Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

EQT Corp Interim / Quarterly Report 2007

Jul 26, 2007

30112_10-q_2007-07-26_f998eb6e-c35a-4992-b0b1-3d65ed4040a5.zip

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

10-Q 1 a07-17940_410q.htm 10-Q

*UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION*

*Washington, D.C. 20549*

*FORM 10-Q*

| | (Mark
One) |
| --- | --- |
| x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 |
| | or |
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | FOR THE
TRANSITION PERIOD FROM

TO |
| | COMMISSION
FILE NUMBER 1-3551 |

*EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC.*

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

PENNSYLVANIA 25-0464690
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (IRS Employer
Identification No.)

*225 North Shore Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212*

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (412) 553-5700

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ý Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

| Class | Outstanding
at June 30, 2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Common stock, no par
value | 121,648,466 shares |

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES*

*Index*

| Part I. Financial
Information : | |
| --- | --- |
| Item 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited): |
| | Statements of Consolidated Income for the Three and Six Months Ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 |
| | Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows for
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 |
| | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December
31, 2006 |
| | Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements |
| Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
| Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk |
| Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
| Part II. Other
Information: | |
| Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
| Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds |
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote
of Security Holders |
| Item 6. | Exhibits |
| Signature | |
| Index to Exhibits | |

2

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='2',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

*Item 1. Financial Statements*

EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

*Statements of Consolidated Income (Unaudited)*

Three Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006
(Thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating
revenues $ 293,240 $ 251,207 $ 749,786 $ 681,326
Cost of sales 116,953 86,113 336,965 294,930
Net operating
revenues 176,287 165,094 412,821 386,396
Operating expenses:
Operation and
maintenance 25,568 25,366 53,012 48,970
Production 16,125 15,670 32,637 31,789
Selling, general
and administrative 45,483 28,050 111,780 57,755
Office
consolidation impairment charges — (2,908 ) — (2,908 )
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization 27,592 24,797 55,019 49,014
Total operating
expenses 114,768 90,975 252,448 184,620
Operating income 61,519 74,119 160,373 201,776
Gain on sale of
assets, net 119,401 — 119,401 —
Gain on sale of
available-for-sale securities — — 1,042 —
Equity in
earnings (losses) of nonconsolidated investments 666 (124 ) 775 50
Interest expense 9,483 9,995 21,763 22,952
Income before
income taxes 172,103 64,000 259,828 178,874
Income taxes 64,760 20,091 95,867 62,606
Net income $ 107,343 $ 43,909 $ 163,961 $ 116,268
Earnings per
share of common stock:
Basic:
Weighted average
common shares outstanding 121,356 120,128 121,289 119,823
Net income $ 0.88 $ 0.37 $ 1.35 $ 0.97
Diluted:
Weighted average
common shares outstanding 122,837 122,044 122,806 121,899
Net income $ 0.87 $ 0.36 $ 1.34 $ 0.95
Dividends
declared per common share $ 0.22 $ 0.22 $ 0.44 $ 0.43

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='3',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

*Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows (Unaudited)*

Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006
(Thousands)
Cash
flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 163,961 $ 116,268
Adjustments to
reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for
losses on accounts receivable (1,075 ) 614
Depreciation,
depletion, and amortization 55,019 49,014
Gain on sale of
assets, net (119,401 ) —
Gain on sale of
available-for-sale securities (1,042 ) —
Office
consolidation impairment charges — (2,908 )
Deferred income
taxes 55,823 5,899
Excess tax
benefits from share-based payment arrangements (4,180 ) (5,758 )
Decrease in
accounts receivable and unbilled revenues 67,376 158,688
Decrease in
inventory 42,174 908
(Increase)
decrease in margin deposits (10,933 ) 199,837
Decrease in
accounts payable (1,373 ) (78,919 )
Change in
derivative instruments at fair value, net 27,375 4,441
Changes in other
assets and liabilities 40,593 (50,211 )
Net cash
provided by operating activities 314,317 397,873
Cash
flows from investing activities:
Capital
expenditures (335,860 ) (153,416 )
Proceeds from
sale of assets 184,576 —
Restricted cash
from sale of assets (95,000 ) —
Proceeds from
contribution of assets 23,262 —
Proceeds from
sale of available-for-sale securities 7,295 —
Investment in
available-for-sale securities (9,709 ) (2,201 )
Proceeds from
sale of discontinued operations, net of purchase price adjustments — (724 )
Net cash used in
investing activities (225,436 ) (156,341 )
Cash
flows from financing activities:
Dividends paid (53,531 ) (51,729 )
Proceeds from
note payable to Nora Gathering, LLC 69,786 —
Repayments of
note payable to Nora Gathering, LLC (7,000 ) —
Proceeds from
exercises under employee compensation plans 2,449 16,274
Excess tax
benefits from share-based payment arrangements 4,180 5,758
Decrease in
short-term loans (33,999 ) (286,801 )
Net cash used in
financing activities (18,115 ) (316,498 )
Net increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 70,766 (74,966 )
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of period — 74,966
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of period $ 70,766 $ —
Cash
paid during the period for:
Interest, net of
amount capitalized $ 21,373 $ 22,972
Income taxes,
net of refund $ 21,072 $ 30,448

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='4',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

*Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)*

June 30, 2007 December 31, 2006
(Thousands)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash
equivalents $ 70,766 $ —
Restricted cash 95,576 —
Accounts
receivable (less accumulated provision for doubtful accounts: June 30, 2007,
$17,003; December 31, 2006, $20,442) 162,018 199,486
Unbilled
revenues 11,794 40,627
Margin deposits
with financial institutions 10,944 11
Inventory 226,954 269,128
Derivative instruments,
at fair value 32,336 129,675
Prepaid expenses
and other 60,770 62,523
Total current assets 671,158 701,450
Equity in
nonconsolidated investments 128,558 35,023
Property, plant
and equipment 3,730,469 3,617,297
Less:
accumulated depreciation and depletion 1,239,581 1,239,826
Net property,
plant and equipment 2,490,888 2,377,471
Investments,
available-for-sale 35,777 31,270
Other assets 113,026 111,697
Total assets $ 3,439,407 $ 3,256,911
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current
liabilities:
Current portion
of long-term debt $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Short-term loans 102,000 135,999
Note payable to Nora Gathering, LLC 62,786 —
Accounts payable 211,953 213,326
Derivative
instruments, at fair value 582,805 570,251
Other current
liabilities 156,673 150,203
Total current
liabilities 1,126,217 1,079,779
Debentures and
medium-term notes 753,500 753,500
Other non-current
liabilities:
Deferred income
taxes and investment tax credits 363,053 338,012
Unrecognized tax
benefits 36,191 —
Pension and
other post-retirement benefits 47,926 50,947
Other credits 89,494 88,393
Total other non-current liabilities 536,664 477,352
Common
stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, no
par value, authorized 320,000 shares; shares issued: June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, 149,008 369,043 366,856
Treasury stock,
shares at cost: June 30, 2007, 27,357; December 31, 2006, 27,405 (net of
shares and cost held in trust for deferred compensation of 177, $3,038 and
159, $2,724) (469,385 ) (469,584 )
Retained
earnings 1,469,629 1,363,310
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss (346,261 ) (314,302 )
Total common
stockholders’ equity 1,023,026 946,280
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 3,439,407 $ 3,256,911

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='5',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*Equitable Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries*

*Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)*

*A. Financial Statements*

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the requirements of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In this Form 10-Q, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Equitable,” “Equitable Resources,” and the “Company” refer collectively to Equitable Resources, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, these statements include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals, unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of Equitable Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2007, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

The balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

Due to the seasonal nature of the Company’s natural gas distribution and energy marketing businesses and the volatility of natural gas prices, the interim statements for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Equitable Resources’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as well as in “Information Regarding Forward Looking Statements” on page 17 of this document.

*B. Segment Information*

The Company reports its operations in two segments, which reflect its lines of business. The Equitable Supply segment’s activities comprise the development, production, gathering, marketing and sale of natural gas and a small amount of associated oil and the extraction and sale of natural gas liquids. The Equitable Utilities segment’s operations comprise the sale and transportation of natural gas to customers at state-regulated rates, interstate pipeline transportation, storage and gathering of natural gas subject to federal regulation, the unregulated marketing of natural gas and limited trading activities.

Operating segments are evaluated on their contribution to the Company’s consolidated results based on operating income, equity in earnings (losses) of nonconsolidated investments and other income. Interest expense and income taxes are managed on a consolidated basis. Headquarters’ costs are billed to the operating segments based upon a fixed allocation of the headquarters’ annual operating budget. Differences between budget and actual headquarters’ expenses are not allocated to the operating segments.

Substantially all of the Company’s operating revenues, income from operations and assets are generated or located in the United States.

6

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='6',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Three Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006
Revenues
from external customers:
Equitable Supply $ 127,884 $ 119,327 $ 253,141 $ 241,776
Equitable
Utilities 172,112 139,027 515,224 473,725
Less:
intersegment revenues (a) (6,756 ) (7,147 ) (18,579 ) (34,175 )
Total $ 293,240 $ 251,207 $ 749,786 $ 681,326
Total
operating expenses:
Equitable Supply $ 56,707 $ 53,884 $ 127,104 $ 104,350
Equitable
Utilities 37,544 31,900 79,602 69,731
Unallocated
expenses (b) 20,517 5,191 45,742 10,539
Total $ 114,768 $ 90,975 $ 252,448 $ 184,620
Operating
income:
Equitable Supply $ 71,177 $ 65,443 $ 126,037 $ 137,426
Equitable
Utilities 10,859 13,867 80,078 74,889
Unallocated
expenses (20,517 ) (5,191 ) (45,742 ) (10,539 )
Total $ 61,519 $ 74,119 $ 160,373 $ 201,776
Reconciliation
of operating income to net income:
Equity
in earnings (losses) of nonconsolidated investments:
Equitable Supply $ 633 $ (124 ) $ 706 $ (18 )
Unallocated 33 — 69 68
Total $ 666 $ (124 ) $ 775 $ 50
Gain on sale of
assets, net — Equitable Supply 119,401 — 119,401 —
Gain on sale of
available-for-sale securities — — 1,042 —
Interest expense 9,483 9,995 21,763 22,952
Income taxes 64,760 20,091 95,867 62,606
Net income $ 107,343 $ 43,909 $ 163,961 $ 116,268
June 30, December 31,
2007 2006
(Thousands)
Segment
Assets:
Equitable Supply $ 1,971,136 $ 1,794,485
Equitable
Utilities 1,293,537 1,407,024
Total operating
segments 3,264,673 3,201,509
Headquarters
assets and intersegment eliminations, net 174,734 55,402
Total assets $ 3,439,407 $ 3,256,911
Three Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006
(Thousands)
Expenditures
for segment assets:
Equitable Supply $ 159,462 $ 68,615 $ 297,455 $ 122,527
Equitable
Utilities 18,616 13,626 38,207 29,080
Unallocated
expenditures 112 541 198 1,809
Total $ 178,190 $ 82,782 $ 335,860 $ 153,416

(a) Intersegment revenues primarily represent sales from Equitable Supply to the unregulated marketing affiliate of Equitable Utilities.

