AI assistant
ESTRELLA RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2016
Nov 20, 2016
64878_rns_2016-11-20_dbfdf7d2-0858-4963-8594-339ec37f0e73.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [185 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
21 November 2016
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
HIGH GRADE LITHIUM DISCOVERED AT SURFACE
MT EDWARDS LITHIUM PROJECT
HIGHLIGHTS
-
Highly encouraging results from Phase II rock chip sampling, with assays up to 2.24% Li2O at the newly discovered “Atomic Three” prospect
-
Nine samples returned over 200ppm Li2O, adding to the existing high priority drill targets
-
A high density cluster of pegmatites located at Atomic Three, which is emerging as a very high priority target area
-
MELP prospects rapidly expanding in size and number through methodical exploration programs
==> picture [487 x 307] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1. Hand specimen from the MEL0024 sample site, Atomic Three prospect, which returned 2.24% Li2O
Estrella Resources Limited (ASX:ESR) (Estrella or the Company), is pleased to announce the results of Phase II rock chip sampling by Mt Edwards Lithium Pty Ltd on the Mt Edwards Lithium Project (MELP). Estrella will hold 75% of the lithium rights to a group of tenements held by Apollo Phoenix Resources Limited (which holds the remaining 25% of the lithium rights) upon completion of the MELP acquisition (refer to ASX release by ESR 7[th] November 2016).
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
==> picture [585 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [185 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
PHASE II ROCK CHIP RESULTS
Assay results for the Phase II rock chip sampling program have been received and the results are highly encouraging. Nine samples returned over 200ppm Li2O, representing new high priority drill targets. Another three samples returned over 100ppm Li2O, representing second order targets for follow-up sampling. One stand-out result from the newly named Atomic Three prospect returned 2.24% Li2O.
As mentioned in previous announcements, an estimated 40% of the known outcropping pegmatite occurrences on the MELP remain untested for lithium. The remaining pegmatites will be systematically sampled during future fieldwork programs.
Table 1. Rock chip sampling details. NA means Not Assayed and BD means Below Detection.
| Sample_ID | Zone | East | North | RL | B_ppm | Li_ppm | Nb_ppm | Ta_ppm | **Li2O_ppm ** | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36739 | 51J | 360580 | 6513865 | 377.3305 | <20 | 1020 | 140 | 20 | 2196 | Phase I |
| 36740 | 51J | 360533 | 6513867 | 374.8501 | <20 | 1230 | 70 | 10 | 2648 | Phase I |
| 36741 | 51J | 360513 | 6513863 | 374.7665 | <20 | 75 | 70 | 10 | 161 | Phase I |
| 36742 | 51J | 359779 | 6514410 | 373.7617 | <20 | 15 | <10 | <10 | 32 | Phase I |
| 36743 | 51J | 359727 | 6514722 | 368.8717 | <20 | 280 | 120 | 15 | 603 | Phase I |
| 36744 | 51J | 360668 | 6514689 | 369.6758 | <20 | 60 | 65 | 20 | 129 | Phase I |
| 36748 | 51J | 358261 | 6514378 | 361.5311 | <20 | <10 | 30 | 15 | 11 | Phase I |
| 36749 | 51J | 358116 | 6514264 | 362.3623 | <20 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 32 | Phase I |
| 36750 | 51J | 357981 | 6514448 | 359.5829 | <20 | 120 | 85 | 10 | 258 | Phase I |
| 36751 | 51J | 357933 | 6514680 | 354.8893 | <20 | 70 | 125 | 35 | 151 | Phase I |
