FOCUS MINERALS LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2017

May 23, 2017

Coolgardie Activities Update

==> picture [77 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

24 May 2017

Focus Minerals Ltd Coolgardie Operational Update

Overview of Recent Coolgardie Activities

Since the previous Coolgardie Exploration Update (ASX 25 January 2017), Focus Minerals Ltd (“Focus” or the “Company”) has continued infill drilling at Brilliant, as well as exploration drilling at Bonnie Vale and Lindsays North. Infill drilling at Brilliant continues to increase the mineralised footprint of the system and a resource update is expected once the current program is completed early next month and all assay data is received. Exploration drilling at Bonnie Vale and Lindsays North has also returned encouraging results and follow-up work is currently being planned. The location of each of these programs are presented in Figure 1.

In addition to drilling at Coolgardie, Focus has been continuing work on the Preliminary Feasibility Study for re-starting operations; it is due for completion in June 2017. As part of that study, Focus has been updating select Mineral Resource estimates from JORC 2004 to JORC 2012 standards. This release includes an updated Mineral JORC 2012 compliance Mineral Resource estimate for the Greenfields deposit based on historic drill data.

==> picture [468 x 291] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Coolgardie Location Plan

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

Brilliant Exploration Update

Since the previous ASX release on 7 April 2017, Focus has continued drilling at Brilliant with an additional 34 drill holes completed to date (26 RC holes for 5,252m and 8 RC/diamond holes for 3,629.0m) aimed at further increasing the Mineral Resource estimate. The current round of drilling has extended the mineralised footprint at Brilliant as well as increased the confidence of mineralisation continuity within both the underground and open pit resource areas (See Figure 2) . The recent drilling brings the total year to date drilling at Brilliant to 52 RC holes (for 11,202m) and 12 RC/DD holes (for 5,306.2m).

At the time of reporting, drilling at Brilliant is ongoing. The current campaign is due for completion in early June 2017 and a Mineral Resource update is expected to follow shortly thereafter. Full significant results from this drilling are listed in Table A, however highlights include:

• TND17030 3.3m @ 5.04g/t Au from 487.2m

• TND17034 1.4m @ 13.97g/t Au from 300.7m

• TND17035 6m @ 3.55g/t Au from 216m

• TND17038 5m @ 4.40g/t Au from 171m

• TND17040 7m @ 7.60g/t Au from 161m o Incl. 1m @ 37.60g/t Au from 161m

• TND17044 1m @ 10.15g/t Au from 356m

• 4.85m @ 7.13g/t Au from 371m

• TND17045 2m @ 12.15g/t Au from 91m

• TND17046 1m @ 11.15g/t Au from 88m

Bonnie Vale Exploration Update

Exploration drilling at Bonnie Vale to date in 2017 has consisted of three RC holes for 813m and three RC/DD holes for 1,075.6m (Figure 3). The three RC holes and one of the RC/DD holes were designed to test for the southward and down-dip continuation of the Quarry Reef Lode approximately 90m to the southeast of the 2016 resource boundary. The remaining two diamond holes were designed to target the Westralia Reef to assess the potential for lode extensions. Drilling was generally encouraging and follow-up work is being planned. Full significant results are included in Table A, but highlights include:

• BONC162 3m @ 24.25g/t Au from 180m (Quarry Reef)

• BONCD077 0.75m @ 14.90g/t Au from 95.85m (Westralia)

2

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [256 x 397] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Plan view of Brilliant Deposit with Recent Hole Locations

==> picture [398 x 258] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Bonnie Vale Plan View and Selected Hole Traces

3

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

Lindsays North Exploration Update

Three RC holes (591m) have been completed since the start of 2017 north of the Lindsays Open Pit, testing for Bayleys-style lode mineralisation along the basalt-ultramafic contact that hosts the historic Bayleys mine. Flow-up drilling is planned. Full significant results are included in Table A, but highlights include:

• LND17003 1m @ 14.95g/t Au from 187m and o 1m @ 5.84g/t Au from 194m

==> picture [456 x 277] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Lindsays Plan View and Selected Hole Traces

Greenfields Deposit Mineral Resource Update

Focus has upgraded the compliance of its Greenfields deposit to JORC 2012 standards following a review and completion of the Table 1 reporting requirements for the currently reported (2004 compliant) block model.

The JORC 2012 Greenfields Mineral Resource is reported above a 1g/t cut-off for open pit resources above 265mRL and comprises:

• Indicated Resource 1.328Mt at 1.7g/t gold for 72,500 contained ounces

• Inferred Resource 0.066Mt at 2.0g/t gold for 4,500 contained ounces

• Total Mineral Resource 1.394Mt at 1.7g/t gold for 77,000 contained ounces

The Mineral Resource is reported on a dry tonnage basis. See the attached JORC Table 1 for additional details. Discrepancies may occur due to rounding. Historic mining depletion has been taken into account.

4

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

The Greenfields Project forms part of Focus Minerals’ tenement portfolio in the highly prospective Coolgardie region of Western Australia. The deposit has previously been an open pit gold producer, mined in stages from 1986 to mid-2013 with production figures of approx. 51,000oz at an average grade of 1.8g/t. Figure 5 presents a plan view of the Greenfields deposit and Figure 6 presents a representative cross section.

==> picture [468 x 307] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Greenfields Plan View and Selected Hole Traces

==> picture [468 x 256] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: Greenfields Cross Section

5

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

Previously, the JORC 2004 Greenfields resource has been reported as a total resource above a 1g/t grade cut-off with no RL cut-offs used. Following preliminary feasibility work, it has been determined the 265mRL is an appropriate RL, for open pit mining considerations, to be reported above. The previously reported JORC 2004 Greenfields resource is tabulated below:

• Indicated Resource

• Inferred Resource

• Total (previous) Mineral Resource

• 1.898Mt at 1.6g/t gold for 96,000 contained ounces

• 0.705Mt at 1.4g/t gold for 32,000 contained ounces

• 2.603Mt at 1.5g/t gold for 128,000 contained ounces

Coolgardie Forward Program

As stated, drilling is ongoing at Coolgardie. Additional RC and diamond drilling is currently in progress at Brilliant and the current programme is expected to be completed early June. A Mineral Resource Estimate update will be completed once all assay data for this program have been received. Further RC drilling at Bonnie Vale and Possum is planned as the next phase of drilling and other drill targets are currently being ranked for exploration during the second half of 2017. The preliminary feasibility study is in progress and is anticipated to be completed by the end of June 2017. Ongoing weather delays have hampered the planned Lake Cowan gravity survey, although this survey is still anticipated to be completed this year.

