Annual / Quarterly Financial Statement • Mar 1, 2012
Annual / Quarterly Financial Statement
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer

Annual Accounts
31 December 2011
Directors´ Report 2011
(With Auditors´Report Thereon)

| Assets | Note | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intangible assets | 5 | 2,555 | 9,025 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 6 | 1,942 | 1,833 |
| Non-current investments in group companies and associates Equity instruments Loans to group companies Derivatives |
8 10.a 11 |
8,490,224 4,189,354 4,293,063 7,807 |
8,126,176 4,004,389 4,121,787 - |
| Non-current investments | 246 | 110 | |
| Deferred tax assets | 18 | 2,109 | 4,579 |
| Total non-current assets | 8,497,076 | 8,141,723 | |
| Trade and other receivables Trade receivables from group companies and associates – current Other receivables Personnel Public entities, other |
9 9 9 18 |
16,247 16,143 91 2 11 |
7,288 6,074 225 1 988 |
| Current investments in group companies and associates Debt securities Derivatives Other investments |
10.a 11 |
652,082 303,436 2.056 346,590 |
483,081 302,813 1,368 178,900 |
| Prepayments for current assets | 100 | 79 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents Cash Cash equivalents |
12 | 788 788 - |
182,767 134 182,633 |
| Total current assets | 669,217 | 673,215 | |
| Total assets | 9,166,293 | 8,814,938 |
| Equity and Liabilities | Note | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital and reserves | |||
| Capital | 13.a | 4,361,541 | 4,361,541 |
| Share premium | 1,228,451 | 1,228,451 | |
| Reserves | 152,371 | 108,280 | |
| Profit for the year | 59,018 | 44,091 | |
| Total equity | 5,801,381 | 5,742,363 | |
| Non-current provisions | 1,015 | - | |
| Long-term employee benefits | 14 | 1,015 | - |
| Non-current payables | 79,184 | 144,049 | |
| Derivatives | 11 | 79,184 | 144,049 |
| Group companies and associates, non-current | 16.a | 2,986,433 | 2,799,548 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 18 | 28,117 | 30,621 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 3,094,749 | 2,974,218 | |
| Current provisions | 14 | - | 13,766 |
| Current payables | 16.b | 451 | 1,324 |
| Group companies and associates, current | 16.a | 250,746 | 60,964 |
| Trade and other payables | 18,966 | 22,303 | |
| Current payables to suppliers | 16.c | 1,555 | 1,689 |
| Suppliers, group companies and associates, current | 16.c | 13,106 | 16,579 |
| Personnel (salaries payable) | 16.c | 4,022 | 3,838 |
| Public entities, other | 18 | 283 | 197 |
| Total current liabilities | 270,163 | 98,357 | |
| Total equity and liabilities | 9,166,293 | 8,814,938 |
| Note | 2,011 | 2,010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONTINUING OPERATIONS | |||
| Revenues | 9 and 21.a | 274,012 | 246,509 |
| Work carried out by the company for assets | 473 | 390 | |
| Other operating income | 7,977 | 2,059 | |
| Non-trading and other operating income | 7,977 | 2,059 | |
| Personnel expenses | (11,170) | (9,834) | |
| Salaries and wages | (9,763) | (8,782) | |
| Employee benefits expense | 21.c | (1,407) | (1,052) |
| Other operating expenses | (18,289) | (29,692) | |
| External services | 21.d) | (15,515) | (15,878) |
| Taxes | (2,025) | (35) | |
| Other administrative expenses | 14 | (749) | (13,779) |
| Amortisation and depreciation | 5 and 6 | (769) | (553) |
| Impairment and gains/(losses) on disposal of fixed assets | - | 12 | |
| Results from operating activities | 252,234 | 208,891 | |
| Finance income | 9 | 133 | 46 |
| Other investment income | 133 | 46 | |
| Other | 133 | 46 | |
| Finance expenses | 15 | (157,242) | (143,344) |
| Group companies and associates | (156,606) | (143,297) | |
| Other | (636) | (47) | |
| Change in fair value of financial instruments | 9 and 15 | 8,981 | (1,164) |
| 10.d and | |||
| Exchange gains/losses | 16.f | (21,345) | 476 |
| Net finance income/(expense) | (169,473) | (143,986) | |
| Profit/(loss) before income tax | 82,761 | 64,905 | |
| Income tax expense | 18 | (23,743) | (20,814) |
| Profit/(loss) from continuing operations | 59,018 | 44,091 | |
| DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | - | - | |
| Profit/(loss) for the year | 59,018 | 44,091 |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the annual accounts for 2011.
| Note | 2,011 | 2,010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit/(loss) for the year | 59,018 | 44,091 | |
| Total income and expense recognised directly in equity |
- | - | |
| Total amounts transferred to the income statement | - | - | |
| Total adjustments to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities |
- | - | |
| Total recognised income and expense | 59,018 | 44,091 |
(Expressed in thousands of Euros)
| Entity | Capital | Share premium |
Reserves | Share capital increase costs |
Profit/(loss) for the year |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 31 December 2010 | 4,361,541 | 1,228,451 | 142,850 | (34,570) | 44,091 | 5,742,363 |
| Recognised income and expense Other changes in equity |
- - |
- - |
- 44,091 |
- - |
59,018 (44,091) |
59,018 - |
| Balance at 31 December 2011 | 4,361,541 | 1,228,451 | 186,941 | (34,570) | 59,018 | 5,801,381 |
| Entity | Capital | Share premium |
Reserves | Share capital increase costs |
Profit/(loss) for the year |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 31 December 2009 | 4,361,541 | 1,228,451 | 74,838 | (34,570) | 68,012 | 5,698,272 |
| Recognised income and expense Other changes in equity |
- - |
- - |
- 68,012 |
- - |
44,091 (68,012) |
44,091 - |
| Balance at 31 December 2010 | 4,361,541 | 1,228,451 | 142,850 | (34,570) | 44,091 | 5,742,363 |
| Note | 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Profit/(loss) for the year before tax | 82,761 | 64,905 | |
| Adjustments for: | (106,948) | (88,216) | |
| Amortisation and depreciation (+) | 5 and 6 | 769 | 553 |
| Change in provisions (+/-) | 14 | (3,178) | 13,766 |
| Proceeds/losses from disposals of fixed assets (+/-) | - | (12) | |
| Finance income (-) | 9 | (274,145) | (246,555) |
| Finance expense (+) | 15 | 157,242 | 143,344 |
| 10.d and | |||
| Exchange gains/losses (+/-) | 16.f | 21,345 | (476) |
| Change in fair value of financial instruments (+/-) | 15 | (8,981) | 1,164 |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities | (14,226) | 970 | |
| Trade and other receivables (+/-) | (3,481) | (284) | |
| Other current assets | (21) | 123 | |
| Trade and other payables (+/-) | (3,423) | 1,328 | |
| Other current liabilities (+/-) | (7,301) | (197) | |
| Other cash flows from (used in) operating activities | (220,779) | (533,793) | |
| Interest paid (-) | (119,585) | (72,225) | |
| Interest received (+) | 260,779 | 229,991 | |
| Payments for (collections of) loans extended to subsidiaries (+/-) | (339,202) | (676,313) | |
| Income tax paid (received) (+/-) | 18 | (22,771) | (15,246) |
| Cash flows from (used in) operating activities | (259,192) | (556,134) | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Payments for investments (-) | (83,766) | (75,608) | |
| Group companies and associates | (80,260) | (65,530) | |
| Intangible assets | (3,492) | (8,585) | |
| Property, plant and equipment | (14) | (1,493) | |
| Proceeds from sale of investments (+) | 3,739 | 97 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 6 | 3,739 | 97 |
| Cash flows from (used in) investing activities | (80,027) | (75,511) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Proceeds from and payments for financial liability instruments | 158,819 | 529,731 | |
| Issue | |||
| Group companies and associates (+) | 158,819 | 529,731 | |
| Redemption and repayment of Group companies and associates (-) |
- | - | |
| Cash flows from (used in) financing activities | 158,819 | 529,731 | |
| Effect of exchange rate fluctuations | (1,579) | 27,129 | |
| Net increase/decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (181,979) | (74,785) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 12 | 182,767 | 257,552 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at year end | 12 | 788 | 182,767 |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the annual accounts for 2011.
The directors authorised for issue the 2011 consolidated annual accounts of EDP Renováveis, S.A. and subsidiaries on 28 February 2012 (23 February 2011 for the 2010 annual accounts), which show consolidated profits of Euros 90,624 thousand and consolidated equity of Euros 5,453,725 thousand (Euros 83,038 thousand and Euros 5,393,511 thousand in 2010). The consolidated annual accounts will be filed at the Asturias Mercantile Registry.
The accompanying annual accounts have been prepared on the basis of the accounting records of EDP Renováveis, S.A. The annual accounts for 2011 have been prepared in accordance with prevailing legislation and the Spanish General Chart of Accounts to present fairly the equity and financial position at 31 December 2011 and the results of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for the year then ended.
The directors consider that the accompanying annual accounts for 2011, authorised for issue on 28 February 2012, will be approved with no changes.
(b) Comparative information
The balance sheet, income statement, statement of changes in equity, statement of cash flows and the notes thereto for 2011 include comparative figures for 2010, which formed part of the annual accounts approved by shareholders at the annual general meeting held on 11 April 2011.
(c) Functional and presentation currency
The figures disclosed in the annual accounts are expressed in thousands of Euros, the Company's functional and presentation currency.
Although estimates are calculated by the Company's directors based on the best information available at 31 December 2011, future events may require changes to these estimates in subsequent years. Any effect on the annual accounts of adjustments to be made in subsequent years would be recognised prospectively.
The proposed distribution of 2011 profit to be submitted to the shareholders for approval at their annual general meeting is as follows:
| Euros | |
|---|---|
| Basis of allocation Profit for the year |
59,018,372.5 |
| Distribution | |
| Legal reserve | 5,901,837.25 |
| Voluntary reserve | 53,116,535.25 |
| Total | 59,018,372.5 |
The distribution of profit and reserves of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2010, approved by the shareholders at their annual general meeting held on 11 April 2011, is as follows:
| Euros | |
|---|---|
| Basis of allocation Profit for the year |
44,091,046.97 |
| Distribution | |
| Legal reserve | 4,409,104.70 |
| Voluntary reserve | 39,681,942.27 |
| Total | 44,091,046.97 |
At 31 December non-distributable reserves are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | ||
| Non-distributable reserves | |||
| Legal reserve | 18,689 | 14,280 | |
| 18,689 | 14,280 |
Profit recognised directly in equity cannot be distributed, either directly or indirectly.
Computer software maintenance costs are charged as expenses when incurred.
(c) Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are measured at cost of acquisition. Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less any accumulated depreciation and impairment.
Property, plant and equipment are depreciated by allocating the depreciable amount of an asset on a systematic basis over its useful life. The depreciable amount is the cost of an asset, less its residual value. The Company determines the depreciation charge separately for each component of an item of property, plant and equipment with a cost that is significant in relation to the total cost of the asset and with a useful life that differs from the remainder of the asset.
Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the following criteria:
| Depreciation | Estimated years of |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| method | useful life | ||
| Other installations | Straight-line | 10 | |
| Information technology equipment | Straight-line | 4 |
A financial asset and a financial liability are offset only when the Company currently has the legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
the performance of a group of financial assets, financial liabilities or both is managed and evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with the Company's documented risk management or investment strategy. Information on these financial assets and financial liabilities provided internally to the Company's key management personnel is evaluated on that basis.
This category also includes the derivative financial instruments described in note 11.
Investments in group companies are initially recognised at cost, which is equivalent to the fair value of the consideration given, excluding transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at cost net of any accumulated impairment. The cost of investments in group companies acquired prior to 1 January 2010 includes transaction costs.
Interest is recognised using the effective interest method.
Based on consultation number 2 with the Spanish Accounting and Auditing Institute, published in its Official Gazette number 78, for entities whose ordinary activity is the holding of shares in group companies and the financing of subsidiaries, dividends and other income – coupons, interest – earned on financing extended to subsidiaries, as well as profits obtained from the disposal of investments, except those deriving from the disposal of subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates, constitute revenue in the income statement.
Impairment of an investment is limited to the amount of the investment, except when contractual, legal or constructive obligations have been assumed by the Company or payments have been made on behalf of the companies.
Financial liabilities, including trade and other payables, that are not classified as held for trading or as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value less any transaction costs directly attributable to the issue of the financial liability. After initial recognition, liabilities classified under this category are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the years when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantially enacted. The tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the Company expects to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets or liabilities are also reflected in the measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised in the balance sheet under non-current assets or liabilities, irrespective of the expected date of recovery or settlement.
The Company classifies assets and liabilities in the balance sheet as current and noncurrent. Current assets and liabilities are determined as follows:
Expenses derived from environmental activities are recognised as operating expenses in the period in which they are incurred.
Details of intangible assets and movement are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at | Balance at | |||
| 31/12/10 | Additions | Disposals | 31/12/11 | |
| Cost | ||||
| Computer software | 2,259 | 449 | - | 2,708 |
| Computer software under | ||||
| development | 7,443 | 2,449 | (8,804) | 1,088 |
| 9,702 | 2,898 | (8,804) | 3,796 | |
| Amortisation | ||||
| Computer software | (677) | (564) | - | (1,241) |
| (677) | (564) | - | (1,241) | |
| Carrying amount | 9,025 | 2.334 | (8,804) | 2,555 |
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 31/12/09 |
Additions | Disposals | Balance at 31/12/10 |
|||
| Cost | ||||||
| Computer software | 2,253 | 6 | - | 2,259 | ||
| Computer software under development |
1,861 | 9,321 | (3,739) | 7,443 | ||
| 4,114 | 9,327 | (3,739) | 9,702 | |||
| Amortisation Computer software |
(225) | (452) | - | (677) | ||
| (225) | (452) | - | (677) | |||
| Carrying amount | 3,889 | 8,875 | (3,739) | 9,025 |
Additions to computer software mainly comprise wind farm management software acquired during the year. Disposals reflect various wind farm management applications invoiced to the Company's subsidiaries EDPR EU and EDPR NA.
At year end the Company has no fully amortised intangible assets.
At 31 December 2011, the Company has commitments to purchase intangible assets, namely computer software, within one year amounting to Euros 405 thousand (in 2010 Euros 7,230 thousand within one year, Euros 2,352 thousand in one to three years and Euros 1,016 thousand in three to five years).
Details of property, plant and equipment and movement are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 31/12/10 |
Additions | Disposals | Balance at 31/12/11 |
||
| Cost | |||||
| Other installations Information technology |
1,357 | 282 19 |
- | 1,639 | |
| equipment | 143 | - | 162 | ||
| Under construction | 466 | 13 | - | 479 | |
| 1,966 | 314 | - | 2,280 | ||
| Depreciation Other installations Information technology equipment |
(87) | (164) | - | (251) | |
| (46) | (41) | - | (87) | ||
| (133) | (205) | - | (338) | ||
| Carrying amount | 1,833 | 109 | - | 1,942 |
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 31/12/09 |
Additions | Disposals | Balance at 31/12/10 |
|||
| Cost | ||||||
| Other installations Information technology |
363 | 994 | - | 1,357 | ||
| equipment | 208 | 32 | (97) | 143 | ||
| Under construction | - | 466 | - | 466 | ||
| 571 | 1,492 | (97) | 1,966 | |||
| Depreciation Other installations Information technology equipment |
(18) | (69) | - | (87) | ||
| (26) | (32) | 12 | (46) | |||
| (44) | (101) | 12 | (133) | |||
| Carrying amount | 527 | 1,391 | (85) | 1,833 |
The Company has taken out insurance policies to cover the risk of damage to its property, plant and equipment. The coverage of these policies is considered sufficient.
At year end the Company has no fully depreciated property, plant and equipment.
Details of financial assets exposed to credit risk are provided in note 10.
Interest rate risk arises from loans extended to group companies and non-current borrowings from group companies. The loans have fixed interest rates, exposing the Company to fair value risks.
Details of the hedged financial assets and the derivative financial instruments obtained to hedge them are provided in notes 8 and 11.
Details of equity instruments of group companies are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| EDP Renováveis Brasil | 14,143 | 12,383 |
| EDP Renewables Europe, S.L.U. | 884,352 | 884,352 |
| EDP Renewables North America, LLC | 3,288,669 | 3,107,654 |
| EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd. | 2,190 | 3 |
| Uncalled equity holdings in EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd. | - | (3) |
| 4,189,354 | 4,004,389 | |
| (note 10.a) | (note 10.a) |
No impairment losses have been recognised as a result of the tests performed.
Details of direct and indirect investments in group companies are provided in Appendix I.
EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd., a solely owned subsidiary of the Company, was incorporated in 2010 with share capital of Euros 3 thousand. In 2011 the Company subscribed successive share capital increases by its subsidiary EDP Renewables Canada totalling Euros 2,187 thousand (Canadian Dollars 2,995 thousand).
The functional currencies of foreign operations are the currencies of the countries in which they are domiciled. The net investment in these operations coincides with the carrying amount of the investment.