| 36752 | 51J | 357915 | 6514683 | 354.3996 | <20 | 475 | 75 | 10 | 1023 | Phase I |
| 36753 | 51J | 357519 | 6514674 | 347.1887 | <20 | 25 | 15 | <10 | 54 | Phase I |
| 36754 | 51J | 357519 | 6514674 | 347.1887 | <20 | 20 | <10 | <10 | 43 | Phase I |
| 36755 | 51J | 357548.2 | 6514855 | 347.2026 | <20 | 360 | 60 | 15 | 775 | Phase I |
| 36757 | 51J | 356050 | 6516818 | 361.8765 | <20 | 25 | 30 | <10 | 54 | Phase I |
| 36758 | 51J | 356050 | 6516818 | 361.8765 | <20 | <10 | <10 | <10 | 11 | Phase I |
| 36759 | 51J | 355682 | 6516990 | 364.0088 | 125 | <10 | <10 | <10 | 11 | Phase I |
| 36760 | 51J | 360318 | 6516518 | 363.6057 | 25 | 155 | 60 | 105 | 334 | Phase I |
| Munda Grab Sample(Bulk) | 51J | 360564.5 | 6513714 | 380 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 33680 | Phase I |
| Munda Grab Sample(Pink) | 51J | 360562.9 | 6513717 | 380 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 20490 | Phase I |
| MEL0002 | 51J | 360782 | 6514133 | 363.2725 | NA | 70 | 105 | 95 | 151 | Phase II |
| MEL0003 | 51J | 360851 | 6514540 | 363.2443 | NA | BD | 140 | 85 | BD | Phase II |
| MEL0004 | 51J | 360798 | 6514517 | 364.1181 | NA | BD | 60 | 40 | BD | Phase II |
| MEL0005 | 51J | 359468 | 6514494 | 372.4431 | NA | 175 | 115 | 30 | 377 | Phase II |
| MEL0006 | 51J | 359540 | 6514474 | 374.0265 | NA | 490 | 55 | BD | 1055 | Phase II |
| MEL0007 | 51J | 358636 | 6513648 | 363.028 | NA | 200 | 20 | BD | 431 | Phase II |
| MEL0008 | 51J | 358653 | 6513542 | 365.4653 | NA | 265 | 485 | 55 | 571 | Phase II |
| MEL0009 | 51J | 358574 | 6513774 | 359.7336 | NA | 230 | 85 | 10 | 495 | Phase II |
| MEL0010 | 51J | 358563 | 6513799 | 359.5058 | NA | 275 | 210 | 20 | 592 | Phase II |
| MEL0011 | 51J | 357969 | 6513671 | 354.1269 | NA | 65 | 15 | BD | 140 | Phase II |
| MEL0012 | 51J | 358443 | 6510874 | 324.4362 | NA | 20 | 30 | BD | 43 | Phase II |
| MEL0013 | 51J | 358071 | 6511048 | 332.9713 | NA | 10 | 50 | BD | 22 | Phase II |
| MEL0014 | 51J | 357603 | 6514828 | 347.2584 | NA | 35 | 15 | BD | 75 | Phase II |
| MEL0015 | 51J | 360698 | 6516302 | 367.1941 | NA | 30 | 70 | 25 | 65 | Phase II |
| MEL0016 | 51J | 360751 | 6516030 | 369.3803 | NA | BD | BD | BD | BD | Phase II |
| MEL0017 | 51J | 360732 | 6516110 | 368.7843 | NA | BD | 60 | 25 | BD | Phase II |
| MEL0018 | 51J | 360758 | 6516143 | 368.5767 | NA | 70 | 75 | 35 | 151 | Phase II |
| MEL0019 | 51J | 358861 | 6518600 | 357.738 | NA | 165 | 15 | BD | 355 | Phase II |
| MEL0020 | 51J | 358854 | 6518375 | 359.3091 | NA | 35 | 15 | BD | 75 | Phase II |
| MEL0021 | 51J | 358910 | 6518100 | 362.6401 | NA | 15 | 20 | BD | 32 | Phase II |
| MEL0022 | 51J | 356549 | 6517587 | 370.365 | NA | BD | 10 | BD | BD | Phase II |
| MEL0023 | 51J | 361046 | 6519744 | 378.4466 | NA | 80 | 75 | 110 | 172 | Phase II |
| MEL0024 | 51J | 360946 | 6519692 | 368.7632 | NA | 10400 | 105 | 185 | 22391 | Phase II |
| MEL0025 | 51J | 361088 | 6519971 | 373.3305 | NA | 215 | 55 | 75 | 463 | Phase II |
| Highly anomalous result requiring follow-up drill testing |
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
==> picture [585 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [185 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [485 x 530] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2. Map showing sample locations and results from Phase I and Phase II sampling. Results are in ppm unless stated otherwise. BD means Below Detection.