Competent Persons Statement

The information that relates to exploration and geological interpretations is based on information compiled by Dr. Wesley Groome who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Dr. Groome is employed by Focus Minerals Limited and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.”

The Mineral Resource estimates were undertaken by, Mr Mark Rigby a former employee of Focus Minerals while he was employed by the compamy. Ms Hannah Kosovich, an employee of Focus Minerals reviewed the geological interpretation, assay QAQC information, estimation methedology and parameters and estimate validation. Ms Kosovich is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and has sufficient experience to qualify as a Competent Person as defined by the 2012 Edition of the “Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.”

Dr Wesley Groome and Ms Hannah Kosovich consent to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.

6

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

Table A: Significant drill results received to date (>1.0g/t Au cut-off over 1m (or equivalent) with up to 1m internal dilution >0.90g/t Au )

Project	HoleID		From	To	Width	Grade (Au g/t)
Brilliant	TND17030*		487.2	490.5	3.3	5.04
		And	497.54	499.31	1.77	2.90
	TND17034***		300.7	302.1	1.4	13.975
		And	335.1	338	2.9	4.85
		And	394	395	1	1.28
	TND17035		1	2	1	1.42
		And	84	85	1	7.34
		And	87	88	1	1.22
		And	144	145	1	1.24
		And	163	164	1	3.16
		And	214	215	1	1.53
		And	216	222	6	3.55
	TND17036		43	47	4	2.79
		And	62	64	1	1.71
		And	82	83	1	1.28
	TND17037		181	182	1	1.20
		And	258	259	1	7.50
		And	276	278	2	1.81
		And	282	283	1	2.86
	TND17038		92	93	1	1.35
		And	164	166	2	2.95
		And	171	176	5	4.40
		And	182	183	1	4.18
	TND17039		43	44	1	1.64
	TND17040		142	144	2	2.18
		And	154	156	2	2.59
		And	158	159	1	1.53
		And	161	168	7	7.60
		Incl.	161	162	1	37.60
	TND17042		85	89	4	3.40
		And	148	150	2	2.88
		And	158	159	1	1.23
		And	195	197	2	2.22
	TND17043**		175	178	3	2.37
		And	180	181	1	1.10
		And	186	188	2	2.07
		And	271.2	272.3	1.1	6.70
		And	277.9	280	2.1	1.90
		And	281	282	1	1.51
		And	336.35	338.75	2.4	2.06
		And	401.65	402.3	0.65	2.74
	TND17044**		182.95	184	1.05	1.85
		And	188	190	2	1.73
		And	194	196	2	1.43
		And	206.45	204	0.55	2.35
		And	251.16	252	0.84	2.18
		And	356	357	1	10.15
		And	368.4	370	1.6	2.43
		And	371	375.85	4.85	7.13
		Incl.	371	372	1	13.50
		And	413	414	1	1.79
	TND17045		87	88	1	1.68

7

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

		And	91	93	2	12.15
	TND17046		88	89	1	11.15
		And	92	93	1	4.86
		And	110	112	2	1.78
	TND17047			NSR
	TND17048		133	134	1	1.60
		And	149	450	1	2.57
Bonnie Vale	BONC160**		159.40	159.70	0.3	6.23
		And	298.85	299.30	0.45	22.70
	BONC162		180	183	3	24.25
		Incl.	181	182	1	66.40
	BONC163		144	145	1	1.13
	BONC164		130	131	1	4.11
		And	134	135	1	1.16
	BONCD075**		89	90	1	1.24
	BONCD077**		95.85	96.6	0.75	14.90
		And	102	102.6	0.6	12.10
Lindsays	LND17001		61	62	1	1.54
		And	73	74	1	1.58
	LND17002			NSR
	LND17003		177	178	1	1.09
		And	187	188	1	14.95
		And	190	191	1	1.22
		And	194	195	1	5.84

 denotes hole extended since previous release; *Diamond hole with RC pre-collar;

***diamond hole from surface

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria

Commentary

Sampling techniques

 This report relates to results from Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling and diamond core drilling. The information of sampling techniques below applies to the drill holes drilled by Focus Minerals (FML) only.  RC percussion drill chips were collected through a cyclone and cone splitter. Samples were collected on a 1m basis. Diamond core was sampled across identified zones of mineralisation by site geologists, the sample widths varied between a minimum of 0.2m and a maximum of 1m.  RC chips were passed through a cone splitter to achieve a sample weight of approximately 3kg. The splitter was levelled at the beginning of each hole using a bullseye level. The spoils were collected in green bags at 1m intervals.  At the assay laboratory all samples were oven dried, crushed to a nominal 10mm using a jaw crusher (core samples only) and weighed. Samples in excess of 3kg in weight were riffle split to achieve a maximum 3kg sample weight before being pulverised to 90% passing 75μm.  The diamond core was marked up for sampling by the supervising geologist during the core logging process, with sample intervals determined by the presence of mineralisation and/or alteration. The core was cut in half using an Almonte automatic core saw and the same half of the core was routinely sent to the laboratory for analysis. Some of the diamond core has been ¼ core sampled, although this is only in a minority of cases.  Historic RC holes have been sampled on 1m or as 2m composite. It is unsure how the composite sampling for pre-Focus drilling would have been undertaken.

8

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

• Drilling  All FML drilling was completed using an RC face sampling hammer or NQ2/HQ3 size diamond core. Where achievable, all drill core was oriented by the drilling contractor

• techniques using an Ezy-mark system. Most holes were surveyed upon completion of drilling initially using an electronic multi-shot (EMS) camera and since Sept 2013 a northseeking gyroscope; holes were surveyed open-hole prior to 2017. Since late 2016, all holes were surveyed using various gyroscopes (non-north-seeking paired with an azimuth aligner and north-seeking) by the drill contractors whilst drilling.

