Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

FIN RESOURCES LIMITED Investor Presentation 2011

Oct 30, 2011

64920_rns_2011-10-30_4cbb42fa-4237-45e5-bd46-39edb1d89a85.pdf

Investor Presentation

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [288 x 210] intentionally omitted <==

**Company

Presenta.on October
2011**

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

Disclaimer

The
informa,on
contained
in
this
presenta,on
(“ Presenta.on ”)
has
been
prepared
by
Orca
Energy
Limited
(“ the
Company
”)
and
is
being
delivered
for
informa,onal
purposes
only
to
a
limited
number
of
persons
to
assist them
in
deciding
whether
or
not
they
have
an
interest
in
inves,ng
in
the
Company.
The
Presenta,on
has
not
been
independently
verified
and
the
informa,on
contained
within
is
subject
to
upda,ng,
comple,on,
revision, verifica,on
and
further
amendment.
The
Presenta,on
does
not
purport
to
contain
all
informa,on
that
a
prospec,ve
investor
may
require.
While
the
informa,on
contained
herein
has
been
prepared
in
good
faith,
neither the
Company
nor
its
shareholders,
directors,
officers,
agents,
employees,
or
advisors
give,
has
given
or
has
authority
to
give,
any
representa,ons
or
warran,es
(express
or
implied)
as
to,
or
in
rela,on
to,
the
accuracy, reliability
or
completeness
of
the
informa,on
in
this
Presenta,on,
or
any
revision
thereof,
or
of
any
other
wriJen
or
oral
informa,on
made
or
to
be
made
available
to
any
interested
party
or
its
advisers
(all
such
informa,on being
referred
to
as
Informa.on ”)
and
liability
therefore
is
expressly
disclaimed.
Accordingly,
neither
the
Company
nor
any
of
its
shareholders,
directors,
officers,
agents,
employees
or
advisers
take
any
responsibility
for, or
will
accept
any
liability
whether
direct
or
indirect,
express
or
implied,
contractual,
tor,ous,
statutory
or
otherwise,
in
respect
of
the
accuracy
or
completeness
of
the
Informa,on
or
for
any
of
the
opinions
contained
herein or
for
any
errors,
omissions
or
misstatements
or
for
any
loss,
howsoever
arising
from
the
use
of
this
Presenta,on.
In
furnishing
this
Presenta,on,
the
Company
does
not
undertake
or
agree
to
any
obliga,on
to
provide
the recipient
with
access
to
any
addi,onal
informa,on
or
to
update
this
Presenta,on
or
to
correct
any
inaccuracies
in,
or
omissions
from,
this
Presenta,on
which
may
become
apparent.

Informa,on
contained
in
this
Presenta,on
is
confiden,al
informa,on
and
the
property
of
the
Company.

It
is
made
available
strictly
for
the
purposes
referred
to
above.

The
Presenta,on
and
any
further
confiden,al informa,on
made
available
to
any
recipient
must
be
held
in
complete
confidence
and
documents
containing
such
informa,on
may
not
be
reproduced,
used
or
disclosed
without
the
prior
wriJen
consent
of
the
Company. This
Presenta,on
shall
not
be
copied,
published,
reproduced
or
distributed
in
whole
or
in
part
at
any
,me
without
the
prior
wriJen
consent
of
the
Company.
By
accep,ng
delivery
of
this
Presenta,on,
the
recipient
agrees to
return
it
to
the
Company
at
the
request
of
the
Company.

This
Presenta,on
should
not
be
considered
as
the
giving
of
investment
advice
by
the
Company
or
any
of
its
shareholders,
directors,
officers,
agents,
employees
or
advisors.

Each
party
to
whom
this
Presenta,on
is
made available
must
make
its
own
independent
assessment
of
the
Company
aOer
making
such
inves,ga,ons
and
taking
such
advice
as
may
be
deemed
necessary.
In
par,cular,
any
es,mates
or
projec,ons
or
opinions
contained herein
necessarily
involve
significant
elements
of
subjec,ve
judgment,
analysis
and
assump,on
and
each
recipient
should
sa,sfy
itself
in
rela,on
to
such
maJers.

