg	15	51.6	4.9	37	0.05	0.25
3294925	Orange brown	B	cg	16	21.9	3.8	25	0.05	3.8
3294926	Orange brown	A/B	cg	5	105.8	3.8	46	0.05	1.5
3294927	Orange brown	B	cg	5	59.5	6.2	30	0.05	0.8
3294928	Orange brown	B	cg	40	51.1	4.4	35	0.05	2.3
3294929	Orange brown	B	mg	40	119.3	4.3	48	0.05	1
3294930	Orange brown	A	cg	10	77.9	7.9	72	0.1	3.9
3294931	Orange brown	B	mg	40	68.3	4.8	49	0.05	1.2
3294932	Orange brown	B	cg	30	19.9	5.6	20	0.05	0.6
3294933	Orange brown	A/B	mg	30	41.6	4.6	31	0.05	1.3
3294934	Orange brown	A/B	mg	30	36.6	6.5	34	0.05	4
3294935	Orange brown	B	mg	60	89.5	5.1	47	0.05	1.2
3294936	Orange brown	A	mg	5	8.3	6.5	14	0.05	2.4
3294937	Orange brown	A/B	cg	30	6.1	8.3	17	0.05	0.8
3294938	Orange brown	B	cg	40	78.8	4.5	41	0.05	1.7
3294939	Orange brown	B	cg	40	46.5	4.4	28	0.05	1.9
3294940	Orange brown	B	cg	40	48.6	4.3	28	0.05	1.6
3294941	Orange brown	B	cg	40	23.7	3.8	13	0.05	1.9
3294942	Orange brown	B	cg	40	72.2	4.3	52	0.05	5.7
3294943	Orange brown	B	cg	50	96.3	3.3	46	0.05	1.3
3294944	Orange brown	B	cg	50	45.4	4	30	0.05	2.6
3294945	Orange brown	A/B	fg	20	41.9	4.1	31	0.05	3.1
3294946	Orange brown	A/B	mg	15	55.3	5.2	33	0.1	5.3
3294947	Orange brown	A/B	cg	10	270.3	5	51	0.1	6.1
3294948	Orange brown	B	fg	60	38.3	5.2	27	0.05	2.1
3294949	Orange brown	A/B	mg	5	66.4	6.3	58	0.1	1.9
3294950	Orange brown	A/B	mg	5	79.2	4	48	0.05	3.2
3294951	Orange brown	A/B	fg	20	11.4	6	18	0.05	0.25
3294952	Orange brown	A/B	fg	20	8.7	6.9	12	0.05	0.25
3294953	Orange brown	A/B	cg	20	2.4	2.9	4	0.05	2.6
3294954	Orange brown	B	mg	20	60.2	3.9	38	0.05	0.25

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 9

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Sample ID	Colour	Soil Horizon	Grain Size*	Depth (cm)	Cu (ppm)	Pb (ppm)	Zn (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)
3294955	Brown	A/B	fg-mg	20	17.3	5	16	0.05	0.25
3294956	Orange brown	B	mg	20	89.5	4.6	54	0.05	0.25
3294957	Orange brown	B	cg	20	20.5	7.3	15	0.05	1.1
3294958	Brown	A/B	mg	20	7.3	9.2	12	0.05	0.25
3294959	Orange brown	A/B	mg	20	13.5	7.3	16	0.05	0.25
3294960	Orange brown	A/B	mg	20	69.3	6	32	0.1	0.25
3294961	Orange brown	B	fg	20	53.2	4	16	0.05	0.25
3294962	Orange brown	B	mg	20	92.3	3.5	53	0.05	1.5
3294963	Orange brown	B	mg	20	163.6	2.4	16	0.3	2.8
3294964	Orange brown	B	mg	20	102.4	3.3	39	0.2	2.5
3294965	Orange brown	B	mg	20	17.4	5.8	14	0.05	0.8
3294966	Orange brown	B	mg	20	16.8	6.7	12	0.05	3.1
3294967	Orange brown	B	mg	20	97.2	3.5	46	0.05	0.7
3294968	Orange brown	B	mg	20	60.8	5.2	26	0.2	0.9
3294969	Orange brown	B	mg	20	49.8	4.6	27	0.05	0.25
3294970	Orange brown	B	mg	20	57.6	5.1	39	0.05	0.25
3294971	Orange brown	B	mg	20	64.5	4.9	32	0.05	0.25
3294972	Orange brown	B	mg	20	63	4	36	0.05	3.1
3294973	Orange brown	B	mg	20	89	6.7	47	0.05	0.5
3294974	Orange brown	B	mg	20	75.7	4.1	37	0.05	119.9
3294975	Orange brown	B	mg	20	11.1	5.4	15	0.05	1.1
3294976	Orange brown	B	mg	40	20.4	4.9	16	0.05	0.25
3294977	Orange brown	B	mg	20	19.6	6.6	18	0.05	1.6
3294978	Orange brown	B	mg	25	49.3	4.8	36	0.05	0.25
3294979	Orange brown	B	mg	65	56.3	6.5	45	0.05	2
3294980	Orange brown	B	mg	65	53	7	39	0.05	1.5
3294981	Orange brown	B	mg	20	78.1	4	38	0.05	4.5
3294982	Orange brown	B	mg	20	60.8	5.8	35	0.05	1.2
3294983	Orange brown	B	cg	40	136.5	4	44	0.05	1.5
3294984	Orange brown	B	fg	30	96.5	3.7	48	0.05	0.9
3294985	Orange brown	B	mg	20	34.1	5.5	32	0.05	0.25
3294986	Orange brown	B	cg	25	13.4	4.6	15	0.05	1.4
3294987	Orange brown	B	mg	20	6.9	5.2	14	0.05	0.25
3294988	Brown	B	mg	50	6.4	5.5	13	0.05	0.5
3294989	Orange brown	B	mg	30	84.5	4.5	37	0.05	0.25
3294990	Orange brown	B	mg	35	17.2	4.8	18	0.05	1.5
3294991	Orange brown	B	mg	20	60.7	6.8	42	0.05	1.7
3294992	Orange brown	B	fg	10	348.9	7.4	47	0.2	7.6
3294993	Orange brown	B/C	fg	10	306.9	3.4	64	0.3	3.2
3294994	Orange brown	B	mg	25	49.2	4.2	41	0.2	3.9
3294995	Brown	A/B	mg	35	46.9	5	52	0.2	0.5
3294996	Brown	A/B	mg	20	199.7	4.6	42	0.1	1.6

