Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Sign up Log in

FIREBIRD METALS LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2021

Jun 14, 2021

64941_rns_2021-06-14_7f52751f-fa7c-444c-8ef7-6152bf0a30b9.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [200 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

ASX / MEDIA ANNOUNCEMENT

15/6/2021

– FIREBIRD ACQUIRES HIGH GRADE MANGANESE PROJECT ROCK CHIPS +60% Mn

Highlights

  • Successful direct licence application for the Raggard Hills Manganese Project

  • Historic rock chip sampling returned multiple significant results including from a total of nineteen samples (refer Table 1 for sample ID):

  • 1) 61.9Mn

  • 2) 61.5 Mn

  • 3) 60.4% Mn

  • 4) 61.6% Mn

  • 5) 60% Mn

  • 6) 62% Mn

  • 15 of the 19 rock chip samples above 40% Mn with majority over 50% Mn

  • Limited drilling conducted on prospect with only a single RC hole drilled outside of high grade area

  • Located only 33km NNE of the high-grade Woodie Woodie Manganese Mine

  • ’

  • Project to complement Firebird s high-grade DSO strategy

==> picture [210 x 289] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Regional Location Map

Firebird Metals Limited ( ASX: FRB , � Firebird � �� ��he Company �) i� �lea�ed �� announce the expansion of its East Pilbara manganese project portfolio with the acquisition of the high grade Raggard Hills ABN: 24 610 035 535 A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au Manganese Project via direct licence application.

Raggard Hills is ideally located 33km NNE of the Woodie Woodie Manganese Mine, straddles the old Woodie Woodie Road and is directly adjacent to the sealed Ripon Hills Road, providing direct haul access to the major exporting hub of Port Hedland.

Commenting on the acquisition of the Raggard Hills Project, Firebird Managing Director Mr Peter Allen stated: � Previous work at Raggard Hills has outlined a particularly compelling high grade manganese target that fits nicely into our long-term strategy of building a significant manganese portfolio in the East Pilbara region.

ABN: 24 610 035 535 A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au

==> picture [200 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

These are the highest manganese grade rock chip samples I have seen in my career and once the tenement is formally granted, we will look to define the extent and grade of manganese mineralisation already identified. �

� However, it is important to note we remain focused on the recently announced Rapid Development Program at our flagship Oakover Manganese project, which is evaluating low capital and fast start-up potential options. Data from the current drill campaign, beneficiation testing and logistics work will feed into a Pre-Feasibility Study to determine the best path�a� to market.�

Raggard Hills Overview:

Raggard Hills consists of a single exploration licence application covering an area of 25.6km[2] . The project is located in the Eastern Pilbara Region of Western Australia, 280km south-east of Port Hedland. The world class Woodie Woodie Manganese Mine is located 33km SSW of the Project.

The basement to the project is comprised of Archaean granites and gneisses. These are unconformably overlain by rocks of the Fortescue Group including basalt, sandstones, shales, dolomites, cherts, and felsic volcanic.

The basement consists of Archaean granitoids and greenstone which crop out in places. The Gregory Granitic Complex underlies much of the area. It has been divided into the following three units:

  • Felsic lava of the Koongaling volcanics

  • Intrusive granophyre equivalent of these volcanics

  • Southern granite Complex

The basement rocks are unconformably overlain by the Fortescue Group (mafic volcanics, volcanoclastics and clastic sediments) which is, in turn, overlain by the Hamersley Group (predominantly clastic sediments).

The Hamersley Group is subdivided in to the lower 60m thick Marra Mamba Iron Formation (chert, shale, BIFs and jaspilite) and the upper 150m thick Carawine Dolomite (stromatolitic carbonate sequence with intercalated chert beds, veins and nodules). Secondary silicification of the Carawine Dolomite under subaerial conditions has led to the widespread formation of the Mesoproterozoic Pinjian Chert Breccia. The Manganese Group consists of upward fining sediments that unconformably overlie or are faulted against the Hamersley and Fortescue Groups. These sediments are considered to be rift filling or shelf deposits and are correlated with the Bangemall Basin sediments to the south and west.

A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au The Balfour sub basin sequence consists of a basal conglomerate overlain by sandstones, shales, dolomites and dolomitic siltstones. The Balfour sub basin sequence is characterised by extensive folding with steep dips.

These include remnants of Permian glacial sediments (Patterson Formation). Tertiary rocks include silcretes, calcretes, calcareous sandstones, chert breccias, laterite and ferruginous duricrusts.

ABN: 24 610 035 535 A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au

==> picture [200 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [485 x 402] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Project geology and significant Mn assay rock chips

Rock chip sampling was undertaken by Pilbara Manganese between 2002 to 2016 which delineated a zone ABN: 24 610 035 535 A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au of massive manganese mineralisation allocated within fresh dolomite and is potentially fault hosted.