Neither
the
issue
of
this
Presenta,on
nor
any
part
of
its contents
is
to
be
taken
as
any
form
of
commitment
on
the
part
of
the
Company
to
proceed
with
any
transac,on
and
the
right
is
reserved
to
terminate
any
discussions
or
nego,a,ons
with
any
prospec,ve
investors.
In
no circumstances
will
the
Company
be
responsible
for
any
costs,
losses
or
expenses
incurred
in
connec,on
with
any
appraisal
or
inves,ga,on
of
the
Company.

The
informa,on
included
in
this
Presenta,on
that
relates
to
resources
was
prepared
by
Mr.
Mark
A.
PaJerson.
Mr.
PaJerson
has
over
30
years
of
oil
and
gas
experience
and
is
a
member
of
the
American
Associa,on
of Petroleum
Geologists,
the
Society
of
Explora,on
Geophysicists,
and
the
Council
of
Energy
Advisors.
Es,mates
as
to
recoverable
hydrocarbon
volumes
contained
in
this
Presenta,on
are
based
upon
certain
assump,ons. Accordingly,
actual
results
will
differ,
and
may
differ
significantly
and
materially,
from
those
presented.

Forward
Looking
Statements

Certain
statements
contained
in
this
presenta,on,
including
informa,on
as
to
the
future
financial
or
opera,ng
performance
of
Orca
Energy
Limited
and
its
projects,
are
forward
looking
statements.
Such
forward
looking statements:

  • § are
    necessarily
    based
    upon
    a
    number
    of
    es,mates
    and
    assump,ons
    that,
    while
    considered
    reasonable
    by
    Orca
    Energy
    Limited,
    are
    inherently
    subject
    to
    significant
    technical,
    business,
    economic,
    compe,,ve, poli,cal
    and
    social
    uncertain,es
    and
    con,ngencies;

  • § involve
    known
    and
    unknown
    risks
    and
    uncertain,es
    that
    could
    cause
    actual
    events
    or
    results
    to
    differ
    materially
    from
    es,mated
    or
    an,cipated
    events
    or
    results
    reflected
    in
    such
    forward
    looking
    statements;
    and

  • § may
    include,
    among
    other
    things,
    statements
    regarding
    targets,
    es,mates
    and
    assump,ons
    in
    respect
    of
    produc,on
    and
    prices
    opera,ng
    costs
    produc,on
    prices,
    and
    results,
    capital
    expenditures,
    reserves
    and resources
    and
    an,cipated
    flow
    rates,
    and
    are
    or
    may
    be
    based
    on
    assump,ons
    and
    es,mates
    related
    to
    future
    technical,
    economic,
    market,
    poli,cal,
    social
    and
    other
    condi,ons.

Orca
Energy
Limited
disclaims
any
intent
or
obliga,on
to
update
publicly
any
forward
looking
statements,
whether
as
a
result
of
new
informa,on,
future
events
or
results
or
otherwise.

The
words
“believe”,
“expect”,
“an,cipate”,
“indicate”,
“contemplate”,
“target”,
“plan”,
“intends”,
“con,nue”,
“budget”,
“es,mate”,
“may”,
“will”,
“schedule”
and
similar
expressions
iden,fy
forward
looking
statements.
All forward
looking
statements
made
in
this
presenta,on
are
qualified
by
the
foregoing
cau,onary
statements.
Investors
are
cau,oned
that
forward
looking
statements
are
not
guarantees
of
future
performance
and accordingly
investors
are
cau,oned
not
to
put
undue
reliance
on
forward
looking
statements
due
to
the
inherent
uncertainty
therein.

2

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**Capital

Structure**

ASX
Listed

ASX:
OGY
§ Previously
Monitor
Energy – ASX:
MHL § Current
Shares
on
Issue – 9,100,671,434

§ Current
Share
Price – 0.2c § Market
Capitalisa,on – $18m

§ Cash – Circa
A$1m

==> picture [414 x 335] intentionally omitted <==

3

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

Management

**Senior

Management**

  • § Greg
    Bandy

    Execu.ve
    Director

  • Over
    12
    years
    broking
    &
    corporate
    experience
    in
    Australia.
    Senior
    Advisor
    with
    Patersons
    Securi,es. Execu,ve
    Director
    of
    dual
    listed
    Red
    Emperor
    Resources
    (ASX/AIM:
    RMP)
    and
    responsible
    for
    managing and
    facilita,ng
    the
    acquisi,on
    of
    the
    Seabiscuit
    asset
    in
    the
    US

