AI assistant
ELIXIR ENERGY LIMITED — Interim / Quarterly Report 2012
Mar 14, 2012
64893_rns_2012-03-14_64bd4d51-cf40-4b52-933f-f0fc8a81c114.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
A B N 5 1 1 0 8 2 3 0 9 9 5
Interim Financial Report for the half-year ended 3 1 D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 1
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
| Page | |
|---|---|
| Corporate directory | 1 |
| Directors’ report | 2 |
| Auditor’s independence declaration | 7 |
| Independent review report | 8 |
| Directors’ declaration | 10 |
| Consolidated statement of comprehensive income | 11 |
| Consolidated statement of financial position | 12 |
| Consolidated statement of changes in equity | 13 |
| Consolidated statement of cash flows | 14 |
| Notes to the consolidated financial statements | 15 |
Corporate Directory
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
Directors
Mr Alan Watson – Non Executive Chairman (appointed 5 October 2011) Mr Andrew Ross – Managing Director Mr John Robertson – Non-Executive Director Mr Michael Price – Non-Executive Director
Company Secretary
Ms Julie Foster
Bankers
National Australia Bank Limited Ground Floor, 50 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000
Barclays Bank plc 5 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 4BB
Registered and Principal Administration
Office
Level 20, 77 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 Telephone: (+61) 8 9440 2650 Facsimile: (+61) 8 9440 2699
UK Operations Office
8 The Courtyard Eastern Road, Bracknell Berkshire RG12 2XB United Kingdom Telephone: (+44) 1344 426 170 Facsimile: (+44) 1344 360 268
Auditors
BDO Audit (WA) Pty Ltd 38 Station Street Subiaco WA 6008
Share Registry
Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd Level 2 45 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000
Stock Exchange Listing
Australian Securities Exchange Home Exchange: Perth, Western Australia Ticker Code: EXR
Website
www.elixirpetroleum.com
1
Directors’ Report
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
The Directors of Elixir Petroleum Limited present their report on the Consolidated Entity, consisting of Elixir Petroleum Limited (“the Company” or “Elixir”) and the entities it controlled during the half-year ended 31 December 2011 (“Consolidated Entity” or “Group”).
DIRECTORS
The names of the Directors of Elixir Petroleum Limited in office during the half-year and until the date of this report are:
Mr Alan Watson (Non-Executive Chairman) appointed 5 October 2011 and appointed Non-Executive Chairman 29 November 2011
Mr Andrew Ross (Managing Director)
Mr John Robertson (Non-Executive Director)
Mr Michael Price (Non-Executive Director)
Mr Jonathan Stewart (Non-Executive Chairman) resigned 29 November 2011
Mr Iain Knott (Executive Director - Exploration) resigned 22 July 2011
Unless otherwise stated, all Directors were in office from the beginning of the half-year until the date of this report.
REVIEW AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operating Results
For the half-year ended 31 December 2011, the Company recorded an after tax loss of $1,965,446 (31 December 2010: loss of $1,383,592).
Corporate and Financial
In October 2011, the Company received commitments to place 28,300,000 new shares at $0.04 per share, to raise $1,132,000 (before costs). The placement was completed under Elixir’s 15% placement capacity to predominantly existing Elixir shareholders. The Placement did not require shareholder approval.
At 31 December 2011, Elixir held cash on hand of $1,413,583 (30 June 2011: $1,320,069). The Elixir Group remains debt free.
Following the conclusion of the reporting period, the Company announced on 2 March 2012 a capital raising by way of a placement and fully underwritten, pro rata, non-renounceable entitlement issue to raise up to $2,200,000 (before costs). It is expected that the offer will close on 30 March 2012.
Summary Review of Operations
During the half-year ended 31 December 2011, the Company produced oil and gas in the Gulf of Mexico and conducted exploration activities onshore in the Paris Basin, France and offshore in the UK North Sea.
EXPLORATION INTERESTS
France
Project Name: Moselle Permit Location: North-Eastern France Ownership: 100% Working Interest Operator: Elixir Petroleum (Moselle) Limited
The Moselle Permit is a 5,360 km[2] (1.34 million acre) onshore exploration block located in the eastern part of the Paris Basin in North-Eastern France. The Permit is prospective for four main play types within the Triassic and
2
Directors’ Report
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
Carboniferous aged sequences, which include conventionally reservoired oil and gas and a giant tight gas and play with associated hydrocarbon liquids. The Permit was awarded in January 2009 for an initial five year term. Elixir acquired operatorship in April 2010 and holds a 100% working interest in the Permit.
