FLAGSHIP MINERALS LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2021

Jan 17, 2021

==> picture [284 x 42] intentionally omitted <==

ASX Announcement | Monday 18 January 2021

Pan Asia Metals Commences Drilling at Reung Kiet Lithium Project in Thailand

Investment Highlights

• Exploration Team and drill rig mobilised to the Reung Kiet Lithium Project.

• The first ever hole at the Bang I Tum Lithium Prospect has commenced.

• Drilling beneath old pit where lepidolite pegmatites were previously mined for tin.

• Targeting lithium rich pegmatites up to 25m wide and associated dyke swarms.

• Bang I Tum pit is approximately 650m in length.

• Pegmatite trend about 1.5km long.

• PAM channel and rock chip assays up to 1.9% Li2O extending southwest of pit.

Specialty metals explorer and developer Pan Asia Metals Limited (ASX: PAM) (‘PAM’ or ‘the Company’) is pleased to report that rig mobilisation to the Reung Kiet Lithium Project in southern Thailand is complete and BTDD001, the first hole at the highly prospective Bang I Tum prospect, has been collared and drilling is underway.

The Reung Kiet Lithium Project (RKLP) is one of PAM’s key projects (see Figure 1). RKLP is a hard rock project with demonstrated potential for lithium hosted in lepidolite rich pegmatites chiefly composed of quartz, albite, lepidolite with minor cassiterite and tantalite as well as other accessory minerals including some rare earths.

==> picture [454 x 228] intentionally omitted <==

Picture 1: Drilling BTDD001 at the Bang I Tum Lithium Prospect

PAN ASIA METALS LIMITED Level 3, 8 Robinson Road, ASO Building, Singapore, 048544 Level 23, 52 Thaniya Plaza, Silom Road, Bangrak, Bangkok, 10500 www.panasiametals.com

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [441 x 537] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [329 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Figure 1: The Reung Kiet Lithium Project, Phang Nga Province, southern Thailand
----- End of picture text -----

2

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Lepidolite is an emerging source of lithium supply

The advantages of lepidolite (unlike spodumene) is that lithium can be extracted without the need for energy intensive roasting, and lepidolite has a suite of potential by-products which are recoverable at the concentrator and processing stages of the flow sheet. Peer feasibility work has demonstrated lepidolite has the potential to be one of the highest purity sources of battery grade lithium carbonate[i] and lithium hydroxide[ii] , that lepidolite is one of the lowest cost sources of lithium hydroxide on an All In Sustaining Costs basis[iii] , and that lepidolite has one of the lowest capex requirements on a per tonne LCE basis after by-products[iv,v] .

RKLP was part of a major tin mining region up until the mid-1980s

There is little detailed information available regarding previous exploration and mining in the project area but up to the late 1980’s southern Thailand was a globally significant tin producer. In Phang Nga Province tin concentrate production of approximately 300,000 tonnes was recorded from 1965 to 1990[vi] . In the late 1960’s a joint Thai/British Geological Survey study was undertaken in the region[vii] . It was during this study that the lithium bearing mineral lepidolite was identified in weathered pegmatites that were being mined for tin at the Reung Kiet and Bang I Tum open pit mines as well as at several other mines in close proximity.

The 1960’s study conducted geological mapping, geochemical analysis and mineralogical descriptions of various tailings, concentrate and rock samples as well as lepidolite beneficiation studies. The lepidolite and lithium bearing muscovite was found to contain 3-4% Li2O. With significant focus on two key tin mines, Reung Kiet and Bang I Tum, the survey stated[vii, viii] :

• “the pegmatites at Reung Kiet and Bang I Tum may well be the largest un-zoned lepidolite pegmatites yet recorded”

• “lepidolite is fairly evenly distributed both along the length of the pegmatite and from wall to wall. In places there is local enrichment of massive lepidolite” ; and

• “much paler-coloured, and also white lepidolite with over 4.0% lithia (Li2O) occurs in the Bang I Tum pegmatite”

Exploration history

There is no recorded exploration activity in the project area since the 1960’s study. In 2011, Thai company Mae Fah Mining Co. Limited (Mae Fah) lodged prospecting licence applications over the area. In 2014 UK based ECR Minerals Plc (ECR) entered into an option agreement to acquire the project. That option did not proceed and the tenement applications lapsed. Mae Fah and ECR conducted some minor sampling in the area. This work reported 11 rock chip samples from unknown locations with analytical results showing 8 of the 11 samples yielding elevated Li2O, ranging up to 1.9%. Accessory Sn and Ta was also identified[viii] .

