Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

FREEHILL MINING LIMITED. Capital/Financing Update 2017

Jul 23, 2017

64918_rns_2017-07-23_3bec0a8f-56fe-414e-9f61-8f6e8565c6a9.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX & MEDIA RELEASE 24[th] July 2017

==> picture [166 x 79] intentionally omitted <==

GEOPHYSICS PROGRAM COMPLETED AT YERBAS BUENAS PROJECT

KEY POINTS

  • Geophysics survey comprising a close spaced high resolution ground magnetics and passive seismic survey successfully completed and all data now processed indicating a magnetite structure over 1.9km in length

  • The 160 line kilometre, 25m and 10m spaced ground magnetics program has confirmed the existence of several large magnetic structures that conform well to the regional magnetite geology of several operating mines in the area.

  • Exceptional level of resolution from the 10m spaced ground magnetics over the trial mining area allowing improved targeting of superficial mineralisation for bulk testing.

  • Compania Minera del Pacifico S.A (“CAP”), Chiles largest iron ore producer drilled two RC holes to 110m & 150m in 2011 in the area of the trial mining pit which confirmed these intrusive structures to contain magnetite.

  • A passive seismic survey over the same area has provided a clear indication of tertiary cover thickness over the anomalies.

  • Detailed mapping of various magnetite outcrops and fault structures in the immediate area to the north have demonstrated that the geology of Yerbas Buenas has remarkable similarity to the magnetite, copper and gold mineralisation of the Dominga, Santa Dominga and El Tofo projects which all lie within 15-20kms along the same El Tofo and Atacama fault structures.

  • Potential for IOCG with a subvertical structure consistent with other projects located in the El Tofo-Atacama belt

Freehill Mining Ltd (“Freehill” or the “Company” ) ( ASX: FHS) are pleased to announce that the companies first major geophysics program over the southern portion of its Yerbas Buenas project area has been successfully completed.

Geophysics Program

Completion of the geophysics survey is a major milestone in the projects development and will provide a solid platform for a maiden magnetite drilling campaign but also additional exploration into prospective gold and copper structures in the mountains to the northern side of the tenements.

Personnel from Resource Potentials, a well-known Perth Western Australia company carried out the geophysics survey over a period of three weeks with the assistance of Chilean technical staff.

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700 Melbourne Office |88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] La Serena, Chile office |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

A total of 160 line-km of ground magnetic data were acquired using 25m line spacing. The new 25m spaced ground magnetic survey TMIRTP image generated by Resource Potentials is shown in Figure 1. together for comparison with the Inge global 200m line survey that was completed in 2011.

The area was initially surveyed with 25m spaced E-W oriented survey lines and is considered high resolution. The survey was planned with E-W survey line orientation, because there were a number of N-S oriented magnetic anomaly trends observed in the earlier 200m wide spaced historical survey ground magnetic data.

==> picture [476 x 345] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1. April 2017 high resolution 25m ground magnetics survey (southern portion) combined with previous 200m survey done prior to listing (northern portion) showing the major magnetic structures in the lower dunal area shown in red-purple shades. The 200m survey shows major magnetic structures in the gold, copper and magnetite areas in the mountain to the north which are part of the El Tofo fault structure.

The central trial mining area was then re-surveyed using 10m line spacing with the objective of identifying superficial high grade areas for more targeted bulk sampling and testing.

Base station and roving magnetometer were both GEM GSM19T Over Hauser with sampling set to continuous sampling mode, with a reading taken every 1 second.

The high amplitude 7,000nT magnetic anomaly associated with the known outcropping hard rock magnetite is more obvious in the new magnetic survey data, and its trend continues to the south underneath Tertiary sand cover, which can now be clearly interpreted compared to the historical wider spaced ground magnetic results by Inge global and Geoexploraciones. This newly refined magnetic anomaly trend is open to the south and increasing in width and depth extent.

Two Tromino seismometers were used to record the ambient seismic signal at a total of 542 survey stations

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700 Melbourne Office |88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] La Serena, Chile office |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

located along E-W oriented survey lines across the project area. The Horizontal to Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR) passive seismic method was used to estimate the Tertiary cover thickness at each of these locations.

