AI assistant
George Weston Limited — Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement 2023
Apr 3, 2023
42730_rns_2023-04-03_dba2c255-18cb-4871-b28a-9010993e15f0.pdf
Proxy Solicitation & Information Statement
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer

MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR
GEORGE WESTON LIMITED ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS MAY 9, 2023
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS: NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR

March 24, 2023
Dear Fellow Shareholder,
On behalf of the Board and management, I am pleased to invite you to our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Tuesday, May 9, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) at The Royal Conservatory, TELUS Centre for Performance and Learning, Koerner Hall, 273 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Shareholders who are not able to attend in person will be able to listen, participate and vote at the meeting in real time through a web-based platform at https:// web.lumiagm.com/249009731.
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and related materials are enclosed.
This Management Proxy Circular describes the business to be conducted at the meeting. It also contains information on our corporate governance practices and our approach to executive compensation. At the meeting, shareholders will be voting on important matters, and we hope that you take the time to review these meeting materials and exercise your vote. You may vote in person at the meeting, by attending the virtual meeting, or by completing and sending in your proxy form. Please refer to the enclosed materials as they contain relevant information for voting on the business to be conducted at the meeting.
The meeting is an opportunity to listen to and ask questions of the people who are responsible for the performance of George Weston Limited and we hope you can join us. Additional information on how to attend the meeting virtually is enclosed and a webcast will be archived on our website afterward.
We thank you for your continued support of George Weston Limited and look forward to your attendance at this year's meeting.
Yours truly,
Galen G. Weston Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

| Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders Voting Information |
1 |
|---|---|
| About this Circular and Related Proxy Materials | 1 |
| Notice and Access | 1 |
| Questions and Answers on Attending and Voting via the Web-Based Platform | 1 |
| Questions and Answers on the Voting Process | 2 |
| General Information | 5 |
| Share Capital and Principal Shareholder | 5 |
| Business to be Transacted at the Meeting | 6 |
| Receive the Financial Statements | 6 |
| Election of the Board of Directors | 6 |
| Meeting Attendance | 13 |
| Director Compensation | 13 |
| Appointment of the External Auditor | 15 |
| Advisory Resolution on Approach to Executive Compensation | 16 |
| Audit Committee Report to Shareholders | 17 |
|---|---|
| Governance Committee Report to Shareholders | 20 |
| Statement of Corporate Governance Practices | 24 |
|---|---|
| Corporate Governance Matters | 35 |
| Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 39 |
|---|---|
| Introduction | 40 |
| Executive Compensation Philosophy | 40 |
| Executive Compensation and Risk Management | 41 |
| Role of Management and Compensation Consultants | 42 |
| Components of Compensation | 45 |
| Components of Executive Compensation for 2022 | 47 |
| 2022 Compensation Decisions Regarding the Named Executive Officers | 70 |
| Termination and Change of Control Benefits | 72 |
| Compensation Decisions for 2023 | 75 |
| Performance Graph | 77 |
| Summary Compensation Table | 78 |
| Incentive Plan Awards | 80 |
| Pension Plan and Long Service Executive Arrangements | 82 |
| Indebtedness of Directors, Executive Officers and Employees | 83 |
| Director and Officer Liability Insurance | 83 |
|---|---|
| Normal Course Issuer Bid | 83 |
| Non-GAAP Financial Measures | 83 |
| Additional Information | 83 |
| Shareholder Proposals | 84 |
| Contacting the Board of Directors | 84 |
| Board Approval | 84 |
| Schedule A | |

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of George Weston Limited (the "Meeting") will be held on Tuesday, May 9, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) at The Royal Conservatory, TELUS Centre for Performance and Learning, Koerner Hall, 273 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, for the following purposes:
-
- to receive the consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended December 31, 2022, and the auditor's report thereon;
-
- to elect the directors (see "Election of the Board of Directors" in the Management Proxy Circular (the "Circular") for additional details);
-
- to appoint the external auditor and to authorize the directors to fix the external auditor's remuneration (see "Appointment of the External Auditor" in the Circular for additional details);
-
- to vote on the advisory resolution on the approach to executive compensation; and
-
- to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 13, 2023 will be entitled to vote at the Meeting.
If you are not able to attend the Meeting in person, you can attend the Meeting by joining the live web-based platform at https://web.lumiagm.com/249009731. You will need the latest versions of Chrome, Safari, Microsoft Edge or Firefox. Please do not use Internet Explorer as it is not a supported browser for the Meeting. You should allow ample time to join the Meeting to check compatibility and complete the related procedures. See "How do I attend and participate at the Meeting virtually?" in the Circular for detailed instructions on how to attend and vote at the Meeting.
Notice and Access
George Weston Limited (the "Corporation") is using the "notice and access" procedure adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators for the delivery of the Circular and the annual consolidated financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the "Annual Report"). Under the notice and access procedure, you are still entitled to receive a form of proxy (or voting instruction form) enabling you to vote at the Meeting. However, instead of paper copies of the Circular and/or Annual Report, you are receiving this Notice of Meeting which contains information about how to access the Circular and/or Annual Report electronically. The principal benefit of the notice and access procedure is that it reduces costs and the environmental impact of producing and distributing paper copies of documents in large quantities. Shareholders who have consented to electronic delivery of materials are receiving this Notice of Meeting in an electronic format.
The Circular and form of proxy (or voting instruction form) for the common shares of the Corporation (the "Common Shares") provide additional information concerning the matters to be dealt with at the Meeting. You should access and review all information contained in the Circular before voting.
Shareholders with questions about the notice and access procedure can call Computershare Investor Services Inc. ("Computershare") toll free at 1-866-964-0492 or by going to: www.computershare.com/noticeandaccess.
Websites Where the Circular and/or Annual Report are Posted
The Circular and/or Annual Report can be viewed online on the Corporation's website, www.weston.ca, or under George Weston Limited's SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.
Non-Registered and Registered Shareholders
If you would like a paper copy of the Circular and/or the Annual Report, you should first determine whether you are: (i) a nonregistered shareholder; or (ii) a registered shareholder.
- You are a non-registered shareholder (also known as a beneficial shareholder) if you own Common Shares indirectly and your Common Shares are registered in the name of a bank, trust company, broker or other intermediary. For example, you are a non-registered shareholder if your Common Shares are held in a brokerage account of any type.
- You are a registered shareholder if you hold a paper share certificate or a direct registration system ("DRS") statement and your name appears directly on the share certificate(s) or DRS statement.
How to Obtain Paper Copies of the Circular and/or Annual Report
All shareholders may request that paper copies of the Circular and/or the Annual Report be mailed to them at no cost for up to one year from the date that the Circular was filed on SEDAR.
If you are a non-registered shareholder, a request may be made by going to www.proxyvote.com and entering the 16-digit control number located on your voting instruction form and following the instructions provided. Alternatively, you may submit a request by calling Broadridge Investor Communications Corporation ("Broadridge") at 1-877-907-7643, or outside Canada and the United States, at 303-562-9305 (English) or 303-562-9306 (French). A request must be received by April 26, 2023 (i.e., at least seven business days in advance of the date and time specified in your voting instruction form as the voting deadline) if you would like to receive the Circular and/or the Annual Report in advance of the voting deadline and Meeting date.
If you hold a paper share certificate or certificates and your name appears directly on the share certificate(s), and, if you would like to receive the Circular and/or Annual Report: (i) in advance of the voting deadline and Meeting date, then a request may be made by calling Computershare at 1-866-962-0498; or (ii) after the Meeting date and within one year from the date the Circular was filed on SEDAR, then a request may be made by calling Computershare at 1-800-564-6253. A request must be received by April 26, 2023 (i.e., at least seven business days in advance of the date and time specified in your proxy form as the voting deadline) if you would like to receive the Circular and/or the Annual Report in advance of the voting deadline and Meeting date.
Voting
Non-registered shareholders
Non-registered shareholders are entitled to vote through Broadridge or their intermediary, as applicable, or during the Meeting by online ballot through the live web-based platform. Non-registered shareholders should exercise their right to vote by following the instructions of Broadridge or their intermediary, as applicable, as indicated on their voting instruction form. Voting instruction forms will be provided by Broadridge or your intermediary. Voting instruction forms may be returned as follows:
INTERNET: www.proxyvote.com
TELEPHONE: 1-800-474-7493 (English) or 1-800-474-7501 (French)
MAIL: Data Processing Centre, P.O. Box 3700, STN. INDUSTRIAL PARK, Markham, Ontario L3R 9Z9
Broadridge or your intermediary, as applicable, must receive your voting instructions at least one business day in advance of the proxy deposit date noted on your voting instruction form. If you are a non-registered shareholder and you wish to attend and vote at the Meeting (or have another person attend and vote on your behalf), you must complete the voting instruction form in accordance with the instructions provided. These instructions include the additional step of registering the person you have designated to attend the Meeting (either yourself or the person you designated to attend on your behalf) with our transfer agent, Computershare, after submitting the voting instruction form. Failure to register the proxyholder you have designated to attend the Meeting with Computershare will result in such proxyholder not receiving a control number to participate in the Meeting and such proxyholder would only be able to attend the Meeting as a guest. Guests will be able to listen to the Meeting but will not be able to ask questions or vote.
Registered shareholders
Registered shareholders are entitled to vote by proxy or during the Meeting by online ballot through the live web-based platform. Registered shareholders who are unable to attend the Meeting should exercise their right to vote by signing and returning the form of proxy, or voting in advance via the internet, in accordance with the directions on the form. Computershare must receive completed proxies no later than 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 5, 2023 or, if the Meeting is adjourned or postponed, 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and statutory holidays) before the date of the adjourned or postponed Meeting.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
Andrew Bunston Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary March 24, 2023 Toronto, Ontario
1 About the Meeting
VOTING INFORMATION
ABOUT THIS CIRCULAR AND RELATED PROXY MATERIALS
George Weston Limited (the "Corporation" or "Weston") is providing you with this Management Proxy Circular (this "Circular") and other proxy materials in connection with the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Meeting") of the Corporation to be held on Tuesday, May 9, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) at The Royal Conservatory, TELUS Centre for Performance and Learning, Koerner Hall, 273 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Shareholders who are not able to attend the Meeting in person will be able to listen, participate and vote at the Meeting in real time through a web-based platform at https://web.lumiagm.com/249009731.
This Circular describes the items to be voted on at the Meeting as well as the voting process, and provides information about director and executive compensation, the Corporation's corporate governance practices and other relevant matters.
Please see the "Questions and Answers on the Voting Process" section below for an explanation of how you can vote on the matters to be considered at the Meeting, whether or not you decide to attend the Meeting.
Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained in this Circular is given as of March 13, 2023 and all dollar amounts used are in Canadian dollars.
NOTICE AND ACCESS
The Corporation is using the notice and access procedure that allows the Corporation to furnish proxy materials, which includes the annual consolidated financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the "2022 Annual Report"), over the internet instead of mailing paper copies to shareholders. Under the notice and access procedure, the Corporation will deliver proxy-related materials by: (i) posting this Circular, the 2022 Annual Report (and other proxy-related materials) on a website other than SEDAR, in this case www.weston.ca; and (ii) sending the Notice of Meeting informing holders of common shares of the Corporation ("Common Shares") that this Circular, the 2022 Annual Report and other proxy-related materials have been posted on the Corporation's website and explaining how to access them.
On or about April 3, 2023, the Corporation will send to shareholders the Notice of Meeting and the relevant voting document (a form of proxy or a voting instruction form). The Notice of Meeting contains basic information about the Meeting and the matters to be voted on, instructions on how to access the proxy materials, and explains how to obtain a paper copy of this Circular and/or the 2022 Annual Report.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON ATTENDING AND VOTING VIA THE WEB-BASED PLATFORM
- Q: Who can attend and vote at the meeting via the web-based platform?
- A: Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders who log in to the Meeting online will be able to listen, ask questions and securely vote through a web-based platform, provided that they are connected to the internet and follow the instructions set out in this Circular. Shareholders who wish to appoint a proxyholder to represent them at the Meeting (including non-registered shareholders who wish to appoint themselves as proxyholder to attend, participate and vote at the Meeting) must submit their duly completed proxy or voting instruction form AND register the proxyholder with the Corporation's registrar and transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services Inc. ("Computershare") as described below. Failure to register the proxyholder (the person you have designated to attend the Meeting, who could be yourself or another person) with Computershare will result in that proxyholder not receiving a control number to participate in the Meeting and such proxyholder would only be able to attend the Meeting as a guest.
Non-registered shareholders who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholder will be able to attend the Meeting as guests, provided that they are connected to the internet. Guests will be able to listen to the Meeting but will not be able to ask questions or vote.
- Q: How do I attend and participate in the Meeting virtually?
- A: How you vote depends on whether you are a registered or a non-registered shareholder. Please read the voting instructions below that are applicable to you.
In order to attend the Meeting, registered shareholders, duly appointed proxyholders (including non-registered shareholders who have duly appointed themselves as proxyholder) and guests (including non-registered shareholders who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholder) must log in online as set out below.
- Step 1: Log in online at https://web.lumiagm.com/249009731. You will need the latest versions of Chrome, Safari, Microsoft Edge or Firefox. Please do not use Internet Explorer as it is not a supported browser for the Meeting. You should allow ample time to join the Meeting to check compatibility and complete the related procedures.
- Step 2: Follow the instructions below:
Registered Shareholders: Click "Login" and then enter your control number and password "george2023" (case sensitive). The control number located on the form of proxy or in the email notification you received from Computershare is your control number. If you use your control number to log in to the Meeting, any vote you cast at the Meeting will revoke any proxy you previously submitted. If you do not wish to revoke a previously submitted proxy, you should not vote at the Meeting.
Duly appointed proxyholders: Click "Login" and then enter your control number and password "george2023" (case sensitive). Proxyholders who have been duly appointed and registered with Computershare as described in this Circular will receive a control number by email from Computershare after the proxy voting deadline has passed.
Guests: Click "Guest" and then complete the online form.
Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders may ask questions at the Meeting and vote by completing a ballot online during the Meeting. When submitting a question through the virtual platform, please identify whether it relates to a motion being considered as part of the formal business of the meeting, or whether it is general in nature. When requested by the Chair of the Meeting, the Secretary of the Meeting will read the questions submitted through the online platform aloud. If you plan to vote at the Meeting, it is important that you are connected to the internet at all times during the Meeting in order to vote when balloting commences. It is your responsibility to ensure internet connectivity for the duration of the Meeting. You should allow ample time to log in to the Meeting online and complete the check-in procedures.
Non-registered shareholders who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholders may listen to the Meeting as guests. Guests will not be permitted to ask questions or vote at the Meeting.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON THE VOTING PROCESS
- Q: What items of business am I voting on?
- A: You will be voting on:
- the election of directors;
- the appointment of the external auditor and authorization of the directors to fix the external auditor's remuneration; and
- an advisory resolution on the Corporation's approach to executive compensation.
- Q: Am I entitled to vote?
-
A: You are entitled to vote if you were a holder of Common Shares as at the close of business on March 13, 2023, which is the record date of the Meeting. Each Common Share is entitled to one vote.
-
A: How you vote depends on whether you are a registered or a non-registered shareholder. Please read the voting instructions below that are applicable to you.
- Q: Am I a registered shareholder?
- A: You are a registered shareholder if you hold Common Shares in your own name and you have a share certificate or direct registration system (DRS) statement. As a registered shareholder, you are identified on the share register maintained by Computershare as being a shareholder.
Q: How do I vote?
- Q: Am I a non-registered or beneficial shareholder?
- A: Most shareholders are non-registered shareholders. You are a non-registered shareholder if your Common Shares are held in an account in the name of an intermediary, such as a bank, broker or trust company. As a non-registered shareholder, you do not have shares registered in your name, but your ownership interest in Common Shares is recorded in an electronic system. As such, you are not identified on the share register maintained by Computershare as being a shareholder. Instead, the Corporation's share register shows the shareholder of your Common Shares as being the intermediary or depository through which you own your Common Shares.
The Corporation distributes copies of the proxy-related materials in connection with the Meeting to intermediaries so that they may distribute the materials to the non-registered shareholders. Intermediaries often forward the materials to nonregistered shareholders through a service company (such as Broadridge Investor Communications Corporation). The Corporation pays for an intermediary to deliver the proxy-related materials to all non-registered shareholders.
Q: How do I vote if I am a registered shareholder?
A: If you are a registered shareholder attending the Meeting in person, you may vote your Common Shares by proxy or at the Meeting. If you are a registered shareholder attending the Meeting virtually, you may vote your Common Shares by proxy or during the Meeting by online ballot through the live web-based platform.
1. Voting at the Meeting
If you wish to vote your Common Shares in person at the Meeting, you are not required to complete or return the form of proxy sent to you. Please register with Computershare upon arrival at the Meeting.
If you wish to vote your Common Shares at the Meeting virtually, you are not required to complete or return the form of proxy sent to you. Your vote will be taken and counted at the Meeting through the live web-based platform.
2. Voting by Proxy
You can vote by proxy whether or not you attend the Meeting. To vote by proxy, please complete the enclosed form of proxy (also available online at www.investorvote.com) and return it by either of the following means:
- by mail, courier or hand to Computershare at the address listed below; or
- by going online at www.investorvote.com.
You may authorize the management representatives named in the enclosed proxy form to vote your Common Shares, or you may appoint another person or company to be your proxyholder. The names already inserted on the form of proxy are Galen G. Weston, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and Andrew Bunston, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporation. Unless you choose another person or company to be your proxyholder, you are giving these persons the authority to vote your Common Shares at the Meeting.
To appoint another person or company to be your proxyholder, you must insert the other person's or company's name in the blank space provided. That person or company must attend the Meeting to vote your Common Shares in person or by online ballot through the live web-based platform. If you do not insert a name in the blank space, the management representatives named above are appointed to act as your proxyholder. You may also use a different form of proxy than the one included with the materials sent to you.
If you wish to appoint another person or company to be your proxyholder and to attend the Meeting virtually through the live web-based platform, you must complete the additional step of registering such proxyholder with Computershare at www.computershare.com/GeorgeWestonLimited after submitting your form of proxy. Failure to register the proxyholder with Computershare will result in the proxyholder not receiving a control number to participate in the Meeting and such proxyholder would only be able to attend the Meeting as a guest.
Please note that in order for your vote to be recorded, your proxy must be received by Computershare at 100 University Avenue, 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2Y1 or online by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 5, 2023, or two business days before reconvening any adjourned or postponed Meeting.
- Q: How will my shares be voted?
- A: On the form of proxy, you can indicate how you want your proxyholder to vote your Common Shares or you can let your proxyholder decide for you. If you have specified on the form of proxy how you want your Common Shares to be voted on a particular issue (by marking FOR, WITHHOLD, or AGAINST, as applicable), then your proxyholder must vote your Common Shares accordingly. If you have not specified on the form of proxy how you want your Common Shares to be voted on a particular issue, then your proxyholder can vote your Common Shares as he or she sees fit.
Unless contrary instructions are provided, Common Shares represented by proxies appointing management of the Corporation as the proxyholder will be voted:
- • FOR the election of the directors;
- • FOR the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") as the external auditor of the Corporation and the authorization of the directors to fix the external auditor's remuneration; and
- • FOR the advisory resolution on the Corporation's approach to executive compensation.
Q: How do I vote if I am a non-registered shareholder?
A: If you are a non-registered shareholder, you may vote your Common Shares in one of the following ways:
1. Through your intermediary
A voting instruction form will be included with the materials sent to you. The purpose of this form is to instruct your intermediary on how to vote on your behalf. Please follow the instructions provided on the voting instruction form.
2. Attend the Meeting
If you wish to vote your Common Shares in person at the Meeting, you should take these steps:
- Insert your name in the space provided on the voting instruction form provided by your intermediary and sign and return it in accordance with the instructions provided. By doing so, you are instructing your intermediary to appoint you as proxyholder.
- You are not required to complete the other parts of the form, as you will be voting at the Meeting.
- Please register with Computershare upon arrival at the Meeting.
If you wish to vote your Common Shares during the Meeting by online ballot through the live web-based platform, you should take these steps:
- Step 1: Insert your name in the space provided on the voting instruction form provided by your intermediary and sign and return it in accordance with the instructions provided. By doing so, you are instructing your intermediary to appoint you as proxyholder. You are not required to complete the other parts of the form, as you will be voting at the Meeting.
- Step 2: Register yourself as a proxyholder with Computershare at www.computershare.com/GeorgeWestonLimited by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 5, 2023, or two business days before reconvening any adjourned or postponed Meeting. Failure to register yourself as a proxyholder with Computershare will result in you not receiving a control number to participate in the Meeting and you would only be able to attend the Meeting as a guest.
3. Designate another person to be appointed as your proxyholder
You can choose another person (including someone who is not a shareholder of the Corporation) to vote for you as a proxyholder.
If you wish to have your proxyholder vote your Common Shares in person at the Meeting, they must be present at the Meeting to vote for you. If you wish to appoint a proxyholder, you should insert that person's name in the space provided on the voting instruction form provided to you by your intermediary and sign and return it in accordance with the instructions provided. By doing so, you are instructing your intermediary to appoint that person as proxyholder. You are not required to complete the other parts of the form, as your proxyholder will be voting at the Meeting. When your proxyholder arrives at the Meeting, they should register with Computershare.
If you wish to have your proxyholder vote your Common Shares during the Meeting by online ballot through the live webbased platform, they must attend the Meeting to vote for you. If you wish to appoint a proxyholder, you should insert that person's name in the space provided on the voting instruction form provided to you by your intermediary and sign and return it in accordance with the instructions provided. By doing so, you are instructing your intermediary to appoint that person as proxyholder. You are not required to complete the other parts of the form, as your proxyholder will be voting at the Meeting. You must also register your proxyholder with Computershare at www.computershare.com/ GeorgeWestonLimited by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 5, 2023, or two business days before reconvening any adjourned or postponed Meeting. Failure to register the proxyholder you have designated to attend the Meeting virtually on your behalf with Computershare will result in the proxyholder not receiving a control number to participate in the Meeting and such proxyholder would only be able to attend as a guest.
The United States Beneficial holders: To attend and vote at the virtual Meeting, you must first obtain a valid legal proxy from your broker, bank or other agent and then register in advance to attend the Meeting. Follow the instructions from your broker or bank included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker or bank to request a legal proxy form. After first obtaining a valid legal proxy from your broker, bank or other agent, to then register to attend the Meeting, you must submit a copy of your legal proxy to Computershare. Requests for registration should be directed to: Computershare, 100 University Avenue; 8th Floor; Toronto, Ontario; M5J 2Y1 or by email to: [email protected].
- Q: Can I revoke my proxy or voting instructions?
- A: If you are a registered shareholder, you may revoke your proxy by taking one of the following steps:
- you may submit a new proxy to Computershare before 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 5, 2023, or two business days before any adjourned or postponed Meeting is reconvened;
- you (or your attorney, if authorized in writing) may sign a written notice of revocation addressed to the Secretary of the Corporation and deposit it at the registered office of Computershare at any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Meeting or any reconvening of an adjourned or postponed Meeting, at which the proxy is to be used;
- you (or your attorney, if authorized in writing) may sign a written notice of revocation and deliver it to the Chair of the Meeting on the day of the Meeting or the reconvening of an adjourned or postponed Meeting, at which the proxy is to be used; or
- you may vote during the Meeting, in person or by submitting an online ballot through the live web-based platform, which will revoke your previous proxy.
If you are a non-registered shareholder, you should contact your intermediary through which you hold Common Shares and obtain instructions regarding the procedure for the revocation of any voting or proxyholder instructions that you have previously provided to your intermediary.
- Q: What if there are amendments or if other matters are brought before the Meeting?
- A: Your proxyholder has discretionary authority to vote in respect of amendments that are made to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting and other matters that may properly come before the Meeting or any adjourned or postponed Meeting. As of the date of this Circular, management of the Corporation is not aware of any such amendments or other matters to be presented at the Meeting; however, if any such matter is presented, your Common Shares will be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the proxyholder you appointed. If you have not specifically appointed a person as proxyholder, a management representative named in the enclosed proxy form will be your proxyholder, and your Common Shares will be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the management representative.
GENERAL INFORMATION
- Q: How many shares are entitled to be voted?
- A: As of March 13, 2023, there were 139,680,180 Common Shares outstanding. Each Common Share is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted upon at the Meeting.
- Q: Who counts the vote?
- A: Votes cast in advance by way of proxy and votes cast at the Meeting (in person and through the live web-based platform) will be counted by representatives of Computershare who will be appointed as scrutineers at the Meeting.
- Q: Who is soliciting my proxy?
- A: Management of the Corporation is soliciting your proxy. Proxies will be solicited primarily by mail, but employees and agents of the Corporation may also use electronic means. Intermediaries will be reimbursed for their reasonable charges and expenses in forwarding proxy materials to non-registered shareholders.
The Corporation will bear the cost of all proxy solicitations on behalf of management of the Corporation.
- Q: Can I access the annual disclosure documents electronically?
- A: The Corporation's Annual Report, which includes its annual financial statements and notes, this Circular and the Annual Information Form, are available for review on its website at www.weston.ca or under the Corporation's SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.
- Q: Who do I contact if I have questions?
- A: If you have any questions, you may call Computershare at 1-800-564-6253 for further information.
SHARE CAPITAL AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDER
As of March 13, 2023, the record date for the Meeting, there were 139,680,180 Common Shares issued and outstanding. As of such date, Mr. Galen G. Weston beneficially owned, directly and indirectly through entities which he controls, including Wittington Investments, Limited ("Wittington"), a total of 78,650,662 Common Shares, representing approximately 56.3% of the outstanding Common Shares. To the knowledge of the Corporation, no other person beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, 10% or more of the outstanding Common Shares.
BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED AT THE MEETING
The following business will be transacted at the Meeting:
1. RECEIVE THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management will present the annual audited consolidated financial statements at the Meeting and shareholders or their proxyholders will be given an opportunity to discuss the financial results with management.
2. ELECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Seven director nominees are proposed for election to the board of directors of the Corporation (the "Board"). Shareholders or their proxyholders will vote on the election of the directors.
3. APPOINTMENT OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITOR
The Board, on the advice of its Audit Committee, recommends the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Corporation's external auditor. Shareholders or their proxyholders will vote on the appointment of the external auditor and the authorization of the Board to fix the external auditor's remuneration.
4. VOTING ON THE APPROACH TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Shareholders or their proxyholders will vote on the advisory resolution on the Corporation's approach to executive compensation, as discussed in more detail under the "Advisory Resolution on Approach to Executive Compensation" section of this Circular.
RECEIVE THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Corporation's audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022, together with the external auditor's report thereon, and management's discussion and analysis will be placed before the shareholders at the Meeting. These documents are included in the Corporation's 2022 Annual Report. Copies of the 2022 Annual Report in English or French may be obtained from the Secretary of the Corporation upon request. The 2022 Annual Report in English or French is also available under the Corporation's SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com or on the Corporation's website at www.weston.ca.
ELECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board has determined that seven director nominees will be elected at the Meeting. All of the nominees are currently directors of the Corporation and have established their eligibility and willingness to serve on the Board for the next annual term. Management does not believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve as a director, but if that should occur for any reason prior to the Meeting, the proxyholder may vote for another nominee at the proxyholder's discretion. At the Meeting, the nominees will be voted on individually, and in accordance with applicable Canadian securities legislation, the voting results for each nominee will be publicly disclosed. The persons named in the enclosed form of proxy intend to vote for the election of the director nominees. Each director will be elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until such office is earlier vacated.
The director nominee profiles, starting on page 9, tell you about each director nominee's experience and other important information to consider, including how much equity they own in the Corporation, and any other public company boards they sit on. The director nominees have been selected based on their sound leadership and professional reputation and their collective ability to address the broad range of issues the Board considers when overseeing the Corporation's business and affairs. As a group, the director nominees complement each other in respect of their respective skills, experiences and diversity of perspectives.
Independence
Five of the seven director nominees are independent. None of these independent directors has ever served as an executive of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries nor do they have relationships with the Corporation that would interfere with the exercise of their independent judgment.
Skills
Each director nominee has a wealth of experience in leadership, governance and strategic planning and collectively, they possess the skills and expertise that enable the Board to carry out its responsibilities. The skills matrix set out below is used to assess the Board's overall strengths and to assist in the Board's ongoing renewal process, which balances the need for experience and knowledge of the Corporation's business with the benefits of board renewal and diversity. Although the director nominees have a breadth of experience in many areas, the skills matrix lists 9 important qualifications determined by the Board and highlights 5 key skills for each director nominee. The matrix is not intended to be an exhaustive list of each director nominee's skills.
| Skills | Harris | Lockhart | Marwah | Nixon | Stymiest | Weston | Wright |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Leadership/Strategic Planning |
ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü |
| Financial Expertise/Accounting and Financial Reporting |
ü | ü | ü | ||||
| Risk Management/Compliance | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||
| HR/Compensation | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||
| Governance | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||
| Environmental and Social | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||
| Retail/Consumer/Marketing | ü | ü | |||||
| Digital / Technology | ü | ü | |||||
| Real Estate | ü | ü | ü |
Each director nominee was nominated in large part because of the nominee's key leadership attributes. The director nominees have demonstrated informed judgment, knowledge of important business issues and a commitment to operational excellence. Every director is expected to act ethically and with integrity. Directors must understand the Corporation's strategic objectives and reflect its values. Directors are expected to prepare for and actively participate in Board and committee meetings. They must understand the Corporation's corporate governance policies and practices and comply with the Corporation's Code of Conduct (the "Code").
Tenure and Diversity
The Corporation has a Board Diversity Policy and Board Tenure Guidelines. The Tenure Guidelines provide that the Chair of the Board and the Governance, Human Resources, Nominating and Compensation Committee (the "Governance Committee") will undertake an assessment of a director's continued participation on the Board upon the director reaching the age of 75, and annually thereafter, or upon a change in the director's principal occupation. The average tenure of the director nominees is 6.0 years. The following diagram shows tenure of the director nominees broken down by the applicable time periods set out below:

The Board believes that these tenure statistics, and the high calibre of director nominees who are standing for re-election, demonstrate that the Board's renewal process is working effectively.
The Board Diversity Policy has a target that, by 2024, people who identify as women will comprise at least 30% of the Board's directors and that people who identify as visible minorities will comprise at least 25% of the Board's directors. This year, three of the seven director nominees identify as women, representing 43% of the Board's composition, and two of the director nominees identify as visible minorities, representing 29% of the Board's composition Further details on the Corporation's Tenure Guidelines and Board Diversity Policy can be found on pages 7 and 33, respectively, of this Circular.
Majority Voting
The directors are elected annually by the shareholders. The Corporation has established a Majority Voting Policy. Under the policy, the Governance Committee reviews and considers the voting results for each director nominee after the Meeting. Any nominee proposed for election as a director in an uncontested election who does not receive a majority of votes cast in favour of their election must immediately tender their resignation to the Chairman of the Board. In such circumstances, the Governance Committee will expeditiously consider the director's resignation and (absent exceptional circumstances) make a recommendation to the Board to accept the resignation. The Board will have 90 days from the date of the Meeting to make a final decision and will promptly announce that decision (including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the resignation) through a news release. Any such resignation will take effect on acceptance by the Board. Any director who tenders their resignation will not participate in any meeting of the Board or any committee of the Board at which the resignation is considered. This policy applies only to uncontested elections of directors where the number of nominees is equal to the number of directors to be elected.
Voting Results from the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
In 2022, each director who stood for election at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders received votes in favour from at least 97% of the votes cast. Below are the voting results for the election of directors at the Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 10, 2022:
| Name of Nominee | Votes For | Votes Withheld | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Marianne Harris | 132,083,412 | 99.92 % | 104,076 | 0.08 % |
| Nancy H.O. Lockhart | 131,638,818 | 99.58 % | 548,669 | 0.42 % |
| Sarabjit S. Marwah | 131,461,685 | 99.45 % | 725,802 | 0.55 % |
| Gordon M. Nixon | 130,177,004 | 98.48 % | 2,010,483 | 1.52 % |
| Barbara G. Stymiest | 130,180,397 | 98.48 % | 2,007,090 | 1.52 % |
| Galen G. Weston | 129,306,726 | 97.82 % | 2,880,762 | 2.18 % |
| Cornell Wright | 131,190,029 | 99.25 % | 997,459 | 0.75 % |
Director Interlock Policy
The Board has established a Director Interlock Policy with the aim of ensuring that interlocking director relationships will not adversely affect the relevant directors' independent judgment. The Board determines that a prohibited interlock occurs when more than two Board members serve together on the board of another public entity. The Director Interlock Policy prohibits such an interlock unless otherwise approved by the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee reviews each interlock and determines if the interlock adversely affects the ability of the relevant directors to exercise their independent judgment. The policy does not apply to the Chairman of the Board or any management directors. There are currently no prohibited interlocks among the directors.
Director Profiles
The following is a summary of relevant biographical and compensation information of each director nominee, including a description of their background and experience, year first elected or appointed as a director, age, meeting attendance, other boards on which they sit, public board interlocks with other director nominees, if applicable, and director fees received. "Director Fees Received" includes compensation received as a director of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The equity holdings of each director nominee of the Corporation consisting of Common Shares and Deferred Share Units ("DSUs"), and the "Total Market Value of Common Shares and DSUs" for non-management directors are calculated for 2022 as at, and based on the closing price of the Common Shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") on March 13, 2023, which was \$162.83, and for 2021, as at, and based on the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on March 14, 2022, which was \$157.26.
The Corporation's representatives named in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote FOR the nominees listed below:

M. Marianne Harris Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Age 65
Weston Board Details: Director since 2022 Independent
Ms. Harris is a corporate director. Prior to 2013, she was the Managing Director and President of Corporate and Investment Banking for Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. ("Merrill Lynch") and Head of Financial Institutions Group Americas, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith. Prior to Merrill Lynch, she held various investment banking positions with RBC Capital Markets from 1984 to 2000.
In addition to her public board memberships listed below, Ms. Harris is a director of the Public Sector Pension Investment Board and a director of President's Choice Bank. She is also a member of the Dean's Advisory Council at the Schulich School of Business and the Advisory Council of the Hennick Centre for Business and Law. Ms. Harris is a former Chair of the board of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC).
Ms. Harris holds an M.B.A. from the Schulich School of Business, a J.D. (Juris Doctor) degree from Osgoode Hall Law School and a B.Sc. (Honours) from Queen's University.
| BOARD/COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP | Attendance | Attendance Total | Director Fees Received | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 2/2 | # | % | Year | Amount | ||
| Audit Committee | 2/2 | 100 % | 2022 | \$483,200 | |||
| Governance Committee | 2/2 | 6/6 | |||||
| EQUITY OWNERSHIP | |||||||
| Year | Common Shares |
DSUs | Total Common Shares and DSUs |
Total Market Value of Common Shares and DSUs (1) |
Minimum Equity Ownership |
In Progress or Satisfies Share Ownership Policy |
|
| 2022 | 1,620 | 1,045 | 2,665 | \$3,051,636 | \$960,000 | Yes |
| Public Board Interlocks(2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CURRENT PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS | Directors | Boards | ||
| Loblaw Companies Limited | 2016 to present | Cornell Wright | Loblaw Companies Limited | |
| Sun Life Financial Inc. | 2013 to present | Barbara G. Stymiest | Sun Life Financial Inc. | |
| PAST PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS (LAST 5 YEARS) | Galen G. Weston | Loblaw Companies Limited | ||
| Hydro One Limited/Hydro One Inc. | 2015 to 2018 |
(1) Pursuant to the Director Share Ownership Policy, Ms. Harris' equity holdings in Loblaw Companies Limited ("Loblaw") at the time of her election to the Board of the Corporation on May 10, 2022 count towards her minimum equity ownership in the Corporation. Ms. Harris held 22,844 Loblaw common shares and deferred share units with a value of \$3,051,636 based on the March 13, 2023 Loblaw common share price of \$114.59.
(2) The Director Interlock Policy does not apply to Mr. Weston. Please see page 8 for details on the Director Interlock Policy.

Nancy H.O. Lockhart, O. Ont. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Age 68
Weston Board Details: Director since 2019 Independent
Ms. Lockhart, a corporate director, is the former Chief Administrative Officer of Frum Development Group and a former Vice President of Shoppers Drug Mart Corporation.
In addition to her public board memberships listed below, Ms. Lockhart is a director of The Royal Conservatory of Music. Ms. Lockhart is also Chair Emeritus of the Crow's Theatre Company and Chair of the Board of Alignvest Student Housing. She is a former Chair of the Ontario Science Centre, former President of the Canadian Club of Toronto and a former chair of the Canadian Film Centre. Ms. Lockhart is also a former director of the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation and the Loran Scholars Foundation.
Ms. Lockhart has received the Certified Director designation (ICD.D) from the Institute of Corporate Directors.
| BOARD/COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP | Attendance | Attendance Total Director Fees Received |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 4/4 | # % |
Year | Amount | |
| Governance Committee | 5/5 | 2022 | \$400,800 | ||
| Pension Committee | 1/1 | 10/10 | 100 % | 2021 | \$373,500 |
| EQUITY OWNERSHIP | |||||
| Common Year Shares DSUs |
Total Common Shares and DSUs |
Total Market Value of Common Shares and DSUs(1) |
Minimum Equity Ownership |
In Progress or Satisfies Share Ownership Policy |
|
| 2022 1,961 7,707 |
9,668 | \$8,838,902 | |||
| 2021 1,961 5,940 |
7,901 | \$8,504,003 | \$960,000 | Yes | |
| Public Board Interlocks(2) | |||||
| CURRENT PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS | Directors Boards |
||||
| Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust |
2019 to present | Cornell Wright | Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust |
||
| Atrium Mortgage Investment Corporation | |||||
| PAST PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS (LAST 5 YEARS) | |||||
| Loblaw Companies Limited | 2005 to 2019 | ||||
| Gluskin Sheff & Associates Inc. | 2013 to 2019 | ||||
| Barrick Gold Corporation | 2014 to 2018 |
(1) Pursuant to the Director Share Ownership Policy, Ms. Lockhart's equity holdings in Loblaw at the time of her election to the Board of the Corporation on May 7, 2019 count towards her minimum equity ownership in the Corporation. As of May 7, 2019, Ms. Lockhart held 63,397 Loblaw common shares and deferred share units with a value of \$7,261,492 based on the March 14, 2022 closing price of the Loblaw common shares on the TSX of \$114.54 and with a value of \$7,264,662 based on the March 13, 2023 closing price of Loblaw common shares of \$114.59.
(2) Please see page 8 for details on the Director Interlock Policy.

