Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

GOLDEN DEEPS LIMITED. Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2004

Aug 17, 2004

64977_rns_2004-08-17_abd2395d-c4f1-4ee2-877c-c359a2bdcdd5.pdf

Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Golden Deeps Ltd

A.C.N. 054 570 777

1st Floor, 8 Parliament Place, West Perth WA 6005 PO Box 1618, West Perth WA 6872 Tel: (08) 9481-7833 Fax: (08) 9481-7835 Email: [email protected] Website: www.goldendeeps.com

10th August 2004

Dear Shareholder.

On 27th July 2004 we announced that the Company had executed an Agreement to acquire the Kelimaizina Gold Project in Madagascar.

The Directors believe that the acquisition and exploration of the project will provide shareholders with valuable exposure to a quality project in a viable gold market.

The Company would like your approval as a shareholder for the transaction to proceed.

The enclosed document provides information on the acquisition to enable you to make an informed decision on the Resolution to be tabled at the General Meeting to be held at The Celtic Club (Inc), 48 Ord Street, West Perth on Friday, 17th September 2004 at 9:30am.

Your Directors unanimously recommend shareholders vote in favour of the Resolution. The Independent Expert has concluded the proposal the subject of Resolution 1 is fair and reasonable to the non-associated shareholders of the Company.

If you are unable to attend the meeting we invite you to complete the attached Proxy Form and return it to this office no less than 48 hours before the time appointed for the meeting.

Yours sincerely,

D N Zukerman Director

Encl.

GOLDEN DEEPS LTD A.B.N. 12054 570 777

NOTICE OF GENERAL MEETING

$-$ and $-$

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Including the Expert's Report of Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd and Independent Geologist's Report and Valuation of the Kelimaizina Project Madagascar Prepared by Malcolm Castle

$-$ and $-$

PROXY FORM

The Independent Expert has concluded the proposal the subject of Resolution 1 is fair and reasonable to the non-associated shareholders of the Company

DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: Friday, 17th September 2004 at 9:30am

VENUE: Presidents Room, The Celtic Club, 48 Ord Street, West Perth WA 6005

These documents should be read in their entirety. If shareholders are in any doubt as to how they should vote, they should seek advice from their accountant, solicitor or other professional advisor.

GOLDEN DEEPS LTD A.B.N. 12 054 570 777

CONTENTS

Notice of Meeting
Explanatory Statement
Proxy Form
Schedule 1: Expert's Report of Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd
Schedule 2: Independent Geologist's Report and Valuation
Of the Kelimaizina Project Madagascar

GOLDEN DEEPS LTD A.B.N. 12 054 570 777 NOTICE OF GENERAL MEETING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a General Meeting of Members of Golden Deeps Ltd, will be held at the Celtic Club Inc, 48 Ord Street, West Perth, Western Australia on Friday, 17th September 2004 at 9:30am.

An Explanatory Statement containing information in relation to each of the following Resolutions accompanies this Notice of General Meeting.

AGENDA

ORDINARY BUSINESS OF THE MEETING

Acquisition of the Kelimaizina Gold Project. $\mathbf{1}$ .

To consider and if thought fit to pass the following resolution as an ordinary resolution:

"That for the purposes of ASX Listing Rules 7.1 and 10.1 and Section 611 Item7 of the Corporations Act and all other purposes the Company approves and agrees to:

  • the acquisition by the Company of Kelimaizina Gold Project in consideration for the issue to Kalgoorlie Mine a) Management Pty Ltd ("KMM") of a total of 2,000,000 ordinary fully paid shares in the Company ("Shares") and 2,000,000 options to acquire ordinary fully paid shares in the Company on or before 30 June 2009 at 10 cents each ("Options") together with a cash payment of \$82,000 for reimbursement of previous expenditure;
  • b) the Directors issuing and allotting to KMM the 2,000,000 Shares and 2,000,000 Options referred to in paragraph (a):
  • the acquisition by KMM and its associates (as described in the Explanatory Statement accompanying this c) Notice of Meeting) by way of allotment referred to in paragraph (b) of the 2,000,000 Shares; and
  • d) the acquisition by KMM and its associates (as described in the Explanatory Statement accompanying this Notice of Meeting) of a further 2,000,000 Shares on exercise of the 2,000,000 Options referred to in paragraph (b).

in each case on the terms and conditions more particularly described in the Explanatory Statement accompanying this Notice of Meeting."

NOTES

  • No votes can be cast on Resolution 1 by KMM or any associates of KMM.
  • Further details of the above acquisitions are set out in the Explanatory Statement accompanying this Notice of Meeting, $2.$ including further information required to be disclosed to shareholders under Australian Securities & Investments Commission Policy Statement 74 and the Listing Rules of Australian Stock Exchange Limited.
  • Shareholders are urged to read the Independent Expert's Report prepared by Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd which report 3. is attached to the Explanatory Statement accompanying this Notice of Meeting. The Independent Expert has concluded that the proposal the subject of Resolution 1 is fair and reasonable to the non-associated shareholders of the Company

$\overline{2}$ . Issue of Shares and Options.

To consider and if thought fit to pass the following resolution as an ordinary resolution:

"That for the purposes of ASX Listing Rules 7.1 and for all other purposes, the Company approves and authorises the Directors to allot and issue to Tansearch Pty Ltd 200,000 ordinary fully paid shares in the Company and 200,000 options to acquire ordinary fully paid shares in the Company on or before 30 June 2009 at 10 cents each on the terms and conditions more particularly described in the Explanatory Statement accompanying this Notice of Meeting."

The Company will disregard any votes cast on Resolution 2 by Tansearch Pty Ltd and any person associated with Tansearch Pty Ltd. However, the Company need not disregard a vote if it is cast by a person as proxy for a person who is entitled to vote, in accordance with the directions on the proxy form or it is cast by the person chairing the meeting as proxy for a person who is entitled to vote, in accordance with a direction on the proxy form to vote as the proxy decides.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD

B R McCullagh COMPANY SECRETARY 10th August 2004

GOLDEN DEEPS LTD A.B.N. 12 054 570 777 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

This Explanatory Statement has been prepared for the information of Shareholders of Golden Deeps Ltd ("Company") in connection with Resolutions 1 and 2 of the Meeting of Members to be held at the Celtic Club Inc. 48 Ord Street, West Perth, Western Australia on Friday, 17th September 2004 at 9:30am.

An Independent Expert's Report prepared by Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd comments on whether the proposal the subject of Resolution 1 is fair and reasonable to the non-associated shareholders of the Company.

Shareholders should note that Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd has concluded that the proposal the subject of Resolution 1 is fair and reasonable to the non-associated shareholders of the Company.

The Directors recommend that shareholders read this Explanatory Statement and the Independent Expert's Reports in full before making any decision in relation to the Resolutions.

This Explanatory Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Notice of Meeting. Please refer to Page 9 of this Explanatory Statement for a Glossary of Terms.

Resolution 1 - Acquisition of Kelimaizina Gold Project

Introduction

On 27 July 2004, the Company announced that it had executed an agreement ("Acquisition Agreement") with Kalgoorlie Mine Management Pty Ltd ("KMM") whereby the Company will acquire 100% of the Kelimaizina Gold Project in Madagascar for a consideration comprising 2,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares in the capital of the Company ("Shares") and 2,000,000 options to acquire Shares, each with an exercise price of 10 cents and an expiry date of 30 June 2009 ("Options"). In addition, the Company must also reimburse KMM the sum of \$82,000 for previous expenditure on the project.

KMM acquired the Kelimaizina Gold Project from Calibra Resource Engineers Madagascar SARL ("Calibra"), the prospector group who originally applied for and acquired the tenements, pursuant to an option agreement. The Company has acquired KMM's interest in the tenements and the option agreement. The Project is being acquired subject to a 25% net profit interest royalty (after amortisation of capital expenditure) on alluvial and eluvial production and a 1% net smelter return interest on the value of gold produced from hard rock mining (i.e. not alluvial or eluvial material) payable in favour of Calibra.

The acquisition and payment of the consideration is subject to shareholder approval. Resolution 1 seeks shareholder approval for the acquisition and the issue of the 2,000,000 Shares and 2,000,000 Options, and the reimbursement of \$82,000 for previous expenditure on the Project, to KMM.

The Project

The Kelimaizina Gold Project consists of 2 mining tenements known as "Permis Recherche" (PR6256 and PR6978) totalling 87.5 square kilometres located in the Maevatanana area, 260kms north of Antananarivo, the capital of Madagascar. The project location is shown in the maps included in the Independent Geologists Report attached as Schedule 2 to this Explanatory Statement.

The area is prospective for alluvial, eluvial and hardrock gold mining.

Previous exploration and alluvial mining was conducted by a French company from 1995 to 1998 when their tenancy was terminated. Reports from that period indicate a zone of mineralisation remains over an area of 140,000 square metres. Grades from exploration pits and surface workings ranged from 0.28g/m3 Au to 5.0 g/m3 Au with a suggested average of 2.6g/m3 Au. A JORC compliant resource has not been established at this stage.

In November 2003, KMM completed a soil and rock chip sampling programme to gauge the areal extent and host lithologies of the gold mineralisation system.

Metallurgical tests on the samples indicate that the mineralization is predominantly free gold less than 1mm in diameter and gravity separation would be easily achievable with a simple milling and gravity circuit. The sampling programme has provided a sound basis for future drill testing.

Independent Consultant Geologist, Malcolm Castle has reported "The Kelimaizina Gold Project has considerable exploration upside and with minimal expenditure could be brought into production."

"The exploration potential within the project area will come from exploration of the bedrock source below the current laterite and old workings, including the recently discovered Tsimahabekitoza and Mahatsinjo deposits. Dredging operations in nearby rivers, where high grades have been reported but not documented, may add to the mineral inventory."

Once acquired the Company intends to pursue an extensive aircore drilling programme to ascertain the following:-

  • The depth of weathering and oxidation of the host rocks, both transported and insitu. (i)
  • (ii). The true position of the gold within the profile and extent of the mineralised "laterite".
  • Generation of samples to allow a preliminary resource to be estimated. $(iii)$
  • Some preliminary exploration for the possible bedrock source of the gold mineralisation. $(iv)$

Further details of the Project, the mining industry in Madagascar, location and access, recent exploration activities and regional geology are set out in the Independent Geologists Report attached as Schedule 2 to this Explanatory Statement.

ASX Listing Rule 7.1

Shareholder approval is being sought pursuant to Listing Rule 7.1 for the issue of the 2,000,000 Shares and 2,000,000 Options. This Rule generally prohibits a company from issuing more than 15% of its share capital within a 12 months period without shareholder approval. Listing Rule 7.3 specifies that certain information be provided to shareholders in respect of such approval.

Information required by ASX Listing Rule 7.3 for the purposes of shareholder approval under ASX Listing Rule 7.1 is provided below:

    1. The maximum number of securities to be issued under Resolution 1 is 2,000,000 Shares in the Company and 2,000,000 Options to acquire Shares in the Company;
  • $2.$ The securities will be issued within 10 days after the date of the Meeting;
    1. The Shares are to be issued at a deemed issue price of 8 cents each and the options issued for nil consideration free of charge;
  • The 2,000,000 Shares and 2,000,000 Options are to be issued to KMM; 4.
    1. The Shares to be issued are fully paid ordinary shares which will, from their date of allotment, rank pari-passu in all respects with all other fully paid ordinary shares in the Company then on issue. The terms of the options are set out in Annexure A to this Explanatory Statement:
    1. There are no funds to be raised by the issue; and
  • $\overline{7}$ The Shares and Options will be allotted within 10 days after the date of the Meeting.

ASX Listing Rule 10.1

Shareholder approval is also being sought pursuant to Listing Rule 10.1 for this transaction.

ASX Listing Rule 10.1 requires a company to obtain prior shareholder approval before acquiring a substantial asset (representing more than 5% of the equity interests of the Company) from a substantial holder or an associate of a substantial holder. The acquisition of the Kelimaizina Project from KMM involves such an acquisition from an associate (KMM) of a substantial holder ("Coniston Pty Ltd").

ASX Listing Rule 10.10.2 requires that the Company provide an independent expert's report addressing whether the transaction the subject of shareholder approval under ASX Listing Rule 10.1, is fair and reasonable to disinterested shareholders. The report prepared by Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd and included as Schedule 1 to the Notice of Meeting is provided to Shareholders for this purpose. An independent geologist's report and valuation of the Kelimaizina Project prepared by Malcolm Castle is included as Schedule 2.

Escrow of Consideration Shares and Options

ASX has ruled that the shares and options to be issued to KMM will be classified as restricted securities and will be held in escrow for a period of 12 months from the later of the date of issue or when ASX receives both a restriction agreement and written confirmation from the share registry that a holding lock will be placed on the restricted securities.

Section 611 Item 7 of the Corporations Act

Shareholder approval is also being sought pursuant to Section 611 Item 7 of the Corporations Act.

Pursuant to Section 606(1) of the Corporations Act, an entity must not acquire a relevant interest in issued voting shares in a listed company if the entity acquiring the interest does so through a transaction in relation to securities entered into by or on behalf of the entity and because of the transaction, that entity's or another's voting power in the company increases:

  • from 20% or below to more than 20%; or a)
  • b) from a starting point above 20% and below 90%.

The voting power of an entity in a body corporate is determined in accordance with Section 610 of the Corporations Act. The calculation of an entity's voting power in a company involves determining the voting shares in the company in which the entity and the entity's associates have a relevant interest.

An entity has a relevant interest in securities if it:

  • a) is the holder of the securities;
  • b) has the power to exercise, or control the exercise of, a right to vote attached to securities; or
  • has the power to dispose of, or control the exercise of a power to dispose of, the securities. c)

It does not matter how remote the relevant interest is or how it arises. If two or more entities can jointly exercise one of these powers, each of them is taken to have the power.

There are various exceptions to the prohibition in section 606, including under section 611 item 7 of the Corporations Act. Section 611 item 7 provides an exception to the prohibition in section 606, in circumstances where the shareholders of the company approve an acquisition of shares by virtue of an allotment or acquisition at a meeting at which no votes are cast by parties involved in the proposed acquisition, including their associates.

Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the Company has agreed (subject to shareholders approval) to allot and issue a total of 2,000,000 Shares and 2,000,000 Options to KMM. An associate of KMM, Coniston Pty Ltd ("Coniston") currently holds 4,150,000 Shares representing 16% of the voting power of the Company. Both KMM and Coniston are controlled by Mr James del Piano. Shareholder approval under Item 7 of Section 611 of the Corporations Act is required for the issue of the 2,000,000 Shares to, and the exercise of 2,000,000 Options by, KMM because KMM and its associates will acquire a relevant interest in those Shares, which along with the interest of Coniston, will be in excess of 20% of the issued capital of the Company.

The following information is required to be provided to shareholders under ASIC Policy Statement 74. Shareholders are also referred to the Independent Expert's Report prepared by Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd, which forms part of this Explanatory Statement.

For the purposes of Item 7 of Section 611 of the Corporations Act and Policy Statement 74, the following information is disclosed:

The identity of the acquirer is KMM. KMM is a private company, controlled by Mr James del Piano, a) which provides management services to public companies and invests in listed securities.