Regionally, approximately seventy wells have penetrated the Triassic interval and a further twenty five wells have penetrated the Carboniferous interval, being the two primary sequences in the Saar-Lorraine Basin. The wells have been drilled over a period spanning nearly 60 years with at least 78% of the Carboniferous well penetrations having recorded oil and/or gas shows throughout the target intervals. At least two wells are known to have produced gas to surface from the Carboniferous interval.
A large geological database containing information on 115 regional wells has been assembled. The database contains over 800 kilometres of digitised wireline well log data from 40 wells, over 600 core and cuttings samples from 2,700 metres of available core taken from three key wells and over 550 geochemical assays conducted on rock samples from eleven wells located in, and adjacent to, the Permit.
The database also contains over 1,000 line kilometres of 2D seismic data over the permit which was reprocessed and reinterpreted during 2011. During the period under review a further 321 line kilometres of 2D was reprocessed and interpreted (Phase 4). At the date of this report, the total reprocessed and reinterpreted 2D seismic dataset stands at 1,362 line kilometres. The balance of the remaining digital raw seismic data over the permit of approximately 1,500 line kilometres has also been purchased, together with a 25km[2] 3D seismic survey.
Mapping of a number of conventional hydrocarbon prospects and leads was competed in September 2011 and volumetric calculations were produced. A total of nineteen conventional prospects and leads were identified on the Permit in the Carboniferous and Triassic sections. Netherland Sewell & Associates Inc. (“NSAI”) independently verified the original hydrocarbon-in-place volume for the identified prospects and leads at a mean unrisked Original Oil In-Place (“OOIP”) of 2.1 billion barrels (“Bbbls”) of oil. Alternatively, if the prospects and leads are gas charged, a mean unrisked Original Gas In-Place (“OGIP”) estimate of 2.2 trillion cubic feet (“TCF”) of gas has been provided by NSAI.
In addition to the volumetric assessment of the conventional prospectivity, NSAI also provided an independent assessment of the unconventional resource potential on the permit. NSAI provided an undiscovered, best estimate volume for unconventional resources of 165 Bbbls of OOIP and 650 TCF of OGIP. It has been assessed that, on average, over 3,000m of the Carboniferous aged source rock currently lies in the thermal maturity window.
Post the publication of the NSAI reports, Elixir has reprocessed and interpreted additional 2D seismic data (Phase 4). This new data has increased the number of conventional prospects and leads from nineteen to thirty four. Using a similar methodology to that adopted by NSAI (2007 PRMS by SPE), the mean prospective unrisked in-place volume has increased approximately threefold from the original NSAI report to 6.8 Bbbls of OOIP or 6.3TCF of OGIP. The mean risked prospective recoverable resource estimate for all 34 conventional prospects and leads is 161 mmbbls of oil or 559 Bcf of gas.
Technical studies designed to assess both the conventional and unconventional prospectivity within the permit area, including additional geochemical analyses, porosity / permeability analyses of sands, a detailed chemostratigraphy study and gravity data interpretation over approximately 28,400km[2] of land in, and adjacent to, the Moselle Permit, were all completed in the period and reports finalised. The studies are at an advanced stage of integration and have significantly improved characterisation of the sub-plays within the permit and the hydrocarbon volumetric potential for both conventional and unconventional systems. At the conclusion of the reporting period ongoing technical work was focused on interpreting and integrating the most recently processed 2D seismic data to identify optimal well locations for the drilling of multi-horizon conventional prospects.
During the period under review discussions were held with the local authority based in Lorraine to establish the well permitting process and associated timelines. Well engineering services have been procured and activities in early 2012 will establish outline well designs and costs. The Company has announced that its ambition is to commence drilling activities in Q4, 2012.
CIBC World Markets Plc has been appointed to provide advisory and investment banking services in relation to the farmout of an interest in the Moselle Permit. Farm-out activities commenced in mid-December with detailed management presentations being provided to a number of interested parties. Data room and seismic workstation reviews are currently ongoing with interested parties and the process is expected to culminate in Q2, 2012.
