Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

EMERALD RESOURCES NL Capital/Financing Update 2024

Jan 23, 2024

64849_rns_2024-01-23_a667c18b-4596-4f4c-8951-0439143c13aa.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX Announcement & Media Release

24 January 2024

Fast Facts

ASX Code: EMR Shares on issue: 625,291,978 Market Cap: ~A$1.99 billion Cash: A$115.6m (US$79.0m) (31 Dec 2023) Bullion: A$22.2m (US$15.2m) (31 Dec 2023)

==> picture [195 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Significant Gold Exploration Results Continue at Bullseye and Okvau Gold Mine

Highlights

North Laverton Gold Project, Western Australia (Bullseye Mining Limited (EMR ~78.05%))

Board & Management

Jay Hughes, Non-Executive Chairman Morgan Hart, Managing Director Mick Evans, Executive Director Simon Lee AO, Non-Executive Director Ross Stanley, Non-Executive Director Billie Slott, Non-Executive Director Michael Bowen, Non-Executive Director Mark Clements, Non-Executive Director and Company Secretary Bernie Cleary, Operations Manager Shannon Campbell, Chief Financial Officer

Company Highlights Team

  • Highly credentialed gold project operational and in-house development team;

  • A proven history of building projects on time and on budget.

Gold Production

  • Okvau Gold Mine commissioned on time on budget in 2021;

  • Forecast +100,000oz gold production for 2024 at AISC US$780-US$850/oz;

Growth

  • Significant exploration and resource growth potential in Cambodia: o Okvau Gold Mine reserve expansion; o Memot Project maiden resource: 8Mt @ 1.84g/t for 470koz

  • 1,428km[2] of prospective tenure

  • Significant exploration and resource growth potential in Australia (Bullseye Mining Limited (~78.05%):

o North Laverton Gold Project located on the underexplored Dingo Range greenstone belt;

  • Resource and reserve expected early 2024;

  • 1,200km[2] of prospective tenure.

ESG

  • Focussed on a net positive impact on near-mine environmental and social values by targeting strict compliance with corporate governance, international guidelines (IFC PS’s) and local laws by engaging and collaborating with all stakeholders;

  • Commitment to carbon neutral operations in Cambodia.

Significant gold mineralisation from Bullseye’s resource exploration program on the Boundary and Neptune Prospects continues to deliver significant results:

  • 3.26m @ 111.79g/t Au from 214.74m including 0.86m @ 422g/t Au from 214.74m (DDRE-BDRC017);

  • 16.6m @ 5.27g/t Au from 202m including 0.4m @ 179g/t Au from 218.2m (RCDD23BDY102);

  • 3m @ 19.09g/t Au from 121m (RC23BDY121);

  • 6m @ 7.96g/t Au from 259m (RC23BDY121); and

  • 4m @ 11.72g/t Au from 162m (RC23BDY100).

The current program follows the previously completed high-grade intersections which include:

  • 5m @ 60.25g/t Au from 171m (WDDH8) – Boundary Prospect;

  • 45m @ 6.07g/t Au from 73m (BDRC058) – Boundary Prospect;

  • 27m @ 9.34g/t Au from 153m (BDRC035) – Boundary Prospect;

  • 53m @ 3.44g/t Au from 66m (WRC17) (EOH) – Boundary Prospect;

  • 22m @ 4.87g/t Au from 17m (NPRD0056) – Neptune Prospect;

  • 26m @ 6.95g/t Au from 40m (NPRD0039) – Neptune Prospect;

  • 16m @ 10.10g/t Au from 63m (NPRD0026) – Neptune Prospect; and

  • 9m @ 9.44g/t Au from 82m (NPRD0078) – Neptune Prospect.

The above results will be integrated into Emerald’s (as manager) maiden resource estimation for the North Laverton Gold Project expected in early 2024.

Okvau Gold Mine (EMR 100%)

Ongoing underground and extensional drilling at the Okvau Gold Mine continues to deliver significant gold mineralisation:

  • 19m @ 5.32g/t Au from 379m including 2m @ 14.03g/t Au from 391m (RCDD23OKV496);

  • 13m @ 7.00g/t Au from 343m including 2m @ 33.11g/t Au from 343m (RCDD23OKV496);

  • 7m @ 6.87g/t Au from 483m including 1m @ 27g/t Au from 485m (RCDD23OKV496); and

  • 4m @ 11.83g/t Au from 278m including 1m @ 37.5g/t Au from 278m (RCDD23OKV503).

Maiden Memot Gold Project (EMR 100%)

  • Maiden Memot Gold Project Open Pit Inferred Resource of 8Mt @ 1.84g/t Au for 470koz announced 21 December 2023; and

  • Emerald to ramp up Stage 2 drilling activities (50,000m) in February 2024.

Registered Office 1110 Hay Street West Perth WA 6005

T: +61 8 9286 6300 F: +61 8 6243 0032 W: www.emeraldresources.com.au

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

North Laverton Gold Project Resource Drill Program (Bullseye Mining Limited (EMR: ~78.05%))

Bullseye’s North Laverton Gold Project consists of 36 exploration licences (including 5 applications) and 4 mining licences covering the majority of the Dingo Range greenstone belt with more than 800km² of tenure (refer Figure 1) and has the potential to host multiple standalone deposits or satellite deposits to supply additional ore to a central milling location. It includes the gold mineralised prospects of Boundary, Neptune, Stirling, Hurleys and Bungarra extending over a 6.4km strike length.

Figure 1 | North Laverton Tenement Map with the prospect locations

==> picture [531 x 388] intentionally omitted <==

Drilling results to date (current and historical) continue to demonstrate the continuity of mineralisation at depth and along strike. The company still expects to generate an updated resource in early 2024, with subsequent reserve estimation to support a decision to commence development activities later in the same year (2024).

Two RC percussion drill rigs and one Diamond drill rig are currently engaged on site, continuing resource drilling activities and investigating along strike extensions, as well as drilling other regional targets.

In the December 2023 quarter, the Company completed 110 collars (16,994m) of both RC (14,013m) and Diamond core drilling (2,981m). To date 591 collars (75,664m) of the 98,000m resource definition program has been completed, of which 388 collars (60,099m) has been drilled since Emerald acquired a controlling interest in Bullseye. Assays for circa 1,400m of drilling remain pending.

Recently returned results from the current RC and diamond drilling program for the Boundary Project include:

  • 3.26m @ 111.79g/t Au from 214.74m including 0.86m @ 422.00g/t Au from 214.74m (DDRE-BDRC017)[(6)]

  • 16.6m @ 5.27g/t Au from 202m including 0.4m @ 179.00g/t Au from 218.2m (RCDD23BDY102)[(6)] ;

  • 3m @ 19.09g/t Au from 121m (RC23BDY121)[(6)] ;

  • 6m @ 7.96g/t Au from 259m (RC23BDY121)[(6)] ; and

  • 4m @ 11.72g/t Au from 162m (RC23BDY100)[(6)]

Page 2 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

29 April 2022 Drilling completed under Emerald management to date, has focussed on the Boundary and Neptune prospects of the Boundary-Bungarra mineralised trend (refer Figure 2) with highlighted significant results including:

  • 15m @ 5.91g/t Au from 291m (RCDD23BDY022)[(4)] ;

  • 9m @ 7.35g/t Au from 59m including 1m @ 58.27g/t Au from 61m and 1m @ 16.02g/t Au from 73m (RC22NPT027)[(2)] ;

  • 38m @ 1.65g/t Au from 56m including 1m @ 16.60g/t Au from 92m (RC22BDY009)[(2)] ;

  • 12m @ 4.94g/t Au from 62m including 1m @ 9.07g/t Au from 69m and 1m @ 42.90g/t Au from 72m (RC22NPT003)[(1)] ;

  • 43m @ 1.17g/t Au from 253m (RC23BDY065)[(4)] ;

  • 7.08m @ 6.91g/t Au from 329m (RCDD22BDY001)[(4)] ;

  • 8.88m @ 5.06g/t Au from 313.12m (RCDD23BDY059)[(4)] ;

  • 15m @ 2.48g/t Au from 108m including 1m @ 7.39g/t Au from 116m and 2m @ 7.79g/t Au from 118m (RC22NPT004)[(1)] ;

  • 13m @ 2.54g/t Au from 76m including 1m @ 19.30g/t Au from 81m (RC22BDY001)[(1)] ;

  • 14m @ 2.37g/t Au from 115m including 4m @ 4.63g/t Au from 117m (RC22NPT020)[(2)] ;

  • 5m @ 6.33g/t Au from 100m including 2m @ 14.70g/t Au from 100m (RC22BDY016)[(2)] ;

  • 14m @ 1.98g/t Au from 49m (RC23BDY029)[(3)] ;

  • 4m @ 7.12g/t Au from 22m including 1m @ 25.97g/t Au from 25m (RC23BDY047)[(3)] ;

  • 15m @ 1.13g/t Au from 76m (RC23BDY051)[(3)] ;

  • 5m @ 3.23g/t Au from 54m including 1m @ 14.34g/t Au from 58m (RC23BDY031)[(3)] ; and

  • 3m @ 5.13g/t Au from 352m including 1m @ 13.30g/t Au from 354m (RCDD23BDY041)[(3)] .

  • 24m @ 3.04g/t Au from 64m (RC23BDY069)[(5)] ;

  • 20m @ 3.68g/t Au from 244m including 2m @ 23.27g/t Au from 252m (RC23BDY081)[(5)] ;

  • 19m @ 2.45g/t Au from 72m (RC23STI012)[(5)] ;

  • 8m @ 3.44g/t Au from 202m (RC23BGA013)[(5)] ;

  • 10m @ 3.94g/t Au from 142m (RC23NPT054)[(5)] ; and

  • 17m @ 2.13g/t Au from 35m (RCDD23HUR001)[(5)] .

Notes:

(1) Refer ASX announcement 7 October 2022; (2) Refer ASX announcement 21 January 2023; (3) Refer ASX announcement 28 April 2023; (4) Refer ASX announcement 4 July 2023; (5) Refer ASX announcement 30 October 2023; (6) Refer Appendix One; *Visible Gold was recorded (refer Figure 2).

Figure 2 | Visible gold from RCDD23BDY102 at 218.4m

==> picture [246 x 234] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [271 x 233] intentionally omitted <==

Results from drilling to date continue to delineate mineralised high-grade structures. Historical drilling had only tested to ~110m vertical depth (average) with the drilling completed by the Company to date infilling and extending a significant portion of the mineralisation at Boundary and Neptune Prospects to ~200-250m vertical. The mineralisation remains open at depth and along strike throughout a significant portion of the five prospects (refer Figures 3, 4, and 5).