Coniston, an associate of KMM is also controlled by Mr del Piano. Coniston invests in property and listed securities. It also has mineral exploration interests in Western Australia.

Mr James del Piano, LLB, is a private investor in property and listed securities with over 25 years experience investing in the mining industry.

b) KMM currently holds directly holds no Shares or Options in the Company. Coniston, an associate of KMM and Mr del Piano currently directly holds 4,150,000 shares representing 16% of the voting power of the Company. Assuming the 200,000 Shares the subject of Resolution 2 are issued, if the 2,000,000 Shares are issued to KMM, KMM will directly hold 7.11% of the voting power of the Company and KMM, Coniston and Mr del Piano will hold a relevant interest in 21.86% of the voting power of the Company. If the 2,000,000 Options are exercised by KMM and assuming no other options are exercised, KMM will directly hold 13.27% of the voting power of the Company and KMM, Coniston and Mr del Piano will hold a relevant interest in 27.04% of the voting power of the Company. The relevant interests of the parties are discussed in further detail in section 2 of the Expert's report.

  • c) There are no new proposed directors as a result of the proposed transaction.
  • d) Future intentions of the Acquirers for Golden Deeps Ltd

The Company understands KMM and its associates have the following intentions for the Company:

  • i) It will remain in the resource exploration industry.
  • ii) The current Board of Directors; Messrs DN Zukerman, A Clemen and B McCullagh will continue and at this time there is no intention to increase the Board.
  • it will maintain its gold exploration activities in Western Australia and upon approval of the iii) Kelimaizina Gold Project to prepare a drilling programme there based on the soil sampling results obtained by KMM.
  • At this time it is not intended to inject further capital into the Company. iv)
  • The Company has no employees but engages consultants when required which KMM and its $V$ associates intends to maintain.
  • vi) It is not the intention of KMM or its associates to change significantly the financial or dividend policies of the Company.
  • vii) It is not the intention of KMM or its associates to re-deploy any assets or property of the Company.
  • $\Theta$ Allotment of the Shares and Options is to be effected within 10 days of Shareholders approval.
  • f) The Directors of the Company have no interest in the outcome of the proposed issue of Shares and Options to KMM.
  • The Directors of the Company have commissioned Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd to $g)$ prepare a report on the question of whether the proposal is fair and reasonable to shareholders not associated with KMM and its associates. An independent Geologist's Report and Valuation prepared by Malcolm Castle has also been commissioned. Those reports are attached to this Explanatory Statement. Shareholders are urged to read the Independent Expert's Report and Independent Geologist's Report and Valuation.
  • h) The Directors intend to vote and cause their associates to vote in favour of Resolution 1.
  • D. No votes can be cast on Resolution 1 by KMM or its associates.

Financial Effect of the Acquisition

a) Proforma Capital Structure

Set out below is a proforma capital structure of the Company taking into account the transaction contemplated by Resolution 1 including the issue of the 200,000 Shares and 200,000 Options to Tansearch Pty Ltd under Resolution 2.

Shares
Shares currently on issue 25,940,020
Shares to be issued to KMM pursuant to Resolution 1 1 2,000,000
Shares to be issued to Tansearch Pty Ltd 200,000
Total 28,140,020
Options
Options on issue
Options to be issued to KMM 2,000,000
Options to be issued to Tansearch Pty Ltd 200,000
Total 2,200,000

The options are exercisable @ 10c before 30 June 2009. Note on capital structure movements:

  • $(1)$
  • Shares to be issued to KMM and Tansearch Pty Ltd are at a deemed issue price of 8 cents per Share.

b) Proforma Statement of Financial Position

Set out below is an unaudited Statement of Financial Position of the Company as at 31 May 2004 along with a pro-forma Statement of Financial Position as contained in the Independent Expert's report assuming the following:

  • Accounting for the investments in other listed companies at 30 June 2004 market values; $\bullet$
  • The acquisition of the Kelimaizina Project from KMM by way of an issue of 2,000,000 Shares at a $\bullet$ market cost of 8.5 cents (and 2,000,000 Options not costed) plus the reimbursement of \$82,000 to KMM.
  • The issue of 200,000 Shares at a market price of 8.5 cents (and 200,000 Options not costed) and $\bullet$ expensed; and
  • Assuming the incidental acquisition costs of the Kelimaizina Project are \$20,000 but are $\bullet$ expensed.
Golden Deeps
31 May 2004
\$000's
Pro-forma
31 May 2004
\$000's
Current Assets
Cash 2,032 1,930
Receivables 7 7
Investments 107
2,146
107
2,044
Non Current Assets
Plant 3 3
Capitalised exploration costs 252
Receivable - Bonds 133 133
136 388
Total Assets 2,282 2,432
Current Liabilities
Payables 10 10
Provisions
10 1 10
Total Liabilities 10 10
Net Assets 2,272 2,422
Equity
Contributed equity
Accumulated losses
8,203
(5,931)
8,390
(5,968)
Net equity 2,272 2,422

Independent Expert's Report

Additional information relevant to the proposed acquisition is contained in the Independent Expert's Report attached as Schedule 1 to the Explanatory Statement and the Independent Geologist's Report and Valuation attached as Schedule 2 to the Explanatory Statement.

Conclusion and Directors' Recommendation

All the current Directors are considered independent for the purposes of Resolution 1, as they do not have any personal interest in the outcome of that resolution. They have the same interest as other non-associated shareholders in the Company to the extent that they, or companies associated with them, hold shares in the Company.

The Directors are unanimously of the opinion that the proposed transaction is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and accordingly recommend that shareholders vote in favour of Resolution 1.

The Directors recommendation that you vote in favour of Resolution 1 is based on the following reasons:

  • The Kelimaizina Project has been the subject of successful eluvial mining in the past and recent ė soil sampling has extended the area of gold mineralistion.
  • Metallurgical tests on the samples have shown the mineralisation is predominantly free gold and gravity separation would be easily achievable with a simple milling and gravity circuit.
  • Additional exploration potential exists in the bedrock source below the current laterite and old $\bullet$ workings.
  • The independent expert has concluded that the transaction is fair and reasonable to the non- $\bullet$ associated shareholders.

Resolution 2 - Approval of Share and Option Issue

The Company has agreed to issue 200,000 Shares and 200,000 Options to Tansearch Pty Ltd as a fee for facilitating the acquisition by the Company of the Kelimaizina Gold Project.

Tansearch is unrelated to any Directors of the Company. KMM or their associates.

Resolution 2 (which is conditional upon the passage of Resolution 1) seeks shareholder approval to the issue of the 200,000 Shares and 200,000 Options to Tansearch.

ASX Listing Rules

As noted above. Listing Rule 7.1 generally prohibits a company from issuing more than 15% of its share capital within a 12 months period without shareholder approval. Listing Rule 7.3 specifies that certain information be provided to shareholders in respect of such approval.

Information required by ASX Listing Rule 7.3 for the purposes of shareholder approval under ASX Listing Rule 7.1 is provided below:

    1. The maximum number of securities to be issued is 200,000 Shares and 200,000 Options in the Company:
  • $\overline{2}$ . The Shares and Options in the Company are proposed to be issued and allotted on the approval of Shareholders and in any case no later than 10 days after the date of the Meeting;
    1. The Shares are deemed to be issued at 8 cents each and the Options issued for no consideration;
    1. The Shares and Options are to be issued to Tansearch Pty Ltd:
    1. The Shares to be issued are fully paid ordinary shares which will, from their date of allotment, rank pari-passu in all respects with all other fully paid ordinary shares in the Company then on issue. The terms of the Options are set out in Annexure A to this Explanatory Statement;
    1. There are no funds to be raised by the issue; and
    1. The Shares and Options will be allotted on the approval of Shareholders and in any case no later than 10 days after the date of the Meeting.

The Directors unanimously recommend Shareholders vote in favour of this Resolution.

ANNEXURE 'A'

GOLDEN DEEPS LIMITED TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS OPTION TERMS AND CONDITIONS

The terms and conditions of the Options are as follows:

  • $(a)$ A holding statement will be issued for the Options.
  • $(b)$ Golden Deeps Limited ("Golden Deeps") do not intend to apply for the Options to be quoted on the ASX.
  • The Options will expire at 5:00pm Western Standard Time on 30 June 2009 ("Expiry Date"). $(c)$
  • The option is a right in favour of the option holder to subscribe for one share in the capital of $(d)$ Golden Deeps.
  • Shares allotted to option holders on exercise of Options shall be issued at 10 cents each $(e)$ ("Exercise Price"). The Exercise Price of the shares the subject of the Options shall be payable in full on exercise of the Options.
  • $(f)$ The Option Holder may exercise Options any time prior to the Expiry Date by delivering to the registered office of Golden Deeps, to be received by Golden Deeps prior to the Expiry Date:
  • $(i)$ a notice in writing stating the intention of the option holder to exercise all or a specified number of Options; and
  • $(ii)$ the holding statement and a cheque made payable to Golden Deeps for the subscription monies for the shares.
  • An exercise of only some Options shall not affect the rights of the option holder to the balance of $(q)$ the Options held by the option holder.
  • $(h)$ Golden Deeps shall allot the resultant shares and deliver the holding statement within five business days of the exercise of the Option.
  • $(i)$ The Options shall be freely transferable.
  • Shares allotted pursuant to an exercise of Options shall rank, from the date of allotment, equally $(i)$ with existing ordinary fully paid shares of Golden Deeps in all respects.
  • $(k)$ In the event of any reconstruction (including consolidation, subdivisions, reductions or return) of the issued capital of Golden Deeps, the rights of the Options shall be reconstructed (as appropriate) in accordance with the Listing Rules.
  • $\langle \mathsf{I} \rangle$ The Options will not give any right to participate in dividends, bonus issues or entitlement issues until shares are allotted pursuant to the exercise of the relevant Options. There is no right to change the exercise price of Options if the Company completes a bonus or entitlements issue.

GOLDEN DEEPS LTD A.B.N. 12 054 570 777 GLOSSARY OF TERMS

In this Explanatory Statement:

"ACN" Australian Company Number
"ASIC" Australian Securities and Investments Commission
"ASX" Australian Stock Exchange Limited (ACN 008 624 691)
"ASX Listing Rules" or "Listing Rules" The Official Listing Rules of ASX as amended from time to time.
"Company" Golden Deeps Ltd (ACN 054 570 777)
"Corporations Act" The Corporations ACT 2001 (Commonwealth)
"Director" A director of Golden Deeps Ltd.
"Experts Report" The report dated July 2004 by Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd
which is annexed to this Explanatory Statement.
"Notice of Meeting" The notice convening the Meeting, which accompanies this
Explanatory Statement.
"Option" An option to subscribe for a Share at an exercise price of 10 cents
per Share on or before 30 June 2009 and otherwise on the terms set
out in Annexure "A" to this Explanatory Statement.
"Resolution" Resolution in the Notice of Meeting.
"Share" A fully paid ordinary share in the capital of the Company.
"Shareholder" The registered holder of a Share in the Company.

GOLDEN DEEPS LTD A.B.N. 12 054 570 777 FORM OF PROXY

Facsimile No: 08-94817835

The Secretary, Golden Deeps Ltd 1st Floor, 8 Parliament Place, WEST PERTH WA 6005

I/We, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , of.................................... being a holder of shares in the capital of Golden Deeps Ltd hereby appoint ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, of....................................

or failing him, the Chairman of the meeting as my/our proxy to vote on my/our behalf at the General Meeting of the Company to be held on Friday, 17th September 2004 and at any adjournment thereof, in the manner indicated
below, or in the absence of indication as he or she thinks fit.

A statement of the Chairman's voting intentions in relation to undirected proxies.

If you do not wish to direct your proxy how to vote, please place a mark in the box. $\Box$

By marking this box you acknowledge that the Chairman may exercise your proxy even if he has an interest in the outcome of the resolution and votes cast by him other than as proxy holder will be disregarded because of that interest.

The Chairman intends to vote for the resolutions.

Ordinary Business

Approval issue of Shares and Options - KMM For □ Against ロ Abstain □
Approval issue of Shares and Options - Tansearch For -8 Against □ Abstain

(Shareholders to indicate by a tick in the box above how a proxy holder is to vote in respect of the above resolutions).

Signed by the said member this day of 2004.
Shareholders Signature Witness
or
The Common Seal of the member
was hereunto affixed in accordance
with its Constitution
Director
.
Director Secretary

Attendance and Voting Eligibility

For the purposes of the meeting, securities will be taken to be held by the persons who are registered holders at 9:30am on Wednesday, 15th September 2004. Accordingly, transactions registered after that time will be disregarded in determining entitlements to attend and vote at the meeting.

Proxies

A member of the Company entitled to attend and vote at the meeting shall be entitled to appoint not more than two other persons (whether members of the company or not) as the member's proxy or proxies, to attend and vote on the member's behalf. Where two proxies are appointed the appointments shall be of no effect unless each proxy is appointed to represent a specified proportion of the member's voting rights. Forms of proxy must be deposited at the registered office of the company in Perth not less than forty-eight (48) hours before the time appointed for the holding of the meeting.

Schedule 1:

Expert's Report of Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd

STANTON PARTNERS CORPORATE PTY LTD

A.C.N 063 036 331 1 HAVELOCK STREET WEST PERTH 6005 WESTERN AUSTRALIA

TELEPHONE: (08) 9481 3188 FACSIMILE: (08) 9321 1204

e-mail: [email protected]

29 July 2004

The Directors Golden Deeps Limited Level 1 8 Parliament Place WEST PERTH WA 6005

Dear Sirs

GOLDEN DEEPS LIMITED ("GOLDEN DEEPS" OR "COMPANY") (ACN 054 570 777) ON Re: THE PROPOSAL TO ACOUIRE THE KELIMAIZINA GOLD PROJECT IN MADAGASCAR FROM KALGOORLIE MINE MANAGEMENT PTY LTD PURSUANT TO LISTING RULE 10.1 AND SECTION 611 (ITEM 7) OF THE CORPORATIONS ACT

1. Introduction

  • $1.1$ We have been requested by the Directors of Golden Deeps to prepare an Independent Expert's Report to determine the fairness and reasonableness relating to the proposal on the Kelimaizina Project in Madagascar as noted below and in resolution 1 in the Notice of Meeting of Shareholders and Explanatory Statement to Shareholders of Golden Deeps of August 2004.
  • $1.2z$ It is proposed that Golden Deeps will acquire a 100% interest in the Kelimaizina Gold Project from Kalgoorlie Mine Management Pty Ltd ("KMM"), a company that is the appointed Manager of Golden Deeps and associated with a substantial shareholder' in Golden Deeps. For the purpose of this report the proposed acquisition is known as the Proposed Transaction.

The purchase consideration payable to KMM is:

  • 2,000,000 shares in Golden Deeps at a deemed issue price of 8 cents each;
  • 2,000,000 options in Golden Deeps, exercisable at 10 cents each on or before 30 June 2009; and
  • Reimbursement of previous expenditure of \$82,000 being the cash expenditure (including option, purchase and legal payments) incurred on the Kelimaizina tenements between November 2003 and June 2004.

Furthermore, 200,000 shares and 200,000 options are to be issued to a non-related party for facilitating the acquisition.

