AI assistant
GOODMAN GROUP — Annual Report 2011
Aug 17, 2011
64998_rns_2011-08-17_6c41afbf-a4aa-41ad-9abe-489292a758e4.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Goodman Group Results for the year ended 30 June 2011+
==> picture [74 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
18 August 2011
building momentum + delivering opportunities
Important notice and disclaimer
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
-
- This document has been prepared by Goodman Group (Goodman Limited (ABN 69 000 123 071) and Goodman Funds Management Limited (ABN 48 067 796 641) (AFSL Number 223621) as the Responsible Entity for Goodman Industrial Trust (ARSN 091 213 839)). This document is a presentation of general background information about the Group’s activities current at the date of the presentation. It is information in a summary form and does not purport to be complete. It is to be read in conjunction with the Goodman Limited Annual Financial Report lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and Goodman Group’s other announcements released to the ASX (available at www.asx.com.au). It is not intended to be relied upon as advice to investors or potential investors and does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investor. These should be considered, with professional advice, when deciding if an investment is appropriate.
-
- This presentation is not an offer or invitation for subscription or purchase of securities or other financial products. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities in the United States or to any “US person” (as defined in Regulation S under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act) (US Person)). Securities may not be offered or sold in the United States or to US Persons absent registration or an exemption from registration. The stapled securities of Goodman Group have not been, and will not be, registered under the Securities Act or the securities laws of any state or jurisdiction of the United States.
-
- This announcement contains certain "forward-looking statements". The words "anticipate", "believe", "expect", "project", "forecast", "estimate", "likely", "intend", "should", "could", "may", "target", "plan" and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Indications of, and guidance on, future earnings and financial position and performance are also forward-looking statements. Due care and attention has been used in the preparation of forecast information. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Group, that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. There can be no assurance that actual outcomes will not differ materially from these statements.
2
Contents
-
Section 1
-
Section 1 Highlights + Section 2 Results overview + Section 3 Operational performance + Section 4 Outlook and summary
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
+ Appendices
-
Results analysis
-
Investment
-
Development
-
Management
-
Capital management
3
==> picture [721 x 541] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Section 1+
Highlights
M7 Business Hub, Australia
4
----- End of picture text -----
Highlights
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
+ Focused strategy delivering:
-
Operating profit after tax of $384 million up 24% on FY2010
-
Fully diluted operating EPS of 5.66[1] cents up 8% on FY2010
-
Statutory accounting profit of $392 million – including revaluations and other non-operating items
-
Distribution per security of 3.5 cents, up 3% on FY2010
-
Investment EBIT contributing 64% of earnings, 36% from Development and Management
-
Offshore operations contributed 45% of EBIT, with Asia and Continental Europe key growth drivers for FY2012 and beyond
+ Strategic focus driving competitive strength:
-
Ownership of core industrial assets in proven locations – 96% occupancy across the Group and managed funds
-
Selective, pre-committed and pre-sold approach to development activities – 91% of all developments pre-sold
-
Actively managing third party capital – raised $1.8 billion in new third party equity
-
Global operating platform provides scale, diversification and the ability to pursue a broad range of opportunities
-
Prudent capital management – continue to diversify funding sources with gearing decreased to 23%, $1.3 billion of liquidity maintained covering maturities to FY2015 and a weighted debt maturity of 5.6 years
+ Positioned to deliver FY2012 operating profit after tax of $460 million, equating to a fully diluted operating EPS of 6.0[2] cents (up 6% on FY2011)
- 5.66 cents on a fully diluted basis adjusted for the CIC hybrid securities - this equates to 5.77 cents on an undiluted basis 2. On a fully diluted basis adjusted for the CIC hybrid securities
5
Highlights
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| + | Occupancy increased to 96% (93% at June 2010) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Own | + | Retention at 76% and WALE of 5.3 years | |
| + | Leased ~1.9 million sqm across the Group and managed funds platform, generating a reversion of +2.3% | ||
| + | Development activity across all core markets providing global diversification | ||
| + | WIP at $1.8 billion across 42 projects in 12 countries with a forecast yield on cost of 8.7% | ||
| Develop | + | $10 billion development pipeline maintained | |
| + | Development commitments of $1.4 billion with 82% pre-committed and 91% pre-sold to funds or third parties | ||
| + | External assets under management (AUM) increased to $14.4 billion (up 22% on FY2010 on a constant | ||
| currency basis) | |||
| Manage | + | Completed successful acquisition of ING Industrial Fund (IIF) to form Goodman Trust Australia | |
| + | Raised $1.8 billion of new third party equity | ||
| + | Strength of capital partner relationships further demonstrated through 50% sale of Interlink | ||
| + | Grew operating profit by 24% while reducing gearing to 23% (36% look through) | ||
| + | ICR 4.5x (2.6x look through) | ||
| + | Established new debt facilities of $4.8 billion with an average term of 5.1 years across the Group and managed | ||
| Corporate | funds – GMG’s weighted debt maturity profile extended to 5.6 years (from 3.3 years) | ||
| + | Diversified sources of drawn funding – raised $0.9 billion in debt capital markets (capital markets now | ||
| represent 69% of the Group’s debt funding) | |||
| + | IIF and Moorabbin acquisitions fully integrated into the business |
6
==> picture [721 x 541] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Section 2+
Results
overview
Andover Business Park, UK
7
----- End of picture text -----
Results overview
-
- Underlying fundamentals robust across all business activities:
-
Operating performance above guidance
-
Credit metrics and liquidity improved
-
Fund capital raisings have reduced gearing, Goodman trending to 20% participation
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| FY2011 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating earnings ($M) | 383.9 | ||
| Operating earnings per security (cents)1 | 5.77 | ||
| Operating earnings per security (fully diluted) (cents)1, 2 |
5.66 | ||
| Distribution per security (cents) | 3.50 | ||
