AI assistant
EV RESOURCES LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2022
Aug 29, 2022
64887_rns_2022-08-29_5b5ce93c-f429-46fd-9db7-841757bb4a3b.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
30[th] August 2022
Exploration Commences at Don Enrique Copper-Silver-Gold Project
HIGHLIGHTS
-
Exploration has commenced at The Don Enrique Project (the “ Project ”), EVR’s 50% owned copper-silver-gold project in Peru after successful community meetings confirmed support for the project.
-
EVR’s Peruvian Exploration Team is taking systematic channel samples along 2 separate orebodies with a 1500-meter outcrop on the Southern orebody, and in an exploration crosscut 300 metres below the brow of the mountain.
-
Exploration will test possible extensions of the orebody in the Northern orebody, where historic grab sample assayed as high as 4.81% Cu[1] .
-
Quotes have been received for conducting IP and Magnetometry Geophysical surveys at site.
-
The Drilling permit is under preparation and will be submitted in Q4,2022.
EV Resources Limited (ASX:EVR) (“ EVR ”, or the “ Company ”) is pleased to announce that exploration has commenced after weeks of successful and constructive engagement with the communities in close proximity of the Don Enrique Project in Peru. The communities are contributing labour to the exploration campaign, and EVR’s specialist community team are in continual dialogue with the communities to establish a long-term relationship of trust, co-operation, and respect. The Project is owned by EVR’s 50% owned subsidiary, Minera Montserrat SAC. EVR holds a 2-year option to purchase the remaining 50% of Minera Montserrat SAC.
==> picture [377 x 126] intentionally omitted <==
Photo 1. Panoramic View of the Don Enrique Project site (Southern Orebodies)
1 This Sample number 25531 (see Table 1 attached), is located at E 460056 and N 8713232(WGS 84) evresources.com.au
311-313 Hay St Subiaco, Western Australia 6008 +61 (0) 8 6489 0600 [email protected]
The exploration programme has commenced with an underground sampling programme in a series of 4 exploration cross cuts developed by a Peruvian mid-tier company in the 1980’s, which neatly allows evaluation of the 2 separate and parallel hydrothermal breccia orebodies estimated to vary between 5-20 metres in width, over a 1500 metre outcropping strike, and separated by an andesite parting typically 90 metres in width.
==> picture [435 x 288] intentionally omitted <==
Photo 2. Panoramic View of Body 1 and Body 2, the separation between them is 90 metres. Each body has a length of 1.5km and a width of 5-20metres. The vertical extent is 300 metres.
It is in this crosscut, that historic grab sampling (verified by EVR’s geological team), had assayed up to 7.17% Copper in Sample RDEN-1 (taken at E 459997, and N 8712314 using Datum WGS84).
Page 2 of 22
==> picture [396 x 234] intentionally omitted <==
Photo 3. Orebody 1, at the entrance to old adit. With Copper oxides (maiachite-azurite in the walls).
Channel samples that are 2 meters in length are being collected with a manual rock cutter and diamond saw, supported by a small generator on site to recharge batteries. Conventional QA/QC controls are being employed by experienced geologists under the leadership of Mr Gonzalo Lemuz, a veteran geologist who has held leadership positions in major and junior companies with a focus on copper and gold.
==> picture [377 x 250] intentionally omitted <==
Photo 4. Accessing Cross Cut for Sampling
Page 3 of 22
==> picture [389 x 270] intentionally omitted <==
Photo 5. Channel Sample Being Cut Underground
The Don Enrique Project
The Project consists of 4 licences covering 1,800Ha, in an area 21km northeast of Jauja, and approximately 260km from the Nation’s capital, Lima:
-
Don Enrique, Licence number: 0100769-12, 1000 Ha.
-
Chaupiloma 2007, Licence Number: 0105549-07, 100 Ha.
-
Chaupiloma 2008, Licence Number: 0101581-08, 100 Ha.
-
COCOA BEACH, Licence Number: 010155815, 600 Ha.
EVR purchased 50% of the project in Q2, 2022 from a group of shareholders for US$150,000 paid in cash and then purchased a 2-year option for US$150,000 paid in cash, to purchase the remaining 50% of the shares for a single cash payment of US$850,000 payable in cash, and a 1% NSR royalty.
Geological Description
The outcropping system at Don Enrique presents as two zones of massive silicification, about 100m apart, one approximately 5m wide and the other 15 to 20m wide, dipping steeply east and striking 320°. The wider, western, vein has a matrix of quartz carbonate and contains pods of massive sulphide with the assemblage pyrite-chalcopyrite-galena and lesser sphalerite-stibnite, with later possibly supergene bornite (Yparraguirre and Blas Rodriguez, 2019). The vein hanging wall has a 2m thick hydrothermal breccia zone. The veins are hosted in an intrusive rock which has been mapped variously as diorite or hypabyssal andesite; it cuts a sequence of dacites and volcanosedimentary rocks of the Mitu Group, Permian in age. There is an evident structural control which may be related to a regional scale SW-NE fault in the valley floor.
The western vein/breccia has been explored (probably in the 1960s) via an underground drive 80m long and four crosscuts of 15m to 20m which cut the structure. On surface, the two silicified structures can be traced for approximately 1 km in the Southern Area.
Page 4 of 22
On the northern side of the main valley, the host intrusives have been mapped for a further 500m strike length with anomalous Cu, Pb and Zn rock chip geochemistry. Veins of quartz with chalcopyrite, galena and molybdenite have been mapped with widths up to 1.5m and continuity up to 30m (Durand and Cortez, 2014).
The mineralogy and geochemistry of the polymetallic veins/breccias suggest that the system is distally related to a porphyry copper. No source intrusion has been recognized to date.
Anomalous values of gold and silver, along with fluid inclusion temperatures in the 150°C to 220°C range, suggest the presence of an epithermal overprinting mineralization event exploiting the same structural control. A suite of typical pathfinder elements (As-Sb-Bi-Hg) are also anomalous and reinforce the idea of an epithermal overprint.
==> picture [452 x 349] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1. Geological Map Don Enrique Scale 1/10,000. WGS84
Within this area, numerous grab samples were taken by previous owners and verified by EVR’s exploration team. These are shown in Figures 2-4 below, and a full list of samples is provided in Table 1, attached.
Page 5 of 22
==> picture [595 x 138] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2. Grab Samples for Copper (Cu%)
==> picture [305 x 249] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3. Grab Samples Assayed for Silver (Ag ppm)
Page 6 of 22
==> picture [595 x 138] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4. Grab Samples for Gold (Au ppm)
The rationale for commencing exploration in the old exploration adits and cross cuts is the excellent presentation of geological structure and mineralisation, which has given EVR the confidence to commence drill permitting.