(b) Unallocated expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 are primarily related to executive compensation.

7

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='7',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*C. Derivative Instruments*

**Natural Gas Hedging Instruments****

The Company’s overall objective in its hedging program is to assure a return on capital invested in long-lived assets in excess of the Company’s cost of capital. The various derivative commodity instruments used by the Company to hedge its exposure to variability in expected future cash flows associated with the fluctuations in the price of natural gas related to the Company’s forecasted sale of equity production and forecasted natural gas purchases and sales have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. Futures contracts obligate the Company to buy or sell a designated commodity at a future date for a specified price and quantity at a specified location. Swap agreements involve payments to or receipts from counterparties based on the differential between a fixed and variable price for the commodity. Collar agreements require the counterparty to pay the Company if the index price falls below the floor price and the Company to pay the counterparty if the index price rises above the cap price. Exchange-traded instruments are generally settled with offsetting positions. Over the counter arrangements require settlement in cash.

The fair value of the Company’s derivative commodity instruments designated as cash flow hedges is presented below:

As of — June 30, 2007 December 31, 2006
(Thousands)
Asset $ 31,908 $ 129,675
Liability (544,919 ) (544,444 )
Net liability $ (513,011 ) $ (414,769 )

These amounts are included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as derivative instruments, at fair value. The net fair value of derivative instruments changed during the first six months of 2007 primarily as a result of an increase in natural gas prices. The absolute quantities of the Company’s derivative commodity instruments that have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges totaled 335.9 Bcf and 392.6 Bcf as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and primarily related to natural gas swaps. The open positions at June 30, 2007 had maturities extending through December 2013.

The Company deferred net losses of $319.8 million and $286.2 million in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, associated with the effective portion of the change in fair value of its derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges. Assuming no change in price or new transactions, the Company estimates that approximately $107.1 million of net unrealized losses on its derivative commodity instruments reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, as of June 30, 2007 will be recognized in earnings during the next twelve months due to the physical settlement of hedged transactions. This recognition occurs through a reduction in the Company’s net operating revenues resulting in the average hedged price becoming the realized sales price.

Ineffectiveness associated with the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges increased earnings by approximately $1.3 million and $0.2 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These amounts are included in operating revenues in the Statements of Consolidated Income.

The Company conducts trading activities through its unregulated marketing group. The function of the Company’s trading business is to contribute to the Company’s earnings by taking market positions within defined limits subject to the Company’s corporate risk management policy. The absolute notional quantities of the futures and swaps held for trading purposes at June 30, 2007 totaled 9.9 Bcf and 23.8 Bcf, respectively.

Below is a summary of the activity of the fair value of the Company’s derivative commodity contracts with third parties held for trading purposes during the six months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands).

| Fair value of
contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2006 | $ | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Contracts
realized or otherwise settled | (723 | ) |
| Other changes in
fair value | 57 | |
| Fair value of
contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2007 | $ (85 | ) |

8

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='8',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

The following table presents maturities and the fair valuation source for the Company’s derivative commodity instruments that are held for trading purposes as of June 30, 2007.

*Net Fair Value of Third Party Contract (Liabilities) Assets at Period-End*

Source of Fair Value Maturity Less than 1 Year Maturity 1-3 Years Maturity 4-5 Years Maturity in Excess of 5 Years Total Fair Value
(Thousands)
Prices actively
quoted (NYMEX) (1) $ (103 ) $ — $ — $ — $ (103 )
Prices provided
by other external sources (2) 18 — — — 18
Net derivative
liabilities $ (85 ) $ — $ — $ — $ (85 )

(1) Contracts include futures and fixed price swaps

(2) Contracts include basis swaps

In May 2007, the Company sold a portion of its interest in certain gas properties in the Nora Field, as discussed in Note J. As part of this transaction, the Company closed out certain cash flow hedges associated with forecasted production at this location by purchasing offsetting positions. The fair value of these derivative instruments was a $27.3 million liability at June 30, 2007. In addition, the fair value of derivative instruments associated with forecasted production at non-core gas properties sold in May 2005 was a $10.6 million liability at June 30, 2007. The Company does not treat these derivatives as hedging instruments under Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS No. 133). These amounts are included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as derivative instruments, at fair value.

When the net fair value of any of the Company’s swap agreements represents a liability to the Company which is in excess of the agreed-upon threshold between the Company and the financial institution acting as counterparty, the counterparty requires the Company to remit funds to the counterparty as a margin deposit for the derivative liability which is in excess of the threshold amount. The Company recorded such deposits in the amount of $4.0 million in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2007.

When the Company enters into exchange-traded natural gas contracts, exchanges require participants, including the Company, to remit funds to the corresponding broker as good-faith deposits to guard against the risks associated with changing market conditions. Participants must make such deposits based on an established margin requirement as well as the net liability position, if any, of the fair value of the associated contracts. In the case where the fair value of such contracts is in a net asset position, the broker may remit funds to the Company, in which case the Company records a current liability for such amounts received. The margin requirements are established by the exchanges based on prices, volatility and the time to expiration of the related contract and are subject to change at the exchanges’ discretion. The Company recorded margin deposits in the amount of $6.9 million in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2007.

*D. Investments, Available-For-Sale*

As of June 30, 2007, the investments classified by the Company as available-for-sale consist of approximately $35.8 million of debt and equity securities intended to fund plugging and abandonment and other liabilities for which the Company self-insures. Any unrealized gains or losses with respect to investments classified as available-for-sale are recognized within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of equity, accumulated other comprehensive loss.

During the first quarter of 2007, the Company reviewed its investment portfolio including its investment allocation and as a result sold equity securities with a cost basis of $6.3 million for total proceeds of $7.3 million, resulting in the Company recognizing a gain of $1.0 million. The Company used the proceeds from these sales and other available cash to purchase other debt and equity securities with a cost basis totaling $9.7 million during the first quarter of 2007. These investments are classified as available-for-sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company utilizes the specific identification method to determine the cost of all investment securities sold.

9

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='9',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*E. Comprehensive Income*

Total comprehensive income, net of tax, was as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006
(Thousands)
Net income $ 107,343 $ 43,909 $ 163,961 $ 116,268
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
Net change in
cash flow hedges:
Natural gas
(Note C) 58,935 49,563 (33,598 ) 248,954
Interest rate 29 29 58 58
Unrealized gain
(loss) on investments, available-for-sale 932 (389 ) 468 366
Pension and
other post-retirement benefit plans:
Prior service
cost (14 ) — (118 ) —
Net loss 352 — 914 —
Settlement loss 238 — 317 —
Total comprehensive income $ 167,815 $ 93,112 $ 132,002 $ 365,646

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, are as follows:

June 30, — 2007 December 31, — 2006
(Thousands)
Net unrealized
loss from hedging transactions $ (320,411 ) $ (286,871 )
Unrealized gain
on available-for-sale securities 4,437 3,969
Pension and
other post-retirement benefits adjustment (30,287 ) (31,400 )
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss $ (346,261 ) $ (314,302 )

*F. Share-Based Compensation*

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R) as of January 1, 2006. Under SFAS No. 123R, the compensation cost of a share-based award is recorded in the Company’s income statement and is generally measured based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

Share-based compensation expense recorded by the Company was as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006
(Thousands)
2005 Executive
Performance Incentive Program units $ 20,830 $ 5,431 $ 46,379 $ 10,122
Restricted stock
awards 626 896 1,513 1,587
Nonqualified
stock options 29 129 212 685
Director stock
units 887 446 1,412 447
Total
share-based compensation expense $ 22,372 $ 6,902 $ 49,516 $ 12,841

2005 Executive Performance Incentive Program

The vesting of the units granted under the 2005 Executive Performance Incentive Program (2005 Program) will occur contingent upon a combination of the level of total shareholder return relative to a fixed group of peer companies and the Company’s average absolute return on total capital during the four year performance period ending December 31, 2008. The Company continually monitors its stock price and performance in order to assess the impact on the ultimate payouts under the 2005 Program. The Company modified its assumptions during the

10

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='10',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

first six months of 2007 and increased its assumptions for both the ultimate share price and the payout multiple at the vesting date to $60.00 and 225% of the units awarded, respectively. As a result, the Company recognized an increase in long-term incentive plan expense associated with the 2005 Program of $15.6 million and $35.7 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The 2005 Program expense is classified as selling, general and administrative expense in the Statements of Consolidated Income. A portion of the 2005 Program expense is included as an unallocated expense in deriving total operating income for segment reporting purposes. See Note B. The Company recorded a total accrual for the 2005 Program of $90.0 million in other current liabilities in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2007.

Restricted Stock Awards

The Company granted 72,600 and 88,200 restricted stock awards during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, to key executives from the Company’s 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan). The shares granted under the Plan will be fully vested at the end of the three-year period commencing the date of grant. The fair value of each share is equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The weighted average fair value of these restricted stock grants, based on the grant date fair value of the Company’s stock, was $43.61 and $35.75, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

As of June 30, 2007, there was $6.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 20 months.

Stock Options

The Company granted 20,123 and 56,257 stock options during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, all of which comprised options granted for reload rights associated with previously-awarded options. The weighted average grant date fair value of these reload option grants was $10.51 and $9.07 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The fair value of the Company’s option grants was estimated at the dates of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the assumptions indicated in the table below for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006
Risk-free
interest rate (range) 4.59% to 5.02% 4.59% to 5.04%
Dividend yield 2.06% to 2.29% 2.34% to 2.38%
Volatility
factor .212 to .213 .212 to .226
Expected term 7 years 7 years

As of June 30, 2007, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding nonvested stock options as all outstanding options were fully vested.

Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Incentive Plans

The Company has historically granted to non-employee directors stock units which vested upon award. The value of the stock units will be paid in cash on the earlier of the director’s death or retirement from the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company accounts for these stock units as liability awards and as such records compensation expense for the remeasurement of the fair value of the stock units based on the Company’s stock price at the end of each reporting period. A total of 88,530 non-employee director stock units were outstanding as of June 30, 2007. A total of 15,570 and 18,000 stock units were granted to non-employee directors during the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The weighted average fair value of these director stock units, based on the grant date fair value of the Company’s stock, was $49.88 and $35.12, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

As of June 30, 2007, 152,404 options were outstanding under the 1999 Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan. No options were granted to non-employee directors during the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

11

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='11',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*G. Income Taxes*

The consolidated Federal income tax liability of the Company has been settled with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) through 1997. The IRS has completed its review of the Company’s Federal income tax filings for the 1998 through 2000 years and the Company believes that only minor issues remain to be resolved. The IRS is expected to survey the 2001 and 2002 Federal income tax filings. During the second quarter of 2007, the IRS began an examination of the Company’s Federal income tax filings for 2003 through 2005. As of June 30, 2007, no significant issues have been raised relating to these filings.

The Company is also subject to various routine state income tax examinations. The Company mainly operates in four states which have statutes of limitations that expire between three to four years from the date of filing of the income tax return.

The Company estimates an annual effective income tax rate based on projected results for the year and applies this rate to income before taxes to calculate income tax expense. Refinements made due to subsequent information that affects the estimated annual effective income tax rate are reflected as adjustments in the current period. Separate effective income tax rates are calculated for net income from continuing operations and any separately reported net income items, such as discontinued operations and extraordinary items.

On April 4, 2007, West Virginia enacted legislation, effective for the Company’s tax year beginning January 1, 2009, that mandates unitary combined reporting, changes certain apportionment provisions for tax partnerships, changes certain definitions for financial organizations and makes miscellaneous changes to other corporate net income tax statutes. As a result of this law change, the Company recorded additional tax expense of $2.9 million to reflect an overall increase in the Company’s expected deferred tax liability as of the effective date. This charge is included in the annual income tax expense and the entire amount is reflected in the second quarter of 2007. The effective income tax rate for the three months ending June 30, 2007 is 37.6%. The Company currently estimates the annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 36.5%. The estimated annual effective income tax rate as of June 30, 2006 was 35.0%.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (FIN 48) which applies to all open tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This Interpretation is intended to result in increased relevance and comparability in financial reporting of income taxes and to provide more information about the uncertainty in income tax assets and liabilities.

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $4.1 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits which was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. Additionally, as a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recorded $29.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits related to a balance sheet reclassification that did not impact retained earnings. A total of $16.9 million of this reclassification relates to the gross up of certain tax positions that were previously recorded net of tax benefit, tax positions which relate to temporary differences that were previously part of deferred taxes and tax positions that were previously offset against deferred tax assets. The remaining $12.8 million relates to tax positions previously categorized as current liabilities. After the recognition of these items in connection with the implementation of FIN 48, the total liability for unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007 was $33.8 million. Of this total, $16.9 million of tax benefits would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate if the tax benefits were recognized in the financial statements.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The total amount of accrued interest included in the FIN 48 liability above as of January 1, 2007 was $11.0 million. No amounts were accrued for penalties as of January 1, 2007.

There were no material changes to unrecognized tax benefits, interest or penalties during the second quarter of 2007. As of June 30, 2007, the Company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.

12

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='12',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*H. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans*

The Company’s costs related to its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

Pension Benefits Other Benefits
Three Months Ended June 30,
2007 2006 2007 2006
(Thousands)
Components of
net periodic benefit cost
Service cost $ 63 $ 108 $ 123 $ 138
Interest cost 1,093 1,097 636 725
Expected return
on plan assets (1,403 ) (1,533 ) — —
Amortization of
prior service cost 41 93 (215 ) (34 )
Recognized net
actuarial loss 363 267 574 536
Settlement loss 697 (109 ) — —
Net periodic
benefit cost $ 854 $ (77 ) $ 1,118 $ 1,365
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
Six Months Ended June 30,
2007 2006 2007 2006
(Thousands)
Components of
net periodic benefit cost
Service cost $ 126 $ 216 $ 246 $ 276
Interest cost 2,186 2,194 1,272 1,450
Expected return
on plan assets (2,806 ) (3,066 ) — —
Amortization of
prior service cost 82 186 (430 ) (68 )
Recognized net
actuarial loss 726 534 1,148 1,072
Settlement loss 1,130 (18 ) — —
Net periodic
benefit cost $ 1,444 $ 46 $ 2,236 $ 2,730

The Company made a cash contribution of $1.3 million to the pension plan in the first quarter of 2007 to fund an early retirement program which was settled during the fourth quarter of 2006.

*I. Recently Issued Accounting Standards*

The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” (SFAS No. 159) which provides entities with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (SFAS No. 157) which establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

13

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='13',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*J. Gain on Sale of Assets*

On April 13, 2007, the Company and Range Resources Corporation (Range) agreed to a development plan for the Nora Field, a gas field located in Southwestern Virginia. The Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (Purchase Agreement) with Pine Mountain Oil and Gas, Inc. (PMOG), a subsidiary of Range, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to PMOG a portion of the Company’s interests in certain gas properties in the Nora Field. Additionally, the Company entered into a Contribution Agreement (Contribution Agreement) with PMOG relating to the contribution of certain Nora Field gathering facilities and pipelines to Nora Gathering, LLC (Nora LLC), a newly formed entity that is equally owned by the Company and PMOG. This gathering system will service production of the Company and Range.

On May 17, 2007, the Company completed a majority of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement by selling proved reserves of approximately 70 Bcf, including developed reserves of approximately 64 Bcf, to PMOG for proceeds of $184.6 million. Proceeds of $95.0 million from the sale were placed into an escrow account pursuant to a deferred exchange agreement, which allows for the use of the funds in a potential like-kind exchange for certain identified assets. The Company is evaluating the potential purchase of eligible replacement properties within the statutory time period. As of June 30, 2007, the balance of restricted cash was $95.6 million.

Additionally, on May 17, 2007, the Company completed a substantial majority of the transactions contemplated by the Contribution Agreement by contributing Nora Field gathering property with a net book value of $120.0 million to Nora LLC in exchange for a 50% interest in Nora LLC and cash of $23.3 million. PMOG contributed cash of $93.1 million to Nora LLC in exchange for its 50% interest. The Company and Nora LLC also entered into a demand note agreement whereby Nora LLC loaned to the Company $69.8 million on the closing date. The balance of this note as of June 30, 2007 was $62.8 million, and was classified as note payable to Nora Gathering, LLC in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company is accounting for its interest in Nora LLC under the equity method of accounting, as the Company determined that it has the ability to exert significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Nora LLC through its 50%, non-controlling interest. The Company recorded an equity investment in Nora LLC of $93.1 million in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 17, 2007.

The Company recorded a gain on these transactions of $147.8 million, net of costs to sell, in accordance with SFAS No. 19, “Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies.” As a result of the working interest sale, the Company reduced its hedge position by approximately 7.3 Bcf, resulting in the Company’s recording a hedge loss of $28.4 million as of the date of sale. These items are recorded in gain on sale of assets, net in the Company’s Statements of Consolidated Income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007.

As a result of these transactions, the Company and Range have equalized their interest in the Nora Field, including their interest in the producing wells, undrilled acreage and gathering system. These transactions are subject to various post-closing purchase price adjustments which may result in the Company recording additional gain or loss on these transactions upon finalization of the adjustments, which is expected to occur during the second half of 2007.

A second closing covering the remainder of the gas properties and related remaining gathering assets included in the above transactions would reduce the Company’s proved reserves by a maximum of approximately 11 Bcf, including developed reserves of up to 10 Bcf. The Company is currently working with all parties involved to obtain the remaining required consents.

*K. Office Consolidation / Impairment Charges*

In May 2005, the Company completed the relocation of its corporate headquarters and other operations to a newly constructed office building located at the North Shore in Pittsburgh. The relocation resulted in the early termination of several operating leases and the early retirement of assets and leasehold improvements at several locations. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company began to utilize certain of the leased space previously deemed to have no economic benefit to the Company, to make space available for the pending acquisition of The Peoples Natural Gas Company and Hope Gas, Inc. transition planning activities. The Company reversed approximately $2.4 million of the associated early termination liability for these leases during the three months ended June 30, 2006.

14

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='14',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Additionally, the Company recorded a $0.5 million reduction in the early termination liability during the three months ended June 30, 2006 resulting from a revision of the amount of estimated cash flows for one of its operating leases.

*L. Other Events*

Pending Acquisition of The Peoples Natural Gas Company and Hope Gas, Inc.

On March 1, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Dominion Resources, Inc.’s (Dominion) natural gas distribution assets in Pennsylvania and in West Virginia for approximately $970 million, subject to adjustments, in a cash transaction for the stock of The Peoples Natural Gas Company (Peoples) and Hope Gas, Inc. (Hope). The Company agreed on July 3, 2007 not to exercise its termination right under the Stock Purchase Agreement prior to September 1, 2007 pending further discussions regarding an amendment to the Stock Purchase Agreement which would allow the sale of Peoples to close in advance of the sale of Hope if the injunction described below is lifted. Dominion has agreed not to exercise its termination right under the Stock Purchase Agreement prior to November 1, 2007. No assurance can be given that the parties will be able to negotiate an amendment providing for the sale of Peoples to close in advance of the sale of Hope or that the remaining regulatory issues will be resolved.

On May 14, 2007, the Public Service Commission of West Virginia (WV PSC) issued an order in the Company’s proposed acquisition of Hope, which case has been consolidated with four other cases, to initiate a focused management audit regarding two Hope applications to adjust purchased gas costs. On July 24, 2007, the WV PSC issued another order bifurcating the acquisition case from the cases involving the focused management audit and soliciting comment from the parties as to, among other things, how to proceed with the acquisition case and the amount and form of an escrow proposed to be posted by Hope in connection with alleged wrong doing. The Company continues to engage in settlement negotiations with the interveners and with Dominion to resolve the open issues.

On April 13, 2007, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PA PUC) issued an Opinion and Order approving the stock acquisition consistent with the terms and conditions of a Joint Petition for Settlement which includes, among other things, an agreement by the Company that Equitable Gas Company and Peoples will not make base rate case filings prior to January 1, 2009.