| Payout ratio (%) | 61 |
- Development contribution increasing while capital allocated to the Development business held constant
+ Investment EBIT contributing 64% of earnings, 36% from Development and Management:
- 71% Investment and 29% Development and Management on a look through basis
==> picture [179 x 140] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [177 x 154] intentionally omitted <==
| As at 30 Jun 2011 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| External assets under management ($B) | 14.4 | ||
| Total assets on balance sheet ($B) | 7.6 | ||
| NTA ($)3 | 0.49 | ||
| Gearing (balance sheet) (%)4 | 23.0 | ||
| Available liquidity ($B) | 1.3 | ||
| WACR (look through) (%) | 7.9 |
-
Operating earnings and EPS excludes unrealised gains on property revaluations, AIFRS and other non-cash adjustments and calculated based on weighted average securities of 6,651.6 million
-
Calculated based on weighted fully diluted average securities of 7,270.3 million and excludes treasury (ESAP) securities
-
Diluted for CIC hybrid securities
-
Calculated as net debt less cash/total assets less cash
8
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
FY2011 results – profit and loss
30 June 2011 income statement
+ Full year operating profit of $383.9 million
| FY2010 | FY2011 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $M | $M | |||
| Investment (look through) | 448.5 | 443.2 | ||
| Management | 53.7 | 62.6 | ||
| Development | 41.7 | 121.6 | ||
| Unallocated operating expenses | (33.2) | (37.3) | ||
| Operating EBITDA (look through) | 510.7 | 590.1 | ||
| Operating EBIT (look through) | 502.2 | 584.3 | ||
| Look through interest and tax adjustment1 | (119.3) | (113.7) | ||
| Operating EBIT | 382.9 | 470.6 | ||
| Net borrowing costs | (19.6) | (16.9) | ||
| Tax benefit/(expense) | (1.0) | (8.8) | ||
| Operating PAT (pre minorities) | 362.3 | 444.9 | ||
| Minorities2 | (52.3) | (61.0) | ||
| Operating PAT (post minorities) | 310.0 | 383.9 | ||
| Weighted average securities (undiluted) (million) |
5,558.6 | 6,651.6 | ||
| Operating EPS (cps) | 5.6 | 5.8 | ||
| Non operating items3 | ||||
| Valuation movements4 | (643.8) | (41.1) | ||
| Derivative mark to market | (75.4) | 66.0 | ||
| Non-operating and non-cash items | (127.8) | (16.8) | ||
| Statutory profit/(loss) | (537.0) | 392.0 |
-
Statutory profit of $392.0 million due to stabilising valuations
-
Investment ROA of 7%, rental income up on a constant currency and same property basis
- Services margin ~60%
-
Development margins for work in progress >15% ROC and segment ROA ~10%
-
12% movement in A$ offset by hedges in this financial year equating to $26 million of EBIT
-
- Represents operating EPS of 5.77 cents per security (5.66 cents fully diluted)
-
- DPS of 3.5 cents per security up 3% on FY2010
-
Reflects adjustment to GMG proportionate share of Fund interest and tax
-
Includes Goodman PLUS and CIC hybrid securities
-
Refer Appendix 1 slide 26
-
Includes impairments and fair value adjustments on derivative instruments in associates and joint ventures
9
FY11 results – balance sheet
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
-
- Strong balance sheet maintained through prudent capital management initiatives
-
Actively recycling development holdings, third party capital utilisation and monetising land
-
- Property valuations have remained stable with prime yields firming over the period
-
- Weighted average cap rate stable at 7.9%
-
- FX movements of 14% have also resulted in net assets reducing by $0.01 per security
-
- $1.3 billion of available liquidity covering maturities to FY2015
-
- Resulted in the following key metrics:
-
Gearing of 23% (36% look through)
-
NTA of $0.49 per security[3]
30 June 2011 balance sheet
| 30 Jun 2010 | 30 Jun 2011 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $M | $M | |||
| Stabilised assets Fund cornerstones1 |
2,310 2,397 |
2,409 2,632 |
||
| Development holdings | 1,245 | 1,251 | ||
| Intangibles | 929 | 828 | ||
| Cash | 515 | 228 | ||
| Other assets | 227 | 217 | ||
| Total assets Interest bearing liabilities |
7,623 (2,276) |
7,565 (1,914) |
||
| Other liabilities | (600) | (637) | ||
| Total liabilities | (2,876) | (2,551) | ||
| Minorities | (798) | (573) | ||
| Net assets (post minorities) Net asset value (cps) |
3,949 0.62 |
4,441 0.60 |
||
| Net tangible assets (cps)2 | 0.48 | 0.49 | ||
| Net tangible assets (cps) – diluted3 | 0.46 | 0.49 | ||
| Balance sheet gearing (%)4 | 24.8 | 23.0 |
-
Includes Goodman’s investments in its managed funds and other investments
-
Diluted for CIC Hybrid securities based on 7,358.3 million securities and excludes treasury (ESAP) securities
-
Calculated based on fully diluted securities of 7,977.0 million and excludes treasury (ESAP) securities 4. Calculated as net debt less cash/total assets less cash
10
Group liquidity position
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
-
- Cash and available lines of credit of $1,301.3 million:
-
$227.8 million available cash
-
$1,073.5 million available lines
-
- Headline gearing reduced to 23.0%
-
- Average debt maturity profile of 5.6 years
-
- ICR increased to 4.5x (2.6x look through)
-
- Successful completion of debt initiatives in FY2011:
-
US$825 million of debt capital market issuance in US144A/Reg S, maturing over 10 years
-
¥12.5 billion of private placement, maturing over 12 years
-
$720 million of new bank facilities, maturing over 5 years
==> picture [356 x 196] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [346 x 165] intentionally omitted <==
11
Highbrook Business Park, New Zealand 12
Investment
-
- Property fundamentals remain robust reflecting quality of the portfolio and customers:
-
Occupancy increased to 96% (93% at June 2010)
-
Retention rate at 76%
-
Like on like rental growth of ~3%
-
- Global platform creating opportunities with active cross border enquiry
-
- Investments (direct or in Funds) will grow organically through development work book
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| Investment ($m) | FY10 | FY11 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | 176.4 | 166.6 | ||
| Fund cornerstones | 272.1 | 276.6 | ||
| Look through EBITDA | 448.5 | 443.2 | ||
| Key metrics1 | FY10 | FY11 | ||
| WACR (%) WALE (yrs) |
7.9 5.5 |
7.9 5.3 |
||
| Customer retention (%) | 75 | 76 | ||
| Occupancy (%) | 93 | 96 |
- Key metrics shown in the above table relate to Goodman and managed fund properties
13
Development
-
- Development demand driven by shortage of prime assets:
-
WIP increased to $1.8 billion (from $1.3 billion as at 30 June 2010)
-
- Prudent low risk strategy focused on pre-sold and pre-committed developments:
-
$1.4 billion of new commitments at 8.6% yield on cost
-
82% of new commitments leased for in excess of 10 years
-
91% of developments pre-sold and pre-funded
-
- Prime core assets remain difficult to source in the open market:
-
Capital partners attracted to prudent operators with a strong brand and development capabilities
-
Competitive pressure decreasing due to fewer small operators
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| Development ($M) | FY10 | FY11 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net revenue | 72.7 | 157.6 | ||
