Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

FIRSTWAVE CLOUD TECHNOLOGY LIMITED Annual Report 2014

Oct 27, 2014

64905_rns_2014-10-27_103a976a-573c-4eb5-b07c-9e41d5255bc3.pdf

Annual Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Annual Report 2014

==> picture [566 x 208] intentionally omitted <==

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014

Corporate Directory

Tellus Resources Ltd ABN 35 144 733 595

Directors

Robert Kennedy Non-Executive Chairman Carl Dorsch Managing Director Neil Young Non-Executive Director

Company Secretary George Yatzis Registered Office and Principal Place of Business Level 5, 70 Pirie Street Adelaide SA 5000 T: 08 8100 9200 F: 08 8227 0544 W: www.tellusresources.com.au E: [email protected]

Share Register Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd Level 5, 115 Grenfell Street Adelaide SA 5000 T: 1300 787 272

Securities Exchange Listing ASK Code: TLU

Auditor

Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd Level 1, 67 Greenhill Road Wayville SA 5034 T: 08 8372 6666 F: 08 8372 6677 www.grantthornton.com.au

Solicitor

Johnson Winter & Slattery Level 10, 211 Victoria Square Adelaide SA 5000 T: 08 8239 7111 F: 08 8239 7100 www.jws.com.au

==> picture [172 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

www.tellusresources.com.au

TELLUS RESOURCES LTDAnnual Report 2014 TELLUS RESOURCES LTDAnnual Report 2014 TELLUS RESOURCES LTDAnnual Report 2014
Contents
Corporate Directory Inside Front Cover
Chairman’s Report 2
Managing Director’s Operatons Report 3
Directors’ Report 7
Remuneraton Report 16
Auditor’s Independence Declaraton 23
Corporate Governance Statement 24
Statement of Proft or Loss and
other Comprehensive Income 30
Statement of Financial Positon 31
Statement of Changes in Equity 32
Statement of Cash Flows 33
Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements 34
Directors’ Declaraton 68
Independent Auditor’s Report 69
Supplementary Informaton 72

==> picture [172 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

1

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Chairman’s Report

Dear fellow shareholders,

On behalf of the Board, I present the 2014 Annual Report of Tellus Resources Limited.

The Report covers what has been a period of significant change for the Company, as it changed strategic direction to focus on oil and gas exploration.

That change has involved a re-shaping of the composition of the Board, with the appointment of 3 new Directors, all of whom have significant experience in the oil and gas sector. For me personally, my appointment as Chairman of Tellus is a welcome return to the oil and gas sector after my retirement as Chairman of Beach Energy Limited in 2012.

The appointment in the year of our new Managing Director, Carl Dorsch, was linked with the acquisition of oil and gas assets in Australia. We subsequently drilled a well in one of the acquired permits in the Cooper Basin. Not untypically for oil and gas exploration, the results of that well were a mixture of the promising and the frustrating. Our Cooper Basin acreage is in an address that has been one of increasing and substantial industry focus and we consider it a very sound and valuable foundation asset for an oil and gas business. We are planning for further exploration efforts in the Cooper Basin in the current financial year.

An oil and gas company needs to constantly re-fresh and optimise its asset portfolio, to ensure it is balanced in terms of risk and has a conveyor belt of activity and opportunity. To that end the Company has acquired further assets in the USA and has recently completed the purchase of an asset in Africa. Both assets will be drilled in the upcoming financial year – and both have very considerable upside in the case of exploration success.

I thank all of our Directors (past and present), employees, consultants and joint venture partners for their significant contributions in the year.

Finally, and most importantly, I thank you, our fellow shareholders, for your ongoing support and with my fellow Directors, I am very much looking forward to the Company’s upcoming drilling.

Bob Kennedy Chairman

2

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Managing Director’s Operations Report – Year Ended 30 June 2014

Summary of Key Assets

  • n 25% Participating Interest in the Covenant Mondo field, Utah USA - an onshore oil asset with the potential to deliver massive upside with drilling to commence in the last quarter of 2014.

  • n 25% of the 10,000 km2 Block 3114 (with options to go up to 80%) - located onshore Madagascar with a drill ready anticlinal oil target as well as prospective fault block trap geometries.

  • n 30% interest in PRLs 108,109 and 110 (formerly PEL 105) in the Cooper Basin – the Company will be 100% free carried in an upcoming well (or equivalent work).

  • n Legacy gold assets in Qld/NSW –discussions re rationalisation and optimisation are currently taking place.

Covenant Mondo JV : Utah, United States

On 17th December 2013, Tellus announced that it had signed a Participation Agreement with a private U.S. company giving it certain rights over an exciting onshore conventional oil-play called Covenant Mondo, located in Sevier County, Utah, USA.

Covenant Mondo consists of two leases with a total area of approximately 3,900 acres held over private lands. The leases are located on the well-known “hingeline” overthrust structure in the Rocky Mountains which trends in a North Easterly direction from Arizona in the South right up into Canada. The overthrust belt has hosted a number of major oil discoveries including the massive Anschutz Ranch East field discovered by Amoco in 1979 as well as the recent (2004) discovery of the Covenant field located some 4 kms immediately to the South West of Covenant Mondo.

The farmin deal included an upfront payment to the owner for past costs, a promoter fee and the upfront funds to drill and complete two wells drilled to 9500 feet and produced to tanks. On 16 July 2014, the Company announced that it would take up a 25% Participating Interest in the Covenant Mondo Joint Venture (CMJV).

Subsequent Events

Tellus’s share of the estimated farmin costs have been advanced to the Operator. The drilling pad is now complete and drilling approval from the State of Utah has been received. Spudding of the first well is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2014.

Block 3114 : Morondava Basin, Madagascar

In June 2014, Tellus announced that it had acquired a 25% interest (with rights to acquire up to an 80% interest) in a drill ready highly prospective onshore oil exploration asset of 10,000 kms[2] , located off the south-east coast of Africa on the Island of Madagascar.

Consideration for the asset was the issue of 89.5M Tellus shares to the vendor, their creditors and the Company’s corporate advisers. A requirement as part of the transactions was that the vendor (an ASX listed company) distribute 54M shares to its own shareholders.

The transaction was conditional on both Tellus and the vendor obtaining shareholder approvals which were obtained by September 26, 2014.

3

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Managing Director’s Operations Report (continued)

PRLs 108,109,110 (previously PEL 105): Cooper Basin, South Australia

Following the approval of the Tellus/PNC Aust Pty Ltd merger, the Company acquired a 50% operated interest in PEL 105. On the 9th of October 2013 the Company completed the purchase of the remaining 50% interest in PEL 105 from Austin Exploration Limited for the issuance of 19,776,020 ordinary shares in the Company.

During September 2013, the PEL 105 permit was successfully farmed out to Senex Energy Ltd (Senex). As a result of the transaction, Senex contributed $3.5M to the Company as its contribution for the cost of drilling Pirie-1 in the western part of the Permit. The Company retained operatorship until rig release and Senex earned a 50% working interest in the permit.

Pirie 1 was spudded on 30 September 2013 and on 9 November 2013 the well was cased and suspended in the Nappamerri formation as a potential Birkhead oil producer. The well did not reach its main objective of the Tirrawarra sands as a result of multiple engineering and bore hole problems.

The well did have hydrocarbon shows in the Birkhead formation and it is intended to complete the well at a later stage.

Following the drilling of the well, Senex assumed operatorship. The transfer was effected subsequent to the acceptance of a proposal to convert PEL 105 into three PRLs (Petroleum Retention Licence) viz. PRL’s 108, 109 and 110. These were granted in May 2014 by the South Australian Department for Manufacturing, Innovation, Trade, Resources and Energy (DMITRE). This gives the Joint venture partners much more flexibility in the management of this acreage as well as up to 15 year tenure.

As part of the joint venture agreement, Senex has agreed to drill a second well (or commit to other similar expenditure) in the PRLs, for which Tellus will be fully carried. Once the expenditure commitment is completed (now by December 2014) Senex will earn a further 20% interest in the PRLs, with Tellus retaining a 30% interest.

The PRLs cover a total area of approximately 218 km2 and are surrounded by producing oil and gas wells, together with significant infrastructure which is tied in with the proximal Moomba processing centre. The Company’s 30% interest amounts to a net position of 16,500 acres in a highly prospective area with up to 15 year tenure.

ATP 904P

PNC Aust Pty Ltd (PNC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Tellus purchased 100% of ATP 904P, subject to Ministerial approval, as part of a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 30 April 2013 with Deka Resources Pty Ltd and Well Traced Pty Ltd (both wholly owned subsidiaries of Beach Energy Ltd (Beach)).

Despite extensive negotiation between the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM), Beach and the Company, the Minister indicated that, as the Permit was not in substantial compliance, Ministerial approval was very unlikely to be granted.

Consequently, Beach notified the DNRM that it wished to relinquish the whole area of the Permit. The DNRM subsequently advised Beach that ATP 904P has been relinquished effective 24 January 2014.

Tellus is continuing discussions with the DNRM with a view to re-securing the former ATP 904P acreage.

Minerals Permits (Chillagoe Qld and NSW Tenements)

During the financial year, the Company maintained its various minerals permits in Queensland and New South Wales in good standing. Discussions and negotiations with various parties on the optimisation and rationalisation of these assets is well advanced and Tellus intends to make an announcement in the near future concerning these tenements.

The Queensland interests were optimised by acquiring several new tenements contiguous to the existing acreage.

Several less prospective interests in NSW were relinquished.

4

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Managing Director’s Operations Report (continued)

Company Resources

Subsequent to the reporting period, the Company called for an independent review of its portfolio and enlisted an independent expert, MacCarthy Petroleum Pty Ltd, to complete the review. This followed the acquisition of its interest in Block 3114 and consequent receipt of independent Madagascan resource reports from MHA Petroleum Consultanrs LLC, Denver, USA.

The brief for the review was to ascertain the total Prospective Resources in the Company’s portfolio. Prospective Resources are defined as the risked and recoverable petroleum resources available and are measured in millions of barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE). Generally these can be considered as the following cases: low case (P90), best case (P50) and high case (P10). The best case or best estimate which can be considered approximately equivalent to the P50 for the Company’s petroleum portfolio is tabulated below.

Project Locaton Risked & Recoverable Petroleum Resource
P50 (Best Estmate) – MMBOE
Risked & Recoverable Petroleum Resource
P50 (Best Estmate) – MMBOE
TELLUS SHARE
Covenant Mondo, Utah Utah, USA 25% 1.1
Block 3114, Madagascar Madagascar 25% 13.8
PEL 105 (PRL’s 108, 109, 110) Cooper Basin, SA 30% 0.5
TOTAL 15.4

The estimated quantities of petroleum that may potentially be recovered by the application of a future development project(s) relate to undiscovered accumulations. These estimates have both an associated risk of discovery and a risk of development. Further exploration appraisal and evaluation is required to determine the existence of a significant quantity of potentially moveable hydrocarbons.

Outlook

With the acquisition of the Madagascar interests, Tellus is placed to continue its growth in 2015 and beyond.

Activity in the current year is focused on the farm-out of the Madagascar Project and the participation in the CMJV for which Tellus is fully funded on a risked basis. Drilling operations are expected to commence in the last quarter of 2014 and the Tellus team remains confident of a successful campaign.

Negotiations with Senex continue on the best way forward with their expenditure commitment on the Cooper Basin PRLs. Whilst drilling remains an attractive option for Tellus, more value may be added with alternative strategies including further 3D seismic and the Pirie 1 completion.

The Company continues to discuss various strategies to fully monetise its valuable gold assets.

The Company continues to assess new projects and opportunities as well as maintaining its first mover access to a number of exciting and innovative drilling and exploration technologies.

It has been a difficult market environment over the period for a junior oil and gas explorer but the Company has managed to secure a very attractive resource base and with success in any one or all of the diverse geographic locations, would see significant value realised for Shareholders.

==> picture [80 x 54] intentionally omitted <==

Carl Dorsch Managing Director

5

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Managing Director’s Operations Report (continued)

Competent Persons Statement

  • n The information in this statement that relates to Hydrocarbon Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Carl Dorsch (Managing Director) who is leading the Company’s operations efforts with the help of various professional consultants who are experts in their fields.

  • n Mr Dorsch has been a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers since 1981. He holds Bachelor of Science and Bachelor of Chemical Engineering degrees from the University of Adelaide, South Australia and is a Chartered Engineer as well as a Fellow of the Institute of Chemical Engineers.

  • n Mr Dorsch has over 35 years experience in the oil and gas exploration and production business both in Australia and on the international stage. Although specialising in drilling and completion operations, his career has included reservoir and production operations.

  • n Mr Dorsch has sufficient expertise in the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined by the ASX Listing Rules.

6

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

The Directors of Tellus Resources Ltd (“Tellus Resources” and/or “the Company”) present their Report together with the financial report of the Company and the entities it controls (referred to hereafter as the “Group”) at the end of, or during the year ended 30 June 2014, unless otherwise stated.

Directors

The following persons held office as Directors of Tellus Resources Ltd during or since the end of the reporting period and up to the date of this report:

Robert Kennedy

Non-Executive Chairman Date of Appointment: 4 December 2013

Expertise and Experience

Mr Kennedy has been Non-executive Chairman of Tellus Resources Ltd since 4 December 2013.

He is a Chartered Accountant and a consultant to Kennedy & Co, Chartered Accountants, a firm he founded.

Mr Kennedy brings to the Board his expertise and extensive experience as Chairman and non-executive Director of a range of listed public companies in the resources sector. In particular, he has a great depth of experience in the Oil and Gas industry having served on Boards in that industry for over 20 years.

He conducts the review of the Board including the Managing Director in his executive role. Mr Kennedy leads the development of strategies for the development and future growth of the Company. Apart from his attendance at Board and Committee meetings Mr Kennedy leads the Board’s external engagement of the Company meeting with Government, investors and is engaged with the media. He is a regular attendee of Audit Committee functions of the major accounting firms.

Current and former directorships in the last 3 years

Mr Kennedy is a Director of ASX listed companies Ramelius Resources Limited (since listing in March 2003), Flinders Mines Limited (since 2001), Maximus Resources Limited (since 2004), Tychean Resources Limited (since 2006), Monax Mining Limited (since 2004) and Marmota Energy Limited (since 2006)and formerly Beach Energy Limited (since 1991 until 2012), Somerton Energy Limited (from 2010 to 2012), Adelaide Energy Ltd (from 2011 to 2012) and Impress Energy Ltd (from 2011 to 2012). He was appointed the Chairman of the University of Adelaide’s Institute of Minerals and Energy Resources in 2008 and his term ended early in 2014.

Responsibilities

His special responsibilities include membership of the Audit, Governance and Remuneration Committee.

Interest in shares and options

1,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares. 7,500,000 unlisted options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of $0.093 cents, exercisable on or before 31 December 2016.

7

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued)

Carl Dorsch

Managing Director Date of Appointment: 23 August 2013

Expertise and Experience

Mr Dorsch has been an Executive Director and Managing Director of Tellus Resources Ltd since 23 August 2013.

He is a Chartered Chemical Engineer with a 35 year career in hardrock, Oil and Gas exploration and development projects in Australia and Internationally. He has held a number of Managing Director positions in ASX listed companies since 2005 and has extensive experience in the capital raising and the operational requirements of companies in the Oil, Gas and Minerals exploration industry.

Current and former directorships in the last 3 years

Mr Dorsch was a Director of Adelaide Energy Limited between 2007 and 2012, he does not hold any other directorships in ASX listed companies and has not held any other directorships in the last three years.

Responsibilities

His special responsibilities include overseeing the delivery of the Group’s strategic and operational objectives.

Interest in shares and options

17,631,078 fully paid ordinary shares.

45,000,000 performance rights over ordinary shares subject to Mr Carl Dorsch remaining employed as Managing Director of the Company. These rights convert into fully paid ordinary shares in the Company on a 1:1 ratio, for nil consideration as follows:

  • n 5,000,000, where the 30 day volume weighted average price (VWAP) for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.175 per share;

  • n 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.200 per share;

  • n 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.225 per share;

  • n 15,000,000, when production testing of PEL 105 in either open or closed hole that can demonstrate an immediate flow capacity for the well in excess of a sustained minimum of 100 BOEPD for a period in excess of 7 days. Such test must be certified by a relevant expert in the field being either an independent consulting reservoir engineer or the contracted testing Company, provided that such threshold is achieved on or prior to 31 December 2014; and

  • n 15,000,000 where the Company has acquired a direct or indirect interest in the Wichita County Project and the production from the leases which form the Wichita County Project reaches an average of 50 BOEPD over a three month period

8

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued)

Neil Young

Non-Executive Director

Date of Appointment: 4 December 2013

Expertise and Experience

Mr Young has been a Non-executive Director of Tellus Resources Ltd since 4 December 2013.

