AI assistant
EVOLUTION MINING LIMITED — Investor Presentation 2014
May 6, 2014
64885_rns_2014-05-06_2921d940-dc81-415b-b12d-4c2fb8d98ffe.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Evolution Mining Macquarie Australia Conference
==> picture [110 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
7 May 2014 Jake Klein - Executive Chairman
Disclaimer
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
This presentation has been prepared by Evolution Mining Limited (“Evolution Mining”) and consists of slides for a presentation concerning the company. By reviewing/attending this presentation, you acknowledge and agree the following.
-
This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements inherently involve subjective judgement and analysis and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, many of which are outside the control of, and may be unknown to, Evolution Mining. As such, actual results or performance may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. The types of factors that could cause such variation in actual results or performance include (without limitation) commodity prices, operational problems and general economic conditions. Given these factors, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements, which speak only as at the date of this presentation. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable law or any relevant stock exchange listing rules, Evolution Mining does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this presentation, including (without limitation) where Evolution Mining’s expectations change in relation to such statements and where there is a change in events, conditions or circumstances providing the basis for any such statement.
-
No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, completeness, reliability, fairness or correctness of the information contained in this presentation. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Evolution Mining and its related bodies corporate and affiliates, and each of their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives, disclaim any liability or responsibility for loss or damage arising from or in connection with the use of the information contained in this presentation.
2
Australian Mid-tier Gold Producer
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
| Corporate Information | |
|---|---|
| ASX Code | EVN |
| Shares | 710M |
| Market Capitalisation1 | A$667M |
| Daily Turnover2 | A$2.8M |
| Major Shareholders | Newcrest 32.5% |
| Van Eck 10.1% | |
| Allan Gray 9.6% | |
| Cash3 | A$36.7M |
| Debt3 | A$141.8M |
| Available Credit3 | A$58.2M |
| Forward Sales3 | 187,774oz at A$1,595/oz |
| Dividend Policy | 2% of revenue from gold eq. production |
Globally competitive cash costs
-
At 28 April 2014
-
3 month average to 28 April 2014
-
At 31 March 2014
-
C1 cost - cost before royalties and after silver credits.
-
AISC (All in sustaining costs) - include C1 cash cost, plus royalty expense, plus sustaining capital expense, plus general corporate and administration expenses plus exploration expense.
3
Corporate Strategy
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
Operational stability and predictability through a portfolio of similar sized mines
-
Australia – a low political risk, first world jurisdiction with a high gold endowment
-
Improving the quality of the portfolio through productivity, reliability and discovery
-
Commitment to growth through exploration success and opportunistic, logical, value accretive acquisitions
-
High performance team culture with clearly defined business plans and goals
4
A Paradigm Shift
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
Majors
-
Multi jurisdictional model broken
-
Scaling back global operations
Juniors
-
Discovery and development hurdles getting beyond reach
-
Large enough to fund growth through cash flow
Mid-tiers
-
Small enough to deliver meaningful growth
-
Well positioned to acquire assets from Camp construction
-
majors and juniors
5
The Australian Opportunity
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
A$ falling
Input costs reducing
-
Productivity improving
-
Talent returning to the sector
-
Attractive political environment
-
Rationalisation of the Australian gold industry
==> picture [421 x 388] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Gold Industry C1 Cash Costs by Country
US$/oz Q3 2012
2,000
1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile
1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
South Africa
800
Australia
China
600
US [Indonesia ]
400
Peru
200
Russia
0
0 25 50 75 Percentile 100
C1 Cost Country
----- End of picture text -----
6
Core Strengths
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [209 x 119] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Edna May