Sarabjit S. Marwah Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Weston Board Details: Director since 2013 Independent
Age 71
Mr. Marwah is the former Vice-Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of The Bank of Nova Scotia. In 2016, he was appointed to the Senate of Canada.
Mr. Marwah is a former Chair and trustee of the Hospital for Sick Children, former Chair of the Humber River Regional Hospital and a former member of the boards of directors of the C.D. Howe Institute and the Toronto International Film Festival.
Mr. Marwah has an M.B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles. He obtained an undergraduate degree in Economics (Honours) from the University of Calcutta and a Masters degree in Economics from the University of Delhi.
| BOARD/COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP Attendance |
Attendance Total | Director Fees Received | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 4/4 | # | % | Year | Amount |
| Audit Committee | 4/4 | 2022 | \$261,500 | ||
| Governance Committee | 5/5 | 13/13 | 100 % | 2021 | \$241,500 |
| EQUITY OWNERSHIP | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Common Shares |
DSUs | Total Common Shares and DSUs |
Total Market Value of Common Shares and DSUs |
Minimum Equity Ownership |
In Progress or Satisfies Share Ownership Policy |
|
| 2022 | 3,500 | 20,132 | 23,632 | \$3,847,999 | \$960,000 | Yes | |
| 2021 | 3,500 | 18,110 | 21,610 | \$3,398,389 | |||
| Public Board Interlocks | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CURRENT PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS | Directors | Boards | |
| ONEX Ltd | 2022 to present | ||
| Cineplex Inc. | 2009 to present | — | — |
| PAST PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS (LAST 5 YEARS) | |||
| TELUS Corporation | 2015 to 2019 |

Gordon M. Nixon, C.M., O. Ont. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Age 66
Weston Board Details: Director since 2014 Independent Lead Director
Mr. Nixon is the Chair of BCE Inc. and the former President and Chief Executive Officer of Royal Bank of Canada, a position he held from August 2001 to August 2014. Mr. Nixon first joined RBC Dominion Securities Inc. in 1979, where he held a number of operating positions, one of which was as Chief Executive Officer.
In addition to his public board memberships listed below, Mr. Nixon sits on the Advisory Board of KingSett Canadian Real Estate Income Fund, L.P. and is a trustee of the Art Gallery of Ontario.
Mr. Nixon has a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) degree from Queen's University and holds Honorary Doctorates of Laws from Queen's University and Dalhousie University. He is a Member of the Order of Canada and the Order of Ontario.
| BOARD/COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP | Attendance | Attendance Total | Director Fees Received | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 4/4 | # | % | Year | Amount | ||
| Governance Committee | 5/5 | 9/9 | 100 % | 2022 2021 |
\$326,500 \$283,950 |
||
| EQUITY OWNERSHIP | |||||||
| Year | Common Shares |
DSUs | Total Common Shares and DSUs |
Total Market Value of Common Shares and DSUs |
Minimum Equity Ownership |
In Progress or Satisfies Share Ownership Policy |
|
| 2022 | 5,000 | 18,300 | 23,300 | \$3,793,939 | Yes | ||
| 2021 | 5,000 | 15,889 | 20,889 | \$3,285,004 | \$960,000 | ||
| Public Board Interlocks(1) | |||||||
| CURRENT PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS | Directors | Boards | |||||
| BCE Inc. | 2014 to present | Cornell Wright | BCE Inc. | ||||
| BlackRock, Inc. | 2015 to present | ||||||
| PAST PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS (LAST 5 YEARS) | |||||||
| — |
(1) Please see page 8 for details on the Director Interlock Policy.

Barbara G. Stymiest, C.M., F.C.P.A. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Age 66
Weston Board Details: Director since 2011 Independent
Ms. Stymiest, a corporate director, is a former member of the Group Executive of Royal Bank of Canada responsible for the overall performance of the bank. Ms. Stymiest is a former Chief Executive Officer of TMX Group Inc., Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer at BMO Capital Markets and Partner of Ernst & Young LLP.
In addition to her public board memberships listed below, Ms. Stymiest is a director of President's Choice Bank, the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and the Advisory Council for the Ivey Institute for Leadership.
Ms. Stymiest has a H.B.A. from the Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario. She is a Fellow Chartered Professional Accountant.
| BOARD/COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP | Attendance | Attendance Total | Director Fees Received | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 4/4 | # | % | Year | Amount | |||
| Audit Committee (Chair) | 4/4 | 13/13 | 100 % | 2022 | \$332,000 | |||
| Governance Committee | 5/5 | 2021 | \$318,500 | |||||
| EQUITY OWNERSHIP | ||||||||
| Year | Common Shares |
DSUs | Total Common Shares and DSUs |
Total Market Value of Common Shares and DSUs |
In Progress or Satisfies Share Ownership Policy |
|||
| 2022 | 2,000 | 25,567 | 27,567 | \$4,488,735 | \$960,000 | Yes | ||
| 2021 | 2,000 | 23,517 | 25,517 | \$4,012,803 | ||||
| Public Board Interlocks(1) | ||||||||
| CURRENT PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS | Directors | Boards | ||||||
| Sun Life Financial Inc. | 2012 to present | M. Marianne Harris | Sun Life Financial Inc. | |||||
| PAST PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS (LAST 5 YEARS) | ||||||||
| BlackBerry Limited | 2007 to 2022 |
(1) Please see page 8 for details on the Director Interlock Policy.

Galen G. Weston Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Age 50
Weston Board Details: Director since 2016 Non-Independent
Mr. Weston is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Chairman and President of Loblaw. He previously held several senior executive positions with Loblaw and its subsidiaries. Prior to joining Loblaw, he was an investment banking analyst for Salomon Brothers in the U.K.
In addition to his public board membership listed below, Mr. Weston is Chairman of President's Choice Bank, Chairman of Wittington and is President of the Weston Family Foundation. Mr. Weston is a former Chair and trustee of Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust.
Mr. Weston has a B.A. from Harvard University and an M.B.A from Columbia University.
| BOARD/COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP | Attendance | Attendance Total Director Fees Received |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 4/4 | # | % | Year | Amount (1) | |||||
| 4/4 | 100 % | 2022 | \$0 | |||||||
| 2021 | \$45,540 | |||||||||
| EQUITY OWNERSHIP | ||||||||||
| Year | Common Shares |
DSUs(2) | Total Common Shares and DSUs |
The value of Mr. Weston's current eligible holdings is \$12,903,287,194. Mr. Weston satisfies the Executive Share Ownership Policy. For details relating to his equity-based share |
||||||
| 2022 | 78,650,662 | 2,266 | 78,652,928 | ownership as an executive, please see the table on page 69. | ||||||
| 2021 | 78,650,662 | 2,228 | 78,652,890 | |||||||
| Public Board Interlocks(3) | ||||||||||
| CURRENT PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS | Directors | Boards | ||||||||
| Loblaw Companies Limited | 2006 to present | M. Marianne Harris | Loblaw Companies Limited | |||||||
| PAST PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS (LAST 5 YEARS) | Cornell Wright | Loblaw Companies Limited | ||||||||
Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
(1) Directors who are members of management do not receive any remuneration for their role as directors of the Corporation. Mr. Weston is the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and did not receive any remuneration for his role as a director of the Corporation in 2022. In 2021 Mr. Weston received \$45,540 as the Chairman of Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust ("Choice Properties" or the "Trust"), which is a subsidiary of the Corporation.
2019 to 2021
(2) Mr. Weston was elected to the Board in 2016 as a non-management director and continued in this capacity until January 2017, at which time he became Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. During his time as a non-management director, Mr. Weston was granted share-based awards in the form of DSUs.
(3) The Director Interlock Policy does not apply to Mr. Weston. Please see page 8 for details on the Director Interlock Policy.

Cornell Wright, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Age 49
Weston Board Details: Director since 2022 Non-Independent
Mr. Wright is President and a Director of Wittington. Mr. Wright joined Wittington in 2021 following a 20-year career at the law firm of Torys LLP, where he was a leading corporate lawyer. Mr. Wright served as Chair of the firm's Corporate practice and former co-head of the firm's M&A practice. Mr. Wright has a broad range of experience in complex transactional, securities, private equity, regulatory, governance and compliance matters. Mr. Wright is a Fellow of The American College of Governance Counsel.
In addition to his public board memberships listed below, Mr. Wright is the Chair of the Board of Directors of the National Ballet of Canada, a Trustee of University Health Network and Executive in Residence at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management.
Mr. Wright holds J.D. and M.B.A degrees from the University of Toronto and a B.A. from McGill University.
| BOARD/COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP | Attendance | Attendance Total | Director Fees Received |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 2/2 | # | % | Year | Amount | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2/2 | 100 % | 2022 | \$398,676 | ||||
| EQUITY OWNERSHIP | |||||||
| Year | Common Shares |
DSUs | Total Common Shares and DSUs |
Total Market Value of Common Shares and DSUs (1) |
Minimum Equity Ownership |
In Progress or Satisfies Share Ownership Policy |
|
| 2022 | — | 965 | 965 | \$157,131 | \$960,000 | Yes | |
| Public Board Interlocks(2) | |||||||
| CURRENT PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS | Directors | Boards | |||||
| BCE, Inc. | 2021 to present | M. Marianne Harris | Loblaw Companies Limited | ||||
| Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust |
2022 to present | Nancy Lockhart | Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust |
||||
| Loblaw Companies Limited | 2022 to present | Gordon Nixon | BCE, Inc. | ||||
| PAST PUBLIC BOARD MEMBERSHIPS (LAST 5 YEARS) | Galen G. Weston | Loblaw Companies Limited |
(1) Mr. Wright has until May 2027 to satisfy the Director Share Ownership Policy.
(2) The Director Interlock Policy does not apply to Mr. Weston. Please see page 8 for details on the Director Interlock Policy.
Meeting Attendance
The following table provides a summary of each director's attendance at Board and committee meetings in 2022:
| Name | Board (9 meetings) |
Audit Committee (5 meetings) |
Governance Committee (5 meetings) |
Pension Committee (1 meeting)(1) |
(#) | (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paviter S. Binning(2) | 2/2 | — | — | 1/1 | 3/3 | 100% |
| Andrew A. Ferrier(2) | 2/2 | 2/2 | — | — | 4/4 | 100% |
| M. Marianne Harris(3) | 2/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 | — | 6/6 | 100% |
| Nancy H.O. Lockhart | 4/4 | — | 5/5 | 1/1 | 10/10 | 100% |
| Sarabjit S. Marwah | 4/4 | 4/4 | 5/5 | — | 13/13 | 100% |
| Gordon M. Nixon | 4/4 | — | 5/5 | — | 9/9 | 100% |
| J. Robert S. Prichard(2) | 2/2 | — | 3/3 | 1/1 | 6/6 | 100% |
| Christi Strauss(2) | 2/2 | 2/2 | — | — | 4/4 | 100% |
| Barbara G. Stymiest | 4/4 | 4/4 | 5/5 | — | 13/13 | 100% |
| Galen G. Weston | 4/4 | — | — | — | 4/4 | 100% |
| Cornell Wright(3) | 2/2 | — | — | — | 2/2 | 100% |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Overall Attendance
(1) The Pension Committee was disbanded effective May 10, 2022 and oversight over the Corporation's pension and benefits matters was transferred to the Governance Committee.
(2) Messrs. Binning, Ferrier and Prichard and Ms. Strauss did not stand for re-election at the Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 10, 2022.
(3) Ms. Harris and Mr. Wright were elected to the Board on May 10, 2022.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The Corporation's director compensation program is structured to compensate directors appropriately for their time, commitment and responsibility as Board members and to remain competitive with director compensation practices in Canada. The program is designed to attract and retain committed and qualified directors and to align their compensation with the long-term interests of the shareholders. To achieve these objectives, directors are required to take 100% of their board retainer and committee fees in DSUs until they satisfy the Director Share Ownership Policy, after which a director has the option to receive up to 50% of all fees in cash, with the balance taken in DSUs. Directors who are employees of the Corporation receive no additional compensation for serving as directors.
Director Deferred Share Unit Plan
A DSU is a right to receive an amount from the Corporation equal to the value of one Common Share. The number of DSUs awarded to a director is equal to the value of the compensation that the director elects or is required to receive in the form of DSUs divided by the volume-weighted average trading price of a Common Share on the TSX for the five trading days prior to the date of the award. DSUs are not paid out until the director ceases to serve on the Board and ceases to hold any position with the Corporation and any company related to the Corporation, thereby providing an equity stake in the Corporation throughout the director's term as a Board member. Dividend equivalents, in the form of additional DSUs that are equal in value to dividends paid on Common Shares, are credited to the director's account on each dividend payment date based on the number of DSUs in the account as of the dividend record date. Following cessation of service with the Corporation and its related entities, payment of DSUs is made in Common Shares purchased on the open market. A Canadian director may elect to defer payment until December 15th of the calendar year following the year in which he or she ceases to hold any position with the Corporation and any of its related entities. DSUs do not entitle the director to any voting or other shareholder rights.
Director Share Ownership Policy
The Corporation believes that it is important that directors demonstrate their commitment to the Corporation through share ownership. In that regard, the Corporation has established a Director Share Ownership Policy for non-management directors. Under the policy, non-management directors are required to hold Common Shares or DSUs with a value of not less than four times the amount of the director's annual retainer. Effective January 1, 2022, the ownership requirement under the Director Share Ownership policy increased from \$900,000 to \$960,000 in connection with the increase to the director's annual retainers at that time. For purposes of the policy, securities are valued at their market value and directors are expected to meet the required level of share ownership within five years of initially being elected or appointed to the Board. To the extent the directors receive an increase in their annual retainer, they have a five-year period from the date of the increase, or from the date of their initial election or appointment to the Board, if later, to attain the incremental ownership requirement. Directors elected or appointed to the Board who were previously or are directors or trustees of either Loblaw and/or Choice Properties are permitted under the policy to count their then holdings in Loblaw and/or Choice Properties towards their target ownership at the date of their election or appointment to the Board, provided that any such holdings were eligible for inclusion toward the individual's previous ownership requirement at Loblaw and/or Choice Properties. All directors either meet the required level of share ownership or are in the process of accumulating securities as required under the policy. For the status of each director nominee under the Director Share Ownership Policy, see their profiles on pages 9 to 12 of the Circular. Management directors are not subject to the Director Share Ownership Policy but instead must satisfy the Executive Share Ownership Policy described on page 69.
2022 Director Compensation Amounts
A summary of the 2022 director compensation amounts is set out below:
| Type of Fee | Amount (\$) |
|---|---|
| Annual Fees | |
| Total Board Retainer | 240,000 |
| Chair and Committee Fees | |
| Independent Lead Director retainer | 50,000 |
| Audit Committee Chair | 30,000 (1) |
| Governance Committee Chair | 30,000 (1) |
| Pension Committee Chair | 15,000 (1)(2) |
| Member of Board committee | 10,000 |
(1) Includes fees received as a committee member.
(2) The Pension Committee was disbanded effective May 10, 2022 and oversight over the Corporation's pension and benefits matters was transferred to the Governance Committee.
Mr. Weston did not receive any remuneration for his role as a director of the Corporation in 2022. The details of Mr. Weston's executive compensation are set out in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. If elected, Mr. Weston will not receive any remuneration in 2023 for his role as a director of the Corporation.
2022 Director Compensation Table
The following table sets out the compensation elements and total compensation earned by each non-management director in 2022 and the manner in which the compensation was paid:
| Fees Breakdown | Allocation of Total Director Fees | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Board Retainer (1) (\$) |
Committee Chair Retainer (\$) |
Committee Member Retainer (\$) |
Total Director Fees Earned (\$) |
All Other Compensation (\$) |
Total Compensation (\$) |
Cash (\$) |
DSUs (2) (\$) |
Allocation of Fees between Cash and DSUs (%) |
| Paviter S. Binning(3) | 91,200 | 5,700 | — | 96,900 | 87,600 (4) | 184,500 | 48,450 | 48,450 | 50% DSUs |
| Andrew A. Ferrier(3) | 91,200 | — | 3,800 | 95,000 | — | 95,000 | — | 95,000 | 100% DSUs |
| M. Marianne Harris(5) | 148,800 | — | 12,400 | 161,200 | 322,000 (6) | 483,200 | — | 161,200 | 100% DSUs |
| Nancy H.O. Lockhart | 240,000 | — | 13,800 | 253,800 | 147,000 (7) | 400,800 | — | 253,800 | 100% DSUs |
| Sarabjit S. Marwah | 240,000 | — | 21,500 (8) | 261,500 | — | 261,500 | — | 261,500 | 100% DSUs |
| Gordon M. Nixon | 240,000 | 85,000 (8,9) | 1,500 (8) | 326,500 | — | 326,500 | — | 326,500 | 100% DSUs |
| J. Robert S. Prichard(3) | 91,200 | — | 7,600 | 98,800 | — | 98,800 | — | 98,800 | 100% DSUs |
| Christi Strauss(3) | 91,200 | — | 3,800 | 95,000 | — | 95,000 | — | 95,000 | 100% DSUs |
| Barbara G. Stymiest | 240,000 | 30,000 | 10,000 | 280,000 | 52,000 (10) | 332,000 | 28,000 | 252,000 | 90% DSUs |
| Cornell Wright(5) | 148,800 | — | — | 148,800 | 249,876 (11) | 398,676 | — | 148,800 | 100% DSUs |
| Total (\$) | 1,622,400 | 120,700 | 74,400 | 1,817,500 | 858,476 | 2,675,976 | 76,450 | 1,741,050 |
(1) Directors are required to take 100% of their board retainer and committee fees in DSUs until they satisfy the Director Share Ownership Policy, after which they may elect to receive up to 50% of their total fees in cash, with the balance taken in DSUs.
(2) In accordance with the DSU Plan, amounts reflect the grant date fair value of DSUs based on the volume-weighted average trading price of the Common Shares on the TSX for the five trading days prior to the date of the grant. As well, additional DSUs are accumulated based on notional equivalents of dividends paid on Common Shares throughout the year. These notional equivalents of dividends are not included in the table.
(3) Messrs. Binning, Ferrier and Prichard and Ms. Strauss did not stand for re-election at the Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 10, 2022.
(4) Includes fees received by Mr. Binning as a director of Loblaw, a subsidiary of the Corporation.
(5) Ms. Harris and Mr. Wright were elected to the Board on May 10, 2022.
(6) Includes fees received by Ms. Harris as a director of Loblaw, a subsidiary of the Corporation, and \$52,000, paid in cash, for her role as a director of President's Choice Bank, a subsidiary of Loblaw.
(7) Includes fees received by Ms. Lockhart as a trustee of Choice Properties, a subsidiary of the Corporation.
(8) Includes fees received for attendance at other meetings of a Board committee.
(9) Includes Independent Lead Director fee.
(10) Ms. Stymiest also received \$52,000, paid in cash, for her role as a director of President's Choice Bank, a subsidiary of Loblaw.
(11) Includes fees received by Mr. Wright as a director of Loblaw and as a trustee of Choice Properties, both subsidiaries of the Corporation.
Outstanding Share-Based Awards
The following table sets forth the value of all share-based awards granted by the Corporation to non-management directors that were outstanding as at January 3, 2023:
| Name of Participant | Number of Shares or Units of Shares That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market or Payout Value of Share-Based Awards That Have Not Vested (\$) |
Market or Payout Value of Vested Share-Based Awards Not Paid Out or Distributed (1) (\$) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paviter S. Binning (2) | — | — | 6,215,035 |
| Andrew A. Ferrier (3) | — | — | 1,632,089 |
| M. Marianne Harris | — | — | 178,235 |
| Nancy H.O. Lockhart (4) | — | — | 1,314,506 |
| Sarabjit S. Marwah | — | — | 3,433,714 |
| Gordon M. Nixon | — | — | 3,121,248 |
| J. Robert S. Prichard (5) | — | — | 9,140,993 |
| Barbara G. Stymiest | — | — | 4,360,708 |
| Christi Strauss (6) | — | — | — |
| Cornell Wright | — | — | 164,590 |
(1) The value of the outstanding DSUs held by the directors is based on the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on January 3, 2023, which was \$170.56, multiplied by the number of outstanding DSUs. The values also include additional DSUs which were accumulated based on notional equivalents of dividends paid on Common Shares.
- (2) Mr. Binning did not stand for re-election at the Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 10, 2022. Mr. Binning is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and during his tenure, he elected to receive a portion of his annual bonus in respect of certain years in executive deferred share units ("EDSUs"). As at January 3, 2023, Mr. Binning held 33,008 EDSUs in addition to the 3,431 DSUs received as a director of Weston. The value of Mr. Binning's EDSUs is \$5,629,844 based on the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on January 3, 2023, which was \$170.56. As at January 3, 2023, Mr. Binning also held 8,654 Loblaw DSUs. Based on the closing price of Loblaw common shares on the TSX on January 3, 2023 of \$120.33, Mr. Binning's Loblaw DSUs had a value of \$1,041,336.
- (3) Mr. Ferrier did not stand for re-election at the Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 10, 2022.
- (4) Ms. Lockhart also holds 67,161 Loblaw DSUs with a value of \$8,081,483 based on the closing price of Loblaw common shares on the TSX on January 3, 2023 of \$120.33 and 37,923 Choice Properties deferred units with a value of \$565,432 based on the closing price of Choice Properties trust units on the TSX on January 3, 2023 of \$14.91.
- (5) Mr. Prichard did not stand for re-election at the Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 10, 2022.
- (6) Ms. Strauss did not stand for re-election at the Corporation's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 10, 2022.
Mr. Weston was elected to the Board in 2016 as a non-management director and continued in this capacity until January 2017, at which time he became Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. During his time as a non-management director, Mr. Weston was granted share-based awards in the form of DSUs. As at January 3, 2023, Mr. Weston held 2,266 DSUs with a value of \$386,489 based on the closing share price of the Common Shares on the TSX on January 3, 2023 of \$170.56. Mr. Weston served as the non-executive Chairman of Choice Properties between 2013 to 2017 and 2019 to 2021 and held 92,525 Choice Properties deferred units as at January 3, 2023 with a value of \$1,379,548 based on the closing price of Choice Properties trust units on the TSX on January 3, 2023 of \$14.91.
APPOINTMENT OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITOR
Appointment of the External Auditor
In keeping with the Corporation's commitment to best practices in corporate governance, the Corporation completed a comprehensive tender process in 2021, overseen by the Audit Committee, for the selection of the Corporation's external auditor. As a result of that process, after a careful review of the proposals received and due consideration of relevant factors, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board the appointment of PwC as the external auditor of the Corporation. At the annual general meeting of the Corporation held on May 10, 2022, shareholders approved the appointment of PwC as the external auditor of the Corporation.
The Board, on the recommendation of the Audit Committee, recommends that PwC be re-appointed as the external auditor of the Corporation to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and that the directors be authorized to fix PwC's remuneration. The Corporation's representatives named in the form of proxy intend to vote FOR the appointment of PwC as the Corporation's external auditor until the next annual meeting of shareholders.
Consolidated External Audit and Other Service Fees
The Audit Committee oversees the fees paid to the independent external auditor for audit and non-audit services. Fees relating to the fiscal year 2022 were as follows:
| 2022 \$(000's) |
|
|---|---|
| Audit fees(1) | 8,937 |
| Audit-related fees(2) | 778 |
| Tax-related fees(3) | 87 |
| All other fees(4) | 2,547 |
| Total fees | 12,349 |
(1) Audit fees include fees for services related to the audit of the Corporation's consolidated financial statements, including its subsidiaries. Audit fees also include fees for services related to the review of quarterly reports, the interpretation of accounting and financial reporting standards and auditor involvement with regulatory filings.
(2) Audit-related fees include fees for French translation services associated with the Corporation's financial and regulatory filings, specified procedures and for the audits of pension plans and charitable foundations.
(3) Tax-related fees include fees for tax compliance services. The Corporation was also billed \$1,283,000 in 2022 for work commenced in 2021, prior to PwC becoming the Corporation's auditor.
(4) All other fees include permissible advisory and support services for ongoing project work commenced prior to PwC becoming the Corporation's auditor.
Prior to PwC, the Corporation's external auditor was KPMG LLP. Fees billed for services rendered by KPMG LLP for the fiscal year 2021 were as follows:
| 2021 \$(000's) |
|
|---|---|
| Audit fees(1) | 8,244 |
| Audit-related fees(2) | 3,174 |
| Tax-related fees(3) | 60 |
| All other fees(4) | 872 |
| Total fees | 12,350 |
(1) Audit fees include fees for services related to the audit of the Corporation's consolidated financial statements, including the audit of Loblaw's consolidated financial statements and the audits of Shoppers Drug Mart, President's Choice Bank and Choice Properties. Audit fees also include fees for services related to the review of quarterly reports, the interpretation of accounting and financial reporting standards, and auditor involvement with filings, such as prospectuses.
- (2) Audit-related fees include fees for French translation services associated with the Corporation's financial and regulatory filings, the audit of pension plans and for services rendered for certain special projects.
- (3) Tax-related fees include fees for tax compliance services and advice and for services rendered for certain special projects.
(4) All other fees include fees for services and advice rendered for certain special projects and for services related to legislative and/or regulatory compliance.
As part of the Corporation's corporate governance practices, the Audit Committee has adopted a policy prohibiting the external auditor from providing non-audit services to the Corporation or its subsidiaries unless the services are approved in advance by the Chair of the Audit Committee. The external auditor is required to report directly to the Audit Committee.
ADVISORY RESOLUTION ON APPROACH TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Advisory Resolution on Approach to Executive Compensation
At the Meeting, the shareholders will be asked to consider an advisory resolution (the "Say on Pay Resolution") regarding the Corporation's approach to executive compensation, which is described in detail in the section of this Circular titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis", which commences on page 39. In 2022, shareholders were asked to consider an advisory resolution regarding the Corporation's approach to executive compensation, which received the approval of 97.33% of shareholders.
Pay for performance is a cornerstone of the Corporation's compensation philosophy, which is intended to align the interests of the Corporation's executives with those of its shareholders. This compensation philosophy enables the Corporation to attract and retain high-performing executives who will be motivated to create value for shareholders.
The Board and management of the Corporation recommend that the shareholders vote FOR the adoption of the advisory Say on Pay Resolution.
The Corporation's representatives named in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote FOR the adoption of the Say on Pay Resolution.
Votes on the Say on Pay Resolution are advisory and will not be binding on the Board or the Corporation. However, the Governance Committee will review and analyze the results of the vote and take it into consideration when reviewing the Corporation's executive compensation philosophy.
The form of Say on Pay Resolution to be submitted to the shareholders at the Meeting, subject to such amendments, variations or additions as may be approved at the Meeting, is set forth below:
BE IT RESOLVED THAT on an advisory basis and not to diminish the role and responsibilities of the Board of Directors, the shareholders accept the approach to executive compensation disclosed in the Circular, delivered in advance of the 2023 Annual Meeting of the shareholders of George Weston Limited.
2 Committee Reports
AUDIT COMMITTEE

Independent

M. Marianne Harris Independent

Sarabjit S. Marwah Independent
The Audit Committee, on behalf of the Board, oversees the integrity of the Corporation's financial statements and related public disclosure. In doing so, the Audit Committee oversees the Corporation's internal controls over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures and internal audit function. The Audit Committee regularly meets with the Corporation's senior officer in charge of the internal audit function and the senior compliance professional in charge of the internal controls compliance group. The Audit Committee also oversees procedures for the receipt, retention and follow-up of any complaints regarding the Corporation's accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the Corporation's legal and regulatory compliance program and the Corporation's enterprise risk management ("ERM") program, and reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of applicable controls related to the Corporation's environmental, social and governance ("ESG") disclosures.
Each year, the Audit Committee reviews and evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of the external auditor and recommends the external auditor to the Board for appointment by the shareholders. The Chair of the Audit Committee is involved in the selection process for the Lead Audit Partner at the external auditor of the Corporation. The Audit Committee ensures that a regular rotation occurs as required under current auditing standards.
All members of the Audit Committee are independent and financially literate as required under applicable Canadian securities legislation.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholders:
On behalf of the Board, the Audit Committee is pleased to share with you the Audit Committee's report and some of the Committee's significant accomplishments in 2022.
2022 Highlights:
- ü Oversaw the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls and procedures related to the Corporation's financial and ESG disclosures
- ü Oversaw the transition of the Corporation's external auditor from KPMG LLP to PwC
- ü Oversaw the related party transactions between the Corporation and its affiliates
- ü Oversaw management's monitoring and mitigation of cyber-security risks
- ü Supervised the Corporation's legal and regulatory compliance program and Enterprise Risk Assessment and ERM programs and reviewed risks facing the Corporation and how those risks are being managed
- ü Oversaw the changes to the Corporation's external financial reporting resulting from the disposition of the Corporation's Weston Foods business
- ü Evaluated the external auditor's performance and monitored the quality and effectiveness of the relationship among the external auditor, management and the Audit Committee
Overview
The Audit Committee meets at least once every quarter. The Audit Committee's specific duties and responsibilities are based on its mandate and work plan. At each quarterly meeting, the Audit Committee meets separately in camera with the Chief Financial Officer, representatives of the internal audit group, the external auditor, and the executive responsible for compliance matters. In addition, it holds an in camera session without management present at each meeting. The Audit Committee met five times in 2022.
Each year, the Audit Committee reviews its mandate to ensure its effectiveness in fulfilling its responsibilities. The Audit Committee communicates regularly with management and the internal and external auditors.
The Audit Committee approved its mandate in 2022 and it is available at www.weston.ca. The members of the Audit Committee are satisfied that the Committee fulfilled its responsibilities in 2022.
Financial Reporting
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Corporation's annual and interim consolidated financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2022 and the interim quarters. The Audit Committee also reviewed the external auditor's reports thereon and heard directly from the external auditor on key risk areas. The purpose of this review is to provide reasonable assurance that the Corporation's financial reporting is complete and fairly presented in all material respects, and that the accounting principles used to prepare the financial statements are appropriate, in particular where judgments, estimates and risks are involved. This review is designed to ensure that adequate disclosure of material issues has been provided.
The Audit Committee assessed the use of non-GAAP financial measures and their presentation within the financial documents. Based on the considerations above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Corporation's annual audited consolidated financial statements be approved and released on March 1, 2023.
ESG Reporting
The Audit Committee reviewed the adequacy and effectiveness of controls relating to the Corporation's ESG disclosure and was satisfied that such controls were sufficient.
Internal and External Auditor
Throughout the year, the Chair of the Audit Committee met regularly with PwC, representatives of the internal audit group and senior members of the Corporation's financial reporting group. In 2022, the Audit Committee reviewed and approved the annual audit plan of the internal audit group and PwC and received regular reports from Internal Audit Services. In addition, the Audit Committee received reports on key audit matters from PwC.
The Audit Committee oversaw the transition of the Corporation's external auditor from KPMG LLP to PwC. The Audit Committee is satisfied that PwC is independent from the Corporation and management. The Audit Committee proposed that the Board recommend to the shareholders the re-appointment of PwC as the external auditor of the Corporation at the Meeting.
Internal Control Compliance
The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of management's review of the design and operating effectiveness of the Corporation's (i) internal control over financial reporting, and (ii) disclosure controls and procedures to ensure the timely disclosure of all material information about the Corporation as required by applicable law or security exchange rules.
Throughout 2022, the Audit Committee reviewed management's administration of the Corporation's Internal Control Compliance ("ICC") program, including by reviewing the 2022 ICC Scoping and Risk Assessment Plan and periodic progress thereon. The Audit Committee reviewed quarterly reports from management with respect to the Corporation's system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
Enterprise Risk Management
The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of certain aspects of the Corporation's ERM program. The Audit Committee also oversees key risks delegated to it by the Board and is responsible for satisfying itself that management has taken appropriate actions to ensure the effective management of such risks.
At Audit Committee meetings throughout the year, the Audit Committee received reports from management on the various key risks facing the Corporation and how they were being mitigated. Management provides quarterly reports to the Audit Committee on the status of certain key risks, anticipated impacts in future quarters, and significant changes in key risk indicators. The Audit Committee also reviewed and recommended to the Board for approval the ERM plan, ERM Corporate Charter and risk appetite statement, and reviewed the corresponding management action plans.
Information Technology
The Audit Committee also reviewed management's oversight of risks relating to information technology affecting the Corporation, including cyber-security. The Audit Committee receives regular reports from management with respect to the Corporation's systems, policies, controls and procedures that management has implemented to identify, manage and mitigate risks related to information technology and the Corporation's information technology systems, including cyber-security.
Legal, Regulatory, Ethics, Related Party Transactions and Tax
Throughout 2022, the Audit Committee provided oversight of the Corporation's legal, regulatory and ethics compliance program and reviewed updates on compliance matters relating to financial reporting and updates on material legislative and regulatory developments, material litigation, regulatory filings, material transactions with related parties and tax matters affecting the Corporation.
Respectfully submitted,
Audit Committee
Barbara G. Stymiest (Chair) M. Marianne Harris Sarabjit S. Marwah
For additional information regarding each member of the Audit Committee, please see pages 9 to 12. For additional information regarding the activities of the Audit Committee, see the Corporation's Statement of Corporate Governance Practices on pages 24 to 38.
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Gordon M. Nixon (Chair) Independent