3
Directors’ Report
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
UK North Sea
Project Name: Tiger Prospect (Block 211/12b) Location: Northern UK North Sea Ownership: 100% Working Interest Operator: Elixir Petroleum (Europe) Limited
Block 211/12b is located in the northern sector of the UK North Sea, approximately 160 kilometres north east of the Shetland Islands, in a water depth of approximately 186 metres. Block 211/12b contains a mapped prospect named ‘Tiger’ which holds a best estimate recoverable resource of 90 mmbbls of oil. The Block lies 5 kilometres to the east of the Magnus Field which was brought into production in 1983 by BP with an in-place volume of approximately 1.5 billion barrels of oil. The Block was awarded for a licence term of four years with a drill or drop decision required by February 2013
Elixir signed a conditional farmin agreement on Block 211/12b in July 2011. The agreement was subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the obtaining of the consent of the UK Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (“DECC”) for the proposed farminee to act as operator of the licence and for the assignment of an interest in the licence. Although the proposed farminee was able to ultimately achieve the consent of the UK regulator to the farmin and the assignment of operatorship, the farminee’s source of funding failed to perform its obligations under its contracted funding arrangements.
Elixir worked with the proposed farminee to achieve completion of the transaction, but ultimately the farminee was unable to secure alternative funding. Consequently, Elixir advised the proposed farminee of the termination of the farmin agreement in late December 2011. Tiger is currently being re-offered to industry.
Project Name: Mulle Project (Prospect (Block 211/22b and 211/27d) Location: Northern UK North Sea Ownership: 40% Working Interest Operator: Elixir Petroleum (Europe) Limited
The Mulle Project joint venture elected to relinquish the licence in September 2011 at the conclusion of the five year licence term.
Project Name: Dumas Project (Block 13/25a (split)) Location: Central UK North Sea Ownership: 100% Working Interest Operator: Elixir Petroleum (Europe) Limited
Elixir acquired the southern part of Block 30/25 in the 26[th] Seaward Licensing Round in late 2010. Block 30/25a contains a Lower Cretaceous and three Upper Cretaceous aged oil prospects that have been mapped on 2D seismic data.
Additional 3D seismic data over the Block area was purchased during the period under review and seismic interpretation and prospect mapping studies are ongoing.
Project Name: Newly Awarded Acreage (Block 12/18 & 19a (split)) Location: Inner Moray Firth, UK North Sea Ownership: 100% Working Interest Operator: Elixir Petroleum (Europe) Limited
In late December 2011 the Company was offered Blocks 12/18 and 12/19a (split) (“Blocks”) by the DECC as part of the 26[th] UK Seaward Licensing Round. The Blocks are located in the Inner Moray Firth area of the UK North Sea and have been offered to Elixir under promote licences as 100% interest holder and operator. The work obligations associated with the Blocks comprise the purchase of 3D seismic data and require a drill-or-drop decision to be made by early 2014.
The Blocks are contiguous and are located approximately 150 km north east of Inverness, in a water depth of approximately 75m. The Blocks lie to the north east of the Beatrice oil field located in Block 11/30a and to the west of the Captain oil field in Block 13/22a. A single large stratigraphic prospect has been identified in the Middle Jurassic Beatrice Formation on the northerly edge of the Smith Bank High. The prospect is predicted to have Beatrice Formation sands as the reservoir, which has been identified as an acoustic impedance anomaly on several 2D seismic lines. No wells to date have targeted the Smith Bank High in the Blocks.
4
Directors’ Report
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
The forward work programme to be undertaken during 2012 will focus on the interpretation of the 3D seismic data set to evaluate and further de-risk the prospect.
PRODUCTION INTERESTS
Gulf of Mexico
Project Name: High Island Project (Block 268A) Location: High Island Area, Offshore Texas, USA Ownership: 30% Working Interest (22.5% Net Revenue Interest) Operator: Peregrine Oil and Gas, LP
The High Island field is located approximately 65 kilometres southeast of Houston, Texas in the Gulf of Mexico and was brought into production in September 2007. Wells A-1 and A-2 at High Island discovered gas and condensate pay in two separate accumulations, with each well currently producing from only the lower of the two reservoir zones to a regional processing facility, the Maritech HI-442 platform.
