AI assistant
GBM RESOURCES LIMITED. — Capital/Financing Update 2012
Apr 11, 2012
64966_rns_2012-04-11_2372451f-2fd6-49e4-a935-0f67b427a151.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [154 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [101 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
ABN 91 124 752 745
----- End of picture text -----
ASX Announcement
ASX Code: GBZ
12 April 2012
GBM RESOURCES FURTHER EXPANDS “FLAGSHIP” MILO IOCG - REE DEPOSIT IN QUEENSLAND
Key Highlights:
-
Scout holes MIL012 and 13 confirm northern extension of system beyond the resource outline.
-
MIL012 returned 25m @ 1% Cu Eq; including 9m @ 2% Cu Eq with rare earth elements of 24m @ 2457ppm and 18m @ 1460ppm of TREEYO.
-
Drilling has now recommenced at Milo to further test the North and South extensions of the system.
-
Current Holes MIL014 and 15 testing the southern extension show strong sulphide mineralisation and potential to extend the resource outline south.
-
Milo Scoping Study on track.
Australian resources company GBM Resources Limited (ASX: GBZ ) (“ GBM ” or “the Company ”) is pleased to provide an update of activities at the Milo IOCG-REE deposit in the North West Mineral Province of Queensland.
Drilling has recommenced with the objective of extending the previously announced maiden inferred resource of 103Mt at an average grade of 760ppm TREEYO, containing an estimated 83,500 tonnes of total rare earth elements and yttrium oxide (TREEYO) (refer ASX release 29 February 2012). Drilling will test both to the north and south sides of the current resource boundary. Improvements to access tracks completed prior to the end of the 2011 field season, has enabled the company to gain early access in 2012. A diamond drill rig was mobilised to site during March to commence the 2012 programme.
This early work has already shown promise. Field logging of Hole MIL014 core indicates a broad zone of sulphide mineralisation extending for approximately 150 metres downhole from about 50 metres, including a zone of massive and semi-massive pyrite from 100 metres to 135 metres downhole (see Photograph 1). This mineralisation is located above previously drilled hole MIL001 which returned the best REE mineralisation encountered in drilling at Milo to date. In Hole MIL015 field observations highlight obvious chalcopyrite from 164m -169m (see Photograph 2). Assay results are expected during the June quarter.
Registered Office: Suite 8, 7 The Esplanade, Mt Pleasant, Western Australia 6153 Tel: (08)9316 9100 • Fax: (08)9315 5475 • Web: www.gbmr.com.au Exploration Office: 10 Parker Street, Castlemaine, Victoria 3450 Tel: (03) 5470 5033
Assay results have now been received for drill holes MIL012 and 013 which were completed in late December 2011. Both holes encountered broad zones of mineralisation confirming the northward extension of the system beyond the resource outline.
Significant results are summarised in the table below and illustrated in the plan view in the attached figure. Both holes were diamond drilled from surface at declinations of approximately 60[0] degrees toward 270[0] (Milo Grid). Samples were half NQ or HQ size core.
| Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
Hole ID Interval Length Cu Au Co Ag Mo U Cu Equiv Cut -off* m m % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % %CuEq |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL011 | 82 to 206 | 124 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 162 | 3.9 | 104 | 96 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| incl. 128 to 136 | 8 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 231 | 8.0 | 186 | 177 | 0.8 | 0.5 | |
| incl. 149 to 170 | 21 | 0.39 | 0.10 | 275 | 9.1 | 184 | 188 | 1.0 | 0.7 | |
| incl. 188 to 192 | 4 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 238 | 6.8 | 172 | 157 | 0.8 | 0.5 | |
| MIL012 | 41 to 66 | 25 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 330 | 1.7 | 131 | 257 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 55 to 64 | 9 | 0.66 | 0.22 | 637 | 3.3 | 253 | 571 | 2.0 | 1 | |
| 201 to 227 | 27 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 179 | 0.1 | 8 | 9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | |
| MIL013 | 49 o 71 | 22 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 108 | 0.7 | 66 | 67 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
Table; CuEq results summary for Milo drillholes MIL011 (reported previously), MIL012 and MIL013
| Hole ID | selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
selected from to interval CeO2 ppm La2O3 ppm Y2O3 ppm Dy2O3 ppm Eu2O3 ppm Nd2O3 ppm Pr2O3 ppm Tb2O3 ppm Yb2O3 ppm Other ppm TREEYO ppm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL011 | 81 | 273 | 192 | 208 | 168 | 54 | 7.6 | 4.4 | 67 | 20 | 1.3 | 3.9 | 27 | 561 |
| Incl. | 249 | 266 | 17 | 547 | 474 | 94 | 12.4 | 3.4 | 169 | 54 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 51 | 1411 |
| MIL012 | 41 | 65 | 24 | 848 | 18 | 167 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 66 | 26 | 3.6 | 19.8 | 461 | 2457 |
| MIL012 | 89 | 155 | 66 | 129 | 61 | 32 | 5.6 | 1.4 | 47 | 13 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 21 | 313 |
| MIL012 | 202 | 220 | 18 | 654 | 455 | 81 | 12.2 | 4.0 | 149 | 47 | 2.4 | 4.9 | 50 | 1460 |
Table; significant TREEYO intersections from recent drillholes. ( note complete REE results not available for hole MIL013).
