Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

FENIX RESOURCES LTD Capital/Financing Update 2010

Feb 4, 2010

64910_rns_2010-02-04_c084ffc1-5b6c-4839-9990-2fb821c9b373.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [443 x 99] intentionally omitted <==

ASX/MEDIA RELEASE

5 February 2010

ASX Codes: EMG, EMGO

DIAMOND CORE TESTWORK CONFIRMS POTENTIAL FOR HIGH GRADE DIRECT REDUCTION IRON CONCENTRATE AT BEYONDIE IRON PROJECT

Key Points

  • Initial diamond core test work has shown the potential for a high value Direct Reduction iron concentrate product to be produced from the Beyondie Iron Project

  • Davis Tube Recovery results confirm potential for a Direct Reduction magnetite concentrate grading up to 71.6% Fe, 1.8% SiO2

  • Davis Tube Recovery results also show processing will not need reverse flotation to remove silica

  • Premium magnetite product is achievable with ultra low detrimental impurities of aluminium, phosphorous and sulphur

  • Emergent plans to develop the Beyondie Project into a world class magnetite project with potential for a long life iron ore operation

Perth-based exploration company Emergent Resources Limited (ASX: EMG) (Emergent) is pleased to announce extremely positive results from its recent diamond core testwork program at its Beyondie Iron Project in Western Australia’s Mid West region.

Testwork by way of Davis Tube Recovery (DTR) from diamond drill core from the Beyondie Project has confirmed the potential to produce a high-grade Direct Reduction (DR) quality magnetite concentrate with exceptionally low level detrimental impurities. Results of up to very high 72.8% Fe and very low 1.1% SiO2 show strong potential for an onsite plant to produce the highest quality DR concentrate of +68%Fe and less than 4% SiO2.

The significant advantage of DR grade magnetite feedstock is that the energy requirement is significantly lower than for Hematite during smelting and also that the impurity level of the feed is small. This means that little flux will be required in the smelting process and will result in an increase in the overall Fe grade of the burden.

DR grade is sold at a premium as it can lead to significant fuel and coke savings in the blast furnace in addition to enhancing productivity. Also the very low sulphur and phosphorus levels reduce pollution emissions – a significant factor for Chinese smelters.

Emergent has completed drilling 113 holes for 17,414.7 metres in October 2009, including 11 diamond core holes for advanced metallurgical testwork. Head grade assays were routinely completed over the prospective iron zones. Magnetic concentrate grades calculated from core measurements are summarized in table 1.

1

Table 1: Beyondie Magnetite Core DTR Results

Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Summary
Hole ID Width m From m To Fe % SiO2
%
Al2O3
%
P % S % LOI Magnetic
Mass
Recovery %
BDD008 132 155 287 70.8 2.0 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2 28.6
BDD009 110 190 300 70.6 2.4 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐2.8 26.0
BDD012 66 180 246 71.2 2.0 0.2 0.003 0.003 ‐3.1 31.4
BDD012 76 308 384 70.9 2.4 0.1 0.010 0.005 ‐3.1 32.9
BDD013 68 198 266 71.6 1.8 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.3 31.8
BDD022 116 102 218 70.9 2.1 0.2 0.002 0.002 ‐2.9 28.0

Note:

Weighted average downhole composite intervals shown. Davis Tube Recovery (DTR) samples consist of 4m composites composed of ½ HQ core. DTR feed size is nominally 80% passing 25 micron. Cut off grade of 10% mass recovery used. LOI is by thermogravimetric method at 1000deg C. Elemental grades calculated by XRF fusion method

Davis Tube Recovery (DTR) determinations will be routinely used to evaluate the grade characteristics throughout the Beyondie deposit to determine potential product characteristics and assist the mining schedule. DTR’s of 350 Reverse Circulation drill samples are in progress to provide wide coverage and are targeted for completion later first quarter. Refer to figure 2.

==> picture [455 x 373] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Magnetic image with planned DTR locations and drillhole coverage

2

About the Beyondie Iron Project

The Beyondie Project is located adjacent to the Great Northern Highway and Goldfields Gas Pipeline (see Project Location map) in the northern part of WA’s mid-west iron ore precinct. Potential shared rail and port infrastructure developments for the project are in progress.

Initial metallurgical test work has shown the potential for the project to produce a high grade magnetite concentrate of +68%Fe, with very low impurities (aluminium, titanium, phosphorous and sulphur).

Emergent plan to develop the Beyondie Project into a long term, large scale, high grade magnetite concentrate mining operation.