In the six month period to 31 December 2011, the following production results were achieved at High Island:
| High Island Field – 268-A | Gas Production | Gas Production | Oil Production | Oil Production |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Dec Half (MMscf) |
Avg Daily Dec Half (MMscf/d) |
Total Dec Half (Bbls) |
Avg Daily Dec Half (Bbls/d) |
|
| Project (100%) | 97.3 | 0.53 | 11,336 | 61.3 |
| Elixir (30% WI) | 29.2 | 0.16 | 3,401 | 18.4 |
The High Island field has produced approximately 4.19 Bcf of gas and 180,800 bbls of condensate (100% project) in the period from the commencement of production in September 2007 to the date of this report. Production revenue from High Island for the half year to 31 December 2011 totalled approximately US$284,000. The average price realised for the sale of gas produced in these months was US$3.33/Mcf, and for oil was US$89.82/Bbl. There were no reported safety incidents in the period.
Project Name: Pompano Gas Project (Block 446-L SE/4) Location: Brazos Area, Offshore Texas, USA Ownership: 25% Working Interest (18.125% Net Revenue Interest) Operator: AnaTexas Offshore Inc.
The Pompano field lies within the Brazos Area of the Gulf of Mexico and is located approximately 6 kilometres offshore the east Texas coast and 110 kilometres south of Houston. The field has been producing from two wells, with production from three separate reservoirs. The field has produced approximately 6.35 Bcf of gas and 6,300 bbls of condensate (100% project) since the commencement of production in March 2008.
As previously reported, workovers undertaken in July 2011 on the two previously producing Pompano wells were unsuccessful at re-establishing production from the wells. We understand that the operator has been producing the wells cyclically by blowing-down built up pressure in the wells on a monthly basis which has resulted in the production of small quantities of gas during the reporting period.
Elixir elected not to participate in the unsuccessful workover operations and consequently is not a participant in the wells. Elixir is considering its options with respect to its interest in the Pompano field.
5
Directors’ Report
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
EVENTS OCCURRING AFTER REPORTING DATE
The following events occurred subsequent to the end of the reporting period:
-
(a) On 11 January 2012, Elixir announced it had secured Blocks 12/18 and 12/19a (split) located in the Inner Moray Firth area of the UK North Sea.
-
(b) On 2 March 2012, Elixir announced a capital raising by way of a placement of 6.4 million ordinary shares at $0.0625 to raise $400,000 and a pro-rata, non-renounceable entitlement issue to eligible Elixir shareholders on the basis of 1 share for every 6 held at the record date at $0.05 to raise approximately $1.8 million (before the costs of the issue). The placement will be made to New Standard Energy (ASX: NSE) who have agreed to fully underwrite the entitlement issue for no fee. NSE have also been granted the option, at their election, to top up their shareholding to 15% post the placement and take up of any of the shortfall under the underwritten entitlements issue at $0.0625 / share.
Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this half-year financial report, no event has arisen since 31 December 2011 that would be likely to materially affect the operations of the Consolidated Entity, the results of the Consolidated Entity or the state of affairs of the Consolidated Entity.
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
The Auditor’s independence declaration is included on page 7 of the half-year financial report.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors made pursuant to s.306 (3) of the Corporations Act 2001 .
On behalf of the Directors
==> picture [145 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
ANDREW ROSS Managing Director
Perth, Western Australia 14 March 2012
Information contained in this report with respect to the Tiger Prospect and the Moselle Permit, was compiled by Elixir or from material provided by the project operators and reviewed by the Elixir’s Exploration Manager, Iain Knott, BSc, MSc, FGS, AAPG, who has had more than 25 years experience in the practice of geology, including more than 5 years experience in petroleum geology. Mr Knott consents to the inclusion in this report of the information in the form and context in which it appears
6
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
==> picture [452 x 478] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 5] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 13] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 12] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
7
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
Independent Review Report
==> picture [452 x 609] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 24] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
8
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
Independent Review Report
==> picture [452 x 224] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 224] intentionally omitted <==
9
Directors’ Declaration
==> picture [126 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
The Directors declare that:
-
(a) The consolidated financial statements and notes set out on pages 11 to 19 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:
-
i. complying with Accounting Standard AASB 134 “Interim Financial Reporting”, and the Corporations Regulations 2001 ; and
-
ii. giving a true and fair view of the Consolidated Entity’s financial position as at 31 December 2011 and of its performance for the half-year ended on that date; and
-
(b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that Elixir Petroleum Limited will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
This declaration is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors made pursuant to section 306(3)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001.
