GATEWAY MINING LIMITED - Capital/Financing Update 2025

==> picture [146 x 89] intentionally omitted <==

ASX Announcement ASX: GML

30 June 2025

Acquisition of Yandal Gold Project from Strickland Metals Ltd

Gateway to acquire Strickland’s Yandal Gold Project for $45 million in GML equity

HIGHLIGHTS

Binding Agreement signed for the purchase of Strickland Metals Limited’s (ASX:STK) 400,400 oz Au Yandal Gold Project[1] .
The total consideration payable to Strickland is $45 million in Gateway shares; Strickland to distribute 80% of the consideration shares to existing Strickland shareholders.
The Yandal Gold Project currently contains a JORC 2012 Inferred Resource of 8.17Mt @ 1.52g/t Au for 400,400 Au,[1] with excellent potential to significantly expand the Resource.
The initial focus of work on the Yandal Project will be to progress the Mining Licence application for the Horse Well resource (291,500 oz Au) that Strickland had already started – several possible toll treating options within the region.
Drilling of the intrusive-related gold targets at Dusk ‘til Dawn identified by Strickland planned for late 2025 / early 2026.
Subject to shareholder approval by both Gateway and Strickland shareholders, the transaction is expected to complete by the second half of August.
Gateway remains well capitalised to undertake planned 2025 and 2026 exploration, with cash and liquid ASX listed securities of approximately $13.6m, as at the end of the March quarter.

1 Refer to “Table 1: Yandal Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate” and Appendix C within this announcement for further details regarding the Yandal Estimate, as well as Strickland Metals Limited’s ASX announcement dated 31 March 2025.

Gateway’s Executive Chairman, Mr Peter Langworthy, said: “I have had significant involvement with the Yandal asset in recent years, and am delighted that Gateway has secured the Yandal Project and can now focus on various development options in what is a highly strategic part of the West Australian goldfields. The project’s advancement will be pursued alongside our existing Montague and Barrelmaker projects at Sandstone.

The initial focus at Yandal will be to progress the Mining Licence application which Strickland has already commenced. Strickland’s work to date has defined a 400,400 oz Au resource[1] , which is an excellent platform from which to also build a more substantial resource inventory. Both Strickland and Gateway’s technical work has identified several areas that warrant drill testing, notably the intrusive related gold targets at Dusk ‘til Dawn. It is expected these targets will be drilled later this year or in early 2026.”

Gateway Mining Limited (ASX: GML) ( Gateway or Company ) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a binding tenement sale agreement ( Agreement ) with Strickland Metals Limited (ASX: STK) ( Strickland ) to acquire Strickland’s interest in the Yandal Gold Project in Western Australia ( Acquisition ).

The Acquisition is subject to shareholder approval from both Gateway and Strickland shareholders.

The Yandal Gold Project contains a JORC 2012 Inferred Resource totalling 8.17Mt @ 1.52g/t Au for 400,400oz Au[1] with additional significant exploration potential.

The tenements which make up the Yandal Gold Project are listed in Appendix A ( Tenements ), and further information with respect to the Yandal Gold Project’s Mineral Resource Estimates and Exploration Results are set out in Appendices C and D.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Yandal Gold Project, Western Australia

The Yandal Gold Project covers 1,780 square kilometres of the prospective eastern flank of the Yandal Greenstone Belt in the northeastern Yilgarn of Western Australia.

Gateway believes that the entire eastern extent of the Yandal Greenstone belt is relatively underexplored, with less than 6 kilometres of the total 75 kilometres Greenstone Belt, having been covered by modern exploration techniques.

==> picture [470 x 475] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1. Strickland's Yandal Project, highlighting the key target areas in relation to the key gold and base metal prospects.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Yandal Project JORC 2012 Inferred Resource

The Yandal Gold Project contains a JORC 2012 Inferred Resource of 8.17Mt @ 1.52g/t Au for 400,400 oz Au ( MRE ).

Table 1: Yandal Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate

Prospect	Tonnes(t)	Au(g/t)	Au(oz)	Cut-off
Palomino Pit	1,963,000	1.84	116,000	0.5
Palomino UG	155,000	2.69	13,500	2.0
Palomino Total	2,118,000	1.90	129,500	-
Warmblood	1,656,000	2.37	126,000	0.5
Filly	581,000	1.15	21,500	0.5
Bronco	324,000	1.38	14,500	0.5
HWGC Subtotal	4,679,000	1.94	291,500	-
Dusk 'til Dawn	3,495,600	1.00	108,900	0.5
Yandal Project Total	8,174,600	1.52	400,400

Table Notes:

Mineral Resources are based on JORC Code Definitions as defined by the Australasian Code for Reporting Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.
All figures are rounded to reflect appropriate levels of confidence. Apparent differences may occur due to rounding.
The Mineral Resource Estimate has been estimated using appropriate high-grade cuts, minimum mining widths and dilutions.
Tonnes rounded to the nearest 1,000t, ounces rounded to the nearest 500oz.
Refer to Appendix C for further information.

Horse Well Gold Camp Resource

The Horse Well Gold Camp is a large-scale gold system consisting of a series of what are now believed to be a network of interconnected mineralised structures. The gold mineralised system has currently been defined over a strike length of 4 kilometres. However, it is clear that the system has strong potential to extend for at least the same distance under transported cover to the north where previous shallow drilling is deemed to be largely ineffective (Figure 2).

The Project is adjacent to Northern Star’s Yandal Operations Centre, with the Horse Well Gold Camp located within 50km of the Jundee Gold Mine.

The Warmblood and Palomino Gold Deposits are currently the most advanced prospects within the broader Horse Well Gold Camp.

Drilling by Strickland in 2024 at the Horse Well Gold Camp continued to delineate extensions to mineralisation both along strike and at depth, with significant results received from the Warmblood, Palomino, Bronco and Marwari Gold Deposits (Figure 3).

Future drilling will focus on depth extensions at the Warmblood (Figure 4) and Palomino (Figure 5) Deposits, where the pit optimisation was restricted by the drilling depth and extent, with high-grade mineralisation present at the bottom of the pit shell and remaining completely open at depth and down plunge. Additional drilling will also be conducted along the 1.6km-long Marwari Trend, with a view of adding the high-grade currently unclassified mineralisation at the Marwari and Filly North prospects into a future resource upgrade. Mineralised gold trends identified through AC drilling, including the 3km Bronco-Konik Trend and 1.6km Marwari trend, remain open along strike to the north where they trend undercover. The MRE currently covers a combined 2.3km of strike length, with over 10km of the mineralised strike length of gold trends yet to be tested by RC or Diamond drilling. This will be the focus of future exploration at the Horse Well Gold Camp.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [413 x 682] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2. Schematic geological interpretation of the Horse Well Gold Camp .

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [466 x 658] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3. Horse Well Gold Camp topographic map showing mineralisation included in the MRE (dark red), unclassified mineralisation outside the MRE (blue) and mineralised trends delineated from AC drilling (pale red). Target zones for future drilling shown by yellow boxes.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [489 x 240] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4. Warmblood Deposit Long Section A: Significant gold intercepts in relation to the 2024 mineralisation model (red) and optimised pit (dark blue linework). Note the lack of drilling below the pit optimisation extent, where mineralisation remains open.

==> picture [489 x 240] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5. Palomino Deposit Long Section B: Significant gold intercepts in relation to the 2024 mineralisation model (red) and optimised pit (dark blue linework).

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Mining Licence Application

The Company has lodged a Mining Licence application for the Horse Well Gold Camp and will progress the application as a matter of priority. Upcoming work at the immediate Horse Well Gold Camp will include environmental and Native Title surveys.

Receipt of a Mining Licence is a critical step for unlocking significant value within the Horse Well Gold Camp and will pave the way for continued advancement of the project.

Updates will be provided in due course as the Mining Licence application advances.

Dusk 'til Dawn Resource

Strickland commissioned consulting group Trepanier to complete a JORC Mineral Resource Estimate for gold mineralisation at Dusk ‘til Dawn (Figure 6). Drilling is sufficiently detailed to enable geological and grade modelling to be completed with confidence.

Based on the work completed, an Inferred Mineral Resource above a cut-off of 0.5 g/t Au is defined over a 400metre strike and to a depth of 200 metres and includes:

3,495,600 tonnes at 1.0 g/t Au for 108,900 ounces, including:
Higher grade of 987,400 tonnes at 1.6 g/t Au for 51,800 ounces above a cut-off of 1.0g/t Au.

The Dusk ‘til Dawn prospect hosts Archaean granitoids and intermediate volcanics/volcaniclastics metamorphosed to upper greenschist–lower amphibolite facies. Dusk ‘til Dawn sits in a magnetic low adjacent to a NNW-trending magnetic high along the western margin of a granitoid body. Finely laminated, magnetiterich horizons within the volcanics/volcaniclastics form stratigraphic layers with significant strike continuity, likely responsible for the regional magnetic highs.

The Dusk ‘til Dawn prospect sits within a broad shear zone-hosted orogenic gold system, marked by abundant (biotite) potassic alteration, a strong planar fabric, high sulphidation, and magnetite destruction - evidence of the significant hydrothermal alteration of the inner mineralised zone. Metamorphosed intermediate volcanics/volcaniclastics, of dacitic-andesitic composition, and minor magnetite-rich chemical sediments (BIF) are host to the most significant gold mineralisation, though mineralised granitoids have also been intersected.

Future drilling will target west of the 108,900 oz resource, following up a 750 m coherent gold corridor identified by 2024 aircore drilling. Most anomalous gold was detected at end-of-holes (except HWAC1982, which was entirely oxide), with no fresh rock intersected. The primary mineralised western structure remains untested in fresh rock and is open down-dip and down-plunge. Drilling will focus on the interpreted intersection of the two sub-parallel shear zones. The target area also offers potential for multiple stacked lodes.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [426 x 292] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6. Dusk ‘til Dawn 108.9koz Resource Model coloured by Au ppm.

Exploration Strategy

Orogenic Gold Targeting

The Gateway team considers the Yandal Project to remain largely underexplored, noting that historical shallow, vertical RAB and aircore drilling often failed to penetrate the weathered overburden and was analysed for gold only. For example, the gold mineralised system across Horse Well has currently been defined over a strike length of 4 kilometres, however it is clear that the system (based on geophysical datasets) has strong potential to extend for at least the same distance under transported cover to the north where previous shallow drilling is deemed to be largely ineffective.

In addition to this historic drilling, large areas of residual outcrop have not been geologically mapped or sampled. The initial focus for the team is to undertake detailed mapping and sampling of these area, while testing areas to the north of Horse Well with close spaced, angled aircore drilling for both gold and multi element analysis.

The aim from this work is to build a comprehensive geological model across the Project, while at the same time, undertake effective low-cost exploration to expand the existing 400,000oz mineral inventory.

Gateway’s maiden drilling campaign at Yandal is expected to commence later this year or early 2026.

Dusk ‘til Dawn IRG targets

The Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp has always been an area of interest for Strickland, given the Dusk ‘til Dawn 108,900 oz Au Mineral Resource[3] and expansive historic aircore drilling that has delineated several areas of significant gold mineralisation.

Two significant bottom-of-hole (>0.1g/t Au) gold trends span a total combined strike length of 7.5 kilometres, that to date have only been tested with wide spaced shallow aircore drilling (Figure 7).

3Refer to “Table 1: Yandal Inferred Mineral Resource Estimates” and Appendix C of this announcement for further details regarding the Yandal Mineral Resource.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Recently, the Strickland team focused on re-logging the bottom-of-hole chips across both trends and identified laterally extensive propylitic alteration. This type of alteration is typical of the alteration assemblage around large intrusion-related gold (IRG) deposits. The alteration is spatially associated with geochemical zonation characterised by an inner zone of gold-molybdenum-copper-bismuth-tellurium anomalism, zoning outwards to silver-antimony-lead-zinc-arsenic anomalism. Geochemical zonation such as this is a common characteristic of IRG systems.

In conjunction with the above work, gravity inversion modelling was completed with the aim of potentially mapping intrusive units at depth.

The results from this work are extremely encouraging, with both the geochemically significant Au-Mo-Cu-Bi-Te assemblage and propylitic alteration corridors underlain by deeper modelled low gravity units. Importantly these features are untested to date and are interpreted to be the intrusives at the core of the hydrothermal system that are driving both the alteration and coincident anomalism.

Based on this independent modelling, the peak alteration and geochemical responses from historic shallow aircore drilling are located at the surface projection of these gravity features, representing compelling targets for drill-testing to be carried out by Gateway following completion of the Acquisition.

==> picture [457 x 309] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7. Shallow Au-Mo-Bi geochemical trends in relation to the 3D gravity inversion models.

An initial four hole diamond program is expected to commence at Dusk ‘til Dawn later this year or early 2026.

Iroquois Project, Western Australia

As part of the Acquisition, the Company will also acquire Strickland’s Iroquois Project. The Iroquois Project area is located to the north of the Company’s Yandal Project, Western Australia. The project is subject to a joint venture, 80% of which is held by Strickland who is also the manager of the Joint Venture.

The Earaheedy Basin margin is emerging as a significant new mineralised province and is highly prospective for zinc-lead discoveries. Strickland controls approximately 30 kilometres of strike in the region.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Terms of the Acquisition

On satisfaction of the conditions precedent and completion of the Acquisition, the Company will issue to Strickland 1,500,000,000 in convertible preference shares in Gateway ( GML CP Shares ), worth $45 million, based on Gateway’s 15 day volume weighted average share price (VWAP) of $0.03 per share as of 25 June 2025.

The GML CP Shares are convertible preference shares with limited voting rights which will automatically convert into fully paid ordinary shares in Gateway on a one for one basis following completion of an In-specie Distribution to eligible Strickland shareholders holding shares on a yet to be determined record date ( In-specie Distribution ). The full terms and conditions of the CP Shares are set out in Appendix B of this announcement.

Completion of the Acquisition is subject to:

(a) the assumption and assignment of Strickland’s obligations under a number of existing joint venture agreements and private royalties associated with the Yandal Project Tenements, and subject to any consents being obtained and the waiver of any pre-emptive rights under these agreements;
(b) Gateway obtaining shareholder approval for the issue of the GML CP Shares;
(c) Strickland obtaining shareholder approval for the In-specie Distribution;
(d) any third party approvals and consents required to be obtained prior to the transfer of the Tenements to Gateway; and
(e) no material adverse event occurring that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on Gateway or the price of Gateway shares, that in turn, results in a materially adverse taxation consequence for Strickland or any eligible shareholder under the In-specie Distribution, as determined by Strickland.

(collectively, the Conditions ).

ASX has confirmed that Listing Rules 11.1.2 and 11.1.3 do not apply to the Acquisition. Also, Listing Rule 10.1 does not apply to the Acquisition (see further below on management of director conflicts).

The Conditions must be satisfied or waived within 90 days of execution of the Agreement (or such later date as is agreed).

1,200,000,000 GML CP Shares will be distributed to Strickland shareholders (representing approximately 63.0% of the fully paid ordinary shares on issue in Gateway post Acquisition) and Strickland will retain 300,000,000 GML CP Shares (representing approximately 15.7% of the fully paid ordinary shares on issue in Gateway post Acquisition).

The GML CP Shares will automatically convert into fully paid ordinary shares in Gateway on a one for one basis on the business day after the In-specie Distribution is complete.

Conflict Management Procedure

Gateway acknowledges the following:

Mr Trent Franklin is a non-executive director of both Gateway and Strickland. Mr Franklin is also a shareholder of both Gateway and Strickland – his participation in the In-specie Distribution is subject to Gateway shareholder approval under Listing Rule 10.11. Mr Franklin has not been involved in any negotiations in relation to the Acquisition and has not been present at, or participated or voted on, any consideration by the board of the Acquisition.

Mr Peter Langworthy is the current Executive Chairman of Gateway and is a past non-executive director of Strickland (until 14 March 2025). Mr Langworthy is also a shareholder of both Gateway and Strickland – his participation in the In-specie Distribution is subject to Gateway shareholder approval under Listing Rule 10.11. Mr Langworty has assisted the independent directors in an advisory capacity, and at their request. This is because of Mr Langworthy’s longstanding knowledge of the Yandal Project through years of involvement with the asset.

Mr Langworthy and Mr Franklin have abstained from voting on all matters relating to the Acquisition at Gateway Board meetings.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

The independent directors of Gateway Mr Peter Lester and Mr David Crook were responsible for negotiating the Acquisition on behalf of Gateway.

The Company will keep the market updated as the Acquisition progresses.

The Company requests that its securities are reinstated to official quotation with immediate effect.

This released has been authorised by:

Peter Langworthy Executive Chairman

For and on behalf of GATEWAY MINING LIMITED

Investors Media Peter Langworthy Nicholas Read Executive Chairman Read Corporate T: 08 6383 9969 T: 08 9388 1474 or Kar Chua Company Secretary T: 02 8316 3998

Click here to subscribe to investor updates

Follow us on: LinkedIn: @gateway-mining Twitter: @gateway_mining

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

– Yandal Gold Project MRE Other Material Information Summary

A summary of other material information pursuant to ASX Listing Rules 5.8.1 is provided below for the Horse Well Gold Camp and Dusk ‘til Dawn Mineral Resource Estimates. The Assessment and Reporting Criteria in accordance with the 2012 JORC Code and Guidelines are presented in Appendix C (JORC Table 1, Sections 1 to 3) to this announcement. Significant intercepts for Yandal Project drilling are listed in Appendix D.

Geology and Geological Interpretation

The Horse Well Project is located in the Eastern Goldfields portion of the Yilgarn Craton, on the northeastern ‘Millrose’ arm of the Yandal Greenstone Belt. This Archaean greenstone belt predominantly comprises a steeply dipping series of tholeiitic basalts, mafic volcaniclastics, ultramafic rocks, felsic volcanic rocks and sediments surrounded by younger Archaean granitoids. Transported cover is prevalent with aeolian sand plains, alluvial flood plains and minor colluvium. The Horse Well Gold Camp is concealed under approximately 5-10m of transported cover, with outcropping sparse greenstone that displays a deep weathering profile. The topography is of generally low relief, with low granite hills to the east and a small siliceous ridge along the granite-greenstone boundary.

The Warmblood-Filly-Palomino prospects lie at a widening of the greenstone belt and diverging stratigraphy at the northern end of two adjacent large external granitoids. The dominant lithotype in the prospect area is fine grained metasediments with intercalated basalt, ultramafic and felsic units. In the south, tholeiitic and highmagnesian basalts predominate. The Celia Shear Zone is located on the eastern edge of the Belt, with NWtrending splay faults that appear to be closely associated with gold mineralisation in the Prospect area, probably as an existing zone of weakness that has been reactivated. The area is dominated by a series of NW-trending magnetic units, which are reflective of the stacked imbricate thrust faulting system that controls mineralisation.

Drilling Techniques and Hole Spacing

Horse Well Gold Camp

Since gold mineralisation was discovered at the Horse Well Project in 1993, it has been owned and operated by several previous companies, including Eagle Mining, Great Central Mines, Doray, and Strickland Metals (formerly Alloy Resources). The table below sets out the companies that operated on the Project, their years of operation, and the type, number, and metres drilled (Table 2).

Table 2: Holes drilled at the Horse Well Gold Camp by Company.

Company	Year	Drillhole Type	Number of Holes	Metres
Eagle Mining	1993-1997	Diamond Drilling	2	228
		Reverse Circulation	227	28,266
Great Central Mines	1999-2000	Reverse Circulation	22	6,050
DorayMinerals	2016	Reverse Circulation	2	210
Strickland Metals (formerly Alloy Resources)	2011-2024	Reverse Circulation	231	29,014
		Diamond Drilling	48	11,271
Total			532	75,040

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

All drill collars were surveyed using a differential global positioning system (DGPS). Most holes have downhole surveys, which include Eastman single-shot, electronic multi-shot, or gyroscopic surveys. Two holes could not be surveyed at the Palomino deposit due to hole collapses, and 36 holes at Warmblood/Filly were not surveyed due to unknown reasons. The historic drilling information with the respective metadata has been loaded into the Strickland Metals SQL database. This database is managed by an external database management company, Mitchell River Group.

Drill spacing on the rotated local grids varies by deposit: Palomino has been predominantly drilled at 25mX x 25mY spacing, with recent Strickland drilling to the northwest along strike completed at 25mX x 40mY; Warmblood has been drilled at 25mX x 40mY, with recent Strickland drilling to the northwest and down plunge completed at 40mX x 80mY; Bronco has been drilled at multiple orientations across each program, with average spacing of 25mX x 25mY; and Filly Central has been drilled at a nominal 50mX x 50mY spacing. Drilling of outside of the MRE that makes up the unclassified mineralisation has been drilled at 40mX x 40mY at the Marwari Prospect, and 40mX x 100mY at all other prospects.

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Drilling at Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp commenced in 2013 by Alloy Resources (later Strickland Metals) and Doray Minerals, in Joint Venture between 2014-2015. At Dusk ‘til Dawn, a total of 90 aircore (AC) for 4,758m, 39 reverse circulation (RC) holes for 7,583m and one diamond hole for 298.8m have been drilled. The drilling programs have been carried out by Alloy Resource and Doray Minerals over a period between 2013 and 2018. Of these holes drilled one AC, one diamond and 26 RC holes have been used in the Mineral Resource Estimate. The table below sets out the companies that operated on the Project, their years of operation, and the type, number, and metres drilled (Table 3).

Table 3: Holes drilled at the Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp by Company.

Company	Year	Drillhole Type	Number of Holes	Metres
Strickland Metals (formerly Alloy Resources)	2013 -2018	Aircore	26	1,716
		Reverse Circulation	14	2,022
Doray Minerals	2014-2015	Aircore	64	3,042
		Reverse Circulation	25	5,561
		Diamond Drilling	1	298.8
Total			130	12,639.8

All drill collars were surveyed using a global positioning system (GPS). Reverse circulation and diamond drillholes were downhole surveyed using a reflex gyroscopic tool. An external database management company, Mitchell River Group, manages this database.

Drilling spacing is on a nominal 40mX x 50mY grid.

Sampling and Sub-Sampling Techniques

Horse Well Gold Camp

The sample information used in resource estimation was derived from reverse circulation and diamond drilling. Aircore and RAB holes were drilled through the different resources; these were used to assist in the interpretation but were excluded from the estimation.

The Horse Well Gold Camp has been subject to many different drill programs, each using slightly different variations in drilling, assay laboratory, sampling and QAQC protocols. Generally, for RC drilling, samples were collected at 1m intervals using an inline rig-mounted cyclone and split using a 75:25 riffle splitter or a cone splitter in later programs. The reject samples were collected in green bags and piled neatly on the drill pad. Four-metre composites were collected in anticipated unmineralised areas using a spear and submitted to the laboratory. If the sample returned a gold grade of 0.1g/t, the original 1-metre split calico bag was collected and submitted for assay.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

For diamond holes, the core was cut in half using an automatic core saw. Half was sent for assay, and the other half was retained for future use. Diamond drilling is sampled at geological intervals ranging from 0.1m to 2m for early programs, and 0.5-1.2m by Strickland Metals.

The most frequently used sample interval at the Yandal Project is 1m.

All RC holes were sampled, logged and assayed in accordance with industry standards at the time of drilling. The RC chips were logged geologically for lithology, mineralisation, veining, alteration and/or weathering, where inconsistency in logging was identified, the holes have been relogged to the current understanding of the Project.

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

RC drilling was completed using face sampling hammers of either 5 ½” or 5 ¾” (140mm – 146mm) diameter. One-metre samples were recovered via cyclone under high pressure and split using a riffle splitter from an original 35 kg to a 2-3 kg sample for laboratory submission. Duplicate sampling was completed every 25 samples by Strickland Metals and every 50th sample by Doray Minerals. The sample splitter was cleaned at the end of each rod to ensure no sample hang-ups have occurred. During drilling the geologist recorded occasions when sample quality was poor, sample return was low, or when the sample was contaminated or compromised in any way.

Diamond Drilling was completed using HQ sized core. Core was orientated relative to the bottom of the hole with metre marks determined from the driller’s blocks and core loss determined from the distance drilled against the length of core collected. HQ Core was sawn to quarter core in one metre intervals; one quarter sent for analysis, one quarter retained in the core library.