He has an Honours degree in Economics and Politics from the University of Edinburgh and obtained a professional qualification in tax accounting whilst working for the accounting firm Ernst & Young in Aberdeen, Scotland. After moving to Australia in the early 1990’s, Mr Young’s career focused on business development, commercial and financial roles in the upstream and downstream sectors of the energy industry. Mr Young has worked in senior management roles for various Oil and Gas companies including Santos Ltd, Adelaide Energy Ltd and Tarong Energy Corporation.

Current and former directorships in the last 3 years

Mr Young does not hold any other Directorships in ASX listed companies and has not held any directorships in the last three years.

Responsibilities

His special responsibilities include membership of the Audit, Governance and Remuneration Committee.

Interest in shares and options

110,000 fully paid ordinary shares. 2,000,000 unlisted options expiring on the 5th of March 2018 exercisable at $0.20.

Ben J Salmon RFD QC

Former Non-Executive Director

Date of Appointment: 19 October 2012 (Resigned 6 June 2014)

Expertise and Experience

Mr Salmon resigned as a Non-executive Director of Tellus Resources Ltd on 6 June 2014.

He has practised as a barrister in Canberra since 1967. He was elected as a member of the ACT Law Society Council and the ACT Bar Council. He served two terms as President of the Bar Council. Mr Salmon has served in the Australian Army Reserve, initially in Infantry and later in the Legal Corps being appointed a Judge Advocate and Defence Force Magistrate. He was appointed Queens Counsel in 1985. He has practised in many areas of the law including commercial and Company matters. Mr Salmon has a Bachelor of Laws from Sydney University and was first admitted to practice by the Supreme Court of New South Wales in July 1965. During his tenure he represented Asia Pacific Mining Capital Pte Ltd, a cornerstone investor following the capital raising for the Chillagoe Gold Project in 2012.

Current and former directorships in the last 3 years

Mr Salmon is a Director of ASX listed Company Land and Mineral Exploration Limited (since December 2013).

Interest in shares and options

Nil.

9

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued)

Anthony Wehby

Former Non-Executive Chairman

Date of Appointment: 21 June 2010 (Resigned 29 November 2013)

Expertise and Experience

Mr Wehby resigned as a Non-Executive Director of Tellus Resources Ltd on 29 November 2013.

He has more than 35 years professional experience. He was a partner with PwC for 19 years until 2000 and since that time has been a consultant providing advice on mergers and acquisitions, IPO’s, funding and valuations. During his time at PwC, Mr Wehby specialised in providing corporate finance advice to a wide range of clients, including those in the mining and exploration sectors.

Current and former directorships in the last 3 years

Mr Wehby is a Director of Aurelia Metals Ltd (Previously YTC Resources Limited).

Interest in shares and options

660,000 fully paid ordinary shares.

Richard Willson

Former Non-Executive Director

Date of Appointment: 12 November 2010 (Resigned 5 December 2013)

Expertise and Experience

Mr Wilson resigned as a Non-Executive Director of Tellus Resources Ltd on 5 December 2013.

He has worked in public practice and in various financial management and Company secretarial roles within the resources and agricultural sectors for both publicly listed and private companies. In addition to his role as Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary with Aurelia Metals Ltd, Richard is a Director of the ASX listed Aus Tin Mining Ltd, a Director and Company Secretary of the not for profit Unity Housing Company and an Alternate Director of Aurelia Metals Ltd.

Mr Wilson has a Bachelor of Accounting from the University of South Australia, is a Fellow of CPA Australia and a Fellow of the Institute of Company Directors. Richard is a founding member of the AICD Emerging Directors Committee.

Current and former directorships in the last 3 years

Mr Wilson is a Director of Aus Tin Mining Ltd (Previously Ausnico Limited) and Aurelia Metals Limited (Previously YTC Resources Limited).

Interest in shares and options

Nil.

10

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued)

Stephen Woodham

Former Executive Director, (former Managing Director)

Date of Appointment: 30 January 2012 (Resigned 18 October 2013)

Expertise and Experience

Mr Woodham resigned as an Executive Director of Tellus Resources Ltd on 18 October 2013.

He has over 20 years’ experience in the mining and exploration industry in Western Australia and New South Wales specialising in field logistics and support and land access in rural and remote environments. He also has a successful track record of tenement acquisition, mining investment and commercial and cross cultural negotiation.

He has served on the Boards of Force Resources Ltd, Aurelia Metals Limited (AMI) and Centaurus Resources. Stephen was a founding Director of AMI and he was successful in attracting Chinese state-owned Yunnan Tin Company as a seed investor. Stephen was also a founding Director of Centaurus Resources, a Company now operating in the Iron Ore sector of Brazil.

Current and former directorships in the last 3 years

Mr Woodham is a former Director of Aurelia Metals Ltd (Formally YTC Resources Limited.)

Interest in shares and options

1,568,000 fully paid ordinary shares.

700,000 performance rights that convert as follows;

  • n 300,000 performance rights, to convert if the 20 day VWAP for the Shares reaches 25 cents per Share, on or before 27 January 2017; and

  • n 400,000 performance rights, to convert if the 20 day VWAP for the Shares reaches 40 cents per Share, on or before 27 January 2017.

Company Secretary

George Yatzis

Company Secretary (appointed 5 September 2013)

Mr Yatzis has held the role of Company Secretary since 5 September 2013 and has experience as a Company secretary of both listed and unlisted companies in Australia.

He is a Chartered Accountant and is a Director and shareholder of the entities that comprise the BDO Chartered Accounting practice in Adelaide South Australia. Mr Yatzis is not an executive of the Company and therefore not a member of its key management personnel.

Anne Adaley

Former Company Secretary (Resigned 30 September 2013)

Ms Adaley held the role of Company secretary to 30 September 2013 and has more than 25 years’ experience in the resources sector, including senior management roles with a number of listed public Australian exploration and mining companies.

11

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued)

Principal Activities

The principal activities of the Group are: exploration and evaluation of minerals, oil & gas. It also has hard rock mineral tenements in Queensland and NSW and is actively seeking to extract value for them through sale or promoting the JV activity.

Operating Results

The Group incurred a loss after tax for the reporting period of $6,707,296 (2013: a loss of $1,376,816). Review of Operations

During the reporting period, the Group continued to evaluate and assess value adding opportunities into its portfolio which resulted in the following key events;

  • n Completion of the PNC Aust Pty Ltd acquisition;

  • n Agreement was entered into to participate in an exciting drilling project in the United States called the Covenant Mondo Joint Venture.

  • n Entering into a conditional Share Purchase Agreement to acquire an interest in a Block in onshore Madagascar.

In line with the Senex Energy Limited farmin arrangement the Group drilled the first well in the Cooper Basin in South Australia with mixed results. To assist with funding asset acquisitions and drilling activity during the period the Group placed shares to a variety of sophisticated investors.

The Group’s gold assets have been maintained in good standing and have been regularly monitored and considered as the Group works towards building a balanced portfolio of good quality assets.

Changes in the State of Affairs

There were no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Group during the reporting period ended 30 June 2014 other than as referred to in this report and the Financial Statements or notes thereto.

Dividends

The Directors recommend that no dividend be paid for the reporting period ended 30 June 2014 nor have any amounts been paid or declared by way of dividend during the reporting period.

Events Subsequent To Reporting Date

Madagascan Asset Opportunity

In May 2014, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with ASX listed Company Caravel Energy Limited to acquire a 25% (with rights to acquire up to a further 55%) interest in a Company called Petromad (Mauritius) Limited. This Company owns a 100% interest in Block 3114 located onshore Madagascar and is a party to a production sharing contract with respect to petroleum exploration and production in the block.

The consideration payable by the Company for the acquisition is 85,000,000 Tellus Resources Ltd ordinary shares.

Completion of the purchase was conditional upon the Company obtaining shareholder approval at an Extraordinary General meeting held on the 26th of September 2014, the Company received shareholder approval at the Extraordinary General Meeting and consequently the transaction will be finalised upon satisfaction of the conditions precedent.

12

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued)

Events Subsequent To Reporting Date (continued)

Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting

On the 6th of August 2014 the Company received a notice to call an Extraordinary General Meeting of shareholders with certain resolutions aimed at adding Directors to the Company. On the 26th August 2014, the Company announced that the date of the meeting will be the 7th October 2014.

Share Placement

On 14 August 2014 the Company announced a placement of 22,000,000 ordinary shares to sophisticated investors at an average price of 3 cents per share to raise a total of AUD $660,000 to assist with the Company’s working capital requirements.

Likely Future Developments

The Directors of the Group will continue to focus upon the Cooper Basin and Utah assets whilst also seeking further oil and gas opportunities. In addition, strategies to maximise the value of its highly prospective gold assets will be pursued.

13

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued) Directors’ Meetings

The number of meetings of Directors held during the year and the number of meetings attended by each Director was as follows:


Director was as follows:
BOARD MEETINGS AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETINGS
NUMBER NUMBER
ELIGIBLE NUMBER ELIGIBLE NUMBER
DIRECTOR TO ATTEND ATTENDED TO ATTEND ATTENDED
R Kennedy (Appointed 4 December 2013) 5 5 1 1
C Dorsch (Appointed 23 August 2013) 10 10 - -
N Young (Appointed (4 December 2013) 5 5 1 1
B Salmon (Resigned 5 June 2014) 12 10 - -
A Wehby (Resigned 29 November 2013) 7 7 - -
S Woodham (Resigned 23 August 2013) 3 3 - -
R Willson (Resigned 5 December 2013) 8 8 - -

The Board does not have separately established committees dealing with nomination, remuneration and risk management. The full Board carried out this role in accordance with the principles as set out in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan. There were a total of 13 Board Meetings held during the year. The Board has established a separate Audit Committee.

Share Options and Performance Rights

Details of unissued shares or interests of Tellus Resources Ltd under option at the date of this report are:

NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
DATE PERFORMANCE SHARES UNDER CLASS OF EXERCISE PRICE EXPIRY DATE
GRANTED RIGHTS OPTION SHARES OF OPTIONS OF OPTIONS
5 Apr 2012 300,000 - Ordinary N/A 27 Jan 2017
5 Apr 2012 400,000 - Ordinary N/A 27 Jan 2017
21 Sep 2012 350,000 - Ordinary N/A 21 Sep 2015
24 Sep 2012 5,000,000 Ordinary $0.25 25 Sep 2014
23 Aug 2013* 45,000,000* - Ordinary N/A **N/A
24 Sep 2013 5,000,000 Ordinary $0.20 17 Sep 2017
4 Dec 2013 7,500,000 Ordinary $0.093 31 Dec 2016
5 Mar 2014 2,000,000 Ordinary $0.20 5 Mar 2018
5 Mar 2014 1,500,000 Ordinary $0.20 17 Sep 2017
17 Apr 2014 6,666,666 Ordinary $0.10 31 Dec 2015
Total 46,050,000 27,666,666

*On the 23rd of August 2013, 45,000,000 performance rights over ordinary shares were granted to Mr Carl Dorsch subject to remaining employed as Managing Director of the Company.

These performance rights convert into fully paid ordinary shares in the Company on a 1:1 ratio, for nil consideration as follows:

  • i) 5,000,000, where the 30 day volume weighted average price (VWAP) for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.175 per share;

ii) 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.200 per share;

iii) 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.225 per share;

iv) 15,000,000, when production testing of PEL 105 in either open or closed hole that can demonstrate an immediate flow capacity for the well in excess of a sustained minimum of 100 BOEPD for a period in excess of 7 days. Such test must be certified by a relevant expert in the field being either an independent consulting reservoir engineer or the contracted testing Company, provided that such threshold is achieved on or prior to 31 December 2014; and

v) 15,000,000 where the Company has acquired a direct or indirect interest in the Wichita County Project and the production from the leases which form the Wichita County Project reaches an average of 50 BOEPD over a three month period.

**Pursuant to a service agreement between Mr Dorsch and the Company the Performance Rights granted to Mr Dorsch will expire at the time that his employment with the Company ceases. No options have been exercised as at the date of this report.

14

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued)

Environmental Issues

The Group is subject to environmental regulations under the laws of the Commonwealth and State. The Group has a policy of complying with its environmental performance obligations and at the date of this report is not aware of any breach of such regulations.

Indemnities given and insurance premiums paid to auditors and officers

During the reporting period, the Company paid an insurance premium to insure the Directors and Officers of the Group. The Officers of the Company covered by the insurance policy include all Directors and the Company Secretary. The liabilities insured are legal costs that may be incurred in defending civil or criminal proceedings that may be brought against the officers in their capacity as officers of the Company, and any other payments arising from liabilities incurred by the officers in connection with such proceedings, other than where such liabilities arise out of conduct involving a willful breach of duty by the officers or the improper use by the officers of their position or of information to gain advantage for themselves or someone else to cause detriment to the Company. Details of the amount of the premium paid in respect of the insurance policies are not disclosed as such disclosure is prohibited under the terms of the contract.

The Company has entered into an agreement with the Directors and Officers to indemnify them against any claim and related expenses, which arise as a result of work completed in their respective capabilities.

The Company has not otherwise, during or since the end of the financial year, except to the extent permitted by law, indemnified or agreed to indemnify any current or former officer or auditor of the Company against a liability incurred as such by an officer or auditor.

Non Audit Services

The Board has considered the non-audit services provided during the year by the auditor and is satisfied that the provision of those non-audit services during the year is compatible with, and did not compromise, the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 for the following reasons:

  • n All non-audit services were subject to the corporate governance procedures adopted by the Company and have been reviewed by the Board to ensure they do not impact upon the impartiality and objectivity of the auditor; and

  • n The non-audit services do not undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence as set out in APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, as they did not involve reviewing or auditing the auditor’s own work, acting in a management or decision-making capacity for the Company, acting as an advocate for the Company or jointly sharing risks and rewards.

Details of the amounts paid to the auditors of the Group, Grant Thornton, and its related practices for audit and non-audit services provided during the year are set out in Note 24 to the Financial Statements.

A copy of the auditor’s independence declaration as required under s307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is included on page 23 of this financial report and forms part of this Directors’ report.

15

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued) Remuneration Report (Audited)

The Directors of Tellus Resources Ltd (“the Group”) present the Remuneration Report for Non-Executive Directors, Executive Directors and other Key Management Personnel, prepared in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and the Corporations Regulations 2001.

The remuneration report is set out under the following main headings:

  • a) Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration

  • b) Details of remuneration

  • c) Service agreements

  • d) Share based remuneration; and

  • e) Other information

a) Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration

The following report determines the principle used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration. The Board is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the Directors and Key Management Personnel. The role also includes responsibility for share options incentives, superannuation entitlements, retirement and termination entitlements, fringe benefits policies, liability insurance policies and other terms of employment.

The Board will review the arrangements having regard to performance, relevant comparative information and at its discretion may obtain independent expert advice on the appropriateness of remuneration packages or fees paid to Key Management Personnel. No remuneration consultant was used during the period. Remuneration packages are set at levels intended to attract and retain Key Management Personnel capable of managing the Group’s activities. Where Key Management Personnel positions are held by consultants, fees are based on normal commercial terms and conditions.

The remuneration of an Executive Director will be decided by the Board, without the affected Executive Director participating in that decision-making process.

The total maximum remuneration of Non-Executive Directors is the subject of a Shareholder resolution in accordance with the Company’s Constitution, the Corporations Act and the ASX Listing Rules, as applicable. The determination of Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration within that maximum will be made by the Board having regard to the inputs and value to the Company of the respective contributions by each NonExecutive Director. The current limit, whichmay only be varied by Shareholders in general meeting, is an aggregate amount of $250,000 per annum.

The Board may award additional remuneration to Non-Executive Directors called upon to perform extra services or make special exertions on behalf of the Group.

The executive pay and reward framework has three components:

  • n Base pay and benefits;

  • n Long-term incentives through share schemes; and

  • n Other remuneration such as superannuation.

The combination of these comprises the Key Management Personnel total remuneration.

All remuneration is fixed and no portion is based on performance targets. The award of long-term incentives is based upon the discretion of the Board.