Inferred resources of 561 million tonnes grading 27.5% Fe have been established with additional 480 – 520 million tonne Exploration Target in the drilled area and another 3.7 to 4.2 billion tonnes Exploration Target outside the drilled area.(Refer ASX release 25 November 2009) The later Target mineralisation is based on aeromagnetic data and geological mapping with the interpreted volumes modelled and confirmed as part of the independent Beyondie Mineral Resource Modelling study. The target mineralisation tonnage and grade is conceptual in nature as there has been insufficient exploration at this stage to define an increased Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in an increased Mineral Resource.

Chinese State Owned Enterprise China Metallurgical Investment Co Ltd (CMIC) has successfully completed Due Diligence on a proposed $200 million Development Joint Venture with Emergent for the Beyondie Project and has entered a binding agreement for the CMIC/Emergent Beyondie Development Joint Venture, which provides for a 50:50 JV, A$200 million funding by CMIC, and a placement of shares and options to CMIC to raise around $5 million and give CMIC an approximate 15% holding in Emergent. Also, Emergent announced the acquisition of 100% ownership of the Beyondie Project on 5 October 2009 through the purchase of De Grey Mining Limited’s 20% free carried interest.

ENDS

For further information please contact:

Garry Hemming James Moses Managing Director Media and Investor Relations Emergent Resources Mandate Corporate Mob: 0419 835 757 Mob: 0420 991 574 E: [email protected] Website: www.emergentresources.com.au

Technical information in this report has been prepared under the supervision of Mr Garry Hemming, a Director of the Company and a member of the Australasian Institute on Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Hemming has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (the JORC Code). Mr Hemming consents to the inclusion in this report of the Information, in the form and context in which it appears.

3

Appendix

Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results
Hole ID m From m To Magnetic
Mass
Recovery %
LOI
Fe % SiO2 % Al2O3 % P % S %
BDD008 155 159 20.8 70.9 2.2 0.2 0.004 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 159 163 35.5 69.5 3.0 0.4 0.007 0.009 ‐2.6
BDD008 163 167 32.3 70.9 2.2 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 167 171 33.7 70.7 2.5 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 171 175 36.0 70.9 2.3 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 175 179 36.5 70.6 2.0 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 179 183 32.3 69.8 2.5 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD008 183 187 33.0 70.9 2.1 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 187 191 32.4 70.8 2.1 0.3 0.002 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD008 191 195 36.5 71.2 2.0 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD008 195 199 35.0 70.0 2.2 0.3 0.005 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 199 203 35.0 70.3 1.9 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 203 207 36.0 71.6 1.6 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 207 211 35.5 71.6 1.4 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 211 215 30.5 71.4 1.7 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD008 215 219 27.5 71.5 1.4 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 219 223 18.5 71.1 1.6 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD008 223 227 24.0 71.0 2.2 0.3 0.004 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 227 231 28.0 70.0 2.5 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD008 231 235 27.0 71.1 2.0 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 235 239 28.5 71.3 1.6 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD008 239 243 25.5 71.4 1.9 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.2
BDD008 243 247 24.5 71.1 1.7 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD008 247 251 23.5 71.5 1.7 0.3 0.002 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD008 251 255 20.3 71.3 1.5 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.4
BDD008 255 259 21.5 71.3 1.8 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD008 259 263 30.5 71.0 1.8 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 263 267 29.4 71.0 2.1 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 267 271 27.5 70.4 2.2 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD008 271 275 28.5 70.2 2.2 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD008 275 279 20.5 71.2 1.7 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 279 283 17.5 71.4 1.3 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD008 283 287 20.0 69.9 2.5 0.4 0.004 0.003 ‐2.4
BDD009 190 194 31.0 70.1 3.1 0.4 0.004 0.001 ‐2.9
BDD009 194 198 25.1 69.6 3.2 0.5 0.004 0.001 ‐2.7
BDD009 198 202 36.5 70.2 2.6 0.4 0.003 0.001 ‐2.9
BDD009 202 206 30.5 70.4 2.5 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐2.8
BDD009 206 210 28.0 70.5 2.1 0.3 0.002 0.001 ‐3.0
BDD009 210 214 33.5 71.0 1.9 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐2.8
BDD009 214 218 30.5 71.1 2.2 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐2.9
BDD009 218 222 28.5 70.8 2.2 0.3 0.002 0.001 ‐3.0