Page 3 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

29 April 2022 Figure 3 | Boundary and Neptune Drill collars with recent (in black – refer Appendix One) and previously announced (in blue) significant results (Plan view)

==> picture [523 x 363] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4 | Section A Cross section from the northern edge of the Boundary prospect showing high-grade zones of continuous mineralisation which remains untested in adjacent sections and at depth. All highlighted significant intersections refer Appendix One

==> picture [255 x 244] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5 | Section B Cross section in the central zone of the Boundary prospect showing wide, high-grade zones of continuous mineralisation within the granodiorite which is untested at depth. RCDD23BDY102 significant intersection refer Appendix One, others refer to ASX announcement 7 October 2022

==> picture [263 x 246] intentionally omitted <==

Page 4 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

North Laverton Project Historic Significant Intersections (Bullseye Mining Limited (EMR: ~78.05%))

Bullseye’s current resource drill program is designed to test the strike and down dip extension of historic significant intersections. These previous drill programs include 84,028m (80,684m RC and 3,344m diamond) completed by Bullseye since 2014 and 45,583m of drilling completed by various previous tenement holders (34,695m RC, 4,587m diamond, 432m AC and 5,869m RAB), (refer Figure 5). Drill results highlights from both programs include:

Boundary[(1)] :

  • 5m @ 60.25g/t Au from 171m (WDDH8);

  • 45m @ 6.07g/t Au from 73m (BDRC058);

  • 27m @ 9.34g/t Au from 153m (BDRC035);

  • 53m @ 3.44g/t Au from 66m (WRC17) (EOH);

  • 47m @ 3.42g/t Au from 93m (BDRD0025);

Stirling[(1)] :

  • 26m @ 5.83g/t Au from 33m (STRD0016);

  • 38m @ 2.62g/t Au from 16m (SRC7);

  • 31m @ 2.75g/t Au from 35m (STRD0008);

  • 27m @ 2.30g/t Au from 59m (STRD0007);27m @ 2.25g/t Au from 31m (STRD0019).

  • 30m @ 5.16g/t Au from 151m (WDDH10);

  • 19m @ 7.89g/t Au from 58m (BRC1002);

  • 8m @ 17.14g/t Au from 38m (BDRC060);

  • 40m @ 3.17g/t Au from 55m (BDRD0022);

  • 27m @ 4.53g/t Au from 62m (BDRC014);

  • 9m @13.55g/t Au from 42m (WDDH1);

  • 30m @ 3.82g/t Au from 179m (BDRD0043);

Hurleys[(1)] :

  • 12m @ 3.30g/t Au from 13m (HRRD0020);

  • 12m @ 2.77g/t Au from 47m (HRRD0050);3m @ 9.00g/t Au from 62m (HRRD0062);9m @2.27g/t Au from 64m (HRRD0032).

  • 9m @ 12.55g/t Au from 42m (WRC23);

  • 27m @ 4.07g/t Au from 62m (BDRD0094).

Neptune[(2)] :

  • 22m @ 4.87g/t Au from 17m (NPRD0056);

  • 9m @ 9.44g/t Au from 82m (NPRD0078);

  • 33m @ 3.82g/t Au from 37m (NPMD1019);15m @ 6.60g/t Au from 67m (NPMD1007);

  • 3m @ 29.85g/t Au from 45m (NPMD1026);

  • 25m @ 5.24g/t Au from 0m (NPGC0053);

  • 40m @ 2.98g/t Au from 14m (NPGC0025);

  • 6m @ 14.24g/t Au from 37m (NPGC0018);

  • 9m @ 9.36g/t Au from 7m (NPGC0045).

Neptune[(3)] :

Bungarra[(1)] :

  - **14m @ 31.46g/t Au from 33m (LAVRD0126);**

  - **19m @ 13.41g/t Au from 32m (DRP495);**

  - **17m @ 13.28g/t Au from 49m (LAVRD0132);**

  - **3m @ 67.37g/t Au from 30m (BFRC15);**  **5m @ 39.41g/t Au from 31m (LAVRD0133);**  **9m @ 17.02g/t Au from 33m (BFRC13);**  **6m @ 23.26g/t Au from 89m (LAVRD0054);**  **9m @ 15.45g/t Au from 39m (LAVRD0142);**  **14m @ 9.74g/t Au from 30m (LAVGW0003);**  **9m @ 14.58g/t Au from 75m (LAVRD0054);**  **6m @ 19.28g/t Au from 53m (LAVRD0135).**
  • 26m @ 6.95g/t Au from 40m (NPRD0039);

  • 16m @ 10.10g/t Au from 63m (NPRD0026);

  • 17m @ 7.44g/t Au from 29m (NPRD0007).

  • (1) Refer ASX announcement 7 October 2022; (2) Refer ASX announcement 5 July 2022; (3) Refer ASX announcement 31 January 2023

Figure 6 | Plan view of Bullseye prospects targeted by the current resource drill program

==> picture [363 x 249] intentionally omitted <==

Page 5 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Exploration Activities – Cambodian Gold Projects

Emerald’s exploration tenements, which comprise of a combination of five (5) 100% owned granted licences, and a further three (3) subject to joint venture agreements (with EMR earning majority ownership), cover a combined area of 1,428km² in Cambodia.

Figure 7 | Cambodian Gold Project | Exploration Licence Areas

==> picture [534 x 314] intentionally omitted <==

Okvau Gold Mine (EMR 100%)

In August 2023, the Company released an Okvau Gold Mine resource update which included a maiden underground resource.

Since the update, Emerald has continued to progress an exploration drill program, focusing on infilling and extending the currently open pit and maiden underground resource mineralisation proximally within and beyond the reserve pit shell. This drilling included an additional 37 holes, 22 of which were shallow RC for 3,669m and 15 of which were 3,362.2m of RC PreCollar and 6,406.5m of diamond core tails (refer Figures 8,10 and 11). Significant results received include:

  • 19m @ 5.32g/t Au from 379m including 2m @ 14.03g/t Au from 391m (RCDD23OKV496);

  • 13m @ 7.00g/t Au from 343m including 2m @ 33.11g/t Au from 343m (RCDD23OKV496);

  • 7m @ 6.87g/t Au from 483m including 1m @ 27.00g/t Au from 485m (RCDD23OKV496);

  • 4m @ 11.83g/t Au from 278m including 1m @ 37.50g/t Au from 278m (RCDD23OKV503);

  • 4m @ 9.82g/t Au from 250m (RCDD23OKV497);

  • 1m @ 38.30g/t Au from 340m (RCDD23OKV506);

  • 7m @ 5.11g/t Au from 366m (RCDD23OKV496);

  • 2m @ 17.80g/t Au from 273m (RCDD23OKV502); and

  • 4m @ 6.26g/t Au from 55m (RC23OKV515).

The mineralisation is associated with massive sulphide pyrrhotite, arsenopyrite and pyrite stack vein sets hosted in both diorite and hornfels sedimentary lithologies.

The significant intercepts listed above are either outside the existing resource and likely to extend the known mineralisation or upgrade the classification of inferred material, enhancing our confidence in the existing resource (refer Figure 10 and 11).

Page 6 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

29 April 2022 In addition to the at depth extensional drilling reported above, the Company has also commenced a program of near surface extensional drilling in the northern extent of the existing reserve pit. The close-spaced drilling has returned the following significant results that are interpreted as the up-dip extension of the significant intercept 4m @ 6.26g/t Au from 55m in RC23OKV515 (see Appendix Three). This new zone of mineralisation is being assessed in a local redesign and expansion of the current pit. Intersections from this drill program include (see Appendix Three);

  • 5m @ 23.5g/t Au from 15m (145_825_036);

  • 7m @ 8.98g/t Au from 11m (145_745_008);

  • 7m @ 7.76g/t Au from 16m (145_745_007);

  • 9m @ 3.53g/t Au from 7m (145_825_027);

  • 1m @ 21.24g/t Au from 27m (145_745_007);

  • 2m @ 10.54g/t Au from 24m (145_835_015); and

  • 5m @ 3.90g/t Au from 7m (145_815_025).

Figure 8 | Completed collars of the current Okvau Resource Drill program, plan view

==> picture [542 x 375] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 9 | Photo of the core from RCDD23OKV496 – 343.5m. The mineralisation in the photos is primarily associated massive arsenopyrite vein, with pyrrhotite, pyrite and some minor chalcopyrite. The metre interval averaged 59.70 g/t Au

==> picture [541 x 86] intentionally omitted <==

Page 7 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

29 April 2022 Figure 10 | Okvau Underground cross section highlighting five significant results in this announcement are either outside the current underground resource calculation, or located in close proximity to inferred classified mineralisation (Refer Appendix Three)

==> picture [490 x 331] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 11 | Okvau cross section of both near surface extensional resource drilling and exploration drilling under the Stage 7 reserve pit. The significant results in this announcement are outside the current Open Pit resource calculation. For holes beginning with 145 or RC23; see Appendix Three. For all other holes refer to announcement 2 July 2019. Assays above 0.5g/t Au shown

==> picture [492 x 339] intentionally omitted <==

Page 8 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Antrong Joint Venture (EMR earning up to 80%)

The Company has previously announced a significant gold-in-soil anomaly on the Kang Roland North prospect in the Antrong North Exploration licence (refer ASX announcement 30 October 2023). The interpreted 2.5km by 1.5km +50ppb goldin-soil contour is associated with aeromagnetic geophysical targets, high-grade rock chip results (50.30, 41.00, 32.30, 22.10,16.45 and 15.35g/t Au) and peak shallow soil results of 842, 788, 611, 513, 434, 359 ppb Au (refer Figure 12).

Figure 12 | Antrong North (Kang Roland North prospect) shallow soil and rock chip results completed by Emerald

==> picture [475 x 330] intentionally omitted <==

Following on from the shallow soil program on the Antrong North Exploration Licence, the Company has continued the Auger soils geochemical sampling, collecting 4,641 samples on the Antrong South Licence (Antrong and O’Thmey Prospects) (refer Figure 14). 5,424 Auger samples have been collected since the program began in 2023, with 880 results pending. Results received to date include 86 samples over 50ppb Au including 2720, 2680, 895, 675, 534, 493 and 427 ppb Au. The results have identified several significant +10ppb Au anomalies over both prospects. Fourteen gold-in-soil anomalies have been interpreted on the Antrong prospect including three at over 1.0 x 0.4km in size and a larger 1.7 x 0.6km anomaly on the O’Thmey prospect (refer Figures 12 and 13).