Sample Analysis Method

Horse Well Gold Camp

Samples have been assayed in six different laboratories: Australian Assay Laboratory Group, Leonora Laverton Assay Laboratory, Analabs, Minanalytical, ALS Chemex, and Intertek. The method of analysis varied depending on the company and program. (Table 4).

Quality assurance procedures and quality control samples were sparse in the historic drilling completed by Eagle Mining and Great Central Mines. However, from 2006 onwards, quality assurance procedures were implemented, and quality control samples, which included certified reference material, blanks, and field duplicates, were incorporated.

Table 4: Sample Analysis Methods at the Horse Well Gold Camp.

Analysis Method	Eagle Mining	Great Central Mines	Doray Minerals	Strickland Metals
Aqua Regia with AAS Finish	27576	2635	-	136
Aqua Regia with ICPMS Finish	-	-	-	6
Fire Assaywith AAS Finish	262	-	210	-
Fire Assay30gwith unknown Finish	651	-	-	-
Fire Assaywith ICPES Finish	-	-	-	25223
Fire Assay25gwith ICPES Finish	-	-	-	12
Fire Assay50gwith Gravimetric Finish	-	-	-	35
Fire AssayOre Grade with AAS Finish	-	-	-	638
Photon Assay	-	-	-	3953
Unknown method and analysis	-	-	-	66

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Primary analysis of drilling samples collected by Alloy Resources were undertaken by ALS Laboratories in Perth, whilst all Doray samples (Dusk ‘til Dawn only) were assayed by Minanalytical Laboratories in Perth.

Samples were collected directly from the drill rig under the custody of Alloy Resources or Doray Minerals where they were collected in a tied numbered calico bag, grouped into larger polyweave bags and cable tied. Polyweave bags are placed into larger Bulky Bags with a sample submission sheet and tied shut. Consignment notes and delivery address details were written on the side of the bag and delivered to McMahon Burnett Transport in Wiluna.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

These samples were delivered to the laboratories where their sample security procedures were followed.

Dusk ‘til Dawn samples taken by Alloy Resources were assayed at ALS Laboratories (Perth) using Aqua Regia (2012 AC program) and Fire Assay with ICP_MS finish (RC programs) to detection limits of 0.01 and 0.001 ppm, respectively. Samples taken by Doray Minerals were analysed at Minanalytical Laboratories (Perth) by aqua-regia digest and finished with ICP-MS at 1m intervals for multi-element assays, and 25 g Fire assay with AAS finish for gold assays.

Certified Reference Material (CRM) is included at a rate of 1 per 50 samples for all assay submissions. Duplicate field samples for the RC drilling were routinely inserted by Alloy Resources at a 1 per 25 sample ratio (Doray Minerals sampling 1 duplicate per 50 samples). CRM and laboratory checks have been assessed. Analysis of the QC samples showed that the CRMs submitted with the samples show results within acceptable tolerances and there were no significant differences between CRMs analysed by ALS or Minanalytical.

Cut-off Grades

Horse Well Gold Camp

The sample composites in the mineralised domains and unmineralised waste have been reviewed on a domainby-domain basis. In domains with a co-efficient of variation (CV) approaching and greater than 2.0, histograms and log-probability plots have been used to identify the influence of extreme values and determine the impact of top-cutting and the values at which top-cuts should be applied. Top-cutting has been applied to sample composites in nine (9) domains.

The Resource has been reported as both in-pit and potential underground. The in-pit resources have been reported using a cut-off grade of 0.5g/t Au within an optimised AUD $4,000/oz Au pit.

For the potential underground resource, a cut-off of 2.0g/t Au has been used to report the resource below the AUD $4,000/oz Au optimised open pit. Potential underground resource has only been reported at Palomino.

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Top-cuts were decided by completing an outlier analysis using a combination of methods including grade histograms, log probability plots and other statistical tools. Based on this statistical analysis of the data population, some top-cuts were applied and typically varied between 12.5 ppm and 17.5 ppm. Some domains did not require top-cutting.

A simple cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au was selected based on industry standard practise and the fact that it was a maiden Inferred Resource for the Dusk ‘til Dawn prospect.

Estimation methodology

Horse Well Gold Camp

Three-dimensional wireframes were created to constrain the mineralisation to the block model. Micromine software was utilised for wireframing ore and weathering profiles. The mineralisation wireframe models for the Horse Well Gold Camp were constructed based on a 0.3g/t Au cut-off grade using sectional interpretation and visualisation of the mineralisation in three dimensions, using a combination of sectional mineralisation strings and 3D wireframes generated with the Micromine software implicit vein modeller module. Geological logging and structural measurements from drillholes have been used to guide mineralisation interpretation and subsequent mineralisation wireframe modelling. In total, 124 individual domain wireframes were created.

Grade estimation for gold was completed by Ordinary Kriging using Micromine software. Five different rotated block models were created for the Horse Well Gold Camp to reflect the orientation of different orebodies. The Palomino resource was rotated -18°, Warmblood -22°, Filly +18°, Marwari no rotation, and Bronco -60°. The parent block size used for estimation was 5mX, 12.5mY, and 5mZ. A sub-block size of 1mX, 1.25mY, and 1mZ was used to reflect the geometry of the wireframes.

Variography was undertaken on domains in Snowden's Supervisor, and the variography was used to undertake Kriging neighbourhood analysis to optimise the block size, search distances and min/max sample numbers used. The block model grades were estimated using ordinary kriging (OK) grade interpolation techniques constrained within the mineralisation wireframes. All work was completed in the GDA/MGA coordinate system. Search ellipses were developed from variography.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

At the Palomino, Warmblood and Filly prospects, estimation was completed in three passes with the following parameters:

Pass 1: Search dimensions were based upon variogram limit with a minimum of 4 samples and a maximum of 20 samples, and a minimum of 3 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole.
Pass 2: Search ellipse expanded by 50% with a minimum of 4 samples and a maximum of 20 samples, and a minimum of 3 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole.
Pass 3: Search ellipse expanded by 100% with a minimum of 2 samples and a maximum of 20 samples, and a minimum of 1 drillhole with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole.

At Bronco, the estimation was completed in three passes with the following parameters:

Pass 1: Search dimensions were based upon variogram limit with a minimum of 4 samples and a maximum of 22-26 samples (dependent on domain), and a minimum of 3 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole.
Pass 2: Search ellipse expanded by 50% with a minimum of 4 samples and a maximum of 22-26 samples (dependent on domain), and a minimum of 3 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole.
Pass 3: Search ellipse expanded by 100% with a minimum of 2 samples and a maximum of 22-26 samples (dependent on domain), and a minimum of 1 drillhole with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole.

All estimation was completed at the parent cell scale.

The block model was validated using various techniques, including visual checking, domain assay versus block model grade, Swathe plots, and quantitative kriging measures.

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Three-dimensional mineralisation wireframes and weathering surfaces were created using Leapfrog software. Five primary and three supergene domains were defined on geological and grade distribution trends.

Estimation parameters were based on the variogram models, data geometry and kriging estimation statistics. Top cuts were decided by completing an outlier analysis using a combination of methods, including grade histograms, log probability plots and other statistical tools. Based on this statistical analysis of the data population, some top-cuts were applied and typically varied between 12.5ppm and 17.5ppm. Some domains did not require top-cutting.

Grade estimation was completed using Ordinary Kriging (“OK”) for Au using GEOVIA Surpac™ software. The estimate was estimated into 10m (E) x 10m (N) x 10m (RL) parent cells for Dusk ‘til Dawn, which has been subcelled to 0.5mX x 1.25mY x 0.625mZ to reflect the geometry of the wireframes.

Estimation parameters at Dusk ‘til Dawn were based on a three-pass strategy for grade estimation consisting of:

Pass 1: Search dimensions consisting of 60m in the major direction with a minimum of 6 samples and a maximum of 12 samples, and a minimum of 4 drillholes with a maximum of 4 samples per drillhole.
Pass 2: Search ellipse major direction expanded to 120m with a minimum of 6 samples and a maximum of 12 samples, and a minimum of 4 drillholes with a maximum of 4 samples per drillhole.
Pass 3: Search ellipse expanded to 1000m in the third pass to ensure that the vast majority of cells are estimated with a minimum of 6 samples and a maximum of 12 samples, and a minimum of 4 drill holes with a maximum of 4 samples per drill hole.

The block model was validated using various techniques, including visual checking, domain assay versus block model grade and Swathe plots.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Bulk Density

Horse Well Gold Camp

Bulk density readings were collected from diamond core at the Palomino and Warmblood deposits. 388 samples were collected at Palomino, and 128 samples were collected at Warmblood. From these samples average densities for oxidation profiles or rock type (transition and fresh rock) were assigned to the block model using the three-dimensional weathering model. No bulk density information has been collected at Filly and Bronco. For these deposits the Warmblood density for the different weathering profiles were assigned.

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

No bulk density samples have been measured at Dusk ‘til Dawn. The bulk density for oxide, transitional and fresh has been assumed from nearby comparable operations and assigned to the respective weathering horizons.

Classification Criteria

The Mineral Resource remains classified as Inferred in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC, 2012). This classification reflects the relative confidence in the estimate and considers the confidence in the geological interpretation, grade continuity, drilling spacing, historical data, quality assurance and quality control information, estimation passes, and other estimation parameters.

Horse Well Gold Camp

The in-pit classification for Palomino, Warmblood, Filly and Bronco was constrained to an AUD $4,000/oz Au optimised pit shell using estimation passes 1 and 2. For the potential underground resource at Palomino, the model was reported using a 2.0g/t Au cut off below the AUD $4,000/oz Au pit. The material that did not meet this criterion remains unclassified, including mineralisation at the Marwari prospect.

The Palomino and Warmblood resource close spaced drilling, 25mX x 25mY, was completed by Eagle Mining between 1993 and 1999. The assay results from this drilling cannot be verified due to lack of QA/QC information, therefore these resources are classified as inferred.

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

The Dusk ‘til Dawn Mineral Resources have been classified as Inferred based on confidence in the geological model, continuity of mineralised zones, drilling density, confidence in the underlying database and the available bulk density information.

The resource was reported at a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au which was based on industry standard practice for the type, location and size of the deposit.

Mining and Metallurgical Methods, Parameters and other modifying factors considered to date

Horse Well Gold Camp

Due to the from-surface nature of mineralisation and deep weathering profile, open-pit mining methods were considered to complete open-pit optimisations across the Horse Well Gold Camp Deposits at an AUD $4,000/oz gold price. The Resource Estimate is reported at a cut-off grade of 0.5g/t Au for in-pit constrained material at Warmblood, Palomino, Bronco and Filly. A cut-off of 2.0g/t Au has been applied to potential underground material at Palomino that is reflective of typical underground mining operation grades in Western Australia. No underground potential has been assessed outside of the open-pit optimisations at Warmblood, Filly and Bronco due to the resources being almost entirely contained within the optimised pits.

Metallurgical testwork was recently completed at the Horse Well Gold Camp on fresh rock samples from the Palomino Deposit showing gravity-recoverable gold recoveries up to 32.5% and total gold (gravity + cyanide leach) recoveries ranging between 78.5% and 88.6%. Drillhole details and metallurgical testwork results for each composite sample can be found in the Strickland ASX Announcement “Metallurgical Testwork Confirms High Gold Recovery at Horse Well Gold Camp” dated 13 March 2025.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

In March 2020, Alloy Resources undertook Metallurgical testwork on RC chip samples of oxide material from the Palomino Deposit showing total gold recovery, via gravity-amalgam and cyanide leaching, at 89.03% and 87.2%, respectively.

No metallurgical factors were considered in this Horse Well Gold Camp Resource Estimation, and no dilution factors were applied.

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

For Dusk ‘til Dawn, based on the orientations, thicknesses and depths to which the gold-bearing zones have been modelled, plus their estimated grades for Au, the potential mining method is considered to be open pit mining. Strickland Metals selected twenty mineralised pulp samples from Dusk ‘til Dawn hole ACDD001 in fresh rock and confirmed very high cyanide recoverable gold from Leachwell analysis following residue analysis and comparison with original fire assays. These results confirm that the gold is not refractory in nature and highly likely to be recoverable by conventional milling and CIP recovery.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Competent Person Statement

The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources for the Horse Well Gold Camp at the Yandal Project, including Mineral Resources for the Horsewell and Dusk ‘til Dawn Camps in Western Australia is based on information compiled by Mr Michael Martin who is a Director at Omni GeoX Pty Ltd and a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Martin has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration to qualify as a Competent Person for resource estimation as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code of Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Martin consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled or reviewed by Mr Richard Pugh who is the Strickland Metals Limited Executive Technical Director and is a current Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Pugh has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code of Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Pugh consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statement

This announcement may contain certain forward-looking statements, guidance, forecasts, estimates, prospects, projections or statements in relation to future matters that may involve risks or uncertainties and may involve significant items of subjective judgement and assumptions of future events that may or may not eventuate ( Forward-Looking Statements ). Forward-Looking Statements can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "anticipate", "estimates", "will", "should", "could", "may", "expects", "plans", "forecast", "target" or similar expressions and may include, without limitation, statements regarding plans, strategies and objectives of management, anticipated production and expected costs. Indications of, and guidance on future earnings, cash flows, costs, financial position and performance are also Forward Looking Statements.

Persons reading this announcement are cautioned that such statements are only predictions, and that actual future results or performance may be materially different. Forward-Looking Statements, opinions and estimates included in this announcement are based on assumptions and contingencies which are subject to change, without notice, as are statements about market and industry trends, which are based on interpretation of current market conditions. Forward-Looking Statements are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied on as a guarantee of future performance.

No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Gateway that any Forward-Looking Statement will be achieved or proved to be correct. Further, Gateway disclaims any intent or obligation to update or revise any Forward-Looking Statement whether as a result of new information, estimates or options, future events or results or otherwise, unless required to do so by law.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

APPENDIX A: YANDAL PROJECT TENEMENTS

Yandal Project, Western Australia	Yandal Project, Western Australia	Yandal Project, Western Australia	Yandal Project, Western Australia
Tenement Holder	Location	Tenement Number	Percentage owned
Eskay Resources Pty Ltd – Application	WA	M69/147	100%1
Eskay Resources Pty Ltd – Granted	WA	E69/1772	100%1
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/1466	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/1471	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E69/2765	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/1924	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E69/2492	100%2,3
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E69/3427	100%2
Earaheedy Zinc Pty Ltd – Granted	WA	E69/2820	80%4
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/1548	75%2,5,6
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/1835	75%2,5,6
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/1970	75%2,5,6
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/1971	75%2,5,6
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/2265	75%2,5,6
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/2266	75%2,5,6

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Yandal Project, Western Australia	Yandal Project, Western Australia	Yandal Project, Western Australia	Yandal Project, Western Australia
Tenement Holder	Location	Tenement Number	Percentage owned
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E69/3929	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/2179	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/2177	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/2178	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited – Granted	WA	E53/2180	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited - Granted	WA	E53/2153	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited - Granted	WA	E53/2154	100%2
Earaheedy Zinc Pty Ltd - Granted	WA	E69/3811	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited - Granted	WA	E53/2160	100%2
Strickland Metals Limited – Application	WA	E53/2357	75%2,5,6

Notes

1% Gross Revenue Royalty held by MW Royalty Co Pty Ltd
1% Gross Revenue Royalty held by L11 Capital Pty Ltd
Wayne Jones 2% NSR
Gibb River Diamonds Limited retain 20% free carried to BFS
25% free carried by Zebina Minerals Pty Ltd as part of Exploration Joint Venture Agreement
0.5% Net Smelter Royalty to Renegade Exploration Limited over a 75% interest in these tenements.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

APPENDIX B: TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE GML CP SHARES

1. Glossary

(a) Unless the context otherwise requires words and expressions used in this appendix have the meanings ascribed to them respectively in the Constitution;
(b) If a word or phrase is defined, its other grammatical forms have a corresponding meaning;
(c) a reference to a clause relates to a clause of these Terms; and
(d)
The following expressions have the following meanings:
ASTC means ASX Settlement and Transfer Corporation Pty Ltd (ABN 49 008 504 532) or any successor.

Automatic Conversion has the meaning given to that term in clause 3(a).

Automatic Conversion Date means the first Business Day after the CPS are registered in the name of the Eligible Shareholder or the Sale Agent (as the case may be) as a result of the Distribution.

Board means the board of directors of the Company.

CHESS means the Clearing House Electronic Subregister System operated by ASTC.

Company means Gateway Mining Limited.

Constitution means the constitution of the Company as amended from time to time.

Conversion means in relation to a CPS, the taking effect of the rights specified in clauses 3(a), 5 and 6(d) in relation to that CPS, where Convert and Converted have corresponding meanings.

Conversion Date means the Automatic Conversion Date or the New Conversion Date, as applicable.

Corporations Act means the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

CPS means the convertible preference shares in the capital of the Company known as “CPS” issued on the Terms, where the context requires, each convertible preference share.

CPS Holder means each person registered in the Register from time to time as a holder of CPS.

Distribution means the distribution in specie of the CPS to Eligible Shareholders, pursuant to the Distribution Resolution.

Distribution Resolution means a resolution passed at a meeting of ordinary shareholders of Strickland authorising the Distribution pursuant to the Corporations Act.

Dividend means the non-cumulative dividend payable on each CPS at the Dividend Rate.

Dividend Rate means 5% per annum based on the Face Value of each CPS.

Eligible Shareholders means a holder of fully paid ordinary shares in the issued capital of Strickland as at the Record Date with a registered address in Australia, New Zealand and any other jurisdictions determined by Strickland.

Face Value means $0.000001 per CPS.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Ineligible Foreign Shareholders means holders of fully paid ordinary shares in the issued capital of Strickland as at the Record Date who are not Eligible Shareholders.

New Conversion Date has the meaning given to that term in clause 6(d).

Record Date means the date determined by Strickland.

Register means the register of CPS maintained by the Company and includes any sub register of that register.

Sale Agent means the sale agent to be appointed by Strickland that will be distributed CPS by Strickland on behalf of the Ineligible Foreign Shareholders.

Shares means a fully paid ordinary share in the capital of the Company.

Strickland means Strickland Metals Limited.

Terms means the terms and conditions for the issue of CPS in the Company as these terms and conditions are amended, supplemented or replaced from time to time and as set out herein.

2. CPS

(a) The CPS are fully paid convertible preference shares in the capital of the Company. They are issued and are automatically Converted according to these Terms.
(b) Each CPS will be issued fully paid at the Face Value.

3. Automatic Conversion

(a) Subject to:
(i) the completion of the Distribution;
(ii) the Company not providing written notice to Strickland prior to 5:00pm (Perth time) on the Business Day prior to the Automatic Conversion Date that it is unable to provide a Cleansing Notice; and
(iii) clause 6(d),

each CPS will be Converted on the Automatic Conversion Date in accordance with clause 5.

(b) The Company does not have the right to automatically Convert the CPS other than in the circumstances listed in clauses 3(a) or 6(d).

4. No Holder conversion right

Save as provided for in these Conditions, no CPS Holder has a right to Convert a CPS.

5. Conversion

(a) In the event of a Conversion all CPS will convert into Shares on the basis of one Share for each CPS.
(b) A CPS, upon Conversion, confers all of the rights attaching to one Share but these rights do not take effect until 5.00pm (Perth time) on the Conversion Date. At that time:
(i) all other rights conferred or restrictions imposed on that CPS under these Terms will no longer have effect; and
(ii) the Share resulting from the Conversion will rank equally with all other Shares.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

(c) Conversion does not constitute a redemption, buy-back, cancellation or termination of CPS or an issue, allotment or creation of a new Share.
(d) Upon Conversion the Company shall provide the CPS Holder with a certificate or statement of holding for the Shares the subject of a Conversion.
(e) Despite anything else in these Terms, upon Conversion of the relevant CPS, any entitlement to a Dividend (accrued or otherwise) with respect to CPS, will cease to accrue and be deemed to be written off.

6. Quotation of Shares

(a) Each Share arising from Conversion will rank pari passu with all other fully paid Shares, except that such Shares arising from Conversion will not be entitled to any dividend or any other distribution or entitlement that has been declared or determined but not paid as at the Conversion Date.
(b) On the Automatic Conversion Date, subject to clause 6(c), the Company must provide to ASX a notice complying with sections 708A(5)(e) and 708A(6) of the Corporations Act ( Cleansing Notice ).
(c) If on the Automatic Conversion Date the Company would be unable to provide to ASX a Cleansing Notice in respect of a Conversion because it is unable to comply with the requirements of sections 708A(5)(e) and 708A(6) of the Corporations Act (including where trading in the Shares on ASX was suspended for more than a total of five days in the preceding 12 month period) or for any other reason is unable to provide to ASX a Cleansing Notice (for the purposes of clause 6(b), the Company must within 20 Business Days after the Automatic Conversion Date lodge with ASIC a prospectus complying with section 708A(11) of the Corporations Act ( Cleansing Prospectus ).
(d) If the Company is under an obligation to lodge a Cleansing Prospectus, and the Automatic Conversion Date would occur prior to actual lodgement of the Cleansing Prospectus then the Conversion of the CPS will not occur until the date on which the Company has complied with its obligations under clause 6(c) (for the purposes of this clause 6(d), the New Conversion Date ) and each CPS will be Converted on the New Conversion Date in accordance with clause 5.
(e) Shares arising from Conversion will be issued in uncertificated form through CHESS.
(f) Statements of holdings for Shares arising from Conversion will be dispatched by the Company free of charge as soon as practicable but in any event within 10 Business Days after the relevant Conversion Date.

7. General CPS Terms

(a) Register

The Company shall maintain the Register.