==> picture [421 x 259] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5. Historic Sampling in Old Exploration Adit and Cross Cuts for Copper (Cu %)
Page 7 of 22
==> picture [454 x 283] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6. Historic Sampling in old Exploration Adit and Cross Cut for Gold (Au ppm)
==> picture [454 x 288] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7. Historic Sampling in old Exploration Adit and Cross Cut for Silver (Ag ppm)
Page 8 of 22
Geophysics and Drill Permitting
A geophysical Exploration Programme employing IP (Induced Polarisation) and Magnetometry is being planned to follow the sampling and select drilling targets.
EVR has employed the services of Aquarum S.A.C, a specialist permitting consultancy, to prepare the drilling permits, and their team have been on site since 15th August compiling baseline data for inclusion in the drill permit application planned to be submitted in Q4, 2022.
Exploration Potential
The highest values in rock chips occur in the underground samples, which raises the possibility that surface weathering may have leached metals and reduced the geochemical contrast for the surficial samples which represent most of the area.
There is clear potential at Don Enrique for two possible scenarios:
-
Small scale underground mining of the silicified breccias themselves, with the potential for high grade epithermal pods in structurally controlled jogs.
-
A possible porphyry system at depth which is the fluid source. Because of the uplift rates often encountered in the Andes, it is often possible to find related porphyry and epithermal systems in relatively close proximity.
Further exploration, including both geophysics and drilling, is justified to investigate both possibilities.
ENDS
For further information, please contact:
Luke Martino Adrian Paul Non-Executive Chairman Executive Director Tel: +61 8 6489 0600 Tel: +61 8 6489 0600 E: [email protected] E: [email protected]
This ASX announcement was authorised for release by the Board of EV Resources Limited.
Forward Looking Statement
Forward Looking Statements regarding EVR´s plans with respect to its mineral properties and programs are forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that EVR’s plans for development of its mineral properties will proceed as currently expected. There can also be no assurance that EVR will be able to confirm the presence of additional mineral resources, that any mineralisation will prove to be economic or that a mine will successfully be developed on any of EVR’s mineral properties. The performance of EVR may be influenced by a number of factors which are outside the control of the Company and its Directors, staff, and contractors. These statements include, but are not limited to statements regarding future production, resources or reserves and exploration results. All of such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of the company, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (i) those relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits and conclusions of economic evaluations, (ii) risks relating to possible variations in reserves, grade, planned mining dilution and ore loss, or recovery rates and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be
Page 9 of 22
refined, (iii) the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility studies, (iv) risks related to commodity price and foreign exchange rate fluctuations, (v) risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms or delays in obtaining governmental approvals or in the completion of development or construction activities, and (vi) other risks and uncertainties related to the company’s prospects, properties and business strategy. Our audience is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date hereof, and we do not undertake any obligation to revise and disseminate forwardlooking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of or non-occurrence of any events.
Competent Person’s Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to the Don Enrique Copper Project, is based on information compiled by Dr Stephen Windle who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Dr Windle is a consultant to EVR. Dr Windle has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Dr Windle consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.
Compliance Statement
This announcement contains information on the Don Enrique Copper Project extracted from an ASX market announcement dated 28 February 2022 and reported in accordance with the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” ("2012 JORC Code"). EVR confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original ASX market announcement.
Page 10 of 22
Appendix 1-Table of compiled rock chip geochemistry for selected elements
| SAMPL E ID |
COMPANY | YEA R |
E_WGS8 4 |
N_WGS8 4 |
ELEVATIO N |
ROCK_TYPE | Au_ppm | Ag_pp m |
As_pp m |
Bi_pp m |
Cu_pp m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRDE-1 | CopperFiel d |
2018 | 460005.8 | 8712317 | 4433 | 0.326 | 539 | 53.5 | 908 | 25700 | |
| RRDE-2 | CopperFiel d |
2018 | 459997.9 | 8712316 | 4433 | 0.071 | 317 | 21.2 | 385 | 34900 | |
| RRDE-3 | CopperFiel d |
2018 | 459993.3 | 8712306 | 4433 | 0.027 | 42.7 | 21.9 | 27.24 | 14800 | |
| RRDE-4 | CopperFiel d |
2018 | 460001.9 | 8712305 | 4433 | 0.053 | 10.7 | 23.1 | 51.04 | 2248 | |
| RRDE-5 | CopperFiel d |
2018 | 460006.2 | 8712304 | 4433 | 0.15 | 14.8 | 23.2 | 41.05 | 5977 | |
| RRDE-6 | CopperFiel d |
2018 | 460005.9 | 8712273 | 4433 | 0.016 | 61.3 | 18.4 | 12.16 | 4382 | |
| 109681 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460404.1 | 8711783 | 4643.5 | Quartz vein | 0.557 | 5 | 118 | ||
| 109682 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460404.1 | 8711780 | 4643.5 | Quartz vein | 0.034 | 7.8 | 153 | ||
| 109683 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460520.1 | 8711789 | 4643.5 | Quartz vein | 0.02 | 1.8 | 168 | ||
| 109684 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460381.1 | 8711971 | 4615 | Quartz vein | 0.009 | 1.3 | 93 | ||
| 109685 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460288.1 | 8712027 | 4572.6 | Quartz vein | 0.034 | 3 | 99 | ||
| 109686 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460281.1 | 8712014 | 4572.3 | Quartz vein | 0.007 | 1.4 | 205 | ||
| 109687 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460279.1 | 8712013 | 4572.4 | Quartz vein | 0.018 | 1.3 | 200 | ||
| 109688 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460236.1 | 8712062 | 4556.9 | Quartz vein | 0.0025 | 0.5 | 64 | ||
| 109689 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459984.1 | 8712348 | 4434.2 | Not observed |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 249 | ||
| 109691 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459982.1 | 8712347 | 4434 | Breccia | 0.007 | 22 | 1240 | ||
| 109692 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459979.4 | 8712347 | 4433.3 | Breccia | 0.0025 | 2.9 | 726 | ||
| 109693 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459977 | 8712346 | 4433.6 | Breccia | 0.0025 | 13 | 1890 | ||
| 109694 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459973.2 | 8712346 | 4432.6 | Pyroclastic rock |
0.0025 | 8 | 1040 | ||
| 109695 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459927.1 | 8712535 | 4393.5 | Quartz vein | 0.0025 | 0.5 | 56 | ||
