AI assistant
FOCUS MINERALS LTD — Annual Report 2007
Oct 17, 2007
64932_rns_2007-10-17_ef6d28a5-45ac-4530-b47f-425233fb76bb.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [149 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
ABn 56 005 470 799 and Controlled entities
==> picture [596 x 571] intentionally omitted <==
AnnuAl RepoRt 2007
CORPORATE INFORMATION
ABN 56 005 470 799
Directors
Donald Taig Chairman Peter Williams Managing Director Phillip Lockyer Non-Executive Director Geoff Rasmussen Non-Executive Director
Company Secretary
K Jon Grygorcewicz
Registered & Head Office
Level 3 105 St George’s Terrace Perth WA 6000 PO Box Z5422, Perth WA 6831
Tel: +61 (0)8 9215 7888 Fax: +61 (0)8 9215 7889
Site Office
270 Egan Street Kalgoorlie WA 6430
PO Box 646, Kalgoorlie WA 6433
+61 (0)8 9021 7600 +61 (0)8 9021 7556
Share Register
Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd Level 2 Reserve Bank Building 45 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000
Tel: +61 1300 557 010 Fax: +61 (0)8 9323 2033
Bankers
Bank Of Western Australia Limited 108 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000
Auditors
Bentleys MRI Perth Partnership Level 1 10 Kings Park Road West Perth WA 6005
Tel: +61 (0)8 9480 2000 Fax: +61 (0)8 9322 7787
Solicitors
Steinepreis Paganin Level 1 Next Building 16 Milligan Street Perth WA 6000
==> picture [254 x 293] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
|||
|---|---|
|Contents|Page|
|Corporate Information|inside cover|
|Chairman’s Letter|1|
|Highlights|3|
|2007 Operations Review|4|
|Directors’ Report|13|
|Corporate Governance Statement|20|
|Auditor’s Independence Declaration|22|
|Income Statement|23|
|Balance Sheet|24|
|Statement of Changes in Equity|25|
|Cash Flow Statement|26|
|Notes to the Financial Statements|27|
|Directors’ Declaration|52|
|Independent Audit Report|53|
|ASX Additional Information|55|
----- End of picture text -----
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Chairman’s Letter
Dear Shareholders
The 2006/2007 financial year represented a period of intense activity and significant advancement for Focus Minerals, positioning your Company for near-term production of both gold and nickel. As a result of several key initiatives and developments, we are well on schedule to mine our first parcel of gold ore ready for treatment in March 2008 and nickel in 2008.
In April this year Canadian-listed Committee Bay Resources Ltd completed earning its 50 per cent share in the Redemption Joint Venture (RJV), expending its agreed A$8 million on exploration approximately 12 months ahead of schedule.
Together with Committee Bay’s commitment, your support for successful capital raisings totaling A$14.5M has underpinned the expansion and acceleration of our RJV exploration programs, helping advance the Coolgardie Gold Project to Bankable Feasibility.
Key Coolgardie Gold Project appointments, including those of a General Manager, Exploration Manager and Underground Manager, were finalised during the June Quarter, further progressing our planned transition towards production.
First ore from this project will come from the centrally located high-grade Perseverance deposit where decline development work is well advanced under experienced mining services provider, Barminco Ltd.
As part of the Bankable Feasibility Study, we are anticipating our ongoing exploration and infill drilling programs to result in significant upgrades to total resources.
In order to maintain our current flexibility and support our focus towards early gold production, the initial ore treatment will be through the neighbouring Greenfields processing plant.
On behalf of the RJV, Focus Minerals is managing the ongoing care and maintenance of the Three Mile Hill facility.
Combined with several strategic management moves, the A$12.9 million capital raising completed in June 2007 has assisted us also to fast-track our wholly-owned Nepean Nickel Project.
Feasibility work commenced in the June Quarter, towards achieving possible first production in early 2008. Discussions for the Nickel off-take are continuing and a decision on where the ore will be processed will be reached soon.
Your Company may be comparatively small, but we are one of the most active emerging producers in Western Australia, and for this I would like to take the opportunity to thank our Managing Director Mr Peter Williams, Exploration Manager Mr Chuck McCormick and our tight-knit team of dedicated support personnel.
The transition of Focus Minerals into a producer of the twin commodities for which the Western Australian Goldfields are renowned may surprise some in the wider investment community during the coming year. Be assured, this ultimate transformation is due in no small part to the commitment, vision and professional approach of the Focus Minerals team.
I would also like to express our gratitude to our RJV partner, Committee Bay, for the expertise, due process and dedication to task displayed by all personnel.
Without our partnership with Committee Bay, we would not have been able to complete a major timely undertaking that has proved crucial to our success and very significant for the region, namely the first major consolidated geophysical re-interpretation of such a large, consolidated expanse of the Coolgardie Gold Belt.
“As a result of several key initiatives and developments, we are well on schedule to mine our first parcel of gold ore ready for treatment in March 2008 and nickel in 2008.”
Page 1
Chairman’s Letter cont.
This work has generated a significant number of new targets and extensions to known mineralised zones throughout our ground position, underscoring our confidence in developing a long-term, profitable minerals business.
Our holdings include several acclaimed historic workings and the site of the original 1892 Bayleys Reward gold find, which sparked the renowned Coolgardie gold rush. Accordingly, it is with much interest that I note reports compiled in 1897-98 following inspections by mining engineer Mr H C Hoover of the former Flagstaff Gold Mining Co Ltd. This is the same Mr Hoover that later would become the 31st President of the United States of America.
Flagstaff’s holdings, one mile south of Coolgardie, now form part of the RJV portfolio and represent an important exploration target just 200m south east of our high-grade Perseverance deposit, within what now constitutes, 110 years later, the Coolgardie Gold Project. Perseverance and the Flagstaff deposit produced ~25,000 ounces of gold at a reputed head grade of 16 g/t Au, principally from the oxide/transition zone.
However, the mines were abandoned in the 1930s due to poor recovery in the sulphide zone. Initially, it was thought the ore was refractory, but the issue was subsequently found to be a grinding problem which the batteries of that era could not overcome.
Mr Hoover noted that the landholding supporting the Flagstaff mine, possessed “a strong vein, and will undoubtedly extend in depth”. Of lower-grade ore above the drives, Mr Hoover noted: “Such low grade ore will at some time be worked to great profit at Coolgardie. That time has not yet arrived …”. With the RJV’s consolidated ground position, consistently high-grade results from deposits such as Perseverance and consolidated tenements indicating significantly endowed mineralisation at depth, we believe the time has arrived for Focus Minerals to extract profitability from these historic holdings.
It is also time to realise the significant benefit from our Nepean Nickel Project. We are looking forward to reporting additional significant progress from our ongoing nickel drilling programs and work that we have recently commenced, following receipt of full access approvals to mine workings.
In anticipation of the growth of Nepean and the Coolgardie Gold Project, as we progress both towards production, we have recently implemented some changes to key Board and Management roles.
My chairman’s role has expanded into a part-time executive position, enabling Mr Williams and Mr McCormick to focus directly on an expanding array of technical and operational details, critical to enhancing our rapid advancement towards production. My focus will be on finalising our future financing structure and looking for appropriate opportunities to grow your Company and enhance its value. Accordingly, and to maintain the independent executive balance within the Board, Mr McCormick has stepped down from his director’s role.
In addition, we have welcomed Mr Steve Denn to the team. Mr Denn, a respected geologist with more than 20 years’ experience in mineral exploration, mine development, production and management, has been appointed to the newly created position of Manager Geology Nickel.
To our Board, I extend my gratitude for their continuing invaluable individual contributions and collective guidance throughout the year. I believe the combined experience and wisdom of the Focus Minerals Board is second to none and I look forward to working with each member as we move into the initial production phase that will deliver our first cash returns.
Your Company is well on the path to establishing an enhanced profile as a prosperous producer of gold and nickel in one of Australia’s most acclaimed and prolific mineral provinces. Thank you for your continuing support. I look forward to sharing further positive news of growth, development and prosperity in the coming months.
==> picture [115 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
Don Taig Chairman
Page 2
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
2007 Highlights
Corporate
-
Successful conclusion of a two-stage A$12.9M capital raising comprising a Share Placement and Share Purchase Plan, resulting in the issue of 300 million shares at 4.3c per share and an oversubscribed placement of 40 million shares at an issue price of 4c per share, to raise an additional A$1.6M.
-
Appointment of key personnel, including Mr Darren Gibcus as General Manager, Dr Gary Adams as Exploration Manager and Mr Brett Ustick as Underground Manager, to the Coolgardie Gold Project and Mr Jon Grygorcewicz, a Chartered Accountant as Company Secretary.
(Subsequent to 30 June 2007)
-
Appointment of Mr Steve Denn, a geologist with 20 years’ experience in mineral exploration, mine development, production and management, to the newly created position of Manager Geology Nickel.
-
Part time executive role assumed by Focus Minerals Chairman, Mr Don Taig, to assist in the Company’s transition to production.
Coolgardie Gold Project (Redemption Joint Venture - Focus 50%)
-
Committee Bay Resources Ltd completed an A$8 million sole exploration funding commitment in April 2007, to earn 50% equity in the Redemption Joint Venture (RJV), formed in November 2005.
-
Comprehensive VTEM helicopter-borne survey completed over entire 210sq km RJV area, comprising 1,420 line kilometres at 200m line spacing with 100m in-fill.
-
Commitment by the RJV to an expanded 2007 exploration program, including resource delineation and feasibility at a budgeted cost of A$8 million.
-
Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resource inventory for Coolgardie Gold Project increased to 503,552 Measured and Indicated ounces and 1,108,461 Inferred ounces of gold.
-
Commencement of a Bankable Feasibility Study targeting the start of mining at the Coolgardie Gold Project in early 2008, from the high-grade Perseverance deposit.
-
535m exploration and development decline commenced at the Perseverance deposit, 280m north of established underground infrastructure at Tindals/Empress.
-
Multiple high-grade gold zones intersected at the Perseverance deposit, resulting in an initial resource of 296,000t @ 9.4 g/t Au, for 89,600 ounces. Significant results incl: 11m @ 23.65 g/t Au; 9m @ 29.91 g/t Au and 4m @ 26.48 g/t Au.
-
Resource upgrade doubling the inferred resource estimate for the Countess gold deposit to 246,000t @ 4.26 g/t Au.
-
Major 20-hole, 2,900m in-fill drilling program completed at the Dreadnought deposit, resulting in an Indicated and Inferred Resource upgrade to 3,458,161t @ 1.99 g/t Au.
-
Initial referred resource calculated for Cyanide (Tindals East), measuring 367,000t @ 5.54 g/t Au, for 65,368 ounces.
-
34% increase in the Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resource for the Greenfields deposit to 1.616Mt @ 1.69 g/t Au, for 87,251 contained ounces.
-
Inferred Resource upgrade of 24% for Norris-Grossmont to 1.05Mt @ 2.43 g/t Au, for 82,033 ounces.
Nepean Nickel Project (100% Focus)
-
Updated scoping study resulting in the commencement of pre-feasibility work targeting the recommencement of mining from the historic Nepean Nickel Mine and initial nickel concentrate production in 2008.
-
45% upgrade of the Nepean Inferred Resource to 591,000t @ 2.2% Ni, as a result of a re-assessment of transitional, remnant and fresh mineralisation.
-
(Subsequent to 30 June 2007)
-
Approvals received for full access to the Nepean Mine underground workings.
-
Winder commissioning completed.
-
Shaft refurbishment completed to the seven level and ore block evaluation commenced.
Page 3
2007 OPERATIONS REVIEW
Overview
During the 2006/07 financial year Focus Minerals achieved substantial progress towards becoming a near-term producer of both nickel and gold. The Company maintained its position as the dominant landholder in the Coolgardie Gold Belt, through its 210sq km consolidated landholding in conjunction with Redemption Joint Venture partner, Committee Bay Resources Ltd.
The Redemption Joint Venture (RJV) formed in November 2005 was consummated with the completion by Committee Bay of its 50% farm-in 18 months ahead of schedule.
Committee Bay’s A$8 million of exploration expenditure demonstrated its commitment to the advancement of the Coolgardie Gold Project and the subsequent allocation by the RJV of a further A$8 million to 2007 exploration programs has resulted in an even more robust outlook for the project.
Resource upgrades for several key deposits have been completed or are underway, key personnel have been appointed to three newly created positions associated with project development and the RJV remains on schedule to mine its first gold ready for treatment during early 2008. Ongoing exploration and expansion drilling programs are anticipated to further grow this project towards its substantial potential to underpin a long-term operation.
Accordingly, on behalf of the RJV, Focus Minerals is continuing to oversee the care and maintenance of the 1.2mtpa Three Mile Hill processing plant ahead of the facility’s planned refurbishment in line with production growth.
In the meantime, the RJV will toll treat ore through the Barminco Ltd subsidiary, Higginsville Mining Pty Ltd’s Greenfields processing plant. Barminco is also developing the access and exploration decline for the high-grade Perseverance deposit, from which we anticipate our first gold ore will be mined.
In conjunction with the development of the Coolgardie Gold Project, Focus Minerals is also conducting shaft refurbishment at its wholly-owned Nepean Nickel Project, 25km south of Coolgardie.
Work completed during the 2006-07 year enabled the Company to secure full regulatory access to the historic Nepean Nickel Mine, complete commissioning of the winder and determine a 45% upgrade to the resource in and around the mine. Focus Minerals has now commenced formal feasibility drilling and development programs for this project, targeting first production in 2008.
In addition, in September 2006, Focus Minerals acquired a direct 100% interest in Exploration Licence EL 26/79, near Kambalda, for consideration of 400,000 shares issued at 4.5c each.
Strategic Objectives
Focus Minerals’ primary strategy as an exploration and development company in the Coolgardie region of WA has always been to become a significant producer in this region.
The Company’s activities over the past year have advanced this aim considerably, to the point where the Company is simultaneously conducting feasibility and exploration programs for its wholly-owned Nepean Nickel Project and the Coolgardie Gold Project, held with Redemption Joint Venture partner, Committee Bay Resources.
Accordingly, the Focus Minerals team is growing and its responsibilities are undergoing continual refinement.
As anticipated, cash needs have also expanded, with the Company’s combined successful capital raisings totaling A$14.5 million, underpinning much of the year’s growth.
Over the coming year, Focus Minerals intends to conduct further exploration and development work aided by initial cash flow from the Coolgardie Gold Project.
Expected production from the Nepean Nickel Project next year will supplement earnings further, helping advance production growth plans, prosperity and profitability.
Page 4
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
2007 Operations Review cont.
Coolgardie Gold Project (Redemption Joint Venture - Focus 50%)
The Redemption Joint Venture (RJV) holds the mineral rights to ~210sq km of under-explored tenements in the Coolgardie Gold Belt, including Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources totaling 1.6 million ounces of gold and the 1.2mtpa Three Mile Hill gold processing plant.
The overall objective of the RJV is to define sufficient reserves and/or secure toll treatment business to enable the 1.2mtpa Three Mile Hill plant to operate at full capacity with five years of scheduled ore treatment, providing cash flow to further explore its surrounding highly-prospective and consolidated land holdings.
Ongoing individual resource upgrades are anticipated to further boost the total Coolgardie Gold Project resources, which comprise a Measured Resource of 545,000t @ 1.77 g/t Au, Indicated Resource of 8.085Mt @ 1.82 g/t Au and Inferred Resource of 11.657Mt @ 2.96 g/t Au.
Resources
During the 2006-07 financial year the RJV completed or commenced initial, new resource estimates for several key deposits centrally located within the Coolgardie Gold Project.