A total of 19 rock chips were collected along a 160 m trend covering an approximate 2,000m[2] area, results presented in Table 1 . A JORC (2012) Table 1 for the Exploration Results is included in this ASX release.

ABN: 24 610 035 535 A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au

==> picture [200 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1: Pilbara Manganese rock chip sampling results on E45/5905

Highlight # Sample ID Easting Northing Mn % WAMEX report
MS09 303564 7643912 60.3 86144
MS10 303566 7643916 59.6 86144
1 MS11 303567 7643914 61.9 86144
MS12 303573 7643921 0.92 86144
2 MS13 303573 7643917 61.5 86144
3 MS14 303569 7643910 60.4 86144
4 MS15 303573 7643910 61.6 86144
MS16 303577 7643908 59.3 86144
MS17 303576 7643900 60.3 86144
5 MS18 303570 7643907 60 86144
MS19 303566 7643914 51.7 86144
MS20 303566 7643915 57.9 86144
MS21 303553 7643893 55 86144
MS22 303560 7643888 35.3 86144
MS23 303559 7643887 36.7 86144
MS24 303560 7643886 25.9 86144
MGRK002 303552 7643968 40.3 108909
MS005 303560 7643920 59.3 108909
6 PM102307 303567 7643924 62 108909

Coordinates in MGA 1994 51S

The objective was to identify targets warranting drill testing which may be analogous to the Woodie Woodie style of mineralisation and geological setting as illustrated in Figure 3. It is interpreted that the fault hosted mineralisation represents a feeder structure which has acted as a mineralisation conduit.

It is noted a RC hole was drilled just north of the northern rock chip sample location. Although no significant manganese mineralisation was intersected in the hole, the hole still needs to be placed into the regional geological context to determine its relevance. ABN: 24 610 035 535

A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au Further exploration work is required to verify any depth extent to the manganiferous surface outcrops associated to the rock chips and to examine the potential of the entire tenement.

ABN: 24 610 035 535 A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au

==> picture [200 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [505 x 299] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Simplified Deposit Model for Woodie Woodie

The announcement has been authorised by the Board of Directors of Firebird Metals Ltd.

-ENDS-

For enquiries regarding this release please contact:

A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au Mr Peter Allen Michael Weir / Cameron Gilenko Managing Director Citadel-MAGNUS Ph +61 8 6245 9818 0402 347 032/ 0466 984 953 Email: [email protected]

ABN: 24 610 035 535 A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au

==> picture [200 x 52] intentionally omitted <==

About Firebird Metals Limited

FRB is an exploration and development company that owns 100% of three highly prospective manganese projects in the renowned East Pilbara manganese province of Western Australia:

  • Oakover Project � Inferred JORC 2012 Mineral Resource estimate of 64 Mt @ 10% Mn

  • Hill 616 Manganese Project - >3,500 metres drilled along strike length of 2.6km

  • Disraeli Manganese Project � potential Woodie Woodie style mineralisation

The c�m�a���� ��ima�� f�c�� �ill be �� �he flagship Oakover Project which is located 85 km east of Newman and covers approximately 360 km[2] . Oakover has an Inferred Mineral Resource estimate of 64Mt at 10% Mn (reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012(H&SC Consultants, August 2012) at the Sixty Sixer and JayEye prospects.

The Inferred Mineral Resource estimate combined with historical exploration work provides a solid technical foundation for further development, with the company planning to complete additional infill and extensional drilling in conjunction with modern metallurgical test work utilising lower cost DMS and ore sorting techniques to deliver marketable manganese products to the global steel and battery markets.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Mark Pudovskis. Mr Pudovskis is a full-time employee of CSA Global Pty Ltd and is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Pudovskis has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources, and Ore Reserves (JORC Code). Mr Pudovskis consents to the disclosure of the information in this report in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this Report that relates to Exploration Results and Mineral Resources of the Company is based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation that has been reviewed and prepared by Robert Wason, who is a Senior Consultant - Geology at Mining Insights Pty Ltd and is a member of AusIMM.

A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au Mr. Wason has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which they are undertaking to qualify as an Expert and Competent Person a� defi�ed ��de� �he VALMIN C�de a�d i� �he 2012 Edi�i�� �f �he �A����ala�ia� C�de f�� Re����i�g �f E��l��a�i�� Re��l��, Mi�e�al Re����ce� a�d O�e Re�e��e�� (�JORC C�de 2012�). M�. Wa��� c���e��� �� the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which they appear.