  • § Jason
    Bontempo

    Non-­‐Execu.ve
    Director

  • Highly
    experienced
    ASX
    director
    with
    over
    10
    years
    experience
    at
    senior
    board
    level
    in
    Australia
    and the
    UK.
    Current
    Execu,ve
    Director
    of
    Interna,onal
    Goldfields
    Limited
    (ASX:
    IGS),
    Glory
    Resources
    (ASX: GLY)
    and
    Chameleon
    Mining
    NL
    (ASX:
    CHM)

  • § Tony
    King

    Execu.ve
    Consultant

  • Managing
    Director
    of
    Max
    Capital
    Pty
    Ltd.
    Tony
    has
    in
    excess
    of
    15
    years
    of
    corporate
    experience, specifically
    with
    publically
    listed
    Australian
    companies
    and
    capital
    markets
    and
    responsible
    for
    advising Monitor/Orca
    on
    the
    Seabiscuit
    acquisi,on
    in
    the
    US

  • § Mark
    A.
    PaRerson

    Technical
    Advisor

  • Mr.
    PaJerson
    has
    over
    30
    years
    of
    oil
    and
    gas
    experience
    and
    is
    a
    member
    of
    the
    American
    Associa,on
    of Petroleum
    Geologists,
    the
    Society
    of
    Explora,on
    Geophysicists,
    and
    the
    Council
    of
    Energy
    Advisors.
    He currently
    advises
    Range
    Resources
    Limited
    (ASX:
    RRS
    ;
    AIM:
    RRL)
    and
    helped
    introduce
    and
    facilitate
    the acquisi,on
    of
    the
    Seabiscuit
    asset
    in
    the
    US.
    Mark
    resides
    in
    Dallas,
    Texas

4

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

Overview

  • § Orca
    Energy
    have
    a
    20%
    interest
    in
    the
    highly
    prospec,ve
    “Seabiscuit
    Project”,
    acquired
    in August
    2011
    and
    announced
    to
    the
    market
    on
    12
    July,
    2011

  • § The
    Seabiscuit
    Project
    covers
    an
    area
    of
    approx.
    1,750
    acres
    and
    has
    the
    poten,al
    to
    contain up
    to
    1Tcf
    and
    10MMbo

  • § Drilling
    expected
    to
    commence
    in
    Q1,
    2012

  • § Orca
    also
    holds
    key
    interests
    in
    two
    highly
    prospec,ve
    Cooper
    Basin
    blocks,
    one
    of
    which
    has already
    had
    an
    oil
    discovery
    (PEL
    115)

  • § PEL
    115
    (OGY

    42%)
    -­‐
    Oil
    discovery
    in
    Dec

  • 13m
    gross
    oil
    column.
    Range
    of
    volumes
    of oil
    in
    place
    (7.99MMbo
    -­‐
    17.44MMbo)*

  • § PEL
    115
    also
    presents
    significant
    unconven,onal
    shale
    gas
    poten,al
    and
    is
    adjacent
    to
    PEL 516
    [100%
    owned
    by
    JV
    partner
    Senex
    Energy
    (ASX:
    SXY)
    which
    es,mates
    over
    100Tcf poten,al
    Gas-­‐in-­‐Place]

    ASX
    Presenta,on,
    October
    2011

  • § PEL
    110
    (OGY

    20%)
    -­‐
    seismic
    work
    to
    begin
    in
    2012

*Independent
report
by
MBA
Petroleum
Consultants,
Brisbane
based
petroleum
consultancy
company

5

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**Seabiscuit

Acquisi.on
&
Partners**

  • § Orca
    Energy
    acquired
    its
    20%
    interest
    in
    the
    Seabiscuit
    Project
    through
    the
    acquisi,on
    of
    100%
    of the
    issued
    capital
    of
    Sugarbay
    Investments
    Pty
    Ltd,
    the
    current
    assignee
    and
    JV
    par,cipant
    in
    the project

  • § Sugarbay
    was
    assigned
    their
    interest
    by
    Crest
    Resources,
    a
    prominent
    oil
    &
    gas
    operator
    in
    the
    Gulf Coast
    and
    responsible
    for
    introducing,
    drilling
    and
    discovering
    Range
    Resources’
    (ASX:
    RRS)
    current producing
    field
    in
    East
    Texas, North
    Chapman
    Ranch