| 109696 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459925.1 | 8712536 | 4393.5 | Quartz vein | 0.0025 | 0.5 | 99 | ||
| 109711 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459992.9 | 8712262 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 26 | ||
| 109712 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459992 | 8712262 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 9 | ||
| 109713 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459991.7 | 8712263 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 98 | ||
| 109714 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459991.3 | 8712264 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 49 | ||
| 109715 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459991.8 | 8712269 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.01 | 18 | 2130 | ||
| 109716 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459990.8 | 8712270 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.008 | 13.3 | 1010 | ||
| 109717 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459987.1 | 8712273 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.018 | 12 | 520 | ||
| 109718 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459985.8 | 8712274 | 4433 | Diorite | 0.0025 | 0.5 | 45 | ||
| 109719 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460007.8 | 8712274 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 1.3 | 106 | ||
| 109721 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460006 | 8712275 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.015 | 10.7 | 884 | ||
| 109722 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460004.1 | 8712275 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.043 | 81.1 | 3590 | ||
| 109723 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460002.4 | 8712276 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.861 | 386 | 24500 | ||
| 109724 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460000.5 | 8712277 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.023 | 67.8 | 3550 | ||
| 109725 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459998.4 | 8712278 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.009 | 46.4 | 3430 | ||
| 109726 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459996.5 | 8712278 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.074 | 48.6 | 4060 | ||
| 109727 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459994.5 | 8712279 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.016 | 25.8 | 2040 | ||
| 109728 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459992.7 | 8712280 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.007 | 6 | 288 | ||
| 109729 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460005.8 | 8712292 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 9.3 | 368 | ||
| 109731 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460003.8 | 8712292 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.008 | 7 | 579 | ||
| 109732 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460001.8 | 8712292 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.013 | 14 | 793 | ||
| 109733 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459999.8 | 8712292 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.018 | 50.7 | 3230 |
Page 11 of 22
| 1880 1020 391 1900 1440 2800 254 214 13800 7680 6840 5230 1160 13400 2650 2980 8210 38500 4060 2160 12000 28500 9990 34900 4750 28500 4330 1410 21400 25900 767 40800 117 199 1750 7290 2460 1890 1880 585 587 1100 50 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 109734 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459997.8 | 8712292 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.009 | 18 | 1880 | |||
| 109735 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459995.8 | 8712292 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.006 | 8.3 | 1020 | |||
| 109736 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459993.8 | 8712292 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 1.4 | 391 | |||
| 109737 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459999.8 | 8712294 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.027 | 24 | 1900 | |||
| 109738 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459997.8 | 8712294 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.008 | 9 | 1440 | |||
| 109739 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459995.8 | 8712294 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.018 | 15 | 2800 | |||
| 109741 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459993.8 | 8712293 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 4 | 254 | |||
| 109742 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460006.8 | 8712304 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 214 | |||
| 109743 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460005.1 | 8712304 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.549 | 43 | 13800 | |||
| 109744 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460003.3 | 8712305 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.072 | 65.1 | 7680 | |||
| 109745 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460001.3 | 8712305 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.067 | 135 | 6840 | |||
| 109746 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459999.4 | 8712305 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.024 | 36 | 5230 | |||
| 109747 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459997.3 | 8712306 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 3.8 | 1160 | |||
| 109748 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459995.3 | 8712306 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.046 | 48 | 13400 | |||
| 109749 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460008.3 | 8712317 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.055 | 6.7 | 2650 | |||
| 112861 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460006.3 | 8712317 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.017 | 12 | 2980 | |||
| 112862 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460004.4 | 8712317 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.09 | 82 | 8210 | |||
| 112863 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460002 | 8712317 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.199 | 1296 | 38500 | |||
| 112864 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460000.4 | 8712316 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.006 | 19.4 | 4060 | |||
| 112865 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459998.6 | 8712316 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.0025 | 15 | 2160 | |||
| 112866 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459996.3 | 8712316 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.033 | 96 | 12000 | |||
| 112867 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459994.7 | 8712316 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.059 | 186 | 28500 | |||
| 112868 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460002.3 | 8712318 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.023 | 41.7 | 9990 | |||
| 112869 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460002.8 | 8712317 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.114 | 655 | 34900 | |||