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 0

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Sample ID	Colour	Soil Horizon	Grain Size*	Depth (cm)	Cu (ppm)	Pb (ppm)	Zn (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)
3294997	Brown	A/B	mg	30	43.2	4.1	33	0.2	2.6
3294998	Orange brown	B	fg	25	85.2	3.7	40	0.05	0.25
3294999	Orange brown	B	mg	20	50.7	5.1	33	0.05	1.4
3295000	Orange brown	B	mg	20	58.3	4.9	40	0.05	1.1
3295001	Orange brown	B	mg	40	40.1	4.7	35	0.05	6.1
3295002	Orange brown	A	mg	20	77	4.7	39	0.05	4.7
3295003	Orange brown	B	cg	50	68.3	3.4	32	0.05	2
3295004	Orange brown	B	mg	60	93.1	3.5	40	0.05	11.2
3295005	Orange brown	B	mg	60	47.4	5.4	36	0.05	3.1
3295006	Orange brown	B	mg	60	43.5	4.4	32	0.05	2.6
3295007	Orange brown	B	mg	60	60.1	4.7	38	0.05	13.9
3295008	Orange brown	B	mg	50	62.5	3.4	26	0.05	12.2
3295009	Orange brown	B	cg	30	134.5	2.6	52	0.05	2.9
3295010	Orange brown	B	cg	20	21	4.2	13	0.05	27.6
3295011	Orange brown	B	cg	20	62.6	6	38	0.05	1.9
3295012	Orange brown	B	mg	25	36.5	5.2	41	0.05	1.3
3295013	Orange brown	B	mg	40	65.4	4.9	36	0.05	1.4
3295014	Orange brown	B	cg	40	66	6.9	35	0.05	1.3
3295015	Orange brown	A/B	cg	40	43.2	4.9	19	0.05	0.7
3295016	Orange brown	B	cg	20	76	3.3	28	0.05	1.8
3295017	Orange brown	B	cg	60	30.1	4.5	30	0.05	2.6
3295018	Brown	B	mg	60	53.8	4	29	0.05	2.6
3295019	Orange brown	B	cg	60	21.5	4.7	23	0.05	1.3
3295020	Orange brown	B	cg	60	38.4	4.5	28	0.05	2.1
3295021	Orange brown	A/B	fg	10	43.9	4.8	34	0.05	1.2
3295022	Orange brown	B	mg	70	29.5	4.5	34	0.05	1.7
3295023	Brown	A/B	fg	60	17.8	5.7	18	0.05	5.6
3295024	Orange brown	B	fg	40	51.4	4.1	26	0.05	3.8
3295025	Orange brown	A/B	fg	20	17.4	3	30	0.05	1.2
3295026	Brown	A/B	mg	40	86	4.9	78	0.2	2.3
3295027	Brown	B	mg	40	24.1	4.9	28	0.2	2.4
3295028	Orange brown	B	mg	40	32.7	6.8	24	0.05	1.2
3295029	Orange brown	B	mg	40	97.2	3	41	0.05	0.25
3295030	Orange brown	B	cg	50	91.8	4	44	0.05	2.6
3295031	Orange brown	B	mg	30	21.5	4.8	17	0.05	2.9
3295032	Orange brown	B	mg	40	26.8	4.3	16	0.05	2.2
3295033	Orange brown	B	mg	40	37.6	3.8	25	0.05	2.1
3295034	Orange brown	B	fg	40	68.9	4	66	0.05	0.25
3295035	Orange brown	B	mg	30	70.4	3.5	33	0.05	3.5
3295051	Orange brown	B	mg	20	26.8	4.7	17	0.05	0.25
3295052	Orange brown	B	cg	40	36.8	5.1	29	0.05	7.5
3295053	Orange brown	A/B	mg	20	57.6	5.2	30	0.05	0.8

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Sample ID	Colour	Soil Horizon	Grain Size*	Depth (cm)	Cu (ppm)	Pb (ppm)	Zn (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)
3295054	Orange brown	B	mg	20	61.4	4.7	33	0.05	1.7
3295055	Orange brown	B	mg	20	20.7	4.4	16	0.05	0.25
3295056	Orange brown	B	mg	20	34.9	5.4	28	0.05	0.5
3295057	Orange brown	B	cg	20	86.2	4.1	36	0.05	1.9
3295058	Orange brown	B	mg	20	39.2	4.8	24	0.05	1.2
3295059	Orange brown	B/C	cg	20	13.7	4.5	14	0.05	0.25
3295060	Orange brown	B/C	cg	20	11.5	4	13	0.05	0.25
3295061	Orange brown	B	mg	40	56	4.4	32	0.05	1.5
3295062	Orange brown	B/C	cg	20	83.8	3.2	44	0.05	2.3
3295063	Orange brown	B/C	mg/cg	20	40.2	3.7	18	0.1	1.8
3295064	Orange brown	B	mg	20	121.3	2.9	41	0.05	2.1
3295065	Orange brown	B	cg	20	68.6	6.2	36	0.2	20.6
3295066	Orange brown	B	cg	20	94.7	3.9	43	0.1	0.9
3295067	Orange brown	B	mg/cg	20	70.9	4.4	37	0.05	2.4
3295068	Orange brown	B	cg	40	44.7	4.9	25	0.05	3.3
3295069	Orange brown	B	cg	60	53.9	5.8	26	0.05	1.7
3295070	Orange brown	B	mg	20	32.6	5.5	29	0.05	2.3
3295071	Orange brown	B	mg	20	126.2	4.5	55	0.05	0.7
3295072	Orange brown	B/C	cg	20	41.7	5.6	32	0.05	0.6
3295073	Orange brown	B/C	cg	20	109.3	3.9	55	0.05	4
3295074	Orange brown	B/C	mg	20	145.9	3.4	70	0.05	2.2
3295075	Orange brown	B/C	mg	20	36.2	4.9	32	0.05	4
3295076	Orange brown	B/C	cg	20	85	5.2	48	0.05	1.9
3295077	Orange brown	B/C	cg	20	60.7	6.4	38	0.05	3.2
3295078	Orange brown	B/C	mg	20	19	4.3	14	0.05	0.25
3295079	Orange brown	B/C	mg	20	32.6	4	23	0.05	3.5
3295080	Orange brown	B/C	mg	20	39.2	4.4	30	0.05	0.25
3295081	Orange brown	B	mg	20	53.3	7.4	38	0.05	1.3
3295082	Orange brown	B	mg	20	44.8	4.7	29	0.05	0.6
3295083	Orange brown	B	mg	20	98.1	4	52	0.05	0.25
3295084	Orange brown	B	cg	15	27.3	5.9	25	0.05	0.5
3295085	Orange brown	B	mg	20	156.6	4.1	53	0.05	0.8
3295086	Orange brown	B	mg	30	79	4.8	47	0.05	10.7
3295087	Orange brown	B	mg	30	102	4.7	56	0.1	1.4
3295088	Orange brown	B	mg	20	27.5	4	23	0.05	6.5
3295089	Orange brown	B	cg	20	54.3	4	28	0.05	1.5
3295090	Orange brown	B	cg	20	31.2	3.1	22	0.05	2.3