Drill sample

• FML sample recovery was recorded by a visual estimate during the logging process.

• All FML RC samples were drilled dry whenever possible to maximise recovery, with

• recovery water injection on the outside return to minimise dust.

• Historic drill recovery has been sporadically recorded.

• Logging  The information of logging techniques below applies to the drill holes drilled by FML only.

• All core samples were oriented where possible, marked into metre intervals and compared to the depth measurements on the core blocks. Any loss of core was noted and recorded in the drilling database.

• All RC samples were geologically logged to record weathering, regolith, rock type, colour, alteration, mineralisation, structure and texture and any other notable features that are present.

• All diamond core was logged for structure and geologically logged using the same system as that for RC.

• The logging information was transferred into the company’s drilling database once the log was complete.

• Logging was qualitative, however the geologists often recorded quantitative mineral percentage ranges for the sulphide minerals present.

• Diamond core was photographed one core tray at a time using a standardised photography jig.

• More recently, samples from RC holes were archived in standard 20m plastic chip trays.

• The entire length of all holes are logged.

• Historic RC holes have been logged at 1m intervals to record weathering, regolith, rock type, colour, alteration, mineralisation, structure and texture and any other notable features that are present.

• Original drill logs have been viewed and used to validate data stored in acQuire for a majority of the pre-FML drilling.

• Sub-sampling  The information of sub-sampling and sample preparation below applies to the drill holes drilled by FML only.

• techniques and  Core samples were taken from half core, cut using an Almonte automatic core saw. The remainder of the core was retained in core trays tagged with a hole number and

• sample metre mark.  RC samples were cone split to a nominal 2.5kg to 3kg sample weight. The drilling

• preparation method was designed to maximise sample recovery and delivery of a clean, representative sample into the calico bag.

• Where possible, all RC samples were drilled dry to maximise recovery. The use of a booster and auxiliary compressor provide dry sample for depths below the water table. Sample condition was recorded (wet, dry or damp) at the time of sampling and recorded in the database.

• The samples were collected in a pre-numbered calico bag bearing a unique sample ID. Samples were crushed to 75μm at the laboratory and riffle split (if required) to a maximum 3kg sample weight. Gold analysis was initially by 40g aqua regia for the composite samples then 40g Fire Assay for individual samples with an ICP-OES or AAS Finish.

• The assay laboratories’ sample preparation procedures follow industry best practice, with techniques and practices that are appropriate for this style of mineralisation. Pulp duplicates were taken at the pulverising stage and selective repeats conducted at the laboratories’ discretion.

• Earlier FML QAQC checks involved inserting a standard or blank every 10 samples in RC and taking a field duplicate every 20 samples in RC. Field duplicates were collected from the cone splitter on the rig. Diamond core field duplicates were not taken, a minimum of one standard was inserted for every sample batch submitted. In

9

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

	more recent drilling no blanks were submitted, only standards every 25 samples with a duplicate taken off the rig every 20thsample. Regular reviews of the sampling were carried out by the supervising geologist and senior field staff, to ensure all procedures were followed and best industry practice carried out. The sample sizes were considered to be appropriate for the type, style and consistency of mineralisation encountered during this phase of exploration.
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests	The assay method and laboratory procedures were appropriate for this style of mineralisation. The fire assay technique was designed to measure total gold in the sample. No geophysical tools, spectrometers or handheld XRF instruments were used. The QA/QC process described above was sufficient to establish acceptable levels of accuracy and precision. All results from assay standards and duplicates were scrutinised to ensure they fell within acceptable tolerances. Very little in the way of quality control data is available from sampling of the historic drilling that currently defines the Greenfields Resource. Drilling by FML aimed to confirm the geometry of the ore envelope and grade tenor encountered in historic drilling at Greenfields.
Verification of sampling and assaying	Significant intervals were visually inspected by company geologists to correlate assay results to logged mineralisation. Consultants were not used for this process. Normally, if old historic drilling was present, twinned holes are occasionally drilled to test the veracity of historic assay data; however, no twinned holes were drilled during this program. Primary data is sent in digital format to the company’s Database Administrator (DBA) as often as was practicable. The DBA imports the data into an acQuire database, with assay results merged into the database upon receipt from the laboratory. Once loaded, data was extracted for verification by the geologist in charge of the project. Historic holes were validated against paper copies and WAMEX reports where possible.  No adjustments were made to any current or historic data. If data could not be validated to a reasonable level of certainty it was not used in any resource estimations.
Location of data points	FML drill collars were surveyed after completion, using a DGPS instrument. All drill core was oriented by the drilling contractor using an Ezy-mark system. Most holes were surveyed upon completion of drilling. Initially an electronic multi-shot camera was used until Sept 2013 when a north-seeking gyroscope tool was used. Holes were surveyed open-hole prior to 2016. Since late 2016, most drillholes were surveyed using various gyroscope systems (non-north-seeking gyroscopes paired with azimuth aligners and north-seeking gyroscopes) by the drillers whilst drilling, otherwise surveyed open hole using a north-seeking gyroscope. Since the start of 2017, gyroscopes were used for “single shot” surveys whilst drilling, otherwise a single shot Eastman camera downhole survey was used. All coordinates and bearings use the MGA94 Zone 51 grid system. FML utilises Landgate sourced regional topographic maps and contours as well as internally produced survey pick-ups produced by the mining survey teams utilising DGPS base station instruments. Historic hole collar survey methods are unknown although Gold Mines Coolgardie JV indicates collars were surveyed by company survey.
Data spacing and distribution	At Brilliant, drill spacing within the resource area is a combination of 20mx20m, 20mx40m and 40mx40m. Outside of the resource area, exploration holes are more irregularly spaced. At Bonnie Vale, drill spacing within the resource area is generally 40mx40m although some exploration step-out holes are more irregularly distributed. At Lindsays North, drill spacing is irregular. At Greenfields, drilling has been conducted on 20m spaced grid lines on sections oriented across strike of the ore zone at an azimuth of either 20oor 200oand at various dips, with 10-20m collar intervals on section. Wider-spaced drilling exists at depth up to as wide as 40x80m.