In early 2019 PAM was granted the three contiguous Special Prospecting Licences (SPL’s) which make up the Reung Kiet Project (see Figure 1), which cover an area of approximately 38km². PAM has undertaken soil, rock chip and stream sediment sampling in conjunction with geological mapping, pit surveying and preliminary mineralogical studies. Trenching and diamond drilling at the old Reung Kiet mine has also been completed along with sighter beneficiation test-work. See PAM’s ASX announcement dated 8[th] October, 2020, and titled “PAM Projects – Technical Reports’. These programs have consistently delivered highly

3

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

encouraging results. To date the work program has focused on the Reung Kiet Prospect in the south of the project area and the Bang I Tum prospect about 10km to the north. Additional reconnaissance exploration has been undertaken more broadly across the project area.

In October 2020 PAM was invited by the Chief Executive Officer of the Phang Nga Provincial Administrative Organisation (PAO), a Phang Nga Provincial Government coordinating body, to present PAM and the Reung Kiet Lithium Project. The meeting was called to assist the Phang Nga Provincial Government with their considerations for the potential establishment of mining and industrial development areas. Also present was the Chairman of the Phang Nga New Town Planning Committee, who conveyed the Committee’s support for the Reung Kiet Lithium Project. The PAO stated that it wants to ensure that the requirements of the Reung Kiet Lithium Project are incorporated into the Phang Nga New Town Planning Committee’s zoning plans to ensure that the project can progress should exploration and feasibility results prove positive. See PAM’s ASX announcement dated 21[st] October, 2020, and titled ‘Positive Discussions regarding Reung Kiet Lithium Project with Phang Nga Provincial Government’.

Bang I Tum Lithium Prospect (BIT)

The Bang I Tum prospect was a relatively large open cut tin mine. The old pit is about 650m long and up to 125m wide (see Figure 2). Mining of the weathered pegmatites extended up to 30m below surface, to the top of hard rock.

The mined pegmatite is recorded to be at least 20m wide[vii] . The pit is now water filled, with water depths to a maximum 15m. Additional smaller scale mining extended further along strike to the southwest. Soil and rock-chip sampling has defined the Main trend and an Eastern trend. The prospective Main trend is about 1.5km long (see Figure 3). Rock chip sampling has yielded 14 of 24 samples >0.5% Li2O, with an average grade of 1.23% Li2O plus accessory tin and tantalum. A lepidolite pegmatite dyke swarm can be observed on a hill about 400m south of the pit. This swarm is up to 100m wide with individual dykes up to 7m wide.

The Eastern trend is about 1.5km long, located approximately 350m east of, and parallel to the Main trend (see Figure 2).

Drilling at BIT is planned on 100-150m spaced sections along the pit length and extending southwest to “Lepidolite Hill” (see Figure 2). Drillhole depths will be up to about 180m and test the interpreted pegmatite positions beneath the open pit (see Figure 3).

PAM has four priority one drill holes planned, with additional drilling contingent on positive results from these holes.

4

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [441 x 520] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: The Bang I Tum Lithium Prospect with proposed drill hole locations

5

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [441 x 520] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Schematic cross section of interpreted pegmatites at the Bang I Tum Lithium Prospect

6

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Forward planning

Following the completion of the priority one holes at BIT, PAM intends to relocate the rig to the nearby Reung Kiet prospect to conduct additional drilling that will target lepidolite rich pegmatites identified in previous trenching and mapping programs conducted by PAM. Results of the priority one holes at BIT will be assessed and further drilling may be conducted.

