GREAT BOULDER RESOURCES LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2016

Dec 8, 2016

9 December 2016

Significant Gold Intersections at Balagundi

• First Phase RC Drilling Identifies Extensive Gold Mineralisation at Balagundi

• An initial 41 hole RC drill programme totaling 3,574m has been completed at Balagundi with exceptional results received from the Mt Bellew North trend

• Gold mineralisation has been intersected along the entire Mt Bellew North trend and remains open in all directions

• Of particular note are the high-grade zones open to the north and newly discovered thick zones of oxide mineralisation to the south and west

• Due to the extensive mineralisation identified in this initial programme, an RC drill rig has been mobilised back to Balagundi today to undertake extensional drilling ahead of the seasonal break

• Results from the Mt Bellew East and South trends are expected shortly and will be reported once all results are returned

Great Boulder Resources Limited (ASX: GBR) (“Great Boulder”) is pleased to release the initial results from the first phase RC drill programme at its flagship Balagundi project, 20km east of Kalgoorlie. Significant new intersections include:

• 4m at 5.64g/t gold from 135m downhole, including 2m at 10.4g/t

• 4m at 3.47g/t gold from 26 m downhole, including 1m at 8.98g/t and 1m at 4.34g/t

• 4m at 3.50g/t gold from 75m downhole, including 1m at 12.6g/t

• 4m at 4.50g/t gold from 116m downhole

• 27m at 1.42g/t gold from 21m downhole, including 4m at 2.54 g/t

• 8m at 1.52g/t gold from 35m downhole, including 2m at 2.96g/t

• 15m at 1.25g/t gold from 17m downhole, including 2m at 5.21g/t

• 6m at 1.86g/t gold from 15m downhole, including 2m at 2.76g/t

• 20m at 1.21g/t gold from 60m downhole, including 4m at 2.06g/t

These results are in addition to the previously reported[1] significant intersections along the Mt Bellew North trend, including:

• 24m at 19.1g/t gold from surface

• 4m at 40.4g/t gold from 99m downhole

• 4m at 5.8g/t gold from 4m downhole

Drilling along the Mt Bellew North trend was designed to test extensions of known gold mineralisation and verify previous drill intersections. Significant near surface gold mineralisation has now been confirmed along the existing 220m trend with follow-up RC drilling to commence immediately, testing additional dip and strike extensions to this trend.

ASX Announcement

2

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

Commenting on the first phase RC drilling at Balagundi, Great Boulder Managing Director Stefan Murphy said results have exceeded expectation, with confirmation of high grade mineralisation and thick near-surface oxide mineralisation attractive for an early start-up strategy.

“We are very pleased with the continuity of mineralisation along the Mt Bellew North trend, with defined zones of high grade mineralisation associated with quartz lode systems extending throughout the Balagundi project.

“Given the extensive historical workings along the Mt Bellew trend and previous high grade drill intersections, we were confident that this initial RC programme would define mineralised lodes and controlling structures. Where we have been particularly surprised is the thickness and extent of shallow oxide mineralisation along the western and southern margin of the trend.

“In line with our early-production strategy for Balagundi, drilling was concentrated in the top 100m with an average downhole drill depth of only 87m. The shallow drilling allowed greater coverage and density of drilling along the Mt Bellew trend which has provided better geological control and identified exciting new zones of mineralisation. Much of the mineralisation is within the deeply weathered saprolite which is a soft, friable horizon amenable to low-cost, free-dig open pit mining methods.

“One of the key benefits of our Balagundi project is its close proximity to Kalgoorlie and related infrastructure. Our strategy is to implement targeted exploration programmes to ensure optimal drilling and cost effective exploration. As this current programme has identified several areas of open mineralisation we will commence a follow-up drill programme at Balagundi today.”