Current gold resources held by the RJV in the Coolgardie Gold Project and the The Mount Gold-Nickel Project near Widgiemooltha, are listed in the table below:
FML 50% Share of RJV Gold Resource
Measured, Indicated and Inferred
| Resource | Category | Tonnage | Grade | Contained |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (t) | (g/t) | Ounces Au | ||
| The Mount | Inferred | 2,090,000 | 5.50 | 369,573 |
| Lindsays | Indicated & Inferred | 5,840,000 | 1.67 | 314,402 |
| Dreadnought | Indicated & Inferred | 3,540,000 | 1.99 | 234,958 |
| Brilliant | Inferred | 1,850,000 | 2.20 | 130,854 |
| King Solomon/Queen Sheba | Inferred | 1,400,000 | 2.00 | 90,022 |
| Perseverance | Inferred | 296,000 | 9.40 | 89,456 |
| Greenfields | Measured, Indicated & Inferred | 1,616,000 | 1.69 | 87,820 |
| Norris | Inferred | 1,050,000 | 2.43 | 82,033 |
| Cyanide (Tindals East) | Inferred | 367,000 | 5.54 | 65,368 |
| Lord Bob | Inferred | 820,000 | 1.60 | 42,182 |
| Countess Underground | Inferred | 246,000 | 4.26 | 33,693 |
| Alicia | Inferred | 550,000 | 1.55 | 27,320 |
| Empress West | Inferred | 129,500 | 4.68 | 19,485 |
| Big Blow Underground | Inferred | 88,000 | 5.00 | 14,146 |
| Big Blow Surface | Inferred | 180,000 | 1.60 | 9,259 |
| Cookes | Inferred | 98,000 | 1.80 | 5,671 |
| Happy Jack | Inferred | 107,000 | 1.50 | 5,160 |
| Friendship | Inferred | 100,000 | 1.43 | 4,610 |
| Total RJV | 20,367,500 | 2.48 | 1,626,012 | |
| Total FML Share | 10,183,750 | 2.48 | 813,006 |
Page 5
2007 Operations Review cont.
Feasibility Study
During the June Quarter 2007, the RJV advanced feasibility work for the Coolgardie Gold Project to the Bankable Feasibility stage, targeting initial mining commencing in the first quarter of 2008 from the high-grade Perseverance deposit.
The Perseverance deposit forms part of the centrally located Tindals Mining Centre, for which combined resources have been estimated at 1,038,500t @ 6.24 g/t Au, for a total of 208,146 ounces. The Tindals Mining Centre is located in close proximity to both the RJV’s Three Mile Hill plant and the Greenfields gold processing facility, operated by Higginsville Mining Pty Ltd on an RJV lease adjacent to Three Mile Hill.
While completing the Bankable Feasibility program, ongoing RJV drilling has resulted in further high-grade intersections from the Perseverance deposit, including: 29m @ 20.02 g/t Au; 24.7m @ 11.76 g/t Au; 7.3m @ 25.66 g/t Au, and 1.7m @ 46.15 g/t Au.
Prior to completing the Bankable Feasibility Study, the RJV anticipates upgrading the Perseverance Resource.
Construction of a 500m exploration and development decline has commenced from the existing, fully permitted Empress underground infrastructure, to facilitate further access to the Perseverance lode. In addition to expediting potential development of this deposit, the new decline will support further exploration and resource upgrade drilling programs.
Feasibility studies on the refurbishment and re-commissioning of the Three Mile Hill plant are continuing under the management of Focus Minerals.
Perseverance Deposit
The RJV will commence initial mining at the Coolgardie Gold Project from the Perseverance Deposit, which has continued to deliver significant widths of high-grade intersections during ongoing drilling programs.
During the year, the RJV completed an initial Resource estimate at Perseverance of 296,000t @ 9.4 g/t Au, for 89,600 ounces.
The resource was based on historical data and drilling conducted by the RJV, which has returned intersections including 11m @ 23.65 g/t Au, 9m @ 29.91 g/t Au and 24.7m @ 11.76 g/t Au. Further high-grade intersections received from ongoing drilling subsequent to the end of 2006-07 included 29m @ 20.02 g/t Au.
Ongoing drilling programs to test extensions to the north and south down plunge are anticipated to result in a further upgrade for this deposit, prior to the commencement of mining. First mining and further exploration drilling will be conducted from a 500m exploration and development decline currently under construction at Perseverance by Barminco Ltd.
==> picture [489 x 289] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Tindals Mining Centre - Road to Production
U/G access from
Tindals Decline
Countess
246,000t @ 4.26 g/t Au Perseverance
Cyanide 296,000t @ 9.40 g/t Au
367,000t @ 5.54 g/t Au Empress
129,500t @ 4.68 g/t Au
----- End of picture text -----
Page 6
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
2007 Operations Review cont.
The Perseverance Deposit is located 280m north of established underground infrastructure at Empress, which together with the Cyanide (Tindals East), Countess and Perseverance lodes, form the centrally located Tindals Mining Centre, which will underpin early production and further underground exploration campaigns for the Coolgardie Gold Project.
Perseverance is located directly along strike from Empress and is hosted by the Redemption/Burbanks shear zone. The Flagstaff Deposit, just 200m south-west of Perseverance, occurs on a linking structure between the Redemption/Burbanks shear zone and the parallel Dreadnought/Tindals fault.
==> picture [491 x 588] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Main Access Road
Contractors Office
and Laydown
Perseverance Lode
ROM Pad
Tindals Pit
Escape Way
Portal
Main Vent Shaft
0 200m Redemption JV
Tindals Site Layout
Coolgardie, WA
----- End of picture text -----
Page 7
2007 Operations Review cont.
Phase 3 Drilling Highlights - September 2007 Quarter – Perseverance Quartz-Sulphide Lodes
| Hole ID | From | To | Length | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (m) | (m) | (m) | Au g/t | |
| 07PEC014 | 109.0 | 114.0 | 5.0 | 1.54 |
| 07PEC015 | 69.0 | 75.0 | 6.0 | 9.27 |
| including | 71.0 | 73.0 | 2.0 | 22.78 |
| 07PEC016 | 8.0 | 14.0 | 6.0 | 2.44 |
| 07PEC020 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 9.86 |
| 07PEC021 | 45.0 | 47.0 | 2.0 | 1.66 |
| 07PEC022 | 124.0 | 130.0 | 6.0 | 5.53 |
| 07PEC023 | 141.0 | 162.0 | 21.0 | 7.30 |
| including | 141.0 | 153.0 | 12.0 | 11.79 |
| 07PEC024 07PEC025 including |
133.0 84.0 84.0 |
136.0 90.0 87.0 |
3.0 6.0 3.0 |
6.83 5.95 9.04 |
| 07PED018 | 138.0 | 167.0 | 29.0 | 20.02 |
| including | 140.9 | 147.0 | 6.1 | 28.21 |
| and | 159.0 | 166.7 | 7.7 | 44.86 |
| 173.8 | 175.0 | 1.2 | 17.15 |
Previous drilling at Perseverance intersected semi-massive sulphides containing pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite and galena associated with high-grade gold. As the gold mineralisation is intimately associated with highly conductive sulphides, the RJV conducted a surface EM program to establish if the mineralisation at Perseverance was conductive and, if so, to resolve the extent of the sulphides through quantitative modelling.
The EM surveys covering both Flagstaff and Perseverance comprised four lines of moving loop EM.
The fixed loop EM surveys (FLTEM) successfully defined at least two basement conductors that appear to be associated with goldbearing sulphide mineralisation. These conductors have a significant size, with a strike length of 250m and 300m, and are open along strike to the north.
The moving loop EM survey (MLTEM) survey detected the FLTEM conductors and also detected two additional conductors. One of these has a basement source and is located along strike from an FLTEM conductor. Another conductor has been identified along strike from the Flagstaff workings.
Downhole EM recently completed at Flagstaff drill hole 07FLD001 highlighted a more conductive body to the north east of the hole. This hole, which was not intersected in 07FLD001, represents a priority target for further drill testing.
Countess Deposit
During the year, the RJV completed a new Inferred Resource estimate for the Countess lode based on drilling results and historical data, doubling the previous estimate to 246,000t @ 4.26 g/t Au.
Countess forms part of a larger mineralised system, known as the Tindals Mining Centre, which also includes the Tindals, Cyanide (Tindals East), Empress, Dreadnought and Perseverance deposits.
Historically, these deposits have produced more than 525,000 ounces of gold from both open pit and underground operations.
Greenfields Deposit
The resource upgrades completed during the year included the Greenfields deposit, located immediately adjacent to the Three Mile Hill plant, where the re-estimate by independent consultants converted much of the Inferred ounces to Measured and Indicated, with a total Resource of 1.616Mt @ 1.69 g/t Au, for 87,820 contained ounces.
The new resource was based on the results of a successful 13-hole 1,498m in-fill drilling program completed in late 2006, together with historical drilling and production data.
The Greenfields deposit has been historically mined several times from an open pit operation, including from three initial cutbacks during the mid-1980s and most recently in 2003.
A total of 1,376,400 tonnes has been mined to date at an average grade of 1.77 g/t Au, for 72,470 ounces.
Dreadnought Deposit
During the 2006/07 financial year, the RJV completed a major 1,900m RC drilling and 1,000m diamond core drilling program over a 200m strike length of the high-grade core of the south east zone of the Dreadnought Deposit.
This program resulted in a combined Indicated and Inferred Resource upgrade to 3,458,500t @ 1.99 g/t Au, for 221,000 ounces, and the commencement of a re-optimisation of the deposit, in preparation for feasibility drilling.
Page 8
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
2007 Operations Review cont.
==> picture [488 x 325] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Drilling at Coolgardie Gold Project
----- End of picture text -----
Subsequent to the end of 2006-07, the RJV completed a further upgrade for the Indicated Resource, representing a 150% increase to 3.024Mt @ 2.02 g/t, for 196,380 ounces.
Dreadnought is hosted by diorite and is believed to be the southern extension of the Tindals/Cyanide(Tindals East)/Empress mineralised diorite system, for which combined historical production, from both open pit and underground operations, totals in excess of 500,000 ounces.
RJV programs conducted at Dreadnought confirm continuity of stock work mineralisation hosted in an altered diorite, and the presence of some narrower, less continuous higher grade mineralisation, hosted in sheared ultramafic rocks.
Norris/Grossmont Deposit
In October 2006, the RJV completed data validation and resource modelling on the Norris/Grossmont deposit, upgrading by 24% the Inferred Resource to 1.05Mt @ 2.43 g/t Au, for 82,033 ounces.
The former Norris CIP plant has been removed, allowing drill access to the down-dip extension of the Norris/Grossmount ore body and enabling a potential cut-back.
Baileys Deposit
The RJV is utilising historical stope plans to complete data validation and construct a 3D mine model for the Baileys Mine and associated lode system, located 3km west of the Three Mile Hill plant. This will enable modelling to be conducted up-dip, up-plunge and down-plunge of high grade shoots, to establish the potential for open pit mining of a portion of the deposit which has never been assessed.
Historically, the Baileys Mine produced ~500,000 ounces from several underground lodes, over a strike length exceeding 1.5km.
However, surface drilling and exploration on the up-dip and up-plunge extensions has, in the past, been severely restricted by tailings and other mine infrastructure.
In addition, historical underground areas were not mined due to water problems, which can now be resolved using new technology.
Page 9
2007 Operations Review cont.
==> picture [489 x 325] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Bayleys Reward Plaque
----- End of picture text -----
Lindsays Deposit
The RJV is completing a new resource estimate for the Lindsays deposit, which currently has combined Indicated Resources of 4.35Mt @ 1.7 g/t Au, for 237,755 ounces of gold and Inferred Resources of 1.49Mt @ 1.6 g/t Au, for 76,647 ounces of gold.
Ongoing validation and geological re-modelling programs are anticipated to also underpin the identification of higher grade zones for potential underground mining.
Bayleys and CNX Targets
The RJV is continuing to expand the production potential of the Coolgardie Gold Project through extensive follow-up and resource drilling at several identified mineralised zones.
In accordance with this strategy, subsequent to 30 June 2007 the RJV commenced priority exploration drilling at the historic Bayleys target, renowned for the Bayleys Reward gold find of 1892, and the nearby CNX target.
As with the Tindals Mining Centre, the Bayleys landholding includes extensive existing underground infrastructure, which could be rehabilitated for potential near-term production.
The drilling programs underway at both CNX and Bayleys are testing near-surface gold targets identified in geoscientific, data compilation and validation programs recently completed by the RJV.
The combined programs comprise 1,500m of reverse circulation drilling covering historically mined areas, un-mined high-grade intersections within historic drill holes, untested extensions and potential new areas of mineralisation.
Page 10
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
2007 Operations Review cont.
==> picture [488 x 325] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Nepean Headframe
----- End of picture text -----
Nepean Nickel Project (Focus 100%)
Feasibility Study
Following the completion of a 45% Inferred Resource upgrade to 591,000t @ 2.2% Ni, Focus Minerals has commenced a Feasibility Study targeting the commencement of mining from its wholly-owned Nepean Nickel Project.
The feasibility program includes infill and exploration drilling and an assessment of underground workings at the historic Nepean Nickel Mine, around which the project is centred.
Focus Minerals is targeting small scale underground mining early in 2008.
Subsequent to the end of the 2006-07 financial year, Focus Minerals received full approvals to access all underground workings at the Nepean Mine. Accordingly, shaft refurbishment has commenced. Commissioning of the winder has also been completed.
Re-entering the underground workings will enable Focus Minerals to confirm the economic potential of the underground remnant Inferred Resource for the mine, which produced 32,303t of nickel metal between 1970 and 1987 at a recovered grade of 2.99% Ni from 1.1Mt of ore.
The current resource comprises fresh, remnant and transitional ore associated with the mine and its immediate surrounds.
“Production from the Nepean Nickel Project will supplement earnings, helping advance production growth plans, prosperity and profitability.”
Page 11
2007 Operations Review cont.
On completion of the shaft rehabilitation, Focus Minerals will sample, survey and map the remnant ore, to determine optimal mining methods.
In addition, drilling already underway on the northern margins of the mine is targeting areas outside of the known remnant blocks where previously reported RC drilling intercepts were encountered. This program could potentially provide additional material for an underground operation.
With a 30km strike length of Kambalda-style nickel sulphide mineralisation contained within the project’s bounds, Focus Minerals anticipates determining a much larger potential project resource for Nepean. The Company has recently identified and commenced further assessment of four strong anomalies within 1.5km of the mine, to the south east.
Four additional defined prospects are located ~20km north of the Nepean Mine.
During the June Quarter 2007, Focus Minerals commenced discussions with Ramelius Resources Ltd regarding the potential to refurbish an existing nickel circuit at Ramelius’ operating gold plant, located 12km by road north of Nepean.
Early in the 2006-07 financial year, Focus Minerals reached agreement with privately owned processing company, McVerde Minerals Pty Ltd, for the evaluation and potential processing of the mullock dump at Focus Minerals’ 100%-owned Nepean Nickel Project, located 25km south of Coolgardie. This assessment is ongoing.
Regional Exploration
VTEM Airborne Survey
During the September Quarter 2006, the RJV conducted a 1,420 line kilometre VTEM helicopter-borne EM survey of the entire RJV landholding, which includes the Coolgardie Gold Project and The Mount Project, near Widgiemooltha.
The survey was carried out at 200m line spacing generally across strike, with 100m in-fill along the Redemption Shear covering the Perseverance and Flagstaff zones within the Coolgardie Gold Project.
Data obtained from the survey provided a benchmark for calibration and comparison of ground EM with significant anomalies and further defined the strike length of the Perseverance-Flagstaff.
The RJV intends conducting further assessment of The Mount project following commencement of production from the Coolgardie Gold Project.
Exploration Licence EL 26/79
Considered highly prospective for both nickel and gold, EL 26/79 hosts parts of the Kambalda ultramafic suite which hosts the majority of the Kambalda nickel deposits.
The lease, which covers ~ 9.3sq km, is located 5km due north of the Long Nickel Mine, 5km south south-east of the Jubilee Gold Mine, 2.6km east of the Golden Hope Gold Mine and 1.3km east of the White Hope Gold Mine.
Focus Minerals is keen to define exploration targets within this lease, in which the Company acquired a 100% interest in September 2006.
However, the Company has considered the development of the Coolgardie Gold Project and Nepean Nickel Projects towards nearterm production to be a higher priority.
Production from both these projects will provide Focus Minerals with the cash flow to pursue additional exploration programs such as that envisaged for EL 26/79.
As with the Coolgardie Gold Project and The Mount Gold-Nickel Project, Focus Minerals intends to initially conduct detailed airborne magnetics, to identify potential areas for follow up field geochemistry.
==> picture [110 x 47] intentionally omitted <==
Peter Williams Managing Director
Page 12
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Directors’ Report
Your directors submit the annual financial report of the consolidated entity for the financial year ended 30 June 2007.
Directors
The names of directors who held office during or since the end of the year and until the date of this report are as follows. Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.
Names, qualifications, experience and special responsibilities
Donald Taig - Non-Executive Chairman
Age : 50
Qualifications : B. Com., FAICD,FCPA
Mr Taig is a Fellow of both the Australian Institute of Company Directors and the Australian Society of Certified Practising Accountants
Mr Taig gained 11 years experience within CRA Ltd’s mining businesses and with Metals Exploration Ltd. Mr Taig also has significant senior management experience particularly within the food industry where he was Managing Director of Goodman Fielder’s Australian baking division and Chief Executive Officer of Bunge Cereal Foods and Chiquita Brands South Pacific.