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [209 x 103] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Cracow
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [209 x 110] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Mt Rawdon
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [117 x 173] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Mt Carlton
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [118 x 161] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Pajingo
----- End of picture text -----
Low operational risk – portfolio of mines delivering consistent results
Solid reserve and resource base 3.6 Moz AuEq Ore Reserve 7.7 Moz AuEq Mineral Resource
Excellent exploration potential Growth oriented – gold production has increased by 30% since FY11
Strong capital discipline and dividend commitment
Ore Reserve and Mineral Resource details are provided within the December 2012 Resource and Reserve Statement at www.evolutionmining.com.au
Robust operations with low risk upside leverage to gold price
7
Reliability and Consistency
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
Delivering on production and cash cost guidance since creation
-
Portfolio of five mines ensures a predictable performance
-
Reliability and consistency recognised through share price outperformance
==> picture [547 x 259] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Evolution (EVN) vs ASX All Ords Gold Index (XGD)
EVN (A$) XGD (pts)
1.10
1.00
3,500
0.90
3,000
0.80
0.70 2,500
0.60
2,000
0.50
0.40 1,500
EVN XGD
----- End of picture text -----
We say, We do, We deliver
8
Real achievement in reducing costs
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
Total Spend - FY13A vs FY14F
Group AISC³ (A$/oz)
| Total Spend (A$M) | Total Spend (A$M) | Total Spend (A$M) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY13 Actual |
FY14 Forecast¹ |
% **Change ** |
|
| Cracow | 145.8 | 108.0 | -26% |
| Pajingo | 140.8 | 84.5 | -40% |
| Edna May | 130.6 | 105.6 | -19% |
| Mt Rawdon | 143.0 | 133.0 | -7% |
| Mt Carlton² | - | 107.5 | - |
| Corporate | 25.5 | 20.1 | -21% |
| Discovery | 26.3 | 19.0 | -28% |
FY13 Average - A$1,228/oz
==> picture [340 x 188] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
FY14 YTD Average - A$1,074/oz
A$1,353/oz
A$1,266/oz
A$1,091/oz A$1,053/oz A$1,07/oz
----- End of picture text -----
Mar Qtr 2013 Jun Qtr 2013 Sep Qtr 2013 Dec Qtr 2013 Mar Qtr 2014
-
FY14 Forecast: 9 months actual + 3 month forecast
-
Mt Carlton commercial production declared on 1 July 2013.
-
AISC (All in sustaining costs) - C1 cash cost, plus royalty expense, plus sustaining capital expense, plus general corporate and administration expenses plus exploration expense.
AISC reduced by 12.5% (FY14 YTD vs FY13A)
9
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
Shift to owner-miner at Cracow & Mt Rawdon
-
Substantial cost savings following successful transition to owner-miner at Cracow (July 2013) estimated at A$18M – A$20Mpa in FY14 (A$180 – A$200/oz AISC[1] saving)
-
Transition to owner-miner at Mt Rawdon currently underway
==> picture [355 x 226] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Cracow - Empire ore heading
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [343 x 226] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Mt Rawdon open pit
----- End of picture text -----
- AISC (All-in Sustaining Cost) includes C1 cash cost, plus royalty expense, plus sustaining capital expense, plus general corporate and administration
Realising cost benefits above expectation
10
Smarter drill and blast at Mt Rawdon
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
Estimated ~A$5Mpa cost reductions following drill and blast optimisation project
-
Large diameter (203mm) blast holes, 15m benches (from 10m), plus electronic detonation (Unitronic600) has improved productivity
-
45% decrease in production blast holes, allowing a 33% reduction in drill fleet
-
25% decrease in blast related shutdowns (increased blast size and combination blasts)
-
10% increase in excavation rates
-
40% reduction in rock breaker hours
-
10% increase in plant throughput
-
==> picture [246 x 328] intentionally omitted <==
Blasting improvements show significant cost benefits
11
Mill ball recycling between mine sites
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
Worn mill balls (30 - 60mm diameter) rejected from Mt Carlton SAG for nil value
-
Opportunity for the Pajingo ball mill to utilise smaller balls discarded by Mt Carlton – an initiative identified by site personnel
-
Estimated savings of around A$280kpa
==> picture [357 x 268] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Mill balls rejected by Mt Carlton SAG mill
