Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

ENERGY TRANSITION MINERALS LTD Investor Presentation 2019

Jul 25, 2019

64879_rns_2019-07-25_3b221fa1-c87f-4772-89b9-c7a9fe2aa5eb.pdf

Investor Presentation

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [197 x 43] intentionally omitted <==

ASX: GGG

July ‐ 2019

Important Notice

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

This presentation contains only a brief overview of Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd (Greenland Minerals) and its respective activities and operations. The contents of this presentation may rely on various assumptions and subjective interpretations which are not possible to detail in this presentation and which have not been subject to any independent verification.

This presentation contains a number of forward looking statements. Known and unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as factors outside of Greenland Minerals’ control, may cause the actual results, performance and achievements of Greenland Minerals to differ materially from those expressed or implied in this presentation.

To the maximum extent permitted by law, Greenland Minerals and its officers, employees and advisers are not liable for any loss or damage (including, without limitation, any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage) suffered by any person directly or indirectly as a result of relying on this presentation or otherwise in connection with it.

The information contained in this presentation is not a substitute for detailed investigation or analysis of any particular issue and has been prepared without consideration of your objectives and needs and financial position. Current and potential investors and shareholders should seek independent advice before making any investment decision in regard to Greenland Minerals or its activates.

JORC Code (2012) Competent Person Statement – Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves

The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Mr Robin Simpson, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Simpson is employed by SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd (“SRK”), and was engaged by Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd on the basis of SRK’s normal professional daily rates. SRK has no beneficial interest in the outcome of the technical assessment being capable of affecting its independence. Mr Simpson has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Robin Simpson consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in the statement that relates to the Ore Reserves Estimate is based on work completed or accepted by Mr Damien Krebs of Greenland Minerals and Energy Ltd and Mr Scott McEwing of SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd.

Damien Krebs is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the type of metallurgy and scale of project under consideration, and to the activity he is undertaking, to qualify as Competent Persons in terms of The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code, 2012 edition). The Competent Persons consent to the inclusion of such information in this report in the form and context in which it appears.

Scott McEwing is a Fellow and Chartered Professional of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity he is undertaking, to qualify as Competent Persons in terms of The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code, 2012 edition). The Competent Persons consent to the inclusion of such information in this report in the form and context in which it appears.

The mineral resource estimate for the Kvanefjeld Project was updated and released in a Company Announcement on February 12[th] , 2015. The ore reserves estimate was released in a Company Announcement on June 3[rd] , 2015. There have been no material changes to the mineral resource estimate, or ore reserves estimate since the release of these announcements.

2

Executive Summary

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Advanced Stage of Development

Globally Significant

Shenghe Resources

==> picture [475 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Largest shareholder
Long‐life, low cost,
>10 years of is a major producer
large output of
sustained research of rare earth
critical minerals:
and development. products and
Progressing toward a
Permitting process supplier to
globally significant
advanced international
integrated producer
customers
----- End of picture text -----

>1 Billion Tonne JORC Resource

Initial 37 year mine life enabling infrastructure development. Year round shipping access

Rare Earth Prices Nd, Pr, Tb and Dy

Regulatory Environmental Framework Outcomes

==> picture [639 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Strong demand Largest projected Implemented by Greenland set to
outlook for magnet output of key rare Greenland & Danish provide critical
metals and limited earth elements, Governments to minerals to facilitate
new supply sets the economics manage project and key global agendas
scene for price strengthened via by‐ export of U by‐ of electrification and
increases products – U, Zn products energy efficiency
----- End of picture text -----

3

Kvanefjeld Project Setting

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [653 x 257] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [653 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

Kvanefjeld is located near existing infrastructure in southern Greenland, with year‐round direct shipping access, airport nearby, and a mild climate; an optimal location

4

Centred on a Multi-Billion Tonne Outcropping Ore Seam

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

The only known bulk occurrence of steenstrupine globally – a unique, non‐ refractory rare earth mineral, that is conducive to simple, low‐ cost processing. Kvanefjeld will be a step change in global rare earth supply

Advanced Project Status

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Kvanefjeld Plateau

==> picture [720 x 100] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

(900m through resource)
Bulk sample material
from adit
----- End of picture text -----

Updated Metallurgical Updated operating Prefeasibility Feasibility Feasibility optimisation guided & capital costs for Study Study Study by Shenghe optimised project 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Pilot Plant Engineering Operations optimisation to minimise civil costs

Vast Mineral Inventory

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

> 11Mt REO, 590Mlb’s U3O8, 2.4Blb’s Zn

==> picture [599 x 385] intentionally omitted <==

Mineral Resource Estimates and Ore Reserve Estimates are independently established by SRK Consulting

7

Kvanefjeld – A Complete Rare Earth Project Nd Pr Dy Tb

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [363 x 392] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [281 x 185] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [49 x 7] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Source: ANSTO
----- End of picture text -----

Rare earth plot highlighting the enrichment across the rare earth spectrum. Kvanefjeld is compared to Mt Weld, and typical bastnasite.