| EBITDA | 41.7 | 121.6 | ||
| Key metrics Commitments ($M) Number of developments |
FY10 1,182 23 |
FY11 1,418 42 |
||
| Balance sheet development (%) | 29 | 9 | ||
| Pre-commitment (%) | 66 | 82 | ||
| Yield (%) | 9.4 | 8.6 | ||
| Work in progress (end value) | $B | |||
| Opening (June 2010) | 1.3 | |||
| FX Completions |
(0.1) (0.8) |
|||
| Commitments | 1.4 | |||
| Closing (June 2011) | 1.8 |
14
Development
-
- 5 year average development workbook running at ~A$2 billion
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
-
- Disciplined approach to prime developments with appropriate risk/returns
Australia + New Zealand
-
- 41 development sites
-
- 2.6m sqm of developable GLA
==> picture [166 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [166 x 58] intentionally omitted <==
Australia - Banfield Distribution Centre
==> picture [151 x 175] intentionally omitted <==
Continental Europe
-
- 29 development sites
-
- 1.6m sqm of developable GLA
==> picture [150 x 150] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 39] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 39] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 40] intentionally omitted <==
Belgium - Puurs – Duvel[1]
Asia
-
- 10 development sites
-
- 0.8m sqm of developable GLA
==> picture [164 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 23] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
China - Kunshan Lujia Logistics Centre
==> picture [152 x 151] intentionally omitted <==
UK
- 39 development sites
==> picture [152 x 152] intentionally omitted <==
- 2.4m sqm of developable GLA
==> picture [164 x 30] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [164 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
UK - Oxford Business Park – Centrica[1]
15
- Artist’s impressions may be subject to change
Management
-
- $14.4 billion of external assets under management, up 14% (22% on a constant currency basis):
-
IIF business fully integrated
-
Ability to pursue large scale transactions like PEPR
-
- Support from capital partners investing with operating businesses remains strong:
-
Raised $1.8 billion in new third party equity
-
$2.2 billion in undrawn debt lines and equity[1]
-
Portfolio opportunities continue to present themselves in all markets, demonstrating the strength of the brand
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| Management ($M) | FY2010 | FY2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fund management fees | 69.8 | 64.1 | ||
| Property service fees | 55.8 | 56.9 | ||
| Revenue2 | 125.6 | 121.0 | ||
| EBITDA | 53.7 | 62.6 | ||
| Key metrics Number of funds Third party AUM (end of period) ($B) |
FY2010 11 12.6 |
FY2011 13 14.4 |
-
- Size and scale enables Goodman to offer competitive pricing while improving margins:
-
MER <50 bps of AUM
-
Undrawn debt as at 30 June 2011. Uncalled equity includes GADF, GHKLF, GCLH, Princeton Lux and Princeton Jersey on a fully drawn basis. Investments are subject to Investment Committee approval 2.Includes the gross up of property outgoings of $16.4 million (2010: $17.3 million)
16
Management - AUM
+ Major new initiatives during the year:
-
Completed €300 million GELF capital raising
-
Successful privatisation of IIF and launch of Goodman Trust Australia
-
Sale of Goodman’s 50% interest in Interlink to CPPIB
-
GAIF inaugural $175 million Australian Medium Term Note issue, following the assignment of a ‘BBB’ credit rating by Standard & Poor’s
==> picture [376 x 240] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [222 x 182] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [256 x 225] intentionally omitted <==
17
Management platform
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| 7.6% 1.5 yrs 36.9% 4.9 yrs3 98% 85 $0.3bn 27.9% $2.0bn GELF 7.6% 2.1 yrs 50.3% 7.4 yrs3 92%4 27 $0.3bn 35.7% $1.9bn ABPP GMT1 GHKLF GTA GAIF 8.6% 3.4 yrs 36.7% 5.6 yrs 97% 22 $0.1bn2 16.7%2 $1.2bn 13 61 106 Number of properties 20.3% 39.5% 37.9% Gearing 3.5 yrs 3.8 yrs 3.9 yrs Weighted average debt expiry Total assets $4.3bn $2.6bn $1.5bn GMG co-investment 43.7% 19.9% 20.0% GMG co-investment $1.1bn $0.3bn $0.2bn Occupancy 97% 97% 99% Weighted average lease expiry 6.5 yrs 4.1 yrs 2.4 yrs WACR 8.3% 8.3% 6.5% Goodman’s six largest funds |
7.6% 1.5 yrs 36.9% 4.9 yrs3 98% 85 $0.3bn 27.9% $2.0bn GELF 7.6% 2.1 yrs 50.3% 7.4 yrs3 92%4 27 $0.3bn 35.7% $1.9bn ABPP GMT1 GHKLF GTA GAIF 8.6% 3.4 yrs 36.7% 5.6 yrs 97% 22 $0.1bn2 16.7%2 $1.2bn 13 61 106 Number of properties 20.3% 39.5% 37.9% Gearing 3.5 yrs 3.8 yrs 3.9 yrs Weighted average debt expiry Total assets $4.3bn $2.6bn $1.5bn GMG co-investment 43.7% 19.9% 20.0% GMG co-investment $1.1bn $0.3bn $0.2bn Occupancy 97% 97% 99% Weighted average lease expiry 6.5 yrs 4.1 yrs 2.4 yrs WACR 8.3% 8.3% 6.5% Goodman’s six largest funds |
7.6% 1.5 yrs 36.9% 4.9 yrs3 98% 85 $0.3bn 27.9% $2.0bn GELF 7.6% 2.1 yrs 50.3% 7.4 yrs3 92%4 27 $0.3bn 35.7% $1.9bn ABPP GMT1 GHKLF GTA GAIF 8.6% 3.4 yrs 36.7% 5.6 yrs 97% 22 $0.1bn2 16.7%2 $1.2bn 13 61 106 Number of properties 20.3% 39.5% 37.9% Gearing 3.5 yrs 3.8 yrs 3.9 yrs Weighted average debt expiry Total assets $4.3bn $2.6bn $1.5bn GMG co-investment 43.7% 19.9% 20.0% GMG co-investment $1.1bn $0.3bn $0.2bn Occupancy 97% 97% 99% Weighted average lease expiry 6.5 yrs 4.1 yrs 2.4 yrs WACR 8.3% 8.3% 6.5% Goodman’s six largest funds |
7.6% 1.5 yrs 36.9% 4.9 yrs3 98% 85 $0.3bn 27.9% $2.0bn GELF 7.6% 2.1 yrs 50.3% 7.4 yrs3 92%4 27 $0.3bn 35.7% $1.9bn ABPP GMT1 GHKLF GTA GAIF 8.6% 3.4 yrs 36.7% 5.6 yrs 97% 22 $0.1bn2 16.7%2 $1.2bn 13 61 106 Number of properties 20.3% 39.5% 37.9% Gearing 3.5 yrs 3.8 yrs 3.9 yrs Weighted average debt expiry Total assets $4.3bn $2.6bn $1.5bn GMG co-investment 43.7% 19.9% 20.0% GMG co-investment $1.1bn $0.3bn $0.2bn Occupancy 97% 97% 99% Weighted average lease expiry 6.5 yrs 4.1 yrs 2.4 yrs WACR 8.3% 8.3% 6.5% Goodman’s six largest funds |
7.6% 1.5 yrs 36.9% 4.9 yrs3 98% 85 $0.3bn 27.9% $2.0bn GELF 7.6% 2.1 yrs 50.3% 7.4 yrs3 92%4 27 $0.3bn 35.7% $1.9bn ABPP GMT1 GHKLF GTA GAIF 8.6% 3.4 yrs 36.7% 5.6 yrs 97% 22 $0.1bn2 16.7%2 $1.2bn 13 61 106 Number of properties 20.3% 39.5% 37.9% Gearing 3.5 yrs 3.8 yrs 3.9 yrs Weighted average debt expiry Total assets $4.3bn $2.6bn $1.5bn GMG co-investment 43.7% 19.9% 20.0% GMG co-investment $1.1bn $0.3bn $0.2bn Occupancy 97% 97% 99% Weighted average lease expiry 6.5 yrs 4.1 yrs 2.4 yrs WACR 8.3% 8.3% 6.5% Goodman’s six largest funds |
7.6% 1.5 yrs 36.9% 4.9 yrs3 98% 85 $0.3bn 27.9% $2.0bn GELF 7.6% 2.1 yrs 50.3% 7.4 yrs3 92%4 27 $0.3bn 35.7% $1.9bn ABPP GMT1 GHKLF GTA GAIF 8.6% 3.4 yrs 36.7% 5.6 yrs 97% 22 $0.1bn2 16.7%2 $1.2bn 13 61 106 Number of properties 20.3% 39.5% 37.9% Gearing 3.5 yrs 3.8 yrs 3.9 yrs Weighted average debt expiry Total assets $4.3bn $2.6bn $1.5bn GMG co-investment 43.7% 19.9% 20.0% GMG co-investment $1.1bn $0.3bn $0.2bn Occupancy 97% 97% 99% Weighted average lease expiry 6.5 yrs 4.1 yrs 2.4 yrs WACR 8.3% 8.3% 6.5% Goodman’s six largest funds |