KMM acquired the two mineral tenements comprising the Kelimaizina Project in Madagascar from Calibra Resource Engineers Madagascar SARL ("Calibra") under an option agreement that has now been finalised. The tenements are purported to be registered in the name of Calibra Resource and Engineers SARL. The sale included a 25% net profit interest on alluvial and eluvial production and a 1% net smelter return interest on production from hard rock mining. On 27 July 2004, Golden Deeps entered into a contract with KMM to acquire the Kelimaizina Project on the terms noted above. It is assumed that the Kelimaizina Project will need to be acquired via a Madagascan registered company controlled by Golden Deeps and at least one of the directors of the Madagascan company will be a Madagascan resident.

$1.3$ For the purposes of Listing Rule 10.1, a substantial shareholder is defined as a person and a person's associates who had a relevant interest prior to the Proposed Transaction of at least 10% of the voting shares of the Company. At the date of this report Coniston Pty Ltd ("Coniston") owns 16.0% of the ordinary shares in Golden Deeps. Coniston is a company controlled by Mr J Del Piano who also controls KMM. Furthermore, KMM provides administrative and management services to Golden Deeps. We have been advised that Coniston and KMM are deemed related parties and act in concert with each other.

Under Section 606 of The Corporations Act ("TCA"), a person must not acquire a relevant interest in issued voting shares in a company if because of the transaction, that persons or someone else's voting power in the company increases:

  • From 20% or below to more than 20%; or $(a)$
  • From a starting point that is above 20% and below 90%. $(b)$

Under Section 611 (Item 7) of the TCA, Section 606 does not apply in relation to any acquisition of shares in a company approved by resolution passed at a general meeting at which no votes were cast in favour of the resolution by the acquirer or the disposer or their respective associates. An independent expert is required to report on the fairness and reasonableness of the transaction pursuant to a Section 611 (Item 7) meeting.

If the Kelimaizina Project proceeds, Coniston and KMM combined will control approximately 21.86% of the issued capital of Golden Deeps. However, if only KMM exercises its share option $(2,000,000)$ to be issued pursuant to the acquisition) and no other share issues are made, Coniston and KMM combined may increase there shareholding in Golden Deeps to 27.04%. For the purposes of this report we have referred to Coniston and KMM as the Coniston Group.

Therefore a notice prepared in relation to a meeting of shareholders convened for the purposes of Listing Rule 10.1 and Section 611 (Item 7) of TCA must be accompanied by an Independent Expert's Report stating whether the Proposed Transaction noted under resolution 1 is fair and reasonable. To assist shareholders in making a decision on the Proposed Transaction, the directors have requested that Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd prepare an Independent Expert's Report, which must state whether, in the opinion of the Independent Expert, the Proposed

Transaction is fair and reasonable to the non-associated shareholders of Golden Deeps (not associated with the Coniston Group).

  • $1.5$ Apart from this introduction, this report considers the following:
  • Summary of opinion ۰
  • Implications of the proposals ٠
  • Corporate history and nature of business of Golden Deeps $\bullet$
  • Future direction of Golden Deeps
  • Basis of valuation of Golden Deeps shares and options ٠
  • Value of consideration
  • Basis of valuation of the Kelimaizina Project
  • Conclusion as to fairness $\bullet$
  • Reasonableness of the offer
  • Conclusion as to reasonableness $\bullet$
  • Sources of information $\bullet$
  • Appendix A
  • 1.6 In determining the fairness and reasonableness of the Kelimaizina Project acquisition, we have had regard for the definitions set out by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ("ASIC") in its Policy Statements 75 and 74. Policy Statement 75 states that an opinion as to whether an offer is fair and/or reasonable shall entail a comparison between the offer price and the value that may be attributed to the securities under offer (fairness) and an examination to determine whether there is justification for the offer price on objective grounds after reference to that value (reasonableness). Policy Statement 74 states that, where an acquisition of shares by way of an allotment is to be approved by shareholders pursuant to Section 611 (Item 7) of TCA, it is desirable to commission a report by an independent expert stating whether or not the proposal is fair and reasonable, having regards to the proposed allottee (in this case KMM) and whether a premium for potential control is being paid by the allottee.

Accordingly, our report relating to the Kelimaizina Project acquisition is concerned with the fairness and reasonableness of the proposals with respect to the existing non-associated shareholders of Golden Deeps (not associated with the Coniston Group) and whether the Coniston Group is paying a premium for potential control.

1.8 In our opinion, the proposals as outlined in paragraph 1.2 and resolution 1 are fair and reasonable to the shareholders of Golden Deeps not associated with the Coniston Group.

The opinions expressed above must be read in conjunction with the more detailed analysis and comments made in this report, including the July 2004 Independent Geologist's Valuation Report prepared by Malcolm Castle, a copy of which is attached as an appendix to the Notice of Meeting and Explanatory Statement.

$2.$ Implications of the Proposals

2.1 As at 29 July 2004, there were 25,940,020 ordinary fully paid shares on issue in Golden Deeps. The significant fully paid shareholders as at 30 June 2004 were believed to be:

No. of fully
paid shares
% of issued
fully paid
shares
Coniston Pty Ltd (associated with KMM) 4,150,000 16.00
ANZ Nominees Pty Ltd 1,606,230 6.19
Peat Corp Pty Ltd 1,280,000 4.93
Sancoast Pty Ltd 1,000,000 3.86
Paso Holdings Pty Ltd 973,927 3.75
Intercorp Pty Ltd 907,661 3.50
9,917,818 38.23

The top 20 shareholders currently own approximately 57.47% of the Company.

  • $2.2$ If the Kelimaizina Project acquisition is completed, KMM would own 2,000,000 shares and 2,000,000 share options (exercisable at 10 cents each, on or before 30 June 2009) representing a 7.11% interest in the expanded capital of the Company (before the exercise of any share options). The Coniston Group would own 21.86%. If only KMM exercised its share options, KMM would own only 13.27% of the issued capital of Golden Deeps. The Coniston Group would own 27.04% of the expanded issued capital. KMM would pay \$200,000 to the Company to exercise the 2,000,000 options.
  • 2.3 The current Board of Directors is not proposed to change in the near future and no change is contemplated as a result of the acquisition of the Kelimaizina Project.
  • 2.4 Although not being paid to KMM, a non-related party is to receive 200,000 shares and 200,000 options (exercisable at 10 cents each, on or before 30 June 2009).
  • 2.5 KMM is also to be reimbursed \$82,000 for past exploration costs and costs incurred by KMM in exercising the option to acquire the Kelimaizina Project from Calibra.

3. Corporate History and Nature of Business

  • $3.1$ Golden Deeps is on the Mining Board of the ASX and is currently a mineral explorer. The Company has a number of interests in mineral tenements including inter-alia, the following areas of interest:
  • Garden Gully, near Coolgardie Western Australia a gold play $\bullet$
  • Blue Funnel, north-west of Kalgoorlie in Western Australia a gold play.
  • Twin Hills near Menzies in Western Australia a gold play; and
  • Victory Dam 26km east of Kalgoorlie a gold play.

4. Future Directions of Golden Deeps

  • $4.1$ We have been advised by the directors and management of Golden Deeps that:
  • There are no proposals currently contemplated either whereby Golden Deeps $\bullet$ will acquire any further properties or assets from The Coniston Group (however Golden Deeps will issue shares to KMM as outlined above) or where Golden Deeps would transfer any of its property or assets to the Coniston Group (other than through KMM acting as manager for Golden Deeps at the rate of \$200,000 per annum);
  • The composition of the Board will not change in the short term; $\bullet$
  • $\bullet$ . No dividend policy has been set and it is not proposed to be set until such time as the Company is profitable and has a positive cash flow; and
  • The Company will endeavour to enhance the value of its interests in the current $\bullet$ gold properties and will evaluate the Kelimaizina Project in Madagascar if acquired.

5. Basis of Valuation of Golden Deeps Shares and Options

  • 5.1 Shares
  • 5.1.1 In considering the proposals to acquire the Kelimaizina Project, we have sought to determine if the considerations payable by Golden Deeps to KMM are fair and reasonable to the existing non-associated shareholders of Golden Deep.
  • 5.1.2 The offer would be fair to the existing non-associated shareholders if the value of the assets (tenement interests known as the Kelimaizina Project) being acquired by Golden Deeps are greater than the implicit value of the shares, options and cash being offered as consideration. Accordingly, we have sought to determine a theoretical value that could reasonably be placed on Golden Deeps shares and options for the purposes of this report.
  • $5.1.3$ The valuation methodologies we have considered in determining a theoretical value of a Golden Deeps share are:
  • Capitalise maintainable earnings/discounted cash flow;
  • Takeover bid the price at which an alternative acquirer might be willing to $\bullet$ offer:
  • Adjusted net backing and windup value; and ۰
  • The weighted average market price of Golden Deeps shares. $\bullet$
  • $5.2$ Capitalise maintainable earnings and discounted cash flows.
  • Due to Golden Deeps operations, a lack of profit history arising from business 5.2.1 undertakings and the lack of a reliable future cash flow from a current business activity, we have considered these methods of valuation not to be relevant for the purpose of this report.

5.3 Takeover Bid

It is possible that a potential bidder for Golden Deeps could purchase all or part of 5.3.1 the existing shares, however no certainty can be attached to this occurrence. To our knowledge, there are no current bids in the market place and the directors of Golden Deeps have formed the view that there is unlikely to be any takeover bids made for Golden Deeps in the immediate future. The Coniston Group's interest in Golden Deeps is currently 16.0% (refer paragraph 2.1 of this report), however after the acquisition of the Kelimaizina Project, the Coniston Group's interest increases to 21.86% before the exercise of any share options.

5.4 Adjusted Net Asset Backing

  • 5.4.1 We set out below an unaudited Statement of Financial Position of Golden Deeps as at 31 May 2004 along with a pro-forma Statement of Financial Position assuming the following:
  • Accounting for the investments in other listed companies at 30 June 2004 market values;
  • The acquisition of the Kelimaizina Project from KMM by way of an issue of 2,000,000 shares at 8.5 cents each (and 2,000,000 share options not costed) plus the reimbursement of \$82,000 to KMM;
  • The issue of 200,000 shares at a market cost of 8.5 cents each (and 200,000 options not costed); and expensed; and
  • Assuming the incidental acquisition costs of the Kelimaizina Project are \$20,000 but are expensed.
Golden Deeps
31 May 2004
\$'000's
Pro-forma
31 May
2004
\$000's
Current Assets
Cash 2,032 1,930
Receivables 7 7
Investments 107 107
2,146 2,044
Non Current Assets
Plant 3 3
Capitalised exploration costs 252
Receivables-Bonds 133 133
136 388
Total Assets 2,282 2,432
Current Liabilities
Payables 10 10
Provisions
10 10

Golden Deeps
31 May 2004
\$2000's
Pro-forma
31 May
2004
\$000's
Total Liabilities 10 10
Net Assets 2,272 2,422
Equity
Contributed Equity
Accumulated losses
Net Equity
8,203
(5,931)
2,272
8,390
(5,968)
2,422
  • 5.4.2 Based on the book values, this equates to a value per fully paid ordinary share post the Proposed Transaction (28,140,020 shares on issue) of approximately 8.6 cents (ignoring the value, if any, of non-booked tax benefits). The book net tangible asset backing as at 31 May 2004 equates to 8.7 cents.
  • $5.4.3$ We have accepted the amounts for all current assets, current liabilities, fixed assets and listed investments. However, the most significant assets of Golden Deeps are their interests in various gold exploration projects in Western Australia.
  • 5.4.4 No detailed review was made by us on the assets and liabilities disclosed in the statement of financial position as at 31 May 2004. We have been assured by the management of Golden Deeps that they believe the carrying value of all current assets, fixed assets, listed investments and liabilities at 31 May 2004 are fair and not materially misstated.
  • 5.4.5 No independent valuations have been prepared on the mineral prospects of Golden Deeps (other than the Kelimaizina Project proposed to be acquired) and we do not consider it necessary to obtain an independent valuation of the mineral prospects for the purposes of this report (other than relying on the independent valuation of the Kelimaizina Project prepared by Malcolm Castle in July 2004). We note that the market has been informed of all of the current projects, joint ventures and farm in/farm out arrangements entered into between Golden Deeps and other parties. The latest quarterly report on the Company's prospects was for the quarter to 30 June 2004 and was released to the market on 27 July 2004 by lodging the report with the ASX. We also note it is not the present intention of the Directors of Golden Deeps to liquidate the Company and therefore any theoretical value based upon wind up value or even net book value (as adjusted), is just that, theoretical. The shareholders, existing and future, must acquire shares in Golden Deeps based on the market perceptions of what the market considers a Golden Deeps share to be worth.

The market has either generally valued the vast majority of mineral exploration companies at significant discounts or premiums to appraised technical values and this has been the case for a number of years although we also note that there is an orderly market (albeit on low turnover) for Golden Deeps shares and the market is

kept fully informed of the activities of the Company. Furthermore, for accounting purposes, the consideration for the issue of Golden Deeps shares to acquire 100% of the Kelimaizina Project will be booked at market value and not any perceived technical value. Accordingly, for the reasons outlined above, we believe that for the purpose of this report, it is not appropriate to use any technical value of a Golden Deeps share in assessing whether the proposal to acquire the Kelimaizina Project is fair and reasonable. We believe a pre-announcement market-based approach is a more suitable basis of assessing whether the proposal is fair and/or reasonable.

  • 5.5 Weighted Average Market Price of Golden Deeps fully paid shares
  • $5.5.1$ We set out below a summary of the fully paid share prices of Golden Deeps since 1 January 2004 to the date immediately prior to the announcement of the proposal to acquire the Kelimaizina Project (27 July 2004).
2004 High Cents Low Cents Last Sale
Cents
Volume
Trade
(000's)
January 11.0 10.0 10.5 464
February 10.5 8.8 10.0 1,279
March 10.0 8.7 10.0 452
April 10.0 9.0 9.0 583
May 9.0 8.0 8.0 363
June 8.0 6.5 6.1 216
July (to $26th$ ) 8.8 8.0 8.8 247

Since the announcement, Golden Deeps shares have traded at 9.1 cents each.

$5.5.2$ Generally, the market is a fair indicator of what a share is worth, however the theoretical technical value based on the underlying value of assets and liabilities may be lower or higher.

In the case of Golden Deeps, current liquidity is reasonable for the ensuing year to meet ongoing administration costs and mineral exploration commitments. The Company, in the medium term will need to:

  • Undertake a capital raising of some significance (or a series of smaller capital raisings) and $/$ or
  • Sell or dilute its interest in existing mining interests.

It is noted that over the past several years, the vast majority of mineral exploration companies listed on the ASX are trading at significant discounts or premiums to appraised technical values and in some cases have traded at a discount to cash asset backing. In the case of Golden Deeps, the monthly volume of trades on the ASX is small but large enough to argue that an orderly market exists for the Company's shares. The "market" arguably is fully informed of the Company's activities and in view of the immediate and near future (2004/2005) lack of a mineable gold or base

metal mine in Australia, it is our opinion appropriate to use a range of recent preannouncement trading market values as fair values to attribute to the 2,000,000 ordinary shares (possibly restricted for 12 months) to be issued to the Coniston Group (actual shares issued to KMM).