==> picture [208 x 294] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Mt Bellew
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [311 x 371] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Mt Bellew North
4m @ 3.5g/t Au 4m @ 40.4g/t Au
inc. 1m @ 12.6g/t 4m @ 5.6g/t Au Significant Results
inc. 2m @10.4g/t
27m @ 1.4g/t Au Previously Reported
inc. 4m @ 2.5g/t 8m @ 1.5 g/t Au
inc. 2m @3.0g/t New Results
24m @ 19.1g/t Au
20m @ 1.2 g/t Au
15m @ 1.3g/t Au 6m @ 1.9 g/t Au
inc. 2m @ 5.2g/t
4m @ 4.5 g/t Au
4m @ 5.8g/t Au
3m @ 1.3g/t Au; plus
4m @ 3.5g/t Au
inc. 1m @ 9.0g/t; and
12m @ 15.2g/t Au
inc. 1m @ 4.3g/t
Mt Bellew East
(results pending)
Mt Bellew South
(results pending)
8m @ 3.3g/t Au
----- End of picture text -----

Balagundi Project – Arsenic soil anomaly over RTP Magnetic Image with Mt Bellew inset

Enlarged Mt Bellew trends - Interpreted structures and drill results[1]

ASX Announcement

3

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

Balagundi Project – Mt Bellew North trend cross section 6599560N

==> picture [184 x 259] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [75 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [337 x 328] intentionally omitted <==

Balagundi Project – Mt Bellew North trend cross section 6599485N

==> picture [183 x 259] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [75 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [339 x 327] intentionally omitted <==

ASX Announcement

4

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

Balagundi Project – Mt Bellew trend cross section 6599425N

==> picture [184 x 259] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [75 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [338 x 313] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

400z
300z
----- End of picture text -----

Balagundi Project – Mt Bellew trend cross section 6599385N

==> picture [536 x 333] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

400z
Balagundi Project – Mt Bellew
trend cross section 6599385N
300z
----- End of picture text -----

ASX Announcement

5

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

Next Steps

• A follow-up RC programme will commence in the coming days, testing the north and south strike extensions of the Mt Bellew North trend, along with western up-dip near surface extensions.

• Results from the Mt Bellew East and South trends are expected shortly, and will be released following receipt and review of all results.

• Where 4m composite samples have retuned material grade intersections, 1m split samples will be collected and submitted to the laboratory for additional fire assay gold analysis.

• Results from the initial and follow-up RC drill programmes will be used to plan further extensional drilling at Balagundi in Q1 2017.

• In addition to the Mt Bellew trend, other prospects identified within the Balagundi project will be tested in Q1 2017 in order to determine the scale potential of the project.

Competent Person’s Statement

Exploration Results

Exploration information in this Announcement is based upon work undertaken by Mrs Melanie Leighton whom is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mrs Melanie Leighton has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a ‘Competent Person’ as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (JORC Code). Mrs Melanie Leighton is a non-executive director of Great Boulder and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

This Announcement is provided on the basis that neither the Company nor its representatives make any warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability, relevance or completeness of the material contained in the Announcement and nothing contained in the Announcement is, or may be relied upon as a promise, representation or warranty, whether as to the past or the future. The Company hereby excludes all warranties that can be excluded by law. The Announcement contains material which is predictive in nature and may be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known and unknown risks and uncertainties, and may differ materially from results ultimately achieved.

The Announcement contains “forward-looking statements”. All statements other than those of historical facts included in the Announcement are forward-looking statements including estimates of Mineral Resources. However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to, copper, gold and other metals price volatility, currency fluctuations, increased production costs and variances in ore grade recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans, as well as political and operational risks and governmental regulation and judicial outcomes. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to any “forward-looking statement” to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the Announcement, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities laws. All persons should consider seeking appropriate professional advice in reviewing the Announcement and all other information with respect to the Company and evaluating the business, financial performance and operations of the Company. Neither the provision of the Announcement nor any information contained in the Announcement or subsequently communicated to any person in connection with the Announcement is, or should be taken as, constituting the giving of investment advice to any person.

1. Refer to Great Boulder Prospectus – Independent Geologist Report Section 7 and 8 (http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20161116/pdf/43cyl0fqsmgg7y.pdf)

2. Refer to Great Boulder Corporate Presentation (http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20161118/pdf/43d0f0w4rhcfyh.pdf)

ASX Announcement

6

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix- JORC Code, 2012 Edition Table 1

The following table relates to activities undertaken at the Balagundi project.