7.6% 1.5 yrs 36.9% 4.9 yrs3 98% 85 $0.3bn 27.9% $2.0bn GELF 7.6% 2.1 yrs 50.3% 7.4 yrs3 92%4 27 $0.3bn 35.7% $1.9bn ABPP GMT1 GHKLF GTA GAIF 8.6% 3.4 yrs 36.7% 5.6 yrs 97% 22 $0.1bn2 16.7%2 $1.2bn 13 61 106 Number of properties 20.3% 39.5% 37.9% Gearing 3.5 yrs 3.8 yrs 3.9 yrs Weighted average debt expiry Total assets $4.3bn $2.6bn $1.5bn GMG co-investment 43.7% 19.9% 20.0% GMG co-investment $1.1bn $0.3bn $0.2bn Occupancy 97% 97% 99% Weighted average lease expiry 6.5 yrs 4.1 yrs 2.4 yrs WACR 8.3% 8.3% 6.5% Goodman’s six largest funds |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodman’s six largest funds | |||||||
| GAIF | GTA | GELF | ABPP | GHKLF | GMT1 | ||
| Total assets | $4.3bn | $2.6bn | $2.0bn | $1.9bn | $1.5bn | $1.2bn | |
| GMG co-investment | 43.7% | 19.9% | 27.9% | 35.7% | 20.0% | 16.7%2 | |
| GMG co-investment | $1.1bn | $0.3bn | $0.3bn | $0.3bn | $0.2bn | $0.1bn2 | |
| Number of properties | 106 | 61 | 85 | 27 | 13 | 22 | |
| Occupancy | 97% | 97% | 98% | 92%4 | 99% | 97% | |
| Weighted average lease expiry | 6.5 yrs | 4.1 yrs | 4.9 yrs3 | 7.4 yrs3 | 2.4 yrs | 5.6 yrs | |
| Gearing | 37.9% | 39.5% | 36.9% | 50.3% | 20.3% | 36.7% | |
| Weighted average debt expiry | 3.9 yrs | 3.8 yrs | 1.5 yrs | 2.1 yrs | 3.5 yrs | 3.4 yrs | |
| WACR | 8.3% | 8.3% | 7.6% | 7.6% | 6.5% | 8.6% |
-
As at 31 March 2011 (as disclosed to the New Zealand stock exchange in May 2011) 2. As at 30 June 2011
-
WALE of leased portfolio to next break as at 30 June 2011
-
Includes leases currently with solicitors, excluding these leases occupancy is 91%
18
==> picture [721 x 541] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Section 4+
Outlook and
summary
Keylink Industrial Estate, Australia
19
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Outlook and summary
| + | Maintain position as a leading industrial property and business partner in all the markets we operate in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| + | Focus on higher and better use to maximise returns | ||
| Own | |||
| + | Recycle assets on balance sheet and within managed funds | ||
| + | Pro-rata equity in funds trending toward 20% over time | ||
| + | Retain low risk strategy of focusing on pre-sold and pre-committed developments | ||
| + | Remain prudent in pursuing only prime developments with appropriate margins | ||
| Develop | |||
| + | Capable of delivering 800,000 sqm across Asian development sites | ||
| + | Lack of supply expected to continue, given market funding constraints and reduced competition | ||
| + | Strong investor appetite to drive growth in assets under management | ||
| + | Evaluating opportunities in new and existing markets in conjunction with capital partners | ||
| Manage | |||
| + | Capital flows for prime real estate remains strong | ||
| + | Size, scale and diversification enhances Goodman’s competitive position | ||
| + | Development and management activities growing to 40-50% of EBIT contribution in the short-term | ||
| + | Offshore businesses major growth drivers moving forward, in particular Asia and Europe | ||
| + | Maintain gearing at current low level and continue to pursue diversification of funding sources across | ||
| Summary | the Group and managed funds | ||
| + | FY2012 earnings guidance at 6.01 cents per security - equates to operating profit after tax of $460 | ||
| million to be driven by growth in ‘active business’ | |||
| + | Maintain distribution policy to pay the higher of 60% of operating EPS and taxable income |
20
- Fully diluted for CIC hybrid securities
==> picture [721 x 541] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
A endix 1+
pp
Results analysis
Interlink, Hong Kong
21
----- End of picture text -----
Profit and loss
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [377 x 196] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [371 x 186] intentionally omitted <==
22
Profit and loss (cont)
| GMG results | Year ended | Year ended | Increase / |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Jun 2010 | 30 Jun 2011 | (decrease) | |
| $M | $M | $M | |
| Property investment1 | 329.2 | 329.5 | 0.3 |
| Management services | 108.3 | 104.6 | (3.7) |
| Development | 72.7 | 157.6 | 84.9 |
| Operating revenue net of property expenses | 510.2 | 591.7 | 81.5 |
| Unrealised (losses)/gains on investment properties and derivatives | (498.4) | 6.1 | 504.5 |
| Non-operating income | (63.3) | (5.9) | 57.4 |
| Total income | (51.5) | 591.9 | 643.4 |
| Expenses from operations | (132.7) | (133.3) | (0.6) |
| Impairment losses | (145.4) | (47.2) | 98.2 |
| Net interest (expense)/income | (154.1) | 49.1 | 203.2 |
| Income tax (expense) – current | (1.0) | (7.5) | (6.5) |
| Minority interests | (52.3) | (61.0) | (8.7) |
| Profit after tax attributable to Securityholders | (537.0) | 392.0 | 929.0 |
| Add net loss from fair value adjustments on investment properties | 210.0 | 26.4 | (183.6) |
| Add unrealised property and derivative loss/(gain) included in share of net results of equity | 288.4 | (32.5) | (320.9) |
| accounted investments | |||
| Add impairment loss on investments | 145.4 | 47.2 | (98.2) |
| Unrealised losses/(gains) on fair value of derivatives | 75.4 | (66.0) | (141.4) |
| Non-operating borrowing costs | 59.1 | - | (59.1) |
| Straight-lining of rent and amortisation of lease incentives | (1.2) | 0.1 | 1.3 |
| Employee LTIP | 5.4 | 12.2 | 6.8 |
| Other non-operating items2 | 64.5 | 5.8 | (58.7) |
| Deferred tax expense (property revaluations) | - | (1.3) | (1.3) |
| Operating profit available for distribution | 310.0 | 383.9 | 73.9 |
| Operating basic earnings per security (cents) | 5.60 | 5.77 | 0.17 |
| Operating basic earnings per security (cents) – diluted | 5.25 | 5.66 | 0.41 |
| Distribution per security (cents) | 3.40 | 3.50 | 0.10 |
| Weighted average number of securities – EPS3 (million) | 5,558.6 | 6,651.6 | 1,093.0 |
| Weighted average number of securities – EPS3 (million) – diluted | 6,638.7 | 7,270.3 | 631.6 |
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
-
Excludes straight-lining of rent and amortisation of lease incentives (non-operating item)
-
Refer to slide 26 for further information
-
Excludes weighted average number of treasury (ESAP) securities on issue
23
Profit and loss (cont)
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
+ Total income by business segment for year ended 30 June 2011
| Category Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Category Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Category Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Category Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Category Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Category Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Category Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $M $M $M $M $M $M |
||||||
| Gross property income Fund management income Property services income Development income Income from disposal of inventories Distributions from investments Net loss from fair value adjustments on investment properties Net gain on disposal of investment properties Net gain on disposal of controlled entities Share of net results of equity accounted investments Net gain on disposal of equity investments |
225.1 64.0 56.9 210.5 112.8 27.1 (26.4) 0.8 17.9 174.5 66.6 |
225.2 27.1 135.8 |
63.9 56.9 0.2 |
0.1 210.5 112.8 0.8 17.9 20.8 57.6 |
(0.1) (26.4) 17.72 9.0 |
|
| Total income | 929.8 | 388.1 | 121.0 | 420.5 | - | 0.2 |