The Company looks forward to keeping Shareholders and the market updated on the drilling progress and results obtained from the drilling program at Bang I Tum.

Pan Asia Metals Managing Director Paul Lock said : “We are excited to not only be drilling the first ever holes at Bang I Tum but the overall potential of the Reung Kiet Lithium project. This particularly after Lepidico Limited (ASX:LPD) released its definitive feasibility study (DFS) results for the Karibib Lithium Project in May 2020, which positioned Karibib at the bottom of the capex and opex cost curves on a per tonne LiOH and Equivalents basis.

Like Karibib, PAM’s Reung Kiet Lithium Project has lepidolite style mineralization, but PAM’s drilling and trenching results to date have generally produced considerably higher Li2O grades than the Karibib “ore reserve”, and the Reung Kiet Lithium Project is in close proximity to all required processing inputs and our end markets.”

Ends

Authorised by: Board of Directors

7

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

About the Reung Kiet Lithium Project

The Reung Kiet Lithium Project is a lepidolite style lithium project located about 70km northeast of Phuket in the Phang Nga Province in southern Thailand. Pan Asia holds a 100% interest in 3 contiguous Special Prospecting Licences (SPL) covering about 38km².

==> picture [420 x 513] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Regional map identifying the location of Phang Nga and the Reung Kiet Lithium Project

8

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

About Pan Asia Metals Limited (ASX:PAM)

Pan Asia Metals Limited (ASX:PAM) is a specialty metals explorer and developer focused on the identification and development of projects in South East Asia that have the potential to position Pan Asia Metals to produce metal compounds and other value-added products that are in high demand in the region.

Pan Asia Metals currently owns two tungsten projects and two lithium projects. Three of the four projects are located in Thailand, fitting Pan Asia Metal’s strategy of developing downstream value-add opportunities situated in low-cost environments proximal to end market users.

Complementing Pan Asia Metal’s existing project portfolio is a target generation program which identifies desirable assets in the region. Through the program, Pan Asia Metals has a pipeline of target opportunities in South East Asia which are at various stages of consideration. In the years ahead, Pan Asia Metals plans to develop its existing projects while also expanding its portfolio via targeted and value-accretive acquisitions.

To learn more, please visit: www.panasiametals.com

Stay up to date with the latest news by connecting with PAM on LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube.

Investor Enquiries

Paul Lock Managing Director paul.lock@panasiametals.com

Media Enquiries

The Capital Network Julia Maguire +61 2 8999 3699 julia@thecapitalnetwork.com.au

9

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this Public Report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr David Hobby, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Hobby is an employee, Director and Shareholder of Pan Asia Metals Limited. Mr Hobby has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Hobby consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

Various statements in this document constitute statements relating to intentions, future acts and events which are generally classified as “forward looking statements”. These forward looking statements are not guarantees or predictions of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors (many of which are beyond the Company’s control) that could cause those future acts, events and circumstances to differ materially from what is presented or implicitly portrayed in this document. For example, future reserves or resources or exploration targets described in this document may be based, in part, on market prices that may vary significantly from current levels. These variations may materially affect the timing or feasibility of particular developments. Words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “potential” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Pan Asia Metals cautions security holders and prospective security holders to not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect the view of Pan Asia Metals only as of the date of this document. The forward-looking statements made in this document relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. Except as required by applicable regulations or by law, Pan Asia Metals does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events. Past performance cannot be relied on as a guide to future performance.

Important

To the extent permitted by law, PAM and its officers, employees, related bodies corporate and agents (Agents) disclaim all liability, direct, indirect or consequential (and whether or not arising out of the negligence, default or lack of care of PAM and/or any of its Agents) for any loss or damage suffered by a Recipient or other persons arising out of, or in connection with, any use or reliance on this document or information.