16

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued) Remuneration Report (Audited) (continued)

SHORT-TERM BENEFITS
POST-
LONG
SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
ELEMENTS OF REMUNERATION
EMPLOYMENT
TERM TERMINATION
SALARY &
BENEFITS BENEFITS
BENEFITS
FEES ALLOWANCES
SUPER-
TERMINATION
PERFORMANCE
RELATED TO NOT RELATED TO
ANNUATION
LSL
PAYMENTS
OPTIONS
RIGHTS
TOTAL PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE
DIRECTORS
YEAR
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
%
$
%
R Kennedy
2014
29,169
-
2,698
-
- 237,750*
-
269,617
-
-
269,617
100%
Chairman
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C Dorsch
2014
282,204
4,007
26,104
-
-
-
764,400* 1,076,715 764,400
71%
312,315
29%
Managing Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N Young
2014
24,964
-
-
-
-
47,200*
-
72,164
-
-
72,164
100%
Non Executve Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A Wehby
2014
20,835
-
2,302
-
-
-
-
23,137
-
-
23,137
100%
Non Executve Director
2013
60,227
-
4,500
-
-
-
-
64,727
-
-
64,727
100%
S Woodham
2014
73,332
18,698
2,764
-
119,728
-
-
214,522
-
-
214,522
100%
Executve Director
2013
219,996
20,500
19,800
-
-
-
26,867*
287,163
26,867
9%
260,296
91%
R Willson
2014
16,665
-
1,841
-
-
-
-
18,506
-
-
18,506
100%
Non Executve Director
2013
40,000
-
3,600
-
-
-
-
43,600
-
-
43,600
100%
B Salmon
2014
40,595
-
-
-
-
-
-
40,595
-
-
40,595
100%
Non Executve Director
2013
30,344
-
-
-
-
-
-
30,344
-
-
30,344
100%
Total
2014
487,764
22,705
35,709
-
119,728
284,950
764,400 1,715,256 764,400
950,856
Total
2013
350,567
20,500
27,900
-
-
-
26,867
425,834
26,867
398,967
*The fair value of share based payments have been determined as at the grant date. The share based payments included as remuneraton in the table above
are not related to or indicatve of the beneft (if any) that individuals may ultmately realise or have realised during the reportng period. The fair value of the
performance rights as at the date of their grant has been determined in accordance with AASB 2. The calculatons are performed using various approved valuaton
methodologies. The total value of the optons and rights, if the performance conditons are not met, is nil.

17

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued) Remuneration Report (Audited continued)

c) Service Agreements

Contracts for services of key management personnel in place during the reporting period are as follows:

Carl Dorsch

Managing Director

Under an Executive Service Agreement the Company engaged the services of Mr Carl Dorsch to serve as Managing Director for a period until termination under the Agreement. The key terms of the Agreement are as follows:

  • n The Company may terminate the employment at any time without cause, by giving 6 months’ notice in writing; or immediately in instances of misconduct.

  • n Mr Dorsch may terminate the employment at any time by giving 6 months’ notice in writing.

Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company shall pay a Base Salary of A$335,000 per annum plus superannuation contributions of $25,000. A package of performance rights (as disclosed elsewhere in this report) were granted under the Agreement.

The performance rights granted to Mr Dorsch will convert into fully paid ordinary shares in the Company on a 1:1 ratio, for nil consideration as follows;

  • n 5,000,000 where the 30 day volume weighted average price (VWAP) for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.175 per share;

  • n 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.200 per share;

  • n 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.225 per share;

  • n 15,000,000, when production testing of PEL 105 in either open or closed hole that can demonstrate an immediate flow capacity for the well in excess of a sustained minimum of 100 BOEPD for a period in excess of 7 days. Such test must be certified by a relevant expert in the field being either an independent consulting reservoir engineer or the contracted testing Company, provided that such threshold is achieved on or prior to 31 December 2014; and

  • n 15,000,000 where the Company has acquired a direct or indirect interest in the Wichita County Project and the production from the leases which form theWichita County Project reaches an average of 50 BOEPD over a three month period.

The performance rights granted to Mr Dorsch are subject to Mr Dorsch remaining employed as the Managing Director of the Company.

18

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued) Remuneration Report (Audited continued)

OPENING
NET
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL UN-
BALANCE AT
OPTIONS
OPTIONS
CHANGE
CLOSING
EXERCISABLE
EXERCISABLE
EXERCISABLE
START OF YEAR
GRANTED
EXERCISED
OTHER
BALANCE
AT 30 JUNE
30 JUNE
30 JUNE
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
R Kennedy
2014
-
7,500,000
-
-
7,500,000
7,500,000
7,500,000
-
Chairman
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C Dorsch
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Managing Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N Young
2014
-
2,000,000
-
-
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
-
Non Executve Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A Wehby
2014
500,000
-
-
(500,000)*
-
-
-
-
Non Executve Director
2013
500,000
-
-
-
500,000
500,000
500,000
-
S Woodham
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Executve Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
R Willson
2014
500,000
-
-
(500,000)*
-
-
-
-
Non Executve Director
2013
500,000
-
-
-
500,000
500,000
500,000
-
B Salmon
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non Executve Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
2014
1,000,000
9,500,000
-
(1,000,000)
9,500,000
9,500,000
9,500,000
-
Total
2013
1,000,000
-
-
-
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
-
*The fgures in the “Net Change Other” column in the table above relate to Optons that have expired.

19

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued) Remuneration Report (Audited continued)

OPENING
NET
TOTAL
TOTAL UN-
BALANCE AT
RIGHTS
RIGHTS
CHANGE
CLOSING
EXERCISABLE
EXERCISABLE
START OF YEAR
GRANTED
EXERCISED
OTHER
BALANCE
30 JUNE
30 JUNE
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
R Kennedy
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Chairman
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C Dorsch
2014
-
45,000,000
-
-
45,000,000
-
45,000,000
Managing Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N Young
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non Executve Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A Wehby
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non Executve Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
S Woodham
2014
700,000
-
-
-
700,000
700,000
-
Executve Director
2013
700,000
-
-
-
700,000
700,000
-
R Willson
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non Executve Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
B Salmon
2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non Executve Director
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
2014
700,000
45,000,000
-
-
45,700,000
700,000
45,000,000
Total
2013
700,000
-
-
-
700,000
700,000
-

20

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued) Remuneration Report (Audited continued)

e) Other Information

Fully Paid Ordinary Shares

Details of Fully Paid Ordinary Shares held by Key Management Personnel (“KMP”) of the Group for the year ended 30 June 2014 are set out in the following table:

OPENING PURCHASES/ NET OTHER CLOSING BALANCE HELD
BALANCE (SALES) CHANGE BALANCE NOMINALLY
DIRECTORS $ $ $ $ $
R Kennedy 2014 - - - - -
Chairman 2013 - - - - -
C Dorsch 2014 - 17,300,000* - 17,300,000* -
Managing Director 2013 - - - - -
N Young
Non Executve Director
2014
2013
-
-
110,000
-
-
-
110,000
-
-
-
A Wehby
Non Executve Director
2014
2013
660,000
660,000
-
-
-
-
660,000
660,000
60,000
60,000
S Woodham
Executve Director
2014
2013
1,568,000
1,568,000
-
-
-
-
1,568,000
1,568,000
-
-
R Willson
Non Executve Director
2014
2013
400,000
400,000
(400,000)
-
-
-
-
400,000
-
-
B Salmon 2014 - - - - -
Non Executve Director 2013 - - - - -
Total 2014 2,628,000 17,010,000 - 19,638,000 60,000
Total 2013 2,628,000 - - 2,628,000 60,000

*Of the 17,300,000 fully paid ordinary shares listed under Mr Dorsch in the table above that were held as at 30 June 2014, 300,000 fully paid ordinary shares are held by Dorsch Consultants Pty Ltd a company Mr Dorsch has complete control over. The remaining 17,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares are held by CNP Energy Pty Limited (ACN 159 055 384) in its capacity as trustee of the PNC Unit Trust. Mr Dorsch holds a relevant interest of (23.88%) in CNP Energy Pty Limited (ACN 159 055 384) and the PNC Unit Trust with the remaining balance held by unrelated parties to Mr Dorsch. CNP Energy Pty Ltd has three Directors, one of which is Mr Dorsch, the two other Directors are unrelated parties to Mr Dorsch.

Options-based compensation

The terms and conditions of each grant of options over ordinary shares affecting the remuneration of directors and other key management personnel in this financial year or future reporting years are as follows:

NUMBER OF NUMBER OF FAIR VALUE PER
OPTIONS OPTIONS EXPIRY EXERCISE OPTION AT
GRANT DATE GRANTED VESTED DATE PRICE GRANT DATE
2014
04-Dec-13 7,500,000 7,500,000 31-Dec-16 $0.09 $0.32
05-Mar-14 2,000,000 2,000,000 05-Mar-18 $0.20 $0.02
2013
No optons issued - - - - -
Total 2014 9,500,000 9,500,000 - - -
Total 2013 - - - - -

Options granted carry no dividend or voting rights.

There are no service requirements associated with the issue of the options in the table above.

21

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ REPORT (continued)

Remuneration Report (Audited continued)

Performance Rights based compensation

The terms and conditions of each grant of Performance Rights over ordinary shares affecting remuneration of directors and other key management personnel in this financial year or future reporting years are as follows:


follows:
VESTING DATE FAIR VALUE PER
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF AND OPTION AT
PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE EXERCISABLE EXPIRY EXERCISE
GRANT
GRANT DATE RIGHTS GRANTED RIGHTS VESTED DATE DATE PRICE
DATE
2014
23-Aug-13 45,000,000 - Refer Note 1 Refer Note 2 N/A
$0.02
2013
No performance rights issued
-
- - - -
-
Total 2014 45,000,000 - - - -
-
Total 2013 - - - - -
-

Note 1 – The terms of the performance rights listed in the table above are outlined on page 14 of the Directors’ report under the table “Share Options and Performance Rights”. Note 2 – The Performance Rights listed in the table above do not have an expiry date, they are however contingent upon Mr Dorsch being employed as Managing Director of Tellus Resources Limited and will expire at the time he is no longer employed as Managing Director.

Other transactions with key management personnel of the Group

During the financial year the following transactions took place with key management personnel;

Prior to Mr Neil Young’s appointment as a director $17,325 was paid for Mining Consultancy Services to Neil A I Young No 1 Pty Ltd a Company associated with Mr Neil Young. After Mr Young’s appointment as a director $26,950 was paid for Mining Consultancy Services to Neil A I Young No 1 Pty Ltd a Company associated with Mr Neil Young. All fees for services paid were established on arm’s length terms in line with standard commercial rates and principles.

A Payment of $15,000 was made to Dorsch Consulting Pty Ltd to acquire Furniture and Fittings at the Tellus Resources Limited Head Office in Adelaide, South Australia. Dorsch Consulting Pty Ltd is an entity associated with Mr Carl Dorsch Managing Director of Tellus Resources Limited. The Payment for Furniture and Fittings was approved by the Board of Directors at a meeting held where Mr Dorsch was not present or permitted to vote or comment upon due to having an interest in the potential transaction. The acquisition was subject to independent valuation and deliberation by the Directors without Mr Dorsch participating in the decision making process.

End of Audited Remuneration Report

Voting and Comments at the Company’s 2013 Annual General Meeting

The Company received 97% of “yes” votes on its remuneration report for the 2013 financial year. The Company did not receive any specific feedback at the AGM on its remuneration report.

Proceedings on Behalf of Company

No person has applied for leave of Court to bring proceedings on behalf of the Company or intervene in proceedings to which the Company is a party for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or any part of those proceedings.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.

Robert Kennedy Chairman Adelaide, 30 September 2014

22

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Auditor’s Independence Declaration

==> picture [312 x 120] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Level 1,
67 Greenhill Rd
Wayville SA 5034
Correspondence to:
GPO Box 1270
Adelaide SA 5001
T 61 8 8372 6666
F 61 8 8372 6677
E [email protected]
W www.grantthornton.com.au
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
TO THE DIRECTORS OF TELLUS RESOURCES LIMITED
----- End of picture text -----

In accordance with the requirements of section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001, as lead auditor for the audit of Tellus Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2014, I declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:

a no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and b no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.

GRANT THORNTON AUDIT PTY LTD Chartered Accountants

S J Gray Partner – Audit & Assurance Adelaide, 30 September 2014

Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd ACN 130 913 594 a subsidiary or related entity of Grant Thornton Australia Ltd ABN 41 127 556 389

‘Grant Thornton’ refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Grant Thornton Australia Ltd is a member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL). GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions. In the Australian context only, the use of the term ‘Grant Thornton’ may refer to Grant Thornton Australia Limited ABN 41 127 556 389 and its Australian subsidiaries and related entities. GTIL is not an Australian related entity to Grant Thornton Australia Limited.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Liability is limited in those States where a current scheme applies.

23

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

The Board of Directors is committed to improving and achieving good standards of corporate governance and has established corporate government policies and procedures, where appropriate and practicable, consistent with the revised Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations with 2010 Amendments 2nd Edition issued by the ASX Corporate Governance Council (“ASX Recommendations”).

The following statement sets out a summary of the Group’s corporate governance practices that were in place during the financial year and how those practices relate to the revised ASX Recommendations. The Company has reported against the revised Principles and Recommendations for each of the financial years ended 30 June 2011 through to 30 June 2014.

These recommendations are not intended to be prescriptions to be followed by all ASX listed companies, but rather guidelines designed to produce an effective, quality and integrity outcome. The Corporate Governance Council has recognised that a “one size fits all” approach to Corporate Governance is not required. Instead, it states aspirations of good practice for optimising corporate performance and accountability in the interests of shareholders and the broader economy. A company may consider that a recommendation is inappropriate to its particular circumstances and has flexibility not to adopt it and explain why.

In ensuring a good standard of ethical behaviour and accountability, the Board has included in its corporate governance policies those matters contained in the ASX Recommendations where applicable. However, the Board also recognises that full adoption of the above ASX Recommendations may not be practical nor provide the optimal result given the particular circumstances and structure of the Company. The Board is, nevertheless, committed to ensuring that appropriate Corporate Governance practices are in place for the proper direction and management of the Company. This statement outlines themain Corporate Governance practices of the Company disclosed under the ASX Recommendations, including those that comply with good practice and which unless otherwise disclosed, were in place during the whole of the financial year ended 30 June 2014.

Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight

Recommendation 1.1 – Recommendation followed

1.1 Companies should establish the functions reserved to the Board and those delegated to senior executives and disclose those functions.

The Board’s role is to govern the Company rather than manage it. The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan includes a Board Charter which sets out the specific responsibilities of the Board and provides that the Board shall delegate responsibility for the day-to-day operations and administration of the Company to the Executive Directors and any Chief Executive Officer (if appointed).

Recommendation 1.2 – Recommendation followed

1.2 Companies should disclose the process for evaluating the performance of senior executives.

The Board will monitor the performance of senior management, including measuring actual performance against planned performance. The Board will follow the performance evaluation principles outlined in its Corporate Governance Plan.

Recommendation 1.3 – Recommendation followed

1.3 Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 1.

The Board Charter discloses the specific responsibilities of the Board and provides that the Board shall delegate responsibility for the day-to-day operations and administration of the Company to the Executive Director/(s) and Chief Executive Officer (if appointed).

The Company’s Corporate Governance policies are set out on the Company’s website at www. tellusresources.com.au.

24

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT (continued)

Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value

Recommendation 2.1 – Recommendation followed

2.1 A majority of the Board should be independent Directors.

A majority of the Directors are currently independent. The Company has three Directors and Neil Young and Robert Kennedy are independent.

The Board seeks to ensure that the appropriate mix of skills and expertise is present on the Board to facilitate successful strategic direction.

The Board Charter specifies that an independent Director is one who is independent of management and free from any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the exercise of independent judgment.

Independent Directors should also meet the definition of independence as set out in the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations.

The independence of Directors will be regularly assessed by the Board in light of their interests, all of which must be disclosed.

Recommendation 2.2 – Recommendation followed

2.2 The Chairman should be an independent Director.

The Chairman is currently Robert Kennedy, who is an independent Director.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan outlines that the Chairman should be a non-executive Director and that if a Chairman ceases to be an independent Director, the Board will consider appointing a lead independent Director.

Recommendation 2.3 – Recommendation followed

2.3 Carl Dorsch was appointed Managing Director on 23 August 2013 and undertakes the role of Chief Executive Officer and Robert Kennedy is the Non-Executive Chairman, thus not been being the same individual.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan also outlines that in the future the Chief Executive Officer should not be the Chairman of the Company during his term as Chief Executive Officer or in the future.

Recommendation 2.4 – Recommendation not followed

2.4 The Board should establish a nomination committee.

Based on the fact that the Company is in its early stages of development, and given the current size and structure of the Board, the Board has not yet formed a separate Nomination Committee. Currently matters typically dealt with by such a committee are dealt with by the Board, however, the Board has formal terms of reference for the establishment of a Nomination Committee.

Recommendation 2.5 – Recommendation followed

2.5 Companies should disclose the process for evaluating the performance of the Board, its committees and individual Directors.

In order to ensure the Board continues to discharge its responsibilities in an appropriate manner, a review of the performance over the previous 12 months of the Board, its committees and individual Directors will be arranged by the Board in accordance with the terms of the Nomination Committee Charter, until such time as a Nomination Committee is established.

Recommendation 2.6 – Recommendation followed

2.6 Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 2.

A description of the skills and experience of each of the current Directors is contained in the Company’s Directors’ Report and on the Company’s website. Two of the three members of the current Board, Robert Kennedy and Neil Young are considered to be independent Directors in accordance with the definition of an independent Director as contained in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan.

25

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT (continued)

Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value (continued)

Based on the fact that the Company is in its early stages of development, the Company has not yet fully complied with Principle 2 of the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations. To the extent that it has not complied with Principle 2, the Company will seek to do so as the Company develops.

