GOLDARC RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2016

Nov 17, 2016

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

==> picture [222 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

18 NOVEMBER 2016

MORE HIGH GRADE RESULTS AT MT STIRLING

1. Highlights

• 5,000m RC drilling program now complete;

• New results from this program include:

• 1m @ 10.90g/t Au from 20m;

• 1m @ 8.26g/t Au from 14m;

• Highlights from this program previously announced include:

• 1m @ 21.10g/t Au from 17m

• 2m @ 30.35g/t Au from 35m

  • Including 1m @ 47.00g/t Au

• 1m @ 11.00g/t Au from 26m

• 1m @ 16.20g/t Au from 10m

• 1m @ 12.50g/t Au from 16m

• 1m @ 16.20g/t Au from 25m

• 2m @ 27.21g/t Au from 55m

  • Including 1m @ 45.50g/t Au from 55m

• 7m @ 10.80g/t Au from 46m

  • Including 1m @69.00g/t Au from 47m

• 4m @ 12.98g/t Au from 17m

  • Including 1m @22.60 g/t Au from 19m

• RAB rig mobilised to Mt Stirling; and

• 3,000m RAB program underway.

Torian Resources Limited ( Torian or Company ) ( ASX:TNR ) is pleased to announce the final results from the successful RC drilling programme at Mt Stirling Well. Torian has now mobilised a RAB rig to Mt Stirling to test a further target north of Mt Stirling Well.

The final round of 14 holes were designed to step out laterally further from the area previously drilled to determine the strike and dip extent of the mineralisation. No holes to date have been drilled deeper than 115m. In addition, four previously drilled holes were extended by between 10-20m once a preliminary

ABN: 72 002 261 565 Unit G4, 49 Melville Parade, South Perth, 6151 Australia

Phone +61 8 6216 0424 Fax +61 8 6216 0425 info@torianresources.com.au www.torianresources.com.au

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

interpretation of the data had been completed. Also some earlier holes have returned final assays from the lab.

This brings the total number of RC holes at Mt Stirling to 135 and the total number of metres to 6,143 in the 4 phases of drilling to date. The details are shown in the table below.

Phase	Company	Holes	Metres	Date
1	Dominion MiningLtd	17	700	July1992
2	Torian Resources Ltd	51	1,711	December 2015
3	Torian Resources Ltd	53	2,497	August 2016
4	Torian Resources Ltd	14	1,235	September 2016
Total		135	6,143

Table 1: Table showing drilling programs completed at Torian’s Mt Stirling Well prospect.

So far, 28 holes have intersected values greater that 5g/t Au whilst 12 holes have intersected old workings.

2. Mt Stirling

The Mt Stirling Project is located 40km northwest of Leonora in Western Australia. The Project lies 8km NW of the Tarmoola Gold Mine (3.5Moz Au), which has produced in excess of 1 million ounces of gold to date. Current unmined resources at Tarmoola are believed to be in the order of 2.5 million ounces at an average grade of 5.3 g/t Au. The location of the Mt Stirling Project can be seen in Figure 2 below.

==> picture [468 x 264] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Picture of Torian’s Mt Stirling prospect showing historic diggings in the area.

2

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [464 x 464] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Map showing Torian’s Mt Stirling and Malcolm Projects in relation to regional deposits and geology.

3. Drilling Program

As advised to shareholders on 25 July 2016, Torian’s drilling program for FY2017 will see exploration targeted in two areas of mineralisation identified at the Mt Stirling Project. As seen in Figure 3 below, those two areas are Mt Stirling Well and Mt Stirling. The program consisted of approximately 5,000m of infill and extensional RC drilling at these two areas. Holes SWC066, SWC067, SWC085 and SWC086 were extended to 86m, 80m, 86m and 112m respectively.

Additionally, a 3,000m RAB programme has commenced to determine if mineralisation exists at the granites/greenstone contact to the north of Mt Stirling Well.

3

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [469 x 439] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Map showing Torian’s Mt Stirling Project, tenure, drilling and geology.

The Company has now received the final results from Mt Stirling Well. The holes assayed to date were drilled vertically to intersect the relatively flat lying vein. Some holes have intersected steep dipping veins that warrant further drilling using angled holes. Results greater than 1g/t Au, returned from the final batches submitted to the laboratory are shown in Table 2 below.