4

Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results

Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results
Hole ID m From m To Magnetic
Mass
Recovery %
LOI
Fe % SiO2 % Al2O3 % P % S %
BDD009 222 226 31.5 71.1 2.4 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD009 226 230 30.0 70.7 2.1 0.4 0.002 0.001 ‐2.9
BDD009 230 234 29.5 71.2 1.8 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD009 234 238 22.5 69.8 3.2 0.4 0.003 0.001 ‐3.0
BDD009 238 242 22.5 70.5 2.3 0.4 0.002 0.001 ‐2.9
BDD009 242 246 21.0 70.4 2.4 0.4 0.002 0.001 ‐3.0
BDD009 246 250 23.5 70.9 2.4 0.3 0.002 0.001 ‐2.9
BDD009 250 252 30.0 70.8 2.5 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.0
BDD009 252 256 22.5 70.9 2.3 0.3 0.002 0.001 ‐2.5
BDD009 256 260 23.0 70.2 2.4 0.4 0.003 0.001 ‐2.1
BDD009 260 264 24.1 70.6 2.5 0.3 0.002 0.001 ‐2.7
BDD009 264 268 26.0 70.6 2.1 0.3 0.002 0.001 ‐2.9
BDD009 268 272 26.0 70.3 2.4 0.4 0.003 0.001 ‐2.6
BDD009 272 276 18.0 71.0 1.6 0.3 0.002 0.001 ‐2.3
BDD009 276 280 18.5 71.3 1.6 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐2.9
BDD009 280 284 21.0 69.9 2.4 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐2.1
BDD009 284 288 26.0 69.7 2.5 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐2.4
BDD009 288 292 24.0 70.8 2.4 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐2.3
BDD009 292 296 20.5 71.0 2.2 0.3 0.004 0.001 ‐2.7
BDD009 296 300 23.5 70.2 2.4 0.4 0.007 0.001 ‐2.5
BDD012 180 184 27.9 67.6 4.7 0.4 0.006 0.011 ‐2.5
BDD012 184 188 38.4 71.2 2.5 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.1
BDD012 188 192 34.9 71.7 1.6 0.2 0.003 0.003 ‐3.2
BDD012 192 196 31.4 71.5 1.7 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.3
BDD012 196 200 33.0 71.4 2.1 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.2
BDD012 200 204 36.9 71.3 1.5 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.3
BDD012 204 208 36.4 71.8 1.7 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.3
BDD012 208 212 36.4 71.4 1.6 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.3
BDD012 212 216 37.9 71.9 1.6 0.2 0.004 0.003 ‐3.3
BDD012 216 218 34.0 72.0 1.5 0.2 0.002 0.002 ‐3.3
BDD012 218 222 27.0 70.6 1.6 0.2 0.002 0.003 ‐2.7
BDD012 222 226 33.5 71.6 1.3 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.0
BDD012 226 230 31.5 71.2 1.6 0.3 0.002 0.003 ‐3.2
BDD012 230 234 26.5 71.3 2.2 0.4 0.002 0.004 ‐3.2
BDD012 234 238 24.5 70.3 3.3 0.5 0.003 0.012 ‐3.0
BDD012 238 242 26.9 71.6 1.6 0.2 0.002 0.004 ‐3.2
BDD012 242 246 17.0 71.3 2.2 0.3 0.003 0.004 ‐3.3
BDD012 308 312 30.0 69.6 4.4 0.2 0.018 0.021 ‐3.0
BDD012 312 316 32.5 70.4 2.3 0.1 0.007 0.002 ‐3.2
BDD012 316 320 34.3 71.4 2.4 0.2 0.010 0.002 ‐3.2
BDD012 320 324 37.5 70.3 2.5 0.2 0.015 0.008 ‐3.1
BDD012 324 328 39.5 70.7 2.6 0.2 0.017 0.012 ‐3.1
BDD012 328 332 39.0 70.2 2.6 0.2 0.017 0.012 ‐3.1