On March 14, 2007, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an administrative complaint challenging the Company’s acquisition of Peoples. On April 13, 2007, the FTC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin the proposed acquisition. On May 14, 2007, the District Court dismissed the FTC’s request for a preliminary injunction. The FTC appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on the basis that the state action immunity doctrine barred the FTC’s claim. On June 1, 2007, the Third Circuit issued an injunction pending appeal preventing the Company from closing the transaction pending further order of the Third Circuit. The appeal is currently in the briefing phase. Pursuant to an amended notice received after the Company's July 26, 2007 earnings call, oral argument, if required by the Third Circuit, is scheduled for the week of October 1, 2007.

The transaction is also under review by the Pennsylvania Attorney General (PA AG). The PA AG has filed an amicus brief in the Third Circuit case arguing that the state action immunity doctrine does not apply, which is contrary to the Company’s position. The PA PUC has filed an amicus brief in the Third Circuit case supporting the Company’s position.

The assets to be acquired are expected to approximately increase: customers in the distribution operations by 475,000 or 173%; total storage capacity by 33 Bcf or 60%; miles of gathering pipelines by 936 miles; gathered volumes by 40%; and miles of high pressure transmission by 466 miles or 42%. Transition planning activities have continued at Equitable Utilities to plan for the integration of the assets, resources, and business processes of Peoples and Hope into Equitable Resources. The Company has deferred certain costs in conjunction with the pending acquisition of Peoples and Hope. In the event that the acquisition does not close or the likelihood becomes remote, the Company will expense these deferred costs which may result in a charge of $10 million to $15 million.

15

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='15',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

West Virginia Royalty Dispute

In June 2006, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals issued a decision involving interpretation of certain types of oil and gas leases of an unrelated party, in which a class of royalty owners in the state of West Virginia filed a lawsuit claiming that the defendant in the case underpaid royalties by deducting certain post-production costs not permitted by such types of leases and not paying a fair value for the gas produced from the royalty owners’ leases. In January 2007, the jury in the aforementioned case returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff royalty owners, awarding the plaintiffs significant compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged underpayment of royalties. While the defendant plans to appeal the verdict, this decision may ultimately impact other royalty interest rights in West Virginia. Claims have been brought against others in the oil and gas industry, including the Company. The proceedings against the Company are in the early stages and the plaintiffs have sought class certification. The Company believes that the claims and facts decided in the unrelated lawsuit can be differentiated from those asserted against the Company. Nevertheless, the Company has reviewed its West Virginia royalty agreements and established a reserve it believes to be appropriate.

16

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='16',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Equitable Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

*Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*

*Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*

*INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS*

Disclosures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts are forward-looking and usually identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “may,” “will,” “forecasts,” “approximate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words or phrases of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial matters. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this report include the matters discussed in the sections captioned “Outlook” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the expectations of plans, strategies, objectives, and growth and anticipated financial and operational performance of the Company and its subsidiaries, including guidance regarding the Company’s drilling and infrastructure programs, production and sales volumes, liquidity, reserves, capital expenditures, executive compensation, hedging risks, the pending acquisition of The Peoples Natural Gas Company and Hope Gas, Inc., the financing of that acquisition and the Company’s move to a holding company structure. A variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance and results of the Company’s business and forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

*Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and the Company does not intend to correct or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.*

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

*Three Months Ended June 30, 2007*

**vs. Three Months Ended June 30, 2006****

Equitable Resources’ consolidated net income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 totaled $107.3 million, or $0.87 per diluted share, compared to $43.9 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, reported for the same period a year ago. This $63.4 million increase in net income from 2006 to 2007 was due to several factors. In the second quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a $119.4 million net gain on the sale of assets in the Nora Field. The impact of higher realized sales prices at Equitable Supply ($6.8 million), reserves established in connection with West Virginia royalty disputes and other legal expenses at Equitable Supply in 2006 ($2.1 million), and higher production sales volumes at Equitable Supply ($1.4 million) also contributed to the increase between years. These increases between years were partially offset by increased incentive compensation expense ($15.5 million) and other operating cost increases.

*Six Months Ended June 30, 2007*

**vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2006****

Equitable Resources’ consolidated net income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 totaled $164.0 million, or $1.34 per diluted share, compared to $116.3 million, or $0.95 per diluted share, reported for the same period a year ago. This $47.7 million increase in net income from 2006 to 2007 was due to several factors, including the second quarter of 2007 gain on the sale of assets. The impact of favorable storage asset optimization at Equitable Utilities ($10.8 million), higher production sales volumes at Equitable Supply ($6.4 million), colder weather in Equitable Gas’ service territory in 2007 ($8.1 million), and higher gathering revenues at Equitable Supply ($5.3 million) also contributed to the increase. These increases between years were partially offset by increased incentive compensation expense ($38.0 million), increased reserves for West Virginia royalty disputes and other legal expenses at Equitable Supply ($9.9 million), increased transition planning expenses related to the pending acquisition of The Peoples Natural Gas Company and Hope Gas, Inc. ($6.5 million), higher depreciation, depletion and amortization expense at Equitable Supply ($5.8 million), a positive impact in 2006 for previously deferred amounts from the approval and settlement of the Equitrans, L.P. rate case ($5.4 million) and higher gathering and compression expense at Equitable Supply ($4.2 million).

17

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='17',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

The Company has reported the components of each segment’s operating income and various operational measures in the sections below, and where appropriate, has provided information describing how a measure was derived. Equitable’s management believes that presentation of this information provides useful information to management and investors regarding the financial condition, operations and trends of each of Equitable’s segments without being obscured by the financial condition, operations and trends for the other segment or by the effects of corporate allocations of interest and income taxes. In addition, management uses these measures for budget planning purposes.

*EQUITABLE SUPPLY*

**OVERVIEW****

During the second quarter of 2007, the Equitable Supply segment sold to Pine Mountain Oil and Gas, Inc. (PMOG) a portion of the Company’s interests in certain gas properties in the Nora Field totaling approximately 70 Bcf of proved reserves. Also during the second quarter of 2007, the Equitable Supply segment contributed certain Nora Field gathering facilities and pipelines to Nora Gathering, LLC, a newly formed entity that is equally owned by the Company and PMOG, in exchange for a 50% equity interest in the LLC and cash. These transactions resulted in a net gain of $119.4 million. See Note J to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these transactions. As a result of the gathering asset contribution, gathered volumes, gathering revenues and gathering-related expenses related to the Nora Field gathering activities are no longer included in Equitable Supply’s operating results. However, Equitable Supply records its 50% equity interest in the earnings of Nora Gathering, LLC in equity in earnings of nonconsolidated investments.

Excluding the impact of the sale of interests in the Nora Field, sales volumes increased approximately 5% from 2006 to 2007, primarily as a result of increased production from the 2006 and 2007 drilling programs. Equitable Supply drilled 267 gross operated wells, including 16 horizontal wells, in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 214 gross operated wells in 2006, a 25% increase.

18

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='18',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*RESULTS OF OPERATIONS*

*EQUITABLE SUPPLY*

Three Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 % Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 %
OPERATIONAL DATA
Production:
Natural gas and
oil production (MMcfe) 21,024 20,381 3.2 41,440 39,963 3.7
Company usage,
line loss (MMcfe) (1,621 ) (1,266 ) 28.0 (2,699 ) (2,519 ) 7.1
Total sales
volumes (MMcfe) 19,403 19,115 1.5 38,741 37,444 3.5
Average
(well-head) sales price ($/Mcfe) $ 5.07 $ 4.71 7.6 $ 4.88 $ 4.90 (0.4 )
Lease operating
expenses (LOE), excluding production taxes ($/Mcfe) $ 0.31 $ 0.31 — $ 0.32 $ 0.30 6.7
Production taxes
($/Mcfe) $ 0.46 $ 0.46 — $ 0.47 $ 0.50 (6.0 )
Production
depletion ($/Mcfe) $ 0.70 $ 0.62 12.9 $ 0.70 $ 0.62 12.9
Gathering:
Gathered volumes
(MMcfe) 24,068 26,268 (8.4 ) 53,110 53,550 (0.8 )
Average
gathering fee ($/Mcfe) $ 1.12 $ 1.01 10.9 $ 1.11 $ 1.00 11.0
Gathering and
compression expense ($/Mcfe) $ 0.49 $ 0.40 22.5 $ 0.46 $ 0.38 21.1
Gathering and
compression depreciation ($/Mcfe) $ 0.16 $ 0.15 6.7 $ 0.15 $ 0.14 7.1
(in thousands)
Production
operating income $ 63,277 $ 56,655 11.7 $ 107,224 $ 118,667 (9.6 )
Gathering
operating income 7,900 8,788 (10.1 ) 18,813 18,759 0.3
Total operating
income $ 71,177 $ 65,443 8.8 $ 126,037 $ 137,426 (8.3 )
Production
depletion $ 14,737 $ 12,594 17.0 $ 29,069 $ 24,731 17.5
Gathering and
compression depreciation 3,894 3,821 1.9 8,227 7,588 8.4
Other
depreciation, depletion and amortization 1,469 1,034 42.1 2,801 1,976 41.8
Total
depreciation, depletion and amortization $ 20,100 $ 17,449 15.2 $ 40,097 $ 34,295 16.9
Capital
expenditures (thousands) $ 159,462 $ 68,615 132.4 $ 297,455 $ 122,527 142.8

19

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='19',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Three Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 % Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 %
FINANCIAL DATA (Thousands)
Production
revenues $ 100,954 $ 92,671 8.9 $ 194,241 $ 188,192 3.2
Gathering
revenues 26,930 26,656 1.0 58,900 53,584 9.9
Total operating
revenues 127,884 119,327 7.2 253,141 241,776 4.7
Operating
expenses:
LOE, excluding
production taxes 6,471 6,360 1.7 13,286 11,790 12.7
Production taxes 9,655 9,310 3.7 19,351 19,999 (3.2 )
Gathering and
compression (O&M) 11,797 10,582 11.5 24,621 20,424 20.5
Selling, general
and administrative (SG&A) 8,684 10,183 (14.7 ) 29,749 17,842 66.7
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization (DD&A) 20,100 17,449 15.2 40,097 34,295 16.9
Total operating
expenses 56,707 53,884 5.2 127,104 104,350 21.8
Operating income $ 71,177 $ 65,443 8.8 $ 126,037 $ 137,426 (8.3 )
Gain on sale of
assets, net $ 119,401 $ — 100.0 $ 119,401 $ — 100.0
Equity in
earnings (losses) of nonconsolidated investments $ 633 $ (124 ) 610.5 $ 706 $ (18 ) 4,022.2

**Three Months Ended* June 30, 2007***

**vs. Three Months Ended* June 30, 2006***

Equitable Supply’s operating income totaled $71.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $65.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The $5.8 million increase in operating income was primarily the result of an increase in the average well-head sales price, reserves established in connection with West Virginia royalty disputes and other legal expenses in 2006 and increased sales volumes. These factors were partially offset by increased DD&A and increased gathering and compression expenses.

