GEOPACIFIC RESOURCES LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2025

Jun 9, 2025

ASX: GPR 10 June 2025

==> picture [198 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

High-Grade Auger Sampling Results Extend Surface Gold Zones at 1.67 Moz[1] Woodlark Gold Project

Trenching underway ahead of major drilling program

Highlights

• Surface auger sampling returns multiple zones grading more than 1.0 g/t Au, with several individual high-grade assays up to 20.0 g/t Au, and a peak assay of 63.6 g/t Au at the northernmost auger line at Little MacKenzie

• Results extend surface mineralisation at Wayai Creek SSW and Little MacKenzie gold prospects, each with a strike extent of over 1 km

• Trenching underway to refine drilling targets, which is scheduled to commence in June 2025 with equipment currently being mobilised to site. First assays from trenching expected from late June.

• A major RC and diamond drilling program, of 30,000 metres planned to extend known gold mineralisation and test multiple new targets to increase Mineral Resources

Geopacific Resources Limited (ASX.GPR) (‘ GPR ’ or the ‘ Company ’) is pleased to announce significant gold results from surface auger sampling at the Wayai Creek SSW and Little MacKenzie prospects within its 100% owned 1.67 Moz Woodlark Gold Project in Papua New Guinea (‘ Woodlark ’, the ‘ Project ’).

The auger sampling is part of an ongoing program of field mapping and sampling activities focussed on the under-explored southwest corner of the Project, part of the Woodlark King Mining Centre (Figures 1 and 2). The area is highly prospective and is supported by favourable host lithology, complex magnetic responses, favourable structures, and anomalous geochemistry, indicating significant potential to host economic gold mineralisation.

Analysis of the results has highlighted several large coherent >0.1 g/t gold anomalies with peak result to 63.6 g/t Au at the northernmost sample line at Little MacKenzie where it remains open to the north, and numerous adjacent samples of over 1.0 g/t Au in both locations (refer Table 1, Figures 3 and 5, and JORC Table 1 at the end of this release for further information on the sampling and assaying methodology).

These prospects will be progressively advanced through further surface sampling and trenching prior to drilling later in 2025 as part of the current exploration drill program. A total of 30,000 metres of RC and diamond drilling is scheduled to commence in June 2025 to extend known gold mineralisation and test new targets to increase mineral resources.

Geopacific CEO James Fox said : “These results confirm the strong prospectivity of the Woodlark King area, with high-grade auger results and extensive surface anomalies extending known mineralisation. The Little MacKenzie and Wayai Creek targets are shaping up as compelling additions to our pipeline and with a major 30,000 metre drill program set to commence this month, we are excited by the potential to build on our 1.67 Moz resource base.”

Discussion

Using a conventional hand auger to a depth of less than one metre, 635 samples were collected in two locations, at Little MacKenzie and Wayai Creek, along 100 m (approximate N-S to NE-SW) spaced lines at 10-20 m approximate (E-W to NE-SW) spacing, and then assayed for gold and multi-elements (refer JORC Table 1 at the end of this release for further information on the sampling and assaying methodology).

1 Refer ASX announcement on 13 August 2024 for full details including JORC tables “Mineral Resource increased to 1.67 Moz as growth strategy delivers early results”.

1

==> picture [585 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

The new, undrilled surface gold anomaly at Little MacKenzie has been traced over a >0.5 km strike extent and appears to follow a key WNW trending structure to the west of the main >1.0 km surface mineralised zone (Figure 3). Trenching is underway and will be extended into this location to determine the orientation of mineralisation prior to drill-testing.

Surface mineralisation has also been extended by >0.5 km immediately along strike to the southeast of the Wayai Creek gold deposit (1.97 Mt @ 1.04 g/t Au for 66 koz Inferred), with two new sub-parallel zones >1.2 km total strike extent defined immediately to the west of the NE zone which contains the Wayai Creek gold deposit (Figure 5). The area is now host to an extensive mineralised surface footprint that warrants further assessment and drill testing.

Drill planning continues to be refined, taking into consideration these auger sampling results. In total, 174 drill collars for approximately 30,000 m of RC and diamond drilling have been planned in a staged approach.

The exploration drill program is broadly split into three categories; exploration targets, targets with potential for new Mineral Resources, and resource development drilling[2] . The sequence of drilling will prioritise those areas such as Little MacKenzie where the targets are well-defined, have good access and a high degree of confidence in potential for mineralisation relative to more regional exploration prospects.

==> picture [398 x 476] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Project Trench & Drill Targets 2025 highlighting current active exploration locations

2 Refer ASX announcement 11 March 2025 “Woodlark Gold Project Update”

2

==> picture [585 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [397 x 682] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Little MacKenzie & Wayai Creek (& S/SW) with anomalous footprints of mineralisation >1 km hosted in Okiduse Volcanics .

3

==> picture [156 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Little Mckenzie Results

Several coherent >0.1 g/t Au in soil anomalies have been delineated within a larger mineralised footprint over the north-south striking mineralised ridge that define the prospect.

A new western anomaly appears to trace a key structure trending WNW that remains untested by drilling. There is a clear demarcation along the eastern side of the surface mineralisation defining a sharp tapering off in gold grades and inferred to be associated with NNW striking intermediate intrusives.

The auger results have significantly improved confidence in the definition of surface mineralisation and has allowed for improved siting of trenching over the >1 km strike in surface mineralised zones (Figure 3).

Excavation and sampling of the southern trenches has commenced, Brecciated zones >60 m wide (Figure 4) have been mapped with some free gold identified in brecciated volcanics. Trenching will continue northwards with assay results anticipated throughout the program until completion in Q3 2025. Final drill collar planning will follow the review of the trench results with 23 reverse circulation and diamond drillholes currently planned as part of the Phase 1 program.

==> picture [398 x 464] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Little MacKenzie surface geochem auger results footprint and >0.1 g/t outline of anomalous mineralisation >1 km hosted in Okiduse Volcanics. Active & planned trenching shown below auger results.

4

==> picture [585 x 57] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [212 x 256] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [214 x 256] intentionally omitted <==

Little MacKenzie southern trench, Geological team preparing the base of the trench for channel sampling, collecting 2m wide channel samples (0.1 x 0.1 x 2 m) over the length of the trench

Little MacKenzie southern trench, with 2m sampling flagged ready for sampling.

==> picture [220 x 279] intentionally omitted <==

Hydrothermal brecciation noted in trench LMTR25001 continuous north along a NW-SE trend, dips steeply to the NE.

==> picture [222 x 279] intentionally omitted <==

Generally, highly weathered with strong pervasive argillic alteration, characterised by strong pervasive hematite-limonite-clays. No primary sulphides are noted due to weathering.

Figure 4: Trenching and brecciation at Little MacKenzie

5

==> picture [156 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Wayai Creek S/SW Results

The surface auger sampling to the south and southwest of the Wayai Creek gold deposit[3] , identified three new >0.1 g/t gold in soil anomalies (Figure 5) that are significant in size with a combined strike extent of >2 km and a geochemical signature indicative of Low Sulphidation Epithermal (LSE) style mineralisation.

The inferred control on the Wayai Creek gold deposit is due to splays of a regional NNW structure that strikes through the target and contains the host rocks of the Talpos Creek Formation, that also hosts the main Woodlark King deposit. The new anomalies have also been suggested to be of a possible LSE mineralisation style (based on their multi-element signature) and therefore could be of a higher grade.

==> picture [398 x 496] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Wayai Creek S/SW >0.1g/t Au surface geochemical auger results and planned trenching

3 Refer to GPR’s ASX Announcement dated 13 August 2024 titled “Mineral Resource increased to 1.67 Moz” for further details of the mineral resource at Wayai Creek, including JORC Tables.

6

==> picture [156 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1: Auger Results at Little MacKenzie and Wayai Creek with grades >1.0 ppm Au (1.0 g/t Au) highlighted

Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK001 LTMK002 LTMK003 LTMK004 LTMK005 LTMK006 LTMK007 LTMK008 LTMK009 LTMK010	0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7	470900 470920 470930 470940 470950 470960 470970 470980 471001 471020	8989700 8989700 8989700 8989700 8989700 8989700 8989700 8989700 8989700 8989700	45.61 43.42 44.67 37.00 38.14 36.37 36.61 37.23 30.05 24.65	0.045 0.077 0.104 0.027 0.379 0.166 0.495 0.479 0.336 0.330	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK011	0.2	1.0	0.8	471040	8989700	28.55	63.595	FA25/MS
WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK012	0.3	1.0	0.7	471060	8989700	28.59	0.031	FA25/MS
WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK013	0.2	1.0	0.8	471080	8989701	19.19	3.505	FA25/MS
WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK014	0.3	1.0	0.7	471101	8989700	21.57	1.644	FA25/MS
WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK015 LTMK016 LTMK017 LTMK018 LTMK019 LTMK020 LTMK021	0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2	0.9 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 1.0 0.9	0.7 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7	470797 470840 470880 470920 470929 470940 470949	8989598 8989600 8989597 8989600 8989600 8989600 8989600	63.02 61.45 61.76 64.79 62.29 56.71 50.38	0.022 0.004 0.003 0.133 0.140 0.203 0.581	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK022	0.4	1.0	0.6	470959	8989600	44.58	2.464	FA25/MS
WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK023 LTMK024 LTMK025 LTMK026	0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0	0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7	470971 470979 470990 471001	8989600 8989600 8989600 8989601	55.73 53.20 65.04 62.87	0.107 0.269 0.219 0.225	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK027	0.3	1.0	0.7	471010	8989600	69.39	1.653	FA25/MS
WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK028 LTMK029 LTMK030 LTMK031 LTMK032 LTMK033 LTMK034 LTMK035 LTMK036 LTMK037 LTMK038 LTMK039 LTMK040 LTMK041 LTMK042 LTMK043 LTMK044 LTMK045 LTMK046 LTMK047 LTMK048	0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3	0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9	0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6	471020 471040 471061 471078 471100 470920 470941 470960 470971 470980 470990 470999 471010 471021 471028 471040 471051 471060 471079 471100 470879	8989600 8989601 8989600 8989600 8989600 8989500 8989500 8989501 8989500 8989500 8989500 8989500 8989500 8989500 8989500 8989500 8989502 8989502 8989500 8989500 8989400	41.17 60.51 71.44 64.93 59.74 59.35 59.86 63.81 67.21 71.02 72.74 70.38 59.90 72.25 76.25 76.03 75.64 65.86 75.28 74.67 57.64	0.036 0.147 0.011 0.007 0.008 0.002 0.020 0.518 0.026 0.045 0.043 0.022 0.067 0.041 0.051 0.019 0.005 0.004 0.001 0.003 0.314	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS

7

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK049 LTMK050 LTMK051 LTMK052 LTMK053 LTMK054 LTMK055 LTMK056 LTMK057 LTMK058 LTMK059 LTMK060 LTMK061 LTMK062 LTMK063 LTMK064 LTMK065 LTMK066 LTMK067 LTMK068 LTMK069 LTMK070 LTMK071 LTMK072 LTMK073 LTMK074	0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3	0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7	470900 470920 470939 470960 470980 470999 471010 471020 471029 471040 471050 471060 471070 471079 471102 471119 471079 471101 471119 471140 471160 471180 471200 471220 470700 470718	8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989402 8989400 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989200 8989200	63.43 55.88 61.19 61.92 60.32 72.00 72.55 74.78 78.99 73.89 76.39 77.14 71.07 77.38 81.45 84.56 81.43 71.33 84.60 88.05 91.41 97.32 92.13 90.90 43.57 44.72	0.106 0.277 0.050 0.698 0.277 0.082 0.007 0.004 0.008 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.007 0.007 0.002 0.004 0.009 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.115 0.134	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK075	0.4	1.0	0.6	470730	8989202	43.13	12.799	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK076 LTMK077 LTMK078 LTMK079 LTMK080 LTMK081 LTMK082 LTMK083 LTMK084 LTMK085 LTMK086 LTMK087 LTMK088	0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3	1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7	470740 470752 470759 470770 470780 470789 470800 470820 470841 470861 470879 470890 470901	8989201 8989200 8989201 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200	44.62 44.70 42.36 42.55 42.78 42.03 38.98 36.55 39.95 42.27 42.54 43.98 43.10	0.015 0.011 0.116 0.425 0.077 0.070 0.103 0.176 0.034 0.048 0.333 0.773 0.340	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK089	0.3	1.0	0.7	470910	8989200	42.19	1.046	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK090 LTMK091 LTMK092 LTMK093 LTMK094 LTMK095	0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7	470920 470929 470938 470950 470959 470969	8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200	57.98 55.86 58.61 74.10 69.70 71.54	0.038 0.061 0.028 0.034 0.010 0.066	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK096	0.3	1.0	0.7	470981	8989200	71.74	7.470	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK097	0.4	0.9	0.5	470990	8989200	88.86	0.142	FA25/MS

8

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK098 LTMK099 LTMK100 LTMK101 LTMK102 LTMK103 LTMK104 LTMK105 LTMK106 LTMK107 LTMK108 LTMK109 LTMK110 LTMK111 LTMK112 LTMK113 LTMK114 LTMK115 LTMK116	0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7	470999 471010 471020 471031 471040 471051 471060 471070 471081 471090 471100 471110 471120 471130 471141 471160 471180 471200 471220	8989200 8989199 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200	88.11 93.89 96.46 99.29 101.89 111.60 65.33 66.06 64.66 62.86 65.74 66.18 70.38 71.13 68.37 75.01 77.82 77.64 68.99	0.206 0.100 0.155 0.135 0.026 0.173 0.038 0.026 0.005 0.015 0.168 0.013 0.018 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.010 0.003	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK117	0.2	1.0	0.8	470740	8989100	39.61	1.799	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK118 LTMK119 LTMK120 LTMK121 LTMK122 LTMK123 LTMK124 LTMK125 LTMK126 LTMK127 LTMK128	0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2	1.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.8	470759 470779 470800 470819 470840 470860 470879 470899 470920 470940 470961	8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989101 8989100	39.57 48.27 54.80 52.56 43.18 48.60 51.59 56.11 50.91 60.90 50.59	0.003 0.003 0.014 0.022 0.118 0.193 0.041 0.026 0.644 0.495 0.081	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK129	0.2	1.0	0.8	470970	8989100	66.61	1.062	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK130 LTMK131 LTMK132	0.2 0.4 0.3	0.9 1.0 0.9	0.7 0.6 0.6	470981 470991 471000	8989100 8989100 8989100	65.84 61.58 68.86	0.050 0.051 0.123	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK133	0.4	1.0	0.6	471010	8989100	54.41	1.694	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK134 LTMK135 LTMK136 LTMK137 LTMK138	0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3	1.0 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9	0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6	471020 471030 471040 471051 471060	8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100	64.20 65.47 64.60 60.17 57.51	0.131 0.113 0.184 0.203 0.224	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK139	0.2	0.7	0.5	471070	8989100	63.37	5.990	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK140 LTMK141 LTMK142 LTMK143 LTMK144 LTMK145 LTMK146	0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2	1.0 0.6 1.0 0.9 0.7 1.0 0.8	0.6 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.6	471081 471090 471100 471111 471120 471130 471141	8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100	62.88 63.68 66.63 72.26 62.06 63.72 64.46	0.054 0.032 0.041 0.007 0.019 0.012 0.005	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS

9

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK147 LTMK148 LTMK149 LTMK150 LTMK151 LTMK152 LTMK153 LTMK154 LTMK155 LTMK156	0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4	0.7 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7	0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3	471160 471180 471201 471220 471240 471260 471280 471300 471321 471340	8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989100 8989101 8989100 8989100	65.40 73.43 70.20 70.05 65.56 62.59 59.62 56.32 44.95 41.75	0.008 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.005 0.078 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.017	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK157	0.2	0.9	0.7	470841	8989000	63.27	1.478	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK158 LTMK159 LTMK160	0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 0.9 1.0	0.7 0.6 0.7	470860 470871 470880	8989000 8989000 8989000	60.66 73.62 69.27	0.573 0.475 0.631	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK161	0.3	0.9	0.6	470901	8989000	64.66	3.201	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK162 LTMK163 LTMK164 LTMK165 LTMK166 LTMK167	0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7	470920 470940 470961 470980 470991 471000	8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000	58.59 62.74 58.77 57.71 47.38 62.54	0.625 0.461 0.079 0.330 0.094 0.036	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK168	0.3	0.9	0.6	471010	8989000	49.64	1.107	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK169 LTMK170 LTMK171 LTMK172	0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3	0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9	0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6	471019 471030 471040 471051	8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000	61.14 73.52 64.08 76.19	0.155 0.480 0.285 0.850	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK173	0.4	1.0	0.6	471060	8989000	76.29	8.547	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK174 LTMK175 LTMK176 LTMK177 LTMK178 LTMK179 LTMK180 LTMK181 LTMK182 LTMK183 LTMK184 LTMK185 LTMK186 LTMK187 LTMK188 LTMK189 LTMK190 LTMK191 LTMK192 LTMK193	0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4	1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.7 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6	471070 471081 471090 471100 471111 471120 471130 471139 471159 471180 471201 471220 471241 471259 471280 471300 471319 471340 471360 471379	8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989001 8989001 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989001 8989000 8989001 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000	68.22 83.40 90.34 95.14 76.33 81.21 77.54 74.72 68.35 77.32 81.61 63.28 57.23 63.75 73.59 69.69 70.43 60.03 52.80 73.00	0.169 0.299 0.741 0.846 0.074 0.039 0.017 0.024 0.076 0.010 0.007 0.031 0.005 0.012 0.039 0.818 0.037 0.018 0.010 0.004	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK194	0.2	1.0	0.8	471160	8988900	73.37	1.136	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK195	0.3	0.9	0.6	471169	8988900	73.09	0.101	FA25/MS

10

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK196 LTMK197 LTMK198 LTMK199 LTMK200 LTMK201 LTMK202 LTMK203 LTMK204 LTMK205 LTMK206 LTMK207 LTMK208 LTMK209 LTMK210 LTMK211 LTMK212 LTMK213 LTMK214 LTMK215 LTMK216 LTMK217 LTMK218 LTMK219 LTMK220 LTMK221 LTMK222 LTMK223 LTMK224 LTMK225 LTMK226 LTMK227 LTMK228 LTMK229 LTMK230 LTMK231 LTMK232 LTMK233 LTMK234 LTMK235 LTMK236 LTMK237 LTMK238 LTMK239 LTMK240 LTMK241 LTMK242 LTMK243 LTMK244	0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7	471180 471190 471199 471210 471220 471230 471240 471250 471261 471270 471280 471160 471169 471180 471192 471199 471210 471220 471240 471261 471019 471040 471049 471060 471069 471077 471090 471100 471118 471139 471160 471180 471200 471219 471241 471240 471257 471282 471302 471320 471341 471360 471377 471407 470641 470660 470680 470701 470721	8988900 8988900 8988900 8988900 8988900 8988898 8988900 8988900 8988901 8988901 8988902 8988800 8988800 8988800 8988801 8988800 8988800 8988800 8988801 8988800 8988700 8988700 8988700 8988700 8988700 8988702 8988701 8988701 8988702 8988701 8988701 8988701 8988701 8988700 8988700 8988599 8988598 8988602 8988604 8988602 8988600 8988600 8988602 8988599 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400	57.17 73.86 70.50 75.77 73.69 71.95 69.42 87.77 84.41 76.70 78.08 77.68 77.12 80.44 77.00 64.33 66.18 76.93 89.16 72.52 93.56 90.47 80.29 92.00 97.50 97.17 107.38 91.18 85.78 84.35 84.37 81.51 83.02 72.31 72.30 71.00 68.00 70.00 70.00 65.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 73.00 47.70 50.35 0.00 47.83 41.55	0.034 0.043 0.005 0.005 0.022 0.075 0.033 0.440 0.050 0.116 0.020 0.110 0.095 0.142 0.231 0.857 0.043 0.031 0.040 0.021 0.002 0.081 0.020 0.089 0.540 0.107 0.177 0.038 0.134 0.083 0.033 0.414 0.275 0.057 0.212 0.008 0.031 0.355 0.020 0.066 0.007 0.010 0.016 0.020 0.015 0.095 0.587 0.100 0.004	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS

11

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK245 LTMK246 LTMK247 LTMK248 LTMK249 LTMK250 LTMK251 LTMK252 LTMK253 LTMK254 LTMK255 LTMK256 LTMK257 LTMK258	0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7	470740 470761 470780 470800 470820 470840 470860 470480 470500 470520 470541 470560 470581 470600	8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989400 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300	37.87 32.20 31.01 27.99 24.89 21.51 24.69 35.70 32.01 24.89 20.06 17.76 13.57 11.73	0.006 0.002 0.003 0.009 0.007 0.131 0.007 0.197 0.006 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.009 0.002	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK259	0.3	1.0	0.7	470620	8989300	17.45	8.290	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK260 LTMK261 LTMK262 LTMK263 LTMK264	0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7	470641 470660 470671 470680 470690	8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300	19.18 14.44 13.35 13.90 11.58	0.214 0.214 0.184 0.226 0.235	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK265	0.3	1.0	0.7	470699	8989300	9.73	1.017	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK266 LTMK267 LTMK268 LTMK269 LTMK270 LTMK271 LTMK272 LTMK273 LTMK274 LTMK275 LTMK276 LTMK277 LTMK278 LTMK279 LTMK280 LTMK281 LTMK282 LTMK283 LTMK284 LTMK285 LTMK286 LTMK287 LTMK288	0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7	470710 470720 470729 470740 470750 470759 470770 470781 470790 470800 470500 470521 470540 470560 470579 470600 470620 470640 470660 470680 470620 470639 470660	8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989300 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989200 8989201 8989200 8989100 8989100 8989100	12.97 15.62 16.81 13.26 17.83 21.43 44.31 39.66 39.66 40.25 36.21 32.98 35.43 29.10 29.45 28.03 28.03 29.46 27.83 26.25 20.68 19.07 20.31	0.326 0.634 0.044 0.242 0.689 0.004 0.007 0.007 0.009 0.010 0.132 0.107 0.003 0.194 0.383 0.173 0.203 0.086 0.006 0.208 0.099 0.486 0.749	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK289	0.3	1.0	0.7	470680	8989100	21.18	1.316	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK290	0.3	1.0	0.7	470699	8989100	14.80	0.148	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie	LTMK291	0.3	1.0	0.7	470720	8989100	12.31	1.038	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie	LTMK292 LTMK293	0.3 0.3	1.0 1.0	0.7 0.7	470700 470721	8989000 8989000	26.69 30.39	0.246 0.237	FA25/MS FA25/MS

12

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Little MacKenzie Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	LTMK294 LTMK295 LTMK296 LTMK297 LTMK298 LTMK299 LTMK300 LTMK301 LTMK302 LTMK303 LTMK304 LTMK305 LTMK306 LTMK307 LTMK308 LTMK309 LTMK310 WCK001 WCK002 WCK003 WCK004 WCK005 WCK006 WCK007 WCK008 WCK009 WCK010 WCK011 WCK012 WCK013 WCK014 WCK015 WCK016 WCK017 WCK018 WCK019 WCK020 WCK021	0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0	0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6	470740 470759 470781 470800 470820 470699 470720 470740 470760 470781 470800 470820 470841 470859 470881 470900 470920 471445 471460 471473 471486 471501 471515 471529 471479 471493 471507 471522 471536 471551 471564 471579 471593 471606 471621 471635 471650 471663	8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000 8989000 8988900 8988900 8988900 8988902 8988900 8988900 8988900 8988900 8988900 8988900 8988900 8988900 8986618 8986632 8986646 8986661 8986675 8986689 8986703 8986512 8986526 8986540 8986554 8986569 8986583 8986597 8986611 8986625 8986639 8986653 8986668 8986682 8986696	28.31 31.86 25.05 25.89 24.00 12.68 11.19 13.27 6.11 5.47 5.48 7.31 0.79 2.23 3.94 6.09 58.00 2.41 6.95 12.09 21.66 26.18 28.15 32.21 1.78 2.23 5.11 7.39 6.70 9.56 15.06 15.62 20.11 23.59 27.68 33.52 42.26 44.97	0.101 0.070 0.059 0.094 0.047 0.028 0.135 0.090 0.005 0.030 0.005 0.014 0.030 0.015 0.000 0.002 0.013 0.542 0.021 0.028 0.060 0.267 0.018 0.003 0.017 0.670 0.177 0.309 0.132 0.046 0.046 0.046 0.003 0.017 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.056	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK025	0.4	1.0	0.6	471593	8986484	4.06	1.107	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK026 WCK027	0.3 0.4	0.9 1.0	0.6 0.6	471606 471621	8986498 8986512	7.59 13.84	0.435 0.093	FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK028	0.4	1.0	0.6	471635	8986526	20.76	8.099	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK029 WCK030 WCK031 WCK032	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6	471650 471663 471678 471692	8986540 8986554 8986568 8986583	27.64 28.91 25.31 25.62	0.234 0.148 0.537 0.115	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK033	0.4	1.0	0.6	471705	8986597	26.35	2.352	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK034 WCK035	0.4 0.4	1.0 1.0	0.6 0.6	471720 471734	8986611 8986625	26.77 24.62	0.008 0.023	FA25/MS FA25/MS

13

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK036 WCK037 WCK038 WCK039 WCK041 WCK042 WCK043	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6	471748 471762 471777 471791 471600 471614 471628	8986639 8986653 8986667 8986682 8986349 8986364 8986378	22.39 30.58 35.63 40.16 7.66 13.14 18.41	0.259 0.145 0.099 0.005 0.149 0.286 0.433	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK044	0.5	1.0	0.5	471642	8986392	21.21	20.714	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK045 WCK046 WCK047 WCK048 WCK049 WCK050 WCK051 WCK052	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	0.9 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6	471656 471671 471684 471699 471711 471726 471741 471755	8986406 8986420 8986434 8986448 8986461 8986477 8986491 8986505	23.59 26.30 24.98 24.19 26.85 27.02 26.65 20.20	0.135 0.203 0.008 0.009 0.011 0.079 0.012 0.018	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK053	0.4	0.9	0.5	471770	8986519	19.86	3.718	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK054 WCK055 WCK056 WCK057 WCK058 WCK059 WCK060 WCK061 WCK062 WCK063 WCK064 WCK065 WCK066 WCK067 WCK068 WCK069 WCK070 WCK071 WCK072 WCK073 WCK074 WCK076 WCK078 WCK079 WCK080 WCK081 WCK082 WCK083 WCK084 WCK085 WCK086 WCK087	0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5	1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5	471783 471798 471812 471826 471840 471854 471868 471883 471621 471635 471649 471664 471677 471692 471706 471720 471734 471749 471762 471777 471791 471804 471819 471643 471658 471671 471684 471698 471713 471727 471742 471755	8986533 8986547 8986561 8986576 8986590 8986604 8986618 8986632 8986229 8986243 8986258 8986272 8986286 8986300 8986314 8986328 8986342 8986356 8986371 8986385 8986399 8986413 8986427 8986109 8986123 8986137 8986152 8986166 8986180 8986194 8986208 8986222	24.87 27.76 29.81 30.95 31.13 32.57 33.28 38.17 6.95 11.83 17.23 20.03 18.36 13.95 16.77 23.64 29.46 34.71 38.45 40.02 41.46 42.68 38.37 7.76 9.95 11.65 15.00 20.26 21.91 20.51 22.00 27.74	0.404 0.756 0.608 0.116 0.101 0.490 0.013 0.155 0.592 0.084 0.056 0.067 0.198 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.011 0.067 0.003 0.020 0.008 0.004 0.067 0.361 0.277 0.046 0.217 0.139 0.013 0.006 0.010	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS

14

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK088 WCK089 WCK090 WCK091 WCK092 WCK093	0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4	0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5	471770 471783 471797 471812 471826 471840	8986236 8986251 8986265 8986279 8986293 8986307	31.61 33.27 34.52 38.06 41.41 44.72	0.009 0.019 0.016 0.005 0.004 0.005	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK094	0.4	1.0	0.6	472060	8986526	62.24	1.935	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK095 WCK096	0.4 0.4	1.0 1.0	0.6 0.6	472074 472088	8986540 8986554	59.83 61.18	0.795 0.417	FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK097	0.4	1.0	0.6	472101	8986568	58.87	10.141	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK098 WCK099 WCK100 WCK101 WCK102 WCK103 WCK104 WCK105 WCK106 WCK107 WCK108 WCK109	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6	472116 472130 472137 472145 472151 472158 472166 472174 472179 472194 472208 471677	8986582 8986597 8986604 8986611 8986618 8986625 8986632 8986639 8986646 8986660 8986674 8986003	49.46 55.43 59.81 57.58 55.61 60.34 65.87 68.94 68.21 63.99 70.89 6.55	0.897 0.615 0.890 0.043 0.485 0.023 0.042 0.048 0.062 0.189 0.121 0.111	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK110	0.4	1.0	0.6	471692	8986017	9.95	2.040	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK111 WCK112 WCK113 WCK114 WCK115 WCK116	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6	471706 471719 471734 471748 471763 471776	8986031 8986045 8986060 8986074 8986088 8986102	8.09 7.34 2.72 6.58 16.26 15.96	0.603 0.249 0.794 0.092 0.111 0.281	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK117	0.4	1.0	0.6	471791	8986116	18.55	1.394	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK118 WCK119 WCK120 WCK121 WCK122 WCK123 WCK124 WCK125 WCK126 WCK127 WCK128 WCK129 WCK130 WCK131 WCK132 WCK133 WCK134 WCK135 WCK136	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.0	0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6	471805 471819 471833 471847 471862 471875 471891 471904 472073 472088 472102 472117 472130 472145 472159 472172 472187 472201 472216	8986130 8986144 8986159 8986173 8986187 8986201 8986215 8986229 8986399 8986413 8986427 8986441 8986455 8986469 8986483 8986498 8986512 8986526 8986540	21.47 23.15 22.26 27.53 35.20 42.22 46.16 48.98 47.68 47.50 45.63 41.93 45.98 49.40 45.43 43.50 37.34 35.90 42.82	0.147 0.430 0.004 0.016 0.002 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.143 0.280 0.144 0.011 0.197 0.039 0.045 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.002	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS

15

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK137 WCK138 WCK139 WCK140 WCK141 WCK142 WCK144 WCK145	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8	1.0 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.2	472229 472244 472258 472273 472286 472300 471748 471763	8986554 8986568 8986583 8986597 8986611 8986625 8985932 8985947	53.68 60.10 63.79 66.75 69.51 72.34 1.05 1.07	0.005 0.002 0.005 0.005 0.105 0.005 0.049 0.060	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK146	0.7	1.0	0.3	471776	8985961	1.42	1.087	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK147	0.6	1.0	0.4	471791	8985975	1.90	0.228	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK148	0.6	1.0	0.4	471805	8985989	3.20	1.045	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK149 WCK150 WCK151 WCK152 WCK153	0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9	0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5	471818 471833 471847 471862 471875	8986003 8986017 8986031 8986045 8986060	5.40 9.08 11.33 14.31 20.80	0.144 0.774 0.228 0.006 0.158	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK154	0.4	0.8	0.4	471890	8986074	20.22	1.492	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK155 WCK156 WCK157 WCK158 WCK159 WCK160 WCK161 WCK162 WCK163 WCK164 WCK165 WCK166 WCK167 WCK168	0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0	0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6	471904 471919 471932 471946 471961 471974 471989 472123 472137 472151 472165 472180 472195 472208	8986088 8986102 8986116 8986130 8986144 8986158 8986173 8986307 8986321 8986335 8986349 8986363 8986377 8986392	19.93 22.19 26.29 30.20 31.20 33.56 33.14 25.89 26.69 23.48 28.78 31.56 34.27 35.52	0.004 0.004 0.017 0.044 0.002 0.023 0.004 0.011 0.025 0.162 0.494 0.050 0.058 0.008	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK169	0.4	0.9	0.5	472222	8986406	37.31	1.211	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK170	0.4	0.9	0.5	472237	8986420	33.36	1.920	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK171 WCK172 WCK173 WCK174 WCK175 WCK176 WCK177 WCK178 WCK179 WCK180 WCK181 WCK182 WCK183 WCK184 WCK185 WCK186	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0	0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6	472250 472265 472279 472294 472307 472321 472336 472350 472364 472378 472393 472406 472420 471734 471748 471762	8986434 8986448 8986462 8986476 8986491 8986505 8986519 8986533 8986547 8986561 8986575 8986589 8986604 8985777 8985791 8985805	32.04 30.66 35.67 41.86 46.19 48.80 52.04 56.05 57.46 55.18 54.68 59.95 65.06 0.91 0.73 0.82	0.053 0.713 0.004 0.040 0.007 0.007 0.060 0.013 0.027 0.018 0.010 0.011 0.013 0.040 0.048 0.039	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS

16

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK187 WCK188 WCK189 WCK190 WCK191 WCK192 WCK193 WCK194 WCK195 WCK196 WCK197 WCK198	0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3	0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7	471775 471790 471805 471818 471833 471847 471862 471875 471889 471904 471917 471932	8985819 8985833 8985848 8985862 8985876 8985890 8985904 8985918 8985932 8985946 8985961 8985975	1.00 1.13 1.37 1.27 1.51 1.79 1.86 2.05 2.30 2.40 2.67 3.10	0.056 0.053 0.059 0.099 0.122 0.053 0.078 0.920 0.171 0.171 0.723 0.297	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK199	0.4	0.7	0.3	471946	8985989	4.93	5.944	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK200	0.4	0.9	0.5	471961	8986003	6.17	1.624	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK201 WCK202 WCK203	0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 0.8 0.9	0.6 0.4 0.5	471975 471989 472003	8986017 8986032 8986046	6.34 4.46 7.12	0.104 0.171 0.088	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK204	0.4	1.0	0.6	472017	8986060	7.48	1.079	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK205 WCK206 WCK207 WCK208	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0	0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6	472031 472045 472060 472074	8986074 8986088 8986102 8986116	9.94 14.09 21.47 20.00	0.191 0.013 0.568 0.125	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK209	0.3	0.6	0.3	472088	8986130	23.18	1.899	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK210 WCK211 WCK212 WCK213 WCK214 WCK215 WCK216 WCK217 WCK218 WCK219 WCK220 WCK221 WCK222 WCK223	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	0.8 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6	472102 472116 472130 472144 472208 472222 472236 472250 472265 472279 472292 472307 472321 472336	8986144 8986158 8986173 8986187 8986250 8986264 8986278 8986293 8986307 8986321 8986335 8986349 8986363 8986377	28.09 18.43 18.04 18.33 27.12 34.22 40.15 43.64 45.69 48.19 50.97 53.79 55.37 55.96	0.336 0.063 0.064 0.134 0.083 0.060 0.341 0.658 0.043 0.063 0.070 0.321 0.096 0.028	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK224	0.4	1.0	0.6	472349	8986392	51.01	19.954	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK225 WCK226 WCK227 WCK228 WCK229 WCK230 WCK231 WCK232 WCK233 WCK234 WCK235	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4	1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6	472364 472378 472392 472406 472420 472435 472448 472463 472477 471741 471755	8986406 8986420 8986434 8986448 8986462 8986476 8986490 8986505 8986519 8985643 8985657	52.96 55.10 52.29 51.96 49.00 50.60 52.36 58.60 53.11 1.19 3.17	0.016 0.038 0.004 0.004 0.091 0.006 0.081 0.137 0.008 0.641 0.019	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS

17

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK236 WCK237 WCK238 WCK239 WCK240 WCK241 WCK242 WCK243 WCK244	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3	0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.9	0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.6	471769 471784 471797 471811 471826 471840 471855 471868 471882	8985671 8985685 8985699 8985713 8985727 8985741 8985756 8985770 8985784	10.01 6.73 3.76 10.69 15.26 17.22 18.06 18.39 17.88	0.046 0.355 0.310 0.076 0.737 0.366 0.207 0.230 0.267	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK245	0.4	0.8	0.4	471896	8985798	17.78	1.503	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK246 WCK247	0.4 0.4	1.0 0.9	0.6 0.5	471911 471925	8985812 8985826	12.15 9.33	0.172 0.237	FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK248	0.4	0.8	0.4	471938	8985840	9.28	1.199	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK249 WCK250 WCK251 WCK252	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9	0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5	471953 471967 471982 471995	8985855 8985869 8985883 8985897	12.31 21.39 23.51 24.04	0.505 0.562 0.293 0.544	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK253	0.3	0.8	0.5	472010	8985911	23.45	1.316	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK254	0.4	0.9	0.5	472024	8985925	23.16	1.910	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK255	0.4	0.9	0.5	472039	8985939	21.71	1.097	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK256 WCK257 WCK258	0.4 0.3 0.4	0.7 0.9 1.0	0.3 0.6 0.6	472052 472066 472081	8985953 8985968 8985982	11.46 18.36 25.03	0.096 0.482 0.072	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK259	0.4	0.9	0.5	472094	8985996	29.97	1.166	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK260 WCK261 WCK262 WCK263 WCK264	0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4	1.0 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.9	0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.5	472109 472123 472138 472151 472165	8986010 8986024 8986038 8986052 8986066	31.44 32.19 33.39 34.74 29.55	0.399 0.151 0.588 0.012 0.026	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK265	0.4	0.8	0.4	472180	8986081	33.83	4.811	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK266 WCK267 WCK268 WCK269 WCK270 WCK271 WCK272 WCK273 WCK274 WCK275 WCK276	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6	472193 472307 472321 472335 472349 472364 472378 472393 472407 472420 472435	8986095 8986208 8986222 8986236 8986250 8986264 8986280 8986293 8986307 8986321 8986335	36.96 51.57 52.02 52.83 52.79 54.08 57.99 59.61 60.41 62.79 64.16	0.047 0.010 0.014 0.057 0.108 0.009 0.068 0.331 0.397 0.255 0.105	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK277	0.4	1.0	0.6	472448	8986349	64.38	1.090	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK278	0.4	1.0	0.6	472462	8986364	65.66	2.620	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK279 WCK280 WCK281 WCK282 WCK283 WCK284	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	1.0 0.8 1.0 0.7 1.0 1.0	0.6 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.6	472477 472492 472505 472519 472534 472547	8986377 8986391 8986406 8986420 8986434 8986448	66.37 63.03 61.39 63.71 66.30 68.33	0.546 0.498 0.015 0.005 0.032 0.025	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS

18

	Project	Prospect	SiteID	Depth From(m)	Depth To(m)	Interval (m)	EastingU TM	Northing UTM	RLUTM	AuPPM	AuMethod
	WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW	WCK286	0.4	0.8	0.4	471798	8985558	3.70	1.847	FA25/MS
	WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK WOODLARK	Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW Wayai CK SSW	WCK287 WCK288 WCK289 WCK290 WCK291 WCK292 WCK293 WCK294 WCK295 WCK296 WCK297 WCK298 WCK299 WCK300 WCK301 WCK302 WCK303 WCK304 WCK305 WCK306 WCK307 WCK308 WCK309 WCK310 WCK311 WCK312 WCK313 WCK314 WCK315 WCK316 WCK317 WCK318 WCK319 WCK320 WCK321 WCK322 WCK323 WCK324 WCK325 WCK326 WCK327 WCK328 WCK329 WCK330 WCK331 WCK332 WCK333	0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4	0.9 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0	0.5 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6	471811 471827 471840 471855 471869 471884 471897 471910 471925 471939 471953 471967 471982 471995 472009 472024 472037 472406 472420 472434 472448 472463 472477 472490 472505 472519 472534 472548 472563 472576 472591 472604 471896 471910 471925 471939 471954 471967 471983 472519 472534 472547 472561 472576 472589 472604 472618	8985572 8985586 8985600 8985614 8985628 8985643 8985657 8985671 8985685 8985699 8985713 8985727 8985741 8985756 8985770 8985784 8985798 8986165 8986179 8986194 8986208 8986222 8986236 8986250 8986264 8986278 8986292 8986307 8986321 8986335 8986349 8986364 8985515 8985529 8985544 8985558 8985572 8985586 8985600 8986137 8986151 8986165 8986179 8986194 8986208 8986222 8986236	5.20 8.43 7.20 9.04 10.63 13.24 12.42 10.06 10.80 13.19 17.34 19.73 20.24 17.82 20.52 25.03 26.77 43.51 43.77 44.38 46.57 44.15 49.78 49.58 51.53 49.52 47.33 48.78 52.94 58.99 58.41 57.19 8.90 13.57 14.97 16.86 16.62 19.00 24.95 50.04 47.63 49.41 48.83 57.00 52.62 50.26 52.73	0.059 0.059 0.577 0.185 0.545 0.050 0.028 0.135 0.330 0.049 0.141 0.450 0.037 0.017 0.157 0.254 0.186 0.039 0.039 0.025 0.011 0.010 0.049 0.300 0.083 0.010 0.046 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.005 0.023 0.014 0.006 0.002 0.003 0.013 0.004 0.006 0.006 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003	FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS FA25/MS

19

==> picture [157 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

This ASX announcement was approved and authorised for release by the Board of Geopacific Resources Limited.