The Nomination Committee, when established, will determine the procedure for the selection and appointment of new Directors and the re-election of incumbents, having regard to the ability of the individual to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities, as well as assist the Company in achieving growth and delivering value to shareholders. The policy for the appointment of new Directors is set out in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan.

The Company’s Corporate Governance policies are set out on the Company’s website at www.tellusresources.com.au.

Principle 3: Promote ethical and responsible decision-making

Recommendation 3.1 – Recommendation followed

3.1 Companies should establish a code of conduct and disclose the code or a summary of the code as to:

  • the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the Company’s integrity

  • the practices necessary to take into account their legal obligations and the reasonable expectations of their stakeholders

  • the responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan includes a Corporate Code of Conduct, which provides a framework for decisions and actions in relation to ethical conduct in employment.

Recommendation 3.2 – Recommendation not followed

3.2 Companies should establish a policy concerning diversity and disclose the policy or a summary of that policy. The policy should include requirements for the Board to establish measureable objectives for achieving gender diversity and for the Board to assess annually both the objectives and progress in achieving them.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan does not include an express policy specifically addressing diversity. The Company is not currently in compliance with this recommendation as the Board is comfortable that the Company already has an appropriate approach to encouraging workplace diversity without the need for a formal policy

Under the Corporate Code of Conduct contained in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan, employees must not harass, discriminate or support others who harass and discriminate against colleagues or members of the public on the grounds of sex, pregnancy, marital status, age, race (including their colour, nationality, descent, ethnic or religious background), physical or intellectual impairment, homosexuality or transgender. Such harassment or discrimination may constitute an offence under legislation. Managers should understand and apply the principles of Equal Employment Opportunity.

Recommendation 3.3 – Recommendation not followed

3.3 Companies should disclose in each annual report the measureable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the Board in accordance with the diversity policy and progress towards achieving them.

As noted above, the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan does not include an express policy specifically addressing diversity.

The Company is not currently in compliance with this recommendation as the Board is comfortable that the Company already has an appropriate approach to encouraging workplace diversity without the need for a formal policy.

26

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT (continued)

Principle 3: Promote ethical and responsible decision-making (continued)

Recommendation 3.4 – Recommendation not followed

3.4 Companies should disclose in each annual report the proportion of women employees in the whole organisation, women in senior executive positions and women on the Board.

There are currently no women on the Board of the Company. This will be reviewed on an on-going basis.

Recommendation 3.5 – Recommendation followed

3.5 Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 3.

The Corporate Code of Conduct can be found in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan on the Company’s website at www.tellusresources.com.au.

Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in financial reporting

Recommendation 4.1 – Recommendation followed

4.1 The Board should establish an Audit Committee.

The Board has established an Audit Committee and of which Neil Young is the Chairman. The Board has established a formal terms of reference for an Audit and Risk Committee.

Recommendation 4.2 – Recommendation not followed

4.2 The Audit Committee should be structured so that it:

  • consists only of non-executive Directors

  • consists of a majority of independent Directors

  • is chaired by an independent Chairman, who is not Chairman of the Board

  • has at least three members.

The Audit Committee satisfies all but one of the conditions outlined in principle 4.2, due to the number of Directors on the Board there are only two independent Directors available to sit on the committee.

Recommendation 4.3 – Recommendation followed

4.3 The Audit Committee should have a formal charter.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan includes a formal charter for the Audit and Risk Committee.

Recommendation 4.4 – Recommendation followed

4.4 Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 4.

As above.

The Company’s Corporate Governance policies are set out on the Company’s website at www.tellusresources.com.au.

Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure

5.1 Recommendation 5.1 – Recommendation followed

Companies should establish written policies designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and to ensure accountability at a senior executive level for that compliance and disclose those policies or a summary of those policies.

The Company has a continuous disclosure program in place designed to ensure the factual presentation of the Company’s financial position. The Board has designated the Company Secretary as the person responsible for overseeing and coordinating disclosure of information to the ASX and shareholders, as well as providing guidance to Directors and employees on disclosure requirements and procedures.

Recommendation 5.2 – Recommendation followed

5.2 Companies should provide the information indicated in Guide to Reporting on Principle 5.

As above.

The Company’s Corporate Governance policies are set out on the Company’s website at www.tellusresources.com.au.

27

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT (continued)

Principle 6: Respect the rights of shareholders

Recommendation 6.1 – Recommendation followed

  • 6.1 Companies should design a communications policy for promoting effective communication with shareholders and encouraging their participation at general meetings and disclose their policy or a summary of that policy.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan includes a shareholder communications strategy, which aims to ensure that the shareholders of the Company are informed of all major developments affecting the Company’s state of affairs.

Recommendation 6.2 – Recommendation followed

6.2 Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 6.

As above.

The Company’s Corporate Governance policies are set out on the Company’s website at www.tellusresources.com.au.

Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk

Recommendation 7.1 – Recommendation followed

7.1 Companies should establish policies for the oversight and management of material business risks and disclose a summary of those policies.

The Board determines the Company’s “risk profile” and is responsible for overseeing and approving risk management strategy and policies, internal compliance and internal control.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan establishes formal terms of reference for disclosure of risk management review procedure and internal compliance and control.

Recommendation 7.2 – Recommendation followed

  • 7.2 The Board should require management to design and implement the risk management and internal control system to manage the Company’s material business risks and report to it on whether those risks are being managed effectively. The Board should disclose thatmanagement has reported to it as to the effectiveness of the Company’s management of its material business risks.

As above.

Recommendation 7.3 – Recommendation followed

  • 7.3 The Board should disclose whether it has received assurance from the chief executive officer (or equivalent) and the chief financial officer (or equivalent) that the declaration provided in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.

The Board has received the relevant declarations from the Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer in accordance with s295A of the Corporations Act 2001 and the relevant assurances required under Recommendation 7.3 of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles.

Recommendation 7.4 – Recommendation followed

7.4 Companies should provide the information indicated in Guide to Reporting on Principle 7.

As above.

The Company’s Corporate Governance policies are set out on the Company’s website at www.tellusresources.com.au.

Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly

Recommendation 8.1 – Recommendation not followed

8.1 The Board should establish a remuneration committee.

Given the current size and structure of the Board, the Board has not yet formed a separate remuneration committee.

28

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT (continued)

Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly (continued)

However, the Board has established formal terms of reference for a remuneration committee. The Board does not consider that any efficiency or other benefits would be gained from establishing a separate committee. Accordingly, until the Remuneration Committee is established, the Board will carry out the duties of the Remuneration Committee in accordance with the terms of reference that have been adopted.

Recommendation 8.2 – Recommendation not followed

8.2 The remuneration committee should be structured so that it:

  • consists of a majority of independent Directors

  • is chaired by an independent Director

  • has at least three members

As above.

Recommendation 8.3 – Recommendation followed

8.3 Companies should clearly distinguish the structure of non-executive Directors’ remuneration from that of executive Directors and senior executives.

As above.

Recommendation 8.4 – Recommendation followed

8.4 Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 8.

As above.

The Company’s Corporate Governance policies are set out on the Company’s website at www.tellusresources.com.au.

29

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

NOTE
Revenue from contnuing operatons
5
Expenses from contnuing operatons
6
Loss before income tax
Income tax beneft
7
Net loss afer tax for the year
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Total comprehensive loss
LOSS PER SHARE:
Basic (loss) per share (cents per share)
18
Diluted (loss) per share (cents per share)
18
CONSOLIDATED
2014
2013
$
$
22,434
94,332
(8,287,130)
(1,471,148)
(8,264,696)
(1,376,816)
(1,557,400)
-
(6,707,296)
(1,376,816)
-
-
(6,707,296)
(1,376,816)
(5.2)
(3.1)
(5.2)
(3.1)

This statement should be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.

30

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE 2014

NOTE
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
20(a)
Trade and other receivables
8
Prepayments
9
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Plant and equipment
10
Intangibles
11
Exploraton and evaluaton expenditure
12
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables
13
Borrowings
14
Employee benefts
15
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITES
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Employee benefts
15
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITES
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Share capital
16
Reserves
17
Accumulated losses
TOTAL EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED
2014
2013
$
$
409,330
1,134,661
1,560,959
752,709
69,493
13,702
2,039,782
1,901,072
49,398
33,856
-
6,047
8,662,845
2,799,550
8,712,243
2,839,453
10,752,025
4,740,525
892,610
113,392
550,392
-
20,510
5,358
1,463,512
118,750
6,780
5,594
6,780
5,594
1,470,292
124,344
9,281,733
4,616,181
17,485,869
7,374,031
1,632,735
371,725
(9,836,871)
(3,129,575)
9,281,733
4,616,181

This statement should be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.

31

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

Balance as at 30 June 2012
Total loss & comprehensive income for the year
Optons granted
Performance rights granted
Share issue costs
Balance as at 30 June 2013
Total loss & comprehensive income for the year
Shares issued during the period
Optons granted
Performance rights granted
Share issue costs
Balance as at 30 June 2014
ISSUED
EQUITY ACCUMULATED
CAPITAL
RESERVE
LOSSES
TOTAL
$
$
$
$
7,470,031
240,513
(1,752,759)
5,957,785
-
-
(1,376,816) (1,376,816)
-
96,000
-
96,000
-
35,212
-
35,212
(96,000)
-
-
(96,000)
7,374,031
371,725
(3,129,575)
4,616,181
-
-
(6,707,296) (6,707,296)
10,598,977
-
- 10,598,977
-
496,610
-
496,610
-
764,400
-
764,400
(487,139)
-
-
(487,139)
17,485,869
1,632,735
(9,836,871)
9,281,733

The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

32

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

NOTE
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash payments in the course of operatons
Interest received
Other Income
Research and development tax ofset received
Net cash used in operatng actvites
20(b)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Payments for exploraton & evaluaton of mineral resources
Payments for applicatons and bonds
Payments for property, plant and equipment
Loan to PNC Aust Pty Ltd
Net cash by used in investng actvites
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from borrowings
Proceeds from issue of shares
Payments for share issue costs
Net cash provided by fnancing actvites
Net decrease in cash held and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
20(a)
CONSOLIDATED
2014
2013
$
$
(1,385,287)
(1,379,692)
19,913
80,464
2,100
800
290,512
-
(1,072,762)
(1,298,428)
(4,481,229)
(495,435)
(50,000)
-
(27,385)
-
-
(700,000)
(4,558,614)
(1,195,435)
550,000
-
4,573,697
-
(217,652)
-
4,906,045
-
(725,231)
(2,493,863)
1,134,661
3,628,524
409,330
1,134,661

The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

33

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

CONTENTS

Note 1 Nature of operatons
Note 2 General informaton
Note 3 Signifcant accountng policies
Note 4 Segment informaton
Note 5 Revenue
Note 6 Loss for the year
Note 7 Income taxes
Note 8 Trade and other receivables
Note 9 Other assets
Note 10 Plant and equipment
Note 11 Intangible assets
Note 12 Exploraton and evaluaton expenditure
Note 13 Trade and other payables
Note 14 Borrowings
Note 15 Employee benefts
Note 16 Share capital
Note 17 Reserves
Note 18 Earnings per share
Note 19 Contngent liabilites and contngent assets
Note 20 Notes to the statement of cash fows
Note 21 Financial risk management
Note 22 Share-based payments
Note 23 Related party disclosures
  • Note 24 Remuneration of auditors

  • Note 25 Acquisition of PNC Aust Pty Ltd

  • Note 26 Parent entity Note 27 Interests in joint operations

  • Note 28 Interests in subsidiaries

  • Note 29 Subsequent events

  • Note 30 Going concern

  • Note 31 Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities

34

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

1. Nature of operations

Tellus Resources Ltd and its subsidiary (the Group) principal activities include oil & gas and mineral exploration.

2. General information

Tellus Resources Ltd is the Group’s ultimate parent Company and is a listed public Company limited by shares incorporated and domiciled in Australia. Tellus Resources was incorporated on 21 June 2010.

Tellus Resources is a for-profit entity for the purpose of preparing the financial statements.

The registered and principal place of business is Level 5, 70 Pirie Street, Adelaide SA 5000. Tellus Resources’ shares are listed on the ASX.

3. Significant accounting policies

a) Basis of preparation

Statement of compliance

The consolidated general purpose financial statements of the Group have been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, Australian Accounting Interpretations and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board. Australian Accounting Standards incorporate International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Compliance with Australian Accounting Standards ensure that the financial statements and notes also comply with IFRS. The consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2014 (including comparatives) were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 30 September 2014.

Historical Cost Convention

The financial report has been prepared on an accrual basis and is based on the historical costs modified, where applicable by the measurement at fair value of selected non-current assets, financial assets and financial liabilities.

Functional and presentation currency

Both the functional and presentation currency of the Group is in Australian dollars.

Critical accounting estimates and judgements

The preparation of a financial report in conformity with Australian Accounting Standards requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised. Judgments made by management in the application of Australian Accounting Standards that have significant effect on the financial report and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustment in the next year are discussed in Note 3(s) below.

b) New and revised standards that are effective for these financial statements

A number of new and revised standards are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2013. Information on these new standards is presented below.

The consolidated entity has adopted all of the new, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (‘AASB’) that are mandatory for the current reporting period.

Any new, revised or amending Accounting Standards or Interpretations that are not yet mandatory have not been early adopted.

35

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

b) New and revised standards that are effective for these financial statements (continued)

Any significant impact on the accounting policies of the consolidated entity from the adoption of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations are disclosed below. The adoption of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations did not have any significant impact on the financial performance or position of the consolidated entity.

The following Accounting Standards and Interpretations are most relevant to the consolidated entity:

AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements

AASB 10 supersedes AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (AASB 127) and AASB Interpretation 112 Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities. The consolidated entity has applied AASB 10 from 1 July 2013, which has a new definition of ‘control’. Control exists when the reporting entity is exposed, or has the rights, to variable returns from its involvement with another entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its ‘power’ over that other entity. A reporting entity has power when it has rights that give it the current ability to direct the activities that significantly affect the investee’s returns. The consolidated entity not only has to consider its holdings and rights but also the holdings and rights of other shareholders in order to determine whether it has the necessary power for consolidation purposes

AASB 11 Joint Arrangements

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 11 from 1 July 2013. The standard defines which entities qualify as joint arrangements and removes the option to account for joint ventures using proportional consolidation. Joint ventures, where the parties to the agreement have the rights to the net assets are accounted for using the equity method. Joint operations, where the parties to the agreements have the rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities, will account for its share of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses separately under the appropriate classifications.

AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities.

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 12 from 1 July 2013. The standard contains the entire disclosure requirement associated with other entities, being subsidiaries, associates, joint arrangements (joint operations and joint ventures) and unconsolidated structured entities. The disclosure requirements have been significantly enhanced when compared to the disclosures previously located in AASB 127 ‘Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements’, AASB 128 ‘Investments in Associates’, AASB 131 ‘Interests in Joint Ventures’ and Interpretation 112 ‘Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities’.

AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement and AASB 2011-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 13

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 13 and its consequential amendments from 1 July 2013. The standard provides a single robust measurement framework, with clear measurement objectives, for measuring fair value using the ‘exit price’ and provides guidance on measuring fair value when a market becomes less active. The ‘highest and best use’ approach is used to measure non-financial assets whereas liabilities are based on transfer value. The standard requires increased disclosures where fair value is used.

AASB 119 Employee Benefits (September 2011) and AASB 2011-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 119 (September 2011).

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 119 and its consequential amendments from 1 July 2013. The standard eliminates the corridor approach for the deferral of gains and losses; streamlines the presentation of changes in assets and liabilities arising from defined benefit plans, including requiring remeasurements to be presented in other comprehensive income; and enhances the disclosure requirements for defined benefit plans. The standard also changed the definition of short-term employee benefits, from ‘due to’ to ‘expected to’ be settled within 12 months. Annual leave that is not expected to be wholly settled within 12 months is now discounted allowing for expected salary levels in the future period when the leave is expected to be taken.

36

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

b) New and revised standards that are effective for these financial statements (continued)

AASB 127 Separate Financial Statements (Revised), AASB 128 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (Reissued) and AASB 2011-7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Consolidation and Joint Arrangements Standards.

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 127, AASB 128 and AASB 2011-7 from 1 July 2013. AASB 127 and AASB 128 have been modified to remove specific guidance that is now contained in AASB 10, AASB 11 and AASB 12 and AASB 2011-7 makes numerous consequential changes to a range of Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations. AASB 128 has also been amended to include the application of the equity method to investments in joint ventures.

AASB 2012-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Disclosures - Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 2012-2 from 1 July 2013. The amendments enhance AASB 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’ and requires disclosure of information about rights of set-off and related arrangements, such as collateral agreements. The amendments apply to recognised financial instruments that are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement.