On behalf of the Directors
==> picture [145 x 36] intentionally omitted <==
ANDREW ROSS Managing Director
Perth, Western Australia 14 March 2012
10
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income For the half-year ended 31 December 2011
| Note Revenue from oil and gas sales Other income Total Income Operating and production costs General and administrative costs Other Depreciation, depletion and amortisation expense Exploration and evaluation expense Impairment of oil and gas properties Loss from continuing operations before income tax expense (2) Income tax expense / benefit Loss attributable to owners of the Company Other comprehensive income Foreign currency translation differences Other comprehensive income for the half-year Total comprehensive income for the half-year attributable to members of the Company (Loss) per share Basic and diluted loss per share (cents per share) |
Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|---|
| 31-Dec-2011 $ 284,379 17,915 302,294 (304,254) (251,449) - (72,316) (55,531) (1,584,190) (1,965,446) - (1,965,446) (1,769) (1,769) (1,967,215) (0.97) |
31-Dec-2010 $ |
|
| 543,904 37,845 |
||
| 581,749 (169,481) (519,344) (182,867) (367,504) (208,145) (518,000) |
||
| (1,383,592) | ||
| - | ||
| (1,383,592) | ||
| (802,564) | ||
| (802,564) | ||
| (2,186,156) | ||
| (0.70) |
The above consolidated statement of comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
11
Consolidated statement of financial position As at 31 December 2011
| Note Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Total current assets Non-current assets Receivables Oil and Gas Properties (4) Other plant and equipment Deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure (5) Total non-current assets Total assets Liabilities Current liabilities Trade and other payables Provisions Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities Provisions Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Equity Contributed equity Reserves Accumulated losses Total parent entity interest in equity |
Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|---|
| 31-Dec-2011 $ 1,413,583 549,618 1,963,201 576,447 311,261 8,340 2,572,413 3,468,461 5,431,662 629,769 47,592 677,361 1,354,588 1,354,588 2,031,949 3,399,713 61,690,306 1,697,485 (59,988,078) 3,399,713 |
30-Jun-2011 $ |
|
| 1,320,069 784,633 |
||
| 2,104,702 | ||
| 553,451 1,712,167 17,179 1,769,126 |
||
| 4,051,923 | ||
| 6,156,625 | ||
| 402,084 307,209 |
||
| 709,293 | ||
| 1,126,344 | ||
| 1,126,344 | ||
| 1,835,637 | ||
| 4,320,988 | ||
| 60,644,366 1,699,254 (58,022,632) |
||
| 4,320,988 |
The above consolidated statement of financial position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
12
Consolidated statement of changes in equity For the half-year ended 31 December 2011
| Consolidated Balance at 1 July 2010 (Loss) for the half-year Other comprehensive income Exchange difference on translation of foreign operations Total comprehensive income for the half-year Transactions with owners, in their capacity as owners Balance at 31 December 2010 Balance at 1 July 2011 (Loss) for the half-year Other comprehensive income Exchange difference on translation of foreign operations Total comprehensive income for the half-year Transactions with owners, in their capacity as owners Contributed equity net of transaction costs Balance at 31 December 2011 |
Contributed Equity Option Premium Reserve Share Based Payment Reserve Foreign Currency Translation Reserve Accumulated Losses Total $ $ $ $ $ $ |
|---|---|
| 60,644,366 1,773,184 871,300 (54,636) (54,659,111) 8,575,102 - - - - (1,383,592) (1,383,592) - - - (802,564) - (802,564) |
|
| - - - (802,564) (1,383,592) (2,186,156) |
|
| - - - - - - |
|
| 60,644,365 1,773,184 871,300 (857,200) (56,042,703) 6,388,946 |
|
| 60,644,366 1,773,184 871,300 (945,230) (58,022,632) 4,320,988 - - - - (1,965,446) (1,965,446) - - - (1,769) - (1,769) |
|
| - - - (1,769) (1,965,446) (1,967,215) |
|
| 1,045,940 - - - - 1,045,940 |
|
| 1,045,940 - - - - 1,045,940 |
|
| 61,690,306 1,773,184 871,300 (946,999) (59,988,078) 3,399,713 |
The above consolidated statement of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
13
Consolidated statement of cash flows
For the half-year ended 31 December 2011
| Note Cash flows from operating activities Receipts from sales Payments to suppliers and employees Net cash (outflow) from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Payments for capitalised exploration, evaluation and development Interest received Net cash (outflow) from investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Proceeds from issues of shares Share issue costs Net cash inflow from financing activities Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period Effect of exchange rate changes on foreign currency denominated cash balances Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|---|
| 31-Dec-2011 $ 297,493 (571,469) (273,976) (696,365) 6,989 (689,376) 1,132,000 (86,060) 1,045,940 82,588 1,320,069 10,926 1,413,583 |
31-Dec-2010 $ |
|
| 839,393 (1,033,868) |
||
| (194,475) | ||
| (1,274,541) 37,845 |
||
| (1,236,696) | ||
| - - |
||
| - | ||
| (1,431,171) 5,084,315 (182,867) |
||
| 3,470,277 |
The above consolidated statement of cash flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
14
Notes to the financial statements
For the half-year ended 31 December 2011
1. Significant accounting policies
Basis of preparation
(a) Statement of compliance
These financial statements are general purpose financial statements for the half-year reporting period ended 31 December 2011, which have been prepared in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 134 Interim Financial Reporting and the Corporations Act 2001 .