*Grain size: vc = very coarse grained, cg = coarse grained, mg = medium grained, fg = fine grained, vfg = very fine grained.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [554 x 428] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9-2: 2020 Hook Bay Property Soil Sample Locations and Copper in Soil Results (ppm)

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [554 x 428] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9-3: 2020 Hook Bay Property Soil Sample Locations and Gold in Soil Results (ppm)

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 4

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

9.1.4 Stream Sediment Sample Results

Fourteen stream sediment samples were collected from north and south of the Cook Creek drainage. Each sample was screened using a 2-mesh (6.35 mm) sieve and ended with a 20-mesh (0.841 mm) sieve.

Table 9.3 outlines the geochemical stream sediment results returned from the 2020 preliminary survey of the Property, and the results are shown in Figures 9-4 and 9-5.

Table 9-3: 2020 Stream Sediment Sample Results

Sample ID	Mo (ppm)	Cu (ppm)	Pb (ppm)	Zn (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)
3294751	0.47	158.48	2.26	82.70	98.00	8.80
3294752	0.45	201.11	5.23	83.50	164.00	94.50
3294753	0.5	181.71	6.26	89.80	134.00	12.80
3294754	0.47	179.86	10.62	49.80	67.00	6.80
3294755	0.76	94.27	2.6	49.60	46.00	5.90
3294756	0.92	76.71	2.16	48.70	70.00	5.10
3294757	0.49	69.8	1.29	38.70	28.00	2.90
3294758	1.34	62.25	1.37	36.20	26.00	2.00
3294759	0.84	49.22	1.73	37.40	29.00	2.70
3294760	0.54	44.86	1.71	37.90	63.00	549.90
3294761	0.56	46.24	1.78	39.30	24.00	1.50
3294762	0.92	50.15	1.81	40.50	30.00	11.90
3294763	4.47	68.44	4.56	43.30	49.00	3.80
3294764	1.45	46.04	2.31	35.80	15.00	3.30

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 5

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [554 x 428] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9-4: 2020 Hook Bay Property Stream Sediment Sample Locations and Copper in Sediment Results (ppm)

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 6

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [554 x 428] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9-5: 2020 Hook Bay Property Stream Sediment Sample Locations and Gold in Sediment Results (ppm)

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 7

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

9.1.5 Interpretation of Results

The 2020 field program established more mineralized areas, namely sample 3294556 (40 m south of Hook Bay 1 showing) and samples 3294582 and 3294583 (470 to 650 m southeast of the Hook Bay 1 showing). Elevated copper is present in soil across the Hook Bay 1 showing, trending along a mapped northeast-southwest shear. It should be noted that many of these soil horizons were poorly developed, and, therefore, the copper in soil may be higher than that recorded. A strong anomaly, with soil samples up to 349 ppm Cu, exists directly south of the Hook Bay 1 showing. These samples may be contaminated through fall-out of boulders along the road cut; however, given the recovered grade from rock sample 3294556 in that area, it is likely that the anomaly indicates a continuation of sub-surface mineralization.

The 2020 field program returned higher grades than had previously been sampled along road 250J in 2014. Three rock samples (3294560, 3294564 and 3294559) assayed 2.12% Cu, 5.53% Cu and 7.41% Cu, respectively. It should also be noted that two of these samples returned gold grades of up to 0.47 g/t Au and 0.30 g/t Au, indicating the potential for the Property to also host gold mineralization, as seen within the Macktush and Nahmint properties to the north and south, respectively.

The stream sediment sample results for gold and copper show locally anomalous results in four subdrainages of the Cook Creek drainage. Identifying the source of this anomaly requires follow up in subsequent field exploration programs.

The results of the 2020 field program, in conjunction with historical work on the Property, warrant further work.

9.2 2020 Satellite Imagery Survey

In November 2020, Longford Exploration commissioned PhotoSat Information Ltd. (PhotoSat) to produce a satellite orthophoto over the Hook Bay Property. PhotoSat produced an 11 km[2] survey over the Property using photos that were acquired on September 28, 2020. The one-metre satellite survey (at a 50 cm precision) produced an orthophoto for 100 km[2] (Figure 9-6). The image was produced by PhotoSat using its proprietary geophysical satellite surveying process, which is known for producing some of the highest quality and most accurate stereo satellite surveys and precision orthophotos in the world.

9.2.1 Data Acquisition Procedures

No ground control was provided during this survey; therefore, the satellite survey and precision orthophoto were located using stereo satellite geometry. The expected relative accuracy of the one metre satellite survey is, over distances of up to 5 km, better than 20 cm for level areas of bare ground. PhotoSat tests its process by comparing data to tens of thousands of ground control points during accuracy tests. In vegetated areas with open-tree canopy spaces approximately every 100 m, PhotoSat can accurately estimate bare-ground elevations beneath to about 10% of the vegetation height. Deliverables for this survey included: 1 m bare-earth satellite survey; 50 cm WorldView-3 colour orthophoto; 1 m, 5 m, 10 m and 50 m contours; project report; and licence documents.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 8

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

9.2.2 Interpretation of Results

The PhotoSat imagery shows the survey area on the Property to be densely vegetated; some areas of exposed outcrops are visible and will allow for targeted reconnaissance exploration and mapping in subsequent field programs.

Ridgelines show a general northwest orientation, parallel to regionally mapped structures (see Figure 7- 2) and the Cook Creek drainage, while second-order drainages show an orthogonal northeast orientation that appears sub-parallel to the Alberni Inlet. These patterns may be indicative of the broader controlling structural regime in the region and may provide controls on mineralization which require further field verification.

Generally, when compared to field mapping, this type of data allows for more efficient and targeted field explorations and interpretation when used in conjunction with additional detailed geological and structural observations. The orthophoto image may be suitable for additional lineament and structural analyses by machine learning (ML) techniques, the scope of which is beyond this report.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 1 9

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

==> picture [468 x 606] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9-6: 2020 Satellite Imagery Survey over the Hook Bay Property

Source: Prepared by Longford Exploration Services, 2020 (on behalf of Luke van der Meer)

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

9 - 2 0

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

10 DRILLING

As of the date of this report, Canadian International Pharma Corp. has not carried out any drilling on the Hook Bay Property.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 0 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSIS, AND SECURITY

CIP (the Issuer) has not carried out any sampling as of the date of this report.