During the last three years, Mr Taig has also served as a director of the following listed companies:
-
Tongaat Hulett Starch (Australia) Pty Ltd * (non executive director: appointed January 2007)
-
Tolhurst Noall Group Limited (resigned May 2004)
-
Clover Corporation Limited (resigned January 2005)
-
Prudential Investment Company of Australia Limited (resigned June 2004)
-
KH Foods Limited (resigned March 2006)
On 17 August 2007, Mr Taig assumed an executive Chairman’s role responsible for corporate development and investor relations thereby allowing Mr Williams to concentrate entirely on the rapid advancement towards production of the Group’s wholly owned Nepean Nickel Project and the Coolgardie Gold Project (owned 50% by the Group).
- denotes current directorships
Mr Taig is Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Remuneration Committee.
Peter Williams - Managing Director
Age : 61
Mr Williams has an extensive career spanning more than 30 years within the mining industry. Mining experience in the extraction and treatment of copper, iron ore, salt, minerals sands and gold has been gained whilst holding senior operational and management positions within CRA Ltd (Dampier Salt), North Ltd (North Parkes and Peak Hill gold mines), Resolute Limited (Bullabulling gold mine), New Hampton Goldfields Ltd (Jubilee gold mines) and others operating in many remote parts of Australia and overseas. In particular experience has been gained in managing large mining operations (both FIFO and residential).
Other directorships: Nil.
Phillip Lockyer - Non- Executive Director
Age : 63
Qualifications :AWASM, DipMetal, MSC
Mr Lockyer has over 40 years experience in the resources industry, as a mining engineer and metallurgist particularly in gold and nickel. He commenced his career with WMC Ltd in Kambalda and progressed through various operations roles where in early 1990’s he was appointed General Manager WA operations. Further senior positions were held with Dominion Mining Ltd as Director Operations & Projects and Resolute Ltd as Director and General Manager Operations. Mr Lockyer has been operating a mining consultancy business since 1999.
Page 13
Directors’ Report cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
During the last three years, Mr Lockyer has also served as a director of the following listed companies:
-
Perilya Limited * (non executive director: appointed June 2004)
-
Jubilee Mines NL* (non executive director : appointed May 2004)
-
Ammtec Limited* (non executive director : appointed March 2005)
-
St Barbara Mines Limited* (non executive director : appointed December 2006)
-
denotes current directorships
Geoff Rasmussen - Non-Executive Director
Age : 37
Mr Rasmussen was a founding partner in the merchant banking and corporate advisory group, Azure Capital Pty Ltd. Mr Rasmussen was also previously a founding director of Poynton and Partners and GEM Consulting and has worked as a senior consultant with McKinsey and Company in USA, Europe South Africa and Central America. In focusing on clients within the mining industry Mr Rasmussen has assisted clients in developing corporate strategies, mergers, acquisitions capital raisings and governance covering a range of commodities including oil & gas, gold, iron ore, aluminium, nickel, zinc and mineral sands.
Mr Rasmussen holds non-executive directorships in a number of listed and unlisted companies operating within the resources, healthcare and fast moving consumer goods industries. He is also on the board of a Perth based charity.
Mr Rasmussen is a member of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Remuneration Committee.
Company Secretary
K. Jon Grygorcewicz
Age : 47
Qualifications : CA, B.Bus
Appointed 1 August 2006
Mr Grygorcewicz was admitted as an Associate member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia during 1983. He gained diverse commercial experience within the audit and corporate advisory services divisions of Arthur Young Australia. He has also gained extensive experience within the resources and engineering industries having been associated with a number of listed companies in both the exploration and mining of gold, diamonds and oil. Mr Grygorcewicz has also worked with a number of engineering and resource service companies with operations in Australia and South East Asia particularly listing an Australian engineering group on the Singapore Stock Exchange.
Mr Charles (Chuck) McCormick was a director of the Company until his resignation on 17 August 2007.
Interests in the shares and options of the company and related bodies corporate
At the date of this report, the direct and indirect interests of directors in the shares and options of the Company were:
==> picture [320 x 61] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
||||
|---|---|---|
|Ordinary shares|Options (Unlisted)|
|-|
|Donald Taig|8,591,730|
|Peter Williams|503,614|6,950,000|
|-|
|Phillip Lockyer|253,614|
|Geoff Rasmussen**|4,750,213|3,000,000|
----- End of picture text -----
** Mr Rasmussen is a director of Azure Capital Pty Ltd and therefore is deemed to have an interest in 3,000,000 options held by Azure Capital Pty Ltd.
Page 14
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Directors’ Report cont.
Share Options
During the year and to the date of this report no share options were granted to directors or executives of the company.
As at the date of this report, details of unissued ordinary shares under options are as follows:
| Issuing Entity | Number of options | Exercise price | Expiry date |
|---|---|---|---|
| cents per share | |||
| Focus Minerals Limited | 3,000,000 | 5.04 | 31/7/2008 |
| 2,140,000 | 12.00 | 6/12/2009 | |
| 2,140,000 | 14.50 | 6/12/2009 | |
| 2,140,000 | 17.00 | 6/12/2009 | |
| 4,925,000 | 5.00 | 30/11/2010 | |
| 4,925,000 | 6.00 | 30/11/2010 | |
| Total options issued | 19,270,000 |
Principal Activities
The principal activities of the entities within the consolidated entity during the year were gold, nickel and other base metal mining and exploration in Australia.
There have been no significant changes in the nature of those activities during the year.
Review of operations
Highlights of operations during the period under review are as follows:
-
During August 2006 the Group entered into agreement with MC Verde Minerals Pty Ltd to evaluate and process mullock dumps at Nepean Nickel Project. The company received a $10,000 licence fee and will receive 30% of the cash surplus from the sale of any nickel concentrate recovered. No significant resource was determined within the mullock dumps.
-
Discovery of the Perseverance gold deposit, a new gold discovery within the Coolgardie Gold Project operated by the Redemption joint venture, owned 50% by the Group. The deposit currently consists of an inferred resource totalling 296,600 tonnes at a grade of 9.4 g/t for 89,600 ozs of gold.
-
Upgrades of various gold deposits within the Coolgardie Gold Project whereby total combined gold resource within the Project consists of Measured Resource of 545,000 tonnes at 1.77 g/t, Indicated Resource of 8,085,000 tonnes at 1.79 g/t and Inferred Resource of 11,657,000 tonnes at 2.96 g/t for a total resource exceeding 1.6 million ozs gold.
-
Increase of the Nepean Nickel Project inferred resource to 590,000 tonnes of nickel at 2.2% nickel. Planning for a feasibility study on recommencing mining of the remnant ore blocks and refurbishing the existing underground infrastructure commenced late in the financial period.
-
Conclusion of a $12.9 million capital raising programme to fund expansion of exploration and feasibility studies to be conducted at the Coolgardie Gold Project and the Nepean Nickel Projects. A total of 300,000,000 ordinary fully paid shares were issued at an issue price of 4.3 cents per share.
Operating results for the year
Operating loss for the year was $ (2,089,695) (2006: loss $ 1,822,025)
Page 15
Directors’ Report cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Significant changes in the state of affairs
The following are significant changes in the state of affairs of the consolidated entity to balance date:
| Issued shares as at 30 June 2006 Corporate advisory fees at 5 cents Purchase EL26/79 at 4.5 cents Placement issue at 4 cents Placement issue at 4.3 cents Share Purchase Plan at 4.3 cents Placement fees at 4.3 cents Share issue expenses Issued shares as at 30 June 2007 |
No of shares $ 430,024,467 30,649,946 2,400,000 120,000 400,000 18,000 40,000,000 1,600,000 250,000,000 10,750,000 50,000,519 2,150,000 6,000,000 258,000 - (939,114) |
|---|---|
| 778,824,986 44,606,832 |
Significant events after balance date
During July 2007, the Redemption joint venture secured priority toll treatment arrangements with Higginsville Mining Pty Ltd to treat ore from the Coolgardie Gold Project in return for an extension, to June 2017, of the sub lease for Higginsville’s Greenfield’s Gold treatment plant located on a mining lease within the Coolgardie Gold Project.
On 30 July 2007 the Redemption joint venture upgraded the Dreadnought gold deposit to an Indicated Resource of 3,020,000 tonnes at 2.02 g/t and an Inferred Resource of 434,000 tonnes at 1.76 g/t for a total of 220,980 ozs gold.
The Redemption joint venture commenced the construction of a 400m decline from the existing Tindals’ underground workings to the Perseverance gold deposit. Construction of the decline was expected to be completed during October 2007.
During August 2007 the Group received mine access approvals to re-enter the underground workings at the Nepean Nickel Project to assess the condition of the underground infrastructure and confirm the extent of remnant ore blocks and extract ore samples for metallurgical testing.
Other than the above, there has not been any matter or circumstance that has arisen after balance date that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect, the operations of the consolidated entity, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the consolidated entity in future financial periods.
Likely developments and expected results
The directors intend to actively pursue and conduct further exploration activities in the Group’s existing tenements with a view to establishing mining operations principally at the Redemption joint venture’s Perseverance Deposit and the Group’s 100% owned Nepean Nickel Project.
Environmental legislation
The Group’s operations are subject to environmental regulation in Australia. The Group continues to comply with these regulations.
Indemnification and insurance of Directors and Officers
- (a) The company has agreed to indemnify all the directors and officers for any breach of laws and regulations arising from their role as directors and officers. The agreement provides for the company to pay an amount not exceeding $20,000. The total amount of premiums paid was $31,000.
Remuneration report
This report outlines the remuneration arrangements in place for directors and executives of Focus Minerals Limited (the “company”).
Remuneration philosophy
The performance of the company depends upon the quality of the directors and executives. The philosophy of the company in determining remuneration levels is to set competitive remuneration packages to attract and retain high calibre employees
Page 16
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Directors’ Report cont.
Remuneration committee
The Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors of the company is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the directors, the CEO and the senior management team.
The Remuneration Committee assesses the appropriateness of the nature and amount of remuneration of directors and senior executives on a periodic basis by reference to relevant employment market conditions with an overall objective of ensuring maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality Board and executive team.
Remuneration structure
In accordance with best practice Corporate Governance, the structure of non-executive director and executive remuneration is separate and distinct.
Non-executive director remuneration
The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level that provides the Company with the ability to attract and retain directors of the highest calibre, whilst incurring a cost that is acceptable to shareholders.
The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the manner in which it is apportioned amongst directors is reviewed annually. The Board considers advice from external shareholders as well as the fees paid to non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking the annual review process.
Each non-executive director receives a fee for being a director of the company.
The remuneration of non-executive directors for the period ended 30 June 2007 is detailed in Table 1 of this report.
Senior manager and executive director remuneration
Remuneration primarily consists of fixed remuneration and an equity component where determined by the directors. Issue of an equity component to directors is subject to the approval of shareholders in general meeting.
Fixed Remuneration
Fixed remuneration is reviewed annually by the Remuneration Committee. The process consists of a review of relevant comparative remuneration in the market and internally and, where appropriate, external advice on policies and practices. The Committee has access to external, independent advice where necessary.
Senior managers are given the opportunity to receive their fixed (primary) remuneration in a variety of forms including cash and fringe benefits such as motor vehicles and expense payment plans. It is intended that the manner of payment chosen will be optimal for the recipient without creating undue cost for the Group.
The fixed remuneration component of specified company executives is detailed in Table 2.
Directors’ Meetings
The number of meetings of directors (including meetings of committees of directors) held during the year and the number of meetings attended by each director were as follows:
| Meetings of Committees | Meetings of Committees | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Directors’ | |||
| Meetings | Audit | Remuneration | |
| Number of meetings held: | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Number of meetings attended: | |||
| Donald Taig | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Williams | 7 | - | - |
| Phillip Lockyer | 7 | - | - |
| Geoff Rasmussen | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| Charles McCormick * | 7 | 1 | 1 |
- Mr McCormick resigned as a director on 17 August 2007.
The Directors also approved Group activities pursuant to 8 circular directors’ resolutions throughout the year.
Page 17
Directors’ Report cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Auditor Independence and Non-Audit Services
Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 requires our auditors, Bentleys MRI Perth Partnership, to provide the directors of the Company with an Independence Declaration in relation to the audit of the annual report. This Independence Declaration is set out on page 22 and forms part of this directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2007.
Non-Audit Services
Bentleys MRI Perth Partnership received amounts for non-audit services totalling $8,033, principally for tax advice and an audit review of tenement expenditure to meet Department of Industry and Resources tenement requirements.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
==> picture [127 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
Don Taig Chairman
27 September 2007 Perth, Western Australia
Page 18
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Directors’ Report cont.
Remuneration of directors and named executives
Table 1: Directors’ remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2007
| Primary Benefits | Primary Benefits | Equity | Other | Total | % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary | Super- | Sub- | Options | Perfor- | ||||
| & Fees | annuation | total | mance | |||||
| related | ||||||||
| Donald Taig | 2007 | 56,200 | - | 56,200 | - | - | 56,200 | 0% |
| 2006 | 50,000 | - | 50,000 | - | - | 50,000 | 0% | |
| Peter Williams | 2007 | 202,540 | 18,229 | 220,769 | - | 7,591 | 228,360 | 0% |
| 2006 | 160,000 | 14,400 | 174,400 | 156,630 | 11,935 | 342,965 | 45.6% | |
| Phillip Lockyer | 2007 | 30,000 | 2,700 | 32,700 | - | - | 32,700 | 0% |
| 2006 | 12,500 | 1,300 | 13,800 | - | - | 13,800 | 0% | |
| Geoff Rasmussen | 2007 | 30,000 | - | 30,000 | - | - | 30,000 | 0% |
| 2006 | 21,930 | - | 21,930 | - | - | 21,930 | 0% | |
| Charles McCormick | 2007 | 150,000 | 13,500 | 163,500 | - | 11,485 | 174,985 | 0% |
| 2006 | 175,804 | 10,321 | 186,125 | 66,483 | 13,025 | 265,633 | 40.1% |
Table 2: Remuneration of the named executive who received the highest remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2007
| Primary Benefits | Primary Benefits | Equity | Other | Total | % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary | Super- | Sub- | Options | Perfor- | ||||
| & Fees | annuation | total | mance | |||||
| related | ||||||||
| Jon Grygorcewicz | 2007 | 93,009 | 10,106 | 103,115 | - | 9,220 | 112,335 | - |
| 2006 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Alec Pismiris | 2007 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2006 | 29,000 | - | 29,000 | - | - | 29,000 | - | |
| Jack Toby | 2007 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2006 | 35,155 | - | 35,155 | - | - | 35,155 | - | |
| Andrew Hawker | 2007 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2006 | 122,442 | 11,020 | 133,462 | - | - | 133,462 | - |
Table 3: Options granted as part of remuneration
| % | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value of | Value of | Value of | Total value of | Value of | Value of | remun- | |
| options | options | options | options | options | options | eration | |
| Year ended | granted at | exercised | lapsed at | granted, | lapsed | included | consisting |
| 30 June 2006 | grant date | at exercise | time of | exercised & | during | in remun- | of options |
| date | lapse | lapsed | year | eration for | for the | ||
| the year | year | ||||||
| Peter Williams | 156,630 | - | - | 156,630 | - | 156,630 | 45.6% |
| Charles McCormick | 66,483 | - | - | 66,483 | - | 66,483 | 40.1% |
For details on the valuation of the options, including models and assumptions used, please refer to Note 14. There were no alterations to the terms and conditions of options granted as remuneration since their grant date.
Page 19
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
The Board of Directors of Focus Minerals Limited is responsible for the corporate governance of the consolidated entity. The Board guides and monitors the business and affairs of Focus Minerals Limited on behalf of the shareholders by whom they are elected and to whom they are accountable.
Focus Minerals Limited’s Corporate Governance Statement is structured with reference to the Corporate Governance Council’s principles and recommendations, which are as follows:
-
Principle 1. Lay solid foundations for management and oversight Principle 2. Structure the board to add value Principle 3. Promote ethical and responsible decision making Principle 4. Safeguard integrity in financial reporting Principle 5. Make timely and balanced disclosure Principle 6. Respect the rights of shareholders
-
Principle 7. Recognise and manage risk Principle 8. Encourage enhanced performance Principle 9. Remunerate fairly and responsibly Principle 10. Recognise the legitimate interests of stakeholders
Focus Minerals Limited’s corporate governance practices were in place throughout the year ended 30 June 2007.