The initial program commenced in April 2023 and was designed on various grid spacings from 400m x 100m down to 200m x 100m. The current program has infilled down to 50 x 50m grid spacing on the areas with anomalous results. The program was planned to cover an interpreted diorite intrusive associated with aeromagnetic geophysical targets, historic and recently sampled high-grade rock chip (155.50g/t[(1)] , 146.50g/t[(1)] , 120.00g/t[(2)] , 78.0g/t[(1)] , 76.10g/t[(2)] , 64.90g/t[(1)] , 47.80g/t[(1)] , 46.10g/t[(1)] Au) and significant drill hole results[(2) ] such as:

  • 5.7m @ 5.06g/t Au from 30.5m (OTSDD002);

  • 3m @ 6.91g/t Au from 25.2m (OTSDD001);

  • 2m @ 4.16g/t Au from 42m (OTMDD002);

  • 3.1m @ 6.23g/t Au from 20m (ANTDD001);

  • 6m @ 0.57g/t Au from 21m (OTMDD015); and

  • 1m @ 2.1g/t Au from 36m (OTSDD003).

  • (1) Refer ASX announcement 30 October 2023

  • (2) Refer ASX announcement 19 October 2022

The Company intends to commence ground geophysics programs across the announced significant anomalies on both the Antrong North (refer ASX announcement 30 October 2023) and Antrong South in early 2024, with reconnaissance drilling expected before the end of the year.

Page 9 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

29 April 2022 Figure 13 | Antrong North and South Licence with historical data including significant rock chips and drill results

==> picture [500 x 344] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 14 | Antrong South Licence (Antrong and O’Thmey prospects) with recent auger soil results and interpreted soil contours

==> picture [503 x 352] intentionally omitted <==

Page 10 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

29 April 2022 For further information please contact Emerald Resources NL

Morgan Hart Managing Director

About Emerald Resources NL

Overview

Emerald is a developer and explorer of gold projects. In particular, Emerald has been focused on the development and commissioning of its most advanced project, the Okvau Gold Mine in Cambodia which saw first production in June 2021. Since commercial production commenced in September 2021, Emerald has now poured over 8,000kgs of gold doré from its operations.

Emerald also holds a number of other projects in Cambodia which are made up of a combination of granted mining licences (100% owned by Emerald) and interests joint venture agreements. Together, Emerald’s interest in its Cambodian Projects covers a combined area of 1,428km².

Emerald has a controlling interest in Bullseye Mining Limited (~78.05%), an unlisted Australian public company with three Western Australian gold projects totalling in excess of 1,200km² of highly prospective gold tenure including the North Laverton Gold Project which covers in excess of 800km² of the entire Dingo Range greenstone belt.

Table 1 | Okvau Mineral Resource Estimate (refer to announcement 31 August 2023)

Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Resource Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Resource Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Resource Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Resource Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Resource Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Resource Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Resource Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Resource Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Resource Estimate
Measured Resources(i) Indicated Resources(ii) Inferred Resources(ii) Total Resources
Resource Tonnage Grade Contained Tonnage Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained
Au (Koz)
Tonnage
(Mt)
Grade
(g/t
Au)
Contained
Au (Koz)
Tonnage Grade Contained Au
(oz)
Type (t) (g/t
Au)
Au (oz) (t) (t) (g/t Au)
Open Pit 2,810,000 0.89 80,000 8,360,000 2.24 601,000 70,000 1.71 4,000 11,240,000 1.90 685,000
Underground - - - 600,000 6.20 120,000 910,000 6.35 185,000 1,510,000 6.29 305,000
Total 2,810,000 0.89 80,000 8,960,000 2.50 721,000 980,000 6.01 189,000 12,750,000 2.42 990,000
  • tonnage is rounded to the nearest 10,000t, grade is rounded to the second decimal pint and ounces are rounded to the nearest 1,000oz

Table 2 | Okvau Ore Reserve Estimate (refer to announcement 31 August 2023)

Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Reserve Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Reserve Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Reserve Estimate Okvau Gold Project - March 2023 Global Reserve Estimate
Resource Tonnage Grade Contained Au (oz)
Type (t) (g/t Au)
Proven 2,810,000 0.89 80,000
Probable 9,140,000 2.10 618,000
Total 11,950,000 1.82 698,000

*tonnage is rounded to the nearest 10,000t, grade is rounded to the second decimal pint and ounces are rounded to the nearest 1,000oz

Table 3 | Maiden Memot Gold Project Open Pit Resource Estimate (refer to announcement 21 December 2023)

Au Lower
Cut off
Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate Memot Gold Project Resource Estimate
Measured Resources
Indicated Resources
Inferred Resources
*Total Resources
Tonnage
Grade
Contained
Au
Tonnage
Grade
Contained
Au
Tonnage
Grade
Contained
Au
Tonnage
Grade
Contained
Au
(t)
(g/t
Au)
(oz)
(t)
(g/t Au)
(oz)
(t)
(g/t Au)
(oz)
(t)
(g/t Au)
(oz)
0.9 - - - - - - 8,000,000 1.84 470,000 8,000,000 1.84 470,000

*tonnage is rounded to the nearest 100Kt, grade is rounded to the second decimal point and ounces are rounded to the nearest 10,000oz

Page 11 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

29 April 2022

Forward Looking Statement

This document contains certain forward looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on the Company’s current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry in which Emerald Resources operates, and beliefs and assumptions regarding the Company’s future performance. Words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”’ “estimates”, “potential” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the control of the Company, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward looking statements, which reflect the view of Emerald Resources only as of the date of this announcement. The forward looking statements made in this release relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. Emerald Resources will not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions or updates to these forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances or unanticipated events occurring after the date of this announcement except as required by law or by any appropriate regulatory authority. This document has been prepared in compliance with the current JORC Code 2012 Edition and the ASX listing Rules.

The Company believes that is has a reasonable basis for making the forward-looking statements in this announcement, including with respect to any production targets and financial estimates, based on the information contained in this announcement. Reference is made to ASX Announcements dated 1 May 2017 and 26 November 2019. All material assumptions underpinning the production target, or the forecast financial information continue to apply and have not materially changed. 100% of the production target referred to in this announcement is based on Probable Ore Reserves.

Emerald has a highly experienced management team, undoubtedly one of the best credentialed gold development teams in Australia with a proven history of developing projects successfully, quickly and cost effectively. They are a team of highly competent mining engineers and geologists who have overseen the successful development of gold projects in developing countries such as the Bonikro Gold Project in Cote d’Ivoire for Equigold NL and more recently, Regis Resources Ltd.

Competent Persons Statements

The information in this report that relates to Exploration and Drill Results from Bullseye Recent Drilling (Appendix One) and Cambodian Recent Drilling (Appendix Three) is based on information compiled by Mr Keith King, who is an employee to the Company and who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy. Mr Keith King has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposits under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Keith King has reviewed the contents of this release and consents to the inclusion in this announcement of all technical statements based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Mr King has reviewed the contents of this news release and consents to the inclusion in this announcement of all technical statements based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

No New Information

To the extent that announcement contains references to prior exploration results and Mineral Resource estimates, which have been cross referenced to previous market announcements made by the Company, unless explicitly stated, no new material information is contained. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the relevant market announcements and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.

Page 12 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix One | New Drill Results from Recent Drilling at Bungarra, Stirling, Hurleys, Neptune and Boundary Prospects (Bullseye) (>2 gram metre)