	Company details	Board & Management	Projects
	Geopacific Resources Limited	Graham Ascough Non-Executive Chairman	PAPUA NEW GUINEA
	ACN 003 208 393	Hansjoerg Plaggemars Non-Executive Director	Woodlark Island Gold
	ASX Code: GPR	Michael Brook Non-Executive Director
	info@geopacific.com.au	Hamish Bohannan Non-Executive Director
	http://www.geopacific.com.au	Rowan Johnston Non-Executive Director
	T +61 8 6143 1820	James Fox CEO
	HEAD OFFICE	Matthew Smith CFO and Company Secretary
	Level 1, 278 Stirling Highway
	Claremont WA 6010.
	PO Box 439, Claremont WA 6910.

20

==> picture [156 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Additional Information

Woodlark Mineral Resource Estimate

Refer to GPR’s ASX Announcement dated 13 August 2024 titled “Mineral Resource increased to 1.67 Moz” for further details, including JORC[4] Tables.

The total Woodlark Mineral Resource hosts 48.3 Mt at 1.07 g/t Au for 1.67 Moz Au. A breakdown of the Woodlark Mineral Resource by JORC classification is outlined in the table below and estimated using a cut-off grade of 0.4 g/t Au which is consistent with the assumed open-cut mining method.

	2024 Woodlark Mineral Resource
Category
(>0.4g/t lower cut)	Tonnes Grade Ounces*
	(Million) (g/t Au) (Thousand)
Measured	2.25 3.00 217
Indicated	39.44 0.98 1,241
Inferred	6.49 0.98 205
Total	48.28 1.07 1,663

*Tonnages are dry metric tonnes. Minor discrepancies may occur due to rounding

The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information, or data, that materially affects the information included, and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimate continue to apply and have not changed. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by or under the supervision of Michael Woodbury, a Competent Person who is a Fellow, and Chartered Professional (CP) of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, and Member of Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a full time employee of Woodlark Mining Limited (wholly owned subsidiary of Geopacific). Mr Woodbury has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Woodbury consents to the inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to Woodlark Mineral Resources is based on information compiled and reviewed by Mr Chris De-Vitry, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a full-time employee of Manna Hill Geoconsulting Pty Ltd. Mr De-Vitry has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposits under consideration and to the activity which he has undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code 2012 and is a qualified person for the purposes of NI43-101. Mr De-Vitry has no economic, financial, or pecuniary interest in GPR and consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears .

4 Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. The JORC Code, 2012 Edition. Prepared by: The Joint Ore Reserves Committee of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia (JORC)

21

==> picture [156 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

JORC Code, 2012 Edition

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,	Line cutting took place ahead of the auger
techniques	random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the	sampling and a tape and compass survey method was used to correctly locate each site. The co-
	minerals under investigation, such as down hole	ordinate of each site was collected with a hand
	gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments,	GPS making sure a high level of accuracy was
	etc). These examples should not be taken as	maintained.
	limiting the broad meaning of sampling.	Auger samples were collected using a
	Include reference to measures taken to ensure	conventional Dormer hand auger kit using a
	sample representivity and the appropriate	general-purpose soil head drilling a 62 mm
	calibration of any measurement tools or systems	diameter holes with extension rods to reach an
	used.	optimum target depth of 1 m. The sample was
	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.	recovered from the holes at 0.2 m intervals down hole until the end of the hole (EOH) was reached. Samples were placed into plastic sheet and
	In case`s where ‘industry standard’ work has been	inspected and highly organic upper profile was
	done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse	discarded. The remaining sample was bagged into
	circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples	plastic bags and sealed and SiteID and Line
	from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g	Number are recorded on the bag along with the
	charge for fire assay’). In other cases more	coordinate of the SiteID via a hand GPS and
	explanation may be required, such as where there	notebook. Samples were bagged in lines on-site
	is coarse gold that has inherent sampling	and transferred back to the Bomagai Core Shed
	problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation	and sorted into lines and SampleID placed onto
	types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant	the sealed plastic bag. Samples size typically
	disclosure of detailed information.	ranged between 0.9 and 1.3kg and all efforts were
		made to maintain a consistent samples size.
		Samples are typically clay rich, which varied due
		to the host lithology and nature of the volcanics
		over the two prospects of Little MacKenzie &
		Wayai Creek S/SW.
		Samples were submitted to ITS Pty Ltd PNG
		(Intertek Services Ltd) preparation facility at
		Bomagai Camp. Samples were logged into the
		system and dried in the laboratory ovens at
		+100oC. Wet and dry weights recorded. The
		samples were then passed through the jaw
		crusher to -2 mm, bottle washed and air dried. No
		riffle splitting was needed as the samples were
		less than ~1.5 kg. Samples were pulverised in
		LM2, 85% passing 75 microns (considered
		acceptable pulverization for geochemical
		sampling) and blank wash between samples.
		Sample screening took place at a ratio of 1 in 15.
		A 150 g packet was collected and sealed with bar
		code and boxed and sent to ITS Pty Ltd PNG
		(Intertek Services Ltd), WA for Au method FA25
		(25 g) with MS finish (LDL of 1 ppb Au), and multi-
		elements ICPMS analysis using four acid 48
		element method 4A/MS48 (0.2 g) with mulitipule
		detections.
		Soil samples have been traditionally used used for
		the most of the surface sampling in exploration
		from the outcropping Okiduse Volcanics on
		Central Woodlark Island.

22

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Drilling techniques Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Auger drilling was performed with a conventional Dormer hand auger kit using a general-purpose soil head drilling a 62 mm diameter holes with extension rods to reach an optimum target depth of 1 m. Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Auger samples were recovered from the soil auger every 0.2 m and placed onto and lined up from top to bottom on a sheet of plastic. The sample were inspected for the presence of organic matter and the upper part of the hole with high percentage of organics discarded. The start depth and final depth of sampling was recorded, The end depth typically occurred when it became difficult to rotate the hand auger, and was around the 1 m depth. Typically, the sampling started between 0.1 m to 0.4 m down hole and ended between 0.8 m to 1 m down hole. The moisture content was recorded in the field and the samples were weighed in the site ITS Pty Ltd PNG (Intertek Services Ltd) laboratory. No significant sampling issues were noted to introduce and bias and samples recovery and quality is considered adequate for the technique utilised. Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Representative chips of the auger samples are collected in chip tray and logged using touchpads and entered into 3rdParty Software supplied by DB Management company Expedio, WA. All the Little Mackenzie & Wayai Creek auger samples were logged for geology for generating a geological interpretation. This information provided a basic overview of the Okiduse Volcanics, aids in identifying alteration and associated mineralisation, and any potential cover sequences that may have existed in the areas sampled. The original design of the auger program considers the extent of the cover sequences knows as the Kiriwina or Florida Formation. Recognised areas of cover sequence in Little Mackenzie & Wayai Ck S/SW were excluded from surface sampling programs. All auger samples from Little Mackenzie and Wayai Creek S/SW were logged for geology. Logging is qualitative. There are 310 auger samples at Little Mackenzie & 325 auger samples at Wayai Creek S/SW. No photograph of auger chips were taken. Chips are stored in container on-site for future reference. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. No sample reduction has taken place to the auger samples. The entire sample was taken from the field to the site ITS Pty Ltd PNG (Intertek Services Ltd) laboratory for preparation. The entire sample was dried and no reduction took place in the
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	Drilling techniques Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Auger drilling was performed with a conventional Dormer hand auger kit using a general-purpose soil head drilling a 62 mm diameter holes with extension rods to reach an optimum target depth of 1 m. Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Auger samples were recovered from the soil auger every 0.2 m and placed onto and lined up from top to bottom on a sheet of plastic. The sample were inspected for the presence of organic matter and the upper part of the hole with high percentage of organics discarded. The start depth and final depth of sampling was recorded, The end depth typically occurred when it became difficult to rotate the hand auger, and was around the 1 m depth. Typically, the sampling started between 0.1 m to 0.4 m down hole and ended between 0.8 m to 1 m down hole. The moisture content was recorded in the field and the samples were weighed in the site ITS Pty Ltd PNG (Intertek Services Ltd) laboratory. No significant sampling issues were noted to introduce and bias and samples recovery and quality is considered adequate for the technique utilised. Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Representative chips of the auger samples are collected in chip tray and logged using touchpads and entered into 3rdParty Software supplied by DB Management company Expedio, WA. All the Little Mackenzie & Wayai Creek auger samples were logged for geology for generating a geological interpretation. This information provided a basic overview of the Okiduse Volcanics, aids in identifying alteration and associated mineralisation, and any potential cover sequences that may have existed in the areas sampled. The original design of the auger program considers the extent of the cover sequences knows as the Kiriwina or Florida Formation. Recognised areas of cover sequence in Little Mackenzie & Wayai Ck S/SW were excluded from surface sampling programs. All auger samples from Little Mackenzie and Wayai Creek S/SW were logged for geology. Logging is qualitative. There are 310 auger samples at Little Mackenzie & 325 auger samples at Wayai Creek S/SW. No photograph of auger chips were taken. Chips are stored in container on-site for future reference. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. No sample reduction has taken place to the auger samples. The entire sample was taken from the field to the site ITS Pty Ltd PNG (Intertek Services Ltd) laboratory for preparation. The entire sample was dried and no reduction took place in the