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [357 x 268] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Recycling of mill balls at Pajingo
----- End of picture text -----
Cost reduction by collaboration – a benefit of a multi-asset portfolio
12
Reduction in voluntary turnover
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
Voluntary turnover¹ halved between March 2013 and March 2014
-
Reflects a more competitive labour force, increased focus on quality of hire and improved on-boarding processes
Group Voluntary Turnover (%)
==> picture [435 x 215] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
Mar-13 Jun-13 Sep-13 Dec-13 Mar-14
Voluntary Turnover
----- End of picture text -----
- Voluntary turnover (12 months rolling) – includes permanent employees who have resigned in the previous 12 months as a percentage of average permanent headcount
13
Embracing technology – industry leading App
-
Efficient capture, reporting and evaluation of real-time mining data
-
Secure, live data stream via WiFi to server and user interfaces (iPhones and iPads)
-
Live mobile reporting (iPhones and iPads), instant utilisation and availability data
-
FaceTime between driver, supervisor and maintenance
-
Mining fleet optimisation (optimum tonnage, load and haul efficiency, eco driving, fuel economy, truck size)
-
Reduced equipment downtime – iPads for pre-start checks
Improved operator productivity
==> picture [242 x 161] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [271 x 162] intentionally omitted <==
A step change in performance monitoring
14
Pioneering new escape-way design
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
An innovative, ground-breaking escape-way system designed and installed at Cracow through collaboration between Evolution and Safescape
-
Record 385m long escape-way fully integrated into a 3.5m diameter Vent Raise
-
Cheaper than a traditional winder and cage with estimated savings of ~A$2M
Cracow – new Empire vent raise headworks
Seismic and 4D – technology and capacity
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
New techniques and Evolution’s talent to reveal deeper discoveries and evaluate potential acquisition opportunities
-
3D seismic at Cracow and Pajingo
-
Spectral analysis to map alteration minerals associated with gold at Mt Carlton
-
4D studies – integrating geological time to find potential areas of gold enrichment
==> picture [483 x 247] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Vera Nancy fault
3km depth
Syn-mineral normal faults
Post mineral inversion
----- End of picture text -----
3D perspective figure showing the regional geology, seismic line and interpreted faults at Pajingo
16
Prudent and opportunistic hedge
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
Gold hedge secured to self-fund near-term capital expenditure at Edna May and provide appropriate rate of return on capital
-
156,281oz at an average gold price of A$1,598/oz
A$ GOLD PRICE
==> picture [590 x 289] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
A$
1,650 Sold forward 156,281 ounce of gold
at A$1,598 on 30 August 2013
1,600
1,550
1,500
1,450
1,400
1,350
1,300
1,250
01-Jan-13 01-Apr-13 01-Jul-13 01-Oct-13 01-Jan-14 01-Apr-14
GOLD PRICE A$
----- End of picture text -----
17
The Evolution Value Proposition
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
-
–
-
Low risk First World jurisdiction
Australia
-
Second largest gold producer globally
-
Globally competitive on costs - and improving
-
Delivering on guidance since creation
Delivery
-
Delivering a significant growth project
-
Delivering on exploration upside
Gold dividend
- Dividend linked to gold production and gold price
Growth
-
Talented exploration team funded through strong cash flow
-
Opportunistic, logical acquisitions
18
Evolution Mining ASX Code: EVN
www.evolutionmining.com.au
==> picture [110 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
Appendix
==> picture [110 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
Mineral Resource Statement Dec 2012
| Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 | Mineral Resource Statement- December 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold | Measured | Indicated | Inferred | Total Resource | ||||||||||
| Project | Type | Cut-Off | Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Gold Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Gold Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Gold Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Gold Metal (koz) |
| Pajingo | Open-Pit | 0.5 | 0.01 | 3.6 |
1 | 0.17 | 5.0 | 28 | 0.32 | 1.2 | 12 | 0.51 | 2.6 |
42 |
| Pajingo1 | Underground | 2.5 | 1.14 | 8.4 |
306 | 3.27 | 5.9 | 621 | 2.06 | 5.1 | 337 | 6.46 | 6.1 |
1,264 |
| Cracow1 | Underground | 2.3 | 0.28 | 8.6 |