10

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

• Orientation of  Drilling was designed based on known geological models, field mapping, verified historical data and cross-sectional interpretation.

• data in relation  Where achievable, drill holes were oriented at right angles to strike of deposit, with dip optimised for drill capabilities and the dip of the ore body. Where drill holes are

• to geological at a low angle to the known mineralisation trend, true widths are re-calculated based on the geology interpretation.

• structure Sample  All samples were reconciled against the sample submission with any omissions or variations reported to FML.

• security  All samples were bagged in a tied numbered calico bag, grouped into green plastic bags. The bags were placed into cages with a sample submission sheet and delivered directly from site to the Kalgoorlie laboratories by FML personnel on a daily basis.

•  Historic sample security is not recorded.

• Audits or  A review of sampling techniques was carried out by rOREdata Pty Ltd in late 2013 as part of a database amalgamation project. Their only recommendation was to change

• reviews the QA/QC intervals to bring them into line with the FML Laverton system, which uses the same frequency of standards and duplicates but has them inserted at different points within the numbering sequence.

• At Greenfields, significant data validation was completed by consultants Hellmann and Schofield in 2005 as part of a resource estimate.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)

Criteria	Commentary
Mineral tenement and land tenure status	All exploration was conducted on tenements 100% owned by Focus Minerals Limited or its subsidiary companies Focus Operations Pty Ltd. All tenements are in good standing. There are currently no registered Native Title claims over the Coolgardie project areas.
Exploration done by other parties	Brilliant Project Brilliant has been explored and mined by various parties over time. The first phase of mining is believed to have taken place in the early twentieth century and would have consisted of prospecting shafts and limited underground mining. Mines Department records document treatment of 60 tonnes of ore producing 6.97oz of gold up to 1935. No other production is recorded. Open pit mining of the prospect commenced in the 1970’s with a number of parties processing ore through the Coolgardie State Battery. In 1980 a treatment plant was constructed at Brilliant by Tryaction Pty Ltd, who produced from an open pit. In the mid 1980’s Electrum NL bought into the project, forming a joint venture with MC Mining. They expanded the treatment plant and continued open pit mining in the Brilliant area. Recorded production by Electrum/MC Mining is 87,986 tonnes at 3.2 g/t Au for 9,000 ounces with a stripping ratio of 12.7:1 (Kirkpatrick, 1995). The project was subsequently purchased by Goldfan Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of Herald Resources Ltd) in 1991 and incorporated into the Tindals Project. They initiated drilling programs which increased the known extent of mineralisation and completed further open cut mining to its present limits in the early 2000’s. Table 2 in the FML Combined Annual Report of 2008 states an estimated total production from Brilliant Pit of in excess of 1.1Mt @ 2.45g/t for 88,000 ounces. Bonnie Vale Project

11

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

• Bonnie Vale is the site of a number of historic workings including the Varischetti Mine (Westralia). Modern exploration has been conducted by Coolgardie Gold NL, Gold Mines of Coolgardie and Focus.

Lindsays North Project

• Lindsays North has several small historic diggings at surface of unknown age. Scout RC drilling has been completed at Lindsays North by Coolgardie Gold NL and Focus.

Greenfields Project

• Greenfields is a site of numerous historic workings including small pits and shafts, however no production figures are available for these workings. Modern exploration by Coolgardie Gold NL include trenching and multiple drill campaigns including RAB, RC and Diamond drilling. Gold Mines of Coolgardie Pty Ltd (GMC), MPI Gold Pty Ltd and FML have also run drilling campaigns of RC and Diamond at Greenfields

Geology

Brilliant Project

• The deposit lies on the western margin of the Archaean Norseman – Menzies Greenstone Belt. Host rocks at Brilliant are a sequence of Archaean Basalts and Ultramafics, which have been intruded by a suite of porphyry dykes (also described as granodiorites). The porphyries host the bulk of the mineralisation, occurring in two orientations, steeply dipping (70 - 80°) with an average width of 3 to 5m, or flatter dipping (20 - 40°) with widths of up to 2m. Mineralisation consists of a stock work of quartz / sulphide micro-veining and albitic alteration of the porphyry.

Bonnie Vale Project

• Locally, the geology is dominated by the Bonnie Vale tonalite, with an ultramafic to the east and west of the tonalite in structural contact. This ultramafic has been logged as a cargonate-altered ultramafic and described as a komatiite in Halberg’s regional mapping. Mineralisation is hosted within large (strike length > 300m) quartz reefs which range in thickness from centimetre scale to several metres. The known reefs strike sub-parallel to the edge of the tonalite, with the main orientations being an easterly dip (e.g. Westralia) or northeast (Bonnie Vale, Quarry Reef) of 40 to 60 degrees.

Lindsays North Project

• Lindsays North is located along the contact between a hangingwall ultramafic unit and a footwall basalt unit, which has been intruded by a suite of late felsic porphyry dykes. Mineralisation is hosted within or adjacent to the felsic porphyries. These felsic porphyries are persistent along strike within the contact zone for several kilometres to the east and south and host significant mineralisation at Bayleys approximately 1.5km along strike to the southeast.

Greenfields Project

• The Greenfields deposit is located within the Greenfield Dolerite Sill within the Coolgardie Greenstone Belt. There are three rock types present in the pit: dolerite, felsic volcaniclastics (sediments) and ultramafics. The dolerite is sub-divided into four separate units known as the unit 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the pit area. These are separated on mineralisation, alteration, veining and grain size variations. These units all have a WNW strike and steep dip with the gold mineralisation best developed within the unit 4 dolerite, with minor occurrences located in units 3 and 5. Within the dolerite sill are shallow to moderately, NE-NW dipping quartz veins which often display higher grade gold mineralisation with visible gold identified in some drill core samples. Sulphides evident in logging include arsenopyrite and pyrrhotite. The dolerite sill and felsic volcaniclastics of the Kurrawang Formation are separated by the Greenfields Fault which runs through the pit at 280-290[o] azimuth.