10

==> picture [55 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

Notes

i Lepidico Limited’s ASX release dated 17 October 2019: https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apimangateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-021601296A950059?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4 ii Lepidico Limited’s ASX release dated 28 May, 2020: https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asxresearch/1.0/file/2924-02239127-6A980475?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4 iii Lepidico Limited’s ASX release dated 28 May, 2020: https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asxresearch/1.0/file/2924-02239127-6A980475?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4 iv Lepidico Limited’s ASX release dated 28 May, 2020: https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asxresearch/1.0/file/2924-02239127-6A980475?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4 v See Figure 35, Section 10.3 in PAM’s Prospectus dated 8 July, 2020 vi Nakapadungrat. S. and Maneenai. D,.1993. The Phuket, Phangnga and Takua Pa Tin-field, Thailand. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences, Vol. 8, Nos 1-4, pp. 359-368 vii Garson, M.S., Bradshaw, N. and Rattawong, S., 1969. Lepidolite Pegmatites in the Phangnga Area of Peninsula Thailand.

viii https://polaris.brighterir.com/public/ecr_minerals_plc/news/rns/story/xe2zzzx

11

Appendix 1: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

PAM Lithium Projects. Soils and Rock-chip sampling

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,	Rock-chip, channel and float samples. Samples
techniques	random chips, downhole gamma sondes, handheld	collected were around 1- 5kg. Most samples are
	XRF instruments, etc).	pegmatite which occurs as outcrop, sub-crop, float or in dumps. A few granite and metasediment samples
	Include reference to measures taken to ensure	were also collected. Channel-chip samples of
	sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.	outcrops were collected where possible, especially in trenches.
		Soil samples are collected from the base of a 20-
	Aspects of determination of mineralisation that are	40cm deep hole dug with a spade. B Horizon
	Material to the Report (eg ‘RC drilling used to obtain	samples are generally preferred, with some local C-
	1m samples from which 3kg was pulverised to	Horizon samples collected.
	produce a 30g charge for fire assay’; or where there
	is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems).	Samples were selected in order to ascertain the
		degree of lithium enrichment and enable
		geochemical characterisation. As such, the samples
		are representative of the lithium mineralisation within
		the samples collected but may not necessarily
		represent the composition of the entire pegmatite,
		with the possible exception of channel-chip samples.
		Samples were collected by PAM employed field
		geologists and/or supervised field assistants, then
		samples are sent to either ALS Chemex in Brisbane
		or SGS in Perth for analyses.
		Internal QAQC standards, duplicates and blanks
		were inserted by the laboratory.
.Drilling	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, etc) and	No drilling being reported
techniques	details (eg core diameter, triple tube, depth of
	diamond tails, face-sampling bit, whether core is
	oriented; if so, by what method, etc).
Drill	Method of recording and assessing core and chip	No drilling being reported
sample	sample recoveries and results assessed.
recovery	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery,
	ensuring representative nature of samples.
	Is sample recovery and grade related; has sample
	bias occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
	fine/coarse material?
Logging	Have core/chip samples been	No drilling being reported , so No logging
	geologically/geotechnically logged to a level of detail	undertaken.
	to support appropriate resource estimation, mining
	studies and metallurgical studies.
	Is logging qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core
	(or costean, channel, etc) photography.
	The total length and percentage of the relevant
	intersections logged.
Sub-	If core, cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all	Not applicable, no drilling undertaken
sampling	core taken.	All samples were dry. No duplicate samples
techniques		collected.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
and	If non-core, riffled, tube sampled etc and sampled	Laboratory standards, splits and repeats were used
sample	wet or dry?	for quality control.
	For all sample types, nature, quality and
	appropriateness of sample preparation technique.	The sample preparation technique of fine crush, riffle
	QAQC procedures for all sub-sampling stages to	or rotary split sub-sample, the pulverisation is
	maximise representivity of samples.	industry standard and practice for this stage of
	Measures taken to ensure sampling is representative of the material collected, e.g. results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.	investigation and style of mineralization. The laboratory reports particle size analysis for crushed and pulverised samples about every 25 samples.
	Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	The sample sizes are considered appropriate for the typically <3mm grain sizes in the aplo-pegmatite.
Quality of	Nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying	The samples were dried, crushed to -3mm, and sub-
assay data	and laboratory procedures used; whether the	sample of 500-1000g is riffle or rotary split and then
and laboratory tests	technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments etc, parameters used in determining the	pulverized to 90% passing 75 microns. For SGS samples, preparation is done at an SGS lab in Bangkok. For ALS samples, preparation was completed at ALS in Laos. 100g -75 micron pulps are
	analysis including instrument make and model,	then dispatched for analysis.
	reading times, calibrations factors applied, their derivation, etc.	All pulp samples were analysed using a hand held Olympus Delta 400 Premium in Geochem and/or soil
	Nature of QAQC procedures adopted (eg standards,	mode, with dual beam analysis for 30 seconds each.
	blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks); whether acceptable accuracy levels (ie lack of bias) / precision established.	Rb, K, Mn assays show very good correlation with lab derived Li analysis. Other elements of interest also exhibit good correlation with lab results.
		Samples were digested by either mixed acid digest
		or sodium peroxide with ICP finish by ALS Chemex
		in Brisbane for Li and at times also Sn, Ta and Rb.
		Samples to ALS were analysed by sodium peroxide
		fusion digest with ICP-MS finish at SGS in Perth for
		Li, Sn, Ta.
		Internal laboratory standards, splits and repeats were
		used for quality control. PAM did insert any QA/QC
		samples. Although some outcrops have been
		sampled up to 3 times and could be considered as
		filed duplicates, and Li results exhibit strong
		agreement.
Verification	Verification of significant intersections by	Sample results have been checked by company
of	independent / alternative company personnel.	Senior Geologist.
sampling and	The use of twinned holes.	Assays reported as Excel xls files and secure pdf
assaying	Documentation of primary data, data entry	files.
	procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.	Data entry carried out both manually and digitally by Geologists. To minimize transcription errors field
	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	documentation procedures and database validation are conducted to ensure that field and assay data are
		merged accurately.
		Following factor adjustments applied to assay data
		for reporting purposes:
		Li x 2.153 to convert to Li2O
Location of	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill	Sample locations are from hand held GPS_,_with
data points	holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine	_a_pproximately 2-7m accuracy, sufficient for this type
	workings etc used in estimation.	of exploration. For trenches to start and end points