This half-year financial report does not include all the notes of the type normally included in an annual financial report. Accordingly, this report is to be read in conjunction with the annual report for the year ended 30 June 2011 and any public announcements made by Elixir Petroleum Limited during the half-year reporting period in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 .
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year and the corresponding half-year reporting period.
Going concern
The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates the continuity of normal business activity and the realisation of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business.
The Group incurred a net loss of $1,965,446 for the half year ended 31 December 2011 and had net cash outflow from operations of $273,976 for the period. Notwithstanding this, the financial report has been prepared on a going concern basis.
The ability of the consolidated entity to continue as a going concern is dependent upon a successful future capital raising. As at the date of this report Elixir expects to successfully raise capital in the future to supplement working capital requirements. However, should the entity be unable to continue as a going concern it may be required to realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities at amounts different from those stated in the financial statements.
2. Loss for the half-year
Loss for the half-year includes the following items which are significant because of their nature, size or incidence:
| Amortisation of oil and gas properties Depreciation of plant and equipment Exploration and evaluation expense Impairment of oil and gas properties |
Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|---|
| 31-Dec-2011 $ 63,264 9,052 72,316 55,531 1,584,190 |
31-Dec-2010 $ |
|
| 356,578 10,926 |
||
| 367,504 208,145 518,000 |
15
For the half-year ended 31 December 2011
Notes to the financial statements
3. Segment information
Management has determined, based on the reports reviewed by the Board of Directors that are used to make strategic decisions, that the Group has three reportable segments being oil and gas exploration and production in the United Kingdom (UK), oil and gas exploration and production in France and oil and gas exploration and production in the United States of America (USA). The Group’s management and administration office is located in Australia.
The Board of Directors review internal management reports on a monthly basis that are consistent with the information provided in the statement of comprehensive income, statement of financial position and cash flow statement. As a result no reconciliation is required, because the information as presented is used by the Board to make strategic decisions.
Reportable segment revenue
Revenue, including interest income, is disclosed below based on the reportable segment:
| Revenue from oil and gas exploration and production - UK Revenue from oil and gas exploration and production - France Revenue from oil and gas exploration and production – USA Revenue from other corporate activities |
31-Dec-2011 $ |
31-Dec-2010 $ |
|---|---|---|
| - - 284,379 17,915 302,294 |
- - 543,904 37,845 |
|
| 581,749 |
Reportable segment assets
Assets are disclosed below based on the reportable segment:
| Asset from oil and gas exploration and production – UK Asset from oil and gas exploration and production – France Asset from oil and gas exploration and production – USA Assets from other corporate activities: Cash and cash equivalents Other corporate assets |
31-Dec-2011 $ |
30-Jun-2011 $ |
|---|---|---|
| 329,773 2,249,831 1,296,604 1,413,583 141,871 5,431,662 |
291,455 1,511,517 2,903,218 1,320,069 130,366 |
|
| 6,156,625 |
Reportable segment loss
Loss is disclosed below based on the reportable segment:
| (Loss) from oil and gas exploration and production – UK (Loss) from oil and gas exploration and production – France (Loss) from oil and gas exploration and production – USA (Loss) from other corporate activities |
31-Dec-2011 $ |
31-Dec-2010 $ |
|---|---|---|
| (68,082) (3,323) (1,660,326) (233,715) (1,965,446) |
(11,431) (196,714) (506,740) (668,707) |
|
| (1,383,592) |
16
For the half-year ended 31 December 2011
Notes to the financial statements
4. Oil and gas properties
| 4. Oil and gas properties | ||
|---|---|---|