In 2020, a field program was completed by Longford Exploration. A total of 39 rock samples, 280 soil samples, and 14 stream sediment samples were collected. These samples enabled detailed out-of-thefield descriptions, and the samples were secured in a manner that maintained their integrity and provenance for future analytical procedures.

11.1 Sample Preparation

The rock, soil, and stream sediment samples collected were located by GPS in NAD83 UTM Zone 10N. The sample locations were recorded in field notebooks and in an assay sample tag book as well as a waypoint recorded on a Garmin 60CSX GPS unit.

Each rock sample was collected into its own 18 in. by 12 in. poly bag labelled with the location (for example, Hook Bay) and a unique eight-character sample ID (for example, E6690306) assigned from a barcoded Tyvek sample book. A tear-out tag with the barcode and unique sample ID was inserted into the bag with the sample, and the bag was sealed in the field with a cable tie. The sample locations were marked in the field with pink flagging tape and the unique sample ID number was written on the tape.

A similar process was carried out for recording the soil sample data; however, soils were carefully collected following strict guidelines. A total of 280 soil samples were collected at 25 m intervals with a 25 m line spacing. All sample locations were recorded using a handheld GPS unit. Sample sites were marked using flagging tape labelled with the sample number. Most soil samples were collected from the B soil horizon (20 to 60 cm deep holes) using soil augers, wile the remaining samples were collected from A soil horizons where the soil profile was found to be poorly developed. Each soil sample was placed into an individually labelled kraft paper bag. A field duplicate was collected for every twentieth sample, totalling 12 soil sample duplicates for the program.

A variety of sieves were used in the field to reduce sample weight and to take higher quality and more representative stream sediment samples. The procedure started with using a 2-mesh (6.35 mm) sieve and ended with a 20-mesh (0.841 mm) sieve. Samples were sieved either dry or wet depending on the availability of water at the sample site or the nature of fines. An amount equivalent to 80 g of fines collected through an 80-mesh sieve was the desired amount for ICP-MS analysis. Multiple locations were sampled along the given drainage at each station; the top 3 cm of sediment was discarded to reduce the potential for contamination. Samples were then sieved in the field and placed into a sample bag; the sample name, position, elevation, flow rate, clast size, clast shape, channel width (m), sieve size (mm), and potential anthropogenic contamination were recorded.

The sampling process followed a strict QA/QC protocol with careful handling of the samples at every stage of collection and processing. Samples were collected using Hubco Sentry sample bags (10 by 17 in.) that were allowed to drain. Additional drying in the lab occurred before the fines were collected and assayed. One stream sediment sample duplicate was collected.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 1 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

All rock, soil and stream sediment samples were placed into rice bags and secured with zap-straps; the sample sequence, number of samples, and bag number was recorded on each bag.

11.2 Chain of Custody

Longford Exploration’s lead geologist maintained custody of all samples until they were submitted to Bureau Veritas in Vancouver, B.C.

11.3 QA/QC

Longford Exploration applies a high-level QA/QC program for early-stage exploration programs. Soil samples were duplicated every twentieth sample to confirm consistency. Stream sediment samples are duplicated every tenth sample. The duplicate samples were homogenized in the field and then separated into individual Hubco Sentry sample bags and left to dry. Sieves and buckets were cleaned at each station to avoid contamination at the subsequent sample location. More comprehensive QA/QC procedures are applied to larger systematic sampling programs.

11.4 Sample Analysis

Sample analysis has been and will be carried out by Bureau Veritas at its Vancouver location; the lab is ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and ISO 9001:2015 certified and independent of CIPC. The check samples collected by the author were also delivered to Bureau Veritas in Vancouver.

The analytical methods used by the lab for samples collected during the 2020 exploration program are shown in Table 11.1.

Table 11-1: Laboratory Analytical Methods

Sample Type	Analytical Methods (Bureau Veritas)
Analysis-Rock	PRP70-250 (crush 1 kg to ≥70% passing 2 mm; pulverize 250 g ≥85% 75 μm) AQ200 (Aqua Regia ICP-OES/MS, 36 elements, 0.5 g)
Analysis-Soil	SS80 (sieve 100 g to 80 mesh), AQ200 (Aqua Regia ICP-OES/MS, 36 elements, 0.5 g)
Analysis-Stream	AQ 252 (Aqua Regia ICP-OES/MS, 37 elements, 30 g)

11.5 Adequacy of Procedures

All sample collection and analyses performed by the Longford Exploration field crew conform to industry best practices and are in accordance with the CIM Best Practice Guidelines for Mineral Processing .

The author has reviewed the original analytical certificates issued by Bureau Veritas for all the samples submitted by Longford Exploration in 2020. In the author’s opinion, the analytical procedures used to determine the concentrations of base and precious metals in the submitted samples were appropriate for an early stage exploration program. The “blind” quality control program used by Bureau Veritas indicates a high level of precision and accuracy in the analytical results. In the author’s opinion, the sample collection and shipping protocols used by Longford Exploration, and observed by the author during the site visit, are consistent with current industry best practices. The in-place protocols ensured that samples collected from the Property were kept secure prior to their arrival at the analytical laboratory.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 1 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

12 DATA VERIFICATION

Much of the data presented in this report has been compiled from assessment reports retrieved from British Columbia’s publicly available reports, various publications, news releases and technical reports. Based on the review of the available information the author can attest that the information presented herein has been presented accurately as shown in those reports. The data obtained from previous assessment reports and 2020 exploration program was reviewed and the information therein was extracted was generated with proper procedures; all relevant data was tabulated or georeferenced and plotted to confirm the information was relevant to the property.

Where provided assay certificates were reviewed to confirm the grades reported, the quality control samples were reviewed and quality assurance was confirmed by spot checking of the reported standard reference material (SRM) and field duplicates result where data as available. The information and data were compiled in a project GIS and further reviewed by the author for general validity. Based on these reviews it is the authors opinion that the information has been accurately transcribed from the original source and is suitable to be used. The author is of the opinion that the datasets are adequate and reliable for the purposes of this technical report. Furthermore the results presented appear to accurately represent the alteration and limited mineralization observed across the property during the site visit.

There were no limitations placed on the author in conducting the aforementioned data verification or the site visit. No other data verification measures were completed as this project as none of the original sample material was retained. The Hook property is at an early stage of exploration and the samples collected are not intended to be used for a mineral resource or mineral reserve estimate. In the author’s opinion, the data used for the purposes of this report are adequately reliable for its purposes to the best knowledge of the author.