Kvanefjeld’s enrichment across the RE spectrum creates a strong alignment with RE market, through exposure to Nd, Pr, Dy and Tb: a complete RE project.

Demand approximates the current rare earth market by value (volume x current price). Projected output value distribution of select ASX‐listed companies

8

Process Flowsheet

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Ore

Residues

Products

Flotation Tailings (>90% vol)

==> picture [172 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Mine and
Concentrator
----- End of picture text -----

Zinc Concentrate 6060 tpa Fluorspar 12,420 tpa

Uranium Concentrate 1 Mlb’s Refinery Tailings Leach Circuit (<10% vol) Rare Earth Intermediate concentrate

GREENLAND

EX‐GREENLAND REO Intermediate Product Nd‐ 4,300 tpa Pr‐ 1,400tpa Rare Earth Eu‐ 30 tpa Separation Tb‐ 45 tpa Dy‐ 270 tpa

Classification
(JORC 2012)
Inventory
(Mt)
REO
(ppm)
U3O8
(ppm)
Zn
(ppm)
JORC 2012: 1.01 BT through 3 depositscontains
11.13 Mt REO, 593 Mlbs U3O8 , 2.42 Mt zinc
37 Year Mine Reserves at Kvanefjeld Deposit
(~10% of resource base)
Proven 43 14,700 352 2,700
Probable 64 14,000 368 2,500
Total 108 14,300 362 2,600

9

Metallurgical Optimisation

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [131 x 113] intentionally omitted <==

Test work programs conducted in both China and Australia

==> picture [95 x 113] intentionally omitted <==

Flotation improvements generate a higher‐grade, low‐volume RE mineral concentrate

==> picture [94 x 113] intentionally omitted <==

SHENGHE

TEST WORK IMPROVEMENTS

FLOTATION

CIRCUIT

Guided by Shenghe, draws on world‐leading rare earth processing technology

==> picture [136 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

Major improvements developed to both flotation and refinery circuits

==> picture [93 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

Single stage atmospheric leach circuit (refinery circuit)

RESULTS

Improved recoveries, 40% reduction in annual operating costs

Unit costs of <US$4/kg of REO, net of by‐product credits

(lowest of undeveloped REE projects in ASX‐listed companies)

10

Engineering Optimisation

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [720 x 100] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [720 x 99] intentionally omitted <==

A team of leading Follow‐up studies have international engineering resulted in a 44% firms visited Kvanefjeld in reduction in civil August 2018 for construction costs to US collaborative onsite $175M – including surveys/studies indirect costs and contingencies Nuna Logistics, Tetra Tech, PDN Engineers, China‐CCC

Major reductions in civil construction costs accompany cost reductions achieved through metallurgical optimisation to reduce overall capital costs substantially

11

Optimised Feasibility Study

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [102 x 130] intentionally omitted <==

Capital costs reduced to US$505M (inclusive of 15% contingency on direct and indirect costs)

Rare earth production of 32,100t/a REO in intermediate product

Inclusive of 5,692 t NdPr oxide, 270 t Dy oxide, 44t Tb oxide Initial 37 year mine life based on 108 Mt ore reserve Simplest flow sheet of emerging RE projects – low technical riskOwing to natural erosional processes, the area has elevated background levels of rare elements and fluorineLowest operating costs and capital intensity of emerging RE projects Road up the valley will be upgraded and connected to new port facilities are the base of the valley

12

Optimised Project Emphasized Global Significance

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [594 x 399] intentionally omitted <==

Sources – Publicly available information, ASX announcements, Company websites

13

Permitting Strategy and Status

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [720 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Kvanefjeld plateau
----- End of picture text -----

Project Permitting ‐ Underway Since 2015

2016 ‐ detailed reviews of impact assessments

2017 ‐ address recommendations and guidance from government and advisory groups

2018 ‐ Finalise additional data, updated reports, public consultation, establish clear project timeline

Q2 2019 – Updated impact assessments lodged in Greenlandic, Danish and English

Thorough and rigorous approach to impact assessments:

Environmental Impact Assessment

GHD (International), Orbicon (Denmark/Greenland), Arcadis, Danish Hydraulic Institute, Environmental Resource Management, DTU, Blue Water Shipping, Wood Group

Social Impact Assessment

Shared Resources (International), NIRAS (Denmark)

14

Regulatory Framework & Permitting Process

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

IAEA Director General visits Kvanefjeld – May 2017

==> picture [720 x 96] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [720 x 96] intentionally omitted <==

Jakob Rohmann Hard (Chief of Protocol, Foreign Department, Greenland), Liselotte Plesner (Danish Ambassador, Vienna), Nuka Møller (Greenland Business), Jørn Skov Nielsen (Deputy Minister, Industry Trade and Labour, Greenland), Kim Kielsen (Greenland Premier), John Mair (MD, GMEL), Yukiya Amano (Director General, IAEA)

The Governments of Greenland and Enabling legislation passed by both Denmark have worked to establish a respective parliaments to implement regulatory framework to manage the safeguards and export controls in production and export of uranium from accordance with IAEA and EURATOM Greenland

In September 2016, Greenland formalised status as signatory to IAEA conventions

Routine site inspection conducted by IAEA in August 2018, with all in good order

15

Community

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [656 x 94] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [656 x 95] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [620 x 230] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Kvanefjeld Project is Over 10 years of In March 2019 MoU Stakeholder
located in Kommune stakeholder entered with meetings with
Kujalleq (Southern engagement in the municipality and specialist
Greenland local community, local business consultants and
Municipality), including important council to negotiate company
behind the town of input into project a participation representatives
Narsaq ‘Terms of agreement to cover conducted in June,
Reference’, community presentation of
approved in 2015 involvement and impact assessments
capacity to municipality
development
----- End of picture text -----

16

Rare Earth Value Chain Integration – Path to Market

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Working with major shareholder to integrate Kvanefjeld with rare separation capacity and international customer network

Shenghe is one of the largest, and fastest growing rare earth companies globally

Major supplier to international end‐user industries – high purity metals and oxides

Commercial agreement entered into in 2018 addressing off‐take, development strategy

==> picture [333 x 272] intentionally omitted <==

Aiming to jointly develop Kvanefjeld as a new cornerstone to international rare earth supply

==> picture [87 x 80] intentionally omitted <==

Shenghe founder Mr Wang Quangen, and John Mair, October 2017 Shenghe HQ, Chengdu

17

Rare Earth Demand is Linked To Important Global Agendas

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

“China to establish timeline to phase out combustion engine vehicles”

The electrification movement is underway. Rare earth permanent magnets create electric motors with greater torque, efficiency and range

“UK, France to ban petrol and diesel vehicles by 2040...”

==> picture [720 x 148] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

“New electric London
“Every Jaguar Land Rover model taxi launches...”
line will be electrified from 2020”
“Volkswagen plans to leapfrog
Tesla in electric car race…”
“India aiming for all‐electric car fleet by 2030...”
Sources – UBS, IEA, IRENA, Manufacturer announcements and websites,
----- End of picture text -----

Clean Energy Initiatives Driving Major RE Demand Growth

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Wind turbines use between 400 and 500kgs of Permanent Magnets per MW

==> picture [720 x 148] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [720 x 147] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

“China to Add GigaWatt‐Level Offshore
Wind Capacity Annually Starting In 2018…”
“In 2016, the UK generated more
electricity from wind than coal…”
“~200kg of Rare Earth Oxide
(150kg Nd, 35kg Pr, 15kg Dy) per
“Europe’s Growth in Offshore Wind
MW of Installed Capacity…”
Must Triple to Achieve Paris Goals…”
Sources ‐ ADAMAS, IEA, IRENA, Wind energy association’s websites
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Rare earths are critical to An opportunity for Successful development the global agenda of Greenland to participate of Kvanefjeld will see slowing climate change through the provision of Greenland become a through the roll out of critical materials, with major contributor to electric cars, renewable jobs, growth and global rare earth supply energy and energy economic benefit to efficient technologies Greenland society 20

Corporate Snapshot

==> picture [309 x 184] intentionally omitted <==

Board Board
Non‐Executive Chairman Tony Ho
Managing Director Dr John Mair
Non‐Executive Director Simon Cato
Non‐Executive Director Xiaolei Guo
Top Shareholders
Shenghe Resources Holdings 125M shares
Tracor Limited 53M shares
Non‐Executive Director Xiaolei Guo
Top Shareholders
Shenghe Resources Holdings 125M shares
Tracor Limited 53M shares

