AI assistant
GREENVALE ENERGY LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2021
Nov 29, 2021
65015_rns_2021-11-29_21fca4bc-6468-43f8-89fa-1b1097309b6f.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
30 November 2021
DRILLING GATHERS MOMENTUM AT GEORGINA BASIN IOCG PROJECT, NT
First diamond hole completed and a second underway, with an exciting pipeline of new prospects identified in the central tenement group
Highlights:
-
First hole targeting the prominent “Twin Peaks” West magnetic-gravity anomaly now complete to a final depth of 796m.
-
KNRDD002 has intersected strongly altered sedimentary rocks and breccias, consistent with oxidised style Tennant Creek IOCG systems.
-
The hole was extended ~80m beyond its designed depth due to prospective veining and alteration observed in the core from 720m downhole. Assays expected in late 2021 or early in the New Year.
-
1,000m now complete as part of the maiden diamond drill program.
-
Geophysical data received from the recent airborne geophysical survey over the central tenement EL32283 and applications 32284 and 32820.
-
Gravity and magnetic inversion modelling completed on EL32295.
-
Interpretation of aeromagnetic and gravity data adds multiple new highpriority targets to the drill-testing pipeline within the exciting central tenement group.
==> picture [375 x 168] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Experienced drill contractors, Eagle Drilling NQ Pty Ltd, on hole KNRDD002 at the Georgina Basin IOCG Project
R E G I S T E R E D O F F I C E : 130 Stirling Hwy, NORTH FREMANTLE, WA 6159 | Locked Bag 4, North Fremantle, WA Australia, 6159 t:+61 8 6215 0372 | e: [email protected] | www.greenvalemining.com
A B N 5 4 0 0 0 7 4 3 5 5 5
==> picture [596 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
Greenvale Mining Limited (ASX: GRV , “ Greenvale ” or “ the Company ”) is pleased to advise that it has made a strong start to its maiden diamond drilling program at the 100%-owned Georgina Basin IOCG Project in the East Tennant area of the Northern Territory.
Greenvale continues to lead the way in exploring the East Tennant area with over 1,000m of diamond drilling already completed as part of its maiden drill program with the successful completion of the first diamond drill hole (KNRDD002) to a final depth of 796.6m.
KNRDD002 is the first of an initial four-hole drill program targeting the exciting "Twin Peaks" coincidental magnetic and gravity anomalies located within tenements EL32282 & EL32296.
==> picture [419 x 253] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Greenvale Mining's 100%-owned Georgina Basin IOCG Project Tenement Locations.
Drill-hole KNRDD002 intersected a sequence of metasedimentary rocks and breccias through the target area, with hematite(-talc), hematite-quartz-chlorite and sericite alteration observed, in line with expectations.
The rock types observed are consistent with the regionally important Warramunga Formation, and the alteration observed is similar to the oxidised end-member Tennant Creek-style IOCG deposits (Figure 3).
Oxidised end-member Tennant Creek deposits, such as Nobles Nob and Eldorado, tend to be sulfur-poor and hematite-rich, with oxidation of magnetite to hematite[1] .
- Reduced and Oxidized Au-Cu-Bi Iron Oxide Deposits of the Tennant Creek Inlier, Australia: An Integrated Geologic and Chemical Model, ROGER G. SKIRROW AND JOHN L. WALSHE, Economic Geology Vol. 97, 2002, pp. 1167–1202.
2
G R E E N V A L E M I N I N G L I M I T E D
==> picture [596 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [403 x 176] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Quartz-hematite (iron-oxide mineral) altered breccia
==> picture [402 x 198] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Hematite (iron-oxide mineral) altered breccia and sedimentary rocks between 776.78 and ~781m
==> picture [399 x 211] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: Veined and hematite (iron-oxide mineral) and chlorite-altered sedimentary rocks between 667 and ~671m
3
G R E E N V A L E M I N I N G L I M I T E D
==> picture [596 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
Consistent with the Tennant Creek deposit model, drill-hole KNRDD002 showed strong hematitic alteration, chlorite alteration and minimal magnetite, with no significant sulphide minerals observed.