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Specification of grid system used.	are recorded. Sample locations are then measured
	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	from the start point using a tape measure. All locations reported are UTM WGS84 Zone 47N.
		Topographic locations interpreted from Thai base
		topographyin conjunction with GPS results.
Data	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	All samples were selected by the geologist to assist
spacing and	Is data spacing and distribution sufficient to establish	with identification of the nature of the mineralisation present at each location. No set sample spacing was
distribution	degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate	used for rock samples, except in channel chips at
	for Resource / Reserve estimation procedure(s) and	outcrops and in trenches, where sample widths
	classifications applied?	generally varied between 1 and 3m. Soil samples are
		collected along lines at 20m spacing, with lines
	Whether sample compositing has been applied.	spaced at 100m or 200m.
		Sample compositingwas not applied
Orientation	Does the orientation of sampling achieve unbiased	Channel-chip samples collected off exposed faces,
of data in	sampling of possible structures; extent to which this	which may not true width information. Trench
relation to	is known/understood.	samples are collected in trenches oriented normal to
geological structure	If relationship between drilling orientation and orientation of mineralised structures has introduced a	the known trend. Associated structural measurements and interpretation by geologist can assist in understanding geological context.
	sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported
	if material.	All other rock samples are essentially point samples.
		Soil samples were collected on lines oriented normal
		to known pegmatite trends.
Sample	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	Samples are securely packaged and transported by
security		independent reputable carrier or transported by
		company personnel to sample preparation and
		facility. Pulp samples for analysis are air freighted to
		Australia in accordance with relevant laboratory
		protocols.
Audits or	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling	None conducted at this stage of the exploration
reviews	techniques and data.	program.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	Type, reference name/number, location and	Three contiguous Special Prospecting Licences
tenement and	ownership including agreements or material issues	(JSPL1, 2 and 3) covering an area of 48sq km are
land tenure status	with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.	registered toThai company Siam Industrial Metals Co. Ltd. (SIM). Pan Asia Metals holds 100% of SIM located 60km north of Phuket in southern Thailand. At the Bang Now project Pan Asia holds a 100% interest in two contiguous Exploration Prospecting
	The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	Licences covering about 5sq. km. The tenure is secure and there are no known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate, aside from normal considerations.
Exploration	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by	The Institute of Geological Sciences, a precursor of
done by other	other parties.	the British Geological Survey (BGS) in the late
parties		1960’s conducted geological mapping, documenting
		old workings, surface geochemical sampling, mill
		concentrates and tailings sampling and
		metallurgical test work on the pegmatite then being
		mined at Reung Kiet. This work appears to be of
		high quality and is in general agreement with Pan
		Asia’s work.
		In 2014 ECR Minerals reported Li results for rock
		samples collected in Reung Kiet project area. The
		locations and other details of the samples were not