12

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

Drill hole Information		Drillholes completed since the previous exploration update	Drillholes completed since the previous exploration update	Drillholes completed since the previous exploration update	Drillholes completed since the previous exploration update	Drillholes completed since the previous exploration update	Drillholes completed since the previous exploration update	Drillholes completed since the previous exploration update	Drillholes completed since the previous exploration update
				Brilliant Project
		Hole ID	Easting	Northin g	RL	Depth	Azi	Dip	Hole Type
		TND17030*	326272	6572273	409.7	550.4	52	-55	RC/DD
		TND17032	326708	6572559	433.1	54	240	-50	RC
		TND17033	326096	6572538	409.6	300	67	-55	RC
		TND17034	326493	6572820	406.4	450.6	246	-64	RC/DD
		TND17035	326321	6572326	410.6	300	67	-55	RC
		TND17036	326397	6572102	413.8	210	70	-55	RC
		TND17037	326319	6572153	411.0	294	70	-55	RC
		TND17038	326206	6572497	408.1	200	73	-54	RC
		TND17039	326168	6573098	406.7	115	70	-88	RC
		TND17040	326290	6573077	406.5	198	251	-60	RC
		TND17041	326394	6573106	405.1	144	253	-54	RC
		TND17042	326314	6573114	405.6	250	253	-55	RC
		TND17043	326584	6572499	415.8	459.6	241	-65	RC/DD
		TND17044	326598	6572601	417.6	555.7	251	-69	RC/DD
		TND17045	326258	6573193	405.8	105	249	-55	RC
		TND17046	326257	6573269	405.5	126	261	-65	RC
		TND17047	326420	6573186	404.9	138	252	-60	RC
		TND17048	326304	6573006	406.0	198	252	-60	RC
		TND17049	326221	6573542	411.0	250	251	-60	RC
		TND17050	326247	6573430	409.4	252	250	-60	RC
		TND17051	326278	6573357	408.6	198	252	-59	RC
		TND17052	326595	6573003	404.1	54	249	-55	RC/DD**
		TND17053	326481	6573004	404.0	462.6	250	-59	RC/DD
		TND17054	326451	6572913	404.7	372.9	245	-65	RC/DD
		TND17055	326564	6572753	408.9	606.6	250	-70	DD
		TND17056	326398	6572990	404.9	246	250	-64	RC
		TND17057	326388	6573029	405.3	258.5	252	-60	RC/DD
		TND17058	326586	6572162	422.2	228	252	-65	RC
		TND17059	326586	6571992	421.8	282	274	-54	RC
		TND17060	326382	6571934	414.0	198	95	-55	RC
		TND17061	326422	6571929	415.0	102	90	-55	RC
		TND17062	326373	6572002	414.0	300	90	-55	RC
		TND17063	326307	6572116	411.0	300	70	-60	RC
		TND17064	326352	6572116	412.0	210	70	-55	RC
				Bonnie Vale		Project
		Hole ID	Easting	Northin g	RL	Depth	Azi	Dip	Hole Type
		BONC160	324444	6584306	384.0	420	220	-65	RC/DD***
		BONC162	324545	6584029	383.0	300	220	-60	RC
		BONC163	324511	6584152	383.0	281	221	-70	RC
		BONC164	324525	6584089	383.0	216	219	-75	RC
		BONCD075	323992	6584206	395.0	462.7	245	-60	RC/DD

13

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

		BONCD077	323830	6584499	389.0	328.3	270	-54	RCDD
		Lindsays North Project
		Hole ID	Easting	Northin g	RL	Depth	Azi	Dip	Hole Type
		LND17001	325694	6575668	418.0	120	221	-60	RC
		LND17002	325531	6575837	416.85	159	221	-60	RC
		LND17003	325466	6575854	418.0	198	208	-60	RC
		 87.9m added to this hole subsequent to previous release; RC pre-collar completed, diamond tail in progress; **RC Pre-collar drilled in 2016

14

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

			Historic Drillholes used for the Greenfields Resource Update	Historic Drillholes used for the Greenfields Resource Update	Historic Drillholes used for the Greenfields Resource Update	Historic Drillholes used for the Greenfields Resource Update	Historic Drillholes used for the Greenfields Resource Update	Historic Drillholes used for the Greenfields Resource Update
		Hole ID	Easting	Northing	RL	Depth	Azimuth	Dip	Company
		GFC001	327999.72	6576518.71	399.6	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC002	327992.68	6576500.68	400.5	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC003	327985.85	6576482.23	399.5	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC004	328050.21	6576544.24	399.8	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC005	328043.50	6576525.27	399.6	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC006	328036.86	6576506.60	399.3	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC007	328030.01	6576487.87	399.1	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC008	328088.27	6576530.97	400.1	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC009	328081.94	6576512.81	399.7	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC010	328075.00	6576493.98	399.2	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC011	328068.14	6576475.45	398.9	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC013	328120.36	6576499.69	399.9	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC014	328113.79	6576479.96	399.4	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC015	328106.88	6576461.97	398.9	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC017	328157.50	6576486.12	400.5	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC018	328150.66	6576467.76	399.8	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC019	328143.89	6576448.66	399.2	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC021	328195.75	6576473.68	400.3	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC023	328181.51	6576435.62	399.2	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC025	328226.61	6576441.98	399.6	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC026	328219.45	6576423.58	399	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC027	328040.34	6576515.76	399.4	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC028	328033.61	6576497.28	399.1	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC030	328078.64	6576502.91	399.4	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC031	328071.61	6576484.28	397.8	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC033	328117.15	6576489.39	399.8	48	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC034	328110.49	6576471.27	399.1	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC036	328154.19	6576477.30	400.1	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC037	328147.11	6576458.15	399.5	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC039	328192.53	6576464.53	400	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC040	328185.24	6576445.45	399.4	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC042	328114.33	6576479.35	399.4	50	38.8	-60	CGNL
		GFC043	328076.73	6576492.15	399.2	50	38.8	-60	CGNL
		GFC044	328038.10	6576505.84	399.3	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC047	328230.12	6576450.71	400	42	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC048	328222.80	6576432.26	399.3	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC050	328188.64	6576454.74	399.5	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC051	328151.01	6576470.01	399.9	50	38.8	-60	CGNL
		GFC052	328047.17	6576535.09	399.8	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC054	328085.35	6576521.50	400	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC061	328260.02	6576419.25	399.3	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC062	328254.50	6576407.70	399.3	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC063	328252.72	6576400.65	398.8	50	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC065	328161.42	6576495.86	400.8	40	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC077	328276.91	6576350.23	397.5	60	20	-60	CGNL
		GFC079	328041.94	6576409.69	399.2	50	20	-60	CGNL