AASB 2012-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from Annual Improvements 2009-2011 Cycle

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 2012-5 from 1 July 2013. The amendments affect five Australian Accounting Standards as follows: Confirmation that repeat application of AASB 1 ‘Firsttime Adoption of Australian Accounting Standards’ is permitted; Clarification of borrowing cost exemption in AASB 1; Clarification of the comparative information requirements when an entity provides an optional third column or is required to present a third statement of financial position in accordance with AASB 101 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’; Clarification that servicing of equipment is covered by AASB 116 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’, if such equipment is used for more than one period; clarification that the tax effect of distributions to holders of equity instruments and equity transaction costs in AASB 132 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’ should be accounted for in accordance with AASB 112 ‘Income Taxes’; and clarification of the financial reporting requirements in AASB 134 ‘Interim Financial Reporting’ and the disclosure requirements of segment assets and liabilities.

AASB 2012-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Transition Guidance and Other Amendments

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 2012-10 amendments from 1 July 2013, which amends AASB 10 and related standards for the transition guidance relevant to the initial application of those standards. The amendments clarify the circumstances in which adjustments to an entity’s previous accounting for its involvement with other entities are required and the timing of such adjustments Interpretation 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine and AASB 2011-12 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from Interpretation 20

The consolidated entity has applied Interpretation 20 and its consequential amendments from 1 July 2013. The Interpretation clarifies when production stripping costs should lead to the recognition of an asset and how that asset should be initially and subsequently measured. The Interpretation only deals with waste removal costs that are incurred in surface mining activities during the production phase of the mine.

AASB 2011-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclosure Requirement

The consolidated entity has applied 2011-4 from 1 July 2013, which amends AASB 124 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ by removing the disclosure requirements for individual key management personnel (‘KMP’). Corporations and Related Legislation Amendment Regulations 2013 and Corporations and Australian Securities and Investments Commission Amendment Regulation 2013 (No.1) now specify the KMP disclosure requirements to be included within the Directors’ report.

37

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

b) New and revised standards that are effective for these financial statements (continued)

Any significant impact on the accounting policies of the consolidated entity from the adoption of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations are disclosed below. The adoption of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations did not have any significant impact on the financial performance or position of the consolidated entity.

The following Accounting Standards and Interpretations are most relevant to the consolidated entity:

AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements

AASB 10 supersedes AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (AASB 127) and AASB Interpretation 112 Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities. The consolidated entity has applied AASB 10 from 1 July 2013, which has a new definition of ‘control’. Control exists when the reporting entity is exposed, or has the rights, to variable returns from its involvement with another entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its ‘power’ over that other entity. A reporting entity has power when it has rights that give it the current ability to direct the activities that significantly affect the investee’s returns. The consolidated entity not only has to consider its holdings and rights but also the holdings and rights of other shareholders in order to determine whether it has the necessary power for consolidation purposes

AASB 11 Joint Arrangements

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 11 from 1 July 2013. The standard defines which entities qualify as joint arrangements and removes the option to account for joint ventures using proportional consolidation. Joint ventures, where the parties to the agreement have the rights to the net assets are accounted for using the equity method. Joint operations, where the parties to the agreements have the rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities, will account for its share of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses separately under the appropriate classifications.

AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities.

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 12 from 1 July 2013. The standard contains the entire disclosure requirement associated with other entities, being subsidiaries, associates, joint arrangements (joint operations and joint ventures) and unconsolidated structured entities. The disclosure requirements have been significantly enhanced when compared to the disclosures previously located in AASB 127 ‘Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements’, AASB 128 ‘Investments in Associates’, AASB 131 ‘Interests in Joint Ventures’ and Interpretation 112 ‘Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities’.

AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement and AASB 2011-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 13

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 13 and its consequential amendments from 1 July 2013. The standard provides a single robust measurement framework, with clear measurement objectives, for measuring fair value using the ‘exit price’ and provides guidance on measuring fair value when a market becomes less active. The ‘highest and best use’ approach is used to measure non-financial assets whereas liabilities are based on transfer value. The standard requires increased disclosures where fair value is used.

AASB 119 Employee Benefits (September 2011) and AASB 2011-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 119 (September 2011).

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 119 and its consequential amendments from 1 July 2013. The standard eliminates the corridor approach for the deferral of gains and losses; streamlines the presentation of changes in assets and liabilities arising from defined benefit plans, including requiring remeasurements to be presented in other comprehensive income; and enhances the disclosure requirements for defined benefit plans. The standard also changed the definition of short-term employee benefits, from ‘due to’ to ‘expected to’ be settled within 12 months. Annual leave that is not expected to be wholly settled within 12 months is now discounted allowing for expected salary levels in the future period when the leave is expected to be taken.

38

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

c) Basis of consolidation

The Group financial statements consolidate those of the Parent Company and all of its subsidiaries as of 30 June 2014. The Parent controls a subsidiary if it is exposed, or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with the subsidiary and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the subsidiary. All subsidiaries have a reporting date of 30 June 2014.

All transactions and balances between Group companies are eliminated on consolidation, including unrealised gains and losses on transactions between Group companies.Where unrealised losses on intra-group asset sales are reversed on consolidation, the underlying asset is also tested for impairment from a group perspective. Amounts reported in the financial statements of subsidiaries have been adjusted where necessary to ensure consistency with the accounting policies adopted by the Group.

Profit or loss and other comprehensive income of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are recognised from the effective date of acquisition, or up to the effective date of disposal, as applicable.

Non-controlling interests, presented as part of equity, represent the portion of a subsidiary’s profit or loss and net assets that is not held by the Group. The Group attributes total comprehensive income or loss of subsidiaries between the owners of the parent and the non-controlling interests based on their respective ownership interests.

d) Cash and Cash Equivalents

For the purpose of presentation in the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.

e) Plant and equipment

Each class of plant and equipment is carried at cost or fair value less, where applicable, any accumulated depreciation.

Depreciation is calculated on the diminishing balance method as follows:

Depreciaton is calculated on the d
Computer equipment 40%
Computer sofware 40%
Field equipment 20%
Furniture and ftngs 20%

The estimated useful lives, residual values and depreciation method is reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period and adjusted if appropriate.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These are included in the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income.

f) Intangibles

Amortisation is calculated on the diminishing balance method as follows:

Computer software 40%

g) Segment Reporting

Operating segments are presented using the ‘management approach’, where the information presented is on the same basis as the internal reports provided to the Chief Operating Decision Makers (‘CODM’). The CODM is responsible for the allocation of resources to operating segments and assessing their performance.

39

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

g) Segment Reporting (continued)

The Group’s expansion into additional geographic locations in Australia and Internationally has resulted in additional detail being provided about operating segments that was not disclosed in the 2013 annual report.

Management has determined the operating segments based on internal reports about components of the group that areregularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker, the Managing Director, in order to make strategic decisions. The reportable operating segments reflect the group’s current strategic business units. The following summary describes the operations in each of the group’s reportable segments;

  • South Australian projects;

  • Eastern Australian projects;

  • Utah, United States projects;

The Managing Director monitors performance in these areas separately. Unless stated otherwise, all amounts reported to the Managing Director are determined in accordance with accounting policies that are consistent to those adopted in the annual financial statements of the group. The group has three operating segments; South Australia, Eastern Australia and the United States.

h) Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure

Exploration and evaluation costs related to an area of interest are written off as incurred except they may be carried forward as an item in the statement of financial position where the rights of tenure of an area are current and one of the following conditions is met:

  • The costs are expected to be recouped through successful development and exploitation of the area of interest, or alternatively, by its sale; and

  • Exploration and/or evaluation activities in the area of interest have not at the end of each reporting period reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves, and active and significant operations in, or in relation to, the area of interest are continuing.

Capitalised costs include costs directly related to exploration and evaluation activities in the relevant area of interest. General and administrative costs are allocated to an exploration or evaluation asset only to the extent that those costs can be related directly to operational activities in the area of interest to which the asset relates.

Capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is written off where the above conditions are no longer satisfied. Identifiable exploration assets acquired are recognised as assets at their cost of acquisition, as determined by the requirements of AASB 3: Business Combinations.

Exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred subsequent to the acquisition in respect of an exploration asset acquired is accounted for in accordance with the policy outlined above . All capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is assessed for impairment if facts and circumstances indicate that an impairment may exist.

i) Employee Benefits

Short-term employee benefits

Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, annual leave and long service leave expected to be wholly settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in current liabilities in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled.

Other long-term employee benefits.

40

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

i) Employee Benefits (continued)

The liability for long service leave not expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in non-current liabilities, provided there is an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability. The liability is measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted usingmarket yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows.

Defined contribution superannuation expense

Contributions to defined contribution superannuation plans are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.

j) Joint Operations

A joint operation is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement. The consolidated entity has recognised its share of jointly held assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of joint operations. These have been incorporated in the financial statements under the appropriate classifications

k) Comparative Figures

Comparative figures are adjusted to conform to Accounting Standards when required.

l) Foreign currency translation

The financial statements are presented in Australian dollars, which is Tellus Resources Limited’s functional and presentation currency.

Foreign currency transactions

Foreign currency transactions are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at financial year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in profit or loss

m) Impairment

Non-financial assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount

Recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs of disposal and value-in-use. The value-in-use is the present value of the estimated future cash flows relating to the asset using a pre-tax discount rate specific to the asset or cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Assets that do not have independent cash flows are grouped together to form a cash-generating unit

n) Goods and Services Tax

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of goods and services tax (“GST”), except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Tax Office (“ATO”). In these circumstances the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense.

Receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included.

o) Borrowings

Loans and borrowings are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration received, net of transaction costs.

They are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

Where there is an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting date, the loans or borrowings are classified as non-current.

41

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

p) Income Tax

Income tax on the profit or loss for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income Statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it is recognised in equity.

Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantially enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.

Deferred tax is provided using the Balance Sheet liability method, providing for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The following temporary differences are not provided for:

  • the initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit;

  • differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future; and

  • no temporary differences are recognised on the initial recognition of goodwill.

The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.

A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised

Tellus Resources Limited (the ‘head entity’) and its wholly-owned Australian subsidiaries have formed an income tax consolidated group under the tax consolidation regime. The head entity and each subsidiary in the tax consolidated group continue to account for their own current and deferred tax amounts.

q) Trade and Other Payables

Trade and other payables are stated at cost and are recognised when the Group becomes obliged to make future payments resulting from the purchase of goods and services. The amounts are unsecured and usually paid within 30 days of recognition.

r) Trade and Other Receivables

Trade and other receivables are stated at their cost less impairment losses.

s) Revenue

Interest revenue is recognised on a receivable basis. Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportionate basis that takes into account the effective yield on the financial asset.

t) Operating expenses

Operating expenses are recognised in profit and loss upon utilisation of the service or at date of their origin.

u) Share based payments

Equity-settled share-based payments granted are measured at fair value at the date of grant. Fair value is calculated using the Black Scholes methodology share options. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is recognised over the vesting period.

Share-based payments

Equity-settled and cash-settled share-based compensation benefits are provided to employees

Equity-settled transactions are awards of shares, or options over shares, that are provided to employees in exchange for the rendering of services. Cash-settled transactions are awards of cash for the exchange of services, where the amount of cash is determined by reference to the share price.

42

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

u) Share based payments (continued)

The costs of equity-settled transactions are measured at fair value on grant date. Fair value is independently determined using either the Binomial or Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option, together with non-vesting conditions that do not determine whether the consolidated entity receives the services that entitle the employees to receive payment. No account is taken of any other vesting conditions

The costs of equity-settled transactions are recognised as an expense with a corresponding increase in equity over the vesting period. The cumulative charge to profit or loss is calculated based on the grant date fair value of the award, the best estimate of the number of awards that are likely to vest and the expired portion of the vesting period. The amount recognised in profit or loss for the period is the cumulative amount calculated at each reporting date less amounts already recognised in previous periods.

v) Contributed equity

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are recognised directly in equity as a deduction, net of tax allowable from proceeds.

  • a) Earnings per share

  • i. Basic earnings per share

    • Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing:

    • The profit attributable to owners of the Group, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares; and

    • By the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year.

  • ii. Diluted earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share adjust the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account:

  • The after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares, and

  • The weighted average number of additional ordinary shares that would have been outstanding assuming the conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares.

w) New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet mandatory or early adopted

Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet mandatory, have not been early adopted by the consolidated entity for the annual reporting period ended 30 June 2014. The consolidated entity’s assessment of the impact of these new or amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations, most relevant to the consolidated entity, are set out below.

AASB 9 Financial Instruments and its consequential amendments

This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 and completes phases I and III of the IASB’s project to replace IAS 39 (AASB 139) ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’. This standard introduces new classification and measurement models for financial assets, using a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortised cost or fair value. The accounting for financial liabilities continues to be classified and measured in accordance with AASB 139, with one exception, being that the portion of a change of fair value relating to the entity’s own credit risk is to be presented in other comprehensive income unless it would create an accounting mismatch. Chapter 6 ‘Hedge Accounting’ supersedes the general hedge accounting requirements in AASB 139 and provides a new simpler approach to hedge accounting that is intended to more closely align with risk management activities undertaken by entities when hedging financial and nonfinancial risks. The consolidated entity will adopt this standard and the amendments from 1 July 2017 but the impact of its adoption is yet to be assessed by the consolidated entity.

43

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

w) New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet mandatory or early adopted (continued)

Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010-2012 Cycle

These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014 and affects several Accounting Standards as follows: Amends the definition of ‘vesting conditions’ and ‘market condition’ and adds definitions for ‘performance condition’ and ‘service condition’ in AASB 2 ‘Share-based Payment’; Amends AASB 3 ‘Business Combinations’ to clarify that contingent consideration that is classified as an asset or liability shall be measured at fair value at each reporting date; Amends AASB 8 ‘Operating Segments’ to require entities to disclose the judgements made by management in applying the aggregation criteria; Clarifies that AASB 8 only requires a reconciliation of the total reportable segments assets to the entity’s assets, if the segment assets are reported regularly; Clarifies that the issuance of AASB 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ and the amending of AASB 139 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ and AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ did not remove the ability to measure short-term receivables and payables with no stated interest rate at their invoice amount, if the effect of discounting is immaterial; Clarifies that in AASB 116 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ and AASB 138 ‘Intangible Assets’, when an asset is revalued the gross carrying amount is adjusted in a manner that is consistent with the revaluation of the carrying amount (i.e. proportional restatement of accumulated amortisation); and Amends AASB 124 ‘Related Party Disclosures’ to clarify that an entity providing key management personnel services to the reporting entity or to the parent of the reporting entity is a ‘related party’ of the reporting entity. The adoption of these amendments from 1 July 2014 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.

Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2011-2013 Cycle

These amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014 and affects four Accounting Standards as follows: Clarifies the ‘meaning of effective IFRSs’ in AASB 1 ‘First-time Adoption of Australian Accounting Standards’; Clarifies that AASB 3 ‘Business Combination’ excludes from its scope the accounting for the formation of a joint arrangement in the financial statements of the joint arrangement itself; Clarifies that the scope of the portfolio exemption in AASB 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ includes all contracts accounted for within the scope of AASB 139 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ or AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’, regardless of whether they meet the definitions of financial assets or financial liabilities as defined in AASB 132 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’; and Clarifies that determining whether a specific transaction meets the definition of both a business combination as defined in AASB 3 ‘Business Combinations’ and investment property as defined in AASB 140 ‘Investment Property’ requires the separate application of both standards independently of each other. The adoption of these amendments from 1 July 2014 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.

x) Key judgement estimates

In the application of the Group’s accounting policies, management is required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstance, the results of which form the basis of making the judgments. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.

y) Critical accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions

The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its judgements and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements, estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on other various factors, including expectations of future events, management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The resulting accounting judgements and estimates will seldom equal the related actual results. The judgements, estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities (refer to the respective notes) within the next financial year are discussed below.

44

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

3. Significant accounting policies (continued)

y) Critical accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions (continued)

Share-based payment transactions

The consolidated entity measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by using either the Binomial or Black-Scholes model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the instruments were granted. The accounting estimates and assumptions relating to equity-settled share-based payments would have no impact on the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next annual reporting period but may impact profit or loss and equity

Estimation of useful lives of assets

The consolidated entity determines the estimated useful lives and related depreciation and amortisation charges for its property, plant and equipment and finite life intangible assets. The useful lives could change significantly as a result of technical innovations or some other event. The depreciation and amortisation charge will increase where the useful lives are less than previously estimated lives, or technically obsolete or non-strategic assets that have been abandoned or sold will be written off or written down.

Impairment of non-financial assets other than goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets

The consolidated entity assesses impairment of non-financial assets other than goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets at each reporting date by evaluating conditions specific to the consolidated entity and to the particular asset that may lead to impairment. If an impairment trigger exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is determined. This involves fair value less costs of disposal or value-in-use calculations, which incorporate a number of key estimates and assumptions. It is reasonably possible that the underlying metal price assumption may change which may then impact the estimated life of mine determinant and may then require a material adjustment to the carrying value of mining plant and equipment, mining infrastructure and mining development assets. Furthermore, the expected future cash flows used to determine the valuein-use of these assets are inherently uncertain and could materially change over time. They are significantly affected by a number of factors including reserves and production estimates, together with economic factors such as metal spot prices, discount rates, estimates of costs to produce reserves and future capital expenditure

Income tax

The consolidated entity is subject to income taxes in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Significant judgement is required in determining the provision for income tax. There are many transactions and calculations undertaken during the ordinary course of business for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The consolidated entity recognises liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on the consolidated entity’s current understanding of the tax law. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the carrying amounts, such differences will impact the current and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made.