  • 5.5.3 The future value of a Golden Deeps share will depend upon, inter alia:
  • The future prospects of its gold mineral prospects in Australia and overseas;
  • The state of the gold markets (and prices) in Australia and overseas; ۰
  • The state of Australian and overseas stock markets; $\bullet$
  • Membership of the Board: $\bullet$
  • General economic conditions; and $\bullet$
  • Liquidity of shares in Golden Deeps.
  • 5.5.4 Using the last two months trade prices to 30 June 2004 and for the period to 26 July 2004), the value lies in the range of 6.1 cents to 9.0 cents and a preferred market value of 8.5 cents. As noted above, we are of the opinion that the preannouncement of proposal market based approach is more appropriate to use for the purposes of this report.
  • $5.5.5$ The above values apply to the 2,000,000 ordinary shares to be issued to KMM. Arguably the shares to be issued to KMM have a lesser value, as they will be restricted from trading for a period of 12 months. A discount of 10% to 20 % per annum is commonly applied to shares that have a restriction on trading and if this applied to the 2,000,000 shares to be issued to KMM, the discounted market value would approximate 6.8 cents to 7.65 cents assuming an 8.5 cents non-restricted share price. Using the 6.1 cent price at 30 June 2004 would result in a discounted range of 4.88 cents to 5.49 cents.

5.6 Options

$5.6.1$ The Company will also issue 2,000,000 options to KMM as part consideration to acquire the Kelimaizina Project. Using a Black Scholes option pricing model, results in the value of the options to be issued of around 4.96 cents. The basic assumptions used were:

Preferred market share price 8.5 cents
interest rate 5.755%
volatility factor 70%
exercise price 10 cents
option term $4.833$ years

Under current Australian Accounting Standards, the options do not need to be costed as part of the acquisition price, however if this was undertaken, the 'additional' cost to acquire 100% of the Kelimaizina Project would be approximately \$99,200. In accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), the 'cost' of issuing the options would be accounted for as part of the consideration. Adoption of IFRS will come into affect in the year ended 30 June 2006 for most standards, however the proposed standard pertaining to the extractive industries will not come into affect until the year ended 30 June 2007. It

is noted that if KMM exercised the 2,000,000 options, Golden Deeps would receive \$200,000 additional cash funds.

6. Value of Consideration

6.1 Using 8.5 cents as the pre-announcement fair market issue price for the shares proposed to be issued to KMM results in a consideration payable (effectively to acquire 100% of the Kelimaizina Project) of \$252,000 (including cash of \$82,000). Although the accounting cost may only be the cost of issuing the shares plus the cash disbursement, the true cost is as follows:

Low Preferred High
2,000,000 shares 122,000 170,000 180,000
2,000,000 options 99,200 99,200 99,200
Cash 82,000 82,000 82,000
Consideration payable to KMM 303,200 351,200 361,200
Share price assumed to be $6.1$ cents 8.5 cents 9.0 cents
Additional consideration to other non
related parties
200,000 shares 12,200 17,000 18,000
$200,000$ options 9,920 9,920 9,920
22,120 26,920 27,920
Total cost to Golden Deeps 325,320 378,120 389,120

$7.$ Basis of Valuation of the Kelimaizina Project

  • $7.1$ The usual approach to the valuation of an asset is to seek to determine what an informed, willing but not anxious buyer would pay to an informed, willing but not anxious seller in an open market.
  • $7.2$ The Company has commissioned Malcolm Castle ("Castle") to prepare a Valuation Report of the Kelimaizina Project owned by KMM. The Castle Valuation Report of July 2004 should be read in its entirety and a full copy of the Castle Valuation Report is attached as an appendix to the Notice of Meeting and Explanatory Statement to Shareholders. The Valuation Report ascribes a range of values to the interests to the Kelimaizina Project and for the purposes of our report, we have used the low, high and preferred market valuations referred to in the Castle Valuation Report.
  • $7.3$ We have used and relied on the Castle Valuation Report on the Kelimaizina Project and have satisfied ourselves that:
  • Mr Malcolm Castle is a suitably qualified geologist and has relevant $\bullet$ experience in assessing the merits of mineral projects and preparing mineral asset valuations:
  • Castle is independent from Golden Deeps and KMM; and $\bullet$
  • $\bullet$ Castle has employed sound and recognised methodologies in the preparation of the valuation report on the Kelimaizina Project.

$7.4$ Castle has provided a range of market values of the interests in the Kelimaizina Project. After taking into account the past exploration commitments, Castle has ascribed a range of values to the Kelimaizina Project as follows:

L0W Preferred High
Kelimaizina Project 575,000 600,000 640,000

It is noted that a 25% net profits interest on alluvial and eluvial production and a 1% net smelter royalty on production from hard rock mining is payable. If an economic gold deposit is discovered and proves to be elluvial or alluvial and if the 25% interest was deducted from the range of fair values, the net effective 75% interest would lie in the range of \$431,250 to \$480,000 with a preferred fair value of \$450,000. However it would be expected that the overall fair value would rise if economic gold discoveries were made.

8. Conclusion as to Fairness

  • 8.1 The proposal to acquire the Kelimaizina Project for the consideration noted in paragraph 1.2 is believed fair to Golden Deeps' non-associated shareholders if the value of the consideration offered is equal to or less than the value of the Kelimaizina Project being acquired.
  • 8.2 Due to the nature of the business of Golden Deeps, valuations are dependent upon the value placed on the mineral interests of Golden Deeps. The valuation of mineral interests and valuing future profitability and cash flows is extremely subjective as it involves assumptions regarding future events that are not capable of independent substantiation.
  • 8.3 We have examined below the values attributable to the shares proposed to be issued and the value of the consideration offered by Golden Deeps to KMM as the vendor of the Kelimaizina Project.
Assessed "gross value" based on Low
S
Preferred
S
High
S
independent valuations of mineral
interests
575,000 600,000 640,000
Value of consideration being
offered by Golden Deeps using a
pre-announcement market based
approach
Payable to KMM (refer paragraph
6.1) 303,200 351,200 361,200
Payable to others 22,120 26,920 27,920
\$325,320 \$378,120 \$389,120

The above consideration figures exclude any discount that could be applied as the 2,000,000 shares may be escrowed for 12 months. The technical values before Castle applied a market premium, was in the range of \$395,000 to \$510,000 with a preferred technical value of \$455,000.

8.4 On a pre-announcement market value approach which is considered more relevant, for the reasons outlined in section 5 of this report, the Kelimaizina Project acquisition is considered fair. It should also be acknowledged that the shares to be issued to KMM for the acquisition of the Kelimaizina Project are likely to be classified as 'restricted securities' by the ASX and escrowed from trading for a period of 12 months.

9. Reasonableness of the Offer

9.1 We set out below some of the advantages and disadvantages and other factors pertaining to the Kelimaizina acquisition proposal.

Advantages

  • 9.2 According to the Castle Valuation report "the Kelimaizina Gold Project has considerable exploration potential and with minimal expenditure could be brought into production". "The current eluvial gold mineralisation could generate a cash flow from a relatively basic gravity plant which is a low cost operation with relatively low environmental impact."
  • 9.3 Castle has applied a 25% market premium to the technical value (low \$395,000, preferred \$455,000 and high \$510,000) given "the recent significant improvement in the market for advanced gold exploration properties and the low perceived country risk associated with investments in Madagascar." Castle in his valuation report also states that "the Kelimaizina Project would be very highly regarded by a prospective purchaser/investor as it represents a project with good potential to discover further mineralisation."
  • 9.4 The consideration payable is fair as noted in section 8 of this report.

Disadvantages and Other Factors

9.6 If the 2,000,000 share options proposed to be issued to KMM are exercised, the Company would receive \$200,000 in new cash funds. The exercise price of 10 cents each is above the current share price (around 8.5 cents), however there may be an opportunity cost if the options are exercised (at 10 cents) whilst the share price of a fully paid Golden Deeps share is materially in excess of 10 cents. Normally, share placements in junior mineral exploration are made at between 80% and 100% of market price of a fully paid share.

  • 9.7 The number of fully paid shares on issue rises by 2,200,000 to 28,140,020 (before exercise of any share options). This represents an 8.48% increase in the ordinary shares of the Company.
  • 9.8 As the Kelimaizina Project is in Madagascar there is always some increase in political and country risk and the title laws may not be as effective as they are in Australia.
  • 9.9 Currently, Coniston owns 16.00% of the Company and if resolution 1 is passed, the Coniston Group (including KMM) will increase its shareholding to 21.86% and potentially to 27.04% (if KMM exercises the 2,000,000 options and there are no other share issues). It is noted that KMM is the current manager of Golden Deeps and thus operational control is already in the hands of the Coniston Group. The Coniston Group is paying a premium for control in that it is receiving consideration of say \$351,200 (refer paragraph 6.1) but is giving up an asset deemed to be valued at \$600,000. However, all of the shareholders of Golden Deeps are benefiting as they are acquiring an asset that is valued at a figure that is greater than the consideration being paid.

10. Conclusion as to Reasonableness

$10.1$ After taking into account the factors referred to in 9 above and elsewhere in this report, we are of the opinion that the Kelimaizina Project proposals as noted in paragraph 1.2 and resolution 1 in the Notice may be considered reasonable to the non-associated shareholders of Golden Deeps.

11. Sources of Information

  • In making our assessment as to whether the Kelimaizina Project proposals as noted $11.1$ in paragraph 1.2 are fair and reasonable, we have reviewed relevant published available information and other unpublished information of the Company and the Kelimaizina Project that is relevant to the current circumstances. In addition, we have held discussions with the management of Golden Deeps about the present and future operations of the Company. Statements and opinions contained in this report are given in good faith but in the preparation of this report, we have relied in part on information provided by the directors and management of Golden Deeps.
  • 11.2 Information we have received includes, but is not limited to:
  • Draft Notice of General Meeting of Shareholders of Golden Deeps and draft Explanatory Statement To Shareholders prepared in July 2004;
  • Discussions with management and directors of Golden Deeps;
  • Details of historical market trading of Golden Deeps ordinary fully paid shares recorded by ASX to 29 July 2004 (10.30 am);
  • Shareholding details of Golden Deeps as supplied by the company's share registry at 24 June 2004;
  • Annual report for Golden Deeps for 2002/03;

  • Unaudited management accounts of Golden Deeps to 31 May 2004;
  • Announcements made by Golden Deeps to the ASX from 1 January 2003 to 28 July 2004;
  • The Independent Valuation Report of Malcolm Castle dated July 2004 relating to the Kelimaizina Project;
  • Schedule of costs on the Kelimaizina Project by KMM; and
  • Discussions with the author of the Castle Valuation Report.
  • 11.3 Our report includes Appendix A attached to this report.

Yours faithfully STANTON PARTNERS CORPORATE PTY LTD

$\eta_{\ell m}$ lu

J P Van Dieren Director

AUTHOR INDEPENDENCE AND INDEMNITY

This annexure forms part of and should be read in conjunction with the report of Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd dated 29 July 2004, relating to the Kelimaizina acquisition proposal as outlined in paragraph 1.2 of the report and resolution 1 in the Notice of Meeting to Shareholders of August 2004.

At the date of this report, Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd does not have any interest in the outcome of the proposal. There are no relationships with Golden Deeps, KMM or Coniston other than acting as an independent expert for the purposes of this report. There are no existing relationships between Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd and the parties participating in the transaction detailed in this report which would affect our ability to provide an independent opinion. The fee to be received for the preparation of this report is based on the time spent at normal professional rates plus out of pocket expenses and is estimated at \$5,000. The fee is payable regardless of the outcome. With the exception of the fee, neither Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd or John P Van Dieren have received, nor will, or may they receive, any pecuniary or other benefits, whether directly or indirectly, for or in connection with the making of this report. Stanton Partners, the partners of who control Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd are the auditors of Golden Deeps.

Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd does not hold any securities in Golden Deeps, KMM or Coniston. There are no pecuniary or other interests of Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd that could be reasonably argued as affecting its ability to give an unbiased and independent opinion in relation to the proposal. Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd and Mr J Van Dieren have consented to the inclusion of this report in the form and context in which it is included as an annexure to the Notice.

QUALIFICATIONS

We advise Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd is the holder of an Investment Advisers Licence under the Corporations Act 2001 relating to advice and reporting on mergers, takeovers and acquisitions. A number of the partners of Stanton Partners are the Directors' of Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd. Stanton Partners and Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd have extensive experience in providing advice pertaining to mergers, acquisitions and strategic and financial planning for both listed and unlisted companies and businesses.

Mr John P Van Dieren, FCA, the person responsible for the preparation of this report, has extensive experience in the preparation of valuations for companies and in advising corporations on takeovers generally and in particular on the valuation and financial aspects thereof, including the fairness and reasonableness of the consideration offered.

The professionals employed in the research, analysis and evaluation leading to the formulation of opinions contained in this report, have qualifications and experience appropriate to the task they have performed.

DECLARATION

This report has been prepared at the request of the Directors of Golden Deeps in order to assist them to assess the merits of the Kelimaizina acquisition proposal (outlined in resolution 1) to which this report relates. This report has been prepared for the benefit of Golden Deeps directors and does not provide a general expression of Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd's opinion as to the longer term value of Golden Deeps or the Kelimaizina Project. Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd does not imply, and it should not be construed, that is has carried out any form of audit on the accounting or other records of Golden Deeps (other than Stanton Partners conducting an audit of Golden Deeps for the year ended 30 June 2003 and undertaking a half year audit review for the six months ended 31 December 2003). Stanton Partners are also the tax agents for Golden Deeps. Neither the whole nor any part of this report, nor any reference thereto may be included in or with or attached to any document, circular, resolution, letter or statement, without the prior written consent of Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd to the form and context in which it appears.

DISCLAIMER

This report has been prepared by Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd with due care and diligence. However, except for those responsibilities, which by law cannot be excluded, no responsibility arising in any way whatsoever for errors or omission (including responsibility to any person for negligence) is assumed by Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd, Stanton Partners, its partners, employees or consultants for the preparation of this report.

DECLARATION AND INDEMNITY

Recognising that Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd may rely on information provided by Golden Deeps and its officers (save whether it would not be reasonable to rely on the information having regard to Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd experience and qualifications), Golden Deeps has agreed:

  • To make no claim by it or its officers against Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd (and a) Stanton Partners) to recover any loss or damage which Golden Deeps may suffer as a result of reasonable reliance by Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd on the information provided by Golden Deeps; and
  • (b) To indemnify Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd (and Stanton Partners) against any claim arising (wholly or in part) from Golden Deeps or any of its officers providing Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd any false or misleading information or in the failure of Golden Deeps or its officers in providing material information, except where the claim has arisen as a result of wilful misconduct or negligence by Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd.

A draft of this report was presented to Golden Deeps directors for a review of factual information contained in the report. Comments received relating to factual matters were taken into account, however the valuation methodologies and conclusions did not alter.