Details of investments, the fair value of which is hedged against currency risk at 31 December 2011 and 2010, are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | ||
| EDP Renewables North America, LLC. (EDPR NA) | 3,288,669 | 3,107,654 | |
| 3,288,669 | 3,107,654 |
The classification of financial assets by category and class, as well as a comparison of the fair value and the carrying amount, is as follows:
| 2011 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||||
| Non-current | Current | ||||||||
| At amortised cost or cost | At amortised cost or cost |
||||||||
| Carrying amount |
Fair value | At fair value |
Total | Carrying amount |
Fair value |
At fair value |
Total | ||
| Assets held for trading Derivative financial |
|||||||||
| instruments | - | - | 7,807 | 7,807 | - | - | 2,056 | 2,056 | |
| Total | - | - | 7,807 | 7,807 | - | - | 2,056 | 2,056 | |
| Loans and receivables Loans, fixed rate |
4,293,063 | 4,184,707 | - | 4,293,063 | 303,436 | 303,436 | - | 303,436 | |
| Deposits and guarantees | 10 | 10 | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | |
| Other financial assets | 236 | 236 | - | 236 | 346,590 | 346,590 | - | 346,590 | |
| Trade receivables | - | - | - | - | 16,236 | 16,236 | - | 16,236 | |
| Total | 4,293,309 | 4,184,953 | - | 4,293,309 | 666,262 | 666,262 | - | 666,262 | |
| Total financial assets | 4,293,309 | 4,184,953 | 7,807 | 4,301,116 | 666,262 | 666,262 | 2,056 | 668,318 |
| 2010 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||
| Non-current | Current | ||||||
| At amortised cost or | At amortised cost or | ||||||
| cost | cost | ||||||
| Carrying amount |
Fair value | Total | Carrying amount |
Fair value | At fair value |
Total | |
| Assets held for trading Derivative financial |
|||||||
| instruments | - | - | - | - | - | 1,368 | 1,368 |
| - | - | - | - | - | 1,368 | 1,368 | |
| Total | |||||||
| Loans and receivables | |||||||
| Loans, fixed rate | 4,110,684 | 3,805,591 | 4,110,684 | 200,963 | 200,963 | - | 200,963 |
| Loans, floating rate | 11,103 | 11,103 | 11,103 | 101,850 | 101,850 | - | 101,850 |
| Deposits and guarantees | 9 | 9 | 9 | - | - | - | - |
| Other financial assets | 101 | 101 | 101 | 178,900 | 178,900 | - | 178,900 |
| Trade receivables | - | - | - | 6,300 | 6,300 | - | 6,300 |
| Total | 4,121,897 | 3,816,804 | 4,121,897 | 488,013 | 488,013 | - | 488,013 |
| Total financial assets | 4,121,897 | 3,816,804 | 4,121,897 | 488,013 | 488,013 | 1,368 | 489,381 |
Net losses and gains by category of financial asset are as follows:
| 2011 Thousands of Euros |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and receivables, group companies |
Loans and receivables, third parties |
Assets held for trading |
Total | |||
| Finance income at amortised cost | 274,012 | 133 | - | 274,145 | ||
| Changes in fair value | - | - | 8,981 | 8,981 | ||
| Net gains/losses in profit or loss | 274,012 | 133 | 8,981 | 283,126 |
(Continues)
| 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||
| Loans and receivables, group companies |
Loans and receivables, third parties |
Total | |||
| Finance income at amortised cost | 246,509 | 46 | 246,555 | ||
| Net gains/losses in profit or loss | 246,509 | 46 | 246,555 |
Details of investments in group companies are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||
| Non | Non | ||||
| current | Current | current | Current | ||
| Group | |||||
| Equity instruments (note 8) | 4,189,354 | - | 4,004,389 | - | |
| Loans | 4,293,063 | 274,902 | 4,121,787 | 282,745 | |
| Interest | - | 28,534 | - | 20,068 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | |||||
| (note 11) | 7,807 | 2,056 | - | 1,368 | |
| Other financial assets | - | 346,590 | - | 178,900 | |
| 8,490,224 | 652,082 | 8,126,176 | 483,081 |
Other financial assets comprise current accounts with the group, which earn daily interest that is settled on a monthly basis. The rate applicable to interest receivable varies between the one-month Euribor plus 1% and the one-year Euribor plus 1% and the rate applicable to interest payable varies between the one-month Euribor and the one-year Euribor.
Details of the main characteristics of loans are as follows.
| 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||
| Carrying amount | |||||||
| Effective | Nominal | Nominal | Non | ||||
| Type | Currency | rate | rate | Maturity | amount | Current | current |
| Group | EUR | 6.29% | 6.29% | 2020 | 50,159 | - | 50,159 |
| Group | EUR | 5.11% | 5.11% | 2018 | 886,691 | - | 886,691 |
| Group | EUR | 5.00% | 5.00% | 2022 | 209,887 | 19,989 | 189,898 |
| Group | EUR | 4.81% | 4.81% | 2022 | 163,129 | 15,536 | 147,593 |
| Group | EUR | 5.14% | 5.14% | 2023 | 463,062 | 40,266 | 422,796 |
| Group | EUR | 5.56% | 5.56% | 2023 | 275,717 | 23,975 | 251,742 |
| Group | EUR | 4.80% | 4.80% | 2016 | 20,663 | 4,133 | 16,530 |
| Group | EUR | 6.98% | 6.98% | 2019 | 69,178 | - | 69,178 |
| Group | EUR | 6.93% | 6.93% | 2019 | 297,663 | - | 297,663 |
| Group | EUR | 6.80% | 6.80% | 2019 | 184,332 | - | 184,332 |
| Group | EUR | 5.04% | 5.04% | 2020 | 136,093 | - | 136,093 |
| Group | EUR | 4.63% | 4.63% | 2020 | 158,481 | - | 158,481 |
| Group | EUR | 5.56% | 5.56% | 2020 | 76,771 | - | 76,771 |
| Group | EUR | 6.33% | 6.33% | 2023 | 222,822 | 18,569 | 204,253 |
| Group | EUR | 5.78% | 5.78% | 2023 | 121,400 | - | 121,400 |
| Group | EUR | 4.78% | 4.78% | 2021 | 336,702 | 33,670 | 303,032 |
| Group | EUR | 5.67% | 5.67% | 2023 | 41,040 | 3,420 | 37,620 |
| Group | EUR | 5.45% | 5.45% | 2027 | 341,401 | 21,338 | 320,063 |
| Group | EUR | 6.54% | 6.54% | 2016 | 241,000 | - | 241,000 |
| Group | EUR | 7.27% | 7.27% | 2016 | 58,554 | - | 58,554 |
| Group | EUR | 5.67% | 5.67% | 2012 | 54,307 | 54,307 | - |
| Group | EUR | 5.64% | 5.64% | 2014 | 570 | - | 570 |
| Group | EUR | 5.62% | 5.62% | 2012 | 39,699 | 39,699 | - |
| Group | EUR | 6.72% | 6.72% | 2014 | 408 | - | 408 |
| Group | EUR | 5.30% | 5.30% | 2014 | 107 | - | 107 |
| Group | PLN | 5.74% | 5.74% | 2024 | 22,757 | - | 22,757 |
| Group | PLN | 6.91% | 6.91% | 2015 | 15,547 | - | 15,547 |
| Group | PLN | 8.41% | 8.41% | 2014 | 69 | - | 69 |
| Group | PLN | 8.44% | 8.44% | 2014 | 20,618 | - | 20,618 |
| Group | PLN | 7.21% | 7.21% | 2014 | 248 | - | 248 |
| Group | PLN | 8.79% | 8.79% | 2014 | 2,890 | - | 2,890 |
| Group | PLN | 9.76% | 9.76% | 2014 | 3,398 | - | 3,398 |
| Group | PLN | 9.93% | 9.93% | 2014 | 1,054 | - | 1,054 |
| Group | PLN | 10.23% | 10.23% | 2014 | 426 | - | 426 |
| Group | PLN | 10.26% | 10.26% | 2014 | 1,178 | - | 1,178 |
| Group | PLN | 10.58% | 10.58% | 2014 | 201 | - | 201 |
| Group | PLN | 10.65% | 10.65% | 2014 | 9,778 | - | 9,778 |
| Group | PLN | 9.47% | 9.47% | 2014 | 11,294 | - | 11,294 |
| Group | PLN | 10.09% | 10.09% | 2014 | 23,442 | - | 23,442 |
| Group | PLN | 10.37% | 10.37% | 2021 | 5,096 | - | 5,096 |
| Group | PLN | 10.72% | 10.72% | 2021 | 133 | - | 133 |
| Total group | 4,567,965 | 274,902 | 4,293,063 | ||||
| Total | 4,567,965 | 274,902 | 4,293,063 | ||||
(Continues)
| 2010 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||
| Carrying amount | |||||||
| Effective | Nominal | Nominal | Non | ||||
| Type | Currency | rate | rate | Maturity | amount | Current | current |
| Group | EUR | 2.74% | 2.74% | 2011 | 71,600 | 71,600 | - |
| Group | EUR | 5.11% | 5.11% | 2018 | 886,691 | - | 886,691 |
| Group | EUR | 5.00% | 5.00% | 2022 | 229,876 | 19,989 | 209,887 |
| Group | EUR | 4.81% | 4.81% | 2022 | 178,665 | 15,536 | 163,129 |
| Group | EUR | 5.14% | 5.14% | 2023 | 503,328 | 40,266 | 463,062 |
| Group | EUR | 5.56% | 5.56% | 2023 | 299,692 | 23,975 | 275,717 |
| Group | EUR | 4.80% | 4.80% | 2016 | 24,796 | 4,133 | 20,663 |
| Group | EUR | 6.98% | 6.98% | 2019 | 69,178 | - | 69,178 |
| Group | EUR | 6.93% | 6.93% | 2019 | 297,663 | - | 297,663 |
| Group | EUR | 6.80% | 6.80% | 2019 | 184,332 | - | 184,332 |
| Group | EUR | 5.04% | 5.04% | 2020 | 136,093 | - | 136,093 |
| Group | EUR | 4.63% | 4.63% | 2020 | 158,481 | - | 158,481 |
| Group | EUR | 5.56% | 5.56% | 2020 | 76,771 | - | 76,771 |
| Group | Euros (*) | 6.33% | 6.33% | 2023 | 241,390 | 18,568 | 222,822 |
| Group | EUR | 5.78% | 5.78% | 2023 | 121,400 | - | 121,400 |
| Group | EUR | 4.78% | 4.78% | 2021 | 370,372 | 33,670 | 336,702 |
| Group | EUR | 5.67% | 5.67% | 2023 | 44,460 | 3,420 | 41,040 |
| Group | EUR | 5.45% | 5.45% | 2027 | 362,739 | 21,338 | 341,401 |
| Group | EUR | 5.67% | 5.67% | 2012 | 17,203 | 6,100 | 11,103 |
| Group | EUR | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2011 | 24,150 | 24,150 | - |
| Group | EUR | 5.64% | 5.64% | 2014 | 570 | - | 570 |
| Group | EUR | 6.71% | 6.71% | 2014 | 2,892 | - | 2,892 |
| Group | EUR | 6.31% | 6.31% | 2014 | 408 | - | 408 |
| Group | EUR | 6.36% | 6.36% | 2014 | 107 | - | 107 |
| Group | PLN | 5.74% | 5.74% | 2024 | 23,899 | - | 23,899 |
| Group | PLN | 6.91% | 6.91% | 2015 | 17,436 | - | 17,436 |
| Group | PLN | 8.41% | 8.41% | 2014 | 10 | - | 10 |
| Group | PLN | 8.44% | 8.44% | 2014 | 29,217 | - | 29,217 |
| Group | PLN | 8.79% | 8.79% | 2014 | 1,098 | - | 1,098 |
| Group | PLN | 9.47% | 9.47% | 2014 | 13,251 | - | 13,251 |
| Group | PLN | 9.76% | 9.76% | 2014 | 3,472 | - | 3,472 |
| Group | PLN | 9.93% | 9.93% | 2014 | 1,182 | - | 1,182 |
| Group | PLN | 10.23% | 10.23% | 2014 | 428 | - | 428 |
| Group | PLN | 10.26% | 10.26% | 2014 | 1,321 | - | 1,321 |
| Group | PLN | 10.58% | 10.58% | 2014 | 225 | - | 225 |
| Group | PLN | 10.65% | 10.65% | 2014 | 10,136 | - | 10,136 |
| Total group | 4,404,532 | 282,745 | 4,121,787 | ||||
| Total | 4,404,532 | 282,745 | 4,121,787 |
All of these loans were extended to EDP Renewables Europe, S.L.U. and subsidiaries at fixed interest rates, with the exception of one floating-interest loan with a nominal amount of Euros 112,953 thousand at year end.
(c) Classification by maturity
| 2011 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Subsequent years |
Less current portion |
Total non current |
|
| Loans and receivables Loans |
||||||||
| Fixed rate | 303,436 | 180,896 | 256,577 | 196,443 | 480,450 | 3,178,697 | (303,436) | 4,293,063 |
| Deposits and guarantees |
- | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 |
| Other financial assets | 346,590 | - | - | - | - | 236 | (346,590) | 236 |
| Derivative financial | ||||||||
| instruments | 2,056 | - | - | 7,807 | - | - | (2,056) | 7,807 |
| Trade receivables from group compa |
||||||||
| nies and associates | 16,143 | - | - | - | - | - | (16,143) | - |
| Other receivables | 91 | - | - | - | - | - | (91) | - |
| Total | 668,316 | 180,896 | 256,577 | 204,250 | 480,450 | 3,178,943 | (668,316) | 4,301,116 |
| 2010 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Subsequent years |
Less current portion |
Total non current |
|
| Loans and receivables Loans |
||||||||
| Fixed rate | 160,125 | 147,226 | 147,226 | 228,887 | 182,004 | 3,068,640 | (160,125) | 3,773,983 |
| Floating rate | 142,688 | 44,773 | 33,670 | 33,670 | 33,670 | 202,021 | (142,688) | 347,804 |
| Deposits and | ||||||||
| guarantees | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | - | 9 |
| Other financial assets | 178,900 | - | - | - | - | 101 | (178,900) | 101 |
| Derivative financial instruments |
1,368 | - | - | - | - | - | (1,368) | - |
| Trade receivables from group compa |
||||||||
| nies and associates | 6,074 | - | - | - | - | - | (6,074) | - |
| Other receivables | 225 | - | - | - | - | - | (225) | - |
| Total | 489,380 | 191,999 | 180,896 | 262,557 | 215,674 | 3,270,771 | (489,380) | 4,121,897 |
(Continues)
Details of exchange differences recognised in profit or loss in relation to financial instruments, distinguishing between settled and outstanding transactions, are as follows:
| 2010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Settled | Outstanding | Settled | Outstanding |
| (1,227) | (74,278) | 805 | (142,499) |
| (1,227) | (9,868) | 805 | 283 |
| (142,782) | |||
| (1,579) | 3,596 | 29,454 | (2,325) |
| (1,579) | 3,596 | 29,454 | (2,325) |
| (2,806) | (70,682) | 30,259 | (144,824) |
| - | 2011 (64,410) |
Thousands of Euros - |
Details of derivative financial instruments are as follows:
| 2011 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||
| Assets | Liabilities | |||
| Non | Non | |||
| current | Current | current | Current | |
| Hedging derivatives | ||||
| a) Fair value hedges | ||||
| Net investment hedging swaps (note 8) | - | - | 79,184 | 129,276 |
| Total | - | - | 79,184 | 129,276 |
| Derivatives held for trading and at fair value through profit or loss |
||||
| b) Foreign currency derivatives | ||||
| Forward exchange contracts | 7,807 | 2,056 | - | 2,056 |
| Total | 7,807 | 2,056 | - | 2,056 |
| Total hedging derivatives | 7,807 | 2,056 | 79,184 | 131,332 |
| (note 10 a) | (note 15) |
| 2010 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||
| Assets | Liabilities | |||
| Non | Non | |||
| current | Current | current | Current | |
| Hedging derivatives | ||||
| a) Fair value hedges Net investment hedging swaps (note 8) Total |
- - |
- - |
144,049 144,049 |
- - |
| Derivatives held for trading and at fair value through profit or loss |
||||
| b) Foreign currency derivatives Forward exchange contracts Total |
- - |
1,368 1,368 |
- - |
2,540 2,540 |
| Total hedging derivatives | - | 1,368 (note 10 a) |
144,049 | 2,540 (note 15) |
The total amount of gains and losses on hedging instruments and on items hedged under fair value hedges of net investments in group companies is as follows:
| 2011 | Gains/(losses) |
|---|---|
| 2010 | |
| Forward exchange contracts | |
| - Swap hedging instruments for net investments (note 8) | (64,410) (142,782) |
| - Investments in group companies (note 8) | 64,410 142,782 |
To eliminate the currency risk of a group subsidiary, in 2011 and 2010 the Company contracted a cross deal whereby it forward sells Polish Zloty to Neo Polska at a fixed price in Euros and simultaneously forward purchases Polish Zloty from EDP-Energías de Portugal, S.A. Sucursal en España. The nominal amount of these forward contracts is Euros 39 million (Euros 39 million in 2010). The Company contracted this cross deal to hedge the risk of exchange rate fluctuations on purchases of wind turbines payable in Polish Zloty by its subsidiary Neolica Polska SP Z.O.O. The fair value of these instruments, which amounts to Euros 2,056 thousand (Euros 1,368 thousand in 2010), is recognised as an asset under current investments in group companies and associates and as a liability under current payables to group companies and associates, as presented in notes 10.a and 16.a, respectively.
In 2011, the Company contracted two cross interest rate swaps for a total notional amount of Polish Zloty 309,307 thousand (Polish Zloty 309,307 thousand in 2010), equivalent to Euros 77,008 thousand (Euros 77,008 thousand in 2010). The fair value of these instruments, which amounts to Euros 7,807 thousand in 2011, is recognised under Non-current investments in group companies and associates, as presented in note 10.a. In 2010, the fair value of these instruments, which amounted to Euros 1,172 thousand, was recognised as a liability under current payables to group companies and associates, as presented in note 16.a.