Structure of the Board
The skills, experience and expertise relevant to the position of director held by each director in office at the date of the annual report is included in the Directors’ Report. Directors of Focus Minerals Limited are considered to be independent when they are independent of management and free from any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with – or could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere with – the exercise of their unfettered and independent judgment.
In the context of director independence, 'materiality' is considered from both the company and individual director perspective. The determination of materiality requires consideration of both quantitative and qualitative elements. An item is presumed to be quantitatively immaterial if it is equal to or less than 5% of the appropriate base amount. It is presumed to be material (unless there is qualitative evidence to the contrary) if it is equal to or greater than 10% of the appropriate base amount. Qualitative factors considered include whether a relationship is strategically important, the competitive landscape, the nature of the relationship and the contractual or other arrangements governing it and other factors that point to the actual ability of the director in question to shape the direction of the company’s loyalty.
In accordance with the definition of independence above, and the materiality thresholds set, the following directors of Focus Minerals Limited are considered to be independent:
==> picture [199 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
|||
|---|---|
|Name|Position|
|Donald Taig|Chairman|
|Phillip Lockyer|Non-Executive Director|
----- End of picture text -----
There are procedures in place, agreed by the Board, to enable directors in the furtherance of their duties to seek independent professional advice at the company’s expense.
The term in office held by each director in office at the date of this report is as follows:
==> picture [223 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
|||
|---|---|
|Name|Term in Office|
|Donald Taig|4 years|
|Geoff Rasmussen|2 years|
|Peter Williams|3 years|
|Phillip Lockyer|2 years|
|Charles McCormick|2 years|
----- End of picture text -----
Mr McCormick resigned from the Board on 17 August 2007.
Page 20
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Corporate Governance Statement cont.
Nomination Committee
The Board has not formally established a Nomination Committee. Board vacancies, composition and the mix of technical and other qualifications are addressed by the full Board.
Audit Committee
The Board has established an Audit Committee, which operates under a charter approved by the Board. It is the Board’s responsibility to ensure that an effective internal control framework exists within the entity. This includes internal controls to deal with both the effectiveness and efficiency of significant business processes, the safeguarding of assets, the maintenance of proper accounting records, and the reliability of financial information as well as non financial considerations such as the benchmarking of operational key performance indicators. The Board has delegated responsibility for establishing and maintaining a framework of internal control and ethical standards to the Audit Committee.
The Committee also provides the Board with additional assurance regarding the reliability of financial information for inclusion in the financial reports. All members of the Audit Committee are non-executive directors.
The members of the Audit Committee during the year were:
Donald Taig – Committee Chairman Geoff Rasmussen
For details on the number of meetings of the Audit Committee held during the year and the attendees at those meetings, refer to the Directors’ Report.
Remuneration
It is the company’s objective to provide maximum stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality Board and executive team by remunerating directors and key executives fairly and appropriately with reference to relevant employment market conditions. To assist in achieving this objective, the Remuneration Committee links the nature and amount of executive directors’ and officers’ emoluments to the company’s financial and operational performance.
The expected outcomes of the remuneration structure are:
-
retention and motivation of key executives;
-
attraction of high quality management to the company; and
-
performance incentives that allow executives to share the success of Focus Minerals Limited.
For a full discussion of the company’s remuneration philosophy and framework and the remuneration received by directors and executives in the current period please refer to the remuneration report, which is contained within the Directors’ Report.
There is no scheme to provide retirement benefits, other than statutory superannuation, to non-executive directors.
The Board is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the directors themselves and the chief executive officer and executive team. The Board has established a Remuneration Committee, comprising 2 non-executive directors.
Members of the Remuneration Committee during the year were:
Geoff Rasmussen – Committee Chairman Donald Taig
For details on the number of meetings of the Remuneration Committee held during the year and the attendees at those meetings, refer to the Directors’ Report.
Page 21
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [483 x 630] intentionally omitted <==
Page 22
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2007
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2007 | |
|---|---|
| Notes Revenue 2(a) Other income 2(b) Depreciation and amortisation expense Finance costs Rental expenses Loan impairment expense Other expenses Loss before income tax expense Income tax benefit 3 Net loss for the period Basic loss per share (cents per share) 5 Diluted loss per share (cents per share) 5 |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 327,362 179,647 258,577 178,064 134,166 5,296 123,141 5,296 |
| 461,528 184,943 381,718 183,360 |
|
| (151,179) (120,764) (114,948) (120,764) (16,187) (29,886) (14,693) (29,886) (81,900) (73,246) (81,900) (73,246) - - (43,277) (300,000) (2,301,957) (1,783,072) (2,255,773) (1,783,072) |
|
| (2,089,695) (1,822,025) (2,128,873) (2,123,608) - - - - |
|
| (2,089,695) (1,822,025) (2,128,873) (2,123,608) |
|
| (0.46) (0.45) (0.46) (0.45) |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements
Page 23
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
BALANCE SHEET
AS AT 30 JUNE 2007
| AS AT 30 JUNE 2007 | |
|---|---|
| Notes Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents 6 Trade and other receivables 7 Inventories 8 Other Total Current Assets Non-Current Assets Receivables 11 Available-for-sale investments 9 Other financial assets 10 Property, plant and equipment 12 Deferred exploration expenditure 13 Total Non-Current Assets Total Assets Liabilities Current Liabilities Trade and other payables 15 Financial liabilities 16 Deferred revenue Total Current Liabilities Non-Current Liabilities Other payables 15 Financial liabilities 16 Deferred revenue Total Non-Current Liabilities Total Liabilities Net Assets Equity Issued capital 17 Reserves 17 Retained earnings Total Equity |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 13,844,876 2,442,429 13,790,748 2,360,386 544,485 320,277 482,862 304,452 243,027 243,027 243,027 243,027 14,535 14,807 7,867 14,807 |
| 14,646,923 3,020,540 14,524,504 2,922,672 |
|
| - 53,100 234,664 53,100 - 1 - 1 - - 7,303,581 7,341,114 802,775 584,312 541,858 584,312 17,100,208 16,293,567 9,739,294 8,932,653 |
|
| 17,902,983 16,930,980 17,819,397 16,911,180 |
|
| 32,549,906 19,951,520 32,343,901 19,833,852 |
|
| 1,660,760 1,011,330 1,595,367 978,497 11,347 - - - 18,750 39,584 18,750 39,584 |
|
| 1,690,857 1,050,914 1,614,117 1,018,081 |
|
| 171,000 80,000 111,000 - 25,252 - - - - 25,000 - 25,000 |
|
| 196,252 105,000 111,000 25,000 |
|
| 1,887,109 1,155,914 1,725,117 1,043,081 |
|
| 30,662,797 18,795,606 30,618,784 18,790,771 |
|
| 44,606,832 30,649,946 44,606,832 30,649,946 561,007 561,007 561,007 561,007 (14,505,042) (12,415,347) (14,549,055) (12,420,182) |
|
| 30,662,797 18,795,606 30,618,784 18,790,771 |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements
Page 24
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2007
| Consolidated Notes Balance as at 30 June 2005 Loss attributable to members of the parent entity Shares issued in the period Share issue expenses Option reserve on recognition of equity based payments Balance as at 30 June 2006 Loss attributable to members of the parent entity Shares issued in the period Share issue expenses Option reserve on recognition of equity based payments Balance at 30 June 2007 Parent Notes Balance as at 30 June 2005 Loss attributable to members of the parent entity Shares issued in the period Share issue expenses Option reserve on recognition of equity based payments Balance at 30 June 2006 Loss attributable to members of the parent entity Shares issued in the period Share issue expenses Option reserve on recognition of equity based payments Balance as at 30 June 2007 |
Ordinary Retained Option Total Shares Earnings Reserve $ $ $ $ 23,412,746 (10,593,322) 303,104 13,122,528 - (1,822,025) - (1,822,025) 7,620,000 - - 7,620,000 (382,800) - - (382,800) - - 257,903 257,903 |
|---|---|
| 30,649,946 (12,415,347) 561,007 18,795,606 - (2,089,695) - (2,089,695) 14,896,000 - - 14,896,000 (939,114) - - (939,114) - - - - |
|
| 44,606,832 (14,505,042) 561,007 30,662,797 |
|
| Ordinary Retained Option Total Shares Earnings Reserve $ $ $ $ 23,412,746 (10,296,574) 303,104 13,419,276 - (2,123,608) - (2,123,608) 7,620,000 - - 7,620,000 (382,800) - - (382,800) - - 257,903 257,903 |
|
| 30,649,946 (12,420,182) 561,007 18,790,771 - (2,128,873) - (2,128,873) 14,896,000 - - 14,896,000 (939,114) - - (939,114) - - - - |
|
| 44,606,832 (14,549,055) 561,007 30,618,784 |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements
Page 25
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
CASH FLOW STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2007
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2007 | |
|---|---|
| Notes Cash flows from operating activities Receipts from customers Payments to suppliers and employees Other income Interest received Finance costs Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities 6(iii) Cash flows from investing activities Proceeds from sale of non-current assets Purchase of non-current assets Secured short term deposits Investments Loans to related entities Loans to other entities Net cash inflow on acquisition of subsidiary 6(iv) Purchase of mining tenements Exploration expenditure Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Proceeds from issue of shares Share issue expenses Repayment of borrowings Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at 1 July 2006 Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June 2007 6(i) |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ Inflows(Outflows) Inflows(Outflows) 175,463 1,100 107,952 1,100 (2,099,546) (3,585,323) (1,789,376) (3,122,831) 134,558 - 123,533 - 151,899 139,199 150,625 137,616 (16,187) (29,886) (14,693) (29,886) |
| (1,653,812) (3,474,910) (1,421,959) (3,014,001) |
|
| 1,200 24,686 1,200 24,686 (173,378) (74,620) (101,085) (74,620) (199,055) (1,495,455) (198,304) (1,469,206) - (1) (1) (1) - - (187,306) (515,000) 53,100 (53,100) - (53,100) 35,825 - - - (41,120) (458,956) (41,120) (458,956) (776,253) (351,022) (776,253) (351,022) |
|
| (1,099,681) (2,408,468) (1,302,869) (2,897,219) |
|
| 14,896,000 7,620,000 14,896,000 7,620,000 (939,114) (382,800) (939,114) (382,800) - (909,092) - (909,092) |
|
| 13,956,886 6,328,108 13,956,886 6,328,108 |
|
| 11,203,392 444,730 11,232,058 416,888 946,974 502,244 891,180 474,292 |
|
| 12,150,366 946,974 12,123,238 891,180 |
The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements
Page 26
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2007
NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Basis of Preparation
The financial report is a general-purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, Australian accounting interpretations, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board and Corporations Act 2001.
The financial report covers the economic entity of Focus Minerals Limited and controlled entities and Focus Minerals Limited as an individual entity. Focus Minerals Limited is a listed public company, incorporated and domiciled in Australia.
The financial report of Focus Minerals Limited and controlled entities and Focus Minerals Limited as an individual entity parent entity comply with all Australian equivalents to International Reporting Standards (AIFRS) in their entirety.
The following is a summary of the material accounting policies adopted by the economic entity in the preparation of the financial report. The accounting policies have been consistently applied, unless otherwise stated.
(b) Reporting Basis and Conventions
The financial report has been prepared on an accrual basis and is based on historical costs modified by the revaluation of selected non-current assets, financial assets and financial liabilities for which the fair value basis of accounting has been applied.
(c) Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Focus Minerals Limited and its controlled entities as at 30 June each year (the Group).
The financial statements of the controlled entities are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and expenses and profit and losses resulting from intra-group transactions have been eliminated in full. Controlled entities are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Group.
(d) Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognised:
(i) Sale of goods
Revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably. Risks and rewards of ownership are considered passed to the buyer at the time of delivery of the goods to the customer.
(ii) Rendering of services
Revenue from the rendering of services is recognised by reference to the stage of completion of the contract.
(iii) Interest income
Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportionate basis that takes into account the effective yield on the financial asset.
(iv) Dividends
Revenue is recognised when the Group’s right to receive the payment is established.
(v) Rental income
Rental income from investment properties is accounted for on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Contingent rental income is recognised as income in the periods in which it is earned. Lease incentives granted are recognised as an integral part of the total rental income
Page 27
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
(e) Borrowing Costs
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense when incurred. Borrowing costs directly attributable to assets under construction are capitalised as part of the cost of those assets.
(f) Leases
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
Assets held under finance leases are initially recognised at their fair value or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments, each determined at the inception of the lease. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation.
Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly against income, unless they are directly attributable to qualifying assets, in which case they are capitalised in accordance with the general policy on borrowing costs.
Finance leased assets are depreciated on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.
Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the lease term, except where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset are consumed.
(g) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and short-term deposits in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and in hand and short term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less.
For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
(h) Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables, which generally have 30-90 day terms, are recognised and carried at original invoice amount less an allowance for any uncollectible amounts. An allowance for doubtful debts is made when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect the debts. Bad debts are written off when identified.
(i) Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Costs incurred in bringing each product to its present location and condition are accounted for as follows:
Raw materials – purchase cost on a first-in, first-out basis; and
Finished goods and work-in-progress – cost of direct materials and labour and a proportion of manufacturing overheads based on normal operating capacity but excluding borrowing costs.
Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
(j) Impairment of financial assets
The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired.
(i) Financial assets carried at amortised cost
If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on loans and receivables carried at amortised cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate (i.e. the effective interest rate computed at initial recognition). The carrying amount of the asset is reduced either directly or through use of an allowance account.
The amount of the loss is recognised in profit or loss.
The Group first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, and individually or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If it is determined that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, the asset is included in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and that group of financial assets is collectively assessed for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognised are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.
Page 28
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES cont.
(j) Impairment of financial assets cont.
If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed. Any subsequent reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss, to the extent that the carrying value of the asset does not exceed its amortised cost at the reversal date.
(ii) Financial assets carried at cost
If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has been incurred on an unquoted equity instrument that is not carried at fair value (because its fair value cannot be reliably measured), or on a derivative asset that is linked to and must be settled by delivery of such an unquoted equity instrument, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the current market rate of return for a similar financial asset.
(iii) Available-for-sale investments
If there is objective evidence that an available-for-sale investment is impaired, an amount comprising the difference between its cost (net of any principal repayment and amortisation) and its current fair value, less any impairment loss previously recognised in profit or loss, is transferred from equity to the income statement. Reversals of impairment losses for equity instruments classified as available-for-sale are not recognised in profit. Reversals of impairment losses for debt instruments are reversed through profit or loss if the increase in an instrument's fair value can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in profit or loss.
(k) Exploration and development expenditure
Exploration and development expenditure related to areas of interest is capitalised and carried forward to the extent that;
-
i. Rights to tenure of the area if interest are current: and
-
ii. Costs are expected to be recouped through the successful development and exploitation of the area of interest or alternatively by sale; or
-
iii. Where activities in the area of interest have not yet reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves, and active and significant operations in, or in relation to, the area are continuing.
Such expenditure consists of an accumulation of acquisition costs and direct net exploration and development costs incurred by or on behalf of the Consolidated Entity, together with an appropriate portion of related overhead expenditure.
Feasibility expenditure represents costs related to the preparation of a feasibility study to enable a development decision to be taken in relation to an area of interest.
When an area of interest is abandoned or the directors decide it is not commercial, any accumulated costs in respect of the area are written off in the year in which the decision was made. Each area of interest is reviewed at the end of each accounting period and accumulated costs written of to the extent they are not expected to be recoverable in the future.
(l) Interest in a jointly controlled operation
The Group has an interest in a joint venture that is a jointly controlled operation. A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby two or more parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control. A jointly controlled operation involves use of assets and other resources of the venturers rather than establishment of a separate entity. The Group recognises its interest in the jointly controlled operation by recognising the assets that it controls and the liabilities that it incurs. The Group also recognises the expenses that it incurs and its share of the income that it earns from the sale of goods or services by the jointly controlled operation.
Page 29
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
(m) Income tax
Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences except:
-
when the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and that, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; or
-
when the taxable temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates or interests in joint ventures, and the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised.
Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance sheet date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in profit or loss.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
(n) Other taxes
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except:
-
when the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and
-
receivables and payables, which are stated with the amount of GST included.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the balance sheet.
Cash flows are included in the Cash Flow Statement on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority, are classified as operating cash flows.
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.