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

CURRENT INVESTORS LOCATION

==> picture [280 x 181] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

International
Shareholder Base
----- End of picture text -----

Capital Structure
Shares outstanding 1133M
Market capitalization A$158M(@14 cents)

Kvanefjeld Project Ownership ‐ 100%

21

Kvanefjeld Project Overview

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [720 x 120] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

North Atlantic Ocean
KVANEFJELD
TASEQ BASIN
(mine area)
NARSAQ VALLEY
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [31 x 276] intentionally omitted <==

1 billion tonne multi‐element resource, largest REO inventory under JORC code Initial 37 year mine life, scope for significant extension, expansion Close to existing infrastructure with year round shipping access Simple configuration and processing, low technical risk Globally significant supplier of Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb , with U, Zn by‐product credits Highly competitive economic metrics – long life, lowest cost quartile production Major shareholder is a fully‐integrated RE producer with international focus

22

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix

23

Kvanefjeld Project – Location and Access

==> picture [427 x 102] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [427 x 102] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [427 x 102] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

The Kvanefjeld Project area is favourably located in southern Greenland

Narsarsuaq international airport is located 35km away, 4h 50m flight from Copenhagen

Project area features year‐round direct shipping access, via deep water fjords that lead directly to the North Atlantic Ocean

Climatically – mildest part of Greenland with average temperate ranging from ‐2 to +10°c

Narsaq town, located approximately 8‐10km from project area

24

Narsaq Peninsula – Southern Greenland

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [672 x 301] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Narsarssuaq airport:
45 minutes by ferry
to Narsaq
----- End of picture text -----

Rocks of the Illimaussaq Complex are strongly enriched in rare elements and have been actively dispersed into the surrounding environment by erosional processes, thereby strongly influencing the natural (baseline) chemistry.

Taseq Basin is underlain by impermeable crystalline rocks (naujaite), and owing to the influence of the unusual rock chemistry, contained water is naturally enriched in a range of elements, is non‐ potable, and is devoid of life.

The footprint of proposed operations is largely restricted to the Kvanefjeld plateau, Narsaq valley, and Taseq basin.

25

Kvanefjeld Project – Geology – Geography

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [637 x 294] intentionally omitted <==

26

Kvanefjeld Project – Key Infrastructure

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [690 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [690 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [690 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [690 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [690 x 68] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [690 x 67] intentionally omitted <==

27

Process Advantage – the Seismic Shift

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [31 x 75] intentionally omitted <==

Viability of a rare earth project is more dependant on metallurgical performance than grade

REE’s occur locked within minerals

The RE minerals in most deposits are highly refractory (vault like), and difficult to crack

In contrast, the unique minerals at Kvanefjeld are non‐refractory

This allows simpler processing, leading to lower production costs

==> picture [279 x 192] intentionally omitted <==

Photomicrograph – steenstrupine grain surrounded by amphibole and feldspar in lujavrite ore

Steenstrupine is the main RE mineral at Kvanefjeld, and contains ~25 ‐30% REO

It is enriched across all key rare earths including Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb

Can be effectively concentrated with conventional froth flotation (multiple successful pilot plant operations)

Both REE’s and U can be readily leached in acidic solutions under atmospheric conditions (pilot plant proven)

Detailed mineralogical studies conducted through MDRU, University of British Columbia

28

Statement of Identified Mineral Resources (JORC – Code Compliant 2012)