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling		Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut	Reverse circulation drilling (RC) was used to produce a 1m
techniques		channels, random chips, or specific	bulk sample and representative 1m split samples
		specialised industry standard measurement	(nominally a 12.5% split) were collected using a cone
		tools appropriate to the minerals under	splitter.
		investigation, such as down hole gamma
		sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).	Geological logging was completed and mineralised
		These examples should not be taken as	intervals were determined by the geologists to be
		limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	submitted as 1m samples. In logged unmineralised zones
			a 4m composite (scoop) samples were submitted to the
		Include reference to measures taken to	laboratory for analysis. If these 4m composite samples
		ensure sample representivity and the	come back with anomalous grade the corresponding
		appropriate calibration of any	original 1m split samples are then routinely submitted to
		measurement tools or systems used.	the laboratory for analysis.
		Aspects of the determination of	The samples were crushed and split at the laboratory,
		mineralisation that are Material to the	with up to 3kg pulverised, with a 50g sample analysed by
		Public Report.	industry standard fire assay with atomic absorption.
		In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to	The sampling techniques used are deemed appropriate for the style of mineralisation and deposit type.
		obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was
		pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire
		assay’). In other cases more explanation
		may be required, such as where there is
		coarse gold that has inherent sampling
		problems. Unusual commodities or
		mineralisation types (eg submarine
		nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
		information.
Drilling		Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-	Reverse Circulation drilling used 140 to 130mm diameter
techniques		hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,	drill bits. RC drilling employed face sampling hammers
		Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core	ensuring contamination during sample extraction is
		diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of	minimised.
		diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
		type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
		what method, etc).
Drill sample		Method of recording and assessing core and	Drilling techniques to ensure adequate RC sample
recovery		chip sample recoveries and results assessed.	recovery and quality included the use of “booster” air
			pressure. Air pressure used for RC drilling was 700-
		Measures taken to maximise sample	800psi.
		recovery and ensure representative nature
		of the samples.	Logging of all samples followed established company
			procedures which included recording of qualitative fields
		Whether a relationship exists between	to allow discernment of sample reliability. This included
		sample recovery and grade and whether	(but was not limited to) recording: sample condition,
		sample bias may have occurred due to	sample recovery, sample split method.

ASX Announcement

7

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

		preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
		material.	Overall logging of all sample recovery as “good” (100%)
			and sample condition as “dry” (100%).
			RC sample intervals recorded 53% 1m split samples, and
			46% 4m composite samples (generally composite
			samples are in unmineralised zones).
			No quantitative analysis of samples weights, sample
			condition or recovery has been undertaken.
			No quantitative twinned drilling analysis has been
			undertaken at the project.
Logging		Whether core and chip samples have been	Geological logging of samples followed established
		geologically and geotechnically logged to a	company and industry common procedures. Qualitative
		level of detail to support appropriate	logging of samples included (but was not limited to)
		Mineral Resource estimation, mining	lithology, mineralogy, alteration, veining and weathering.
		studies and metallurgical studies.
		Whether logging is qualitative or
		quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
		channel, etc) photography.
		The total length and percentage of the
		relevant intersections logged.
Sub-sampling		If core, whether cut or sawn and whether	Splitting of RC samples occurred via cone splitter by the
techniques		quarter, half or all core taken.	RC drill rig operators. Cone splitting of RC drill samples
and sample			occurred regardless of the sample condition.
preparation		If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
		rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or	All samples were submitted to ALS Minerals (Kalgoorlie)
		dry.	for analyses. The sample preparation included:
			 Samples were weighed and pulverised such that
		For all sample types, the nature, quality and	a minimum of 85% passed 75um (ALS standard).
		appropriateness of the sample preparation	 Analysis was undertaken using 50g for fire
		technique.	assay.
		Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.	Sample length, weight and collection methods are considered acceptable for the exploration of these styles of gold mineralisation.
		Measures taken to ensure that the sampling
		is representative of the in situ material
		collected, including for instance results for
		field duplicate/second-half sampling.
		Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
		the grain size of the material being sampled.
Quality of		The nature, quality and appropriateness of	All samples were assayed by industry standard methods
assay data		the assaying and laboratory procedures	through commercial laboratories in Australia (ALS
and		used and whether the technique is	Minerals, Kalgoorlie).
laboratory		considered partial or total.
tests			Typical analysis methods used;
		For geophysical tools, spectrometers,	 Au grades were analysed by Priority Fire
		handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	Analysis (50g charge). I.e. ALS standard method
		parameters used in determining the	Au-AA26.
		analysis including instrument make and