(o) Plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Such cost includes the cost of replacing parts that are eligible for capitalisation when the cost of replacing the parts is incurred. Similarly, when each major inspection is performed, its cost is recognised in the carrying amount of the plant and equipment as a replacement only if it is eligible for capitalisation.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets as follows:
Plant and equipment – over 5 to 15 years
The assets' residual values, useful lives and amortisation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each financial year end.
Page 30
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES cont.
(o) Plant and equipment cont.
(i) Impairment
The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment at each reporting date, with recoverable amount being estimated when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.
The recoverable amount of plant and equipment is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, recoverable amount is determined for the cashgenerating unit to which the asset belongs, unless the asset's value in use can be estimated to be close to its fair value.
An impairment exists when the carrying value of an asset or cash-generating units exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. The asset or cash-generating unit is then written down to its recoverable amount.
For plant and equipment, impairment losses are recognised in the income statement in the cost of sales line item. However, because land and buildings are measured at revalued amounts, impairment losses on land and buildings are treated as a revaluation decrement.
(ii) Derecognition and disposal
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no further future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal.
Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in profit or loss in the year the asset is derecognised.
(p) Investments and other financial assets
Financial assets in the scope of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are classified as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, or available-for-sale investments, as appropriate. When financial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value, plus, in the case of investments not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transactions costs. The Group determines the classification of its financial assets after initial recognition and, when allowed and appropriate, re-evaluates this designation at each financial year-end.
All regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade date i.e. the date that the Group commits to purchase the asset. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of financial assets under contracts that require delivery of the assets within the period established generally by regulation or convention in the marketplace.
(iii) Available-for-sale investments
Available-for-sale investments are those non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not classified as any of the three preceding categories. After initial recognition available-for sale investments are measured at fair value with gains or losses being recognised as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognised or until the investment is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is recognised in profit or loss.
The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets is determined by reference to quoted market bid prices at the close of business on the balance sheet date. For investments with no active market, fair value is determined using valuation techniques. Such techniques include using recent arm’s length market transactions; reference to the current market value of another instrument that is substantially the same; discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models.
All other non-current investments were carried at the lower of cost and recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount
Non-current financial assets measured using the cost basis were not carried at an amount above their recoverable amount, and when a carrying value exceeded this recoverable amount, the financial asset was written down to its recoverable amount.
(q) Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are carried at the fair value of the consideration to be paid in the future. Trade and other payables represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes obliged to make future payments in respect of the purchase of goods and services.
Page 31
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
(r) Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at cost, being fair value of the consideration received net of issue costs associated with the borrowing.
After initial recognition, interest bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any issue costs, and any discount or premium on settlement.
Gains and losses are recognised in the income statement when the liabilities are derecognised and as well as through the amortisation process.
(s) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre-tax rate that reflects the risks specific to the liability.
When discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a borrowing cost.
(t) Employee leave benefits
(i) Wages, salaries, annual leave and sick leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, annual leave and accumulating sick leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting date, They are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. Liabilities for nonaccumulating sick leave are recognised when the leave is taken and are measured at the rates paid or payable.
(ii) Long service leave
The liability for long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures, and period of service. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currencies that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows.
(u) Share-based payment transactions
(i) Equity settled transactions:
The Group provides benefits to employees (including senior executives) of the Group in the form of share-based payments, whereby employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (equity-settled transactions).
The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by an external valuer using a Black Scholes model, further details of which are given in Note 14.
In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions linked to the price of the shares of Focus Minerals Limited (market conditions) if applicable.
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award (the vesting period).
The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects (i) the extent to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) the Group’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. No adjustment is made for the likelihood of market performance conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date. The income statement charge or credit for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the beginning and end of that period.
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is only conditional upon a market condition.
Page 32
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES cont.
(u) Share-based payment transactions cont.
If an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.
The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of earnings per share (see Note 5).
(v) Issued capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
(w) Restoration, Rehabilitation and Environmental Costs
Restoration, rehabilitation and environmental Costs necessitated by exploration and evaluation activities are accrued at the time of those activities and treated as exploration and evaluation expenditure.
Restoration, rehabilitation and environmental obligations recognised include the costs of reclamation and subsequent monitoring of the environment.
Costs are estimated on the basis of current undisclosed costs, current legal requirements and current technology, which are discounted to their present value. Estimates are reassessed at least annually. Changes in estimates are dealt with retrospectively, with any amounts that would have been written off or provided against under accounting policy for exploration and evaluation immediately written off.
(x) Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the parent, adjusted to exclude any costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the parent, adjusted for:
-
costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends;
-
the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares that have been recognised as expenses; and
-
other non-discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would result from the dilution of potential ordinary shares; divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
(y) Comparative figures
When required by Accounting Standards, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in presentation for the current financial year.
(z) New Standards and Interpretations not yet adopted
The following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations have been identified as those which may impact the entity in the period of initial application. They are available for early adoption at 30 June 2007, but have not been applied in preparing this financial report.
AASB 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures (August 2005) replaces the presentation requirements of financial instruments in AASB 132. AASB 7 is applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2007, and will require extensive additional disclosures with respect top the Group’s financial instruments and share capital.
AASB 2005-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards (September 2005) makes consequential amendments to AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation, AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements, AASB 114 Segment Reporting, AASB 117 Leases, AASB 133 Earnings Per Share, AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, AASB 1 First-time adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards, AASB 4 Insurance Contracts, AASB 1023 General Insurance Contracts and AASB 1038 Life Insurance Contracts arising from the release of AASB 7. AASB 2005-10 is applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2007 and is expected to only impact disclosures contained within the consolidated financial report.
AASB 8 Operating Segments replaces the presentation for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009 and it is not expected to have an impact on the financial results of the Company and the Group as the standard is only concerned with disclosures.
Page 33
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
(z) New Standards and Interpretations not yet adopted cont.
AASB 2007-3 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 8 makes amendments to AASB 5 Noncurrent Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, AASB 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources, AASB 102 Inventories, AASB 107 Cash Flow Statements AASB 119 Employee Benefits, AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, AASB 134 Interim Financial Reporting, AASB 136 Impairment Assets, AASB 1023 General Insurance Contracts and AASB 1038 Life Insurance Contracts. AASB 2007-3 is applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009 and must be adopted in conjunction with AASB 8 Operating Segments. This standard is only expected to impact disclosures contained within the financial report.
AASB 2007-1 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB Interpretation II amends AASB 2 Sharebased Payments to insert the transitional provisions of IFRS 2, previously contained in AASB 1 First-time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards. AASB 2007-1 is applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 March 2007 and is not expected to have any impact on the consolidated financial report.
AASB 2007-2 Amendments to Australia Accounting Standards arising from AASB Interpretation 12 makes amendments to AASB 1 First-time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards, AASB 117 Leases, AASB 118 Revenue, AASB 120 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, AASB 121 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statement, AASB 131 Interest in Joint Ventures, and AASB 139 Financial Instruments Recognition and Measurement. AASB 2007-2 is applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2008 and must be applied at the same time as the Interpretation 12 Service Concession Arrangements.
AASB 2007-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards also amends references to “UIG Interpretation” to interpretations. This amending standard is applicable to annual reporting periods ending on or after 28 February 2007.
AASB 2007-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from ED 151 and other Amendments makes consequential amendments to AASB 1 First-time adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards, AASB 2 Share Based Payments, AASB 3 Business Combinations, AASB 4 Insurance Contracts, AASB 5 NonCurrent Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, AASB 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources, AASB 7 Financial Instruments : Disclosures, AASB 102 Inventories, AASB 107 Cash Flow Statement, AASB 108 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, AASB 110 Events after the Balance Sheet Date. AASB 112 Income Taxes, AASB 114 Segment Reporting, AASB 116 Property, Plant and Equipment, AASB 117 Leases, AASB 118 Revenue, AASB 119 Employee Benefits, AASB 120 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, AASB 121 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Currency Rates, AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, AASB 128 Investment in Associates, AASB 129 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies, AASB 130 Disclosures of Financial Statement of Banks and Similar Financial Institutions, AASB 131 Interest in Joint Ventures, AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosures and Presentation, AASB 133 Earnings Per Share, AASB 134 Interim Financial Reporting, AASB 136 Impairment of Assets, AASB 137 Provision, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, AASB 138 Intangible Assets, AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, AASB 141 Agriculture, AASB 1023 General Insurance Contracts, and AASB 1038 Life Insurance Contracts. This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2007. The potential impact on the Company has not yet been determined.
AASB 2007-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standard – Inventories Held for Distribution by Not-for-Profit Entities requires inventories held for distribution by not-for-profit entities to be measured at the lower of cost and current replacement costs. AASB 2007-5 is applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2007 and is not expected to have an impact on the financial results or disclosures contained within the financial report.
AASB 2007-6 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 123 makes amendments to AASB 1 Firsttime Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards, AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements, AASB 107 Cash Flow Statements, AASB 111 Construction contracts, AASB 116 Property, Plant and Equipment, AASB 138 Intangible Assets, Interpretation 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities and Interpretation 12 Service Concession Arrangements. AASB 2007-6 is applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009 and must be applied at the same time as AASB 123 Borrowing Costs. This standard principally removes the references to expensing borrowing costs on qualifying assets.
AASB 2007-7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 2007-4 makes amendments to AASB 1 First-time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards, AASB 2 Share-Based Payment, AASB 4 Insurance Contracts, AASB 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, AASB Cash Flow Statements and AASB 128 Investments in Associates. AASB 2007-7 is applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2007. This standard is only expected to impact disclosures contained within the financial report.
Page 34
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
NOTE 2: REVENUES AND EXPENSES
| NOTE 2: REVENUES AND EXPENSES | |
|---|---|
| (a) Revenue Gold sales Rental revenue Services revenue Interest received (b) Other income Net gains on disposal of property, plant and equipment Other (c) Expenses Finance charges payable under finance leases and hire purchase contracts Interest expense Depreciation of non-current assets Exploration expenditure written-off Legal fees Loan impairment expense Mill operating costs Operating lease rental expense Employee share based payment expense |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 9,899 1,100 9,899 1,100 98,053 39,348 98,053 39,348 67,511 - - - 151,899 139,199 150,625 137,616 |
| 327,362 179,647 258,577 178,064 |
|
| (392) 4,144 (392) 4,144 134,558 1,152 123,533 1,152 |
|
| 134,166 5,296 123,141 5,296 |
|
| 1,494 356 - 356 14,693 29,886 14,693 29,886 151,179 120,764 141,948 120,764 10,732 807 10,732 807 27,613 202,874 27,613 202,874 - - 43,277 300,000 563,526 294,561 563,526 294,561 81,900 73,246 81,900 73,246 626,456 223,113 626,456 223,113 |
Page 35
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
NOTE 3: INCOME TAX
| NOTE 3: INCOME TAX | |
|---|---|
| Income tax recognised in profit or loss The prima facie income tax expense on pre-tax accounting loss from operations reconciles to the income tax expense in the financial statements as follows: Accounting loss before income tax Income tax expense Income tax expense calculated at statutory income tax rate of 30% Sundry non-deductible expenses Deferred tax asset relating to tax losses not brought to account Income Tax Benefit Income Statement Current tax Deferred tax asset relating to tax losses Deferred income tax Temorary Differences recognised in equity Relating to origination and reversal on temporary differences Current year tax losses not recognised in the current period Income tax benefit reported in the income statement Unrecognised Deferred Tax Balances Unrecognised deferred tax asset losses Unrecognised deferred tax asset other Unrecognised deferred tax liabilities Net unrecognised deferred tax assets |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ (2,089,695) (1,822,025) (2,128,873) (2,123,608) |
| (626,909) (546,608) (638,662) (637,082) 13,713 79,733 13,693 169,731 613,196 466,875 624,969 467,351 |
|
| - - - - |
|
| - - (613,196) (466,875) (624,969) (467,351) (79,315) - (79,315) - (253,110) (230,756) (238,431) (217,283) 945,621 697,631 942,716 684,634 |
|
| - - - - |
|
| 8,746,870 7,778,281 7,078,809 6,015,498 313,547 30,373 416,530 28,678 (5,130,062) (5,103,683) (2,921,788) (2,895,409) |
|
| 3,930,355 2,704,971 4,573,551 3,148,767 |
The deferred tax asset arising from the tax losses has not been recognised as an asset in the balance sheet because recovery is not probable.
The tax benefit of losses not brought to account will only be obtained if
(a) assessable income is derived of a nature and amount sufficient to enable the benefits to be realised:
(b) conditions for deductibility imposed by the law are complied with: and
(c) no changes in the tax legislation adversely affect the realisation of the benefit form the deductions.
Tax Consolidation
Focus Minerals Limited and its 100% owned Australian resident subsidiary have not formed a tax consolidated group.
NOTE 4: SEGMENT REPORTING
The Group operates solely in the resources exploration industry within Western Australia. The Group is actively exploring for natural minerals, in particular, gold and nickel in proximity to Coolgardie, Western Australia.
Page 36
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
NOTE 5: EARNINGS PER SHARE
| NOTE 5: EARNINGS PER SHARE | |
|---|---|
| Basic earnings per share: Total Basic EPS Diluted earnings per share: Total Diluted EPS Basic Earnings per share The earnings and weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share is as follow: Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of basic earnings per share Diluted Earnings per share The earnings and weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share: Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of basic earnings per share |
Consolidated 2007 2006 Cents per share Cents per share (0.46) (0.45) |
| (0.46) (0.45) |
|
| (2,089,695) (1,822,025) |
|
| 455,529,684 406,368,817 |
|
| (2,089,695) (1,822,025) |
|
| 474,799,684 415,788,816 |
NOTE 6: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
| NOTE 6: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | |
|---|---|
| Cash at bank and on hand Short-term deposits – secured Short-term deposits – unsecured |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 270,366 265,724 243,238 209,930 1,694,510 1,495,455 1,667,510 1,469,206 11,880,000 681,250 11,880,000 681,250 |
| 13,844,876 2,442,429 13,790,748 2,360,386 |
Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates.
Short-term deposits are made for varying periods of between one day and six months, depending on the immediate cash
requirements of the Group, and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates.
Performance bonds have been issued by a bank on behalf of the Group in respect of Western Australian mining tenements. The Group has indemnified the bank against any loss arising from the performance bonds and the indemnity is secured against cash deposits
Secured performance bonds comprise $854,223 (2006: $852,250) attributable to the Group for its directly held mining tenements as joint venture partner in the Redemption joint venture, and $840,287 (2006: $643,205) attributable to Committee Bay Resources Limited as joint venture partner in the Redemption joint venture. The amount attributable to Committee Bay Resources Limited is shown as a liability in Note 15 as amount due to joint venture partner totalling $840,287 (2006: $643,205).
At 30 June 2007, the Group had no available borrowing facilities.
Page 37
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 6: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
(i) Reconciliation to Cash Flow Statement:
For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand and at bank and investments in money market instruments, net of secured short term deposits.
Cash and cash equivalents as shown in the cash flow statement is reconciled to the related items in the balance sheet as follows:
| Cash and cash equivalents as shown in the cash flow statement | is reconciled to the related items in the balance sheet as follows: |
|---|---|
| Cash at bank and short term deposits Short term deposit - secured Cash and cash equivalents (ii) Cash balances not available for use Short term deposits lodged as security (iii) Reconciliation of profit for the year to net cash flows from operating activities Loss for the year (Gain)/loss on sale or disposal of non-current assets Exploration expenditure written off Equity settled share based payment Loan impairment expense Depreciation expense (Increase)/decrease in assets: Current receivables Other current assets Increase/(decrease) in liabilities: Current payables Other current liabilities Rehabilitation costs Employee benefits Deferred revenue Non-current payables Net cash from operating activities |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 13,844,876 2,442,429 13,790,748 2,360,386 (1,694,510) (1,495,455) (1,667,510) (1,469,206) |
| 12,150,366 946,974 12,123,238 891,180 |
|
| 1,694,510 1,495,455 1,694,510 1,469,206 |
|
| (2,089,695) (1,822,025) (2,128,873) (2,123,608) 392 (4,144) 392 (4,144) 10,732 807 10,732 807 - 257,903 - 257,903 - - 43,277 300,000 151,179 120,764 141,947 120,764 (224,208) (320,277) (178,410) (304,452) 272 (4,307) 6,940 (14,807) 407,143 (1,774,628) 586,848 (1,337,461) 48,370 39,584 33,189 39,584 111,000 - 111,000 - (3,164) 26,413 (3,167) 26,413 (45,834) 25,000 (45,834) 25,000 (20,000) (20,000) - - |
|
| (1,653,813) (3,474,910) (1,421,959) (3,014,001) |
(iv) Net cash on acquisition of subsidiary
| (iv) Net cash on acquisition of subsidiary | |
|---|---|
| During the year 50% of the controlled entity, Underground Drilling Services Pty Ltd was acquired. The details of the transaction are : Assets and liabilities acquired Cash and bank balances Trade and other debtors Plant and equipment Trade and other payables Financial liabilities Net Identifiable assets Consideration paid Net cash acquired |
35,825 - 53,223 - 205,545 - (261,662) - (32,933) - |
| (2) - 2 - |
|
| 35,825 - |
Non Cash transactions
During the period the Company issued 2,400,000 (2006: 600,000) fully paid ordinary shares at 5 cents per share and totalling $120,000 (2006: $30,000) in consideration for corporate advisory services received.