M. Marianne Harris Independent

Nancy H.O. Lockhart Independent

Independent

Barbara G. Stymiest Independent
The Governance Committee believes that good corporate governance is essential to strong performance. The Corporation's governance practices are designed to provide oversight and accountability, ensure trust with its stakeholders and promote the long-term interests of its shareholders.
The Governance Committee is responsible for the oversight of the Corporation's governance practices, including the development and implementation of good governance principles, consistent with high standards of corporate governance. On an annual basis, the Governance Committee evaluates the performance and practices of the Board, including a review of Board policies and mandates and, together with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, a review of the composition of the Board committees. The Governance Committee oversaw all elements of the Corporation's ESG program, including reviewing and approving its ESG report, prior to the transition of the oversight of ESG matters to the Board following the release of the Corporation's 2022 ESG report.
As part of its mandate, the Governance Committee, together with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, identifies and recommends candidates for nomination to the Board as directors. The Governance Committee also recommends to the Board for approval any changes to directors' compensation arrangements. In addition, the Governance Committee monitors the orientation program for new directors and continuing education for all directors, and oversees the process for assessing the performance of the Board, its committees and individual directors.
The Governance Committee assists the Board with overseeing the design of the Corporation's executive compensation programs, including its incentive programs and the compensation of the named executive officers (the "NEOs") identified on page 40. The Governance Committee is also responsible for overseeing talent management and succession planning for the Corporation's senior executive positions.
Key Skills and Experiences
The Board believes that the members of the Governance Committee, individually and collectively, have the requisite knowledge, skill and experience in governance and compensation matters, including human resource management, executive compensation and general business leadership, to fulfill the Committee's mandate. All members of the Committee have substantial knowledge and experience as senior executives of large and complex organizations and served as directors of other publicly traded companies. The chart below sets out the relevant experience of each member of the Governance Committee:
| Name of Member Experience in Governance and Executive Compensation |
|
|---|---|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | -- |
| M. Marianne Harris | • Director and member of Loblaw's Governance, Employee Development, Nominating and Compensation Committee • Chair of the Governance, Investment & Conduct Review Committee of Sun Life Financial Inc. • Chair of the Governance Committee of the Public Sector Pension Investment Board • Executive experience as former Managing Director and President of Corporate and Investment Banking for Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. |
|---|---|
| Nancy H.O. Lockhart | • Director and Chair of the Atrium Mortgage Investment Corporation's Governance Committee • Trustee and member of Choice Properties' Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee • Former director and member of Loblaw's Governance, Employee Development, Nominating and Compensation Committee • Former Board Chair and member of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee for Gluskin Sheff & Associates Inc. • Former director and member of Barrick Gold Corporation's Governance Committee |
| Sarabjit S. Marwah | • Executive experience as former Vice-Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of The Bank of Nova Scotia • Chair of the Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Cineplex Inc. • Former member of TELUS Corporation's Corporate Governance Committee |
| Gordon M. Nixon | • Executive experience as former President and Chief Executive Officer of Royal Bank of Canada • Member of the Management Development and Compensation Committee and Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee of BlackRock, Inc. • Chair of BCE Inc. and former member of its Corporate Governance Committee and Management Resource & Compensation Committee |
| Barbara G. Stymiest | • Executive experience as former member of the Group Executive of Royal Bank of Canada, former Chief Executive Officer of TMX Group Inc., former Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of BMO Capital Markets • Director and former member of Sun Life Financial Inc.'s Management Resources Committee • Former director and member of Blackberry Limited's Compensation, Nomination and Governance Committee |
Board Succession Planning and Nomination Process
The Board regularly reviews potential vacancies on the Board. The Governance Committee assists the Board by maintaining an evergreen list of potential candidates and identifying individuals for the Board's consideration at the appropriate time. The Corporation has in place director tenure guidelines, which provide that the Chairman and the Governance Committee will undertake an assessment of a director's continued participation on the Board upon the director reaching the age of 75, and annually thereafter, or upon a change in the director's principal occupation. The director tenure guidelines do not apply to the Chairman or any management directors.
In addition to the formal director tenure guidelines, the Governance Committee:
-
- undertakes an annual Board effectiveness evaluation that enables the Governance Committee and the Board to solicit feedback regarding director contribution, skill set and expertise;
-
- maintains a director skills matrix to ensure that, in choosing director candidates, it focuses appropriately on critical competencies and experience;
-
- monitors director turnover through the evaluation process and, to the extent appropriate, from time to time requests directors who are long serving and who have a readily replaceable skill set or experience not to stand for re-election;
-
- annually reviews Board committee chairs and memberships with a view to balancing the desire for diverse perspectives with the need for experience and subject matter expertise; and
-
- provides disclosure in this Circular in respect of director tenure, the director evaluation process and director turnover with an explanation of how the Corporation's approach ensures diversity of skills, experience and background on the Board and an appropriate level of turnover.
In summary, each year the Governance Committee undertakes a review of the composition of the Board, the performance of the individual directors and the mandate and composition of the committees of the Board. Recommendations for changes, if any, are developed by the Governance Committee and subsequently discussed with the Board and with the controlling shareholder. The Board is of the view that these processes have worked well and have resulted in governance that has been both effective and adaptive to the changing nature of the businesses and the markets in which the Corporation operates.
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholders:
On behalf of the Board, the Governance Committee is pleased to share with you some of the Committee's significant accomplishments in the past year:
| 2022 Highlights: | |
|---|---|
| ü Reviewed the size, composition and diversity of the Board and its Committees and maintained an "evergreen" list of director candidates |
|
| ü Oversaw the design of the Corporation's 2022 Short-Term Incentive Plan ("STIP") and Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") |
|
| ü Oversaw the Corporation's ESG program and disclosure prior to its transition to the Board following the release of the Corporation's 2021 ESG report |
|
| ü Oversaw changes to the Corporation's governance structure following the sale of Weston Foods | |
| ü Oversaw the performance and assessment of the Board and its committees | |
| ü Reviewed the personal objectives of senior executives and assessed their performance against such objectives |
|
| ü Assessed senior executive succession candidates in respect of the Corporation and its operating companies |
|
| ü Reviewed the Corporation's diversity and inclusion strategy, initiatives and progress thereon | |
| ü Conducted and reported on the annual Board assessment consisting of a confidential survey of all directors |
Executive Talent Management and Succession Planning
The Governance Committee is entrusted with the responsibility of overseeing the Corporation's approach to talent management and succession planning for senior executive roles. The Governance Committee receives reports on the development of senior executives, updates on the talent management plans across the organization and performance evaluation processes, which are designed to improve individual leadership and management skills. The succession planning process includes an annual review of each senior executive position and the performance of the incumbent.
Board Composition and Succession
The Governance Committee's focus is to maintain a strong, vibrant and engaged Board that understands the Corporation's businesses. The Governance Committee assesses and evaluates the effectiveness of the Board and identifies areas where the Board may benefit from new directors with additional skills, experience and diverse backgrounds. The Board Diversity Policy includes a target that people who identify as women will comprise at least 30% of the Board's directors and that, by 2024, people who identify as visible minorities will comprise at least 25% of the Board's directors. The list of nominees for the upcoming Meeting includes three nominees who identify as women and two nominees who identify as visible minorities, representing 43% and 29% of the Board's composition, respectively. Seven directors have been proposed for election to the Board at the Meeting. The Board considers this to be an appropriate size given the nature of the Corporation's business.
The Governance Committee is responsible for the process of identifying prospective director nominees. The Governance Committee assesses the appropriate size of the Board and whether any vacancies are expected and reviews the skills matrix of current Board members to determine criteria and qualifications to be considered when recruiting new director nominees. Each candidate is evaluated with respect to his or her experience and expertise, with particular attention paid to those areas of expertise that could best complement the current Board. This year, the Governance Committee has again included in this Circular a skills matrix that the Governance Committee used as a tool in managing Board succession. This matrix was used to identify the skills, experience and expertise required on the Board. The Governance Committee also assesses any concerns relating to potential conflicts, independence, interlocking board memberships, or time commitment that the candidate may present. Before being put forward as a director nominee, a candidate must meet the Chair of the Governance Committee, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and other Board members to discuss the Board's expectations in regards to contribution and commitment obligations.
Director Education and Training Program
The Governance Committee is responsible for ensuring the provision of continuing education programs for the Corporation's directors. The educational program includes presentations by internal and external experts on specific topics of interest and importance to the Board and each of its committees and on specialized or complex areas of the Corporation's business, to assist directors in carrying out their responsibilities. These presentations are in addition to regular reporting from senior management and other elements of the Corporation's continuing education program.
Environmental, Social and Governance Strategy
In May 2022, oversight of ESG matters at the Corporation was transitioned from the Governance Committee to the Board. Prior to the transition, the Governance Committee oversaw the Corporation's ESG program and received periodic reports on the program from management. The Governance Committee also oversaw the continued development of the program and reviewed and approved the Corporation's annual ESG report.
KEY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS IN 2022
The Board reviewed the Corporation's financial performance in 2022, and determined the NEOs' incentive payouts under the Corporation's plans, as applicable, in part based on such performance:
- The short term incentive plans of Loblaw and Choice Properties paid out at 179.9% and 111.2% of target, respectively, for the applicable NEOs, which resulted in a corporate payout factor for the Corporation's NEOs of 161.4%.
- The 2020 performance share units ("PSUs") that vested in 2023 had a payout factor of 117.9% of target for the Corporation's NEOs.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY
The Corporation's compensation philosophy guides every aspect of the Corporation's strategy, programs, policies and decisions on executive compensation. The Governance Committee reviews and approves the Corporation's compensation philosophy and programs for executive officers. The Corporation's philosophy is set out below:
The Corporation believes that its compensation structure must be designed to attract, motivate and retain the best candidates for the challenging roles that the Corporation's executive officers fulfill. To this end, the Corporation strives for executive compensation programs that are competitive with market and industry practices to enable the Corporation to attract, motivate and retain executives with the talent and experience to ensure that the Corporation meets its strategic and operational objectives.
Pay for performance is a cornerstone of the Corporation's compensation philosophy. The compensation programs for all employees, including executives, are results oriented. The Corporation believes that a strong pay-for-performance focus should align compensation with the successful execution of business strategy, sustained long-term performance and shareholder interests. This objective is achieved through the design of the Corporation's short and long-term compensation plans. In particular, the Corporation believes that granting PSUs to all executives provides a strong link between pay and performance.
Executive compensation should align with the long-term interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. The Corporation believes its STIP and LTIP programs accomplish this objective. The Corporation's STIP is a balanced program comprised of different performance measures that focus executives on the key drivers of the business and value creation over both the short and long-term.
The 2022 LTIP is fully at risk and balances the use of (i) stock options, which align an executive's interest with shareholders in share price appreciation; and (ii) PSUs, which focus executives on the delivery of key objectives set forth in the Corporation's strategic plan. The Corporation also expects executives to meet minimum share ownership requirements that apply to executives at the senior vice president level and higher, to reinforce the alignment between executive compensation and longterm shareholder interests.
The principles of good governance must underlie the Corporation's executive compensation programs. The programs are designed to promote responsible decision-making by rewarding senior executives for execution of business strategy without taking undue risks.
Governance Practices
The Governance Committee is committed to ensuring that the Corporation's approach to governance practices satisfies regulatory requirements and aligns with best practices. In connection with the sale of Weston Foods, the Governance Committee provided oversight for changes to the governance structure of the Corporation and certain changes at the corporate centre.
The Governance Committee also continues to work with management to ensure adherence to a robust process for reviewing and approving related party transactions. The Governance Committee is confident that management has considered the relevant legal and governance considerations associated with related party transactions, and has implemented a sound governance framework to address them when they arise.
The Governance Committee is confident that the Corporation has strong and practical governance systems in place. At the same time, the Governance Committee remains committed to the ongoing evaluation of its practices and monitoring of emerging best practices to deliver shareholder value.
Respectfully submitted,
Governance Committee
Gordon M. Nixon (Chair) M. Marianne Harris Nancy H.O. Lockhart Sarabjit S. Marwah Barbara G. Stymiest
For additional information regarding each member of the Governance Committee, please see pages 9 to 12. For additional information regarding the activities of the Governance Committee, see the Corporation's Statement of Corporate Governance Practices on pages 24 to 38.
3 Statement of Corporate Governance Practices
STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
The Corporation's Board and management are dedicated to strong corporate governance practices designed to maintain high standards of oversight, accountability, integrity and ethics while promoting long-term growth and complying with the Canadian Securities Administrators' Corporate Governance Guidelines (the "Governance Guidelines"). The Corporation's strong governance practices are reflected in its approach and application of policies and practices, some of which are highlighted below:
| GOVERNANCE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approach | Reference | Application | Highlights | |
| Majority Voting Policy | See page 8 for additional detail See Policy on: www.weston.ca |
• Annual election of directors by Shareholders • Director in an uncontested election who does not receive a majority of votes cast in favour of their election must tender resignation • Governance Committee reviews resignation and makes recommendation to the Board |
• At least 97% of total votes cast at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders were cast in favour of each of the directors |
|
| Independence Statement | See page 30 for additional detail |
• Majority of the Board to be comprised of independent directors |
• 71% of directors are independent • 100% of Audit Committee members are Independent • 100% of Governance Committee members are Independent |
|
| Board Effectiveness | See page 33 for additional detail • | Ensures that the Board and its Committees are functioning at optimal levels |
• Annual assessment of the performance and effectiveness of the Board and its Committees, and Committee Chairs • Independent Lead Director in place to drive strong independent Board oversight |
|
| Share Ownership Policy | See pages 13 and 69 for additional detail |
• Aligns the interests of directors and executives with those of shareholders • Applies to each director and executive at the SVP level and higher |
• All directors and executives either satisfy the required level of share ownership or are in the process of accumulating the securities as required under the policy |
|
| Continuing Education | See page 32 for additional detail • | Ensures relevant continuing education sessions are provided to directors |
• 13 continuing education sessions were provided to a Committee or the Board in 2022 |
|
| Director Tenure Guidelines | See page 7 for additional detail | • Fosters ongoing renewal of the Board's membership • Chairman and Governance Committee Chair assess each director's continued participation on the Board upon the director reaching the age of 75 and annually thereafter, or upon a change in the director's principal occupation |
• 43% of director nominees have tenure of 0 to 5 years • 43% of director nominees have tenure of 5 to 10 years • 14% of director nominees have tenure of 10+ years • Average tenure of 6.0 years |
|
| Director Interlock Policy | See page 8 for additional detail | • Ensures that interlocking director relationships will not adversely affect independent judgement • Prohibited interlock occurs when more than two directors, other than the Chairman, sit on the board of another public entity • Governance Committee reviews interlocking directors |
• Zero prohibited interlocks among independent directors and among director nominees |
|
| Related Party Transactions |
See page 19 for additional detail | • Oversight of related party transactions rests with the Audit Committee • The Board approves significant related party transactions within the Weston Group (as defined below) |
• Quarterly reports on related party transactions delivered to the Audit Committee • The Board oversaw all significant related party transactions in 2022 |
|
| Corporate Opportunities Principles |
See page 29 for additional detail |
• Framework established to facilitate decision-making process to deal with corporate opportunities which could be of interest to more than one entity in the Weston Group |
• Annual review of strategic focus areas for each of the main businesses in the Weston Group • Annual review of corporate opportunity principles against entity strategies |
|
| Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-On-Pay) |
See page 16 for additional detail | • Provides shareholders with an opportunity to vote on the Corporation's approach to executive compensation |
• 97.33% of votes cast at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders were cast in favour of the Corporation's approach to executive compensation |
|
| Executive Clawback Agreement |
See page 41 for additional detail • | Deterrent to executives taking excessive risk • | Part of overall executive compensation program designed to align interests of the Shareholders with the Corporation |
| COMPLIANCE AND ETHICS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approach | Reference | Application | Highlights | ||
| Code of Conduct | See Code on: www.weston.ca | • Reflects the Corporation's commitment to high standards of ethical conduct and business practices • Addresses conflicts of interest, compliance with laws, rules and regulations, confidentiality and fair dealing |
• Annual review and approval of the Code • Annual acknowledgment by the Corporation's employees and directors of their commitment to abide by the Code. |
||
| Ethical Business Conduct | See page 35 for additional detail • | Integrity Action Line – Toll-free number that any employee or director can use to report conduct thought to violate the Code • Anti-Fraud Policy – Fraud reporting protocols established to ensure fraud reporting to senior management • Accounting, Auditing and Internal Controls Procedures - outlines the procedures for receipt and treatment of complaints received in connection with accounting, internal controls, disclosure controls or auditing matters |
• Quarterly review of integrity action line comments with the Audit Committee • Annual review of the Anti-Fraud Policy and the Accounting, Auditing and Internal Controls Procedures by the Audit Committee • Quarterly compliance reporting to the Audit Committee |
||
| Compliance with Laws Policy |
Referenced in the Code on: www.weston.ca |
• Reflects the Corporation's commitment to compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and describes expectations of employees to ensure such compliance |
• Administered by the Regulatory Compliance and Ethics function, which is overseen by the Audit Committee • Robust compliance program with a focus on key verticals applicable to the Corporation, including Competition Law compliance |
||
| Securities Trading Policy | See page 42 for additional detail |
• Addresses trading restrictions for the Corporation's employees and others subject to the policy • Addresses procedures for the reporting of trades by the Corporation's reporting insiders |
• Annual review and approval of the policy • Prohibits trading, directly or indirectly, in the securities of Weston, Loblaw or Choice Properties while in possession of material undisclosed information |
||
| Disclosure Policy | See page 38 for additional detail |
• The Disclosure Committee is responsible for the administration and implementation of the Disclosure Policy • Describes the processes and procedures of the Corporation in connection with the timely disclosure of material information • Provides direction and guidance on communications with external audiences • Establishes consistent guidance for determining what information is material and avoiding selective disclosure |
• Quarterly review of disclosure documents, including the interim management's discussion and analysis, interim financial statements and news releases • Quarterly review and reporting on the application of non-GAAP measures • Annual review of the management proxy circular and annual information form • File all continuous disclosure documents within the required timelines, including earnings releases, annual and interim reports, annual information form and management proxy circular |
||
| ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE | |||||
| Approach | Reference | Application | Highlights | ||
| Mandate of the Board | See Mandate on: www.weston.ca |
• Oversight of a group-wide approach to ESG • Oversight of the Corporation's approach to ESG • Provides guidance on the group-wide approach to ESG |
• Oversees and monitors the Corporation's approach, policies and practices related to ESG matters • The Board receives periodic reports on ESG initiatives and reviews and approves the Corporation's ESG report annually |
||
| Mandate of the Audit Committee |
See Mandate on: www.weston.ca |
• Review of the controls related to the Corporation's ESG disclosure |
• Audit Committee reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of applicable controls related to the Corporation's ESG disclosures |
| ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (Continued) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approach | Reference | Application | Highlights | |
| ESG Reporting | See page 35 for additional detail • | Cross-functional management working team with representation from all the operating businesses of the Weston Group to advance ESG initiatives |
• Alignment on ESG reporting strategy across all the operating businesses of the Weston Group |
|
| www.loblaw.ca/en/ responsibility |
Loblaw • ESG Steering Committee, comprised of executives, guide the ESG programs and related strategies, activities, priorities, internal measurement and reporting, and external disclosure frameworks |
Loblaw • Release of 2021 ESG Report and 2022 Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure ("TCFD") Report • Conducted a materiality assessment in line with the Global Reporting Initiative standards ("GRI") Standards • Set new targets for the reduction of carbon, including a net-zero emissions for Scope 1 & Scope 2 by 2040 and Scope 3 by 2050, and the reduction of food waste, including zero food waste to landfill by 2030 • ESG performance measures were incorporated into Loblaw's short-term incentive program • Conducted a Climate Risk Assessment which identified five high impact risks and opportunities of Loblaw |
||
| www.choicereit.ca/ sustainability |
Choice Properties • The Board is responsible for risk management oversight and ensures business is conducted to meet high standards of environmental and social responsibility • President and CEO is the executive sponsor of the ESG program • ESG Steering Committee and Standing Sub committees, responsible for setting priorities, tracking metrics and championing program initiatives across the Trust • Dedicated team tasked with the day-to-day management of initiatives related to the ESG program |
Choice Properties • Release of 2021 ESG Report • Release of the inaugural Pathway to Net Zero Report, highlighting Choice Properties' approach to achieving net zero emissions across its entire portfolio • Received validation of Choice Properties' greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions reduction targets by the Science Based Targets initiative ("SBTi") • Continued incorporation of Sustainability Accounting Standards Board ("SASB") metrics, recommendations of the TCFD framework and the United Nations Sustainable Development goals into the ESG Report • 1st submission to the CDP Climate Change Questionnaire, an independent evaluation of public disclosures related to climate change • Received "Prime Status" rating by Institutional Shareholder Services for its ESG corporate rating • 3rd year of voluntary verification of GHG emission statements to a reasonable level of assurance in accordance with ISO standards • 4th submission to the Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark ("GRESB") benchmarking survey, resulting in a Standing Investment score of 82, which is an increase of 4 points from its 2021 score, and achieved a 4-star rating in October 2022 |
||
| Board Diversity Policy | See page 33 for additional detail • | 30% target for representation of people who identify as women on the Board by 2024 • 25% target for representation of people who identify as visible minorities on the Board by 2024 • Consideration of age, ethnicity, gender, diverse backgrounds • Annual self-identification on designated group membership |
• 43% of director nominees identify as women • 29% of director nominees identify as visible minorities • Annual assessment of Board composition |
| ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (Continued) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Approach | Reference | Application | Highlights |
| Management Diversity and Inclusion Programs |
See page 34 for additional detail |
• Diversity and Inclusion training sessions held to generate awareness and implement activities that embed diversity principles into the culture of the organization • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee, comprised of a cross section of employees from across the organization and sponsored by the executive leadership team • Consider diversity at the talent development and succession planning process at various senior levels • Target that by 2024, 50% of Vice President or higher positions, and 50% of Senior Manager to Senior Director positions be held by people who identify as women and 35% of Vice President or higher positions and 45% of Senior Manager to Senior Director positions be held by people who identify as visible minorities • Annual self-identification on designated group membership |
• 36% of Vice President or higher positions and 58% of Senior Manager to Senior Director positions were held by people who identify as women and 29% of Vice President or higher positions and 48% of Senior Manager to Senior Director positions be held by people who identify as visible minorities • Training sessions held on diversity and inclusion, including training on Respect in Our Workplace completed by all employees |
| Loblaw • The Corporation is committed to a more representative workforce at leadership levels and creating a culture of empathy and inclusion • Target that by 2024, 40% of Vice President or higher positions be held by people who identify as women and 25% of such positions be held by people who identify as visible minorities • Target that by 2024, 43% of management positions be held by people who identify as women and 30% of such positions be held by people who identify as visible minorities • Drives the Corporation's diversity priorities by creating resource groups, generating awareness and implementing activities that embed diversity principles into the culture of the organization • Diversity driven mentoring and recruiting practices and talent development strategies • Consider diversity at the talent development and succession planning process at various senior levels • Annual self-identification on designated group membership |
Loblaw • 39% of Vice President or higher positions were held by people who identify as women and 28% of such positions were held by people who identify as visible minorities • 45% of management positions were held by people who identify as women and 29% of such positions were held by people who identify as visible minorities • Advancing diversity, equity and inclusion through an inclusion council and a network of diversity, equity and inclusion committees, and within communities through strategic partnerships • Training sessions held on anti discrimination, sexual harassment, accessibility and accommodation, inclusive customer service, and inclusive leadership |
||
| Choice Properties • Talent initiatives focused on mentoring and recruiting practices based on inclusion strategies • Drives Choice Properties' diversity priorities by creating resource groups, generating awareness and implementing activities that embed diversity principles into culture of the organization • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee, comprised of a cross section of employees from across the organization and sponsored by the executive leadership team • Consider diversity at the talent development and succession planning process at various senior levels • Annual self-identification of designated group membership • Target that by 2024, 45% of Vice President or higher positions be held by people who identify as women and 30% of such positions be held by people who identify as visible minorities • Target that by 2024, 50% of Senior Manager to Associate Vice President positions be held by people who identify as women and 25% of such positions be held by people who identify as visible minorities |
Choice Properties • Establishment of a dedicated Social Impact team • Joined the Canadian Centre for Diversity and Inclusion as a member and the Accelerating Accessibility Coalition as a founding member • Training sessions completed by all new employees on diversity and inclusion, including training on Respect in Our Workplace • Continued voluntary self-identification on designated group membership for all employees in the organization • Internal sessions organized by the Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee,, including presentations by numerous guest speakers, campaigns to support local Black-owned and Indigenous owned businesses and a DEI book club • 48% of Vice President or higher positions are held by individuals who identity as women • 22% of Vice President or higher positions are held by individuals who identify as visible minorities • 57% of Senior Manager to Associate Vice President positions are held by individuals who identity as women • 21% of Senior Manager to Associate Vice President positions are held by individuals who identify as visible minorities |
| ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approach | Reference | Application | Highlights | ||
| Mandate of the Audit Committee |
See pages 17 and 31 for additional detail on the Board and Audit Committee's oversight of the Corporation's ERM program |
• Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of ERM policies and procedures to ensure that relevant risks are identified and mitigation plans are put into place • Audit Committee oversees risks related to information technology and systems |
• Annual review and recommendation to the Board for approval of the Corporation's ERM Plan and Risk Appetite Statement • Oversaw monitoring and mitigation of information security risks • Quarterly reports on information/cyber security to the Audit Committee |
Board Responsibilities and Duties
The Board is responsible for the overall stewardship and governance of the Corporation. It oversees the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation, both directly and through its committees. In addition, the Board has the following responsibilities and duties:
Strategic Oversight
The Board oversees the development, execution and fulfillment of the Corporation's strategic plans and assigns responsibility to management for achievement of that strategy. As part of its responsibility for overseeing the strategic direction of the Corporation, the Board reviews and approves:
- management's strategic plans;
- material capital deployment and expenditures, acquisitions, divestitures and restructurings; and
- investments outside the ordinary course of business.
In overseeing the strategic planning of the Corporation, the Board has a high level of engagement with management. In addition to an annual meeting dedicated to strategic planning, the Board regularly receives updates from management on the Corporation's progress in achieving its strategic plans. At each meeting, the Board monitors the Corporation's performance against both short-term and long-term strategic plans and annual operating objectives.
Oversight of Management
Although the Board delegates to management the responsibility for managing the day-to-day affairs of the Corporation, the Board reviews management's performance and effectiveness on an ongoing basis. The Board's expectations of management are communicated to management directly and through committees of the Board. The Board approves the Corporation's business and operating plans and budgets, which take into account the opportunities and risks of the business. The Board also regularly receives reports on the operating and financial results of the Corporation and on matters such as ESG programs, pensions, tax, treasury and legal matters.
Enterprise Risk Management
The Board has oversight responsibility for ERM activities associated with the Corporation's businesses. In order to identify and address any material risks, the Board undertakes an annual assessment of the Corporation's ERM structure. The annual ERM assessment is carried out through interviews, surveys, and facilitated workshops between management and the Board, Loblaw's board and Choice Properties' board. Risks are identified and then assessed and evaluated based on the Corporation's vulnerability to the risk and the potential impact that the underlying risk would have on the Corporation's ability to execute its strategies and achieve its objectives. To assist with the ERM process, the Corporation has adopted a risk appetite statement that takes into consideration important aspects of the Corporation's businesses, values and brands and provides directional guidance on risk-taking. The types of risks the Corporation is exposed to include: strategic; financial; operational; cyber security; regulatory; human capital; and reputational risks. Management provides periodic updates to the applicable committees of the Board, Loblaw's board or Choice Properties' board on the status of the key risks including any anticipated near and longer term impacts and significant changes in key risk indicators. In addition, long-term (three to five year) risk levels are assessed to assist in risk mitigation planning activities. Accountability for oversight of each risk is allocated by the Board to the full Board or to a committee of the Board. For more information on the Corporation's ERM program and the types of risks the Corporation is exposed to, refer to Weston's 2022 Annual Report and the Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2022, which are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
Internal Controls and Financial Reporting
The Board is responsible for overseeing the Corporation's financial reporting and disclosure obligations to ensure compliance with applicable audit, accounting, regulatory and reporting requirements. The Board, through the Audit Committee, assesses and evaluates the integrity and effectiveness of the Corporation's internal controls over financial reporting and information systems.
Talent Management and Succession Planning
The Board, with support from the Governance Committee, oversees the Corporation's talent management and succession planning for senior executive roles. The Governance Committee receives reports on the development of senior executives and on the talent management plans across the organization and reports on performance evaluation processes, which are designed to improve individual leadership and management skills. The succession planning process includes an annual review of each senior executive position and the performance of the incumbents to ensure the Corporation has a pipeline of talented leaders.
Governance Matters
The Board is responsible for developing and monitoring the Corporation's approach to corporate governance. The Board, through the Audit and Governance Committees, closely monitors any potential conflicts of interest between the Corporation and its affiliates and related parties, including Wittington, Loblaw and Choice Properties, and reviews and approves any material related party transactions. Individual directors, with the approval of the Independent Lead Director, may also retain an outside advisor at the expense of the Corporation with regards to related party transactions.
The Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties are part of a common control group (the "Weston Group"). Although the entities making up the Weston Group each have their own strategies and, for the most part, focus on different businesses, the entities acknowledge that from time to time new corporate opportunities may arise that potentially could be of interest to more than one entity of the Weston Group. Accordingly, the entities making up the Weston Group have adopted a framework that facilitates the decision making process to deal with any such opportunities in a manner that is consistent with good governance, taking into account existing businesses and other considerations.
A copy of the Board's mandate is attached as Schedule A to this Circular.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board believes that combining the Chair and Chief Executive Officer positions under the strong leadership of Mr. Galen G. Weston benefits all stakeholders. This structure provides for clear and effective authority as it enables one person to represent both the Corporation and the Board. Furthermore, Mr. Galen G. Weston represents the long-term interests of shareholders. However, recognizing the importance of strong independent board oversight, in 2022 the Board reappointed Mr. Gordon M. Nixon as Independent Lead Director. The Board's view on the effective role of an independent lead director has also been endorsed by leading corporate governance organizations.
The Board maintains a position description for the Chairman that is reviewed annually and approved by the Governance Committee. The Board also maintains a position description for the Independent Lead Director. The following is a description of the roles of the Chairman and Independent Lead Director:

Director Independence
The mandate of the Board provides that the Board shall be comprised of a majority of independent directors. The independence of each director is assessed by the Governance Committee with reference to the Governance Guidelines and the requirements set by the Canadian Securities Administrators in National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees. In determining independence, the Governance Committee determines whether a director has any material relationship with the Corporation or its affiliated entities that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the exercise of such director's independent judgment. Directors who have a material relationship with the Corporation, including management directors, are not considered independent. This determination is conducted through a due diligence process that includes reviewing the following:
- a. each director's responses to a detailed annual questionnaire about their individual circumstances;
- b. biographical information;
- c. internal records and documents on relationships between a director and any entity affiliated with the director on the one hand, and the Corporation and its affiliated entities, on the other hand; and
- d. discussions with the director as may be required.
When assessing materiality, the Governance Committee considers all relevant factors and circumstances, including transactions between the Corporation and the director directly, immediate family members of the director, and organizations with which the director is affiliated, and the frequency and dollar amounts associated with any such transactions. The Governance Committee has reviewed each existing and proposed director's factual circumstances and relationships with the Corporation to determine whether he or she is independent within the meaning of the Governance Guidelines. The Governance Committee determined that five of the seven director nominees are independent. The Governance Committee reviews its findings with the Board.
The table below describes whether each director nominee is independent or non-independent and, in the case where a director nominee is of non-independent status, the reason for such status is provided. Mr. Cornell Wright, President of Wittington, the controlling shareholder of the Corporation, and Mr. Galen G. Weston, who is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, Chairman and President of Loblaw, and Chairman of Wittington, the controlling shareholder of the Corporation, were determined not to be independent because they have a material relationship with the Corporation.
| Status of Director Nominees | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Independent | Not Independent | Reason for Non-Independent Status | |||
| M. Marianne Harris | x | |||||
| Nancy H.O. Lockhart | x | |||||
| Sarabjit S. Marwah | x | |||||
| Gordon M. Nixon | x | |||||
| Barbara G. Stymiest | x | |||||
| Galen G. Weston | x | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, Chairman and President of Loblaw and Chairman of Wittington, the controlling shareholder of the Corporation |
||||
| Cornell Wright | x | President of Wittington, the controlling shareholder of the Corporation |
The Corporation has taken steps to ensure that adequate structures and processes are in place to permit the Board to function independently of management of the Corporation. The Chair of the Board and of each committee meet separately with the Board or committee members after each meeting without other members of management present. The independent directors meet separately and meet without the non-independent directors or management's presence after each Board meeting. Additional information relating to the directors standing for election, including other public company boards on which they serve as well as their attendance record for all Board and committee meetings during 2022, can be found on pages 9 to 12 of this Circular.
Independent Lead Director
The Board is confident that the current leadership structure ensures the appropriate level of oversight, independence and responsibility is applied to Board decisions. The Board is of the view that having an Independent Lead Director who is independent ensures that any potential conflicts of interest between the Corporation and the controlling shareholder are addressed. The Chair of the Governance Committee serves as the Independent Lead Director. The Independent Lead Director's role is to ensure that the interests of the Corporation and of the minority shareholders and other relevant stakeholders are protected and that the Board is following good governance processes and prioritizing the right matters. The Independent Lead Director has the responsibilities set out above under "Board Leadership Structure".
Board Committees
The Board has two standing committees:
- Audit Committee; and
- Governance Committee.
The Chair of each committee reports to the Board on material issues discussed and the actions taken at each committee meeting.
Position Descriptions for the Chair of each Committee
The Chair of each committee is responsible for the leadership and effective functioning of the committee. Specifically, the Chair is responsible for the following: maintaining a productive and effective relationship between the committee and management of the Corporation; holding management accountable for matters delegated to the committee by the Board; ensuring the proper flow of information from the committee to the Board regarding the matters discussed and decisions taken at each committee meeting; reviewing the agenda for each meeting of the committee to ensure that all appropriate matters are brought forward for discussion; ensuring that the committee meets as frequently as is necessary to fulfill its mandate; and ensuring, with the assistance of management, that all proper materials and information are brought before the committee in connection with matters to be discussed at each meeting.
Committee Membership
At least once a year, the Governance Committee reviews the composition and chair of each committee and tables its recommendations to the Board for approval. All committees may engage outside advisors or consultants as necessary and have the authority to approve fees for any such engagements. The Audit and Governance Committees are comprised solely of independent directors.
Committee Responsibilities
Each committee has a formal mandate and a position description for its Chair, both of which are established by the Board. On an annual basis, each committee reviews its mandate and the position description for its Chair to ensure they reflect best practices and address applicable regulatory and other requirements. The results of those reviews are presented to the Board for approval. Copies of the committees' mandates are available on the Corporation's website at www.weston.ca.
The following is a summary of the responsibilities of each committee:
1. Audit Committee
The Audit Committee reviews with management and the external auditor the Corporation's annual and interim consolidated financial statements, Management's Discussion and Analysis, Annual Information Form and other matters relating to the Corporation's financial disclosure. The Audit Committee also assesses and evaluates the integrity of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting and information systems. Although the Board oversees the Corporation's ERM Program, it delegates the oversight of certain risks to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews the design and structure of the Corporation's ERM program and monitors and assesses its effectiveness. The Committee reviews and recommends to the Board for approval the Corporation's ERM Corporate Charter and risk appetite statement. The Committee assists the Board in its oversight responsibilities in relation to the Corporation's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to the Corporation's financial statements.
In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for:
- recommending the appointment of the external auditor;
- reviewing and approving the annual audit plan for the external auditor;
- reviewing the independence of the external auditor;
- considering and evaluating with management the design and effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and financial disclosure controls and reviewing any proposed corrective actions;
- overseeing procedures for the receipt, retention and follow-up of complaints regarding the Corporation's accounting, internal controls and auditing matters and the confidential anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding such matters;
- reviewing and approving internal audit's annual plan and receiving regular reports thereon;
- reviewing and approving the audit fees paid to the external auditor and pre-approval of non-audit related fees to the external auditor;
- assessing the performance of the Corporation's internal audit function;
- reviewing and approving any material related party transactions;
- reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of controls relating to the Corporation's ESG disclosure;
- reviewing regular reports by management relating to the implementation of the Corporation's information technology systems; and
- reviewing regular reports from management's on systems, policies and procedures related to the mitigation of cybersecurity risks.
The Audit Committee, whose current members are Barbara G. Stymiest (Chair), M. Marianne Harris and Sarabjit S. Marwah, had five meetings in 2022. Further information relating to the Audit Committee's accomplishments in 2022 is set out in the "Audit Committee Report to Shareholders" on pages 17 to 19.
2. Governance Committee
The Governance Committee oversees succession planning and compensation for directors and senior management. The Governance Committee's specific responsibilities include:
- developing criteria and qualifications for selecting director candidates and identifying and recommending candidates for membership on the Board;
- evaluating the independence of directors and assessing their performance on an ongoing basis;
- assessing and reporting to the Board on its performance and effectiveness and that of its committees;
- assisting in the directors' orientation program;
- ensuring that the Corporation provides appropriate continuing education opportunities for the Corporation's directors;
- shaping the Corporation's approach to corporate governance and recommending to the Board the corporate governance principles to be followed by the Corporation;
- assisting the Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to compensation and succession planning processes for the Corporation's senior executives;
- reviewing and determining the design of the compensation of directors and executive officers; and
- overseeing the Corporation's pension and benefits program.
The Governance Committee, whose current members are Gordon M. Nixon (Chair), M. Marianne Harris, Nancy H.O. Lockhart, Sarabjit S. Marwah, and Barbara G. Stymiest, had five meetings in 2022. Further information relating to the Governance Committee's accomplishments in 2022 is set out in the "Governance Committee Report to Shareholders" on pages 20 to 23.
New Director Orientation
The Governance Committee is responsible for the orientation of new directors and their education about the business of the Corporation. The Governance Committee coordinates an in-depth orientation session for all new directors, which is attended by the Chairman and CEO and other senior executives and includes:
- a review of the Corporation's business strategy, financial information and governance processes;
- historical information on the Corporation;
- store and facility visits; and
- one-on-one meetings with the heads of each of the Corporation's principal business divisions.
In addition, new directors are provided with a reference manual in advance of the orientation session describing the Corporation's operations, strategy and business plan, the structure and role of the Board and its committees, the Board's mandate, compliance requirements for directors and corporate policies, as well as agendas and minutes for recent Board and committee meetings.
Director Continuing Education
The Governance Committee is also responsible for the continuing education of the Corporation's directors. On an ongoing basis, as part of regular Board and committee meetings, directors are given presentations on various aspects of the Corporation's operations, take part in site visits to the Corporation's facilities and receive reports from management.
In 2022, the Board and its committees received targeted training on the following topics as part of the Corporation's director continuing education program:
| Educational Sessions | Date | Participants |
|---|---|---|
| ESG Investing | February 22, 2022 | Pension Committee |
| Loblaw Market Division Strategy | February 28, 2022 | Board |
| Health Care Industry | February 28, 2022 | Board |
| Real Estate Industry | February 28, 2022 | Board |
| Cybersecurity | March 1, 2022 | Audit Committee |
| Legislative Update | March 1, 2022 | Governance Committee |
| Cybersecurity | May 9, 2022 | Audit Committee |
| Corporate Governance Insights | July 28, 2022 | Governance Committee |
| Cybersecurity | July 28, 2022 | Audit Committee |
| Macro-economic Update | November 21, 2022 | Board |
| ESG Reporting | November 21, 2022 | Audit Committee |
| Cybersecurity | November 21, 2022 | Audit Committee |
| Corporate Governance Insights | November 21, 2022 | Governance Committee |
Assessment of the Board and its Committees
Each year, the Governance Committee undertakes a review process to assess the performance and effectiveness of the Board and its committees. This process includes a confidential survey completed by each of the directors on matters including the operation of the Board and its committees, the adequacy of information provided to directors, Board structure and an assessment of Board and committee chairs. Additionally, the Governance committee chair conducts one-on-one interviews with the directors, which includes obtaining peer feedback from the directors and evaluating committee performance to further augment the assessment process. The survey and interview results are reviewed by the Governance Committee and then presented to the full Board.
Following the 2022 assessment, the members of the Board made recommendations for improvements in certain areas, including board composition and recommended relevant topics for future Board meetings. Each year, the Governance Committee reviews committee composition, recommends committee chairs and makes recommendations to the Board for approval.
In addition to the assessment that the Governance Committee performs in connection with compensation matters, each year the Governance Committee assesses, with the participation of the entire Board, the performance of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives.
Nomination of Directors
The Governance Committee is responsible for the process of identifying prospective director nominees. The Governance Committee reviews the relevant experience, skills and competencies of nominees. It also recommends the appointment of directors to the various committees.
The Governance Committee meets on an annual basis, or when required, to assess the appropriate size of the Board and whether any vacancies are expected due to retirement in accordance with the director tenure guidelines or otherwise. As part of this assessment, the Governance Committee reviews an evergreen list of potential candidates, as well as the skills matrix of current Board members to determine criteria and qualifications to be considered when recruiting new director nominees. The members of the Board are canvassed with respect to potential candidates and each candidate is evaluated with respect to their experience and expertise, with particular attention paid to those areas of expertise that could best complement the current Board. As part of this evaluation process, the Board is mindful of diversity considerations in terms of thought, experiences, perspectives and gender and recognizes the benefits of promoting diverse candidates to the Board. The Governance Committee also assesses any concerns relating to potential conflicts, independence, interlocking board memberships, or time commitment that the candidate may present. The Chairman and the Chair of the Governance Committee, as well as other members of the Governance Committee, meet with the potential candidates to determine their interest, availability and suitability. The Governance Committee then presents its list of potential candidates and recommendations to the Board. A continuous list of potential candidates is maintained by the Governance Committee. Before being put forward as a director nominee, candidates must meet the Chair of the Governance Committee, the Chairman and other Board members to discuss the Board's expectations in regards to contribution and commitment obligations.
Diversity and Inclusion
The Corporation values diversity of views, thought, experience, skill sets, gender and ethnicity and supports the identification and nomination of diverse directors and candidates for senior management positions. Diversity is an important factor that is taken into account in identifying and selecting Board members and in considering the hiring, promotion and appointment of senior management. The Board believes that diversity is important to ensure that directors and senior management provide a wide range of thoughts, perspectives, experience and expertise required to achieve effective stewardship of the Corporation.
Board
The Corporation adopted a Board Diversity Policy. The Board Diversity Policy sets out guidelines for the Governance Committee to find the best qualified candidates for Board positions given the needs and circumstances of the Board and the Corporation, taking into account the current representation of diverse groups on the Board. The Board Diversity Policy provides that when identifying suitable candidates for appointment to the Board, the Committee must consider candidates on merit using objective criteria with due regard to the benefits of diversity and the needs of the Board and the Corporation. The Board Diversity Policy states that, among other qualities, a nominee's gender, age, ethnicity, disabilities and geographic background may be considered in their assessment. The Board Diversity Policy also requires that the Governance Committee measure and report to the Board annually with respect to the Corporation's progress in identifying and considering diverse candidates for appointment to the Board. To measure the effectiveness of the policy, the Governance Committee reviews: (i) the number of candidates representing various diversity categories considered or brought forward for Board positions; and (ii) the skills, knowledge, experience and character of candidates representing various diversity categories to ensure that these candidates are being fairly considered relative to other candidates. The results of the Governance Committee's review are taken into account when identifying and nominating candidates for election or re-election to the Board. The Corporation's approach in circumstances where diverse candidates are not selected for Board positions is to satisfy itself that there are justifiable reasons to support the selection.
The Board Diversity Policy includes a target that people who identify as women will comprise at least 30% of the Board's directors, and people who identify as visible minorities will comprise at least 25% of the Board's directors by 2024. This year, three of the seven director nominees identify as women, representing 43% of the Board's composition and two of the seven director nominees identify as visible minorities, representing approximately 29% of the Board's composition. The Board Diversity Policy does not currently specifically address, or include formal targets for, board representation of Indigenous peoples (being Indian, Inuit, Métis) or persons with disabilities* (together with women and visible minorities, the "designated groups" as defined under Article 3 of the Employment Equity Act (Canada)), as diversity is already an important factor that is considered in the director identification process, and ultimately it is the skills, experience, expertise, character and behavioral qualities of an individual that are most important in determining the value that an individual could bring to the Board. The Corporation will continue to monitor its level of board diversity and consider whether it would be appropriate to include specific reference to, or formal targets for, the representation of certain other diversity categories, including the designated groups, in the future.
* Persons with disabilities" means persons who have a long term or recurring physical, mental, sensory, psychiatric or learning impairment and who: (i) consider themselves to be disadvantaged in employment by reason of that impairment; or (ii) believe that an employer or potential employer is likely to consider them to be disadvantaged in employment by reason of that impairment. This definition also includes persons whose functional limitations owing to their impairment have been accommodated in their current job or workplace.
Management
The Corporation is committed to an inclusive and diverse workplace and recognizes that diversity is an important consideration in creating and maintaining an effective management team. The Corporation has established a number of talent initiatives to support this objective, including mentoring and recruiting practices based on inclusion strategies and principles and maintaining active diversity and inclusion initiatives within the workplace. These programs were established to ensure that the Corporation's rich and diverse talent pool is supported and provided opportunities to grow their careers to the highest levels within the organization.
The Corporation has formal targets in respect of women and visible minorities in executive and management positions, by 2024: (i) 50% of Vice President or higher positions and 50% of Senior Manager to Senior Director positions will be held by people who identify as women, and (ii) 35% of Vice President or higher positions and 45% of Senior Manager to Senior Director positions will be held by people who identify as visible minorities. The Corporation has not adopted targets in respect of other designated groups, as diversity is already an important factor that is considered in hiring and promoting senior management, and ultimately it is the skills, experience, character and behavioral qualities of an individual that are most important in determining the value that an individual could bring to the Corporation as a member of senior management. The Corporation will continue to monitor its level of diversity in senior management and consider whether it would be appropriate to adopt formal targets for the representation of certain other diversity categories, including the designated groups, in the future.
Diversity Survey Results
In early 2023, the Corporation surveyed the Board, executive and management teams to determine the number and proportion of individuals that self-identified as belonging to one or more of the designated groups. Participation in the survey was voluntary and, as such, the results represent only those individuals who elected to participate and may not be entirely representative of the designated groups at the Board or management level. Similarly, each of Loblaw and Choice Properties completed a voluntary survey of their respective boards and management to determine the number and proportion of individuals that self-identified as belonging to the designated groups.
The Corporation has three director nominees that identify as women, representing 43% of the Board's composition. Two director nominees identify as visible minorities, representing 29% of the Board's composition. No director nominees identify as Indigenous peoples and none identify as a person with disabilities. All director nominees provided information as part of the self-identification survey. Loblaw has five director nominees that identify as women, representing 42% of its board composition. Two Loblaw director nominees identify as visible minorities, representing 17% of its board composition. One Loblaw director nominee identifies as a person with disabilities, representing 8% of its board composition. No Loblaw director nominees identify as Indigenous peoples. Choice Properties has five trustee nominees that identify as women, representing 45% of its board composition. Two trustee nominees identify as visible minorities, representing 18% of its board composition, none identify as Indigenous peoples and none identify as a person with disabilities.
The Corporation's executive team, which at the time of the survey, was comprised of 14 Vice President level or higher positions, includes: five individuals who identify as women, representing 36% of the executive team and four individuals who identify as visible minorities, representing 29% of the executive team. No members of the Corporation's executive team identify as Indigenous peoples and none identify as a person with disabilities. The Corporation's management team, which at the time of the survey, was comprised of 33 Senior Manager to Senior Director positions, includes: 19 individuals who identify as women, representing 58% of the management team and 16 individuals who identify as visible minorities, representing 48% of the management team. No members of the Corporation's management team identify as Indigenous peoples and none identify as a person with disabilities.
Loblaw's senior management, which is comprised of 189 Vice President level positions and higher, includes: 74 individuals who identify as women, representing 39% of its senior management; 53 individuals who identify as visible minorities, representing 28% of its senior management; two individuals who identify as Indigenous peoples, representing 1% of its senior management; and five individuals who identify as persons with disabilities, representing 3% of senior management. Loblaw's management team (Senior Director, Director, Senior Manager, Manager, Store Manager, Assistant Store Manager and Distribution Centre Management), which is comprised of 7,335 individuals, includes: 3,307 individuals who identify as women, representing 45% of management; 2,142 individuals who identify as visible minorities, representing 29% of management; 48 individual who identifies as Indigenous peoples, representing less than 1% of management; and 45 individuals who identify as persons with disabilities, representing less than 1% of management.
Choice Properties' executive team, which is comprised of 23 Vice President level positions and higher, includes: 11 individuals who identify as women, representing 48% of the executive team and five individuals who identify as visible minorities, representing 22% of the executive team. No members of Choice Properties' senior management identify as Indigenous peoples and none identify as a person with disabilities. Choice Properties' senior management team, which is comprised of 82 Senior
Manager to Associate Vice President positions, includes: 47 individuals who identify as women, representing 57% of management, and 17 individuals who identify as visible minorities, representing approximately 21% of management. One member of management identifies as Indigenous peoples, representing 1% of management and none identifies as a person with disabilities.
The Corporation is committed to ensuring that it attracts and retains the most highly qualified and experienced directors and senior management and recognizes that diversity is an important consideration in creating and maintaining an effective Board and senior management team.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Ethical Business Conduct
The Corporation's Code of Conduct reflects the Corporation's commitment to high standards of ethical conduct and business practices. The Board annually reviews the Code to ensure it is current and reflects best practices in ethical business conduct and integrity and includes a strong "tone from the top" message. The Code addresses, among other things, conflicts of interest, compliance issues including compliance with laws, rules and regulations, confidentiality and fair dealing with the Corporation's shareholders, customers and suppliers and reporting of illegal or unethical behavior. All directors, officers and employees of the Corporation are required to comply with the Code and must acknowledge their commitment to abide by the Code on a periodic basis. The Audit Committee receives periodic reports on compliance. The Governance Committee also receives periodic reports from management discussing various policies and procedures that support this important area. Material issues under the Code are brought to the attention of the Audit Committee and, if appropriate, to the Board. A copy of the Code is available on the Corporation's website at www.weston.ca.
Senior management oversees the implementation of the Code, the education of employees regarding the Code and all material breaches. Senior management also reviews the Code annually to determine if it requires revision or enhancement, and if so, such revisions are reviewed with the Board.
The Code also deals with conflicts of interest. If an officer or employee has a conflict of interest with respect to any matter, that individual is required to bring the conflict to the attention of his or her manager or the Human Resources Department. If a director has a conflict of interest with respect to any matter, he or she may not participate in any discussion and is required to abstain from voting on it. The Code also addresses such matters as the protection of confidential information and the protection and proper use of the Corporation's assets to ensure cyber and information security.
The Corporation encourages the reporting of violations and potential violations of the Code and has established an Integrity Action Line (or "whistleblower" line), which is a toll-free number that any employee or director may use to report conduct that he or she feels violates the Code or otherwise constitutes fraud or unethical conduct. A fraud reporting protocol has also been implemented to ensure that fraud is reported to senior management in a timely manner. In addition, the Audit Committee has endorsed procedures for the anonymous receipt, retention and handling of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. Reports are received periodically by the Audit Committee regarding any concerns reported through any of these procedures. These procedures are available at www.weston.ca. The Legal Department reports regularly to the Audit Committee regarding complaints received through the whistleblower procedures so that the Audit Committee can ensure that any complaints are handled appropriately.
Loblaw has a Vendor Code of Conduct that sets out Loblaw's expectations of its vendor community with respect to ethical conduct and social responsibilities. The Vendor Code of Conduct deals with such matters as labour practices, environmental practices and compliance with applicable laws.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
The Corporation is focused on advancing its ESG program at the corporate centre and supporting each of Loblaw and Choice Properties to continue developing and advancing their own industry specific ESG programs based on a shared approach and philosophy at the Weston Group level. The Corporation believes that its investors, employees and other stakeholders care deeply about the Corporation's commitment to being a force for positive change and to demonstrating robust corporate governance practices. By integrating consideration of environmental and social risks and good governance practices into its day-to-day business activities, instituting programs which contribute to the health and wellness of employees, undertaking impactful charitable activities, and implementing a robust compliance program, the Corporation strives to be an inclusive employer and a trusted brand.
The ESG program is comprised of a series of initiatives and programs across the Corporation and its subsidiaries which is overseen by the Board. The ESG program at the Corporation, in its role as the holding company for the Weston Group, is centered on group-wide governance and strategic oversight. In addition, the Corporation is responsible for its own corporate centre ESG program, consisting of corporate governance, diversity, equity and inclusion, colleagues, culture and community, and data security.
As part of the Corporation's continued efforts to enhance communication with its stakeholder community, it publishes an ESG Report, which is updated annually and available on the Corporation's website at www.weston.ca. The ESG Report is reviewed and approved annually by the Board.
Loblaw ESG
Loblaw strives to be a trusted brand and recognizes the important role it plays in bringing about positive environmental and social change and demonstrating robust corporate governance practices. As a multi-generational, family-owned company, as well as the largest retailer and private-sector employer in Canada, Loblaw is uniquely positioned to make an impact on the issues that matter most to Canadians. This perspective has been fundamental to Loblaw's purpose-led approach to addressing ESG issues, with a focus on two priorities where Loblaw can have the biggest impact: Fighting Climate Change and Advancing Social Equity.
Fighting Climate Change
Loblaw has been an industry leader on environmental action for decades and is extending this focus with an emphasis on further reducing green-house gas (GHG) emissions and eliminating waste from the business. Loblaw is committed to:
- Achieving Net-Zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions by 2040, and Scope 3 emissions by 2050;
- Adopting a science-based approach to reducing emissions across operations by 50% by 2030;
- Operating a zero emissions fleet by 2030;
- Reducing plastic waste by making all plastic packaging on all control brand products recyclable or reusable and implementing the Consumer Goods Forum's Golden Design Rules for these products and in-store packaging by 2025; and
- Sending zero food waste to landfill by 2030, and by the end of 2023, achieving measurable food waste reductions in every store.
In 2022, Loblaw:
- Completed a climate risk assessment which evaluated its risk exposure and opportunities across multiple climate scenarios.
- Published its inaugural TCFD-aligned report.
- Assessed over 10,000 control brand and in-store packaging products relative to the Golden Design Rules; Loblaw established 35% compliance and a plan to achieve 100% compliance by 2025.
- Achieved its commitment to have 100% of corporate, food franchise, and associate-owned Shoppers Drug Mart ("SDM") stores, and distribution centres actively donating to a food recovery agency.
Advancing Social Equity
Loblaw is committed to being Canada's most representative and inclusive employer, and to supporting the health of children and women as the building blocks of healthy communities. Loblaw is committed to:
- Achieving industry-leading representation goals for management, executive management and the Board by 2024;
- Creating a ripple effect of inclusion and empathy in the communities in which it operates by deploying an inclusion training program to the Corporation's workforce of over 200,000 Canadians by the end of 2024;
- Supporting President's Choice Children's Charity (PCCC), Canada's top non-government provider of in-school children's nutrition programs, as PCCC seeks to raise \$150 million by 2027 and feed one million children a year by 2025;
- Helping feed more individuals and families in need, through food bank and food recovery programs both nationally and through stores; and
- Supporting the efforts of the LOVE YOU by Shoppers Drug Mart program to advance women's health through improved access to care, by contributing \$50 million over the next five years to advance the network of local community-based efforts and partners.
In 2022, Loblaw:
- Made progress in its representation commitment, with individuals who identify as women representing 39% of executive roles and 45% of management roles, and individuals who identify as visible minorities representing 28% of executive roles and 29% of management roles.
- Set ambitious new commitment to Feed More FamiliesTM, with a pledge to donate one billion pounds of food to charities by 2028.
- Raised and donated more than \$110 million to support research, charities and non-profits across Canada.
- Engaged ELEVATE, a third-party expert and leader in sustainability and supply chain services, on several workstreams related to human rights and responsible sourcing, including conducting Human Rights Due Diligence to assess procedures and policies across Loblaw's enterprise. Additional details on this work can be found at www.loblaw.ca/en/ human-rights.
- To ensure increased transparency, published its Supply Chain Compliance Program.
Loblaw's long-standing commitment to sustainability and social impact, and its approach to addressing material ESG risks and opportunities, are driven by its purpose and its goal of creating long-term value for the business and communities in which it operates. This includes determining sustainable solutions; establishing measurable targets; and ensuring transparent disclosure, proactive stakeholder engagement and robust governance practices.
In addition, Loblaw has a robust corporate governance framework in place, elements of which are discussed in its proxy circular, available on www.sedar.com. In particular, the Loblaw Board oversees and monitors Loblaw's approach, policies and practices related to ESG matters. The ESG Steering Committee, comprised of senior leaders, is responsible for setting priorities, tracking metrics and championing program initiatives across the Corporation. Various management committees are responsible for setting priorities and implementing and monitoring ESG-related initiatives across the organization.
Additional information regarding Loblaw's key initiatives and achievements are included on its website at www.loblaw.ca, including its historical Corporate Social Responsibility Reports and, going forward, its ESG Reports.
Choice Properties ESG
ESG practices are fully integrated into Choice Properties' day-to-day business activities, and are aligned with its purpose of creating enduring value for generations. Choice Properties believes that its tenants, investors, employees and other stakeholders care deeply about its commitment to being a force for positive environmental and social change and maintaining robust corporate governance practices. By integrating consideration of environmental and social risks and good governance practices into its day-to-day business activities and implementing robust compliance and ethics programs, Choice Properties strives to be an ESG leader in the North American real estate industry. To achieve this goal, Choice Properties has refined its focus to two areas where it can best create enduring environmental and social value and which align with stakeholder interests: Fighting Climate Change and Advancing Social Equity. Since launching its ESG program, Choice Properties has created leading and impactful programs and has set ambitious targets that will guide its approach to these two pillars in the years to come. The ESG program is comprised of a series of initiatives and programs across Choice Properties.
ESG practices strongly align with Choice Properties' strategy, which seeks to maximize long term value by taking a disciplined and sustainable approach to property operations and financial management, and by unlocking value through development activities. Choice Properties continues to integrate sustainable and resilient business practices to deliver value both for today and for future generations.
Choice Properties' ESG scope includes but is not limited to the following initiatives:
Fighting Climate Change
Choice Properties aims to continue reducing the environmental impact of its operations. To guide these reductions, in 2022, Choice Properties adopted new net-zero GHG emissions reduction targets that apply to its entire portfolio of income-producing and development properties, including (i) a 50% reduction in absolute scope 1 and scope 2 emissions and a 30% reduction in scope 3 emissions from tenant energy use and development activities by 2030, in each case relative to a 2019 base year; and (ii) a 90% reduction in absolute scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 2050 relative to a 2019 base year. In 2022, the Science Based Target Initiative (SBTi) validated Choice Properties GHG emissions reduction targets, making it one of the first entities in Canada to have its net-zero targets approved by the SBTi. Choice Properties' targets are consistent with the primary goal of the Paris Agreement – to limit the rise in global temperature this century to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
These emissions targets replace Choice Properties' previously disclosed short-term targets related to energy use, water use, and high efficiency lighting conversions which were achieved in 2021, ahead of their 2023 target date. Choice Properties continues to make progress towards the remaining targets to be reached by the end of 2023, including:
- diverting 70% of annual office waste from landfills, and
- certifying 65% of Choice Properties' portfolio under LEED or BOMA BEST, two market-leading green building certification programs.
Following the validation of its net-zero GHG emissions reductions targets, in November 2022 Choice Properties released its inaugural Pathway to Net-Zero report, which details the scope of these targets, details of the programs currently in place, or to be implemented in order to achieve these targets, as well as details on how progress towards the targets will be reported. The Pathway to Net Zero report is available on Choice Properties' website at www.choicereit.ca/sustainability.
Advancing Social Equity
Choice Properties aims to make a positive difference in the communities it serves, including by focusing on advancing diversity, equity and inclusion through its operations, promoting health and wellness and corporate philanthropy. Choice Properties has founded various colleague resource groups to both guide and deliver on this commitment. In 2022, Choice Properties formed its first ever Social Impact team dedicated to expanding its social equity initiatives. The Social Impact team supplements the employee-led Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee, formed in 2020, which continues to organize events focused on increasing awareness of lived experiences, challenging individual biases, acknowledging privilege, creating empathy, promoting inclusion and authenticity, and fostering meaningful relationships amongst employees.
Choice Properties has focused on increasing training and awareness to all employees across the organization. All new employees are required to complete various training sessions on bias, discrimination and inclusive behaviours. Selfidentification data on gender identity, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, and disability is collected on a voluntary basis from colleagues to understand where gaps exist and to monitor progress on diversity initiatives.
In 2019, Choice Properties launched Choice Cares, a community involvement program through which employees dedicate time to volunteer and fundraise for charitable organizations that support the communities in which it operates. Choice Properties has a target of volunteering an average of 4 paid hours per employee every year and has met this target each year since the establishment of the program. In 2022, through Choice Cares, Choice Properties donated over \$625,000 and volunteered over 1,240 hours in support of charities across the country, focused on supporting and empowering children and youth in lowincome communities. Since the launch of Choice Cares, Choice Properties has raised over \$1.6 million in support of various Canadian charities. A portion of the funds raised through the Choice Cares program is donated by the Corporation.
As part of Choice Properties continued efforts to enhance communication with its stakeholder community, it publishes an ESG Report, which is updated annually and available on the Choice Properties' website at www.choicereit.ca. The ESG Report is reviewed and approved annually by the Board.
Reporting and Disclosure
Choice Properties remains focused on the environmental and social issues that matter most to its stakeholders and plans to continue refining its governance practices, and integrating industry leading ESG reporting frameworks to more transparently disclose its progress in these areas, as appropriate.
In recognition of the importance of quality data related to ESG disclosure, Choice Properties had its energy, water, waste and GHG emission statements in its 2019, 2020 and 2021 ESG Reports verified to a reasonable level of assurance in accordance with ISO standards. Choice Properties intends to continue pursuing assurance of its key ESG metrics.
Choice Properties continues to align ESG disclosures with SASB standards and the recommendations made by the TCFD. Choice Properties is monitoring the workings of the International Sustainability Standards Board as they continue to develop global sustainability reporting standards. Choice Properties expects that the SASB standards and TCFD recommendations will provide a well-designed and consistent means of identifying and quantifying its ESG risks and will allow it to benchmark its performance against peers. In 2022, Choice Properties completed its first submission of the CDP Climate Change questionnaire, receiving a rating of "B".
ESG Governance
Choice Properties understands that good governance is critical to sustainable business operations. The Board and its committees oversee and monitor Choice Properties' approach, policies and practices related to ESG matters, as well as its reporting and disclosure of ESG-related metrics and matters. Choice Properties' President and Chief Executive Officer acts as the executive sponsor for the ESG program and oversees the integration of ESG strategy into Choice Properties' business operations. Choice Properties has also established an ESG Steering Committee, a cross-functional group comprised of senior management and executives across the business. The ESG Steering Committee meets regularly throughout the year to review progress on key initiatives, to budget and monitor expenses related to the ESG program, and to prioritize new activities based on their importance to Choice Properties' stakeholders, including employees, tenants, communities and investors. In addition, Choice Properties has a dedicated ESG team to manage day-to-day ESG strategy implementation.
Additional information on Choice Properties' ESG program can be found in its ESG Report, which is updated annually and available on the Trust's website at www.choicereit.ca. More information on Loblaw's and Choice Properties' ESG initiatives can also be found in their respective annual information forms and management proxy circulars, all of which can be found on www.sedar.com.
Disclosure Policy
The Corporation has adopted a corporate Disclosure Policy to deal with the timely dissemination of all material information. The Disclosure Policy establishes guidance for determining what information is material and how to ensure that all material information is publicly disclosed on a timely basis to avoid selective disclosure. The Board, directly and through its committees, reviews and approves the content of major disclosure documents, including annual and interim consolidated financial statements, the Annual Report, the Annual Information Form, Management's Discussion and Analysis and the Circular. The Corporation seeks to communicate to its shareholders through these documents as well as by means of news releases, its website and investor relations calls and meetings.
Disclosure Committee
A Disclosure Committee comprised of the Corporation's senior management oversees the Corporation's disclosure process as outlined in its Disclosure Policy. The Disclosure Committee's mandate includes ensuring that effective controls and procedures are in place to enable the Corporation to satisfy all of its continuous disclosure obligations, including evaluating events to determine whether they give rise to material information that must be publicly disclosed and reviewing all disclosure documents before they are presented to the Audit Committee and the Board. In addition, the Disclosure Committee is responsible for ensuring that the policies and procedures contained in the Corporation's Disclosure Policy are in compliance with regulatory requirements.
The Corporation's website, www.weston.ca, sets out governance information, including the Corporation's Code, Disclosure Policy and mandates of the Board and of its committees.
| Introduction | 40 |
|---|---|
| Executive Compensation Philosophy | 40 |
| Executive Compensation and Risk Management Risk Mitigation Practices |
41 41 |
| Role of Management and Compensation Consultants | 42 |
| Role of Management in the Compensation and Evaluation Process | 42 |
| Comparative Market Data Role of Meridian Compensation Partners |
42 43 |
| Role of Other Compensation Consultant Partners | 43 |
| Compensation Comparator Group | 43 |
| Loblaw's Compensation Analysis | 44 |
| Weston's Compensation Analysis | 44 |
| Components of Compensation | 45 |
| Summary of the Components of Compensation | 45 |
| Overview of Components | 45 |
| Components of Executive Compensation for 2022 | 47 |
| Base Salary | 47 |
| Short-Term Incentive Plans | 47 |
| Long-Term Incentive Plans | 57 |
| Other Compensation Matters and their Application to Each NEO, as Applicable | 68 |
| 2022 Compensation Decisions Regarding the Named Executive Officers | 70 |
| Termination and Change of Control Benefits | 72 |
| Potential Amounts Paid on Termination | 74 |
| Compensation Decisions for 2023 | 75 |
| Compensation Changes for NEOs | 75 |
| 2023 Weston Short-Term Incentive Plan | 75 |
| 2023 Loblaw Short-Term Incentive Plan | 75 |
| 2023 Choice Properties Short-Term Incentive Plan | 76 |
| 2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan | 76 |
| 2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan Grants | 76 |
| Performance Graph | 77 |
| Summary Compensation Table | |
| 78 | |
| Incentive Plan Awards Incentive Plan Awards - Outstanding Option-Based Awards and Share-Based Awards |
80 80 |
| Incentive Plan Awards - Value Vested or Earned During the Year | 81 |
| Pension Plan and Long Service Executive Arrangements | 82 |
INTRODUCTION
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation programs of the NEOs. For 2022, the NEOs were:
| Name | Position |
|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Chairman and President of Loblaw |
| Richard Dufresne | President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and Chief Financial Officer of Loblaw |
| Robert Sawyer | Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw |
| Barry Columb | Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial |
| Rael L. Diamond | President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Properties |
Messrs. Weston and Dufresne are NEOs of the Corporation (the "Weston NEOs"). For purposes of the Circular, Mr. Sawyer and Mr. Columb, who are NEOs of Loblaw, are referred to as the "Loblaw NEOs" and Mr. Diamond, who is an NEO of Choice Properties, is referred to as the "Choice NEO".
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY
The Corporation's executive compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and incent outstanding executives who are committed to improving the Corporation's performance and creating value for its shareholders. Four key principles underlie the Corporation's executive compensation programs, as set out below:

1. Benchmarked Against Peer Companies
Competitive compensation is important as it enables the Corporation to attract and retain talented and qualified individuals to lead the business. The Corporation has developed processes to ensure that its compensation programs are competitive with market and industry practices and support the attraction and retention of high quality executives. The Corporation periodically benchmarks compensation and incentive design relative to peer companies.
2. Pay for Performance
The Corporation structures its compensation programs to align executive compensation with the financial and strategic performance of the Corporation and the performance of its Common Shares. A significant portion of executive compensation is in the form of at-risk pay, namely STIP and LTIP compensation. This creates a performance-based corporate culture that rewards individual and team-based contributions to the achievement of the Corporation's operational and financial goals and aligns compensation with total return to shareholders. The at-risk components for the NEOs in 2022 ranged from 79.0% to 89.0% of their total direct compensation, as discussed under "Components of Executive Compensation for 2022" starting on page 47.
3. Aligned with Long-Term Shareholder Value
The Corporation structures its executive compensation programs to align the interests of its executives with those of its shareholders and other stakeholders. A significant portion of executive compensation takes the form of long-term equity-based awards. Structuring executive compensation in this manner rewards executives for the creation of sustainable, long-term shareholder value.
4. Consistent with Good Governance Practices
The Corporation structures its executive compensation programs to reward senior executives for the execution of business strategies while also taking an expected and reasonable level of risk. In 2022, the Corporation's STIP and LTIP programs were comprised of multiple performance measures to reduce the risk of executives focusing on a single performance measure.
Similar to the Corporation, the Governance Committees of Loblaw and Choice Properties approved executive compensation philosophies that underlie the principles of their respective executive compensation programs, as further set out in the "Executive Compensation Philosophy" sections of their respective management proxy circulars, each of which is available at www.sedar.com.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MITIGATION PRACTICES
The Corporation has risk mitigation practices that include balanced incentive plans that are not focused on a single financial measure, a clawback policy for short- and long-term compensation, share ownership requirements for NEOs and other senior executives and trading restrictions and hedging prohibitions.
1. Incentive Plan Design
The Corporation's 2022 short and long-term incentive plans included a variety of performance measures, including share price appreciation, earnings and sales performance, compliance, return on capital, and individual performance. Using multiple performance measures requires that the operating results of the Corporation and its operating businesses outperform in all key metrics in order for executives to achieve the maximum compensation award. This balanced approach is intended to reduce the risk of a disproportionate focus by executives on any single aspect of the business for the sole purpose of increasing their compensation.
Short-term incentives are designed to focus executives on the key drivers of the operating businesses and on value creation over both the short term and long term and, as such, minimize the likelihood of inappropriate or excessive risk-taking. The Corporation's STIP has a maximum payout level that limits the amount that an executive can be paid, thereby limiting the incentive to take excessive risk.
A significant portion of executive compensation is allocated to long-term incentives to focus executives on sustainable value creation. The Corporation's objective is to design incentive plans that do not motivate executives to take excessive or unexpected risks given the potential negative impacts on the long-term equity components of their compensation. The Governance Committee also requires that a sensitivity analysis be performed prior to any increase in an NEO's incentive compensation to ensure that the potential payouts are evaluated in the context of the Corporation's long-term plan and anticipated share price performance.
The Governance Committee regularly reviews each compensation plan and has the ability to make adjustments to incentive awards and actual payouts, as appropriate.
2. Clawback Policy
The Corporation has a clawback policy for STIP and LTIP payments for certain senior executives, including the NEOs. Under the policy, the Corporation can require an executive to repay STIP and LTIP payouts if the executive engages in misconduct that results in the need for the restatement of financial results. The clawback policy also provides that the Governance Committee may, in its discretion, claw back an executive's STIP and LTIP payouts if the executive engages in misconduct that would justify the executive's termination for just cause. The clawback policy applies to all incentive payments received by the executive over the two most recently completed years.
3. Share Ownership Requirements
Senior executives are required to maintain a significant equity investment in the Corporation. The Corporation's Executive Share Ownership Policy is designed to align executives' interests with those of the Corporation's shareholders, and to mitigate the likelihood of undue risk taking. The Policy establishes minimum share ownership levels for executives which are set at a multiple of an executive's base salary, with the multiple increasing to reflect the level and responsibility of an executive.
The Corporation imposes a mandatory hold period requiring the Chief Executive Officer and the President to maintain their respective required share ownership levels for one year following the end of their respective employment.
Senior executives, including NEOs, are subject to a mandatory holding requirement that requires an executive subject to the Policy to retain 50% of any after-tax proceeds received on the payout of RSUs or PSUs or an exercise of stock options in Common Shares until such executive's ownership level has been met. The Policy applies to a broad group of senior management, as further discussed under Executive Share Ownership Policy on page 69.
4. Trading Restrictions and Hedging Prohibitions
Directors, officers, executives, employees and certain other designated persons are subject to the Corporation's Securities Trading Policy, which prohibits trading, directly or indirectly, in the securities of Weston, Loblaw or Choice Properties while in possession of material undisclosed information. The Securities Trading Policy also prohibits informing unauthorized persons of such information and recommending or encouraging others to trade in the companies' securities while in possession of material undisclosed information.
Hedging transactions involving the securities of Weston, Loblaw or Choice Properties are prohibited. The prohibition covers transactions such as prepaid variable forward contracts, short sales, puts or calls, equity swaps or other equity monetization transactions, that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in the market value of securities of Weston, Loblaw or Choice Properties.
The Corporation has regularly scheduled quarterly closed trading windows which include the period during each fiscal quarter when the Corporation's financial results are being compiled but not released to the public. Directors and executive officers must not trade in the securities or exercise options of Weston, Loblaw or Choice Properties outside prescribed open trading windows.
ROLE OF MANAGEMENT AND COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS
ROLE OF MANAGEMENT IN THE COMPENSATION AND EVALUATION PROCESS
Weston and Loblaw
In 2022, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Talent Officer and the Chief Legal Officer of the Corporation participated in the compensation design process, evaluated the performance of key senior executives and made recommendations to the Governance Committee with respect to the compensation of the Weston and Loblaw NEOs and the specific business goals to be used as performance targets for the various incentive programs. The views of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are valued because of his ongoing involvement with key senior executives. As a result, he was in the best position to effectively assess the performance of the Weston and Loblaw NEOs and how their efforts have contributed to the achievement of the Corporation's strategic objectives and operational targets.
These evaluations are based on the achievement of objectives and targets related to both the individual and the Corporation and include an assessment of leadership capabilities and team development. The results of these evaluations are presented to the Governance Committee. The Chief Talent Officer and the Chief Legal Officer assisted the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in developing and presenting to the Governance Committee management's recommendations and supporting material regarding the design of the incentive plans and the compensation of the other senior executives.
Choice Properties
The Chair and the President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Properties participate in the compensation design process, evaluate the performance of key senior executives and make recommendations to the Choice Properties Governance Committee with respect to the compensation of the other executives and the specific business goals to be used as performance targets for the various incentive programs. The views of the Chair and the President and Chief Executive Officer are valued because of their ongoing involvement with key senior executives. As a result, they are in the best position to effectively assess the performance of the other executives and how their efforts have contributed to the achievement of the Trust's strategic objectives and operational targets. The Chair makes recommendations to the Choice Properties Governance Committee with respect to the compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer.
The evaluations of executives are based on the achievement of objectives and targets related to both the Trust and the individual and include an assessment of each executive's leadership capabilities and team development skills. The results of these evaluations are presented to the Choice Properties Governance Committee. The Chief Financial Officer assists the Chair and the President and Chief Executive Officer in developing and presenting management's recommendations and supporting materials to the Choice Properties Governance Committee regarding the design and payout of the incentive plans.
COMPARATIVE MARKET DATA
Comparative market data is one factor used in setting the compensation of each NEO. Other factors include the scope of the role, individual performance and experience, leadership ability, internal equity among executives and the operating results of the business or area for which the NEO has responsibility. From time to time, the Governance Committee uses benchmarking or comparisons of compensation programs from a peer group of companies to confirm that the Corporation's programs remain competitive.
ROLE OF MERIDIAN COMPENSATION PARTNERS
Weston and Loblaw
In 2022, the Boards of both Weston and Loblaw engaged Meridian Compensation Partners ("Meridian") to:
- Update Meridian's 2020 benchmark of Mr. Weston's compensation relative to the updated Weston and Loblaw comparator groups approved by the Weston and Loblaw Governance Committees in May 2022. The results of the 2022 review suggested that Mr. Weston's total direct compensation was below the market median and Weston's and Loblaw's compensation policy objectives. For a description of the resulting changes to Mr. Weston's compensation, please see the section "2022 Compensation Decisions Regarding the Named Executive Officers".
- Benchmark Mr. Dufresne's compensation against the Weston and Loblaw comparator groups and certain other industry data given Mr. Dufresne's unique dual role. The results of the 2022 review provided that Mr. Dufresne's total direct compensation was comparable to the applicable benchmarks and therefore no change to his compensation was recommended.
In 2022, the Loblaw Governance Committee also engaged Meridian to:
- Benchmark the compensation of Mr. Columb relative to certain Canadian financial and banking industry data.
- Review management's philosophy for peer group development and senior executive competitive benchmarking and to review the comparator group used for this purpose.
- Benchmark the compensation of certain senior executives, relative to Loblaw's executive compensation comparator group.
- Evaluate the competitiveness of Loblaw's STIP and LTIP against its peers and industry, as well as for alignment with Loblaw's growth- and efficiency-focused strategic initiatives.
Choice Properties
In 2022, the Choice Properties Governance Committee engaged Meridian to:
- Benchmark certain senior executives compensation against Choice Properties' compensation comparator group.
- Review management's philosophy for peer group development and senior executive competitive benchmarking and to review the comparator group used for this purpose.
- Evaluate Choice Properties' STIP and LTIP against its peers and industry standards.
- Provide commentary on compensation principles, trends, and best practices.
Meridian is not an independent compensation advisor. In 2022 and 2021, Meridian received \$48,467 and \$31,735, respectively, from the Corporation for executive compensation advisory services to the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee regularly evaluates whether to formally retain an independent compensation advisor to assist in compensation matters. As part of its annual assessment of governance practices, the Governance Committee determined that it did not require the services of an independent compensation advisor in 2022 or 2021.
The role of management and compensation consultants relating to the compensation practices of the Loblaw NEOs and the NEOs of Choice Properties are further set out in the "Role of Management and Compensation Consultants" section of Loblaw's management proxy circular, and "Role of Management and Compensation Consultants" section of Choice Properties' management proxy circular, respectively, which are both available at www.sedar.com.
ROLE OF OTHER COMPENSATION CONSULTANT PARTNERS
In 2022, Willis Towers Watson was engaged by Loblaw to provide consulting services on various executive compensation matters. Willis Towers Watson is not an independent compensation advisor. For 2022 and 2021, Willis Towers Watson received \$114,369 and \$32,232, respectively, from Loblaw for advisory services to Loblaw.
COMPENSATION COMPARATOR GROUP
In addition to its periodic review of individual executive compensation, in 2022 Meridian was also engaged to review management's philosophy for peer group development and to review the comparator group used for this purpose. The results of the review reaffirmed the Corporation's approach to setting a market peer group. Meridian confirmed that, although the peer group remained size and industry appropriate, a few changes were necessary in order to better reflect a comparable peer group based on availability of compensation data and change in business focus.
Determining a comparator group to benchmark NEO compensation is challenging in light of Loblaw's presence in the Canadian market as one of the largest companies in Canada by revenue and number of employees. Loblaw also has a limited number of direct retail peers in Canada and there are few large, Canadian companies outside of the financial services and resource-based industries against which Loblaw may easily compare.
The Governance Committees of the Corporation and Loblaw approved a blended comparator group comprised of three types of companies: (i) Canadian retail companies; (ii) US retail companies; and (iii) large (non-retail) Canadian companies. The US retail companies reflect the broader retail talent market and are direct competitors for talent at the senior executive level. The large Canadian companies were selected to reflect how Canadian companies pay executives for their skill set and experience. Most of the comparators listed below are within one-third to three times Loblaw's revenue size. Revenue was selected as the criterion for members of each comparator group because it reflects the complexity of the business and is generally a stronger and more predictive measure for compensation comparisons for a retail company than other criteria (e.g. assets or market capitalization). Loblaw was positioned at the 59th percentile based on revenue and at the 40th percentile based on market capitalization of this blended comparator group in 2022.
The group of comparator companies is set out below:
| Canadian Retail Companies | US Retail Companies | Large Canadian Companies | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited Empire Company Limited Metro Inc. |
Albertsons Companies, Inc. Best Buy Co Inc. Costco Wholesale Corporation Dollar General Corp. Dollar Tree Inc. The Home Depot, Inc. The Kroger Co. Lowe's Companies, Inc. Publix Super Markets, Inc. Rite Aid Corporation Sysco Corporation Target Corporation Walgreen Co. US Foods Holdings Corporation |
BCE Inc. Brookfield Asset Management Inc. Canadian Natural Resources Limited Cenovus Energy Inc. Enbridge Inc. |
Imperial Oil Limited Nutrien Ltd. Parkland Corporation Power Corporation of Canada Rogers Communications Inc. Suncor Energy Inc. TELUS Corporation |
LOBLAW'S COMPENSATION ANALYSIS
The Loblaw Governance Committee reviews the compensation of its NEOs on a bi-annual basis. In 2022, the Loblaw Governance Committee reviewed the results of the compensation analysis performed by Meridian, which results were considered when making decisions regarding NEO compensation.
WESTON'S COMPENSATION ANALYSIS
In 2022, the Governance Committee reviewed the results of the review and benchmarking analysis of Mr. Weston's compensation performed by Meridian in determining the compensation adjustments for Mr. Weston.
COMPONENTS OF COMPENSATION
SUMMARY OF THE COMPONENTS OF COMPENSATION
The Corporation's executive compensation program is comprised of the elements described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, as summarized below:

* In February 2019, the Governance Committee determined that RSUs would be eliminated from the executive LTIP design.
OVERVIEW OF COMPONENTS
The 2022 NEO compensation was comprised principally of base salary, short-term cash incentives (which Weston and Loblaw executives may elect to receive in the form of EDSUs) and long-term incentives, including performance share units ("PSUs") and stock options in the case of Weston; restricted share units ("RSUs"), PSUs and stock options in the case of Loblaw; restricted units ("RUs") and/or unit-settled restricted units ("URUs"), and performance units ("PUs"), in the case of Choice Properties, as described in the table that follows. Benefits, pensions and perquisites comprise a relatively small part of an NEO's total annual compensation.
| Base Salary | Short-Term Incentives | Medium-Term and Long-Term Incentives |
Pension and Benefits | Perquisites | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensate executives for fulfilling their day- to day responsibilities |
Reward executives for meeting annual financial and/or operating performance targets |
Motivate and reward executives for increasing shareholder value and serve to retain executives |
Assist executives in providing for their health and retirement planning |
Provide additional benefits to employees that are competitive with market practice |
|||
| Components | Form | Period | Program Objectives and Details | ||||
| Fixed Compensation |
Base Salary | Cash | Annual | • | performance. | Reflects the executive's level of responsibility and experience, market competitiveness, internal equity among executives and the executive's overall |
|
| STIP | Cash | Annual | • • • |
Each executive has a target annual bonus (% of base salary). Actual payout is determined by the achievement of predetermined financial and/or operating performance objectives and the individual performance of each NEO. Payouts range from zero to a maximum of 185%, 200%, and 127.5% of an executive's target bonus for the Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties respectively. |
|||
| Variable Compensation |
LTIP | EDSUs (Elective; Weston and Loblaw) |
Annual election; EDSUs held until cessation of employment |
• • |
executive's base salary. Executive Share Ownership Policy. |
Weston and Loblaw executives can choose to receive all or a portion of their STIP payouts in the form of EDSUs, to a cumulative maximum of three times an individual Align executives' interests with those of shareholders and count towards the |
|
| • | EDSUs are settled in Common Shares or Loblaw common shares, as applicable, purchased on the open market no later than December 15th of the year following the year in which the executive's employment ceases for any reason. |
||||||
| • | at the same time as EDSUs. | EDSU Plan provides for the crediting of additional EDSUs in respect of dividends paid on Common Shares for the period when an EDSU is outstanding. Dividend EDSUs vest |
| Components | Form | Period | Program Objectives and Details | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTIP | RSUs (Weston and Loblaw) RUs (Choice Properties) |
3 year vesting period | • • • • |
Motivate and reward executives for increasing shareholder/unitholder value. Serve as a key component in retaining executives. RSU and RU grants are generally made once per year. RSUs are no longer part of the value of annual LTIP grants to Weston executives, but RSUs typically comprise one-third of the total value of annual LTIP grants to Loblaw executives. RUs and/or URUs (discussed below) typically comprise 75% of the total |
|
| LTIP PSUs (Weston and Loblaw) PUs (Choice Properties) Variable Compensation (Continued) LTIP Unit-Settled Restricted Units (Choice Properties) LTIP Stock Options Group health, dental and Benefits insurance benefits Weston Group Consolidated Executive Plan (the "Consolidated Executive Plan") - Defined Benefit Provisions Pensions Consolidated Executive Plan - Defined Contribution Provisions Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP") |
• | value of annual LTIP grants to Choice Properties executives. RSUs are settled at the end of the applicable vesting period, in Common Shares or Loblaw common shares, as applicable, purchased on the open market. RUs are settled at the end of the applicable vesting period, in cash or Trust Units acquired in the open market. |
|||
| • | The RSU and RU Plans provide for the crediting of additional RSUs in respect of dividends paid on Common Shares, and additional RUs in respect of distributions paid on Trust Units, in the case of Choice Properties, for the period when an RSU or RU is outstanding. Dividend RSUs and Distribution RUs vest at the end of the applicable vesting period. |
||||
| 3 year performance period (cliff vesting) |
• | Motivate and reward executives for increasing shareholder/unitholder value. | |||
| • | PSU and PU grants are generally made once per year. | ||||
| • | PSUs typically comprise one-half of the total value of annual LTIP grants to Weston executives and one-third of the total value of annual LTIP grants to Loblaw executives. PUs typically comprise 25% of the total value of annual LTIP grants to Choice Properties executives. |
||||
| • | For the Corporation, for 2022 PSU vesting is based on success in achieving consolidated return on capital targets. |
||||
| • | For Loblaw, PSU vesting is based on Loblaw's success in achieving revenue and return on capital targets. |
||||
| • | For Choice Properties, PU vesting is based on Choice Properties' achievement of total Unitholder return versus pre-determined targets. |
||||
| • | PSUs are settled at the end of the applicable vesting period, in Common Shares or Loblaw common shares, as applicable, purchased on the open market. PUs are settled at the end of the applicable vesting period, in cash or Trust Units acquired in the open market. |
||||
| • | The PSU and PU Plans provide for the crediting of additional PSUs in respect of dividends paid on Common Shares, and additional PUs in respect of distributions paid on Trust Units, in the case of Choice Properties, for the period when a PSU or PU is outstanding. Dividend PSUs and Distribution PUs vest at the same time and based on the same performance factors as the PSUs and PUs, respectively. |
||||
| Three year vesting period (33.33% per year) |
• • |
Motivates and rewards Choice Properties executives for increasing unitholder value. Serves as a key component in retaining executives. |
|||
| • • |
URU grants are generally made once per year. RUs and/or URUs typically comprise 75% of the total value of annual LTIP grants to executives. |
||||
| • | The Trust Units granted under the URU Plan are purchased in the open market and are held by an independent custodian on behalf of each participant until such time as they have vested and the disposition restrictions have been lifted. |
||||
| • | The participant has the right to vote the restricted Trust Units and to receive distributions from the date of grant. |
||||
| • | The participant may not dispose of his or her URUs until six years following the date of grant. |
||||
| 5 year vesting period (20% per year); |
• • |
Motivate and reward executives for increasing share price. Stock option grants are generally made once per year. |
|||
| 7 year term | • | Stock options typically comprise one-half of the total value of annual LTIP grants to | |||
| Weston executives and one-third of the total value of annual LTIP grants to Loblaw executives. |
|||||
| Employment and post employment |
• | Executive benefit plans provide health, dental, disability and insurance coverage. | |||
| Post-employment | • | The defined benefit provisions of the Consolidated Executive Plan are designed to provide a reasonable level of retirement income to executives to reward them for their service. |
|||
| • | Pension entitlements for an executive who participates in the defined benefit provisions of the Consolidated Executive Plan are based on length of service and eligible salary. |
||||
| • | The total annual benefits payable under the defined benefit provisions of the Consolidated Executive Plan are capped at \$125,000 per year. |
||||
| • | The defined benefit provisions of the Consolidated Executive Plan were closed to new participants in 2006. |
||||
| Post-employment | • | Since 2006, new executives participate on a non-contributory basis in the defined contribution provisions of the Consolidated Executive Plan. |
|||
| • | Contributions were set as a percentage of base salary (maximum of \$250,000) and in 2022 were capped at \$30,780 per year. |
||||
| Post-employment | • | The SERP is an unfunded obligation of the Corporation and Loblaw. | |||
| • | Senior executives of the Corporation and Loblaw whose pension benefits exceed the prescribed limits under the applicable tax legislation may participate in the SERP on a non-contributory basis if they comply with certain eligibility provisions. |
||||
| Perquisites | Cash allowance/ reimbursement for professional services |
Annual | • | A limited number of personal benefits are provided, including a car or car allowance, an annual medical examination, a discretionary health care spending account and the ability to participate in the employee share ownership plan. |
COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FOR 2022
BASE SALARY
Base salaries for the NEOs are set on an individual basis and not within formal salary ranges, taking into account the level of responsibility and experience, market competitiveness, internal equity among executives and the executive's overall performance both individually and in relation to the executive's business unit or division. The Governance Committee of the Corporation, Loblaw or Choice Properties, as applicable, generally reviews the base salary of each NEO bi-annually. The applicable Governance Committee may make adjustments to an NEO's salary as a result of a change in the NEO's duties and responsibilities, or in the performance and contribution of the NEO, both on an individual basis and in relation to the performance of the NEO's business unit or division.
The following table sets out the base salary for each NEO for 2022. For further details with respect to the reasons for any increase in annualized base salary from 2021, refer to the section titled "2022 Compensation Decisions Regarding the Named Executive Officers" on page 70.
| Name | 2022 Base Salary (\$) |
Increase From 2021 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 1,350,000 (1) | 8.7 |
| Richard Dufresne | 950,000 (2) | Nil |
| Robert Sawyer | 1,000,000 | Nil |
| Barry Columb | 650,000 | 4.0 |
| Rael L. Diamond | 780,000 | Nil |
- (1) Mr. Weston's 2022 aggregate actual base salary of \$1,296,000 was allocated 30% to Weston and 70% to Loblaw. In aggregate, Weston paid \$388,800 and Loblaw paid \$907,200 in 2022.
- (2) Mr. Dufresne's aggregate base salary was allocated 20% to Weston and 80% to Loblaw. In the aggregate, Weston paid \$190,000 and Loblaw paid \$760,000 in 2022.
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS
As detailed below, the awards under the Corporation's STIP, in which Messrs. Weston and Dufresne participate, are determined based in part on the results of the STIP programs of each of Loblaw and Choice Properties. The Loblaw and Choice Properties NEOs participate in the Loblaw and Choice Properties' STIP programs, respectively. Messrs. Weston and Dufresne also participate in the Loblaw STIP program. A portion of Mr. Columb's STIP is based on measures specific to President's Choice Financial. Accordingly, this section provides details on the STIP programs of each of the Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties, as well as certain STIP measures specific to President's Choice Financial.
The Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties each have their own STIP program. The STIP programs are designed to incent their respective executives, including the NEOs, as applicable, to meet certain annual business and financial objectives. Each fiscal year, the performance of the executives is measured by the achievement of specific financial and operational goals, which may vary from year to year. The Governance Committee believes that the STIP programs are balanced as they are comprised of different performance measures that are designed to focus executives on the key drivers of the operating businesses and value creation over both the short term and long term and, therefore, reduce the risk of inappropriate or excessive risk-taking behaviour by executives.
The Governance Committee is responsible for approving the plan design and awards made by the Corporation pursuant to its STIP. The Loblaw Governance Committee is responsible for the plan design and awards made pursuant to the Loblaw STIP for Loblaw colleagues, including its NEOs. The Choice Properties Governance Committee is responsible for the plan design and awards made pursuant to the Choice Properties STIP for Choice Properties colleagues, including its NEOs. The Governance Committee receives periodic reports on the performance of such STIP metrics, including performance against targets.
All participating executives have STIP award targets that are expressed as a percentage of their base salary, with such targets determined by the executive's position and level within the organization. Depending on actual performance relative to the performance targets, payouts for each performance target range from: (i) zero to a maximum of 200% of target for each component of the Loblaw STIP; and (ii) zero to an aggregate maximum of 127.5% of target for the components of the Choice Properties STIP. For 2022, the Loblaw STIP included a condition that the payout for the ESG measures could not exceed 100% of target unless the combined performance of the four other business performance metrics had exceeded target and a revenue qualifier whereby consolidated revenue performance could not exceed 100% of target unless certain food tonnage metrics were met, as described in more detail below.
For 2022, the Corporation's STIP included an individual performance component weighted at 30% of its NEOs' overall STIP target. The Loblaw and Choice Properties STIP programs also included individual performance components weighted at 25% and 30% of their respective NEOs' overall STIP targets. For 2022, the Governance Committees of the Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties, in assessing individual performance, took into account the executive's role in the overall achievement of the Corporation's, Loblaw's or Choice Properties' goals, as applicable, and the individual performance objectives and leadership qualities of the executive. Messrs. Weston's and Dufresne's overall STIP design was determined by the Governance Committees of the Corporation and Loblaw to reflect their respective responsibilities at both organizations.
Under the Weston and Loblaw STIP, awards are determined separately for each performance measure and then aggregated to determine the final amount. The STIP award payments are made in cash, although executives may elect to receive all or a portion of their STIP award in EDSUs, to a cumulative maximum of three times the executive's base salary.
Loblaw 73% Business Performance 70% Weight Individual Performance 30% Weight (0% - 180%) (0% - 200%) Choice Properties 27% Actual STIP Payout (0% -186%) Target STIP Award
The Corporation's STIP awards for 2022 were determined using the following formula:
Loblaw's STIP awards for 2022 were determined using the following formula:

Choice Properties' STIP awards for 2022 were determined using the following formula:

The Governance Committees of the Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties determine the appropriate STIP performance measures and weightings for each NEO, based on their roles and responsibilities within the Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties, respectively, as well as the individual performance factors. The following table sets forth the applicable STIP programs and weightings that were used in determining the aggregate STIP awards for each NEO for 2022:
| Name | Title | STIP Programs | Weighting (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Chairman and President of Loblaw |
Loblaw STIP Weston STIP |
70 30 |
| Richard Dufresne | President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and Chief Financial Officer of Loblaw |
Loblaw STIP Weston STIP |
80 20 |
| Robert Sawyer | Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw |
Loblaw STIP | 100 |
| Barry Columb | Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial |
Loblaw STIP PC Financial STIP |
40 60 |
| Rael L. Diamond | President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Properties |
Choice Properties STIP | 100 |
The following table sets forth details regarding the STIP targets and maximum aggregate STIP award achievable for 2022 for each NEO:
| Name | Annualized Base Salary (1) (\$) |
STIP Target as Percentage of Base Salary (%) |
STIP Target (1) (\$) |
Maximum STIP (\$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 1,350,000 | 160 | 2,012,322 | 3,934,131 |
| Richard Dufresne | 950,000 | 125 | 1,187,500 | 2,339,375 |
| Robert Sawyer | 1,000,000 | 150 | 1,500,000 | 3,000,000 |
| Barry Columb | 650,000 | 100 | 643,836 | 1,287,672 |
| Rael L. Diamond | 780,000 | 100 | 780,000 | 994,500 |
(1) 2022 STIP awards were calculated based on each NEO's STIP-eligible salary for 2022. The STIP-eligible salaries received by Messrs. Weston, Dufresne, Sawyer, Columb and Diamond were \$1,296,311, \$950,000, \$1,000,000, \$643,836 and \$780,000, respectively. The actual base salaries received by Messrs. Weston, Dufresne, Sawyer, Columb and Diamond were \$1,296,000, \$950,000, \$1,000,000, \$643,750 and \$780,000, respectively.
LOBLAW STIP
Plan Design
In 2022, the Loblaw STIP was designed so that NEOs would be focused on key drivers of the Loblaw and SDM businesses, with an additional focus on ESG. The Loblaw STIP was designed with the following five business performance measures, weightings and targets to drive Loblaw's strategic goals in 2022:

(1) Business Performance Measures applicable to Messrs. Weston, Dufresne and Sawyer. For the Business Performance Measures applicable to Mr. Columb, which include measures specific to President's Choice Financial, please see the section "2022 STIP Performance Measures Applicable to Barry Columb, Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial".
(2) OSAT refers to Loblaw's customer satisfaction index, Overall Satisfaction.
Descriptions of each performance measure and charts summarizing performance ranges and payout percentages are set forth below:
Consolidated Sales Target
The consolidated sales target for 2022 (\$52,964 million) was designed to focus executives on growth in consolidated revenues, including the consolidation of franchises. The consolidated sales target included a qualifier such that performance would be capped at 100% if year-over-year adjusted tonnage share, normalized for change in square footage, declined more than five basis points. For 2022, the consolidated earnings target included a qualifier that in order to be eligible for above target achievement, year over year Adjusted EBITDA growth must be positive and target Adjusted EBITDA must be achieved.
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Range | Less than \$51,905 million |
\$51,905 million | Each additional 0.20% (\$105.9 million) |
\$52,964 million | Each additional 0.20% (\$105.9 million) |
\$54,023 million or more |
| Payout Factor (% of Target) |
0% | 50% | +5% | 100% | +10% | 200% |
Consolidated Earnings Target
The consolidated earnings target for 2022 (\$4,262 million) was designed to focus executives on delivering adjusted earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA")* pursuant to Loblaw's and SDM's combined annual and multi-year business plans. Adjusted EBITDA, as referred to in relation to Loblaw's 2022 STIP target, includes certain further adjustments, in addition to those noted in section 17, "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" of Loblaw's 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis.
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Range | Less than \$4,155 million |
\$4,155 million | Each additional 0.25% (\$10.7 million) |
\$4,262 million | Each additional 0.5% (\$21.3 million) |
\$4,475 million or more |
| Payout Factor (% of Target) |
0% | 50% | +5% | 100% | +10% | 200% |
*Non-GAAP financial measure. Please see note in the "Other Information" section of this Circular.
ESG
The ESG target for 2022 was designed to focus executives on continuing to drive higher levels of corporate social responsibility across the business. Achievement of the ESG metric was determined based in equal part on social and environmental initiatives. The social initiatives related to representation (meeting or exceeding gender and diversity representation goals), Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) training (provided to corporate colleagues), and community investment (increased support for women's health and fighting childhood hunger). The environmental initiatives related to carbon (progress toward Net Zero Carbon footprint by 2040), food waste (progress toward eliminating all food waste to landfill by 2030), and plastic (reduce plastic waste and improve packaging). If Loblaw achieved its ESG target, then to the extent that the combined performance of the consolidated sales, consolidated earnings, EBIT margin and consolidated OSAT targets exceeded 100%, the same combined performance factor would be applied to the ESG metric. To the extent that the ESG target was not met, any performance payout for the ESG metric would be at the discretion of the Loblaw Governance Committee.
| Initiative | Target |
|---|---|
| Social - Representation | Yes/No achievement |
| Social - DEI Training | Yes/No achievement |
| Social - Community Investment | Yes/No achievement |
| Environment - Carbon | Yes/No achievement |
| Environment - Food Waste | Yes/No achievement |
| Environment - Plastic | Yes/No achievement |
EBIT Margin Target
The EBIT margin* target is determined by calculating Adjusted EBIT** as a percentage of revenue. Adjusted EBIT, as referenced in relation to Loblaw's 2022 STIP targets, includes certain further adjustments in addition to those noted in Loblaw's 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis. The EBIT margin target was designed to measure management's ability to translate revenue into profitability. The EBIT margin measure aligns with Loblaw's increased focus on data benefits along with ongoing process and efficiency initiatives. The target for 2022 was 6.75%.
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Range | Lower than 6.50% |
6.5% | Each 2.5 basis point improvement |
6.75% | Each 5.0 basis point improvement |
7.25% or higher |
| Payout Factor (% of Target) |
0% | 50% | +5% | 100% | +10% | 200% |
*Non-GAAP financial measure. See the note in the "Other Information" section of this Circular.
**Non-GAAP financial measure. See the note in the "Other Information" section of this Circular and section 17 of Loblaw's 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis, which can be found on www.sedar.com.
Overall Satisfaction Target
The enterprise-wide customer satisfaction index, OSAT, is a direct measure of customer interaction in-store. The OSAT target for 2022 (66.1%) was designed to focus executives on customer satisfaction in the short term to drive loyalty in the longer term. The 2022 target and performance range were developed with the target representing a proposed improvement of 60 basis points in Loblaw's OSAT compared to the 2021 OSAT.
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Range | Less than 62.6% | 62.6% | Each 0.35% improvement |
66.1% | Each 0.35 % improvement |
69.6% |
| Payout Factor (% of Target) |
0% | 50% | +5% | 100% | +10% | 200% |
2022 Loblaw STIP Calculation
In February 2023, the Loblaw Governance Committee reviewed Loblaw's 2022 financial results. Following the review, the Loblaw 2022 STIP payout was approved as follows:
| Performance Objective | Weighting (%) |
Target | Actual | Performance | Payout Factor (% of Target) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated Sales | 35 | \$52,964 million | \$56,504 million | 200.0 % | 70.0 % |
| Consolidated Earnings | 35 | \$4,262 million | \$4,593 million | 200.0 % | 70.0 % |
| ESG | 10 | Established targets | Targets Achieved | 179.7 % | 18.0 % |
| EBIT Margin | 10 | 6.75 % | 6.92 % | 133.6 % | 13.4 % |
| Overall Satisfaction | 10 | 66.1 % | 65.1 % | 85.7 % | 8.6 % |
| Overall STIP Payout | 179.9 % |
For 2022, the Loblaw STIP represented approximately 85% and 90% of Messrs. Weston's and Dufresne's overall STIP targets, respectively.
Key Factors Influencing Results
Early in 2023, the Loblaw Governance Committee reviewed Loblaw's 2022 financial results and determined the key factors contributing to each component's performance relative to target. These factors included:
- Consolidated sales exceeded target, driven by strong growth in the food and drug businesses.
- Consolidated earnings exceeded target, driven by focused cost control measures.
- EBIT margin was favourable relative to target, driven by gross profit rate improvement and operating leverage.
In 2022, Loblaw continued to focus on its ESG initiatives, including the completion of numerous projects targeting fighting climate change, including carbon footprint reduction, elimination of food waste and reduction of plastic waste, and projects advancing social equity, including representation targets, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion training and community investment.
2022 STIP Performance Measures Applicable to Barry Columb, Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial
For 2022, the STIP for Mr. Columb, as President of President's Choice Financial, was designed so that Mr. Columb would be focused on both the strategy and performance of President's Choice Financial, as well as the integration of the President's Choice Financial business with that of the Corporation, with an ongoing focus on ESG and compliance. The STIP for Mr. Columb was based on sales, earnings, ESG and OSAT measures that included both President's Choice Financial and Loblaw consolidated components, as well as the Loblaw EBIT margin measure. For Mr. Columb's target STIP, 60% is based on President's Choice Financial components and 40% is based on Loblaw consolidated components.
The STIP for the President of President's Choice Financial was designed with the following business performance measures and overall weightings to drive the strategic goals of the Corporation and President's Choice Financial in 2022:

Descriptions of the performance measures applicable to Mr. Columb are set forth below:
Loblaw Components
The components of the business performance measures applicable to Mr. Columb that are comprised of Loblaw performance measures, including performance ranges, payout percentages and factors influencing results, are all as set out above. The final payout factors for the Loblaw components for Mr. Columb differ slightly due to their different weightings within his overall STIP.
President's Choice Financial Sales Target
The President's Choice Financial sales target for 2022 (\$1,373 million) was designed to focus President's Choice Financial executives on revenue growth.
President's Choice Financial Earnings Target
The President's Choice Financial earnings target for 2022 (\$160 million) was designed to focus President's Choice Financial executives on delivering earnings before tax pursuant to President's Choice Financial's annual and multi-year business plan.
President's Choice Financial ESG Target
The President's Choice Financial ESG target for 2022 was designed to focus President's Choice Financial executives on President's Choice Financial's ongoing commitment to compliance, regulatory and social metrics. Achievement of the following initiatives would result in a payout of 100% in respect of the President's Choice Financial ESG target: (i) no or only minor issues as determined through President's Choice Financial's risk appetite statement; (ii) achieving an overall regulatory compliance rating of medium or better; and (iii) an increase in representation of persons who identify as Indigenous peoples or persons with disabilities, and on-time completion of mandatory DEI training. If President's Choice Financial achieved its ESG targets, then to the extent that the combined sales and earnings performance of the Corporation and President's Choice Financial exceeded target, the same combined performance factor would be applied to the ESG metric. To the extent that the ESG targets were not met, any performance payout for the ESG metric would be at the discretion of President's Choice Financial's Governance Committee.
President's Choice Financial Overall Satisfaction Target
The President's Choice customer satisfaction index, OSAT, is a direct measure of customer interactions. The President's Choice Financial OSAT target for 2022 (65%) was designed to focus executives on customer satisfaction in the short term to drive loyalty in the longer term. The President's Choice Financial OSAT strategic pursuit is a blended score weighted 60% to President's Choice Financial OSAT results and 40% to The Mobile Shop OSAT results.
2022 STIP Calculation applicable to the President of President's Choice Financial
In February 2023, the Governance Committee reviewed the 2022 financial results. Following the review, the aggregate payout factor for Mr. Columb was approved at 137.2% of target. The Governance Committees assessed the 2022 performance measures applicable to the President of President's Choice Financial as follows:
| Performance Objective | Weighting (%) |
Target | Actual | Performance | Payout Factor (% of Target) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCF Sales | 17 | \$1,373 million | \$1,337 million | 86.9 % | 8.7 % |
| PCF Earnings | 58 | \$160 million | \$158 million | 93.8 % | 32.8 % |
| PCF ESG | 8 | Established Targets | Targets Achieved | 132.7 % | 6.6 % |
| PCF Overall Satisfaction | 17 | 65.00 % | 68.2 % | 191.4 % | 19.1 % |
| Loblaw Consolidated Sales | 10 | \$52,964 million | \$56,504 million | 200.0 % | 20.0 % |
| Loblaw Consolidated Earnings | 15 | \$4,262 million | \$4,593 million | 200.0 % | 30.0 % |
| Loblaw ESG | 5 | Established targets | Targets Achieved | 179.7 % | 9.0 % |
| Loblaw EBIT Margin | 5 | 6.8 % | 6.9 % | 133.6 % | 6.7 % |
| Loblaw Overall Satisfaction | 5 | 66.1 % | 65.1 % | 85.7 % | 4.3 % |
| Overall STIP Payout | 137.2 % |
Key Factors Influencing President's Choice Financial Results
Early in 2023, the President's Choice Financial Governance Committee reviewed President's Choice Financial's 2022 financial results and determined the key factors that contributed to President's Choice Financial's performance relative to its targets, including:
- sales and earnings results were below target leading to performance payouts of 86.9% and 93.8% of target, respectively; and
- ESG targets were surpassed and customer Overall Satisfaction levels were above target, leading to performance payouts of 132.7% and 191.4% of target, respectively.
2022 Loblaw STIP Award
The following table sets forth the Loblaw performance measures that were used in determining the Loblaw STIP award for Mr. Sawyer and the Loblaw portion of the STIP awards for Messrs. Weston and Dufresne for 2022:
| Consolidated Sales (\$) |
Consolidated Earnings (\$) |
ESG (\$) |
EBIT Margin (\$) |
Overall Satisfaction (\$) |
STIP Total from Business Performance (at 179.9%) (\$) |
Individual Performance (2) (\$) |
Loblaw STIP Award (\$) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 739,675 | 189,885 | 141,172 | 90,557 | 760,386 | 2,661,350 | ||||
| 498,750 | 128,037 | 95,190 | 61,061 | 474,261 | 1,756,049 | ||||
| 787,500 | 202,162 | 150,300 | 96,413 | 877,013 | 2,900,888 | ||||
| 739,675 498,750 787,500 |
2022 Loblaw STIP Award (1) | 1,900,964 1,281,788 2,023,875 |
(1) STIP awards are calculated using the NEO's actual base salary received in 2022, as applicable.
(2) Individual Performance dollar value is calculated as 25% of the STIP target dollar value multiplied by the business performance factor and the individual performance factor.
(3) Mr. Weston's aggregate base salary was awarded 30% to Weston and 70% to Loblaw, with each applicable allocation thereof being subject to the applicable company's STIP. Full details of Mr. Weston's compensation from Loblaw are set forth in the Loblaw Management Proxy Circular, which is available at www.sedar.com.
(4) Mr. Dufresne's aggregate base salary was allocated 20% to the Corporation and 80% to Loblaw, with each applicable allocation thereof being subject to the applicable company's STIP. Full details of Mr. Dufresne's compensation from Loblaw are set forth in the Loblaw Management Proxy Circular, which is available at www.sedar.com.
The following table sets forth the performance measures and aggregate weightings that were used in determining Mr. Columb's STIP award for 2022, including both the President's Choice Financial and Loblaw performance measures:
| 2022 Aggregate STIP Award for Barry Columb, President, President's Choice Financial (1) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales (\$) |
Earnings (\$) |
ESG (\$) |
EBIT Margin (\$) |
Overall Satisfaction (\$) |
STIP Total from Business Performance (\$) |
Individual Performance (2) (\$) |
Aggregate STIP Award (\$) |
|||
| PCF | 42,010 | 158,384 | 31,870 | n/a | 92,230 | 324,494 | ||||
| Loblaw | 96,575 | 144,863 | 43,459 | 32,353 | 20,764 | 338,014 | ||||
| Total | 662,508 | 242,918 | 905,426 |
(1) STIP awards are calculated using the NEO's actual base salary received in 2022, as applicable.
(2) Individual Performance dollar value is calculated as 25% of the STIP target dollar value multiplied by the business performance factor and the individual performance factor.
CHOICE PROPERTIES STIP
Plan Design
The Choice Properties STIP is designed to motivate the Trust's executives to meet the Trust's annual business and strategic objectives. The Trust's STIP was designed with the following business performance measures, weightings and targets to drive the Trust's strategic goals in 2022:
| Choice Properties STIP - 2022 Business Performance Measures | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Measures Pursuit Measures |
|||||||||
| Net Operating Income 35.7% |
Funds From Operations per Unit 35.7% |
Process Improvement 14.3% |
ESG 14.3% |
In February 2022, the Choice Properties Governance Committee reviewed the Trust's 2022 financial results and approved a business performance factor of 111.2%. For an executive receiving an individual performance rating of 100%, the combined individual and business performance factors resulted in an aggregate STIP payout factor of 107.9%.
A description of each performance measure is set forth below:
Net Operating Income
Choice Properties' target net operating income ("NOI"*) consisted of property rental revenue excluding straight line rental revenue and lease surrender revenue, less direct property operating expenses and realty taxes as set forth in the Trust's consolidated results. The NOI component excluded certain expenses included in the determination of net income such as interest expense, general and administrative expenses and fair value adjustments.
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Range | \$878.1M | Each additional \$3.584M |
\$896.0M | Each additional \$3.584M |
\$913.9M or more |
| Payout Factor (% of Target) |
75% | +5% | 100% | +5% | 125% |
*Non-GAAP financial measure. See the note in the "Other Information" section of this Circular and section 15 of Choice Properties' 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis, which can be found on www.sedar.com.
FFO per Unit
Choice Properties' target funds from operations per unit ("FFO per Unit"*) is calculated pursuant to the Real Property Association of Canada's white paper titled "White Paper on Funds from Operations & Adjusted Funds from Operations for IFRS" issued in January 2022.
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Range | \$0.924 | Each additional \$0.0047 |
\$0.948 | Each additional \$0.0047 |
\$0.971 or more |
| Payout Factor (% of Target) |
75% | +5% | 100% | +5% | 125% |
*Non-GAAP financial measure. See the note in the "Other Information" section of this Circular and section 15 of Choice Properties' 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis, which can be found on www.sedar.com.
Pursuit Measures
For 2022, the Trust's STIP included two pursuit measures, being Process Improvement and ESG.
The Process Improvement target for 2022 was designed to focus executives on achieving operational efficiencies and enhancing controls through the standardization of processes. Success of the Process Improvement metric was determined based on achieving certain objectives related to (i) the establishment of a data governance program; and (ii) the identification and implementation of an application solution to manage tenant recoveries.
The ESG target for 2022 was designed to focus executives on continuing to drive higher levels of corporate social responsibility across the business. Achievement of the ESG metric was determined based on Choice Properties' environmental, social and governance initiatives. The environmental initiatives related to waste diversion, SBTi approval of emissions reduction targets, LEED and BOMA BEST property certifications, tracking software for GHG emissions, and certain lease updates to align with ESG strategy. The social initiatives related to colleague engagement surveys and action plans, mandatory colleague inclusion and compliance training, and colleague volunteer activities. The governance initiatives related to mandatory colleague information security training and information security maturity scores.
In February 2023, the Choice Properties Governance Committee determined that Choice Properties' had successfully completed 90% of the Pursuit Measure metrics for 2022.
| Initiative | Target |
|---|---|
| Process Improvement | Established targets |
| ESG | Established targets |
2022 Choice Properties STIP Calculation
In February 2023, the Choice Properties Governance Committee reviewed Choice Properties' 2022 financial results and determined Choice Properties' 2022 STIP payout with respect to the business objectives as follows:
| Performance Objective |
Weighting | Target | Result | Payout Factor (% of Target) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOI | 25% | \$896.0M | \$911.8M | 122.1% |
| FFO Per Unit | 25% | \$0.948 | \$0.964 per Unit | 117.3% |
| Financial Measures | 50% | n/a | n/a | 119.7% |
| Pursuit Measures | 20% | Established targets | Targets substantially met |
90.0% |
| Total STIP Business Payout | 111.2% |
The Choice Properties STIP represented approximately 6% and 4% of Messrs. Weston's and Dufresne's overall STIP targets, respectively.
The following table sets forth the Choice Properties performance measures that were used in determining the STIP award for the Choice Properties NEO for 2022:
2022 Choice Properties STIP Award (1)
| STIP Target as |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Actual Base Salary (\$) |
Percentage of Base Salary (%) |
STIP Target (1) (\$) |
Maximum STIP Award (1) (\$) |
NOI Component (\$) |
FFO per Unit Component (\$) |
Pursuit Measures Component (\$) |
Individual Component (\$) |
Total (\$) |
| Rael L. Diamond | 780,000 | 100 | 780,000 | 994,500 | 250,055 | 240,226 | 147,428 | 343,999 | 981,708 |
(1) STIP award was calculated using the Choice Properties NEO's STIP-eligible salary received in 2022.
WESTON STIP
Plan Design
The business performance component of the Corporation's STIP is comprised of the weighted performance of Loblaw and Choice Properties, as discussed above.
In early 2022, the Governance Committee determined that, subsequent to the sale of Weston Foods, business performance would continue to make up 70% of the Corporation's overall STIP payout, measured as a weighted average of the Loblaw and Choice Properties STIP payouts, weighted at 73% and 27%, respectively, with the weightings reflecting each entity's contribution to the value of the Corporation's market capitalization. The Governance Committee further determined that with the successful integration of compliance initiatives into the operational best practices of the businesses, it was appropriate to remove the compliance measure from the Corporation's STIP targets for 2022, and that the individual performance component would be correspondingly increased to 30% of the payout.
STIP Calculation
Based on the 2022 weighted performance of Loblaw and Choice Properties, the Corporation achieved a STIP payout factor of 161.4% for 2022.
Individual STIP Components
The Governance Committee considered the overall performance of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Financial Officer to determine the individual component of each NEO's STIP award. The Loblaw Governance Committee considered the overall performance of its NEOs, including Loblaw's Chairman and President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial. The Choice Properties Governance Committee considered the overall performance of its NEOs, including Choice Properties' President and Chief Executive Officer, Rael L. Diamond.
Galen G. Weston, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Chairman and President of Loblaw
The individual performance component of the STIP amount awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was determined by the Governance Committees of both the Corporation and Loblaw based on Mr. Weston's achievement of both quantitative and qualitative factors established in early 2022. The quantitative factors were based on the execution of strategic objectives and achievement of the 2022 financial plan. The qualitative factors included the Governance Committees' assessment of Mr. Weston's leadership performance. Mr. Weston's individual component is weighted at 30% of his overall STIP target. In light of the above considerations, the Governance Committees of both the Corporation and Loblaw awarded Mr. Weston an aggregate amount of \$977,628 for the individual component of his STIP award, of which the Weston and Loblaw components were \$217,242 and \$760,386, respectively, representing 120% of his target in aggregate.
Richard Dufresne, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and Chief Financial Officer of Loblaw
The individual performance component of the STIP amount awarded to the President and Chief Financial Officer was determined by the Governance Committee based on Mr. Dufresne's achievement of both quantitative and qualitative factors established in early 2022. The quantitative factors were based on the financial performance of the Corporation, including Mr. Dufresne's role in delivering on the 2022 financial plan. The qualitative factors included the Governance Committee's assessment of Mr. Dufresne's leadership performance and role in implementing strategic objectives. Mr. Dufresne's individual component is weighted at 30% of his overall STIP target. In light of the above considerations, the Governance Committees of both the Corporation and Loblaw awarded Mr. Dufresne an aggregate amount of \$552,636 for the individual component of his STIP award, of which the Weston and Loblaw components were \$78,375 and \$474,261, respectively, representing 110% of his target in respect of Weston and 111% in respect of Loblaw.
Robert Sawyer, Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw
The 2022 STIP award for Mr. Sawyer reflected Mr. Sawyer's role as Chief Operating Officer during the year and included an individual performance component weighted at 25% of his overall STIP target. In assessing individual performance, the Loblaw Governance Committee took into account quantitative factors including Mr. Sawyer's role in leading and advancing Loblaw's enhanced focus on retail excellence and in the execution of the Corporation's 2022 business plan. The Loblaw Governance Committee also considered qualitative factors, such as Mr. Sawyer's leadership qualities, including executive oversight of operational leadership teams. Based on these criteria, the Loblaw Governance Committee awarded Mr. Sawyer an individual performance component of \$877,013, representing 130% of target.
Barry Columb, Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial
The 2022 STIP award for Mr. Columb reflected his role as President of President's Choice Financial during the year and included an individual performance component weighted at 25% of his overall STIP target. In assessing individual performance, the Loblaw Governance Committee took into account quantitative factors, including Mr. Columb's role in advancing strategic initiatives at President's Choice Financial. The Loblaw Governance Committee also considered qualitative factors, such as Mr. Columb's leadership qualities, his role in driving compliance and ethics awareness and driving culture and engagement at President's Choice Financial. Based on these criteria, the Loblaw Governance Committee awarded Mr. Columb an individual performance component of \$242,918, representing 110% of target.
Rael L. Diamond, President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Properties
The 2022 STIP award for Mr. Diamond reflected Mr. Diamond's role as President and Chief Executive Officer during the year and included an individual performance component weighted at 30% of his overall STIP target. In assessing individual performance, the Choice Properties Governance Committee took into account quantitative factors including Mr. Diamond's performance in implementing and achieving the Trust's strategic objectives and his role in the overall achievement of the Trust's 2022 business plan. The Choice Properties Governance Committee also considered qualitative factors, such as Mr. Diamond's leadership qualities, his role in strengthening Choice Properties' relationships with key tenants and other stakeholders, advancing the ESG program and driving culture and engagement objectives. Based on these criteria, the Choice Properties Governance Committee awarded Mr. Diamond \$343,999 for the individual performance component of his STIP award, representing 140% of target.
TOTAL AGGREGATED STIP AWARDS FOR 2022
The following tables set out the aggregated STIP awards paid to NEOs of the Corporation and Loblaw in respect of the 2022 fiscal year.
| Name | Loblaw STIP Award (\$) |
Choice Properties STIP Award (\$) |
President's Choice Financial STIP Award (\$) |
Individual STIP Award (\$) |
2022 STIP Award (\$) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 3,216,403 (1) | 126,725 | n/a | 217,242 | 3,560,370 (2) | |
| Richard Dufresne | 1,974,502 (1) | 49,875 | n/a | 78,375 | 2,102,752 (2) | |
| Robert Sawyer | 2,023,875 | n/a | n/a | 877,013 | 2,900,888 (3) | |
| Barry Columb | 474,888 (4) | n/a | 314,180 | 119,194 (5) | 905,426 (3) | |
| Rael L. Diamond | n/a | 637,709 | n/a | 343,999 | 981,708 (6) |
(1) This amount includes the Loblaw business performance component of the Corporation's STIP together with the amount received under the business performance component of the Loblaw STIP.
(2) The total STIP awards for 2022 for Messrs. Weston and Dufresne were \$3,560,370 and \$2,102,752, respectively, of which Loblaw paid \$2,661,350 and \$1,756,049, respectively. Full details of the compensation of Messrs. Weston and Dufresne from Loblaw are set forth in Loblaw's management proxy circular, which is available at www.sedar.com.
(3) The full details of the compensation of Messrs. Sawyer and Columb are set forth in the management proxy circular of Loblaw, which is available at www.sedar.com.
(4) This amount for Mr. Columb includes the Loblaw business performance component and individual performance component.
(5) This amount for Mr. Columb represents the President's Choice Financial individual performance component.
(6) The full details of the compensation of Mr. Diamond are set forth in the management proxy circular of Choice Properties, which is available at www.sedar.com.
Executive Deferred Share Unit Plan
The Corporation's EDSU Plan enables an executive to receive up to 100% of the executive's STIP payout in any year in EDSUs, subject to a cumulative cap of three times the executive's base salary. All EDSUs held by an executive will be paid out in Common Shares or Loblaw common shares purchased on the open market by no later than December 15th of the year following the year in which the executive's employment ceases for any reason. An election to participate in the EDSU Plan in any year must be made before the beginning of that year and is irrevocable. The number of EDSUs granted in respect of any year will be determined by dividing the STIP payout that is subject to an EDSU Plan election by the value of a Common Share or Loblaw common share on the date the STIP bonus would otherwise be paid. For this purpose, and for purposes of determining the value of an executive's EDSUs upon redemption, the value of a Common Share or Loblaw common share is calculated by using the volume-weighted average of the trading price of the Common Shares or Loblaw common shares on the TSX for the five trading days prior to that valuation date. Additional EDSUs are accumulated based on notional equivalents of dividends paid on Common Shares or Loblaw common shares while an EDSU is outstanding. Loblaw has also adopted a similar EDSU Plan for its executives.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS
Overview - Weston and Loblaw
The Corporation's and Loblaw's equity-based LTIPs are designed to retain and incent executives by allowing them to participate in increased shareholder value creation by providing them with equity-based incentive awards that vest over time. Under the LTIPs, the Corporation and Loblaw award executives long-term incentives in the form of stock options, PSUs and, in the case of Loblaw, RSUs, the values of which are directly linked to the market value of the Common Shares or Loblaw's common shares, as applicable. Executives eligible for LTIP grants generally receive them on an annual basis.
Annual LTIP grants for the Weston NEOs are comprised of 50% stock options and 50% PSUs. The target value of a PSU award is contingent on business performance, measured by the return on capital achieved by the Corporation, and thus the target value of an annual LTIP grant is 50% contingent on business performance. The Corporation's LTIP thus balances the use of stock options, which align an executive's interest with shareholders in share price appreciation, and PSUs, which focus executives on the delivery of key objectives set forth in the strategic plan.
Annual LTIP grants for the Loblaw NEOs are comprised of 1/3 stock options, 1/3 RSUs and 1/3 PSUs.
Overview - Choice Properties
Choice Properties equity-based LTIP is designed to retain executives and align their interests with long-term Unitholder value creation by providing them equity-based awards that vest over time. Executives eligible for LTIP grants generally receive them on an annual basis. The value of an LTIP grant to a participating executive is generally based on a percentage of the executive's base salary. All grants are reviewed and approved by the Choice Properties Governance Committee as part of its regular review of compensation.
For 2022, the Choice Properties Governance Committee awarded executives long-term incentives in the form of URUs, RUs and PUs under the LTIP, the values of which are directly linked to the market value of the Trust Units, with PUs comprising 25% of the target annual LTIP award mix and RUs, URUs or a combination thereof, at the executive's election, comprising 75% of the mix.
All NEOs
The value of an LTIP grant to a participating executive is generally determined as a percentage of the executive's base salary. All grants are reviewed and approved by the applicable governance committee as part of its regular review of compensation. Annual LTIP awards are granted in the first quarter during the open trading window following the announcement of the Corporation's, Loblaw's or Choice Properties' year end financial results, as applicable, in accordance with their respective securities trading policies. "Off-cycle" grants are made to newly hired executives and to executives promoted part way through a year, during open trading windows following the release of quarterly financial results.
In 2022, the Governance Committee approved LTIP awards to Messrs. Weston and Dufresne as follows:
| Name | Base Salary (1) (\$) |
Annual LTIP Grant as a Percentage of Base Salary (%) |
Grant Date Fair Value (2) (\$) |
Type of LTIP Grant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 1,350,000 | 560 | 2,065,515 (3) | 50% Stock Options and 50% PSUs |
| Richard Dufresne | 950,000 | 375 | 712,511 (4) | 50% Stock Options and 50% PSUs |
(1) Other than one-time grants, LTIP awards are calculated using each NEO's base salary on the date of grant.
(2) The grant date fair value of a PSU award assumes vesting at 100% of target.
(3) In addition to his annual LTIP grant from the Corporation, Mr. Weston received an annual LTIP grant from Loblaw, the details of which are set out below. The aggregate grant date fair value of Mr. Weston's annual LTIP grant from the Corporation and Loblaw is \$6,884,772, which reflects approximately 531% of his 2022 actual base salary. The cost of Mr. Weston's LTIP is allocated 30% to the Corporation and 70% to Loblaw.
(4) In addition to his annual LTIP grant from the Corporation, Mr. Dufresne received an annual LTIP grant from Loblaw, the details of which are set out below. The aggregate grant date fair value of Mr. Dufresne's annual LTIP grant from the Corporation and Loblaw was \$3,562,348, which reflects approximately 375% of his 2022 actual base salary. The cost of Mr. Dufresne's LTIP is allocated 20% to the Corporation and 80% to Loblaw.
In 2022, the Loblaw Governance Committee approved the following Loblaw LTIP awards to Messrs. Weston, Dufresne, Sawyer and Columb:
| Name | Base Salary (1) (\$) |
Annual LTIP Grant as a Percentage of Base Salary (%) |
Grant Date Fair Value (2) (\$) |
Type of LTIP Grant(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 1,350,000 | 560 | 4,819,257 (4) | Stock Options, RSUs and PSUs |
| Richard Dufresne | 950,000 | 375 | 2,849,837 (5) | Stock Options, RSUs and PSUs |
| Robert Sawyer | 1,000,000 | 400 | 3,999,788 | Stock Options, RSUs and PSUs |
| Barry Columb | 650,000 | 265 | 1,604,371 (6) | Stock Options, RSUs and PSUs |
(1) Other than one-time grants, LTIP awards are calculated using each NEO's base salary on the date of grant.
(2) The grant date fair value of a PSU award assumes vesting at 100% of target.
(3) Stock options, RSUs and PSUs each comprise one-third of the annual LTIP grant.
(4) Mr. Weston received annual LTIP grants from Loblaw comprised of, in aggregate, 106,989 stock options, 15,924 RSUs and 15,930 PSUs, with an aggregate grant date fair value of \$4,819,257. The aggregate grant date fair value of Mr. Weston's annual LTIP grant from the Corporation and Loblaw was \$6,884,772 which reflects approximately 531% of his 2022 actual base salary. The cost of Mr. Weston's LTIP is allocated 30% to the Corporation and 70% to Loblaw. Mr. Weston's Loblaw grant value shown above includes the Loblaw portion of an LTIP grant that Mr. Weston received in August 2022 representing the incremental grant value owing in connection with the increase to his base salary and to his LTIP target during the year.
(5) Mr. Dufresne received annual LTIP grants from Loblaw comprised of, in aggregate, 65,636 stock options, 9,563 RSUs and 9,566 PSUs, with an aggregate grant date fair value of \$2,849,837. The aggregate grant date fair value of Mr. Dufresne's annual LTIP grant from the Corporation and Loblaw was \$3,562,348, which reflects approximately 375% of his 2022 actual base salary. The cost of Mr. Dufresne's LTIP is allocated 20% to the Corporation and 80% to Loblaw.
(6) Mr. Columb's grant value shown above includes an LTIP grant that Mr. Columb received in May 2022 representing the incremental grant value owing in connection with the increase to his base salary and to his LTIP target during the year.
In 2022, the Choice Properties Governance Committee approved the following Choice Properties LTIP awards to Mr. Diamond:
| Name | Base Salary (\$) |
Annual LTIP Grant as a Percentage of Base Salary (%) |
Targeted Annual LTIP Grant Date Value (1) (\$) |
LTIP Grant (2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rael L. Diamond | 780,000 | 250 | 1,950,005 | 75% URUs and 25% PUs |
(1) The aggregate targeted annual LTIP grant date value was based on the volume-weighted average price of the Trust Units of \$14.40, being the Grant Value Per Trust Unit applicable to the awards of RUs and PUs granted on February 25, 2022. The grant date fair value of the RUs and PUs was based on the volume-weighted average price of the Trust Units of \$14.40, being the Grant Value Per Trust Unit applicable to the awards of RUs and PUs granted on February 25, 2022 and the grant value per URU for the URUs granted on February 28, 2022 reflects the volume weighted average trading price of the Trust Units on the TSX for the five trading days immediately preceding the date of the award, which was \$14.38.
(2) The grant date fair value of a PU award assumes vesting at 100% of target.
(3) Mr. Diamond received an annual LTIP grant comprised of 101,578 URUs and 33,839 PUs, with an aggregate grant date fair value of \$1,950,005, representing approximately 250% of his actual base salary received. The full details of Mr. Diamond's LTIP grants can be found in Choice Properties' management proxy circular at www.sedar.com.
The key features of the Corporation's stock option plan (the "Stock Option Plan"), RSU Plan and PSU Plan are described below. The characteristics of the Loblaw stock option plan, RSU plan and PSU plan are substantially similar to the Weston plans; for a full description of the key features of Loblaw's LTIP, please refer to Loblaw's management proxy circular at www.sedar.com. The key features of Choice Properties' URU and PU Plans are described below. Please also refer to Choice Properties' management proxy circular at www.sedar.com.
Stock Option Plan
Under the Stock Option Plan, the size of the annual award an executive receives is determined by reference to the executive's total LTIP award. The Governance Committee administers the Stock Option Plan, approves the participants, makes grants of options and establishes any limitations, restrictions and conditions on any grants. Any employee of the Corporation or any of its affiliates, as determined by the Governance Committee, may participate in the Stock Option Plan.
The table below provides detail regarding the outstanding options to purchase Common Shares and Common Shares available for future option grants:
| As at: | December 31, 2022 | As at: | March 13, 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issued and Outstanding Common Shares | 140,737,942 | 139,680,180 | ||
| Outstanding Options to Purchase Common Shares | ||||
| Number Outstanding | 1,648,766 | 1,750,138 | ||
| Number Outstanding as a Percentage of the Issued and Outstanding Common Shares |
1.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Maximum Number of Common Shares Issuable Pursuant to the Stock Option Plan at Any Time |
||||
| Number Issuable | 6,453,726 | 6,453,726 | ||
| Number Issuable as a Percentage of the Issued and Outstanding Common Shares |
4.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Common Shares Available for Future Option Grants | ||||
| Number Available | 3,858,480 | 3,743,970 | ||
| Number Available as a Percentage of the Issued and Outstanding Common Shares |
2.7% | 2.7% |
The Stock Option Plan provides that Common Shares issuable pursuant to outstanding options that are cancelled, expired, forfeited or terminated for any reason without having been exercised will again be available for grant under the Stock Option Plan. Stock options are not transferable or assignable otherwise than by will or by laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of an optionee will be exercisable only by the holder. Please see page 72 for details regarding the treatment of stock options upon the resignation, termination with or without cause, or retirement of a participant as well as the effect of a change of control of the Corporation.
The exercise price for options may not be less than the fair market value of a Common Share, which is defined as the greater of: (i) the volume-weighted average of the trading price of a Common Share on the TSX for the five trading days prior to the grant date; or (ii) the volume-weighted average of the trading price of a Common Share on the TSX on the trading day immediately preceding the grant date. The exercise price for options granted to U.S. participants is no less than the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on the day immediately preceding the grant date.
Options may not be exercised prior to the first anniversary of the date of the grant. The vesting of options is determined on the grant of the option. Under the Stock Option Plan, each option has a term of not less than five and not more than 10 years. Generally, options vest over a five-year period at a rate of 20% per year and expire at the end of seven years.
If the expiry date of an option occurs during a blackout period or other period during which an insider is prohibited from trading in securities of the Corporation pursuant to its Securities Trading Policy, the expiry date will automatically be extended for 10 business days after the blackout period ends.
The aggregate number of Common Shares issued to insiders within any 12 month period, or issuable to insiders at any time, under the Stock Option Plan and any other security based compensation arrangement of the Corporation, may not exceed 5% of the total number of issued and outstanding Common Shares during such period of time.
In the event of a consolidation, subdivision or reclassification of the Common Shares, or any stock dividend of Common Shares paid otherwise than in lieu of a normal cash dividend, or any amalgamation or reorganization of the Corporation, the Board will make appropriate adjustments to the number of Common Shares subject to any options then outstanding and the exercise price thereof. The Stock Option Plan provides that shareholder approval is not required for any amendments to the Stock Option Plan or an option granted under the Stock Option Plan, except for any amendment or modification that:
-
- increases the number of Common Shares that can be issued under the Stock Option Plan, including an increase to a fixed number of Common Shares or a change from a fixed maximum number of Common Shares to a fixed maximum percentage;
-
- reduces the exercise price of an option (including, without limitation, a cancellation and re-grant of an option, constituting a reduction of the exercise price of such option), except in connection with a change in the number of the Corporation's outstanding Common Shares by reason of a stock dividend or split, recapitalization, reorganization, amalgamation, consolidation, combination or exchange of Common Shares, or another corporate change affecting Common Shares;
-
- extends the term of an option beyond its original expiry date, except where the expiry date would have occurred during a blackout period or at any other time when the holder may be prohibited from trading in securities of the Corporation pursuant to the Corporation's Securities Trading Policy;
-
- changes the provisions relating to the transferability of an option;
-
- extends eligibility to participate in the Stock Option Plan to a non-employee director;
-
- permits awards, other than options, to be made under the Stock Option Plan;
-
- requires shareholder approval under applicable laws, regulations or stock exchange rules; or
-
- affects the amending provisions of the Stock Option Plan.
Subject to any required regulatory review or approval, the Board may make all other amendments to the Stock Option Plan without shareholder approval. These amendments include, but are not limited to, the termination of the Stock Option Plan; amendments designed to comply with applicable laws or regulatory requirements and "housekeeping" administrative changes (such as correcting an immaterial inconsistency or curing any ambiguity).
There were no amendments to the Stock Option Plan in 2022.
The Corporation's annual burn rate, which represents the number of Stock Options awarded under an arrangement divided by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding as at the end of a fiscal year, under the Stock Option Plan was 0.12% in 2022, 0.27% in 2021 and 0.36% in 2020.
In 2022, the following NEOs exercised Weston stock options as described in the table below:
| Name | Grant Date | Exercise Date | Quantity Exercised (#) |
Exercise Price (\$) |
Market Price (\$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Dufresne | August 10, 2015 | June 15, 2022 | 123 | 111.66 | 147.06 |
| March 10, 2016 | November 23, 2022 | 7,131 | 111.97 | 165.08 |
In 2022, the following NEOs exercised Loblaw stock options as described in the table below:
| Name | Grant Date | Exercise Date | Quantity Exercised (#) |
Exercise Price (\$) |
Market Price (\$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | March 5, 2015 | March 2, 2022 | 35,667 | 53.41 | 99.31 |
| Richard Dufresne | July 30, 2015 | June 2, 2022 | 511 | 58.75 | 114.45 |
| March 3, 2016 | June 15, 2022 | 5,000 | 58.00 | 112.55 | |
| March 3, 2016 | August 10, 2022 | 15,000 | 58.00 | 116.43 | |
| March 3, 2016 | November 22, 2022 | 11,401 | 58.00 | 114.01 | |
| Barry Columb | March 5, 2015 | March 3, 2022 | 40,531 | 53.41 | 101.07 |
| March 1, 2018 | July 29, 2022 | 7,000 | 55.69 | 120.00 | |
| March 3, 2016 | August 11, 2022 | 5,000 | 58.00 | 118.35 | |
| March 3, 2016 | August 12, 2022 | 5,000 | 58.00 | 118.50 | |
| March 3, 2016 | August 15, 2022 | 17,958 | 58.00 | 119.59 | |
| March 3, 2016 | August 16, 2022 | 10,000 | 58.00 | 120.93 | |
| March 2, 2017 | August 16, 2022 | 18,502 | 59.00 | 121.65 |
In 2022, Messrs. Weston and Dufresne received stock option grants from Weston as described in the table below:
| Name | Options Granted (#) |
Exercise Price (\$) |
Grant Date Fair Value (\$) |
Vesting Schedule | Term of Grant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 42,792 | 152.97 | 931,582 | 20% per year over 5 years | 7 years |
| 3,840 (1) | 152.18 | 101,299 | 20% per year over 5 years | 7 years | |
| Richard Dufresne | 16,364 | 152.97 | 356,244 | 20% per year over 5 years | 7 years |
(1) Mr. Weston received an additional grant of options in August 2022 to reflect a mid-year increase to his base salary and LTIP target. For full details of this increase please refer to the section "2022 Compensation Decisions Regarding the Named Executive Officers".
In 2022, Messrs. Weston, Dufresne, Sawyer and Columb received stock option grants from Loblaw as described in the table below:
| Name | Options Granted (#) |
Exercise Price (\$) |
Grant Date Fair Value (\$) |
Vesting Schedule | Term of Grant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 100,112 | 99.33 | 1,448,621 | 20% per year over 5 years | 7 years |
| 6,877 (1) | 117.67 | 157,483 | 20% per year over 5 years | 7 years | |
| Richard Dufresne | 65,636 | 99.33 | 949,753 | 20% per year over 5 years | 7 years |
| Robert Sawyer | 92,120 | 99.33 | 1,332,976 | 20% per year over 5 years | 7 years |
| Barry Columb | 28,788 | 99.33 | 416,562 | 20% per year over 5 years | 7 years |
| 5,504 (1) | 115.84 | 118,116 | 20% per year over 5 years | 7 years |
(1) Messrs. Weston and Columb received additional grants of Loblaw options in August 2022 and May 2022, respectively, to reflect mid-year increases to their respective base salaries and LTIP targets. Full details of Messrs. Weston's and Columb's compensation from Loblaw are set forth in Loblaw's management proxy circular, which is available at www.sedar.com.
Loblaw Restricted Share Unit Plan
RSUs entitle an executive to receive the value of the RSU award in Common Shares purchased on the open market at the end of the applicable vesting period, which is usually three years in length. An executive receives the number of Common Shares equal to the number of RSUs granted, with the ultimate award value determined by the Common Share price at the end of the applicable vesting period. Dividend equivalents in the form of additional RSUs that are equal in value to dividends paid on Common Shares are credited to the participant's account on each dividend payment date based on the number of RSUs in the account as of each dividend record date. The additional RSUs are subject to the same vesting conditions applicable to the related RSUs.
As discussed above, in 2022 the Corporation did not award RSUs to the Weston NEOs as part of its executive LTIP program.
In 2022, Messrs. Weston, Dufresne, Sawyer and Columb were awarded RSUs from Loblaw as follows:
| Name | RSUs Granted (#) | Grant Value Per Unit (\$) |
Grant Date Fair Value (\$) |
Vesting Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 14,586 | 99.33 | 1,448,827 | March 3, 2025 | |
| 1,338 (1) | 117.67 | 157,442 | August 4, 2025 | ||
| Richard Dufresne | 9,563 | 99.33 | 949,893 | March 3, 2025 | |
| Robert Sawyer | 13,422 | 99.33 | 1,333,207 | March 3, 2025 | |
| Barry Columb | 4,194 | 99.33 | 416,590 | March 3, 2025 | |
| 1,020 (1) | 115.84 | 118,157 | May 11, 2025 |
(1) Messrs. Weston and Columb received additional grants of Loblaw RSUs in August 2022 and May 2022, respectively, to reflect mid-year increases to their respective base salaries and LTIP targets. Full details of Messrs. Weston's and Columb's compensation from Loblaw are set forth in Loblaw's management proxy circular, which is available at www.sedar.com.
Weston Performance Share Unit Plan
PSUs represent a form of at-risk long-term compensation that serves to motivate the recipient to deliver on objectives set forth in the Corporation's strategic plan. PSUs serve to focus executives on selected key drivers of corporate performance and reduce the number of stock options granted and potential shareholder dilution. PSUs also serve as a pay-for-performance incentive to reward executives for the achievement of prescribed corporate goals and share price appreciation. PSUs entitle an executive to receive the value of a PSU award in Common Shares purchased on the open market at the end of the applicable performance period, typically three years in length. However, the number of PSUs that vest during such period depends on the achievement of certain performance measures.
The Corporation's PSU performance measure and weighting for the Corporation's PSUs awarded to Messrs. Weston and Dufresne for 2022 is set out below:
| Performance Measure | Weighting (%) |
|---|---|
| Consolidated Return on Capital | 100 |
PSUs vest at the end of the applicable three-year performance period, however the performance factor that determines the number of PSUs that vest is determined by averaging results against target in each year in the performance period. Setting yearly performance targets allows the Corporation to set targets with appropriate stretch and reduces the need for the Corporation to make provisions for adjustments or moderation of macro-economic impacts which may be more likely over a longer term. The results in each year, in turn, are determined based upon the level of achievement of each of the performance conditions during that year. When setting the three one-year targets, the Governance Committee considers the longer term financial operating model of the Corporation. The setting of three one-year targets, as opposed to one three-year target, aligns with the emerging trend among retail organizations to set targets over shorter periods and reflects a retail industry specific incentive design. The overall number of PSUs that vest at the end of a performance period range from 0% to 200% of the initial grant as illustrated below:

*Calculated as a simple average of performance in Years 1, 2, and 3.
Each PSU measure has a threshold, target and maximum performance level. Where performance is below threshold, PSUs do not vest. PSUs vest at 100% if target performance is achieved and at 200% if maximum performance is achieved.
For performance between threshold and target and target and maximum, vesting of PSUs is determined on a linear basis. Dividend equivalents in the form of additional PSUs that are equal in value to dividends paid on Common Shares are credited to the participant's account on each dividend payment date based on the number of PSUs in the account as of the dividend record date. The additional PSUs are subject to the same vesting conditions applicable to the underlying PSUs.
The performance target for the PSUs granted in 2022 relates to a three-year period ending December 31, 2024 and was developed taking into account the Corporation's confidential business strategies, plans and initiatives and its expectations regarding financial and operational performance. The target is intended to be challenging – neither impossible nor easy to achieve. PSU targets are forward-looking and disclosure of them before the end of the performance period would seriously prejudice the Corporation's interests. As a result, targets are disclosed at the time of payout of PSUs.
In 2022, Messrs. Weston and Dufresne were awarded PSUs from Weston for which the grant date fair value assumes vesting at 100% of target:
| Name | PSUs Granted (#) |
Grant Value Per Unit (\$) |
Grant Date Fair Value (\$) |
Vesting Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 6,089 | 152.97 | 931,434 | March 9, 2025 |
| 665 (1) | 152.18 | 101,200 | August 8, 2025 | |
| Richard Dufresne | 2,329 | 152.97 | 356,267 | March 9, 2025 |
(1) Mr. Weston received an additional grant of PSUs in August 2022 to reflect increases to his base salary and LTIP target. For full details of this increase please refer to the section "2021 Compensation Decisions Regarding the Named Executive Officers".
Performance of 2020 PSUs
In 2020, the Weston NEOs were awarded PSUs whose vesting was tied to achieving specific targets. For Weston, the performance target related to consolidated return on capital, defined as adjusted earnings before interest and taxes divided by capital at the start of the year* .
At the time of grant, the performance targets relating to the 2020 measures, namely, Weston's consolidated return on capital metric, were forward-looking as they related to the three-year period ending in 2022 and were developed taking into account Weston's business strategies, plans and initiatives, and expectations regarding financial and operational performance. The targets were intended to be challenging – neither impossible nor easy to achieve.
The targets and performance for the PSUs awarded in 2020, which were equally weighted on the Corporation's results from 2020, 2021 and 2022 and paid out in 2023, are set out below:
| 2020-2022 PSU PERFORMANCE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | Payout | |||
| Consolidated Return on Capital | 12.3 % | 14.3 % | 16.9 % | |||
| Target | 12.7 % | 13.0 % | 15.5 % | |||
| Performance | 89.2 % | 132.0 % | 132.6 % | |||
| Performance Weight | 33.3 % | 33.3 % | 33.3 % | |||
| Vesting | 29.7 % | 44.0 % | 44.2 % | |||
| Overall Payout | 117.9% |
*Non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the note in the "Other Information" section of this Circular.
2020 PSU Payout Summary
In early 2023, the Governance Committee reviewed the performance of the 2020 PSU grants against target and determined the PSU payout for the Corporation was 117.9% of target. The number of PSUs that vested for Messrs. Weston and Dufresne pursuant to these performance results is set out in the table below:
| Name | 2020 PSUs Granted (#) |
Total number of PSUs vested prior to application of performance factor (1) (#) |
Total number of PSUs Vested from Consolidated Return on Capital (#) |
Actual Settlement Value (\$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 17,283 | 18,288 | 21,562 | 3,597,462 (2) |
| Richard Dufresne | 17,103 | 18,098 | 21,338 | 3,560,090 (2) |
(1) The total number of PSUs vested prior to application of performance factor reflects the original number of PSUs granted plus the dividend equivalents earned subsequent to the grant date.
(2) The actual value of the PSU settlements was based on the market price of the Common Shares on March 3, 2023, the vesting date of the PSUs, which was \$166.84.
Loblaw Performance Share Unit Plan
For 2022, the Loblaw PSU performance measures for the Loblaw PSUs awarded to Messrs. Weston, Dufresne, Sawyer and Columb were consolidated revenue and return on capital, excluding consolidated franchises. The overall number of PSUs that vest at the end of a performance period range from 0% to 200% of the initial grant as illustrated below:

*Calculated as a simple average of performance in Years 1, 2, and 3.
Though the Governance Committee closely monitors the Corporation's performance relative to that of its peers when making compensation decisions, the Governance Committee believes that the best approach for the Corporation is to tie its executive compensation to performance metrics that are aligned with the Corporation's strategy and operating plans and that can be directly impacted by its executives. Consolidated return on capital creates a direct link to value creation by measuring effective deployment of shareholders' capital.
The Loblaw Governance Committee has determined that relative total shareholder return is not an appropriate performance measure for Loblaw's PSUs due to the lack of size-appropriate Canadian retail peers and the significantly different inflation, foreign exchange and macro-economic factors to which comparable U.S. retailers are subject. The Corporation's Governance Committee has likewise determined that relative total shareholder return is not an appropriate performance measure for the Corporation's PSUs due to its inapplicability to Loblaw as well as the lack of size-appropriate Canadian peers of the Corporation and the significantly different inflation, foreign exchange and macro-economic factors to which comparable U.S. peers are subject.
The Loblaw Governance Committee has determined that consolidated revenue is appropriate as a significantly-weighted performance measure for the Loblaw PSUs, notwithstanding its inclusion as a measure for the STIP, as it serves as a proxy for market share and is intended to reward growth of the business. Growth in revenue and market share is critical to the success of Loblaw and to Loblaw remaining competitive relative to its peers. Using consolidated revenue as a factor in the LTIP and STIP aligns the interests of executives with those of shareholders.
In 2022, Messrs. Weston, Dufresne, Sawyer and Columb were awarded PSUs from Loblaw for which the grant date fair value assumes vesting at 100% of target:
| PSUs Granted | Grant Value Per Unit |
Grant Date Fair Value |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | (#) | (\$) | (\$) | Vesting Date |
| Galen G. Weston | 14,591 | 99.33 | 1,449,324 | March 3, 2025 |
| 1,339 (1) | 117.67 | 157,560 | August 4, 2025 | |
| Richard Dufresne | 9,566 | 99.33 | 950,191 | March 3, 2025 |
| Robert Sawyer | 13,426 | 99.33 | 1,333,605 | March 3, 2025 |
| Barry Columb | 4,196 | 99.33 | 416,789 | March 3, 2025 |
| 1,020 (1) | 115.84 | 118,157 | May 11, 2025 |
(1) Messrs. Weston and Columb received additional grants of Loblaw PSUs in August 2022 and May 2022, respectively, to reflect mid-year increases to their respective base salaries and LTIP targets. Full details of Messrs. Weston's and Columb's compensation from Loblaw are set forth in Loblaw's management proxy circular, which is available at www.sedar.com.
Performance of 2020 Loblaw PSUs
In 2020, Messrs. Weston and Columb were awarded Loblaw PSUs whose vesting was tied to Loblaw's consolidated revenue and return on capital targets over a three-year period. Revenue excluded the consolidation of franchises in 2020, but was included as of 2021. The return on capital measure was defined as Adjusted EBIT* divided by capital at the start of the year. Adjusted EBIT, as referenced in relation to Loblaw's 2020 PSU targets, includes certain further adjustments in addition to those noted in Loblaw's 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis. At the time of grant, the performance targets relating to the 2020 return on capital and enterprise consolidated revenue metrics were forward-looking as they related to the three-year period ending in 2022 and were developed taking into account Loblaw's business strategies, plans and initiatives and its expectations regarding financial and operational performance. The targets were intended to be challenging – neither impossible nor easy to achieve.
*Non-GAAP financial measure. Please see the note in the "Other Information" section of this Circular and section 17 of Loblaw's 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis, which can be found on www.sedar.com.
The targets and performance for the Loblaw PSUs awarded in 2020, which were equally weighted on Loblaw results from 2020, 2021 and 2022 and paid out in 2023, are set out below:
| 2020 | 2021 2022 |
Performance | Performance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measures | Target | Results | Target | Results | Target | Results | by Measure | Factor | |
| Enterprise Consolidated | Max: | \$49,436 | \$52,760 | \$52,760 | |||||
| Revenue | Target: | \$48,705 | \$50,847 | \$51,725 | \$53,170 | \$52,964 | \$56,504 | 199.8% | 99.9% |
| 50% weighting | Min: | \$48,218 | \$50,690 | \$50,690 | |||||
| Max: | 10.95% | 12.02% | 12.02% | ||||||
| Loblaw Return on Capital 50% weighting |
Target: | 10.45% | 9.95% | 11.27% | 12.90% | 13.48% | 14.86% | 133.2% | 66.6% |
| Min: | 9.95% | 10.52% | 10.52% | ||||||
| Performance by Year | 100.0% | 200.0% | 200.0% | — | — | ||||
| Vesting | 33.3% | 66.6% | 66.6% | — | — | ||||
| Overall Payout | 166.5% | ||||||||
2020 Loblaw PSU Payout Summary
In 2023, the Loblaw Governance Committee determined that the 2020 grant of Loblaw's PSUs paid out at 166.5% of target for Messrs. Weston and Columb. The number of PSUs that vested for Messrs. Weston and Columb pursuant to these performance results is set out in the table below:
| Vesting of 2020 PSU Award | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | 2019 PSUs Granted (#) |
Total number of PSUs vested prior to application of performance factor (1) (#) |
Enterprise Consolidated Revenue Component (#) |
Loblaw Return on Capital Component (#) |
Total number of PSUs Vested (#) |
Actual Settlement Value (\$) |
|
| Galen G. Weston | 11,419 | 12,003 | 11,991 | 7,993 | 19,984 | 2,340,152 (2) | |
| Barry Columb | 5,947 | 6,251 | 6,245 | 4,162 | 10,407 | 1,218,673 (2) |
(1) The total number of PSUs vested prior to application of performance factor reflects the original number of PSUs granted plus the dividend equivalents earned subsequent to the grant date.
(2) The actual value of the PSU settlements was based on the market price of Loblaw common shares on February 27, 2023, the vesting date of the PSUs, which was \$117.1013.
Choice Properties Performance Unit Plan
PUs represent a form of at-risk long-term compensation that serves to motivate the recipient to deliver on objectives set forth in the Trust's strategic plan. PUs serve to focus executives on selected key drivers of performance. PUs also serve as a pay-forperformance incentive to reward executives for the achievement of prescribed goals and Trust Unit price appreciation. PUs also entitle an executive to receive the value of the PU award in cash or Trust Units at the end of the applicable vesting period, which is also usually three years in length. A participant receives either a cash payment or the number of Trust Units (acquired on the open market) at the end of the applicable performance period. However, the number of PUs that vest during such period depends on the achievement of certain measures. Under the PU Plan, when distributions are paid on Trust Units for the period when a PU is outstanding, additional PUs equivalent in value to the distributions paid on Trust Units will be credited to the participant's account. The additional PUs vest at the same time as, and based on the achievement of performance measures applicable to, the underlying PUs.
If a participant is either terminated for cause or voluntarily resigns prior to the end of the applicable vesting period, all PUs are cancelled on the date of cessation of employment and no payments are made in respect of such PUs.
If a participant's employment is terminated: (i) due to death; (ii) due to retirement; or (iii) by the Trust without cause, then the PUs vest at target on a pro-rata basis for the period of time the participant was actively employed. All other PUs are cancelled. Settlement of vested PUs is made as soon as practicable following the last day of active employment.
The Choice Properties Governance Committee determined that PU performance measure for 2022 would be total Unitholder return. The total Unitholder return metric aligns with Choice Properties' strategic objectives, with the underlying objective of the PU plan being to focus executives on the achievement of long-term strategic objectives in addition to meeting short-term business and financial objectives contained in Choice Properties' annual business plan.
The number of PUs that vest at the end of the applicable three-year performance period is determined by averaging each of the three year's results against target. The results in each year are determined based upon the level of achievement of each of the performance conditions during that year. The overall number of PUs that vest at the end of a performance period will range from 0% to 200% of the initial grant as illustrated below:

*Calculated as a simple average of performance in Years 1, 2, and 3.
A threshold performance condition for total Unitholder return must be met in order for any PUs to vest and Choice Properties sets targeted levels of performance for total Unitholder return. If the target performance condition is achieved, the number of PUs that vest will be equal to 100% of PUs initially granted. If the maximum performance condition is achieved during every year of the performance period, 200% of the initial number of PUs granted will vest.
Any performance results between the threshold performance conditions and maximum performance conditions will result in the vesting of PUs determined on a linear basis.
The total Unitholder return performance targets for the PUs granted in 2022 relate to a three-year period ending December 31, 2024 and were developed taking into account Choice Properties' business strategies, plans and initiatives and its expectations regarding financial and operational performance. These targets are intended to be challenging – neither impossible nor easy to achieve.
In 2022, Mr. Diamond was awarded PUs for which the grant date fair value assumes vesting at 100% of target, as follows:
| Name | PUs Granted (#) |
Grant Value Per Trust Unit (\$) |
Grant Date Fair Value (1) (\$) |
Vesting Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rael L. Diamond | 33,839 (2) | 14.40 | 487,282 | February 25, 2025 |
(1) The grant date fair value of the PUs is calculated as the number of PUs granted multiplied by the greater of the volume weighted average Trust Unit price on the TSX for the one or five trading days preceding the grant date as applicable.
(2) Full details of Mr. Diamond's compensation from Choice Properties are set forth in Choice Properties' management proxy circular, which is available at www.sedar.com.
Performance of Choice Properties 2020 Performance Units
In 2020, Mr. Diamond was awarded PUs whose vesting was based on total Unitholder return over a three-year period.
Choice Properties' relative total Unitholder return is measured in relation to a select group of peers, based on a percentile ranking, where the minimum (threshold), target and maximum performance are achieved by nil, 50th and 100th percentile rankings, respectively, resulting in payouts of 0%, 100% and 200%, respectively. The peer group is comprised of certain REITs and real estate entities in Canada and the United States comparable in terms of size and complexity to Choice Properties, including a strong performance correlation to Choice Properties. Choice Properties' comparator group for the purpose of calculating performance is set out below:
| Choice Properties Comparator Group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allied Properties REIT | First Capital REIT | |||||
| Canadian Apartment Properties REIT | H&R REIT | |||||
| Cominar REIT | RioCan REIT | |||||
| CT REIT | SmartCentres REIT | |||||
At the time of the grant, the performance targets relating to the 2020 total Unitholder return metric were forward-looking as they related to a three-year performance period ending in 2022 and were developed taking into account Choice Properties' business strategies, plans and initiatives and its expectations regarding financial and operating performance. These targets were intended to be challenging – neither impossible nor easy to achieve.
In early 2023, the Governance Committee reviewed the performance of the 2020 PUs and determined the following results based on the average of the three year performance:
The TUR measure achieved performance results of 175%, 75% and 200% in the first, second and third years of the performance period, respectively.
The target and performance for total Unitholder return for the PUs awarded in 2020, which were equally weighted on the results from 2020, 2021 and 2022 and paid out in 2023, are set out below:
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Total Unitholder Return |
(0.1)% | 22.6% | 2.8% |
| Percentile Ranking | 87.5% | 37.5% | 100.0% |
| Payout Factor | 175% | 75% | 200% |
| Performance Weight | 33.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% |
| Vesting | 58.3% | 25.0% | 66.7% |
| Overall Payout | 150.0% |
(1) Total Unitholder Return is calculated using a starting price and ending price equal to the volume weighted average Trust Unit price on the TSX for the five trading days including and immediately preceding the first and last trading days of the year, respectively.
2020 Choice Properties Performance Unit Payout Summary
In early 2023, the Choice Properties Governance Committee confirmed that the 2020 grant of PUs paid out at 150.0% of target. The actual value of the PU payout earned was based on the volume-weighted average of the Trust Units on the TSX for the 5 trading days immediately preceding February 20, 2023, being the final day of the performance period, which was \$14.71.
The number of PUs that vested for Mr. Diamond pursuant to this performance result is set out in the table below:
| Name | Grant Date | PUs Granted (#) |
Total number of PUs vested prior to application of performance factor (1) (#) |
Total number of PUs vested from Total Unitholder Return (#) |
Actual Settlement Value (\$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rael L. Diamond | February 21, 2020 | 25,084 | 29,420 | 44,129 | (2) 649,087 |
(1) The total number of PUs vested prior to the application of the performance factor reflects the original number of PUs granted plus the distribution equivalents earned subsequent to the grant date.
(2) The actual value of the PU payouts was based on the volume-weighted average of the Trust Units on the TSX for the 5 trading days immediately preceding February 20, 2023, being the final day of the performance period, which was \$14.71.
Choice Properties Unit-Settled Restricted Unit Plan ("URU Plan")
The URU Plan is designed to achieve the following objectives: (i) foster the long-term retention of executives (through multiyear vesting and disposition restriction provisions); (ii) provide a performance-driven component to an executive's compensation; (iii) align the long-term interest of executives with the interests of Unitholders, through multi-year vesting and the six-year disposition restrictions; and (iv) assist in the recruitment of key personnel. In addition, executives participating in the URU Plan are required to pay income tax on the value of the URUs at the time the URUs are awarded, which requires an out-of-pocket investment at the time of the grant.
The URU Plan provides for the award of URUs to certain employees, subject to approval by the Choice Properties Governance Committee. The Trust Units represented by the URUs granted under the URU Plan are purchased in the open market and are held by an independent custodian on behalf of each participant until they have vested and the disposition restrictions have been lifted. The participant has the right to vote the Trust Units represented by the URUs and to receive distributions from the date of grant.
URUs have multi-year disposition restriction periods encouraging executives to think and act with a clear focus on long-term value creation. Disposition means selling, pledging or disposing of the URUs, except as otherwise permitted in the URU Plan and corresponding instruments of grant.
URUs vest over a three-year period at a rate of 1/3 per year, on each of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd anniversaries of the grant date. Once the URUs have vested, they are no longer subject to forfeiture, but remain subject to a disposition restriction until six years following the grant date.
For further details on the Choice Properties URU Plan, including termination provisions, refer to the Choice Properties management proxy circular available at www.sedar.com.
The table below sets out the URUs granted under the URU Plan to Mr. Diamond in respect of 2022. The value of the URUs is based on the market value of Trust Units and does not reflect the fair value of the restricted Trust Units, which is lower than the market value, since the restricted Trust Units are not freely tradeable.
| Name | URUs Granted (#) |
Grant Date | Grant Value Per URU (1) (\$) |
Grant Date Fair Value (\$) |
Vesting Schedule | Date no longer subject to disposition restrictions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rael L. Diamond | 101,578 | February 28, 2022 | 14.38 | 1,460,692 | 1/3 on grant anniversary in each of 2023, 2024 and 2025 |
February 28, 2028 |
(1) The grant values per URU for the URUs granted to Mr. Diamond reflect the volume weighted average trading price of the Trust Units on the TSX for the five trading days immediately preceding the date of the award; the targeted grant value for the URU allocation of the February 28, 2022 LTIP grant for Mr. Diamond was \$1,462,723, based on the volume-weighted average price of the Trust Units of \$14.40, being the Grant Value Per Trust Unit applicable to the awards of RUs and PUs granted on February 25, 2022.
Summary of Payout of 2017 Incentive applicable to Barry Columb, Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial
In 2016, the Loblaw Governance Committee reviewed Mr. Columb's compensation and approved a grant of certain performance appreciation rights ("PAR") to Mr. Columb in order to position his total direct compensation competitively relative to a comparator group comprised of certain companies within the Canadian banking and financial services sector as well as select other industries.
The PAR incentive was granted in 2017 with payout, if any, to occur in 2022 following a five-year performance period, and based on financial results and achievement of certain business objectives. The targeted payout opportunity (performance at 100%) was \$2,500,000 (being the equivalent of \$500,000 per year over the performance/vesting period), with a maximum payout threshold of 200% if maximum performance was achieved.
In May 2022, the Loblaw Governance Committee reviewed President's Choice Financial's results and determined that, due to certain strategic changes outside of the control of Mr. Columb, adjustments to the PAR performance targets were appropriate and that performance was within the adjusted performance thresholds. With these adjustments, the Loblaw Governance Committee approved a PAR payout to Mr. Columb of \$2,000,000.
OTHER COMPENSATION MATTERS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO EACH NEO, AS APPLICABLE
Long-Term Incentive Plan Clawback
All LTIP grants by the Corporation include a clawback provision stating that if an executive accepts employment with a competitor of the Corporation, Loblaw or Choice Properties within six months after leaving the employment of the Corporation, the gross dollar value of all stock option, RSU and PSU payments received in the 12 months of employment immediately prior to the date of cessation of employment must be repaid to the Corporation. Loblaw LTIP awards and Choice Properties LTIP awards to their respective executives also include this provision.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans as of December 31, 2022
The following table shows the number of securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans of the Corporation:
| Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (a) |
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (b) |
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) (c) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Securityholders | |||
| Stock Option Plan | 1,648,766 | \$106.38 | 3,858,480 |
| Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Securityholders | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Total | 1,648,766 | \$106.38 | 3,858,480 |
RETIREMENT AND PENSION ARRANGEMENTS
The retirement and pension arrangements of the Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties are designed to provide a reasonable level of retirement income to executives. Senior executives of the Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties (other than Mr. Weston) participate in either the defined benefit or the defined contribution component of the Consolidated Executive Plan. Certain Choice Properties executives, including Mr. Diamond, participate in the CREIT Management, L.P. Pension Plan, a defined contribution registered pension plan. Mr. Weston does not participate in any of the Corporation's or Loblaw's pension plans.
All new executives join the Consolidated Executive Plan and participate in the defined contribution portion of the plan. In addition, senior executives of the Corporation and Loblaw whose pensionable earnings exceed prescribed levels participate in a non-contributory SERP.
The details of these retirement and pension arrangements are set out in the section "Pension Plan and Long Service Executive Arrangements" on page 82.
EXECUTIVE BENEFIT PLANS
The Corporation and Loblaw, as participating employers in Weston's executive benefit program, provide their respective NEOs with designated health, dental, disability and insurance coverage through executive benefit plans paid for by the Corporation and Loblaw, respectively.
PERQUISITES
NEOs receive a limited number of perquisites. These include the use of a car or car allowance, an annual medical examination and a discretionary health care spending account, and the right to participate in the employee share ownership plan.
EXECUTIVE SHARE OWNERSHIP POLICY
The Corporation maintains an Executive Share Ownership Policy to further align the interests of senior executives with those of the Corporation's shareholders. The policy establishes minimum share ownership levels for executives which, based on their executive level, are set at a multiple of their base salary.
Under the policy, Common Shares, DSUs, EDSUs and the in-the-money value of vested stock options of the Corporation are the only eligible holdings included in determining an executive's ownership value. The policy applies to every executive at the senior vice president level and higher. Senior executives of the Corporation who serve the Corporation as well as Loblaw or Choice Properties may include their eligible holdings of each entity that they serve to satisfy the policy.
Under the policy, senior executives are expected to own eligible equity-based holdings with a value equal to a multiple of their base salary as determined by their position:
| Chief Executive Officer | 5x base salary |
|---|---|
| President | 3x base salary |
| Executive Vice Presidents | 2x base salary |
| Senior Vice Presidents | 0.5x base salary |
Executives are expected to attain the required ownership level within five years of their appointment. The Chief Executive Officer and the President are subject to post-employment hold periods which require them to maintain their share ownership levels for one year following the end of their employment.
Executives subject to the policy are required to retain a minimum of 50% of the after-tax proceeds received on the settlement of RSUs or PSUs or an exercise of stock options in Common Shares until their respective executive ownership levels have been attained.
The dollar values of each NEO's eligible equity-based holdings, based on the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on March 13, 2023 of \$162.83 and the closing price of the Loblaw common shares on the TSX on March 13, 2023 of \$114.59, are set forth in the following table, along with the dollar value of those equity-based holdings that are not eligible to be included in determining an executive's ownership value:
| Ownership Requirement |
Value of Eligible Equity-Based Holdings | Value of Ineligible Equity-Based Holdings | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | (\$) | Mul tiple of Salary |
Common Shares (\$) |
DSUs and EDSUs (\$) |
Vested In-the Money Stock Options (\$) |
Eligible Total (\$) |
RSUs (\$) |
PSUs (1) (\$) |
Unvested In-the Money Stock Options (\$) |
Ineligible Total (\$) |
| Galen G. Weston (2) | 6,750,000 | 5 | 12,860,961,242 | 368,973 | 41,956,979 | 12,903,287,194 | 5,106,589 | 10,341,386 | 17,346,812 | 32,794,787 |
| Richard Dufresne (3) | 2,850,000 | 3 | 4,910,840 | — | 20,885,804 | 25,796,644 | 2,035,233 | 5,740,514 | 10,698,768 | 18,474,515 |
| Robert Sawyer (4) | 2,000,000 | 2 | 924,464 | 1,590,523 | 1,345,506 | 3,860,493 | 5,054,565 | 5,056,169 | 5,381,980 | 15,492,714 |
| Barry Columb | 1,300,000 | 2 | 4,716,181 | — | 4,556,435 Vested |
9,272,616 | 1,949,520 | 1,950,093 | 3,089,998 Unvested |
6,989,611 |
| Unrestricted Trust Units (\$) |
Trust Units, Restricted (6) (\$) |
In-the Money Unit Options (\$) |
RUs (\$) |
PUs (1) (\$) |
In-the Money Unit Options (\$) |
|||||
| Rael L. Diamond (5) | 2,340,000 | 3 | 4,867,319.1 | 8,202,273 | — | 13,069,592 | — | 1,529,868 | — | 1,529,868 |
(1) The value of PSU and PU awards assumes vesting at 100% of target.
(2) Mr. Weston is also subject to Loblaw's Executive Share Ownership Policy. His Loblaw equity-based holdings are included in the table based on their value on March 13, 2023 at \$114.59, being the closing price on the TSX of a Loblaw common share on that date. Mr. Weston was granted DSUs during his time as a non-management director of the Corporation between 2016 and 2017. Mr. Weston's common share amount includes the value of the common shares controlled by him through his control of Wittington Investments, Limited.
(3) Mr. Dufresne is also subject to Loblaw's Executive Share Ownership Policy. His Loblaw equity-based holdings are included in the table based on their value on March 13, 2023 at \$114.59, being the closing price on the TSX of a Loblaw common share on that date.
(4) Mr. Sawyer is subject to Loblaw's Executive Share Ownership Policy. His Loblaw equity-based holdings are set forth in the table based on their value on March 13, 2023 at \$114.59, being the closing price on the TSX of a Loblaw common share on that date. Mr. Sawyer was a director of Weston until May 2021. Pursuant to Loblaw's Share Ownership Policy, Mr. Sawyer's equity holdings in Weston, as at May 6, 2021, the date of his appointment at Loblaw, count towards his minimum equity ownership requirement. Mr. Sawyer held 4,270 Weston common shares and 9,768 Weston deferred share units with a value of \$1,590,523 based on the closing price on the TSX of a Weston common share on March 13, 2023 of \$162.83.
(5) Mr. Diamond is subject to Choice Properties' Executive Equity Ownership Policy. His Choice Properties equity-based holdings are set forth in the table based on their value on March 13, 2023 at \$14.35, being the closing price on the TSX of a Choice Properties Trust Unit on that date.
(6) The Trust Unit values are based on the market value of freely tradeable Trust Units.
For a description of the Loblaw Executive Share Ownership Policy in respect of Messrs. Weston, Dufresne, Sawyer and Columb please refer to Loblaw's management proxy circular available at www.sedar.com. For a description of the Choice Properties Executive Equity Ownership Policy in respect of Mr. Diamond, please refer to Choice Properties' management proxy circular available at www.sedar.com.
2022 COMPENSATION DECISIONS REGARDING THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following outlines the rationale underlying the compensation decisions for each of the Corporation's NEOs for 2022.
Galen G. Weston, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Chairman and President of Loblaw
In 2022, the Boards of both Loblaw and Weston engaged Meridian to update Meridian's 2020 benchmarking regarding Mr. Weston's compensation relative to the updated Weston and Loblaw comparator groups approved by the Weston and Loblaw Governance Committees in May 2022. The results of Meridian's 2022 review suggested that Mr. Weston's total direct compensation was below the market median and Weston's and Loblaw's compensation policy objectives. In recognition of Mr. Weston's unique position as Chairman and President of Loblaw and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Weston, and to further reflect the complexity of managing these multiple roles, effective July 1, 2022, Mr. Weston received an increase in his base salary from \$1,242,000 to \$1,350,000, an increase in his STIP target from 150% to 160% of base salary and an increase in his LTIP target from 500% to 560% of base salary. Mr. Weston's base salary continues to be paid 70% by Loblaw and 30% by Weston. Each of Loblaw and Weston determines and funds its respective share of Mr. Weston's STIP. 70% of Mr. Weston's STIP is subject to the Loblaw STIP and 30% is subject to the Weston STIP.
Mr. Weston's annual Loblaw LTIP granted in March 2022 had an aggregate grant date fair value of \$4,346,772, comprised of 100,112 stock options, 14,586 RSUs and 14,591 PSUs. In conjunction with the increase to Mr. Weston's base salary, the Loblaw Governance Committee approved a one-time grant of 6,877 stock options, 1,338 RSUs and 1,339 PSUs in August 2022, with an aggregate grant date fair value of \$472,485, representing Mr. Weston's incremental LTIP value from Loblaw for 2022.
Mr. Weston's annual LTIP grant from Weston for 2022 had an aggregate grant date fair value of \$1,863,016, comprised of 42,792 stock options and 6,089 PSUs. In conjunction with the increase to Mr. Weston's base salary, the Weston Governance Committee approved a one-time grant of 3,840 stock options and 665 PSUs in August 2022, with an aggregate grant date fair value of \$202,499, representing Mr. Weston's incremental LTIP value from Weston for 2022.
As discussed in the section "Individual STIP Components", the Governance Committees of both the Corporation and Loblaw awarded Mr. Weston an individual performance component of his STIP award of \$977,628.
Richard Dufresne, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and Chief Financial Officer of Loblaw
Mr. Dufresne's compensation arrangements were last set in 2020, prior to his assuming the role of Chief Financial Officer of Loblaw in 2021, in addition to his duties as President and Chief Financial Officer of Weston. Mr. Dufresne's compensation arrangements did not change in 2022, being a base salary of \$950,000 and STIP and LTIP targets of 125% and 375% of base salary, respectively.
To reflect his dual role, 80% of Mr. Dufresne's base salary is paid by Loblaw and 20% by Weston. Each of the Corporation and Loblaw determines and funds its respective share of Mr. Dufresne's STIP. 80% of Mr. Dufresne's STIP is subject to the Loblaw STIP and 20% is subject to the Weston STIP.
Mr. Dufresne's LTIP grants from the Corporation for 2022 had an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately \$712,511, comprised of 16,364 stock options and 2,329 PSUs. Mr. Dufresne's annual Loblaw LTIP granted in March, 2022 had an aggregate grant date fair value of \$2,849,837, comprised of 65,636 stock options, 9,563 RSUs and 9,566 PSUs. In addition, as discussed in the section "Individual STIP Components", the Governance Committee awarded Mr. Dufresne an individual performance component of his STIP award of \$552,636.
Robert Sawyer, Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw
Prior to 2022, Mr. Sawyer's compensation arrangements were last set in 2021, upon his appointment to the role of Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw. The Loblaw Governance Committee reviewed Mr. Sawyer's compensation arrangements in July 2022 and determined that his target direct compensation would not change, being a base salary of \$1,000,000 and STIP and LTIP targets of 150% and 400% of base salary, respectively, however the Loblaw Governance Committee approved certain adjustments to Mr. Sawyer's allowance for certain relocation and travel expenses.
For 2022, Mr. Sawyer received an LTIP grant from Loblaw comprised of 92,120 stock options, 13,422 RSUs and 13,426 PSUs, with an aggregate grant date value of \$3,999,788.
In addition, as discussed in the section "Individual STIP Components" of the Loblaw management proxy circular, available at www.sedar.com, the Loblaw Governance Committee awarded Mr. Sawyer \$877,013 for the individual performance component of his 2022 STIP award.
Barry Columb, Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial
Prior to 2022, Mr. Columb's compensation arrangements in his role as Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial were last set effective April 1, 2020. In April 2022 the Loblaw Governance Committee approved an increase in Mr. Columb's base salary from \$625,000 to \$650,000 and an increase in his LTIP target from 200% to 265% of base salary, effective April 1, 2022. Mr. Columb's STIP target remained unchanged at 100% of base salary.
For 2022, Mr. Columb received an annual LTIP grant comprised of 28,788 stock options, 4,194 RSUs and 4,196 PSUs, with an aggregate grant date fair value of \$1,604,371. In addition, as discussed in the section "Individual STIP Components" on page 56, the Loblaw Governance Committee awarded Mr. Columb \$242,918 for the 25% individual performance component of his 2022 STIP award.
Rael L. Diamond, President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Properties
Mr. Diamond's compensation arrangements as President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Properties were last set effective May 1, 2021, and did not change for 2022, being a base salary of \$780,000 and STIP and LTIP targets of 100% and 250%, respectively.
For 2022, Mr. Diamond received an LTIP grant comprised of 101,578 URUs and 33,839 PUs, with an aggregate grant fair value of \$1,950,005.
As described previously, in early 2023 the Choice Properties Governance Committee awarded Mr. Diamond \$981,708 for his 2022 STIP award.
TERMINATION AND CHANGE OF CONTROL BENEFITS
None of the NEOs' employment agreements provide for change of control benefits; however, the Corporation's compensation plans have termination and change of control provisions. The table below summarizes the termination and change of control benefits provided under each plan in situations that result in cessation of employment. The actual amounts that an NEO would receive upon termination of employment can only be determined at the time the NEO leaves the Corporation.
| Change of Control | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Compensation |
Resignation | Termination without Cause |
Termination with Cause |
Retirement after age 55 with at least 10 years of service (the "Conditions") |
Retirement that does not meet the Conditions |
|
| Short-Term Incentive Plan |
No payment | Bonus for the applicable year is prorated to the termination date |
No payment | Bonus for the applicable year is prorated to the retirement date |
Bonus for the applicable year is prorated to the retirement date |
Governance Committee discretion to grant or adjust bonus |
| Stock Option Plan |
30 days from the last day of active employment to exercise vested options |
90 days from notice of termination to exercise vested options |
All outstanding options forfeited at time of notice of termination |
Options will continue to vest and pay out in the normal course, with the exception of any award granted in the calendar year of retirement |
90 days from the date of retirement to exercise vested options |
Governance Committee discretion to accelerate vesting of options |
| Restricted Share Unit Plan |
Units forfeited upon the last day of active employment |
Value of units paid out on a prorated basis (at target level) for units granted at least 12 months prior to termination date |
All outstanding units forfeited upon the last day of active employment |
RSUs will continue to vest and pay out in the normal course, with the exception of any award granted in the calendar year of retirement |
Value of outstanding units paid out on a prorated basis for units granted at least 12 months prior to date of retirement |
Governance Committee discretion to adjust grant |
| Performance Share Unit Plan |
Units forfeited upon the last day of active employment |
Value of units paid out on a prorated basis (at target level) for units granted at least 12 months prior to termination date |
All outstanding units forfeited upon the last day of active employment |
PSUs will continue to vest and pay out in the normal course, with the exception of any award granted in the calendar year of retirement |
Value of outstanding units paid out on a prorated basis for units granted at least 12 months prior to date of retirement |
Governance Committee discretion to adjust grant |
| Executive Deferred Share Unit Plan |
NEO has until December 15th of the year following resignation to redeem |
NEO has until December 15th of the year following termination to redeem |
NEO has until December 15th of the year following termination to redeem |
NEO has until December 15th of the year following retirement to redeem |
NEO has until December 15th of the year following retirement to redeem |
Governance Committee to ensure substantially similar award following a change of control event |
| Choice Properties Performance Unit Plan |
All outstanding PUs forfeited upon the last day of active employment |
Value of outstanding PUs paid out on a prorated basis to the date of termination |
All outstanding PUs forfeited upon the last day of active employment |
PUs will continue to vest and pay out in the normal course, with the exception of any award granted in the calendar year of retirement |
Value of outstanding PUs paid out on a prorated basis to the date of retirement |
Governance Committee discretion to adjust grant |
| Choice Properties Unit Settled Restricted Unit Plan |
Unvested URUs forfeited upon the last day of active employment |
Unvested URUs which would have vested within 24 months from date of termination will vest and the balance will be forfeited |
Unvested URUs forfeited upon the last day of active employment |
Unvested URUs will continue to vest in the normal course |
Unvested URUs will continue to vest in the normal course |
Unvested URUs will immediately vest |
(1) The Corporation's plans were amended in 2016 to provide for certain benefits upon an executive's retirement at age 55 with at least 10 years of service. The plans were also amended for executives who die or become disabled, to allow for their RSUs and PSUs to continue to vest and pay out in the normal course. All vested and unvested stock options will immediately vest and executives (or their estates) will have 2 years from the date of death or disability (or, if earlier, expiry of the term) to exercise vested options.
(2) The Trust's RU and PU plans were amended in 2021 to provide for certain benefits upon an executive's retirement at age 55 with at least 10 years of service. The plans were also amended for executives who die or become disabled, to allow for their RUs and PUs to continue to vest and pay out in the normal course.
The Governance Committee has discretion to make adjustments to the general plan provisions for a particular executive if considered appropriate in the circumstances. The following summarizes the termination benefits described above as they relate to the specific arrangements under each NEO's employment agreement as at December 31, 2022.
Galen G. Weston, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Chairman and President of Loblaw
Mr. Weston is not contractually entitled to severance, termination or change of control payments other than applicable incentive payments and share-based settlements as provided for under the terms of the STIP and the LTIP. Upon termination, Mr. Weston would be subject to certain non-competition and confidentiality undertakings.
Richard Dufresne, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and Chief Financial Officer of Loblaw
If Mr. Dufresne's employment is terminated without cause, he would be entitled to receive for a period of 18 months plus one additional month for every completed year of service from the effective date of his most recent employment agreement up to a maximum of 24 months: (a) his base salary and car allowance, (b) his target STIP bonus, and (c) his health care and dental benefits, participation in the employee/family assistance program and pension accrual. Mr. Dufresne would also be entitled to applicable incentive payments and share-based settlements as provided for under the terms of the LTIP. Upon termination, Mr. Dufresne would be subject to certain non-competition and confidentiality undertakings.
Robert Sawyer, Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw
If Mr. Sawyer's employment is terminated without cause, he would be entitled to receive (a) a lump sum of 50% of his base salary for the period beginning on the last day of his employment and ending December 31, 2023; and (b) a lump sum of 50% of his target STIP bonus for the period beginning on the last day of his employment and ending December 31, 2023. In addition, his LTIP awards received during the term of his employment would continue to vest on their original timeline without proration. Upon termination, Mr. Sawyer would be subject to certain non-competition and confidentiality undertakings. If Mr. Sawyer remains employed by Loblaw until December 31, 2023 his LTIP awards received during the term of his employment will continue to vest on their original timeline.
Barry Columb, Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial
If Mr. Columb's employment is terminated without cause, he would be entitled to receive for a period of 18 months plus one additional month for every completed year of service from March 7, 2017 up to a maximum of 24 months: (a) his base salary, (b) his target STIP bonus, (c) participation in the Corporation-leased car program, and (d) his health care and dental benefits, participation in the employee/family assistance program and pension accrual. Mr. Columb would also be entitled to certain incentive payments and share-based settlements applicable to the period prior to the termination date, as provided for under the terms of the STIP and LTIP. Upon termination, Mr. Columb would be subject to certain non-competition and confidentiality undertakings.
Rael L. Diamond, President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Properties
If Mr. Diamond's employment is terminated without cause, he would be entitled to receive for a period of 18 months plus one additional month for every completed year of service after ten years of continuous service up to a maximum of 24 months: (a) his base salary and car allowance, (b) his target STIP bonus, and (c) his health care and dental benefits, participation in the employee/family assistance program and pension accrual. Mr. Diamond would also be entitled to certain incentive and unit based payments applicable to the period prior to the termination date, as provided for under the terms of the STIP and LTIP. Upon termination, Mr. Diamond would be subject to certain non-competition and confidentiality undertakings.
POTENTIAL AMOUNTS PAID ON TERMINATION
The following table sets forth the estimated incremental payments or benefits that the NEOs would have received upon termination of employment on December 31, 2022 for the various reasons described below.
| Amounts Due on Termination | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractual Severance | |||||||||||
| Long-Term Incentive Plans | |||||||||||
| Name | Event | Salary (1) (\$) |
Annual Bonus (1) (\$) |
Benefits (\$) |
Other (\$) |
Stock Options (2) (\$) |
RSUs (3) (\$) |
PSUs / PUs (3) (\$) |
URUs (4) (\$) |
Total (\$) |
|
| Galen G. Weston | Termination with cause |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of |
Termination without cause |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| the Corporation and Chairman and President of Loblaw |
Resignation Retirement |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
|
| Change of Control | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Richard Dufresne | Termination with cause |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| President and Chief Financial Officer of |
Termination without cause |
1,820,834 (5) | 2,276,041 (6) | 105,837 (7) | 47,341 (8) | — | — | — | — | 4,250,053 (9) | |
| the Corporation and Chief Financial Officer |
Resignation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| of Loblaw | Retirement | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Change of Control | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Robert Sawyer | Termination with cause |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw |
Termination without cause |
666,667 (10) 1,000,000 (10) | — | (10) — |
(10) 6,435,225 2,288,399 2,289,105 | — 12,679,396 | |||||
| Resignation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Retirement Change of Control |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
— — |
||
| Barry Columb | Termination with cause |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's |
Termination without cause |
1,245,833 | 1,245,833 | 106,976 | — | — | — | — | — | 2,598,642 | |
| Choice Financial | Resignation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Retirement | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Change of Control | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Rael L. Diamond | Termination with cause |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer of |
Termination without cause |
1,170,000 (11) | 1,170,000 (11) | 84,180 (11) | 31,500 (11) | — | — | — 2,386,456 | 4,842,136 | ||
| Choice Properties | Resignation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Retirement | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Change of Control | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) The Salary and Annual Bonus figures reflect contractual entitlements and may be paid by salary continuance, subject to mitigation obligations.
(2) The NEOs are entitled to exercise vested options following termination without cause in accordance with the Stock Option Plan. NEOs are entitled to continued vesting and payout of stock options in the normal course if they retire at age 55 with 10 years of service.
(3) Weston and Loblaw RSUs and PSUs are paid out on a prorated basis where the NEO retires or is terminated without cause in accordance with the RSU Plan and PSU Plan, respectively. NEOs are entitled to continued vesting and payout of RSUs and PSUs if they retire at age 55 with 10 years of service. Choice Properties PUs are paid out on a prorated basis where the NEO retires or is terminated without cause, and the NEO is entitled to continued vesting and payout of PUs upon retirement at age 55 with 10 years of service, in accordance with the PU Plan.
(4) Following termination without cause, in accordance with the URU Plan, the unvested URUs that would have vested within 24 months of the termination date will vest immediately.
(5) Aggregate based on 18 months' salary, plus one additional month for every completed year of service from the effective date of Mr. Dufresne's most recent employment agreement, which amounts to 23 months. The Weston and Loblaw allocations are \$364,167 and \$1,456,667, respectively.
(6) Mr. Dufresne's aggregate annual bonus is valued at target level. The Weston and Loblaw allocations are \$455,208 and \$1,820,833, respectively.
(7) Mr. Dufresne's aggregate is based on benefits and pension accruals for 23 months. The Weston and Loblaw allocations are \$7,936 and \$97,901, respectively.
(8) Mr. Dufresne's aggregate is based on car allowance for 23 months. The Weston and Loblaw allocations are \$9,468 and \$37,873, respectively.
(9) Mr. Dufresne's Weston and Loblaw allocations are \$836,779 and \$3,413,274, respectively.
(10) For Mr. Sawyer, the Salary and Annual Bonus figures are calculated based on 50% of the base salary and STIP that he would otherwise have received from December 31, 2022 to his contractual end of term, which amounts to 12 months. In the event of termination without cause, Mr. Sawyer's benefits and other perquisites would cease.
(11) For Mr. Diamond, the Salary and Annual Bonus figures reflect contractual entitlements and may be paid by salary continuance, subject to mitigation obligations. The Annual Bonus figure is valued at target level. The salary and annual bonus amounts are calculated based on 18 months' salary plus one additional month for every completed year of service after 10 years of continuous service, up to a maximum of 24 months, which amounts to 18 months. The Benefits figure includes benefits and pension accrual based on 18 months, per the terms of Mr. Diamond's employment agreement. The Other figure includes Mr. Diamond's car allowance, based on 18 months.
COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR 2023
COMPENSATION CHANGES FOR NEOs
No changes were made to the compensation arrangements of any NEO for 2023.
2023 WESTON SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
For 2023, the Corporation's STIP awards will be determined using the following formula:

In early 2023, the Governance Committee determined that business performance would continue to make up 70% of the Corporation's overall STIP payout, measured as a weighted average of the Loblaw and Choice Properties STIP payouts, weighted at 75% and 25%, respectively, with the weightings reflecting each entity's contribution to the value of the Corporation's market capitalization, and that the individual performance component would continue to make up 30% of the payout.
2023 LOBLAW SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
The Loblaw Governance Committee has approved the performance measures and weightings for the 2023 STIP as set out below.
Consistent with its ongoing commitment to corporate social responsibility,Loblaw will continue to include an ESG measure in its STIP targets for 2023, to continue driving higher levels of corporate social responsibility across the business. For 2023 Loblaw will also continue to include the customer satisfaction index, OSAT, as well as the EBIT margin measure designed to measure management's ability to translate revenue into profitability, calculated as Adjusted EBIT as a percentage of revenue. For 2023, the STIP design will continue to include a revenue qualifier whereby consolidated revenue performance will be capped at 100% if year-over-year adjusted tonnage share, normalized for a change in square footage, declines, and an earnings qualifier whereby in order to be eligible for above-target achievement, year-over-year Adjusted EBITDA growth must be positive and the Adjusted EBITDA target must be achieved.