ASX Announcement

8

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.  Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. Routine “standard” (mineralised pulp) Certified Reference Material (CRM) were inserted by Great Boulder at a nominal rate of 1 in 50 samples. Routine “blank” (unmineralised pulp) Certified Reference Material were inserted at a nominal rate of 1 in 100 samples. Results from CRM (standards and blanks) gives confidence in the accuracy and precision of the assay data returned from ALS. The analytical laboratories provided their own routine quality controls within their own practices. Future studies will assess the insertion (and rate) and nature of standards or blanks in future drilling programmes.
Verification of sampling and assaying  The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.  The use of twinned holes.  Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.  Discuss any adjustment to assay data. No verification of sampling and assaying has been undertaken in the drilling programme. Great Boulder has strict procedures for data capture, flow and data storage, and validation. Limited adjustments were made to returned assay data; values returned lower than detection level were set to the methodology’s detection level, and this was flagged by code in the database.
Location of data points  Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.  Specification of the grid system used.  Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Drill collars were set out using a hand held GPS. Downhole surveys were completed on the drilling. Holes without downhole survey use planned or compass bearing/dip measurements for survey control. The MGA94 UTM zone 51 coordinate system was used for all undertakings..
Data spacing and distribution  Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.  Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.  Whether sample compositing has been applied. The spacing and location of the majority of the drilling in the projects is, by the nature of early exploration, variable. At the Balagundi project, some of the drilling does have localised and nominal 20-40m by 60m spacing. In intervals qualitatively logged as unmineralised, 4 metre composite (scoop) samples were taken from the RC drill holes. Intervals qualitatively logged as mineralised are submitted as 1m samples. RC sample intervals recorded 53% 1m split samples, and 46% 4m composite sample. The spacing and location of data is currently only being considered for exploration purposes
Orientation of data in  Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible Drilling was nominally perpendicular to mineralisation where practical and where known, meaning that

ASX Announcement

9

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

relation to		structures and the extent to which this is	intersection widths are broadly representative of the
geological		known, considering the deposit type.	true width of mineralisation.
structure
		If the relationship between the drilling	A list of the drillholes and orientations are reported with
		orientation and the orientation of key	significant intercepts is appended to this table.
		mineralised structures is considered to have
		introduced a sampling bias, this should be	Considering the types of mineralisation at the project,
		assessed and reported if material.	the drilling orientations and subsequent sampling is
			considered to be unbiased in its representation for
			exploration reporting purposes.
Sample		The measures taken to ensure sample	Great Boulder has strict chain of custody procedures that
security		security.	are adhered to for drill samples. All samples for each
			batch have the sample submission number/ticket
			inserted into each bulk polyweave sample bag with the id
			number clearly visible. The sample bag is stapled
			together such that no sample material can spill out and
			no one can tamper with the sample once it leaves the
			company’s custody.
Audits or		The results of any audits or reviews of	None completed.
reviews		sampling techniques and data.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC	Code explanation				Commentary	Commentary
Mineral		Type, reference name/number, location				Great Boulder Resource Ltd (GBR) is comprised of
tenement and		and ownership including agreements or				several projects with associated tenements;
land tenure		material issues with	third parties such as
status		joint ventures, partnerships, overriding				Balagundi Project tenements and details
		royalties, native title interests, historical					Mining lease M25/194 where Great Boulder
		sites, wilderness or national park and					has executed a JV agreement to earn 75%
		environmental settings.					interest through exploration expenditure of
							$1,000,000 AUD over five years. Following
		The security of the tenure held at the					satisfaction of the minimum expenditure
		time of reporting along with any known					commitment by GBR, Eastern Goldfields
		impediments to obtaining a license			to		Mining Company Pty Ltd (EGMC - current
		operate in the area.					tenement owner) will have the right to
							contribute to expenditure in the project at
							its 25% interest level or choose to convert
							to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty (NSR). Should
							EGMC choose to convert its remaining
							interest into a 2% NSR, then GBR will have a
							100% interest in the project.
Exploration		Acknowledgment	and	appraisal	of	Previous explorers included:
done by other		exploration by other	parties.				1970’s. Eureka Minerals Pty Ltd
parties							1980’s. Texasgulf Australia Ltd, Hawk
							Investments Ltd, Delta Gold NL, Red River
							Mining Ltd
							1990’s. Delta Gold NL, Archean Gold NL,
							Arcacia Resources Ltd, Kanowna Lights NL.
							This exploration undertaken includes soil
							sampling, shallow wide-spaces Rotary Air
							Blast (RAB) drilling and, aircore drilling over