| 112871 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459995.8 | 8712318 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.008 | 34 | 4750 | |||
| 112872 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459995.8 | 8712316 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.124 | 213 | 28500 | |||
| 112873 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459984.8 | 8712346 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.033 | 102 | 4330 | |||
| 112874 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459982.8 | 8712345 | 4433 | Pyroclastic Rock |
0.016 | 18 | 1410 | |||
| 112875 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460056.1 | 8713248 | 4474.5 | Vein | 0.009 | 49 | 21400 | |||
| 112876 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460064.1 | 8713243 | 4472.7 | Vein | 0.016 | 98.7 | 25900 | |||
| 112987 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459957.4 | 8712321 | 4439.4 | Not Observed |
0.007 | 2.9 | 35.8 | 5.45 | 767 | |
| 112988 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459954.4 | 8712321 | 4438.8 | Quartz vein | 0.135 | 959 | 75.3 | 2409 | 40800 | |
| 112989 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460004 | 8712258 | 4492.8 | Quartz vein | 0.0025 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 8.73 | 117 | |
| 112991 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 458518 | 8711323 | 4469.1 | Not Observed |
0.015 | 28.2 | 46.3 | 12.62 | 199 | |
| 117571 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459975.4 | 8712336 | 4433 | Not observed |
0.013 | 17 | 1750 | |||
| 117572 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459979.5 | 8712333 | 4433 | Quartz vein | 0.021 | 85.2 | 7290 | |||
| 117573 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459983.4 | 8712337 | 4433 | Quartz vein | 0.014 | 21 | 2460 | |||
| 117574 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459983.3 | 8712341 | 4433 | Quartz vein | 0.023 | 16.7 | 1890 | |||
| 117575 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460135.1 | 8712061 | 4550 | Breccia | 0.061 | 8 | 1880 | |||
| 117576 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460133.1 | 8712059 | 4550.4 | Breccia | 0.0025 | 1 | 585 | |||
| 117577 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460128.1 | 8712058 | 4550.7 | Not observed |
0.0025 | 1.6 | 587 | |||
| 117578 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460124.1 | 8712059 | 4551.2 | Not observed |
0.0025 | 2.6 | 1100 | |||
| 117579 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460168.1 | 8712204 | 4527.1 | Breccia | 0.006 | 2 | 50 |
Page 12 of 22
| 130 142 70 117 1590 599 410 674 136 1730 5000 817 113 1300 194 7 35 147 109 31.8 55.7 15.5 15.4 164 162 30.2 2480 51.4 1750 6900 17.1 11.9 4.9 24.2 2.6 9.8 1750 283 9920 5810 1710 3960 1680 82.4 44.6 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 117581 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460165.1 | 8712202 | 4526.7 | Quartz vein | 0.044 | 2.4 | 130 | |||
| 117582 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460149.1 | 8712239 | 4516.4 | Quartz vein | 0.031 | 2.3 | 142 | |||
| 117583 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460148.1 | 8712237 | 4516.6 | Quartz vein | 0.35 | 1.4 | 70 | |||
| 117584 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460046.1 | 8712205 | 4510.5 | Quartz vein | 0.006 | 4 | 117 | |||
| 117585 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460045.1 | 8712203 | 4510.9 | Quartz vein | 0.056 | 54.3 | 1590 | |||
| 117586 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460040.1 | 8712203 | 4510.6 | Quartz vein | 0.012 | 15.8 | 599 | |||
| 117587 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460036.1 | 8712205 | 4509.7 | Quartz vein | 0.038 | 12 | 410 | |||
| 117588 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460033.1 | 8712201 | 4510.4 | Quartz vein | 0.0025 | 3.6 | 674 | |||
| 117589 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459989.1 | 8712326 | 4446.4 | Pyroclastic rock |
0.0025 | 1 | 136 | |||
| 117591 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459986.1 | 8712325 | 4446 | Quartz vein | 0.01 | 10.6 | 1730 | |||
| 117592 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459983.1 | 8712326 | 4444.3 | Quartz vein | 0.061 | 43.6 | 5000 | |||
| 117593 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459982.1 | 8712325 | 4444.5 | Quartz vein | 0.009 | 13.7 | 817 | |||
| 117594 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459980.1 | 8712324 | 4444.4 | Quartz vein | 0.0025 | 5.9 | 113 | |||
| 117595 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459977.1 | 8712321 | 4445.1 | Quartz vein | 0.016 | 28 | 1300 | |||
| 117596 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 459977.1 | 8712319 | 4446.3 | Pyroclastic rock |
0.0025 | 2.3 | 194 | |||
| 117597 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460398.1 | 8711638 | 4609.6 | Not observed |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 7 | |||
| 117598 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460302.1 | 8711674 | 4599.3 | Not observed |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 35 | |||
| 117599 | CUMBREX | 2014 | 460403.1 | 8711787 | 4643.5 | Quartz vein | 0.983 | 8 | 147 | |||
| RR- 00187 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460403.1 | 8711791 | 4643.5 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.048 | 3.5 | 142 | 8 | 109 | |
| RR- 00188 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460381.1 | 8711961 | 4616.2 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 82 | 7 | 31.8 | |
| RR- 00189 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460233.1 | 8712062 | 4556.5 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.0025 | 0.5 | 30 | 2.5 | 55.7 | |
| RR- 00190 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460284.1 | 8712135 | 4561.7 | Diorita | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 10 | 2.5 | 15.5 | |
| RR- 00191 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460240.1 | 8712068 | 4556.9 | Dacitico | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 18 | 5 | 15.4 | |
| RR- 00192 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460004.1 | 8712139 | 4525.2 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.012 | 5.8 | 106 | 14 | 164 | |
| RR- 00193 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460028.1 | 8712238 | 4500.6 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.037 | 4.4 | 30 | 145 | 162 | |
| RR- 00194 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459991.4 | 8712262 | 4433 | Diorita | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 6 | 2.5 | 30.2 | |
| RR- 00195 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460000.4 | 8712277 | 4433 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.035 | 40.3 | 11 | 19 | 2480 | |
| RR- 00196 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459986.4 | 8712273 | 4433 | Diorita | 0.0025 | 0.4 | 8 | 2.5 | 51.4 | |
| RR- 00197 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460000.4 | 8712294 | 4433 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.019 | 10.4 | 33 | 32 | 1750 | |
| RR- 00198 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460000.4 | 8712318 | 4433 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.01 | 57.8 | 20 | 109 | 6900 | |