  • § Orca’s
    major
    partner
    and
    operator
    of
    the
    Seabiscuit
    Project
    will
    be
    Dan
    A.
    Hughes
    Co.,
    a
    prominent, independent
    petroleum
    explora,on
    and
    produc,on
    company
    with
    a
    43-­‐year
    record
    of
    success
    in drilling,
    discovering
    and
    producing
    hydrocarbons
    in
    the
    Gulf
    Coast

  • § With
    over
    $400m
    in
    annual
    revenue,
    Dan
    A.
    Hughes
    has
    been
    credited
    with
    discoveries
    in
    excess 530MMbo
    &
    1.6Tcf

  • § Hughes
    holds
    a
    50%
    working
    interest
    in
    the
    Seabiscuit
    Project.

  • § Other
    US
    oil
    &
    gas
    companies
    and
    their
    management
    hold
    the
    remaining
    30%
    working
    interest.

6

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

Seabiscuit
Loca.on

Texas
Gulf
Coast

Geological
Map
of
Texas

7

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

Seabiscuit
Loca.on
(cont.)

§ The
Seabiscuit
Project
is located
along
the
Texas Gulf
Coast
in
Matagorda County,
within
the expanded
Frio
producing trend

§ The
prospect
is
on
trend with
several
recent discoveries
and
world class
oil
and
gas
fields

==> picture [395 x 336] intentionally omitted <==

Regional
Produc,on
Map

8

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**Seabiscuit

Structure**

  • § The
    Seabiscuit
    Project
    is
    a
    large
    structural
    closure
    with
    an
    area
    of
    approximately
    1,750
    acres on
    the
    Gulf
    Coast

  • § It
    is
    located
    in
    an
    ideal
    geological
    sewng
    on
    trend
    with
    recently
    drilled
    wells
    flowing
    at sustained
    rates
    of
    20
    million
    cubic
    feet
    of
    natural
    gas
    and
    200
    barrels
    of
    oil
    per
    day,
    without any
    fracture
    s,mula,on

  • § A
    17,500
    O.
    well
    has
    been
    proposed
    to
    test
    the
    Seabiscuit
    trap
    that
    is
    es,mated
    to
    contain prospec,ve
    resources
    of
    more
    than
    300
    billion
    cubic
    feet
    of
    natural
    gas
    (Bcf)
    and
    3
    million barrels
    of
    oil
    (MMbo)
    or
    condensate
    (mid
    case
    scenario)

  • § Depending
    on
    reservoir
    thickness
    and
    column,
    Seabiscuit
    could
    contain
    prospec,ve resources
    more
    than
    1
    trillion
    cubic
    feet
    of
    natural
    gas
    (Tcf)
    and
    10
    million
    barrels
    of
    oil (MMbo)
    or
    condensate
    (high
    case
    scenario)

  • § The
    Seabiscuit
    project
    was
    delineated
    from
    high
    quality
    3D
    seismic
    data,
    the
    oil
    and
    gas industry's
    best
    tool
    for
    imaging
    hydrocarbon
    traps

9

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

Seabiscuit
Structure
(cont.)

==> picture [445 x 369] intentionally omitted <==

§ 3D
seismic
data clearly
indicate
the presence
of
a
large, 3-­‐way
dip
closure
at the
Upper
Tex
Miss objec,ve

§ Up-­‐thrown
fault traps
such
as Seabiscuit
are
well known
to
be produc,ve
along
the prolific
Texas
Gulf Coast

10

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**Seabiscuit

Geological
Summary**

  • § Nearby
    wells
    have
    confirmed
    hundreds
    of
    feet
    of
    high
    quality
    reservoir
    sandstones,
    and
    the proposed
    well
    is
    expected
    to
    penetrate
    the
    objec,ve
    forma,on
    approximately
    500
    feet
    higher
    than the
    closest
    well
    which
    is
    4
    km’s
    away
    and
    produced
    gas
    and
    condensate
    from
    the
    very
    top
    of
    the objec,ve
    sec,on

  • § All
    of
    the
    nearby
    wells
    have
    encountered
    thick,
    high
    quality
    porous
    sandstones,
    indica,ng
    that
    the risk
    of
    poor
    reservoir
    rock
    is
    low