(b) General Rights
(i) CPS rank equally amongst themselves in all respects.
(ii) Until Conversion, the CPS shall have an entitlement to the payment of Dividends equal to the Dividend Rate before payment of a dividend to holders of Shares or any other class of shares ranking behind the CPS.
(iii) Until Conversion, if there is a return of capital on a winding up of the Company, CPS Holders will be entitled to receive out of the assets of the Company available for distribution to holders of CPS, in respect of each CPS held, a cash payment equal to the Face Value and any accrued and unpaid Dividend before any return of capital is made to holders of Shares or any other class of shares ranking behind the CPS.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

(iv) CPS do not confer on their holders any right to participate in profits or property except as set out in these Terms or in the Constitution.
(v) If, upon a return of capital, there are insufficient funds to pay in full the amounts referred to above and the amounts payable in respect of any other shares in the Company ranking as to such distribution equally with the CPS on a winding up of the Company, the CPS Holders and the holders of any such other shares will share in any distribution of assets of the Company in proportion to the amounts to which they respectively are entitled.
(vi) Until Conversion, the CPS do not confer on the CPS Holders any further right to participate in the surplus assets of the Company on a winding up then those set out in these Terms.
(vii) Until all CPS have been converted, the Company must not, without approval of the CPS Holders, issue shares ranking in priority to the CPS or permit the variation of any rights of any existing shares to shares ranking equally or in priority to the CPS, but the Board are at all times authorised to issue further CPS ranking equally with any existing CPS.
(viii) If a takeover bid is made for ordinary shares, acceptance of which is recommended by the Board, or the Board recommend a member’s scheme of arrangement, the Board will use reasonable endeavours to procure that equivalent takeover offers are made to the CPS Holder or that they participate in the scheme of arrangement.
(ix) Until Conversion, the CPS confer no rights to subscribe for new securities in the Company or to participate in any bonus issues.
(x) A CPS does not entitle a CPS Holder to vote at any general meeting of the Company except in the following circumstances:
(A) on a proposal:
- (1) to reduce the share capital of the Company;
- (2) that affects rights attached to the CPS;
- (3) to wind up the Company; or
- (4) for the disposal of the whole of the property, business and undertaking of the Company;
(B) on a resolution to approve the terms of a buy back agreement;
(C) on a resolution during a period in which a Dividend or part of a Dividend on the CPS is in arrears; or
(D) on a resolution during the winding up of the Company.
(xi) In accordance with the Constitution, a Holder will have the same rights as the holders of Shares with respect to receiving notices at general meetings and financial reports and attending the Company's general meetings.
(xii) Subject to complying with all applicable laws, the Company may, without the authority, assent or approval of the CPS Holders, amend or add to these terms of issue if such amendment or addition is, in the opinion of the Company:
(A) of a formal, minor or technical nature;
(B) made to correct a manifest error; or
(C) not likely (taken as a whole and in conjunction with all other modifications, if any, to be made contemporaneously with that modification) to be materially prejudicial to the interests of the CPS Holders.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

APPENDIX C: JORC TABLE 1 – HORSE WELL GOLD CAMP AND DUSK ‘TIL DAWN GOLD CAMP

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.	Eagle Mining • Eagle Mining operated in the Horse Well Project between 1993 and 1997. • Drillex, Drillcorp and Apex drilling completed RC drilling. Sampling of initial drilling programs undertaken in 1993 consisted of samples collected at 1m intervals split into 1-2kg samples by an inline riffle splitter mounted on the rig's side. Samples were analysed for Au at AAL Kalgoorlie by single-stage mix and grind preparation, with an aqua-regia digest and an AAS. Repeats (approximately 10%) were fire-assayed to a detection limit of 0.01 ppm Au. In follow up program, consisted of samples were collected at 1m intervals split into 1-2kg samples by an inline riffle splitter. Samples were submitted to AAL in Kalgoorlie for analysis of Au using a single stage and grind preparation, with an aqua regia digest and an AAS finish. Holes HWRC015 to HWRC021 repeat analyses were by 50gm Fire Assay, HWRC022 repeat analyses were Aqua regia, HWRC023 to 027 were assayed by FA30 (30gram fire assay) repeated using the same method. The remaining holes drilled by Eagle Mining were sent to Leonora and Laverton Assay Laboratory (LLAL), which used the Aqua Regia method SA30 with an SA30 repeat on 10% of samples and some samples greater than 0.1 ppm. SA30 is an aqua regia method with an AAS finish (Solvent Assay 30-gram charge); duplicates are repeats from the pulp. It is unknown whether certified reference material samples and field duplicate were submitted. • Diamond Drilling was completed by Apex drilling. The core was cut with a diamond saw, and half is submitted for assay. Sample lengths vary and are based on the core's geology. Half-core samples were taken and submitted for analysis to Leonora Laverton Assay Laboratory (LLAL) for an SA30 Aqua regia analysis with an SA30 laboratory repeat on 10% of samples or samples greater than 0.1 ppm.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
			Great Central Mines • Great Central Mines completed 22 drillholes in 1999. Samples were collected and recovered via cyclone under high pressure and split using a 75:25% riffle splitter from an original 35kg to a 2-3kg sample for laboratory submission. Samples were initially collected as a 4m composite, and a composite sample that returns a gold grade of 0.1g/t or better or has intersected a structural target has the one-metre samples submitted for assay. • Analabs analysed the Samples, which were oven-dried, pulverised to a nominal 75 microns, and split into 400–500 grams. They determined gold using Aqua Regia acid digest (40gram) with fire assay repeats. It is unknown whether certified reference material samples and field duplicates were submitted. Alloy Resources • Aircore drilling was completed by Raglan Drilling and were completed to blade refusal, usually at saprock or fresh bedrock to an average depth of 66 metres. • This reconnaissance drilling was carried out a widely spaced pattern of 200 metres by 400 metres, with drill samples composited over 4 metre intervals and assays for gold down to 0.001ppm or 1ppb Au. Any gold values greater than 0.05ppm Au in the 4-metre composite were considered significant to warrant follow up drilling. • Drilling samples were transported by trailer to Wiluna, where they were placed in bulky bags and shipped to Perth via Toll-Ipec for assay. The drilling samples were analysed by ALS-Chemex in Perth. All samples and blind standards were analysed for gold using 30g fire assay and ICP-AES finish (range 0.001-10ppm Au). Assays greater than 10ppm were analysed using the AA25 methos, but only standard samples were above this level. • The initial RC program at Warmblood was carried out by Easternwell Drilling. RC samples were split directly from the cyclone into 2kg bags for every metre drilled. Samples were assayed as 4 metre composites. Forall 4 metre composite sampleswhich returned greaterthan0.5g/t

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
			Au, 1 metre samples were collected from the original ‘split’ one metre samples and assayed. Alloy Resources & Doray Minerals Ltd (JV) From 2013 to 2021 exploration work was undertaken by Alloy Resources and Doray Minerals Ltd under the pre-existing JV agreement. The details regarding RC sampling from this work is outlined below: • Reverse circulation (RC) percussion drill chips collected through a cyclone and cone splitter at 1m intervals. • Spitter was cleaned regularly during drilling. • Splitter was cleaned and levelled at the end of each hole. • Mineralisation determined qualitatively through rock type, sulphide and quartz content and intensity of alteration. • Mineralisation determined quantitatively via assay (aqua-regia digest followed by ICP-MS for multi-element data and 25g Fire Assay and AAS determination for gold at 1m intervals). RC samples pulverized to 75 pm • All samples analysed by aqua-regia digest followed by ICP-MS for multi-element data and 25g Fire Assay and AAS determination for gold at 1 m intervals. Strickland Metals Ltd Diamond Drilling • Diamond coring was undertaken predominantly as HQ sizing, with PQ utilized to maximise recovery, where required, particularly within saprolite and clay zones. • Triple-tubing was utilised throughout to maximise recovery. • Diamond core samples were collected at geologically defined intervals, with a minimum sample length of 0.5m and a maximum of 1.2m.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		• Core samples were cut using an automated variable-speed diamond saw with half core, weighing approximately 3kg, submitted for analysis. • OREAS certified reference material (CRM) was inserted at a ratio of 1:20 throughout sampling. The grade ranges of the CRMs were selected based on grade populations and economic grade ranges. The reference material type was selected based on the geology, weathering, and analysis method of the sample. • Density measurements were collected as per Water Displacement Method 3 (Lipton, 2001) with paraffin wax coatings used for oxide and porous samples. Selected core samples were 0.1 – 0.2 m in size. Aluminium cylinders of 0.1 and 0.2 m in length, with known mass and density were measured at regular intervals at a ratio of 1:20, as a reference material. Duplicate sample weights were measured in fresh rock at a ratio of 1:20. • Handheld instruments, such as an Olympus Vanta pXRF and Terraplus KT-10 meter were used to aid geological interpretation. CRMs were tested at regular intervals at a ratio of 1:20. RC Drilling • 2-3 kg samples were split from dry 1 m bulk samples. The sample was initially collected from the cyclone in an inline collection box, with independent upper and lower shutters. Once the full metre was drilled to completion, the drill bit was lifted off the bottom of the hole, creating a gap between samples; ensuring the entirety of the 1 m sample was collected, and over-drilling did not occur. When the gap of air entered the collection box, the top shutter was closed off. Once the top shutter was closed, the bottom shutter was opened, dropping the sample under gravity over a cone splitter. • Two even 2 – 3 kg duplicate sample splits, from the A- and B-chutes of the splitter, were collected at the same time for each metre, with the remaining reject bulk sample being collected in labelled green bags directly below the cyclone, minimising external contamination.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		• Original sample bags were consistently collected from the A-chute, whilst duplicate sample splits were collected from the B-chute. During the sample collection process, the original and duplicate calico sample splits, and green bag of bulk reject sample were weighed to test for sample splitting bias and sample recovery. • Green bags were then placed in neat lines on the ground, with tops folded over to avoid contamination. Duplicate B-chute sample bags are retained and stored on site for follow up analysis and test work. • In mineralised zones, the original A-chute sample split was sent to the laboratory for analysis. In non-mineralised ‘waste’ zones, a 4 m composite scoop sample was collected from the green bags and the A-chute bag retained on site for follow up analysis test work. All composite intervals over 0.1 g/t Au were resampled at 1 m intervals using the original A-chute bag from the cyclone splitter. • QA samples were inserted at a combined ratio of 1:20 throughout. Field duplicates were collected at a 1:40 ratio from the B-chute of the cone splitter at the same time as the original sample was collected from the A-chute. OREAS certified reference material (CRM) was inserted at a ratio of 1:40. The grade ranges of the CRMs were selected based on grade populations and economic grade ranges. The reference material type was selected based on the geology, weathering, and analysis method of the sample. • The cyclone was cleaned after each rod, at the base of oxidation, and when deemed necessary by the geologist to minimise contamination of samples. Sample condition was recorded for bias analysis. The cyclone was balanced at the start of each rod and checked after each sample to avoid split bias. Dual air-vibrators on the cyclone transfer box were utilised, when necessary, to aid sample throughput. Vibrators were placed on opposite sides of the cyclone and perpendicular to the chutes to avoid vibration-induced splitting bias. • Handheld instruments, such as an Olympus Vanta pXRF and Terraplus KT-10 meter were used to aid geological interpretation. CRMs were tested at regular intervals at a ratio of 1:20.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
Drilling techniques	• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).		Eagle Mining • The original Eagle Mining was completed by Drillex using a Warman 1000 Multi-Purpose all-hydraulic top-drive rig- with a Sullair rated at 900 CFM @ 350 psi, Apex drilling, and Drillcorp. • Early drilling programs were surveyed by Downhole surveys using a magnetic, electronic multi-shot probe. Two holes at Palomino couldn’t be surveyed due to hole collapse. One program drilled by Apex drilling downhole surveys were taken using an Eastman single shot. Later programs were downhole surveys by Total Borehole Services (now WSG), downhole surveys, and driller-operated electronic multishots. Great Central Mines • Great Central Mines completed 22 RC drillholes in 1999. Holes were downhole at 10m intervals Alloy Resources • In 2019 Alloy Resources undertook Reverse Circulation Drilling with an 120mm bit. Strickland Metals Ltd Diamond Drilling • Diamond Drilling was undertaken by Terra Drilling using a truck- mounted KWL1600 drill rig. • Diamond coring was undertaken predominantly as HQ sizing, with PQ utilised to maximise recoveries where necessary. Triple-tubing was utilised to maximise recovery. • REFLEX Sprint IQ and OMNI-Tool North-Seeking Gyroscopes were used for downhole dip and azimuth calculation, with multi-shot measurements taken every 30m during drilling, and a continuous IN and OUT readings taken at end-of-hole (EOH). • RELFEX TN-14 Rig Aligner was used to align the rig to within 0.01 degrees of the planned azimuth, dip and roll at the start of each hole. • Boart Longyear Orientation tools were used for core orientation.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
			RC Drilling • RC drilling was undertaken by Ranger Drilling, using a truck-mounted Hydco 350RC Rig with a 1350 cfm @ 500 psi on-board compressor, a 1150 cfm onboard Booster, and a truck-mounted Sullair 900 cfm @ 350 psi Auxiliary Compressor. • RC holes were drilled with a 5 ½” hammer. • REFLEX Sprint IQ and OMNI-Tool North-Seeking Gyroscopes were used for downhole dip and azimuth calculation, with multi-shot measurements taken every 30m during drilling, and a continuous IN and OUT readings taken at end-of-hole (EOH). • RELFEX TN-14 Rig Aligner was used to align the rig to within 0.01 degrees of the planned azimuth, dip and roll at the start of each hole. Dusk ‘til Dawn The Dusk ‘til Dawn Deposit was drilled predominantly with Aircore (90 holes for 4,758m) and Reverse Circulation (39 holes for 7,583m) drilling. One HQ diamond core hole was also drilled (ACDD001 for 298.9m). The diamond core hole, 1 AC and 26 RC holes have been used in the resource estimation. Holes were drilled either by Alloy or Doray Minerals between 2012 and 2018.
Drill sample recovery	• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.		Eagle Mining • No sample recovery information is available. Great Central Mines • No sample recovery information is available. Alloy Resources • RC Drilling: sample splitter is cleaned at the end of each rod to ensure no sample hang-ups have occurred. Sample bag weights are recorded and in general should be approximately 3kg. • No sample recovery information is available.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
			• Wet samples due to excess ground water were noted when present. Strickland Metals Ltd Diamond Drilling • Diamond core samples are considered dry. • Triple-tubing and the appropriate drill tube diameter was selected (PQ, HQ, or NQ) depending on ground competency to maximise sample recovery. • Sample recovery is recorded every run (average run length of 3m) and is generally above 98%, except for in very broken ground. • Core was cut in half, with the same half of the core submitted to the laboratory for analysis. • From the collection of recovery data, no identifiable bias exists. RC Drilling • During the RC sample collection process, the original and duplicate cone split samples, and green bag reject bulk samples were weighed to test for bias and sample recoveries. The majority of this work was undertaken in ore zones. • Once drilling reached fresh rock, a fine mist of water was used to suppress dust and limit loss of fines through the cyclone chimney. • At the end of each metre, the bit was lifted off the bottom of hole to separate each metre drilled. • The majority of samples were of good quality, with ground water having minimal effect on sample quality or recovery. • From the collection of recovery data, no identifiable bias exists.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.		Eagle Mining • Logging of lithology, structure, alteration, veining, mineralisation, oxidationstate,weathering,mineralogy, colour. RCHoleswere

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
	• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.		logged to a level of detail to support future mineral resource estimation. Logging was qualitative and quantitative in nature • Qualitative: lithology, alteration, foliation • Quantitative: vein percentage; mineralisation (sulphide) percentage; • All holes logged for the entire length of hole. • All RC holes were chipped and archived. • Holes have been relogged where necessary to provide consistent logging through the project. Great Central Mines • Logging of lithology, structure, alteration, veining, mineralisation, oxidation state, weathering, mineralogy, colour. Logging was qualitative in nature. All holes logged for the entire length of hole. Alloy Resources • Logging of lithology, structure, alteration, veining, mineralisation, oxidation state, weathering, mineralogy, colour. Logging was qualitative in nature. • All RC holes were chipped and archived. • RC Holes were logged to a level of detail to support future mineral resource estimation. Logging was qualitative and quantitative in nature. • Qualitative: lithology, alteration, foliation. • Quantitative: vein percentage; mineralisation (sulphide) percentage. Strickland Metals Ltd • Logging of lithology, structure, alteration, veining, mineralisation, oxidation state, weathering, mineralogy, colour, magnetic susceptibility and pXRF geochemistry were recorded. • Logging was both qualitative and quantitative in nature.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Diamond Drilling • Diamond core was geotechnically logged at 1cm resolution; recording recovery, RQD, orientation confidence, joint density, joint sets, joint asperity and fill mineralogy. • Core trays were photographed wet and dry. • Structural measurements were collected utilizing the IMDEX IQ- Logger 2, with reference measurements taken at the start of each logging session and every 20 measurements throughout the drill hole to ensure instrument calibration and data quality. RC Drilling • RC chips were washed, logged and a representative sub-sample of the 1 m drill sample retained in reference chip trays for the entire length of a hole. • Reference chip trays were photographed wet and dry.
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation	• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	Eagle Mining • RC samples were split from a 1m bulk sample via an inline riffle splitter directly from the cyclone. • QC sample consisted of repeat samples and laboratory duplicates. These laboratory duplicates and repeats samples were analysed by a mixture of aqua regia or fire assay for samples above 0.1 by aqua regia or fire assay. • Diamond Drilling consisted of the core being cut with a diamond saw, and half is submitted for assay. Sample lengths vary and are based on the core's geology. Alloy Resources • RC chips were cone split every metre, sampled dry where possible and wet when excess ground water could not be prevented. Sample condition (wet, dry or damp) was recorded at the time of logging.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation		Commentary
			• Where mineralisation was unlikely, the samples were composited by spear sampling – four x 1 metre subsamples combined to approximately 3kg and submitted for assay. • The entire ~3kg RC sample was pulverised to 75um (85% passing). This is considered best practice and is standard throughout the industry. • Pulp duplicates taken at the pulverizing stage and selective repeats conducted at the laboratory’s discretion. • Duplicate samples were taken every 50thsample. • Sample size is appropriate for the grain size of the sample material. • Historic pulp samples from Warmblood were stored at the STK warehouse in sealed carboard boxes that were labelled with the key lab job number from the historic gold only Fire Assay analysis. The lab job number was referenced with the existing drill database to determine each representative hole ID. The samples/holes requiring multi-element analysis were then subsequently placed in new cardboard boxes with new sample submission numbers and sent to ALS laboratory in Perth for full four-acid multi element analysis – code MS61. Strickland Metals Ltd Diamond Drilling • Diamond core samples were collected at geologically defined intervals, with a minimum sample length of 0.5m and maximum of 1.2m. • Samples were cut using an automated variable-speed diamond saw. • Core was cut in half, with the same half of the core submitted to the laboratory for analysis. • Diamond core samples are considered dry.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		• Triple-tubing and the appropriate drill tube diameter was selected (PQ, HQ, or NQ) depending on ground competency to maximise sample recovery. • Sample recovery is recorded every run (average run length of 3m) and is generally above 98%, except for in very broken ground. • Handheld instruments, such as an Olympus Vanta pXRF and Terraplus KT-10 Magnetic Susceptibility meter, were used to aid geological interpretation. Core was analysed at 1m intervals for 60 seconds (3 x 20 second beams) utilising an Olympus Vanta pXRF instrument. CRMs were tested at regular intervals at a ratio of 1:20. RC Drilling • RC samples were split from dry, 1m bulk sample via a cone splitter directly from the cyclone. • Weighing of calico and reject green samples to determine sample recovery compared to theoretical sample recovery, and check sample bias through the splitter. • Field duplicates collected from the B-chute of the splitter through the entire hole at the same time as the original sample collection from the A-chute. Quality Control Procedures • Approximately 3kg of sample was submitted to ALS, Perth WA for analysis via 50g fire assay with an ICP-AES finish (method code: Au- ICP22). Samples that over-ranged are subsequently analysed by 50g fire assay and gravimetric finish (method code: Au-GRA22). • Ore zones were additionally analysed via 250g Photon Assay (method code: Au-PA01). • Detection limits of utilised methods: Method Unit Lower Limit Upper Limit

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
			Au- ICP22	ppm	0.001	10
			Au- GRA22	ppm	0.01	100
			Au-PA01	ppm	0.03	350
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used indetermining the analysis including instrument	Eagle Mining • The majority of samples were analysed using Aqua Regia which is a partial analysis. fire assay was also used for some analyses, which is a total analysis.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

	make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.		• QC samples consisted of laboratory repeats and duplicates Great Central Mines • Great Central Mines submitted samples to Analabs, where the samples were analysed for gold using Aqua Regia acid digest (40gm) with fire assay repeats. Aqua Regia method is a partial analysis and Fire assay is a total analysis. • QC samples consisted of laboratory repeats and duplicates Alloy Resources • Fire assay was used and is a total digest technique. • Certified reference material standards, 1 in every 50 samples. • Blanks: a lab barren quartz flush is requested following a predicted high-grade sample (i.e., visible gold). • Lab: Random pulp duplicates were taken on average 1 in every 10 samples. • Accuracy and precision levels have been determined to be satisfactory after analysis of these QAQC samples. • Dusk ‘til Dawn samples taken by Alloy were assayed by ALS Laboratories (Perth) using Aqua Regia (2012 AC program) and Fire Assay with ICP_MS finish (RC programs) to detection limits of 0.01 and 0.001ppm respectively. Samples taken by Doray Minerals were analysed by Minanalytical Laboratories of Perth by aqua-regia digest followed by ICP-MS at 1m intervals for multi-element assays, 25 g Fire assay with AAS finish for gold assays. Strickland Metals Ltd Diamond Drilling •Sample duplicates (DUP) were inserted at a ratio of 1:20 throughout sampling of ore zones, and 1:40 throughout sampling of waste material. •OREAS certified reference material (CRM) was inserted at a ratio of 1:20 throughout sampling of ore zones, and 1:40 throughout sampling of wastematerial. The graderanges ofthe CRMswere selected

==> picture [74 x 449] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [409 x 445] intentionally omitted <==

based on grade populations and economic grade ranges. The reference material type was selected based on the geology, weathering, and analysis method of the sample.

The total combined QAQC (DUPs and CRMs) to sample ratio through ore zone material was 1:10. For waste zones the combined QAQC to sample ratio was 1:20.
Field Duplicates and CRMs were submitted to the lab using unique Sample IDs.
ALS, Perth WA conduct CRM analysis and laboratory check assays at a combined ratio of 1:25 samples as part of standard laboratory QAQC protocols.
Blank quartz ‘flushes’ were inserted into the sample sequence throughout high-grade ore zones. After each high-grade sample (usually determined by the presence of visible gold) is crushed, a quartz flush is crushed. A second quartz flush is run after each sample is pulverised, prior to the quartz crush flush undergoing pulverisation. In total, two quartz flushes are conducted (one for each preparation stage) for each suspected high-grade sample to determine the level of potential contamination across samples.
No bias or contamination is seen across samples.
Core was analysed at 1m intervals for 60 seconds (3 x 20 second beams) utilising an Olympus Vanta pXRF instrument. CRMs were tested at regular intervals at a ratio of 1:20. Olympus Vanta pXRF instruments cannot accurately measure elemental Au and whole-suite elemental data are not considered appropriate for reporting. pXRF data are used as a guide for logging only.

RC Drilling

2-3 kg samples were split from dry 1 m bulk samples. The sample was initially collected from the cyclone in an inline collection box, with independent upper and lower shutters. Once the full metre was drilled to completion, the drill bit was lifted off the bottom of the hole, creating a gap between samples; ensuring the entirety of the 1 m sample was collected, and over-drilling did not occur. When the gap of air entered the collection box, the top shutter was closed off. Once the top shutter

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [409 x 444] intentionally omitted <==

was closed, the bottom shutter was opened, dropping the sample under gravity over a cone splitter.

Two even 2 – 3 kg duplicate sample splits, from the A- and B-chutes of the splitter, were collected at the same time for each metre, with the remaining reject bulk sample being collected in labelled green bags directly below the cyclone, minimising external contamination.
Original sample bags were consistently collected from the A-chute, whilst duplicate sample splits were collected from the B-chute. During the sample collection process, the original and duplicate calico sample splits, and green bag of bulk reject sample were weighed to test for sample splitting bias and sample recovery.
Green bags were then placed in neat lines on the ground, with tops folded over to avoid contamination. Duplicate B-chute sample bags are retained and stored on site for follow up analysis and test work.
In mineralised zones, the original A-chute sample split was sent to the laboratory for analysis. In non-mineralised ‘waste’ zones, a 4 m composite scoop sample was collected from the green bags and the A-chute bag retained on site for follow up analysis test work. All composite intervals over 0.1 g/t Au were resampled at 1 m intervals using the original A-chute bag from the cyclone splitter.
QA samples were inserted at a combined ratio of 1:20 throughout. Field duplicates were collected at a 1:40 ratio from the B-chute of the cone splitter at the same time as the original sample was collected from the A-chute. OREAS certified reference material (CRM) was inserted at a ratio of 1:40. The grade ranges of the CRMs were selected based on grade populations and economic grade ranges. The reference material type was selected based on the geology, weathering, and analysis method of the sample.
The cyclone was cleaned after each rod, at the base of oxidation, and when deemed necessary by the geologist to minimise contamination of samples. Sample condition was recorded for bias analysis. The cyclone was balanced at the start of each rod and checked after each sample to avoid split bias. Dual air-vibrators on the cyclone transfer box were utilised, when necessary, to aid sample throughput. Vibrators were placed on opposite sides of the cyclone and

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

			perpendicular to the chutes to avoid vibration-induced splitting bias. •Handheld instruments, such as an Olympus Vanta pXRF and Terraplus KT-10 meter were used to aid geological interpretation. CRMs were tested at regular intervals at a ratio of 1:20.
Verification of sampling and assaying	• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data.		Eagle Mining • Logging and sampling were recorded on paper logs. Alloy Resources transferred these logs to digital format and loaded them into the corporate database. • Drill intersections were checked by repeat analyses and laboratory duplicates at the Laboratory. • Two twin diamond holes were completed. Doray Mining • Logging and sampling were recorded electronically. Alloy Resources transferred these logs to digital format and loaded them into the corporate database. Alloy Resources • All sampling was routinely inspected by senior geological staff. Significant intercepts were inspected by senior geological staff. • No twinned holes were drilled during the program. • Data was hard keyed into Excel data capture software and merged with Datashed SQL based database on Strickland’s internal company server. Data is validated by a Database Administrator, import validation protocols in place. • Visual checks of data were completed within Surpac software by consultant geologists. • No adjustments were made to any of the assay data. Strickland Metals Ltd • Logging and sampling were recorded directly into LogChief, utilising lookup tables and in-file validations, on a Toughbook by a geologist at the rig.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

			• Logs and sampling were imported daily into Micromine for further validation and geological confirmation. • When received, assay results were plotted on section and verified against neighbouring drill holes. • From time to time, assays will be repeated if they fail company QAQC protocols. • All data is verified by Strickland’s senior geologists. • No adjustments to assay data are made. All data is now managed and hosted by Mitchell River Group.
Location of data points	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control.		Eagle Mining • The grid system used was MGA94 Zone 51. All historic holes have been surveyed by DGPS by Strickland Metals. • Downhole surveys were collected using magnetic Downhole multi- shot measurements by either drillers or by contract downhole wireline surveyors in open hole. Some holes were not able to be surveyed due to collapsed holes. • Topography was built using collar surveys surveyed by DGPS. Alloy Resources • Collars: surveyed with GPS with expected relative accuracy of approximately 2-3m. • Downhole: surveyed with in-rod reflex Gyro tool continuously. • Holes are located in MGA94 zone 51. • Estimated RL’s were assigned during the drilling. Strickland Metals Ltd • The grid system used was MGA94 Zone 51 and drillhole collar positions surveyed using DGPS. • REFLEX Sprint IQ and OMNI-Tool North-Seeking Gyroscopes were usedfordownhole dip and azimuthcalculation,with multi-shot

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [409 x 119] intentionally omitted <==

measurements taken every 30m during drilling, and a continuous IN and OUT readings taken at end-of-hole (EOH).
RELFEX TN-14 Rig Aligner was used to align the rig to within 0.01 degrees of the planned azimuth, dip and roll at the start of each hole.
• Boart Longyear Orientation tools were used for core orientation.
Strickland engaged with an independent surveyor to pick up and locate all collars that had not been subject to a DGPS pick-up previously.