Jurassic and Cretaceous volcanic rocks extend to the south underneath Tertiary sand and gravel deposits in the survey area. There may be some economic concentration of iron sands in the sand cover mapped and modelled by the passive seismic data and further data integration and review will be completed to understand this potential.

Resource Potentials prepared a 3D inversion model image over the trial mining pit area using the 10m ground magnetics data shown in Figure 2 and the companies Chilean geophysicist constructed the total project inversion model based on the 25m data.

==> picture [487 x 174] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 . The left side 3D model shows an 800 m x 800m portion of the trial mining pit that was completed using 10m line spaced ground magnetics whilst the right side image shows a 3D model of the entire project area based on the 25m spaced ground magnetics. Both models show the magnetite structures clearly.

Inversion modelling has also been used to generate cross sections through the general area of the trial mining pit and Figure 3 shows an E-W section through Line 67236600N. The conceptual vein structure and two drill holes completed by CAP prior to Freehills development of the project have been shown. The magnetite containing structure is shown in pink bounded by magnetic lows.

==> picture [487 x 175] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3 . The left hand image shows a 600m square area that contains the trial mining pit with two CAP RC drill holes marked as YB1 & YB2. East-west line 6723600N represents the cross section shown above which is based on the 25m & 10m ground magnetics.

Detailed drilling data and samples from two Compania Minera del Pacifico S.A (“CAP”), Reverse Circulation drill holes completed in late 2011 have been graciously provided by CAP to allow Freehill to better interpret

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700 Melbourne Office |88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] La Serena, Chile office |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

|88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

the recent geophysics data and plan future drilling locations.

CAP are Chile’s largest iron ore producer and operate the Romeral iron ore mine and pelletising plant 21kms south of Freehills project and under a formal purchasing agreement have purchased the majority of magnetite concentrates produced to date.

==> picture [423 x 597] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4. Satellite image showing the various magnetite hydrothermal replacement structures and outcropping zones that align with the general NE-SW mineralised structures that pass through the tenement from the northern hills to the southern boundary and confirmed by the geophysics.

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

|88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

Melbourne Office La Serena, Chile office

Project Location

The companies Yerbas Buenas project is located on the coast 45 km north of the modern cities of La Serena and Coquimbo via the four lane Pan-American Highway ( Figure 5.). The two cities form the Greater La Serena region with a combined population of 400,000 making it Chile’s third largest city region. The cities provide numerous services to the mining and exploration sectors in the southern Atacama area including engineering, mobile equipment and assay laboratories.

La Serena has a large commercial airport with several flights per day from the Capital Santiago which is only 50 mins flying time away.

The company has access to a number of ports in the region. Coquimbo has two port facilities the larger of which is used by CAP, has a draft capability of 22m and is capable of handling Cape size vessels up to 165,000 dwt. The second port is a public port that can berth 30,000 dwt Handymax vessels.

==> picture [478 x 340] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5. Regional map showing location of the Yerbas Buenas project relative to the cities of Coquimbo, La Serena, Guayacán Port, proposed Cruz Grande port at Chungungo and major mining projects along the El Tofo and Atacama Faults all within 15-25kms of Yerbas Buenas.

The new port of Cruz Grande at Chungungu which is only 19kms by road north west of Yerbas Buenas will be completed within three years and service the regions mining industry.

Compania Minera del Pacifico S.A (“CAP”), Chile’s largest iron ore producer operates the Romeral iron ore mine and pelletising plant approximately half way between the Yerbas Buenas project and La Serena and rail iron ore products through to the Port of Guayacán.

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700 Melbourne Office |88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] La Serena, Chile office |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

Next Steps

Results of the geophysics program and technical data derived from the trial mining pit and demonstration processing plant have provided a significantly higher level of confidence to the projects ability to produce a number of concentrate products acceptable to both local and international magnetite buyers. Plans are now underway to formalise an ‘Exploration Target’ estimate which lays the foundation for the planning of the company’s maiden drilling program.

The company’s immediate focus will be on the central and southern magnetic structures however those copper and gold targets identified in the northern half of the tenements by surface sampling and the presence of numerous artisanal mine workings shown in Figure 6. will be further investigated.

Iron mineralisation from hard rock magnetite associated with hydrothermal alteration and replacement of host andesite bedrock near a granite contact zone. Cu, Au and Ag mineralisation may be associated with skarn, IOCG or porphyry style deposition associated with granitic intrusions at depth. The Yerbas Buenas Project contains the southernmost hydrothermal magnetite deposit in the western Chile-Peru IOCG belt.