  • § Seismic
    interpreta,on
    indicates
    that
    the
    reservoir
    rocks
    were
    in
    a
    trapping
    posi,on
    in
    ,me
    to receive
    hydrocarbon
    charge,
    and
    this
    is
    supported
    by
    other
    discoveries
    along
    trend

  • § Once
    formed,
    the
    Seabiscuit
    trap
    was
    buried
    beneath
    an
    es,mated
    8500
    O.
    of
    impermeable
    shale, which
    formed
    an
    ideal
    seal
    to
    keep
    the
    oil
    and
    gas
    in
    place

  • § The
    targeted
    objec,ves
    at
    Seabiscuit
    are
    the
    same
    age
    as
    those
    found
    produc,ve
    in Old
    Ocean Field
    (4.9
    Tcf)
    approximately
    53
    km
    northeast
    of
    the
    prospect,
    and East
    Bay
    City
    Field
    (500
    Bcf)

  • approximately
    43
    km
    to
    the
    northeast.

The
latest
discovery
along
trend
at
the Silverspoon Field , located
approximately
24
km
northeast
of
Seabiscuit,
came
on
line
at
over
18
MMcfd
and
has produced
9.9
Bcf
and
100,000
barrels
of
oil
in
just
over
2
years

11

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**Seabiscuit

Seismic**

==> picture [432 x 375] intentionally omitted <==

§ Seabiscuit
was mapped
on
high quality
3D
seismic data,
processed
with state-­‐of-­‐the-­‐art
Pres-­‐ stack
,me
migra,on § NW-­‐SE
dip
lines
show the
main
trapping fault
and
posi,on
of Seabiscuit
updip
to produc,ve
wells

3D
Seismic
Dip
Line

12

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

Seabiscuit
Seismic
(cont.)

==> picture [459 x 375] intentionally omitted <==

§ NE-­‐SW
strike
lines show
the
cri,cal
dip reversal
on
strike necessary
for
a large,
up-­‐thrown fault
trap.

§ 3D
seismic
supports the
interpreta,on that
the
Seabiscuit trap
was
in
place well
before hydrocarbon migra,on
occurred.

3D
Seismic
Strike
Line

13

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**Tex

Miss
Target:
World
Class
Reservoir**

==> picture [200 x 202] intentionally omitted <==

§ As
evidenced
by
the
Devon Harrington
#1
well
in
the
nearby Silverspoon
Field
(type
well),
the
Tex Miss
has
the
poten,al
for
massive sand
development
with
excellent porosity
and
permeability

§ The
Devon
well
produced approximately
9.9
Billion
Cubic
Feet of
natural
gas
and
100,000
barrels
of oil
in
its
first
25
months
of produc,on

==> picture [200 x 177] intentionally omitted <==

14

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**Drilling

Timetable
&
Fiscal
Terms**

§ The
first
well
is
expected
to
be
drilled
in
Q1,
2012

  • § Orca’s
    share
    of
    drilling
    costs
    (OGY
    -­‐
    20%)
    will
    be
    circa
    $US1.8m

  • § NRI

    72%
    (Standard
    for
    US
    oil
    &
    gas
    plays
    of
    this
    nature)

  • § Mid
    case
    success
    scenario
    would
    call
    for
    6-­‐10
    development
    wells
    to
    be
    drilled

  • § NPV
    on
    “mid
    case
    scenario”
    is
    circa
    $US360MM
    (gross)

    refer
    appendix
    on
    page
    20

  • § NPV
    on
    “high
    case
    scenario”
    is
    circa
    $US1.8B
    (gross)

    refer
    appendix
    on
    page
    20

  • § Operator
    es,mates
    the
    geological
    chance
    of
    success
    (CoS)
    at
    between
    50%
    -­‐
    75%

  • § Independently
    reviewed
    by
    RISC
    Pty
    Ltd
    whose
    geological
    CoS
    was
    between
    50%
    -­‐
    60%

  • § Both
    es,mates
    represent
    a
    very
    low
    risk
    for
    such
    an
    explora,on
    prospect

15

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**Cooper

Basin**

  • § PEL
    115
    (OGY
    42%)

  • Oil
    discovery
    in
    December
    2009
    (Fury-­‐1)

  • 13m
    gross
    oil
    column
    with
    an
    interpreted
    range
    of
    volumes
    of
    oil
    in
    place
    from
    a mean
    7.99MMbo
    to
    a
    highside
    17.44MMbo*