Total operating revenues were $127.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $119.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The $8.6 million increase in total operating revenues was primarily due to an 8% increase in the average well-head sales price and a 2% increase in production sales volumes. The $0.36 per Mcfe increase in the average well-head sales price was primarily attributable to increased market prices on unhedged volumes. The 2% increase in production sales volumes was primarily the result of increased production from the 2006 and 2007 drilling programs, partially offset by the normal production decline in the Company’s wells and the sale of 583 MMcfe in the Nora Field to PMOG. Gathering revenues were essentially flat, as an 11% increase in the average gathering fee was offset by an 8% decrease in gathered volumes. The increase in the average gathering fee, primarily charged to affiliates, is reflective of the Company’s commitment to an increased infrastructure program as well as operating cost increases. The decrease in gathered volumes is due to the contribution of gathering facilities and pipelines to Nora Gathering, LLC, partially offset by increased Company production.

Operating expenses totaled $56.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $53.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in DD&A was primarily due to increased depletion expense resulting from both increases in the unit rate and volume, as well as increased depreciation on a higher asset base. The $0.08 increase in the depletion rate is primarily attributable to the increased investment in the oil and gas producing properties. Gathering and compression expense increased approximately 12% due to electricity charges on newly installed electric compressors, increased field line and compressor maintenance related to the Company’s infrastructure investments, increased field labor and related employment costs and increased property taxes. In addition, the per unit gathering and compression rate increased as the per unit rate for the Nora Field properties contributed in 2007 was significantly lower than the rate for the Company’s remaining properties. These expense increases were partially offset by a decrease in expenses due to the sale of assets in the Nora Field as well as a reduction due to reserves established in 2006 for certain West Virginia royalty disputes and other legal expenses.

20

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='20',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated investments totaled $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to an equity loss of $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The $0.7 million increase was primarily due to equity earnings of $0.6 million recorded in the second quarter of 2007 for Equitable Supply’s investment in Nora Gathering, LLC.

Capital expenditures totaled $159.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $68.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The $90.9 million increase was primarily due to increased capital spending for midstream infrastructure projects, including the construction of the Big Sandy Pipeline, and an increased drilling and development plan in 2007.

**Six Months Ended June 30, 2007****

**vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2006****

Equitable Supply’s operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $126.0 million compared to $137.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The $11.4 million decrease in operating income was primarily the result of reserves established in connection with West Virginia royalty disputes and other legal expenses, increased operating expenses and decreased average well-head sales prices. These factors were partially offset by increased sales volumes and gathering revenues.

Total operating revenues were $253.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $241.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The $11.3 million increase in total operating revenues was primarily due to a 4% increase in production sales volumes and a 10% increase in gathering revenues, partially offset by a slight decline in the average well-head sales price. The 4% increase in production sales volumes was primarily the result of increased production from the 2006 and 2007 drilling programs, partially offset by the normal production decline in the Company’s wells and the sale of 583 MMcfe in the Nora Field to PMOG. The 10% increase in gathering revenues was due to an 11% increase in the average gathering fee partially offset by a 1% decrease in gathered volumes. The increase in the average gathering fee, primarily charged to affiliates, is reflective of the Company’s commitment to an increased infrastructure program as well as operating cost increases. The decrease in gathered volumes is due to the contribution of gathering facilities and pipelines to Nora Gathering, LLC, partially offset by increased Company production.

Operating expenses were $127.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $104.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to increased reserves for certain West Virginia royalty disputes and other legal expenses, adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts, and increased insurance costs. The increase in DD&A was primarily due to increased depletion expense resulting from both increases in the unit rate and volume, as well as increased depreciation on a higher asset base. The $0.08 increase in the depletion rate is primarily attributable to the increased investment in the oil and gas producing properties. Gathering and compression expense increased approximately 21% due to electricity charges on newly installed electric compressors, increased field line and compressor maintenance related to the Company’s infrastructure investments, increased field labor and related employment costs and increased property taxes. The increase in LOE is attributable to increased direct operating costs, personnel costs and environmental costs. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in expenses due to the sale of assets in the Nora Field as previously discussed.

Capital expenditures totaled $297.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $122.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The $175.0 million increase was primarily due to increased capital spending for midstream infrastructure projects, including the construction of the Big Sandy Pipeline, and an increased drilling and development plan in 2007.

**OUTLOOK****

Equitable Supply’s Appalachian Basin business strategy is focused on growing through expansion of its drilling program and midstream gathering and processing systems. The Company will continue to emphasize operational excellence, including cost control in all areas of its operations.

21

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='21',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Equitable Supply is on track to drill at least 650 gross operated wells in 2007, which includes at least 70 horizontal wells, and to sell between 77 and 78 Bcfe of gas. The 650 gross operated wells is a 16% increase over the 560 gross operated wells drilled in 2006.

Since September 2006, the Company has drilled 30 horizontal wells. The Company’s engineering projections and cost estimates have been revised to incorporate experience to date, reflecting an 8% reduction in estimated cost per well to $1.2 million, a 17% increase in the expected reserve recovery and a higher expected after-tax return of 17%, up from 15%. Based on the encouraging results of the horizontal program, the Company decided in the second quarter of 2007 to exclusively drill Kentucky shale wells horizontally. Horizontal wells typically require longer lead time for permitting and implementation of capital commitments. The decision not to drill some permitted vertical shale wells reduced the number of wells drilled and associated volumes, compared to the Company’s previous drilling plan. Ultimately, volumes from the Kentucky shale drilling locations are expected to be higher as a result of using horizontal drilling technology.

Through its Equitrans affiliate, the Company is constructing the Big Sandy Pipeline, which will provide for a significant increase in midstream throughput capacity in the Appalachian region. This project is targeted for completion later in 2007. The Company is also upgrading the Company-operated hydrocarbon processing plant in Langley, Kentucky, targeted for completion in early 2008. The projects are projected to cost an aggregate of $255 million, up from the Company’s previous estimate of $191 million primarily due to scope changes and cost increases.

EQUITABLE UTILITIES

**OVERVIEW****

On March 1, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Dominion Resources, Inc.’s (Dominion) natural gas distribution assets in Pennsylvania and in West Virginia for approximately $970 million, subject to adjustments, in a cash transaction for the stock of The Peoples Natural Gas Company (Peoples) and Hope Gas, Inc. (Hope). The Company agreed on July 3, 2007 not to exercise its termination right under the Stock Purchase Agreement prior to September 1, 2007 pending further discussions regarding an amendment to the Stock Purchase Agreement which would allow the sale of Peoples to close in advance of the sale of Hope if the injunction described below is lifted. Dominion has agreed not to exercise its termination right under the Stock Purchase Agreement prior to November 1, 2007. No assurance can be given that the parties will be able to negotiate an amendment providing for the sale of Peoples to close in advance of the sale of Hope or that the remaining regulatory issues will be resolved.

On May 14, 2007, the Public Service Commission of West Virginia (WV PSC) issued an order in the Company’s proposed acquisition of Hope, which case has been consolidated with four other cases, to initiate a focused management audit regarding two Hope applications to adjust purchased gas costs. On July 24, 2007, the WV PSC issued another order bifurcating the acquisition case from the cases involving the focused management audit and soliciting comment from the parties as to, among other things, how to proceed with the acquisition case and the amount and form of an escrow proposed to be posted by Hope in connection with alleged wrong doing. The Company continues to engage in settlement negotiations with the interveners and with Dominion to resolve the open issues.

On April 13, 2007, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PA PUC) issued an Opinion and Order approving the stock acquisition consistent with the terms and conditions of a Joint Petition for Settlement which includes, among other things, an agreement by the Company that Equitable Gas Company and Peoples will not make base rate case filings prior to January 1, 2009.

On March 14, 2007, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an administrative complaint challenging the Company’s acquisition of Peoples. On April 13, 2007, the FTC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin the proposed acquisition. On May 14, 2007, the District Court dismissed the FTC’s request for a preliminary injunction. The FTC appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on the basis that the state action immunity doctrine barred the FTC’s claim. On June 1, 2007, the Third Circuit issued an injunction pending appeal preventing the

22

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='22',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Company from closing the transaction pending further order of the Third Circuit. The appeal is currently in the briefing phase. Pursuant to an amended notice received after the Company's July 26, 2007 earnings call, oral argument, if required by the Third Circuit, is scheduled for the week of October 1, 2007.

The transaction is also under review by the Pennsylvania Attorney General (PA AG). The PA AG has filed an amicus brief in the Third Circuit case arguing that the state action immunity doctrine does not apply, which is contrary to the Company’s position. The PA PUC has filed an amicus brief in the Third Circuit case supporting the Company’s position.

The Company has filed applications with the PA PUC and WV PSC to reorganize as a holding company. The Company expects to complete the reorganization upon receipt of the required approvals.