Prospect Hole Name Easting Northing RL Azi Dip End
Depth
(m)
From
(m)
To
(m)
Interval
(m)
Gold
g/t
Boundary DDRE-BDRC017 345,247 6,972,013 493 -61 268 327 214.74 218 3.3 111.79
including 345,247 6,972,013 493 -61 268 327 214.74 215.6 0.9 422.00
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 202 218.6 16.6 5.27
including 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 218.2 218.6 0.4 179.00
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 121 124 3.0 19.09
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 259 265 6.0 7.96
Boundary RC23BDY100 345,338 6,971,991 494 -60 273 300 162 166 4.0 11.72
Stirling RC23STI022 345,846 6,970,676 507 -61 227 97 40 65 25.0 1.87
including 345,846 6,970,676 507 -61 227 97 58 59 1.0 16.09
Boundary RCDD23BDY069 345,283 6,971,860 494 -61 272 280 78 107 29.0 1.56
including 345,283 6,971,860 494 -61 272 280 85.5 86.2 0.7 24.53
Boundary RC23BDY108 345,372 6,972,047 496 -63 266 300 271 289 18.0 2.43
including 345,372 6,972,047 496 -63 266 300 279 280 1.0 24.20
Neptune DDRE-NPRD0061 345,250 6,971,234 499 -60 220 219 108.52 146 37.5 1.04
Boundary RCDD23BDY069 345,283 6,971,860 494 -61 272 280 177.45 178.55 1.1 33.98
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 84 88 4.0 9.21
Boundary RC23BDY103 345,270 6,971,965 494 -61 265 122 57 64 7.0 4.94
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 202 212 10.0 3.37
Boundary RC23BDY100 345,338 6,971,991 494 -60 273 300 231 235 4.0 7.55
Boundary DDRE-BDRC002 345,314 6,971,943 494 -61 268 353 308.3 309.65 1.4 21.71
Boundary DDRE-BDRC047 345,261 6,972,040 493 -61 267 301 247 255 8.0 3.38
Boundary RC23BDY104 345,408 6,972,003 496 -60 266 300 213 214 1.0 25.10
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 281 281.38 0.4 62.60
Boundary RC23BDY104 345,408 6,972,003 496 -60 266 300 115 128 13.0 1.74
Boundary RCDD23BDY087 345,408 6,971,852 495 -61 270 351 76 90 14.0 1.57
Boundary RC23BDY088 345,363 6,971,797 495 -60 273 300 71 79 8.0 2.55
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 241 251 10.0 1.98
Boundary RC23BDY108 345,372 6,972,047 496 -63 266 300 245 263 18.0 1.07
Boundary DDRE-BDRC047 345,261 6,972,040 493 -61 267 301 277 286.42 9.4 2.03
Stirling RC23STI030 345,884 6,970,686 506 -59 226 114 92 94 2.0 9.38
Boundary RC23BDY103 345,270 6,971,965 494 -61 265 122 111 116 5.0 3.44
Boundary DDRE-BDRC061 345,295 6,971,941 494 -61 268 311 274.5 277.55 3.1 5.56
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 135 146 11.0 1.54
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 214 234 20.0 0.82
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 284 287 3.0 5.36
Boundary RC23BDY077 345,248 6,971,437 498 -61 267 198 53 69 16.0 0.89
Boundary RC23BDY100 345,338 6,971,991 494 -60 273 300 275 276 1.0 14.20
Boundary DDRE-BDRC002 345,314 6,971,943 494 -61 268 353 218.4 218.7 0.3 46.90
Boundary RC23BDY086 345,491 6,971,909 497 -55 273 240 208 219 11.0 1.27
Boundary RCDD23BDY066 345,357 6,972,096 497 -59 269 443 313 321.6 8.6 1.57
Neptune RCDD23NPT055 345,416 6,971,292 501 -61 230 242 174.05 186 11.9 1.10
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 234 244 10.0 1.23
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 326.85 333.6 6.8 1.82
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 130 132 2.0 6.12
Stirling RC23STI033 345,866 6,970,728 506 -60 230 162 111 117 6.0 2.01
Boundary RC23BDY104 345,408 6,972,003 496 -60 266 300 189 197 8.0 1.50
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 115 127 12.0 0.97
Boundary RCDD23BDY066 345,357 6,972,096 497 -59 269 443 326 332 6.0 1.72
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 231.4 234.4 3.0 3.41
Boundary DDRE-DRC17 345,258 6,971,890 494 -61 268 354 91 104 13.0 0.74
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 92 96 4.0 2.38
Boundary RC23BDY104 345,408 6,972,003 496 -60 266 300 86 91 5.0 1.88
Boundary RC23BDY117 345,226 6,971,969 494 -60 267 216 72 73 1.0 9.37
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 186.1 192 5.9 1.57
Boundary RC23BDY119 345,254 6,971,948 494 -61 273 192 30 32 2.0 4.60
Boundary RC23BDY088 345,363 6,971,797 495 -60 273 300 160 161 1.0 9.06
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 368.05 382 13.9 0.64
Neptune RC23NPT098 345,330 6,971,219 500 -61 226 186 38 46 8.0 1.09
Boundary RC23BDY089 345,437 6,971,797 496 -60 262 288 227 228 1.0 8.45
Stirling RC23STI030 345,884 6,970,686 506 -59 226 114 71 76 5.0 1.66
Boundary DDRE-BDRC061 345,295 6,971,941 494 -61 268 311 237.05 239.75 2.7 2.99
Boundary RC23BDY108 345,372 6,972,047 496 -63 266 300 0 4 4.0 2.00
Boundary DDRE-BDRC002 345,314 6,971,943 494 -61 268 353 193.7 198 4.3 1.86
Boundary DDRE-BDRC061 345,295 6,971,941 494 -61 268 311 211 212 1.0 7.98
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 260 266.16 6.2 1.28
Neptune RCDD23NPT057 345,461 6,971,313 502 -61 226 246 213 217 4.0 1.91
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 44 48 4.0 1.90
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 262 268 6.0 1.25
Neptune RC23NPT099 345,556 6,971,125 507 -61 229 133 29 36 7.0 1.03
Boundary DDRE-BDRC002 345,314 6,971,943 494 -61 268 353 337 344 7.0 1.00
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 217 218 1.0 6.93
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 72 80 8.0 0.86
Neptune RC23NPT103 345,533 6,971,202 504 -60 226 258 108 111 3.0 2.18
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 162 165 3.0 2.12
Boundary RC23BDY086 345,491 6,971,909 497 -55 273 240 199 201 2.0 3.18
Boundary RC23BDY093 345,204 6,972,042 493 -60 263 181 29 30 1.0 6.25
Boundary RC23BDY086 345,491 6,971,909 497 -55 273 240 59 63 4.0 1.55
Neptune RCDD23NPT063 345,511 6,971,289 502 -61 228 278 228 229 1.0 6.05
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 154 164.3 10.3 0.58
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 98 104 6.0 0.99
Neptune RCDD23NPT073 345,362 6,971,417 500 -60 227 309 243 246 3.0 1.96
Boundary RC23BDY098 345,188 6,972,085 493 -60 261 270 132 138 6.0 0.96
Boundary DDRE-BDRC002 345,314 6,971,943 494 -61 268 353 251 261 10.0 0.57
Boundary RC23BDY083 345,309 6,971,899 494 -70 260 90 45 46 1.0 5.56
Boundary RC23BDY117 345,226 6,971,969 494 -60 267 216 177 185 8.0 0.69
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 409 419.05 10.1 0.54
Boundary RCDD23BDY087 345,408 6,971,852 495 -61 270 351 251 252 1.0 5.37
Boundary RC23BDY083 345,309 6,971,899 494 -70 260 90 77 81 4.0 1.34
Neptune RC23NPT098 345,330 6,971,219 500 -61 226 186 79 80 1.0 5.33
Boundary DDRE-BDRC061 345,295 6,971,941 494 -61 268 311 219 224 5.0 1.06
Boundary RCDD23BDY066 345,357 6,972,096 497 -59 269 443 379 382 3.0 1.76
Boundary RC23BDY093 345,204 6,972,042 493 -60 263 181 154 155 1.0 5.26
Boundary RC23BDY115 345,246 6,972,067 493 -60 269 264 245 246 1.0 5.22
ASX Announcement&
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement&
Release
29 April 2022
Media

Boundary

RC23BDY083
345,309 6,971,899 494 -70 260 90 62 70 8.0 0.64
Boundary RCDD23BDY087 345,408 6,971,852 495 -61 270 351 318 319.15 1.2 4.27
Neptune RC23NPT101 345,451 6,971,267 502 -60 226 252 150 154 4.0 1.22
Boundary RC23BDY103 345,270 6,971,965 494 -61 265 122 105 106 1.0 4.88
Neptune RC22NPT018 345,412 6,971,230 501 -60 223 160 131 136 5.0 0.96
Boundary RC23BDY116 345,139 6,972,184 492 -61 226 121 44 49 5.0 0.94
Boundary DDRE-BDRC002 345,314 6,971,943 494 -61 268 353 280.7 281 0.3 15.50
Boundary RC23BDY088 345,363 6,971,797 495 -60 273 300 244 248 4.0 1.13
Neptune RC23NPT103 345,533 6,971,202 504 -60 226 258 118 120 2.0 2.26
Boundary RC23BDY104 345,408 6,972,003 496 -60 266 300 148 153 5.0 0.90
Boundary DDRE-BDRC002 345,314 6,971,943 494 -61 268 353 240 246 6.0 0.74
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 168.7 174 5.3 0.83
Boundary RC23BDY113 345,222 6,972,061 493 -60 265 288 166 168 2.0 2.18
Boundary RC23BDY088 345,363 6,971,797 495 -60 273 300 220 222 2.0 2.15
Neptune RC23NPT102 345,589 6,971,228 505 -61 224 204 104 110 6.0 0.71
Neptune RCDD23NPT077 345,275 6,971,408 498 -60 227 276 157 163.2 6.2 0.67
Bungarra RCDD23BGA015 348,546 6,968,375 502 -60 272 295 206 209 3.0 1.33
Boundary RCDD23BDY087 345,408 6,971,852 495 -61 270 351 230 236 6.0 0.64
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 174 179 5.0 0.74
Stirling RC23STI018 345,932 6,970,648 507 -60 228 85 40 43 3.0 1.23
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 350.05 354 4.0 0.93
Boundary DDRE-BDRC061 345,295 6,971,941 494 -61 268 311 184 185 1.0 3.67
Boundary RC23BDY088 345,363 6,971,797 495 -60 273 300 182 189 7.0 0.52
Neptune RCDD23NPT055 345,416 6,971,292 501 -61 230 242 192 193 1.0 3.46
Boundary RCDD23BDY069 345,283 6,971,860 494 -61 272 280 169 171 2.0 1.70
Boundary RCDD23BDY087 345,408 6,971,852 495 -61 270 351 297 302 5.0 0.64
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 400.9 403 2.1 1.52
Boundary RCDD23BDY069 345,283 6,971,860 494 -61 272 280 206 207 1.0 3.20
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 249.3 253 3.7 0.86
Boundary RC23BDY077 345,248 6,971,437 498 -61 267 198 37 41 4.0 0.80
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 286 288 2.0 1.52
Boundary DDRE-BDRC002 345,314 6,971,943 494 -61 268 353 316 318 2.0 1.52
Boundary RC23BDY104 345,408 6,972,003 496 -60 266 300 134 136 2.0 1.51
Boundary RC23BDY121 345,283 6,971,977 494 -61 265 300 277 278 1.0 2.93
Boundary RCDD23BDY087 345,408 6,971,852 495 -61 270 351 132 133 1.0 2.92
Boundary RCDD23BDY094 345,522 6,971,936 498 -61 265 360 296 297 1.0 2.91
Boundary RC23BDY111 345,193 6,972,060 493 -60 264 258 37 38 1.0 2.89
Boundary RC23BDY119 345,254 6,971,948 494 -61 273 192 127 130 3.0 0.95
Boundary RC23BDY116 345,139 6,972,184 492 -61 226 121 57 58 1.0 2.84
Boundary RC23BDY100 345,338 6,971,991 494 -60 273 300 144 148 4.0 0.71
Neptune RC23NPT099 345,556 6,971,125 507 -61 229 133 69 72 3.0 0.94
Neptune DDRE-NPRD0061 345,250 6,971,234 499 -60 220 219 174.81 176 1.2 2.35
Boundary DDRE-BDRC061 345,295 6,971,941 494 -61 268 311 205.45 205.8 0.4 7.94
Boundary RC23BDY100 345,338 6,971,991 494 -60 273 300 262 263 1.0 2.75
Boundary RC23BDY119 345,254 6,971,948 494 -61 273 192 106 108 2.0 1.36
Boundary RC23BDY100 345,338 6,971,991 494 -60 273 300 174 179 5.0 0.54
Neptune RC23NPT103 345,533 6,971,202 504 -60 226 258 153 158 5.0 0.53
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 428 433 5.0 0.52
Boundary RC23BDY100 345,338 6,971,991 494 -60 273 300 242 243 1.0 2.59
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 224 225.55 1.6 1.67
Stirling RC23STI031 345,765 6,970,782 505 -61 228 72 32 35 3.0 0.84
Stirling RC23STI022 345,846 6,970,676 507 -61 227 97 16 18 2.0 1.24
Boundary RCDD23BDY094 345,522 6,971,936 498 -61 265 360 272 274 2.0 1.22
Boundary RC23BDY098 345,188 6,972,085 493 -60 261 270 157 159 2.0 1.22
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 306.05 306.5 0.5 5.39
Stirling RC23STI027 345,630 6,970,851 505 -60 230 102 60 61 1.0 2.36
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 315.1 317 1.9 1.23
Boundary RC23BDY097 345,158 6,972,086 492 -60 263 151 90 92 2.0 1.13
Boundary RC23BDY108 345,372 6,972,047 496 -63 266 300 231 233 2.0 1.10
Boundary DDRE-BDRC036 345,379 6,971,949 494 -60 268 435 391 392 1.0 2.18
Stirling RC23STI017 345,832 6,970,765 505 -61 229 181 133 135 2.0 1.08
Neptune RC23NPT098 345,330 6,971,219 500 -61 226 186 59 60 1.0 2.07
Bungarra RCDD23BGA015 348,546 6,968,375 502 -60 272 295 188 189 1.0 1.98
Boundary RCDD23BDY066 345,357 6,972,096 497 -59 269 443 442 442.5 0.5 3.92
Boundary DDRE-BDRC017 345,247 6,972,013 493 -61 268 327 255 257.88 2.9 0.68
Boundary RC23BDY086 345,491 6,971,909 497 -55 273 240 163 164 1.0 1.84
Neptune RCDD22NPT027 345,233 6,971,293 499 -60 223 226 159 160 1.0 1.73
Boundary RC23BDY100 345,338 6,971,991 494 -60 273 300 132 133 1.0 1.73
Boundary RCDD23BDY066 345,357 6,972,096 497 -59 269 443 338.95 340 1.1 1.63
Boundary RC23BDY104 345,408 6,972,003 496 -60 266 300 236 237 1.0 1.68
Neptune RC23NPT099 345,556 6,971,125 507 -61 229 133 59 60 1.0 1.66
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 273 274 1.0 1.66
Boundary RCDD23BDY102 345,323 6,971,894 494 -67 273 359 239.1 240.75 1.7 1.00
Boundary RC22BDY018 345,312 6,972,093 495 -59 270 300 285 287 2.0 0.81
Boundary RC23BDY119 345,254 6,971,948 494 -61 273 192 169 170 1.0 1.61
Neptune RC23NPT103 345,533 6,971,202 504 -60 226 258 96 99 3.0 0.51
Boundary RC23BDY097 345,158 6,972,086 492 -60 263 151 50 53 3.0 0.50
Neptune RC22NPT008 345,442 6,971,219 502 -60 225 222 178 180 2.0 0.75
Neptune RC23NPT098 345,330 6,971,219 500 -61 226 186 176 178 2.0 0.75