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Contained Metal Contained Metal
Cut‐off Classification M tonnes TREO2 U3O8 LREO HREO REO Y2O3 Zn TREO HREO Y2O3 U3O8 Zn
(U3O8 ppm)1 Mt ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm Mt Mt Mt M lbs Mt
Kvanefjeld ‐ February 2015
150 Measured 143 12,100 303 10,700 432 11,100 978 2,370 1.72 0.06 0.14 95 0.34
150 Indicated 308 11,100 253 9,800 411 10,200 899 2,290 3.42 0.13 0.28 172 0.71
150 Inferred 222 10,000 205 8,800 365 9,200 793 2,180 2.22 0.08 0.18 100 0.48
150 Grand Total 673 10,900 248 9,600 400 10,000 881 2,270 7.34 0.27 0.59 368 1.53
200 Measured 111 12,900 341 11,400 454 11,800 1,048 2,460 1.43 0.05 0.12 83 0.27
200 Indicated 172 12,300 318 10,900 416 11,300 970 2,510 2.11 0.07 0.17 120 0.43
200 Inferred 86 10,900 256 9,700 339 10,000 804 2,500 0.94 0.03 0.07 49 0.22
200 Grand Total 368 12,100 310 10,700 409 11,200 955 2,490 4.46 0.15 0.35 252 0.92
250 Measured 93 13,300 363 11,800 474 12,200 1,105 2,480 1.24 0.04 0.10 75 0.23
250 Indicated 134 12,800 345 11,300 437 11,700 1,027 2,520 1.72 0.06 0.14 102 0.34
250 Inferred 34 12,000 306 10,800 356 11,100 869 2,650 0.41 0.01 0.03 23 0.09
250 Grand Total 261 12,900 346 11,400 440 11,800 1,034 2,520 3.37 0.11 0.27 199 0.66
300 Measured 78 13,700 379 12,000 493 12,500 1,153 2,500 1.07 0.04 0.09 65 0.20
300 Indicated 100 13,300 368 11,700 465 12,200 1,095 2,540 1.34 0.05 0.11 82 0.26
300 Inferred 15 13,200 353 11,800 391 12,200 955 2,620 0.20 0.01 0.01 12 0.04
300 Grand Total 194 13,400 371 11,900 471 12,300 1,107 2,530 2.60 0.09 0.21 159 0.49
350 Measured 54 14,100 403 12,400 518 12,900 1,219 2,550 0.76 0.03 0.07 48 0.14
350 Indicated 63 13,900 394 12,200 505 12,700 1,191 2,580 0.87 0.03 0.07 54 0.16
350 Inferred 6 13,900 392 12,500 424 12,900 1,037 2,650 0.09 0.00 0.01 6 0.02
350 Grand Total 122 14,000 398 12,300 506 12,800 1,195 2,570 1.71 0.06 0.15 107 0.31

Independently Prepared by SRK Consulting

29

Statement of Identified Mineral Resources (JORC – Code Compliant 2012)

==> picture [116 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Multi‐Element Resources Classification, Tonnage and Grade Contained Metal Contained Metal
Cut‐off Classification M tonnes TREO2 U3O8 LREO HREO REO Y2O3 Zn TREO HREO Y2O3 U3O8 Zn
(U3O8 ppm)1 Mt ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm Mt Mt Mt M lbs Mt
Sørensen ‐ March 2012
150 Inferred 242 11,000 304 9,700 398 10,100 895 2,602 2.67 0.10 0.22 162 0.63
200 Inferred 186 11,600 344 10,200 399 10,600 932 2,802 2.15 0.07 0.17 141 0.52
250 Inferred 148 11,800 375 10,500 407 10,900 961 2,932 1.75 0.06 0.14 123 0.43
300 Inferred 119 12,100 400 10,700 414 11,100 983 3,023 1.44 0.05 0.12 105 0.36
350 Inferred 92 12,400 422 11,000 422 11,400 1,004 3,080 1.14 0.04 0.09 85 0.28
Zone 3 ‐ May 2012
150 Inferred 95 11,600 300 10,200 396 10,600 971 2,768 1.11 0.04 0.09 63 0.26
200 Inferred 89 11,700 310 10,300 400 10,700 989 2,806 1.03 0.04 0.09 60 0.25
250 Inferred 71 11,900 330 10,500 410 10,900 1,026 2,902 0.84 0.03 0.07 51 0.20
300 Inferred 47 12,400 358 10,900 433 11,300 1,087 3,008 0.58 0.02 0.05 37 0.14
350 Inferred 24 13,000 392 11,400 471 11,900 1,184 3,043 0.31 0.01 0.03 21 0.07
Project Total
150 Measured 143 12,100 303 10,700 432 11,100 978 2,370 1.72 0.06 0.14 95 0.34
150 Indicated 308 11,100 253 9,800 411 10,200 899 2,290 3.42 0.13 0.28 172 0.71
150 Inferred 559 10,700 264 9,400 384 9,800 867 2,463 6.00 0.22 0.49 326 1.38
150 Grand Total 1010 11,000 266 9,700 399 10,100 893 2,397 11.14 0.40 0.90 593 2.42

1 There is greater coverage of assays for uranium than other elements owing to historic spectral assays. U3O8 has therefore been used to define the cutoff grades to maximise the confidence in the resource calculations.

2Total Rare Earth Oxide (TREO) refers to the rare earth elements in the lanthanide series plus yttrium.

Note: Figures quoted may not sum due to rounding.

Independently Prepared by SRK Consulting

30