	• Boart Longyear Orientation tools were used for core orientation. • Strickland engaged with an independent surveyor to pick up and locate all collars that had not been subject to a DGPS pick-up previously.	• Boart Longyear Orientation tools were used for core orientation. • Strickland engaged with an independent surveyor to pick up and locate all collars that had not been subject to a DGPS pick-up previously.
	Eagle Mining
	•	Holes were drilled on a variable collar spacing of approximately 40m across the Horse Well Project with up to 80 to 100 metre spacings.
	•	Intercepts are reported as composites of individual 1m assay results from a cut-off of 0.5g/t Au.
	•	Reported intercepts include internal waste averaging 3m.
	Great Central Mines
	•	Holes were drilled to extend deeper mineralisation along strike of the
		Palomino deposit at 100m spacing.
	Doray Minerals
	•	Two drill holes were drilled testing the long strike extension to the
		Palomino mineralisation. Holes were drilled on same line, but 25m
		apart.
	•	The Dusk ‘til Dawn Resource area has been drilled on 50m x 40m
		spacing.
	•	Mineralisation at Dusk ‘til Dawn is sufficient geological and grade
		continuity that may be appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore
		Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications to be applied in
		the future.
	•	Samples were on 1m length, with some 4m composites Samples have
		been composted to 1m for resource estimation.
	Strickland Metals Ltd

Data spacing • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Eagle Mining and distribution • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the • Holes were drilled on a variable collar spacing of approximately 40m degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral across the Horse Well Project with up to 80 to 100 metre spacings. Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications • Intercepts are reported as composites of individual 1m assay results applied. from a cut-off of 0.5g/t Au.
• Whether sample compositing has been applied. • Reported intercepts include internal waste averaging 3m. Great Central Mines • Holes were drilled to extend deeper mineralisation along strike of the Palomino deposit at 100m spacing.
Doray Minerals

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

		• Diamond Drilling at Palomino is located between existing 40m-spaced historic drill holes, to achieve 20m x 20m spacing within the Mineral Resource. • Assay results show good continuity of grade and width of intercepts between STK and Historic drill holes, both along strike, down-dip and down-plunge. • The data spacing and distribution is sufficient to demonstrate spatial and grade continuity of the mineralised horizon to support the classification of the Mineral Resources reported. • Intercepts are reported as composites of individual 1m assay results from a cut-off of 0.5g/t Au. Reported intercepts include internal waste averaging 3m unless stated otherwise.
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure	• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	• Based on the drilling completed to date, the orientation (both dip and plunge) of mineralisation is based on numerical Au assay values and confirmed by structural data collected from Strickland Metals’ diamond drilling. • The orientation of key structures and any relationship to mineralisation at Dusk ‘til Dawn is preliminary and inferred using competent person experience and interpretation at this stage. • The orientation of primary mineralisation is approximately vertical. Oxide mineralisation is approximately flat. STK-drilling has been completed at -60 degrees and perpendicular to the strike of mineralisation to avoid the introduction of bias to results. • Drilling intercepts are reported as down-hole width. • It is unlikely that the drilling orientation has introduced a sampling bias.
Sample security	• The measures taken to ensure sample security.	Eagle Mining • The data was originally maintained by Eagle Mining Corporation and forwarded to Normandy Jundee Operation. Doray Minerals

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [409 x 382] intentionally omitted <==

All DRM historic samples were selected, cut and bagged in a tied numbered calico bag, grouped into larger polyweave bags and cable tied. Polyweave bags were placed into larger Bulky Bags with a sample submission, Doray Minerals Ltd, 21st October 2015, Criteria JORC Code explanation, Commentary sheet and tied shut. A consignment notes and delivery address details were written on the side of the bag, and it was delivered to Toll Express in Meekatharra. The bags were delivered directly to MinAnalytical in Canning Vale, WA, who are NATA-accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC17025:2005.

Alloy Resources

Alloy Resources' historic samples were assayed by ALS Laboratories (Perth) using Aqua Regia (2012 AC program) and Fire Assay with ICP_MS finish (RC programs) to detection limits of 0.01 and 0.001 ppm, respectively.
Strickland Metals Ltd
Strickland Metals Ltd managed chain of Custody of digital data.
All samples were bagged in tied numbered calico bags, grouped into larger polyweave bags and cabled-tied. Polyweave bags were placed into larger Bulky Bags with a sample submission sheet and tied shut. Delivery address details were written on the side of the bag.
Sample material was stored on site and, when necessary, delivered to the assay laboratory by Strickland Metals personnel and a nominated courier (DFS).
Thereafter, laboratory samples were controlled by the nominated laboratory.
• Digital sample control files and hard-copy ticket books-controlled sample collection.

						• Thereafter, laboratory samples were controlled by the nominated laboratory. • Digital sample control files and hard-copy ticket books-controlled sample collection.	• Thereafter, laboratory samples were controlled by the nominated laboratory. • Digital sample control files and hard-copy ticket books-controlled sample collection.
Audits	or	•	The results of any	audits or reviews of sampling	techniques and data.	Eagle Mining
reviews						•	All drilling has been plotted, checked in section and three dimensions
							to recent drilling to ensure that historic drilling, geology, drill intercepts,
							and hole locations are more thoroughly documented valid.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [409 x 271] intentionally omitted <==

Doray Minerals

All drilling has been plotted, checked in section and three dimensions to recent drilling to ensure that historic drilling, geology, drill intercepts, and hole locations are more thoroughly documented valid.
Performance meetings held between a DRM and MinAnalytical representative were conducted monthly. QAQC data were reviewed with each assay batch returned, and on regular monthly intervals (trend analysis).

Alloy Resources

All drilling has been plotted, checked in section and three dimensions to recent drilling to ensure that historic drilling, geology, drill intercepts, and hole locations are more thoroughly documented valid.

Strickland Metals

All assay data is audited and reviewed by Mitchell River Group (MRG), with weekly performance meetings held between Strickland Personnel and the Database Manager at MRG.
The multi-element geochemistry from the historic drill pulps was reviewed by Dr Nigel Brand (Geochemical Services Pty Ltd), who determined the key pathfinder element suite.

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in section 1, also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	• Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	• Warmblood and Palomino are located on 100% owned STK tenure (tenement ID) E 69/1772. • Dusk ‘til Dawn is located within E69/2492. • MW Royalty Co Pty Ltd holds a 1% gross revenue royalty over the above tenure.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		• Wayne Jones holds a 2% net smelter return royalty over E69/2492.
Exploration done by other parties	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	• Exploration prior to Strickland in the region was conducted by Eagle Mining and Great Central Mines Ltd. Drilling included shallow RAB and RC drilling that was completed in the mid – 1990s, all of which had been sampled, assayed, and logged and records held by Strickland. This early work, including aeromagnetic data interpretation, was focused on gold and provided anomalous samples which was the focus of this period of exploration.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	• Palomino, Warmblood, Filly and Bronco are Archean aged gold prospects with common host rocks and structures related to mesothermal orogenic gold mineralisation as found throughout the Yilgarn Craton of Western Australia.
Drill hole Information	• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: `o` easting and northing of the drill hole collar `o` elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar `o` dip and azimuth of the hole `o` down hole length and interception depth `o` hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	• Historic gold intercepts have been compiled, with a summary of all information documented in Appendix C Tables 1 and 2. • Historic drill holes relating to the re-assay of existing pulps for multi- element pathfinder geochemistry.
Data aggregation methods	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade _results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for _	• No top-cuts have been applied when reporting results. • A cut-off of 0.3g/t Au was applied for all significant gold assay results. • No metal equivalent values were used.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths	• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).	• The orientation of primary mineralisation is approximately vertical. Oxide mineralisation is approximately flat. STK-drilling at Warmblood, Palomino and Marwari has been completed at -60 degrees and perpendicular to the strike of mineralisation to avoid the introduction of bias to results. Drilling at Bronco has been conducted at multiple dip angles and azimuths as understanding of the orientation of mineralisation progressed. All drill holes are within 20 degrees of the perpendicular angle to mineralisation and no bias in grade is found to be related to the angle of drilling. • At Dusk ‘til Dawn the exact structural geometry of the mineralisation is not yet known due to insufficient diamond drilling in the targeted areas. Broad geological and mineralisation features have been interpreted from available drilling sections. • Drilling intercepts are reported as down-hole width.
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	• Please refer to the main body of text.
Balanced reporting	• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.	• All Au assays are presented in the appendix to this announcement for clarity, including drill holes that returned no significant mineralisation above 0.3g/t Au. • Representative higher-grade intervals have been presented in the text and section.
Other substantive exploration data	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,	• All meaningful and material information has been included in the body of the text. • In March 2020, Alloy Resources engaged with Australian Laboratory Services (ALS) to undertakeMetallurgical Testworkon PalominoRC

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.	chip samples. From the samples received, six composites were generated. Overall gold recovery, via gravity-amalgam and cyanide leaching at a 75um grind was high, at 89.03% and 87.2% respectively. • In March 2024, Strickland Metals completed metallurgical testwork on fresh rock drill core from Palomino. Results show total gold recoveries ranged between 78.5% and 88.6%.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	• Continued RC and diamond drilling along strike and down plunge to determine the overall economic potential of each target area. • Exploration Drilling along strike from mineralised trends to the north and northwest testing for continuation of mineralisation under transported cover. • Further metallurgical testwork of the Warmblood Deposit.

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

(Criteria listed in section 1, and where relevant in section 2, also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Database integrity	• Measures taken to ensure that data has not been corrupted by, for example, transcription or keying errors, between its initial collection and its use for Mineral Resource estimation purposes. Data validation procedures used	• All data is managed by Mitchell River Group and stored in a Datashed SQL database. Data is logged using Logchief, which has inbuilt validation and uploaded into the database. • Analytical data was received from the laboratories in electronic ASCII files of varying format, and was merged with sampling data already present in the database. • Any data files that did not validate were investigated and rectified by field staff or the Database Administrator • Historical data has been checked, validated, and merged into the relevant data tables in the database.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		• All drill core, RC Drill chips have been photographed both dry and wet and available for viewing from the Strickland’s company database. • Historic RC drill chips available for viewing. • Drill pulps from Alloy Resources and Strickland Metals are available for reanalysis. • All drilling, logging and assay results are viewed in three-dimensional software to validate hole location, assay intercepts and logging consistency. Dusk ‘til Dawn • The drilling database was originally held by Eagle Mining Corporation and was passed on to Great Central Mines Limited and then became part of the Normandy Jundee Operation. Original drillhole data was found in Department of Mining and Petroleum, Annual Report. • The drilling data was imported into a relational SQL server database using DatashedTM (Industry standard drill hole database management software) by Doray Minerals. This was subsequently managed by Mitchell River Group and migrated to a new SQL database model schema.v 4.6.3 as used by DataShedTM. • All of the available drilling data was imported into 3D mining and modelling software packages (SurpacTM and LeapfrogTM), which allow visual interrogation of the data integrity and continuity. All of the resource interpretations were carried out using these software packages. During the interpretation process it was possible to highlight drilling data that does not conform to the geological interpretation for further validation. • Data validation checks were completed on import to the SQL database. Data validation was carried out by visually checking the positions and orientations of drill holes.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Site visits	• Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent Person and the outcome of those visits. If no site visits have been undertaken, indicate why this is the case.	• The Mineral Resource Competent Person has not visited the site. Other OMNI GeoX personnel have been to the site and have played a significant role in supervising the Strickland Metals drill programs, collecting geological and sampling information and QC analysis. This information has been relayed to the Competent Person. • During the Dusk ‘til Dawn resource drilling, Andy Viner (previous CP) visited the Horse Well project site on numerous occasions.
Geological interpretation	• Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of) the geological interpretation of the mineral deposit.Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made. The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on Mineral Resource estimation. The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resource estimation. The factors affecting continuity both of grade and geology.	• Confidence in geological interpretation is good. Stratigraphy is consistent and can be correlated between holes and along strike. • Geological logging and structural measurements from drillholes have been used to construct the mineralisation models. Sections were interpreted, digitised and a 3D wireframe model constructed. Geological continuity has been assumed along strike and down-dip. • The geological interpretation is robust. The geological interpretation was built by on the ground geologists who logged, relogged and interpreted the geology to ensure the geological interpretation was consistent. Mutli-elemental data was analysed in ioGAS software to aid in the geological interpretation of altered and fine-grained units. There is currently sufficient drilling to map the stratigraphic units and mineralisation to an Inferred Classification. • Geological continuity has been assumed along strike and down-dip based on drilling data. In general, geological and grade continuity within a 0.3ppm Au shell is good. Grades and thickness are consistent down-plunge. Dusk ‘til Dawn •The Dusk ‘til Dawn mineralisation interpretation is controlled by an apparent primary steeply plunging trends within a broader shear zone. Cross cutting and abutting these primary zones are three shallow sub horizontal and parallel supergene zones, defined by laterally consistent low to moderate grades.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		•Surfaces were created in LeapFrogTMwhich define the base of Oxide and the top of Fresh rock. The surface defining the top of the upper most supergene zone was used to flag base of complete weathering The key factors affecting continuity are the orientations of the shear zones, and subsequent weathering which has produced the supergene deposits.
Dimensions	• The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed as length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth below surface to the upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource.	• The Horse Well Gold Camp Project consists of four main deposits: Palomino, Warmblood, Filly and Bronco. Gold mineralisation extends along strike at Palomino for 600m, Warmblood for 950m, Filly for 650m and Bronco 250m. Gold mineralisation continues below surface at Palomino to 365m, Warmblood to 250m, Filly to 300m and Bronco to 200m. Gold mineralisation is open at depth and down plunge. • The Warmblood resource has supergene gold mineralisation, which is approximately 200m long, 100m wide and 25m thick. • The transition/fresh rock boundary is about 60 to 80m m below surface. • Dusk ‘til Dawn (primary mineralisation) has a strike length of 300m by up to 30-40m wide by 250m deep trending NW-SE.
Estimation and modelling techniques	• The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s) applied and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme grade values, domaining, interpolation parameters and maximum distance of extrapolation from data points. If a computer assisted estimation method was chosen include a description of computer software and parameters used. • The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or mine production records and whether the Mineral Resource estimate takes appropriate account of such data. • The assumptions made regarding recovery of by-products.	• Gold grades were estimated by using Ordinary Kriging using Micromine Origin version 2025. • Variography was completed in Snowden’s Supervisor geostatistical program 9.0. • Block size, Search ellipses, discretisation, and minimum and maximum samples were determined using the variogram through a QKNA process in Snowden’s Supervisor geostatistical program 9.0. • The block dimensions were 12.5mY, 5mX and 5mZ for parent cells, sub-blocked to 1.25mY, 1.0mX and 1.0mZ. • Four rotated block models were created to reflect the orientation of different orebodies. The Palomino resource was rotated -18°, Warmblood -22°, Filly +18°, and Bronco -60°.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	• Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade variables of economic significance (eg sulphur for acid mine drainage characterisation). • In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation to the average sample spacing and the search employed. • Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units. • Any assumptions about correlation between variables. • Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control the resource estimates. • Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping. • The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data if available	• All estimation was completed at the parent cell scale. • Grade estimation was constrained to blocks within each of the mineralisation wireframes. • Mineralisation wireframes/domains at Palomino, Warmblood, Filly and Bronco were defined using a 0.3g/t cut-off. The Palomino mineralisation, including Clydesdale, consists of 32 individual ore domains of varying sizes. Warmblood mineralisation, including Filly SW, consists of 23 individual ore domains. Filly mineralisation consists of 28 individual ore domains, and Bronco comprises 27 ore domains. • Hard boundaries were used for grade estimation, with each mineralised zone estimated separately, apart from the supergene mineralisation at Warmblood, where the assay data was shared. • The search directions have been determined by individual and grouped domains from variographic and geological analysis. • For the Palomino, Warmblood and Filly Deposits, the estimation was completed in three passes with the following parameters: • Pass 1 search dimensions were based upon variogram limit with a minimum of 4 samples and a maximum of 20 samples, and a minimum of 3 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole. • Pass 2 – search ellipse expanded by 50%, with a minimum of 4, a maximum of 20 samples, a minimum of 3 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole. • Pass 3 – search ellipse expanded by 100%, with a minimum of 2, a maximum of 20 samples, a minimum of 1 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole. • For Bronco, the estimation was completed in three passes with the following parameters: • Pass 1 search dimensions were based upon variogram limit with aminimumof 4, amaximumof 22or 26 samples, dependent on

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		domain, a minimum of 3 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole. • Pass 2 – search ellipse expanded by 50%, with a minimum of 4, a maximum of 22 or 26 samples dependent on domain, a minimum of 3 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole. • Pass 3 – search ellipse expanded by 100%, with a minimum of 2, a maximum of 22 or 26 samples, dependent on domain, a minimum of 1 drillholes with a minimum of 2 samples per drillhole. • For the minimum number of drill holes for each block to estimate, the parameters were set to a minimum of 3 for the first pass, minimum of 3 for the second pass and minimum of 1 for the third pass. • Top-cuts were established after a study of statistics, histograms, and log-probability plots for the main domains. Domains with CVs above 2 were top-cut until their CV was below 2. Samples in nine domains were cut. • The block model is checked visually in Micromine by comparing drillhole assays with block grades. Swath plots are generated to compare block grades with sample composite grades on a sectional and plan slice basis. • Rotary Air-blast (RAB) and air core (AC) holes were excluded from the grade estimation. • No mining has occurred at the Yandal Project. • No assumptions have been made regarding by-products. • No deleterious elements are known or expected. Only Au has been modelled. Dusk ‘til Dawn • Grade estimation using Ordinary Kriging (OK) was completed using Geovia Surpac™ software for Au only.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		• Drill hole samples were flagged with wire framed domain codes. Sample data were composited for Au to 1m using a best fit method. Most holes were sampled on 1m intervals, however there were some 4m composites in the raw assay data. • Influences of extreme sample distribution outliers were reduced by top- cutting on a domain basis. Top-cuts were decided by using a combination of methods including grade histograms, log probability plots and statistical tools. Based on this statistical analysis of the data population some top cuts were applied, including Dusk ‘til Dawn primary domains D1 and D4 (12.5ppm) and supergene domains D12 & 13 (12.5ppm and 7.5ppm) plus Warmblood primary domains D1 and D2 (17.5ppm and 15ppm) and supergene domain D11 (15ppm). • Directional variograms were modelled by domain using traditional variograms. At Warmblood nugget values are moderate to low (around 20-25%) and structure ranges up to 100m in the primary zones. Dusk ‘til Dawn showed higher nuggets (45-55%) with ranges of up to 80m. • Block model was constructed with parent blocks for DTD of 10m (E) by 10m (N) by 1m (RL) and sub-blocked to 1.25m (E) by 1.25m (N) by 1.25m (RL). Block model was constructed with parent blocks for Warmblood of 4m (E) by 10m (N) by 5m (RL) and sub-blocked to 0.5m (E) by 1.25m (N) by 0.625m (RL). All estimation was completed to the parent cell size. Discretisation was set to 5 by 5 by 2 for all domains. • Three estimation passes were used. For both DTD and Warmblood, the first pass had a limit of 60m, the second pass 120m and the third pass searching a large distance to fill the blocks within the wire framed zones. Each pass used a maximum of 12 samples, a minimum of 6 samples and maximum per hole of 4 samples. • Search ellipse sizes were based primarily on a combination of the variography and the trends of the wire framed mineralized zones. Hard boundaries were applied between all estimation domains. • Validation of the block model included a volumetric comparison of the resource wireframes to the block model volumes. Validation of the grade estimateincluded comparisonofblock modelgrades to the

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		declustered input composite grades plus swath plot comparison by easting, northing and elevation. Visual comparisons of input composite grades vs. block model grades were also completed.
Moisture	• Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with natural moisture, and the method of determination of the moisture content.	• Tonnages and grades were estimated on a dry in situ basis.
Cut-off parameters	• The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality parameters applied.	• The mineral resource estimate for the Horse Well has been reported above an arbitrary cut-off of 0.5 g/t within an optimised Au$4000 pit shell to reflect an open pit scenario and a cut-off grade of 2g/t to report the resource below the optimised Au$4000 pit shell to reflect an underground scenario. • This cut-off is a commonly used cut-off for similar deposits at the current gold price, mining and processing costs. • The projects would be amenable to trucking to a mill.
Mining factors or assumptions	• Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimum mining dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) mining dilution. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential mining methods, but the assumptions made regarding mining methods and parameters when estimating Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the mining assumptions made.	• The mineral resources for the Horse Well Project have been reported using an optimised AUD $4,000 pit shell for Palomino, Warmblood, Filly, and Bronco to reflect the reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. A cut-off of 2.0g/t Au has been applied to potential underground material at Palomino that is reflective of typical underground mining operation cut-off grades in Western Australia. No underground potential has been assessed outside of the open-pit optimisations at Warmblood, Filly and Bronco due to the resources being almost entirely contained within the optimised pits. Dusk ‘til Dawn • It has been assumed that there will be limited attempts made to selectively mine the ore and that the ore will incur maximum dilution. • It would be mined using typical Eastern Goldfields open pit methodologies.
Metallurgical factors or assumptions	• The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding metallurgical amenability. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider	• Metallurgical testwork was recently completed at the Horse Well Gold Camp on fresh rock samples from the Palomino Deposit showing gravity-recoverable gold recoveries up to 32.5% and total gold (gravity

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	potential metallurgical methods, but the assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, it should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the metallurgical assumptions made.	+ cyanide leach) recoveries ranging between 78.5% and 88.6%. Drillhole details and metallurgical testwork results for each composite sample can be found in Strickland’s ASX Announcement “Metallurgical Testwork Confirms High Gold Recovery at Horse Well Gold Camp” dated 13 March 2025. • In March 2020, Alloy Resources undertook Metallurgical testwork on RC chip samples of oxide material from the Palomino Deposit showing total gold recovery, via gravity-amalgam and cyanide leaching, at 89.03% and 87.2%, respectively. • No metallurgical factors were considered in this Horse Well Gold Camp Resource Estimation, and no dilution factors were applied. Dusk ‘til Dawn • Thirty eight higher-grade fresh rock sample pulps from Dusk ‘til Dawn diamond hole showed close correlation of Leachwell cyanide recoverable gold analysis with original fire assays. These results confirm that the gold is not refractory in nature and highly likely to be recoverable by conventional milling and CIP recovery.
Environmenta l factors or assumptions	• Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process residue disposal options. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider the potential environmental impacts of the mining and processing operation. While at this stage the determination of potential environmental impacts, particularly for greenfields project, may not always be well advanced, the status of early consideration of these potential environmental impacts should be reported. Where these aspects have not been considered this should be reported with an explanation of the environmental assumptions made.	• The deposit is in an area of Western Australia with nearby mining operations, both underground and open-cut, and any proposed mine would comply with the well-established environmental laws and protocols in the Goldfields area of WA. • Waste rock from open pit operations would be placed in a waste rock landform adjacent to open pit operations, progressively contoured and revegetated throughout the life of mine. Process plant residue would be disposed of in a surface tailings storage facility (TSF). Adoption of an upstream, central decant design would utilise mine waste material for dam wall construction and facilitate water recovery to supplement process water requirements. It is expected that sufficient volumes of oxide material, able to be made sufficiently impermeable, will be available in the overburden stream to enable acceptable TSF construction.
Bulk density	• Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for the assumptions. Ifdetermined, the method used, whether wet or dry, the	• Bulk density readings were collected from diamond core at the Palomino andWarmblood deposits.388 sampleswere collected at