In addition, trace native copper was observed on a slickensided shear (a slickenside is caused by frictional movement between rocks along the sides of a fault), at approximately 732.5m down-hole, which may indicate the presence of metals within fluids responsible for the observed alteration. As a result of observed veining and alteration intersected in drill core from 720m, the hole was extended by approximately 80m beyond its designed depth to further evaluate this exciting opportunity.
==> picture [428 x 293] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6: Slickensided parting KNRDD002 with fine native copper indicated at approximately 732.5m down-hole.
The diamond core from KNRDD002 has been geologically and structurally logged and will be sampled and assayed for a full suite of elements, including gold, with assay results expected to begin arriving in late December/early January. Once assay results are returned, the basement core will be sampled for petrography to confirm the host rock lithologies and alteration styles present at Twin Peaks.
Early on-site interpretation of the core is promising, with all the key ingredients present to suggest that the hole may sit on the edge of the geological source of the gravity and magnetic anomalies. Selected holes will be cased in order to undertake down-hole magnetic surveying to provide further directional data on the source of the observed magnetic anomalies at "Twin Peaks".
4
G R E E N V A L E M I N I N G L I M I T E D
==> picture [596 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [411 x 298] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7: Overlay of Interpreted Gravity on “Twin Peaks” Magnetic Anomalies.
Drill hole KNRDD004, the second hole in the program, has been designed to target the eastern magnetic anomaly, and is expected to provide further insights into the potential prospectivity of the "Twin Peaks" targets. Work has already commenced on the second hole (KNRDD004), with the hole currently at a depth of 275m towards a planned total depth of 750m.
Table 1: Drill Collar & Setup Details
| Hole ID | East | North | RL (AHD) | Azi (MGA) |
Dip |
Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (MGA53) | (MGA53) | |||||
| KNRDD002 | 506771 | 7825392 | 250 | 170° | -61.5° | 796.6m |
| KNRDD004 | 509608 | 7825960 | 251 | 160° | -61.5° | 750m* |
*Hole KNRDD004 design depth only, drilling underway
5
G R E E N V A L E M I N I N G L I M I T E D
==> picture [596 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [454 x 325] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Georgina Basin-Proterozoic Contact
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 8: KNRDD002 design cross-section – the hole targeted magnetic (red) and gravity (purple line) anomalies from inversion of geophysical data.
While the drilling program has been progressing, the Company has been conducting desktop reviews of the recently completed gravity and aeromagnetic surveys over the Company's central tenement group (EL32295, EL32283 and EL32284).
These desktop reviews have yielded several new and exciting prospects in the Company’s central tenement package, specifically within EL32295.
EL32295 is located adjacent to Middle Island Resources Ltd's (ASX: MDI) Crosswinds Prospect, where significant surface copper oxide mineralisation has been identified[2] . Tenement EL32295 also surrounds NDIBK05 and NDIBK10, two holes drilled as part of the National Drilling Initiative.
- Middle Island Resources Ltd. (2020, December 23) Breakthrough maiden copper discovery provides early encouragement for Barkly IOCG potential [ASX release]. http://www.middleisland.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/20201223_BarklyCopper-Discovery_final.docx.pdf
6
G R E E N V A L E M I N I N G L I M I T E D
==> picture [596 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 325] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 9: Overlay of Interpreted Gravity on Mawson, Banks & Leichhardt Magnetic Anomalies.
Greenvale has designed an initial 9-hole drill program for 5,860m (Figure 7) to assess three of the promising targets identified within EL32295 – Mawson, Banks, and Leichhardt. A further three contingent holes have been designed for 2,825m.
The three prioritised targets demonstrate coincidental magnetic and gravity anomalies similar to those seen at the Company's "Twin Peaks" prospects and consistent with IOCG deposit models.
As mentioned in previous announcements, IOCG deposits contain substantial amounts of dense iron oxide minerals, causing the deposits to have an elevated gravity response relative to the surrounding country rocks. They can have a range of magnetic responses that can vary considerably as a function of the type of magnetic minerals present and strength of remnant magnetisation relative to induced magnetisation.