| RR- 00199 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459374.1 | 8713422 | 4465.4 | Dacitico | 0.011 | 0.1 | 6 | 2.5 | 17.1 | |
| RR- 00200 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459353.1 | 8713433 | 4472.3 | Dacitico | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 4 | 2.5 | 11.9 | |
| RR- 00205 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459408.1 | 8713552 | 4451.7 | Diorita | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 4 | 2.5 | 4.9 | |
| RR- 00206 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459283.1 | 8713559 | 4501.5 | Dacitico | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 7 | 2.5 | 24.2 | |
| RR- 00207 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459161.1 | 8713561 | 4589.1 | Dacitico | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.6 | |
| RR- 00208 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459074.1 | 8714083 | 4532.6 | Dacitico | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 7 | 2.5 | 9.8 | |
| RR- 00209 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460057.1 | 8713245 | 4473.3 | Dacitico | 0.012 | 6.6 | 11 | 6 | 1750 | |
| RR- 00210 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460006.4 | 8712304 | 4433 | Dioritico | 0.021 | 0.8 | 20 | 7 | 283 | |
| RR- 00211 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460003.4 | 8712305 | 4433 | Dioritico | 0.089 | 58.9 | 98 | 407 | 9920 | |
| RR- 00212 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460000.4 | 8712305 | 4433 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.04 | 56.3 | 248 | 1229 | 5810 | |
| RR- 00213 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459997.4 | 8712306 | 4433 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.033 | 4.1 | 60 | 19 | 1710 | |
| RR- 00214 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459995.4 | 8712306 | 4433 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.009 | 14.9 | 58 | 19 | 3960 | |
| RR- 00215 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 459992.4 | 8712303 | 4433 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.006 | 8.5 | 56 | 21 | 1680 | |
| RR- 00445 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460522.1 | 8711789 | 4643.5 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.01 | 0.8 | 18 | 9 | 82.4 | |
| RR- 00446 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460518.1 | 8711510 | 4569.1 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.0025 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 44.6 |
Page 13 of 22
| 8 1.8 1.1 0.6 0.6 48 72.5 59.7 1370 7.4 6.3 337 7.6 3.9 12.7 10000 6693 10.3 150 71700 13400 7291 20900 10200 489 10900 27100 18100 12 1735 2400 2220 1285 1405 1835 17 29 17200 259 29 264 1390 55 4440 58 651 103 2870 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR- 00447 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460444.1 | 8711490 | 4529.1 | DIORITA | 0.0025 | 0.2 | 14 | 2.5 | 8 | |
| RR- 00448 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460177.1 | 8710956 | 4493.7 | ESTRUCTUR A |
0.0025 | 0.1 | 4 | 2.5 | 1.8 | |
| RR- 00449 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460758.1 | 8711109 | 4477.7 | DACITE | 0.0025 | 0.2 | 8 | 2.5 | 1.1 | |
| RR- 00450 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460785.1 | 8711071 | 4484.9 | DACITE | 0.014 | 0.1 | 14 | 2.5 | 0.6 | |
| RR- 00451 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 461105.1 | 8710885 | 4585 | VEIN | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 10 | 2.5 | 0.6 | |
| RR- 00452 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 461168.1 | 8710855 | 4572.1 | VEIN | 0.033 | 0.6 | 10 | 2.5 | 48 | |
| RR- 00453 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 461147.1 | 8710890 | 4584.3 | VEIN | 0.0025 | 0.6 | 10 | 2.5 | 72.5 | |
| RR- 00454 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 461069.1 | 8710986 | 4593.5 | VEIN | 0.005 | 2.2 | 28 | 2.5 | 59.7 | |
| RR- 00455 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460569.1 | 8711690 | 4643.5 | VEIN | 0.011 | 2.3 | 17 | 2.5 | 1370 | |
| RR- 00456 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460975.1 | 8711650 | 4684.9 | DACITE | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 4 | 2.5 | 7.4 | |
| RR- 00457 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460938.1 | 8711530 | 4687 | DACITE | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 6.3 | |
| RR- 00458 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 461066.1 | 8711401 | 4618.7 | DACITE | 0.0025 | 1.2 | 71 | 15 | 337 | |
| RR- 00459 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 461200.1 | 8711752 | 4555.4 | DACITE | 0.0025 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 7.6 | |
| RR- 00460 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460776.1 | 8712253 | 4589.9 | DACITE | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3.9 | |
| RR- 00461 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460335.1 | 8712193 | 4580 | DACITE | 0.0025 | 0.1 | 4 | 2.5 | 12.7 | |
| RR- 00476 |
LA MORENA |
2012 | 460004.1 | 8712320 | 4455 | DIORITA | 0.048 | 93.8 | 28 | 33 | 10000 | |
| 2401 | MARIANA RES O |
2015 | 459955.1 | 8712343 | 4433 | Diorite | 0.036 | 62.2 | 78 | 34 | 6693 | |
| 2402 | MARIANA RES O |
2015 | 460195.1 | 8712843 | 4393.5 | Dacite | 0.0025 | 0.3 | 6 | 2.5 | 10.3 | |
| 2403 | MARIANA RES O |
2015 | 459895.1 | 8713023 | 4425.6 | Dacite | 0.0025 | 0.4 | 8 | 2.5 | 150 | |
| RDEN-1 | MASGLAS | 2019 | 459997 | 8712314 | 4433 | 0.136 | 1269 | 134 | 3280 | 71700 | ||
| RDEN-2 | MASGLAS | 2019 | 459997 | 8712274 | 4433 | 0.112 | 302 | 14 | 242 | 13400 | ||
| RDEN-3 | MASGLAS | 2019 | 459999 | 8712302 | 4433 | 0.11 | 23.2 | 60 | 84 | 7291 | ||
| RDEN-4 | MASGLAS | 2019 | 459991 | 8712313 | 4433 | 0.034 | 155 | 20 | 230 | 20900 | ||
| RDEN-5 | MASGLAS | 2019 | 460222 | 8711928 | 4579.2 | 0.04 | 38.7 | 42 | 9 | 10200 | ||
| RDEN-6 | MASGLAS | 2019 | 460397 | 8711783 | 4642 | 0.502 | 25.6 | 207 | 2.5 | 489 | ||
| RDEN-7 | MASGLAS | 2019 | 460097 | 8713214 | 4464.4 | 0.025 | 21.7 | 21 | 2.5 | 10900 | ||
| RDEN-8 | MASGLAS | 2019 | 460057 | 8713235 | 4469.6 | 0.049 | 142 | 45 | 2.5 | 27100 | ||
| RDEN-9 | MASGLAS | 2019 | 460055 | 8713235 | 4469.7 | 0.006 | 79.9 | 12 | 6 | 18100 | ||
| MDE- 001 |
MINES MANAG |
2013 | 460080.1 | 8712055 | 4552.4 | 0.011 | 0.2 | 17 | 1 | 12 | ||
| MDE- 002 |
MINES MANAG |
2013 | 460059.1 | 8712146 | 4526.6 | 0.009 | 4.2 | 578 | 14 | 1735 | ||
| MDE- 003 |
MINES MANAG |
2013 | 459965.1 | 8712352 | 4433 | 0.009 | 13 | 288 | 21 | 2400 | ||
| MDE- 004 |
MINES MANAG |
2013 | 459965.1 | 8712352 | 4427.9 | 0.005 | 15.9 | 40 | 2 | 2220 | ||
| MDE- 005 |
MINES MANAG |
2013 | 459965.1 | 8712352 | 4427.9 | 0.011 | 14.5 | 30 | 9 | 1285 | ||
| MDE- 006 |
MINES MANAG |
2013 | 459965.1 | 8712352 | 4427.9 | 0.005 | 8.9 | 10 | 10 | 1405 | ||
| MDE- 007 |
MINES MANAG |
2013 | 459949.1 | 8712361 | 4419.7 | 0.008 | 28.8 | 85 | 909 | 1835 | ||
| 817 | SMC | 457540.1 | 8712607 | 4593.5 | 0.005 | 2.5 | 45 | 5 | 17 | |||
| 818 | SMC | 457540 | 8712607 | 4593.5 | 0.005 | 1.7 | 24 | 5 | 29 | |||
| 819 | SMC | 458530 | 8714478 | 4636.8 | 0.042 | 146 | 6 | 55 | 17200 | |||
| 820 | SMC | 460563 | 8711967 | 4654.2 | 0.02 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 259 | |||
| 821 | SMC | 461002 | 8711659 | 4679.1 | 0.005 | 0.2 | 3 | 5 | 29 | |||
| 822 | SMC | 460628 | 8711595 | 4643.5 | 0.08 | 8.4 | 79 | 5 | 264 | |||