15

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

		GFC119	327987.47	6576426.52	400	131	20	-60.24	CGNL
		GFC120	328000.09	6576461.67	397.9	150	24.99	-59.05	CGNL
		GFC121	328027.61	6576424.31	400	149	0	-60	CGNL
		GFC122	328036.57	6576448.48	397.2	144	20.25	-60.11	CGNL
		GFC123	328065.43	6576410.46	398.9	149	22.04	-60.09	CGNL
		GFC124	328073.87	6576433.42	396.1	149	19.29	-60	CGNL
		GFC125	328099.41	6576393.21	398.4	150	17.3	-60.87	CGNL
		GFC126	328110.15	6576415.17	391.8	149	21.68	-59.08	CGNL
		GFC127	328137.22	6576373.55	397.8	149	21.95	-59.17	CGNL
		GFC128	328148.40	6576405.41	391.3	138	24.49	-59.97	CGNL
		GFC129	328175.14	6576359.59	397.6	150	21.24	-59.36	CGNL
		GFC130	328184.17	6576385.37	391.1	143	20.91	-60.28	CGNL
		GFC131	328003.02	6576411.07	400.3	91	0	-60	CGNL
		GFC132	328039.81	6576398.46	400.5	152	19.62	-63.1	CGNL
		GFC133	328078.41	6576388.19	399.1	149	21.18	-60.68	CGNL
		GFC134	328223.49	6576314.02	397.1	153	17.78	-59.81	CGNL
		GFC135	328152.12	6576357.42	397.7	149	22.37	-60.18	CGNL
		GFC136	328186.88	6576333.97	397.4	152	20.53	-60.27	CGNL
		GFC143	327982.43	6576470.09	398.2	143	0	-60	CGNL
		GFC144	328265.94	6576312.28	396.9	130	20.01	-60.3	CGNL
		GFC145	328208.73	6576335.37	397.2	149	19.26	-59.8	CGNL
		GFC146	328257.05	6576353.86	391.2	70	20.56	-60.48	CGNL
		GFC148	327981.76	6576468.84	398.4	142	26	-69.5	GMC
		GFC149	328165.34	6576335.62	397.7	202	21	-59.5	GMC
		GFC150	328132.52	6576361.08	398	128	20	-65.5	GMC
		GFC151	328114.77	6576367.15	398.5	157	20	-63.75	GMC
		GFC152	328093.54	6576378.39	399.1	175	21	-64	GMC
		GFC153	328056.03	6576386.43	399.7	200	20	-60.75	GMC
		GFC154	328020.89	6576405.19	400.9	195	19	-60	GMC
		GFC155	327995.28	6576392.83	400.6	130	19	-60	GMC
		GFC156	328179.09	6576313.55	397.9	234	19	-60	GMC
		GFC157	328114.31	6576364.11	398.5	220	25	-69.5	GMC
		GFC158	328018.61	6576457.35	397.8	198	21	-81	GMC
		GFC159	328198.16	6576309.17	397.6	220	23	-59	GMC
		GFC160	327964.80	6576426.04	400.1	120	23.48	-59.44	GMC
		GFC161	327945.68	6576432.68	400.6	114	20.75	-58.77	GMC
		GFC162	327926.72	6576439.10	400.8	147	18.39	-59.38	GMC
		GFC164	327940.98	6576422.02	400.4	100	189.21	-89.31	GMC
		GFC165	327920.24	6576423.66	400.8	80	12.45	-79.36	GMC
		GFC166	327902.91	6576433.30	400.9	80	14.84	-79.55	GMC
		GFC168	327960.83	6576419.54	400.4	120	27.47	-79.04	GMC
		GFD029	328026.82	6576478.55	399.2	93	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD032	328064.59	6576465.33	399	95.2	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD035	328103.42	6576452.82	398.6	87.14	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD038	328140.09	6576439.75	399	92	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD041	328177.83	6576426.81	398.7	83.4	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD049	328215.89	6576414.26	398.6	67.01	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD053	328020.01	6576459.93	399.2	129.5	18.89	-60	CGNL