In most IOCG deposits in the Gawler Craton (e.g., Prominent Hill, Olympic Dam) magnetic and gravity anomalies are non-coincident, however for other IOCG deposits – such as Ernest Henry in the Cloncurry region – magnetic and gravity responses occur together.
The proposed drill program design for the central tenement grouping will need further refinement once final geophysical modelling has been completed, expected in January 2022. The Company expects that it will be ready to commence the new drilling program in the second quarter of the New Year.
7
G R E E N V A L E M I N I N G L I M I T E D
==> picture [596 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 263] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
N
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 10: Greenvale's next steps for each tenement grouping at the Georgina Basin IOCG Project.
Greenvale and its field team are pushing hard to finish the year on a high, aiming to complete the current hole, KNRDD004, in the coming weeks, commence trial spinifex and superfine soil sampling within EL32282 and 32296 and fast-track assays and interpretation of KNRDD002.
The Company intends to maintain significant exploration momentum moving into 2022, with down-hole geophysical surveys scheduled to commence at Twin Peaks in conjunction with drilling of the remaining two holes, and site preparations, cultural heritage surveys and government approvals expected to advance rapidly to allow drilling to commence within tenement EL32295 (see Figure 8 above).
MANAGEMENT COMMENT:
Greenvale Mining CEO, Matthew Healy, commented:
“It is very encouraging that the inaugural exploration hole to be drilled at Twin Peaks West intersected not only the same rock types that host major IOCG deposits at Tennant Creek but also extensive hematite and chlorite alteration, which is associated with Tennant Creek-style IOCG deposits.
“The Greenvale team on site has done an exceptional job in preparing for and supporting drilling operations. Drill core samples from the first hole will shortly be in transit to the lab for assay and the second hole, at Twin Peaks East, is well under way, cementing Greenvale’s status as a first mover in the district.
“Drill-hole design on the central tenements is well advanced, and further target generation planned for over the wet season will see the pipeline of high-prospectivity IOCG targets grow, positioning Greenvale well to make the first discovery in the East Tennant region.”
8
G R E E N V A L E M I N I N G L I M I T E D
==> picture [596 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
“This is an exciting time for our shareholders as we look to finish 2021 on a high, with two completed drill-holes at Twin Peaks, initial assay results on the way, and a maiden JORC Mineral Resource Estimate nearing completion for the Alpha Torbanite Project in Central Queensland.”
Authorised for Release
This announcement has been approved by the Board for release.
Alan Boys Company Secretary
Contact
For further details, contact: Neil Biddle, Managing Director, 0418 915 752 Matthew Healy, CEO, 0431 683 952
Media inquiries, contact: Nicholas Read, Read Corporate, 0419 929 046 [email protected]
9
G R E E N V A L E M I N I N G L I M I T E D
==> picture [596 x 97] intentionally omitted <==
COMPETENT PERSON’S STATEMENT:
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. Matthew Healy, a Competent Person who is a Member or Fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy or the Australian Institute (AusIMM Member number 303597).
Mr Healy is a full-time employee of the company and is eligible to participate in a performance rights incentive plan of the Company.
Mr. Healy has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’.