==> picture [480 x 306] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6. District mapping showing gold (yellow), copper (red) and magnetite (pink) occurrences relative to the three large magnetite structures identified by the recent ground magnetometer survey in the southern portion of the tenement. The northern areas contain many artisanal tunnels and old copper-gold workings.

The Shuttle Radar Topography (SRTM) image in Figure 7 provides a clear topography view of the relationship between the El Tofo and Atacama faults and their convergence in the Yerbas Buenas area.

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700 Melbourne Office |88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] La Serena, Chile office |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

==> picture [478 x 339] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7. Shuttle Radar Topography image showing the clear relationship between the major mountain and fault structures and their convergence in the Yerbas Buenas area. Other mining projects shown by the yellow markers

About Freehill Mining Limited

Freehill Mining Limited is a mineral exploration company focused on creating shareholder wealth through the identification of mineral resources in Chile and development of its Yerbas Buenas magnetite project. The company has also identified copper and gold mineralisation on its tenements and will further develop these.

For further information contact:

Joe Fekete Company Secretary Freehill Mining Limited +61 407282199 [email protected]

Competent Statement: The information in this report that relates to Exploration results is based on information compiled by Mr Peter Hinner a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy’. Mr Hinner is a full-time employee of the Freehill Mining Ltd and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Peter Hinner consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.’

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700

Melbourne Office |88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] La Serena, Chile office |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report

Freehill Mining Limited

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels,
random chips, or specific specialized industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of
sampling.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.

Aspects of the determination of mineralization that are
Material to the Public Report.

In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done
this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation
drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg
was pulverized to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’).
In other cases more explanation may be required, such
as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or mineralization types
(e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting. No drilling
carried out by Freehill Mining Ltd
Drilling
techniques

Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and
details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth
of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether
_core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). _

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting.
Drill sample
recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip
sample recoveries and results assessed.

Measures taken to maximize sample recovery and
ensure representative nature of the samples.

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery
and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred
due topreferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting.
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically
and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies
and metallurgical studies.

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature.
Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.

The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting.
Sub-sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or
all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split,
etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling
stages to maximize representivity of samples.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected, including
for instance results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size
of the material being sampled.

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting.
Quality of
assay data
and laboratory
tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying
and laboratory procedures used and whether the
technique is considered partial or total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining
the analysis including instrument make and model,

Ground magnetics survey carried out
on 25m line spacings for 160 line kms
and sub-area of approximately 460m
x 330m completed on 10m line
spacings

Base station data corrections done

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

|88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

Melbourne Office La Serena, Chile office

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e.
lack of bias) and precision have been established.
daily, QA/QC and processing
completed by Resource Potentials
geophysicist.

All digital data, maps and data
products associated with this report
are provided in coordinate system:
datum WGS84 and projection UTM
zone 19S.

area was surveyed with E-W oriented
survey lines because of N-S oriented
magnetic anomaly trends observed in
historical 200m spaced ground
magnetic survey data

Base Station GEM GSM19T Over
Hauser sampling every 30 secs and
GEM GSM19T roving unit with
integrated GPS sampling
continuously at 1 sec intervals.

Earth’s magnetic field In the survey
area has approximate values of
inclination -29.7 0 , declination 0.32 0
and magnetic field strength of
23,400nT and corrections made on
this basis

TMI, TMIRT, 1VD & 2VD data
processingcarried out
Verification of
sampling and
assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either
independent or alternative company personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures,
data verification, data storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting.
Location of
data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes
(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings
and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

GPS 0.7m SBAS (WAAS, EGNOS,
MSAS) < 1.5m non-SBAS and
considered more than sufficient for
the survey being conducted

All digital data, maps and data
products associated with the
geophysical report are provided in
coordinate system: datum WGS84
andprojection UTM zone 19S.
Data spacing
and
distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of geological and grade continuity
appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

Geophysics ground magnetometer
lines completed on 25m spacings
over whole survey area and 10m
spacings within a 460mx 330m sub-
area
Orientation of
data in
relation to
geological
structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased
sampling of possible structures and the extent to which
this is known, considering the deposit type.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralized structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this should be
assessed and reported if material.