16

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

		GFD055	328058.53	6576445.89	398.8	134.5	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD057	328093.12	6576436.61	398.6	122	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD064	328245.37	6576382.41	398.6	79	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD066	328132.25	6576421.09	398.3	143	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD068	328170.32	6576408.18	398.3	121.5	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD069	328207.20	6576395.11	398.2	119	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD078	328050.56	6576427.99	398.9	146.4	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD080	328010.87	6576441.00	399.5	154.1	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD082	328088.10	6576416.47	398.6	133	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD083	328080.84	6576399.01	398.4	200	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD084	328124.89	6576402.07	398.3	151	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD085	328118.56	6576384.65	398.1	169.35	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD086	328163.23	6576389.43	397.9	131	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD087	328155.98	6576371.98	397.9	173	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD088	328200.38	6576376.04	397.9	127	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD089	328225.79	6576346.88	397	149.1	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD090	328238.19	6576363.33	398.1	126	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD091	328193.55	6576357.43	397.5	165	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD092	328128.35	6576411.49	398	141	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD093	328041.01	6576518.37	370.5	122.1	20	-90	CGNL
		GFD094	328041.25	6576519.08	370.5	49	18.89	-60	CGNL
		GFD095	328077.85	6576500.75	370.14	119	25	-88	CGNL
		GFD097	328116.41	6576488.90	368.8	54.7	301	-86	CGNL
		GFD098	328116.81	6576489.55	368.9	37.1	20	-69	CGNL
		GFD099	327995.26	6576500.82	399.6	82.1	21	-59	CGNL
		GFD100	327999.59	6576517.24	399.8	95	25	-60	CGNL
		GFD101	328257.73	6576412.02	368.8	30	0	-90	CGNL
		GFD102	328228.72	6576434.43	368.4	49	20	-60	CGNL
		GFD103	328229.35	6576443.95	368.9	44	20	-60	CGNL
		GFD104	328196.69	6576462.73	369.1	44	20	-65	CGNL
		GFD105	328155.40	6576481.13	368.8	40	20	-65	CGNL
		GFD106	328012.19	6576493.83	399.8	96	20	-60	CGNL
		GFD107	328010.78	6576473.86	399.7	128	20	-60	CGNL
		GFD108	328044.80	6576470.20	399.5	111	20	-60	CGNL
		GFD109	328082.24	6576454.21	399.3	96	20	-60	CGNL
		GFD110	328078.14	6576441.53	398.7	105	20	-60	CGNL
		GFD111	328040.75	6576514.56	370.3	44	200	-60	CGNL
		GFD112	328056.77	6576503.84	370.7	41.5	200	-60	CGNL
		GFD113	328077.00	6576498.27	370	44.5	200	-60	CGNL
		GFD114	328096.44	6576495.21	369.7	35	20	-70	CGNL
		GFD115	328098.76	6576501.19	369.9	25	20	-65	CGNL
		GFD432	328137.81	6576374.22	377.5	187	20.26	-59.2	MPI
		GFD433	328143.28	6576389.51	377.6	132.8	18.59	-54.06	MPI
		GFDD30160-1	328077.43	6576388.80	376.96	179.5	21.71	-58.47	REDEMPTION JV
		GFDD30300-1	328218.79	6576365.15	379.97	122.7	20.73	-60.46	REDEMPTION JV
		GFDD30340-1	328263.34	6576366.96	382.95	92.7	17.95	-59.21	REDEMPTION JV
		GFR429	328143.84	6576419.37	373.1	110	20.74	-59.87	MPI
		GFR430	328151.34	6576381.73	377.5	150	20.41	-59.04	MPI

17

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

		GFR431	328133.79	6576391.99	377.6	142	20.31	-57.6	MPI
		GFR434	328115.07	6576428.57	377.8	110	20	-50	MPI
		GFRC30060-1	327998.67	6576462.80	378.48	132	18	-65	REDEMPTION JV
		GFRC30100-1	328024.60	6576421.43	378.08	60	158.2	-87.85	REDEMPTION JV
		GFRC30120-1	328050.60	6576425.98	374.28	140	21	-59	REDEMPTION JV
		GFRC30340-2	328269.64	6576389.07	378.1	70	23.45	-61	REDEMPTION JV
		GFRC30340-3	328262.30	6576369.09	382.82	90	270.38	-89.2	REDEMPTION JV
		TMHCD0009	328191.72	6576283.72	397.581	324.56	13.04	-63.7	FOCUS
		TMHCD0011	328078.27	6576286.62	401.226	316.73	25.81	-56.63	FOCUS
		TMHCD0017	328221.74	6576561.23	402.977	319.79	205.64	-52.16	FOCUS
		TMHCD0018	328258.23	6576541.49	402.839	328.24	193.04	-50	FOCUS
		TMHDD0019	327996.85	6576529.96	381.931	187.9	205.04	-80	FOCUS
		TMHDD0020	327996.85	6576529.96	381.931	198.8	201.04	-70	FOCUS
		TMHDD0021	328228.43	6576436.08	360.169	170.67	207.84	-54.4	FOCUS
		TMHDD0022	328228.43	6576436.08	360.169	215.29	210.94	-64.3	FOCUS
		TMHDD0023	328228.43	6576436.08	360.169	232.94	210.04	-77	FOCUS
Data aggregation methods		 New exploration results mineralised intersections are reported at a 0.9g/t Au cut-off with a minimum reporting width of 1m for RC holes and 0.2m for diamond holes, reported as length-weighted average grades.  For Greenfields, mineralised intersections are reported at 1.0g/t Au cut-off with a minimum reporting width of 1m for RC holes and 0.2m for diamond holes, reported as length-weighted averages.
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths		 Holes were drilled orthogonal to mineralisation as much as possible, however the exact relationship between intercept width and true width cannot be estimated exactly in all cases.
Diagrams		Refer to Figures and Tables in body of the release.
Balanced reporting		Recent FML drill assay results used in this estimation are published in previous news releases. Historic drill hole results available on WAMEX.
Other substantive exploration data		There is no other material exploration data to report at this time.
Further work		RC and Diamond drilling is ongoing at Brilliant and the current program is anticipated to be completed in late May 2017. A resource update is expected once all data has been received.

18

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

• Follow-up RC drilling is planned at Bonnie Vale to further delineate lode mineralisation in structures parallel to the Quarry Reef, as well as testing greenfields geophysical targets in the Bonnie Vale district

• Follow-up RC drilling is planned at Lindsays North.

• Future work at Greenfields will be contingent upon the results of the Preliminary Feasibility Study previously announced.

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources - Greenfields

(Criteria listed in section 1, and where relevant in section 2, also apply to this section. This section refers exclusively to the Greenfields Resource Update)