12.1 Author’s Site Visit

The author visited Hook Bay Property on March 20 and 21, 2020 at the time of the 2020 exploration activities completed by Longford Explorations Services, and personally reviewed the soil and stream sampling and prospecting work completed at that time. The site visit focused on the areas surrounding the Hook Bay 1 showing, where copper mineralization is identified along narrow shear zones and brittle faults. During the visit, the author also independently confirmed GPS readings at selected sample sites visited as a check on the location accuracy being recorded by field personnel. The sampling procedures of field personnel were also reviewed and were found to be generally in accordance with industry best practices. Additionally, the overall, density and distribution of sample sites were adequate for the purpose of showing the preliminary extent and grade of mineralization exposed on surface at the Hook Bay 1 showing. This is an early-stage project and preliminary investigations have commenced; further work is certainly required to define the true extent and nature of the alteration and mineralization identified thus far.

The author was able to complete several traverses over the Property to review the mineral potential of the observed host-rock stratigraphy, and confirm the identified mineral showing and review the general geology of the prospect areas.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 2 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Common brittle fault zones were observed along new forestry road cuts, these were variably associated with weak sericite alteration, occasional moderate epidote alteration, and pervasive, weak to moderate chlorite alteration. Minor visible sulphides were observed in rock outcrops and float materials; these included pyrite and lesser chalcopyrite and were commonly associated with quartz veins and sheeted, anastomosing veinlet arrays within brittle fault zones.

In the author’s opinion, such characteristics are typical of high crustal level porphyry copper style alteration and mineralization.

A total of two rock samples were collected by the author/QP during the March 20 and 21, 2020 site visit. The outcrop chip samples were collected according to typical best practice. Sample analysis on these was conducted by ALS Laboratories (ALS), a well-recognized and certified laboratory in Canada. The author did not submit standards or duplicate samples; however, ALS maintains a rigorous internal (blind) quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program throughout the sample preparation and analysis process. The author confirms that the samples submitted for analysis are representative of the general lithology of the Property.

Results for the two check samples collected are presented in table 12.1 below; and are shown on Figure 9.1, in section 9 above. These mineralized vein and shear zone samples containing visible amounts of sulphides confirmed weakly anomalous copper from the analysis and returned results consistent with the host lithologies from which they were taken.

Table 12-1: Authors Rock Sample Assay Results

Sample ID	Type	Lithology	Cu (ppm)	Ag (ppm)	Au (ppb)	Description
3294701	Outcrop	Basalt	405.30	0.20	8.70	Karmutsen basalt with chaotic blebs (2-5 cm) of quartz, epidote, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and bornite in a brittle fault zone ~10 m wide with a north south orientation.
3294702	Outcrop	Basalt	2.34	12.60	30.00	Lens or vein of sulphide-rich basalt (Karmutsen) with hornfelsed margin. 10% euhedral pyrite; 5- 7% chalcopyrite occurring in blebs; 2% bornite. Highly sheared outcrop showing from road. Vein/lens@210/90

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 2 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING

This is an early-stage exploration project. Mineral processing and metallurgical testing have not been carried out at this time.

14 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

This is an early-stage exploration project. Mineral resource estimates have not been carried out at this time.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 4 - 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

23 ADJACENT PROPERTIES

A B.C. MINFILE search reveals that there are several copper-rich mineral prospects in the area, the closest and most notable include the Macktush and Nahmint properties (after Ferguson, 2014).

23.1 Macktush Property

The Macktush Property (MINFILE 092F 012) lies several kilometres north of the Hook Bay Property, approximately 2 km west of Alberni Inlet. This developed prospect is similarly underlain by Karmutsen Formation volcanics, intruded by granodioritic rocks of the Island Plutonic Suite. The volcanic rocks consist of dark green massive basalt and andesite interbedded with or intruded by porphyritic felsic flows or dykes striking 030°. The mafic volcanics contain disseminated pyrite and epidote veinlets with local disseminated chalcopyrite. Sulphide lenses are <0.6 m wide and of limited lateral extent. At least four quartz veins up to 0.8 m wide striking 030° to 080° occur over an area of between 150 to 200 m. The sampled Macktush vein hosts strongly silicified diorite. Historical resources estimates were prepared and reported by J. Houle 2006 and 2007 which describe indicated resources along 11 veins and zones within the local area, see table 23.1 below.

Table 23-1: Macktush Property Historical Resource Estimates by Vein/Zone

Vein/Zone	Tonnes	Gold	Silver	Copper	Category
	t	g/t	g/t	%
David Vein	16,278	5.65	25.6	0.31	Indicated
Fred Vein	65,475	13.91	48.1	0.59	Indicated
Zinc Vein	35,710	8.97	44.5	0.57	Indicated
Jack Vein	13,994	2	0.8	0.02	Indicated
Moly Vein	504	4.27	1.5	0.01	Indicated
Dauntless North Veins	14,171	0.04	6.2	2.05	Indicated
Herbert Jr. Vein	8,479	0.12	6.7	5.16	Indicated
MC1 Zone	21,851	0.26	6.9	0.43	Indicated
MC2 Zone	138,499	0.33	5.2	0.47	Indicated
MC3 Zone	17,618	0.38	1	0.05	Indicated
Tasha Zone	20,423	0.01	0.6	0.16	Indicated

Source: Houle, J., 2007

The information regarding the Macktush property was derived from the technical report titled “Technical Report for the 2006 Diamond Drilling Program and the 2006 Prospecting Program on the Macktush Property” dated January 26[th] 2007. The key assumptions, parameters and methods used to prepare the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates set forth here are set out in the technical report. The author has been unable to independently verify this information and such information is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the Hook Bay Property.

23.2 Nahmint Property

The Nahmint Property lies several kilometres south of the Hook Bay Property. Collectively, it includes two groups of 15 Crown-granted mineral claims known as the “Three Jays” (group of eight claims) and the

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 4 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

“Monitor” (group of seven claims) and the surrounding 21 cell mineral claims. Together, these claims form a large, contiguous, early-stage copper +/-gold-silver-zinc-cobalt-molybdenum-rhenium-tellurium project. The Nahmint Property hosts three historical past producers of direct-shipping, high-grade copper, silver-gold ore which yielded a total of 3,274 tonnes averaging 8.15% Cu, 34.4 g/t Ag, and 0.61 g/t Au. These consist of the following occurrences:

Three Jays produced 1,981 tonnes @ 7.52% Cu, 38.0 g/t Ag and 0.97 g/t Au from 1898 to 1902.
Monitor produced 1,288 tonnes @ 9.08% Cu, 28.8 g/t Ag, and 0.05 g/t Au from 1900 to 1918.