Hole	Eastings	Northings	From	To	m	g/t Au
SWC053	5358	10121	20	21	1	10.90
and			63	64	1	1.96
SWC066	5276	10057	8	9	1	1.09
SWC067	5316	10055	88	90	2	1.63
SWC083	5239	10119	35	37	2	1.04
SWC084	5239	10099	30	31	1	1.27

4

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

and			32	33	1	2.72
and			47	48	1	3.66
SWC086	5235	10018	57	58	1	1.19
SWC089	5195	10096	16	17	1	4.24
SWC090	5196	10115	14	15	1	8.26
	Table 2: Results of RC Holes +1g/t Au

Several of the holes intersected values between 0.5 and 1g/t Au. The planning of further drilling is underway. Figure 4 below show’s a typical cross section at the Mt Stirling Well prospect.

Figure 4 below shows a typical section at Mt Stirling Well showing vertical holes that have been drilled by Torian and a number of angled holes that were drilled by Dominion Mining in July 1992.

==> picture [452 x 229] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Typical cross section at Torian’s Mt Stirling Well prospect showing historic and new drill holes.

Previous drilling by Torian has intersected several significant zones of mineralisation. These results have been announced by the company previously on 3[rd] March 2016, 29[th] September 2016 and 14[th] October 2016, whilst the preliminary metallurgical testwork was announced on the 24[th] August 2016. Highlights from previous drilling at Mt Stirling Well include:

Phase 1

• 2m @ 13.50g/t Au from 16m

• 2m @ 26.90g/t Au from 27m

• Including 1m @ 52.0g/t Au

• 2m @ 8.28g/t Au from 47m

• Including 1m @ 15.0g/t Au

5

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

Phase 2

• 1m @ 21.10g/t Au from 17m

• 2m @ 30.35g/t Au from 35m o Including 1m @ 47.00g/t Au

• 1m @ 11.00g/t Au from 26m

• 1m @ 16.20g/t Au from 10m

• 4m @ 5.33g/t Au from 27m

• 1m @ 12.50g/t Au from 16m

• 1m @ 16.20g/t Au from 25m

Phase 3

• 2m @ 27.21g/t Au from 55m

• Including 1m @ 45.50g/t Au from 55m

• 1m @ 8.50g/t Au from 50m

• 1m @ 8.00g/t Au from 59m

• 7m @ 10.80g/t Au from 46m o Including 1m @69.00g/t Au from 47m

As announced on the 14[th] October 2016, Torian also completed an RC program at Mt Stirling. The programme consisted of 20m by 40m spaced RC drilling testing the known mineralisation along a 280m strike length. The holes varied from 15m to 85m in depth. Figure 5 below shows a typical section at Mt Stirling.

6

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [363 x 342] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Mt Stirling prospect showing the mineralised shear zone in section.

The holes completed were drilled at -60 degrees towards the south west to intersect the steep north easterly dipping vein. Some holes have intersected additional veins that warrant further investigation. Results greater than 1g/t Au are shown in Table 3 below.

Hole	E	N	Depth	Dip	Az	From	To	m	**g/t **
SWC104	5514	10896	30	-60	240	6	9	3	3.84
and						17	18	1	3.03
SWC105	5530	10908	50	-60	240	26	28	2	2.23
and						36	38	2	3.52
SWC106	5546	10918	85	-60	240	63	66	3	4.72
SWC107	5541	10865	15	-60	240	1	2	1	1.58
and						4	5	1	5.12
SWC108	5557	10876	40	-60	240	20	21	1	1.46
and						23	26	3	1.27
SWC109	5572	10887	64	-60	240	48	51	3	3.34
SWC111	5581	10849	40	-60	240	18	21	3	5.35
including						19	20	1	10.00
SWC112	5597	10860	68	-60	240	47	50	3	1.69
and						53	54	1	3.52