Appendix Two | JORC Code, 2012 Edition | ‘Table 1’ Report

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data from Recent Drilling at Bungarra, Stirling, Hurleys, Neptune and Boundary Prospects (Bullseye)

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections).

Page 14 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Criteria
JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,
random chips, or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as limiting the
broad meaning of sampling.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure
sample
representivity
and
the
appropriate
calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that
are Material to the Public Report.

In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been
done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples
from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30g
charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more
explanation may be required, such as where there
is coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation
types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.


Standards are inserted at regular intervals in
sample batches to test laboratory performance.

All Bullseye reverse circulation (RC) drilling is used
to collect both a 4m composite and 1m samples
in the precollar. The 4m composite are determined
based on areas of known very low or background
mineralisation or geological assessment at the rig.
The 4m program composites are taken from the
excess bagged material off the cone splitter taken
every 1m. A spear sampling technique is then
used to produce a 3-5kg composite sample. The
1m samples are split with a cone splitter at the drill
rig to produce a 3-5kg sub-sample. These 1m
samples are submitted after the results of the 4m
composites are received to identify the zones of
mineralisation.

Diamond core was sampled using half-core where
the core is cut in half down the longitudinal axis
and sample intervals were determined by the
geologist based on lithological contacts, with
most of the sample intervals being 1 metre in
length. In areas of no mineralised (negligible
amounts of alteration/sulphides typically present
with mineralisation) a 2m composite was
submitted.

The Bullseye drill program used SGS Laboratories,
Kalgoorlie and Bureau Veritas Kalgoorlie for RC
and Diamond samples:

SGS – samples crushed and milled to <75µm and
assayed using fire assay (50g) with additional AAS.

Bureau Veritas – samples crushed and milled to
<75µm (90% pass) and assayed using fire assay
(40g) with additional AAS.
Drilling
techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc)
and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or
other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).


A Schramm 685 drill rig with a 5.5-inch hammer
and a Schramm 450 with a 5.375-inch hammer is
used for RC drilling.

5 3/8 hole were used to drill the RC holes. A
UDR1000 rig is used to drill NQ2 Diamond Core.

All Bullseye holes were downhole surveyed using
a gyroscopic survey tool (a REFLEX GYRO SPRINT-
IQ™). A typical downhole survey was taken at 10m
depth to the end of hole. All readings showed that
down hole deviations were within acceptable
limits.
Drill sample
recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip
sample recoveries and results assessed.

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and
ensure representative nature of the samples.

Whether a relationship exists between sample
recovery and grade and whether sample bias may
have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.

RC drill sample recovery averaged better than
99%.
Logging
Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a level
of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature.
Core
(or
costean,
channel,
etc)
photography.

The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.

All RC chips and diamond core is routinely logged
(qualitatively) by a geologist, to record details of
regolith
(oxidation),
lithology,
structure,
mineralization and/or veining, and alteration. All
logging and sampling data are captured into a
database, with appropriate validation and security
features.

Page 15 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter,
half or all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness
of
the
sample
preparation
technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-
sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in-situ material collected,
including
for
instance
results
for
field
duplicate/second-half sampling.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain
size of the material being sampled.

Most samples are dry and there is no likelihood of
compromised results due to moisture.

This sample technique is industry standard and is
deemed appropriate for the material.

All RC samples were put through a fixed cone
splitter at 1m intervals with the sample reduced to
between a 2kg to 5kg sample.

The drilling used SGS Laboratories, Kalgoorlie and
Bureau Veritas, Kalgoorlie for RC samples: SGS–
samples are dried at 105° Celsius, crushed and
milled to 85% passing -75µm. Assay was 50g fire
assay with AAS finish for gold. Bureau Veritas–
samples are dried at 105° Celsius, crushed and
milled to 90% passing -75µm. Assay was 40g fire
assay with AAS finish for gold.
Quality of assay
data and
laboratory tests


The nature, quality and appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or
total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometres, handheld
XRF instruments, etc, the parametres used in
determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy
(ie lack of bias) and precision have been
established.

All samples are sent to the accredited SGS
Laboratories, Kalgoorlie 50g fire assay with AAS
finish for gold or the accredited Bureau Veritas
laboratory in Kalgoorlie for 40g fire assay with AAS
finish for gold. These methods have a lower
detection limit of 0.01ppm gold.

Industry-standard QAQC protocols are routinely
followed for all sample batches sent for assay,
which includes the insertion of commercially
available pulp CRMs at rate of 1 for every 20 field
samples and pulp blanks at a rate of 1 for every 50
field samples. Field duplicates were collected at
the rig, directly from the cyclone at a rate of one
in every 50 samples for the entire program.

QAQC data are routinely checked before any
associated
assay
results
are
reviewed
for
interpretation.

All assay data, including internal and external
QA/QC data and control charts of standard,
replicate
and
duplicate
assay
results,
are
communicated electronically.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying

The verification of significant intersections by
either
independent
or
alternative
company
personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures,
data
verification,
data
storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.


All field data associated with sampling, and all
associated assay and analytical results, are
archived in a relational database, with industry-
standard verification protocols in place.

The calculations of all significant intercepts (for
drill holes) are routinely checked by senior
management.

Data verification and validation procedures
undertaken included checks on collar position
against design and site survey collar pick-ups by
Licenced on site surveyors. Hole depths were
cross-checked in the geology logs, down hole
surveys, sample sheets and assay reports to ensure
consistency. All down hole surveys were exposed
to rigorous QAQC and drill traces were plotted in
3D for validation and assessment of global
deviation trends.

Page 16 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Location of data
points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill
holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches,
mine workings and other locations used in Mineral
Resource estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

The grid system used is MGA_94. The creation of
the topographic surface is based on a site survey
pick-up in March 2014 by GEMS (Glockner
Engineering
and
Mining
Services,
licenced
Australian surveyors) and again in July 2014,
August 2015 and August 2017 of all drill holes and
surface contour points in GDA_94.

Collars drilled prior to 20 December 2023 have
been picked up using Trimble RTK DGPS by Insight
UAS authorised surveyors. Drillholes drilled after
20 December 2023 have been picked up using a
hand GPS. These collars will be picked up using
DGPS in future survey campaigns. It is the
intention to use a licenced surveyor with DGPS
equipment to pick up relevant collars prior to any
resource calculation.

All Bullseye drill holes were downhole surveyed
using a gyroscopic survey tool (a REFLEX GYRO
SPRINT-IQ™) and are routinely undertaken at ~5m
intervals for the drilling.
Data spacing and
distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological and
grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)
and classifications applied.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.


This drill spacing is considered to be sufficient to
establish
geological
and
grade
continuity
appropriate for the declaration of estimates of
resources.

The drill program adopted a standard sample
length of 1.0m.
Orientation of
data in relation to
geological
structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiased sampling of possible structures and the
extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation
and the orientation of key mineralised structures is
considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed and reported if material.

Drill holes are usually designed to intersect target
structures with a “close-to-orthogonal” intercept.

Most of the drill holes intersect the mineralised
zones at sufficient angle for the risk of significant
sampling orientation bias to be low.
Sample security
The measures taken to ensure sample security.

All RC samples were sampled as single 1m calico
samples, each with a unique sample number.
These calicos were collected from the drill sites in
allotments of 1 tonne bulka bags. These bulka
bags were loaded by Bullseye field staff and
delivered to SGS Kalgoorlie or Bureau Veritas by
road transport supplied by the relevant laboratory.
Zones of waste a sampled as a composite sample
using the spear sampling technique. If the
composite returns an anomalous value, the
individual 1m samples (collected and stored at the
time of drilling) are submitted for analysis.
Audits or reviews
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling
techniques and data.