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	frequency of the measurements, the nature, size and representativeness of the samples. • The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit. • Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation process of the different materials.	Palomino, and 128 samples were collected at Warmblood. From these samples, average densities for oxidation profiles or rock type (transition and fresh rock) were assigned to the block model using the three-dimensional weathering model. No bulk density information has been collected at Filly and Bronco. For these deposits the Warmblood density for the different weathering profiles were assigned. Dusk ‘til Dawn • The following bulk densities have been assumed from nearby comparable operations: `o` Oxide: 1.8 `o` Transition: 2.3 `o` Fresh: 2.8
Classification	• The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into varying confidence categories. • Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant factors (ie relative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of input data, confidence in continuity of geology and metal values, quality, quantity and distribution of the data). • Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit.	• The inferred classification for the Horse Well Project and Dusk ‘til Dawn reflects the relative confidence in the estimate. It considers the confidence in the geological interpretation, grade continuity, drilling spacing, historical data, quality assurance and quality control information, estimation passes, and other estimation parameters. • The input data has been checked and is considered to be reliable. • The results reflect the Competent Person’s view of the deposit.
Audits or reviews	• The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral Resource estimates.	• An internal review has been undertaken, and no material issues were identified.
Discussion of relative accuracy/ confidence	• Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and confidence level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of statistical or geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the resource within stated confidence limits, or, if such an approach is not deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors that could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate.	• Confidence in the estimate is reflected in the Mineral Resource Classification. The Mineral Resource relates to global tonnage and grade estimates.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	• The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to technical and economic evaluation. Documentation should include assumptions made and the procedures used. • These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate should be compared with production data, where available.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

APPENDIX D – SIGNIFICANT INTERCEPTS

Table 1: Horse Well Gold Camp

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
HWDD017	271,830	7,128,780	569	RC_DD	72.5	-60	186	114	128.4	14.4	6.0	[email protected]/t Au from 114m	Warmblood
including								115	122	7	10.6	[email protected]/t Au from 115m
and								144	156.7	12.7	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 144m
HWDD028	271,917	7,128,493	569	DDH	72.5	-68	139.4	74.7	77	2.3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 74.7m	Warmblood
HWDD029	271,902	7,128,568	569	DDH	72.5	-68	109.6	8.6	24	15.4	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 8.6m	Warmblood
and								27	46	19	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 27m
and								49.6	57	7.4	5.0	7.4m@5g/t Au from 49.6m
including								49.6	52.6	3	10.6	[email protected]/t Au from 49.6m
and								64	65	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 64m
HWDD039	271,854	7,128,746	569	DDH	72.5	-60	155.9	28.6	30.4	1.8	1.6	[email protected]/t Au from 28.6m	Warmblood
and								102.5	117	14.6	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 102.5m
including								102.5	105.8	3.3	4.2	[email protected]/t Au from 102.5m
and								127.2	140	12.8	1.6	[email protected]/t Au from 127.2m
HWDD042	271,792	7,128,852	569	DDH	72.5	-60	222.4	117	121.1	4.1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 117m	Warmblood
and								129.6	131	1.4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 129.6m
and								138.5	146.4	7.9	9.7	[email protected]/t Au from 138.5m
including								141.8	145	3.2	22.0	3.2m@22g/t Au from 141.8m
and								169.8	179.6	9.9	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 169.8m
HWDD043	271,745	7,128,920	569	DDH	72.5	-60	245.6	171.7	176.9	5.2	3.1	[email protected]/t Au from 171.7m	Warmblood
including								174.7	176.9	3.2	7.0	3.2m@7g/t Au from 174.7m
and								203.6	211	7.4	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 203.6m
and								211.5	215	3.5	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 211.5m
HWRC263	271,906	7,128,805	569	RC	72.5	-60	94	39	44	5	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 39m	Warmblood
HWRC264	271,868	7,128,792	569	RC	72.5	-60	154	32	36	4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 32m	Warmblood
and								70	76	6	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 70m
including								72	74	2	3.6	[email protected]/t Au from 72m
and								94	103	9	2.6	[email protected]/t Au from 94m
including								95	99	4	4.9	[email protected]/t Au from 95m
HWRC265	271,885	7,128,840	569	RC	72.5	-60	124	53	56	3	3.5	[email protected]/t Au from 53m	Warmblood
HWRC266	271,855	7,128,704	569	RC	72.5	-60	154	109	110	1	3.2	[email protected]/t Au from 109m	Warmblood
and								112	114	2	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 112m
and								128	130	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 128m
HWRC275	271,912	7,128,722	569	RC	72.5	-60	124	4	5	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 4m	Warmblood
and								37	43	6	4.0	6m@4g/t Au from 37m
including								38	41	3	7.6	[email protected]/t Au from 38m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								62	69	7	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 62m
HWRC329	271,817	7,128,902	569	RC	72.5	-60	150	102	108	6	2.5	[email protected]/t Au from 102m	Warmblood
including								106	108	2	5.0	2m@5g/t Au from 106m
HWRC330	271,830	7,128,864	569	RC	72.5	-60	162	24	25	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Warmblood
and								42	44	2	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 42m
and								114	119	5	2.0	5m@2g/t Au from 114m
HWRC331	271,847	7,128,827	569	RC	72.5	-60	162	23	24	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 23m	Warmblood
and								87	88	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 87m
and								101	102	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 101m
HWRC332	271,931	7,128,771	569	RC	72.5	-60	114					NSR	Warmblood
HWRC333	271,893	7,128,758	569	RC	72.5	-60	126	21	22	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 21m	Warmblood
and								51	54	3	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 51m
and								69	70	1	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 69m
HWRC334	271,931	7,128,729	569	RC	72.5	-60	66	35	41	6	1.0	6m@1g/t Au from 35m	Warmblood
HWRC335	271,919	7,128,683	569	RC	72.5	-60	114	16	30	14	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Warmblood
HWRC349	271,779	7,128,934	569	RC	72.5	-60	192	94	96	2	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 94m	Warmblood
and								100	101	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 100m
and								150	155	5	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 150m
HWRC350	271,754	7,128,975	569	RC	72.5	-60	175					NSR	Warmblood
HWRC351	271,714	7,129,075	569	RC	72.5	-60	175	125	127	2	1.0	2m@1g/t Au from 125m	Warmblood
HWRC352	271,711	7,129,018	569	RC	72.5	-60	175	126	127	1	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 126m	Warmblood
HWRC353	271,575	7,129,298	569	RC	72.50	-60	174	80	84	4	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 80m	Warmblood
and								140	141	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 140m
and								144	145	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 144m
HWRC355	271,544	7,129,383	569	RC	72.5	-60	126					NSR	Warmblood
HWRC356	271,497	7,129,475	569	RC	73	-60	198	0	4	4	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Warmblood
and								86	87	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 86m
and								90	91	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 90m
and								110	111	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 110m
HWRC357	271,497	7,129,359	569	RC	72.5	-60	159					NSR	Warmblood
HWRC358	271,452	7,129,570	569	RC	72.5	-60	181					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA351	271,925	7,128,543	570	AC	360	-90	45	12	20	8	4.4	[email protected]/t Au from 12m	Warmblood
AHWA352	271,933	7,128,542	570	AC	360	-90	46	13	14	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 13m
and								20	28	8	4.8	8m @ 4.8g/t Au from 20m, incl. 3m @	Warmblood
including								22	25	3	11.3	11.3g/t Au
AHWA353	271943	7128549	570	AC	360	90	52	0	32	32	3.9	32m @ 3.9g/t Au from 0m, incl 16m @	Wbld
including	,	,,				-		0	16	16	6.6	6.6g/t Au	armoo
AHWA354	271,941	7,128,490	571	AC	360	-90	48	12	16	4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 12m	Warmblood
AHWA355	271,949	7,128,496	571	AC	360	-90	51					NSR	Warmblood

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
AHWA356	271960	7128502	571	AC	360	90	57	0	40	40	3.4	40m @ 3.4g/t Au from 0m, incl. 12m	Wbld
including	,	,,				-		28	40	12	9.0	@9.0g/t Au	armoo
AHWA357	271,968	7,128,505	571	AC	360	-90	68	20	28	8	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Warmblood
AHWA358	271,978	7,128,513	571	AC	360	-90	66	20	24	4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Warmblood
AHWA394	271,837	7,128,956	565	AC	70	-60	69					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA395	271,807	7,128,948	567	AC	70	-60	72	48	52	4	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 48m	Warmblood
AHWA396	271,788	7,128,944	567	AC	70	-60	68					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA397	271,764	7,128,933	571	AC	65	-60	53					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA398	271,744	7,128,931	573	AC	70	-60	48					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA399	271,693	7,128,908	573	AC	70	-60	41					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA400	271,782	7,129,046	568	AC	70	-60	60	25	44	19	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 25m	Warmblood
AHWA401	271,755	7,129,037	569	AC	70	-60	75	34	35	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 34m	Warmblood
and								60	75	15	4.2	[email protected]/t Au from 60m
AHWA402	272,009	7,128,905	568	AC	75	-60	48					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA403	271,961	7,128,892	567	AC	70	-60	58					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA404	271,917	7,128,873	570	AC	70	-60	64					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA405	271,863	7,128,867	567	AC	70	-60	83	68	80	12	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 68m	Warmblood
AHWA406	271,844	7,128,850	567	AC	70	-60	84					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA407	271,817	7,128,845	565	AC	70	-60	63					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA408	271,795	7,128,834	567	AC	70	-60	58					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA409	271,769	7,128,828	570	AC	70	-60	59					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA410	271,745	7,128,819	571	AC	70	-60	59					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA411	271,727	7,128,812	571	AC	70	-60	45					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA412	271,746	7,129,247	566	AC	70	-60	72	36	40	4	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 36m	Warmblood
AHWA413	271725	7129238	565	AC	70	60	69	44	52	8	22.0	8m @ 22g/t Au from 44m. Incl. 4m @	Wbld
including	,	,,				-		44	48	4	43.6	43.6g/t Au	armoo
AHWA414	271,696	7,129,229	567	AC	70	-60	71					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA415	271,677	7,129,222	567	AC	70	-60	72					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA416	271,650	7,129,217	569	AC	70	-60	69					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA417	271,628	7,129,205	569	AC	70	-60	65					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA418	271,601	7,129,197	566	AC	70	-60	64					NSR	Warmblood
AHWA419	271,580	7,129,195	565	AC	70	-60	64	44	52	8	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 44m	Warmblood
AHWA420	271,555	7,129,188	567	AC	70	-60	63					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR012	271,890	7,128,893	569	RC	70	-60	90	32	36	4	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 32m	Warmblood
AHWR013	271,867	7,128,877	569	RC	70	-60	111	56	68	12	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 56m	Warmblood
AHWR014	271,866	7,128,936	569	RC	70	-60	99	24	32	8	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Warmblood
AHWR015	271,846	7,128,925	569	RC	70	-60	114	40	48	8	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 40m	Warmblood
and								56	60	4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 56m
AHWR016	271,855	7,128,959	569	RC	70	-60	63	28	36	8	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 28m	Warmblood

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
AHWR017	271,833	7,128,953	569	RC	70	-60	108	48	56	8	1.6	[email protected]/t Au from 48m	Warmblood
AHWR018	271,811	7,128,946	569	RC	70	-60	123					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR019	271,853	7,129,011	569	RC	70	-60	66					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR020	271,834	7,129,004	569	RC	70	-60	90					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR021	271,814	7,128,997	569	RC	70	-60	111					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR022	271,796	7,128,990	569	RC	70	-60	111	52	56	4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 52m	Warmblood
AHWR023	271,778	7,128,981	569	RC	70	-60	111	52	56	4	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 52m	Warmblood
AHWR024	271,799	7,129,024	569	RC	70	-60	72	28	36	8	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 28m	Warmblood
AHWR025	271,783	7,129,015	569	RC	70	-60	90	20	24	4	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Warmblood
AHWR026	271,760	7,129,012	569	RC	70	-60	120					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR027	271,784	7,129,071	569	RC	70	-60	60	16	24	8	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Warmblood
AHWR028	271,767	7,129,060	569	RC	70	-60	90					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR029	271,746	7,129,053	569	RC	70	-60	120	68	76	8	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 68m	Warmblood
AHWR030	271,973	7,128,529	571	RC	249	-54	120	13	36	23	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 13m	Warmblood
and								40	45	5	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 40m
AHWR031	271,993	7,128,536	572	RC	256	-54	132	20	21	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Wbld
and								37	41	4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 37m
and								48	49	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 48m
and								70	102	32	1.7	32m @ 1.7g/t Au from 70m, incl. 8m	armoo
including								93	101	8	5.5	@5.5g/t Au
and								108	109	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 108m
AHWR032	271,965	7,128,569	570	RC	250	-54	90	0	7	7	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Warmblood
and								18	43	25	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 18m
and								57	62	5	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 57m
AHWR033	271,978	7,128,573	570	RC	250	-55	132	10	12	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 10m	Warmblood
and								19	61	42	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 19m
and								66	68	2	1.0	2m@1g/t Au from 66m
and								99	112	13	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 99m
AHWR034	271,989	7,128,492	572	RC	249	-56	108	44	47	3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 44m	Warmblood
and								52	55	3	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 52m
and								60	63	3	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 60m
and								71	87	16	2.7	16m @ 2.7g/t Au from 71m, incl. 7m
including								79	86	7	4.6	@4.6g/t Au
AHWR035	272,006	7,128,499	572	RC	250	-55	162					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR038								12	30	18	2.4	18m @ 2.4g/t Au from 12m, incl. 5m
including	271,962	7,128,440	571	RC	71	-60	114	14	19	5	5.1	@5.1g/t Au	Warmblood
and								38	40	2	6.3	[email protected]/t Au from 38m
AHWR039	271,943	7,128,433	571	RC	70	-59	162	33	34	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 33m	Warmblood
and								38	45	7	1.0	7m@1g/t Au from 38m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								58	64	6	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 58m
AHWR040	271,976	7,128,402	572	RC	71	-60	156	18	19	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 18m	Warmblood
and								21	22	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 21m
and								32	33	1	8.6	[email protected]/t Au from 32m
and								37	40	3	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 37m
AHWR041	271,955	7,128,395	572	RC	72	-60	126	35	49	14	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 35m	Warmblood
AHWR042	271,983	7,128,362	572	RC	71	-59	156	19	20	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 19m	Warmblood
and								23	24	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 23m
AHWR043	271,923	7,128,549	570	RC	68	-60	39	3	5	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 3m
and								10	32	22	3.7	22m @ 3.7g/t Au from 10m, incl. 9m	Warmblood
including								10	19	9	5.2	@5.2g/t Au
AHWR044	271904	7128542	570	RC	68	60	39	14	32	18	0.9	18m @ 0.9g/t Au from 14m, incl. 3m	Wbld
including	,	,,				-		14	17	3	3.7	@3.7g/t Au	armoo
AHWR045	271,951	7,128,603	569	RC	68	-61	69	12	34	22	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 12m	Warmblood
AHWR046	271,931	7,128,597	569	RC	68	-61	59	19	21	2	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 19m	Warmblood
and								24	33	9	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 24m
AHWR047								14	21	7	1.9	7m @ 1.9g/t Au from 14m, incl. 1m @
including	271908	7128591	570	RC	68	61	69	15	16	1	10.9	10.9g/t Au	Warmblood
and	,	,,				-		27	36	9	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 27m
and								51	56	5	3.2	[email protected]/t Au from 51m
AHWR048	271,892	7,128,581	570	RC	68	-65	89	28	39	11	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 28m
and								54	80	26	1.8	26m @ 1.8g/t Au from 54m, incl. 6m	Warmblood
including								54	60	6	6.5	@6.5g/t Au
AHWR049	271,969	7,128,695	569	RC	68	-60	69					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR050	271,933	7,128,683	569	RC	68	-60	69					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR051	271892	7128666	569	RC	74	60	69	20	47	27	1.2	27m @ 1.2g/t Au from 20m, incl. 8m	Wbld
including	,	,,				-		35	43	8	3.0	@3g/t Au	armoo
AHWR052	271,848	7,128,651	569	RC	68	-60	69					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR053	271,949	7,128,776	569	RC	68	-60	79					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR054	271,910	7,128,763	569	RC	68	-60	69					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR055	271,865	7,128,748	569	RC	68	-60	69	61	63	2	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 61m	Warmblood
AHWR056	271,946	7,128,478	571	RC	73	-60	37	15	20	5	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 15m	Warmblood
AHWR057								46	49	3	13.6	3m @ 13.6g/t Au from 46m, incl. 1m
including	271,929	7,128,472	571	RC	71	-60	55	47	48	1	35.4	@35.4g/t Au	Warmblood
and								53	55	2	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 53m
AHWR058	271,920	7,128,638	569	RC	72	-60	48	15	26	11	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 15m	Warmblood
AHWR059	271,904	7,128,630	569	RC	70	-61	68	21	42	21	1.0	21m@1g/t Au from 21m	Warmblood
AHWR060	271,881	7,128,623	569	RC	71	-61	88	30	32	2	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 30m	Warmblood
and								39	41	2	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 39m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								65	69	4	1.0	4m@1g/t Au from 65m
AHWR061	271,909	7,128,681	569	RC	72	-61	48	21	24	3	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 21m	Warmblood
and								28	30	2	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 28m
and								32	43	11	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 32m
AHWR062	271,870	7,128,661	569	RC	74	-61	94	43	49	6	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 43m	Warmblood
and								57	58	1	4.1	[email protected]/t Au from 57m
and								70	81	11	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 70m
AHWR063	271,894	7,128,721	569	RC	75	-61	58	24	26	2	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Warmblood
and								54	58	4	2.9	[email protected]/t Au from 54m to BOH
AHWR064	271,872	7,128,713	569	RC	76	-60	78	5	7	2	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 5m	Warmblood
and								66	68	2	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 66m
AHWR065	271,853	7,128,709	569	RC	77	-61	99					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR066	271,880	7,128,755	569	RC	74	-60	59					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR067	271,845	7,128,657	569	RC	71	-60	152					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR068	271,855	7,128,623	569	RC	71	-60	143	20	21	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Wbld
and								36	37	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 36m
and								43	46	3	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 43m
and								53	75	22	5.6	22m @ 5.6g/t Au from 53m, incl. 4m	armoo
including								67	71	4	20.1	@20.1g/t Au
and								89	92	3	1.6	[email protected]/t Au from 89m
AHWR069	271859	7128576	569	RC	67	60	160	83	107	24	3.7	24m @ 3.7g/t Au from 83m, incl. 10m	Wbld
including	,	,,				-		85	95	10	7.8	@7.8g/t Au	armoo
AHWR070	271,910	7,128,519	570	RC	67	-60	110	69	77	8	2.7	[email protected]/t Au from 69m	Warmblood
and								82	92	10	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 82m
AHWR071	271,869	7,128,508	570	RC	67	-60	161					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR072	271,902	7,128,483	570	RC	71	-60	130	73	81	8	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 73m	Warmblood
AHWR073	271,921	7,128,427	571	RC	71	-60	130	63	72	9	2.2	[email protected]/t Au from 63m	Warmblood
AHWR074	271,733	7,129,247	569	RC	71	-60	80	52	57	5	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 52m	Warmblood
and								61	63	2	9.3	[email protected]/t Au from 61m
AHWR075	271,705	7,129,237	569	RC	71	-60	120					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR101	271,879	7,128,456	570	RC	63	-60	127					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR102	271,939	7,128,562	570	RC	69	-61	49	0	1	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Warmblood
and								9	23	14	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 9m
and								27	43	16	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 27m
AHWR103	271,913	7,128,552	570	RC	73	-61	79	22	44	22	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 22m	Warmblood
and								60	64	4	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 60m
AHWR104								103	107	4	1.6	4m @ 1.6g/t Au from 103m, incl. 1m
including	271,829	7,128,612	569	RC	67	-61	157	106	107	1	5.2	@5.2g/t Au	Warmblood
and								144	145	1	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 144m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
AHWR105	271,804	7,128,603	570	RC	67	-61	199					NSR	Warmblood
AHWR106	271,884	7,128,717	569	RC	71	-61	109	72	73	1	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 72m	Warmblood
and								77	78	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 77m
and								99	109	10	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 99m to BOH
HWRC064	271,726	7,129,129	568	RC	71	-60	99	89	99	10	24.3	[email protected]/t Au from 89m to BOH	Warmblood
HWRC065	271,821	7,129,163	568	RC	253	-58	117	92	93	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 92m	Warmblood
and								96	98	2	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 96m
and								101	102	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 101m
HWRC078	271,752	7,129,136	568	RC	75	-60	100	51	52	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 51m	Warmblood
and								78	80	2	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 78m
HWRC079	271,708	7,129,122	568	RC	75	-59	150	105	106	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 105m	Warmblood
and								110	117	7	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 110m
HWRC080	271,787	7,129,177	568	RC	72	-61	102					NSR	Warmblood
HWRC081	271,768	7,129,171	568	RC	72	-62	111					NSR	Warmblood
HWRC082	271,744	7,129,162	568	RC	72	-61	105	68	69	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 68m	Warmblood
HWRC083	271,721	7,129,155	568	RC	74	-60	111	22	23	1	2.4	[email protected]/t Au from 22m	Warmblood
and								81	92	11	5.3	[email protected]/t Au from 81m
HWRC084	271,697	7,129,146	568	RC	75	-61	123	113	123	10	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 113m to BOH	Warmblood
HWRC085	271,675	7,129,141	568	RC	73	-60	110	100	101	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 100m	Warmblood
and								103	104	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 103m
HWRC086	271,808	7,129,132	568	RC	74	-60	99	81	82	1	2.1	[email protected]/t Au from 81m	Warmblood
HWRC087	271,786	7,129,124	568	RC	72	-60	99					NSR	Warmblood
HWRC088	271764	7129116	568	RC	70	60	105	52	67	15	2.6	15m @ 2.6g/t Au from 52m, incl. 4m	Wbld
including	,	,,				-		57	61	4	8.2	@8.2g/t Au	armoo
HWRC089	271,735	7,129,108	568	RC	75	-59	117	71	72	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 71m	Warmblood
and								83	89	6	3.4	[email protected]/t Au from 83m
HWRC090	271,711	7,129,102	568	RC	71	-60	123	59	60	1	4.6	[email protected]/t Au from 59m	Warmblood
HWRC106	271,755	7,129,190	568	RC	74	-60	99	31	32	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 31m	Warmblood
HWRC107	271,737	7,129,186	568	RC	74	-60	105	68	69	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 68m	Warmblood
HWRC108	271,711	7,129,177	568	RC	72	-60	117	16	17	1	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Warmblood
and								58	62	4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 58m
HWRC109	271,789	7,129,100	568	RC	73	-59	99					NSR	Warmblood
HWRC110	271,766	7,129,092	568	RC	73	-59	99	68	69	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 68m	Warmblood
HWRC111	271,743	7,129,083	568	RC	74	-59	105	85	86	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 85m	Warmblood
and								89	90	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 89m
HWRC238	271,673	7,129,115	568	RC	73	-60	240	116	119	3	2.9	[email protected]/t Au from 116m	Warmblood
and								164	167	3	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 164m
and								171	172	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 171m
HWRC241	271,682	7,129,170	568	RC	71	-61	227	50	53	3	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 50m	Warmblood