7

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

SWC114	5608	10822	55	-60	240	17	21	4	12.98
including						19	20	1	22.60
SWC114						22	23	1	1.51
SWC115	5624	10832	85	-60	240	51	52	1	5.84
and						53	54	1	1.15
SWC117	5626	10787	58	-60	240	9	12	3	2.18
and						56	58	2	1.33
SWC120	5642	10753	64	-60	240	1	6	5	1.35
and						8	10	2	3.74
SWC121	5658	10764	76	-60	240	34	35	1	1.03
and						37	40	3	2.80
and						42	43	1	1.09
SWC123	5668	10724	70	-60	240	13	15	2	2.93
and						18	20	2	2.97
and						21	29	8	3.07
including						21	22	1	9.93
and						34	35	1	1.21
SWC124	5684	10734	82	-60	240	46	48	2	9.95
including						47	48	1	12.60
and						58	64	6	1.38
SWC127	5690	10693	74	-60	240	20	21	1	1.70
and						26	28	2	1.71
and						30	32	2	1.59
and						38	39	1	1.27

Table 3: Results from RC drilling at Mt Stirling showing assays that intersected +1g/t Au.

==> picture [437 x 246] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: RC rig at Torian’s Mt Stirling project.

8

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

4. Interpretation

Based upon the assays received to date, Torian’s preliminary interpretations are:

• The mineralised area is larger than previously understood;

• the existence of steeper veins requires further investigation;

• there appear to be subtle variations in the dip of the main flat lying veins; or

• there may be small fault offsets that disrupt the vein locally.

Geological interpretation is showing the granite intrusion to be more complex than previously understood. This added complexity is encouraging and suggests potential for additional mineralisation styles to be present away from the main vein structure.

5. Next Steps

Over the next two months Torian plans the following:

• Announce results from 3,000m RAB program currently underway;

• Carry out an interpretation of all results received and plan further work; and

• Plan diamond drill holes to provide geology, structure engineering and metallurgical data.

6. Commentary

Torian’s Managing Director, Matthew Sullivan said:

“These results and the earlier ones are very encouraging. We are building a better understanding of the gold mineralisation at Mt Stirling Well. Further drilling will be required to refine details of the geological model including the location and geometry of the steeper veins”.

Geological interpretation is showing the granite intrusion to be more complex than previously understood. This added complexity is encouraging and suggests potential for additional mineralisation styles to be present away from the main vein structure.“

For further information, please contact Matthew Sullivan (Torian’s MD) on (08) 6216 0424.

Yours sincerely,

==> picture [141 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Matthew Sullivan Managing Director

9

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

About Torian:

Torian Resources Ltd ( ASX:TNR ) is a highly active Australian gold company that is focused on developing the gold mines of tomorrow. The Company has four advanced projects located in the Goldfields region of Western Australia.

Torian’s flagship Project, the Zuleika JV, lies north and partly along strike of several major gold mines including Northern Star (ASX:NST), Tribune Resources (ASX:TBR) and Rand Mining’s (ASX:RND) 7Moz East Kundana Joint Venture and Evolution’s (ASX:EVN) Frogs Legs and White Foil operations.

Since May 2015, Torian has increased its landholding at the Zuleika Project by approximately 86% via eight separate acquisitions. Torian is now the second largest landholder in this highly sought after region and is focused on fast tracking its development.

Torian has commenced a large, 55,000m exploration program that is targeting its Zuleika and Mt Stirling projects and intends to further consolidate ground in this region.

Torian is also developing the high grade Mt Stirling Project which has an outcropping inferred resource located 40km northwest of Leonora. Following a successful infill drilling program in December, Torian is currently completing an internal economic study on the project to assess it as a standalone mining operation.

Torian’s exploration team has an enviable track record of discovering and developing a number of multimillion ounce gold mines in this region. Torian is commencing an exciting phase in its development and we look forward to updating the market as things progress.

10

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 1: Mt Stirling Well Drill Collars & Plan View

Hole	Local E	Local N	Depth	Dip	Azimuth
SWC128	5355	10054	100	-90	0
SWC129	5353	10014	115	-90	0
SWC130	5396	10098	92	-90	0
SWC131	5394	10052	115	-90	0
SWC132	5393	10013	110	-90	0
SWC133	5436	10136	106	-90	0
SWC134	5434	10097	115	-90	0
SWC135	5434	10050	100	-90	0
SWC136	5432	10012	115	-90	0
SWC137	5315	10015	109	-90	0
SWC138	5275	10015	115	-90	0
SWC139	5121	10171	18	-90	0
SWC140	5122	10211	15	-90	0
SWC141	5124	10251	10	-90	0

Table 4: Collar details of all holes drilled to date in the current programme.