The Three Jays (MINFILE 092F 140) was also called Hayes or Nahmint during its exploration and production history between 1898 and 1947, and it is by far the most developed area on the Nahmint Property. The Three Jays is situated several kilometres south of Hook Bay on the west side of Alberni Inlet approximately 2.5 km south of Nahmint Bay. In this area, Vancouver Group Quatsino limestones are underlain by Karmutsen basalts and interbedded tuffs. Lower Jurassic Bonanza Group andesite tuffs, agglomerates and flows are also present. These rocks are folded, faulted and intruded by a 60 m wide granodiorite dyke and by several diorite and quartz-feldspar porphyry bodies (Island Plutonic Suite). Skarn mineralization is hosted in limestone and overlying Bonanza volcanics and in Karmutsen tuff horizons. Mineralization is high-grade chalcopyrite, magnetite, pyrite, bornite, epidote, garnet and actinolite. Seven major ore shoots in three parallel zones are separated by roughly 30 m, and ore deposits are 1,500 m long. The easterly trend of the ore has steep dips (80°S) and plunges to the west.

The author has not been able to independently verify this mineral reserve information, and, therefore, this information is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the Hook Bay Property which is the subject of this report.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

1 4 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

24 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION

The author is not aware of any other relevant information not included in this report.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 4 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

25 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

As a first pass exploration program, Longford Exploration identified multiple narrow, mineralized veins/pods striking between 210° and 348°. Rock samples taken from the Hook Bay 1 showing confirmed previous high-grade samples from Aztec Geoscience’s 2012 and 2014 programs, but the historical grab samples from Noranda Exploration’s 1982 Contented 1 and Contented 2 showings still require verification. Stream sediment samples taken directly below the Contented 2 showing indicate a strong source of copper and silver (up to 164 g/t Ag); these are in line with Noranda Exploration’s 1983 findings from the 600 m outcrop located directly above. The stream sediment samples collected from the northern drainages are weak in copper; this is thought to be due to significant slope failure and burial upstream from the sample collection site.

The 2020 field program established more mineralized areas, namely sample 3294556 (40 m south of Hook Bay 1 showing) and samples 3294582 and 3294583 (470 to 650 m southeast of Hook Bay 1 showing). Elevated copper is present in soil across the Hook Bay 1 showing, trending along a northeast-southwest shear. It should be noted that many of these soil horizons were poorly developed, and, therefore, the copper in soil may be higher than that recorded. A strong anomaly, with soil samples up to 349 ppm Cu, exists directly south of the Hook Bay 1 showing. These samples may be contaminated through fall-out of boulders along the road cut; however, given the recovered grade from rock sample 3294556 in that area, it is likely that the anomaly indicates a continuation of sub-surface mineralization.

The 2020 field program returned higher grades than had been previously sampled in 2014 along road 250J. Three rock samples (3294560, 3294564 and 3294559) assayed 2.12% Cu, 5.53% Cu and 7.41% Cu, respectively. It should also be noted that two of these samples returned gold grades of up to 0.47 g/t Au and 0.30 g/t Au, indicating the potential for the Property to host gold mineralization, as seen within the Macktush and Nahmint properties to the north and south, respectively. Given these results, Longford Exploration declared this new location to be the “Hook Bay 2 showing” in March 2020.

The results of the 2020 field program, in conjunction with historical work completed on the Property, warrant further work. Focus should be on extending both the soil sampling grid along the southern Hook Bay shear zone and the stream sediment sampling on the eastern side of the Property. An IP survey should also be conducted within the vicinity of the Hook Bay 1 showing. The stream sediment sample results for gold and copper show locally anomalous results in four sub-drainages of the Cook Creek drainage. Identifying the source of this anomaly requires follow up in subsequent field exploration programs.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 5 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

The Hook Bay Property is situated in an economically and socio-politically stable area, and there are currently no known factors that would prevent further exploration or any future potential project development. However, as this is still an early-stage grass-roots phase of exploration, there is always the risk that the proposed work may not result in the discovery of an economically viable deposit. However, the author can attest that there are no significant foreseeable risks or uncertainties to the Property’s potential economic viability or continued viability directly arising from the quality of the data provided within this report.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 5 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

26 RECOMMENDATIONS

26.1 Proposed Exploration Programs

Based on the evaluation of available data, the author recommends a multi-phase exploration program for the Hook Bay Property.

Preliminary and field components of Phase 1 investigations should include the following:

A preliminary, detailed review of historical data, including complete digitization of the information from historical work, mapping, and sampling to provide a modern context to advance exploration efforts. Focus on an increased understanding of the nature and extent of mineralization using the existing geochemical and geophysical datasets.
Detailed mapping and prospecting as well as systematic surface sampling across the mineral showings to delineate the extent, thickness, and characteristics of any mineralized zones. Work should include stream sediment, soil/till and/or moss mat sampling, and channel sampling of visible surface mineralization (Phase 1), and include the following:
Detailed lithological and structural geological mapping over areas of outcrop exposure, and particular attention should be paid to understanding any stratabound versus discordant (vein and structure) hosted mineralization. It is expected that there will be significant structural controls on mineralization and understanding what these are will be critical to the ongoing exploration efforts.
The stream sediment sample results for gold and copper show locally anomalous results in four sub-drainages of the Cook Creek drainage. Identifying the source of this anomaly requires follow up in subsequent field exploration programs.
Systematic stream sediment sampling should be completed along the major drainages on all areas of the Property. This work could be extended beyond the Property to assess the extent of any anomalies beyond the Property boundary in support of additional land acquisition in the area.
An orientation stream sediment sample program should be completed on the second-order drainages. Upon confirmation of anomalism related to copper mineralization and development of a robust methodology, this sampling procedure should be applied throughout the Property.
Soil sampling lines and/or systematic grids (at 50 m to 100 m spacing), and/or moss mat sampling should also be completed along the ridgeline spurs and across areas of known mineralization and their strike continuation (for example, between the Hook Bay and Contented showings).
A comprehensive QA/QC program should be implemented for all systematic sampling programs. Due to the high-grade nature of the identified mineralization, it is strongly recommended that a robust field duplicate and coarse lab duplicate program is implemented, as well as representative umpire sampling of the high-grade sample population.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 6 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

A more detailed breakdown of Phase 1 work is provided in Table 26.1.

Phase 2 recommendations are conditional on the results of Phase 1, and include the following:

Ground and/or airborne geophysics, with specific techniques determined by the Phase 1 results (for example, an IP survey should also be conducted within the vicinity of the Hook Bay 1 showing).
Further artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML) studies.
Technical data reviews by third-party experts in porphyry copper and VMS target generation that could support a preliminary diamond drilling program (3,500 m).