5

Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results

Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results
Hole ID m From m To Magnetic
Mass
Recovery %
LOI
Fe % SiO2 % Al2O3 % P % S %
BDD012 332 334 41.0 70.8 2.5 0.1 0.010 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD012 334 338 40.0 71.2 2.2 0.1 0.009 0.001 ‐3.1
BDD012 338 342 29.5 72.1 1.2 0.1 0.006 0.007 ‐3.2
BDD012 342 346 23.0 72.3 1.1 0.0 0.010 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD012 346 350 29.5 71.3 1.4 0.1 0.010 0.004 ‐3.2
BDD012 350 354 22.5 72.4 1.4 0.0 0.009 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD012 354 358 9.5 71.8 1.7 0.0 0.012 0.004 ‐3.3
BDD012 358 362 20.0 71.6 0.9 0.1 0.007 0.003 ‐3.3
BDD012 362 366 30.0 71.9 1.5 0.1 0.009 0.001 ‐3.0
BDD012 366 370 44.5 70.6 2.5 0.1 0.009 0.002 ‐3.1
BDD012 370 374 41.0 71.0 2.6 0.1 0.005 0.002 ‐3.2
BDD012 374 376 36.0 69.6 3.2 0.1 0.006 0.002 ‐3.1
BDD012 376 380 33.0 70.7 3.3 0.1 0.006 0.003 ‐3.0
BDD012 380 384 45.5 70.2 3.6 0.1 0.007 0.004 ‐2.8
BDD013 198 202 32.0 71.3 2.7 0.3 0.006 0.002 ‐3.1
BDD013 202 206 35.0 70.9 2.5 0.3 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD013 206 210 36.0 70.4 2.2 0.2 0.004 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD013 210 214 34.5 70.9 2.1 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD013 214 218 33.0 72.0 2.1 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD013 218 222 30.5 72.0 1.3 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD013 222 226 31.0 72.2 1.7 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD013 226 230 35.5 71.4 1.9 0.2 0.004 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD013 230 234 30.5 71.1 1.5 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD013 234 238 33.5 71.5 1.6 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD013 238 242 34.5 72.6 1.6 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.3
BDD013 242 246 30.0 72.3 1.7 0.2 0.003 0.001 ‐3.2
BDD013 246 250 29.5 71.8 1.8 0.3 0.002 0.002 ‐3.3
BDD013 250 254 34.0 71.2 2.0 0.3 0.003 0.002 ‐3.2
BDD013 254 258 30.5 71.0 1.6 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD013 258 262 26.5 71.7 1.4 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD013 262 266 24.0 72.8 1.1 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD022 102 106 28.5 70.6 2.3 0.2 0.001 0.002 ‐2.7
BDD022 106 110 33.5 69.8 2.6 0.2 0.001 0.002 ‐2.7
BDD022 110 114 35.5 71.1 2.0 0.1 0.001 0.004 ‐2.8
BDD022 114 118 36.0 70.8 2.4 0.1 0.001 0.002 ‐2.8
BDD022 118 122 21.0 70.9 1.6 0.2 0.001 0.002 ‐2.3
BDD022 122 126 31.0 71.1 2.2 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐2.7
BDD022 126 130 31.5 70.0 3.1 0.2 0.001 0.002 ‐2.7
BDD022 130 134 30.5 71.0 1.9 0.2 0.002 0.0020 ‐2.7
BDD022 134 138 31.5 71.2 2.0 0.2 0.001 0.003 ‐3.2
BDD022 138 142 24.0 70.6 2.0 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐2.9
BDD022 142 146 32.5 71.1 2.0 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.0
BDD022 146 150 33.0 71.4 1.3 0.1 0.001 0.002 ‐3.1

6

Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results

Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results Beyondie Davis Tube Magnetic Concentrate Recovery Results
Hole ID m From m To Magnetic
Mass
Recovery %
LOI
Fe % SiO2 % Al2O3 % P % S %
BDD022 150 154 26.0 70.8 2.1 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐2.5
BDD022 154 158 25.5 70.5 2.3 0.3 0.003 0.002 ‐2.7
BDD022 158 162 23.5 71.4 1.7 0.2 0.002 0.002 ‐2.9
BDD022 162 166 20.5 71.2 1.5 0.2 0.002 0.003 ‐3.0
BDD022 166 170 23.0 69.9 2.3 0.3 0.002 0.002 ‐2.7
BDD022 170 174 24.0 70.2 2.6 0.3 0.004 0.004 ‐2.7
BDD022 174 178 25.0 70.1 2.8 0.3 0.003 0.004 ‐2.6
BDD022 178 182 29.0 70.2 2.6 0.3 0.003 0.004 ‐3.0
BDD022 182 186 28.5 70.9 2.8 0.3 0.005 0.004 ‐2.9
BDD022 186 190 25.0 69.6 2.8 0.3 0.003 0.004 ‐2.8
BDD022 190 194 25.5 71.4 1.9 0.2 0.002 0.004 ‐3.3
BDD022 194 198 24.5 71.7 1.5 0.2 0.002 0.002 ‐3.2
BDD022 198 202 26.0 72.0 1.4 0.2 0.002 0.001 ‐3.3
BDD022 202 206 21.5 71.5 1.4 0.2 0.002 0.002 ‐3.3
BDD022 206 210 27.0 71.3 1.8 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.0
BDD022 210 214 25.0 70.9 1.8 0.2 0.002 0.003 ‐3.0
BDD022 214 218 44.5 71.9 1.3 0.2 0.003 0.002 ‐3.0

Note:

Davis Tube Recovery (DTR) samples consist of 4m composites composed of ½ HQ core. DTR feed size is nominally 80% passing 25 micron. LOI is by thermogravimetric method at 1000deg C. Elemental grades calculated by XRF fusion method

7