  • Tes,ng
    and
    comple,on
    delayed
    due
    to
    heavy
    rain
    &
    flooding
    in
    the
    Cooper
    Basin

  • JV
    review
    of
    economics
    currently
    underway

  • Significant
    unconven,onal
    shale
    gas
    resource
    poten,al

  • Adjacent
    to
    JV
    partner
    and
    operator’s
    100%
    owned
    block,
    PEL
    516

  • Senex
    Energy
    Limited
    (ASX:
    SXY)
    is
    drilling
    up
    to
    3
    wells
    on
    PEL
    516
    in
    the
    next
    9 months
    and
    es,mates
    over
    100Tcf
    Gas-­‐in-­‐Place
    resource
    poten,al
    (ASX presenta,on

    October
    2011)

  • § PEL
    110
    (OGY
    20%)

  • Highly
    prospec,ve
    explora,on
    block

  • Seismic
    work
    planned
    for
    2012

*Independent
report
by
MBA
Petroleum
Consultants,
Brisbane
based
petroleum
consultancy
company

16

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

PEL
115
Loca.on

==> picture [620 x 370] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

PEL
115

Orca
Energy
42%
----- End of picture text -----

17

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**PEL

115

Large
Shale
Poten.al**

Coal Seam Methane & Shale Gas Potential

  • § Extensive gas zones have been identified in deep coal/shale units throughout the Cooper Basin.

  • § Endorsed and promoted by major Cooper basin players: Santos, Drillsearch, Beach

  • § Senex have estimated over 100 Tcf Gas-in-Place resource potential

  • seams.

  • § PEL 115 contains previous drilling with intersections of coal § PEL 115 located in the heart of prospective CSM/Shale Gas acreage.

Paleochannelstrandedoil prospects

  • § Recent discoveries nearby – analogous to Growler, Snatcher.

  • § Previously ignored in Cooper Basin § Large scale potential identified on PEL 115.

18

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

Summary

§ Orca
Energy
has
managed
to
secure
a
world
class
oil
&
gas
explora,on project
with
“company
making”
upside

§ The
Seabiscuit
JV
partners
and
operator
are
significant
players
in
the
Gulf Coast,
USA
and
provide
the
exper,se
and
funding
required
to
achieve success

§ Drilling
is
imminent
with
work
having
already
begun
to
prepare
for
Q1, 2012
ac,vity

§ The
Cooper
Basin
assets
and
specifically
PEL
115
provides
Orca
with
a strategically
valuable
block
in
the
current
shale
gas
environment

§ Strong
corporate
management
team
with
history
of
success
and
focused on
delivering
results

19

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

**Assump.ons

for
Seabiscuit
NPV’s**

§ Most

likely
Case

  • Assumes
    a
    10-­‐well
    development
    averaging
    20
    Bcf
    &
    200
    Mbo
    per
    well

  • – Average
    well
    cost
    of
    $9MM

  • – Oil
    price
    of
    $85
    per
    barrel
    and
    gas
    price
    of
    $4.50
    per
    Mcf

  • – Current
    state
    severance
    tax
    assump,ons
    used

  • – Opera,ng
    expenditure
    of
    $5,000
    per
    month

  • – Discount
    rate
    of
    10%

  • NRI
    of
    72%

  • – Gross
    NPV
    of
    the
    project
    =
    $360m

§ Upside

Case

  • Assumes
    a
    30-­‐well
    development
    averaging
    30Bcf
    &
    300
    Mbo
    per
    well

  • – Average
    well
    cost
    of
    $9MM

  • – Oil
    price
    of
    $85
    per
    barrel
    and
    gas
    price
    of
    $4.50
    per
    Mcf

  • – Current
    state
    severance
    tax
    assump,ons
    used

  • – Opera,ng
    expenditure
    of
    $5,000
    per
    month

  • – Discount
    rate
    of
    10%

  • – NRI
    of
    72%

  • Gross
    NPV
    of
    the
    project
    =
    $1.8b

It
should
be
noted
that
these
assump,ons
are
based
on
prospec,ve
resources
that
OGY
has
not
yet
delineated
and
are
subject
to drilling
confirma,on

20

==> picture [102 x 84] intentionally omitted <==

Orca
Energy
Limited

ASX:
OGY
35
Richardson
Street
|
West
Perth
WA
6005 www.orcaenergy.com.au [email protected]

21