*RESULTS OF OPERATIONS*

*EQUITABLE UTILITIES*

| | Three
Months Ended June 30, — 2007 | 2006 | % | | Six
Months Ended June 30, — 2007 | 2006 | % | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| OPERATIONAL
DATA | | | | | | | | |
| Heating degree
days (30 year normal average: | | | | | | | | |
| Qtr - 705; YTD -
3,635) | 617 | 565 | 9.2 | | 3,465 | 3,103 | 11.7 | |
| Residential
sales and transportation volumes (MMcf) | 3,301 | 2,656 | 24.3 | | 15,251 | 12,861 | 18.6 | |
| Commercial and
industrial volumes (MMcf) | 5,632 | 4,667 | 20.7 | | 15,638 | 13,750 | 13.7 | |
| Total throughput
(MMcf) — Distribution Operations | 8,933 | 7,323 | 22.0 | | 30,889 | 26,611 | 16.1 | |
| Net operating
revenues (thousands): | | | | | | | | |
| Distribution
Operations (regulated): | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | $ 19,093 | $ 16,648 | 14.7 | | $ 60,268 | $ 53,167 | 13.4 | |
| Commercial &
industrial | 7,553 | 6,589 | 14.6 | | 25,510 | 22,668 | 12.5 | |
| Other | 2,115 | 1,697 | 24.6 | | 3,991 | 3,204 | 24.6 | |
| Total
Distribution Operations | 28,761 | 24,934 | 15.3 | | 89,769 | 79,039 | 13.6 | |
| Pipeline
Operations (regulated) | 14,327 | 13,868 | 3.3 | | 32,443 | 38,937 | (16.7 | ) |
| Energy Marketing | 5,315 | 6,965 | (23.7 | ) | 37,468 | 26,644 | 40.6 | |
| Total net
operating revenues | $ 48,403 | $ 45,767 | 5.8 | | $ 159,680 | $ 144,620 | 10.4 | |
| Operating income
(thousands): | | | | | | | | |
| Distribution
Operations (regulated) | $ 958 | $ 2,285 | (58.1 | ) | $ 30,261 | $ 29,571 | 2.3 | |
| Pipeline
Operations (regulated) | 5,123 | 5,150 | (0.5 | ) | 13,920 | 19,348 | (28.1 | ) |
| Energy Marketing | 4,778 | 6,432 | (25.7 | ) | 35,897 | 25,970 | 38.2 | |
| Total operating
income | $ 10,859 | $ 13,867 | (21.7 | ) | $ 80,078 | $ 74,889 | 6.9 | |
| DD&A
(thousands): | | | | | | | | |
| Distribution
Operations | $ 5,086 | $ 4,962 | 2.5 | | $ 10,040 | $ 9,887 | 1.5 | |
| Pipeline
Operations | 2,096 | 2,190 | (4.3 | ) | 4,256 | 4,401 | (3.3 | ) |
| Energy Marketing | 10 | 19 | (47.4 | ) | 20 | 37 | (45.9 | ) |
| Total DD&A | $ 7,192 | $ 7,171 | 0.3 | | $ 14,316 | $ 14,325 | (0.1 | ) |
| Capital expenditures (thousands) | $ 18,616 | $ 13,626 | 36.6 | | $ 38,207 | $ 29,080 | 31.4 | |

23

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='23',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Three Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 % Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006 %
FINANCIAL DATA (Thousands)
Distribution
revenues (regulated) $ 71,560 $ 61,594 16.2 $ 281,969 $ 283,303 (0.5 )
Pipeline
revenues (regulated) 14,949 14,239 5.0 33,286 39,636 (16.0 )
Marketing
revenues 96,950 75,840 27.8 225,648 181,237 24.5
Less:
intrasegment revenues (11,347 ) (12,646 ) (10.3 ) (25,679 ) (30,451 ) (15.7 )
Total operating
revenues 172,112 139,027 23.8 515,224 473,725 8.8
Purchased gas
costs 123,709 93,260 32.6 355,544 329,105 8.0
Net operating
revenues 48,403 45,767 5.8 159,680 144,620 10.4
Operating
expenses:
Operating and
maintenance (O & M) 14,286 14,642 (2.4 ) 28,484 28,257 0.8
SG&A 16,066 12,483 28.7 36,802 29,545 24.6
Office
consolidation impairment charges — (2,396 ) (100.0 ) — (2,396 ) (100.0 )
DD&A 7,192 7,171 0.3 14,316 14,325 (0.1 )
Total operating
expenses 37,544 31,900 17.7 79,602 69,731 14.2
Operating income $ 10,859 $ 13,867 (21.7 ) $ 80,078 $ 74,889 6.9

*Three Months Ended June 30, 2007*

*vs. Three Months Ended June 30, 2006*

Equitable Utilities’ operating income totaled $10.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $13.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The $3.0 million decrease in operating income is primarily the result of the office consolidation impairment charge reversal recorded in the 2006 quarter, increased transition costs for the pending acquisition of Peoples and Hope, and a lower bad debt expense reduction. These decreases were partially offset by higher distribution revenues due to colder weather.

Net operating revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007 were $48.4 million compared to $45.8 million for the same quarter in 2006. The $2.6 million increase was due to increased distribution net operating revenues, partially offset by decreased energy marketing net operating revenues. The increase in distribution net operating revenues was primarily the result of increased throughput from colder weather and increased customer usage in 2007. In addition, commercial and industrial volumes increased 965 MMcf from the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due to increased purchases by several large industrial end use customers. Because these industrial sales generate small margins, the increased volumes did not significantly impact net operating revenues. While total marketing revenues increased, net energy marketing operating revenues decreased primarily due to higher offsystem sales volumes at lower margins in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006. Energy marketing net operating revenues are generally lower in the second and third fiscal quarters and higher in the cold weather first and fourth quarters of the calendar year.

Operating expenses totaled $37.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $31.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The $5.6 million increase in operating expenses included $4.3 million of expenses incurred in connection with the planning for the pending acquisition of Peoples and Hope, a $1.6 million increase from the second quarter of 2006. The 2006 quarter included a positive $2.4 million impact due to the office consolidation impairment charge reversal and a positive $0.8 million impact due to a greater bad debt expense reduction. The Company continued to experience improved collection efforts in 2007 but recorded a lower bad debt expense reduction in the second quarter of 2007. Other SG&A increases were primarily related to increased general overhead costs and costs incurred in connection with the pending holding company reorganization.

24

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='24',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Capital expenditures totaled $18.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $13.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The $5.0 million increase was primarily due to increased expenditures for distribution and transmission pipeline replacement programs.

*Six Months Ended June 30, 2007*

*vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2006*

Equitable Utilities’ operating income totaled $80.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $74.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The $5.2 million increase in operating income is primarily the result of increases in margins in the energy marketing and distribution operations. These positive factors were partially offset by increased transition planning expenses incurred in the first six months of 2007 in planning for the pending acquisition of Peoples and Hope, lower pipeline revenues and the prior year office consolidation impairment charge reversal.

Net operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were $159.7 million compared to $144.6 million for the same period in 2006. The $15.1 million increase was due to increased energy marketing net operating revenues and increased distribution net operating revenues. The increase in energy marketing net operating revenues was a result of storage asset optimization opportunities realized, as the energy marketing operations used contractual storage capacity to capture unusually high summer-to-winter price spreads which developed in the commodities market over recent periods. These price spreads were captured at a time of high volatility and the transactions settled during the current period. The increase in distribution net operating revenues was primarily the result of increased throughput from colder weather and increased customer usage in 2007. These positive variances were partially offset by lower pipeline net operating revenues due to the recognition in the first quarter of 2006 of $6.1 million of previously reserved revenues as a result of the Equitrans rate case settlement.

Operating expenses totaled $79.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $69.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 . The $9.9 million increase in operating expenses included $9.2 million of expenses incurred in connection with the planning for the pending acquisition of Peoples and Hope, a $6.5 million increase over similar expenses incurred in the first six months of 2006. The 2006 period also included a $2.4 million office consolidation impairment charge reversal and the recognition of $1.7 million of previously deferred operating expenses recognized in connection with the Equitrans rate case settlement. Excluding these items, operating expenses increased $2.7 million primarily related to increased general overhead, costs incurred in connection with the pending holding company reorganization and other administrative costs. Partially offsetting these increases, bad debt expense decreased $2.2 million, resulting from the Company’s improved collection experience and regulatory and other assistance provided to assist low income customers.

Capital expenditures totaled $38.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $29.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The $9.1 million increase was primarily due to increased expenditures for distribution and transmission pipeline replacement.

25

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='25',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

**OUTLOOK****

Equitable Utilities is focused on obtaining the required regulatory approvals to close the acquisition of Peoples and Hope. Planning for the integration of Peoples and Hope into Equitable Resources continued at Equitable Utilities through the first six months of 2007. Based on the work completed to date, the Company expects that transition planning activities will be minimal for the third quarter of 2007. The Company is working with Dominion to amend the Stock Purchase Agreement to allow Peoples and Hope to be acquired separately, when regulatory matters for each are resolved.

Equitable Utilities is also focused on enhancing the value and growth potential of its existing regulated utility operations and on selectively expanding its natural gas storage and gathering businesses. Equitable Utilities was able to realize a significant increase in margins from energy marketing asset optimization opportunities during the first six months of 2007, as per unit storage spreads were greater than those realized in the same period in 2006. Value from these assets is captured primarily in the winter months and may vary significantly from one year to the next due to changing commodity market conditions.

*CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY*

**Operating Activities****

Cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $314.3 million for the first six months of 2007 and $397.9 million for the first six months of 2006, a net decrease of $83.6 million in cash flows provided by operating activities between years. The decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities was attributable primarily to the following:

• a $210.7 million net decrease in cash inflows for margin deposit requirements on the Company’s natural gas hedge agreements. The Company’s margin deposits increased $10.9 million during the first six months of 2007, compared to a decrease of $199.8 million in margin deposits during the first six months of 2006. The net decrease in margin deposit requirements during the first six months of 2006 resulted from the significant decrease in commodity price during that period from the abnormally high price levels experienced in late 2005;

• a smaller decrease in accounts receivable during the first six months of 2007, primarily the result of significant decreases in commodity price during the first six months of 2006.

partially offset by:

• a smaller decrease in accounts payable, primarily the result of a significant decrease in commodity price during the first six months of 2006.

• a large reduction in other current liabilities during the first six months of 2006, as significant amounts were outstanding at December 31, 2005 for which payment was remitted early in the first quarter of 2006;

**Investing Activities****

Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $225.4 million for the first six months of 2007 and $156.3 million for the first six months of 2006, a net increase of $69.1 million in cash flows used in investing activities between years. The increase in cash flows used in investing activities was primarily due to an increase in capital expenditures to $335.9 million in the first six months of 2007 from $153.4 million in the first six months of 2006, resulting primarily from more capital expended for Supply midstream infrastructure projects, including the construction of the Big Sandy Pipeline, and increased drilling and development in 2007. This increase in cash flows used in investing activities was partially offset by cash proceeds received from the sale of assets. A total of $95.0 million of the proceeds from the sale was placed into an escrow account. See Note J to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

26

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='26',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

During July 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved additional capital commitments under the Company’s 2007 Capital Program. The Company is forecasting total capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2007, of approximately $800 million, including over $400 million for Supply infrastructure projects, over $300 million for well development and approximately $80 million for Equitable Utilities.