All QAQC data are reviewed routinely, batch by
batch, and on a quarterly basis to conduct trend
analyses, etc. Any issues arising are dealt with
immediately and problems resolved before results
are interpreted and/or reported.

Keith King completed his most recent site visit and
lab audit of both the SGS Kalgoorlie and Bureau
Veritas Kalgoorlie laboratories in September
2023.

Page 17 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results from Bungarra, Stirling, Hurleys, Neptune and Boundary Prospects

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)

Criteria Explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status

Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material issues
with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.


The Bullseye Gold Prospects are 100% held by
Bullseye Mining Limited (EMR~78.05%). The tenure
is considered to be secure.
Exploration
done
by other parties


Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by
other parties.

Historical drilling was conducted between 1989 –
2005 by companies Julia Mines NL, Eagle Mining
NL, Deep Yellow NL and Korab Resources Ltd.
Geology
Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.

Geology comprises a basalt country rock and BIF.
The Neptune and Boundary prospects are
associated with an approximately 45 degree
plunging mineralised lode (or sheets) that have
formed in association with the basalt/BIF contact, a
large antiform structure and a large cross cutting
structure. Gold Mineralisation is as shallow as a few
metres below surface, extends to some 100m
below surface and is open at depth.

The weathering profile displays a surface laterite,
followed
by
clay/saprolite
weathering
predominately in association with the weathered
basalt.
Saprock
is
encountered
earlier
in
association with weathered BIF. Global fresh rock is
encountered from 70m down hole, but weathering
is not well advanced at Neptune and hard saprock
and fresh rock are encountered in more shallow
horizons.
Drill
hole
Information

A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results including
a tabulation of the following information for all
Material drill holes:
-
easting and northing of the drill hole collar;
-
elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar;
-
dip and azimuth of the hole;
-
down hole length and interception depth;
-
hole length.
If the exclusion of this information is justified on
the basis that the information is not Material and
this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent
Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

Details of significant drilling results are shown in
Appendix One.
Data aggregation
methods


In
reporting
Exploration
Results,
weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum
grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be
stated.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of
low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be shown
in detail.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.

No high grade top cuts have been applied.

The reported significant intersections in Appendix
One are above 2 gram metre intersections and
allow for up to 4m of internal dilution with a lower
cut trigger values of greater than 0.5g/t.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths
and
intercept lengths


These relationships are particularly important in
the reporting of Exploration Results.

If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect
to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should
be reported.

If it is not known and only the down hole lengths
are reported, there should be a clear statement to

All reported intersections are down hole lengths.
True widths are unknown and vary depending on
the orientation of target structures.

Page 18 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Criteria
Explanation Commentary
this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not
known’).
Diagrams
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being reported These
should include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.

Appropriate maps and sections are included in the
body of this release.
Balanced reporting
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration
Results is not practicable, representative reporting
of both low and high grades and/or widths should
be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.

All significant drilling results being intersections
with a minimum 2 gram metre values are reported
in Appendix One.
Other substantive
exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material,
should be reported including (but not limited to):
geological
observations;
geophysical
survey
results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples –
size and method of treatment; metallurgical test
results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.

Surface geological mapping and detailed structural
interpretation have helped inform the geological
models.
Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work (eg
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible
extensions,
including
the
main
geological
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided
this information is not commercially sensitive.

Additional drilling programs are being planned
across all exploration licences.

Page 19 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix Three | New Significant Intercepts Okvau RC/DD Drill Programs (>2 gram metre)

Project Name Hole Name Easting
IND60
Northing
IND60
RL Azi Dip End
Depth
From To Interval Gold
g/t
Silver Copper Lead Zinc
(m) (m) (m) (m) (g/t) (g/t) ppm ppm ppm
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV496 694,502 1,396,436 135 315 -59 770 379 398 19 5.32 0.40 582 6 34
including 391 393 2 14.03 1.60 2,763 11 53
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV496 694,502 1,396,436 135 315 -59 770 343 356 13 7.00 0.29 131 3 26
including 343 345 2 33.11 1.35 433 7 20
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV496 694,502 1,396,436 135 315 -59 770 483 490 7 6.87 0.46 355 6 24
including 485 486 1 27.00 0.80 152 8 17
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV503 694,591 1,396,524 141 311 -72 336 278 282 4 11.83 0.58 158 9 32
including 278 279 1 37.50 1.40 288 12 24
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV497 694,550 1,396,497 135 310 -68 650 250 254 4 9.82 1.95 212 36 39
including 251 253 2 17.15 2.85 243 43 36
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV506 694,361 1,396,581 40 309 -75 592 340 341 1 38.30 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV496 694,502 1,396,436 135 315 -59 770 366 373 7 5.11 0.16 147 4 30
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV502 694,564 1,396,585 126 312 -76 339 273 275 2 17.80 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV495 694,393 1,396,469 135 320 -69 396 306 313 7 3.64 0.24 270 4 34
Okvau UG DD23OKV500 694,551 1,396,564 128 314 -69 336 177 183 6 2.80 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV493 694,475 1,396,422 140 306 -72 558 360 363 3 4.84 0.33 324 5 42
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV496 694,502 1,396,436 135 315 -59 770 439 454 15 1.00 0.21 66 5 36
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV503 694,591 1,396,524 141 311 -72 336 288 293 5 2.66 0.69 178 21 37
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV504 694,606 1,396,543 141 311 -72 500 308 318 10 1.16 0.20 35 8 26
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV502 694,564 1,396,585 126 312 -76 339 234 238 4 2.17 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV502 694,564 1,396,585 126 312 -76 339 254 263 9 0.95 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG DD23OKV500 694,551 1,396,564 128 314 -69 336 214 215 1 8.03 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG DD23OKV500 694,551 1,396,564 128 314 -69 336 203 207 4 1.85 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV504 694,606 1,396,543 141 311 -72 500 429 436 7 1.04 3.16 1,493 52 53
Okvau UG DD23OKV500 694,551 1,396,564 128 314 -69 336 265 271 6 0.97 0.38 694 4 35
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV495 694,393 1,396,469 135 320 -69 396 326 327 1 5.53 0.70 35 16 27
Okvau UG DD23OKV500 694,551 1,396,564 128 314 -69 336 126 127 1 4.58 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV496 694,502 1,396,436 135 315 -59 770 273 279 6 0.73 0.75 88 34 55
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV498 694,574 1,396,611 125 313 -67 345 219 220 1 4.39 2.50 36 93 65
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV498 694,574 1,396,611 125 313 -67 345 227 230 3 1.23 0.23 214 6 28
Okvau UG DD23OKV500 694,551 1,396,564 128 314 -69 336 151 155 4 0.70 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG DD23OKV500 694,551 1,396,564 128 314 -69 336 161 163 2 1.27 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV493 694,475 1,396,422 140 306 -72 558 504 505 1 2.71 1.80 271 24 54
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV496 694,502 1,396,436 135 315 -59 770 259 260 1 2.65 0.50 766 7 49
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV498 694,574 1,396,611 125 313 -67 345 119 120 1 2.56 0.20 409 3 30
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV501 694,539 1,396,540 130 312 -73 315 122 126 4 0.64 3.40 99 931 969
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV502 694,564 1,396,585 126 312 -76 339 223 228 5 0.63 assays pendi ng
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV504 694,606 1,396,543 141 311 -72 500 281 284 3 1.05 1.00 29 55 57
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV512 694,178 1,396,609 110 310 -55 198 193 194 1 2.21 0.10 88 3 21
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV486 694,295 1,396,745 50 311 -83 309 15 16 1 2.13 0.05 49 5 28
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV486 694,295 1,396,745 50 311 -83 309 124 125 1 1.61 0.05 65 4 23
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV493 694,475 1,396,422 140 306 -72 558 266 267 1 1.84 0.10 100 18 90
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV495 694,393 1,396,469 135 320 -69 396 337 338 1 1.50 0.70 56 14 40
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV495 694,393 1,396,469 135 320 -69 396 366 367 1 1.72 0.30 112 5 31