East-West survey line direction which
were perpendicular to interpreted
strike of magnetite structures
Sample
security

The measures taken to ensure sample security.

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting. All geophysics
data collected was backed up on a
daily basis by Resource Potentials
Geophysicist
Audits or
reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling
techniques and data.

None completed

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700

|88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

Melbourne Office La Serena, Chile office

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status

Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material issues
with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title interests, historical
sites, wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting
along with any known impediments to obtaining a
license to operate in the area.

The Yerbas Buenas Project is located
on licenses held through Chilean
subsidiaries of Freehill Mining Ltd.
Licenses are numbers 04102-2723-1,
04102-2714-2, 04102-2715-0, 04102-
2755-K, 04102-2937-4 and total 398
hectares

The licenses allow for the extraction of
up to 5000 tonnes per month and
application currently with Sernageomin,
the Chilean mining authority, for
expanded production to 40,000 tonnes
per month;
Exploration
done by other
parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by
other parties.

Two Reverse Circulation drill holes-
SDHYB1101 & 1102- completed by
previous tenement holder Compania
Mineria Pacifico (CAP) in 2011 and
referred to in prospectus section 2.5 of
IGR

Holes drilled to 101m & 150m, Dip 70
degrees, azimuth 119, E6,723,594
N279,725 & E6,723,564 N279,758

Complete drill hole assays provided by
CAP, photographs of drilling activity
and hole collars, geophysics by
Geoexploracoiones,

Samples assayed for Total %Fe and %
magnetics by Davis Tube.

50m line spaced ground magnetics
survey completed over 800mx800m in
2010 by Geoexploraciones
Geology
Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralization.

The deposit occurs within the El Tofo
and Atacama Fault region with those
projects lying along the El Tofo Fault
being primarily iron bearing whilst those
along the Atacama Fault tending to be
predominantly copper bearing. The
central area is characterized by three
dominant intrusive structures. The
structural setting is one of NE-SW
trending sub vertical tabular bodies with
apatite the primary gangue. The
primary intrusive unit is a diorite with
veins of quartz-magnetite,
disseminated magnetite. Andesitic
porphyry occurs with abundant biotite,
quartz with magnetite as well as
hydrothermal breccia with magnetite.
Yerbas Buenas shows some evidence
of IOCG mineralization
Drill hole
Information

A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results including a
tabulation of the following information for all Material
drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above
sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting.

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700 Melbourne Office |88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] La Serena, Chile office |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.

If the exclusion of this information is justified on the
basis that the information is not Material and this
exclusion does not detract from the understanding of
the report, the Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
Data
aggregation
methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging
techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off
grades are usually Material and should be stated.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths
of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade
results, the procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in detail.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting.
Relationship
between
mineralization
widths and
intercept
lengths

These relationships are particularly important in the
reporting of Exploration Results.

If the geometry of the mineralization with respect to
the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be
reported.

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are
reported, there should be a clear statement to this
_effect(e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). _

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting.
Diagrams
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for any
significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole
collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

See Figure 1, 2 3 and 5 in body of
report
Balanced
reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration
Results is not practicable, representative reporting of
both low and high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.

This document is considered to be a
balanced report of the geophysics
survey, and subsequent processing
and targeting
Other
substantive
exploration
data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material,
should be reported including (but not limited to):
geological observations; geophysical survey results;
geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.

Not applicable for geophysics survey
programme reporting.
Further work
The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g.
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible
extensions, including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this
information is not commercially sensitive.

Detailed mapping and rock-chip
sampling of main geophysical targets
are being undertaken together with
sampling in a 0.5 Hec bulk sampling pit

First pass RC drilling of the identified
magnetite structures at the Yerbas
Buenas project are currently planned
and estimated to be commenced Q4
2017.

==> picture [595 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

Freehill Mining Ltd – iron ore producers | ACN 091 608 025 |www.freehillmining.com | Tel: +61 03 86021700

|88 Miller Street, West Melbourne, Vic 3003 |email: [email protected] |Level 7, Edificio Seville, La Serena, Chile South America

Melbourne Office La Serena, Chile office