| Producing projects At cost Accumulated amortisation Impairment Net carrying amount Development projects At cost Impairment provision Net carrying amount Total |
Consolidated | |
| 31-Dec-2011 $ 32,548,225 (17,864,993) (14,371,971) 311,261 1,889,726 (1,889,726) - 311,261 |
30-Jun-2011 $ |
|
| 31,075,547 (17,090,740) (12,272,640) |
||
| 1,712,167 | ||
| 1,814,338 (1,814,338) |
||
| - | ||
| 1,712,167 |
A reconciliation of movements in oil and gas properties during the period is as follows:
| Balance at the beginning of the financial period Additions Amortisation expense Impairment1 Foreign currency movement Net carrying amount |
Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|---|
| 31-Dec-2011 $ 1,712,167 181,445 (63,264) (1,578,439) 59,352 311,261 |
30-Jun-2011 $ |
|
| 2,507,949 41,604 (428,834) (377,414) (31,138) |
||
| 1,712,167 |
1. In the absence of readily available market prices, the recoverable amount of oil and gas properties is determined by the assets value in use. Value in use is calculated based on estimates of the present value of future cashflows discounted at asset specific rates and by reference to forecast commodity prices.
During the period Elixir’s US based oil and gas projects were exposed to an approximate 49% decline in natural gas prices. As the decline in natural gas price was not considered temporary, the present value of estimated future cashflows also reflected the decline.
Oil and gas properties for the period ended 31 December 2011 were therefore impaired to recoverable amount.
17
Notes to the financial statements
For the half-year ended 31 December 2011
5. Deferred exploration, evaluation and development
| 5. Deferred exploration, evaluation and development | ||
|---|---|---|
| Opening balance Capitalised expenditure Impairment Foreign currency movement |
Consolidated | |
| 31-Dec-2011 $ 1,769,126 795,070 - 8,217 2,572,413 |
30-Jun-2011 $ |
|
| 778,276 1,704,381 (644,168) (69,363) |
||
| 1,769,126 |
The ultimate recoupment of exploration expenditure carried forward is dependent on successful development and exploitation, or alternatively sale, of the respective area of interest.
6. Dividends
No dividend has been paid or is proposed in respect of the half-year ended 31 December 2011 (2010: None).
7. Commitments and Contingencies
The Consolidated Entity has no material contingent assets or liabilities at reporting date and has no firm contractual commitments for expenditure not reflected in the financial statements other than:
| Capital commitments Within one year More than one year but less than five years Total Non-cancellable operation lease commitments Within one year More than one year but less than five years Total |
Consolidated | Consolidated |
|---|---|---|
| 31-Dec-2011 $ 98,266 - 98,266 57,278 23,853 81,131 |
30-Jun-2011 $ |
|
| 94,365 - |
||
| 94,365 | ||
| 57,013 52,483 |
||
| 109,496 |
The rental lease is held by Elixir Petroleum (Technical Services) Ltd. At 31 December 2011 the remaining lease term was 1.4 years (30 June 2011: 2 years).
18
Notes to the financial statements
For the half-year ended 31 December 2011
8. Events Occurring After Reporting Date
The following events occurred subsequent to the end of the half year:
-
(a) On 11 January 2012, Elixir announced it had secured Blocks 12/18 and 12/19a (split) located in the Inner Moray Firth area of the UK North Sea.
-
(b) On 2 March 2012, Elixir announced a capital raising by way of a placement of 6.4 million ordinary shares at $0.0625 to raise $400,000 and a pro-rata, non-renounceable entitlement issue to eligible Elixir shareholders on the basis of 1 share for every 6 held at the record date at $0.05 to raise approximately $1.8 million (before the costs of the issue). The placement will be made to New Standard Energy (ASX: NSE) who have agreed to fully underwrite the entitlement issue for no fee. NSE have also been granted the option, at their election, to top up their shareholding to 15% post the placement and take up of any of the shortfall under the underwritten entitlements issue at $0.0625 / share.
Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this half-year financial report, no event has arisen since 31 December 2011 that would be likely to materially affect the operations of the Consolidated Entity, the results of the Consolidated Entity or the state of affairs of the Consolidated Entity.
19