Employee benefits provision

As discussed in note 1, the liability for employee benefits expected to be settled more than 12 months from the reporting date are recognised and measured at the present value of the estimated future cash flows to be made in respect of all employees at the reporting date. In determining the present value of the liability, estimates of attrition rates and pay increases through promotion and inflation have been taken into account.

Exploration and evaluation costs

Exploration and evaluation costs have been capitalised on the basis that the consolidated entity will commence commercial production in the future, from which time the costs will be amortised in proportion to the depletion of the mineral resources. Key judgements are applied in considering costs to be capitalised which includes determining expenditures directly related to these activities and allocating overheads between those that are expensed and capitalised. In addition, costs are only capitalised that are expected to be recovered either through successful development or sale of the relevant mining interest. Factors that could impact the future commercial production at the mine include the level of reserves and resources, future technology changes, which could impact the cost of mining, future legal changes and changes in commodity prices. To the extent that capitalised costs are determined not to be recoverable in the future, they will be written off in the period in which this determination is made.

45

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

TOTAL
ADD/(DEDUCT)
SOUTH
EASTERN
UTAH
SEGMENT
NON SEGMENT
AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIA
UNITED STATES
AMOUNTS
AMOUNTS
TOTALS
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
REVENUE Interest income
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19,913
94,332
19,913
94,332
Total segment revenue
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22,013
94,332
22,013
94,332
RESULTS Operatng loss before tax
(4,588,106)
- (1,657,218)
(6,050)
-
- (6,245,324)
(6,050) (2,019,372) (1,370,766)(8,264,696) (1,376,816)
Net loss afer tax
(4,588,106)
- (1,657,218)
(6,050)
-
(6,245,324)
(6,050)
(461,972) (1,370,766)(6,707,296) (1,376,816)
Included within segment results: Depreciaton & amortsaton
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
17,892
15,207
17,892
15,207
Impairment
4,588,106
- 1,657,218
6,050
-
6,245,324
6,050
-
-6,245,324
6,050
SEGMENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Segment assets
6,436,770
- 1,227,270
2,839,551
2,410,657
- 10,074,697 2,839,551
677,328
1,900,97410,752,025
4,740,525
Segment liabilites
424,115
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,046,177
124,3441,470,292
124,344

46

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

5. Revenue

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014
5. Revenue
Revenue
Interest revenue – bank deposits
Interest revenue on loan to PNC Aust Pty Ltd
Service revenue
Foreign exchange gain
2014
2013
$
$
19,913
80,464
-
13,068
2,100
800
421
-
22,434
94,332

6. Loss for the year

Loss before income tax includes the following specific expenses:

6. Loss for the year
Loss before income tax includes the following specifc expenses:
Administratve and corporate costs
Business Development costs
Share based incentves
Management fees and on-costs
Depreciaton and amortsaton:
Depreciaton of non-current assets
Amortsaton of intangible assets
Capitalised exploraton costs writen of:
Impairment South Australian assets
Impairment New South Wales Assets
Impairment Queensland assets
Total operatng expenses
Operatng loss before tax
2014
2013
$
$
841,318
945,836
105,769
485,953
338,609
-
728,218
-
2,013,914
1,431,789
11,845
11,072
6,047
4,135
17,892
15,207
4,588,106
-
39,291
24,152
1,617,927
-
6,245,324
24,152
8,287,130
1,471,148
8,264,696
1,378,816

During the reporting period, the Group did not asses the carrying value of its Utah, Unites States Exploration and Evaluation assets.

47

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

7. Income Taxes

a) Income tax expense

a) Income tax expense
Current tax expense
Deferred tax
Research and development tax ofset
Income tax expense
2014
2013
$
$
163,792
-
-
-
(1,721,192)
-
(1,557,400)
-

The prima facie income tax expense on pre-tax accounting profit from operations reconciles to the income tax expense in the financial statements as follows:

Loss before income tax expense (8,264,696) (1,376,816)
Prima facie tax payable on (loss) (2,479,409) (413,045)
Tax efect of non-temporary diferences 1,472,957 156,350
Tax efect of equity raising costs debited to equity (163,792) (48,628)
Tax efect of tax losses & temporary diferences not recognised
(387,156)
305,323
Total income tax expense (1,557,400) -

b) Income tax recognised directly in equity

There is no amount of tax benefit recognised in equity as the tax effect of temporary differences has not been booked.

  • c) A deferred tax asset (DTA) has not been recognised in respect of temporary differences as they do not meet the recognition criteria set out on Note 1 (p) of the financial statements. A DTA has not been recognised in respect of tax losses either as realisation of the benefit is not regarded as probable.

The Group has derecognised net DTA of $3,126,762 (2013: $893,274) that are available indefinitely for offset against future taxable profits.

The tax rates applicable to each potential benefit are as follows;

  • Timing differences 30%

  • Permanent differences 30%

48

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

8. Trade and other receivables

GST receivable
Other receivables
Research and development tax ofset
Loan to PNC Aust Pty Ltd*
Total
2014
2013
$
$
53,373
36,672
75,927
8,398
1,431,659
-
-
707,639
1,560,959
752,709

*Loan to PNC Aust Pty Ltd - On 23rd of August 2013 the conditions precedent in relation to the acquisition of PNC Aust Pty Ltd were satisfied and PNC Aust Pty Ltd became a 100% owned subsidiary of Tellus Resources Limited. Consequently the loan is eliminated on Consolidation.

There were no past due amounts at 30 June 2014 and no provision has been recorded (2013: nil).

9. Other assets

9. Other assets 9. Other assets
Prepaid acquisiton costs
Prepayments
Total
10. Plant and equipment
FURNITURE
COMPUTER
AND FITTINGS
HARDWARE
$
$
Gross Carrying Amount
Balance at 30 June 2012
-
14,683
Additons
-
-
Balance at 30 June 2013
-
14,683
Additons
15,000
12,387
Balance at 30 June 2014
15,000
27,070
Accumulated depreciaton /amortsaton and impairment
Balance at 30 June 2012
-
4,250
Depreciaton expense
-
4,173
Balance at 30 June 2013
-
8,423
Depreciaton expense
1,123
5,202
Balance at 30 June 2014
1,123
13,625
Net Book Value
30 June 2013
-
6,260
30 June 2014
13,877
13,445
2014
2013
$
$
65,099
-
4,393
13,702
69,493
13,702
FIELD
EQUIPMENT
TOTAL
$
$
-
14,683
-
-
42,089
56,772
-
-
-
14,683
15,000
12,387
42,089
56,772
-
27,387
15,000
27,070
42,089
84,159
7,594
11,844
6,899
11,072
-
8,423
1,123
5,202
14,493
22,916
5,520
11,845
1,123
13,625
20,013
34,761
-
6,260
27,596
33,856
13,877
13,445
22,076
49,398

49

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

10. Plant and equipment (continued)

Aggregate depreciation allocated, whether recognised as an expense, or capitalised as part of the carrying amount of other assets during the year.

Plant and equipment
11. Intangible assets
Gross Carrying Amount
Balance at 30 June 2012
Additons
Balance at 30 June 2013
Additons
Balance at 30 June 2014
Accumulated amortsaton and impairment
Balance at 30 June 2012
Amortsaton expense
Balance at 30 June 2013
Amortsaton expense
Balance at 30 June 2014
Net Book Value
30 June 2013
30 June 2014
2014
2013
$
$
11,845
11,072
SOFTWARE
TOTAL
$
$
16,970
16,970
-
-
16,970
16,970
-
-
16,970
16,970
SOFTWARE
TOTAL
$
$
6,788
6,788
4,135
4,135
10,923
10,923
6,047
2,419
16,970
13,342
6,047
6,047
-
3,628

50

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

12. Exploration and evaluation expenditure

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014
12. Exploraton and evaluaton expenditure
30 JUNE 30 JUNE
2014 2013
Non-producing propertes $ $
Exploraton and evaluaton expenditure:
Balance at the beginning of the reportng year 2,799,550 2,512,841
Additons through normal acquisiton 5,299,748 304,811
Tenements and licenses acquired on acquisiton of
PNC Aust Pty Ltd (refer note 1) – including costs of acquisiton
6,267,676
-
Tenements and licenses acquired – 50% interest in PEL 105 1,750,000 -
Farm out of 50% interest to Senex Energy Limited – in PEL 105
(3,500,000)
-
Covenant Mondo Joint Venture Utah, USA – partcipaton costs
(refer note 2)

2,291,195
-
Impairment of exploraton and evaluaton assets* (6,245,324) (18,102)
Balance at the end of the reportng year 8,662,845 2,799,550
Closing balance comprises:
Exploraton and Evaluaton 1,371,650 2,799,550
Exploraton and Evaluaton – Joint Operatons 7,291,195 -
8,662,845 2,799,550

(*The Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets occurs where senior management conclude that capitalised expenditure is unlikely to be recovered by sale or future exploration)

: Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets

Impairment of exploraton and evaluaton assets:
ASSET
NATURE
REPORTABLE
SEGMENT
Cooper Basin SA
Oil & gas exploraton
South Australia
Upper Hunter NSW
Gold exploraton
Eastern Australia
Chillagoe QLD
Gold exploraton
Eastern Australia
ATP 904 QLD
Oil & gas exploraton
Eastern Australia
30 JUNE
30 JUNE
2014
2013
$
$
(4,588,106)
-
(39,291)
(18,102)
(1,528,711)
-
(89,216)
-
(6,245,324)
(18,102)

Note 1 – Uplift on Acquisition of PNC Aust Pty Ltd

As part of the acquisition of PNC Aust Pty Ltd an Uplift on Acquisition was applied as follows: Net Assets acquired from PNC Aust Pty Ltd ($197,581)* Consideration paid:

  • Issue of Shares $4,000,000

  • Issue of options $764,400 $4,764,400

Uplift on asset acquisition $4,961,981

*Included in net liabilities acquired was $1,305,695 of exploration assets.

The recoverable amounts were determined based on the fair value of the assets, less cost to sell. In the absence of a binding sale agreement and active market, the Board determined the fair value based on the best information available to reflect an estimated amount that the entity could obtain from the disposal of the assets in an arm’s length transaction.

51

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

12. Exploration and evaluation expenditure (continued)

Note 2Covenant Mondo Joint Venture

The Group has agreed with the Operator of the Covenant Mondo Joint Venture that the Group’s participation Interest in the project would reduce to 25% resulting in a reduction in the cost contribution requirement for the two wells from 50% to 30%. The balance of funds paid in relation to the project is represented by the following;

  • Participation Interest payments $1,454,472

  • • USA Costs contributions $ 266,033 • Australian operational costs $ 273,087 • Project Finder’s fee $ 297,603 $2,291,195

13. Trade and other payables

13. Trade and other payables
Current
Trade payables
Accruals and Other Payables
Payroll liabilites
14. Borrowings
Current
Unsecured loans (refer note 1)
2014
2013
$
$
600,466
52,143
221,731
29,214
70,413
32,035
892,610
113,392
2014
2013
$
$
550,392
-
550,392
-

Note 1 : Interest has been capitalised as part of the loans where applicable in accordance with loan agreements entered into.

15. Employee benefits


Current
Annual leave
Non-current
Long-service leave
2014
2013
$
$
20,510
5,358
2014
2013
$
$
6,780
5,594

52

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

16. Share capital

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014
16. Share capital
168,099,767 fully paid ordinary shares (2013:
44,380,555 fully paid ordinary shares)
Share issue expenses net of tax
2014
2013
$
$
18,783,477
8,184,500
(1,297,608)
(810,469)
17,485,869
7,374,031

Each ordinary share carries the right to one vote at shareholders’ meetings and is entitled to participate in any dividends or other distributions of the Group.

2014 2014 2013 2013
NUMBER $ NUMBER $
Fully paid ordinary shares
Balance at the beginning of the period 44,380,555 7,374,031 44,380,555 7,470,031
Shares issued during the period & fully paid 123,719,212 10,598,977 - -
Share issue transacton costs net of tax - (487,139) - (96,000)
Ordinary fully paid shares at end of year 168,099,767 17,485,869 44,380,555 7,374,031
a) Movements in ordinary share capital
DETAILS DATE NO OF SHARES ISSUE PRICE $
Balance 1 July 2012 44,380,555 7,470,031
Issue of shares - - -
Share issue transacton costs, net of tax - - (96,000)
Balance 30 June 2013 44,380,555 7,374,031
Issue of shares – placement 23 August 2013 20,736,953 $0.10 2,073,695
Issue of shares – placement 23 August 2013 7,721,414 $0.055 424,678
Issue of shares – PNC Aust Pty Ltd * 23 August 2013 40,000,000 $0.10 4,000,000
Issue of Shares – 50% PEL 105 16 October 2013 19,776,020 $0.089 1,750,000
Issue of Shares – placement 24 December 2013 11,719,348 $0.07 820,355
Issue of Shares – placement 6 January 2014 585,715 $0.07 41,000
Issue of Shares – placement 29 January 2014 1,982,142 $0.07 138,749
Issue of Shares – placement 6 March 2014 7,864,288 $0.07 550,500
Issue of Shares – placement 17 April 2014 13,333,332 $0.06 800,000
Share issue transacton costs, net of tax - - (487,139)
Balance 30 June 2014 168,099,767 17,485,869

*Shares Issued as consideration for the acquisition of PNC Aust Pty Ltd.

53

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

16. Share capital (continued)

b) Capital Management

Management controls the capital of the Group in order to maximise the return to shareholders and ensure that the Group can fund its operations and continue as a going concern.

Management effectively manages the Group’s capital by assessing the Group’s financial risks and adjusting its capital structure in response to changes in these risks and in the market. These responses include the management of debt levels, working capital requirements, distributions to shareholders and share issues.

17. Reserves

a) Movement in Reserves

Movements in each class of reserve during the current and previous financial year are set out below:

Option Reserve

The reserve is used to recognise the value of options granted for services rendered by consultants and employees of the Company in accordance with the accounting policy described at note 1.

OPTION RESERVE TOTAL
$
Total Balance at 1 July 2012 240,513
Fair value of Optons issued during the reportng period 96,000
Fair value of Performance Rights vested 35,212
Balance at 30 June 2013 371,725
Fair value of Performance Rights (Optons) issued as part of the
acquisiton of PNC Aust Pty Ltd
764,400
Fair value of Optons issued during the reportng period (refer note 1) 454,812
Fair value of Performance Rights vested 41,798
Balance at 30 June 2014 1,632,735

Note 1 : The following options over ordinary shares in the Company were granted during the reporting year:

  1. On the 24th of September 2013, the Company issued pursuant to approval at the shareholders meeting held on 10 July 2013 5,000,000 options to Helmsec exercisable at $0.20 on or before 17 September 2017.

  2. On the 10th of December 2013, the Company issued to Mr Robert Kennedy 7,500,000 options exercisable at $0.093 on or before 31 December 2016.

  3. On the 5th March 2014, the Company issued to Mr Neil Young 2,000,000 options exercisable at $0.20 on or before 5th of March 2018.

  4. On the 5th of March 2014 the Company issued to Robert Lord 1,500,000 options exercisable at $0.20 on or before 17th of September 2017.

For the options above the fair value at grant date has been calculated using the Black Scholes methodology. Volatility has been calculated with reference to comparable entities.

54

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

18. Earnings per share

Basic (loss) per share
Diluted (loss) per share
The following refects the income and share data used in the
calculatons of the basic and diluted earnings per share:
Earnings reconciliaton
Net loss for the period
Earnings used in calculatng basic & diluted earnings per share
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the
denominator in calculatng basic and dilutve
earnings per share
2014
2013
CENTS PER
CENTS PER
SHARE
SHARE
(5.2)
(3.1)
(5.2)
(3.1)
2014
2013
$
$
(6,707,296)
(1,376,816)

(6,707,296)
(1,376,816)
129,012,489
44,380,555
129,012,489
44,380,555

The following potential ordinary shares are not dilutive and are therefore excluded from the weighted average number of ordinary shares and potential ordinary shares in the calculation of diluted earnings per share:

$0.30 29 July 2011 unlisted optons
$0.30 30 April 2011 unlisted optons
$0.25 25 September 2012 unlisted optons
$0.20 17 September 2013 unlisted optons
$0.093 4 December 2013 unlisted optons
$0.20 5 March 2014 unlisted optons
$0.20 5 March 2014 unlisted optons
$0.10 17 April 2014 unlisted optons
2014
2013
NUMBER
NUMBER
-
4,800,000
-
1,200,000
5,000,000
5,000,000
5,000,000
-
7,500,000
-
2,000,000
-
1,500,000
-
6,666,666
-

19. Contingent liabilities and contingent assets

Chillagoe Gold Project, QLD, Australia

In accordance with the Agreement dated 15 May 2012 with Premier Minerals Limited, upon the successful delineation and announcement by Tellus Resources Limited of an Indicated JORC resource of at least 300,000 ounces of gold with a cut-off grade of 3.0 grams per tonne at the Chillagoe Gold Project, Tellus Resources Limited will pay Premier Minerals Limited a further $2,000,000 in cash; and issue Premier Minerals Limited $2,000,000 worth of shares in Tellus Resources Limited.