| LREEO | HREEY | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Others | |||||||||||
| CeO2 | La2O3 | Nd2O3 | Pr2O3 | Sm2O3 | Eu2O3 | Gd2O3 | Y2O3 | Dy2O3 | Er2O3 | (ppm, t) | |
| REEYO Prices (US$/t) | 24,500 | 24,000 | 130,000 | 130,000 | 86,000 | 3,010,000 | 103,000 | 130,000 | 1,160,000 | N/A | |
| (metalpages 5 April 2012) |
Table: available REE prices (red denotes elements in critical undersupply, US Dept. of Energy, Dec 2011: Critical Materials Strategy) .
==> picture [429 x 189] intentionally omitted <==
Photograph 1: massive sulphides (largely pyrite) in wet drill core from 132 metres in drill hole MD014 (NQ2 drill core, diameter 53mm).
==> picture [478 x 209] intentionally omitted <==
Photograph 2: Hole MIL015 showing obvious chalcopyrite from 164m-169m
GBM Resources is also pleased to report that the Milo Scoping Study is on track to be to be completed by mid-year. The Study covers the key activities of:
-
Delineation of a maiden copper equivalent resource;
-
Metallurgical testing for both the copper equivalent and rare earth elements;
-
Preliminary mine and processing plane design; and
-
Financial modelling to demonstrate commercialisation of the Milo ore body.
This will provide the basis to lead into the next development phase for Milo - the Pre-feasibility Study to be undertaken in the second half of this year.
For further information please contact:
Peter Thompson Managing Director GBM Resources Limited Tel: 08 9316 9100
Colin Hay Professional Public Relations (PPR) Tel: 0404 683355 E: [email protected]
==> picture [428 x 600] intentionally omitted <==
Abbreviations: REE(O) Rare Earth Elements(oxides) . There are 14 rare earth elements; Lanthanum (La), Cerium (Ce), Praseodymium (Pr), Neodymium (Nd), Samarium (Sm), Europium (Eu), Gadolinium (Gd), Terbium (Tb), Dysprosium (Dy), Holmium (Ho), Erbium (Er), Thulium (Tm), Ytterbium (Yb), Lutetium (Lu) but excluding Promethium (Pm). TREEY(O) Total Rare Earth element and Yttrium (oxides) (Yttrium (Y) is not always considered as a Rare Earth Element but does have many similar properties CuEq Copper Equivalent, as defined in Note 1 below.
Reference Notes
- [1] Copper Equivalent calculation represents the total metal value for each metal, multiplied by the conversion factor, summed and expressed in equivalent copper percentage. These results are exploration results only and no allowance is made for recovery losses that may occur should mining eventually result. However it is the company’s opinion that elements considered here have a reasonable potential to be recovered. It should also be noted that current state and federal legislation may impact any potential future extraction of Uranium. Prices and conversion factors used are summarised below, rounding errors may occur.
| Commodity | Price | Units | unit value | unit | Conversion factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (unit value/Cu % value) | |||||||
| copper | 6836 | US$/t | 68.36 | US$/% | 1.0000 | ||
| gold | 1212 | US$/oz | 38.97 | US$/ppm | 0.5700 | ||
| cobalt | 40000 | US$/t | 0.04 | US$/ppm | 0.0006 | ||
| silver | 18 | $/oz | 0.58 | US$/ppm | 0.0085 | ||
| uranium | 40 | US$/lb | 0.08 | US$/ppm | 0.0012 | ||
| molybdenum | 38000 | US$/t | 0.04 | US$/ppm | 0.0006 |
- [2] Intersections quoted are length weighted averages of results for individual sample intervals. Samples were taken at 1 metre intervals in RC drilling by multistage splitter and generally 1 metre intervals of half sawn core with maximum of 2 metres for diamond drilling. Analyses were completed by ALS in Mt Isa for all elements other than gold by MEMS61r, over limit (>1%) Cu by Cu-OG46 and AU by Au-AA25 in Brisbane. Holes generally range in declination from 50[0] to 70[O] to 225[0] MGA at Milo. Mineralised zones are interpreted to dip steeply in the opposite direction, holes are therefore drilled approximately perpendicular to the interpreted strike of mineralised zones.
The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Kerrin Allwood, who is a Member or Fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Allwood is a full-time employee of the Geomodelling Pty. Ltd a New Zealand based consultancy. Mr Allwood has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Allwood consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Neil Norris, who is a Member or Fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Norris is a full-time employee of the company. Mr Norris has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Norris consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.