| Development and property expenses and inventory cost of sales Operating expenses Impairment losses |
(321.5) (149.7) (47.2) |
(58.6) | (58.4) | (262.9) (36.0) |
(43.1) | (12.2) (47.2) |
| EBIT | 411.4 | 329.5 | 62.6 | 121.6 | (43.1) | (59.2) |
| Look through NPI adjustment (Goodman share of interest and tax within its fund investments) |
113.7 | |||||
| Look through operating EBIT | 443.2 | 62.6 | 121.6 | (43.1) | (59.2) |
- For reconciliation of non-operating and non-cash items refer to slide 26 2. Includes share of associates and JVEs property valuation gains of $63.4 million, share of associates and JVEs unrealised derivative losses of $30.9 million, share of JVEs impairment losses and non-cash items of $14.8 million
24
Profit and loss (cont)
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| Category | Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
Total Investment Management Development Unallocated Non- operating items1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $M $M $M $M $M $M |
||||||
| EBIT – per statutory accounts | 411.4 | 329.5 | 62.6 | 121.6 | (43.1) | (59.2) |
| Net loss from fair value adjustments on investment properties Share of net gain from fair value adjustments on investment properties and fair value adjustments on interest rate swaps in associates and JVEs Impairment losses Straight-lining of rent and amortisation of lease incentives Share based payment expense Other non-operating items1 |
26.4 (32.5) 47.2 0.1 12.2 5.8 |
26.4 (32.5) 47.2 0.1 12.2 5.8 |
||||
| Operating EBIT | 470.6 | 329.5 | 62.6 | 121.6 | (43.1) | - |
| Income tax expense Net financing income (statutory) Add: fair value adjustments on derivative instruments Net financing costs (operating) Deferred tax expense (property revaluations) Minorities |
49.1 (66.0) |
|||||
| (7.5) (16.9) (1.3) (61.0) |
||||||
| Operating profit available for distribution | 383.9 | |||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities2 | 294.4 |
-
For reconciliation of non-operating items refer to slide 26
-
Difference between operating profit and cash provided by operating activities of $89.5 million primarily relates to non-cash share of equity income of $31.5 million and development cash flows included in investing activities of $58.0 million
25
Reconciliation non-operating items
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| Non-operating items in statutory profit and loss | Notes | 30 Jun 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| $M | $M | ||
| Property valuation | |||
| Net (loss) from fair value adjustments on investment properties | (26.4) | ||
| Share of net gain from fair value adjustments on investment properties in associates | 55.8 | ||
| Share of net gain from fair value adjustments on investment properties in joint | 7.6 | ||
| ventures | |||
| Subtotal | 37.0 | ||
| Impairment losses | |||
| Impairment – inventories | (14.9) | ||
| Impairment – receivables | (6.1) | ||
| Impairment – other financial assets | (7.2) | ||
| Impairment – intangible assets | (19.0) | ||
| Subtotal | (47.2) | ||
| Mark to market derivatives and debt restructuring | |||
| Fair value adjustments on derivative instruments – GMG | 66.0 | ||
| Fair value adjustments on derivative instruments – associates and joint ventures | (30.9) | ||
| Subtotal | 35.1 | ||
| Other non-cash/non-operating items | |||
| Impairment and business acquisition costs incurred in GTA | 1 | (14.6) | |
| Loss on dilution of investment in associate | 1 | (3.8) | |
| Non-cash items impacting distributable income in associate | 1 | (0.2) | |
| Straight-lining rental income | (0.1) | ||
| Share based payment expense | (12.2) | ||
| Deferred tax expense (property valuations) | 1.3 | ||
| Capital profits not distributed | 1 | 12.8 | |
| Subtotal | (16.8) | ||
| TOTAL | 8.1 |
- Total $5.8 million other non-operating items (refer to slides 23 and 25)
26
Financial position
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
+ Headline gearing of 23.0%
| $0.49 NTA (per security) – diluted2 23.0% Gearing1 2,408.5 2,408.5 Direct assets $M 1,251.2 32.3 12.6 516.2 484.9 205.2 Developments $M 2,631.6 25.7 2,584.8 21.1 Investments $M 2,597.4 Investments accounted for using equity method 2,924.7 Investment properties 484.9 Inventories 412.5 186.2 Receivables 227.8 227.8 Cash As at 30 June 2011 Other $M Total $M Other financial assets 25.7 Intangibles 827.9 827.9 Other assets 31.7 64.0 Total assets 1,273.6 7,564.9 Interest bearing liabilities 1,913.8 1,913.8 Other liabilities 637.2 637.2 Total liabilities 2,551.0 2,551.0 Net assets/(liabilities) 5,013.9 |
$0.49 NTA (per security) – diluted2 23.0% Gearing1 2,408.5 2,408.5 Direct assets $M 1,251.2 32.3 12.6 516.2 484.9 205.2 Developments $M 2,631.6 25.7 2,584.8 21.1 Investments $M 2,597.4 Investments accounted for using equity method 2,924.7 Investment properties 484.9 Inventories 412.5 186.2 Receivables 227.8 227.8 Cash As at 30 June 2011 Other $M Total $M Other financial assets 25.7 Intangibles 827.9 827.9 Other assets 31.7 64.0 Total assets 1,273.6 7,564.9 Interest bearing liabilities 1,913.8 1,913.8 Other liabilities 637.2 637.2 Total liabilities 2,551.0 2,551.0 Net assets/(liabilities) 5,013.9 |
|---|---|
| 227.8 Cash |
227.8 |
| 205.2 21.1 186.2 Receivables |
412.5 |
| 484.9 Inventories |
484.9 |
| 2,408.5 516.2 Investment properties |
2,924.7 |
| 12.6 2,584.8 Investments accounted for using equity method |
2,597.4 |
| 25.7 Other financial assets |
25.7 |
| Intangibles 827.9 |
827.9 |
| 32.3 Other assets 31.7 |
64.0 |
| 2,408.5 1,251.2 2,631.6 Total assets 1,273.6 |
7,564.9 |
| Interest bearing liabilities 1,913.8 |
1,913.8 |
| Other liabilities 637.2 |
637.2 |
| Total liabilities 2,551.0 |
2,551.0 |
| Net assets/(liabilities) | 5,013.9 |
| Gearing1 | 23.0% |
| NTA (per security) – diluted2 | $0.49 |
-
Gearing calculation based on debt (net of cash) over total assets (net of cash)
-
Calculated based on 7,977.0 million number securities on issue less 36.3 million treasury securities
27
Property valuations
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
-
- Property valuations have remained stable with prime yields firming over the period
-
- WACR stable at 7.9%
-
- Funding and investor appetite for prime real estate remains strong with limited opportunities available
30 June 2011 property valuations (look through)
| Book value | Movement | WACR | WACR movement | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (GMG exposure) | FY2011 | since June 2010 | |||
| $M | $M | % | % | ||
| Australia | 4,891 | 64 | 8.2 | - | |
| New Zealand | 273 | (3) | 8.6 | - | |
| Hong Kong | 234 | 44 | 6.1 | (0.8) | |
| China | 106 | (8) | 8.7 | (0.5) | |
| Japan | 208 | 8 | 5.9 | (0.2) | |
| UK | 1,393 | (40) | 7.8 | - | |
| Continental Europe | 929 | (14) | 7.7 | (0.2) | |
| Total / Average | 8,034 | 51 | 7.9 | - |
28
Net tangible assets
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
+ Movement in net tangible assets for the year ended 30 June 2011
| Net tangible asset reconciliation | $M $M Per security |
|---|---|
| Total equity at 1 July 2010 | 4,746.6 0.75 |