Details of cash and cash equivalents are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |||
| Cash in hand and at banks | 788 | 134 | ||
| Current bank deposits | - | 182,633 | ||
| 788 | 182,767 |
At 31 December 2010 current bank deposits reflect US Dollar deposits in the group company EDP Finance BV, which mature in less than three months and earn interest at a rate of between 5% and 5.5%.
Details of equity and movement during 2011 and 2010 are shown in the statement of changes in equity.
| 2011 and 2010 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Number of shares |
Percentage ownership |
||
| EDP - Energías de Portugal, S.A. Sucursal en España Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. Others (*) |
541,027,156 135,256,700 196,024,306 |
62.02% 15.51% 22.47% |
||
| 872,308,162 | 100.00% | |||
(*) Shares quoted on the Lisbon stock exchange
This reserve is freely distributable.
(c) Reserves
Details of reserves and movement during the year reflect the proposed distribution of profit approved by the shareholders (see note 3).
These reserves are freely distributable.
As a result of the public share offering, the Company has incurred a number of expenses associated with the share capital increase, which have been recognised in this caption net of the tax effect.
Movement in provisions in 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 31/12/10 |
Charge | Applica tions |
Reversals | Balance at 31/12/11 |
|||
| Non-current provisions | |||||||
| Long-term employee benefits |
- | 1,015 | - | - | 1,015 | ||
| Current provisions Provisions |
13,766 | - | (9,573) | (4,193) | - | ||
| Thousands of Euros Balance at Balance at |
| 31/12/09 | Charge | 31/12/10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current provisions | ||||
| Provisions | - | 13,766 | 13,766 |
The classification of financial liabilities by category and class and a comparison of the fair value with the carrying amount are as follows:
| 2011 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||||
| Non-current | Current | ||||||||
| At amortised cost or cost | At amortised cost or cost | ||||||||
| Carrying amount |
Fair value | At fair value |
Total | Carrying amount |
Fair value | At fair value |
Total | ||
| Liabilities held for trading | |||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 2,056 | 2,056 | |
| Total | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,056 | 2,056 | |
| Debts and payables | |||||||||
| Payables to group companies Fixed-rate Floating rate |
2,986,433 - |
2,558,364 - |
- - |
2,986,433 - |
2,432 117,433 |
2,432 117,433 |
- - |
2,432 117,433 |
|
| Trade and other payables | - | - | - | - | 18,683 | 18,683 | - | 18,683 | |
| Total | 2,986,433 | 2,558,364 | 2,986,433 | 138,548 | 138,548 | - | 138,683 | ||
| Hedging derivatives Traded on OTC markets |
- | - | 79,184 | 79,184 | - | - | 129,276 | 129,276 | |
| Total | 79,184 | 79,184 | 129,276 | 129,276 | |||||
| Total financial liabilities | 2,986,433 | 2,558,364 | 79,184 | 3,065,617 | 138,548 | 138,548 | 131,332 | 269,880 |
| 2010 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
| Non-current | Current | |||||||
| At amortised cost or cost | At amortised cost or cost | |||||||
| Carrying amount |
Fair value | At fair value |
Total | Carrying amount |
Fair value | At fair value |
Total | |
| Liabilities held for trading | ||||||||
| Derivative financial instruments |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 2,540 | 2,540 |
| Total | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,540 | 2,540 |
| Debts and payables | ||||||||
| Payables to group companies, fixed-rate |
2,799,548 | 2,652,417 | - | 2,799,548 | 806 | 806 | - | 806 |
| Other financial liabilities | - | - | - | - | 58,942 | 58,942 | - | 58,942 |
| Trade and other payables | - | - | - | - | 22,106 | 22,106 | - | 22,106 |
| Total | 2,799,548 | 2,652,417 | 2,799,548 | 81,854 | 81,854 | - | 81,854 | |
| Hedging derivatives Traded on OTC markets |
- | - | 144,049 | 144,049 | - | - | - | - |
| Total | - | - | 144,049 | 144,049 | - | - | - | - |
| Total financial liabilities | 2,799,548 | 2,652,417 | 144,049 | 2,943,597 | 81,854 | 81,854 | 2,540 | 84,394 |
Net losses and gains by financial liability category are as follows:
| 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||
| Debts and payables, group companies |
Debts and payables, third parties |
Liabilities held for trading |
Total | |||
| Finance expenses at amortised cost | 156,606 | 636 | - | 157,242 | ||
| Total | 156,606 | 636 | - | 157,242 |
| 2010 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||
| Debts and payables, group companies |
Debts and payables, third parties |
Liabilities held for trading |
Total | ||||
| Finance expenses at amortised cost Change in fair value |
143,297 - |
47 - |
- 1,164 |
143,344 1,164 |
|||
| Total | 143,297 | 47 | 1,164 | 144,508 |
Details of payables to group companies are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||
| Non | Non | |||||
| current | Current | current | Current | |||
| Group | ||||||
| Group companies | 2,986,433 | - | 2,799,548 | - | ||
| Interest | - | 2,432 | - | 806 | ||
| Suppliers of fixed assets, group companies |
- | 43 | - | 151 | ||
| Derivative financial instruments (note 11) |
- | 131,332 | - | 2,540 | ||
| Current account with group companies |
- | 116,939 | - | 57,467 | ||
| Total | 2,986,433 | 250,746 | 2,799,548 | 60,964 |
Details of payables are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| Non current |
Current | Non current |
Current | |||||
| Unrelated parties | ||||||||
| Suppliers of fixed assets Interest |
- - |
390 39 |
- - |
1,324 - |
||||
| Other | - | 22 | - | - | ||||
| Total | - | 451 | - | 1,324 |
At 31 December 2011 and 2010, payables to suppliers of fixed assets reflect invoices payable to suppliers of computer software.
(c) Main characteristics of payables
The terms and conditions of loans and payables are as follows:
| 2011 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||
| Carrying amount | |||||||
| Effective | Nominal | Maturity | Nominal | Non | |||
| Type | Currency | rate | rate | amount | Current | current | |
| Group | EUR | 4.66% | 4.66% | 2018 | 890,275 | - | 890,275 |
| EUR | 6.93% | 6.93% | 2019 | 186,644 | - | 186,644 | |
| EUR | 5.04% | 5.04% | 2020 | 133,124 | - | 133,124 | |
| EUR | 6.54% | 6.54% | 2016 | 241,000 | - | 241,000 | |
| USD | 4.57% | 4.57% | 2018 | 1,138,251 | - | 1,138,251 | |
| USD | 7.86% | 7.86% | 2019 | 176,331 | - | 176,331 | |
| USD | 7.30% | 7.30% | 2019 | 104,925 | - | 104,925 | |
| USD | 7.40% | 7.40% | 2020 | 38,751 | - | 38,751 | |
| USD | 8.35% | 8.35% | 2019 | 36,929 | - | 36,929 | |
| USD | 7.50% | 7.50% | 2021 | 40,203 | - | 40,203 | |
| Total | 2,986,433 | 2,986,433 |
| 2010 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
| Carrying amount | ||||||||
| Effective | Nominal | Nominal | Non | |||||
| Type | Currency | rate | rate | Maturity | amount | Current | current | |
| Group | EUR | 4.66% | 4.66% | 2018 | 890,275 | - | 890,275 | |
| EUR | 6.93% | 6.93% | 2019 | 186,644 | - | 186,644 | ||
| EUR | 5.04% | 5.04% | 2020 | 160,776 | - | 160,776 | ||
| EUR | 4.63% | 4.63% | 2020 | 79,000 | - | 79,000 | ||
| EUR | 5.56% | 5.56% | 2020 | 35,000 | - | 35,000 | ||
| USD | 4.57% | 4.57% | 2018 | 1,102,218 | - | 1,102,218 | ||
| USD | 7.86% | 7.86% | 2019 | 170,749 | - | 170,749 | ||
| USD | 7.30% | 7.30% | 2019 | 101,603 | - | 101,603 | ||
| USD | 7.40% | 7.40% | 2020 | 37,524 | - | 37,524 | ||
| USD | 8.35% | 8.35% | 2019 | 35,759 | - | 35,759 | ||
| Total | 2,799,548 | - | 2,799,548 |
Details of trade and other payables are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||
| Non current |
Current | Non current |
Current | ||
| Group | |||||
| Suppliers | - | 13,106 | - | 16,579 | |
| - | 13,106 | - | 16,579 | ||
| Unrelated parties | |||||
| Trade payables | - | 1,555 | - | 1,689 | |
| Salaries payable | - | 4,022 | - | 3,838 | |
| Public entities, other (note 16) | - | 283 | - | 197 | |
| - | 5,860 | - | 5,724 | ||
| Total | - | 18,966 | - | 22,303 |
Payables to group companies and associates mainly comprise expenses invoiced by EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. and EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. (Sucursal en España), primarily for management and IT services and use of the trademark.
The classification of financial liabilities by maturity is as follows:
| 2011 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Subsequent years |
Less current portion |
Total non current |
|
| Group companies Derivative financial |
- | - | - | - | - | 2,986,433 | - | 2,986,433 |
| instruments Group companies and |
131,332 | - | - | - | - | 79,184 | (131,332) | 79,184 |
| associates | 119,414 | - | - | - | - | - | (119,414) | - |
| Current payables | 451 | - | - | - | - | - | (451) | - |
| Trade and other payables | 18,683 | - | - | - | - | - | (18,683) | - |
| Total financial liabilities | 269,880 | - | - | - | - | 3,065,617 | (269,880) | 3,065,617 |
| 2010 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Subsequent years |
Less current portion |
Total non current |
|
| Group companies | - | - | - | - | - | 2,799,548 | - | 2,799,548 |
| Derivative financial instruments |
2,540 | 89,332 | - | - | - | 54,717 | (2,540) | 144,049 |
| Group companies and associates |
58,424 | - | - | - | - | - | (58,424) | - |
| Current payables | 1,324 | - | - | - | - | - | (1,324) | - |
| Trade and other payables | 22,303 | - | - | - | - | - | (22,303) | - |
| Total financial liabilities | 84,591 | 89,332 | - | - | - | 2,854,265 | (84,591) | 2,943,597 |
Details of exchange differences recognised in profit or loss in relation to financial instruments, distinguishing between settled and outstanding transactions, are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||
| Settled | Outstanding | Settled | Outstanding | |||
| Group companies and associates, |
||||||
| non-current | - | (51,545) | - | (98,870) | ||
| Trade and other payables | (9) | (100) | (1) | (112) | ||
| Total financial liabilities | (9) | (51,645) | (1) | (98,982) |
Pursuant to the third additional provision of Law 15/2010 of 5 July 2010, which amends Law 3/2004 and establishes measures against bad trade debts, companies are required to expressly disclose information on payment periods with suppliers in the notes to the annual accounts. Details of payments to suppliers in 2011 (highlighting the amounts that exceeded the maximum legal payment period), the weighted average period by which payments are past-due and the outstanding amount payable that exceeds the legal payment period at year end are as follows:
| Payments made and outstanding at the balance sheet date |
||
|---|---|---|
| 2011 Amount |
% | |
| Within maximum legal period | 7,672 | 65% |
| Other | 4,180 | 35% |
| Total payments for the year | 11,852 | 100% |
| Weighted average period by which payments past-due (days) |
48 | |
| Late payments exceeding maximum legal period at year | ||
| end | 5,274 |
Within past-due payables to suppliers at the 2011 year end, Euros 5,194 thousand was payable to group companies.
Past-due payables to suppliers at the 2010 year end amounted to Euros 8,101 thousand, of which Euros 7,752 thousand was payable to group companies.
According to the Resolution of the Spanish Accounting and Audit Institute of 29 December 2010 regarding the information required to be incorporated to the annual accounts related to the information provided at the Note 23 about past-due payables to suppliers, comparative information to provide about 2010 year end refers exclusively to the amount of past-due payables to suppliers which exceeded the legal payment period at year end, which means that information provided for 2011 year end is not comparable with information provided on previous year.
Details of balances with public entities are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||
| Non current |
Current | Non current |
Current | ||
| Assets | |||||
| Deferred tax assets | 2,109 | - | 4,579 | - | |
| Non-current tax assets | - | 11 | - | 988 | |
| 2,109 | 11 | 4,579 | 988 | ||
| Liabilities | |||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | 28,117 | - | 30,621 | - | |
| Value added tax and similar taxes | - | 283 | - | 197 | |
| 28,117 | 283 | 30,621 | 197 |
The Company files consolidated income tax and value added tax returns. The parent of this consolidated tax group is EDP-Energías de Portugal, S.A. Sucursal en España. At 31 December 2011 the Company has recognised income tax payable of Euros 18,148 thousand (Euros 15,246 thousand in 2010) and VAT payable of Euros 1,490 thousand (Euros 696 thousand in 2010). These balances are recognised in the current account with the parent company (see note 20.a).
The Company has the following main applicable taxes open to inspection by the Spanish taxation authorities:
| Tax | Years open to inspection |
|---|---|
| Income tax | 2009 to 2010 |
| Value added tax | 2009 to 2011 |
| Personal income tax | 2008 to 2011 |
| Capital gains tax | 2008 to 2011 |
| Business activities tax | 2008 to 2011 |
| Social Security | 2008 to 2011 |
| Non-residents | 2008 to 2011 |
| 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||
| Income statement | |||||
| Increases | Decreases | Net | |||
| Profit for the year | 59,018 | ||||
| Income tax | 23,743 | ||||
| Profit before income tax | 82,761 | ||||
| Permanent differences | - | (3,612) | (3,612) | ||
| Temporary differences: | 6,455 | (20,521) | (14,066) | ||
| originating in current year | 6,455 | - | 6,455 | ||
| originating in prior years | - | (20,521) | (20,521) | ||
| Taxable income | 65,083 | ||||
| 2010 | |||||
| Thousands of Euros | |||||
| Income statement | |||||
| Increases | Decreases | Net | |||
| Profit for the year | 44,091 | ||||
| Income tax | 20,814 | ||||
| Profit before income tax | 64,905 | ||||
| Permanent differences | 4,325 | - | 4,325 | ||
| Temporary differences: | 10,767 | (29,163) | (18,396) | ||
| originating in current year | 10,767 | - | 10,767 | ||
| originating in prior years | - | (29,163) | (29,163) | ||
| Taxable income | 50,834 |
Decreases due to permanent differences in 2011 reflect costs relating to the recognition of the provision mentioned in note 14, considered non-deductible expenses in 2010.
Increases due to temporary differences in 2011 relate to expenses for the rendering of services considered to be non-deductible. The increases in 2010 reflect salaries payable and other non-deductible items, as well as costs relating to the recognition of the provision mentioned in note 14, considered non-deductible expenses.
Decreases due to temporary differences in 2011 reflect the tax amortisation of the financial goodwill of EDPR NA, salaries payable and other non-deductible items in 2010. The decreases in 2010 reflect the tax amortisation of the financial goodwill of EDPR NA.
The relationship between the tax expense and accounting profit for the year is as follows:
| 2011 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||
| Profit or loss | Equity | Total | ||
| Profit for the year | 82,761 | - | 82,761 | |
| Tax at 30% | 24,828 | - | 24,828 | |
| Non-deductible expenses Provisions |
(1,083) | - | (1,083) | |
| Prior years' adjustments | (2) | - | (2) | |
| Deductions and credits for the current year | - | - | - | |
| Income tax expense | 23,743 | - | 23,743 |
| 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||
| Profit or loss | Equity | Total | |||
| Profit for the year | 64,905 | - | 64,905 | ||
| Tax at 30% | 19,471 | - | 19,471 | ||
| Non-deductible expenses Provisions |
1,298 | - | 1,298 | ||
| Prior years' adjustments | 47 | - | 47 | ||
| Deductions and credits for the current year | (2) | - | (2) | ||
| Income tax expense | 20,814 | - | 20,814 |
Details of the income tax expense are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | ||
| Current tax | |||
| Present year | 19,525 | 15,248 | |
| Other | (2) | 47 | |
| 19,523 | 15,295 | ||
| Deferred tax | |||
| Source and reversal of temporary differences | |||
| Provisions | 2,832 | (2,832) | |
| Tax amortisation of EDPR NA goodwill | 1,750 | 8,749 | |
| Salaries payable and other items | (362) | (398) | |
| 4,220 | 5,519 | ||
| 23,743 | 20,814 |
Details of deferred tax assets and liabilities by type of asset and liability are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | Liabilities | Net | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| Tax amortisation of EDPR NA goodwill |
- | - | (28,117) | (30,621) | (28,117) | (30,621) |
| Salaries payable and other items | 2,109 | 4,579 | - | - | 2,109 | 4,579 |
| Total assets/liabilities | 2,109 | 4,579 | (28,117) | (30,621) | (26,008) | (26,042) |
As a result of the additional taxes raised in the tax inspection of 2007 and 2008, in 2011 the Company has reduced deferred tax liabilities by Euros 4,254 thousand, reflecting the amount paid to the taxation authorities in respect of the tax amortisation of EDPR NA goodwill for 2007.
Details of deferred tax assets and liabilities that are expected to be realised or reversed in periods exceeding 12 months are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |||
| Tax amortisation of EDPR NA goodwill | (28,117) | (30,621) | ||
| Net | (28,117) | (30,621) |
Given the nature of its activity, the Company does not consider it necessary to make investments to prevent or correct the impact of its activity on the environment, or make any environmental provisions. However, a number of environmental studies required by prevailing legislation have been carried out to obtain authorisation for wind farms developed on behalf of group companies. These studies have been recognised as an increase in property, plant and equipment under construction.