==> picture [585 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
==> picture [185 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [486 x 276] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3. MEL0024 rock chip sample location.
ATOMIC THREE PROSPECT
This new high priority prospect is an area of about 1km[2] where there is a particularly high density of pegmatite bodies. There are over 40 pegmatite occurrences in the area and only three of them sampled so far. All three samples were anomalous and one, MEL0024, returned a highly anomalous result from a surface sample of 2.24% Li2O.
This is a good example of the high prospectivity of the MELP and shows how much work is required to fully assess its potential. Mt Edwards Lithium is working methodically through the most highly ranked targets in preparation for drill testing in the 1[st] Quarter of the 2017 Calendar Year.
==> picture [585 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
==> picture [185 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [490 x 536] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4. Map of the Atomic Three prospect showing the three rock chip samples collected and the dense cluster of unsampled pegmatites. Results are in ppm unless stated otherwise. BD means Below Detection.
==> picture [585 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
==> picture [185 x 74] intentionally omitted <==
ABOUT THE MELP
The MELP consists of 16 tenements covering over 127km[2] on the highly prospective Widgiemooltha Dome. It is located centrally within what is emerging as a highly endowed and globally significant lithium province.
The MELP location in relation to the other significant LCT pegmatite projects in the province is as follows:
-
2km east of the recent Goldfields Lithium Alliance (GLIA) Widgiemooltha project acquisition
-
2km south of Maximus Resources’ recent “high grade lithium discovery” at Spargoville
-
40km south of the Mt Marion Lithium project
-
40km SSE of the Londonderry Pegmatites and Lithium Australia’s Lithium Hill project
-
60km west of the Bald Hill Sn-Ta-Li project and Tawana Resources’ Cowan project
-
30km north of Pioneer Resources Limited Pioneer Dome Lithium project
==> picture [481 x 340] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5. Location of the MELP in relation to other significant LCT pegmatite projects in the region.
==> picture [585 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
==> picture [153 x 64] intentionally omitted <==
Table 2. Tenement Schedule.
| Schedule of Mining and Exploration Tenements | Schedule of Mining and Exploration Tenements | Schedule of Mining and Exploration Tenements | Schedule of Mining and Exploration Tenements | Schedule of Mining and Exploration Tenements | Schedule of Mining and Exploration Tenements | Schedule of Mining and Exploration Tenements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | State/Region | Project | Tenement ID | Area Km2 | Grant Date | Interest % |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/698 | 4.2 | 22/12/1994 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/75 | 5.7 | 10/11/1984 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/699 | 3.4 | 23/12/1994 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/87 | 3.6 | 26/07/1984 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/74 | 9.3 | 10/11/1984 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/101 | 9.6 | 23/07/1984 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/99 | 9.8 | 23/07/1984 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/653 | 10 | 28/01/1993 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/97 | 6.8 | 23/07/1984 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/96 | 8.4 | 23/07/1984 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/102 | 9.3 | 4/01/1985 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/100 | 9.6 | 23/07/1984 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | M15/1271 | 4.8 | 2/07/2007 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | E15/1505 | 2 | 5/10/2016 | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | E15/1507 | 15 | Application | 75 |
| Australia | WA | Mt Edwards Lithium Project | E15/1562 | 16 | Application | 75 |
For more information, please contact:
Ray Shorrocks [email protected]
Competent Person Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Luke Marshall, who is a consultant to Apollo Phoenix Resources and Mt Edwards Lithium, and a member of The Australasian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Marshall has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resource and Ore Reserves”. Mr Marshall consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
==> picture [585 x 10] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
APPENDIX 3 JORC TABLE 1 - JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION – TABLE 1 MELP
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut | The samples reported in this document are rock chip grab samples collected at surface |
| techniques | channels, random chips, or specific specialised | from outcropping pegmatite occurrences. |
| industry standard measurement tools | This involved taking a random grab sample of approximately 3kg using a geological | |
| appropriate to the minerals under investigation, | hammer and numbered calico bag. | |
| such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld | ||
| XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should | These rock chip samples should not be considered to be representative samples of the | |
| not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of | pegmatite occurrences. | |
| sampling. | Drill testing is required to collect representative sample data through the pegmatites. | |
| Samples were analysed by an industry standard crush and grind prep, a 4 acid digest and | ||
| ICP-MS or ICP-OES finish depending on the element being analysed. | ||
| Include reference to measures taken to ensure | No measures have been taken to ensure sample representivity at this stage as the project | |