STANTON PARTNERS CORPORATE PTY LTD

A C N 063 036 331

1 HAVELOCK STREET WEST PERTH 6005 WESTERN AUSTRALIA

TELEPHONE: (08) 9481 3188 FACSIMILE: (08) 9321 1204

e-mail: [email protected]

FINANCIAL SERVICES GUIDE Dated 29 July 2004

$1.$ STANTON PARTNERS CORPORATE PTY LTD

Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd ABN 89 036 036 331 ("SPC" or "we" or "us" or "ours" as appropriate) has been engaged to issue general financial product advice in the form of a report to be provided to you.

$2.$ FINANCIAL SERVICES GUIDE

In the above circumstances we are required to issue to you, as a retail client a Financial Services Guide ("FSG"). This FSG is designed to help retail clients make a decision as to their use of the general financial product advice and to ensure that we comply with our obligations as financial services licensees.

This FSG includes information about:

  • who we are and how we can be contacted:
  • the services we are authorised to provide under our Australian Financial $\blacksquare$ Services Licence. Licence No: 231201:
  • remuneration that we and/or our staff and any associated receive in connection with the general financial product advice;
  • any relevant associations or relationships we have; and $\blacksquare$
  • our complaints handling procedures and how you may access them. $\blacksquare$

$31$ FINANCIAL SERVICES WE ARE LICENCED TO PROVIDE

We hold an Australian Financial Services Licence which authorises us to provide financial product advice in relation to:

$\blacksquare$ Securities (such as shares and options)

We provide financial product advice by virtue of an engagement to issue a report in connection with a financial product of another person. Our report will include a description of the circumstances of our engagement and identify the person who has engaged us. You will not have engaged us directly but will be provided with a copy of the report as a retail client because of your connection to the matters in respect of which we have been engaged to report.

Any report we provide is provided on our own behalf as a financial services licensee authorised to provide the financial product advice contained in the report.

$\overline{4}$ . GENERAL FINANCIAL PRODUCT ADVICE

In our report we provide general financial product advice, not personal financial product advice, because it has been prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs.

You should consider the appropriateness of this general advice having regard to your own objectives, financial situation and needs before you act on the advice. Where the advice relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition of a financial product, you should also obtain a product disclosure statement relating to the product and consider that statement before making any decision about whether to acquire the product.

5. BENEFITS THAT WE MAY RECEIVE

We charge fees for providing reports. These fees will be agreed with, and paid by, the person who engages us to provide the report. Fees will be agreed on either a fixed fee or time cost basis.

Except for the fees referred to above, neither SPC, nor any of its directors, employees or related entities, receive any pecuniary benefit or other benefit, directly or indirectly, for or in connection with the provision of the report.

6. REMUNERATION OR OTHER BENEFITS RECEIVED BY OUR EMPLOYEES

All our employees receive a salary. Our employees are eligible for bonuses based on overall productivity but not directly in connection with any engagement for the provision of a report.

$7.$ REFERRALS

We do not pay commissions or provide any other benefits to any person for referring customers to us in connection with the reports that we are licensed to provide.

8. ASSOCIATIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS

Through a variety of corporate and trust structures, SPC is ultimately wholly owned by and operates as part of Stanton Partners professional advisory and accounting practice. Our directors may be partners in Stanton Partners.

From time to time, SPC or Stanton Partners and/or Stanton Partners' related entities may provide professional services, including audit, tax and financial advisory services, to financial product issuers in the ordinary course of its business.

9. COMPLAINTS RESOLUTION

Internal complaints resolution process $9.1$

As the holder of an Australian Financial Services Licence, we are required to have a system for handling complaints from persons to whom we provide financial product advice. All complaints must be in writing, addressed to:

The Complaints Officer Stanton Partners Corporate Level 1 1 Havelock Street WEST PERTH WA 6005.

When we receive a written complaint we will record the complaint, acknowledge receipt of the complaints within 15 days and investigate the issues raised. As soon as practical, and not more than 45 days after receiving the written complaint, we will advise the complainant in writing of our determination.

$9.2$ Referral to External Dispute Resolution Scheme

A complainant not satisfied with the outcome of the above process, or our determination, has the right to refer the matter to the Financial Industry Complaints Service Limited ("FICS"). FICS is an independent company that has been established to provide free advice and assistance to consumers to help in resolving complaints relating to the financial services industry.

Further details about FICS are available at the FICS website www.fics.asn.au or by contacting them directly via the details set out below.

Financial Industry Complaints Service Limited PO Box 579 Collins Street West MELBOURNE VIC 8007

Toll Free: 1300 78 08 08 Facsimile: (03) 9621 2291

10. CONTACT DETAILS

You may contact us using the details set out at the top of our letterhead on page 1 of this FSG.

STANTON PARTNERS CORPORATE PTY LTD

A C N 063 036 331

1 HAVELOCK STREET WEST PERTH 6005 WESTERN AUSTRALIA

TELEPHONE: (08) 9481 3188 FACSIMILE: (08) 9321 1204

e-mail: [email protected]

FINANCIAL SERVICES GUIDE Dated 29 July 2004

$1.$ STANTON PARTNERS CORPORATE PTY LTD

Stanton Partners Corporate Pty Ltd ABN 89 036 036 331 ("SPC" or "we" or "us" or "ours" as appropriate) has been engaged to issue general financial product advice in the form of a report to be provided to you.

$2.$ FINANCIAL SERVICES GUIDE

In the above circumstances we are required to issue to you, as a retail client a Financial Services Guide ("FSG"). This FSG is designed to help retail clients make a decision as to their use of the general financial product advice and to ensure that we comply with our obligations as financial services licensees.

This FSG includes information about:

  • who we are and how we can be contacted:
  • the services we are authorised to provide under our Australian Financial $\blacksquare$ Services Licence. Licence No: 231201:
  • remuneration that we and/or our staff and any associated receive in connection with the general financial product advice;
  • any relevant associations or relationships we have; and $\blacksquare$
  • our complaints handling procedures and how you may access them. $\blacksquare$

$31$ FINANCIAL SERVICES WE ARE LICENCED TO PROVIDE

We hold an Australian Financial Services Licence which authorises us to provide financial product advice in relation to:

$\blacksquare$ Securities (such as shares and options)

We provide financial product advice by virtue of an engagement to issue a report in connection with a financial product of another person. Our report will include a description of the circumstances of our engagement and identify the person who has engaged us. You will not have engaged us directly but will be provided with a copy of the report as a retail client because of your connection to the matters in respect of which we have been engaged to report.

Any report we provide is provided on our own behalf as a financial services licensee authorised to provide the financial product advice contained in the report.

$\overline{4}$ . GENERAL FINANCIAL PRODUCT ADVICE

In our report we provide general financial product advice, not personal financial product advice, because it has been prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs.

You should consider the appropriateness of this general advice having regard to your own objectives, financial situation and needs before you act on the advice. Where the advice relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition of a financial product, you should also obtain a product disclosure statement relating to the product and consider that statement before making any decision about whether to acquire the product.

5. BENEFITS THAT WE MAY RECEIVE

We charge fees for providing reports. These fees will be agreed with, and paid by, the person who engages us to provide the report. Fees will be agreed on either a fixed fee or time cost basis.

Except for the fees referred to above, neither SPC, nor any of its directors, employees or related entities, receive any pecuniary benefit or other benefit, directly or indirectly, for or in connection with the provision of the report.

6. REMUNERATION OR OTHER BENEFITS RECEIVED BY OUR EMPLOYEES

All our employees receive a salary. Our employees are eligible for bonuses based on overall productivity but not directly in connection with any engagement for the provision of a report.

$7.$ REFERRALS

We do not pay commissions or provide any other benefits to any person for referring customers to us in connection with the reports that we are licensed to provide.

8. ASSOCIATIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS

Through a variety of corporate and trust structures, SPC is ultimately wholly owned by and operates as part of Stanton Partners professional advisory and accounting practice. Our directors may be partners in Stanton Partners.

From time to time, SPC or Stanton Partners and/or Stanton Partners' related entities may provide professional services, including audit, tax and financial advisory services, to financial product issuers in the ordinary course of its business.

9. COMPLAINTS RESOLUTION

Internal complaints resolution process $9.1$

As the holder of an Australian Financial Services Licence, we are required to have a system for handling complaints from persons to whom we provide financial product advice. All complaints must be in writing, addressed to:

The Complaints Officer Stanton Partners Corporate Level 1 1 Havelock Street WEST PERTH WA 6005.

When we receive a written complaint we will record the complaint, acknowledge receipt of the complaints within 15 days and investigate the issues raised. As soon as practical, and not more than 45 days after receiving the written complaint, we will advise the complainant in writing of our determination.

$9.2$ Referral to External Dispute Resolution Scheme

A complainant not satisfied with the outcome of the above process, or our determination, has the right to refer the matter to the Financial Industry Complaints Service Limited ("FICS"). FICS is an independent company that has been established to provide free advice and assistance to consumers to help in resolving complaints relating to the financial services industry.

Further details about FICS are available at the FICS website www.fics.asn.au or by contacting them directly via the details set out below.

Financial Industry Complaints Service Limited PO Box 579 Collins Street West MELBOURNE VIC 8007

Toll Free: 1300 78 08 08 Facsimile: (03) 9621 2291

10. CONTACT DETAILS

You may contact us using the details set out at the top of our letterhead on page 1 of this FSG.

Schedule 2:

Independent Geologist's Report and Valuation of the Kelimaizina Project Madagascar

P.O. Box 473, South Perth WA 6951 Phone: 08 9368 4923 Fax: 08 9368 4932 Mobile: 04 1234 7511 Email: [email protected]

16 July 2004

The Directors Golden Deeps Limited 8 Parliament Place West Perth WA 6005

Dear Sirs.

Re:

INDEPENDENT GEOLOGIST'S REPORT AND VALUATION OF THE KELIMAIZINA PROJECT, MADAGASCAR

I have been commissioned by Golden Deeps Limited ("Golden Deeps") to provide an Independent Geologist's Report and Mineral Asset Valuation ("Report") of the Kelimaizina Project in Madagascar ("Kelimaizina").

Kalgoorlie Mine Management ("KMM") acquired 100% of the Kelimaizina Project from Calibra Resource Engineering Madagascar ("CREM") under an option agreement that has now been finalized. The sale includes a 25% net profits interest on alluvial and eluvial production and a 1% net smelter royalty on production from hard rock mining. KMM now wish to vend the property into Golden Deeps.

Golden Deeps will be the beneficial owner of the project subject to shareholder approval and I have based this review on exploration work on the property, information provided by the title holders, along with technical reports by consultants, previous tenements holders and other relevant published and unpublished data for the area. I am familiar with the Keliamaizina Project and spent two weeks in Madagascar and at Kelimaizina in November 2003. I have endeavoured, by making all reasonable enquiries, to confirm the authenticity and completeness of the technical data upon which this Report is based. A final draft of this Report was also provided to Golden Deeps, along with a written request to identify any material errors or omissions prior to finalising the Report. Where and if appropriate, consent has been obtained to quote data and opinions expressed in unpublished reports prepared on the properties concerned by other professionals.

The mineral assets comprise two "Permis Recherche" (PR) tenements in the Maevatanana area, 260 km north of Antananarivo, the capital of Madagascar.

The project location is shown on the accompanying maps. The present status of tenements listed in this report is based on information provided by Golden Deeps and available at the Bureau du Cadastre Minier in Antananarivo and the Report has been prepared on the assumption that the tenements are lawfully accessible for evaluation.

This Report has been prepared in accordance with the Code and Guidelines for Assessment and Valuation of Mineral Assets and Mineral Securities for Independent Expert Reports ("The Valmin Code") effective April 1998, which is binding upon Members of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), and the rules and guidelines issued by such bodies as ASIC and Australian Stock Exchange (ASX), which

pertain to Independent Expert Reports. Where Mineral Resources have been referred to in this Report, the classifications are consistent with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code), prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) of the AusIMM, the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), effective September 1999 and the draft code 2004.

Under the definition provided in the JORC and Valmin Codes the properties are classified as "Exploration" projects, which are inherently speculative in nature. The properties are considered to be sufficiently prospective, subject to varying degrees of risk, to warrant further exploration and development of their economic potential, consistent with the programs proposed by Golden Deeps.

The Independent Geologist's Report has been compiled based on information available up to and including the date of this Report. I have given my consent for the distribution of this report in the form and context in which it appears.

I am not, nor intend to be, a director, officer or other direct employee of Golden Deeps and have no material interest in the Project or Golden Deeps. My relationship with Golden Deeps is solely one of professional association between client and independent consultant. The review work and this Report are prepared in return for professional fees based upon agreed commercial rates and the payment of these fees is in no way contingent on the results of this Report.

Yours faithfully

Malcolm Castle B.Sc. (Hons) MAusIMM GCertAppFin (Sec Inst)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY OF VALUATION
3.1
3.2
5.1
5.2
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
INTRODUCTION
THE MINING INDUSTRY IN MADAGASCAR
LOCATION AND ACCESS
COORDINATE SYSTEM
TENURE
REGIONAL GEOLOGY
MINERALIZATION STYLE
OTHER DEPOSITS
ARTISANAL MINING
RECENT EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
MINING PRE 1995
EXPLORATION AND MINING 1995 - 98
ARTISANAL MINING 1998 - PRESENT
SOIL SAMPLING PROGRAM 2003
ROCK CHIP SAMPLING 2003
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 2004
EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE
CONCLUSIONS
MINERAL ASSETS VALUATION METHODOLOGY
FAIR MARKET VALUE OF MINERAL ASSETS
METHODS OF VALUING EXPLORATION TENEMENTS
VALUATION OF RESOURCES BY COMPARABLE TRANSACTIONS 23
APPLICATIONS OF DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS 24
CONCLUSIONS
VALUATION OPINION
VALUATION OF THE EXPLORATION POTENTIAL - GEOSCIENTIFIC RATING
METHOD
VALUATION OF THE EXPLORATION POTENTIAL - MULTIPLE OF
EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE METHOD
MARKET VALUE

$1.01$ INTRODUCTION

Madagascar does not have a well-developed mineral industry, although there is vast potential to discover and develop new deposits. Madagascar is noted for its production of good quality chemical and metallurgical grade chromite, high-grade crystalline flake graphite, mica and semi precious stones. However, the island has other deposits containing gold, nickel, cobalt, heavy mineral sands, bauxite, coal and petroleum products.

The country is emerging from third world status with the support and governance of the World Bank. It has established a new Mining Code in line with international expectations and supports political insurance of investments through the IMF. Sovereignty of tenure is more certain through this process.

Infrastructure is currently limited, though the Kelimaizina project is well located close to a major sealed highway from Antananarivo, the capital, to Mahajanga, a sea port on the north west coast, and is accessible to heavy machinery by local roads with minimal uporadino.

The Environmental lobby is strong in Madagascar and is fully supported by the Mining Code. Several National Parks are located some distance from the project but do not cover the prospective areas. The project area is located in an area of gardens and regrowth and sparsely populated. It is considered that there will be little or no adverse environmental impact that cannot be contained and controlled by modern mining practices.

Import and export tax relief is available for certain projects by negotiation with the government. Company income tax is currently 35% and royalties on production are 2%. The country is supportive of foreign investment and is looking forward to a strong contribution from the mining sector to the national economy.