| Valuation of non-current assets during the year Valuation of investments properties Valuation of investments properties in associates Valuation of investments Impairment of intangibles, inventory and other assets Equity issues (net of issue costs and effect of ESAP and additional securities) Movement in retained earnings, reserves (and other AIFRS adjustments) Change in fair value of derivatives Foreign exchange Attributable to minority interests (includes Goodman PLUS and CIC hybrid) |
(26.4) 32.5 14.3 (47.2) (26.8) - 466.7 (0.04) 208.3 0.03 78.6 0.01 (173.5) (0.03) (286.0) (0.04) |
| Total equity as at 30 June 2011 | 5,013.9 0.68 |
| Less Minorities Less Intangibles |
(573.1) (0.08) (827.9) (0.11) |
| Net tangible assets at 30 June 20111 | 3,612.9 0.49 |
| Net tangible assets at 30 June 2011 – diluted2 | 3,887.9 0.49 |
-
Calculated on 7,358.3 million securities being closing securities on issue of 7,394.6 million less 36.3 million securities related to ESAP
-
Diluted for CIC hybrid securities, calculation based on fully diluted securities of 7,977.0 million
29
==> picture [721 x 541] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
+
Appendix 2
Investment
Kobe, Japan
30
----- End of picture text -----
Own: Leasing
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Across the Group and Funds platform:
-
- ~1.9 million sqm leased
-
- Reversion of +2.3% on new leasing deals
-
- Like for like NPI growing at ~3%
-
- Occupancy increased to 96% across all markets – up 3% from June 2010
| Division | Leasing area (sqm) | Net annual rent (A$M) | Average lease term (yrs) | Occupancy at | Occupancy at |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June | 2011 (%) | ||||
| Australia – Direct | 208,067 | 24.8 | 4.1 | 97 | |
| Australia – GAIF | 420,727 | 46.4 | 4.4 | 97 | |
| New Zealand – GMT | 140,378 | 16.1 | 4.7 | 972 | |
| Hong Kong – GHKLF | 412,281 | 39.2 | 2.1 | 99 | |
| UK – ABPP | 34,099 | 11.9 | 7.8 | 923 | |
| Europe – GELF | 448,481 | 25.8 | 4.2 | 98 | |
| Other | 215,162 | 17.8 | 3.9 | 87 | |
| Total1 | 1,879,195 | 182.0 | 4.1 | 96 |
-
Excludes ‘Australia – GTA’
-
As at 31 March 2011 (as disclosed to the New Zealand stock exchange in May 2011)
-
Includes leases currently with solicitors, excluding these leases occupancy is 91%
31
Customers
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [357 x 186] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Hfjdhfs hjhjhjhjhjhjhj hjhjhj
----- End of picture text -----
- Includes customers of Goodman Group direct portfolio and its managed funds and is based on income
32
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Direct portfolio detail – Australia
Portfolio snapshot
Key metrics[1]
| Total assets | A$2.1 billion |
|---|---|
| Customers | 231 |
| Number of properties | 29 |
| Occupancy | 97% |
| Weighted average cap rate | 8.0% |
-
- 29 properties with a total value of $2.1 billion located across key Australian markets
-
- Leasing deals remain strong across the portfolio:
-
208,067 sqm ($24.8 million net annual rental) of existing space leased
-
customer retention 71% (rolling 12 months)
-
average portfolio valuation cap rate of 8.0%
-
- 97% occupancy and a weighted average lease expiry of 4.1 years
WALE of 4.1 years (by income)[1]
==> picture [190 x 173] intentionally omitted <==
Top 10 customers make up 30.0% of portfolio income[1]
==> picture [328 x 172] intentionally omitted <==
- As at 30 June 2011
33
Direct portfolio detail – UK
Portfolio snapshot
Key metrics[1]
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
-
- 70% of properties located in the core South East and Midlands markets
-
- Weighted average lease expiry of 5.5 years
-
- Cap rates stabilised - with current WACR of 8.2%
| Total assets | A$0.3 billion |
|---|---|
| Customers | 11 |
| Number of properties | 11 |
| Occupancy | 81% |
| Weighted average cap rate | 8.2% |
-
- Vacancy across 3 assets with active enquiry across all vacancies
WALE of 5.5 years (by income)[1]
==> picture [162 x 177] intentionally omitted <==
Top 10 customers make up 80.0% of portfolio income[1]
==> picture [349 x 193] intentionally omitted <==
- As at 30 June 2011
34
==> picture [721 x 541] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
+
Appendix 3
Development
Interlink, Hong Kong
35
----- End of picture text -----
Developments
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| FY2011 Developments | Completions | Commitments | Work in progress | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value ($M) | 773 | 1,418 | 1,817 | ||
| Area (m sqm) | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | ||
| Yield (%) | 8.9 | 8.6 | 8.7 | ||
| Pre-committed (%) | 96 | 82 | 86 | ||
| Weighted Average Lease Term (years) 12.7 |
10.2 | 8.5 | |||
| Development for Third Parties or Funds (%) 94 |
91 | 91 | |||
| Asia Pacific (%) | 43 | 59 | 69 | ||
| UK/Europe (%) | 57 | 41 | 31 |
| Work In progress | On balance sheet | Third party funds | Total end value | Third party funds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| by region | end value | end value | % of total | |||
| $M | $M | $M | ||||
| Asia Pacific | 29 | 1,218 | 1,247 | 98 | ||
| Europe | 143 | 427 | 570 | 75 | ||
| Total | 172 | 1,645 | 1,817 | 91 |
36
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Developments
==> picture [260 x 211] intentionally omitted <==
+ Maintained development pipeline at $10 billion:
-
$0.6 billion of development pipeline committed in FY11
-
Development pipeline restocked (Moorabbin, land options), in excess of $10 billion
-
Forecast GLA over 6.8 million sqm
-
Development pipeline allocated as Asia Pacific 37% and Europe 63%
+ The Group’s development future cash commitments
| Commitments as at 30 June 2011 | $M | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross GMG cost to complete | 175 | ||
| Less pre-sold1cost to complete | (50) | ||
| Net GMG cost to complete | 125 | ||
| Net GMG managed funds cost to complete | 715 |
==> picture [179 x 154] intentionally omitted <==
- Pre-sold projects are reimbursed by instalments throughout the project or at practical completion of the project
37
Belleville Logistics Centre, France 38
Global platform
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 34] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 34] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [682 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
As at 30 June 2011 (Australian currency)
----- End of picture text -----
39
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Goodman Australia Industrial Fund
Key metrics[1]
Key events
| Total assets | A$4.3 billion |
|---|---|
| Interest bearing liabilities | A$1.7 billion |
| Gearing2 | 37.9% |
| Customers | 367 |
| Number of properties | 106 |
| Occupancy | 97% |
| Weighted average lease expiry3 | 6.5 years |
| Weighted average cap rate | 8.3% |
| GMG co-investment | 43.7% |
| GMG co-investment | A$1.1 billion |
| Weighted average debt expiry | 3.9 years |
| WACR at covenant | 10.2% |
| Cap rate expansion to breach | 1.9% |
-
- Total leasing of approximately 420,727 sqm
-
- Approximately 218,000 sqm of development precommitments secured providing a total end value of $274 million
-
- Refinanced $1.5 billion and moved to a senior unsecured debt structure
-
- Completion of inaugural unsecured debt capital markets issue:
-