79 | 1.11 | 7.7 | 275 | 2.90 | 5.2 | 488 | 4.29 | 6.1 |
842 |
| Edna May1 | Open-Pit | 0.4 | 21.1 | 0.9 |
629 | 16.5 | 1.0 | 514 | 8.18 | 0.9 | 226 | 45.8 | 0.9 | 1,369 |
| Edna May | Underground | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0.63 | 7.2 | 146 | 0.58 | 6.9 | 128 | 1.21 | 7.1 | 273 |
| Mt Carlton | Open-Pit | 0.35 | 9.28 | 2.0 |
587 | 14.7 | 1.5 | 695 | 1.41 | 1.5 | 68 | 25.4 | 1.7 | 1,350 |
| Mt Rawdon1 | Open-Pit | 0.23 | 1.84 | 0.4 |
23 | 51.5 | 0.7 | 1,203 | 3.42 | 0.6 | 62 | 56.7 | 0.7 | 1,288 |
| Twin Hills | Open-Pit | 0.5 | - | - | - | 2.42 | 2.2 | 170 | 0.64 | 1.7 | 35 | 3.06 | 2.1 | 204 |
| Twin Hills | Underground | 2.3 | 0.54 | 4.1 | 71 | 0.32 | 3.5 | 36 | 0.70 | 3.9 | 87 | 1.56 | 3.9 | 194 |
| Total | 34.1 | 1.5 | 1,696 | 90.6 | 1.3 | 3,688 | 20.2 | 2.2 | 1,443 | 145 | 1.5 | 6,827 |
| Mt | Silver | Silver | Silver | Measured | Measured | Measured | Indicated | Indicated | Indicated | Inferred | Inferred | Inferred | Total Resource | Total Resource | Total Resource |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Type | Cut-Off | Tonnes (Mt) |
Silver Grade (g/t) |
Silver Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Silver Grade (g/t) |
Silver Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Silver Grade (g/t) |
Silver Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Silver Grade (g/t) |
Silver Metal (koz) |
|
| Mt Carlton1 | Open-Pit | * | 11.7 | 57 |
21,437 | 14.9 | 19 | 9,004 | 1.51 | 16 | 796 | 28.1 | 35 | 31,237 | |
| Total | 11.7 | 57 | 21,437 | 14.9 | 19 | 9,004 | 1.51 | 16 | 796 | 28.1 | 35 | 31,237 | |||
| Copper | Measured | Indicated | Inferred | Total Resource | |||||||||||
| Project | Type | Cut-Off | Tonnes (Mt) |
Copper Grade (%) |
Copper Metal (kt) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Copper Grade (%) |
Copper Metal (kt) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Copper Grade (%) |
Copper Metal (kt) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Copper Grade (%) |
Copper Metal (kt) |
|
| Mt Carlton1 | Open-Pit | * | 11.7 | 0.24 |
27.9 | 14.9 | 0.21 | 32.1 | 1.51 | 0.20 | 3.0 | 28.1 | 0.22 | 63.1 | |
| Total | 11.7 | 0.24 | 27.9 | 14.9 | 0.21 | 32.1 | 1.51 | 0.20 | 3.0 | 28.1 | 0.22 | 63.1 | |||
| Rawdon Open Pit: Sta Gold Equivalent |
Measured |
Indicated |
Inferred | Total Resource | |||||||||||
| ~~ge 2 C~~ Tonnes (Mt) |
~~utbac~~ Gold Equiv. Grade (g/t) |
~~k Sep~~ Gold Equiv. Metal (koz) |
~~t 201~~ Tonnes (Mt) |
~~2~~ Gold Equiv. Grade (g/t) |
Gold Equiv. Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Equiv. Grade (g/t) |
Gold Equiv. Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Equiv. Grade (g/t) |
Gold Equiv. Metal (koz) |
||||
| Total Group | 36.5 | 1.9 |
2,228 | 90.9 | 1.4 | 3,992 | 20.3 | 2.3 | 1,470 | 148 | 1.6 | 7,691 |
Notes:
Data is reported to significant figures and differences may occur due to rounding Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Ore Reserves 1 Includes stockpiles
- Combined figure for V2 using 0.35g/t Au cut-off and A39 using 42g/t Ag cut-off
The gold equivalence calculation represents total metal value for each metal summed and expressed in equivalent gold grade and ounces The prices used in the calculation being A$1350/oz Au, A$28.00/oz Ag and A$2.00/lb Cu
- Metallurgical recovery to concentrate of 90.0% for gold, 92.0% for silver at V2 and 88.0% for silver at A39 and 92.0% for copper as indicated by metallurgical testwork 1 Troy Ounce = 31.1034768 grams
Au Eq for Silver = ((Price Ag per Oz x Ag Recovery)/(Price Au per Oz x Au Recovery)) x Ag Grade
Au Eq for Copper = ((Price Cu per lb x 2204.623) x (Cu Recovery)) / ((Price Au per Oz x Au Recovery / 31.1034768) x (Cu Grade / 100))
| Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 | Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold | Proved | Probable | Total Reserve | |||||||||
| Project | Type | Cut-Off | Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Gold Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Gold Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Gold Metal (koz) |
|
| Pajingo | Open-Pit | 0.65 | 0.01 | 3.9 |
1 | 0.17 | 5.6 | 30 | 0.18 | 5.5 |
31 | |
| Pajingo1 | Underground | 3.0 | 0.56 | 7.1 |
129 | 0.88 | 6.0 | 169 | 1.44 | 6.4 |
298 | |
| Cracow1 | Underground | 3.6 | 0.17 | 8.3 |
46 | 1.44 | 4.9 | 226 | 1.61 | 5.3 |
273 | |
| EdnaMay1 | Open-Pit | 0.4 | 13.4 | 0.9 |
402 | 9.14 | 1.0 | 306 | 22.5 | 1.0 | 709 | |
| Mt Carlton | Open-Pit | 0.69 | 4.52 | 3.1 |
446 | 4.61 | 2.5 | 366 | 9.13 | 2.8 | 812 | |
| MtRawdon1 | Open-Pit | 0.3 | 1.08 | 0.5 |
17 | 38.7 | 0.8 | 1,009 | 39.8 | 0.8 | 1,026 | |
| Total | 19.7 | 1.6 | 1,042 | 54.9 | 1.2 | 2,106 | 75 | 1.3 | 3,148 |
Ore Reserve Statement Dec 2012