| sample representivity and the appropriate | is in the very early stages of assessment. | |
| calibration of any measurement tools or systems | ||
| used. | ||
| Aspects of the determination of mineralisation | No determinations were made in this regard. Pegmatite occurrences were sampled and | |
| that are material to the Public Report. | assayed regardless of determination with regard to mineralisation. | |
| In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has | Rock chip samples were collected using a geological hammer and a calico bag to achieve | |
| been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. | a random grab sample. | |
| ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 | These samples are not considered to be representative of the pegmatites. | |
| m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to |
==> picture [600 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
| produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other | ||
| cases more explanation may be required, such | ||
| as where there is coarse gold that has inherent | ||
| sampling problems. Unusual commodities or | ||
| mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) | ||
| may warrant disclosure of detailed information | ||
| Drilling | Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open- | Not applicable, no drill results are being reported. |
| techniques | hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, | |
| sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple | ||
| or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- | ||
| sampling bit or other type, whether core is | ||
| oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). | ||
| Drill sample | Method of recording and assessing core and | Not applicable, no drill results are being reported. |
| recovery | chip sample recoveries and results assessed. | |
| Measures taken to maximise sample recovery | ||
| and ensure representative nature of the | ||
| samples. | ||
| Whether a relationship exists between sample | ||
| recovery and grade and whether sample bias | ||
| may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain | ||
| of fine/coarse material. | ||
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been | A log was collected for each sample which included sample location, sample type, date |
| geologically and geotechnically logged to a level | sampled and sample condition. |
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
==> picture [600 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
| of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource | ||
| estimation, mining studies and metallurgical | ||
| studies. | ||
| Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in | ||
| nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) | ||
| photography. | ||
| The total length and percentage of the relevant | ||
| intersections logged. | ||
| Sub- | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether | Not applicable, no drill results are being reported. |
| sampling techniques |
quarter, half or all core taken. | Not applicable, no drill results are being reported. |
| and sample preparation |
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary | Sample condition field to record moisture and sample recovery is included in the sampling |
| split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. | log sheet and populates the assay table of the database. | |
| For all sample types, the nature, quality and | Sample preparation is considered to be appropriate for rock chip sampling as per industry | |
| appropriateness of the sample preparation | standard practices. | |
| technique. | ||
| No quality control procedures have been undertaken other than the laboratory’s own | ||
| Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- | internal QAQC check and procedures. | |
| sampling stages to maximise representivity of | ||
| samples. | Sample sizes may not be appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. | |
| Grain sizes of the pegmatites varied from 4mm to 25mm. | ||
| Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is | ||
| representative of the in situ material collected, | ||
| including for instance results for field | ||
| duplicate/second-half sampling. |
==> picture [600 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation Commentary |
| Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. |
|
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. No QAQC procedures have been put in place for the MELP given the very early stage of assessment. No geophysical methods or hand-held XRF units have been used for determination of grades in this announcement. |
| Verification of sampling and assaying |
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. Not applicable, no intersections are being reported. |
| The use of twinned holes. Not applicable, no drill results are being reported. |
|
| Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Drill hole data were sourced from digital sources and original hard- copy sampling and assay records, and imported into a central electronic database. Datashed software is used to validate and manage the data. |
|
| Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Li2O was calculated as Li x 2.153. |
|
| Location of data points |
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Rock chip sample locations were recorded by handheld GPS. |
==> picture [600 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
| Specification of the grid system used. Original surveying was undertaken in MGA94 zone 51. |
|
| Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Topographic control is considered more than adequate for the results being reported. |
|
| Data spacing and distribution |
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. These are random rock chip sampled with no regular data spacing. |
| Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Not applicable, no mineral resource or ore reserve is being reported. |