Page 38
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
NOTE 7: CURRENT TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
| Consolidated | Consolidated | Parent | Parent | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Other receivables | 544,485 | 320,277 | 482,862 | 304,452 |
An allowance for doubtful debts is made when there is objective evidence that a trade receivable is impaired. The amount of the allowance/impairment loss has been measured as the difference between the carrying amount of the trade receivables and the estimated future cash flows expected to be received from the relevant debtors
NOTE 8: INVENTORIES
| NOTE 8: INVENTORIES | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spare parts – at cost | 243,027 | 243,027 | 243,027 | 243,027 |
| NOTE 9: AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS | ||||
| At fair value: | ||||
| Unlisted shares | - | 1 | - | 1 |
Available-for-sale investments consist of investments in ordinary shares, and therefore have no fixed maturity date or coupon rate.
The fair value of the unlisted available-for-sale investments has been estimated using valuation techniques based on assumptions that are not supported by observable market prices or rates. Management believes the estimated fair values resulting from the valuation techniques and recorded in the balance sheet and the related changes in fair values recorded in the income statement are reasonable and the most appropriate at the balance sheet date.
NOTE 10: OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS (NON-CURRENT)
| Investments in controlled entities - note 1 Amounts receivable from controlled entities - note 2 Impairment expense |
- - 3,301,278 3,301,276 |
|---|---|
| - - 4,302,303 4,339,838 - - (300,000) (300,000) |
|
| - - 4,002,303 4,039,838 |
|
| - - 7,303,581 7,341,114 |
Note 1
On 1 April 2007, the Company acquired a direct 50% interest in Underground Drilling Services Pty Ltd (“UDS”). At 30 June 2007 the Company controlled 50% of the issued capital of UDS and held 1 of 2 directorships of UDS. At balance date, it is considered that the Company has control of UDS and accordingly has consolidated the financial statements of UDS from1 April 2007.
Note 2
The ultimate recoverability of the amount receivable from controlled entity is dependant on the successful and commercial exploitation and or sale of the controlled entity’s mining tenements at amounts at least equal to the book value.
- As there is no current intention for the loans to controlled entities to be repaid in the near future, the amounts receivable from controlled entities are treated as investment in controlled entities, for accounting purposes.
Page 39
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
NOTE 11: OTHER RECEIVABLES
| NOTE 11: OTHER RECEIVABLES | |
|---|---|
| Other receivable Impairment expense Other receivables |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ - 53,100 277,941 53,100 - - (43,277) - |
| - 53,100 234,664 53,100 |
Other receivables are to an external party are on minimum fixed repayment amounts and are non interest bearing.
NOTE 12: PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| NOTE 12: PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | |
|---|---|
| Mining plant & equipment At cost Less accumulated depreciation Movements in carrying amounts Balance at 1 July Additions Acquired on acquisition of subsidiary company Transferred from exploration expenditure Disposals Depreciation expense |
1,216,077 804,461 918,274 804,461 (413,302) (220,149) (376,416) (220,149) |
| 802,775 584,312 541,858 584,312 |
|
| 584,312 77,050 584,312 77,050 165,559 74,620 101,085 74,620 205,674 - - - - 573,948 - 573,948 (1,591) (20,542) (1,591) (20,542) (151,179) (120,764) (141,948) (120,764) |
|
| 802,775 584,312 541,858 584,312 |
The useful life of the mining plant and equipment was estimated as follows for both 2006 and 2007: Plant and equipment 5 to 15 years
NOTE 13: DEFERRED EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE
Costs carried forward in respect of:
Exploration and evaluation phase – at cost
| Exploration and evaluation phase – at cost | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at beginning of year | 16,293,567 | 16,301,371 | 8,932,653 | 8,940,457 |
| Sale of tenements | - | - | - | - |
| Purchase of tenements | 41,120 | 458,956 | 41,120 | 458,956 |
| Transfer of plant and equipment value on formation of joint venture | - | (573,948) | - | (573,948) |
| Transfer of spare parts value on formation of joint venture | - | (243,027) | - | (243,027) |
| Exploration expenditure incurred | 776,253 | 351,022 | 776,253 | 351,022 |
| 17,110,940 | 16,294,374 | 9,750,026 | 8,933,460 | |
| Expenditure written off | (10,732) | (807) | (10,732) | (807) |
| Total exploration expenditure | 17,100,208 | 16,293,567 | 9,739,294 | 8,932,653 |
The recoupment of costs carried forward in relation to areas of interest in the exploration and evaluation phases are dependent on the discovery of commercially viable mineral or other natural resource deposits and their successful development and commercial exploitation or sale of the respective areas.
Page 40
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
NOTE 14: SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
During the year the Company issued 9,850,000 options to acquire fully paid ordinary shares in the Company to directors of the Company. The issue of the options was approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held 30 November 2005.
The options have an expiry date of 30 November 2010.
The fair value of the equity settled share options granted is estimated as at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option pricing model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted.
The following table lists the inputs to the model used for the years ended 30 June 2007 and 30 June 2006.
| 2007 | 2006 | |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (%) | - | 55% |
| Risk free interest rate (%) | - | 5.25% |
| Expected life of option (years) | - | 2 |
| Exercise price (cents) | - | 5-6 |
| Weighted average share price at grant date (cents) | - | 2.0 |
The expected life of the options is based on historical data and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may also not necessarily be the actual outcome. No other features of options granted were incorporated into the measurement of fair value.
NOTE 15: TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
| NOTE 15: TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES | |
|---|---|
| Current Trade payables (i) Sundry creditors and accrued expenses Employee benefits Amount due to joint venture partner Non Current Other parties Rehabilitation costs |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 518,302 111,160 500,923 111,160 267,631 219,261 219,617 186,428 34,540 37,704 34,540 37,704 840,287 643,205 840,287 643,205 |
| 1,660,760 1,011,330 1,595,367 978,497 |
|
| 60,000 80,000 - - 111,000 - 111,000 - |
|
| 171,000 80,000 111,000 - |
(i) Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30-60 day terms.
Information regarding the credit risk of current payables is set out in Note 18.
NOTE 16: FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
| NOTE 16: FINANCIAL LIABILITIES | |
|---|---|
| Obligations under finance leases and hire purchase contracts (refer Note 19) Current Non current |
11,347 - - - 25,252 - - - |
| 36,599 - - - |
Page 41
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
NOTE 17: ISSUED CAPITAL AND RESERVES
| NOTE 17: ISSUED CAPITAL AND RESERVES | |
|---|---|
| Issued Capital Ordinary shares issued and fully paid at 30 June 2005 Issued 8 August 2005 Issued 8 August 2005 Issued 8 & 23 August 2005 Issued 29 September 2005 Issued 1 February 2006 Issued 15 February 2006 Share issue expenses Ordinary shares issued and fully paid at 30 June 2006 Issued 21 September 2006 Issued 25 September 2006 Issued 1 November 2006 Issued 31 January 2007 Issued 12 June 2006 Issued 22 June 2007 Share issue expenses Ordinary shares issued and fully paid at 30 June 2007 |
Parent Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 Shares Shares $ $ - 248,472,098 - 23,412,746 - 5,000,000 - 300,000 - 23,809,512 - 900,000 - 140,000,000 - 5,880,000 - 11,904,762 - 500,000 - 238,095 - 10,000 - 600,000 - 30,000 - - - (382,800) |
| 430,024,467 430,024,467 30,649,946 30,649,946 600,000 - 30,000 - 400,000 - 18,000 - 40,000,000 - 1,600,000 - 600,000 - 30,000 - 300,000,519 - 12,900,000 - 7,200,000 - 318,000 - - - (939,114) - |
|
| 778,824,986 430,024,467 44,606,832 30,649,946 |
Fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share and carry the right to dividends.
Reserves
Option Reserve
Movements in the option reserve as a result of equity settled transactions were as follows:
| Balance 1 July Employee share options issued Share issue expenses Balance 30 June |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 561,007 303,104 561,007 303,104 - 223,113 - 223,113 - 34,790 - 34,790 |
|---|---|
| 561,007 561,007 561,007 561,007 |
The share option arises on the grant of share options. Amounts are transferred out of the reserve and into issued capital when the options are exercised.
Page 42
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
NOTE 18: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Group’s principal financial instruments, other than derivatives, comprise bank loans and overdrafts, debentures, convertible noncumulative redeemable preference shares, finance leases and hire purchase contracts, and cash and short-term deposits.
The main purpose of these financial instruments is to raise finance for the Group’s operations. The Group has various other financial assets and liabilities such as trade receivables and trade payables, which arise directly from its operations. It is, and has been throughout the period under review, the Group’s policy that no trading in financial instruments shall be undertaken. The main risks arising from the Group’s financial instruments are cash flow interest rate risk, liquidity risk, commodity risk and credit risk. The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks and they are summarised below.
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed in Note 1 to the financial statements.
Cash flow interest rate risk
The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk relates to the risk that a financial instrument’s value will fluctuate as result of changes tin market interest rates and the effective average interest rates affecting the classes of financial assets and liabilities detailed below.
Commodity price risk
The Group’s exposure to price risk is at present minimal. Upon commencement of production of natural minerals, management of the commodity risk will be assessed by the Board in consultation with commodity experts to determine the appropriate level of protection and financial instrument to be adopted.
Credit risk
The Group trades only with recognised, creditworthy third parties. It is the Group's policy that all customers who wish to trade on credit terms are subject to credit verification procedures
In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Group’s exposure to bad debts is not significant.
There are no significant concentrations of credit risk within the Group.
With respect to credit risk arising from the other financial assets of the Group, which comprise cash and cash equivalents, availablefor-sale financial assets the Group’s exposure to credit risk arises from default of the counter party, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments.
Since the Group trades only with recognised third parties, there is no requirement for collateral.
Liquidity risk
The Group’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of bank overdrafts, bank loans, convertible notes and hire purchase contracts.
Set out below is a comparison by category of carrying amounts and fair values of all of the Group’s financial instruments recognised in the financial statements.
| in the financial statements. | |
|---|---|
| Average Effective Interest Rate % Consolidated 30 June 2007 Financial assets Cash 6.27 Trade receivables - Total financial assets Financial liabilities Trade payables and other payables - Amount due to joint venture partner 4.85 Obligations under finance leases 8.70 Employee entitlements - Deferred revenue - Total financial liabilities |
Floating Fixed Non Interest Interest Interest Rate Rate Bearing Total $ $ $ $ 1,964,876 11,880,000 - 13,844,876 - - 544,485 544,485 |
| 1,964,876 11,880,000 544,485 14,389,361 |
|
| - - 956,933 956,933 840,287 - - 840,287 36,599 - 36,599 - - 34,540 34,540 - - 18,750 18,750 |
|
| 840,287 36,599 1,010,223 1,887,109 |
Page 43
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 18: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS cont.
| Average Effective Interest Rate % Consolidated 30 June 2006 Financial assets Cash 5.27 Trade receivables - Available-for-sale investments - Other financial assets (non-current) Total financial assets Financial liabilities Trade payables and other payables - Amount due to joint venture partner 5.60 Employee entitlements - Deferred revenue Total financial liabilities Parent 30 June 2007 Financial assets Cash 6.27 Trade receivables - Receivables - Other financial assets (non-current) - Total financial assets Financial liabilities Trade payables and other payables - Amount due to joint venture partner 4.85 Deferred revenue - Employee entitlements - Total financial liabilities Parent 30 June 2006 Financial assets Cash 5.27 Trade receivables - Receivables - Available-for-sale investments - Other financial assets (non-current) - Total financial assets Financial liabilities Trade payables and other payables - Amount due to joint venture partner 5.60 Deferred revenue - Employee entitlements - Total financial liabilities |
Floating Fixed Non Interest Interest Interest Rate Rate Bearing Total $ $ $ $ 2,442,429 - 2,442,429 - - 320,277 320,277 - - 1 1 - - 53,100 53,100 |
|---|---|
| 2,442,429 - 373,378 2,815,807 |
|
| - - 410,421 410,421 643,205 - - 643,205 - 37,704 37,704 - - 64,584 64,584 |
|
| 643,205 - 512,709 1,155,914 |
|
| 1,910,748 11,880,000 - 13,790,748 - - 482,862 482,862 - - 4,236,967 4,236,967 - - 3,301,278 3,301,278 |
|
| 1,910,748 11,880,000 8,021,107 21,811,855 |
|
| - - 831,540 831,540 840,287 - - 840,287 - - 18,750 18,750 - 34,540 34,540 |
|
| 840,287 - 884,830 1,725,117 |
|
| 2,360,386 - - 2,360,386 - - 304,452 304,452 - - 4,092,938 4,092,938 - - 1 1 - - 3,301,276 3,301,276 |
|
| 2,360,386 - 7,698,667 10,059,053 |
|
| - - 297,588 297,588 643,205 - - 643,205 - - 64,584 64,584 - - 37,704 37,704 |
|
| 643,205 - 399,876 1,043,081 |
Page 44
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
NOTE 19: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating lease commitments – Group as lessee
The Group has entered into commercial leases on certain office accommodation. These leases have an average life of 2 years with no renewal option included in the contracts. There are no restrictions placed upon the lessee by entering into these leases.
Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases as at 30 June are as follows:
| Office accommodation Within one year After one year but not more than five years More than five years |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 69,295 65,800 69,295 65,800 10,129 65,800 10,129 65,800 - - - - |
|---|---|
| 79,424 131,600 79,424 131,600 |
Finance lease and hire purchase commitments - Group as lessee
The Group had finance leases for various items of plant and machinery. These leases had terms of renewal but no purchase options and escalation clauses. Renewals are at the option of the specific entity that holds the lease.
Future minimum lease payments under finance leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments are as follows:
| follows: | |
|---|---|
| CONSOLIDATED Within one year After one year but not more than five years Total minimum lease payments Less amounts representing finance charges Present value of minimum lease payments PARENT Within one year After one year but not more than five years Total minimum lease payments Less amounts representing finance charges Present value of minimum lease payments |
2007 2006 Minimum Present Minimum Present lease Value of lease lease Value of lease payments payments payments payments $ $ $ $ 14,468 11,347 - - 29,596 25,252 - - |
| 44,064 36,599 - - (7,465) - - - |
|
| 36,599 36,599 - - |
|
| - - - - - - - - |
|
| - - - - - - - - |
|
| - - - - |
The weighted average interest rate impact of the leases for both the Group and the Parent at 30 June 2007 is 8.7% (2006: nil%)
Mining tenement expenditure commitments
The Consolidated Entities and Company have minimum statutory expenditure, including tenement rentals, as conditions of tenure of certain mining tenements.
To secure certain performance obligations attaching to certain mining and exploration tenements, the Consolidated Entity and the Company has lodged bank bonds totalling $1,683,300 (2006: $1,495,455), with the Department of Industry and Resources.
| Within one year After one year but not more than five years More than five years |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 1,517,380 1,435,020 1,517,380 1,435,020 - - - - - - - - |
|---|---|
| 1,517,380 1,435,020 1,517,380 1,435,020 |
Page 45
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
NOTE 20: INTEREST IN JOINTLY CONTROLLED OPERATION
(a) Redemption joint ventures
The Group has a 50% interest in the Redemption Plant and Equipment joint venture, which is involved in management and operation of the plant and equipment held by the Redemption joint venture.
The Group has a 50% (2006: 90%) interest in the Redemption Exploration joint venture, which is involved in the exploration of the tenements comprising the Coolgardie Gold Project located in the vicinity of Coolgardie, Western Australia.
During the financial period, Committee Bay Resources Limited (“Committee Bay”) concluded earning its 50% interest in the Redemption Exploration joint venture on spending its earn in commitment of A$8,000,000.