26.2 Preliminary Budget

A preliminary budget for future exploration work on the Hook Bay Property is summarized in Table 26.1 and a more detailed breakdown of phase 1 of work is provided in Table 26.2 below.

Table 26-1: Preliminary Proposed Two-Phase Summary Exploration Budget.

Phase	Description	Estimated Cost (CAD$)
1	Exploration program (14 day 4-person) • Digitizing historical results • Prospecting • Geologic mapping • Geochem orientation • Stream sediment, soil/till and/or moss mat sampling • Site visit (QP/Senior Project Manager)	125,535
2	Exploration program (TBD) • Ground geophysics - Allowance • Airborne geophysics - Allowance • Third-party technical studies – Allowance • Diamond drilling program (3,500 m) - Allowance	50,000 200,000 20,000 1,100,000
GRAND TOTAL		$1,495,535

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 6 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Table 26-2 Phase 1 Proposed Detailed exploration budget.

Personnel		Days	Rate	Line Total
Senior Geologist -		14	800.00 $	11,200.00 $
Geologist -		14	700.00 $	9,800.00 $
Senior Field Assistant/Firs Aid -		14	600.00 $	8,400.00 $
Field Assistant -		14	500.00 $	7,000.00 $
P.Geo -	Site visit	2	1,000.00 $	2,000.00 $
	total man-days	58	Cat. Total	38,400.00 $
Food and Lodging		Units	Rate	Line Total
Food and Groceries	per-diem rateperperson	58	75.00 $	4,350.00 $
Lodging		14	200.00 $	2,800.00 $
			Cat. Total	7,150.00 $
Transportation		Units/Days	Unit Price	Line Total
Truck x2	1 ton with safetyand recovery gear	20	150.00 $	3,000.00 $
Fuel	per km for truck	1500	0.65 $	975.00 $
Trailer	18' 7000lb covered trailer	14	50.00 $	700.00 $
			Cat. Total	3,975.00 $
Equipment Rentals		Units	Unit Price	Line Total
Electronics Kit	Radio,Satphone,GPS, perperson day	14	35.00 $	490.00 $
Mobile XRF		14	175.00 $	2,450.00 $
Rock Saw and PPE		14	70.00 $	980.00 $
Chain saw and PPE		14	25.00 $	350.00 $
			Cat. Total	4,270.00 $
Consumables		Units	Unit Price	Line Total
Field/Office Consumables	per field man day	14	35.00 $	490.00 $
			Cat. Total	490.00 $
Analytical		Units	Unit Price	Line Total
Analysis - Rock	PRP70-250,MA200,GC820 overlimit ~30%	30	45.00 $	1,350.00 $
Analysis - Soil	Augrain count + classification	200	200.00 $	40,000.00 $
Analysis - Stream sediment	SS80,AQ252	25	36.00 $	900.00 $
Sample Shipping	Buerau Veritas	2	750.00 $	1,500.00 $
			Cat. Total	43,750.00 $
Mobilization		Units	Unit Price	Line Total
BC Ferries	DEPARTURE BAY - HORSESHOE BAY	4	125.00 $	500.00 $
Taxi's andpositioning	unit costper man	4	500.00 $	2,000.00 $
			Cat. Total	2,500.00 $
Pre and Post Fileldwork		Units	Unit Price	Line Total
GIS maps,historical workprocessing, geo-referencing, proposal and summaryreport		1	5,000.00 $	5,000.00 $
Results compilation,GIS and mapmaking,final 43-101 report writingand signoff		1	20,000.00 $	20,000.00 $

			Cat. Total	25,000.00 $
Estimated Sub Total				125,535.00 $

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 6 - 3

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

27 REFERENCES

ARIS_12044, Stewart, C., 1983, Contented Claim Report #1 Report on Geology and Geochemistry for Assessment Purposes for Noranda Exploration Company, Ltd.
ARIS_28497, 2006, Technical Report for the 2005 Diamond Drilling Program and the Airborne Geophysical Survey on Contiguous Properties, for SYMC Resources Ltd.
ARIS_28497, Houle, J., 2006, Technical Report for: The 2005 Diamond Drilling Program and Airborne Geophysical Survey on the Macktush Property for SYMC Resources Ltd.
ARIS 28989A, Houle, J., 2007, Technical Report for: The 2006 Diamond Drilling Program and Prospecting Program on the Macktush Property for SYMC Resources Ltd.
ARIS_28989B, Houle, J., 2007, Technical Report for: The 2006 Diamond Drilling Program and Prospecting Program on the Macktush Property for SYMC Resources Ltd.
ARIS_32297, Hills, L., Sanadria, R., 2011, 2011 Geological and Geochemical Technical Exploration Report on the Macktush Copper Project for G4G Resources Ltd.
ARIS_33140, Auracle Geospatial Science, Inc., 2012, Technical Report for the Macktush Project for Nahminto Resources Ltd.
ARIS_33232, Ferguson, D.W., 2012, Prospecting Survey Report: Hook Bay Cu Property for Aztec Geoscience Inc.
ARIS_34302, Ferguson, D.W., 2013, Geological Mapping and Prospecting Report: DCS3-Hook Bay Cu Property for Aztec Geoscience Inc.
ARIS_34542, Ferguson, D.W., 2014, Prospecting Survey Report: Hook Bay Cu Property for Aztec Geoscience Inc.
BC Minfile_092F616, 2013, Hook Bay Report, Flower, K. A., Version 2013/08/08, BC Geological Survey, Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas, BC Government 2013.
BC Minfile_092F615, 2013, Contented 2 Report, Flower, K. A., Version 2013/08/08, BC Geological Survey, Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas, BC Government 2013.
BC Minfile_092F195, 2013, Contented 1 Report, Flower, K. A., Version 2013/07/26, BC Geological Survey, Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas, BC Government 2013.
Bonnet, A.-L., and Corriveau, L., 2007, Alteration vectors to metamorphosed hydrothermal systems in gneissic terranes, in Goodfellow, W.D., ed., Mineral deposits of Canada—A synthesis of major deposit-types, district metallogeny, the evolution of geological provinces, and exploration methods: Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Special Publication No. 5, p. 1035– 1049.
Galley, A.G., Hannington, M.D., and Jonasson, I.R., 2007, Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits, in Goodfellow, W.D., ed., Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods: Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Special Publication No. 5, p. 141-161.
Gendall, I.R., 1994, The Porphyry Copper System and the Precious Metal-Gold Potential, Master of Sciences, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 7 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