Senior unsecured five year notes
-
A$175 million face value
Covenant compliance[1,4]
-
- Gearing covenant[4]
==> picture [246 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
Debt maturity profile[1]
-
- ICR covenant[5,6]
-
As at 30 June 2011
-
Calculated as debt/total assets
-
Including development assets
-
Based on Fund covenants that are currently most capable of triggering an event of default in the Fund, excluding 5 small single-asset non-recourse facilities
-
Covenant increases to ≥1.75x from 1 July 2011
-
30 June 2011 position adjusted for net cash and committed capital expenditure
40
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Goodman Trust Australia
Key events
Key metrics[1]
-
- GTA launched 29 March 2011 following successful IIF Unitholder vote and scheme approval
| Total assets | A$2.6 billion |
|---|---|
| Interest bearing liabilities | A$1.0 billion |
| Gearing2 | 39.5% |
| Customers | 201 |
| Number of properties | 61 |
| Occupancy | 97% |
| Weighted average lease expiry | 4.1 years |
| Weighted average cap rate | 8.3% |
| GMG co-investment | 19.9% |
| GMG co-investment | A$0.3 billion |
| Weighted average debt expiry | 3.8 years |
| WACR at covenant | 11.8% |
| Cap rate expansion to breach | 3.5% |
-
- Portfolio comprises $2.6 billion of high quality industrial logistics:
-
Funded via $1.4 billion private wholesale equity and new $1.1 billion debt facility
-
Australia: 41 stabilised properties valued at A$2.1 billion and 4 development assets valued at A$0.2 billion
-
Europe: 16 stabilised properties valued at A$0.3 billion
-
- Commencement of 3 Western Sydney development projects with a total end value of $113 million
Covenant compliance[1]
-
- Gearing covenant[2]
==> picture [246 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
Debt maturity profile[1]
==> picture [333 x 164] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
hfdjhfke
----- End of picture text -----
-
- ICR covenant
==> picture [246 x 76] intentionally omitted <==
- As at 30 June 2011 2. Calculated as Australian debt/total assets
41
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Goodman European Logistics Fund
Key metrics[1]
Key events
| Total assets | A$2.0 billion |
|---|---|
| Interest bearing liabilities | A$0.7 billion |
| Gearing2 | 36.9% |
| Customers | 70 |
| Number of properties | 85 |
| Occupancy | 98 % |
| Weighted average lease expiry3 | 4.9 years |
| Weighted average cap rate | 7.6% |
| GMG co-investment | 27.9% |
| GMG co-investment | A$0.3 billion |
| Weighted average debt expiry | 1.5 years |
| WACR at covenant | 11.3% |
| Cap rate expansion to breach | 3.7% |
-
- Completed €300 million rights issue:
-
Dutch asset managers APG (€150 million) and PGGM (€100 million) received their full subscription
-
Goodman subscribed for €20 million (less than the €50 million maximum underwrite)
-
Demand from existing Unitholders totalled €30 million
-
- Leased approximately 448,481 sqm of space (excluding developments) with a WALE of 4.2 years to next break
-
- Entered into fixed price developments of 310,000 sqm
-
- Commenced developments on balance sheet of 72,000 sqm
Covenant compliance[4]
-
- Gearing covenant[5]
Debt maturity profile[1]
-
- ICR Covenant[6]
==> picture [247 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
-
As at 30 June 2011
-
Calculated as debt/(property assets + cash + JV investments and loans) 3. WALE of leased portfolio to next break
-
Based on Fund covenants that are currently most capable of triggering an event of default in the Fund
==> picture [324 x 150] intentionally omitted <==
- As at 30 June 2011, adjusted for cash on balance sheet, development capex and committed but uncalled equity 6. 12 month forward looking for leases with average break date > 3.0 years
42
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Arlington Business Parks Partnership
Key metrics[1]
Key events
| Total assets | Total assets | A$1.9 billion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest bearin liabilities | A$09 billion | ||
| g | . | ||
| 70% Ge~~a~~ring2 |
63.4% 50.3% |
||
| ring | |||
| 50% ~~60%~~ Cus |
tomers | 145 | |
| 40% Nu |
36.6% ~~m~~ber of active business parks3 |
23 | |
| ~~20%~~ 30% Oc~~c~~ |
~~u~~pancy5 | 92% | |
| 10% Wei |
ghted average lease expiry4 | 7.4 years | |
| 0% We~~i~~ |
~~2014~~ ~~7.6%~~ |
||
| ~~2012~~ ~~ghted average cap rate~~ |
|||
| GMG co-investment | 35.7% | ||
| GMG co-investment | A$0.3 billion | ||
| Weighted average debt expiry | 2.1 years | ||
| WACR at covenant | 11.0% | ||
| Cap rate expansion to breach | 3.4% |
-
- Total leasing of 34,099 sqm (£7.4 million) during FY2011 (including extensions of 2012 onwards lease expiries) – reducing vacancy to 8%
-
- Continue to pursue land sales at highest and best use - Hammersmith and Aberdeen disposals of £88.4 million
-
- Risk mitigated developments – £120.1 million developments 100% pre-committed:
-
Recent transaction with British gas for a 7,525 sqm pre-let at Oxford Business Park (17 year term)
-
- Strong 12 month rolling retention rate of 93%
Covenant compliance[1]
-
- Gearing covenant
==> picture [246 x 76] intentionally omitted <==
Debt maturity profile[1]
==> picture [334 x 152] intentionally omitted <==
-
- ICR covenant[6]
==> picture [246 x 76] intentionally omitted <==
-
As at 30 June 2011
-
Calculated as net debt/total assets less cash
-
Comprise 23 active business parks and 4 standalone properties
-
WALE of portfolio to next break as at 30 June 2011
-
Includes a further 2,314 sqm currently with solicitors reducing the vacancy from 9.1% to 8.5%
43
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Goodman Hong Kong Logistics Fund
Key events
Key metrics[1]
-
- Strategically located and diversified portfolio benefited from strong economic recovery to achieve 99% occupancy (highest occupancy since December 2008)
| Total assets | A$1.5 billion |
|---|---|
| Interest bearing liabilities | A$0.3billion |
| Gearing | 20.3% |
| Customers | 184 |
| Number of properties | 13 |
| Occupancy | 99% |
| Weighted average lease expiry | 2.4 years |
| Weighted average cap rate3 | 6.5% |
| GMG co-investment | 20% |
| GMG co-investment | A$0.2 billion |
| Weighted average debt expiry | 3.5 years |
| WACR at covenant | 10.3% |
| Cap rate expansion to breach | 3.8% |
-
- Successfully completed a series of capital management initiatives to position the Fund in strong capital position with gearing at 20.3%
+ Interlink development:
-
Construction progressing well and remains on budget with 6 months of construction remaining
-
Pre-leasing commitment of 81% with strong enquiry on remaining space
Covenant compliance[1]
-
- Gearing covenant[2]
Debt maturity profile[1]
-
- ICR covenant
==> picture [246 x 76] intentionally omitted <==
-
As at 30 June 2011
-
Calculated as senior debt/stabilised investment properties
-
Stabilised portfolio only
==> picture [330 x 155] intentionally omitted <==
44
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Goodman Property Trust
Key metrics[1]
Key events[1]
| Total assets | $A1.2 billion |
|---|---|
| Interest bearing liabilities | $A0.5 billion |
| Gearing2 | 36.7% |
| Customers | 223 |
| Number of properties | 22 |
| Occupancy | 97% |
| Weighted average lease expiry | 5.6 years |