The share of the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses of the jointly controlled operations, which are included in the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:
| financial statements, are as follows: | |
|---|---|
| Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Inventories Total current assets Non-current assets Receivables Other Financial Asset Property, plant & equipment Deferred Exploration Expenditure Total Non-current assets Current liabilities Trade and other payables Rehabilitation cost Deferred Revenue Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Deferred Revenue Total Non-current liabilities Revenue Cost of sales Depreciation Administrative expenses Finance cost Profit before income tax Income tax expense Net Profit |
Consolidated 2007 2006 $ $ 113,490 3,360 446,768 17,527 243,027 243,027 |
| 803,285 263,914 |
|
| 277,942 53,100 - 1 428,870 469,506 2,269,856 1,795,006 |
|
| 2,976,668 2,317,613 |
|
| 396,666 27,846 111,000 - 18,750 39,584 |
|
| 526,416 67,430 |
|
| - 25,000 |
|
| - 25,000 |
|
| 129,122 56,778 - - (94,242) (87,641) (606,804) (294,561) - - |
|
| (571,924) (325,424) - - |
|
| (571,924) (325,424) |
Refer to Note 19 for details on capital commitments and guarantees. There were no impairment losses in the jointly controlled operation.
Page 46
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
NOTE 21: CONTROLLED ENTITIES
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Focus Minerals Limited and the subsidiaries listed in the following table.
| following table. | |
|---|---|
| Country of Name Incorporation Austminex Pty Ltd Australia Underground Drilling Services Pty Ltd Australia |
Equity Interest (%) Investment ($) 2007 2006 2007 2006 100% 100% 3,301,276 3,301,276 50% - 2 - |
| 3,301,278 3,301,276 |
On 14 September 2005, Focus Minerals Pty Ltd changed its name to Austminex Pty Ltd.
On 1 April 2007, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Underground Drilling Services Pty Ltd.
NOTE 22: RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURE
The following table provides the total amount of transactions that were entered into with related parties for the relevant financial year (for information regarding outstanding balances at year-end, refer to note 10 and note 21):
| Sales to | Purchases | Amounts | Amounts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| related | from | Owned by | Owed to | ||
| parties | related | related | related | ||
| parties | parties | parties | |||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | ||
| Related party | |||||
| Consolidated | |||||
| Joint ventures in which the parent is a venturer: | |||||
| Redemption joint venture | 2007 | 111,964 | - | 111,964 | - |
| 2006 | 299,767 | - | 299,767 | - | |
| Being recharges of salaries and expenses | |||||
| provided to the joint venture | |||||
| Parent | |||||
| Related party | |||||
| Austminex Pty Ltd | 2007 | - | - | 4,302,303 | - |
| 2006 | - | - | 4,339,838 | - | |
| Joint venture in which the parent is a venturer: | |||||
| Redemption joint venture | 2007 | 111,964 | - | 111,964 | - |
| 2006 | 299,767 | - | 299,767 | - | |
| Being recharges of salaries and expenses | |||||
| provided to the joint venture |
Joint venture in which the entity is a venturer
The Group has a 50% interest in the assets, liabilities and output of the Redemption Plant & Equipment joint venture (2006: - 50%).
The Group has a 50% interest in the assets, liabilities and output of the Redemption Exploration joint venture (2006: - 90%).
Terms and conditions of transactions with related parties
Sales to and purchases from related parties are made in arm's length transactions both at normal market prices and on normal commercial terms.
Outstanding balances at year-end are unsecured, interest free and settlement occurs in cash.
For the year ended 30 June 2007, the Group has not made any allowance for doubtful debts relating to amounts owed by related parties due to solid payment history (2006: $nil). An impairment assessment is undertaken each financial year by examining the financial position of the related party and the market in which the related party operates to determine whether there is objective evidence that a related party receivable is impaired. When such objective evidence exists, the Group recognises an allowance for the impairment loss.
Page 47
Notes to the Financial Statements cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
NOTE 23: EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE
During July 2007, the Redemption joint venture secured priority toll treatment arrangements with Higginsville Mining Pty Ltd to treat ore from the Coolgardie Gold Project in return for an extension, to June 2017, of the sub lease for Higginsville’s Greenfield’s Gold treatment plant located on a mining lease within the Coolgardie Gold Project.
On 30 July 2007 the Redemption joint venture upgraded the Dreadnought gold deposit to an Indicated Resource of 3,020,000 tonnes at 2.02 g/t and an Inferred Resource of 434,000 tonnes at 1.76 g/t for a total of 220,980 ozs gold.
During August 2007, the Redemption Exploration joint venture commenced the construction of a 400m decline from the existing Tindals’ underground workings to the Perseverance gold deposit. Construction of the decline was expected to be completed during October 2007.
During August 2007, the Group received mine access approvals to re-enter the underground workings at the Nepean Nickel Project to assess the condition of the underground infrastructure and confirm the extent of remnant ore blocks and extract ore samples for metallurgical testing.
NOTE 24: AUDITORS' REMUNERATION
The auditors of Focus Minerals Limited are Bentleys MRI Perth Partnership.
| Amounts received or due and receivable by Bentleys MRI for: An audit or review of the financial report of the entity and any other entity in the consolidated group Other services in relation to the entity and any other entity in the consolidated group Amounts received or receivable by other auditors of subsidiaries and joint ventures for: An audit or review of the financial report of any other entity in the consolidated group Other services in relation to any other entity in the consolidated group |
Consolidated Parent 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 22,475 14,624 22,475 14,624 8,033 - 8,033 - |
|---|---|
| 30,508 14,624 30,508 14,624 |
|
| 5,562 3750 5,562 3750 - - - - |
|
| 5,562 3750 5,562 3750 |
NOTE 25: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURES
(a) Details of Key Management Personnel
(i) Directors Donald Taig Chairman (executive) Peter Williams Chief Executive Officer Geoff Rasmussen Director (non-executive) Phillip Lockyer Director (non-executive) Charles McCormick Director (executive) – resigned 17 August 2007
(ii) Executives Alec Pismiris K.Jon Grygorcewicz
Company Secretary – appointed 28.11.2005 and resigned 2.8.2006 Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer - appointed 1.8.2006
There were no other changes of the board or key management after the reporting date and the date the financial report was authorised for issue.
Page 48
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 25: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURES cont.
(b) Compensation of Key Management Personnel
(i) Remuneration structure
In accordance with best practice Corporate Governance, the structure of non-executive director and executive remuneration is separate and distinct.
Non-executive director remuneration
The Board seeks to set aggregate remuneration at a level that provides the company with the ability to attract and retain directors of the highest calibre, whilst incurring a cost that is acceptable to shareholders.
The amount of aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the manner in which it is apportioned amongst directors is reviewed annually. The Board considers advice from external shareholders as well as the fees paid to non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking the annual review process.
At present the maximum aggregate remuneration of non-executive directors is $150,000 par annum.
Senior manager and executive director remuneration
Remuneration primarily consists of fixed remuneration and an equity component where determined by the directors. Issue of an equity component to directors is subject to the approval of shareholders in general meeting.
Fixed Remuneration
Fixed remuneration is reviewed annually by the Remuneration Committee. The process consists of a review of relevant comparative remuneration in the market and internally and, where appropriate, external advice on policies and practices. The Committee has access to external, independent advice where necessary.
Senior managers are given the opportunity to receive their fixed (primary) remuneration in a variety of forms including cash and fringe benefits such as motor vehicles and expense payment plans. It is intended that the manner of payment chosen will be optimal for the recipient without creating undue cost for the Group.
(ii) Compensation of Key Management Personnel for the years ended 30 June 2007 & 2006
| 30 June 2007 | Salary | Super- | Other | Share | Total | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| & Fees | annuation | Based | Performance | |||
| Payment | Related | |||||
| - Options | ||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Directors | ||||||
| Donald Taig | 56,200 | - | - | - | 56,200 | - |
| Peter Williams | 202,540 | 18,229 | 7,591 | - | 228,360 | - |
| Phillip Lockyer | 30,000 | 2,700 | - | - | 32,700 | - |
| Geoff Rasmussen | 30,000 | - | - | - | 30,000 | - |
| Charles McCormick* | 150,000 | 13,500 | 11,485 | - | 174,985 | - |
| 468,740 | 34,429 | 19,076 | - | 522,245 | ||
| Executives | ||||||
| Jon Grygorcewicz | 93,009 | 10,106 | 9,220 | - | 112,335 | - |
| 93,009 | 10,106 | 9,220 | - | 112,335 |
- Mr McCormick was appointed a director on 23.12.2005. Salary and benefits received prior to his appointment has presented within this classification.
The Company only employed 1 executive in the period.
Page 49
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 25: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURES cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
(ii) Compensation of Key Management Personnel for the years ended 30 June 2007 & 2006 cont.
| 30 June 2006 | Salary | Super- | Other | Share | Total | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| & Fees | annuation | Based | Performance | |||
| Payment | Related | |||||
| - Options | ||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Directors | ||||||
| Donald Taig | 50,000 | - | - | - | 50,000 | - |
| Peter Williams | 160,000 | 14,400 | 11,935 | 156,630 | 342,965 | 45.6% |
| Phillip Lockyer | 12,500 | 1,300 | - | - | 13,800 | - |
| Geoff Rasmussen | 21,930 | - | - | - | 21,930 | - |
| Charles McCormick* | 175,804 | 10,321 | 13,025 | 66,483 | 265,633 | 40.1% |
| Catherine Hobbs | 45,872 | 4,128 | - | - | 50,000 | - |
| 466,106 | 30,149 | 24,960 | 223,113 | 744,328 | ||
| Executives | ||||||
| Alec Pismiris | 29,000 | - | - | - | 29,000 | - |
| Andrew Hawker | 122,442 | 11,020 | - | - | 133,462 | - |
| Jack Toby | 35,155 | - | - | - | 35,155 | - |
| 186,597 | 11,020 | - | - | 197,617 |
- Mr McCormick was appointed a director on 23.12.2005. Salary and benefits received prior to his appointment has presented within this classification.
(iii) Contract for Services
Mr Peter Williams, the Managing Director, has a contract of employment with the Company dated 10 March 2005. The contract specifies the duties and obligations to be fulfilled by the Managing Director. The employment contract is continuous from the commencement date of 28 February 2005. Should the contract be terminated by the Company for any reason, other than misconduct, Mr Williams will be entitled to a termination payment equivalent to one year’s salary which currently totals $220,000.
(c) Compensation options: Granted and vested during the year
During the financial year no share options were granted as equity compensation benefits to management personnel. No share options have been granted to the non-executive members of the Board of Directors.
Options issued in the period ended 30 June 2006 were issued free of charge.
| 30 June 2007 Directors 30 June 2006 Directors Peter Williams Charles McCormick Total |
Terms and Conditions for each Grant Vested Granted Grant Fair Value Exercise Expiry First Date per option price per Date Exercise at grant option No. No. (cents) (cents) Date - - - - - - - Terms and Conditions for each Grant Vested Granted Grant Fair Value Exercise Expiry First Date per option price per Date Exercise at grant option No. No. (cents) (cents) Date 3,475,000 3,475,000 28/2/2006 2.25 5.0 30/11/2010 30/11/2007 3,475,000 3,475,000 28/2/2006 2.25 6.0 30/11/2010 30/11/2007 1,450,000 1,450,000 1/2/2006 2.29 5.0 30/11/2010 30/11/2006 1,450,000 1,450,000 1/2/2006 2.29 6.0 30/11/2010 30/11/2007 9,850,000 9,850,000 |
|---|---|
Issue of the above options was approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held 30 November 2005.
Page 50
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 25: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURES cont.
(d) Option holdings of Key Management Personnel (Consolidated)
| Balance at | Granted | Balance at | Vested | as at 30 June | 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| beginning | as | Net | end of | Not | ||||
| or period | remuner- | Options | change | Period | Exer- | Exer- | ||
| 30 June 2007 | 1/07/06 | ration | exercised | Other # | 30/06/07 | Total | cisable | cisable |
| Directors | ||||||||
| Peter Williams | 6,950,000 | - | - | - | 6,950,000 | 6,950,000 | 3,475,000 | 3,475,000 |
| Charles McCormick | 5,900,000 | - | - | - | 5,900,000 | 5,900,000 | 3,450,000 | 2,450,000 |
| Total | 12,850,000 | - | - | - | 12,850,000 | 12,850,000 | 6,925,000 | 5,925,000 |
| # Includes forfeitures | ||||||||
| Balance at | Granted | Balance at | Vested | as at 30 June | 2006 | |||
| beginning | as | Net | end of | Not | ||||
| or period | remuner- | Options | change | Period | Exer- | Exer- | ||
| 30 June 2006 | 1/07/05 | ration | exercised | Other # | 30/06/06 | Total | cisable | cisable |
| Directors | ||||||||
| Peter Williams | - | 6,950,000 | - | - | 6,950,000 | 6,950,000 | - | 6,950,000 |
| Charles McCormick | 3,000,000 | 2,900,000 | - | - | 5,900,000 | 5,900,000 | 1,000,000 | 4,900,000 |
| Total | 3,000,000 | 9,850,000 | - | - | 12,850,000 | 12,850,000 | 1,000,000 | 11,850,000 |
Includes forfeitures
(e) Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel
| Balance | 01-Jul-06 | Granted as | Granted as | Net | other | Balance at 30-06-07 | Balance at 30-06-07 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| remuneration | changes | |||||||
| 30 June 2007 | Ord | Options | Ord | Options | Ord | Options | Ord | Options |
| Directors | ||||||||
| Donald Taig** | 8,377,274 | - | - | - | 214,456 | - | 8,591,730 | - |
| Peter Williams | 250,000 | 6,950,000 | - | - | 253,614 | - | 503,614 | 6,950,000 |
| Phillip Lockyer | 200,000 | - | - | - | 53,614 | - | 253,614 | - |
| Geoff Rasmussen* | 4,696,599 | 3,000,000 | - | - | 53,614 | - | 4,750,213 | 3,000,000 |
| Total | 13,523,873 | 9,950,000 | - | - | 575,298 | - | 14,099,171 | 9,950,000 |
| Balance | 01-Jul-05 | Granted as | Net | other | Balance at 30-06-06 | |||
| remuneration | changes | |||||||
| 30 June 2006 | Ord | Options | Ord | Options | Ord | Options | Ord | Options |
| Directors | ||||||||
| Donald Taig** | 8,377,274 | - | - | - | - | - | 8,377,274 | - |
| Peter Williams | - | - | - | 6,950,000 | 250,000 | - | 250,000 | 6,950,000 |
| Phillip Lockyer | - | - | - | - | 200,000 | - | 200,000 | - |
| Geoff Rasmussen* | 4,696,599 | - | - | - | - | 3,000,000 | 4,696,599 | 3,000,000 |
| Charles McCormick | 18,188,143 | 3,000,000 | - | 2,900,000 | 2,558,103 | - | 20,746,246 | 5,900,000 |
| Total | 31,262,016 | 3,000,000 | - | 9,850,000 | 3,008,103 | 3,000,000 | 34,270,119 | 15,850,000 |
-
Mr Rasmussen is a director of Azure Capital Pty Ltd and accordingly is deemed to have an interest in the options. Mr Rasmussen is also a director of Zap Nominees Pty Ltd and accordingly has an indirect interest in the shares.
-
** Mr Taig is a director of Tizon Pty Ltd and Lugano Enterprises Pty Ltd and accordingly has an indirect interest in the shares.
Page 51
Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 25: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURES cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
(f) Other transactions and balances with Key Management Personnel
Azure Capital Pty Ltd
Mr Geoff Rasmussen is a director of Azure Capital Pty Ltd (Azure) which acted as lead manager to the capital raising undertaken under the prospectus dated 14 July 2005. For these services Azure received a retainer and underwriting fees totalling $382,800 together with 3,000,000 options over unissued shares. Shareholders approved the issue of the options in General Meeting held 1 July 2005.
Capital Investment Partners Pty Ltd
Mr Pismiris while appointed Company Secretary was also a director of Capital Investment Partners Pty Ltd which provided accounting services and office accommodation. Total fees paid to Capital Investment Partners for these services, in addition to fees paid for company secretarial services, totalled $33,367.
In addition, Capital Investment Partners Pty Ltd been appointed to act as corporate adviser. Fees paid to Capital Investment Partners Pty Ltd for these services totalled $30,000 and was settled by the issue of 600,000 fully paid ordinary shares. Fees for a further $30,000 have been accrued but unpaid as at 30 June 2006.
DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
-
In the opinion of the directors:
-
a. the financial statements and notes of the company and of the consolidated entity are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 including:
-
i. giving a true and fair view of the company’s and consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2007 and of their performance for the year then ended; and
-
ii. complying with Accounting Standards and Corporations Regulations 2001; and
-
-
b. there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
-
This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the directors in accordance with Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2007.
This declaration is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors.
==> picture [158 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
Don Taig Chairman
27 September 2007 Perth, Western Australia
Page 52
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
==> picture [483 x 720] intentionally omitted <==
Page 53
==> picture [521 x 766] intentionally omitted <==
Page 54
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information required by the Australian Stock Exchange Limited Listing Rules and not disclosed elsewhere in this report. The information was prepared based on share registry information processed up to 26 September 2007.
SPREAD OF HOLDERS
| SPREAD OF HOLDERS | |
|---|---|
| Spread of Holdings 1 - 1,000 1,001 - 5,000 5,001 - 10,000 10,001 - 100,000 100,001 - and over Total Number of Holders Number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel: |
Ordinary Shares 37 145 424 2,240 1,047 |
| 3,893 | |
| 80 |
SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS
There are no shareholders who have a substantial shareholding.
VOTING RIGHTS
All ordinary shares carry one vote per share without restriction. Options for ordinary shares do not carry any voting rights.
STATEMENT OF QUOTED SECURITIES
Quoted on the Australian Stock Exchange are 778,824,467 fully paid ordinary shares.
Page 55
Additional Information cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
TWENTY LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS OF EACH CLASS OF QUOTED SECURITIES ORDINARY FULLY PAID SHARES
==> picture [450 x 335] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
|||||
|---|---|---|---|
|Shareholder Name|Number of|Percentage|
|Shares|of Capital|
|1|ANZ Nominees Limited (Cash Income A/c)|65,417,248|8.40%|
|2|HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited|62,739,437|8.06%|
|3|Nefco Nominees Pty Ltd|23,222,849|2.98%|
|4|Broadarrow Goldmines Pty Ltd|11,644,332|1.50%|
|5|Surfboard Pty Ltd (ARW Super Fund)|9,767,441|1.25%|
|6|122 Dean St Pty Ltd (Gavin Mackenzie Superannuation Fund)|8,348,242|1.07%|
|7|Blackmort Nominees Pty Ltd (41496 Account)|7,450,623|0.96%|
|8|Paticoa Nominees Pty Ltd|7,450,000|0.96%|
|9|Sugarmill Pty Limited (The AB No 3 A/c)|6,000,000|0.77%|
|10|Mr William Brooks (Brooks Superannuation A/c)|5,435,000|0.70%|
|11|Broadarrow Goldmines Pty Ltd|5,291,005|0.68%|
|12|Surfboard Pty Ltd (ARW Super Fund No 1 A/c)|4,751,929|0.61%|
|13|Ocean View WA Pty Ltd|4,680,382|0.60%|
|14|Dr Salim Cassim|4,651,162|0.60%|
|15|Zap Nominees Pty Ltd (The Jibber BTML A/c)|4,550,966|0.58%|
|16|Lugano Enterprises Pty Ltd|4,129,372|0.53%|
|17|Mr John Sutton Hewson & Mrs Rosemary Ann Hewson|
|(Hewson Super Fund A/c)|4,000,000|0.51%|
|18|Fortis Clearing Nominees Pty Ltd (Settlement A/c)|3,853,000|0.49%|
|19|KRN Construction Services Pty Ltd (KRN Retirement A/c)|3,728,614|0.48%|
|20|Marmulla Holdings Pty Ltd (Marmulla Super Fund A/c)|3,590,000|0.46%|
|250,701,602|32.19%|
----- End of picture text -----
HOLDERS OF SECURITIES OF AN UNQUOTED CLASS OPTIONS
==> picture [487 x 165] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
|||||
|---|---|---|---|
|---------------No of Options---------------|
|Option Holder Name|Options|Options|Options|
|expiring|expiring|expiring|
|31/7/2008|6/12/2009|30/11/2010|
|-|-|
|Broadarrow Goldmines Pty Ltd|3,000,000|
|Catherine Hobbs|-|3,000,000|-|
|-|-|
|Jaguar Enterprises Pty Lt|210,000|
|Susan Ruth Panza|-|210,000|-|
|-|-|
|Azure Capital Pty Ltd|3,000,000|
|Peter Arthur Williams|-|-|6,950,000|
|Charles McCormick|-|-|2,900,000|
|3,000,000|6,420,000|9,850,000|
----- End of picture text -----
Page 56
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Additional Information cont.
TABLE OF DEPARTURES AND EXPLANATIONS (FROM THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ASX CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COUNCIL)
During the reporting period from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007, the Company has complied with each of the ten Corporate Governance principles and corresponding Best Practice Recommendations as published by ASX Corporate Governance Council and as detailed in the Company’s Corporate Governance Statement. In regard to the following matters the Company departed from those principles and recommendations:
| “RECOMMENDATION” | DEPARTURE | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| REF (“PRINCIPLE NO” | ||
| REF FOLLOWED | ||
| BY RECOMMENDATION | ||
| REF) | ||
| 2.4 | A separate Nomination Committee has not | The board comprises four members each of |
| been formed. | who have valuable contributions to make in | |
| fulfilling the role of a nomination committee | ||
| member. A director will excuse himself | ||
| where there is a personal interest or conflict. | ||
| 7.1 and 7.2 | There has been no written implementation of | Given the nature and size of the company, its |
| policy on risk oversight and management or | business interests and the involvement of all | |
| for senior management to make statements | directors it is not considered necessary to | |
| to the board concerning those matters. | establish this practice at this time, however | |
| the principles are adopted in circumstances | ||
| where an event or issue is deemed to require | ||
| it. | ||
| 8.1 | There has been no formal disclosure of the | Given the size of the company and the |
| process for performance evaluation of the | involvement of all directors a policy has not | |
| board, committees, individual directors and | been required to date. The directors | |
| key executives. No formal review has been | continually monitor, review and discuss | |
| undertaken. | performance and implement changes as | |
| necessary. | ||
| 10.1 | There has been no disclosure of a code of | The business practices adopted by the board |
| conduct to deal with compliance for legal or | recognise this principle but no formal code | |
| other obligations to legitimate stakeholders. | has been drawn-up or approved. |
Page 57
Additional Information cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
INTERESTS IN MINING TENEMENTS
REDEMPTION JOINT VENTURE
Focus Minerals Limited – 50% interest
| The Mount | Norriscont | Lord Bobcont | Bonnievalecont |
|---|---|---|---|
| M15/30*3 | L 15/170 | P15/3156 | P15/3012 |
| M15/1431 | L 15/171 | MLA15/1149 | PLA15/4073 |
| M15/1423*3I | L 15/172 | MLA15/980 | PLA15/4541 |
| L 15/173 | MLA15/1151 | PLA15/4542 | |
| Dreadnought | L 15/174 | MLA15/1253 | PLA15/4543 |
| M15/958*3 | L 15/175 | MLA15/1315 | MLA15/760 |
| M15/1114*3 | L 15/193 | MLA15/1074 | MLA15/868 |
| M15/646*1 | L 15/194 | MLA15/855 | |
| M15/660*1 | M15/391 | Malaga | MLA15/877 |
| L15/213 | P15/4003 | M15/515 | MLA15/896 |
| MLA15/856 | |||
| Boundary | MLA15/1090 | North Miriam | Camel Paddock |
| M15/411 | M15/1115 | M15/385 | P15/4131 |
| MLA15/1150 | P15/3072 | P15/4132 | |
| Almina | MLA15/1268 | MLA15/979 | P15/4133 |
| P15/3138 | M15/1302 | P15/4134 | |
| P15/3139 | MLA15/1316 | Sala | P15/4135 |
| MLA15/939 | MLA15/1343 | P15/3426*2 | P15/4136 |
| MLA15/1420 | P15/3252 | P15/4137 | |
| Big Red | PLA15/5040 | P15/3253 | P15/4138 |
| P15/2990 | P15/3753 | P15/4139 | |
| MLA15/874 | Kangaroo Hills | P15/3943 | P15/4140 |
| P15/2665 | MLA15/1152 | P15/4141 | |
| Central Gibralter | P15/2666 | MLA15/1050 | P15/4142 |
| M15/384 | P15/2667 | MLA15/1301 | MLA15/1444 |
| M15/1422 | P15/2668 | MLA15/1360 | MLA15/1446 |
| P15/2669 | PLA15/5043 | MLA15/1447 | |
| Golden Web | P15/2670 | PLA15/4546 | |
| M15/761 | MLA15/889 | Tindals | |
| M15/791 | M15/23 | Coolgardie | |
| M15/871 | Londonderry | M15/412 | M15/1293 |
| M15/1153*2 | P15/3070 | P15/3170 | M15/1294 |
| P15/3071 | P15/3172 | M15/1432 | |
| Norris | P15/4092 | P15/3173 | M15/1433 |
| M15/632 | P15/4093 | P15/3174 | M15/1434 |
| M15/1374 | P15/4094 | M15/746 | M15/1484 |
| P15/2963 | P15/4095 | P15/4197 | P15/2474 |
| P15/2986 | MLA15/920 | MLA15/966 | P15/3118*3 |
| P15/3207 | MLA15/1435 | MLA15/1461 | P15/3229 |
| P15/3429 | P15/3462*3 | ||
| P15/3658 | Lord Bob | Bonnievale | P15/3484 |
| P15/3659 | M15/631 | M15/277 | P15/3543 |
| P15/3835 | P15/2987 | M15/595 | P15/3630*3 |
| P15/3846 | P15/2988 | P15/2741 | P15/3699*3 |
| L 15/71 | P15/3001 | P15/2921 | P15/3700*3 |
| L 15/168 | P15/3428 | P15/3000 | P15/3721 |
| L 15/169 | P15/3686 | P15/3011 | P15/3785 |
Page 58
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Additional Information cont.
INTERESTS IN MINING TENEMENTS
REDEMPTION JOINT VENTURE
Focus Minerals Limited – 50% interest cont
| Coolgardiecont | Coolgardiecont | Gunga | Rainbow |
|---|---|---|---|
| P15/3849 | M15/152 | P15/2870 | P15/2869*3 |
| P15/4126 | M15/154 | P15/2871 | P15/2919*3 |
| L15/27 | M15/156 | P15/2872 | P15/2920*3 |
| L15/28 | M15/176 | P15/2873 | MLA15/781*3 |
| L15/34 | M15/299 | P15/2874 | MLA15/827*3 |
| L15/42 | M15/491 | MLA15/780 | |
| L15/51 | M15/545 | Tycho | |
| L15/59 | M15/594 | Logans | M15/40 |
| L15/63 | M15/630 | PLA15/5045 | M15/148 |
| L15/77 | M15/636 | P15/2886 | |
| L15/78 | M15/645*3 | Mistery Mint | P15/3235*3 |
| L15/88 | M15/646*3 | M15/365*3 | P15/3325 |
| L15/90 | M15/647 | M15/662*3 | P15/3394 |
| L15/95 | M15/660*3 | M15/711*3 | MLA15/779 |
| L15/96 | M15/677 | M15/1384 | MLA15/1051*3 |
| L15/114 | M15/725 | M15/1760*3 | MLA15/1126 |
| L15/116 | MLA15/733 | P15/2617*3 | MLA15/1142 |
| L15/119 | MLA15/1041 | P15/2774*3 | |
| L15/122 | MLA15/1200 | P15/2775*3 | Widgiemooltha |
| L15/123 | MLA15/1201 | P15/2943*3 | P15/4462 |
| L15/126 | MLA15/1279 | P15/2955*3 | P15/4068 |
| L15/127 | M15/1293 | P15/3200*3 | PLA/15/4473 |
| L15/130 | MLA15/928*3 | P15/3201*3 | P15/4477 |
| L15/161 | MLA15/1262*3 | MLA15/770*3 | P15/4478 |
| L15/164 | MLA15/1277*3 | MLA15/769*3 | MLA15/1410 |
| L15/177 | MLA15/1278*3 | MLA15/852*3 | MLA15/1764 |
| L15/186 | MLA15/1363 | MLA15/857*3 | |
| L15/200 | MLA15/1328 | MLA15/981*3 | Nepean |
| L15/211 | MLA15/1445 | L15/179 | |
| M15/73 | PLA15/4073 | M15/709 | |
| M15/121 | |||
| M15/150 | Burbanks | ||
| M15/151 | P15/4054 | ||
| Focus Minerals Limited – 100% interest | |||
| Nepean | Buldania | White Hope | Snake Hill |
| E 15/238 | M 63/177*3 | E26/79 | MLA25/233 |
| M15/576 | P 63/1063*3 | ||
| MLA15/1335 | P 63/1070*3 | Logans | |
| MLA15/1336 | MLA63/571*3 | MLA15/1742 |
Page 59
Additional Information cont.
==> picture [80 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
INTERESTS IN MINING TENEMENTS cont.
NOTE
All of the above tenements are situated in Western Australia. Ownership interest is 100% unless otherwise stated.
Redemption Joint Venture
The Redemption Joint Venture is subject to the joint venture with Committee Bay Resources Limited (via their 100% owned subsidiary Matador Exploration Inc.), as described below.
Committee Bay Resources Limited, a company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“Committee Bay”) had an initial 10% interest in the Redemption Joint Venture, which included most of the Parent Entity’s tenement interests and all rights and interest in the Coolgardie Gold Project. Committee Bay committed to earn up to a 50% interest in the joint venture by expending $8,000,000 within 3 years on exploration of the joint venture area.
During April 2007, Committee Bay had expended its exploration expenditure commitment of A$8,000,000 and has earned an additional 40% interest. From April 2007 Committee Bay has a 50% earned interest and the Parent Entity has a 50% interest.
ABBREVIATIONS:
-
*1 = CONTRACTUAL INTEREST IN PART ONLY.
-
*2 = 95% ONLY AND SUBJECT TO ROYALTY PAYMENT.
-
*3 = SUBJECT TO ROYALTY PAYMENT.
TENEMENT ABBREVIATIONS:
-
E = Exploration Licence
-
P = Prospecting Licence
-
M = Mining Lease
-
L = Miscellaneous Lease
-
MLA = Mining Lease Application
Page 60
Focus Minerals Ltd. - Annual Report 2007
Additional Information cont.
FOCUS MINERALS LIMITED ROYALTY AGREEMENTS
The Parent Entity has entered into 7 deeds of assignment for royalty agreements. The material terms of these royalty agreements are set out in the table below:
| TENEMENTS | ROYALTY |
|---|---|
| M15/645 | $1.00/tonne crushed & treated. |
| M15/645 | $1.50/tonne mined (after 85,000 tonnes mined). |
| M15/646 | $0.25/tonne mined & treated (After 2,500,000 tonnes of ore have been mined and |
| M15/660 | treated. |
| P15/3118 | |
| P15/3235 | |
| P15/3630 | |
| P15/3699 | |
| P15/3700 | |
| MLA15/928 | |
| MLA15/1051 | |
| MLA15/1262 | |
| MLA15/1277 | |
| MLA15/1278 | |
| P15/3462 | $1.00/tonne mined & treated. |
| M15/646 (portion of) | 2% of all future gold produced from area of M15/270, M15/173, M15/297 and |
| GML 15/6507 (which converted into part of M15/646). | |
| P15/2617 | 2.50% of the value of sales received or deemed to have been received by The Parent |
| P15/2774 | Entity for the sale of gold, silver, other minerals, ores, concentrates or other product mined |
| P5/2775 | from the tenements (royalty is payable within 30 days of the expiry of the proceeding |
| P15/2943 | calendar quarter after the commencement of production from the tenements). |
| P15/2955 | |
| P15/3200 | |
| P15/3201 | |
| M15/365 | |
| M15/662 | |
| M15/711 | |
| M15/1384 | |
| MLA15/769 | |
| MA15/770 | |
| MLA 15/852 | |
| MLA15/857 | |
| MLA 15/981 | |
| GML15/6897 | |
| P15/2869 | 0.50% of the value of sales received or deemed to have been received by The Parent |
| P15/2919 | Entity for the sale of gold, silver, other minerals, ores, concentrates or other product mined |
| P15/2920 | from the tenements (royalty is payable within 30 days of the expiry of the proceeding |
| MLA15/781 | calendar quarter after the commencement of production from the tenements). |
| MLA15/827 |
Page 61