ASX Announcement

10

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

			limited portions of the project. Some
			limited RC drilling was undertaken by Delta
			Gold NL and Acacia Resource Ltd.
			 2000’s. Private exploration including RC and
			diamond drilling in limited portions of the
			project.
Geology		Deposit type, geological setting and style	Greenstone hosted, large-scale structural duplex
		of mineralisation.	intruded by gabbroic sills, and lesser felsic porphyry
			dykes, with E-W faults and NNW-trending structures,
			with mineralised (and potential gold) vein systems
			extending over strike length of several hundred
			metres.
Drill hole		A summary of all information material to	A complete list of the reported significant results from
Information		the understanding of the exploration	Great Boulder’s Balagundi drilling is provided as an
		results including a tabulation of the	appendix to this table.
		following information for all Material drill
		holes:	Any quoted results in the main report body, from
			historic or previous company drilling or sampling
	o	easting and northing of the drill hole	programmes, has been provided for historic and
		collar	qualitative purposes only.
	o	elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation	Any historic or previous company drilling results not
		above sea level in metres) of the drill hole	included may be due to; a) uncertainty of result,
		collar	location or other unreliability, b) yet to be assessed by
			GBR, c) unmineralised, d) unsampled or unrecorded,
	o	dip and azimuth of the hole	or e) not considered material.
	o	down hole length and interception depth
	o	hole length.
		If the exclusion of this information is
		justified on the basis that the information
		is not Material and this exclusion does not
		detract from the understanding of the
		report, the Competent Person should
		clearly explain why this is the case.
Data		In reporting Exploration Results,	In reported exploration results, length weighted
aggregation		weighting averaging techniques,	averages are used for any non-uniform intersection
methods		maximum and/or minimum grade	sample lengths. Length weighted average is (sum
		truncations (eg cutting of high grades)	product of interval x corresponding interval assay
		and cut-off grades are usually Material	grade), divided by sum of interval lengths and
		and should be stated.	rounded to one decimal place
		Where aggregate intercepts incorporate	No top cuts have been considered in reporting of
		short lengths of high grade results and	grade results, nor was it deemed necessary for the
		longer lengths of low grade results, the	reporting of significant intersections.
		procedure used for such aggregation
		should be stated and some typical	No metal equivalent values have been reported.
		examples of such aggregations should be
		shown in detail.
		The assumptions used for any reporting
		of metal equivalent values should be
		clearly stated.