| 823 | SMC | 460404 | 8711779 | 4643.5 | 8.231 | 133 | 35 | 5 | 1390 | |||
| 7067 | SMC | 2013 | 459991.9 | 8712262 | 4433 | 0.003 | 0.1 | 13 | 2.5 | 55 | ||
| 7068 | SMC | 2013 | 459990.6 | 8712271 | 4433 | 0.008 | 15.6 | 215 | 19 | 4440 | ||
| 7069 | SMC | 2013 | 459985.4 | 8712275 | 4433 | 0.003 | 0.1 | 6 | 2.5 | 58 | ||
| 7071 | SMC | 2013 | 459987.4 | 8712275 | 4433 | 0.003 | 4.3 | 14 | 2.5 | 651 | ||
| 7072 | SMC | 2013 | 460008.6 | 8712273 | 4433 | 0.003 | 0.5 | 17 | 2.5 | 103 | ||
| 7073 | SMC | 2013 | 460006.7 | 8712273 | 4433 | 0.025 | 39.5 | 94 | 8 | 2870 |
Page 14 of 22
| 2940 1870 454 3050 2210 1680 1420 5340 1500 2260 914 36500 55 4980 1920 3360 3110 481 3330 82 127 895 272 1080 101 2440 50100 47300 1890 17100 2004 13200 48100 2384 3800 164.5 2720 265 107.5 193 814 1290 8450 6.6 7.3 4.4 6.3 45.6 5.6 2010 58.2 |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7074 | SMC | 2013 | 460002 | 8712275 | 4433 | 0.01 | 40.1 | 19 | 9 | 2940 | ||
| 7075 | SMC | 2013 | 459995.9 | 8712277 | 4433 | 0.003 | 17.2 | 16 | 2.5 | 1870 | ||
| 7076 | SMC | 2013 | 459993.2 | 8712278 | 4433 | 0.008 | 12.3 | 8 | 2.5 | 454 | ||
| 7077 | SMC | 2013 | 459991.2 | 8712278 | 4433 | 0.025 | 29.7 | 21 | 2.5 | 3050 | ||
| 7078 | SMC | 2013 | 459992 | 8712285 | 4433 | 0.017 | 28.9 | 75 | 2.5 | 2210 | ||
| 7079 | SMC | 2013 | 459997.2 | 8712293 | 4433 | 0.014 | 14.1 | 22 | 2.5 | 1680 | ||
| 7081 | SMC | 2013 | 460005.8 | 8712293 | 4433 | 0.054 | 25.4 | 35 | 35 | 1420 | ||
| 7082 | SMC | 2013 | 460003.1 | 8712305 | 4433 | 0.154 | 17.7 | 18 | 91 | 5340 | ||
| 7083 | SMC | 2013 | 459996.9 | 8712306 | 4433 | 0.006 | 2.6 | 64 | 8 | 1500 | ||
| 7084 | SMC | 2013 | 459993.5 | 8712309 | 4433 | 0.005 | 6.9 | 27 | 2.5 | 2260 | ||
| 7085 | SMC | 2013 | 460006.9 | 8712318 | 4433 | 0.003 | 4.4 | 52 | 17 | 914 | ||
| 7086 | SMC | 2013 | 460001.8 | 8712317 | 4433 | 0.115 | 1089 | 109 | 2285 | 36500 | ||
| 7087 | SMC | 2013 | 459995.2 | 8712316 | 4433 | 0.017 | 0.1 | 2 | 2.5 | 55 | ||
| 7088 | SMC | 2013 | 459979.7 | 8712333 | 4433 | 0.029 | 44 | 21 | 8 | 4980 | ||
| 7089 | SMC | 2013 | 459980.1 | 8712349 | 4433 | 0.011 | 36.9 | 9 | 62 | 1920 | ||
| 7091 | SMC | 2013 | 459983.5 | 8712336 | 4433 | 0.031 | 14.4 | 68 | 34 | 3360 | ||
| 7092 | SMC | 2013 | 459975 | 8712346 | 4433.3 | 0.006 | 13.2 | 2 | 7 | 3110 | ||
| 7093 | SMC | 2013 | 460031 | 8712207 | 4508.7 | 0.018 | 12.2 | 19 | 2.5 | 481 | ||
| 7094 | SMC | 2013 | 460056 | 8712152 | 4524.9 | 0.007 | 3.8 | 283 | 6 | 3330 | ||
| 7095 | SMC | 2013 | 460143 | 8712239 | 4515 | 0.086 | 0.6 | 9 | 2.5 | 82 | ||
| 7096 | SMC | 2013 | 460187 | 8712164 | 4538.6 | 0.005 | 2.3 | 23 | 2.5 | 127 | ||
| 7097 | SMC | 2013 | 460078 | 8712113 | 4535.8 | 0.024 | 13.7 | 936 | 228 | 895 | ||
| 7098 | SMC | 2013 | 460398 | 8711782 | 4642.5 | 0.93 | 19.1 | 242 | 23 | 272 | ||
| 7099 | SMC | 2013 | 460428 | 8711775 | 4643.5 | 0.015 | 10.1 | 182 | 2.5 | 1080 | ||
| 7101 | SMC | 2013 | 460278 | 8712028 | 4570.2 | 0.007 | 2 | 190 | 11 | 101 | ||
| 7102 | SMC | 2013 | 460628 | 8711630 | 4643.5 | 0.583 | 23.3 | 118 | 2.5 | 2440 | ||
| 25525 | SOLITARIO | 2018 | 459998.8 | 8712316 | 4433 | V | 0.133 | 997 | 71.7 | 2200 | 50100 | |
| 25526 | SOLITARIO | 2018 | 459992.8 | 8712318 | 4433 | V | 0.066 | 278 | 29 | 300 | 47300 | |
| 25527 | SOLITARIO | 2018 | 459995.8 | 8712316 | 4433 | V | 0.005 | 10.8 | 8.4 | 5.56 | 1890 | |
| 25528 | SOLITARIO | 2018 | 459990.8 | 8712306 | 4433 | V | 0.027 | 66.6 | 8.5 | 48.48 | 17100 | |
| 25529 | SOLITARIO | 2018 | 459976 | 8712349 | 4432.2 | V | 0.017 | 45.9 | 8.4 | 77.91 | 2004 | |
| 25530 | SOLITARIO | 2018 | 460057 | 8713232 | 4468.5 | 0.008 | 54.4 | 0.05 | 0.005 | 13200 | ||
| 25531 | SOLITARIO | 2018 | 460056 | 8713232 | 4468.5 | VNQZ | 0.155 | 251 | 58 | 0.005 | 48100 | |
| 25532 | SOLITARIO | 2018 | 460047 | 8713243 | 4471.7 | 0.0025 | 6.2 | 0.05 | 0.005 | 2384 | ||
| 26030 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 459993.8 | 8712317 | 4453.1 | 0.03 | 17.25 | 43.4 | 83.3 | 3800 | ||
| 26031 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 459986.2 | 8712293 | 4465.1 | 0.005 | 1.91 | 59.1 | 6.51 | 164.5 | ||
| 26032 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 459987.7 | 8712271 | 4479.7 | 0.013 | 31.9 | 13.1 | 5.12 | 2720 | ||
| 26033 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460398 | 8711783 | 4642.4 | 0.319 | 8.91 | 157 | 3.48 | 265 | ||
| 26034 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460514 | 8711786 | 4643.5 | 0.013 | 1.25 | 16.7 | 3.19 | 107.5 | ||
| 26035 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460361 | 8711986 | 4598 | 0.012 | 1.78 | 182.5 | 10.25 | 193 | ||
| 26036 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460066 | 8712138 | 4529 | 0.01 | 5.04 | 297 | 5 | 814 | ||
| 26037 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460100 | 8713197 | 4456.8 | 0.01 | 1.69 | 65.6 | 0.54 | 1290 | ||
| 26038 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460094 | 8713214 | 4464.5 | 0.015 | 15.8 | 21.1 | 1.57 | 8450 | ||
| 75411 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 459927 | 8712283 | 4450.2 | 0.06 | 10.4 | 1.82 | 6.6 | |||
| 75412 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460088 | 8712045 | 4555.1 | MILKY QTZ | 0.13 | 11.7 | 0.45 | 7.3 | ||
| 75413 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460031 | 8711979 | 4578.5 | 0.04 | 3.8 | 0.31 | 4.4 | |||
| 75414 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460041 | 8712068 | 4547.9 | VOLC BX - EPICLAST | 0.05 | 7.7 | 0.79 | 6.3 | ||
| 75415 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 459954 | 8712081 | 4539 | 0.55 | 23.4 | 2.53 | 45.6 | |||
| 75416 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 460093 | 8713189 | 4453.5 | VOLC SANDSTONE? | 0.06 | 3.8 | 0.25 | 5.6 | ||
| 95649 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 459970 | 8712353 | 4428.9 | 0.01 | 36.9 | 17.1 | 107 | 2010 | ||
| 95650 | SOLITARIO | 2012 | 459973 | 8712357 | 4427.8 | RHYODACITE? | 0.3 | 10.4 | 0.95 | 58.2 |
Page 15 of 22
Appendix 2 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling techniques |
• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. |
• Geochemical sampling consists of 229 samples, mostly linear rock chips with some channel samples. • Data were compiled by the vendors from eight different sampling visits over the period 2012 to 2019. Various different companies were involved in the sampling and subsequent assaying as part of their due diligence to assess the project. As a result, different laboratories and assay protocols were involved, with most of the assay work done either at ALS Laboratories or Certimin, both in Lima. • There is limited petrographic and fluid inclusion work available (Yparraguirre and Blas Rodriguez, 2019). Mostly, the interpretation relies on assays combined with field identification of copper minerals. |
| Drilling techniques |
• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core _is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). _ |
• Not applicable – so far there is no drilling on the project |
| Drill sample recovery |
• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. |
• Not applicable – so far there is no drilling on the project |
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource |
• So far there is no drilling on the project. Sampling notes, with summary geological descriptions,are available for rock chipand |