11

Appendix 2 Mt Stirling Project JORC Tables

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling		Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific		All data and results referred to in this report are historic or new, and date from the
techniques		specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under		late 1980s to the present day. This data has been judged to be reliable following
		investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.		independent research, including discussions with previous operators and explorers in person. Samples were collected via Rotary Air Blast (RAB) and Reverse Circulation (RC) drill
		Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public		chips.
		Report.		All drilling yielded samples on a metre basis. RAB drilling samples were commonly
		In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively		composited into intervals of 4 or 5m, with selected individual or 2m resamples
		simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3		collected. Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling is utilised to obtain 1 m samples which
		kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.		are cone split, from which approx. 2-3 kg is pulverised to produce a 40 g charge for fire assay. Sample preparation method is total material dried and pulverized to nominally 85%
				passing 75 µm particle size. Gold analysis method is generally by 40g Fire Assay,
				with Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) finish (DL 0.01 – UL 50 ppm Au).
				Samples exceeding the upper limit of the method were automatically re-assayed
				utilizing a high grade gravimetric method.
Drilling		Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,		RAB holes were typically 100mm in diameter, RC drilling usually 155mm in diameter.
techniques		Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of		RC drilling was via a face sampling hammer.
		diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
		_what method, etc). _
Drill sample		Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results		Recoveries were logged onto paper logs during drilling. Recoveries were visually
recovery		assessed.		assessed.
		Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of		Sample recoveries were maximised in RAB and RC drilling via collecting the samples
		the samples.		in a cyclone prior to sub sampling. RAB drillholes were stopped if significant water
		Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether		flows were encountered.
		sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.		No relationship appears from the data between sample recovery and grade of the
				samples.
Logging		Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to		All drillholes were geologically logged. This logging appears to be of high quality and
		a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies		suitable for use in further studies.
		and metallurgical studies.		Logging is qualitative in nature.
		Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel,		All samples / intersections are logged. 100% of relevant length intersections are
		etc) photography.		logged.
		The total length andpercentage of the relevant intersections logged.
Sub-sampling		If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.		Non-core RC drill chip sample material is riffle split, where sample is dry. In case of
techniques and		If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet		wet sample a representative ‘grab’ sample method is utilized.
		_or dry. _		The samplepreparation technique is total material dried andpulverized to

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
sample		For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample		nominally 85% passing 75 µm particle size, from which a 40g charge was
preparation		preparation technique.		representatively riffle split off, for assay.
		Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise		Standard check (known value) sample were not used in all cases. Where used the
		representivity of samples.		known values correspond closely with the expected values. A duplicate (same
		Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material		sample duplicated) were commonly inserted for every 20 or 30 samples taken.
		collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.		There is a significant amount of coarse gold at Mt Stirling Well. This is reflected in
		Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being		the poor repeatability of some samples and also was noted on the drill logs.
		sampled.
Quality of assay		The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures		Various independent laboratories have assayed samples from the project over the
data and		used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.		years. In general they were internationally accredited for QAQC in mineral analysis.
laboratory tests		For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters		No geophysical tools have been used to date.
		used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading		The laboratories inserted blank and check samples for each batch of samples
		times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.		analysed and reports these accordingly with all results.
		Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates,
		external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of
		bias) andprecision have been established.
Verification of		The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative		Selected significant intersections were resampled from original remnant sample
sampling and		company personnel.		material and analysed again.
assaying		The use of twinned holes.		No twinned holes have been used to date.
		Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data		Documentation of primary data is field log sheets (hand written). Primary data is
		storage (physical and electronic) protocols.		entered into application specific data base. The data base is subjected to data
		Discuss any adjustment to assay data.		verification program, erroneous data is corrected. Data storage is retention of
				physical log sheet, two electronic backup storage devices and primary electronic
				database.
Location of data		Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole		Survey control used is hand held GPS for historic holes and differential GPS for the
points		surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource		new holes. No down hole surveys were completed to date. As these areas contain
		estimation.		drillholes to no more than 100m significant deviations are not expected.
		Specification of the grid system used.		Grid systems are various local grid converted to MGA coordinates.
		Quality and adequacy of topographic control.		Topographic control is accurate to +/- 0.5 m for the historic holes and 0.1m for the
				new holes..
Data spacing		Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.		The drill spacing of the historic drilling is variable but generally no greater than
and distribution		Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of		200m by 40m, with some areas infilled to 80m by 40m. The new drilling is 20m by
		geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore		20m spaced.
		Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.		The areas have drilling density sufficient for JORC Inferred category. Further infill
		Whether sample compositing has been applied.		will be required for other categories.
				Sample compositing has been used in areas where mineralisation is not expected to
				be intersected. If results return indicate mineralisation, 1m split samples will be
				submitted for analysis.
Orientation of		Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible		Apart from some reconnaissance RAB drilling, the orientation of the drilling is
data in relation		structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.		approximatelyat right angles to the known mineralisation and sogives a fair