The Kelimaizina deposits are well advanced with prior mining activity in the 1995 - 1998 period, which was terminated over a problem with the mining licence before the potential mineralization was significantly depleted. Reports from that period indicate a zone of mineralization remains over an area of 140,000 square metres. Grades from exploration pits and surface workings ranged from $0.28q/m^3$ to $5.0q/m^3$ with a suggested average of $2.6$ g/m3. A JORC compliant resource has not been estimated at this stage.

Two other deposits with artisanal workings have been identified within the tenement area and exploration throughout most of the area is at an early stage.

This valuation assesses the exploration potential of the project area based on two methods commonly used to value mineral assets without stated resources. The Geoscientific Rating method emphasises the potential for further discoveries in the tenements. The Multiple of Exploration Expenditure method emphasises the potential to expand on existing zones of mineralisation. The valuation allows for a market premium of 25%. In my opinion, the market value of Golden Deeps' 100% equity in the Kelimaizina project lies in the range \$565,000 to \$615,000 with a preferred value of \$600,000.

$2.0$ THE MINING INDUSTRY IN MADAGASCAR

  • Precambrian metamorphic terrain constitutes two-thirds of Madagascar's surface area, and it is here that most of the country's mineral occurrences have been found. Among the larger discoveries have been chromite, bauxite, graphite, mica and kaolin.
  • Madagascar's chief mineral export is chromium ore and concentrate; but it is the unofficial production of gold, estimated to be about three or four tonnes per vear. which represents the allure of Madagascar's mineral potential.
  • Madagascar's auriferous potential is grossly under-evaluated, roughly comparing to Western Australia in the 1950s. A large number of small, abandoned mines have been worked for higher grade ore and usually only to the water table. If modern exploration is applied, a few of these old workings could lead to much larger resources. While much of the gold has come from eluvial and alluvial operations, the potential in the industry is in primary gold in hard rock environments.
  • Madagascar's lode gold deposits occur mostly in sulphide-bearing quartz veins systems. With the exception of the Betsiaka district in the extreme north, which is probably an epithermal system, all the other auriferous districts are in Precambrian terrains and belong to the mesothermal lode gold type.
  • Madagascar also hosts other mineral deposits such as mineral sands, lateritic nickel and tantalite/rare earth deposits which have yet to be explored and developed
  • World Bank now supports Madagascar and lends political and economic stability. The country was guided by a colonial past (British/French/Soviet) and is now independent since 1975. Soviet influence was significant until the early 1990s and provided additional impetus to natural resource studies. Strong French social and business influence remains currently. French widely spoken and some English. Malagasy is the local language.
  • The country encourages foreign investment, mainly in agriculture and fisheries but increasingly in the mining sector with large companies involved. The cost of living in Madagascar about half that in Australia. Labour is plentiful with costs ranging from US\$40-50 per month for manual labour to US\$150 per month for supervisor level.
  • The new Mining Act (2000) offers good security and political risk insurance is backed by International Monetary Fund.
  • Royalties are currently 2% on production, company income tax is 35%, import/export tax relief is available and tax incentives may be arranged by special application to the government.

$3.01$ LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Kelimaizina Project is located north-central Madagascar at latitude 16°38'44.7"S, longitude 47°15'03.6"E, about 260km north of the capital, Antananarivo. Access is by sealed road on the main highway to Mahajanga (N4) through Maevatanana to Andranomamy; then by poorly maintained zebu track suitable for ox carts for 25km to Kelimaizina village.

Independent Valuation Report - Kelimaizina Project, Madagascar - Page 6

$3.1$ COORDINATE SYSTEM

Maps and geological records, including those relating to Kelimaizina are reported using the 'Laborde" coordinate system. This has survived from French colonial times and is unique to Madagascar. It is a metric system based on a latitude and longitude east and south of Paris with no angular off set. The datum for the system is as follows.

WGS 84 Laborde. UTM
Northina 18°54' 400,000 650.960.59
Easting -46° 27. 800,000 ,625.49
.909.

Two small open pits are shown on maps from previous workers from the 1995-98 period. The shape and dimensions of the Poste and Besasanangy pits at the Kelimaizina Project have changed somewhat from the available September 1995 map and four location points were picked up by GPS on a best quess basis and used as a grid transform.

UTM LABORDE
North end. 740.849E 8.158,311N 487.560E 1.049.364N
Poste pit
South end. 740,718E 8,158,128N 487,430E 1.049.210N
Poste Pit
South end, 740,973E 8,158,621N 487.660E 1,049,715N
Besasanangy pit
North east end. 741.019E 8.158.710N 487.715E 1.049.785N
Besasanangy pit

$3.2$ TENURE

The Kelimaizina project area is held under two "Permis Recherche" (PR) mineral tenements. Nos PR6256 and PR6978, held in the name of Calibra Resource and Engineers S.A.R.L. a locally domiciled Madagascan company and subsidiary of CREM.

Four main categories of mineral tenements are available in Madagascar for exploration and mining. Tenements may only be held by Malagasy nationals or companies domiciled in Madagascar. Such companies may have foreign owners and directors. Minerals are the property of the State and subject to modest royalties. Applications are made on a graticular unit basis (squares) using the Laborde coordinate system. One square is 2.5km by 2.5km and the approximate exchange rate is 5,000fmg to A\$1.00.

AERP (Exclusive Reservation Authorization of Perimeter)

  • Maximum 2,400 squares $(15,000 \text{km}^2)$
  • Duration of validity 3 months
  • Expenditure commitment is 10,000 fmg/square (A\$2/square)
  • Confers on the holder exclusive right to prospect
  • Useful for initial appraisal prior to the application of a PR or PE licence

PR (Licences of Research)

  • Maximum 1,600 squares $(10,000 \text{km}^2)$
  • Duration is 10 years, renewable once for 5 years
  • Exploration commitment is 315,000 fmg/square (A\$63/square), multiplied by the number of year since grant.
  • Confers on its holder the exclusive right for prospecting and research.

PE (Licences of Exploitation)

  • Maximum of 160 squares. $(1,000km^2)$
  • · Duration is 40 years, renewable.
  • Expenditure commitment is 1,600,000 fmg/square (A\$320/square), increasing on an escalating scale with the number of years since grant.
  • Confers on its holder the exclusive right to make exploitation and prospecting.

PRE (Licences Reserved to the Small Miners)

  • Maximum 16 squares (100km2) distributed at least on 4 separate blocks
  • Duration is 8 years, renewable.
  • Expenditure commitment is 95,000 fmg/square, multiplied by the number of years since grant.
  • Confers on its holder the exclusive right to undertake prospecting, research and exploitation inside the marked perimeter.

PR6256 was granted on 18th April 2003 over 10 squares for a total area of 62.5 square kilometres for a period of 10 years in Mahajanga Province, Andranomamy Commune.

PR6978 was granted on 18th April 2003 over 4 squares for a total area of 25.0 square kilometres for a period of 10 years in Mahajanga Province, Andranomamy Commune.

Total area is 87.5 square kilometres

$4.0$ REGIONAL GEOLOGY

Precambrian rocks form about two-thirds of Madagascar. They are exposed continuously from Tolanaro in the south to Antsiranana in the north. These Precambrian terrains are often referred to as the crystalline Basement of Madagascar.

The metamorphic grade of this Basement is generally high, and for almost the whole island varies between the amphibolite and the granulite facies. Greenschist facies rocks are comparatively rare. The tectonic history and geology of Madagascar presents several similarities with both eastern Africa and peninsular India.

Madagascar's Basement rocks have been divided into three major systems. From the youngest to the oldest these are:

• The Vohibory System

The Vohibory System was first defined on Vohibory Mountain in the South-western part of Madagascar. Characteristic of the Vohibory System is the abundance of gneiss in the form of ortho-gneiss, associated with basic to ultrabasic intrusions also metamorphosed to various degrees.

• The Graphite System

The Graphite System forms the greatest part of Madagascar's Basement - and is the most consistently mineralised in gold. The system is characterised by the presence of graphite in greater or lesser abundance. The intensity of metamorphism varies according to location and the different regional groups are still defined by their metamorphic grade rather than their stratigraphic relationship.

• The Androyen System

The Androven System is the oldest on the island and consists of highly metamorphosed. often granulitic, rocks. This system is sometimes referred to in French literature as "Migmatitic-leptynitic Lower Complex". The Androven System outcrops are principally in the southern part of the island. Apparently none of Madagascar's gold districts occur within the Androyen System.

The Basement rocks have been intruded by several igneous episodes. Some of which may have contributed to the remobilization and concentration of gold.

Within the Graphite System, a simpler distinction can be made between migmatites without graphites (G1) and those that are graphite-rich (G2). This easier differentiation is particular relevant to gold exploration as all the presently known mineralization occur in the graphite-rich zones of the Graphite System, especially near Antananarivo.

Ten groups within the graphite system have been distinguished, some of which are closely associated with specific Madagascar gold districts. From the youngest to the oldest:

  • Daraina Group Amphibolites with epidotes, gneiss, granodiorites
  • Sambirano Group Gneisses, quartzites, marbles
  • Antonigil Group Epidote-rich migmatites
  • Ambodiriana Group Feldsphatic micashists
  • Maevatanana Group Greenschists, magnetiferous quartzites, amphibolites, aneiss
  • Beforona Group Amphibolites, migmatites
  • Manajary Group Micaschists, gneiss, greenschists, migmatites
  • Amborompotsy Group Amphibolic gneiss, migmatites, marbles
  • Malakialina Group micashists, marbles, quartzites
  • Vohibory Group Leptynites, amphibolic gneiss, amphibolites, marbles.

The Kelimaizina deposits are hosted by the Maevatanana Group.

Madagascar's primary gold deposits are thought to be of mesothermal "lode" guartzhosted type, and they are hosted in Proterozoic or, more frequently, Archaean terrains. Lode gold deposits of this type account for nearly 20% of world deposits, and are largely responsible for the vigorous gold development of Australia, Canada, Brazil and Ghana.

There is no evidence in Madagascar of sediment-hosted gold deposits, pebbleconglomerate deposits, gold-rich porphyry copper deposits or true epithermal gold deposits. Although their presence cannot be excluded given the current level of knowledge, their occurrence seems unlikely.

5.0 MINERALIZATION STYLE

The Poste and Besasanangy pits at Kelimaizina are within weathered bedrock to the surface which has been eroded on the steep slopes to the bounding creeks. Within the top 5 metres or so all trace of rock texture has been destroyed except for flat lying coarse quartz veins. The current floor of the Poste pit is mostly in weathered amphibolite gneiss which contains interstratified zones of finer quartz veins and small pegmatite lenses (coarse granular mixtures of quartz and feldspar) which are believed to host the gold mineralization. All zones are flat lying and relatively narrow. Metamorphic grade is high and possibly post dates the gold mineralization.

Floor of the Poste Pit

Artisanal workers, Poste Pit, Kelimaizina

The surface portion mined by SDEM in the 1995 - 1998 period is iron rich and dark red in colour suggesting lateritization but would not be described as a 'laterite' deposit in the W.A. sense because of the rapid erosional cycles - merely highly oxidized and ferruginous bedrock.

Coarse quartz veins up to about 15cm are prevalent throughout the pit and, indeed throughout the whole area. These are conformable to the fabric of the amphibolite gneiss and may have resulted in 'sweating' during metamorphism. Orientation is overwhelmingly flat Iving (as are all the observed structures and fabrics) and only one instance of a steeply dipping vein was observed. These coarse quartz veins are apparently barren and are discarded by artisanal miners.

Flat Iying quartz veins, Kelimaizina

Flat lying quartz veins, Kelimaizina

No waste dumps or tailing were observed at the site. SDEM state that they used a bulk mining technique and treated all the material mined. Small amounts of waste could be flushed down the adjacent creek. Tailings, which were said to contain 13 to 15g/t gold have been retreated by artisanal miners but no remnants of the tailings now remain.

OTHER DEPOSITS 5.1

In addition to the Poste and Besasanangy pits operated by SDEM, three other localities with gold mineralization are known to exist. A small pit dating from French colonial times (1950's) is located about 400 metres west of Besasananagy with dimensions of about 50m by 100m. Workings are not extensive.

Mahatsinjo Deposit, east of Poste

The Mahatsinjo deposit is located at 739,950E, 8157,990N, about 1000m WSW of Kelimaizina. Minor sluicing channels have been dug over an area 200m by 100m in preparation for summer rains. Several small excavations have been made into creek banks on gold bearing zones. This area is newly discovered by local people and could be more extensive.

Artisanal workings, Mahatsinjo Deposit, east of Poste

The Tsimahabekitoza area is about 1000m ESE of Mahatsinjo where more workings are said to be located.

$5.2$ ARTISANAL MINING

The Poste pit has been extensively worked by local miners, which is continuing today. This is the main activity of the local community and significant ground disturbance was noted in the pit floor and at a top soil pile to the north of the pit.

Some "artisanal" gold practices are unique to Madagascar and no ready English translation is available. The techniques favoured at Kelimaizina include the practice of digging long derivation channels to collect gold from the hills during the rainy season ("Lakantany"). This practice is particularly well suited to the denuded hilly morphology of Madagascar's highlands. At times the "lakantany" are supplemented with sluices.

Underground mining on a small scale is also prevalent in the southern end of the pit where soft mineralized zones are excavated, bagged and taken to nearby watercourses for sluicing.

Underground opening and workers (unknown depth), Kelimaizina

The floor of the pit has been extensively channelled with egress on the steep east side of the area. Channels are often 0.3 to 0.5m deep have been dug from the mineralized zones at the north end to the south east in preparation for summer rains.

Exploratory diggings on mineralized zones

At the commencement of mining by SDEM, top soil was placed to the north of the pit over possible extensions to the mineralized zones. This material has also been extensively trenched by artisanal miners.

6.0 RECENT EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES

6.1 MINING PRE 1995

The area was known since the early days of French colonialism (1896 - 1960). Anecdotal evidence suggests the Kelimaizina deposits may have been worked prior to that in the time of the Malagasy kings and queens. Mining would mostly have been from alluvial sources but some surface works were carried out at Poste and Besasananay though no records are available. Maps and sections by SDEM indicate pit depths of about 7.5 metres at Poste and 15 metres at Besasanangy. Mining was generally by sluicing through the weathered material through openings in the pit wall at pit floor level to local drainages.

$6.2$ EXPLORATION AND MINING 1995 - 98

French company "Societe de Developpment Economique Minier, Mines des Kelimaizina" (SDEM) commenced exploration and assessment in the Maevatanana area in July 1995 focussing on the Kelimaizina area. Equipment was purchased for eluvial and alluvial treatment of the mineralized occurrences which were known from literature available at the Department of Mines. Exploration and study of the deposits in the area continued through 1996 while mining equipment was purchased, mobilized and apparently cleared through customs.

Infrastructure was assembled at Kelimaizina, including road repairs and plant establishment, with minor alluvial gold treatment to produce 3 kg of gold in 1997. Pre strip was complete at Poste in July 1997 and records show that only 25 days mining were completed.

SDEM terminated mining prematurely when served with a notice to remove equipment because of a taxation problem. Virtually none of the mineralization was extracted from the ore body. The mining Reserve available to SDEM is not stated by the company.