These annual accounts do not include any environmental costs.
The directors consider that no significant environmental contingencies exist.
Details of balances by category are as follows:
| 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | |||||
| Parent | Group | ||||
| company | companies | Directors | Total | ||
| Non-current investments in group | |||||
| companies | - | 4,189,354 | - | 4,189,354 | |
| Non-current investments | - | 4,293,063 | - | 4,293,063 | |
| Total non-current assets | - | 8,482,417 | - | 8,482,417 | |
| Trade and other receivables | - | 16,143 | - | 16,143 | |
| Current investments | 179,074 | 480,815 | - | 659,889 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | - | - | - | - | |
| Total current assets | 179,074 | 496,958 | - | 676,032 | |
| Total assets | 179,074 | 8,979,375 | - | 9,158,449 | |
| Payables to group companies, non | |||||
| current | - | 2,986,433 | - | 2,986,433 | |
| Total non-current liabilities | - | 2,986,433 | - | 2,986,433 | |
| Current accounts with group |
|||||
| companies | - | 116,939 | - | 116,939 | |
| Current payables | - | 4,531 | - | 4,531 | |
| Trade and other payables | 6,996 | 6,110 | - | 13,106 | |
| Total current liabilities | 6,996 | 127,580 | - | 134,576 | |
| Total liabilities | 6,996 | 3,114,013 | - | 3,121,009 |
| 2010 Thousands of Euros |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent company |
Group companies |
Directors | Total | ||
| Non-current investments in group | |||||
| companies Non-current investments |
- - |
4,004,392 4,121,787 |
- - |
4,004,392 4,121,787 |
|
| Total non-current assets | - | 8,126,179 | - | 8,126,179 | |
| Trade and other receivables Current investments |
- 171,081 |
6,074 312,000 |
- | 6,074 483,081 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | - | 182,633 | - | 182,633 | |
| Total current assets | 171,081 | 500,707 | - | 671,788 | |
| Total assets | 171,081 | 8,626,883 | - | 8,797,964 | |
| Payables to group companies, non current |
- | 2,799,548 | - | 2,799,548 | |
| Total non-current liabilities | - | 2,799,548 | - | 2,799,548 | |
| Current accounts with group |
|||||
| companies | - | 57,467 | - | 57,467 | |
| Current payables Trade and other payables |
- 11,476 |
3,497 5,103 |
- - |
3,497 16,579 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 11,476 | 66,067 | - | 77,543 | |
| Total liabilities | 11,476 | 2,865,615 | - | 2,877,091 |
The Company's transactions with related parties are as follows:
| 2011 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||
| Group | ||||
| companies | Directors | Total | ||
| Income | ||||
| Other services rendered | 695 | - | 695 | |
| Finance income (notes 9 and 21.a) | 274,012 | - | 274,012 | |
| 274,707 | - | 274,707 | ||
| Expenses | ||||
| Operating lease expenses and royalties | (2,169) | - | (2,169) | |
| Other services received | (7,479) | - | (7,479) | |
| Personnel expenses | ||||
| Salaries | - | (1,063) | (1,063) | |
| Finance expenses (note 15) | (156,606) | - | (156,606) | |
| (166,254) | (1,063) | (167.317) | ||
| 108,453 | (1,063) | 107.390 |
| 2010 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | ||||
| Group companies |
Directors | Total | ||
| Income | ||||
| Other services rendered | 1,712 | - | 1,712 | |
| Finance income (notes 9 and 21.a) | 246,509 | - | 246,509 | |
| 248,221 | - | 248,221 | ||
| Expenses | ||||
| Operating lease expenses and royalties | (1,837) | - | (1,837) | |
| Other services received | (7,861) | - | (7,861) | |
| Personnel expenses | ||||
| Salaries | - | (1,158) | (1,158) | |
| Finance expenses (note 15) | (143,297) | - | (143,297) | |
| (152,995) | (1,158) | (154,153) | ||
| 95,226 | (1,158) | 94,068 |
Notes to the Annual Accounts
Details of investments held by the directors and their related parties in companies with identical, similar or complementary statutory activities to that of the Company, as well as positions held and functions and activities performed in these companies, are shown in Appendix II, which forms an integral part of this note to the annual accounts.
(a) Revenues
Details of revenues by category of activity and geographical market are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic | Rest of Europe | Total | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| Finance income | 261,353 | 236,070 | 12,659 | 10,439 | 274,012 | 246,509 |
Details of income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| Income Financial instruments |
7,660 | 6,628 |
| Finance income | 7,660 | 6,628 |
| Expenses Financial instruments |
(77,981) | (80,295) |
| Finance expenses | (77,981) | (80,295) |
| Net | (70,321) | (73,667) |
The Company's main foreign currency transactions are carried out in US Dollars and Polish Zlotys.
Details of employee benefits expense are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| Employee benefits expense | ||
| Social Security payable by the Company | 870 | 591 |
| Other employee benefits expenses | 537 | 461 |
| 1,407 | 1,052 |
Details of external services are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| Leases | 835 | 464 |
| Royalties | 1,500 | 1,500 |
| Independent professional services | 1,932 | 2,963 |
| Advertising and publicity | 727 | 1,457 |
| Other services | 10,521 | 9,494 |
| 15,515 | 15,878 |
Leases mainly include the rental of the Company's offices. There are no noncancellable payments at 31 December 2011 and 2010.
Other services primarily include management support, communications and maintenance expenses, as well as travel costs.
At 31 December 2011 the Company has commitments to purchase external services within one year amounting to Euros 1,119 thousand (in 2010 Euros 3,191 thousand within one year, Euros 1,103 thousand in one to three years and Euros 685 thousand in three to five years).
Other operating income primarily reflects the surplus provision made in 2010, which was reversed in 2011 following settlement of the obligations (see note 14).
The average headcount of the Company in 2011 and 2010, distributed by category, is as follows.
| Number | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | ||
| Management | 19 | 16 | |
| Senior technicians | 73 | 37 | |
| Technicians | 2 | 2 | |
| Administrative staff | 5 | 4 | |
| 99 | 59 |
At year end the distribution by gender of Company personnel and the members of the board of directors is as follows:
| Number 2011 |
Number 2010 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| Management | 18 | 2 | 14 | 2 |
| Senior technicians | 66 | 30 | 36 | 17 |
| Technicians | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Administrative staff | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 90 | 37 | 53 | 22 |
In 2011, one of the seventeen members of the board of directors is female (one of the sixteen members was female in 2010).
KPMG Auditores, S.L., the auditors of the individual and consolidated annual accounts of the Company, and other individuals and companies related to the auditors as defined by Audit Law 19/1988 of 12 July 1988, have invoiced the Company the following net fees for professional services during the years ended 31 December 2011 and 2010:
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
| Audit | services, accounts |
individual | and | consolidated | annual | 130 | 141 |
| 130 | 141 |
Audit services detailed in the above table include the total fees for services rendered in 2011 and 2010.
Other companies related to KPMG International have invoiced the Company as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | |
| Audit-related services | 219 | 235 |
| Audit services, consolidated annual accounts | 96 | 96 |
| 315 | 331 |
At 31 December 2011 the Company has not extended guarantees to suppliers of wind turbines on behalf of group companies (US Dollars 11 million in 2010). In addition, the Company has deposited guarantees with financial institutions on behalf of group companies amounting to Euros 483million (Euros 454 million in 2010), of which guarantees denominated in US Dollars amount 395 million (US Dollars 158 million in 2010).
The Company's directors do not expect any significant liabilities to arise from these guarantees.
No events have occurred subsequent to year end that could affect these annual accounts.
Appendix I Page 1 of 25
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registered offices |
% indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Net profit | |||||||
| Group companies | % direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||
| EDP RENEWABLES EUROPE, S.L. | Oviedo, Spain | 100% | - | KPMG | Holding company Wind farm installation |
30,000 | 123,863 | - | (30,623) | (30,623) | 123,240 |
| Generaciones Especiales I, S.L. | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | and assembly | 28,562 | 169,264 | - | 90,664 | 90,664 | 288,490 |
| Edpr Polska, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production Other economic |
121,228 | (412) | 2,537 | (1,453) | (1,453) | 121,900 |
| Tarcan, B.V | Holland | - | 100.00% | KPMG | activities | 20 | 6,638 | - | 2,266 | 2,266 | 8,924 |
| Greenwind, S.A. | Belgium | - | 70.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 24,924 | 1,866 | - | 3,381 | 3,381 | 30,171 |
| Neo Energía Aragón, S.L. Neo Energías de Occidente Catalunya, |
Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 10 | (2) | - | - | - | 8 |
| S.L. | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 10 | (1,315) | - | (254) | (254) | (1,559) |
| Agrupación Eólica, S.L.U | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Other business activities | 650 | 33,978 | - | 5,877 | 5,877 | 40,505 |
| EDP Renovaveis Portugal, S.A. | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,500 | 23,040 | 8,935 | 36,405 | 36,405 | 75,880 |
| Ceasa Promociones Eólicos | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,205 | 4,677 | - | 1,192 | 1,192 | 7,074 |
| EDP Renewables France, S.A.S. | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Holding company | 48,527 | (10,569) | - | (4,960) | (4,960) | 32,998 |
| EDP Renewables Romania, S.R.L. | Romania | - | 85.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,123 | (2,111) | (165) | (9,418) | (9,418) | (4,571) |
| Cernavoda Power, S.R.L. | Romania | - | 85.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 10,023 | (3,170) | (3,054) | (8,484) | (8,484) | (4,685) |
| EDP Renewables Italia, S.R.L. | Italy United |
- | 93.52% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 21,335 | 9,165 | - | (2,422) | (2,422) | 28,078 |
| EDPR Uk Ltd | Kingdom | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 113 | (720) | (441) | 410 | 410 | (638) |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Galicia, S.A. | Coruña, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 6,130 | 3,712 | 651 | 645 | 645 | 11,138 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Tarifa, S.A.U | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 5,800 | 2,396 | - | 2,642 | 2,642 | 10,838 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Corme, S.A. | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,666 | 3,784 | - | 495 | 495 | 7,945 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos Buenavista, S.A.U | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,712 | 1,527 | 646 | 1,256 | 1,256 | 5,141 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Lugo, S.A.U. | Coruña, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,761 | 5,856 | (1,094) | 5,919 | 5,919 | 18,442 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Rabosera, S.A. | Zaragoza, Spain | - | 95.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,561 | 2,289 | (441) | 2,973 | 2,973 | 12,382 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos Almarchal S.A.U. | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,061 | 2,353 | (511) | 1,324 | 1,324 | 5,227 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos Dumbría S.A.U. | Coruña, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 61 | 13,131 | - | 4,609 | 4,609 | 17,801 |
| Parque Eólico Santa Quiteria, S.L. | Zaragoza, Spain | - | 83.96% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 63 | 12,290 | (211) | 2,720 | 2,720 | 14,862 |
| Eólica La Janda, SL | Madrid, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,050 | 2,549 | - | 2,378 | 2,378 | 6,977 |
| Eólica Guadalteba, S.L. | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,460 | 5,952 | - | 4,868 | 4,868 | 12,280 |
Appendix I Page 2 of 25
| % indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Registered offices |
Net profit | |||||||||
| % direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
|||||
| Eólica Muxia, S.L.U. | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 23,480 | (3) | - | (82) | (82) | 23,395 |
| Eólica Fontesilva, S.L.U. | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,610 | (1,644) | - | (1,522) | (1,522) | 1,444 |
| Eneroliva, S.A.U | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 301 | (7) | - | - | - | 294 |
| Eólica Curiscao Pumar, S.A.U. | Madrid, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 60 | 13 | - | 863 | 863 | 936 |
| Parque Eólico Altos del Voltoya S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 61.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,813 | 6,666 | (230) | 4,030 | 4,030 | 18,279 |
| Sierra de la Peña, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 84.90% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,294 | 4,754 | (996) | 2,080 | 2,080 | 9,132 |
| Eólica Arlanzón S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 77.50% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,509 | 3,197 | (289) | 2,094 | 2,094 | 9,511 |
| Eolica Campollano S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 75.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 6,560 | 15,115 | (50) | 5,514 | 5,514 | 27,139 |
| Parque Eólico Belchite S.L.U. | Zaragoza, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,600 | 3,220 | - | 2,356 | 2,356 | 9,176 |
| Parque Eólico La Sotonera S.L. | Zaragoza, Spain Las Palmas, |
- | 64.85% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,000 | 2,130 | (373) | 1,834 | 1,834 | 5,591 |
| Siesa Renovables Canarias S.L. | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | (3) | - | - | - | - |
| Eólica Don Quijote, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3 | 1 | - | 2,888 | 2,888 | 2,892 |
| Eólica Dulcinea, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 10 | 171 | - | 995 | 995 | 1,176 |
| Eólica Sierra de Avila, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,628 | (1,656) | - | (1,711) | (1,711) | 1,261 |
| Eólica de Radona, S.L.U. | Madrid, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 6,888 | (1,218) | - | (1,424) | (1,424) | 4,246 |
| Eolica Alfoz, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 83.73% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 8,480 | (1,185) | - | 2,471 | 2,471 | 9,766 |
| Eólica La Navica, SL Investigación y desarrollo de Energías |
Madrid, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 10 | 1,311 | - | 1,181 | 1,181 | 2,502 |
| Renovables (Ider), S.L. | León, Spain | - | 59.59% | KPMG | Wind energy production Cogeneration: Electricity |
29,451 | (7,413) | - | (2,106) | (2,106) | 19,932 |
| Rasacal Cogeneración, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 60.00% | Unaudited | production Mini-hydroelectric |
60 | (476) | - | - | - | (416) |
| Hidroeléctrica Fuentehermosa, S.L. | Oviedo, Spain Salamanca, |
- | 100.00% | Unaudited | energy prod. Mini-hydroelectric |
77 | 185 | 1 | 18 | 18 | 281 |
| Hidroeléctrica Gormaz, S.A. | Spain | - | 75.00% | Unaudited | energy prod. Mini-hydroelectric |
61 | (147) | - | (19) | (19) | (105) |
| Hidroeléctrica del Rumblar, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 80.00% | Unaudited | energy prod. Wind power: Wind farm |
277 | (32) | - | (185) | (185) | 60 |
| SINAE Inversiones Eólicas, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | development | 6,010 | 7,670 | - | 13,721 | 13,721 | 27,401 |
| Parques Eólicos del Cantábrico, S.A. Industrias Medioambientales Río |
Oviedo, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production Waste: Livestock waste |
9,080 | 17,088 | (390) | 2,283 | 2,283 | 28,061 |
| Carrión, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 90.00% | Unaudited | treatment | 60 | (610) | - | - | - | (550) |
Appendix I Page 3 of 25
| % indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Net profit | ||||||||||
| Registered offices |
% direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||
| Tratamientos Mediambientasles del | Waste: Livestock waste | ||||||||||
| Norte, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 80.00% | Unaudited | treatment Waste treatment and |
60 | 13 | - | 863 | 863 | 936 |
| Sotromal, S.A. | Soria, Spain | - | 90.00% | Unaudited | recycling | 451 | (289) | - | - | - | 162 |
| Renovables Castilla La Mancha, S.A. | Madrid, Spain Albacete, |
- | 90.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 60 | 889 | - | 1,326 | 1,326 | 2,275 |
| Eólica La Manchuela, S.A. | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production Wind power: Project |
1,142 | 1,161 | - | 1,032 | 1,032 | 3,335 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos, S.A. | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | development Wind power: Project |
1,056 | 15,917 | - | (621) | (621) | 16,352 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos Promoción, S.A. | Seville, Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | development Mini-hydroelectric |
8,061 | 1,612 | - | 23,723 | 23,723 | 33,396 |
| Ceprastur, A.I.E. | Oviedo, Spain | - | 56.76% | Unaudited | energy prod. | 360 | 51 | - | (3) | (3) | 408 |
| Acampo Arias, SL | Spain | - | 98.19% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,314 | (595) | - | 255 | 255 | 2,974 |
| SOCPE Sauvageons, SARL | France | - | 49.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1 | (41) | - | (65) | (65) | (105) |
| SOCPE Le Mee, SARL | France | - | 49.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1 | (20) | - | (56) | (56) | (75) |
| SOCPE Petite Piece, SARL | France | - | 49.00% | KPMG Jean-Yves |
Wind energy production | 1 | (109) | - | 46 | 46 | (62) |
| Plouvien,.S.A.S | France | - | 100.00% | Morisset | Wind energy production | 40 | (1,801) | - | (130) | (130) | (1,891) |
| CE Patay, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,640 | 2,180 | (575) | 714 | 714 | 3,959 |
| Relax Wind Park III, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 117 | (159) | 17 | (123) | (123) | (148) |
| Relax Wind Park I, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 96.40% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 597 | 4,581 | 1,467 | 2,346 | 2,346 | 8,991 |
| Relax Wind Park IV, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 109 | (127) | 12 | (117) | (117) | (123) |
| Relax Wind Park II, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 123 | (63) | (9) | (32) | (32) | 19 |
| C.E.Renovables alternativa slu | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 86 | (2) | - | - | - | 84 |
| CIA.E d enrgias renov alternativas sau.2 | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 69 | (14) | - | - | - | 55 |
| Eolica.Garcimuñoz SL | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 10 | - | - | (3) | (3) | 7 |
| Compañía Eólica Campo de Borja, SA | Spain | - | 75.83% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 858 | 704 | - | 220 | 220 | 1,782 |
| Desarrollos Catalanes del Viento, SL | Spain | - | 60.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 5,993 | 15,773 | - | 565 | 565 | 22,331 |
| Iberia Aprovechamientos Eólicos, SAU | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,919 | 175 | - | 426 | 426 | 2,520 |
| Molino de Caragüelles, S.L. | Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 180 | 208 | - | 73 | 73 | 461 |
| Parque Eólico Plana de Artajona, SLU | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 12 | (3) | - | (1) | (1) | 8 |
| Parque Eólico Los Cantales, SLU | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,963 | 1,130 | - | 1,906 | 1,906 | 4,999 |
Appendix I Page 4 of 25
| % indirect interest interest |
Auditor Activity |
Thousands of Euros | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | % direct | Net profit | |||||||||
| Registered offices |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
|||||
| Parque Eólico Montes de Castejón,S.L. | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 12 | (3) | - | - | - | 9 |
| Parques de Generación Eólica, SL | Spain | - | 60.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,924 | 3,369 | (1,741) | 512 | 512 | 4,064 |
| CE Saint Bernabé, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,600 | 1,095 | (650) | 369 | 369 | 2,414 |
| CE Segur, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,615 | 1,290 | (659) | 786 | 786 | 3,032 |
| Eolienne D´Etalondes, SARl | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (32) | - | (2) | (2) | (33) |
| Eolienne de Saugueuse, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (34) | - | (1) | (1) | (34) |
| Parc Eolien D'Ardennes | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (142) | - | (16) | (16) | (157) |