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								62	63	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 62m
and								64	65	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 64m
and								130	133	3	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 130m
HWRC242	271,735	7,129,030	568	RC	72	-61	250	93	95	2	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 93m	Warmblood
and								221	223	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 221m
HWAC1774	271,550	7,129,200	572	AC	270	-60	54					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1775	271,600	7,129,200	572	AC	270	-60	63					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1776	271,650	7,129,200	572	AC	270	-60	65					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1777	271,700	7,129,200	572	AC	270	-60	57					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1778	271,750	7,129,200	572	AC	270	-60	78					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1779	271,800	7,129,200	572	AC	270	-60	68					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1780	271,850	7,129,200	572	AC	270	-60	74					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1781	271,900	7,129,200	572	AC	270	-60	81					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1782	271,950	7,129,200	572	AC	270	-60	89	20	24	4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Warmblood
HWAC1791	271,700	7,129,000	572	AC	270	-60	13					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1792	271,750	7,129,000	572	AC	270	-60	57					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1793	271,800	7,129,000	572	AC	270	-60	64					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1794	271,850	7,129,000	572	AC	270	-60	75	64	68	4	1.0	4m@1g/t Au from 64m	Warmblood
HWAC1795	271,900	7,129,000	572	AC	270	-60	65					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1796	271,950	7,129,000	572	AC	270	-60	70					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1797	272,000	7,129,000	572	AC	270	-60	80					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1806	271,800	7,128,800	572	AC	270	-60	48					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1807	271,850	7,128,800	572	AC	270	-60	56					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1808	271,900	7,128,800	572	AC	270	-60	64					NSR	Warmblood
HWAC1809	271950	7128800	572	AC	270	60	87	24	60	36	1.2	36m @ 1.2g/t Au from 24m, incl. 16m	Wbld
including	,	,,				-		32	48	16	2.5	@2.5g/t Au	armoo
HWAC1810	272,000	7,128,800	572	AC	270	-60	69					NSR	Warmblood
HWRC280	272,065	7,130,318	572	RC	110	-60	124	16	21	5	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Marwari-Filly
HWRC281	272,046	7,130,264	572	RC	110	-60	124	47	48	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 47m	Marwari-Filly
HWRC282	271,901	7,130,528	572	RC	110	-60	106	40	44	4	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 40m	Marwari-Filly
HWRC283	271,863	7,130,542	572	RC	110	-60	160	108	120	12	5.4	[email protected]/t Au from 108m	Marwari-Filly
including								112	116	4	8.4	[email protected]/t Au from 112m
HWRC284	271,750	7,130,510	572	RC	110	-60	106	72	76	4	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 72m	Marwari-Filly
HWRC285	271,879	7,130,411	572	RC	110	-60	106	80	84	4	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 80m	Marwari-Filly
HWRC286	271,864	7,130,482	572	RC	110	-60	106	72	76	4	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 72m	Marwari-Filly
HWRC287	272,055	7,130,813	572	RC	110	-60	112	16	44	28	1	28m@1g/t Au from 16m	Marwari-Filly
including								40	44	4	3.8	[email protected]/t Au from 40m
HWRC288	271,913	7,130,565	572	RC	110	-60	106					NSR	Marwari-Filly
HWRC289	271,927	7,130,544	572	RC	270	-60	124					NSR	Marwari-Filly

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
MWRC001	271,950	7,130,500	572	RC	270	-60	184	44	48	4	2.7	[email protected]/t Au from 44m	Marwari-Filly
and								152	154	2	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 152m
MWRC002	271,990	7,130,580	572	RC	270	-60	226	16	17	1	1	1m@1g/t Au from 16m	Marwari-Filly
MWRC003	271,950	7,130,540	572	RC	270	-60	160	19	43	24	7.4	[email protected]/t Au from 19m	Marwari-Filly
and								60	61	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 60m
and								69	70	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 69m
and								79	80	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 79m
and								141	143	2	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 141m
MWRC004D	271,990	7,130,540	572	RC_DDH	270	-60	258.8					NSR	Marwari-Filly
MWRC005	271,910	7,130,500	572	RC	270	-60	154	49	50	1	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 49m	Marwari-Filly
and								122	125	3	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 122m
MWRC006	271,910	7,130,460	572	RC	270	-60	154	69	70	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 69m	Marwari-Filly
and								92	93	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 92m
MWRC007	271,950	7,130,580	572	RC	270	-60	178	36	38	2	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 36m	Marwari-Filly
and								71	74	3	8.9	[email protected]/t Au from 71m
MWRC008	271,950	7,130,420	572	RC	270	-60	244	19	20	1	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 19m	Marwari-Filly
MWRC009	271,990	7,130,420	572	RC	270	-60	145					NSR	Marwari-Filly
MWRC010	271,950	7,130,340	572	RC	270	-60	220	2	3	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 2m	Marwari-Filly
and								26	27	1	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 26m
and								32	36	4	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 32m
MWRC011	271,990	7,130,340	572	RC	270	-60	244	61	62	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 61m	Marwari-Filly
and								80	81	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 80m
and								106	107	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 106m
MWRC012	271,870	7,130,510	572	RC	90	-60	124	83	86	3	6	3m@6g/t Au from 83m	Marwari-Filly
and								102	103	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 102m
MWRC013	271,830	7,130,510	572	RC	90	-60	184					NSR	Marwari-Filly
MWDD001	271,990	7,130,500	572	DDH	270	-60	291.1	151	152	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 151m	Marwari-Filly
and								216.2	218.7	2.5	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 216.2m
and								231	234	3	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 231m
and								270	271	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 270m
MWDD002	271,950	7,130,460	572	DDH	270	-60	168.5	23.4	24	0.7	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 23.4m	Marwari-Filly
and								30	31	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 30m
and								120.5	121.9	1.5	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 120.5m
and								163.46	164	0.5	4.8	[email protected]/t Au from 163.46m
MWDD003	272,030	7,130,500	572	RC_DDH	270	-60	314.6	217	222	5	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 217m	Marwari-Filly
and								247.5	248.5	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 247.5m
MWDD004	272,030	7,130,420	572	RC_DDH	270	-60	302.5	116.0	128.0	12	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 116m	Marwari-Filly
and								190.2	195.0	4.8	2.7	[email protected]/t Au from 190.23m
and								237.0	238.0	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 237m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								239.7	241.0	1.3	1	1.3m@1g/t Au from 239.71m
and								258.7	263.0	4.3	2.2	[email protected]/t Au from 258.71m
and								280.0	282.0	2	2.2	[email protected]/t Au from 280m
MWDD005	272,030	7,130,460	572	RC_DDH	270	-60	299	224	227	3	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 224m	Marwari-Filly
and								232	233	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 232m
MWDD006	272,030	7,130,540	572	RC_DDH	270	-60	304.6	292.7	293.9	1.2	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 292.65m	Marwari-Filly
MWDD007	272,030	7,130,580	572	RC	270	-60	154	32	36	4	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 32m	Marwari-Filly
and								80	84	4	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 80m
MWDD008	271,990	7,130,460	572	RC_DDH	270	-60	248	133.6	134.3	0.6	3.2	[email protected]/t Au from 133.63m	Marwari-Filly
HWRC259	270,886	7,130,369	565	RC	110	-60	148	58	60	2	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 58m	Bronco-Konik
and								71	79	8	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 71m
including								77	78	1	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 77m
HWRC260	270,937	7,130,393	565	RC	110	-60	166					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC261	270,785	7,130,151	566	RC	110	-60	136	132	133	1	2.2	[email protected]/t Au from 132m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC262	271,023	7,130,511	565	RC	110	-60	124					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC267	271,221	7,130,412	567	RC	252	-60	100	74	75	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 74m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC268	271,266	7,130,322	567	RC	252	-60	124					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC269	270,895	7,130,369	565	RC	40	-60	166	117	118	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 117m	Bronco-Konik
and								130	138	8	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 130m
including								130	131	1	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 130m
HWRC270	270,998	7,130,348	570	RC	40	-60	70					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC271	270,877	7,130,077	571	RC	40	-60	124	73	79	6	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 73m	Bronco-Konik
including								74	76	2	2.7	[email protected]/t Au from 74m
and								82	87	5	1.0	5m@1g/t Au from 82m
HWRC272	270,903	7,130,107	569	RC	40	-60	100	49	50	1	1.6	[email protected]/t Au from 49m	Bronco-Konik
and								64	65	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 64m
HWRC273	270,928	7,130,075	570	RC	40	-60	88	23	32	9	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 23m	Bronco-Konik
including								26	29	3	3.3	[email protected]/t Au from 26m
HWRC274	270,715	7,130,353	565	RC	40	-60	124					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC336	270,835	7,130,433	564	RC	50	-60	192	146	162	16	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 146m	Bronco-Konik
including								146	149	3	4.6	[email protected]/t Au from 146m
and								157	158	1	2.1	[email protected]/t Au from 157m
and								161	162	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 161m
HWRC337	270,832	7,130,495	564	RC	50	-60	150	83	86	3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 83m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC338	270,799	7,130,532	564	RC	50	-60	144	80	81	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 80m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC339	270,777	7,130,517	564	RC	50	-60	192	20	21	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Bronco-Konik
and								63	65	2	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 63m
HWRC340	270,768	7,130,573	564	RC	50	-60	96					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC341	270,749	7,130,557	564	RC	50	-60	192	94	95	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 94m	Bronco-Konik

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
HWRC342	270,765	7,130,635	564	RC	50	-60	180					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC343	270,739	7,130,612	564	RC	50	-60	156	125	126	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 125m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC344	270,716	7,130,596	564	RC	50	-60	198	96	97	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 96m	Bronco-Konik
and								99	101	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 99m
and								113	114	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 113m
HWRC345	270,733	7,130,674	564	RC	50	-60	144					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC346	270,708	7,130,653	564	RC	50	-60	150					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC347	270,689	7,130,639	564	RC	50	-60	210					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC348	270,842	7,130,573	564	RC	50	-60	126					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWDD012	270,864	7,130,250	565	DDH	110	-60	169.8	31	32	1	3.8	[email protected]/t Au from 31m	Bronco-Konik
and								51.4	52.6	1.2	3.1	[email protected]/t Au from 51.4m
and								60	66.2	6.2	2.1	[email protected]/t Au from 60m
including								60	62	2	5.9	[email protected]/t Au from 60m
HWDD013	270,737	7,130,253	565	RC_DDH	110	-60	100					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWDD014	270,826	7,130,264	565	DDH	110	-60	227.6	52	64	12	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 52m	Bronco-Konik
including								53.5	58.3	4.8	2.5	[email protected]/t Au from 53.5m
and								74.1	83.3	9.2	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 74.1m
including								74.1	76	1.9	4.9	[email protected]/t Au from 74.1m
and								99	100	1	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 99m
HWDD015	270,699	7,130,267	565	RC_DDH	110	-60	148					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWDD016	270,848	7,130,383	565	DDH	110	-60	222	84	99.8	15.8	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 84m	Bronco-Konik
including								86.9	91.8	5	4.4	[email protected]/t Au from 86.9m
including								86.9	88.9	2.1	8.4	[email protected]/t Au from 86.9m
HWDD018	270,834	7,130,152	567	DDH	40	-60	219	108	119	11	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 108m	Bronco-Konik
and								137	148	11	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 137m
HWDD019	270,904	7,130,313	567	DDH	40	-60	356.8	29.4	33.1	3.8	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 29.4m	Bronco-Konik
and								38.4	39.4	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 38.4m
and								49.2	50	0.8	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 49.2m
and								58.7	71	12.3	1.0	12.3m@1g/t Au from 58.7m
including								58.7	61	2.3	3.4	[email protected]/t Au from 58.7m
and								142.1	143.3	1.2	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 142.1m
HWDD038	270,830	7,130,143	565	DDH	30	-60	220	66.5	69.9	3.4	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 66.5m	Bronco-Konik
and								114	176.3	62.3	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 114m
including								115.4	121.5	6.1	2.0	6.1m@2g/t Au from 115.4m
including								170.7	173.8	3.1	3.0	3.1m@3g/t Au from 170.7m
and								192	193	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 192m
and								195	196	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 195m
and								204.9	207	2.1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 204.9m
HWDD040	270,825	7,130,177	565	DDH	30	-60	180	81	101.2	20.2	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 81m	Bronco-Konik

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
including								82.2	85	2.8	3.5	[email protected]/t Au from 82.2m
and								114.4	119.5	5.1	2.9	[email protected]/t Au from 114.4m
and								131	139	8	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 131m
including								138	139	1	7.3	[email protected]/t Au from 138m
and								159	160.5	1.5	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 159m
and								161.5	162	0.5	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 161.5m
and								164.4	165	0.6	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 164.4m
HWDD041	270,845	7,130,167	565	DDH	30	-60	215.35	47	47.6	0.6	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 47m	Bronco-Konik
and								75.7	76.4	0.7	1.6	[email protected]/t Au from 75.7m
and								81	99.5	18.5	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 81m
including								87.6	90.8	3.2	8.0	3.2m@8g/t Au from 87.6m
and								106.3	106.8	0.5	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 106.3m
and								113.7	114.2	0.5	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 113.7m
and								119.3	123.3	4	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 119.3m
and								132.1	141	8.9	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 132.1m
and								163	163.5	0.5	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 163m
HWDD044	270,828	7,130,181	565	DDH	15	-60	198.14	39.9	43.1	3.2	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 39.9m	Bronco-Konik
and								136.1	148.2	12.1	1.0	12.1m@1g/t Au from 136.1m
and								169.8	173	3.2	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 169.8m
HWDD045	270,789	7,130,188	565	DDH	30	-60	209.84	76.4	77.3	0.9	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 76.4m	Bronco-Konik
and								135	136.5	1.5	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 135m
and								141	143	2	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 141m
and								147	148.5	1.5	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 147m
and								153.4	154	0.6	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 153.4m
and								160	160.9	0.9	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 160m
AHWR076	270,879	7,130,232	541	RC	342	-58	72	19	26	7	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 19m	Bronco-Konik
and								38	55	17	1.0	17m@1g/t Au from 38m
AHWR077	270,860	7,130,226	541	RC	344	-59	120	20	21	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Bronco-Konik
and								32	33	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 32m
and								39	51	12	2.1	[email protected]/t Au from 39m
and								64	72	8	2.0	8m@2g/t Au from 64m
AHWR078	270,846	7,130,217	541	RC	342	-60	118	36	38	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 36m
and								57	59	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 57m
and								63	88	25	0.8	25m @ 0.8g/t Au from 63m, incl. 6m	Bronco-Konik
including								82	88	6	1.2	@1.2g/t Au
and								98	118	20	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 98m to BOH
AHWR079	270,827	7,130,209	541	RC	346	-59	187	32	33	1	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 32m	Bronco-Konik
and								50	51	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 50m
and								56	57	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 56m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								69	74	5	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 69m
and								96	140	44	0.6	44m @ 0.6g/t Au from 96m^, incl. 4m
including								134	138	4	2.6	@2.6g/t Au
AHWR080	270,907	7,130,128	541	RC	74	-64	103	16	18	2	1.0	2m@1g/t Au from 16m	Bronco-Konik
and								33	34	1	3.1	1m@3g/t Au from 33m
and								44	53	9	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 44m
AHWR081	270,886	7,130,120	541	RC	67	-63	103	33	34	1	4.5	[email protected]/t Au from 33m	Bronco-Konik
and								45	46	1	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 45m
and								72	75	3	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 72m
and								82	83	1	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 82m
AHWR082	270887	7130177	541	RC	345	60	91	4	6	2	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 4m
and								13	21	8	1.5	8m @ 1.5g/t Au from 13m, incl. 2m @	BKik
including	,	,,				-		16	18	2	4.4	4.4g/t Au	ronco-on
and								68	69	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 68m
AHWR083	270,863	7,130,167	541	RC	72	-60	115	27	28	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 27m	Bronco-Konik
and								39	41	2	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 39m
AHWR084	270,845	7,130,155	541	RC	72	-61	151	46	81	35	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 46m	Bronco-Konik
AHWR085	270,903	7,130,283	541	RC	346	-61	73	65	71	6	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 65m	Bronco-Konik
AHWR086	270,849	7,130,276	541	RC	344	-59	97	19	20	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 19m	Bronco-Konik
and								22	23	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 22m
and								48	49	1	3.1	[email protected]/t Au from 48m
AHWR087								19	24	5	0.8	5m @ 0.8g/t Au from 19m, incl. 2m @
including	270832	7130264	541	RC	347	60	92	19	21	2	1.6	1.6g/t Au from 19m	Bronco-Konik
and	,	,,				-		35	36	1	3.6	[email protected]/t Au from 35m
and								42	43	1	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 42m
AHWR088	270,812	7,130,253	541	RC	349	-59	67	64	65	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 64m	Bronco-Konik
AHWR089	270,904	7,130,344	541	RC	270	-60	79	43	46	3	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 43m	Bronco-Konik
and								60	61	1	28.6	[email protected]/t Au from 60m
AHWR090	270,863	7,130,329	541	RC	90	-60	139	42	48	6	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 42m	Bronco-Konik
and								72	84	12	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 72m
and								94	95	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 94m
AHWR091	270,832	7,130,320	541	RC	270	-60	139	92	120	28	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 92m	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1447	270,700	7,130,500	541	AC	90	-60	51					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1448	270,750	7,130,500	541	AC	90	-60	61					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1449	270,800	7,130,500	541	AC	71	-58	56					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1450	270,850	7,130,500	541	AC	71	-59	57	37	38	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 37m	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1451	270,900	7,130,500	541	AC	343	-61	58	31	32	1	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 31m	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1452	270,950	7,130,500	541	AC	341	-60	64	44	45	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 44m	Bronco-Konik
and								57	60	3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 57m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
HWAC1453	271,000	7,130,500	541	AC	324	-61	61	29	30	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 29m	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1454	271,050	7,130,500	541	AC	342	-59	90	48	49	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 48m	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1482	270,750	7,130,400	541	AC	90	-60	65					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1483	270,700	7,130,400	541	AC	75	-60	65					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1484	270,800	7,130,400	541	AC	270	-60	69					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1485	270,850	7,130,400	541	AC	270	-60	75	32	33	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 32m	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1486	270,900	7,130,400	541	AC	270	-60	86					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1487	270,950	7,130,400	541	AC	270	-60	71					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1488	271,000	7,130,400	541	AC	270	-60	75	1	6	5	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 1m	BKik
and								11	12	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 11m
and								17	75	58	1.7	58m @ 1.7g/t Au from 17m to BOH,	ronco-on
including								60	70	10	4.2	incl. [email protected]/t Au
HWAC1489	271,050	7,130,400	541	AC	270	-60	78					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1519	270,750	7,130,200	541	AC	345	-60	87					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1520	270,800	7,130,200	541	AC	340	-60	93					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1521	270,850	7,130,200	541	AC	345	-59	93	8	9	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 8m	Bronco-Konik
and								18	19	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 18m
and								43	44	1	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 43m
HWAC1522	270,900	7,130,200	541	AC	343	-58	99	11	12	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 11m	Bronco-Konik
and								24	26	2	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 24m
HWAC1523	270,950	7,130,200	541	AC	270	-60	100	28	36	8	1.0	8m@1g/t Au from 28m	Bronco-Konik
and								41	42	1	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 41m
and								80	81	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 80m
and								90	91	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 90m
HWAC1524	271,000	7,130,200	541	AC	270	-60	95	9	10	1	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 9m	Bronco-Konik
and								26	29	3	4.3	[email protected]/t Au from 26m
HWAC1525	271,050	7,130,200	541	AC	270	-60	89					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1643	270,900	7,130,450	541	AC	270	-60	66	30	34	4	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 30m	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1643R	270,900	7,130,450	541	AC	270	-60	75	27	28	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 27m	Bronco-Konik
and								48	49	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 48m
and								70	71	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 70m
HWAC1644	270,950	7,130,450	541	AC	270	-60	85					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1644R	270,950	7,130,450	541	AC	270	-60	68					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1645	271,000	7,130,450	541	AC	270	-60	80					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1645R	271,000	7,130,450	541	AC	270	-60	69					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1646	271,050	7,130,450	541	AC	270	-60	92	24	25	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1648	271,050	7,130,350	541	AC	270	-60	95					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1649	271000	7130350	541	AC	270	60	93	44	49	5	0.7	5m @ 0.7g/t Au from 44m, incl. 1m @	BKik
including	,	,,				-		44	45	1	2.0	2g/t Au	ronco-on

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								64	67	3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 64m
HWAC1650	270,950	7,130,350	541	AC	270	-60	86					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1651	271,050	7,130,300	541	AC	270	-60	96					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1652	271,000	7,130,300	541	AC	270	-60	102	40	41	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 40m	Bronco-Konik
and								51	54	3	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 51m
HWAC1653	270,950	7,130,300	541	AC	90	-60	106	19	28	9	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 19m	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1656	271,050	7,130,250	541	AC	341	-60	98					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1657	271,000	7,130,250	541	AC	342	-60	105					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1661	271,050	7,130,150	541	AC	342	-59	96					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1683	271,050	7,130,000	541	AC	342	-60	66					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1684	271,000	7,130,000	541	AC	340	-60	88					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1685	270,950	7,130,000	541	AC	74	-61	94					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1686	270,900	7,130,000	541	AC	72	-61	89					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWAC1687	270,850	7,130,000	541	AC	78	-64	83					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC072	270853	7130219	541	RC	349	59	107	18	107	89	3.0	89m @ 3.0g/t Au from 18m to BOH^,	BKik
including	,	,,				-		18	33	15	14.2	incl. [email protected]/t Au	ronco-on
HWRC073	270,812	7,130,204	541	RC	350	-60	105	85	105	20	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 85m to BOH	Bronco-Konik
HWRC074	270,949	7,130,248	541	RC	350	-60	113	73	74	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 73m
and								88	113	25	1.3	25m @ 1.3g/t Au from 88m to BOH,	Bronco-Konik
including								100	104	4	3.8	incl. [email protected]/t Au
HWRC075	270,745	7,130,394	541	RC	75	-61	107					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC076	270,793	7,130,408	541	RC	90	-60	95					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC091	270,901	7,130,230	541	RC	345	-60	110	6	32	26	2.0	[email protected]/t Au from 6m	Bronco-Konik
and								76	77	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 76m
HWRC092								12	33	21	0.8	21m @ 0.8g/t Au from 12m, incl. 4m
including	270907	7130211	541	RC	344	59	117	28	32	4	1.6	@1.6g/t Au from 28m	BKik
and	,	,,				-		41	66	25	0.9	25m @ 0.9g/t Au from 41m, incl. 8m	ronco-on
including								50	58	8	1.7	@1.7g/t Au from 50m
HWRC093	270,916	7,130,188	541	RC	345	-60	117	74	100	26	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 74m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC094	270,875	7,130,226	541	RC	345	-60	111	15	16	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 15m	Bronco-Konik
and								20	32	12	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 20m
and								47	58	11	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 47m
HWRC095	270,889	7,130,202	541	RC	343	-61	117	25	34	9	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 25m	Bronco-Konik
and								42	50	8	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 42m
and								64	66	2	4.4	[email protected]/t Au from 64m
and								78	79	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 78m
and								87	91	4	3.4	[email protected]/t Au from 87m
and								103	106	3	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 103m
HWRC096	270,894	7,130,179	541	RC	345	-60	117	5	14	9	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 5m	Bronco-Konik