Top soil lay down area and artisanal costeans, north of Poste

$6.3$ ARTISANAL MINING 1998 - PRESENT

Following the departure of SDEM, local artisanal miners moved to the area and established Kelimaizina village. They have been very active in the pit areas in extracting soft weathered mineralized material and removing it for sluicing in nearby creaks. No records are available but the volumes must have been significant judging by the current state of the pit. Gold grains can be readily panned from the pit area.

$6.4$ SOIL SAMPLING PROGRAM 2003

CREM researched the area and applied for two PR tenements in 2003. An option was negotiated with KMM to acquire the area subject to an initial exploration due diligence program.

A program of soil sampling in the Poste - Besasanangy area was completed by KMM in November 2003 in an attempt to gauge the areal extent of the gold mineralizing system. Initial spacing was nominally set at 50m by 50m but sampling in some areas was limited by steep sided gullies and ground disturbance.

  • All samples were collected from the 'B' horizon beneath the root level of grass tussocks prevalent in the area. This generally was in the range 0.2 to 0.3m.
  • In areas of ground disturbance, such as the top soil lay down area, samples were collected in areas which appeared to be residual but given the amount of surface vegetation now present some samples may have been contaminated.
  • No samples were collected from within the pit floor area or steep creek slopes to the east of the Poste Pit.

Overall coverage of the prospective areas was considered adequate to determine the presence and extent of the mineralization and should form a sound basis for future drill testing.

The mineralized zones appear to be flat lying and it is unlikely that soil sampling will directly test these zones. However a broader, low grade anomaly should be encountered over areas of gold mineralization. Artisanal workings provide direct evidence of primary gold mineralisation at significant grades.

ROCK CHIP SAMPLING 2003 6.5

A series of rock chip samples were collected from within the pits and at Mahatsinio. These were aimed at determining the host lithologies for the gold mineralization and focused on active artisanal workings and quartz-pegmatite zones. Several samples of apparently barren coarse quartz were collected for comparison.

Samples were collected from the Poste Pit of the fine material remaining in the sluicing channels and from spoils associated with artisanal workings. Other samples of spoils were taken from the Besasanangy pit. These samples are designed to provide information on the nature of the gold and possible treatment options. Gold, where it was observed, was fine grained - perhaps up to 200-300 microns and smaller and appears to be free milling. No sulphides were observed but possible sulphide casts are visible in quartz (now oxidised to limonite).

Metallurgical test work on some samples indicated that the mineralization is predominantly free gold less that 1mm in diameter. Gravity separation is easily achieved with a simple milling and gravity circuit.

6.6 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 2004

As a requirement of the tenement licence, a preliminary environmental assessment study was completed to establish the current status of vegetation and ground disturbance. The Poste and Besasasangy pits were worked in the recent past but grass regrowth is well established. All known mineralized areas are subject to current artisanal workings, which cause significant ground disturbance and erosion.

6.7 EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE

Estimates have been made of the expenditure by the French mining team SDEM that is currently useful to further exploration. No value is ascribed to the actual mining and processing operations or infrastructure such as they were but pre strip and pit exposures are useful in determining mineralization styles and planning further drilling and exploration.

Exploration Activities Expenditure
SDEM - 1995 - 98*
Regional Studies 25,000
Target Identification 30,000
Roads and Infrastructure 10,000
Exploration Pits 20,000
Mine pre Strip 30,000
Pit exposures 30.000
KMM and CREM 2003 - 04
Research & target identification 20,000
Option Payments 30.000
Legal 3.000
Sampling Program 38,000
Environmental Study 10,000
Administration 12,000
Total 258.000

$7.0$ CONCLUSIONS

The project has clear potential for the development of gold bearing zones below the current pit floor at Poste- Besasanangy. The exact nature or extent of the zones is not known at this stage and detailed mapping of the pits would be a useful next stage of exploration.

Several gold deposits are now known to exist within several kilometres of the Poste pit where artisanal miners are active. Other areas may also be present. Detailed stream sediment survey could assist in identifying these zones.

In view of the apparent flat lying nature of the mineralized zones, some form of drilling will be required to advance the project. There is currently no access to the pit floor

because of the sluicing operations of the artisanal miners and access from the main highway would need to be upgraded from the current zebu track to allow access for 4wd vwhicles and a suitable drill rig.

The Kelimaizina Gold Project has considerable exploration upside and with minimal expenditure could be brought into production. The current eluvial gold mineralization could generate a cash flow from a relatively basic gravity plant which is a low cost operation with relatively low environmental impact

The exploration potential within the project area will come from exploration of the bedrock source below the current laterite and old workings, including the recently discovered Tsimahabekitoza and Mahatsinio deposits. Dredging operations in nearby rivers, where high grades have been reported but not documented, may add to the mineral inventory.

A regional exploration program within the tenements is recommended, including detailed stream sediment sampling, to locate the sources of alluvial gold found in the rivers.

Initial work on the Poste - Besasanangy pit areas should include an extensive Aircore drilling program which will also determine the depth of weathering and oxidation of the host rocks. This program will locate the true position of the gold within the weathered profile and in fresh rock and delineate the extent of the mineralized 'laterite' overlying the deposit. The drilling should be sufficiently detailed to allow a preliminary JORC compliant resource estimate to be calculated. This program would most likely consist of drilling the area with shallow vertical aircore holes on a $25 \times 25$ m staggered pattern where possible to a depth of 40 metres

MINERAL ASSETS VALUATION METHODOLOGY 8.0

8.1 FAIR MARKET VALUE OF MINERAL ASSETS

Mineral assets include, but are not limited to, mining and exploration tenements held or acquired in connection with the exploration, the development of, and the production from those tenements together with all plant, equipment and infrastructure owned or acquired for the development, extraction and processing of minerals in connection with those tenements.

Mineral assets classification
Exploration areas Mineralisation may or may not have been identified, but where a mineral
resource has not been defined.
Advanced
exploration
areas
Mineral resources have been identified and their extent estimated (possibly
incompletely). This includes properties at the early stage of assessment.
Pre-development projects A positive development decision has not been made.
This includes
properties where a development decision has been negative, properties on
care and maintenance and properties held on retention titles.
Development projects Committed to production, but which, are not yet commissioned or not
initially operating at design levels.
Operating Mines Mineral properties, particularly mines and processing plants, which have
been fully commissioned and are in production.

The fair market value, of a mineral asset is the estimated amount of money or the cash equivalent or some other consideration for which the mineral asset should change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arms length transaction. Each party is assumed to have acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.

The value of a mineral asset usually consists of two components,

  • The underlying or Technical Value which is an assessment of a mineral asset's future net economic benefit under a set of appropriate assumptions, excluding any premium or discount for market, strategic or other considerations.
  • The Market Component, which is a premium relating to market, strategic or other considerations which, depending on circumstances at the time, can be either positive, negative or zero.

When the technical and market components of value are combined the resulting value is referred to as the market value. A consideration of country risk should also be taken into account.

The value of mineral assets is time and circumstance specific. The asset value and the market premium (or discount) changes, sometimes significantly, as overall market conditions, commodity prices, exchange rates, political and country risk change.

8.2 METHODS OF VALUING EXPLORATION TENEMENTS

When valuing an exploration tenement the estimate is attempting to arrive at a value that reflects:

  • The potential of the tenement yo yield newly discovered zones of mineralisation.
  • The potential of the tenement at the valuation date to yield a mineable ore reserve

and which is, at the same time,

• In line with what the tenement will be judged to be worth when assessed by the market.

The Fair Market Value of Exploration Properties and Advanced Exploration Properties can be determined by several general approaches: Geoscience Factor; Cost; Market; or Income. For properties without mineral reserves, the income (DCF) approach is not appropriate and the following approaches are used by the geologist to establish value for exploration and advanced exploration areas:

  • Ranked and weighted geological aspects, including proximity to mines, deposits and the significance of the camp and the commodity sought. (Geoscience Factor Method)
  • Results and costs of historic exploration and the program and cost of future exploration, if warranted (Appraised Value Method) and
  • Prior transactions for the property and recent arm's-length transactions for comparable properties. (Comparable Transaction)

There is a large element of subjectivity involved in arriving at a value of a tenement no matter which method is selected. It is obvious that the geologist must be aware of all valuation methods and actual transactions taking place in the industry in general to ensure that value estimates are realistic.

In the preparation of a tenement valuation, a geologist must give consideration to a range of technical issues as well as make a judgment about the "market". Key technical issues that need to be taken into account include:

  • Geological setting of the property and style of mineralisation.
  • Results of exploration activities on the tenement usually data from soil mapping, trenching, mapping and drilling.
  • Interpretation of geophysical data and remotely sensed information.
  • Evidence of mineralisation on adjacent properties.
  • Proximity to existing infrastructure and production facilities to the property.

In addition to these technical issues the geologist has to take particular note of the market's demand for the type of property being valued. An adjustment of the technical value of a mineral tenement should only be made if the technical and market values are obviously out of phase with each other.

A. GEOSCIENCE FACTOR METHOD

The Geoscience Factor method determines a base dollar value unit area (Base Acquisition Cost - BAC), which is dependent on the tenement type, to arrive at an overall property value which is upgraded by various elements of perceived prospectivity. The method is based on four main characteristics of mineral properties: location; inclusion of valuable mineralization; inclusion of geophysical and/or geochemical targets; and inclusion of favourable geological lithologies and structures.

The subcategories are prioritized and assigned relative value factors. Factors are generally expressed as a range of values to reflect the uncertainties in estimation. The four factors are multiplied together to provide the Prospectivity Index (PI).

Value of each mineral tenement is determined by applying the appropriate PI to a base value per unit area. Property value is calculated by totaling the values of the tenements in the project area. The value of a property is ultimately influenced by additional, subjective factors to arrive at a fair market value; the expertise of geologists and engineers, commodity markets, financial markets, stock markets, mineral property markets, metal prices and political and economic conditions which vary with time.

In Madagascar there are three main classes of tenement available to companies, the AERP, the PR and the PE. The BAC's per unit of area for an Australian company working in the area have been estimated to be:

  • $\bullet$ AERP $$100/km2$
  • $\bullet$ PR $$350/ km2$
  • PE $$1200/km2$

A major disadvantage of the method is that the degree of dependence of the property value on the assumed basic value of each tenement. Large properties would tend to have very high values and very small properties would tend to have very low values, which may not reflect the real exploration potential.

The preferred method of accounting for prospectivity is to subdivide tenements into blocks based on geological signatures and value each separately. This assists in accounting for large tracts of land with little or no potential surrounding prospect areas.

B. APPRAISED VALUE METHOD (Multiple of Exploration Expenditure)

The method is a cost approach to valuation and a basic tenet is that an exploration property is worth 'meaningful past exploration expenditures plus warranted future costs'. The latter represent a reasonable budget to advance the property to the next decision stage as determined by a prudent and responsible explorationist, i.e. a seasoned exploration geologist. The appraised value may have to be adjusted to market value if the local market for properties is elevated or depressed.

In this method a property is deemed to be worth what has been spent on it, with a premium if results are positive, or a discount if results are poor. Sometimes costs are adjusted for inflation, although, if applied indiscriminately to old costs, this can result in an overly large value bonus for inflation. Replacement costs to carry out the relevant work may be more appropriate in some cases.

The method is based upon the cost of conducting exploration on a current standard contract basis, which accounts for the effects of inflation. The purpose is to provide a standard basis for valuing historical work on large property positions where there is a wide range in historic costs for similar work completed. Costs, particularly for diamond drilling, are then factored for significance. Some allowance may also be made for drilling which provides useful geological data aiding target selection.

A premium or discount may be allocated to the relevant and effective Expenditure Base (represented by the past and future expenditure) through the use of the Prospectivity Enhancement Multiplier (PEM), a factor directly related to the success (or failure) of the exploration completed to date and to an assessment of the future prospects of the tenement(s). The multiples range from 0.5 to 3.0 with zero representing a complete write-off and values greater than 1 applying where exploration had successfully upgraded the property.

Prospectivity Enhancement Multipliers (P.E.M.)
Exploration Outcome P.E.M.
Irrelevant or ill-conceived expenditure Nil - 0.5
Results have failed to demonstrate encouragement $0.5 - 1.0$
Some encouragement but no drill targets $1.0 - 1.4$
Prospective to sub-ore grades over known areas. Drill targets
developed
$14 - 18$
Ore grade over known, economically interesting area And/or strong
coincident anomalous zones
$1.8 - 2.2$
Sub ore grades over known volume of interest Drill testing
demonstrates further potential
$2.2 - 2.6$
Ore grade, known volume, not yet shown to be economic $2.6 - 3 +$

The principal shortcomings of this method are that there is no constant base from which to commence the valuation, as there is with the base cost used in the Geoscience Rating Method, and, secondly, there is no systematic approach taken in arriving at the exploration multiplier. A judgment is required, therefore, at both the start and end of the valuation. An estimate of unit costs for various stages of exploration (eq. acquisition, office studies, regional mapping and geochemistry, geophysics, trenching, RAB and drilling) could be used as an estimate, as a check on actual, stated expenditure. A predetermined scale of multipliers could be established as a quide.

In other words, what current budget would be required to accomplish the encouraging results presently available? This conceptual budget should be upgraded by the success of the exploration by the use of prospectivity multipliers.

C. MARKET APPROACH METHOD (COMPARABLE TRANSACTION)

If a property in the recent past was the subject of an arms-length transaction, for either cash or shares (i.e.: from a company whose principal asset was the mineral property) then this forms the most realistic starting point, provided that the deal is still relevant in today's market. Complicating matters is the knowledge that properties rarely change hands for cash, except for liquidation purposes, estate sales, or as raw exploration property when sold by an individual prospector, or entrepreneur.

Any underlying royalty or net profits interests or rights held by the original vendor of the claims should be deducted from the resultant property value before determination of the company's interest. Also, reductions in value should be made where environmental, legal or political sensitivities could seriously retard the development of exploration properties.

It should be noted again that exploration is cyclical, and in periods of low metal prices there is often no market, or a market at very low prices, for ordinary exploration acreage (inventory property) unless it is combined with a significant mineral deposit, or with other incentives.

Truly Comparable Transactions are rare for early stage properties without defined drill targets. This is natural in a recession, as companies focus "close to the headframe". Inflated prices paid for property in fashionable areas should not be discounted because they reflect the true market value of a property at the transaction date. If however, the market sentiment is not so buoyant then adjustments must be made.

8.3 VALUATION OF RESOURCES BY COMPARABLE TRANSACTIONS

When only a resource has been outlined and its economic viability has still to be established (i.e. there is no ore reserve) then a Comparable Transactions approach is usually applied.

With gold projects the method requires allocating a dollar value to resource ounces of gold in the ground. The dollar value must take into account a number of aspects of the resources including:

  • The confidence in the resource estimation (the JORC Category).
  • The quality of the resource (grade and recovery characteristics)
  • Possible extensions of the resource in adiacent areas
  • Exploration potential for other mineralisation within the tenements
  • Presence and condition of a treatment plant within the project
  • Proximity of toll treatment facilities, infrastructure, development and capital expenditure aspects

There is a vide variety of prices paid for mineral resource transactions in Australia ranging from A\$3 to A\$44. Projects may include significant exploration potential and/or a treatment plant. A review of a number of market transactions in the gold industry in Australia from April 2000 to June 2004 suggests that the implied resource ounce values for projects lie in the following ranges.