| Eolienne des Bocages, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (28) | - | - | - | (27) |
| Parc Eolien des Longs Champs, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (71) | - | (5) | (5) | (75) |
| Parc Eolien de Mancheville, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (42) | - | (2) | (2) | (43) |
| Parc Eolien de Roman, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (115) | - | 801 | 801 | 687 |
| Parc Eolien des Vatines, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (1,217) | (798) | 312 | 312 | (1,666) |
| Parc Eolien de La Hetroye, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (32) | - | (4) | (4) | 1 |
| Eolienne de Callengeville, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (25) | - | (4) | (4) | 8 |
| Parc Eolien de Varimpre, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (938) | (901) | 560 | 560 | (1,242) |
| Parc Eolien du Clos Bataille, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (796) | (700) | 192 | 192 | (1,267) |
| Eólica de Serra das Alturas,S.A | Portugal | - | 50.10% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 50 | 2,508 | - | 632 | 632 | 3,190 |
| Malhadizes- Energia Eólica, SA | Portugal | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 50 | 100 | - | 396 | 396 | 546 |
| Eólica de Montenegrelo, LDA | Portugal | - | 50.10% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 50 | 5,045 | - | 1,435 | 1,435 | 6,530 |
| Eólica da Alagoa,SA | Portugal | - | 60.00% | PwC | Wind energy production | 50 | 1,729 | 1,014 | 1,240 | 1,240 | 4,033 |
| Aplica.Indust de Energias limpias S.L Aprofitament D´Energies Renovables de |
Spain | - | 61.50% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 131 | 594 | - | 661 | 661 | 1,386 |
| la Tierra Alta S.A | Spain | - | 48.70% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1,994 | (778) | - | (21) | (21) | 1,195 |
| Bon Vent de L´Ebre S.L.U | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 90 | (35) | - | 1,202 | 1,202 | 1,257 |
| Parc Eólic Coll de la Garganta S.L | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1,693 | - | - | (704) | (704) | 989 |
| Parc Eólic Serra Voltorera S.l | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1,283 | (534) | - | (410) | (410) | 339 |
| Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy I sp zoo | Poland United |
- | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 20 | (71) | 27 | (219) | (219) | (243) |
| Moray Offshore renewables limited Centrale Eolienne Canet –Pont de |
Kingdom | - | 66.64% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 9,931 | 153 | 1,267 | 22 | 22 | 11,373 |
| Salaras S.A.S | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 125 | 153 | (705) | 303 | 303 | (124) |
| Centrale Eolienne de Gueltas Noyal – | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,261 | 1,847 | 3 | 485 | 485 | 4,596 |
Appendix I Page 5 of 25
| Registered offices |
% indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Net profit | |||||||||||
| % direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||||
| Pontiv y S.A.S | ||||||||||||
| Centrale Eolienne Neo Truc de | ||||||||||||
| L´Homme ,S.A.S | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 38 | (10) | - | (1) | (1) | 27 | |
| Vallee de Moulin SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (285) | - | (143) | (143) | (427) | |
| Mardelle SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (204) | - | (91) | (91) | (294) | |
| Quinze Mines SARL | France | - | 49.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (348) | - | (293) | (293) | (640) | |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Teruel SL | Spain | - | 51.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 60 | - | - | - | - | 60 | |
| Par Eólic de Coll de Moro S.L. | Spain | - | 60.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | 5 | - | - | - | 8 | |
| Par Eólic de Torre Madrina S.L. | Spain | - | 60.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | 4 | - | (671) | (671) | (664) | |
| Parc Eolic de Vilalba dels Arcs S.L. | Spain | - | 60.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | 682 | - | 338 | 338 | 1,023 | |
| Parc Eolic Molinars S.L. | Spain | - | 54.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | - | - | - | - | 3 | |
| Bon Vent de Vilalba, SL | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3,600 | (943) | - | (122) | (122) | 2,535 | |
| Bon Vent de Corbera, SL | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3,330 | (2,620) | - | (478) | (478) | 232 | |
| Masovia Wind Farm I s.p. zo.o. | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 350 | 5,025 | (32) | (119) | (119) | 5,224 | |
| Farma wiatrowa Starozbery Sp.z.o.o | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 130 | (22) | (18) | (35) | (35) | 55 | |
| Rowy-Karpacka mala | ||||||||||||
| Energetyka,sp,z.o.o | Poland | - | 85.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 14 | (17) | 2 | (24) | (24) | (25) | |
| Repano wind S.R.L | Italy | - | 93.52% | Unaudited | Energy production | 11 | 133 | - | (10) | (10) | 134 | |
| Re plus – Societa ´a Responsabilita | ||||||||||||
| ´limitada | Italy United |
- | 93.52% | Unaudited | Energy production | 100 | 1,013 | - | (603) | (603) | 510 | |
| Telfford Offsore Windfarm limited | Kingdom United |
- | 66.64% | Unaudited | Energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Maccoll offshore windfarm limited | Kingdom United |
- | 66,64% | Unaudited | Energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Stevenson offshore windfarma limited | Kingdom | - | 66,64% | Unaudited | Energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Parc Eolien des Bocages Sarl | France | - | 100,00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 1 | (28) | - | - | - | (27) | |
| Santa quiteria Energia S.L.U | Spain | - | 100,00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 3 | 467 | - | 299 | 299 | 769 | |
| EDPR Renovaveis Cantabria, SL | Madrid, Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 300 | - | - | (15) | (15) | 285 | |
| Villa Castelli Wind srl | Verbania | - | 93.52% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Pestera Wind Farm, S.A. | Bucharest | - | 85.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 26 | (2,115) | 154 | (439) | (439) | (2,374) | |
| Pochidia Wind Farm S.A. | Bucharest | - | 85.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 26 | - | (2) | (2) | (2) | 22 | |
| S. C. Ialomita Power SRL | Bucharest | - | 85.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | (4) | (4) | (4) |
Appendix I Page 6 of 25
31 December 2011
| Auditor | Activity | Thousands of Euros | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Registered offices |
% direct interest |
% indirect interest |
Net profit | |||||||
| Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||||
| EDP Renewables North America, LLC | Texas | 100.00% | - | KPMG | Holding | 3,275,952 | (126,896) | - | (47,410) | (47,410) | 3,101,646 |
| Wind Turbine Prometheus, LP | California | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 5 | (5) | - | - | - | - |
| Lost Lakes Wind Farm LLC | Minnesota | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 155,865 | (6,948) | 399 | (7,009) | (7,009) | 142,307 |
| Quilt Block Wind Farm, LLC | Minnesota | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,042 | (14) | - | (1) | (1) | 4,027 |
| Cloud County Wind Farm, LLC | Kansas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 237,645 | 920 | - | 1,250 | 1,250 | 239,815 |
| Whitestone Wind Purchasing, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,406 | (843) | - | (14) | (14) | 2,549 |
| Blue Canyon Windpower II LLC | Oklahoma | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 120,974 | 8,919 | - | 3,493 | 3,493 | 133,386 |
| Blue Canyon Windpower V, LLC | Oklahoma | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 128,450 | 4,360 | - | 7,050 | 7,050 | 139,860 |
| Horizon Wind Energy International | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 19 | 202 | - | 1 | 1 | 222 |
| Pioneer Prairie Wind Farm I, LLC | Iowa | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 439,448 | (16,988) | 8,267 | 2,455 | 2,455 | 433,182 |
| Sagebrush Power Partners, LLC | Washington | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 156,956 | (833) | 397 | (7,873) | (7,873) | 148,647 |
| Telocaset Wind Power Partners, LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 95,878 | 13,913 | 4,945 | 5,139 | 5,139 | 119,875 |
| High Trail Wind Farm, LLC | Illionois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 282,683 | 3,646 | - | 4,129 | 4,129 | 290,458 |
| Marble River, LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 193,972 | (138) | - | (21) | (21) | 193,813 |
| Rail Splitter | Illionois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 180,653 | (7,891) | 423 | (5,062) | (5,062) | 168,123 |
| Blackstone Wind Farm, LLC | Illionois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 119,595 | (4,205) | 38,376 | (2,399) | (2,399) | 151,367 |
| Aroostook Wind Energy LLC | Maine | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 10,103 | (85) | - | (7) | (7) | 10,011 |
| Jericho Rise Wind Farm LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,330 | (35) | - | - | - | 4,295 |
| Madison Windpower LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 8,937 | (2,319) | - | (929) | (929) | 5,689 |
| Mesquite Wind, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 187,518 | 17,770 | - | 4,259 | 4,259 | 209,547 |
| Martinsdale Wind Farm LLC | Colorado | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,949 | (7) | - | (11) | (11) | 2,931 |
| Post Oak Wind, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 213,141 | 28,368 | - | 3,329 | 3,329 | 244,838 |
| BC2 Maple Ridge Wind LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 284,390 | 2,710 | 5,001 | 136 | 136 | 292,237 |
| High Prairie Wind Farm II, LLC | Minnesota | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 112,365 | (1,276) | 464 | 352 | 352 | 111,905 |
| Arlington Wind Power Project LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 130,432 | 2,288 | 1,887 | 1,716 | 1,716 | 136,323 |
| Signal Hill Wind Power Project LLC | Colorado | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3 | (2) | - | (2) | (2) | (1) |
| Tumbleweed Wind Power Project LLC | Colorado | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3 | (3) | - | - | - | - |
| Old Trail Wind Farm, LLC | Illionois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 300,743 | (9,214) | 2,676 | 3,492 | 3,492 | 297,697 |
| Stinson Mills Wind Farm, LLC | Colorado | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,411 | (78) | - | 2 | 2 | 2,335 |
Appendix I Page 7 of 25
| % indirect interest |
Auditor | Thousands of Euros | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Registered offices |
Activity | Net profit | ||||||||
| % direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
|||||
| OPQ Property LLC | Illionois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | 107 | - | 6 | 6 | 113 |
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm, LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 221,428 | (5,731) | 78,689 | (2,086) | (2,086) | 292,300 |
| Wheatfield Wind Power Project, LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 69,700 | 7,641 | 32,852 | 5,489 | 5,489 | 115,682 |
| 2007 Vento I, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 828,073 | 2,795 | - | 1,014 | 1,014 | 831,882 |
| 2007 Vento II, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 732,464 | (2,348) | - | (350) | (350) | 729,766 |
| 2008 Vento III, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 815,835 | (1,280) | - | (698) | (698) | 813,857 |
| Horizon Wind Ventures I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 977,686 | 46,902 | - | 22,716 | 22,716 | 1,047,304 |
| Horizon Wind Ventures II, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 109,602 | 909 | - | 1,151 | 1,151 | 111,662 |
| Horizon Wind Ventures III, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 53,199 | (585) | - | 1,411 | 1,411 | 54,025 |
| Clinton County Wind Farm, LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 193,978 | (6) | - | - | - | 193,972 |
| BC2 Maple Ridge Holdings LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cloud West Wind Project, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Five-Spot, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Chocolate Bayou I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Alabama Ledge Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Antelope Ridge Wind Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 10,806 | (1) | - | (10) | (10) | 10,795 |
| Arkwright Summit Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ashford Wind Farm LLC Athena-Weston Wind Power Project |
Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Black Prairie Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,080 | (1) | - | (1) | (1) | 4,078 |
| Blackstone Wind Farm II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 232,481 | (271) | 84,866 | (6,281) | (6,281) | 310,795 |
| Blackstone Wind Farm III LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 4,155 | (8) | - | (2) | (2) | 4,145 |
| Blackstone Wind Farm IV LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Blackstone Wind Farm V LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Blue Canyon Windpower III LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Blue Canyon Windpower IV LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Blue Canyon Windpower VI LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 40,153 | - | - | 12 | 12 | 40,165 |
| Broadlands Wind Farm II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Broadlands Wind Farm III LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Appendix I Page 8 of 25
| 31 December 2011 |
|---|
| % indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Net profit | ||||||||||
| Registered offices |
% direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||
| Broadlands Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Chateaugay River Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cropsey Ridge Wind Farm LLC Crossing Trails Wind, Power Project |
Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Dairy Hills Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Diamond Power Partners LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ford Wind Farm LLC Gulf Coast Windpower Management |
Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Company, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rising Tree Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest VII LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest X LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest XI LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Panhandle I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest III LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest IV LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Valley I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind MREC Iowa Partners LLC Horizon Wind, Freeport Windpower I |
Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Juniper Wind Power Partners, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 7,660 | - | - | (9) | (9) | 7,651 |
| Machias Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 151,344 | (1,296) | 405 | (600) | (600) | 149,853 |
| New Trail Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Slope Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Number Nine Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Pacific Southwest Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Appendix I Page 9 of 25
| Registered offices |
% indirect interest |
Auditor | Thousands of Euros | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Activity | Net profit | ||||||||||
| % direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||||
| Pioneer Prairie Wind Farm II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Buffalo Bluff Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Saddleback Wind Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,082 | (4) | - | - | - | 1,078 | |
| Sardinia Windpower LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Turtle Creek Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Western Trail Wind Project I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Whistling Wind WI Energy Center, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Coos Curry Wind Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Horizon Wind Energy Midwest IX LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Peterson Power Partners LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Pioneer Prairie Interconnection LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| The Nook Wind Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Tug Hill Windpower LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Whiskey Ridge Power Partners LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Wilson Creek Power Partners LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| WTP Management Company LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm IV LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 96,379 | 80 | 35,788 | 45 | 45 | 132,292 | |
| Meadow Lake Windfarm III LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 112,749 | (41) | 43,202 | (1,130) | (1,130) | 154,780 | |
| 2009 Vento IV, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 180,897 | (160) | - | (79) | (79) | 180,658 | |
| 2009 Vento V, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 128,617 | (122) | - | (112) | (112) | 128,383 | |
| 2009 Vento VI, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 156,031 | (235) | - | 76 | 76 | 155,872 | |
| Horizon Wind Ventures VI, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 87,637 | (1,774) | - | 27 | 27 | 85,890 | |
| Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm II LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 427 | - | - | (2) | (2) | 425 | |
| Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm III LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| East Klickitat Wind Power Project LLC | Washington | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest IV LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Blue Canyon Wind Power VII LLC | Oklahoma | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Horizon Wyoming Transmission LLC | Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Appendix I Page 10 of 25
| Auditor | Activity | Thousands of Euros | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | % indirect interest |
Net profit | ||||||||||
| Registered offices |
% direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
|||||
| AZ Solar LLC | Arizona | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Black Prairie Wind Farm II LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Black Prairie Wind Farm III LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Paulding Wind Farm LLC | Ohio | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,408 | - | - | (1) | (1) | 4,407 | |
| Paulding Wind Farm II LLC | Ohio | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 78,525 | (5) | 425 | 2,262 | 2,262 | 81,207 | |
| Paulding Wind Farm III LLC | Ohio | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,190 | - | - | (30) | (30) | 3,160 | |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm II LLC | Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm III LLC | Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm IV LLC | Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm V LLC Athena-Weston Wind Power Project II, |
Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm V, LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,589 | - | - | (5) | (5) | 1,584 | |
| Horizon Wind Ventures IB, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 10,988 | 36,712 | - | 19,119 | 19,119 | 66,819 | |
| Horizon Wind Ventures IC, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 5,990 | 6,124 | - | 7,327 | 7,327 | 19,441 | |
| Headwaters Wind Farm LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 17th Star Wind Farm LLC | Ohio | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Rio Blanco Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Hidalgo Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Stone Wind Power LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Franklin Wind Farm LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Waverly Wind Farm LLC | Kansas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 2,367 | - | - | (1) | (1) | 2,366 | |
| 2010 Vento VII, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 151,444 | (161) | - | 62 | 62 | 151,345 | |
| 2010 Vento VIII, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 157,039 | (12) | - | (71) | (71) | 156,956 | |
| Horizon Wind Ventures VII, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 87,262 | (579) | - | 544 | 544 | 87,227 | |
| Horizon Wind Ventures VIII, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 81,048 | (385) | - | (102) | (102) | 80,561 | |