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								65	97	32	1.2	32m @ 1.2g/t Au from 65m, incl. 7m
including								68	75	7	3.2	@3.2g/t Au from 68m
and								112	117	5	1.0	5m@1g/t Au from 112m to BOH
HWRC097	270,853	7,130,219	541	RC	342	-60	117	50	51	1	4.2	[email protected]/t Au from 50m	Bronco-Konik
and								58	59	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 58m
HWRC098	270,862	7,130,191	541	RC	342	-59	117	35	36	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 35m	Bronco-Konik
and								41	48	7	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 41m
and								53	56	3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 53m
and								108	111	3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 108m
and								115	117	2	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 115m to BOH
HWRC099	270,869	7,130,170	541	RC	67	-62	117	41	43	2	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 41m	Bronco-Konik
and								72	98	26	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 72m
and								112	117	5	2.0	5m@2g/t Au from 112m to BOH
HWRC100	270,832	7,130,213	541	RC	343	-60	117	89	94	5	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 89m	Bronco-Konik
and								101	106	5	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 101m
HWRC101	270,837	7,130,186	541	RC	344	-60	111					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC102	270,844	7,130,163	541	RC	71	-63	117	96	97	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 96m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC103	270,877	7,130,307	541	RC	90	-60	108	22	28	6	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 22m	Bronco-Konik
and								54	56	2	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 54m
and								69	70	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 69m
and								78	82	4	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 78m
and								93	94	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 93m
and								97	98	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 97m
and								105	106	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 105m
HWRC104	270,887	7,130,284	541	RC	344	-60	117	25	26	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 25m	Bronco-Konik
and								100	102	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 100m
and								105	114	9	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 105m
and								116	117	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 116m
HWRC105	270,893	7,130,256	541	RC	26	-60	117	16	17	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Bronco-Konik
and								36	37	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 36m
and								49	50	1	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 49m
and								100	101	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 100m
and								104	105	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 104m
HWRC112	270,922	7,130,163	541	RC	72	-61	123	16	18	2	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Bronco-Konik
and								42	48	6	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 42m
and								103	123	20	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 103m to BOH
HWRC113	270,922	7,130,238	541	RC	211	-60	94					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC114	270,954	7,130,093	541	RC	73	-60	117					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC115	270,940	7,130,113	541	RC	73	-60	117	0	1	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Bronco-Konik

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								19	20	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 19m
and								27	28	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 27m
and								45	47	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 45m
and								53	59	6	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 53m
HWRC116	270,929	7,130,145	541	RC	73	-60	94	10	49	39	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 10m	Bronco-Konik
and								89	90	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 89m
HWRC117	270,951	7,130,166	541	RC	69	-61	117					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC118	270,942	7,130,191	541	RC	342	-60	117	14	15	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 14m	Bronco-Konik
and								20	22	2	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 20m
and								35	36	1	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 35m
HWRC119	270,930	7,130,218	541	RC	342	-60	117	18	19	1	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 18m	Bronco-Konik
and								26	27	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 26m
and								30	32	2	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 30m
HWRC120	270,833	7,130,291	541	RC	20	-60	117					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC121	270839	7130269	541	RC	20	60	117	20	25	5	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 20m
and								42	50	8	2.5	8m @ 2.5g/t Au from 42m, incl. 2m @	BKik
including	,	,,				-		42	44	2	8.0	8g/t Au from 42m	ronco-on
and								62	64	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 62m
HWRC122	270,844	7,130,245	541	RC	20	-60	117	38	40	2	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 38m	Bronco-Konik
and								48	63	15	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 48m
and								91	95	4	1.0	4m@1g/t Au from 91m
HWRC123	270,920	7,130,342	541	RC	90	-60	117	61	63	2	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 61m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC124	270,917	7,130,342	541	RC	90	-60	117	10	11	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 10m	Bronco-Konik
and								15	49	34	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 15m
and								60	65	5	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 60m
and								84	89	5	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 84m
HWRC125	270,934	7,130,296	541	RC	90	-60	117	10	19	9	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 10m	Bronco-Konik
and								33	41	8	3.2	[email protected]/t Au from 33m
and								50	109	59	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 50m^
HWRC126	270,940	7,130,272	541	RC	20	-60	117	66	67	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 66m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC127	270,964	7,130,360	541	RC	90	-60	117	83	113	30	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 83m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC128	270,975	7,130,335	541	RC	90	-60	117	19	20	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 19m	Bronco-Konik
and								111	112	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 111m
and								115	116	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 115m
HWRC129	270,986	7,130,309	541	RC	90	-60	124	80	81	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 80m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC130	270,990	7,130,290	541	RC	90	-60	117	59	61	2	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 59m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC131	271,016	7,130,372	541	RC	90	-60	117	35	43	8	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 35m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC132	271,026	7,130,351	541	RC	90	-60	117	61	65	4	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 61m	Bronco-Konik
and								75	78	3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 75m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								109	112	3	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 109m
HWRC133	271,032	7,130,328	541	RC	90	-60	117					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC167	270,875	7,130,172	541	RC	20	-60	83	16	17	1	3.2	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Bronco-Konik
and								66	69	3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 66m
and								76	79	3	3.0	3m@3g/t Au from 76m
HWRC168	270,863	7,130,273	541	RC	20	-60	53	42	45	3	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 42m	Bronco-Konik
and								49	50	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 49m
HWRC221	270,875	7,130,147	541	RC	69	-61	221					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC222	270,936	7,130,129	541	RC	71	-60	155	9	43	34	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 9m^	Bronco-Konik
HWRC223	270,983	7,130,184	541	RC	343	-59	125					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC224	270,969	7,130,131	541	RC	270	-60	149					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC225	270,790	7,130,285	541	RC	20	-60	113	85	86	1	2.4	[email protected]/t Au from 85m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC226	270,763	7,130,231	541	RC	20	-60	131	104	106	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 104m	Bronco-Konik
and								111	115	4	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 111m
HWRC227	270,745	7,130,184	541	RC	20	-60	125					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC228	270,953	7,130,099	541	RC	270	-60	143	8	24	16	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 8m	Bronco-Konik
HWRC234	270,841	7,130,423	541	RC	90	-60	209	31	32	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 31m	Bronco-Konik
and								38	39	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 38m
and								119	120	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 119m
HWRC235	270,728	7,130,389	541	RC	252	-60	203					NSR	Bronco-Konik
HWRC236	270786	7130193	541	RC	73	60	299	110	179	69	0.7	69m @ 0.7g/t Au from 110m^, incl. 4m	BKik
including	,	,,				-		173	177	4	2.6	@2.6g/t Au	ronco-on
HWRC237	270,857	7,130,113	541	RC	270	-60	280	67	73	6	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 67m	Bronco-Konik
and								83	84	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 83m
and								105	107	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 105m
and								110	111	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 110m
HWRC251								144	239	95	0.7	95m @ 0.7g/t Au from 144m^, incl.
including	270,720	7,130,172	541	RC	72	-60	280	229	239	10	3.5	[email protected]/t Au	Bronco-Konik
and								258	264	6	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 258m
HWDD001	271,495	7,130,870	568	DDH	252	-62	213.0	127.91	129.4	1.4	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 127.91m	Palomino
and								133.4	147	13.7	6.3	[email protected]/t Au from 133.4m
including								133.9	136.9	3	20.0	3m@20g/t Au from 133.9m
HWDD002	271,494	7,130,895	568	DDH	252	-62	201.0	14.2	17	2.9	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 14.2m	Palomino
and								19	19.7	0.7	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 19m
and								144.7	161.6	17	10.6	[email protected]/t Au from 144.7m
including								150.1	153.6	3.5	15.0	3.5m@15g/t Au from 150.1m
HWDD004	271,274	7,130,918	565	RC_DD	72.5	-60	293.5	52.0	56.0	4.0	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 52m	Palomino
and								166.2	167.9	1.6	3.1	[email protected]/t Au from 166.2m
including								166.9	167.9	0.9	5.1	[email protected]/t Au from 166.9m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								182.2	183.9	1.7	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 182.2m
and								222.1	236.9	14.9	3.9	[email protected]/t Au from 222.1m
including								222.1	224.5	2.4	10.9	[email protected]/t Au from 222.1m
and								230.8	234.6	3.7	5.9	[email protected]/t Au from 230.8m
and								252.0	253.0	1.0	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 252m
HWDD006	271,250	7,130,994	565	RC_DD	72.5	-60	341.1	149.5	150.0	0.6	1.6	[email protected]/t Au from 149.5m	Palomino
and								178.8	179.3	0.5	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 178.79m
and								232.4	233.5	1.1	2.8	[email protected]/t Au from 232.4m
and								240.0	242.0	2.0	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 240m
and								254.0	256.0	2.0	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 254m
and								329.6	330.2	0.6	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 329.6m
HWDD007	271,209	7,131,023	565	RC_DD	72.5	-60	342.0	146.5	147.0	0.5	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 146.5m	Palomino
and								150.5	151.0	0.5	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 150.5m
and								154.0	155.8	1.8	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 154m
and								161.8	162.5	0.7	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 161.8m
and								268.0	269.0	1.0	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 268m
and								307.0	310.0	3.0	1.0	3m@1g/t Au from 307m
and								320.0	321.0	1.0	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 320m
HWDD008	271,384	7,130,709	567	RC_DD	72.5	-60	256.6	175.0	177.0	2.0	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 175m	Palomino
HWDD009	271,397	7,130,783	567	DDH	72.5	-60	174.0	19.5	20	0.5	1.0	0.5m@1g/t Au from 19.5m	Palomino
and								49	55.6	6.4	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 49m
and								61.3	67	6.7	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 61.3m
and								68.9	73.5	4.6	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 68.9m
and								80	83	3	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 80m
and								103.6	123.9	20.3	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 103.6m
including								109	116	7	4.7	[email protected]/t Au from 109m
HWDD011	271,310	7,130,929	565	DDH	72.5	-60	213.0	148	168	20	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 148m	Palomino
HWDD020	271,368	7,130,751	567	RC_DD	72.5	-60	249.0	146	148.5	2.5	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 146m	Palomino
and								171	172.9	1.9	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 171m
and								180.2	190	9.8	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 180.2m
and								193	195	2	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 193m
HWDD021	271,330	7,130,738	566	RC_DD	252	-60	186	91	97	6	1.0	6m@1g/t Au from 91m	Palomino
and								102	104	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 102m
and								112	124.1	12.1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 112m
and								128	133	5	1.0	5m@1g/t Au from 128m
and								124	151	9	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 124m
and								163	165.8	2.8	1.0	2.8m@1g/t Au from 163m
HWDD023	271,317	7,130,861	566	RC	252	-60	100					NSR	Palomino
HWDD024	271,281	7,130,962	565	RC_DD	72.5	-60	267.0	24	29.2	5.2	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Palomino

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								150.9	151.7	0.8	3.3	[email protected]/t Au from 150.9m
and								170	177.8	7.8	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 170m
and								180.9	183.5	2.6	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 180.9m
and								199.8	201.9	2.1	3.5	[email protected]/t Au from 199.8m
including								201.3	201.9	0.6	6.9	[email protected]/t Au from 201.3m
HWDD025	271,147	7,131,087	563	DDH	72.5	-60	423.1	345	351	6	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 345m	Palomino
including								347	348.5	1.5	7.0	1.5m@7g/t Au from 347m
HWDD026	271,425	7,130,825	565	DDH	73	-60	84	45	64	19	3.0	19m@3g/t Au from 45m	Palomino
including								58	61	3	12.0	3m@12g/t Au from 58m
HWDD027	271,367	7,130,807	567	DDH	73	-60	207	90.8	93	2.2	2.1	[email protected]/t Au from 90.8m	Palomino
and								97	98	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 97m
and								122	123	1	2.4	[email protected]/t Au from 122m
and								138.6	145.5	6.9	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 138.6m
and								151	151.5	0.5	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 151m
and								162	162.5	0.5	1.0	0.5m@1g/t Au from 162m
HWDD030	271,179	7,131,097	565	DDH	73	-60	328	65.2	72.7	7.6	1.0	7.6m@1g/t Au from 65.2m	Palomino
and								146.5	147.3	0.7	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 146.5m
and								154.2	155.2	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 154.2m
and								199.5	200	0.5	1.0	0.5m@1g/t Au from 199.5m
and								202.5	203.5	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 202.5m
and								205	205.5	0.5	2.0	0.5m@2g/t Au from 205m
and								210	210.5	0.5	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 210m
and								326	327	1	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 326m
HWDD031	271,218	7,131,109	565	DDH	73	-60	321	12	13.6	1.6	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 12m	Palomino
and								34	35	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 34m
and								49	50.2	1.2	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 49m
and								62.4	64	1.6	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 62.4m
and								68.3	69.4	1.1	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 68.3m
and								106	107	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 106m
and								110.5	111	0.5	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 110.5m
and								117.5	118.8	1.3	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 117.5m
and								123.4	126	2.6	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 123.4m
and								128	130	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 128m
and								132	133	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 132m
and								198	198.7	0.7	3.3	[email protected]/t Au from 198m
and								218.7	222	3.3	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 218.7m
and								230	232	2	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 230m
and								256	257.9	1.9	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 256m
and								258.8	259.7	0.9	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 258.8m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								273.5	275	1.5	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 273.5m
HWDD032	271,249	7,131,078	567	DDH	73	-60	249	49	50	1	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 49m	Palomino
and								54	56	2	3.2	[email protected]/t Au from 54m
and								131	132	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 131m
and								140	140.8	0.8	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 140m
and								141.8	147	5.2	1.0	5.2m@1g/t Au from 141.8m
and								166.3	175.5	9.2	1.0	9.2m@1g/t Au from 166.3m
and								177	179	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 177m
and								182	183	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 182m
and								195	199	4	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 195m
including								195.9	197	1.1	4.2	[email protected]/t Au from 195.9m
HWDD033	271,280	7,131,046	567	DDH	73	-60	204	53.75	54.3	0.6	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 53.75m	Palomino
and								90	91.2	1.2	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 90m
and								99.2	110.6	11.4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 99.2m
and								102	103	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 102m
and								108	108.75	0.75	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 108m
and								118.5	124	5.5	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 118.5m
and								144	148	4	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 144m
and								161.2	173.5	12.3	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 161.2m
including								168	171.5	3.5	3.2	[email protected]/t Au from 168m
HWDD034	271,273	7,131,001	567	DDH	73	-60	255	42	43.2	1.2	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 42m	Palomino
and								89.6	90.5	0.9	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 89.6m
and								129	135.1	6.1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 129m
and								154	155	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 154m
and								161	165.1	4.1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 161m
and								170	180	10	6.9	[email protected]/t Au from 170m
including								171.9	174	2.1	15.1	[email protected]/t Au from 171.9m
HWDD035	271,242	7,131,033	567	DDH	73	-60	264	118.8	120.5	1.7	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 118.8m	Palomino
and								229	231	2	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 229m
and								233.1	238	4.9	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 233.1m
and								243.3	245.9	2.6	3.7	[email protected]/t Au from 243.3m
and								254	256	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 254m
HWRC254	271,350	7,130,942	567	RC	72.5	-60	136.0	22	31	9	2.4	[email protected]/t Au from 22m	Palomino
and								76	97	21	1.0	21m@1g/t Au from 76m
HWRC255	271,319	7,130,974	566	RC	72.5	-60	172.0	62	64	2	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 62m	Palomino
and								83	85	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 83m
and								111	138	27	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 111m
including								111	114	3	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 111m
including								134	136	2	2.8	[email protected]/t Au from 134m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								141	142	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 141m
HWRC256D	271,330	7,130,873	566	RC_DD	72.5	-60	225.0	161.4	172	10.6	7.5	[email protected]/t Au from 161.4m	Palomino
including								165.9	168.9	3	21.2	[email protected]/t Au from 165.9m
HWRC257	271,312	7,131,013	567	RC	72.5	-60	202.0	68	80	12	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 68m	Palomino
and								108	129	21	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 108m
including								113	117	4	2.0	4m@2g/t Au from 113m
including								126	129	3	2.7	[email protected]/t Au from 126m
HWRC258	271,330	7,130,935	567	RC	72.5	-60	202.0	123	143	20	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 123m	Palomino
including								133	137	4	4.9	[email protected]/t Au from 133m
HWRC294	271,406	7,130,895	567	RC	72.5	-60	100.0	37	51	14	2.8	[email protected]/t Au from 37m	Palomino
including								37	46	9	4.2	[email protected]/t Au from 37m
HWRC295	271,358	7,130,912	567	RC	72.5	-60	124.0	37	41	4	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 37m	Palomino
and								79	95	16	2.4	[email protected]/t Au from 79m
including								88	95	7	5.1	[email protected]/t Au from 88m
HWRC290	271,003	7,131,566	561	RC	72.5	-60	148.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC291	271,126	7,131,440	561	RC	72.5	-60	154.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC292	271,070	7,131,420	561	RC	72.5	-60	202.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC293	271,406	7,130,895	568	RC	72.5	-60	100.0	96	100	4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 96m	Palomino
HWRC296	271,376	7,130,922	568	RC	72.5	-60	100.0	51	52	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 51m	Palomino
and								62	65	3	1.0	3m@1g/t Au from 62m
and								71	72	1	5.2	[email protected]/t Au from 71m
HWRC297	271,392	7,130,958	567	RC	72.5	-60	76.0	24	25	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Palomino
HWRC298	271,371	7,130,951	567	RC	72.5	-60	100.0	60	61	1	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 60m	Palomino
and								66	70	4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 66m
HWRC299	271,357	7,130,990	567	RC	72.5	-60	100.0	51	62	11	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 51m	Palomino
HWRC300	271,351	7,131,025	566	RC	72.5	-60	100.0	7	13	6	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 7m	Palomino
HWRC301	271,319	7,131,058	565	RC	72.5	-60	124.0	31	33	2	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 31m	Palomino
and								48	49	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 48m
and								61	67	6	1.0	6m@1g/t Au from 61m
HWRC302	271,257	7,131,246	563	RC	72.5	-60	156.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC303	271,218	7,131,234	563	RC	72.5	-60	150.0	92	96	4	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 92m	Palomino
HWRC304	271,280	7,131,169	564	RC	72.5	-60	114.0	84	92	8	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 84m	Palomino
HWRC305	271,243	7,131,156	563	RC	72.5	-60	174.0	16	20	4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Palomino
and								148	152	4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 148m
and								164	168	4	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 164m
and								173	174	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 173m
HWRC306	271,324	7,131,098	565	RC	72.5	-60	78.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC313	271,702	7,130,502	565	RC	72.5	-60	126.0	80	88	8	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 80m	Palomino
and								104	112	8	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 104m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
HWRC314	271,570	7,130,585	567	RC	72.5	-60	120.0	24	32	8	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Palomino
and								36	38	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 36m
HWRC315	271,532	7,130,573	567	RC	72.5	-60	138.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC316	271,558	7,130,623	569	RC	72.5	-60	114.0	16	20	4	2.0	4m@2g/t Au from 16m	Palomino
and								28	32	4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 28m
HWRC317	271,520	7,130,611	569	RC	72.5	-60	150.0	83	88	5	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 83m	Palomino
HWRC318	271,488	7,130,643	565	RC	72.5	-60	156.0	101	112	11	1.0	11m@1g/t Au from 101m	Palomino
HWRC319	217,526	7,130,655	565	RC	72.5	-60	102.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC320	217,337	7,131,064	565	RC	72.5	-60	78.0	33	34	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 33m	Palomino
HWRC321	271,230	7,130,809	565	RC	72.5	-60	132.0	38	39	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 38m	Palomino
and								55	74	19	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 55m
including								71	74	3	3.9	[email protected]/t Au from 71m
AHWA170	271,534	7,130,721	565	AC	252	-60	64.0	15	18	3	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 15m	Palomino
and								36	64	28	2.0	28m@2g/t Au from 36m
AHWR007	271,494	7,131,051	567	AC	247.5	-60	264.0	236	237	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 236m	Palomino
and								250	264	14	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 250m to BOH
AHWR008	271,448	7,131,148	566	AC	247.5	-60	303.0	270	279	9	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 270m	Palomino
AHWR010	271,505	7,131,169	566	AC	247.5	-60	361.0	163	164	1	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 163m	Palomino
and								344	352	8	3.7	[email protected]/t Au from 344m
including								347	350	3	8.2	[email protected]/t Au from 347m
AHWR092	271,503	7,130,710	568	AC	71.9	-60	56.0	24	32	8	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Palomino
AHWR093	271,480	7,130,703	568	AC	71.2	-60	85.0	20	21	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Palomino
and								23	24	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 23m
and								28	29	1	4.0	1m@4g/t Au from 28m
and								41	60	19	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 41m
AHWR094	271,464	7,130,752	568	AC	75.1	-60	85.0	6	60	54	3.0	54m@3g/t Au from 6m	Palomino
including								27	35	8	8.6	[email protected]/t Au from 27m
including								45	50	5	7.4	[email protected]/t Au from 45m
AHWR095	271,442	7,130,745	568	AC	73.8	-60	120.0	42	45	3	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 42m	Palomino
and								81	103	22	3.6	[email protected]/t Au from 81m
AHWR096	271,447	7,130,799	568	AC	73.8	-60	79.0	6	50	44	3.0	44m@3g/t Au from 6m	Palomino
including								32	37	5	12.2	[email protected]/t Au from 32m
AHWR097	271,418	7,130,789	568	AC	68.7	-60	139.0	23	38	15	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 23m	Palomino
and								48	52	4	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 48m
and								72	88	16	3.9	[email protected]/t Au from 72m
AHWR098	271,371	7,130,775	568	AC	69.8	-60	199.0	117	118	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 117m	Palomino
and								121	122	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 121m
and								132	143	11	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 132m
and								174	187	13	1.0	13m@1g/t Au from 174m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								192	199	7	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 192m to BOH
AHWR099	271,346	7,130,800	568	AC	69.5	-60	229.0	124	126	2	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 124m	Palomino
and								159	166	7	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 159m
and								213	224	11	2.0	11m@2g/t Au from 213m
AHWR100	271,343	7,130,845	566	AC	69.5	-60	229.0	173	184	11	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 173m	Palomino
including								176	177	1	6.2	[email protected]/t Au from 176m
HWAC1321	271,350	7,131,200	572	AC	270	-60	87.0	38	41	3	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 38m	Palomino
and								69	70	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 69m
HWAC1348	271,400	7,131,000	572	AC	270	-60	61.0	34	35	1	1.6	[email protected]/t Au from 34m	Palomino
and								20	21	1	1.0	1m@1g/t Au from 20m
and								24	28	4	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 24m
and								33	39	6	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 33m
HWAC1380	271500	7130800	572	AC	270	-60	69.0	0	3	3	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Palomino
and								14	17	3	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 14m
and								20	22	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 20m
and								25	64	39	6.1	[email protected]/t Au from 25m
including								45	52	7	22.2	[email protected]/t Au from 45m
HWAC1438	271,600	7,130,600	572	RC	270	-60	57.0	28	52	24	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 28m	Palomino
including								35	37	2	6.5	[email protected]/t Au from 35m
HWDH001	271,491	7,130,791	568	DD	257	-60	108.0	0	11	11	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Palomino
and								17	19	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 17m
and								65	66	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 65m
and								70	82	12	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 70m
and								87	89	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 87m
HWDH002	271,515	7,130,800	568	DD	252	-60	120.0	24	25	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Palomino
and								32	33	1	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 32m
and								41	42	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 41m
and								54	57	3	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 54m
and								101	102	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 101m
and								106	108	2	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 106m
and								114	118	4	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 114m
HWRC006	271,526	7,130,745	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	24	58	34	2.2	[email protected]/t Au from 24m	Palomino
and								83	84	1	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 83m
and								89	90	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 89m
and								95	98	3	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 95m
and								102	103	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 102m
HWRC007	271,550	7,130,753	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	79	80	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 79m	Palomino
and								84	99	15	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 84m
HWRC008	271,482	7,130,787	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	0	3	3	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Palomino

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								31	65	34	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 31m
and								98	105	7	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 98m
HWRC009	271,504	7,130,795	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	0	2	2	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Palomino
and								26	105	79	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 26m
HWRC010	271,528	7,130,804	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	39	41	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 39m	Palomino
and								51	52	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 51m
and								54	55	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 54m
and								114	120	6	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 114m to BOH
HWRC011	271,492	7,130,842	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	5	6	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 5m	Palomino
and								40	41	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 40m
and								44	73	29	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 44m
and								80	83	3	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 80m
and								90	96	6	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 90m
and								110	111	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 110m
and								115	116	1	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 115m
HWRC016	271,453	7,130,881	568	RC	252	-60	117.0	16	36	20	5.1	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Palomino
including								24	28	4	16.1	[email protected]/t Au from 24m
HWRC017	271,476	7,130,889	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	45	46	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 45m	Palomino
and								62	64	2	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 62m
and								75	76	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 75m
and								83	87	4	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 83m
HWRC019	271,467	7,130,834	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	6	16	10	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 6m	Palomino
and								28	29	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 28m
and								92	96	4	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 92m
HWRC021	271,554	7,130,808	568	RC	252	-60	201.0	42	43	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 42m	Palomino
and								160	162	2	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 160m
and								174	178	4	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 174m
HWRC023	271,571	7130765	568	RC	252	-60	171.0	152	163	11	2.7	[email protected]/t Au from 152m	Palomino
and								167	168	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 167m
HWRC024	271,535	7,130,698	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	2	9	7	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 2m	Palomino
and								26	46	20	5.0	20m@5g/t Au from 26m
and								82	83	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 82m
HWRC025	271,558	7,130,706	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	13	19	6	2.0	6m@2g/t Au from 13m	Palomino
and								36	37	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 36m
and								85	88	3	4.1	[email protected]/t Au from 85m
HWRC027	271599	7,130,666	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	100	102	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 100m	Palomino
HWRC030	271,434	7,130,929	568	RC	252	-60	117.0	26	59	33	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 26m	Palomino
and								99	100	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 99m
HWRC031	271,459	7,130,936	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	105	109	4	3.4	[email protected]/t Au from 105m	Palomino