| Silver | Silver | Silver | Proved | Proved | Proved | Probable | Probable | Probable | Total Reserve | Total Reserve | Total Reserve |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Type | Cut-Off | Tonnes (Mt) |
Silver Grade (g/t) |
Silver Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Silver Grade (g/t) |
Silver Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Silver Grade (g/t) |
Silver Metal (koz) |
| Mt Carlton1 | Open-Pit | ** | 5.81 | 69 |
12,969 | 4.61 | 20 | 2,991 | 10.4 | 48 | 15,960 |
| Total | 5.81 | 69 |
12,969 | 4.61 | 20 | 2,991 | 10.4 | 48 | 15,960 |
| Copper | Copper | Copper | Proved | Proved | Proved | Probable | Probable | Probable | Total Reserve | Total Reserve | Total Reserve |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Type | Cut-Off | Tonnes (Mt) |
Copper Grade (%) |
Copper Metal (kt) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Copper Grade (%) |
Copper Metal (kt) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Copper Grade (%) |
Copper Metal (kt) |
| Mt Carlton1 | Open-Pit | ** | 5.81 | 0.29 |
17.1 | 4.61 | 0.23 | 10.5 | 10.4 | 0.26 | 27.6 |
| Total | 5.81 | 0.29 |
17.1 | 4.61 | 0.23 | 10.5 | 10.4 | 0.26 | 27.6 | ||
| Gold Equivalent | Proved | Probable | Total Reserve | ||||||||
| Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Equiv. Grade (g/t) |
Gold Equiv. Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Equiv. Grade (g/t) |
Gold Equiv. Metal (koz) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Gold Equiv. Grade (g/t) |
Gold Equiv. Metal (koz) |
|||
| Total Group | 21.0 | 2.0 |
1,365 | 54.9 | 1.2 | 2,204 | 75.9 | 1.5 | 3,570 |
Notes:
Data is reported to significant figures and differences may occur due to rounding
-
1 Includes stockpiles
-
** Combined figure for V2 using 0.69g/t Au cut-off and A39 using 53g/t Ag cut-off
The gold equivalence calculation represents total metal value for each metal summed and expressed in equivalent gold grade or ounces The prices used in the calculation being A$1350/oz Au, A$28.00/oz Ag and A$2.00/lb Cu
metallurgical recovery to concentrate of 90.0% for gold, 92.0% for silver at V2 and 88.0% for silver at A39 and 92.0% for copper as indicated by metallurgical testwork
- 1 Troy Ounce = 31.1034768 grams
Au Eq for Silver = ((Price Ag per Oz x Ag Recovery)/(Price Au per Oz x Au Recovery)) x Ag Grade Au Eq for Copper = ((Price Cu per lb x 2204.623) x (Cu Recovery)) / ((Price Au per Oz x Au Recovery / 31.1034768) x (Cu Grade / 100))
Competent Person Statement
==> picture [108 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
The information in this presentation that relates to exploration results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves listed in the table below is based on work compiled by the person whose name appears in the same row, who is employed on a full-time basis by the employer named in that row and is a member of the institute named in that row. Each person named in the table below has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he or she has undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (the JORC Code, 2004). Each person named in the table consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.
| Activity | Name of Competent Person |
Employer | Institute |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cracow Mineral Resources | Shane Pike | Evolution Mining | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Cracow Ore Reserves | Fusheng Li | Evolution Mining | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Pajingo Mineral Resources | Hans Andersen | Evolution Mining | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Pajingo Ore Reserves: Open-Pit | Tony Wallace | Evolution Mining | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Pajingo Ore Reserves: Underground | Ian Patterson | Evolution Mining | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Edna May Ore Reserves | Luke Cox | Evolution Mining | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Edna May Mineral Resources | John Winterbottom | Formerly Evolution Mining | Australian Institute of Geoscientists |
| Mt Rawdon Mineral Resources | Hans Andersen | Evolution Mining | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Mt Rawdon Ore Reserves | Tony Wallace | Evolution Mining | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Mt Carlton Mineral Resources | John Winterbottom | Formerly Evolution Mining | Australian Institute of Geoscientists |
| Mt Carlton Ore Reserves | Tony Wallace | Evolution Mining | Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy |
| Twin Hills Mineral Resources | John Winterbottom | Formerly Evolution Mining | Australian Institute of Geoscientists |
Evolution Mining ASX Code: EVN
www.evolutionmining.com.au
==> picture [110 x 67] intentionally omitted <==