Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

FOCUS MINERALS LTD Capital/Financing Update 2014

Oct 7, 2014

64932_rns_2014-10-07_5d1dd406-2db5-42e0-9d53-e507f75cf886.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Level 2, 159 Adelaide Terrace East Perth WA 6004 PO Box 3233 East Perth WA 6892 T: +61 8 9215 7888 F: +61 8 9215 7889 E: [email protected]

==> picture [118 x 82] intentionally omitted <==

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

8 October 2014

Focus Minerals Hits High Grade Gold at Bonnie Vale (including 5 metres at 17.8g/t)

Focus Minerals Ltd (ASX: FML) has successfully completed Stage 2 drilling of Bonnie Vale in Coolgardie, Western Australia. Stage 2 involved eleven RC holes for a total of 2,563m (Figure 1). Highlight results include hole BONC053, located in the central southeast of the area, which returned 5.0 meters at 17.8 g/t gold.

The purpose of Stage 2 was to test the potential of additional mineralisation down-dip and along strike of the main mineralised structures and follow up the significant intersections drilled in Stage 1 earlier this year, which included 6.0m @ 9.45 g/t in BONC035 and 6.0m @ 7.12 g/t in BONC033 (released to the ASX on 30 July, 2014).

Highlight Intersections from Bonnie Vale Stage 2*

  • 1.0m @ 8.03 g/t Au from 192m in BONC045

  • 2.0m @ 38.5 g/t Au from 95m in BONC046

  • 1.0m @ 24.1 g/t Au from 58m in BONC047

  • 2.0m @ 9.38 g/t Au from 92m in BONC050

  • 4.0m @ 4.59 g/t Au from 100m in BONC052

  • 5.0m @ 17.8g/t Au from 128m in BONC053

*Other significant intersections are presented in Table A below

==> picture [452 x 280] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 Bonnie Vale Drill Hole Locations

1

==> picture [59 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

Stage 1 drilling intersected quartz reefs with high grade gold mineralisation (ASX 30 July, 2014), Stage 2 confirmed the gold mineralisation extends down dip (Figure 2) and along strike, particularly the quartz reef intersected by BONC033 during the Stage 1 drilling. The mineralisation remains open in both directions.

==> picture [452 x 219] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Bonnie Vale Cross Section (Facing Northwest)

Wanghong Yang, Interim CEO of Focus, commented “the strong results from this stage of drilling are particularly impressive in both the width and grade of the high-grade intervals. We are highly encouraged by these results and will continue to further define the economic extent of this reef”

Focus is currently planning additional drill holes to test the size and grade of the quartz reefs delineated in Stages 1 and 2 of the Bonnie Vale exploration campaign completed this year.

For further information please contact:

Dane Etheridge Andrew Paterson Company Secretary and GM Business Development GM Exploration & Resource Development Focus Minerals Ltd Focus Minerals Ltd Phone: +61 8 9215 7888 Phone: +61 8 9215 7888

Focus Minerals Limited - Focus owns two large gold projects in Western Australia’s Eastern Goldfields. The company is the largest landholder in the Coolgardie Gold Belt, where it owns the 1.2Mtpa processing plant at Three Mile Hill. 250km to the northeast Focus has the Laverton Gold Project which comprises a significant portfolio of highly prospective tenure. Focus also owns the 1.45Mtpa Barnicoat mill in Laverton which has been on care and maintenance since 2009.

Forward Looking Statements

This release contains certain “forward looking statements”. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of ‘forward-looking’ terminology, including, without limitation, the terms ‘believes’, ‘estimates’, ‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘predicts’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘propose’, ‘goals’, ‘targets’, ‘aims’, ‘outlook’, ‘guidance’, ‘forecasts’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future, assumptions which may or may not prove correct, and may be beyond Focus’ ability to control or predict which may cause the actual results or performance of Focus to be materially different from the results or performance expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and contingencies and are not guarantees or predictions of future performance. No representation is made that any of these statements or forecasts will come to pass or that any forecast result will be achieved. Similarly, no representation is given that the assumptions upon which forward-looking statements may be based are reasonable. Forward-looking statements speak only as at the date of this document and Focus disclaims any obligations or undertakings to release any update of, or revisions to, any forward-looking statements in this document.

2

==> picture [59 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

Table A: Significant Intersections

Hole ID Easting Northing RL Depth Dip Azimuth From To Intersection
(MGA 94 Zone 51) (m) (MGA94) (m) (m) (ppm Au)
BONNIE VALE, COOLGARDIE GOLD PROJECT
BONC047 324286 6584243 389 222 -59.8 227 58 59 [email protected]
And 166 167 [email protected]
BONC053 324370 6584134 386 160 -59.6 225 51 52 [email protected]
And 83 84 [email protected]
And 128 133 [email protected]
BONC049 324133 6584384 389 246 -60.1 225 119 120 [email protected]
BONC051 323969 6584491 393 264 -60.7 222 221 222 [email protected]
BONC052 323871 6584622 391 312 -61.1 225 100 104 [email protected]
BONC050 324015 6584408 390 294 -89.3 90 92 94 [email protected]
BONC048 324177 6584351 388 261 -61.3 225 134 135 [email protected]
And 217 218 [email protected]
BONC046 324305 6584132 387 191 -59.3 224 60 62 [email protected]
And 67 68 [email protected]
And 74 76 [email protected]
And 95 97 [email protected]
BONC045 324395 6584213 385 223 -60.1 222 74 75 [email protected]
And 85 86 [email protected]
And 115 117 [email protected]
And 192 193 [email protected]
BONC044 324368 6584048 371 162 -59.7 221 4 5 [email protected]