ABN: 24 610 035 535 A: Suite 20, 513 Hay Street, Subiaco WA 6008 | P: +61 8 6245 9818 | E: [email protected]| W: www.firebirdmetals.com.au

Drill sample
recovery		 Drilling
techniques		 Sampling
techniques		 Criteria
� Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries
and results assessed.
� Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the samples.
� Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade
and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.		 � Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air
blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
_type, whether core is oriented and ifso, by what method, etc). _		 � Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or
specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate
to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should
not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
� Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity
and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used.
� Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.
� In cases where ‘industry standard� work has been done this would be
relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1
m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge
for fire assay�). In other cases more explanation may be required,
such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg
submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.		 JORC Code explanation
�Not applicable as reporting results of rock chip sampling. �Not applicable as reporting results of rock chip sampling. �Rock chip samples were collected manually from a small zone of
manganese mineralisation in outcropping dolomite. Samples were
collected from the surface, however the quantity of material collected
is unknown.
�Several rock chip samples were collected over an approximate
2,000 m2area. Even though it has not been reported, the number of
samples collected would increase the representivity of the reported
samples.
�Samples were dried, crushed, ring pulverised and analysed by X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF). The elements determined by XRF
were Al2O3, Ba, CaO, Cr, Cu, Fe, K2O, MgO, Mn, P, Pb, SO3, SiO2,
TiO2, V2O5, Zn. Loss on Ignition results were determined using a TGA
system. Furnaces in the system were set to 1,000 degrees Celsius.
�The Competent Person (CP) considers that the sample techniques
adopted were appropriate for the style of mineralisation and for
reportingof an Exploration Result.		 Commentary

==> picture [52 x 200] intentionally omitted <==

Verification
of sampling		 Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests		 Sub-
sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation		 Criteria
Logging
� The verification of significant intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.		 � The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
� For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc,
the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
� Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels
of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.		 � If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
� If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and
whether sampled wet or dry.
� For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the
sample preparation technique.
� Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to
maximise representivity of samples.
� Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in
situ material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
� Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material
being sampled.		 JORC Code explanation
� Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
� Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography.
� The total length andpercentage of the relevant intersections logged.
�Primary data on rock chips including, project, sample number, co-
ordinates,zone,sample type,sample date,lithology,tenement		 �A total of 20 rock chip samples were submitted to SGS Australia Pty
Ltd at their Woodie Woodie mine site laboratory and analysed by XRF
for Al2O3, Ba, CaO, Cr, Cu, Fe, K2O, MgO, Mn, P, Pb, SO3, SiO2,
TiO2, V2O5, Zn. Loss on Ignition results were determined using a TGA
system. Furnaces in the system were set to 1,000 degrees Celsius.
�The use of duplicate, standard and blank samples by the laboratory is
not recorded in the data. As the laboratory used internal quality
control procedures to analyse samples, the rock chip analyses are
considered suitable for regional geochemical exploration to aid in
defining manganese targets.
�The Competent Person (CP) considers that the quality of assay data
and laboratory tests were appropriate for the style of mineralisation
andfor reporting ofan Exploration Result.		 �Rock chip samples of manganese mineralisation in outcropping
dolomite collected from the surface. The sampling technique is
appropriate as a first pass method to assess manganese anomalism
at the surface however it is unknown whether the rock chip sampling
methods were representative of the outcrop. Several rock chips were
collected over an area of approximately of 2,000 m2to increase
representivity of the samples. No duplicate samples were recorded as
being collected. The material and sample sizes are considered
appropriate given the style of mineralisation being targeted.
�The Competent Person (CP) considers that the sub sampling
techniques adopted were appropriate for the style of mineralisation
and for reporting of an Exploration Result.		 Commentary
�Rock chip samples were logged for 17 of the 19 samples.

==> picture [52 x 200] intentionally omitted <==

Audits or
reviews		 Sample
security		 Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure		 Data spacing
and
distribution		 Location of
data points		 and
assaying		 Criteria
� The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. � The measures taken to ensure sample security. � Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of
possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering
the deposit type.
� If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation
of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.		 � Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
� Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
� Whether sample compositing has been applied.		 � Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations
used in Mineral Resource estimation.
� Specification of the grid system used.
� Quality and adequacy of topographic control.		 � The use of twinned holes.
� Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
� Discuss any adjustment to assay data.		 JORC Code explanation
�There is no record of any audits or reviews having been undertaken
on the sampling data.		 �Rock chip samples were collected during several field trips and were
delivered for analysis to SGS Australia Pty Ltd at their Woodie
Woodie mine site laboratory.		 �Rock chip sample spacing, and orientation is considered suitable for
regional geochemical exploration to define manganese targets.		 �Rock chip sampling was conducted along outcropping dolomite over
an area of approximately of 2,000 m2. The sample spacing is
considered suitable for first pass testing of regional exploration
targets for manganese mineralisation.		 �Rock chip sample locations were located by handheld GPS. Expected
accuracy is +/- 5m for northing and easting.
�GDA94 Zone 51 datum is used as the coordinate system.
�There is no record of topographic control in the WAMEX metadata.
�The Competent Person (CP) considers that the survey techniques
adopted were appropriate for the style of mineralisation and for
reportingof an Exploration Result.		 number and laboratory job number were collated in a Company
database, as evidenced by the WAMEX metadata.		 Commentary