Covenant Mondo Joint Venture, Utah, USA

The Group is committed to expenditure pursuant to the Participation Agreement entered into with Trans Western Petroleum LLC for the Covenant Mondo Joint Venture in Utah in the Unites States of America, as a result a contingent liability for costs in accordance with the Participation Agreement entered into exists. As at the date of this report the Group has paid all amounts due pursuant to the agreements entered into and has not been advised on any additional costs by the operator of the Covenant Mondo Joint Venture.

55

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

19. Contingent liabilities and contingent assets (continued)

Tenement Minimum expenditure

The Company has minimum expenditure commitments to meet the conditions under which certain tenements were granted. These minimum expenditure commitments total $385,000. These minimum commitments may vary from time to time, subject to approval by the grantor of titles or by variation of contractual agreements. The expenditure represents potential expenditure which may be reduced by entering into sale, joint venture or relinquishment of the interests and may vary depending upon the results of exploration. Should expenditure not reach the required level in respect of each area of interest, the Company’s interest could be either reduced or forfeited.

20. Notes to the statement of cash flows

a) Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents

For the purpose of presentation in the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year as shown in the statement of cash flows is reconciled to the related items in the statement of financial position as follows:

2014 2013
$ $
Cash at bank and on hand 409,330 1,134,661
b) Reconciliaton of loss for the period afer income tax to cash fows used in operatng actvites
Loss for the year (6,707,296) (1,376,816)
Depreciaton and amortsaton of non-current assets 17,892 15,207
Impairment of exploraton assets 6,245,324 18,102
Amounts set aside for provisions - 1,870
Equity setled share based payments 338,610 35,212
Tax efect of share issue costs (163,793) -
Exploraton expenditure expensed - 6,050
(Increase)/decrease in assets:
Current receivables - 18,600
Prepayments 9,309 (3,089)
Increase/(decrease) in liabilites: (808,250) -
Current and non-current payables (20,896) (13,564)
Provisions 16,338 -
Net cash used in operatng actvites (1,072,762) (1,298,428)

56

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

21. Financial Risk Management

Financial Risk Exposures and Management

The main risks the Group is exposed to through its financial instruments are interest rate risk, liquidity and credit risk. Due to the size of the Group, a separate finance committee does not exist. The Board is responsible for the financial risk management and considers future cash flow requirements as required.

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is managed by investing cash with major financial institutions in both cash on deposit and term deposit accounts.

Liquidity risk

The Group manages liquidity risk by monitoring forecast cash flows. The Group’s operations require it to raise capital on an on-going basis to fund its planned exploration program and to commercialise its tenement assets. If the Group does not raise capital in the short term, it can continue as a going concern by reducing planned but not committed exploration expenditure until funding is available and/or entering into joint venture arrangements where exploration is funded by the joint venture partner.

Credit risk

Credit risk refers to the risk that counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group as well as through deposits with financial institutions. The Group has adopted a policy of only dealing with credit worthy counterparties obtaining sufficient collateral or other security where appropriate as a means of mitigating the risk of financial loss from defaults and only banks and financial institutions with an ‘A’ rating are utilised. The Group measures risk on a fair value basis.

The maximum exposure to credit risk at reporting date to recognised financial assets is the carrying amount, net of any provisions for impairment of those assets, as disclosed in the statement of financial position and notes to the financial statements.

Price risk

The Group does not derive revenue from sale of products, therefore the effect on profit and equity as a result of changes in the price risk is not considered material. The fair value of the mineral projects will be impacted by commodity price changes and could impact future revenues once operational. However, management monitors current and projected commodity prices.

The Group is mainly exposed to mining services price risk. Management constantly monitors price movements and seeks ways to minimise the cost on operating activities.

Financial instruments

The Group has exposure to interest rate risk, which is the risk that a financial instrument’s value will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates and the effective weighted average interest rates on those financial assets and the financial liabilities.

57

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

21. Financial Risk Management (continued)

The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and effective weighted average interest rate for financial assets and liabilities is set out below. These tables also set out the Groups remaining contractual maturity for its financial liabilities, they have been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities and are based on the earliest date on which the financial liabilities are required to be paid. The tables include both interest and principal cash flows disclosed as remaining contractual maturities and therefore these totals may differ from their carrying amount in the statement of financial position.

FIXED MATURITY DATES

FIXED MATURITY DATES
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EFFECTIVE
INTEREST
RATE
2014
%
VARIABLE
LESS
NON
INTEREST
THAN
1-2
2-3
INTEREST
RATE
1 YEAR
YEARS
YEARS
BEARING
TOTAL
$
$
$
$
$
$
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 2.77%
Trade and other receivables
Financial liabilites
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
15.00%
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EFFECTIVE
INTEREST
RATE
2013
%
409,330
-
-
-
-
409,330
-
-
-
-
1,560,959
1,560,959
409,330
-
-
-
1,560,959
1,970,289
-
-
-
-
892,610
892,610
-
-
300,392
-
250,000
550,392
-
-
300,392
-
1,142,610
1,443,002
FIXED MATURITY DATES
VARIABLE
LESS
NON
INTEREST
THAN
1-2
2-3
INTEREST
RATE
1 YEAR
YEARS
YEARS
BEARING
TOTAL
$
$
$
$
$
$
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 2.77%
Trade and other receivables
Loan to PNC Aust Pty Ltd
7.0%
Financial liabilites
Trade and other payables
1,080,530
40,000
-
-
14,131
1,134,661
-
-
-
-
45,070
45,070
-
707,639
-
-
-
707,639
1,080,530
747,639
-
-
59,201
1,887,370
-
-
-
-
113,392
113,392

Fair values

The Directors consider that the carrying amount of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the financial statements approximates their fair values.

58

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

21. Financial Risk Management (continued)

Sensitivity analysis

Interest Rate Risk and Price Risk

The Group has performed sensitivity analysis relating to its exposure to interest rate risk and price risk at reporting date. This sensitivity analysis demonstrates the effect on the current year results and equity which could result from a change in these risks.

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

At 30 June 2014, the effect on loss and equity as a result of fluctuations in the interest rate, with all other variables remaining constant has been considered. For the purpose of this exercise, a 1% increase in the interest rate results in a decrease in loss by $67,073 (2013: $13,768) and an increase in equity by $67,073 (2013: $13,768). These changes are considered to be reasonably possible based on observation of current market conditions.

Price Risk Sensitivity Analysis

As the Group does not derive revenue from sale of products, the effect on profit and equity as a result of changes in the price risk is not considered material. The fair value of the exploration projects will be impacted by commodity price changes and could impact future revenues once operational. However, management monitors current and projected commodity prices.

22. Share-based payments

Employee share option plan

There were no employee options granted during the reporting period.

Other share-based payment options on issue

The following reconciles other outstanding share-based payment options on issue at the beginning and at the end of the reporting year:

2014
Outstanding at beginning of the reportng year
Granted during the fnancial year
Expired during the fnancial year
Balance at end of the reportng year
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
NUMBER OF
EXERCISE
OPTIONS
PRICE
11,000,000
$0.28
16,000,000
$0.15
(6,000,000)
$0.30
21,000,000
$0.19

The options outstanding at 30 June 2014 had a weighted average exercise price of $0.18 and weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.96 years.

2013
Outstanding at beginning of the reportng year
Granted during the fnancial year
Expired during the fnancial year
Balance at end of the reportng year
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
NUMBER OF
EXERCISE
OPTIONS
PRICE
6,000,000
$0.30
5,000,000
$0.25
-
-
11,000,000
$0.28

The options outstanding at 30 June 2013 had a weighted average exercise price of $0.28 and weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.93 years.

59

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

22. Share based payments (continued)

The following share-based payment arrangements were in existence during the reporting year:

EXERCISE FAIR VALUE AT
OPTIONS SERIES NUMBER GRANT DATE EXPIRY DATE PRICE GRANT DATE*
Issued 25 Sept 2012 5,000,000 25 Sept 2012 25 Sept 2014 $0.25 $96,000
Issued 23 Sept 2013 5,000,000 23 Sept 2013 24 Sept 2017 $0.20 $158,000
Issued 4 Dec 2013 7,500,000 4 Dec 2013 31 Dec 2016 $0.093 $237,750
Issued 5 Mar 2014 2,000,000 5 Mar 2014 5 Mar 2018 $0.20 $47,200
Issued 5 Mar 2014 1,500,000 5 Mar 2014 17 Sept 2017 $0.20 $31,350

*The fair value at grant date has been calculated using the Black Scholes methodology. Volatility has been calculated with reference to comparable entities.

INPUTS INTO THE MODEL OPTION OPTION OPTION OPTION OPTION
SERIES SERIES SERIES SERIES SERIES
Grant date 25-Sep-12 23-Sept-13 4-Dec-13 5-Mar-2014 5-Mar-2014
Exercise price $0.25 $0.20 $0.093 $0.20 $0.20
Expected volatlity 82.6% 75% 75% 75% 75%
Opton life 2 years 4 years 3 years 4 years 3.5 years
Risk-free interest rate 3.65% 2.80% 2.80% 2.80% 2.80%

60

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

22. Share based payments (continued)

Performance Rights

The following Performance Rights were in existence during the reporting year:

2014
WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF
AVERAGE
PERFORMANCE
EXERCISE
RIGHTS
PRICE
Outstanding at beginning of the reportng year
1,050,000
$0.33
Granted during the fnancial year
45,000,000
N/A
Expired during the fnancial year
-
Balance at end of the reportng year
46,050,000
2013
WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF
AVERAGE
PERFORMANCE
EXERCISE
RIGHTS
PRICE
Outstanding at beginning of the reportng year
700,000
$0.33
Granted during the fnancial year
350,000
$0.33
Expired during the fnancial year
-
Balance at end of the reportng year
1,050,000
$0.33
FAIR VALUE AT
GRANT DATE/
PERFORMANCE RIGHTS
NUMBER
GRANT DATE
VESTED
2014
WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF
AVERAGE
PERFORMANCE
EXERCISE
RIGHTS
PRICE
Outstanding at beginning of the reportng year
1,050,000
$0.33
Granted during the fnancial year
45,000,000
N/A
Expired during the fnancial year
-
Balance at end of the reportng year
46,050,000
2013
WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF
AVERAGE
PERFORMANCE
EXERCISE
RIGHTS
PRICE
Outstanding at beginning of the reportng year
700,000
$0.33
Granted during the fnancial year
350,000
$0.33
Expired during the fnancial year
-
Balance at end of the reportng year
1,050,000
$0.33
FAIR VALUE AT
GRANT DATE/
PERFORMANCE RIGHTS
NUMBER
GRANT DATE
VESTED
700,000
$0.33
350,000
$0.33
-
1,050,000
$0.33
FAIR VALUE AT
GRANT DATE/
GRANT DATE
VESTED
S Woodham
700,000
Consultants
350,000
C Dorsch
45,000,000
5 April 2012
$48,513
21 Sept 2012
$23,367
23 Aug 2013
$764,400

Milestones

The Performance Rights will convert as follows:

  • 1) 300,000 Performance Rights, to convert if the 20 day VWAP for the Shares reaches 25 cents per Share, on or before 27 January 2017; and

  • 2) 400,000 Performance Rights, to convert if the 20 day VWAP for the Shares reaches 40 cents per Share, on or before 27 January 2017.

  • 3) 5,000,000, where the 30 day volume weighted average price (VWAP) for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.175 per share;

  • 4) 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.200 per share;

  • 5) 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.225 per share;

  • 6) 15,000,000, when production testing of PEL 105 in either open or closed hole that can demonstrate an immediate flow capacity for the well in excess of a sustained minimum of 100 BOEPD for a period in excess of 7 days. Such test must be certified by a relevant expert in the field being either an independent consulting reservoir engineer or the contracted testing Company, provided that such threshold is achieved on or prior to 31 December 2014; and

  • 7) 15,000,000 where the Company has acquired a direct or indirect interest in theWichita County Project and the production from the leases which form the Wichita County Project reaches an average of 50 BOEPD over a three month period;

61

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

22. Share based payments (continued)

Valuation of Performance Rights

The Performance Rights have been independently valued by Stantons International. The valuation noted above is not necessarily the market price that the Performance Rights could be traded at and is not automatically the market price for taxation purposes.

Performance Rights – S Woodham 27 January 2012

VESTING CONDITION – DISCOUNT FOR
CONVERTING PROVIDED VESTING PRICE
THE PRICE OF SHARES NO. OF TIMES THE BARRIER
PERFORMANCE DEEMED ON THE ASX IS ABOVE VESTING PRICE IS APPLIED TO FAIR
RIGHT NO. OF SHARE PRICE THE FOLLOWING PRICES GREATER THAN VALUE BASED
PERFORMANCE 27 JANUARY AT THE TIME OF THE SHARE PRICE AS AT ON 27 JANUARY
RIGHTS 2012 (CENTS) CONVERSION (CENTS) 27 JANUARY 2012 2012 SHARE PRICE
Milestone 1 300,000 14 25 1.79 35%
Milestone 2 400,000 14 40 2.86 65%

The determination of the probability and therefore discount to apply is somewhat subjective as it is difficult to predict the future prospects of the Group or the market. However, the time to meet Milestones 2 and 3 are quite long (to 27 January 2017) and the share volatility since the shares have been traded on ASX in May 2011 approximates 67% and these have been taken into account in determining the appropriate discount. For purposes of our valuation, we have estimated the discount to apply to the value of the Performance Rights with market based vesting conditions.

Performance Rights – C Dorsch 23 August 2013

NO. OF
PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE PROBABILITY OF
RIGHT RIGHTS HURDLE OCCURENCE FAIR VALUE
Milestone 3 5,000,000 30 Day VWAP $0.175 32% $0.049
Milestone 4 5,000,000 30 Day VWAP $0.200 23% $0.049
Milestone 5 5,000,000 30 Day VWAP $0.225 17% $0.049
Milestone 6 15,000,000 100 BOEPD PEL 105 50% $0.049
Milestone 7 15,000,000 50 BOEPD Witchita 30% $0.049

The fair value of the 45,000,000 Performance Rights issued to Carl Dorsch or his Nominee were calculated using the Independent experts report from Hall Chadwick that formed part of the Notice of Meeting to shareholders when the transaction was voted upon earlier in the year. The Hall Chadwick valuation report calculated the likelihood of achieving each of the target 30-day VWAP’s by applying a Monte Carlo simulation based on the assumptions of transaction completion, $0.10 spot price, 75% share volatility, and the target prices of the respective hurdles. The likelihood of PEL 105 production being achieved has been estimated at 50% and the likelihood of acquiring the Wichita County Project has been estimated at 30% as outlined in the table above.

62

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

22. Share based payments (continued)

Based on the above assumptions (after discounting where appropriate for market based conditions) the values are as follows:

PERFORMANCE 27 JANUARY 2012 VALUE (CENTS) 23 AUGUST 2013 VALUE (CENTS)
RIGHTS AFTER DISCOUNT FOR AFTER DISCOUNT FOR
MARKET BASED CONDITIONS MARKET BASED CONDITIONS
(MILESTONES 1 AND 2) (MILESTONES 3 TO 7)
300,000 Milestone 1 9.1
400,000 Milestone 2 4.9
5,000,000 Milestone 3 4.9
5,000,000 Milestone 4 4.9
5,000,000 Milestone 5 4.9
15,000,000 Milestone 6 4.9
15,000,000 Milestone 7 4.9

i) 350,000 Performance Rights, to convert if the Share price reaches 30 cents per Share, on or before 21 September 2015.

Valuation of Performance Rights

These Performance Rights have been valued at $0.067 each. This valuation is not necessarily the market price that the Performance Rights could be traded at and is not automatically the market price for taxation purposes.

Performance rights price inputs

Performance rights price inputs
Hurdle price $0.30
Spot price - 25 September 2012 $0.11
Risk free rate 2.56%
Issue date 21-Sep-2012
Conversion date 21-Sep-2015
Number of rights issued 350,000
Present value of performance right $0.067
Total value of performance rights $23,367

23. Related party disclosures

Parent entity Tellus Resources Limited is the parent entity.

Subsidiaries

Interests in subsidiaries are set out in note 28.

Joint operations

Interests in joint operations are set out in note 27.