23

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. preparation and pulverising of the sample. No field duplicate or results are available for the geochemical auger program due to the samples size collected. The samples have dry and wet weight. Samples are Kiln dried, crushed to a nominal 2 mm by a jaw crusher, with the whole sample pulverized to 85% passing 75 um and then split; one 150 g sample for submission with residue sored on site. This sample preparation approach should be appropriate for the style of mineralisation and the gold grainsize. No field duplicates were collected due to the samples size. Blank samples were inserted per GPR/WML QAQC procedure per 100 samples. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. For surface geochemistry auger program, no verification studies have been undertaken by either independent or alternative companies. No repeat check samples were submitted to an alternative laboratories to assess the effectiveness of the 25 g Fire Assay method. The 25 g fire assay Au and four-acid digest ICPMS analysis are thought to be appropriate for determination of gold and multielement are considered to represent a total analysis. No results from geophysical tools, spectrometers or handheld XRF instruments are included in this report. No field blanks were collected for the auger geochemical program. Lab blanks and independent certified standard samples were used in auger program. Laboratory blanks, duplicates and reference standards are routinely used. Results from these QA/QC samples were within the acceptable ranges. Verification of sampling and assaying The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. For the early-stage exploration activity undertaken, no verification studies have been undertaken by either independent or alternative company personnel. A rigorous industry standard system is utilised, which is administered by an independent third party to ensure data integrity and offsite data backup. No adjustment to data is made in the reported results Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Auger samples were collected from vertically holes ranging from 0.5 m to 1.0 m in depth and collected between 10 m to 20 m intervals along east-west lines at Little MacKenzie and northeast-southwest lines at Wayai Creek A GPS and tape-and-compass was used to survey the collars of the auger holes. The collar coordinates were captured in UTM WGS84 S56. Historical coordinates on Woodlark were captured via AGD66 Zone 56 UTM. The Woodlark Grid was
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. preparation and pulverising of the sample. No field duplicate or results are available for the geochemical auger program due to the samples size collected. The samples have dry and wet weight. Samples are Kiln dried, crushed to a nominal 2 mm by a jaw crusher, with the whole sample pulverized to 85% passing 75 um and then split; one 150 g sample for submission with residue sored on site. This sample preparation approach should be appropriate for the style of mineralisation and the gold grainsize. No field duplicates were collected due to the samples size. Blank samples were inserted per GPR/WML QAQC procedure per 100 samples. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. For surface geochemistry auger program, no verification studies have been undertaken by either independent or alternative companies. No repeat check samples were submitted to an alternative laboratories to assess the effectiveness of the 25 g Fire Assay method. The 25 g fire assay Au and four-acid digest ICPMS analysis are thought to be appropriate for determination of gold and multielement are considered to represent a total analysis. No results from geophysical tools, spectrometers or handheld XRF instruments are included in this report. No field blanks were collected for the auger geochemical program. Lab blanks and independent certified standard samples were used in auger program. Laboratory blanks, duplicates and reference standards are routinely used. Results from these QA/QC samples were within the acceptable ranges. Verification of sampling and assaying The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. For the early-stage exploration activity undertaken, no verification studies have been undertaken by either independent or alternative company personnel. A rigorous industry standard system is utilised, which is administered by an independent third party to ensure data integrity and offsite data backup. No adjustment to data is made in the reported results Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Auger samples were collected from vertically holes ranging from 0.5 m to 1.0 m in depth and collected between 10 m to 20 m intervals along east-west lines at Little MacKenzie and northeast-southwest lines at Wayai Creek A GPS and tape-and-compass was used to survey the collars of the auger holes. The collar coordinates were captured in UTM WGS84 S56. Historical coordinates on Woodlark were captured via AGD66 Zone 56 UTM. The Woodlark Grid was

24

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary established in 1990 (by Palanga Survey) with an origin from Mt Kabat (AA 599), an Australian Army brass plaque establish in May 1981. Geodetric Survey was undertaken on Woodlark in 2010 (by Quickclose Pty Ltd). Survey control points (25 control stations and pillars) were established in 2010 across the Woodlark project and provide excellent ground control for total station surveying. PNG94 became the primary geodetric control and all the stations and pillars were tied into the Local Area Government pillar at Guasopa Airstrip in 2010. Coordinates were recorded in PNG94 geodetic system from September 2010, and conversions were applied following the 2010 geodetric survey (Quickclose Pty Ltd). WGS84 has also been used on Woodlark (default for any GPS receiver) and corrections have been made due to the underlying tectonic plate movement. Some historic holes had uncertain collar locations and these holes were not used in the resource estimates. Auger collars are collected to LiDAR (2010) RL. Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing, and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Auger samples were collected from vertical holes ranging from 0.5 m to 1.0 m in depth and collected between 10 m to 20 m intervals along east-west lines at Little MacKenzie and northeast-southwest lines at Wayai Creek. The auger spacing is considered adequate for the nature and style of mineralisation that is being targeted. Historical auger ridge & spur auger sampling (Misima Mines 2000) highlighted Wayai Creek Deposit over three 5 0m spaced sample sites. Reported results are reconnaissance in nature and the stage of exploration based on density of data and quantity and quality of the sampling medium reported is insufficient to support mineral resource estimation. No sample compositing was been applied. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. The auger lines were oriented perpendicular to the dominate structural trend at Little MacKenzie mineral occurrence and Wayai Creek deposit, and gold anomalism observed in known surface geochemistry results and based on geological interpretation of the geology, structure and less so the magnetics It is recognised that there are multiple orientation of the mineralisation responsible for the known mineralisation in the prospects. Auger reported assays are of surface geochemical point sample collected for exploration targeting purposes. No assumption of true widths, interpretation ofgeometryor estimation of volume
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	established in 1990 (by Palanga Survey) with an origin from Mt Kabat (AA 599), an Australian Army brass plaque establish in May 1981. Geodetric Survey was undertaken on Woodlark in 2010 (by Quickclose Pty Ltd). Survey control points (25 control stations and pillars) were established in 2010 across the Woodlark project and provide excellent ground control for total station surveying. PNG94 became the primary geodetric control and all the stations and pillars were tied into the Local Area Government pillar at Guasopa Airstrip in 2010. Coordinates were recorded in PNG94 geodetic system from September 2010, and conversions were applied following the 2010 geodetric survey (Quickclose Pty Ltd). WGS84 has also been used on Woodlark (default for any GPS receiver) and corrections have been made due to the underlying tectonic plate movement. Some historic holes had uncertain collar locations and these holes were not used in the resource estimates. Auger collars are collected to LiDAR (2010) RL. Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing, and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Auger samples were collected from vertical holes ranging from 0.5 m to 1.0 m in depth and collected between 10 m to 20 m intervals along east-west lines at Little MacKenzie and northeast-southwest lines at Wayai Creek. The auger spacing is considered adequate for the nature and style of mineralisation that is being targeted. Historical auger ridge & spur auger sampling (Misima Mines 2000) highlighted Wayai Creek Deposit over three 5 0m spaced sample sites. Reported results are reconnaissance in nature and the stage of exploration based on density of data and quantity and quality of the sampling medium reported is insufficient to support mineral resource estimation. No sample compositing was been applied. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. The auger lines were oriented perpendicular to the dominate structural trend at Little MacKenzie mineral occurrence and Wayai Creek deposit, and gold anomalism observed in known surface geochemistry results and based on geological interpretation of the geology, structure and less so the magnetics It is recognised that there are multiple orientation of the mineralisation responsible for the known mineralisation in the prospects. Auger reported assays are of surface geochemical point sample collected for exploration targeting purposes. No assumption of true widths, interpretation ofgeometryor estimation of volume

25

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary of mineralised zones can be made from the reported results. Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. All samples were collected by WML (GPR) staff and put into plastic bags and sealed. When the samples were returned to the WML core preparations facility, sample tickets were assigned to the auger samples and the bags are immediately re-sealed and placed in order on a pallet with other samples in an area directly adjacent to the onsite sample preparation laboratory. The pallet containing the sealed samples was then delivered directly into the onsite sample preparation laboratory where chain of custody was handed over to ITS Pty Ltd PNG (Intertek Services Ltd). Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. No audits or reviews of reported data were completed.
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	of mineralised zones can be made from the reported results. Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. All samples were collected by WML (GPR) staff and put into plastic bags and sealed. When the samples were returned to the WML core preparations facility, sample tickets were assigned to the auger samples and the bags are immediately re-sealed and placed in order on a pallet with other samples in an area directly adjacent to the onsite sample preparation laboratory. The pallet containing the sealed samples was then delivered directly into the onsite sample preparation laboratory where chain of custody was handed over to ITS Pty Ltd PNG (Intertek Services Ltd). Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. No audits or reviews of reported data were completed.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria			JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral			Type, reference name/number, location and	GPR holds a 100% interest in Mining Lease 508
tenement		and	ownership including agreements or material	and Exploration Licence 1279, within which all
land status	tenure		issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national	reported results are located. Mining Lease 508 was granted to WML on the 4 July 2014 and is valid for 21 years, renewable. EL 1279 was first granted
			park and environmental settings.	on 26 August 1999, and last grated to WML on 26
			The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	August 2023, and is up for renewal on 23 August 2025. The renewal of EL 1279 was submitted on 23 May 2025 (3-months prior).
Exploration			Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by	Woodlark Island exploration and resource
done by parties	other		other parties.	definition has been completed by Bureau of Mineral Resources, BHP, Highlands, Auridium, Misima Mines LTD, BDI, Kula Gold LTD and
				Geopacific. Exploration (including drilling)
				commenced in 1962.
Geology			Deposit type, geological setting and style of	Most of Woodlark Island is covered by a Veneer of
			mineralisation.	Plio-Pleistocene limestone (coronus) of variable
				thickness with associated marine clays and basal
				conglomerates. A central elevated portion of the
				island (horst structure) contains Miocene volcanic
				rocks.
				Gold mineralisation within the Woodlark Island
				Gold Project is principally hosted by andesites and
				their sub-volcanic equivalents within the Miocene
				age stratigraphic unit known as the Okiduse
				Volcanics. The mineralisation is variously
				associated with lodes, quartz veins, and stockwork
				zones and breccias developed within proximal
				phyllic and marginal propylitic alteration envelopes
				regionally associated with intrusive breccia
				complexes. Gold mineralisation is consistent with
				low sulphidation, base metal carbonate,
				epithermal systems typical of the south-west
				pacific.
				A 3Dgeological/structural interpretation isyet to