13

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
to geological		If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key		representation of the mineralisation intersected.
structure		mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should		No sampling bias is believed to occur due to the orientation of the drilling.
		be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security		The measures taken to ensure sample security.		Samples were delivered to the laboratory in batches at regular intervals. These are
				temporarilystored in a secure facilityafter drillingand before delivery
Audits or reviews		The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.		The company engages independent consultants who regularly audit the data for
				inconsistencies and other issues. None have been reported to date.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Mineral		Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or		The Mt Stirling Well Prospect is wholly contained within P37/7172. This is
tenement and		material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding		beneficially held 100% by the company, transfers are pending. An application for
land tenure		royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and		Mining Lease M37/1305 has been submitted to the DMP, and is pending approval.
status		environmental settings.
		The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known
		impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration done		Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.		All work relating to previous exploration contained within this report was completed
by other parties				by other parties. Details are included in the references.
Geology		Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.		Details of the geology are found elsewhere in this report.
Drill hole		A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration		Details of the drilling, etc are found within the various tables and diagrams
Information		results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:		elsewhere in this report.
		o easting and northing of the drill hole collar		No material information, results or data have been excluded.
		o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill
		hole collar
		o dip and azimuth of the hole
		o down hole length and interception depth
		o hole length.
		If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not
		Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report,
		the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
Data		In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or		Weighted averages were calculated by a simple weighting of from and to distances
aggregation		minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are		down each hole. Most samples are 1 metre samples. No top cuts were applied.
methods		usually Material and should be stated.		Lower cut-offs used were – Mt Stirling 1.0g/t Au.
		Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and		The high grade nature of the resource at Mt Stirling Well means that little low grade
		longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should		material has been included in the intersection table. At Mt Stirling a small amount
		be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.		of higher grade is consistently present in each intersection as shown in the drill
		The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly		results tables above.
		stated.

14

==> picture [111 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
				 No metal equivalent values are used
Relationship		These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.		Details of geology, and selected cross sections are given elsewhere in this report
between		If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its		 At Mt Stirling Well the gently dipping nature of the mineralisation means that
mineralisation		nature should be reported.		steeply inclined holes give approximately true widths. At Mt Stirling the steep
widths and		If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a		dip of the mineralisation means that drill widths are exaggerated. These are
intercept lengths		clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).		shown in the tables above.
				The tables above show drill widths not true widths. In the case of Mt Stirling
				Well the drill widths are approximatelythe same as true widths.
Diagrams		Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be		Details of geology, and selected cross sections are given elsewhere in this report.
		included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be
		limited to aplan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced		Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable,		Details of the results, drilling, etc are reported elsewhere in this report.
reporting		representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be
		practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
Other		Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including		Details of geology, and selected cross sections are given elsewhere in this report.
substantive		(but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical
exploration data		survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test
		results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential
		deleterious or contaminating substances.
Further work		The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth		Proposed work included drilling of selected twin holes followed by infill and step out
		extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).		RC drilling across all resources. The aim of such work is to increase confidence in
		Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main		the data and also to test for extensions to the known resources. Budgets are being
		geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not		prepared for this work at present.
		commercially sensitive.		In addition a significant number of additional prospects are known to exist within
				the projects as defined by previous RAB and RC drilling intersections. These will
				form the second phase of exploration.
				Various maps and diagrams are presented elsewhere in this report to highlight
				possible extensions and new targets.

15