63

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

23. Related party disclosures (continued)

Key Management Personnel

The aggregate of compensation payments made to Directors and other members of key management personnel of the Group is set out below:


personnel of the Group is set out below:
2014 2013
$ $
Short term employee benefts 510,469 371,067
Post-employment benefts 35,709 27,900
Long term benefts/Terminaton benefts 119,728 -
Share-based payments 1,049,350 26,867
1,715,256 425,834
T_ransactons with related partes:_
The following transactons occurred with related partes;
2014 2013
$ $
Payments for services:
Payment for accountng and Company secretarial services to
BDO Administraton SA Pty Ltd an entty associated with
Mr George Yatzis the Company secretary of Tellus Resources Ltd.
46,000
-
Payments for Furniture and Fitngs
*Payment made to Dorsch Consultng Pty Ltd for Furniture and
Fitngs at the Tellus Resources Limited Head Ofce Adelaide,
South Australia (Note 1) 15,000 -
Total 61,000 -

Note 1 : Dorsch Consulting Pty Ltd is an entity associated with Mr Carl Dorsch Managing Director of Tellus Resources Limited. The Payment for Furniture and Fittings was approved by the board of directors at a meeting held where Mr Dorsch was not present or permitted to vote or comment upon due to having an interest in the potential transaction,. The acquisition was subject to independent valuation and deliberation by the directors without Mr Dorsch participating in that decision-making process.

Loans to/from related parties

There were no loans to or from related parties at the current and previous reporting date.

Terms and conditions

All transactions were made on normal commercial terms and conditions and at market rates.

24. Remuneration of auditors

Remuneraton of the auditor for the Group for:
Audit or review of the fnancial report
Total
2014
2013
$
$
37,085
50,915
37,085
50,915

The auditor of the Group is Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd.

64

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

25. Acquisition of PNC Aust Pty Ltd

On 30 April 2013, the Company announced that it had entered into a conditional agreement to acquire 100% of the issued shares in PNC Aust Pty Ltd (PNC). Completion of the Acquisition was conditional on, amongst other things, the Company’s shareholders approval of the resolutions as set out in the Notice of Meeting to the Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) held on 10 July 2013. All resolutions were carried by shareholders at the EGM. Furthermore, it was a condition of the Acquisition that the Company raise a minimum of AUD $2,000,000 to fund the ongoing operations of the Company. On the 23rd of August 2013 the Capital Raising conditions were satisfied and the acquisition of PNC Aust Pty Ltd was completed. At the date of acquisition, PNC Aust Pty Ltd had no employees and its only assets were the tenements and related cash and receivables. Accordingly PNC Aust Pty Ltd does not constitute a business and has been accounted for as an asset acquisition. As a result, costs of $69,017 incurred through this asset acquisition have been capitalised into the cost of the assets acquired.

As part of the acquisition of PNC Aust Pty Ltd an Uplift on Acquisition was applied as follows:

Net liabilities acquired from PNC Aust Pty Ltd ($197,581)

Consideration paid:

  • Issue of Shares $4,000,000

  • Issue of options $764,400 $4,764,400

  • Uplift on asset acquisition $4,961,981

The recoverable amounts were determined based on the fair value of the assets, less cost to sell. In the absence of a binding sale agreement and active market, the Board determined the fair value based on the best information available to reflect an estimated amount that the entity could obtain from the disposal of the assets in an arm’s length transaction.

26. Parent entity information

Information relating to Tellus Resources Ltd (‘the parent entity’).

Statement of Financial Positon
Current Assets
Non-current assets
Total Assets
Current liabilites
Non-current liabilites
Total liabilites
Net Assets
Equity
Issued capital
Equity reserve
Accumulated losses
Total Equity
Loss for the year
Total Comprehensive loss
2014
2013
$
$
1,912,759
1,901,072
2,414,674
2,839,453
4,327,433
4,740,525
877,462
118,750
6,780
5,594
884,242
124,344
3,443,191
4,616,181
17,485,869
7,374,031
1,632,735
371,725
(15,675,413)
(3,129,575)
3,443,191
4,616,181
(12,545,838)
(1,376,816)
(12,545,838)
(1,376,816)

Refer to note 19 for details of the parent entity’s commitments and contingent liabilities. The parent entity has not entered into a deed of cross guarantee at the year end.

65

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

27. Interests in Joint Operations

The consolidated entity has recognised its share of jointly held assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of joint operations. These have been incorporated in the financial statements under the appropriate classifications. Information relating to joint operations that are material to the consolidated entity are set out below:


out below:
OWNERSHIP INTEREST
PRINCIPAL PLACE 2014 2013
NAME OF BUSINESS % %
PEL 105 Exploraton & mining of oil South Australia, Australia 50.00% 0.00%
Covenant Mondo Joint Venture Utah,
Exploraton and mining of oil United States of America 25.00% 0.00%

28. Interests in subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following whollyowned subsidiaries in accordance with the accounting policy described in note 1:

CONTROLLED COUNTRY OF PERCENTAGE
ENTITY INCORPORATION OWNED
Premier Mining Pty Ltd Australia 100%
PNC Aust Pty Ltd Australia 100%
PNC USA LLC United States of America 100%

29. Subsequent events

Madagascan Asset Opportunity

In May 2014, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with ASX listed Company Caravel Energy Limited to acquire a 25% (with rights to acquire up to a further 55%) interest in a Company called Petromad (Mauritius) Limited. This Company owns a 100% interest in Block 3114 located onshore Madagascar and is a party to a production sharing contract with respect to petroleum exploration and production in the block.

The consideration payable by the Company for the acquisition is 85,000,000 Tellus Resources Ltd ordinary shares.

Completion of the purchase was conditional upon the Company obtaining shareholder approval at an Extraordinary General meeting held on the 26th of September 2014, the Company received shareholder approval at the Extraordinary General Meeting and consequently the transaction will be finalised upon satisfaction of the conditions precedent.

Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting

On the 6th of August 2014 the Company received a notice to call an Extraordinary General Meeting of shareholders with certain resolutions aimed at adding Directors to the Company. On the 26th August 2014, the Company announced that the date of the meeting will be the 7th October 2014.

Share Placement

On 14 August 2014 the Company announced a placement of 22,000,000 ordinary shares to sophisticated investors at an average price of 3 cents per share to raise a total of AUD $660,000 to assist with the Company’s working capital requirements.

66

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014

30. Going concern

The financial report has been prepared on the basis of going concern.

The consolidated entity incurred a net loss after tax of $6,707,296 during the financial year ended 30 June 2014, had a net cash outflow of $5,631,376 from operating and investing activities, and its planned expenditure exceeds its current cash held. The Group continues to be reliant on the completion of a capital raising for continued operations and the provision of working capital which it has a string history of success with.

If the additional capital is not obtained, the going concern basis may not be appropriate with the result that the Company and consolidated entitymay have to realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities, other than in the ordinary course of business in amounts different from those stated in the financial report.

31. Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities

Fair value hierarchy

AASB 13 requires disclosure of fair value measurements by level of the following fair value hierarchy:

  • Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1);

  • Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (level 2); and

  • Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (level 3).

The Group does not have any assets or liabilities that are measured on the basis of fair value.

67

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION

  1. In the opinion of the Directors of Tellus Resources Ltd:

  2. a. the financial statements and notes of Tellus Resources Ltd are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:

    • i. giving a true and fair view of its financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date; and

    • ii. complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

  3. b. there are reasonable grounds to believe that Tellus Resources Ltd will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.

  4. The Directors have been given the declarations required by Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 from the Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer for the financial year ended 30 June 2014.

  5. The financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors:

Robert Kennedy Chairman

Adelaide, 30 September 2014

68

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [453 x 665] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Level 1,
67 Greenhill Rd
Wayville SA 5034
Correspondence to:
GPO Box 1270
Adelaide SA 5001
T 61 8 8372 6666
F 61 8 8372 6677
E [email protected]
W www.grantthornton.com.au
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF TELLUS RESOURCES LIMITED
Report on the financial report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Tellus Resources Limited (the
“Company”), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June
2014, the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income,
consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for
the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and
other explanatory information and the directors’ declaration of the consolidated entity
comprising the Company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time
during the financial year.
Directors’ responsibility for the financial report
The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report
that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the
Corporations Act 2001. The Directors’ responsibility also includes such internal control as
the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that
gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error. The Directors also state, in the notes to the financial report, in accordance with
Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements, the financial
statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We
conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards
require us to comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is
free from material misstatement.
Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd ACN 130 913 594
a subsidiary or related entity of Grant Thornton Australia Ltd ABN 41 127 556 389
‘Grant Thornton’ refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the
context requires. Grant Thornton Australia Ltd is a member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL). GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm
is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate one another and
are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions. In the Australian context only, the use of the term ‘Grant Thornton’ may refer to Grant Thornton Australia Limited ABN 41 127 556 389 and its
Australian subsidiaries and related entities. GTIL is not an Australian related entity to Grant Thornton Australia Limited.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Liability is limited in those States where a current
scheme applies.
----- End of picture text -----

69

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error.

In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company’s preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Independence

In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.

Auditor’s opinion

In our opinion:

  • a the financial report of Tellus Resources Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:

  • i giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and

ii complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

b the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.

Emphasis of matter

Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 30 in the financial report which indicates that the company incurred a net loss of $6,707,296 during the year ended 30 June 2014 and, as of that date, cash outflows from operating and investing activities equates to $5,631,376. These conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note 30, indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern and therefore, the company may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business, and at the amounts stated in the financial report.

70

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Report on the remuneration report

We have audited the remuneration report included in the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2014. The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the remuneration report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the remuneration report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.

Auditor’s opinion on the remuneration report

In our opinion, the remuneration report of Tellus Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2014, complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.

GRANT THORNTON AUDIT PTY LTD Chartered Accountants

S J Gray Partner – Audit & Assurance Adelaide, 30 September 2014

71

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Additional information required by the Australian Securities Exchange Limited and not shown elsewhere in this report is as follows:

Ordinary shares

As at 17 October 2014, the issued capital comprised of 277,848,295 fully paid ordinary shares (ASX code: TLU) held by 524 holders.

Options

As at 17 October 2014, the Company had the following options available to be exercised:

  1. 6,666,666 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of 10 cents each, exercisable on or before 31 December 2015.

  2. 7,500,000 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of 9.3 cents each, exercisable on or before 31 December 2016.

  3. 5,000,000 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of 20 cents each, exercisable on or before 17 September 2017.

  4. 1,500,000 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of 20 cents each, exercisable on or before 17 September 2017

  5. 2,000,000 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of 20 cents each, exercisable on or before 5 March 2018.

Each option converts to one ordinary share.

Performance Rights

As at 17 October 2014, the company has the following performing rights on issue on the terms and conditions set out below:

  1. 300,000 performance rights, to convert if the 20 day vwap for the shares reaches 25 cents per share, on or before 27 January 2017;

  2. 400,000 performance rights, to convert if the 20 day vwap for the shares reaches 40 cents per share, on or before 27 January 2017.

  3. 350,000 performance rights, to convert if the share price reaches 30 cents per share, on or before 21 September 2015.

  4. 45,000,000 performance rights over ordinary shares subject to Carl Dorsch remaining employed as managing director of the Company. These rights convert into fully paid ordinary shares in the Company on a 1:1 ratio, for nil consideration as follows:

  5. 5,000,000, where the 30 day volume weighted average price (VWAP) for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.175 per share;

  6. 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.200 per share;

  7. 5,000,000, where the 30 day VWAP for the ordinary shares of the Company reaches at least $0.225 per share;

  8. 15,000,000, when production testing of PEL 105 in either open or closed hole that can demonstrate an immediate flow capacity for the well in excess of a sustained minimum of 100 BOEPD for a period in excess of 7 days. Such test must be certified by a relevant expert in the field being either an independent consulting reservoir engineer or the contracted testing company, provided that such threshold is achieved on or prior to 31 December 2014; and

  9. 15,000,000 where the Company has acquired a direct or indirect interest in the Wichita County Project and the production from the leases which form the Wichita County Project reaches an average of 50BOEPD over a three month period.

72

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Distribution of holders equity security – as at 17 October 2014

Fully Paid Ordinary Shares

Fully Paid Ordinary Shares
HOLDING NUMBER OF TOTAL PERCENTAGE
HOLDERS UNITS %
1 - 1,000 3 9 0.00
1,001 - 5,000 10 30,616 0.01
5,001 - 10,000 61 534,916 0.19
10,001 - 100,000 232 10,708,703 3.85
100,001 and over 218 266,584,051 95.95
Total number of holders 524 277,848,295 100.000
Holding less than a marketable parcel 144 1,753,425

Restricted Securities

Substantial shareholder notices received – as at 17 October 2014

SHAREHOLDER ORDINARY SHARES
NUMBER HELD PERCENTAGE
MR JASON PETERSON 25,000,000 9.00
AUSTIN EXPLORATION LIMITED 19,776,020 7.11
PARAGON GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED 18,760,463 6.75
CNP ENERGY PTY LTD 17,000,000 6.12

73

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Top Twenty Shareholders – as at 17 October 2014

Top Twenty Shareholders – as at 17 October 2014
ORDINARY SHARES
SHAREHOLDERS NUMBER HELD PERCENTAGE
CARAVEL ENERGY LIMITED 54,000,000 19.44
CELTIC CAPITAL PTY LTD 25,000,000 9.00
AUSTIN EXPLORATION LIMITED 19,776,020 7.12
CNP ENERGY PTY LTD 17,000,000 6.12
QOC FOUNDERS NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 7,598,239 2.73
ASIA PACIFIC MINING CAPITAL PTE LTD 5,787,573 2.08
BEN CAMERON MELVILLE SALMON 5,424,369 1.95
PREMIER MINERALS LTD 4,837,005 1.74
SAYERS INVESTMENTS (ACT) PTY LTD 4,800,000 1.73
TAYCOL NOMINEES PTY LTD <211 A/C> 4,800,000 1.73
PARAGON GROUP HOLDING LIMITED 4,508,000 1.62
MR ROBERT SIMEON LORD 3,818,572 1.37
WENTWORTH GLOBAL CAPITAL FINANCE PTY LTD 3,649,033 1.31
RAYA GROUP LIMITED 3,166,666 1.14
DAYWAVE PTY LIMITED 2,728,249 0.98
PARAGON GROUP HOLDING LIMITED 2,309,249 0.83
MERRILL LYNCH (AUSTRALIA) NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 2,245,034 0.81
MR ALEXANDER SUTHERLAND 2,015,334 0.73
ANTONOV HEAVY INDUSTRY & ENGINEERING CONSULTING LIMITED 2,004,445 0.72
MR ROBERT WELBORN 2,004,445 0.72
TOTAL 177,472,233 63.87

Voting rights

The voting rights attaching to each class of equity securities are set out below:

  • a) Ordinary Shares – on a show of hands every member present at a meeting in person or by proxy shall have one vote and upon a poll each share shall have one vote.

  • b) Options – No voting rights.

74

==> picture [567 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

Interests in mining tenements

Current interests in tenements held by the Group as at 17 October 2014 are listed below:

State Project Tenement Tenement Holder Interest
QUEENSLAND Chilagoe
Project
Gold
ML20234 Golden Girl Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
ML20380 Empire One Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
ML20381 Wandoo Extended Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
ML5130 Mt Wandoo Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM10780 Yum Yum Prospect Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM18397 Victoria Project Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM18398 Blueys Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM19377 Big Reef Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM19378 Bush Tucker Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM19605 Rockwood North Tellus Resources Ltd 100%
EPM19607 Rockwood North Tellus Resources Ltd 100%
EPM19803 Dome South Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM25253 South Vol Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM25193 West Wandoo Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM25230 Bolwarra Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM25233 North Crystal Brook Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
EPM25528 Sandy Creek Premier Mining Pty Ltd 100%
NSW Southern New
England Gold
EL7874 Upper Hunter Tellus Resources Ltd 100%
Rockley Gold EL7993 Triangle Flat Tellus Resources Ltd 100%
EL8004 Rockley Tellus Resources Ltd 100%
SA Cooper Basin
Oil & Gas
PRL108 PNC Aust Pty Ltd 50%
PRL109 PNC Aust Pty Ltd 50%
PRL110 PNC Aust Pty Ltd 50%
USA Utah – CMP
Oil & Gas
American Gypsum
Oil & Gas Lease
Parcels 1- 9 PNC Utah LLc/
Tellus Resources Ltd
30%
U.S. Gypsum
Oil & Gas Lease
Parcels 1- 5 PNC Utah LLc/
Tellus Resources Ltd
30%
MADAGASCAR Morondava
Basin
Oil & Gas
Block 3114 Lac Bezaha Tellus Resources Ltd * 25%
  • The tenement is legally held by Petromad (Mauritius) Ltd in which Tellus owns a 25% shareholding.

75

==> picture [568 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

TELLUS RESOURCES LTD Annual Report 2014
----- End of picture text -----

This page is intentionally left blank.

76

==> picture [566 x 568] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [566 x 207] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [568 x 569] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [172 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

www.tellusresources.com.au