ASX Announcement

11

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

Relationship			These relationships are particularly	Drilling was nominally perpendicular to
between			important in the reporting of Exploration	mineralisation (where practical), meaning that the
mineralisation			Results.	intersections width are broadly representative of the
widths and				true width of mineralisation.
intercept			If the geometry of the mineralisation with
lengths			respect to the drill hole angle is known, its	The relationship of mineralisation widths to the
			nature should be reported.	intercepts of any historic drilling or drilling
				undertaken by other previous companies is unknown.
			If it is not known and only the down hole
			lengths are reported, there should be a
			clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down
			hole length, true width not known’).
Diagrams			Appropriate maps and sections (with	Refer to figures in announcement. A plan view of
			scales) and tabulations of intercepts	reported significant intersection drillholes is included.
			should be included for any significant
			discovery being reported These should
			include, but not be limited to a plan view
			of drill hole collar locations and
			appropriate sectional views.
Balanced			Where comprehensive reporting of all	It is not practical to report all exploration results as
reporting			Exploration Results is not practicable,	such unmineralised intervals. Low or non-material
			representative reporting of both low and	grades have not been reported.
			high grades and/or widths should be
			practiced to avoid misleading reporting of	There has been selective sampling of historic holes
			Exploration Results.	where mineralisation is observed. The grades (or lack
				thereof) in unsampled material is unknown.
				The confidence in reported historic assays, results or
				drill productions is unknown.
Other			Other exploration data, if meaningful and	Available data from historic or previous exploration
substantive			material, should be reported including	parties includes some soil sampling, geological
exploration			(but not limited to): geological	mapping, and historic gold production figures. Where
data			observations; geophysical survey results;	possible, historic exploration data has been
			geochemical survey results; bulk samples	supported by limited or selected sampling and
			– size and method of treatment;	geological mapping undertaken by GBR.
			metallurgical test results; bulk density,
			groundwater, geotechnical and rock
			characteristics; potential deleterious or
			contaminating substances.
Further work			The nature and scale of planned	Potential work across the project may include
			further work (eg tests for lateral	detailed geological mapping and surface sampling,
			extensions or depth extensions or	ground or airborne geophysics as well as
			large-scale step-out drilling).	confirmatory, exploratory or follow-up drilling.
			Diagrams clearly highlighting the
			areas of possible extensions,
			including the main geological
			interpretations and future drilling
			areas, provided this information is not
			commercially sensitive.

ASX Announcement

12

9 December 2016

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [48 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

Notes to Significant Intercepts tables and maps

• The results comprise both 4m composite and 1m split samples lengths.

• Results comprise 1m selective cone split samples (RC) and 4m composite samples (RC) with assay via Priority Fire Assay analysis (50g charge).

• All results were analysed by ALS Minerals (Kalgoorlie)

• The quoted Northing and Easting collar locations are in MGA 94 Zone 51 co-ordinate system.

HoleID	Coordinates	Coordinates		Azim. Dip	Intersection	Intersection	Interval	Gold
	Northing (mN)	Easting (mN)	RL		From	To	(m)	(g/t Au)
BGP0080	6599560 373753		417	270 -60 including	75 79 75 76		4 1	3.50 12.65
BGP0081	6599560 373785		416	270 -60 including	135 139 135 137		4 2	5.64 10.43
BGP0082	6599522 373785		417	270 -60	32 36 66 67		4 1	1.68 1.22
BGP0083	6599485 373785		420	270 -60	17 19 21 48		2 27	1.52 1.42
BGP0084	6599485 373825		421	270 -60	69 71		2	0.82
BGP0085	6599465 373805		421	270 -60 including	0 4 12 13 31 56 31 33		4 1 25 2	0.93 1.17 0.61 1.35
BGP0086	6599465 373825		421	270 -60	35 43		8	1.52
BGP0088	6599445 373840		423	270 -60 including	38 39 55 57 64 84 76 80		1 2 20 4	2.34 0.84 0.63 0.93
BGP0089	6599425 373815		423	270 -60 including	0 2 12 14 17 32 17 19		2 2 15 2	1.10 0.92 1.25 5.22
BGP0090	6599425 373845		424	270 -60 including	19 24 34 36 60 80 64 72		5 2 20 8	1.09 1.29 1.21 1.75
BGP0092	6599405 373860		423	270 -60	44 47		3	0.72
BGP0093	6599405 373885		423	270 -60 including and	15 21 15 16 17 19 25 28 33 34		6 1 2 3 1	1.86 2.36 2.76 1.49 0.95
BGP0094	6599405 373905		423	270 -60	116 120		4	4.50
BGP0095	6599385 373865		424	270 -60	4 7 10 13 25 29 31 34		3 3 4 3	0.86 1.30 3.47 1.02
BGP0096	6599385 373885		424	270 -60	27 28		1	1.19
BGP0097	6599385 373905		424	270 -60	81 82 87 92		1 5	1.07 0.87