Page 20 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Okvau UG
RCDD23OKV496 694,502 1,396,436 135 315 -59 770 471 474 3 0.77 0.20 97 4 27
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV496 694,502 1,396,436 135 315 -59 770 739 742 3 0.62 0.50 1,128 15 43
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV497 694,550 1,396,497 135 310 -68 650 240 241 1 1.83 0.20 49 9 22
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV498 694,574 1,396,611 125 313 -67 345 210 211 1 1.63 0.60 27 21 35
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV499A 694,579 1,396,606 125 310 -80 308 278 280 2 0.89 assays pending
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV502 694,564 1,396,585 126 312 -76 339 142 143 1 2.45 assays pending
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV505 694,249 1,396,687 94 310 -83 584 156 157 1 1.64 assays pending
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV506 694,361 1,396,581 40 309 -75 592 243 244 1 2.20 assays pending
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV506 694,361 1,396,581 40 309 -75 592 316 317 1 2.43 assays pending
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV507 694,363 1,396,580 40 309 -88 180 91 95 4 0.60 assays pending
Okvau UG RCDD23OKV507 694,363 1,396,580 40 309 -88 180 175 176 1 1.93 0.60 308 5 44
Okvau Near Mine RC23OKV515 694,711 1,396,940 140 315 -65 197 55 59 4 6.26 assays pending
Okvau Near Mine RC23OKV545 695,442 1,395,300 161 270 -52 120 35 36 1 6.42 0.70 188 3 30
Okvau Near Mine RC23OKV514 694,629 1,396,894 142 310 -55 200 0 8 8 0.52 assays pending
Okvau Near Mine RC23OKV551 694,307 1,397,044 139 310 -60 120 11 13 2 1.68 assays pending
Okvau Near Mine RC23OKV514 694,629 1,396,894 142 310 -55 200 32 33 1 3.13 assays pending
Okvau Near Mine RC23OKV515 694,711 1,396,940 140 315 -65 197 169 170 1 1.91 assays pending
Okvau Near Mine RC23OKV545 695,442 1,395,300 161 270 -52 120 98 99 1 1.78 0.20 157 3 22
Okvau Near Mine RC23OKV533 694,196 1,397,298 133 360 -55 168 68 69 1 1.76 2.00 229 83 343
Okvau Close spaced 145_825_036 694,646 1,396,935 140 315 -60 36 15 20 5 23.50 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_745_008 694,620 1,396,848 141 315 -60 36 11 18 7 8.98 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_745_007 694,627 1,396,843 142 315 -60 36 16 23 7 7.76 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_825_027 694,641 1,396,940 142 315 -60 29 7 16 9 3.53 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_745_007 694,627 1,396,843 142 315 -60 36 27 28 1 21.24 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_835_015 694,668 1,396,927 143 315 -60 36 24 26 2 10.54 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_815_025 694,629 1,396,938 141 315 -60 17 7 12 5 3.90 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_755_005 694,633 1,396,849 142 315 -60 36 26 29 3 4.25 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_835_015 694,668 1,396,927 143 315 -60 36 34 36 2 5.97 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_840_036 694,667 1,396,936 140 315 -60 36 7 8 1 11.01 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_835_038 694,636 1,396,959 141 315 -60 6 3 4 1 10.85 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_845_045 694,658 1,396,952 140 315 -60 36 11 17 6 1.73 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_830_006 694,637 1,396,951 141 315 -60 29 9 12 3 3.39 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_840_037 694,656 1,396,947 140 315 -60 36 15 19 4 2.54 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_850_016A 694,674 1,396,943 140 315 -60 36 6 9 3 3.07 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_840_036 694,667 1,396,936 140 315 -60 36 21 23 2 4.30 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_825_026 694,634 1,396,947 141 315 -60 29 8 10 2 4.10 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 140_850_001 694,714 1,396,902 141 315 -60 12 8 9 1 8.05 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_825_025 694,697 1,396,885 145 315 -60 18 6 12 6 1.15 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_830_028 694,630 1,396,958 141 315 -60 5 2 3 1 5.81 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_830_028 694,630 1,396,958 141 315 -60 5 1 2 1 5.81 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_825_016 694,658 1,396,924 143 315 -60 36 28 29 1 5.14 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_825_016 694,658 1,396,924 143 315 -60 36 28 29 1 5.14 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_845_015 694,665 1,396,945 142 315 -60 36 19 24 5 1.00 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_830_012 694,658 1,396,930 142 315 -60 11 7 11 4 1.10 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_850_016A 694,674 1,396,943 140 315 -60 36 20 24 4 1.05 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_900_002 694,693 1,396,994 140 315 -60 36 9 10 1 4.07 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_880_001 694,675 1,396,984 140 315 -60 36 27 30 3 1.32 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_835_017 694,654 1,396,941 142 315 -60 36 17 21 4 0.99 Multielements not assayed

Page 21 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Okvau Close spaced
145_815_015 694,647 1,396,920 143 315 -60 36 20 21 1 3.84 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_815_018 694,626 1,396,941 141 315 -60 19 6 8 2 1.88 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_835_016 694,661 1,396,935 142 315 -60 36 5 7 2 1.86 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_835_017 694,654 1,396,941 142 315 -60 36 18 21 3 1.19 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_830_035 694,664 1,396,924 140 315 -60 36 30 31 1 3.54 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_820_025 694,656 1,396,919 143 315 -60 36 34 36 2 1.66 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_830_035 694,664 1,396,924 140 315 -60 36 10 11 1 2.96 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_895_018 694,704 1,396,977 140 315 -60 36 25 28 3 0.95 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_825_020 694,629 1,396,953 141 315 -60 7 3 5 2 1.31 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_830_035 694,664 1,396,924 140 315 -60 36 21 23 2 1.23 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_850_017A 694,659 1,396,958 140 315 -60 36 2 3 1 2.26 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_895_010 694,715 1,396,966 140 315 -60 36 34 36 2 1.12 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_815_014 694,654 1,396,913 144 315 -60 36 23 24 1 2.22 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_820_007 694,636 1,396,938 142 315 -60 20 14 16 2 1.10 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_815_036 694,622 1,396,945 141 315 -60 10 4 6 2 1.08 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_845_013 694,678 1,396,931 142 315 -60 36 29 30 1 1.98 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_820_005 694,629 1,396,945 141 315 -60 20 5 6 1 1.93 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_745_008 694,620 1,396,848 141 315 -60 36 20 24 4 0.47 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_820_006 694,633 1,396,941 141 315 -60 20 9 10 1 1.71 Multielements not assayed
Okvau Close spaced 145_840_035 694,677 1,396,925 140 315 -60 36 27 28 1 1.23 Multielements not assayed

Appendix Four | JORC Code, 2012 Edition | ‘Table 1’ Report Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data from New Significant Intercepts on the Okvau Drill Programs

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections).

  • Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut • Standards are inserted at regular intervals in sample techniques channels, random chips, or specific batches to test laboratory performance. specialised industry standard measurement • For the recent exploration drilling, reverse circulation tools appropriate to the minerals under (RC) drilling is used to collect both a 4m composite and investigation, such as down hole gamma 1m samples in the precollar. The 4m program sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). composited are taken from the excess bagged material These examples should not be taken as off the cone splitter taken every 1m. A spear sampling limiting the broad meaning of sampling. technique is then used to produce a 3-5kg composite

  • • Include reference to measures taken to sample. The 1m samples are split with a cone splitter or ensure sample representivity and the three staged riffle splitter at the drill rig to produce a 2- appropriate calibration of any measurement 5kg sub-sample. These 1m samples are submitted after tools or systems used. the results of the 4m composites are received to identify

    • For the recent exploration drilling, reverse circulation (RC) drilling is used to collect both a 4m composite and 1m samples in the precollar. The 4m program composited are taken from the excess bagged material off the cone splitter taken every 1m. A spear sampling technique is then used to produce a 3-5kg composite sample. The 1m samples are split with a cone splitter or three staged riffle splitter at the drill rig to produce a 2- 5kg sub-sample. These 1m samples are submitted after the results of the 4m composites are received to identify the zones of mineralisation.
  • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

  • Diamond core was sampled using half-core where the core is cut in half down the longitudinal axis and sample intervals were determined by the geologist based on lithological contacts, with 80% of the sample intervals being 1 metre in length. In areas of no mineralised (negligible amounts of alteration/sulphides typically present with mineralisation) a 2m composite was submitted.

  • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3kg was pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

  • The Exploration drill samples preparation is carried out at a commercial off-site laboratory (ALS Phnom Penh). Gold assays are conducted at ALS Vientiane, Laos utilising a 50gram subsample of 85% passing 75µm pulped sample using Fire Assay with AAS finish on and Aqua Regia digest of the lead collection button. Multielement assay is completed at ALS, Perth, Australia on a 1g pulp subsample digested by Aqua Regia and determined by ICP-AES or ICP-MS for lowest available detection for the respective element. The "Okvau Close Spaced” Drilling was carried out by the he Okvau Mine Site laboratory using Aqua Regia digest with a AAS finish.

Page 22 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Criteria
JORC Code explanation Commentary


Historical drilling results in this ASX release refer to
historical drilling records from OZ minerals completed
in 2010. Historical RC drilling samples were through a
cyclone on a 1 metre basis. The specific sub-sampling
equipment utilised is not known and therefore
representivity is not known.

Soil samples (approximately 1000g) are collected to
avoid any surface contamination from shallow (generally
+/-20-30cm deep) shovel holes to selectively sample
pisolite bearing laterite soil material and are used to
define areas of interest and mineralised system
footprints.

Soil auger samples (approx. 500g) are collected from
hand auger refusal depth in in-situ weathered bedrock
(B/C horizon soil transition). The sample is sieved to
collect a sample passing 2mm. Where transported
material is not penetrated no sample is taken to avoid
spurious anomalism in transported material and assist in
confirming bedrock geology. This sampling is preferred
to constrain areas of interest and/or drill targets.

Soil sample preparation is carried out at a commercial
off-site laboratory (ALS Phnom Penh). Gold and multi-
element assays are conducted at ALS Brisbane, Australia
utilising a 50gram subsample of 85% passing 75µm
pulped sample digested by Aqua Regia and analysed by
ICP-MS.

Rock chip samples are collected as niche samples of rock
material of specific style or character of interest. A target
sample weight of 3-5kg is collected for assay. Sample
preparation is carried out at a commercial off-site
laboratory (ALS Phnom Penh). Gold assays are
conducted at ALS Vientiane, Laos utilising a 50gram
subsample of 85% passing 75µm pulped sample using
Fire Assay with AAS finish on and Aqua Regia digest of
the lead collection button. Multi-element assay is
completed at ALS, Brisbane, Australia utilising a 4 acid
digest of a 1g subsample of 85% passing 75µm pulped
sample and determination by ICP-AES or ICP-MS for
lowest available detection for the respective element.

Oxide matrix standards, field duplicates and pulp blanks
are inserted in sample batches to test laboratory
performance.
Drilling
techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-
hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter,
triple or standard tube, depth of diamond
tails, face-sampling bit or other type,
whether core is oriented and if so, by what
method, etc).

A track mounted UDR650 rig is used to drill 5.5-inch RC
precollar holes and a LF90 rig is used to drill NQ2
Diamond Core. The ”Okvau Close Spaced” drilling was
completed using aA Schramm T450WS/BH mounted
on tracked drill rig is used to drill 5.51-inch.

Recent drilling used a REFLEX survey tool to survey hole
deviation. A typical downhole survey was taken at 12m
depth and then every 30m to the end of hole. Surveying
of RC holes utilises 6m of stainless drill rod to negate the
magnetic interference from the rod string and hammer
assembly. All readings showed that down hole were
within acceptable limits.
Drill
sample
recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and
chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

Measures
taken
to
maximise
sample
recovery and ensure representative nature of
the samples.

Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

All RC 1m samples and sub-samples (pre- and post-
split) are weighed at the rig, to check that there is
adequate sample material for assay. Any wet or damp
samples are noted and that information is recorded in
the database; samples are usually dry.

The drilling results relate to historical sampling results.
Drill recoveries are not known.
Logging

Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.

All RC chips and diamond core is routinely logged
(qualitatively) by a geologist, to record details of
regolith (oxidation), lithology, structure, mineralisation
and/or veining, and alteration. In addition, the
magnetic susceptibility of all samples is routinely
measured. All logging and sampling data are captured

Page 23 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Criteria
JORC Code explanation Commentary

Whether
logging
is
qualitative
or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.

The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.

into a database, with appropriate validation and security
features.