Mr. Healy consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
10
G R E E N V A L E M I N I N G L I M I T E D
==> picture [197 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Report Template
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or | • | Altitude for airborne magnetic surveying was determined using a |
| techniques | specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate | Reninshaw ILM-500-R laser with a vertical accuracy of 0.1m | ||
| to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma | • | Base station magnetic field monitoring was completed using GEM | ||
| sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should | Overhauser and Scintrex ENVIMAG proton precession | |||
| not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | magnetometers with 1.0 and 0.5 Hz sampling rates respectively | |||
| • | Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity | • | Radiometric surveying was completed using an RSI RS-500 gamma- | |
| and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems | ray spectrometer with a sampling rate of 2Hz | |||
| used. | • | Magnetic surveying was completed using a Geometrics G-823A | ||
| • | Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the | caesium vapour magnetometer at a 20Hz sampling rate | ||
| Public Report. | ||||
| • | In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be | • | NQ drill core to be cut in half lengthwise and sampled on nominal 1m | |
| relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 | intervals or as determined by geological boundaries | |||
| m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge | ||||
| for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, | ||||
| such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling | ||||
| problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg | ||||
| submarine nodules)maywarrant disclosure of detailed information. | ||||
| Drilling | • | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air | • | Mud-rotary methods employed to bit refusal, and HQ and ND |
| techniques | blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple | diamond core drilling methods thereafter. | ||
| or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other | • | Drill core that has intersected basement (Proterozoic) rocks has been | ||
| type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | oriented where possible | |||
| Drill sample | • | Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries | • | Core blocks inserted between runs by drill crew record run length and |
| recovery | and results assessed. | recovered core | ||
| • | Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure | • | Core recovery logged by field staff/contractors at the point of core | |
| representative nature of the samples. | markup | |||
| • | Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade | |||
| and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential | ||||
| loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | ||||
| Logging | • | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and | • | Drill core logged by field geologists to capture interpreted lithology, |
| geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate | weathering, alteration and veining, and structure orientations where | |||
| Mineral Resource estimation,miningstudies and metallurgical | appropriate |
1
==> picture [197 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| studies. | •Core logging is largely qualitative, with some quantitative estimates of | |
| • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or | notable minerals | |
| costean, channel, etc) photography. | •Core tray photography undertaken of wet and dry drill core | |
| •The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. | •All drill core logged from | |
| Sub-sampling | •If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core |
•Half-core to be crushed and pulverized to 85% passing 75 micron |
| techniques | taken. | particle size prior to assay |
| and sample | •If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and | •Half drill core considered representative of sample intervals |
| preparation | whether sampled wet or dry. | |
| •For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the | ||
| sample preparation technique. | ||
| •Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to | ||
| maximise representivity of samples. | ||
| •Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in | ||
| situ material collected, including for instance results for field | ||
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | ||
| •Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material | ||
| beingsampled. | ||
| Quality of | •The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and | •NATA-accredited ALS Laboratories conducting preparation and |
| assay data | laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered | analysis of samples |
| and | partial or total. | •Laboratory analysis to include Fire Assay and AAS finish for Au and |
| laboratory | •For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, | 4-acid digest and ICP-MS for a 48-element suite |
| tests | the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument | •Both techniques considered total for elements of interest |
| make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their | •Certified reference materials (CRMs) and blanks inserted in the | |
| derivation, etc. | sample stream to monitor accuracy and potential contamination as | |
| •Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, | part of Company QAQC processes | |
| duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels | •ALS in-house QAQC includes the use of CRMs, splits and duplicates |
|
| of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. | to monitor accuracy and precision | |
| Verification of | •The verification of significant intersections by either independent or |
•Sample intervals assigned a unique sample identification number |
| sampling and | alternative company personnel. | prior to core cutting and analysis |
| assaying | •The use of twinned holes. | •Significant intersections to be checked against drill core photography |
| •Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data | and QAQC results by a company geologist | |
| verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. | ||
| •Discuss anyadjustment to assaydata. | ||
| Location of | •Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and | •Magnetic survey flight path recovery was established using a NovAtel |
| data points | down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations | OEM 719 DGPS Receiver with a 0.4m RMS accuracy and a 2Hz |
| used in Mineral Resource estimation. | samplingrate |
2
==> picture [197 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| •Specification of the grid system used. | • | Drill collar location determined using a Garmin hand-held GPS with | |
| •Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | location reported in GDA94 MGA Zone 53 | ||
| • | Downhole surveys determined using a Reflex north-seeking Gyro at | ||
| 20m depth intervals | |||