**Financing Activities****

Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $18.1 million for the first six months of 2007 and $316.5 million for the first six months of 2006, a net decrease of $298.4 million in cash flows used in financing activities between years. The decrease in cash flows used in financing activities was primarily due to a $34.0 million decrease in amounts borrowed under short-term loans in the first six months of 2007 compared to a $286.8 million decrease in amounts borrowed under short-term loans in the first six months of 2006. The decrease in short-term borrowings in the first six months of 2006 was greater primarily as the result of significantly decreased requirements for funding margin deposits as previously discussed. The decrease in cash flows used in financing activities was also due to cash received by the Company in the second quarter of 2007 under the demand note agreement with Nora LLC, as described in Note J to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company believes that cash generated from operations, amounts available under its credit facilities and amounts which the Company could obtain in the debt and equity markets given its financial position, are adequate to meet the Company’s reasonably foreseeable operating liquidity requirements. The Company intends to finance the $970 million purchase price for the previously discussed acquisition from Dominion through a combination of equity and debt issuances and a portion of the asset sale proceeds from the PMOG transaction.

*Security Ratings*

The table below reflects the current credit ratings for the outstanding debt instruments of the Company. Changes in credit ratings may affect the Company’s cost of short-term and long-term debt and its access to the credit markets.

Senior — Unsecured Commercial
Rating Service Debt Paper
Moody’s
Investors Service A2 P-1
Standard &
Poor’s Ratings Services A- A-2

In 2006, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services placed the Company’s short and long-term credit ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications and Moody’s Investors Service placed the ratings under review for possible downgrade as a result of the Company’s announcement that it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Peoples and Hope from Dominion. The final ratings outcomes are expected to be determined after the requisite approvals are received and the acquisition financing plan has been reviewed by the ratings agencies.

The Company’s credit ratings may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. The Company cannot ensure that a rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant. If the rating agencies downgrade the Company’s ratings, particularly below investment grade, it may significantly limit the Company’s access to the commercial paper market and borrowing costs would increase. In addition, the Company would likely be required to pay a higher interest rate in future financings, incur increased margin deposit requirements with respect to its hedging instruments and the potential pool of investors and funding sources would decrease.

The Company’s debt instruments and other financial obligations include provisions that, if not complied with, could require early payment, additional collateral support or similar actions. The most important default events include maintaining covenants with respect to maximum leverage ratio, insolvency events, nonpayment of scheduled principal or interest payments, acceleration of other financial obligations and change of control provisions. The Company’s current credit facility’s financial covenants require a total debt-to-total capitalization ratio of no greater than 65%. The calculation of this ratio excludes accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). During an acquisition period, which is defined as the period beginning with the funding of the purchase price for the stock of Peoples and Hope and ending on the first fiscal quarter end at least 365 days after the funding of such purchase

27

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='27',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

price, the covenant is relaxed from 65% to 70%. As of June 30, 2007, the Company is in compliance with all existing debt provisions and covenants.

*Commodity Risk Management*

The Company’s overall objective in its hedging program is to assure a return on capital invested in long-lived assets in excess of the Company’s cost of capital. The Company’s risk management program includes the use of exchange-traded natural gas futures contracts and options and over the counter natural gas swap agreements and options (collectively, derivative commodity instruments) to hedge exposures to fluctuations in natural gas prices and for trading purposes. The preponderance of derivative commodity instruments currently utilized by the Company are fixed price swaps or collars.

During the first six months of 2007, the Company’s hedge position declined with the reduction in reserves that resulted from the closing of the purchase and sale transaction with PMOG previously discussed. The approximate volumes and prices of the Company’s total hedge position for 2007 through 2009 are:

2007** 2008 2009
Swaps
Total Volume
(Bcf) 26 50 37
Average Price
per Mcf (NYMEX)* $ 4.72 $ 4.62 $ 5.91
Collars
Total Volume
(Bcf) 5 10 10
Average Floor Price
per Mcf (NYMEX)* $ 7.61 $ 7.61 $ 7.61
Average Cap
Price per Mcf (NYMEX)* $ 11.27 $ 11.27 $ 11.27
  • The above price is based on a conversion rate of 1.05 MMBtu/Mcf

**July through December

The Company’s current hedged position provides price protection for a substantial portion of expected equity production for the years 2007 through 2009 and a smaller but significant portion of expected equity production for the years 2010 through 2013. The Company’s exposure to a $0.10 change in average NYMEX natural gas price is approximately $0.01 per diluted share for 2007 and ranges from $0.01 to $0.03 per diluted share per year for 2008 and 2009. The Company also engages in a limited number of basis swaps to protect earnings from undue exposure to the risk of geographic disparities in commodity prices.

See Note C to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Company’s hedging activities.

*Commitments and Contingencies*

In the ordinary course of business, various legal claims and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company. While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the Company is unable to predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of such claims and proceedings. The Company has established reserves for pending litigation, which it believes are adequate, and after consultation with counsel and giving appropriate consideration to available insurance, the Company believes that the ultimate outcome of any matter currently pending against the Company will not materially affect the financial position of the Company.

In June 2006, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals issued a decision involving interpretation of certain types of oil and gas leases of an unrelated party, in which a class of royalty owners in the state of West Virginia filed a lawsuit claiming that the defendant in the case underpaid royalties by deducting certain post-production costs not permitted by such types of leases and not paying a fair value for the gas produced from the royalty owners’ leases. In January 2007, the jury in the aforementioned case returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff royalty owners, awarding the plaintiffs significant compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged underpayment of royalties. While the defendant plans to appeal the verdict, this decision may ultimately impact other royalty interest rights in West Virginia. Claims have been brought against others in the oil and gas industry, including the Company. The proceedings against the Company are in the early stages and the plaintiffs have sought class certification. The Company believes that the claims and facts decided in the unrelated lawsuit can be differentiated

28

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='28',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

from those asserted against the Company. Nevertheless, the Company has reviewed its West Virginia royalty agreements and established a reserve it believes to be appropriate.

*Incentive Compensation*

The Company accounts for its share-based payment arrangements in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” (SFAS No. 123R) and accordingly records compensation expense related to share-based awards in its income statement. The Company’s compensation practices focus primarily on the issuance of performance-based units and time-restricted stock awards for which it recognizes compensation expense over the applicable vesting periods. Management and the Board of Directors believe that such an incentive compensation approach more closely aligns management’s incentives with shareholder rewards than is the case with traditional stock options. All stock options granted subsequent to 2003 have comprised options granted for reload rights associated with previously-awarded options. Such reloads immediately vest under the terms of the related stock option award agreements. The Company recorded approximately $0.2 million and $0.7 million of compensation expense related to stock options in the first six months of 2007 and 2006, respectively, primarily related to stock option reloads. All stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2007 are fully vested, and as such, the Company does not anticipate incurring any additional compensation expense related to currently outstanding stock options. Compensation expense associated with reload rights will be recorded in the period in which the reload options are granted.

The Company recorded the following incentive compensation expense for the periods indicated below:

Six Months Ended June 30, — 2007 2006
(Millions)
Short-term
incentive compensation expense $ 7.2 $ 5.9
Long-term
incentive compensation expense 49.5 12.8
Total incentive
compensation expense $ 56.7 $ 18.7

The long-term incentive compensation expenses are primarily associated with the 2005 Executive Performance Incentive Program (“the 2005 Program”). In the first six months of 2007, the Company increased its assumptions for both the payout multiple and ultimate share price at the vesting date (December 31, 2008) based on a review of the Company’s performance relative to its peer group under the 2005 Program as well as the significant appreciation in the Company’s stock price during the period. As a result, the Company recognized an additional $35.7 million of long-term incentive expenses associated with the 2005 Program in the first six months of 2007 and expects to record a greater amount of incentive expense in fiscal year 2007 than previously estimated. The Company currently forecasts fiscal year 2007 total incentive compensation expense of approximately $82 million, including expense of $64 million for the 2005 Program.

*Dividend*

On July 11, 2007, the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of 22 cents per share payable September 1, 2007, to shareholders of record on August 10, 2007.

*Critical Accounting Policies*

The Company’s critical accounting policies are described in the notes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any new accounting policies or updates to existing accounting policies as a result of new accounting pronouncements have been included in the notes to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended June 30, 2007 included in this Form 10-Q. The application of the Company’s critical accounting policies may require management to make judgments and estimates about the amounts reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Management uses historical experience and all available information to make these estimates and judgments, and different amounts could be reported using different assumptions and estimates.

29

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='29',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Derivative Commodity Instruments

The Company’s primary market risk exposure is the volatility of future prices for natural gas, which can affect the operating results of the Company primarily through the Equitable Supply segment and the unregulated marketing group within the Equitable Utilities segment. The Company’s use of derivatives to reduce the effect of this volatility is described in Note C to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and under the caption “Commodity Risk Management” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q. The Company uses non-leveraged derivative commodity instruments that are placed with major financial institutions whose creditworthiness is continually monitored. The Company also enters into energy trading contracts to leverage its assets and limit its exposure to shifts in market prices. The Company’s use of these derivative financial instruments is implemented under a set of policies approved by the Company’s Corporate Risk Committee and Board of Directors.

Commodity Price Risk

The following sensitivity analysis estimates the potential effect on fair value or future earnings from derivative commodity instruments due to a 10% increase and a 10% decrease in commodity prices.

For the derivative commodity instruments used to hedge the Company’s forecasted production, the Company sets policy limits relative to the expected production and sales levels, which are exposed to price risk. The financial instruments currently utilized by the Company include futures contracts, swap agreements and collar agreements, which may require payments to or receipt of payments from counterparties based on the differential between a fixed and variable price for the commodity. The Company also considers options and other contractual agreements in determining its commodity hedging strategy. Management monitors price and production levels on a continuous basis and will make adjustments to quantities hedged as warranted. In general, the Company’s strategy is to hedge production at prices considered to be favorable to the Company. The Company attempts to take advantage of price fluctuations by hedging more aggressively when market prices move above historical averages and by taking more price risk when prices are significantly below these levels. The goal of these actions is to earn a return above the cost of capital and to lower the cost of capital by reducing cash flow volatility. To the extent that the Company has hedged its production at prices below the current market price, the Company is unable to benefit fully from increases in the price of natural gas.

With respect to the derivative commodity instruments held by the Company for purposes other than trading as of June 30, 2007, the Company hedged portions of expected equity production through 2013 by utilizing futures contracts, swap agreements and collar agreements covering approximately 273.7 Bcf of natural gas. See the “Commodity Risk Management” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q for further discussion. A hypothetical decrease of 10% in the market price of natural gas from the June 30, 2007 levels would increase the fair value of non-trading natural gas derivative instruments by approximately $214 million. A hypothetical increase of 10% in the market price of natural gas from the June 30, 2007 levels would decrease the fair value of non-trading natural gas derivative instruments by approximately the same amount.

With respect to the derivative commodity instruments held by the Company for trading purposes as of June 30, 2007, an increase or decrease of 10% in the market price of natural gas from the June 30, 2007 levels would not have a significant impact on the fair value.