|
| Whether sample compositing has been applied Not applicable for random rock chips. |
|
| Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Not applicable, these are spot samples. Not applicable, no drilling is being reported. |
| Sample security |
The measures taken to ensure sample security. Samples were submitted to the SGS Kalgoorlie laboratory by Apollo Phoenix Resources. Sample security was ensured up to this point as the samples were always in the presence of Apollo staff. |
| Audits or reviews |
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. No audits or reviews have been undertaken on the samples being reported due to the small number of samples in the dataset. |
==> picture [600 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including | Apollo Phoenix Resources (25%) and Mt Edwards Lithium (75%) |
| tenement and land tenure |
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint | hold a combined 100% interest the lithium rights to the project. |
| status | ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, | There are no known impediments to operate in the area. |
| historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental | ||
| settings. | ||
| The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any | ||
| known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | ||
| Exploration | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | Exploration has been undertaken by previous holders, but |
| done by other parties |
predominantly Western Mining Corporation (WMC) during the 1980s | |
| and Titan Resources from 2001. Consolidated Minerals took over | ||
| Titan in 2006. No mining for Li has been undertaken on the project. | ||
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | The geology at MELP consists of a mafic-ultramafic belt bound to the |
| east by metasediments and to the west by granites. | ||
| The mineralisation at MELP consists of pegmatite swarms in | ||
| greenstone belts at some distance from their parent granites. | ||
| The lithium baring minerals identified to date are spodumene and | ||
| accessory lepidolite. | ||
| Depth of complete oxidation varies from 10 to 80 metres below the | ||
| natural surface but is typically around 40 metres. |
==> picture [600 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation Commentary |
| Drill hole Information |
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: oeasting and northing of the drill hole collar oelevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar odip and azimuth of the hole odown hole length and interception depth ohole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. No drill results are reported in this announcement. No information is excluded. |
| Data aggregation methods |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. Not applicable for rock chip sampling. |
| The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values No metal equivalents are used. |
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
==> picture [600 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
| should be clearly stated. | ||
| Relationship | These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of | Not applicable for random rock chip grab samples. |
| between mineralisation |
Exploration Results. |
|
| widths and intercept |
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole | |
| lengths | angle is known, its nature should be reported. | |
| If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there | ||
| should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true | ||
| width not known’). | ||
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of | Appropriate maps and tables are included in the body of the Report. |
| intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being | ||
| reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of | ||
| drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. | ||
| Balanced | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not | This is not a large enough dataset to ensure balanced reporting. |
| reporting | practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades | |
| and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of | ||
| Exploration Results. | ||
| Other | Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be | Pegmatite occurrences were identified from historic detailed |
| substantive exploration |
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; | geological mapping and then confirmed by ground checking. |
| data | geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples | Geological observations are included in the report. All core drilled at |
| – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk | MELP is available for review and is stored at the Fisher mine offices | |
| density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential | in Kambalda. |
|
| deleterious or contaminating substances. |
==> picture [600 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |
| | Metallurgical test work is out of the scope of this report. | ||
| | Multi-element assay suites have been analysed for all but two | ||
| samples. | |||
| Further work | The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral | | Further field confirmation and rock chip sampling is planned, |
| extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | followed by drill testing of the most anomalous pegmatites. | ||
| Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, | | The presence of possible extensions cannot be determined at this | |
| including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, | stage. | ||
| provided this information is not commercially sensitive. |
==> picture [600 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
Office Address Suite 1503B Level 15, 1 Alfred Street New South Wales 2000 Australia Postal Address PO Box R933 Royal Exchange New South Wales 1225 Australia Phone +61 2 9078 7671 Email [email protected]