| Horizon Wind Ventures IX, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | (2,737) | (2,737) | (2,737) | |
| 2011 Vento IX, LLC | - | Wind energy production | 78,559 | - | - | (35) | (35) | 78,524 | ||||
| 2011 Vento X, LLC | Texas | - | 100,00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 40,153 | - | - | (19) | (19) | 40,134 | |
| EDPR Wind Ventures X | Texas | - | 100,00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | (44) | (44) | (44) |
Appendix I Page 11 of 25
| Thousands of Euros | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registered offices |
% indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Net profit | ||||||||
| Group companies | % direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
|||||
| Paulding Wind Farm IV, LLC | Ohio | - | 100,00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Rush County Wind Farm, LLC | Kansas | - | 100,00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Eastern Nebraska Wind Farm, LLC | Nebraska | - | 100,00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| EDP RENOVÁVEIS BRASIL, S.A. Central Nacional de Energia Eólica, S.A. |
Sao Paulo | 55.00% | - | KPMG | Wind energy production | 28,948 | (2,064) | - | (3,203) | (3,203) | 23,681 | |
| (Cenaeel) | Sao Paulo | - | 55.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 5,809 | (28) | - | 803 | 803 | 6,584 | |
| Elebrás Projectos, Ltda | Sao Paulo | - | 55.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 32,122 | (764) | - | 3,511 | 3,511 | 34,869 | |
| EDP RENEWABLES CANADA, LTD | Canadá | 100.00% | - | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 2,270 | (102) | - | (1,019) | (1,019) | 1,149 |
Appendix I Page 12 of 25
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auditor | Net profit | ||||||||||||
| Associates | Registered offices | % direct interest |
% indirect interest |
Activity | Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Associates | |||
| Aprofitament D´Energies Renovables | |||||||||||||
| de l´Ebre S.l | Spain | - | 18.97% | Unaudited | Wind energy production Mini-hydroelectric energy |
3,870 | - | (551) | (168) | (168) | 3,151 | ||
| Hidroastur, S.A. | Oviedo, Spain | - | 25.00% | Centium | prod. Biomass: Electricity |
4,808 | 3,952 | 132 | 797 | 797 | 9,689 | ||
| Biomasas del Pirineo, S.A. | Huesca, Spain | - | 30.00% | Unaudited | production Biomass: Electricity |
455 | (217) | - | - | - | 238 | ||
| Culitvos Energéticos de Castilla, S.A. | Burgos, Spain | - | 30.00% | Unaudited | production | 300 | (48) | - | - | - | 252 | ||
| Parque Eólico Sierra del Madero, S.A. | Soria, Spain | - | 42.00% | Ernst & Young | Wind energy production | 7,194 | 1,559 | 886 | 3,247 | 3,247 | 12,886 | ||
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Canarias, S.A. | Las Palmas, Spain | - | 44.75% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,291 | 5,836 | 1,273 | 1,799 | 1,799 | 13,199 | ||
| Solar Siglo XXI, S.A. | Ciudad Real, Spain | - | 25.00% | Unaudited | Solar energy | 80 | (18) | - | - | - | 62 | ||
| Naturneo Energía, S.L. | Spain | - | 49.00% | Unaudited | Holding company | 3 | (2) | - | (1) | (1) | - | ||
| Eólicas de Portugal,SA | Portugal | - | 35.96% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 42,312 | 7,689 | (26,285) | 6,027 | 6,027 | 29,743 | ||
| Parque Eólico Belmonte, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 29.90% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 120 | 2,793 | - | 258 | 258 | 3,171 | ||
| Inch Cape Offshore Limited | Edimburgh | - | 49.00% | Deloitte | Wind energy production | 1,621 | (32) | - | (12) | (12) | 1,577 |
Appendix I Page 13 of 25
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jointly controlled entities | Auditor | Net profit | |||||||||||
| Registered offices | % direct interest |
% indirect interest |
Activity | Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuin g operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||
| Tebar Eolica, S.A. | Tébar/Cuenca, Spain | - | 50.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 4,720 | 3,386 | 1,066 | 1,666 | 1,666 | 10,838 | ||
| Evolución 2000, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 49.15% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 118 | 8,397 | 3,048 | 3,412 | 3,412 | 14,975 | ||
| Desarrollos Energéticos Canarios, S.A. | Las Palmas, Spain | - | 49.90% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 60 | - | (24) | - | - | 72 | ||
| Compañia Eólica Aragonesa S.A. | Spain | - | 50.00% | Deloitte | Wind energy production | 6,701 | 39,800 | (719) | 15,543 | 15,543 | 61,325 | ||
| Flat Rock Windpower LLC | New York | - | 50.00% | E&Y | Wind energy production | 202,032 | (38,838) | - | (2,420) | (2,420) | 160,774 | ||
| Flat Rock Windpower II LLC | New York | - | 50.00% | E&Y | Wind energy production | 80,164 | (14,187) | - | (2,011) | (2,011) | 63,966 | ||
Appendix I Page 14 of 25
| % indirect interest |
Auditor | Thousands of Euros | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registered offices |
Activity | Net profit | |||||||||
| Group companies | % direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||
| EDP RENEWABLES EUROPE, S.L. | Oviedo, Spain | 100.00% | - | KPMG | Holding company Wind farm installation and |
30,000 | 135,111 | - | (20,674) | (20,674) | 144,437 |
| Generaciones Especiales I, S.L. | Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | assembly | 28,562 | 168,524 | - | 740 | 740 | 197,826 |
| Edpr Polska, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 109,395 | 3,796 | (1,889) | (4,168) | (4,168) | 107,134 |
| Tarcan, B.V | Holland | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Other economic activities | 20 | 4,630 | - | 2,008 | 2,008 | 6,658 |
| Greenwind, S.A. | Belgium | - | 70.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 24,924 | (81) | - | 1,947 | 1,947 | 26,790 |
| Neo Energía Aragón, S.L. | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 10 | (1) | - | - | - | 9 |
| Neo Energías de Occidente Catalunya, S.L. | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 10 | (910) | - | (406) | (406) | (1,306) |
| Agrupación Eólica, S.L.U | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Other business activities | 650 | 32,726 | - | 1,209 | 1,209 | 34,585 |
| EDP Renovaveis Portugal, S.A. | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,500 | 4,120 | - | 33,908 | 33,908 | 45,528 |
| Ceasa Promociones Eólicos | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,205 | 3,866 | - | 812 | 812 | 5,883 |
| EDP Renewables France, S.A.S. | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Holding company | 48,527 | (6,062) | - | (4,507) | (4,507) | 37,958 |
| EDP Renewables Romania, S.R.L. | Romania | - | 85.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 6,722 | (905) | - | (1,088) | (1,088) | 4,729 |
| Cernavoda Power, S.R.L. | Romania | - | 85.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 9,460 | (799) | - | (2,193) | (2,193) | 6,468 |
| EDP Renewables Italia, S.R.L. | Italy | - | 85.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 19,555 | - | - | (1,180) | (1,180) | 18,375 |
| EDPR Uk Ltd | United Kingdom | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 116 | - | - | (743) | (743) | (627) |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Galicia, S.A. | Coruña, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 6,130 | 3,608 | - | 1,044 | 1,044 | 10,782 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Tarifa, S.A.U | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 5,800 | 2,201 | - | 1,953 | 1,953 | 9,954 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Corme, S.A. | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,666 | 3,784 | - | 1,329 | 1,329 | 8,779 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos Buenavista, S.A.U | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,712 | 1,527 | - | 803 | 803 | 4,042 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Lugo, S.A.U. | Coruña, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,761 | 5,022 | (1,246) | 4,834 | 4,834 | 16,371 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Rabosera, S.A. | Zaragoza, Spain | - | 76.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,561 | 2,032 | (542) | 2,569 | 2,569 | 11,620 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos Almarchal S.A.U. | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,061 | 1,667 | (399) | 686 | 686 | 4,015 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos Dumbría S.A.U. | Coruña, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 61 | 10,375 | - | 4,257 | 4,257 | 14,693 |
| Parque Eólico Santa Quiteria, S.L. | Zaragoza, Spain | - | 46.66% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 63 | 11,263 | (292) | 2,567 | 2,567 | 13,601 |
| Eólica La Janda, SL | Madrid, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,050 | 1,108 | - | 1,441 | 1,441 | 4,599 |
| Eólica Guadalteba, S.L. | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,460 | 790 | - | 5,162 | 5,162 | 7,412 |
| Eólica Muxia, S.L.U. | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 10 | (1) | - | (2) | (2) | 7 |
| Eólica Fontesilva, S.L.U. | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 470 | (1) | - | (1,643) | (1,643) | (1,174) |
| Eneroliva, S.A.U | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 301 | (7) | - | - | - | 294 |
| Eólica Curiscao Pumar, S.A.U. | Madrid, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 60 | 14 | - | 718 | 718 | 792 |
Appendix I Page 15 of 25
| Auditor | Thousands of Euros | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registered offices |
% indirect interest |
Activity | Net profit | ||||||||
| Group companies | % direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||
| Parque Eólico Altos del Voltoya S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 48.80% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,813 | 4,552 | (550) | 2,114 | 2,114 | 13,929 |
| Sierra de la Peña, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 67.92% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,294 | 4,028 | (1,266) | 1,726 | 1,726 | 7,782 |
| Eólica Arlanzón S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 62.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,509 | 3,547 | (438) | 1,878 | 1,878 | 9,496 |
| Eolica Campollano S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 60.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 6,560 | 15,115 | (1,015) | 4,737 | 4,737 | 25,397 |
| Parque Eólico Belchite S.L.U. | Zaragoza, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,600 | 3,220 | - | 2,228 | 2,228 | 9,048 |
| Parque Eólico La Sotonera S.L. | Zaragoza, Spain Las Palmas, |
- | 51.88% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,000 | 2,027 | (302) | 1,503 | 1,503 | 5,228 |
| Siesa Renovables Canarias S.L. | Spain | - | 80.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | (3) | - | - | - | - |
| Eólica Don Quijote, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3 | 1 | - | 1,802 | 1,802 | 1,806 |
| Eólica Dulcinea, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 10 | 172 | - | 692 | 692 | 874 |
| Eólica Sierra de Avila, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 71.99% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 10 | - | - | (1,656) | (1,656) | (1,646) |
| Eólica de Radona, S.L.U. | Madrid, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 6,888 | (104) | - | (1,114) | (1,114) | 5,670 |
| Eolica Alfoz, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 67.98% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 10 | - | - | (1,185) | (1,185) | (1,175) |
| Eólica La Navica, SL Investigación y desarrollo de Energías |
Madrid, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 10 | 1,311 | - | 996 | 996 | 2,317 |
| Renovables (Ider), S.L. | León, Spain | - | 47.67% | KPMG | Wind energy production Cogeneration: Electricity |
15,718 | (4,990) | - | (2,424) | (2,424) | 8,304 |
| Rasacal Cogeneración, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 48.00% | Unaudited | production Mini-hydroelectric energy |
60 | (476) | - | - | - | (416) |
| Hidroeléctrica Fuentehermosa, S.L. | Oviedo, Spain Salamanca, |
- | 80.00% | Unaudited | prod. Mini-hydroelectric energy |
77 | 184 | - | 13 | 13 | 274 |
| Hidroeléctrica Gormaz, S.A. | Spain | - | 60.00% | Unaudited | prod. Mini-hydroelectric energy |
61 | (116) | - | (30) | (30) | (85) |
| Hidroeléctrica del Rumblar, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 64.00% | Unaudited | prod. Wind power: Wind farm |
277 | (202) | - | 170 | 170 | 245 |
| SINAE Inversiones Eólicas, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | development | 6,010 | 25,540 | - | 10,193 | 10,193 | 41,743 |
| Parques Eólicos del Cantábrico, S.A. Industrias Medioambientales Río Carrión, |
Oviedo, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production Waste: Livestock waste |
9,080 | 15,736 | (634) | 1,352 | 1,352 | 25,534 |
| S.A. Tratamientos Medioambientales del Norte, |
Madrid, Spain | - | 72.00% | Unaudited | treatment Waste: Livestock waste |
60 | (610) | - | - | - | (550) |
| S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 64.00% | Unaudited | treatment Waste treatment and |
60 | (43) | - | (1) | (1) | 16 |
| Sotromal, S.A. | Soria, Spain | - | 72.00% | Unaudited | recycling | 451 | (289) | - | - | - | 162 |
| Renovables Castilla La Mancha, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 72.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 60 | 1,163 | - | 726 | 726 | 1,949 |
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net profit | |||||||||||
| Group companies | Registered offices |
% direct interest |
% indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
| Albacete, | |||||||||||
| Eólica La Manchuela, S.A. | Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production Wind power: Project |
1,142 | 1,161 | - | 958 | 958 | 3,261 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos, S.A. | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | development Wind power: Project |
1,056 | 17,069 | - | (1,152) | (1,152) | 16,973 |
| Desarrollos Eólicos Promoción, S.A. | Seville, Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | development Mini-hydroelectric energy |
8,061 | 46,894 | - | 11,688 | 11,688 | 66,643 |
| Ceprastur, A.I.E. | Oviedo, Spain | - | 45.41% | Unaudited | prod. | 361 | 55 | - | (4) | (4) | 412 |
| Veinco del ebro energía S.L | Spain | - | 80.00% | Unaudited | Unavailable | 188 | 3,918 | - | 740 | 740 | 4,846 |
| Acampo Arias, SL | Spain | - | 98.19% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,314 | (326) | - | (270) | (270) | 2,718 |
| SOCPE Sauvageons, SARL | France | - | 49.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1 | (33) | - | (9) | (9) | (41) |
| SOCPE Le Mee, SARL | France | - | 49.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1 | (43) | - | 23 | 23 | (19) |
| SOCPE Petite Piece, SARL | France | - | 49.00% | KPMG Jean-Yves |
Wind energy production | 1 | (76) | - | (33) | (33) | (108) |
| Plouvien,.S.A.S | France | - | 100.00% | Morisset | Wind energy production | 40 | (1,613) | - | (188) | (188) | (1,761) |
| CE Patay, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,640 | 1,410 | (452) | 770 | 770 | 3,368 |
| Relax Wind Park III, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 106 | (77) | - | (66) | (66) | (37) |
| Relax Wind Park I, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 96.40% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 538 | (652) | 198 | 4,786 | 4,786 | 4,870 |
| Relax Wind Park IV, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 51.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 98 | (116) | - | 2 | 2 | (16) |
| Relax Wind Park II, Sp.z.o.o. | Poland | - | 51.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 111 | (40) | - | (17) | (17) | 54 |
| C.E.Renovables alternativa slu | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 86 | (2) | - | - | - | 84 |
| CIA.E d enrgias renov alternativas sau.2 | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 69 | (14) | - | - | - | 55 |
| Eolica.Garcimuñoz SL | Spain | - | 80.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 10 | - | - | - | - | 12 |
| Compañía Eólica Campo de Borja, SA | Spain | - | 75.83% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 858 | 691 | - | 158 | 158 | 1,707 |
| Desarrollos Catalanes del Viento, SL | Spain | - | 60.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 5,993 | 15,517 | - | 256 | 256 | 21,766 |
| Iberia Aprovechamientos Eólicos, SAU | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,919 | 22 | - | 153 | 153 | 2,094 |
| Molino de Caragüelles, S.L. | Spain | - | 80.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 180 | 182 | - | 64 | 64 | 426 |
| Neomai Inversiones SICAV, S.A. | Spain | - | 100.00% | PwC | Other business activities | 33,358 | 6,499 | - | 591 | 591 | 40,448 |
| Parque Eólico Plana de Artajona, SLU | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 12 | (3) | - | - | - | 9 |
| Parque Eólico Los Cantales, SLU | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,963 | 1,130 | - | 1,585 | 1,585 | 4,678 |
| Parque Eólico Montes de Castejón, S.L. | Spain | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 12 | (3) | - | - | - | 9 |
| Parques de Generación Eólica, SL | Spain | - | 60.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,924 | 3,133 | (565) | 653 | 653 | 5,145 |
Appendix I Page 17 of 25
| % indirect interest |
Thousands of Euros | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net profit | |||||||||||
| Group companies | Registered offices |
% direct interest |
Auditor | Activity | Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
|
| CE Saint Bernabé, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,600 | 561 | (501) | 534 | 534 | 2,194 |
| CE Segur, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,615 | 632 | (507) | 658 | 658 | 2,398 |
| Eolienne D'Etalondes, SARl | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (28) | - | (4) | (4) | (31) |
| Eolienne de Saugueuse, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (27) | - | (7) | (7) | (33) |
| Parc Eolien D'Ardennes | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (123) | - | (19) | (19) | (141) |
| Eolienne des Bocages, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (28) | - | - | - | (27) |
| Parc Eolien des Longs Champs, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (69) | - | (2) | (2) | (70) |
| Parc Eolien de Mancheville, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (40) | - | (2) | (2) | (41) |
| Parc Eolien de Roman, SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (102) | - | (13) | (13) | (114) |
| Parc Eolien des Vatines, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (1,181) | (600) | (36) | (36) | (1,780) |
| Parc Eolien de La Hetroye, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (28) | - | (4) | (4) | 5 |
| Eolienne de Callengeville, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (20) | - | (5) | (5) | 12 |
| Parc Eolien de Varimpre, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (983) | (678) | 45 | 45 | (1,579) |
| Parc Eolien du Clos Bataille, SAS | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 37 | (704) | (527) | (92) | (92) | (1,286) |
| Eólica de Serra das Alturas,S.A | Portugal | - | 50.10% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 50 | 1,842 | - | 664 | 664 | 2,556 |
| Malhadizes- Energia Eólica, SA | Portugal | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 50 | 100 | - | 399 | 399 | 549 |
| Eólica de Montenegrelo, LDA | Portugal | - | 50.10% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 50 | 3,532 | - | 1,513 | 1,513 | 5,095 |
| Eólica da Alagoa,SA | Portugal | - | 59.99% | PwC | Wind energy production | 50 | 1,729 | - | 1,026 | 1,026 | 2,805 |
| Aplica.Indust de Energias limpias S.L Cia Productora de energia para consumo |
Spain | - | 36.40% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 131 | 902 | - | 334 | 334 | 1,367 |
| interno S.l | Spain | - | 12.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 468 | 4,600 | - | 2,411 | 2,411 | 7,479 |
| Desarrollo Eólico del Valle del Ebro | Spain | - | 12.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 60 | (89) | - | (23) | (23) | (52) |
| Energi E2 Renovalbles Aragon S.l | Spain | - | 12.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 240 | 1,708 | - | 2,429 | 2,429 | 4,377 |
| Sinergia Aragonesa S.L Aprofitament D'Energies Renovables de la |
Spain | - | 32.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 6 | (34) | - | (6) | (6) | (34) |
| Tierra Alta S.A | Spain | - | 48.69% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1,994 | (546) | - | (232) | (232) | 1,216 |
| Bon Vent de L'Ebre S.L.U | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 90 | (35) | - | - | - | 55 |
| Parc Eólic Coll de la Garganta S.L | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1,693 | - | - | - | - | 1,693 |
| Parc Eólic Serra Voltorera S.l | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1,283 | - | - | (534) | (534) | 749 |
| Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy I sp zoo | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 18 | (12) | - | (52) | (52) | (46) |
| Moray Offshore renewables limited | United Kingdom | - | 75.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | 158 | 158 | 158 |
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registered offices |
Net profit | ||||||||||
| Group companies | % direct interest |
% indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | ||
| Centrale Eolienne Canet –Pont de Salaras | |||||||||||
| S.A.S | France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 125 | (164) | (486) | 317 | 317 | (208) |
| Centrale Eolienne de Gueltas Noyal – | |||||||||||
| Pontiv y S.A.S Centrale Eolienne Neo Truc de L'Homme |
France | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,261 | 1,353 | 16 | 494 | 494 | 4,124 |
| ,S.A.S | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 38 | (9) | - | (2) | (2) | 27 |
| Vallee de Moulin SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (17) | - | (269) | (269) | (285) |
| Mardelle SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (5) | - | (199) | (199) | (203) |
| Quinze Mines SARL | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1 | (19) | - | (330) | (330) | (348) |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Teruel SL | Spain | - | 40.80% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 60 | (79) | - | 79 | 79 | 60 |
| Par Eólic de Coll de Moro S.L. | Spain | - | 60.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | 5 | - | - | - | 8 |
| Par Eólic de Torre Madrina S.L. | Spain | - | 60.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | 5 | - | - | - | 8 |
| Parc Eolic de Vilalba dels Arcs S.L. | Spain | - | 60.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | - | - | 682 | 682 | 685 |
| Parc Eolic Molinars S.L. | Spain | - | 54.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3 | - | - | - | - | 3 |
| Bon Vent de Vilalba, SL | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3,600 | (719) | - | (224) | (224) | 2,657 |
| Bon Vent de Corbera, SL | Spain | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3,330 | (4) | - | (2,617) | (2,617) | 709 |
| Farma wiatrowa Bodzanow Sp.z.o.o | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 65 | (4) | - | (40) | (40) | 21 |
| Farma wiatrowa Starozbery Sp.z.o.o | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 117 | (5) | - | (15) | (15) | 97 |
| Farma wiatrowa Wyszogrod Sp.z.o.o | Poland | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 165 | (4) | - | (16) | (16) | 145 |
| Rowy-Karpacka mala Energetyka,sp,z.o.o | Poland | - | 85.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 13 | (8) | - | (7) | (7) | (2) |
| Repano wind S.R.L | Italy | - | 85.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 162 | (8) | - | (9) | (9) | 145 |
| Re plus – Societa ´a Responsabilita limitada | Italy | - | 68.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 100 | 1,073 | - | (60) | (60) | 1,113 |
| Telford Offhsore Windfarm limited | United Kingdom | - | 75.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Maccoll offshore windfarm limited | United Kingdom | - | 75.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Stevenson Offshore Windfarm Limited | United Kingdom | - | 75.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Parc Eolien des Bocages Sarl | France | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 1 | (162) | - | - | - | (161) |
| Santa quiteria Energia S.L.U | Spain | - | 80.00% | Unaudited | Energy production | 3 | 398 | - | 91 | 91 | 492 |
| HORIZON WIND ENERGY LLC | Texas | 100.00% | - | KPMG | Holding company | 3,094,936 | (100,529) | - | 22,350 | 22,350 | 2,972,057 |
| Wind Turbine Prometheus, LP | California | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4 | (4) | - | - | - | - |
| Lost Lakes Wind Farm LLC | Minnesota | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 151,317 | (149) | - | 6,579 | 6,579 | 157,747 |
| Quilt Block Wind Farm, LLC | Minnesota | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,085 | (14) | - | - | - | 3,071 |
Appendix I Page 19 of 25
| Registered offices |
% indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Thousands of Euros | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Net profit | ||||||||||
| % direct interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
|||||
| Cloud County Wind Farm, LLC | Kansas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 242,811 | 2,099 | - | 1,208 | 1,208 | 246,118 |
| Whitestone Wind Purchasing, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,824 | (775) | - | 41 | 41 | 1,090 |
| Blue Canyon Windpower II LLC | Oklahoma | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 125,109 | 7,929 | - | 708 | 708 | 133,746 |
| Blue Canyon Windpower V, LLC | Oklahoma | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 138,567 | 551 | - | 3,671 | 3,671 | 142,789 |
| Horizon Wind Energy International | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,465 | 192 | - | 4 | 4 | 4,661 |
| Pioneer Prairie Wind Farm I, LLC | Iowa | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 447,222 | (11,318) | 8,396 | 5,133 | 5,133 | 449,433 |
| Sagebrush Power Partners, LLC | Washington | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 152,574 | (28) | - | 779 | 779 | 153,325 |
| Telocaset Wind Power Partners, LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 101,635 | 9,285 | 345 | 4,188 | 4,188 | 115,453 |
| High Trail Wind Farm, LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 292,612 | 6,132 | - | 2,602 | 2,602 | 301,346 |
| Marble River, LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 45,621 | (123) | - | 11 | 11 | 45,509 |
| Rail Splitter | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 177,974 | (1,605) | - | 6,036 | 6,036 | 182,405 |
| Blackstone Wind Farm, LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 116,763 | (1,025) | - | 3,047 | 3,047 | 118,785 |
| Aroostook Wind Energy LLC | Maine | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 8,974 | (79) | - | 3 | 3 | 8,898 |
| Jericho Rise Wind Farm LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,058 | (32) | - | 2 | 2 | 4,028 |
| Madison Windpower LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 7,958 | (1,197) | - | 1,049 | 1,049 | 7,810 |
| Mesquite Wind, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 194,125 | 14,909 | - | 2,298 | 2,298 | 211,332 |
| Martinsdale Wind Farm LLC | Colorado | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,257 | (5) | - | 2 | 2 | 3,254 |
| Post Oak Wind, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 219,690 | 11,236 | - | 16,234 | 16,234 | 247,160 |
| BC2 Maple Ridge Wind LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 295,123 | 1,600 | 8,130 | 1,024 | 1,024 | 305,877 |
| High Prairie Wind Farm II, LLC | Minnesota | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 115,020 | (81) | 475 | 1,154 | 1,154 | 116,568 |
| Arlington Wind Power Project LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 136,660 | 2,451 | - | 235 | 235 | 139,346 |
| Signal Hill Wind Power Project LLC | Colorado | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3 | (2) | - | - | - | 1 |
| Tumbleweed Wind Power Project LLC | Colorado | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3 | (3) | - | - | - | - |
| Old Trail Wind Farm, LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 308,103 | (5,821) | 2,724 | 3,101 | 3,101 | 308,107 |
| Stinson Mills Wind Farm, LLC | Colorado | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 2,291 | (73) | - | 2 | 2 | 2,220 |
| OPQ Property LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | 99 | - | 5 | 5 | 104 |
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm, LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 221,086 | (1,478) | - | 4,072 | 4,072 | 223,680 |
| Wheatfield Wind Power Project, LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 76,248 | 3,257 | - | 4,142 | 4,142 | 83,647 |
| 2007 Vento I, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 858,893 | 2,572 | - | 134 | 134 | 861,599 |
| 2007 Vento II, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 754,698 | (1,468) | - | 806 | 806 | 754,036 |
| 2008 Vento III, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 835,067 | (670) | - | 570 | 570 | 834,967 |
Appendix I Page 20 of 25
| Auditor | Thousands of Euros | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Activity | Net profit | ||||||||||
| Registered offices |
% direct interest |
% indirect interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||
| Horizon Wind Ventures I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,092,113 | 27,304 | - | 18,113 | 18,113 | 1,137,530 | |
| Horizon Wind Ventures II, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 105,904 | (610) | - | 1,490 | 1,490 | 106,784 | |
| Horizon Wind Ventures III, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 58,686 | (10) | - | 556 | 556 | 59,232 | |
| Clinton County Wind Farm, LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 45,664 | (5) | - | - | - | 45,659 | |
| BC2 Maple Ridge Holdings LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 295,123 | 1,600 | 8,130 | 1,024 | 1,024 | 305,877 | |
| Cloud West Wind Project, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 242,811 | 2,099 | - | 1,208 | 1,208 | 246,118 | |
| Five-Spot, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Horizon Wind Chocolate Bayou I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Alabama Ledge Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Antelope Ridge Wind Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 7,901 | - | - | 1 | 1 | 7,902 | |
| Arkwright Summit Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Ashford Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Athena-Weston Wind Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Black Prairie Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 3,803 | - | - | 1 | 1 | 3,804 | |
| Blackstone Wind Farm II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 87,404 | (1) | - | 261 | 261 | 87,664 | |
| Blackstone Wind Farm III LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 2,756 | - | - | 7 | 7 | 2,763 | |
| Blackstone Wind Farm IV LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Blackstone Wind Farm V LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Blue Canyon Windpower III LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Blue Canyon Windpower IV LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Blue Canyon Windpower VI LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1,732 | - | - | - | - | 1,732 | |
| Broadlands Wind Farm II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Broadlands Wind Farm III LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Broadlands Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Chateaugay River Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Cropsey Ridge Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Crossing Trails Wind, Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Dairy Hills Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Diamond Power Partners LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Ford Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Gulf Coast Windpower Management | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Appendix I Page 21 of 25
31 December 2010
| Registered offices |
Auditor | Activity | Thousands of Euros | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Net profit | ||||||||||
| % direct interest |
% indirect interest |
Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||||
| Company, LLC | |||||||||||
| Rising Tree Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest VII LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest X LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest XI LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Panhandle I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest III LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest IV LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Valley I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind MREC Iowa Partners LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind, Freeport Windpower I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Juniper Wind Power Partners, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 5,506 | - | - | - | - | 5,506 |
| Machias Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 152,363 | (1) | - | 1,254 | 1,254 | 153,616 |
| New Trail Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| North Slope Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Number Nine Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Pacific Southwest Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Pioneer Prairie Wind Farm II LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Buffalo Bluff Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Saddleback Wind Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 1,020 | (4) | - | - | - | 1,016 |
| Sardinia Windpower LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Turtle Creek Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Western Trail Wind Project I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Whistling Wind WI Energy Center, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Coos Curry Wind Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Energy Midwest IX LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Thousands of Euros
| % indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Reserves | Net profit | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Registered offices |
% direct interest |
Capital | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
|||||
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest I LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Peterson Power Partners LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Pioneer Prairie Interconnection LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| The Nook Wind Power Project LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Tug Hill Windpower LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Whiskey Ridge Power Partners LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Wilson Creek Power Partners LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| WTP Management Company LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm IV LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 39,941 | - | - | 78 | 78 | 40,019 | |
| Meadow Lake Windfarm III LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 49,311 | - | - | 40 | 40 | 49,351 | |
| 2009 Vento IV, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 178,160 | (75) | - | 80 | 80 | 178,165 | |
| 2009 Vento V, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 138,653 | (6) | - | 113 | 113 | 138,760 | |
| 2009 Vento VI, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 151,402 | (75) | - | 152 | 152 | 151,479 | |
| Horizon Wind Ventures VI, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 84,892 | (1) | - | 1,716 | 1,716 | 86,607 | |
| Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm II LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 210 | - | - | - | - | 210 | |
| Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm III LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| East Klickitat Wind Power Project LLC | Washington | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest IV LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Blue Canyon Wind Power VII LLC | Oklahoma | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Horizon Wyoming Transmission LLC | Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| AZ Solar LLC | Arizona | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Black Prairie Wind Farm II LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Black Prairie Wind Farm III LLC | Illinois | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Paulding Wind Farm LLC | Ohio | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 4,062 | - | - | - | - | 4,062 | |
| Paulding Wind Farm II LLC | Ohio | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 8,242 | - | - | 5 | 5 | 8,247 | |
| Paulding Wind Farm III LLC | Ohio | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm II LLC | Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm III LLC | Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm IV LLC | Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm V LLC | Wyoming | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Athena-Weston Wind Power Project II, LLC | Oregon | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Appendix I Page 23 of 25
Thousands of Euros
| % % direct indirect interest interest Auditor Activity Capital |
Net profit | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group companies | Registered offices |
Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
|||||
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm V, LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 696 | - | - | - | - | 696 |
| Horizon Wind Ventures IB, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 9,602 | 19,752 | - | 15,798 | 15,798 | 45,152 |
| Horizon Wind Ventures IC, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 5,016 | (455) | - | 6,385 | 6,385 | 10,946 |
| Headwaters Wind Farm LLC | Indiana | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 17th Star Wind Farm LLC | Ohio | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rio Blanco Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hidalgo Wind Farm LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Stone Wind Power LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Franklin Wind Farm LLC | New York | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Waverly Wind Farm LLC | Kansas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 1,265 | - | - | - | - | 1,265 |
| 2010 Vento VII, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 152,384 | - | - | 156 | 156 | 152,540 |
| 2010 Vento VIII, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 153,322 | - | - | 12 | 12 | 153,334 |
| 2010 Vento IX, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Horizon Wind Ventures VII, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 89,808 | - | - | 561 | 561 | 90,369 |
| Horizon Wind Ventures VIII, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 83,514 | - | - | 373 | 373 | 83,887 |
| Horizon Wind Ventures IX, LLC | Texas | - | 100.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sao Paulo | |||||||||||
| EDP RENOVÁVEIS BRASIL, S.A. | (Brazil) | 55.00% | - | KPMG | Wind energy production | 28,056 | (407) | - | 1,841 | 1,841 | 29,490 |
| Central Nacional de Energia Eólica, S.A. | Sao Paulo | ||||||||||
| (Cenaeel) | (Brazil) | - | 55.00% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 6,329 | (79) | - | 818 | 818 | 7,068 |
| Elebrás Projectos, Ltda | Sao Paulo (Brazil) |
- | 55.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 733 | (540) | - | 292 | 292 | 485 |
| EDP RENEWABLES CANADA, LTD | Canada | 100.00% | - | Unaudited | Wind energy production | - | - | - | 101 | 101 | 101 |
Appendix I Page 24 of 25
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Associates | Registered offices | % direct interest |
% indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Net profit Continui ng operatio ns |
Total | Total equity |
||
| Aprofitament D'Energies Renovables de l'Ebre S.l |
Spain | - | 18.97% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 3,869 | (366) | - | - | - | 3,503 | ||
| Hidroastur, S.A. | Oviedo, Spain | - | 20.00% | Centium | Mini-hydroelectric energy prod. | 4,808 | 2,091 | - | - | - | 6,899 | ||
| Sodecoan, S.L. | Seville, Spain | - | 40.00% | Unaudited | Promotion of energy development | 6 | (9) | - | - | - | (3) | ||
| Biomasas del Pirineo, S.A. | Huesca, Spain | - | 24.00% | Unaudited | Biomass: Electricity production | 455 | (217) | - | - | - | 238 | ||
| Culitvos Energéticos de Castilla, S.A. | Burgos, Spain | - | 24.00% | Unaudited | Biomass: Electricity production | 300 | (48) | - | - | - | 252 | ||
| Parque Eólico Sierra del Madero, S.A. | Soria, Spain | - | 33.60% | Ernst & Young |
Wind energy production | 7,194 | 5,434 | - | 3,535 | 3,535 | 16,163 | ||
| Desarrollos Energéticos Canarios, S.A. | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain) |
- | 39.92% | Unaudited | Wind power: Project development |
4,291 | 5,836 | - | 1,242 | 1,242 | 11,369 | ||
| Solar Siglo XXI, S.A. | Ciudad Real, Spain | - | 20.00% | Unaudited | Solar energy | 80 | (18) | - | - | - | 62 | ||
| Naturneo Energía, S.L. | Spain | - | 49.00% | Unaudited | Holding company | 3 | (1) | - | - | - | 2 | ||
| Eólicas de Portugal,SA | Portugal | - | 35.96% | Unaudited | Wind energy production | 25,248 | 18,836 | (14,215) | 5,917 | 5,917 | 35,786 | ||
| Parque Eólico Belmonte, S.A. | Madrid, Spain | - | 23.92% | KPMG | Wind energy production | 120 | 4,322 | - | (69) | (69) | 4,373 | ||
Appendix I Page 25 of 25
| Thousands of Euros | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net profit | |||||||||||||