Page 16 of 22
| Commentary channel sampling locations. These notes are qualitative and from several different authors • Work is not sufficiently advanced to support any kind of Resource Estimation. • There is not a sufficiently comprehensive program of duplicates to assess the precision of the sampling. The author has interviewed Nazario Anyoza, the geologist who was present for the 2018 and 2019 sampling, and he described industry- standard chip and channel sampling practices appropriate to this type of early-stage exploration. The report by Cumbrex (Durand and Cortez, 2014) describes linear chip sampling appropriate to this type of early-stage exploration. Between them, these two sample groups represent the majority of the geochemical samples. • The general consistency displayed between the eight generations of sampling gives subjective confidence in the style and geochemical characteristics of the mineralization. • 100 of 229 samples have assay certificates, either in pdf or Excel format, from Certimin or ALS. Of these, 6 use a total digest and the remainder aqua regia for the multielement assay. Gold is uniformly by 30g fire assay / AA finish. • No field duplicates are reported. However, there is spatial overlap of the various sampling campaigns which does give some confidence about the general nature of the geochemical anomalies, which is probably sufficient for an early-stage project of this nature. Some laboratory duplicates are reported by both Certimin and ALS which establish instrumental precision to be within accepted limits. These labs also report some commercial CRMs which are within established limits for accuracy. Both Certimin and ALS are accredited by independent auditors. • Values without supporting assay certificates derive from a compilation supplied bythe vendors. 25 of them have |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
| estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. |
channel sampling locations. These notes are qualitative and from several different authors • Work is not sufficiently advanced to support any kind of Resource Estimation. |
||
| Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second- half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
• There is not a sufficiently comprehensive program of duplicates to assess the precision of the sampling. The author has interviewed Nazario Anyoza, the geologist who was present for the 2018 and 2019 sampling, and he described industry- standard chip and channel sampling practices appropriate to this type of early-stage exploration. The report by Cumbrex (Durand and Cortez, 2014) describes linear chip sampling appropriate to this type of early-stage exploration. Between them, these two sample groups represent the majority of the geochemical samples. • The general consistency displayed between the eight generations of sampling gives subjective confidence in the style and geochemical characteristics of the mineralization. |
|
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. |
• 100 of 229 samples have assay certificates, either in pdf or Excel format, from Certimin or ALS. Of these, 6 use a total digest and the remainder aqua regia for the multielement assay. Gold is uniformly by 30g fire assay / AA finish. • No field duplicates are reported. However, there is spatial overlap of the various sampling campaigns which does give some confidence about the general nature of the geochemical anomalies, which is probably sufficient for an early-stage project of this nature. Some laboratory duplicates are reported by both Certimin and ALS which establish instrumental precision to be within accepted limits. These labs also report some commercial CRMs which are within established limits for accuracy. Both Certimin and ALS are accredited by independent auditors. • Values without supporting assay certificates derive from a compilation supplied bythe vendors. 25 of them have |
Page 17 of 22
| Commentary laboratory batch numbers; the remainder, no assay certificates. 97 samples collected by Cumbrex, while having no certificates, have the results detailed in a formal report (Durand and Cortez, 2014) which also describes QAQC procedures and identifies the assay laboratory as Certimin. • Spatial overlap of the eight distinct sampling campaigns gives high confidence in the pattern of the anomalies. • Surveying in the field is by handheld GPS, with tape and compass in underground galleries. This is considered adequate for the early-stage nature of the project. • Older data have been converted from PSAD56 datum and a final compilation made in WGS84, Zone 18S • Sample spacing is not systematic and some sampling bias may be present; it is likely that successive visitors have been drawn to the same outcrops. • Sampling is sufficient to establish the presence of anomalous values but not the continuity of mineralization • Rather the opposite: there are two prominent structures mapped and these have been preferentially sampled. • Not applicable – no drilling. • Not known • There are no audits available or known about. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
| laboratory batch numbers; the remainder, no assay certificates. 97 samples collected by Cumbrex, while having no certificates, have the results detailed in a formal report (Durand and Cortez, 2014) which also describes QAQC procedures and identifies the assay laboratory as Certimin. |
|||
| Verification of sampling and assaying |
• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. |
• Spatial overlap of the eight distinct sampling campaigns gives high confidence in the pattern of the anomalies. |
|
| Location of data points |
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down- hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
• Surveying in the field is by handheld GPS, with tape and compass in underground galleries. This is considered adequate for the early-stage nature of the project. • Older data have been converted from PSAD56 datum and a final compilation made in WGS84, Zone 18S |
|
| Data spacing and distribution |
• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
• Sample spacing is not systematic and some sampling bias may be present; it is likely that successive visitors have been drawn to the same outcrops. • Sampling is sufficient to establish the presence of anomalous values but not the continuity of mineralization |
|
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
• Rather the opposite: there are two prominent structures mapped and these have been preferentially sampled. • Not applicable – no drilling. |
|
| Sample security |
• The measures taken to ensure sample security. | • Not known | |
| Audits or reviews |
• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | • There are no audits available or known about. |
Page 18 of 22
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
• Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
• A group of four tenements totalling 1,800 Ha covers the mapped breccia bodies and potential along strike extensions. All four are held by Minera Montserrat SAC and are listed as granted and up to date on the Peruvian Government Geocatmin website: • Chaupiloma 2007 • Chaupiloma 2008 • Cocoa Beach • Don Enrique 85 • No impediments are anticipated in the process of obtaining a licence to operate. The project is located in a part of Peru with considerable historical mining activity and very sparse population. However, as in all parts of Peru, due attention must be given to community relations and maintaining social licence at all stages of the work. |