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								119	120	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 119m to BOH
HWRC034	271,463	7,130,884	568	RC	252	-60	99.0	41	43	2	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 41m	Palomino
and								61	67	6	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 61m
HWRC036	271,459	7,130,857	568	RC	252	-60	117.0	10	20	10	1.9	[email protected]/t Au from 10m	Palomino
and								111	117	6	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 111m to BOH
HWRC037	271,484	7,130,864	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	20	21	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 20m	Palomino
and								53	57	4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 53m
and								63	67	4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 63m
and								89	106	17	4.6	[email protected]/t Au from 89m
including								97	104	7	10.2	[email protected]/t Au from 97m
HWRC038	271,478	7,130,840	568	RC	252	-60	135.0	27	32	5	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 27m	Palomino
and								37	38	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 37m
and								41	48	7	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 41m
and								67	68	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 67m
and								75	78	3	1.0	3m@1g/t Au from 75m
and								81	83	2	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 81m
and								108	110	2	2.6	[email protected]/t Au from 108m
HWRC039	271,503	7,130,844	568	RC	252	-60	141.0	35	36	1	1.2	[email protected]/t Au from 35m	Palomino
and								113	115	2	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 113m
and								120	131	11	3.9	[email protected]/t Au from 120m
HWRC042	271,496	7,130,814	568	RC	252	-60	117.0	42	112	70	1.3	[email protected]/t Au from 42m	Palomino
HWRC045	271,471	7,130,783	568	RC	252	-60	120.0	9	32	23	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 9m	Palomino
and								36	49	13	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 36m
and								83	94	11	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 83m
HWRC047	271,489	7,130,763	568	RC	252	-60	123.0	0	38	38	2.8	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Palomino
including								13	18	5	17.1	[email protected]/t Au from 13m
and								40	41	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 40m
and								77	86	9	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 77m
HWRC048	271,514	7,130,768	568	RC	252	-60	129.0	29	93	64	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 29m	Palomino
and								110	112	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 110m
and								119	122	3	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 119m
HWRC049	271,538	7,130,776	568	RC	252	-60	129.0	40	42	2	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 40m	Palomino
and								50	53	3	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 50m
and								90	129	39	2.9	[email protected]/t Au from 90m
including								111	119	8	12.5	[email protected]/t Au from 111m
HWRC051	271,532	7,130,718	568	RC	252	-60	123.0	0	14	14	3.9	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Palomino
and								24	31	7	8.3	[email protected]/t Au from 24m
and								40	63	23	5.8	[email protected]/t Au from 40m
and								77	78	1	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 77m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								85	89	4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 85m
HWRC052	271,553	7,130,728	568	RC	252	-60	123.0	90	101	11	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 90m	Palomino
HWRC053	271,547	7,130,705	568	RC	252	-60	129.0	4	5	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 4m	Palomino
and								19	20	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 19m
and								57	58	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 57m
HWRC056	271,574	7,130,658	568	RC	252	-60	99.0	44	46	2	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 44m	Palomino
HWRC058	271,588	7,130,610	568	RC	252	-60	108.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC059	271,611	7,130,619	568	RC	252	-60	123.0	69	79	10	1.0	10m@1g/t Au from 69m	Palomino
HWRC061	271,627	7,130,571	568	RC	252	-60	135.0	47	48	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 47m	Palomino
HWRC063	271,440	7,130,720	568	RC	252	-60	168.0	42	49	7	5.8	[email protected]/t Au from 42m	Palomino
and								104	114	10	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 104m
HWRC135	271,486	7,130,855	568	RC	252	-60	131.0	75	78	3	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 75m	Palomino
and								94	110	16	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 94m
and								120	123	3	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 120m
HWRC136	271,508	7,130,780	568	RC	252	-60	107.0	0	4	4	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 0m	Palomino
and								11	13	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 11m
and								21	24	3	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 21m
and								40	59	19	1.5	[email protected]/t Au from 40m
and								76	89	13	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 76m
HWRC137	271,310	7,130,703	568	RC	252	-60	119.0	4	11	7	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 4m	Palomino
and								16	23	7	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 16m
and								36	50	14	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 36m
HWRC138	271,345	7,130,713	568	RC	252	-60	119.0	50	59	9	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 50m	Palomino
and								62	66	4	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 62m
and								76	91	15	1.4	[email protected]/t Au from 76m
including								76	81	5	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 76m
and								105	107	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 105m
and								117	118	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 117m
HWRC152	271,466	7,130,912	568	RC	252	-60	185.0	70	74	4	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 70m	Palomino
and								86	118	32	0.7	[email protected]/t Au from 86m
and								173	177	4	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 173m
and								183	185	2	1.7	[email protected]/t Au from 183m to BOH
HWRC155	271,505	7,130,872	568	RC	252	-60	185.0	34	35	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 34m	Palomino
and								140	165	25	3.8	[email protected]/t Au from 140m
including								154	160	6	13.6	[email protected]/t Au from 154m
and								180	181	1	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 180m
and								184	185	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 184m to BOH
HWRC156	271,528	7,130,879	568	RC	252	-60	233.0	112	113	1	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 112m	Palomino
and								206	216	10	2.1	[email protected]/t Au from 206m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)		Hole Details	Hole Details				Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)
		Northing	RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth	Depth	Intercept	Grade
		(m)	(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	from (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								220	223	3	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 220m
HWRC157	271,524	7,130,854	568	RC	252	-60	179.0	173	178	5	1.1	[email protected]/t Au from 173m	Palomino
HWRC160	271,559	7,130,785	568	RC	252	-60	201.0	7	10	3	1.0	3m@1g/t Au from 7m	Palomino
and								39	41	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 39m
and								68	69	1	0.9	[email protected]/t Au from 68m
and								72	73	1	0.8	[email protected]/t Au from 72m
and								88	89	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 88m
and								98	99	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 98m
and								182	188	6	2.6	[email protected]/t Au from 182m
HWRC162	271,590	7,130,769	568	RC	252	-60	203.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC165	271,594	7,130,747	568	RC	252	-60	203.0	104	105	1	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 104m	Palomino
HWRC166	271,595	7,130,719	568	RC	252	-60	209.0					NSR	Palomino
HWRC229	271,492	7,130,948	568	RC	252	-60	280.0	16	18	2	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 16m	Palomino
and								165	176	11	3.0	11m@3g/t Au from 165m
including								168	172	4	6.8	[email protected]/t Au from 168m
and								219	221	2	0.5	[email protected]/t Au from 219m
HWRC231	271,574	7,130,893	568	RC	252	-60	323.0	87	92	5	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 87m	Palomino
and								98	103	5	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 98m
HWRC239	271,530	7,130,959	568	RC	252	-60	330.0	243	247	4	2.4	[email protected]/t Au from 243m	Palomino
including								245	246	1	8.1	[email protected]/t Au from 245m
and								296	297	1	0.3	[email protected]/t Au from 296m
and								306	308	2	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 306m
and								312	314	2	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 312m
HWRC249	271,462	7,131,044	568	RC	252	-60	287.0	143	161	18	1.8	[email protected]/t Au from 143m	Palomino
including								144	146	2	7.0	2m@7g/t Au from 144m
and								189	190	1	2.3	[email protected]/t Au from 189m
PLRC001	271,419	7,131,027	568	RC	250	-60	150.0	74	99	25	0.6	[email protected]/t Au from 74m	Palomino
and								121	131	10	0.4	[email protected]/t Au from 121m

^Reported bulk intercept includes internal waste: AHWR079 (13m), HWRC072 (13m), HWRC125 (11m), HWRC222 (10m), HWRC236 (16m), HWRC251 (17m). Drill intercepts reported at a 0.3g/t Au cut-off and include consecutive internal waste up to 3m unless stated otherwise.

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Table 2: Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)	Northing (m)
			RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth f	Depth	Intercept	Grade
			(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	rom (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
CDA002	264,316	7,143,468	543	AC	90	-60	68	64	68	4	1.3	[email protected]/t from 64m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
ACDA003	264,286	7,143,475	541	AC	90	-60	58	56	58	2	1.4	[email protected]/t from 56m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
ACDA004	264,261	7,143,469	543	AC	90	-60	64	24	28	4	1.9	[email protected]/t from 24m	Dusk to Dawn
ACDA009	264,341	7,143,487	544	AC	180	-60	63.5	52	63.5	11.5	1.6	[email protected]/t from 52m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
ACDA016	263,195	7,144,418	545	AC	180	-60	74	24	36	12	1.1	[email protected]/t from 24m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
ACDA036	263,387	7,144,719	543	AC	180	-60	60	52	56	4	0.9	[email protected]/t from 52m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
ACDA038	263,406	7,144,622	541	AC	90	-60	79	68	72	4	3.0	[email protected]/t from 68m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
ACDD001	263,187	7,144,290	547	DDH	360	-60	298.9	70	71	1	1.0	[email protected]/t from 70m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								107	108	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 107m
and								116	124	8	0.8	[email protected]/t from 116m
and								141	144	3	1.7	[email protected]/t from 141m
and								148	155	7	1.9	[email protected]/t from 148m
and								159	160	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 159m
and								162	169	7	0.6	[email protected]/t from 162m
and								170	171	1	1.3	[email protected]/t from 170m
and								176	181	5	0.7	[email protected]/t from 176m
and								184	193	9	0.7	[email protected]/t from 184m
and								194	205	11	1.1	[email protected]/t from 194m
and								212	221	9	0.6	[email protected]/t from 212m
ACDR001	264,387	7,143,463	545	RC	70	-60	119	65	70	5	1.7	[email protected]/t from 65m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								74	80	6	0.6	[email protected]/t from 74m
ACDR002	263,200	7,144,342	546	RC	357.5	-60	139	34	40	6	0.6	[email protected]/t from 34m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								46	47	1	3.4	[email protected]/t from 46m
and								58	59	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 58m
and								98	99	1	3.6	[email protected]/t from 98m
and								106	115	9	1.9	[email protected]/t from 106m
ACDR003	263,192	7,144,263	546	RC	360	-60	234	52	54	2	0.7	[email protected]/t from 52m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								69	70	1	0.8	[email protected]/t from 69m
and								91	93	2	0.9	[email protected]/t from 91m
and								144	162	18	2.6	[email protected]/t from 144m
and								164	174	10	1.2	[email protected]/t from 164m
ACDR004	263,400	7,144,334	543	RC	360	-60	179	92	94	2	1.0	[email protected]/t from 92m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
ACDR005	263,600	7,144,326	537	RC	360	-60	40					NSR
ACDR006	263,203	7,144,357	546	RC	90	-60	159	33	35	2	1.0	[email protected]/t from 33m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								54	55	1	1.7	[email protected]/t from 54m
ACDR007	263,270	7,144,453	543	RC	90	-60	159					NSR

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)	Northing (m)
			RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth f	Depth	Intercept	Grade
			(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	rom (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
ACDR008	263,201	7,144,403	545	RC	0	-60	110	44	48	4	1.0	[email protected]/t from 44m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								52	56	4	0.8	[email protected]/t from 52m
and								68	76	8	0.7	[email protected]/t from 68m
ACDR009	263,106	7,144,348	545	RC	0	-60	154	40	44	4	1.3	[email protected]/t from 40m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								72	80	8	1.1	[email protected]/t from 72m
and								96	104	8	1.2	[email protected]/t from 96m
ACDR010	263,002	7,144,342	547	RC	355	-60	154					NSR
ACDR011	263,157	7,144,390	544	RC	355	-60	110	28	36	8	1.9	[email protected]/t from 28m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
ACDR012	263,155	7,144,305	546	RC	0	-60	149	44	48	4	0.8	[email protected]/t from 44m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								100	120	20	0.9	[email protected]/t from 100m
and								123	128	5	0.7	[email protected]/t from 123m
and								132	136	4	0.7	[email protected]/t from 132m
ACDR013	263,264	7,144,398	543	RC	10	-60	149					NSR
ACDR014	263,249	7,144,347	543	RC	10	-60	179					NSR
ACDR015	263,220	7,144,390	546	RC	10	-60	107	28	32	4	0.8	[email protected]/t from 28m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								48	49	1	0.9	[email protected]/t from 48m
CDAC003	263,899	7,143,533	540	AC	90	-60	58	49	51	2	1.0	[email protected]/t from 49m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
DDAC036	262,850	7,144,602	550	AC	90	-60	56	41	42	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 41m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
DDAC044	262,686	7,144,600	549	AC	90	-60	52	39	42	3	2.4	[email protected]/t from 39m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
DDAC046	263,010	7,144,603	551	AC	90	-60	59	55	56	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 55m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
DDAC054	263,056	7,144,459	542	AC	90	-60	85	62	66	4	12.7	[email protected]/t from 62m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								78	82	4	0.5	[email protected]/t from 78m
and								83	84	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 83m
DDAC059	262,892	7,144,460	545	AC	90	-60	54	25	26	1	0.8	[email protected]/t from 25m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
DDAC062	262,805	7,144,456	542	AC	90	-60	54	44	50	6	0.9	[email protected]/t from 44m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
DDRC001	263,193	7,144,425	545	RC	225	-55	180	28	34	6	1.4	[email protected]/t from 28m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								50	64	14	7.2	[email protected]/t from 50m
and								67	74	7	1.4	[email protected]/t from 67m
and								78	87	9	0.9	[email protected]/t from 78m
and								92	108	16	2.2	[email protected]/t from 92m
and								110	113	3	0.6	[email protected]/t from 110m
and								122	131	9	0.8	[email protected]/t from 122m
and								141	142	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 141m
DDRC002	263,224	7,144,460	545	RC	225	-60	220	65	68	3	0.6	[email protected]/t from 65m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								72	76	4	0.7	[email protected]/t from 72m
and								99	102	3	0.8	[email protected]/t from 99m
and								141	149	8	0.8	[email protected]/t from 141m
and								150	158	8	0.8	[email protected]/t from 150m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)	Northing (m)
			RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth f	Depth	Intercept	Grade
			(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	rom (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								159	161	2	0.6	[email protected]/t from 159m
DDRC003	263,162	7,144,462	546	RC	225	-55.9	180	73	78	5	1.8	[email protected]/t from 73m	Dusk ‘til Dawn n
and								84	85	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 84m
and								98	99	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 98m
and								103	104	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 103m
DDRC004	263,192	7,144,495	546	RC	225	-60	250					NSR	Dusk ‘til Dawn
DDRC005	263,100	7,144,551	544	RC	250	-60	250					NSR	Dusk ‘til Dawn
DDRC006	263,293	7,144,387	541	RC	225	-60	250	187	188	1	0.9	[email protected]/t from 187m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								204	212	8	0.7	[email protected]/t from 204m
and								213	221	8	0.9	[email protected]/t from 213m
DDRC007	263,329	7,144,348	543	RC	225	-60	280	183	184	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 183m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								185	192	7	1.0	[email protected]/t from 185m
and								195	196	1	0.9	[email protected]/t from 195m
and								208	215	7	0.6	[email protected]/t from 208m
and								220	243	23	1.2	[email protected]/t from 220m
DDRC008	263,271	7,144,296	543	RC	225	-60	270	98	99	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 98m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								126	128	2	2.1	[email protected]/t from 126m
and								132	133	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 132m
and								229	230	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 229m
and								236	237	1	0.9	[email protected]/t from 236m
DDRC009	263,387	7,144,404	539	RC	225	-60	270	204	205	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 204 m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								255	258	3	0.6	[email protected]/t from 255 m
and								265	268	3	1.3	[email protected]/t from 265m
DDRC010	263,236	7,144,330	545	RC	225	-60	250	38	40	2	0.7	[email protected]/t from 38m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								124	127	3	0.8	[email protected]/t from 124m
DDRC011	263,263	7,144,359	544	RC	225	-60	250	51	52	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 51m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								67	68	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 67m
and								71	72	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 71m
and								135	136	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 135m
and								145	146	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 145m
and								154	158	4	0.6	[email protected]/t from 154m
and								161	184	23	1.5	[email protected]/t from 161m
DDRC012	263,321	7,144,418	542	RC	225	-65	250	190	209	19	1.9	[email protected]/t from 190m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								212	213	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 212m
and								217	227	10	0.7	[email protected]/t from 217m
and								238	245	7	0.8	[email protected]/t from 238m
and								248	249	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 248m
DDRC013	263,193	7,144,359	546	RC	225	-62	230	39	44	5	0.9	[email protected]/t from 39m	Dusk ‘til Dawn

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)	Northing (m)
			RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth f	Depth	Intercept	Grade
			(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	rom (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								67	69	2	1.2	[email protected]/t from 67m
and								92	93	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 92m
and								98	102	4	1.4	[email protected]/t from 98m
and								106	115	9	1.0	[email protected]/t from 106m
and								119	120	1	0.9	[email protected]/t from 119m
and								216	219	3	0.6	[email protected]/t from 216m
and								221	222	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 221m
DDRC014	263,229	7,144,391	546	RC	225	-62	230	30	35	5	1.1	[email protected]/t from 30m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								40	43	3	0.6	[email protected]/t from 40m
and								100	101	1	1.0	[email protected]/t from 100m
and								109	124	15	7.7	[email protected]/t from 109m
and								135	141	6	0.6	[email protected]/t from 135m
and								143	146	3	0.7	[email protected]/t from 143m
and								150	169	19	1.4	[email protected]/t from 150m
DDRC015	263,252	7,144,413	545	RC	225	-62	230	125	141	16	1.4	[email protected]/t from 125m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								142	166	24	1.6	[email protected]/t from 142m
and								172	179	7	0.8	[email protected]/t from 172m
and								220	221	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 220m
DDRC016	263,282	7,144,442	546	RC	225	-62	230	107	112	5	1.1	[email protected]/t from 107m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								115	116	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 115m
and								138	141	3	0.9	[email protected]/t from 138m
and								148	165	17	1.9	[email protected]/t from 148m
and								169	175	6	1.2	[email protected]/t from 169m
and								185	191	6	1.0	[email protected]/t from 185m
DDRC017	263,138	7,144,369	543	RC	225	-62	203	41	55	14	2.0	[email protected]/t from 41m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								73	74	1	1.4	[email protected]/t from 73m
and								187	193	6	1.7	[email protected]/t from 187m
DDRC018	263,166	7,144,393	544	RC	225	-62	202	35	47	12	1.7	[email protected]/t from 35m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								52	54	2	1.2	[email protected]/t from 52m
and								63	68	5	0.6	[email protected]/t from 63m
and								70	84	14	0.9	[email protected]/t from 70m
and								100	107	7	2.6	[email protected]/t from 100m
and								155	156	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 155m
and								185	186	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 185m
DDRC019	263,255	7,144,484	543	RC	225	-62	250					NSR	Dusk ‘til Dawn
DDRC020	263,104	7,144,407	543	RC	223	-62	180	36	37	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 36m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								40	42	2	0.9	[email protected]/t from 40m
and								65	66	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 65m

==> picture [76 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Coordinates(MGA94 Zone 51)	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Hole Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Intercept Details	Prospect
	Easting (m)	Northing (m)
			RL		Azi	Dip	Total	Depth f	Depth	Intercept	Grade
			(m)	Hole Type	(deg)	(deg)	Depth (m)	rom (m)	To (m)	Width (m)	(g/t)	Grade Summary/ Comments
and								107	108	1	0.5	[email protected]/t from 107m
and								112	113	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 112m
DDRC021	263,135	7,144,435	544	RC	223	-62	184	30	31	1	0.9	[email protected]/t from 30m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								92	93	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 92m
and								96	97	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 96m
DDRC022	263,064	7,144,438	542	RC	225	-62	190	88	89	1	1.3	[email protected]/t from 88m
and								176	177	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 176m
and								181	183	2	1.4	[email protected]/t from 181m
DDRC023	263,096	7,144,467	541	RC	225	-62	180	31	33	2	1.1	[email protected]/t from 31m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								55	61	6	0.9	[email protected]/t from 55m
DDRC024	263,121	7,144,495	545	RC	225	-62	172	78	79	1	1.9	[email protected]/t from 78m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
and								85	89	4	0.6	[email protected]/t from 85m
DDRC025	263,146	7,144,524	543	RC	225	-62	180					NSR	Dusk ‘til Dawn
HWAC030	262,318	7,145,860	547	AC	90	-60	33	28	29	1	0.7	[email protected]/t from 28m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
HWAC052	263,719	7,145,462	538	AC	270	-60	51	49	50	1	0.6	[email protected]/t from 49m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
HWAC697	263,354	7,145,758	550	AC	270	-60	54	36	40	4	0.6	[email protected]/t from 36m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
HWAC698	263,431	7,145,757	550	AC	270	-60	44	16	20	4	1.3	[email protected]/t from 16m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
HWAC712	263,831	7,145,561	550	AC	270	-60	58	36	40	4	0.9	[email protected]/t from 36m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
HWAC730	263,525	7,145,199	550	AC	270	-60	60	52	56	4	0.8	[email protected]/t from 52m	Dusk ‘til Dawn
emcMTAC32	264,336	7,143,494	544	AC	0	-90	55	44	55	11	3.5	[email protected]/t from 44m	Dusk ‘til Dawn

Drill intercepts reported at a 0.3g/t Au cut-off and include consecutive internal waste up to 3m unless stated otherwise.

AI assistant

GATEWAY MINING LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2025

64999_rns_2025-06-29_8f1b9bb2-c523-4c47-9ad3-ad3073262317.pdf

ASX Announcement ASX: GML

30 June 2025

Acquisition of Yandal Gold Project from Strickland Metals Ltd

HIGHLIGHTS

Yandal Gold Project, Western Australia

Yandal Project JORC 2012 Inferred Resource

Horse Well Gold Camp Resource

Mining Licence Application

Dusk 'til Dawn Resource

Exploration Strategy

Orogenic Gold Targeting

Dusk ‘til Dawn IRG targets

Iroquois Project, Western Australia

Terms of the Acquisition

Completion of the Acquisition is subject to:

(collectively, the Conditions ).

Conflict Management Procedure

Gateway acknowledges the following:

For and on behalf of GATEWAY MINING LIMITED

– Yandal Gold Project MRE Other Material Information Summary

Geology and Geological Interpretation

Drilling Techniques and Hole Spacing

Horse Well Gold Camp

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Sampling and Sub-Sampling Techniques

Horse Well Gold Camp

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Sample Analysis Method

Horse Well Gold Camp

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Cut-off Grades

Horse Well Gold Camp

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Estimation methodology

Horse Well Gold Camp

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Bulk Density

Horse Well Gold Camp

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Classification Criteria

Horse Well Gold Camp

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Mining and Metallurgical Methods, Parameters and other modifying factors considered to date

Horse Well Gold Camp

Dusk ‘til Dawn Gold Camp

Competent Person Statement

Forward Looking Statement

APPENDIX A: YANDAL PROJECT TENEMENTS

Notes

APPENDIX B: TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE GML CP SHARES

1. Glossary

2. CPS

3. Automatic Conversion

4. No Holder conversion right

5. Conversion

6. Quotation of Shares

7. General CPS Terms

APPENDIX C: JORC TABLE 1 – HORSE WELL GOLD CAMP AND DUSK ‘TIL DAWN GOLD CAMP

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

RC Drilling

Alloy Resources

Doray Minerals

Alloy Resources

Strickland Metals

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in section 1, also apply to this section.)

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

(Criteria listed in section 1, and where relevant in section 2, also apply to this section.)

APPENDIX D – SIGNIFICANT INTERCEPTS

Table 1: Horse Well Gold Camp

More from GATEWAY MINING LIMITED

GATEWAY MINING LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2025