| Data spacing | •Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | • | A total of 12,618 line km of survey data was collected in total |
| and distribution |
•Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral |
• | Flight lines were spaced at 100m with perpendicular tie-lines at 1000m intervals. The survey was conducted in two orientations, with |
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and | flight lines oriented north-south for approximately 15% of the survey, | ||
| classifications applied. | and at 135° for the remainder | ||
| •Whether sample compositing has been applied. | |||
| • | Drill spacing is appropriate for early exploration purposes | ||
| Orientation of | •Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of | • | Insufficient information available due to early exploration status |
| data in | possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering | ||
| relation to | the deposit type. | ||
| geological | •If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation | ||
| structure | of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a | ||
| samplingbias,this should be assessed and reported if material. | |||
| Sample | •The measures taken to ensure sample security. | • | Samples delivered from the drill site to Freight agent by Company |
| security | staff/contractors for delivery to external laboratory | ||
| Audits or | •The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | • |
Not applicable |
| reviews |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | •Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including | •Magnetic survey undertaken on granted EL32283 and EL Application |
| tenement and | agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint |
32284, the grant of which is subject to aboriginal freehold land |
| land tenure | ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, | negotiations and agreement execution |
| status | historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental | •Modelling of geophysical responses undertaken on granted EL32295 |
| settings. | •Twin Peaks exploration drilling undertaken on granted EL32282 and | |
| •The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any | 32296 | |
| known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | •Tenements held in 100% Greenvale subsidiary Knox Resources Pty | |
| Ltd |
3
==> picture [197 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exploration | • | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | • | Not applicable |
| done by other | ||||
| parties | ||||
| Geology | • | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | • | The principal target deposit style is iron-oxide-copper-gold (IOCG). |
| IOCG deposits are typically characterized by associated magnetic | ||||
| and gravity responses due the prevalence of dense and often | ||||
| magnetic iron oxide minerals as a substantial portion of the deposit | ||||
| footprint mineralogical constitution. IOCG deposits are known in the | ||||
| Tennant Creek region and recent Geoscience Australia prospectivity | ||||
| analysis indicates that basement rocks east of Tennant Creek, the | ||||
| location of the Company tenements, are prospective for IOCG | ||||
| deposits. | ||||
| Drill hole | • | A summary of all information material to the understanding of the | • | Drillhole KNRDD002 collared at 506771 E 7825392 N and 250m RL |
| Information | exploration results including a tabulation of the following information | • | Drillhole KNRDD004 located at 509608 E, 7825960 N and 251m RL | |
| for all Material drill holes: | • | Drillhole KNRDD002 setup at 170° azimuth and -61.5° dip | ||
oeasting and northing of the drill hole collar |
• | Drillhole KNRDD004 setup at 160° azimuth and -61.5° dip | ||
oelevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar odip and azimuth of the hole odown hole length and interception depth |
• • • |
Drillhole KNRDD002 drilled to a total depth of 796.6m Drillhole KNRDD004 has a design depth of 750m Collar location reported in GDA94 MGA Zone 53 |
||
ohole length. |
||||
| • | If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the | |||
| information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from | ||||
| the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly | ||||
| explain whythis is the case. | ||||
| Data | • | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, | • | Not applicable |
| aggregation | maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high | |||
| methods | grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. | |||
| • | Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade | |||
| results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used | ||||
| for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of | ||||
| such aggregations should be shown in detail. | ||||
| • | The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values | |||
| should be clearlystated. | ||||
| Relationship | • | These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of | • | Insufficient information available due to early exploration status |
| between | Exploration Results. | |||
| mineralisation |
4
==> picture [197 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| widths and | •If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole | |
| intercept | angle is known, its nature should be reported. | |
| lengths | •If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there | |
| should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true | ||
| width not known’). | ||
| Diagrams | •Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of | •See in release |
| intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being | ||
| reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of | ||
| drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | •Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not | •This release describes all relevant information |
| reporting | practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades | |
| and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of | ||
| Exploration Results. | ||
| Other | •Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported | •This release describes all relevant information |
| substantive | including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical | |
| exploration | survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and | |
| data | method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, | |
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential | ||
| deleterious or contaminatingsubstances. | ||
| Further work | •The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral | •Further drilling will be conducted at Twin Peaks. Assay work and |
| extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | petrography will be conducted on selected drill core. | |
| •Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, | •Exploration drilling is planned for targets located on EL32295 | |
| including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, | •Further target generation will be conducted on prospective | |
| provided this information is not commercially sensitive. | geophysical anomalies identified from airborne magnetic survey data |
5