Criteria	Commentary
Database integrity	Data was geologically logged electronically, collar and downhole surveys were also received electronically as was the laboratory analysis results. These electronic files were loaded into an acQuire database by either consultants rOREdata or the company in-house Database Administrator. Data was routinely extracted to Microsoft Access during the drilling program for validation by the geologist in charge of the project. FML’s database is a Microsoft SQL Server database (acQuire), which is case sensitive, relational and normalised to the Third Normal Form. As a result of normalisation, the following data integrity categories exist:  Entity Integrity: No duplicate rows in a table, eliminated redundancy and chance of error.  Domain Integrity: Enforces valid entries for a given column by restricting the type, the format or a range of values.  Referential Integrity: Rows cannot be deleted which are used by other records.  User-Defined Integrity: Business rules enforced by acQuire and validation codes set up by FML. Additionally, in-house validation scripts are routinely run in acQuire on FML’s database and they include the following checks:  Missing collar information  Missing logging, sampling, downhole survey data and hole diameter  Overlapping intervals in geological logging, sampling, down hole surveys  Checks for character data in numeric fields The historical Greenfields drill data was validated by the Focus data management team and the Project Geologist. This involved collaborating all collar, downhole survey, geology and assay data with existing hardcopy material as well as displaying the holes in three dimensions in Surpac to determine any unusual or unlikely trends in the data so that it could be rectified before loading into the Focus site database. This process was thorough and took a couple of months for the team to complete.
Site visits	Hannah Kosovich, the Competent Person for the Greenfields Resource Estimate is FML’s Resource Geologist, and conducts periodic site visits. Wesley Groome, the Competent Person for the exploration results, is Senior Geologist at FML and conducts regular site visits
Geological interpretation	All available drill hole and historic mining data was used to guide the geological interpretation of the mineralisation. The majority of the resource occurs in what has been labelled the Unit 4 Dolerite. The remaining minor lodes occur within the less well mineralised (and altered) Unit 3 and Unit 5 Dolerites. The mineralised geological interpretation was digitised in GEOVIA Surpac software on a section by section basis. The contact of the Dolerite 4 was used to guide the interpretation or an approximate 0.5g/t cut-off was used where the contact was obscure. Significant internal dilution included for continuity of modelling the Dolerite contact. Minor deviation only of the lode geometry was noticed between drill holes along

19

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

	strike and down-dip. Minor lodes with less continuity and sample numbers were also interpreted.
Dimensions	The resource extends over a strike length of over 300m (from 30030mE to 30350mE) and includes the ~200m interval from the mined surface down to the 120mRL. The thickness of the main lode varies from average thickness of 20m near surface pinching to an average thickness of 10m at depth.
Estimation and modelling techniques	158 holes were used in the estimate including 96 RC, 8 diamond core holes and 54 RC pre-collared diamond core holes for a total of 16,908.82. Samples within the wireframes were composited to even 2m intervals, the dominant sample interval from historic drilling. Residual samples that did not meet the minimum length criteria of the compositing process were appended to the adjacent sample so that all material within the wireframe was included The statistics of the 2m composites were analysed to determine if any top cutting was required. Top-capping of higher Au values within each domain was carried out with Au values above the cut-off grade reset to the cut-off grade. Skree plots and Cumulative Frequency plots were used to determine top cut grade which was 25 g/t Au and affected five samples. Variography was modelled for the Major, Semi Major and Minor axes on the main Unit 3 Dolerite. GEOVIA Surpac Software was used for the estimation. An Ordinary Kriging (OK) technique was selected using the variograms modelled in Surpac. Each domain was estimated separately using only its own sample values. No samples were shared between domains (hard boundaries). Minimum (8) and maximum (32) sample numbers were selected based on a Quantitative Kriging Neighbourhood analysis. An elliptical search was used orientated on the lode geometry and based on range of the Variograms. Three search passes were run in order to fill the block model with estimated Au values, with reduced minimum sample numbers and increased search distances. Block sizes for the model were 5m in Y, 20m in X and 5m in Z direction. Sub celling of the parent blocks was permitted to 1.25m in the Y direction, 5m in the X direction and 2.5m in the Z direction. Sub-blocking was used to best fill the wireframes and inherit the grade of the parent block. A 20° rotation in the Z axis (bearing rotation) was applied to the orientation of the blocks. This aligned the blocks with the WNW strike of the lodes. The estimate was validated by a number of methods. An initial visual review was done by comparing estimated blocks and raw drill holes. Tonnage weighted mean grades were compared for all lodes with the raw and top- capped drill hole values. There were no major differences. Swath plots of drill hole values and estimated Au grades by northing and RL were completed to review the trends of the raw data vs estimates and if too much smoothing of the grades had occurred. Comparisons between previous Greenfields block model estimates was also plotted as trend lines by elevation.
Moisture	Tonnages are estimated on a dry basis.
Cut-off parameters	The Resources for Brilliant have been reported above a 1g/t cut-off for open pit above 265mRL, this is based on a preliminary whittle shell optimisation.
Mining factors or assumptions	An existing open pit exists at Greenfields, mining would continue by cut-back and open cut extraction.
Metallurgical factors or assumptions	In house metallurgical test work had been conducted on Greenfields samples and recoveries were in the plus 90% range. GMC who mined Greenfields from Dec 2003 to Jan 2005 had an overall reconciliation of ~96.9% of tonnes, 100.7% of grade and 101% of ounces milled compared to mined.

20

Coolgardie Activities Report

==> picture [76 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

Environmental factors or assumptions	Greenfields deposit occurs in an area of previous disturbance with an open cut pit and associated waste dump. The Three Mile Hill Processing Plant is currently on care and maintenance, but has all necessary tailing facilities etc. that would allow for a rapid restart of the plant.
Bulk density	Bulk densities of 1.8, 2.4 and 2.8 t/m³ were applied to Oxide, Transitional and Fresh resources respectively. The oxide and transitional values are based on values used in similar gold deposits. The fresh rock value is based on 32 measurements taken from recent Focus drill core using a water immersion method and is the average value of those samples.
Classification	Resources have been classified as either Indicated or Inferred based mainly on geological confidence in the geometry and continuity of the lodes. In addition, various estimation output parameters such as number of samples, search pass, kriging variance, and slope of regression have been used to assist in classification. Recent Focus drilling has confirmed the geological interpretation is sound and provided some quality assurance in the pre-Focus drilling.
Audits or reviews	No external audits or reviews were formally carried out on the Greenfields deposit.
Discussion of relative accuracy/ confidence	The mineral resource relates to global tonnage and grade estimates. The Greenfields pit has been mined in four campaigns in the modern era commencing in 1986 and finishing in 2005 producing some 0.98Mt @ 1.81g/t for 56,776 ounces (reconciled). The current model reports higher tonnages at a lower grade due to the internal dilution included in modelling the main dolerite unit, 1.38Mt @ 1.69g/t for 75,214 ounces.

21