Standard field data are similarly recorded (qualitatively)
routinely by a geologist for all soil sampling sites.

Emerald cannot verify the detail and full scope of the
historical logging from the available reports.
Sub-sampling
techniques
and
sample
preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or
dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for all
sub-sampling
stages
to
maximise
representivity of samples.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling
is representative of the in-situ material
collected, including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
grain size of the material being sampled.


Most samples are dry and there is no likelihood of
compromised results due to moisture.

All samples except for the “Okvau Close Spaced” drilling
samples, were prepared for assay at the NATA
accredited ALS Cambodia sample preparation facility in
Phnom Penh; and that facility has been inspected, at the
request of the Company, numerous times and most
recently by Mr Keith King in April 2022. Samples are
dried for a minimum of 12 hours at 105˚C.

This sample technique is industry standard and is
deemed appropriate for the material.

The Okvau Mine site lab is not accredited.

The historical data available to Emerald is such that
Emerald cannot reliably confirm that the historical RC
samples were dry and free of free of significant
contamination. Emerald cannot specifically confirm that
the RC drilling results have not been compromised due
to excessive moisture of contamination.

The historical data available is such that Emerald cannot
reliably confirm the specific subsampling techniques
and sample preparation used to generate samples to be
sent for assay. It is not known whether a subsample was
retained as a geological record.

No review of historic sampling practices has been
completed nor was possible from the data available to
Emerald for this announcement.
Quality of assay
data
and
laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of
the assaying and laboratory procedures used
and whether the technique is considered
partial or total.

For
geophysical
tools,
spectrometres,
handheld
XRF
instruments,
etc,
the
parametres used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and model,
reading times, calibrations factors applied
and their derivation, etc.

Nature
of
quality
control
procedures
adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and whether
acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
and precision have been established.

All samples are sent to the NATA accredited ALS
Laboratory in Vientiane, Laos, for single Aqua Regia
digest with a 50g charge with an ICP-MS finish. Samples
are sent to the similarly accredited ALS Lab in Brisbane,
Australia and ALS Lab Perth, Australia, for multi-element
ICP analysis, after partial extraction by aqua regia digest
then via a combination of ICP-MS and ICP-AES. This
method has a lower detection limit of 1ppm gold.

Industry-standard
QAQC
protocols
are
routinely
followed for all sample batches sent for assay, which
includes the insertion of commercially available pulp
CRMs and pulp blanks into all batches - usually 1 of each
for every 20 field samples. Additional blanks used are
home-made from barren quarry basalt. QAQC data are
routinely checked before any associated assay results
are reviewed for interpretation, and any problems are
investigated before results are released to the market -
no issues were raised with the results reported here.

All assay data, including internal and external QAQC
data and control charts of standard, replicate and
duplicate assay results, are communicated electronically.

Drill samples for the historical results followed the above
assaying methodology except the sample preparation
occurred in the ALS Laboratory in Vientiane, Laos.

Samples processed at the Okvau Mine Site laboratory
(Okvau Close Spaced Drill samples) were analysed using
Aqua Regia digest with a AAS finish.
Verification
of
sampling
and
assaying

The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.


All field data associated with sampling, and all
associated assay and analytical results, are archived in a
relational database, with industry-standard verification
protocols and security measures in place.

The calculations of all significant intercepts (for drill
holes) are routinely checked by senior management.

All field data associated with drilling and sampling, and
all associated assay and analytical results, are archived
in a relational database, with industry-standard
verification protocols and security measures in place.

Page 24 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Criteria
JORC Code explanation Commentary


Historical sampling and assay verification processes are
unknown.

No sample recording procedures are known for
reported data from historic drilling.
Location of data
points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other
locations
used
in
Mineral
Resource
estimation.

Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.


Whilst, all sample locations are first surveyed with a
hand-held GPS instrument (which generates relatively
inaccurate RL values), not all samples were insitu. All
locations are surveyed to IND60 or WGS84 as specified
in Appendix Three.

Drill hole collar locations are first surveyed with a hand-
held GPS instrument (which generates relatively
inaccurate RL values). The locations of all holes used in
Mineral Resource estimates are verified or amended by
survey using a differential GPS by and external
contractor with excellent accuracy in all dimensions
using a local base station reference).

The newly reported collars of holes drilled have been
picked up by a licenced surveyor with DGPS equipment.

Down-hole surveys are routinely undertaken at 30m
intervals for all types of drilling, using a single-shot or
multi-shot REFLEX survey tool (operated by the driller
and checked by the supervising geologist).
Data spacing and
distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree
of
geological and grade continuity appropriate
for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and classifications
applied.

Whether sample compositing has been
applied.


This drill spacing is considered to be sufficient to
establish geological and grade continuity appropriate
for the declaration of estimates of resources.
Orientation
of
data in relation to
geological
structure

Whether
the
orientation
of
sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.

If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be
assessed and reported if material.

Drill holes are usually designed to intersect target
structures with a “close-to-orthogonal” intercept.

Drilling has been done at various orientations.

Most of the drill holes intersect the mineralised zones
at sufficient angle for the risk of significant sampling
orientation bias to be low.

Soil sampling grids are of appropriate orientation to
cover the observed mineralisation.
Sample security
The measures taken to ensure sample
security.

The chain of custody for all drill samples from the drill
rig and soil/auger samples from the field to the ALS
Sample Preparation facility in Phnom Penh is managed
by
Renaissance
personnel.
Drill
samples
are
transported from the drill site to the Okvau exploration
core farm, where they are logged and all samples are
batched up for shipment to Phnom Penh.

Sample submission forms are sent to the ALS Sample
Prep facility in paper form (with the samples
themselves) and also as an electronic copy. Delivered
samples are reconciled with the batch submission form
prior to the commencement of any sample preparation.

ALS is responsible for shipping sample pulps from
Phnom Penh to the analytical laboratories in Vientiane,
Brisbane and Perth and all samples are tracked via their
Global Enterprise Management System.

All bulk residues are stored permanently at the ALS
laboratory in Phnom Penh.

No information is available regarding sample security
procedures for the historical drilling results reported.

All samples processed at the Okvau Mine site (Okvau
Close Spaced Drill Samples), are handled by RNS
employees and utilise the same stringent internal
paperwork and tracking systems as the routine grade
control methodology.
Audits or reviews
The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.


All QAQC data are reviewed routinely, batch by batch,
and on a quarterly basis to conduct trend analyses, etc.
Any issues arising are dealt with immediately and

Page 25 of 27

==> picture [137 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

Release
29 April 2022

Criteria
JORC Code explanation Commentary

problems resolved before results are interpreted and/or
reported.

Comprehensive QAQC audits have been conducted on
this project by Duncan Hackman (August 2009,
February 2010 & November 2011), SRK (February 2013)
and Nola Hackman (January 2014), Wolfe (July 2015).

Mr Brett Gossage reviewed the data used in the Okvau
Resource up to December 2016 and concluded that
there are no concerns about data quality.

Keith King completed his most recent site visit and lab
audit of the ALS Phnom Penh and Vientiane facilities in
October 2023.

No review has been completed due to data availability
for historical drilling.

Due to the critical importance to production, the Okvau
Mine site lab has regular internal audits completed.
Including routine checks of selected assays being sent
to external laboratories for umpire checks.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results from New Significant Intercepts Okvau Drill Programs

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)

Criteria Explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status

Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments
to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.


The Okvau and Memot licences are held (100%) in
the name of Renaissance Minerals (Cambodia)
Limited which is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Emerald Resources NL (EMR). EMR are in a Joint
Venture agreement on the Antrong North and South
Licences where the Company and earn up to a 80%
share.

The tenure is considered to be secure.
Exploration
done
by other parties


Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration
by other parties.

Exploration has been completed by previous
explorers; Oxiana and Oz Minerals including soil
sampling, geophysical data collection and drilling.
Geology
Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.


Gold occurrences within the licences is interpreted as
either
a
“intrusion-related
gold
system”
or
“Porphyry”
related
mineralisation.
Gold
mineralization is hosted within quartz and/or
sulphide veins and associated within or proximal
distance to a Cretaceous age diorite.
Drill
hole
Information

A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results
including a tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill holes:
-easting and northing of the drill hole collar;
-elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar;
-dip and azimuth of the hole;
-down hole length and interception depth;
-hole length.
If the exclusion of this information is justified
on the basis that the information is not Material
and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent
Person should clearly explain why this is the
case.

Details of significant drilling in Appendix Three.
Data aggregation
methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging
techniques,
maximum
and/or
minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material
and should be stated.

Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
lengths of high grade results and longer
lengths of low grade results, the procedure
used for such aggregation should be stated
and
some
typical
examples
of
such
aggregations should be shown in detail.

No high grade top cuts have been applied.
The reported significant intersections in Appendix
Three are above 2 gram metre Au intersections and
allow for up to 4m of internal dilution with a lower
cut trigger values of greater than 0.5g/t Au. Cu
significant intersections allow for up to 4m of internal
dilution with a lower cut trigger values of greater
than 2,000ppm Cu.

Page 26 of 27

ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022
ASX Announcement& Media
Release
29 April 2022

Criteria
Explanation Commentary

The assumptions used for any reporting of
metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths
and
intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly important
in the reporting of Exploration Results.

If the geometry of the mineralisation with
respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.

If it is not known and only the down hole
lengths are reported, there should be a clear
statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length,
true width not known’).

All reported intersections are down hole lengths.
True widths are unknown and vary depending on the
orientation of target structures.
Diagrams
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)
and tabulations of intercepts should be
included for any significant discovery being
reported These should include, but not be
limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.

Appropriate maps and sections are included in the
body of this release.
Balanced reporting
Where
comprehensive
reporting
of
all
Exploration
Results
is
not
practicable,
representative reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be practiced to
avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.

All significant drilling results being intersections with
a minimum 2 gram metre values are reported in
Appendix Three.
Other substantive
exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but not
limited
to):
geological
observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical survey
results; bulk samples – size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics;
potential
deleterious
or
contaminating substances.

All mineralisation is associated with visible amounts
of pyrrhotite or arsenopyrite.
Further work

The nature and scale of planned further work
(eg tests for lateral extensions or depth
extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible
extensions,
including
the
main
geological interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is not
commercially sensitive.

Further drilling programs are being planned on
additional nearby targets.

Additional drilling programs are being planned
across all exploration licences.

Page 27 of 27