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		reported. But the samples showed elevated Li
		contents.
		There is no previous exploration reported for the
		Bang Now Project.
		.
Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of	Both projects are located in the Western Province
	mineralisation.	of the South-East Asia Tin Tungsten Belt. The
		Reung project area sits adjacent and sub-parallel to
		the regionally extensive NE trending Phangnga
		fault. The Cretaceous age Khao Po granite intrudes
		into Palaeozoic age Phuket Group sediments along
		the fault zone, Tertiary aged LCT pegmatite dyke
		swarms intrude along the fault zone .
		The Bang Now project is located in the NNE
		trending Ranong Fault Zone. LCT type pegmatites
		viens and dykes intrude Palaeozoic aged
		metasediments.
Drillhole	A summary of information material to the	Drilling is not being reported
Information	understanding of the exploration results including a
	tabulation for all Material drill holes of:
	• easting and northing of the drill hole collar
	• elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above
	sea level in meters) of the drill hole collar
	• dip and azimuth of the hole
	• downhole length and interception depth
	• hole length.
	If exclusion of this information is not Material, the
	Competent Person should clearly explain why this
	is the case.
Data	Weighting averaging techniques, maximum/	Drilling is not being reported. Other data not
aggregation	minimum grade cutting and cut-off grades are	applicable to sample type and methods reported.
methods	Material and should be stated.	Where average grades are reported the lower cut-
		off grade and number of samples above and below
	Where compositing short lengths of high grade	cut-off are reported.
	results and longer lengths of low grade results,
	compositing procedure to be stated; typical
	examples of such aggregations to be shown in
	detail.
	Assumptions for metal equivalent values to be
	clearly stated.
Relationship	These relationships are particularly important in the	Not applicable, rock chip sample results reported as
between	reporting of Exploration Results.	individual surface samples collected from float sub-
mineralisation		crop or exposed faces. For channel samples
widths and intercept lengths	If mineralisation geometry with respect to the drillhole angle is known, its nature should be reported.	relationship between sample width and true width varies.
	If it is not known and only down hole lengths are
	reported, a clear statement to this effect is required
	(eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and	Soil and rock sample results are provided on
	tabulations of intercepts to be included for any	relevant maps.
	significant discovery. These to include (not be
	limited to) plan view of collar locations and
	appropriate sectional views.
Balanced	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration	Results of assays of all samples collected are
reporting	Results is not practicable, representative reporting	reported as appropriate in the text or on plans and
	of both low and high grades and/or widths should	sections.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
	Exploration Results.
Other	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material,	Reconnaissance diamond has since been
substantive	should be reported including (but not limited to):	conducted at Reung Kiet targeting the pegmatite
exploration data	geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size	beneath the old pit. Pegmatite with variable Li grades was intersected in every hole.
	and method of treatment; metallurgical test results;
	bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
	characteristics; potential deleterious or
	contaminating substances.
Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (eg	It is envisaged that further mapping and sampling is
	tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or	warranted to investigate potential additional lithium
	large-scale step-out drilling).	pegmatites, Drilling to test extensions at depth and along strike is also planned.
	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible	Appropriate diagrams appear in the report.
	extensions, including the main geological
	interpretations and future drilling areas (if not
	commercially sensitive).