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)

Coolgardie
Gold Project
This report relates to results for Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling of Focus
Minerals Coolgardie area.
The summary table below lists metres drilled by drill type. RC percussion drill
chips were collected through a cyclone and cone splitter. Samples were
collected on a 1m basis.
4m composite samples were collected manually using spear sampling.
In total 11 RC holes were drilled for 2,563 meters
RC chips were passed through a cone splitter to achieve a sample weight of
approximately 3kg.
The splitter was levelled at the beginning of each hole using a bullseye level.
Any RC composite samples returning an assay value of 0.2g/t Au or greater
were then re-assayed in 1m intervals by submitting the 1m cone-split samples
for fire assay by 40g charge.

3

==> picture [59 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

At the assay laboratory all samples were oven dried, crushed to a nominal 10mm
using a jaw crusher (core samples only) and weighed. Samples in excess of 3kg
in weight were riffle split to achieve a maximum 3kg sample weight before being
pulverized to 90% passing 75µm.
The samples were then prepared for fire assay.
When visible gold was observed in RC chips, this sample was then flagged by
the supervising geologist for the benefit of the laboratory.
Drilling
techniques
All drilling was completed using an RC face sampling hammer
All holes were surveyed upon completion of drilling using a north-seeking
gyroscope and all holes were surveyed open-hole.
Drill
sample
recovery
RC sample recovery was recorded by a visual estimate during the logging
process.
All RC samples were drilled dry whenever possible to maximize recovery, with
water injection on the outside return to minimise dust.
Study of sample recovery versus gold grade does not indicate a bias in the gold
grade caused by any drop in sample recovery.
Logging All RC samples were geologically logged to record weathering, regolith, rock
type, colour, alteration, mineralisation, structure and texture and any other
notable features that are present.
The logging information was recorded into acQuire software format using a
Toughbook notepad and then transferred into the company’s drilling database
once the log was complete.
Logging was qualitative, however the geologists often recorded quantitative
mineral percentage ranges for the sulphide minerals present.
Samples from RC holes were archived in standard 20m plastic chip trays.
The entire length of all holes are logged.
Sub-sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
RC samples were cone split to a nominal 2.5kg to 3kg sample weight. The drilling
method was designed to maximise sample recovery and delivery of a clean,
representative sample into the calico bag.
Where possible all RC samples were drilled dry to maximise recovery. The use
of a booster and auxiliary compressor provide dry sample for depths below the
water table.
Sample condition was recorded (wet, dry or damp) at the time of sampling and
recorded in the database.
The samples were collected in a pre-numbered calico bag bearing a unique
sample ID.
Samples were crushed to 75µm at the laboratory and riffle split (if required) to a
maximum 3kg sample weight.
Gold analysis was determined by a 40g charge fire assay with an AAS Finish
The difference in fire assay charge size was simply due to the use of two different
commercial laboratories during the drilling campaign.
The assay laboratories’ sample preparation procedures follow industry best
practice, with techniques and practices that are appropriate for this style of
mineralisation.
Pulp duplicates were taken at the pulverising stage and selective repeats
conducted at the laboratories’ discretion.
FML inserts 2 standards and takes 4 duplicates for every 100 samples.

4

==> picture [59 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

Field duplicates were collected from the cone splitter on the rig for RC samples
at a frequency of one duplicate every 20 samples, excluding the 100th sample
as this was a standard.
Regular reviews of the sampling were carried out by the supervising geologist
and senior field staff, to ensure all procedures were followed and best industry
practice carried out.
The sample sizes were considered to be appropriate for the type, style and
consistency of mineralisationencountered during this phase ofexploration.
The assay method and laboratory procedures were appropriate for this style of
mineralisation. The fire assay technique was designed to measure total gold in
the sample.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
No geophysical tools, spectrometers or handheld XRF instruments were used.
The QA/QC process described above was sufficient to establish acceptable
levels of accuracy and precision.
All results from assay standards and duplicates were scrutinised to ensure they
fell within acceptable tolerances.
Significant intervals were visually inspected by company geologists to correlate
assay results to logged mineralisation. Consultants were not used for this
process.
Verification
of sampling
and assaying
Normally if old historic drilling was present, twinned holes are occasionally drilled
to test the veracity of historic assay data; however no twinned holes were drilled
during this program.
Primary data is sent in digital format to the company’s Database Administrator
(DBA) as often as was practicable. The DBA imports the data into an acQuire
database, with assay results merged into the database upon receipt from the
laboratory.
Once loaded, data was extracted for verification by the geologist in charge of the
project.
No adjustments were made to any current or historic data. If data could not be
validated to a reasonable level of certainty it was not used in any resource
estimations.
Drill collars were surveyed after completion, using a DGPS instrument.
Down-hole surveys were completed using a north-seeking gyroscope operated
by a qualified contractor.
Location of
data points
All coordinates and bearings use the MGA94 Zone 51 grid system.
Focus utilises Landgate sourced regional topographic maps and contours as
well as internally produced survey pick-ups produced by the mining survey
teams utilising DGPS base station instruments.
Drill spacing across the Coolgardie prospects varied depending on the
exploration stage that the drill target currently existed.
Drilling varied from wide spaced exploration RC drilling to precisely placed
diamond tails designed to test mineralisation at depth and along strike.
Data spacing
and
distribution
The data spacing of the drilling across Focus’s prospects during this campaign
was not considered sufficient to be used in a Mineral Resource; the majority of
drilling was completed to establish continuity of mineralisation and alteration at
depth.
Intercepted mineralisation will be digitized and incorporated into existing models
or to create new models as required.