26

==> picture [156 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria		JORC Code explanation	Commentary
			be constructed for Little MacKenzie & Wayai Creek
			prospect.
Drill	hole	A summary of all information material to the	Refer to Figures 3 and 5 of this release for auger
Information		understanding of the exploration results including	sample location, summary of results, and gold
		a tabulation of the following information for all	anomalism, outlined in a spatial context for
		Material drill holes:	reported results.
		- easting and northing of the drill hole collar	The reported auger sampling is a geochemical
		- elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar	technique generated for targeting purposes only and should not be utilised to quantify the tenor, extent or geometry of gold mineralisation and would not be utilised in any future mineral resource
		- dip and azimuth of the hole	estimation.
		- down hole length and interception depth	All reported sample intervals were collected from
		- hole length.	single auger hole typically less than 1 m intervals targeting the upper profile of the
		If the exclusion of this information is justified on the	weathering/regolith profile, providing a
		basis that the information is not Material and this	geochemical result to define anomalous trends on
		exclusion does not detract from the understanding	par with surface soil sampling results sampled and
		of the report, the Competent Person should clearly	assayed for the purpose of trench & drill targeting.
		explain why this is the case.	Sample locations are provided in their entirety in
			Figures 3 and 5 of the report. A better
			understanding of the results is provided with
			results reported in plan view and in a spatial
			context. Easting, Northing, depth from & depth to
			of sample locations with results exceeding 0.1 ppm
			gold (0.10 g/t Au) for contour and presentation of
			anomalies and all results from Little MacKenzie
			(310 auger sites), & Wayai Creek S/SW (325
			auger sites) are presented in Table 1 in the main
			body of this report.
			Elevation & RL is captured in the above table. The
			RL reported are generated from pressing the collar
			locations to the LiDAR (2010), which was
			conducted over Central Woodlark Island. The
			digital elevation model (DTM) has been generated
			in current version of Micromine Origin using
			Grid/DTM tool. A large number of points across
			Little MacKenzie and Wayai Creek exist for the
			generated DTM.
			All auger holes are vertically oriented.
			Holes range from 0.5 m to 1.0 m in depth,
			averaging 0.9 m in depth.
Data		In reporting Exploration Results, weighting	Auger holes returning a result >0.001 g/t (>1 ppb)
aggregation methods		averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be	gold lower cut-off have been included in target outlines prioritised for further exploration. Location of all sample sites is represented in their entirety in
		stated.	graphics provided in the body of the report for the
		Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short	purpose of balanced reporting.
		lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of	No upper cut-offs were applied to the reported
		low grade results, the procedure used for such	results.
		aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.	There are no aggregate intercepts in the reported results.
		The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	No metal equivalent reporting is applicable to this announcement.
			Aggregated intercepts are not reported.
			No metal equivalent reportingis applicable to this

27

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary announcement. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Auger sampling reported is an early-stage exploration method providing no underpinning information about geometry or volume of mineralisation targeted and is not intended for use in a mineral resource estimation. Down hole lengths are not material for reported geochemistry exploration method reported (auger sampling). The results represent point samples from shallow regolith/weathering horizons targeted from near or at surface across the two-prospect area. No assumption of true widths of the mineralised zones is made in reported results and assays should not be interpreted to be representative sampling of the reported interval–true width not know. Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Appropriate plans and sections are included in the release. The plans present are deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. The data is near surface point sampling and the spacing and grid used allows for the define geochemical trends, with the exploration results considered on par with geology, structure and underlying magnetics. The reported data yields a two dimensional/planar dataset that does not imply any vertical/sectional projections. No sectional views are presented in this release. Sectional views are not deemed appropriate for the reported data as the reported results target the surface horizon. Future trenching and drilling that follows will provide a third dimension with the appropriate information made available to quantify mineralisation and underpin any mineral resource estimation work if justified by results of continued exploration. Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. Auger results are reported in their entirety and any trench & drill locations are presented in diagrams in context of all reported and previous drill collar locations and reported data is provided in context of previous results including contours of previous soil location and collar locations for other sampling and drilling methods. Maximum assay values are included in the body of the report. For results from FA (25 g), results range from below the analytical detection limit of 0.001 ppm gold up to the maximum result of 63.6 ppm gold, with a Mean of 0.50 ppm Au of samples assayed. There is only one assay below the lower detection limit. Other substantive exploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical Geophysical and geochemical surveys have been completed and used for exploration targeting over Woodlark, Gold deposits on Woodlark are linked to areas of diamagnetism, and / or associated with magnetic gradients, which are also considered to be of interest.
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	announcement. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Auger sampling reported is an early-stage exploration method providing no underpinning information about geometry or volume of mineralisation targeted and is not intended for use in a mineral resource estimation. Down hole lengths are not material for reported geochemistry exploration method reported (auger sampling). The results represent point samples from shallow regolith/weathering horizons targeted from near or at surface across the two-prospect area. No assumption of true widths of the mineralised zones is made in reported results and assays should not be interpreted to be representative sampling of the reported interval–true width not know. Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Appropriate plans and sections are included in the release. The plans present are deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. The data is near surface point sampling and the spacing and grid used allows for the define geochemical trends, with the exploration results considered on par with geology, structure and underlying magnetics. The reported data yields a two dimensional/planar dataset that does not imply any vertical/sectional projections. No sectional views are presented in this release. Sectional views are not deemed appropriate for the reported data as the reported results target the surface horizon. Future trenching and drilling that follows will provide a third dimension with the appropriate information made available to quantify mineralisation and underpin any mineral resource estimation work if justified by results of continued exploration. Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. Auger results are reported in their entirety and any trench & drill locations are presented in diagrams in context of all reported and previous drill collar locations and reported data is provided in context of previous results including contours of previous soil location and collar locations for other sampling and drilling methods. Maximum assay values are included in the body of the report. For results from FA (25 g), results range from below the analytical detection limit of 0.001 ppm gold up to the maximum result of 63.6 ppm gold, with a Mean of 0.50 ppm Au of samples assayed. There is only one assay below the lower detection limit. Other substantive exploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical Geophysical and geochemical surveys have been completed and used for exploration targeting over Woodlark, Gold deposits on Woodlark are linked to areas of diamagnetism, and / or associated with magnetic gradients, which are also considered to be of interest.

28

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. No contaminating substances have been observed at any of the Woodlark deposits. Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. Trenching and RC and diamond core drilling is planned at both Little MacKenzie & Wayai Creek to infill existing drill spacings on an even grid to test for extensions to mineralisation, both along strike and down dip. Diamond core will be drilled at Little MacKenzie and Wayai Creek to collect further orientation and SG data and make core samples available for potential metallurgical studies.
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. No contaminating substances have been observed at any of the Woodlark deposits. Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. Trenching and RC and diamond core drilling is planned at both Little MacKenzie & Wayai Creek to infill existing drill spacings on an even grid to test for extensions to mineralisation, both along strike and down dip. Diamond core will be drilled at Little MacKenzie and Wayai Creek to collect further orientation and SG data and make core samples available for potential metallurgical studies.

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

(Criteria listed in section 1, and where relevant in section 2, also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Database	Measures taken to ensure that data has not been	GPR utilises a digital logging process for data
integrity	corrupted by, for example, transcription or keying errors, between its initial collection and its use for	collection that interfaces with a rigorous software auditing and tracking system that validates data
	Mineral Resource estimation purposes.	entry prior to uploading to the database.
	Data validation procedures used.	Pre-determined logging codes, internal meterage
		calculation and cross references plus unique
		sample number identifiers are all utilised to ensure
		quality of input data.
		Any modification of data once entered into the
		database is key stroke recorded by username to
		ensure both accountability and ability to reverse
		changes if required.
		All data is re-validated by site geologists post
		merge with data against physical core and drill
		cuttings.
Site visits	Comment on any site visits undertaken by the	Michael Woodbury (Competent Person) is
	Competent Person and the outcome of those	employed by Woodlark Mining Limited (wholy
	visits.	owned subsidiary of Geopacific) and is on-site at
	If no site visits have been undertaken indicate why this is the case.	Woodlark during the sample collection, logging and submission to Woodlark on-site preparations laboratory managed by ITS Pty Ltd PNG (Intertek
		Services Ltd).
		Chris De-Vitry of MHGEO (Competent Person for
		the Mineral Resource Estimates) visited site in
		November 2022.
		Wayai Creek and Liitle MacKenzie were visited
		regularly during the sampling campaign, however
		there is limited outcrop to observe.
		The sample preparation laboratory is inspected
		regularly and found to be clean and well run.
Geological	Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of)	The Little MacKenzie prospect is encompasses a
interpretation	the geological interpretation of the mineral deposit. Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made.	north-south striking ridge that is part of the Talpos Creek Formations and falls into the Watou eruptive centre to the south and ultimately is part of the Okiduse Volcanics which host the bulk of the
	The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on	mineralisation on Woodlark. The volcanics consist
	Mineral Resource estimation.	of fine to coarse-grained porphyritic andesites,
	The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resource estimation.	epiclastics, conglomerates, minor basalt and intermediate feldspar porphyry intrusives. There is little natural outcrop, and most geologic data has
	The factors affectingcontinuityboth ofgrade and	been obtained from limited legacy costeans in the