The Company determined the change in the fair value of the derivative commodity instruments using a method similar to its normal change in fair value as described in Note 1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company assumed a 10% change in the price of natural gas from its levels at June 30, 2007. The price change was then applied to the derivative commodity instruments recorded on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, resulting in the change in fair value.

30

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='30',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative contracts. This credit exposure is limited to derivative contracts with a positive fair value. The Company believes that NYMEX-traded futures contracts have minimal credit risk because futures exchanges are the counterparties. The Company manages the credit risk of the other derivative contracts by limiting dealings to those counterparties who meet the Company’s criteria for credit and liquidity strength.

31

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='31',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*Item 4. Controls and Procedures*

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”)), was conducted as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the second quarter of 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

32

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='32',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*PART II. OTHER INFORMATION*

*Item 1. Legal Proceedings*

**Federal Trade Commission v. Equitable Resources, Inc. et al, Before Federal Trade Commission****

On March 14, 2007, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an administrative complaint challenging the Company’s proposed acquisition of The Peoples Natural Gas Company from Dominion Resources, Inc. (successor by merger to Consolidated Natural Gas Company) (Dominion). Each of the Company, Dominion and The Peoples Natural Gas Company are named as parties in the complaint.

The complaint charged that the acquisition agreement violates Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45 (which prohibits unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce), and that the acquisition, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18 (which prohibits conduct which substantially lessens competition and/or tends to create a monopoly in a relevant market), and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The relief sought by the FTC in the complaint includes, among other things, (i) an order preventing the Company from acquiring The Peoples Natural Gas Company, (ii) a prohibition against any transaction between the Company and Dominion that combines their operations in the relevant markets except as may be approved by the FTC, and (iii) any other relief appropriate to correct the anticompetitive effects of the transaction or to restore The Peoples Natural Gas Company as a viable, independent competitor in the relevant market. On May 24, 2007, the FTC stayed discovery in this matter until further notice. The Company believes that the FTC’s complaint is without merit and intends to vigorously oppose the FTC’s charges.

**Federal Trade Commission v. Equitable Resources, Inc. et al, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit****

On April 13, 2007, the FTC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Company’s proposed acquisition of The Peoples Natural Gas Company from Dominion. Each of the Company, Dominion and The Peoples Natural Gas Company are named as defendants in the complaint. The relief sought by the FTC in the complaint was an injunction to maintain the status quo during the pendency of the administrative proceeding described above. On May 14, 2007, the District Court dismissed the FTC’s request for a preliminary injunction on the basis that the state action immunity doctrine barred the FTC’s claim. The FTC appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. On June 1, 2007, the Third Circuit issued an order enjoining the transaction pending further order of the Third Circuit. The FTC’s appeal to the Third Circuit is currently in the briefing phase. Pursuant to an amended notice received after the Company's July 26, 2007 earnings call, oral argument, if required by the Third Circuit, is scheduled for the week of October 1, 2007. The Pennsylvania Attorney General has filed an amicus brief arguing that the state action immunity doctrine does not apply, which is contrary to the Company’s position. The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission has filed an amicus brief supporting the Company’s position. The Company believes that the FTC’s complaint is without merit and intends to vigorously oppose the FTC’s position in this case.

**Kay Company, LLC et al v. Equitable Production Company et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia****

On June 13, 2006, eight royalty owners who have entered into leases with Equitable Production Company, a subsidiary of the Company, filed a gas royalty action in the Circuit Court of Roane County, West Virginia. The suit was served on July 31, 2006 and alleges that Equitable Production Company has failed to pay royalties on the fair

value of the gas produced and marketed from the leases and has taken improper post-production deductions from the royalties paid. It seeks class certification, compensatory and punitive damages, an accounting, and other relief based on alleged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and fraudulent concealment. Equitable Production Company removed the suit to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia on August 7, 2006. The plaintiffs have filed an amended complaint naming the Company as an additional defendant.

33

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='33',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

In June 2006, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals issued a decision involving interpretation of certain types of oil and gas leases of an unrelated party, in which a class of royalty owners in the state of West Virginia filed a lawsuit claiming that the defendant in the case underpaid royalties by deducting certain post-production costs not permitted by such types of leases and not paying a fair value for the gas produced from the royalty owners’ leases. In January 2007, the jury in the aforementioned case returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff royalty owners, awarding the plaintiffs significant compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged underpayment of royalties. While the defendant plans to appeal the verdict, this decision may ultimately impact other royalty interest rights in West Virginia. The Company is vigorously defending its case and believes that the claims and facts in the unrelated lawsuit can be differentiated from those asserted against the Company. Nevertheless, the Company has reviewed its West Virginia royalty agreements and established a reserve it believes to be appropriate.

In addition to the claims disclosed above, in the ordinary course of business, various other legal claims and proceedings are pending or threatened against the Company. While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the Company is unable to predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of such claims and proceedings. The Company has established reserves for other pending litigation, which it believes are adequate, and after consultation with counsel and giving appropriate consideration to available insurance, the Company believes that the ultimate outcome of any other matter currently pending against the Company will not materially affect the financial position of the Company.

34

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='34',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*Item 1A. Risk Factors*

Information regarding risk factors is discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K.

*Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds*

The following table sets forth the Company’s repurchases of equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act that occurred in the three months ended June 30, 2007.

Period Total number of shares (or units) purchased (a) Average price paid per share (or unit) Total number of shares (or units) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares (or units) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (b)
April 2007 (April 1 - April 30) 6,042 $ 49.12 — 8,385,400
May 2007 (May 1 - May 31) 2,588 $ 51.75 — 8,385,400
June 2007 (June 1 - June 30) 2,027 $ 49.31 — 8,385,400
Total 10,657 —

(a) Includes 3,455 shares delivered in exchange for the exercise of stock options and restricted share awards to cover award cost and tax withholding and 7,202 shares for Company-directed purchases made by the Company’s 401(k) plans.

(b) Equitable’s Board of Directors previously authorized a share repurchase program with a maximum of 50.0 million shares and no expiration date. The program was initially publicly announced on October 7, 1998 with subsequent amendments announced on November 12, 1999, July 20, 2000, April 15, 2004 and July 13, 2005.

35

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='35',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders*

| a) — b) | The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was
held on April 11, 2007. — Brief description of matters voted
upon: | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | (1) | Elected the named directors to serve a
three-year term expiring 2010 as follows: | | |
| | | Director | Shares Voted For | Shares Withheld |
| | | Vicky A. Bailey | 101,515,737 | 5,056,395 |
| | | Murry S. Gerber | 101,037,137 | 5,534,995 |
| | | George L. Miles,
Jr. | 101,349,741 | 5,222,391 |
| | | James W. Whalen | 101,439,809 | 5,132,323 |
| | | The following Directors’ terms continued after the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders: | | |
| | | until 2008 - Phyllis A. Domm,
Ed.D., David L. Porges, James E. Rohr and David S. Shapira | | |
| | | until 2009 - Thomas A. McConomy , Barbara S. Jeremiah , and Lee T. Todd, Jr., Ph.D. | | |
| | (2) | Ratified appointment of Ernst &
Young, LLP, as independent auditors for the year ended December 31,
2007. Vote was 105,612,088 shares for; 780,982 shares against and
179,062 shares abstained. | | |
| | (3) | Approved the amendment to the Equitable
Resources, Inc. Articles of Incorporation. Vote was 89,726,780 shares
for; 1,647,319 shares against; 378,464 shares abstained and 14,819,569 broker
non-votes. | | |
| | (4) | The shareholder proposal regarding
pay-for-superior performance received less than a majority of the votes
cast. Vote was 79,046,764 shares against; 11,941,586 shares for;
764,211 shares abstained and 14,819,571 broker non-votes. | | |
| Item 6. Exhibits | | | | |
| | 2.01 | Letter agreement dated as of July 3, 2007 by and
between Equitable Resources, Inc. and Dominion Resources, Inc. (as successor
by merger to Consolidated Natural Gas Company) | | |
| | 10.1 | Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of April 13,
2007 by and between Equitable Production Company and Pine Mountain Oil and Gas,
Inc. Schedules (or similar attachments) to the Purchase and Sale
Agreement are not filed. The Company will furnish supplementally a copy
of any omitted schedule to the Commission upon request. | | |
| | 10.2 | Contribution Agreement dated as of April 13, 2007 by
and between Equitable Production Company, Equitable Gathering Equity, LLC,
Pine Mountain Oil and Gas, Inc. and Nora Gathering, LLC. Schedules (or
similar attachments) to the Contribution Agreement are not filed. The
Company will furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the
Commission upon request. | | |
| | 31.1 | Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification of Principal
Executive Officer | | |
| | 31.2 | Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification of Principal
Financial Officer | | |
| | 32 | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer | | |

36

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='36',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

*Signature*

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

| EQUITABLE
RESOURCES, INC. | |
| --- | --- |
| | (Registrant) |
| By: | /s/
PHILIP P. CONTI |
| | Philip
P. Conti |
| | Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

Date: July 26, 2007

37

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='37',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

| Exhibit No. | Document
Description | Incorporated
by Reference |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2.01 | Letter
agreement dated as of July 3, 2007 by and between Equitable Resources, Inc.
and Dominion Resources, Inc. (as successor by merger to Consolidated Natural
Gas Company) | Filed herewith as Exhibit 2.1 |
| 10.1 | Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of April 13,
2007 by and between Equitable Production Company and Pine Mountain Oil and
Gas, Inc. Schedules (or similar attachments) to the Purchase and Sale
Agreement are not filed. The Company will furnish supplementally a copy
of any omitted schedule to the Commission upon request. | Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 16,
2007 |
| 10.2 | Contribution Agreement dated as of April 13, 2007 by
and between Equitable Production Company, Equitable Gathering Equity, LLC,
Pine Mountain Oil and Gas, Inc. and Nora Gathering, LLC. Schedules (or
similar attachments) to the Contribution Agreement are not filed. The
Company will furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the
Commission upon request. | Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on April 16,
2007 |
| 31.1 | Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification
of Principal Executive Officer | Filed herewith as Exhibit 31.1 |
| 31.2 | Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification
of Principal Financial Officer | Filed herewith as Exhibit 31.2 |
| 32 | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Filed herewith as Exhibit 32 |

38

SEQ.=1,FOLIO='38',FILE='C:\JMS\jtam\07-17940-4\task2281430\17940-4-ba.htm',USER='jtam',CD='Jul 26 16:42 2007'