Dollar per Ounce Ranges
Measured Indicated Inferred
Resource Resource Resource
LOW. High Low High Low High
1st Quartile 7.00. 11.00 5.00 8.00 3.00 5.00
2nd Quartile 11.00 20.00 8.00 13.00 5.00 9.00
3rd Quartile 20.00 35.00 13.00 24.00 9.00 16.00
4th Quartile 35.00 60.00 24.00 40.00 16.00 27.00
Exceptional 56.00 66.00 37.00 44.00 25.00 29.00

\$46.00 \$44.00 \$42.00 \$40.00 \$38.00 \$36.00 \$34.00 \$32.00 \$30.00 \$28.00 \$26.00 \$24.00 \$22.00 \$20.00 \$18.00 \$16.00 \$14.00 \$12.00 \$10.00 \$8.00 \$6.00 \$4.00 \$2.00 ð. Ŏ. ų, Xb. $\mathcal{S}$ A Ą, Š. ΛÔ nN ďk Ř $\triangle$ ゆ пÓ n\$2 æ9 πÞ 40

Dollar per Ounce for Recent Sales

1 Safari Bore Project; 2 Famous Blue Project; 3 Indee Project; 4 Maud Creek Gold Project; 5 Wiluna Project; 6 Laverton (SOG) Project; 7 Mount Gibson Project: 8 Davyhurst Gold Project: 9 Mount Pleasant Project: 10 Paddy Flat: 11 Fortitude Project: 12 Wiralie Project: 13 Mt Monger Gold Project; 14 Kirkalocka Gold Project; 15 Gidgee Project; 16 Janet Ivy Project; 17 New Celebration Gold Project; 18 Golden Cities Gold Project; 19 Chalice; 20 Lake Cowan Project; 21 Bulong Project; 22 Timbarra, NSW; 23 White Foil Gold Project; 24 Higginsville Project; 25 Gossan Hill; 26 Western Tanami, WA; 27 Bronzewing; 28 Brocks Creek Project; 29 Union Reefs; 30 Comet Vale Project; 31 Old Plough Dam Project; 32 St Ives and Agnew Projects;

8.4 APPLICATIONS OF DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS

Discounted cash flow analysis is a forward-looking methodology which requires that forecasts be made with respect to technical and economic conditions which will prevail in the future. All predictions of the future are inherently uncertain, but the level of uncertainty will be materially reduced if adequate data are available from which to project future rates of production and future costs. The more comprehensive the available data, the more reliable will be the discounted cash flow valuation.

These observations suggest that the most definitive application of discounted cash flow analysis will be in the valuation of an existing mining operation with a well-defined mineable reserve, no potential for additional discoveries, and an established history of consistent production rates and cash costs, sufficient to permit the confident projection of future operating conditions.

One step removed from this is the property for which a favourable bankable feasibility study has been prepared. Almost invariably, such a feasibility study will use discounted cash flow techniques to assess the economic viability of the proposed development, based on the current reserve estimate, comprehensive engineering studies, detailed estimates of capital expenditure and operating cost, and rational projections of product revenues. In this instance, however, the resultant net present value at any selected discount rate may not, by itself, provide an accurate measure of the value of the property.

It is not uncommon for a mining company to commission a bankable feasibility study and commit to production from a new property as soon as a sufficient tonnage and grade of mineralization has been identified to warrant development, but before the entire property has been fully explored. In such cases, the feasibility study will typically make provision, within the original design, for the possible future expansion of the productive facilities to accommodate the definition of additional mineable reserves. Under these circumstances, the net present value derived in the feasibility study will represent a base, demonstrated value for the property, but it is clear that some additional value must be attributed to any inferred resources and unexplored geological potential.

Since discounted cash flow analysis is fully capable of assessing the profitability of various levels of expansion, or increases in operating life, associated with various levels of additional ore discovery, it remains the preferred method for valuing properties which are at the stage of a bankable feasibility study. The value derived, however, will not be as definitive as that for a producing mine, and will be heavily influenced by informed geological judgment as to the most likely level of future discovery.

At a lower level of definition come those properties which have been subjected to preliminary or conceptual feasibility studies, on the basis of a resource which has been identified to a greater or lesser degree of assurance. In these cases, the economic viability of the property will typically be assessed by discounted cash flow analysis, based on preliminary estimates of production, revenue and cost. Despite the preliminary nature of the underlying estimates, it is still generally accepted that discounted cash flow analysis is the best method of valuing mineral properties at this stage of development.

Ultimately, as long as a resource has been identified, it is possible to make a reasoned estimation of production rates, revenues and costs. Discounted cash flow analysis. therefore, can be validly applied to the valuation of any property with an identified resource. In the absence of an identified resource, however, there simply are no data to support the application of discounted cash flow analysis, and such properties must be valued using other methodologies.

8.5 CONCLUSIONS

Valuation reports must be prepared by a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and who is therefore obligated to prepare tenement valuations in accordance with the Australian reporting requirements as set out in the VALMIN Code and Guidelines for assessment and valuation of mineral assets and mineral securities for independent expert reports (AusIMM, 1995). This code is binding upon members of the AusIMM, who are "competent persons", when preparing public reports concerning the valuation of mineral assets.

Mineral Property can be categorised into five groups and methods will vary depending on the data available.

Valuation Methods
Exploration areas Geoscience Factor Method which
rates
the i
perceived prospectivity of mineral tenements, and
Appraised Value Method which considers past
expenditures and applies a multiplier depending on
the results obtained.
Advanced exploration areas with defined
resources
Comparable Transactions method which considers
sales of similar deposits to select an appropriate
dollar pe ounce rate, and
Conceptual Discounted Cash Flow method which is
based on an estimate of future earnings.
Pre-development projects Discounted Cash Flow method which is based on a
preliminary feasibility study
Development projects Discounted Cash Flow method which is based on a
full feasibility study
Operating Mines Discounted Cash Flow method which is based on a
operating records and experience.

$9.0 -$ VALUATION OPINION

There are no defined resources estimated to JORC standard in either of the tenements within the Kelimaizina Project. Having considered the various methods used in the valuation of exploration tenements, I am of the opinion that two methods provide the most appropriate approach to the technical valuation. Geoscientific Rating method and the multiple of exploration expenditure (MEE) methods have been applied to the tenement areas and past expenditures to arrive at a range of valued and a preferred valuation for the project area. Both methods reflect the current state of knowledge of the prospectivity at Kelimaizina and the preferred value lies between the two techniques.

The methods emphasise different aspects of the project area, though with significant overlap. The Geoscientific rating method focuses on the exploration potential and the opportunity to make new discoveries. The MEE method focuses on expenditure on the existing target areas and the opportunity to turn these to account.

In arriving at a technical value for a particular exploration tenement, I have taken into consideration the company's equity in the tenement and have only considered the net area of a tenement where it overlaps with any pre-existing titles.

VALUATION OF THE EXPLORATION POTENTIAL - GEOSCIENTIFIC RATING $9.1$ METHOD

Elements of the valuation are as follows.

BAC - Base acquisition cost is estimated at \$350 per square kilometre for the tenements. PR6256 is 62.5km2 in area with a BAC of \$21.875. PR6978 is 25.0km2 in area with a BAC of \$8,750.

Regional Setting - Metal Endowment (Off Property) - The Kelimaizina tenements are located in the Maevatanana Gold Province north of Antananarivo. The tenements are considered highly prospective with several old workings further south in the gold field and ratings are set at 2.00.

Local Setting - Metal Endowment (On Property) - At least four mineralised occurrences including two old workings exist within the tenements. Artisanal mining is currently in progress at several locations. Ratings are set at 2.00 for PR6256 and 1.75 for PR6978.

Anomaly Factor - The area has been explored within the surface environment and several drill targets are known to exist. Several areas require further work and a ratings are set at 2.25 for PR6256 and 2.00 for PR6978.

Geology Factor - The tenements lies on highly prospective lithologies with major structural features thought to be conduits for mineralising fluids. Ratings are set at 1.75.

Prospectivity Index - This is calculated by multiplying the four factors together. The Index is then multiplied by the BAC and the tenement area to arrive at a valuation. Three cases have been considered - a Lower case with an index value of 12.8 for PR6256 and 9.8 for PR6978; an Upper case with an index value of 19.2 for PR6256 and 15.0 for PR6978 and a Preferred case with an index value of 15.8 for PR6256 and 12.3 for PR6978.

Exploration Potential Valuation - Geoscientific Rating

PR6256 PR6978
\$21,875 \$8,750
Low High Preferred Low High Preferred
1.95 2.05 2.00 1.95 2.05 2.00
1.95 2.05 2.00 1.70 1.80 1.75
2.20 2.30 2.25 1.95 2.05 2.00
1.70 1.80 1.75 1.70 1.80 1.75
12.8 19.2 15.8 9.8 15.0 12.3
310,000 380,000 345,000 85,000 130,000 110,000

VALUATION OF THE EXPLORATION POTENTIAL - MULTIPLE OF $9.2$ EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE METHOD

An assessment of the previous exploration expenditures and the indications of worthwhile drill targets associated with known mineralization suggests prospective to sub-ore grades have been identified over known areas at the Poste and Besasananay pits and the other mineralized locations. Drill targets have been developed close to the pits and further regional exploration is warranted. The average preferred Prospectivity Enhancement Multiplier (PEM) for all expenditure is 1.9 with a range of 1.0 to 2.0.

French Activities 1995 - 98* Expenditure PEM Lower Upper Preferred
Regional Studies 25.000 2.00 47.500 52,500 50.000
Target Identification 30,000 2.00 57.000 63,000 60,000
Roads and Infrastructure 10.000 2.00 19.000 21.000 20,000
Exploration Pits 20,000 2.00 38,000 42,000 40,000
Mine pre Strip 30,000 2.00 57.000 63,000 60,000
Pit exposures 30.000 2.00 57.000 63,000 60.000
KMM and CREM 2003 - 04
Research & target identification 20,000 1.80 34.000 38.000 36,000
Option Payments 30.000 2.00 57.000 63.000 60,000
Legal 3.000 1.00 3,000
Sampling Program 38,000 2.00 72,200 79,800 76,000
Environmental Study 10.000 1.25 11.500 13,500 12,500
Administration 12,000 1.00 10.800 13,200 12.000
Total 258.000 1.90 460,000 510,000 490,000

Exploration Potential Valuation - MEE

$9.3 -$ MARKET VALUE

In arriving at a fair market value for a particular exploration tenement, I have considered the current market for gold exploration properties in Australia and overseas. It is considered appropriate to apply a market premium of 25% to the technical value of the Golden Deeps' interest in the exploration potential of its tenements given the recent significant improvement in the market for advanced gold exploration properties and the low perceived country risk associated with investments in Madagascar.

Golden Deeps Limited is acquiring the project from Kalgoorlie Mine Management who purchased 100% of the Kelimaizina Project from Calibra Resource Engineering Madagascar under an option agreement that has now been finalized. The sale includes a 25% net profits interest on alluvial and eluvial production and a 1% net profits interest on production from hard rock mining.

This valuation is based on an assessment of the exploration potential of the project. No resources have been delineated at the project at this stage and no financial studies are possible to assess the impact of the net profits interest and royalty at this stage.

$9.4$ SUMMARY OF VALUATION

In this report, I have systematically established the value of the mineral assets as at 16 July 2004. After careful consideration of the current market for gold exploration properties in Australia, I am of the opinion that it is appropriate to apply a market premium of 25% to the technical value of mineral assets interest in the exploration potential of its project areas for the following reasons:

  • the recent improvement in the market for advanced gold exploration properties and demonstrated market interest in small exploration companies exploring for high-quality gold resources is offset by country risk for Madagascar;
  • the Kelimaizina project would be very highly regarded by a prospective purchaser/investor as it represents a project with good potential to discover further mineralization.

A summary estimate of the current market value of the Kelimaizina Project is presented in the following table.

Method
Technical Value
No. of
Tenements
Area
km 2
Lower Upper Preferred
Geoscientific
Rating
Method
2 87.5 395.000 510,000 455.000
Market Value 25% 495,000 640.000 565.000
Expenditure PEM Lower Upper Preferred
Multiple of
Exploration
Expenditure
Method
\$258,000 1.9 460,000 510.000 490.000
Market Value 25% 575.000 640.000 615.000

Command of Waterstone

Golden Deeps will hold 100% equity in the Kelimaizina Project. The agreement with CREM includes a 25% net profits interest on alluvial and eluvial production and a 1% net smelter royalty on production from hard rock mining. At this early exploration stage it is not possible to determine if alluvial, eluvial or hard rock mineral resources will be established. In any event, Golden Deeps will retain 100% equity and the valuation has been prepared on that basis.

In my opinion, the market value of the Kelimaizina project lies in the range \$565,000 to \$615,000 with a preferred value of \$600,000.

CONSENT OF MALCOLM CASTLE

Pursuant to Listing Rule 10.1 and section 611 (Item 7) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and in relation to the Independent Experts Report to be issued by Golden Deeps Limited ACN 054 570 777 ("Company") and dated in the year 2004 ("Report"), Malcolm Castle consents to the inclusion in the Report, together with any electronic versions of the Report, of all statements made by Malcolm Castle or attributed to or derived from those statements in the form and context in which they are included.

This consent is given on the basis a statement appears in the Report to the effect that:

"Malcolm Castle:

  • $(a)$ does not make, or purport to make, any statement in this Report or on which a statement made in the Report is based other than as specified in this Section: and
  • $(b)$ to the maximum extent permitted by law, expressly disclaims and takes no responsibility for any part of this Report other than a reference to its name and a statement included in this Report with the consent of Malcolm Castle as specified in this Section."

Dated: 16 July 2004

Signed for and on behalf of Malcolm Castle by:

Signature

Malcolm Castle B.Sc.(Hons) MAusIMM GCertAppFin (Sec Inst)

Malcolm Castle has 38 years experience in exploration geology and property evaluation, working for major companies for 20 years as an exploration geologist. He established a consulting company 18 years ago and specializes in exploration management, technical Audit, due diligence and property valuation at all stages of development. He has wide experience in a number of commodities including gold, base metals and mineral sands. He has been responsible for project discovery through to feasibility study in Indonesia and technical Audits in many countries.

Mr Castle completed a Batchelor's Degree in Applied Geology with the University of New South Wales in 1965 and has been awarded a B.Sc (Hons) degree. He has completed postgraduate studies with the Securities Institute of Australia in 2001 and has been awarded a Graduate Certificate in Applied Finance and Investment.

The information in this report that relates to Resources has been compiled by Malcolm Castle who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), and has the appropriate relevant qualifications, experience, competence and independence to be considered as a" Qualified Person" as defined in the National Instrument 43-101, Canada as well as an "Expert" and "Competent Person" the Valmin and JORC Codes, respectively.

PO Box 473, South Perth, WA, 6951, Australia Phone: + 61 8 9368 4923, Fax: + 61 8 9368 4932 Mobile: + 61 4 1234 7511, email: [email protected]