29

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary geology. central parts of the prospect and wide spaced drill fences of 100 m to 300 m. Mineralisation at Little McKenzie appears to be narrow NNW, N-S & SSW trending zones of near vertical dip. While not confirmed, Little McKenzie appears to be a northerly extension of the Tower Hill mineral occurrence & Woodlark King resource albeit at a more northerly orientation. The Little McKenzie mineralisation has been tested by historic adits however, there is no recorded production. Mineralisation is not closed off to the north however to the south the mineralisation appears to connect to Woodlark King albeit via a lower grade zone. The current defined mineralisation extends over about 1 km and drill lines are spaced from 100 m to 300 m. At Wayai Creek tensional quartz veins appear to have been developed in a N-S jog structure formed by the intersection of northwest and northeast conjugate structures. Further reactivation of the northwest structure has resulted in mineralised hydrothermal breccias being emplaced in association with felsic dyke intrusions. Subsequent post mineralisation faulting has disrupted the vein and breccia zones. At Wayai Creek a key geological feature is the southwest trending steeply dipping breccia. Mineralisation appears to be parallel to this breccia however, not necessarily contained within it. There is also a parallel felsic dyke. Finally, there are mineralised cross-cutting quartz vein zones of various orientations. These features have been interpreted in plan view. While there is fact mapping a geological map of other geological features has not yet been interpreted The overall shape of the mineralisation is moderately well understood however, the more holes are drilled the more complex the grade shells will likely become. It appears there are different styles of mineralisation within each of with a variety of continuity directions. These cannot be fully understood with wide spaced data. Dimensions The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed as length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth below surface to the upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource. This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate. Estimation and modelling techniques The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s) applied and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme grade values, domaining, interpolation parameters and maximum distance of extrapolation from data points. If a computer assisted estimation method was chosen include a description of computer software and parameters used. The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or mine production records and whether the Mineral Resource estimate takes This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate.
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	geology. central parts of the prospect and wide spaced drill fences of 100 m to 300 m. Mineralisation at Little McKenzie appears to be narrow NNW, N-S & SSW trending zones of near vertical dip. While not confirmed, Little McKenzie appears to be a northerly extension of the Tower Hill mineral occurrence & Woodlark King resource albeit at a more northerly orientation. The Little McKenzie mineralisation has been tested by historic adits however, there is no recorded production. Mineralisation is not closed off to the north however to the south the mineralisation appears to connect to Woodlark King albeit via a lower grade zone. The current defined mineralisation extends over about 1 km and drill lines are spaced from 100 m to 300 m. At Wayai Creek tensional quartz veins appear to have been developed in a N-S jog structure formed by the intersection of northwest and northeast conjugate structures. Further reactivation of the northwest structure has resulted in mineralised hydrothermal breccias being emplaced in association with felsic dyke intrusions. Subsequent post mineralisation faulting has disrupted the vein and breccia zones. At Wayai Creek a key geological feature is the southwest trending steeply dipping breccia. Mineralisation appears to be parallel to this breccia however, not necessarily contained within it. There is also a parallel felsic dyke. Finally, there are mineralised cross-cutting quartz vein zones of various orientations. These features have been interpreted in plan view. While there is fact mapping a geological map of other geological features has not yet been interpreted The overall shape of the mineralisation is moderately well understood however, the more holes are drilled the more complex the grade shells will likely become. It appears there are different styles of mineralisation within each of with a variety of continuity directions. These cannot be fully understood with wide spaced data. Dimensions The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed as length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth below surface to the upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource. This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate. Estimation and modelling techniques The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s) applied and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme grade values, domaining, interpolation parameters and maximum distance of extrapolation from data points. If a computer assisted estimation method was chosen include a description of computer software and parameters used. The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or mine production records and whether the Mineral Resource estimate takes This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate.

30

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary appropriate account of such data. The assumptions made regarding recovery of by- products. Estimation of deleterious elements or other non- grade variables of economic significance (eg sulphur for acid mine drainage characterisation). In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation to the average sample spacing and the search employed. Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units. Any assumptions about correlation between variables. Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control the resource estimates. Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping. The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data if available. Moisture Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with natural moisture, and the method of determination of the moisture content. This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate. Cut-off parameters The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality parameters applied. This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate. No cut-offs have been considered for auger sampling. Mining factors or assumptions Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimum mining dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) mining dilution. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential mining methods, but the assumptions made regarding mining methods and parameters when estimating Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the mining assumptions made. This Release doesn’t consider Mining factors or assumptions. Metallurgical factors or assumptions The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding metallurgical amenability. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential metallurgical methods, but the assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the metallurgical assumptions made. This Release doesn’t consider Metallurgical factor or assumptions. Environmen-tal factors or assumptions Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process residue disposal options. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider thepotential environmental All resources are located on granted mining lease ML508. A comprehensive environmental impact study was completed as part of the mining lease application and includes a proposed deep-sea tailings disposal option(DSTP). The DSTP option
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	appropriate account of such data. The assumptions made regarding recovery of by- products. Estimation of deleterious elements or other non- grade variables of economic significance (eg sulphur for acid mine drainage characterisation). In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation to the average sample spacing and the search employed. Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units. Any assumptions about correlation between variables. Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control the resource estimates. Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping. The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data if available. Moisture Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with natural moisture, and the method of determination of the moisture content. This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate. Cut-off parameters The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality parameters applied. This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate. No cut-offs have been considered for auger sampling. Mining factors or assumptions Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimum mining dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) mining dilution. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential mining methods, but the assumptions made regarding mining methods and parameters when estimating Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the mining assumptions made. This Release doesn’t consider Mining factors or assumptions. Metallurgical factors or assumptions The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding metallurgical amenability. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential metallurgical methods, but the assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the metallurgical assumptions made. This Release doesn’t consider Metallurgical factor or assumptions. Environmen-tal factors or assumptions Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process residue disposal options. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider thepotential environmental All resources are located on granted mining lease ML508. A comprehensive environmental impact study was completed as part of the mining lease application and includes a proposed deep-sea tailings disposal option(DSTP). The DSTP option

31

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary impacts of the mining and processing operation. While at this stage the determination of potential environmental impacts, particularly for a greenfields project, may not always be well advanced, the status of early consideration of these potential environmental impacts should be reported. Where these aspects have not been considered this should be reported with an explanation of the environmental assumptions made. was subjected to a rigorous study and was approved and permitted by the government of PNG in 2014. Bulk density Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for the assumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or dry, the frequency of the measurements, the nature, size and representativeness of the samples. The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit. Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation process of the different materials. This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate. Classification The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into varying confidence categories. Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant factors (ie relative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of input data, confidence in continuity of geology and metal values, quality, quantity and distribution of the data). Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit. Mineralisation at Wayai Creek and appears to have continuity at the current drill spacing. Additional drilling however will change the shape and extents of the mineralisation which is yet to be closed off at depth and to some extent along strike. Geological information still needs to be compiled and incorporated into a 3D geological model which my aid in interpretating the mineralisation. The deposits and mineral occurrence were drilled from 1990 to 2022 and QA/QC does not exist for all drilling. Channel samples were used for domaining and estimation and presumably this data is of lower quality than RC/diamond drilling. Currently, no density data exists for the Little MacKenzie mineral occurrence or Wayai Creek deposit. Given the above factors the Competent Person considers that an Inferred classification is appropriate. None of the currently defined resource is unclassified. Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral Resource estimates. This release does not however consider a Mineral Resource Estimate, however as referenced in the main body of this release an initial mineral resource estimate was completed for Wayai Creek (Refer ASX announcement on 13 August 2024 for full details including JORC tables “Mineral Resource increased to 1.67 Moz as growth strategy delivers early results”.), no further reviews have been completed. Discussion of relative accuracy/ confidence Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and confidence level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of statistical or geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the resource within stated confidence limits,or,if such an approach is not deemed This release does not however consider a Mineral Resource Estimate
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	impacts of the mining and processing operation. While at this stage the determination of potential environmental impacts, particularly for a greenfields project, may not always be well advanced, the status of early consideration of these potential environmental impacts should be reported. Where these aspects have not been considered this should be reported with an explanation of the environmental assumptions made. was subjected to a rigorous study and was approved and permitted by the government of PNG in 2014. Bulk density Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for the assumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or dry, the frequency of the measurements, the nature, size and representativeness of the samples. The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit. Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation process of the different materials. This Release doesn’t consider a Mineral Resource Estimate. Classification The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into varying confidence categories. Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant factors (ie relative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of input data, confidence in continuity of geology and metal values, quality, quantity and distribution of the data). Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit. Mineralisation at Wayai Creek and appears to have continuity at the current drill spacing. Additional drilling however will change the shape and extents of the mineralisation which is yet to be closed off at depth and to some extent along strike. Geological information still needs to be compiled and incorporated into a 3D geological model which my aid in interpretating the mineralisation. The deposits and mineral occurrence were drilled from 1990 to 2022 and QA/QC does not exist for all drilling. Channel samples were used for domaining and estimation and presumably this data is of lower quality than RC/diamond drilling. Currently, no density data exists for the Little MacKenzie mineral occurrence or Wayai Creek deposit. Given the above factors the Competent Person considers that an Inferred classification is appropriate. None of the currently defined resource is unclassified. Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral Resource estimates. This release does not however consider a Mineral Resource Estimate, however as referenced in the main body of this release an initial mineral resource estimate was completed for Wayai Creek (Refer ASX announcement on 13 August 2024 for full details including JORC tables “Mineral Resource increased to 1.67 Moz as growth strategy delivers early results”.), no further reviews have been completed. Discussion of relative accuracy/ confidence Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and confidence level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of statistical or geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the resource within stated confidence limits,or,if such an approach is not deemed This release does not however consider a Mineral Resource Estimate

32

	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors that could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate. The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to technical and economic evaluation. Documentation should include assumptions made and the procedures used. These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate should be compared with production data, where available.
	Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
	appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors that could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate. The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to technical and economic evaluation. Documentation should include assumptions made and the procedures used. These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate should be compared with production data, where available.

33