2023 CHOICE PROPERTIES SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
For 2023, the Choice Properties Governance Committee determined that the financial measures of the 2023 STIP would continue to focus on NOI* and FFO per Unit*. The Choice Properties Governance Committee also decided to continue to include an ESG measure in its STIP targets for 2023, to continue to drive environmental and social responsibility across the business. The Choice Properties pursuit measures for 2023 will continue to include Process Improvement and ESG measures.
For 2023, Choice Properties' STIP awards will be determined using the following formula:

*Non-GAAP financial measure. See the note in the "Other Information" section of this Circular and section 15 of Choice Properties' 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis, which can be found on www.sedar.com.
2023 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
For 2023, the Governance Committee approved annual LTIP grants for the Corporation's NEOs comprised of 50% stock options and 50% PSUs, with the PSU performance measured by the return on capital achieved by the Corporation.
2023 Long-Term Incentive Plan Grants
In February 2023, the Governance Committee approved LTIP awards to Messrs. Weston and Dufresne as set out below. The LTIP grants were awarded on March 8, 2023. The annual LTIP grants to Messrs. Weston and Dufresne were comprised of equal grants (by grant value) of stock options and PSUs. For 2023, the LTIP compensation arrangements for Messrs. Weston and Dufresne will continue to be allocated 30% and 20% to the Corporation and 70% and 80% to Loblaw, respectively.
| Name | Grant Date Fair Value (1) (\$) |
Stock Options (2) (#) |
PSUs (#) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 2,268,001 | 32,758 | 6,676 |
| Richard Dufresne | 712,519 | 10,293 | 2,097 |
(1) These amounts reflect the grant date fair value of the options and PSUs. The grant date fair value of stock options is calculated in the following manner: Stock Option Value = Number of Stock Options Granted x Black-Scholes-Merton Value. The grant date fair value of PSUs is calculated in the following manner: PSU Value = Number of PSUs Granted x the greater of the volume-weighted average share price for the one or five trading days preceding the grant date, which was \$169.85 as of March 8, 2023. The grant date fair value of a PSU award assumes vesting at 100% of target.
(2) The exercise price of the stock options is \$169.85 for the Corporation.
In February 2023, the Loblaw Governance Committee approved LTIP awards to the Loblaw NEOs as set out below. These annual LTIP grants were comprised of equal grants (by grant value) of stock options, RSUs and PSUs, and were awarded on March 2, 2023. For 2023, the LTIP compensation arrangements for Messrs. Weston and Dufresne will continue to be allocated 30% and 20% to the Corporation and 70% and 80% to Loblaw, respectively.
| Name | Grant Date Fair Value (1) (\$) |
Stock Options (2) (#) |
RSUs (#) |
PSUs (#) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | 5,291,946 | 66,861 | 14,977 | 14,981 |
| Richard Dufresne | 2,849,992 | 36,008 | 8,066 | 8,068 |
| Robert Sawyer | 3,999,949 | 50,537 | 11,320 | 11,324 |
| Barry Columb | 1,722,484 | 21,763 | 4,875 | 4,876 |
(1) These amounts reflect the grant date fair value of the options, RSUs and PSUs. The grant date fair value of stock options is calculated in the following manner: Stock Option Value = Number of Stock Options Granted x Black-Scholes-Merton Value. The grant date fair value of the RSUs and PSUs is calculated in the following manner: RSU or PSU Value = Number of RSUs or PSUs Granted x the greater of the volume-weighted average share price for the one or five trading days preceding the grant date, which was \$117.77 as of March 2, 2023. The grant date fair value of a PSU award assumes vesting at 100% of target.
(2) The exercise price of the stock options is \$117.77.
In February 2023, the Choice Properties Governance Committee approved an LTIP grant to Mr. Diamond as set out below. The annual LTIP grant was comprised of PUs and, at the election of the participant, RUs, URUs or a combination thereof, and were awarded during an open trading window on February 24, 2023, in the case of the PUs and the RUs, and on February 28, 2023, in the case of the URUs.
| Name | Grant Date Fair Value (1) (\$) |
URUs (#) |
RUs (#) |
PUs (#) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rael L. Diamond | 1,950,002 | 98,884 | — | 32,962 |
(1) These amounts reflect the grant date fair value of the PUs, RUs and URUs when granted. The grant date fair value of PUs and RUs is calculated in the following manner: Number of PUs or RUs granted times the greater of the volume-weighted average Trust Unit price on the TSX for the one or five trading days preceding the grant date, which was \$14.79 as of February 24, 2023. The grant date fair value of the URUs is calculated in the following manner: The price used for the PU and RU calculation of grant date fair value, being \$14.79, was used to determine the number of URUs to be awarded and the grant date fair value reflected above. Trust Units were purchased by the trustee of the URU Plan in the market over several days to fund the URU grants.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on \$100 invested in Common Shares, Loblaw common shares and Choice Properties trust units on December 31, 2017, with the cumulative annual total return of the S&P/TSX Composite Total Return Index over the same period (assuming all dividends and distributions were reinvested). The graph also shows the Corporation's total direct NEO target compensation (which includes base salary, STIP and LTIP) over the same period.

| Five-Year Cumulative Total Shareholder Return on \$100 Investment | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||
| S&P / TSX COMPOSITE TOTAL RETURN INDEX | \$100 | \$99 | \$123 | \$129 | \$161 | \$139 | ||||
| GEORGE WESTON LIMITED | \$100 | \$84 | \$98 | \$93 | \$146 | \$170 | ||||
| CHOICE PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST | \$100 | \$92 | \$117 | \$116 | \$142 | \$146 | ||||
| LOBLAW COMPANIES LIMITED | \$100 | \$113 | \$129 | \$121 | \$204 | \$239 |
| Total Direct NEO Compensation | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||
| TOTAL DIRECT NEO COMPENSATION (\$ millions) | \$26.1 | \$29.0 | \$28.6 | \$28.1 | \$32.4 | \$35.0 |
For the five-year period ended December 31, 2022, total shareholder return of the Corporation, total unitholder return of Choice Properties and total shareholder return of Loblaw outperformed the S&P/TSX Composite Total Return Index. During the period, the total cumulative shareholder return for \$100 invested in Common Shares was \$170, compared to \$139 for the S&P/TSX Composite Total Return Index.
The total compensation for the Corporation's NEOs during this period has remained relatively stable. However, there have been year-over-year fluctuations in the reported total compensation primarily as a result of changes in the constitution of the NEO group. Over this period, the mix of NEO compensation has also changed such that equity-based incentives account for approximately 49% of all NEO compensation in 2022.
The NEO compensation disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table is not strongly correlated to shareholder returns in the short to medium term, in part because equity-based incentives are calculated at the time of grant using grant date fair values, which do not reflect the actual value of compensation received when such incentives vest or are exercised. In the longer term, NEO compensation is directly affected by the Corporation's share price performance. Stock option, RSU and PSU awards directly correlate to the share price and are therefore aligned with shareholder returns.
A substantial portion of NEO pay is at risk. In addition to the LTIP awards, the STIP awards are made based on the successful performance of key financial objectives that are tied to the business plan. These at-risk components (the STIP and LTIP awards) for the NEOs in 2022 ranged from 79.0% to 89.0% of the NEOs' total direct compensation.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by the NEOs during fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, as applicable:
| Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name and Principal Position |
Year | Salary (\$) |
Share/ Trust Unit Based Awards (1) (\$) |
Option Based Awards (2) (\$) |
Annual Incentive Plans (\$) |
Long Term Incentive Plans (\$) |
Pension Value (\$) |
All Other Compensation (3) (\$) |
Total Compensation (\$) |
|
| Galen G. Weston | 2022 | 1,296,000 (4) | 4,245,787 (4) | 2,638,985 (4) | 3,560,370 (4) | — | —(4) | 50,926 | 11,792,068 (4) | |
| Chairman and CEO of the Corporation |
2021 | 1,221,000 (4) | 3,464,885 (4) | 2,640,458 (4) | 3,183,827 (4) | — | —(4) | 96,219 | 10,606,389 (4) | |
| 2020 | 1,200,000 (4) | 3,400,054 (4) | 2,599,996 (4) | 1,608,120 (4) | — | —(4) | 191,908 | 9,000,078 (4) | ||
| Richard Dufresne | 2022 | 950,000 (5) | 2,256,351 (5) | 1,305,997 (5) | 2,102,752 (5) | — | 42,500 | 76,211 | 6,733,811 (5) | |
| President and Chief Financial Officer |
2021 | 950,000 (5) | 1,781,288 (5) | 1,781,256 (5) | 2,011,777 (5) | — | 42,500 | 74,337 | 6,641,158 (5) | |
| 2020 | 937,500 | 1,781,277 | 1,781,255 | 1055687 | — | 42,500 | 81,654 | 5,679,873 | ||
| Robert Sawyer | 2022 | 1,000,000 | 2,666,812 | 1,332,976 | 2,900,888 | — | 42,500 | 1,412,572 (6) | 9,355,748 | |
| Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw |
2021 | 666,667 | 2,666,798 | 1,333,201 | 2,013,699 | — | 42,500 | 798,335 | 7,521,200 | |
| Barry Columb | 2022 | 643,750 | 1,069,693 | 416,562 | 905,426 | 2,000,000 | 42,500 | 44,032 | 5,121,963 | |
| Executive Vice President, Loblaw and |
2021 624,999.84 | 833,386 | 416,767 | 855,625 | — | 42,500 | 42,391 | 2,815,669 | ||
| President, President's Choice Financial |
2020 | 612,500 | 833,294 | 416,670 | 505,369 | — | 42,500 | 46,811 | 2,457,144 | |
| Rael L. Diamond | 2022 | 780,000 | 1,950,005 | — | 981,708 | — | 37,500 | 65,542 | 3,814,755 | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer of |
2021 | 770,000 | 1,800,006 | — | 819,312 | — | 37,500 | 62,886 | 3,489,704 | |
| Choice Properties | 2020 | 750,000 | 1,500,008 | — | 650,250 | — | 37,500 | 67,710 | 3,005,468 |
(1) Amounts represent the grant date fair value of RSUs and PSUs awarded to the Weston and Loblaw NEOs and URUs and PUs awarded to the Choice Properties NEO, calculated in the following manner:
RSU Grant Date Value + PSU Grant Date Value. RSU Grant Date Value = Number of RSUs Granted x the greater of the volume-weighted average share price for the one or five trading days preceding the grant date. PSU Grant Date Value = Number of PSUs Granted x the greater of the volume-weighted average share price for the one or five trading days preceding the grant date. The grant date fair value of an RSU or PSU award is the same as the accounting grant date fair value of such award on the applicable grant date. Dividends or equivalents of dividends, if any, earned subsequent to a grant date are not included in the values reflected in the table. The grant date fair value of a PSU award assumes vesting at 100% of target. The number of PSUs that may vest will range between 0% and 200% of the number granted.
PU and URU Grant Date Value. PU Grant Date Value = the number of PUs granted multiplied by the greater of the volume weighted average Trust Unit price on the TSX either for the one or five trading days preceding the grant date as applicable. URU market value = the number of URUs granted multiplied by the volume weighted average unit price of the Trust Units on the TSX for the five trading days preceding or subsequent to the grant date or price on the grant date. The grant date fair value of a PU award is the same as the accounting fair value of such award on the applicable grant date and assumes vesting at 100% of target. The number of PUs that vest will range between 0% and 200% of the number granted. The accounting fair value of a URU award is based on the market value of a Trust Unit, less a discount to account for the vesting and holding period restrictions placed on the URUs.
| Grant Date | Valuation Discount (%) |
Accounting Value, in Relation to Grant Date Market Value for Compensation Reporting Purpose, Per URU |
Applicable NEO URU holder(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| February 28, 2020 | 42.76% | Lower by \$6.29 | R. Diamond |
| February 25, 2021 | 51.02% | Lower by \$6.50 | R. Diamond |
| February 28, 2022 | 49.67% | Lower by \$7.14 | R. Diamond |
(2) These amounts reflect the grant date fair value of the Weston and Loblaw stock options when granted. The grant date fair value of stock options is calculated in the following manner: Stock Option Value = Number of Stock Options Granted x Black-Scholes-Merton Value. The Corporation has chosen to use the Black-Scholes-Merton model as the methodology for calculating the grant date fair value of the options granted as this methodology is commonly used by issuers. To determine the grant date fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes-Merton model, an expected life of 7 years is used, which is based on the contractual term of the options. The other assumptions used in the model are based on relevant market data on the day of the valuation. The Corporation also uses the Black-Scholes-Merton model for accounting purposes. However, the accounting value ascribed at the grant date for the stock options is based on an expected life that reflects historical exercise patterns, as opposed to the contractual term of the option which is used for compensation reporting purposes (see Notes 2 and 30 to the Corporation's annual audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022, for the other assumptions and estimates used for this calculation). As a result, when using the Black-Scholes-Merton value method, there is a difference between the grant date fair value per option for compensation reporting purposes, and the accounting value per option as set forth below:
| Grant Date | Accounting Value, in Relation to Grant Date Fair Value for Compensation Reporting Purpose, Per Option |
Issuer | Applicable NEO Optionholder(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| March 3, 2020 | Lower by \$0.39 | Weston | G. Weston, R. Dufresne |
| March 9, 2021 | Lower by \$0.66 | Weston | G. Weston, R. Dufresne |
| August 9, 2021 | Lower by \$1.37 | Weston | G. Weston |
| March 9, 2022 | Higher by \$4.88 | Weston | G. Weston, R. Dufresne |
| August 8, 2022 | Higher by \$1.86 | Weston | G. Weston |
| February 27, 2020 | Lower by \$1.21 | Loblaw | G. Weston, B. Columb |
| March 4, 2021 | Lower by \$0.27 | Loblaw | G. Weston, B. Columb |
| May 12, 2021 | Lower by \$1.08 | Loblaw | R. Sawyer |
| August 5, 2021 | Lower by \$1.94 | Loblaw | G. Weston |
| March 3, 2022 | Higher by \$3.22 | Loblaw | G. Weston, R. Dufresne, R. Sawyer, B. Columb |
| May 11, 2022 | Lower by \$2.47 | Loblaw | B. Columb |
| August 4, 2022 | Higher by \$0.44 | Loblaw | G. Weston |
(3) Amounts under All Other Compensation include the value of (i) perquisites; and (ii) payments made by the Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties under their respective employee share/unit ownership plans. Other than certain allowances received by Mr. Sawyer as discussed below, the largest single payment received by certain NEOs relates to participation in the Corporation-leased car program with an annual value of approximately \$24,000.
(4) The cost of Mr. Weston's total compensation amount was apportioned between the Corporation and Loblaw as described in this footnote and as set out in the table below. Base Salary: As of May 6, 2021, the cost of Mr. Weston's base salary is paid 30% by Weston and 70% by Loblaw. Prior to May 6, 2021, Mr. Weston's base salary was allocated 60% to Weston and 40% to Loblaw. STIP: In each year the Weston and Loblaw allocations of Mr. Weston's salary were subject to the Corporation's STIP and Loblaw's STIP, respectively. LTIP: The cost of Mr. Weston's LTIP grants awarded since May 6, 2021 have been allocated 30% to the Corporation and 70% to Loblaw. The cost of Mr. Weston's LTIP grants awarded prior to May 6, 2021 were allocated 60% to the Corporation and 40% to Loblaw. Pension: Mr. Weston does not participate in any retirement plans and does not have any other retirement or pension arrangement with the Corporation. Choice Properties: The compensation received by Mr. Weston in 2021 and 2020 from Choice Properties for his role as Chairman of Choice Properties is also set out in the table below.
| Weston | Choice Properties |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Base Salary | LTIP Awards | STIP | Portion of total compensation |
Base Salary | LTIP Awards | STIP | Portion of total compensation |
Trustee Fees |
| 2022 | 388,800 | 2,065,515 | 899,020 | 3,267,413 | 907,200 | 4,819,257 | 2,661,350 | 8,423,455 | — |
| 2021 | 490,454 | 3,631,542 | 1,010,076 | 5,198,026 | 730,546 | 2,473,801 | 2,173,751 | 5,408,363 | 45,540 |
| 2020 | 720,000 | 3,600,022 | 960,120 | 7,056,798 | 480,000 | 2,400,028 | 648,000 | 3,549,591 | 138,000 |
(5) The cost of Mr. Dufresne's total compensation amount was apportioned between the Corporation and Loblaw as described in this footnote and as set out in the table below. Base Salary: As of May 6, 2021, the cost of Mr. Dufresne's base salary is paid 20% by the Corporation and 80% by Loblaw. Prior to May 6, 2021, Mr. Dufresne's base salary was allocated 100% to Weston. STIP: In each year the Weston and Loblaw allocations of Mr. Dufresne's salary were subject to the Corporation's STIP and Loblaw's STIP, respectively. LTIP: The cost of Mr. Dufresne's LTIP for 2022 was allocated 20% to the Corporation and 80% to Loblaw; the cost of Mr. Dufresne's LTIP for 2021 was allocated 100% to the Corporation.
| Weston | Loblaw | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Base Salary | LTIP Awards | STIP | Portion of total compensation |
Base Salary | LTIP Awards | STIP | Portion of total compensation |
| 2022 | 190,000 | 712,511 | 346,703 | 1,306,956 | 760,000 | 2,849,837 | 1,756,049 | 5,426,855 |
| 2021 | 452,103 | 3,562,544 | 774,330 | 4,824,015 | 497,897 | — | 1,237,447 | 1,817,143 |
(6) For 2022, "All Other Compensation" for Mr. Sawyer included: (a) housing rental reimbursement of \$90,000; (b) travel reimbursement of \$543,676; and (c) tax equalization and other taxable benefits of \$729,936.
(7) For further details on Mr. Columb's 2022 long-term incentive plan payout see the "Summary of Payout of 2017 Incentive applicable to Barry Columb, Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial" section on page 68 of this Circular.
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS – OUTSTANDING OPTION-BASED AWARDS AND SHARE-BASED AWARDS
The following tables sets forth the number and value of all unexercised option-based and share- or unit-based awards granted to NEOs outstanding as at December 31, 2022 for the Corporation, Loblaw and Choice Properties:
| Option-Based Awards | Share-Based Awards (1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) |
Option Exercise Price (\$) |
Option Expiration Date |
Value of Unexercised In The Money Options (2) (\$) |
Number of Shares or Units of Shares That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market or Payout Value of Share or Unit-Based Awards That Have Not Vested (3) (\$) |
Market or Payout Value of Vested Share- or Unit Based Awards Not Paid Out or Distributed (\$) |
|
| Galen G. Weston | 46,576 | 112.52 | March 9, 2024 | 2,583,571 | 43,585 | 7,321,892 | 379,217 (4) | |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and |
57,463 145,867 |
104.81 93.17 |
March 9, 2025 March 5, 2026 |
3,630,512 10,913,769 |
||||
| Chairman and President of Loblaw |
162,016 | 104.15 | March 3, 2027 | 10,343,101 | ||||
| 121,786 | 100.86 | March 9, 2028 | 8,175,494 | |||||
| 773 | 132.17 | August 9, 2028 | 27,689 | |||||
| 42,792 | 152.97 | March 9, 2029 | 642,736 | |||||
| 3,840 | 152.18 | August 8, 2029 | 60,710 | |||||
| 60,730 (5) | 58.00 | March 3, 2023 | 3,748,256 | 83,189 | (5) 9,959,431 |
— | ||
| 93,333 (5) | 59.00 | March 2, 2024 | 5,667,180 | |||||
| 104,364 (5) | 55.69 | March 1, 2025 | 6,682,427 | |||||
| 82,136 (5) | 65.55 | February 28, 2026 | 4,449,307 | |||||
| 97,919 (5) | 70.06 | February 27, 2027 | 4,862,658 | |||||
| 89,010 (5) | 62.67 | March 4, 2028 | 5,078,021 | |||||
| 1,836 (5) | 86.30 | August 5, 2028 | 61,359 | |||||
| 100,112 (5) | 99.33 | March 3, 2029 | 2,041,284 | |||||
| 6,877 | 117.67 | August 4, 2029 | 14,098 | |||||
| Richard Dufresne | 7,697 | 112.52 | March 9, 2024 | 426,953 | 38,606 | 6,485,356 | — | |
| President and Chief Financial Officer of the |
3,425 | 109.78 | August 4, 2024 | 199,369 | ||||
| Corporation and Chief Financial Officer of |
65,741 | 104.81 | March 9, 2025 | 4,153,516 | ||||
| Loblaw | 109,400 | 93.17 | March 5, 2026 | 8,185,308 | ||||
| 160,329 | 104.15 | March 3, 2027 | 10,235,403 | |||||
| 120,518 16,364 |
100.86 152.97 |
March 9, 2028 March 9, 2029 |
8,090,373 245,787 |
|||||
| 35,989 (5) | 59.00 | March 2, 2024 | 2,185,252 | 19,393 (5) | 2,321,764 | — | ||
| 15,216 (5) | 57.66 | August 2, 2024 | 944,305 | |||||
| 65,636 (5) | 99.33 | March 3, 2029 | 1,338,318 | |||||
| Robert Sawyer | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,728,186 (6) | |
| Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw |
122,989 (5) 92,120 |
71.32 99.33 |
May 12, 2028 March 3, 2029 |
5,952,668 1,878,327 |
65,592 (5) | 7,852,621 | — | |
| Barry Columb | 10,171 | 55.69 | March 1, 2025 | 651,249 | 36,782 (5) | 4,403,523 | — | |
| Executive Vice President, Loblaw and |
39,357 | 65.55 | February 28, 2026 | 2,131,969 | ||||
| President, President's Choice Financial |
51,000 | 70.06 | February 27, 2027 | 2,532,660 | ||||
| 46,359 | 62.67 | March 4, 2028 | 2,644,781 | |||||
| 28,788 5,504 |
99.33 115.84 |
March 3, 2029 May 11, 2029 |
586,987 21,356 |
|||||
| Rael L. Diamond | — | — | — | — | 102,223 (7) | 1,508,811 | — | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Properties |
(1) Includes Weston and Loblaw RSUs, PSUs and DSUs, if applicable, and Choice Properties RUs, PUs and DUs, if applicable, but excludes Choice Properties URUs, which are disclosed in the next table.
(2) The value of outstanding vested and unvested option-based awards is calculated based on the closing price for the Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2022, which was \$167.99 or the Loblaw common shares on the TSX on December 31, 2022, which was \$119.72, as applicable.
(3) The value of RSUs, PSUs, DSUs, RUs, PUs and DUs held by the NEOs, as applicable, is calculated based on the closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2022, which was \$167.99, the closing price of the Loblaw common shares on the TSX on December 31, 2022, which was \$119.72, or the closing price of the Choice Properties trust units on the TSX on December 31, 2022, which was \$14.76, in each case multiplied by the number of RSUs, PSUs, DSUs, RUs, PUs or DUs held, as applicable. The value of RSU, PSU, RU and PU awards assumes vesting at 100% of target.
- (4) Mr. Weston held 2,257 DSUs as at December 31, 2022 received as compensation for his role as a Director of Weston prior to his appointment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation on January 18, 2017.
- (5) Stock Options, RSUs and PSUs awarded by Loblaw.
- (6) Mr. Sawyer held 10,287 DSUs as at December 31, 2022 received as compensation for his role as a Director of Weston prior to his appointment as Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw on May 6, 2021.
(7) PUs awarded by Choice Properties.
The following table sets forth the number and value of all Choice Properties Trust Unit-based URU awards granted to Mr. Diamond, excluding any URU awards that are no longer subject to disposition restrictions, that were outstanding at December 31, 2022:
| Name | Total Number of Unvested URUs |
Value of Unvested URUs (1) |
Date on which Units Vest or are no longer subject to Disposition Restrictions |
# of Units that will Vest |
# of URUs that will no longer be subject to Disposition Restrictions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rael L. Diamond | 195,543 | 2,886,215 | February 25, 2023 | 29,297 | — |
| President and Chief | February 28, 2023 | 58,943 | 55,800 | ||
| Executive Officer of Choice Properties |
August 3, 2023 | 5,144 | — | ||
| February 25, 2024 | 29,297 | — | |||
| February 26, 2024 | — | 60,954 | |||
| February 28, 2024 | 33,859 | — | |||
| August 3, 2024 | 5,144 | — | |||
| September 28, 2024 | — | 43,477 | |||
| February 28, 2025 | 33,859 | — | |||
| March 5, 2025 | — | 88,120 | |||
| February 28, 2026 | — | 75,251 | |||
| February 25, 2027 | — | 87,891 | |||
| August 3, 2027 | — | 15,432 | |||
| February 28, 2028 | — | 101,578 |
(1) The value of the unvested URUs is calculated based on the closing price for the Trust Units on the TSX on December 31, 2022, which was \$14.76.
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS – VALUE VESTED OR EARNED DURING THE YEAR
The following table sets forth the value of option-based and share-based awards of the NEOs that vested during fiscal 2022, as well as the value of non-equity incentive plan compensation that the NEOs earned during fiscal 2022. The dollar value of the option-based and share-based awards is calculated using the number of units vested/earned multiplied by the closing price of the Common Shares, Loblaw common shares or Choice Properties Trust Units, as applicable, on the TSX on the applicable vesting date.
| Name | Option-Based Awards — Value Vested During The Year (\$) |
Share-Based Awards — Value Vested During The Year (\$) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation — Value Earned During The Year (1) (\$) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galen G. Weston | |||||
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Chairman and President of Loblaw |
Weston | 5,174,693 | 3,250,056 | 899,020 | |
| Loblaw | 3,574,475 | 2,939,845 | 2,661,350 | ||
| Total | 8,749,168 | 6,189,901 | 3,560,370 | ||
| Richard Dufresne | |||||
| President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and |
Weston | 4,523,832 | 2,437,504 | 2,102,752 | |
| Chief Financial Officer of Loblaw | Loblaw | 470,365 | — | 1,756,049 | |
| Total | 4,994,197 | 2,437,504 | 2,102,752 | ||
| Robert Sawyer | |||||
| Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw | 1,040,249 | — | (2) 2,900,888 |
||
| Barry Columb | |||||
| Executive Vice President, Loblaw and President, President's Choice Financial |
1,762,082 | 1,647,365 | 2,905,426 | ||
| Rael L. Diamond | — | 2,358,167 (3) | 981,708 | ||
| President and Chief Executive Officer of Choice Properties |
(1) Payments made in accordance with the Corporation's STIP and Loblaw's STIP, as applicable.
(2) Mr. Sawyer has share-based awards (DSUs) in the Corporation received as compensation for his role as a Director prior to his appointment as Chief Operating Officer of Loblaw on May 6, 2021.
(3) Mr. Diamond has unit-based awards in Choice Properties.
PENSION PLAN AND LONG SERVICE EXECUTIVE ARRANGEMENTS
The Corporation's and Loblaw's retirement programs are designed to facilitate the retirement of executives who have served over the long term. The NEOs, other than Mr. Weston, who does not participate in any pension plan, participate in the same retirement programs as other executives and receive no additional enhancements in determining their pension benefits. The NEOs (other than Mr. Weston) participate in, variously, the Consolidated Executive Plan, as well as the corresponding SERP, and the CREIT Management L.P. Pension Plan. All newly hired or newly appointed executives join the defined contribution portion of the Consolidated Executive Plan.
CONSOLIDATED EXECUTIVE PLAN - DEFINED BENEFIT PROVISIONS AND SERP
The Consolidated Executive Plan includes defined benefit plan provisions that provide a reasonable level of retirement income to executives to reward them for their service. Pension entitlements for an executive who participates in the defined benefit portion of the Consolidated Executive Plan is based on length of service and eligible salary. The total annual benefits payable under the defined benefit component of the Consolidated Executive Plan and corresponding SERP combined is capped at \$125,000 per year. The defined benefit provisions of both plans were closed to new participants in 2006. None of the Corporation's NEOs participated in the Consolidated Executive Plan - Defined Benefit Provisions.
CONSOLIDATED EXECUTIVE PLAN - DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PROVISIONS AND SERP
Executives who do not participate in the defined benefit component of the Consolidated Executive Plan participate on a noncontributory basis in the defined contribution component of the Consolidated Executive Plan and corresponding SERP. Contributions for these plans were set as a percentage of base salary (maximum of \$250,000). In 2022, contributions to the Consolidated Executive Plan were capped at \$30,780 per year, as set forth in the following table:
| Age + Years of Service | Employer Contributions as a Percentage of Base Salary |
|---|---|
| <50 | 13% |
| 50-60 | 15% |
| 60+ | 17% |
The Corporation, Loblaw or Choice Properties, as applicable, have entered into retirement agreements with certain executives to provide SERP benefits (both defined benefit and defined contribution) to those executives with allocations for pension accrual in excess of registered plan limits. As noted above, the SERP is an unfunded obligation of the Corporation, Loblaw or Choice Properties, as applicable, and executives who participate in the SERP must comply with certain eligibility provisions in order to receive payment; most notably, executives are not eligible to receive SERP payments while employed by a competitor of the Corporation, Loblaw or Choice Properties, as applicable.
The following table sets forth details regarding the plan participation of Messrs. Dufresne, Sawyer, Columb and Diamond during 2022:
| Name | Applicable Plan | Accumulated Value at Start of Year (\$) |
Compensatory (\$) |
Accumulated Value at Year End (1) (\$) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Dufresne | Consolidated Executive Plan - DC Component and SERP |
552,500 | 42,500 | 503,700 | |
| Robert Sawyer | Consolidated Executive Plan - DC Component and SERP |
43,100 | 42,500 | 77,500 | |
| Barry Columb | Consolidated Executive Plan - DC Component and SERP |
1,119,500 | 42,500 | 1,029,500 | |
| Rael L. Diamond | Consolidated Executive Plan - DC Component and SERP |
119,400 | 37,500 | 140,300 | |
| CREIT Management L.P. Pension Plan | 252,400 | — | 223,200 |
(1) The accumulated value includes interest (investment returns) earned by each member during the financial years ended December 31, 2022, in the case of Weston and Choice Properties, and December 31, 2022, in the case of Loblaw.
INDEBTEDNESS OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
As of March 13, 2023, none of the current or former executive officers or directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries was indebted to the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries (other than "routine indebtedness" under applicable Canadian securities laws). The following table sets forth certain indebtedness (other than "routine indebtedness" under applicable Canadian securities laws) of the current and former employees of the Corporation and any of its subsidiaries as of March 13, 2023.
| Purpose | Aggregate Indebtedness to the Corporation or its Subsidiaries (\$) |
Aggregate Indebtedness to Another Entity (\$) |
|---|---|---|
| Share purchases | — | — |
| Other | \$1,139,250 | — |
OTHER INFORMATION
DIRECTOR AND OFFICER LIABILITY INSURANCE
The Corporation maintains insurance for the benefit of its directors and officers, and the directors and officers of its subsidiaries, in respect of the performance by them of their duties. This insurance policy is shared with Loblaw. The Corporation's annual insurance premium in 2022 was \$1,199,000, half of which was paid by Loblaw. The insurance limit is \$200 million per year on an aggregate basis or per occurrence basis. There is no deductible in the case of directors and officers and a deductible of up to \$1 million for the Corporation.
NORMAL COURSE ISSUER BID
The Corporation has a Normal Course Issuer Bid (the "NCIB") on the TSX which allows for the purchase and cancellation of up to 7,304,927 Common Shares at market prices. A copy of the Corporation's Notice of Intention to make a Normal Course Issuer Bid filed with the TSX can be obtained by shareholders, without charge, by contacting the Corporation. As at March 13, 2023, the Corporation had purchased a total of 5,787,676 Common Shares for cancellation under the NCIB at a weighted average price of \$157.28 per Common Share. The current NCIB expires on May 24, 2023. The Corporation intends to refile the NCIB.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Certain financial measures discussed in this Circular, such as Adjusted EBITDA, EBIT Margin, Adjusted EBIT*, NOI and FFO per unit are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information on the Corporation's use of non-GAAP financial measures, please see section 14, "Non-GAAP Financial Measures", included in the Corporation's 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis, which is incorporated by reference herein and is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. As discussed in more detail under the "Loblaw STIP" and "Performance of the 2020 Loblaw PSUs" sections of this Circular, the Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT* figures reported in this Circular reflect certain additional adjustments for the purposes of determining 2022 STIP performance and 2020 PSU performance, as applicable, as compared to the Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT figures reported in Loblaw's 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis, which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. For more information on NOI and FFO per unit, please see the "Choice Properties STIP" section of this Circular and section 15 "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" in Choice Properties' 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis, which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
These measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore they may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other publicly traded companies, and they should not be construed as an alternative to other financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP.
* Adjusted EBIT is referred to in Loblaw's 2022 Management's Discussion & Analysis as "Adjusted Operating Income".
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Corporation is a reporting issuer under the applicable legislation of all of the provinces and territories of Canada and is required to file consolidated financial statements and information circulars with the various securities commissions. The Corporation has filed with those securities commissions its Annual Information Form which, among other things, contains all of the disclosure required by Form 52-110F1 under National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees.
Copies of the Corporation's latest Annual Information Form, the Corporation's 2022 Annual Report and this Circular can be obtained upon request from the Group Vice president, Investor Relations of the Corporation, at 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario, M4T 2S5.
Financial information is provided in the Corporation's audited consolidated financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for its most recently completed financial year.
Additional information about or relating to the Corporation can also be found at www.weston.ca and www.sedar.com or by dialing in for regularly scheduled conference calls. Additional information regarding Loblaw and Choice Properties can be found at www.loblaw.ca, www.choicereit.ca and www.sedar.com.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
There were no shareholder proposals received in relation to the Meeting.
The Canada Business Corporations Act permits eligible shareholders of the Corporation to submit shareholder proposals for consideration at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The final date for submission of proposals by shareholders to the Corporation for inclusion in the Circular in connection with the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is February 9, 2024.
CONTACTING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Shareholders, employees and other interested parties may communicate directly with the Board through the Independent Lead Director by writing to:
Independent Lead Director George Weston Limited 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S5
Shareholders may also contact the Independent Lead Director with any proposals for director nominees.
BOARD APPROVAL
The contents and sending of this Circular to shareholders entitled to receive notice of the Meeting, to each director, to the external auditor of the Corporation and to the appropriate government agencies have been approved by the Board.
Andrew Bunston Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Dated in Toronto, Ontario
March 24, 2023
SCHEDULE A GEORGE WESTON LIMITED
Mandate of the Board of Directors
1. ROLE
As a public holding company, the Corporation's mission is to build generational value with actively managed market-leading business in retail and real estate through expertise in strategy, mergers and acquisition, capital allocation and talent development. The role of the Board is to ensure that the Corporation remains focused on this mission, by overseeing the development of the overall corporate strategy, assigning responsibility to management for the achievement of that strategy, establishing limitations on the authority delegated to management and overseeing performance against approved objectives. In fulfilling this role, the Board regularly reviews management's strategic plans to ensure that they continue to be responsive to the changing business environment of the Corporation and its operating subsidiaries. The Board oversees the Corporation's approach to corporate governance, environmental and social matters, succession planning, capital allocation, structuring, finance matters, risk management activities, ethics and compliance matters, internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, and information systems. Through its oversight, the Board ensures that the Corporation accurately and fairly reports financial and other information to shareholders, other stakeholders and the public. The Board is required to appoint corporate officers. The Board satisfies itself as to the integrity of senior management, that the Corporation engages in ethical and legal conduct and that senior management maintains a culture of integrity throughout the Corporation.
2. RESPONSIBILITIES
To ensure that it fulfills its role, the Board, or any Committee so delegated by the Board, will oversee the following:
(a) Strategic Goals, Corporate Performance, Performance Objectives and Operational Policies
The Board will review and, if advisable, approve broad strategic objectives and values against which corporate performance will be measured. In this regard, the Board will:
- Determine, from time to time, the appropriate criteria against which to evaluate performance, and set corporate strategic goals and objectives within this context.
- Monitor and evaluate performance against both corporate strategic goals and objectives.
- Approve long-term strategies.
- Review and approve management's strategic and operational plans so that they are consistent with longterm goals.
- Oversee the development, execution and fulfillment of the Corporation's strategic plans and the operational policies within which management will operate.
- Approve material transactions, including acquisitions, sales of assets or shares, and financing arrangements.
- Review and approve the Corporation's dividend policy and approve the payment of dividends.
- Approve targets and budgets against which to measure corporate and executive performance.
(b) Finance and Capital Matters
- Review with management and receive periodic reports on the Corporation's target capital structure.
- Review with management and receive periodic reports on the Corporation's consolidated balance sheet, including cash, investment assets and debt position.
- Receive periodic reports from rating agencies and updates on any material discussions or communications with rating agencies.
(c) Executive Compensation and Succession Planning
- Satisfy itself of the appropriateness of all executive and colleague compensation matters and that a portion of executive compensation is linked appropriately to corporate performance.
- Satisfy itself that a process is in place with respect to the appointment, development, evaluation and succession of senior management.
(d) Delegation of Management Authority to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
- Delegate to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer the authority to manage and supervise the business of the Corporation and to make decisions regarding the Corporation's ordinary course of business and operations that are not specifically reserved to the Board under the terms of that delegation of authority.
- Determine what, if any, executive limitations may be required in the exercise of the authority delegated to management.
(e) Financial Disclosure
- Oversee the Corporation's financial reporting and disclosure obligations in accordance with applicable law.
- Approve the Corporation's financial statements, management's discussion and analysis and related releases. • Oversee the Corporation's compliance with applicable audit, accounting and reporting requirements, including in the areas of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.
(f) Enterprise Risk Management Program
- Oversee the Corporation's enterprise risk management program, including its design and structure and assessment of its effectiveness.
- Approve the Corporation's enterprise risk management policy, the risk appetite statement, and management's approach to enterprise risk management and its mitigation practices, including the identification, assessment and mitigation of the principal risks. Satisfy itself as to the effective oversight of risk management of individual risks, through the receipt of periodic reports from the Committee Chairs or management, as appropriate.
- Delegate, as appropriate, the oversight of the enterprise risk management design and structure, assessment of its effectiveness to the Audit Committee and the oversight of the principal risks to the appropriate Committee.
(g) Related Party Transactions
• Approve all proposed material related party transactions and any related party transactions that are not dealt with by a "special committee" of independent directors pursuant to applicable securities legislation.
(h) External Communications
- Satisfy itself that there is effective communication between the Board and the Corporation's shareholders, other stakeholders and the public.
- At least annually, with the assistance of the Audit Committee, review and approve any material changes to the Corporation's Disclosure Policy.
(i) Corporate Governance
- Develop, and review compliance with, a set of corporate governance principles and guidelines.
- Appoint a lead director who is independent to provide leadership to the Board and the independent directors, including presiding over meetings or sessions of the non-management directors and consulting with the Chairman on any matters arising out of such sessions.
- Ensure that independent directors hold regular meetings without the attendance of management or nonindependent directors.
- On the recommendation of the Governance, Human Resource, Nominating and Compensation Committee, approve the appointment of directors or recommend the election of director nominees to the Board at the annual general meeting of shareholders.
- Review the Board's mandate on an annual basis and make appropriate revisions.
- Develop, adopt and regularly review position descriptions for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Lead Director and the chair of each committee of the Board.
- Assess the effectiveness and performance of the Board and its committees as well as their individual members.
- Oversee significant compensation decisions for the directors and for senior executive management.
(j) Environmental, Social and Governance ("ESG"), Ethics and Compliance
- Oversees and monitors the Corporation's approach, policies and practices related to ESG matters.
- Review and approve the Corporation's annual ESG Report.
- Oversee actions taken by management to ensure that senior executives maintain a culture of integrity throughout the Corporation.
- Review and approve a written code of conduct which is applicable to employees, officers and directors of the Corporation, and oversee compliance with the code.
- Receive periodic reports on the Corporation's compliance and ethics matters.
3. COMPOSITION
The Board shall be comprised of a majority of independent directors. For this purpose, a director is independent if he or she would be independent within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities laws, as the same may be amended from time to time.
4. COMMITTEES
The Board may establish committees of the Board where required or prudent. The Board may delegate to such committees of the Board matters for which the Board is responsible, including the approval of Board and management compensation, the conduct of performance evaluations and oversight of internal controls, but the Board retains its oversight function and ultimate responsibility for these matters and all other delegated responsibilities. The Board has established the following committees:
- the Audit Committee (comprised entirely of independent directors);
- the Governance, Human Resource, Nominating and Compensation Committee (comprised entirely of independent directors);
- the Weston Foods Committee (no more than one member of the Committee shall be a management director); and
- the Pension Committee (a majority of whom shall be non-management directors).
The Board shall provide a forum for discussion and reporting of all matters considered by the committees. Circumstances may warrant the establishment of new committees, the disbanding of current committees or the reassignment of authority and responsibilities amongst committees. The authority and responsibilities of each committee are set out in a written mandate, as approved by the Board. At least annually, each mandate shall be reviewed by the respective committee and submitted to the Board for approval with such amendments as the committee proposes. Each committee chair shall provide a report to the Board on material matters considered by the Committee at the next regular Board meeting following such Committee's meeting.
5. ORIENTATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION
With the Governance, Human Resource, Nominating and Compensation Committee, the Board shall ensure that all directors receive a comprehensive orientation program and continuing education in connection with their role, responsibilities, the business of the Corporation, and the skills they must use in their roles as directors.
6. EQUITY OWNERSHIP BY DIRECTORS
The Board shall oversee directors' compliance with the Corporation's Share Ownership Policy.
7. RETENTION OF EXPERTS
The Board may engage any professional advisors including legal, accounting or other experts, at the expense of the Corporation, as it considers necessary to perform its duties.