Greene, A.R., Scoates, J.S., Weis, D., 2005, Wrangellia Terrane on Vancouver Island, British Columbia: Distribution of Flood Basalts with Implications for Potential Ni-Cu-PGE Mineralization in Southwestern British Columbia, British Columbia Geological Survey.
Holliday, J. R. and Cooke, D. R., (2007): Advances in Geological Models and Exploration Methods for Copper ± Gold Porphyry Deposits; in "Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration" edited by B. Milkereit, 2007, p. 791–809.
Muller, J. E., Northcote, K. E. & Carlisle, D. (1974). Geology and mineral deposits of Alert Bay - Cape Scott map area, Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 74-8, 77.
Nixon, G.T., Kelman, M.C., Stevenson, D., Stokes, L.A., and Johnston, K.A., 2006, Preliminary Geology of the Nimpkish Map Area (NTS 092/L07), Northern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, British Columbia Geological Survey, Fieldwork 2005, Paper 2006-1.
PhotoSat Information Ltd., 2020, PhotoSat Stereo Satellite Surveying Project Report, Hook Bay, BC for Longford Exploration Services Ltd. on behalf of Canadian International Pharma Corp.
Shanks, W.C., Thurston, R., 2012: Volcanogenic massive sulfide occurrence model. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations, Report 2010–5070–C, 345 p.

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 7 - 2

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

28 DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE

This report titled, “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Hook Bay Property, Alberni Mining Division Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada” with the effective date November 18[th] , 2020, was prepared by the following author:

Dated this 18[th] day of January 2021

==> picture [180 x 61] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

”
----- End of picture text -----

(Signed and Sealed) “Luke van der Meer ” Luke van der Meer. P. Geo Consulting Geologist

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 8 - 1

N I 4 3 - 1 0 1 T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T ( 2 0 2 0 ) H o o k B a y P r o p e r t y | B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a , C a n a d a

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

Luke van der Meer, P. Geo.

I, Luke van der Meer, B.Sc., P.Geo., do hereby certify the following:

I am an Independent Professional Geoscientist providing services through VDM Geological Consultants a wholly owned company established May 20[th] 2008 in the Province of British Columbia (registration no. 0478202-08). My business address is 614 360 Robson Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6B 2B2. I am a member in good standing, with Engineers and Geoscientist British Columbia (Licence Number 37848).
I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101), and past relevant work experience, I fulfil the requirements to be a “qualified person” according to NI 43-101.
I am responsible for the preparation of all Sections in the Technical Report titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Hook Bay Property, Alberni Mining Division, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada” dated January 18, 2021 with an effective date of November 18, 2020.
I have had no prior involvement with Canadian International Pharma Corp. or the Hook Bay Property, other than visiting the property can completing this report in exchange for typical fair arms length compensation.
I am independent of Canadian International Pharma Corp., Longford Capital Corp., Longford Exploration Service., and any other companies named within this report.
I most recently completed a two-day site visit to the Hook Bay Property on March 20 and 21, 2020.
I have read the NI 43-101, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report (Form 43-101F1) and the Technical Report and confirm that it has been prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1.
At the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the technical report not misleading.
I graduated from Otago University in New Zealand in 2001 with a Bachelor of Science with a double major in Geology and Geography. I have been employed continuously in the mineral exploration and mining and mineral exploration industry since 2001. I have been practicing as a Professional Geologist in British Columbia, continuously, since 2012.
I have practiced my profession as a geologist, in British Columbia, the Yukon, and elsewhere globally for over 20 years. Work has included detailed geological investigations of mineral properties and districts, geological mapping, mineral deposit modeling and building of geoscientific databases, and resource models. I have directly supervised and conducted geologic mapping and mineral property evaluations, published reports and maps on different mineral properties and districts and compiled and analyzed data for mineral potential evaluations, drilling programs, and geophysical programs.

Dated this 18[th] day of January 2021.

(Original Signed and Sealed) “Luke van der Meer”

Luke van der Meer, P.Geo.

==> picture [180 x 61] intentionally omitted <==

L u k e v a n d e r M e e r | P . G e o . E f f e c t i v e d a t e : N o v e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 2 0

2 8 - 2

AI assistant

Grounded Lithium Corp. — Audit Report / Information 2021

43625_rns_2021-01-28_2452b339-284d-42c0-b2c5-21bf46412b49.pdf

NI 43-101

TECHNICAL REPORT

HOOK BAY PROPERTY

Located Within:

Centered at Approximately:

Report Prepared for: CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL PHARMA CORP.

Report Prepared by:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGURES

1 SUMMARY

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Property Ownership

1.3 Property Description

1.4 Status of Exploration

1.5 Geology and Mineralization

1.6 Conclusions and Recommendations

Table 1-1: Preliminary Summary Budget for Phases 1 and 2.

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 Purpose of Report

2.2 Terms of Reference

2.3 Sources of Information

2.4 Details of Personal Inspection

2.5 Abbreviations and Units of Measurement

3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS

4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

4.1 Location

4.2 Mineral Titles

4.3 Mineral Rights in British Columbia

Table 4-2: B.C. Work Requirements for Mineral Tenures

Table 4-3: B.C. Cash-in-lieu for Mineral Tenures

4.4 Property Legal Status

4.5 Nature of Title to Property

4.6 Surface Rights in British Columbia

4.7 Permitting

4.8 Environmental

5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

5.1 Accessibility

Table 5-1: Driving Distances to the Property

5.2 Climate

5.3 Local Resources

5.4 Infrastructure

5.5 Physiography

6 HISTORY

6.1 Historical Exploration Activity

Table 6-1: Work History of Mineral Occurrences on or near the Hook Bay Property

Figure 6-1: Hook Bay Property Footprint of Historical Work

7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION

7.1 Regional Geology

7.1.1 The Wrangellia Terrane

7.1.2 Regional Stratigraphy

7.2 Property Geology

7.2.1 Property Rock Descriptions

BASALT

RHYOLITE PORPHYRY

GRANODIORITE

BASALTIC LAPILLI-TUFF

Figure 7-4: Rock Outcrops Found on the Hook Bay Property during the 2020 Field Season

7.2.2 Mineralization

Figure 7-5: Hook Bay 1 Showing

8 DEPOSIT TYPE

8.1 Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Style Deposit

8.2 Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Porphyry Style Deposit

9 EXPLORATION

9.1 2020 Field Program

9.1.1 Results Overview

9.1.2 Rock Sample Results

Table 9-1: 2020 Rock Sample Assay Results

9.1.3 Soil Sample Results

9.1.4 Stream Sediment Sample Results

9.1.5 Interpretation of Results

9.2 2020 Satellite Imagery Survey

9.2.1 Data Acquisition Procedures

9.2.2 Interpretation of Results

10 DRILLING

11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSIS, AND SECURITY

11.1 Sample Preparation

Grounded Lithium Corp. Audit Report / Information 2021