==> picture [52 x 200] intentionally omitted <==

Drill hole
Information		 Geology Exploration
done by
other parties		 Mineral
tenement
and land
tenure status		 Criteria Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results–Raggard Hills Manganese Project
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
� A summary of all information material to the understanding of the
exploration results including a tabulation of the following information
for all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level– elevation above sea level in
metres) of the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole		 � Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. � Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. � Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint
ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests,
historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.
� The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any
known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.		 JORC Code explanation
�Not applicable as no drill results being reported. �Manganese mineralisation in the eastern Pilbara is hosted by the
Jeerinah Formation, Carawine Dolomite and parts of the Manganese
Subgroup. The exploration model used for ELA45/5905 is based on
Woodie Woodie, where manganese mineralisation forms as
replacement of the host Carawine Dolomite in an interpreted inverted
graben structure. Deposits are typically 10 m to 50 m wide by 50 m to
200 m long with typical thicknesses of 20 m to 40 m. They form as
either fault‐fill, steeply dipping narrow bodies, or as bedding
replacement, flat tabular bodies, or combinations of the two to form
large �f�nnel� shaped bodies.		 �Historic exploration of relevance has been undertaken by Pilbara
Manganese Pty Ltd.
�Work completed within ELA 45/5905 consisted of rock chip sampling
and RC drilling. The majority of the work undertaken was regional
based exploration outside the ELA within the larger Woodie Woodie
project area.		 �The Ragged Hills Manganese Project consists of one exploration
licence application (E45/5905) located 33 km NNE of the Woodie
Woodie Manganese Mine and 280 km SE of Port Hedland in the
Eastern Pilbara Region of Western Australia.
�The licence application is by Firebird Metals Limited.
�The licence covers 8 blocks, was applied for on 29 April 2021 and is
currently pending grant.		 Commentary

==> picture [52 x 200] intentionally omitted <==

Balanced
reporting		 Diagrams Relationship
between
mineralisatio
n widths and
intercept
lengths		 Data
aggregation
methods		 Criteria
� Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades
and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.		 � Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being
reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.		 � These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.
� If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
angle is known, its nature should be reported.
� If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true
width not known�).		 � In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
� Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade
results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used
for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of
such aggregations should be shown in detail.
� The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values
_should be clearly stated. _		 JORC Code explanation
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
� If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from
the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly
explain why this is the case.
�No significant manganese mineralisation was intersected in the hole. �Collar details of a relevant RC hole drilled by Pilbara Manganese Pty
Ltd on historical tenement E45/2694 in October 2015. The RC hole
was collared 7 m east and 6 m north of the northern most rock chip
sample (MGRC002).
Hole ID
East
North
RL
(m)
Dip
(°)
Azimuth
(°)
Depth
(m)
MERC002
303559
7643974
263.915
60
270
135		 �Refer to figures within the body of the release. �Not applicable as reporting surface rock chip results. �No data aggregating of historical results was undertaken.
�Not applicable, as no drill results being reported.
�No metal equivalents have been reported.		 Commentary

==> picture [52 x 200] intentionally omitted <==

Further work Other
substantive
exploration
data		 Criteria
� The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
� Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,
provided this information is not commercially sensitive.		 � Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported
including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples– size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,
groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential
deleterious or contaminating substances.		 JORC Code explanation
�Detailed geological mapping; other geochemical surveys, if
warranted; geophysical surveys; structural interpretation; target
generation and drilling.		 �A geological field observation was made at the time of collecting rock
chip sample number PM102307. It was noted there was a small zone
of solid manganese mineralisation along a 160° trend in fresh
dolomite that appeared to be fault hosted.		 Commentary
�MERC002 was only partiallysampled.

==> picture [52 x 200] intentionally omitted <==

More from FIREBIRD METALS LIMITED

Investor Presentation 2026
May 19
Capital/Financing Update 2026
Apr 29
Interim / Quarterly Report 2026
Apr 27
Capital/Financing Update 2026
Apr 22
Regulatory Filings 2026
Apr 20
Regulatory Filings 2026
Mar 24
Regulatory Filings 2026
Mar 24
Investor Presentation 2026
Mar 17
Interim / Quarterly Report 2026
Mar 12
Capital/Financing Update 2026
Feb 25
View all filings →