5

==> picture [59 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

Additional infill drilling will be required before this mineralisation can be used in
the estimation of a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve.
Sample compositing has not been applied to the reporting of exploration results.
Drilling was designed based on known geological models, field mapping, verified
historical data and cross-sectional interpretation.
Drill holes were oriented at right angles to the strike of the deposit, with dip
optimised for drill capabilities and the dip of the mineralised body.
Orientation of
data in
relation to
geological
structure
No orientation and sampling bias has been recognised in the drilling data to date.
Sample
security
Coolgardie Gold Project
All samples were reconciled against the sample submission with any omissions
or variations reported to FML.
All samples were bagged in a tied numbered calico bag, grouped into green
plastic bags. The bags were placed into cages with a sample submission sheet
and delivered directly from site to the Kalgoorlie laboratories by FML personnel
on a daily basis.
Audits or
reviews
A review of sampling techniques was carried out by Roredata Pty Ltd in late
2013 as part of a database amalgamation project. Their only recommendation
was to change the QA/QC intervals to bring them into line with the FML Laverton
system, which uses the same frequency of standards and duplicates but has
them inserted at different points within the numbering sequence.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project
Mineral
tenement
and land
tenure status
All drilling was conducted on tenements 100% owned by Focus Minerals Limited
or its subsidiary companies Focus Operations Pty Ltd. All tenements are in good
standing.
There are currently no registered Native Title claims over the Coolgardie project
areas.
Exploration
done by
other parties
Bonnie Vale is the site of a number of historic workings including the “Varischetti
Mine” (Westralia). Modern exploration has been conducted by Coolgardie Gold
NL, Gold Mines of Coolgardie and Focus Minerals.
Geology Bonnie Vale mineralisation is historically contained within large (300m strike
length) planar reef structures on or near the contact of the Bonnie Vale tonalite
and an overlying ultramafic unit. FML drilling is investigating potential extensions
to these structures at depth and along strike.
Drillhole
Information
Hole ID
BONC043
BONC044
BONC045
BONC046
BONC047
BONC048
Easting Northing RL Depth Azimuth Dip Tenements
M1500877
M1500595
M1500595
M1500595
M1500595
M1500595
324522 6583936 386 228 220 -61 M1500877
324368 6584048 371 162 221 -60 M1500595
324395 6584213 385 223 222 -60 M1500595
324305 6584132 387 191 224 -59 M1500595
324286 6584243 389 222 227 -60 M1500595
324177 6584351 388 261 225 -61 M1500595

6

==> picture [59 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project Coolgardie Gold Project
BONC049 324133 6584384 389 246 225 -60 M1500595
BONC050 324015 6584408 390 294 90 -89 M1500595
BONC051 323969 6584491 393 264 222 -61 M1500595
BONC052 323871 6584622 391 312 225 -61 M1500595
BONC053 324370 6584134 386 160 225 -60 M1500595
Data
aggregation
methods
Mineralised intersections are reported at a 1.00g/t Au cut-off with a minimum reporting
width of 1m, reported as length-weighted average grades.
Relationship
between
mineralization
widths and
intercept
lengths
Holes were drilled orthogonal to mineralisation as much as possible, however the
exact relationship between intercept width and true width cannot be estimated exactly
in all cases.
Holes BNOC 050 drilled was drilled vertically due to site access issues associated
with open pit geometries.
Diagrams Accurate collar plans are included in this announcement. Representative cross
sections are included to depict the attitude and style of mineralised structures.
Balanced
reporting
Drilling results are reported in a balanced reporting style. The ASX announcement
shows actual locations of holes drilled, and representative sections as appropriate.
Holes shown on the collar location plan which are not reported in the table of
significant intercepts did not intersect reportable mineralisation.
Other
substantive
exploration
data
There is no other material exploration data to report at this time.
Further work The company is designing drilling program to follow up results from Bonnie Vale

Competent Person’s Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Andrew Paterson who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Paterson is employed by Focus Minerals Limited and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Paterson consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on the information compiled by him in the form and context in which it appears.

7