| Weighted average cap rate | 8.6% |
| GMG co-investment3 | 16.7% |
| GMG co-investment3 | $A0.1 billion |
| Weighted average debt expiry | 3.4 years |
| WACR at covenant | Not disclosed |
| Cap rate expansion to breach | Not disclosed |
+ Active portfolio management:
-
Over 140,378 sqm of space leased to new and existing customers, equating to NZ$20.8 million (16.5%) of portfolio income
-
WALE of 5.6 years
-
97% occupancy rate
-
- Capital management programme executed:
-
NZ$487.0 million of refinancing completed
-
NZ$45.0 million, seven year wholesale bond issue (assigned an investment grade rating of BBB+ by Standard & Poor’s)
-
NZ$66.0 million of equity raised through operation of DRP and asset for equity swap
-
Distribution policy revised to 80% payout ratio
-
- 36.7% gearing consistent with target range of 35% to 40% and weighted average term to expiry across all debt facilities of 3.4 years
Debt maturity profile[3]
-
- New development commitments from Bridgestone, Downer, Plytech and PMP New Zealand totalling almost 12,000 sqm with a weighted average term of 10.7 years
-
As at 31 March 2011 (as disclosed to the New Zealand stock exchange on 18 May 2011) 2. Calculated as net debt/property assets 3. As at 30 June 2011
45
==> picture [721 x 541] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
+
A ndix 5
ppe
Capital
management
Uxbridge, United Kingdom
46
----- End of picture text -----
Group financial covenants
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
| Covenants | Test | Covenant | Result | Headroom | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gearing ratio | Net liabilities1 as a percentage of net tangible assets is not more than 55.0% |
55.0% | 29.9% | 25.1% | ||
| Interest cover ratio | EBITDA to interest expense at least 2.0x | 2.0x | 4.5x | 2.5x | ||
| Secured debt as a percentage of total tangible assets is | ||||||
| Priority debt | not more than 5.0% (however specific permitted uses where ratio is either 2.5% or up to 7.5% over the short |
5.0% | 0% | 5.0% | ||
| term) | ||||||
| Net unsecured debt (total unsecured debt less | ||||||
| Unencumbered real property assets |
unrestricted cash) to be not more than 100% of the amount of unencumbered real property assets (all unencumbered direct assets including stabilised assets, |
100% | 55.2% | 44.8% | ||
| development WIP and land bank) | ||||||
| Unencumbered assets | Unsecured debt as a percentage of unencumbered assets is not more than 66.6% |
66.7% | 28.9% | 37.8% |
- Net liabilities = total liabilities less cash and excludes trade payables, mark to market derivatives, deferred tax liabilities and provisions for Securityholder distributions
47
Currency mix
==> picture [299 x 266] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [326 x 252] intentionally omitted <==
48
Financial risk management
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Financial risk management in line with Group Board policy
+ Interest risk management:
-
89% hedged over next 12 months
-
Weighted average hedge maturity of 4.4 years
-
Weighted average hedge rate of 5.13%[1] vs spot[2] 2.31%
-
Current “all in” net WACD 3.84%[3]
+ Foreign currency risk management:
-
78% hedged as at 30 June 2011, of which 72% is debt and liabilities and 28% is derivatives
-
Weighted average maturity of derivatives 3.8 years
- Includes the 10 year EMTN £250 million at 9.75% fixed rate and the AUD fixed rate receiver leg from the cross currency swaps
-
Spot refers 5 year swap market rate as at 15 August 2011
-
Includes the AUD receiver leg from the cross currency swaps
49
Financial risk management
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Interest rate
-
- Interest rates are hedged to 89% over next 12 months
-
- Weighted average hedge rate of 5.13%[1] vs spot[2] 2.31%:
-
NZD – (hedge 8.14%, spot 4.20%)
-
JPY – (hedge 3.32%, spot 0.47%)
-
HKD – (hedge 2.70%, spot 1.15%)
-
GBP – (hedge 8.40%[3] , spot 1.80%)
-
Euro – (hedge 3.18%, spot 2.18%)
-
- Weighted average maturity of 4.4 years
==> picture [412 x 256] intentionally omitted <==
-
- “All in” net WACD of 3.84%[4]
Includes the 10 year EMTN £250 million at 9.75% fixed rate and the AUD fixed rate receiver leg from the cross currency swaps
Spot refers 5 year swap market rate as at 15 August 2010
Includes the 10 year EMTN £250 million at 9.75% fixed rate
Includes the AUD receiver leg from the cross currency swaps
50
Financial risk management
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Interest rate hedging profile
| Euro payable GBP payable HKD payable NZD payable JPY payable |
|
|---|---|
| As at June | €M Fixed rate % £M Fixed1 rate % HK$M Fixed rate % NZ$M Fixed rate % ¥M Fixed rate % |
| 2012 | (538.0) 3.24 (425.0) 8.20 (1,750.0) 2.90 (110.0) 8.79 (1,200.0) 3.32 |
| 2013 | (505.0) 3.16 (425.0) 8.20 (1,406.0) 2.76 (110.0) 8.79 (1,200.0) 3.32 |
| 2014 | (391.0) 3.15 (425.0) 8.20 (760.0) 2.27 (110.0) 8.79 (1,200.0) 3.32 |
| 2015 | (250.0) 2.86 (437.6) 7.96 (122.0) 1.98 (69.0) 7.30 (1,200.0) 3.32 |
| 2016 | (108.0) 3.39 (388.7) 8.23 - - (50.0) 5.75 (1,200.0) 3.32 |
| 2017 | (33.0) 4.50 (307.2) 9.03 - - (16.0) 5.75 (1,200.0) 3.32 |
| 2018 | - - (266.0) 9.50 - - - - (1,200.0) 3.32 |
| 2019 | - - (11.0) 9.75 - - - - (1,200.0) 3.32 |
| 2020 | 3.32 (1,200.0) - - - - - - - - |
- Includes the 10 year EMTN £250 million at 9.75% fixed rate
51
Financial risk management
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Foreign currency denominated balance sheet hedging maturity profile
| Currency | Maturity | Weighted average | Amount receivable1 | Amount payable1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| exchange rate | |||||||
| NZ$M | 2012 / 2013 | 1.2413 | A$150.7M | NZ$187M | |||
| HK$M | 2014 | /2015 / 2016 | 7.3167 | A$294.8M | HK$2,150M | ||
| ¥M | 2016 | 87.9200 | A$79.6M | ¥7,000M | |||
| £ | 2023 | 131.54 | ¥11,300M | £85.9M | |||
| €M | 2015/2016 | 0.6858 | A$248.2M | €170M | |||
| US$M | 2020 / 2021 | 0.6182 | US$290M | £179.3M | |||
| US$M | 2020 / 2021 | 0.7068 | US$535M | €378.1M |
- Floating rates apply for the payable and receivable legs for the cross currency swaps except for the US$825M, ¥11,300M and NZ$102M cross currency where the receivable is at a fixed rate
52
Exchange rates
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
-
- Statement of Financial Position – exchange rates as at 30 June 2011
-
AUDGBP – 0.6667 (30 June 2010 : 0.5666)
-
AUDEUR – 0.7405 (30 June 2010 : 0.7050)
-
AUDHKD – 8.3336 (30 June 2010 : 6.5923)
-
– AUDSGD – 1.3156 (30 June 2010 : 1.1831) – AUDNZD – 1.2953 (30 June 2010 : 1.2321) – AUDUSD – 1.0739 (30 June 2010 : 0.8523) – AUDJPY – 86.3300 (30 June 2010 : 76.720) – AUDCNY – 6.9228 (30 June 2010: 5.7415)
-
- Statement of Financial Performance – average exchange rates for the 12 months to 30 June 2011
-
AUDGBP – 0.6214 (30 June 2010 : 0.5588)
-
– AUDEUR – 0.7249 (30 June 2010 : 0.6359) – AUDHKD – 7.6968 (30 June 2010 : 6.8469) – AUDSGD – 1.2783 (30 June 2010 : 1.2404) – AUDNZD – 1.3048 (30 June 2010 : 1.2554) – AUDUSD – 0.9892 (30 June 2010 : 0.8822) – AUDJPY – 82.0961 (30 June 2010 : 80.7539) – AUDCNY – 6.5548 (30 June 2010: 6.0235)
53
==> picture [73 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
thank+ you
54