| Exploration done by other parties |
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | • The geological mapping, recent sampling and compilation of historical work have been undertaken by Nazario Anyoza, who is a certified Geological Engineer in Peru and who is known to the author as a competent professional geologist experienced in this style of deposit. Because of travel restrictions in 2020- 2021, the author has not been able to visit the Don Enrique site and has relied upon the results presented by Ing. Anyoza. Another useful report was prepared by Cumbres Exploraciones SAC in 2014 (Durand and Cortez, 2014). |
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | • The outcropping system at Don Enrique presents as two zones of massive silicification, about 100m apart, one approximately 5m wide and the other 15 to 20m wide, dipping steeply east and striking 320°. The wider, western, vein has a matrix of quartz >> calcite and contains pods of massive sulphide with the assemblagepyrite-chalcopyrite-galena and lesser |
Page 19 of 22
| Commentary sphalerite-stibnite, with later possibly supergene bornite (Yparraguirre and Blas Rodriguez, 2019). The vein hanging wall has a 2m thick hydrothermal breccia zone. The veins are hosted in diorite, part of a sequence of dacite, diorite and volcano-sedimentary rocks of the Mitu Group, Permian in age. There is an evident structural control which may be related to a regional scale SW-NE fault in the valley floor. • The western vein/breccia has been explored (probably in the 1960s) via an underground drive 80m long and four crosscuts of 15m to 20m which cut the structure. On surface, the two silicified structures can be traced for approximately 1 km. • The mineralogy and geochemistry of the veins/breccias suggest that the system is distally related to a porphyry copper. No source intrusion has been recognized to date. • Anomalous values of gold and silver, along with fluid inclusion temperatures in the 150°C to 220°C range, suggest the presence of an epithermal overprinting mineralization event exploiting the same structural control. • Not applicable – no drilling. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
| sphalerite-stibnite, with later possibly supergene bornite (Yparraguirre and Blas Rodriguez, 2019). The vein hanging wall has a 2m thick hydrothermal breccia zone. The veins are hosted in diorite, part of a sequence of dacite, diorite and volcano-sedimentary rocks of the Mitu Group, Permian in age. There is an evident structural control which may be related to a regional scale SW-NE fault in the valley floor. • The western vein/breccia has been explored (probably in the 1960s) via an underground drive 80m long and four crosscuts of 15m to 20m which cut the structure. On surface, the two silicified structures can be traced for approximately 1 km. • The mineralogy and geochemistry of the veins/breccias suggest that the system is distally related to a porphyry copper. No source intrusion has been recognized to date. • Anomalous values of gold and silver, along with fluid inclusion temperatures in the 150°C to 220°C range, suggest the presence of an epithermal overprinting mineralization event exploiting the same structural control. |
|||
| Drill hole Information |
• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: • easting and northing of the drill hole collar • elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • dip and azimuth of the hole • down hole length and interception depth • hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. |
• Not applicable – no drilling. |
Page 20 of 22
| Commentary • No averaging or aggregate results are reported • Most of the underground sampling consists of linear chip sampling which, while less subject to bias than simple grab samples, is still not free of bias since most of the sample lines are chosen to cut visible veins and mineralization. Thus, the data are indicative only, but are appropriate and typical for a project at this stage of exploration. • See long section presented above • All results are included in the figures and tables presented • No other substantive results are available • The Don Enrique system is prospective for two different scenarios: 1. Small scale underground mining of the silicified breccias themselves, with the potential for high grade epithermalpods |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
| Data aggregation methods |
• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
• No averaging or aggregate results are reported | |
| Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
• These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not _known’). _ |
• Most of the underground sampling consists of linear chip sampling which, while less subject to bias than simple grab samples, is still not free of bias since most of the sample lines are chosen to cut visible veins and mineralization. Thus, the data are indicative only, but are appropriate and typical for a project at this stage of exploration. |
|
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. |
• See long section presented above | |
| Balanced reporting |
• Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should bepracticed to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. |
• All results are included in the figures and tables presented | |
| Other substantive exploration data |
• Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. |
• No other substantive results are available | |
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
• The Don Enrique system is prospective for two different scenarios: 1. Small scale underground mining of the silicified breccias themselves, with the potential for high grade epithermalpods |
Page 21 of 22
| Commentary 2. Identify the source of the fluids, possible porphyry system at depth • For (1), geophysics (probably IP) and drilling shallow diamond holes below both structures is appropriate. For (2), some deeper diamond drilling and more district scale geophysics would be needed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
| 2. Identify the source of the fluids, possible porphyry system at depth • For (1), geophysics (probably IP) and drilling shallow diamond holes below both structures is appropriate. For (2), some deeper diamond drilling and more district scale geophysics would be needed. |
Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources
The data are indicative only, collected for reconnaissance purposes and none are suitable for use in Resource Estimation, neither has any Resource Estimation been undertaken. Section 3 not applicable.
Section 4 Estimation and Reporting of Ore Reserves
The project is early stage and no Ore Reserves have been estimated. Section 4 not applicable
Section 5 Estimation and Reporting of Diamonds and Other Gemstones
Section 5 not applicable.
References Cited
Durand, A. and Cortez, R., 2014. REPORTE TÉCNICO GEOLÓGICO PROSPECTO DON ENRIQUE, Cumbres Exploraciones SAC. Yparraguirre, J. and Blas Rodriguez, F., 2019. ESTUDIOS DE INCLUSIONES FLUIDAS, ESTUDIO MINERAGRÁFICO Y DIFRACCIÓN DE RAYOS X (DRX). , FAIngenieros SAC.
Page 22 of 22