| Jointly controlled entities | Registered offices | % direct interest |
% indirect interest |
Auditor | Activity | Capital | Reserves | Other equity items |
Continuing operations |
Total | Total equity |
||
| Tebar Eolica, S.A. | Tébar/Cuenca, Spain | - | 40.00% | Unaudited | Wind energy production |
4,720 | 4,502 | (400) | 1,222 | 1,222 | 10,444 | ||
| Evolución 2000, S.L. | Madrid, Spain | - | 39.32% | KPMG | Wind energy production |
118 | 12,779 | (1,354) | 3,048 | 3,048 | 15,945 | ||
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Canarias, S.A. | Las Palmas, Spain | - | 35.80% | KPMG | Wind energy production |
4,291 | 5,836 | - | 1,242 | 1,242 | 11,369 | ||
| Compañia Eólica Aragonesa S.A. | Spain | - | 50.00% | Deloitte | Wind energy production |
6,701 | 68,188 | (1,168) | 12,722 | 12,722 | 87,611 | ||
| Flat Rock Windpower LLC | New York | - | 50.00% | E&Y | Wind energy production |
195,636 | (27,218) | - | (3,736) | (3,736) | (160,946) | ||
| Flat Rock Windpower II LLC | New York | - | 50.00% | E&Y | Wind energy production |
77,626 | (10,017) | - | (2,207) | (2,207) | 63,195 | ||
Appendix II Page 1 of 5
| Name or registered name of board member |
Registered name of entity | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Antonio Luís Guerra Nunes Mexía | EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. | Chairman of the board |
| Energías do Brasil, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Ana María Machado Fernandes | EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. | Board member |
| EDP - Energías do Brasil, S.A. | Board member | |
| EDP Renováveis Brasil, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | Board member | |
| EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. | Chairman of the board | |
| ENEOP – Eólicas de Portugal, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Rui Manuel Rodrigues Lopes Teixeira | EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. | Board member |
| Generaciones Especiales I, S.L.U. | Board member | |
| EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. | Board member | |
| Malhadizes – Energía Eólica, S.A. | Board member | |
| EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park III SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park I SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| EDP Renewables Polska SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy I SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Masovia Wind Farm I SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Farma Wiatrowa Starozreby SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Karpacka Mala Energetyka SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park IV SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park II SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| EDP Renováveis Brasil, S.A. | Board member | |
| Nuno María Pestana de Almeida Alves | EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. | Board member and Chief Financial Officer |
| EDP Energias do Brasil, S.A. | Board member | |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | Board member | |
| João Paulo Nogueira de Sousa Costeira | Eneroliva, S.A. | Board member |
| EDP Renewables Europa, S.L.U. | Board member | |
| Cogeneraciones Especiales I, SLU | Board member | |
| EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. | President | |
| Malhadizes – Energía Eólica, S.A. | President |
Appendix II Page 2 of 5
| Name or registered name of board member |
Registered name of entity | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Eólica da Serra das Alturas, S.A. | Board member | |
| Eólica de Montenegrelo, S.A. | Board member | |
| ENEOP 2 – Exploração de Parques Eolicos, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Eólica dos Altos de Salgueiros-Guilhado, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Eólica de Alvarrões, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Eólica do Espigão, S.A. | Board member | |
| Eólica do Bravo, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Eólica do Campanário, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Eólica da Terra do Mato, S.A. | Board member | |
| Eólica do Alto da Lagoa, S.A. | Board member | |
| Eólica do Alto do Mourisco, S.A. | Board member | |
| Eólica das Serras das Beiras, S.A. | Board member | |
| Eólica do Alto Douro, S.A. | Board member | |
| Eólica do Monte das Castelhanas, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Eólica da Lomba, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Eólica do Cachopo, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Eólica do Cotão, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| EDP Renewables Romania, SRL | Board member | |
| Cernavoda Power, SRL | Board member | |
| Greenwind, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| EDP Renewables France, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Centrale Eolienne Neo Truc de l'Homme, SAS | Chairman of the board | |
| Eolienne de Callengeville, SAS | Chairman of the board | |
| Neo Plouvien, SAS | Chairman of the board | |
| Parc Eolien de la Hetroye, SAS | Chairman of the board | |
| Eolienne de Saugueuse, SARL | Board member | |
| Eolienne de Bocages, SARL | Board member | |
| Eolienne d'Etalondes, SARL | Board member | |
| Parc Eolien d'Ardennes, SARL | Board member | |
| Parc Eolien de Mancheville, SARL | Board member | |
| Parc Eolien de Roman, SARL | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park III SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park I SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| EDP Renewables Polska SP. Z O.O | Board member |
Appendix II Page 3 of 5
| Name or registered name of board member |
Registered name of entity | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy I SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Masovia Wind Farm I SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Farma Wiatrowa Starozreby SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Karpacka Mala Energetyka SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park IV Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park II Z O.O. | Board member | |
| EDPR UK, Ltd | Board member | |
| Moray Offshore Renewables, Ltd | Board member | |
| Maccoll Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Board member | |
| Stevenson Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Board member | |
| Telford Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Board member | |
| EDP Renewables Italia, Srl | Board member | |
| Operação e Manuntenção Industrial, S.A. | Board member | |
| João Manuel Manso Neto | EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. | Board member |
| EDP Gestão da Produção de Energía, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| EDP Energía Iberica, S.A. | Board member | |
| EDP Gás.Com Comércio de Gás Natural, S.A. | Board member | |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | Vice Chairman of the board | |
| Empresa Hidroelectrica do Guadiana, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Naturgás Energía Grupo, S.A. | Second Vice Chairman of the board | |
| HidroCantábrico Energía, S.A.U. | Chairman of the board | |
| Eléctrica de la Ribera del Ebro, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | Naturgas Energía Grupo, S.A. | Chairman of the board |
| EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. | Board member | |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | Chairman of the board | |
| Enagas, S.A. | Individual representing the legal entity on the board of directors |
|
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd. | Chairman of the board |
| EDP Renewables North America, LLC and subsidiaries (see Appendix I) |
Chairman of the board | |
| Luis de Abreu Castello-Branco Adão da Fonseca |
EDP Renewables Europe, S.L.U. | Board member |
| Generaciones Especiales I, S.L.U. | Board member | |
| EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. | Board member | |
| EDP Renewables Romania, SRL | Board member |
Appendix II Page 4 of 5
Details of Investments and Positions Held by Company Directors in Other Companies at 31 December 2011
| Name or registered name of board member |
Registered name of entity | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Cernavoda Power, SRL | Board member | |
| Pochidia Wind Farm, S.A. | Board member | |
| EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park III SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park I SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| EDP Renewables Polska SP. Z O.O | Board member | |
| Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy I SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Masovia Wind Farm I SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Farma Wiatrowa Starozreby SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Karpacka Mala Energetyka SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park IV SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| Relax Wind Park II SP. Z O.O. | Board member | |
| EDPR UK, Ltd | Board member | |
| Moray Offshore Renewables, Ltd | Board member | |
| Maccoll Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Board member | |
| Stevenson Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Board member | |
| Telford Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Board member | |
| EDP Renewables Italia, Srl | Board member | |
| EDP Renováveis Brazil, S.A. | Board member | |
| EDP Inovação, S.A. | Board member | |
Appendix II Page 5 of 5
| Name or registered name of director or board member |
Registered name of entity | Number of shares |
|---|---|---|
| Antonio Luís Guerra Nunes Mexía | EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. | 41,000 |
| EDP Energias do Brasil, S.A. | 1 | |
| João Manuel Manso Neto | EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. | 1,268 |
| Nuno María Pestana de Almeida Alves | EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. | 100,000 |
| EDP Energias do Brasil, S.A. | 1 | |
| Jorge Manuel Azevedo Henriques dos Santos | EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. | 2,379 |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | EDP Energías de Portugal, S.A. | 4,550 |
| REN - Redes Energéticas Nacionais, SGPS, S.A. | 380 | |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | Iberdrola, S.A. | 50 |


MANAGEMENT REPORT DECEMBER 2011

| 0. INTRODUCTION 3 | |
|---|---|
| 1. MAIN EVENTS OF THE PERIOD 4 | |
| 2. PERFORMANCE OF 2011 8 | |
| 3. RISK MANAGEMENT 19 | |
| 4. FINANCIAL HEDGING DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS 27 | |
| 5. TREASURY STOCKS (OWN SHARES) 28 | |
| 6. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE 29 | |
| 7. HUMAN CAPITAL 32 | |
| 8. RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 39 | |
| 9. RELEVANT SUBSEQUENT EVENTS 40 | |
| 10. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 41 | |
| 11. SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE 44 | |
| 12. CAPITAL MARKETS 46 | |
| 13. DISCLAIMER 48 |

1
EDP Renováveis S.A. individual accounts refer to the Holding of EDP Renováveis Group (EDPR), which includes (apart from EDPR Holding) its subsidiaries EDPR Europe (EDP Renewables Europe, S.L.), EDPR North America (Horizon Wind Energy, LLC) and EDPR South America (EDP Renováveis Brasil). This management report will focus on financials and 2011 activity of "EDPR Holding" as well as its subsidiaries in each of the supra-mentioned platforms. Therefore, the report describes both the Holding and EDPR Group' business and activity during 2011. Financial accounts for EDPR Holding are presented according to Spanish local GAAP ("Plan General de Contabilidad", in all material aspects similar to IFRS), while EDPR Group consolidated financial info were prepared according to IFRS. The current management report addresses EDPR Holding and EDP Group
1 2

02 Feb – EDP Renováveis announces YE2010 provisional operating data: EDP Renováveis installed 1,101 MW and achieved an electricity output 14,352 GWh, more 32% than in 2009. Load factor in Europe was 27% and in the US 32%.
24 Feb – EDP Renováveis announces YE2010 results: Revenues and EBITDA increased by 31% YoY, reaching €947.6 million and €712.7 million, respectively. EBITDA margin stood at 75.2% and Net Income totalled €80.2 million (-30% YoY).
30 Mar – EDP Renováveis takes full control of Genesa: EDPR takes full control of Genesa, following the decision of Caja Madrid to exercise its put option over its 20% stake in Genesa, in accordance to the provisions under the shareholders' agreement. The strike price of the put option was set at €231 million.
07 Apr – EDP Renováveis sells financial stake in Spanish wind farm: EDPR closed an agreement with Enel Green Power to sell its stake in SEASA – a company with 74 operating MW in Spain. EDPR sells its 16.67% equity shareholding by €10.7 million (or 24.5 million of enterprise value, including the equivalent net debt as of Dec-10).
18 Apr – EDP Renováveis announces 1Q2011 provisional operating data: capacity increased by 188 MW and electricity output reached 4,421 GWh, more 21% than in 1st quarter of 2010. Load factor in Europe was 29% and in the US 35%.
4 May – EDP Renováveis announces 1Q2011 results: Revenues amounted to €284.3 million in the quarter (+17% YoY), EBITDA totalled €220.1 million (+19% YoY), reaching an EBITDA margin of 77.4%. Net income was €49.2 million (+16% YoY).

03 Jun – EDP Renováveis is awarded a new long-term contract in the US: EDPR was awarded a 10-year contract by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) in conjunction with the Public Service Commission (PSC) to sell the renewable energy credits (RECs) equivalent to 45 MW from its Marble River Wind Farm project in the New York state, to be commissioned in 2012.
06 Jun – EDP Renováveis establishes a partnership for the development of 2.4 GW of wind offshore capacity in the UK: EDPR entered into a partnership with Repsol to jointly develop 2.4 GW of offshore wind projects in the UK. EDPR will lead the partnership with a 60% share in the overall capacity to be developed.
21 Jun – EDP Renováveis executes a project finance for 138 MW in Romania: EDPR has executed a project finance structure agreement with a consortium of banks led by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, for 138 MW in Romania. The long-term contracted debt facility amounts to €115 million.
28 Jun – EDP Renováveis is awarded with 127 MW in Spain: EDPR was awarded with 127 MW in the region of Aragón, corresponding to 11% of the total 1.2 GW granted by the Spanish regional Government in its tender to award electricity production licenses through wind energy.
11 Jul – EDP Renováveis executes a project finance for 90 MW in Romania: EDPR has executed another project finance structure agreement with a consortium of banks led by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, for the 90 MW Pestera wind farm in Romania. The long-term contracted debt facility amounts to €73 million.
13 Jul – EDP Renováveis establishes a new institutional partnership structure for 99 MW in the US: EDPR has signed an agreement to secure USD116 million of institutional equity financing from Bank of America Corporation and Paribas North America, Inc., a subsidiary of BNP Paribas, in exchange for a partial interest in its 99 MW Timber Road II wind farm.
14 Jul – EDP Renováveis announces 1H2011 provisional operating data: capacity increased 486 MW (362 MW in Europe, 70 MW in Brazil and 54 MW in the US) and electricity output totalled 8,790 GWh, meaning a 27% increase comparing with the 1st half of 2010. Load factor in Europe was 26% and in the US 36%.

25 Jul – EDP Renováveis executes a project finance for 70 MW in Brazil: EDPR has executed a project finance structure agreement with the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES) for its 70 MW Tramandaí wind farm in Brazil, in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, fully commissioned in May 2011. The long-term contracted debt facility amounts to R\$ 228 million.
27 Jul – EDP Renováveis announces 1H2011 results: Revenues were €546.6 million (+18% YoY) and EBITDA €409.2 million (+19% YoY), with an EBITDA margin of 74.9%. Net income increased 109% YoY to €89.5 million reflecting the operating performance in the period, the extension of the projects' useful life to 25 years and the capital gain from the sale of EDPR's stake in SEASA.
14 Sep – EDP Renováveis secures a new PPA for 101 MW in the US: EDPR signed a 19-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Tennessee Valley Authority to sell the renewable energy produced by its 101 MW Lost Lakes wind farm in Iowa, US.
13 Oct – EDP Renováveis announces 9M2011 provisional operating data: capacity increased 604 MW (435 MW in Europe, 99 MW in the US and 70 MW in Brazil) and electricity output totalled 11,975 GWh, meaning a 22% increase comparing with the nine months of 2010. Load factor in Europe was 25% and in the US 31%.
26 Oct – EDP Renováveis announces 9M2011 results: Revenues were €768.8 million (+16% YoY) and EBITDA €548.3 million (+16% YoY), with an EBITDA margin of 71.3%. Net income reached €62.6 million, having increased 182% YoY reflecting the operating performance in the period and the extension of the projects' useful life but partially offset by the negative forex differences.
20 Dec – EDP Renováveis is awarded long-term contracts for 120 MW at the Brazilian energy auction: EDPR has secured four 20-year Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) at the Brazilian energy A-5 auction to sell electricity in the regulated market. The four PPA are related to the equivalent renewable energy produced by four wind farms totalling 120 MW, to be installed in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, in Brazil.
21 Dec – ENEOP executes a project finance of €260 million for 376 MW in Portugal: EDPR's associated company ENEOP – Eólicas de Portugal has executed a project finance structure with the European Investment Bank (EIB) for its second group of wind farms developed in Portugal, totalling 376 MW.

22 Dec – EDPR's principal shareholder EDP and China Three Gorges establish a strategic partnerhip: EDPR's principal shareholder EDP established a strategic partnership with China Three Gorges, following the selection of the Chinese company to be the purchaser of a 21.35% stake in EDP formerly owned by the Portuguese Government, in the context of the 8th reprivatisation phase of EDP.
22 Dec – EDP Renováveis establishes a new institutional partnership structure for 99 MW in the US: EDPR has secured c.USD 124 million of institutional equity financing from JPM Capital Corporation and Wells Fargo, in exchange for a partial interest in its 99 MW Blue Canyon VI wind farm that has started operating in the State of Oklahoma.

EDPR Holding closed the year of 2011 with €8.5 billion in assets, mainly due to investments in its associates of €4.2 billion and loans to affiliated and group companies of €4.3 billion.
Total equity reached €5.8 billion providing evidence of the robust EDPR Holding capital structure with Equity over Total Assets surpassing 63.2%.
Total Liabilities amounted, by year-end, to €3.4 billion (for the great part a result of €3.0 billion in financial debt to EDP group companies (EDP Finance BV)).
The Financial income totalled €274 millions driven by €260 millions in interest income from financial assets resulting from loans to group companies.
Financial Results totalled (€157) million, leading to a EBT (Earnings before Taxes) of €83 millions. Effective tax rate was 28.7%, resulting in (€24) million in Taxes and a 2011 full year Net Income of €59 million.
| EBITDA MW | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 3,978 | 3,439 | +538 |
| US | 3,422 | 3,224 | +198 |
| Brazil | 84 | 14 | +70 |
| Total | 7,483 | 6,676 | +806 |
Note: Including ENEOP (attributable to EDPR)
EDPR added 806 MW to its EBITDA+ENEOP installed capacity in 2011, of which 538 MW (87 MW from ENEOP) were in Europe, 198 MW in the US and 70 MW in Brazil. As of Dec-11, EDPR had 90% of its portfolio under long-term contracts and visible regulatory frameworks, and only 10% purely exposed to US spot electricity markets.

| Load Factor | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 25% | 27% | (2 pp) |
| US | 33% | 32% | +1 pp |
| Brazil | 35% | 26% | +9 pp |
| Total | 29% | 29% | - |
In 2011, the average load factor was stable YoY at 29%, keeping its position as one of the highest in the wind sector, as the company continues to leverage on its competitive advantages to maximize wind farm's output and on its diversified portfolio to mitigate the wind volatility risk. In Europe, the load factor decreased to 25% in 2011, given a lower wind resource in the period, particularly in the 4Q (27%, -3pp YoY). In the US, the 2011 load factor improved by 1pp YoY to 33%, having remained stable in the 4Q11 at 37%. In Brazil, load factors increased 9pp YoY to 35% following the strong wind resource in the 4Q11 and the commissioning of 70 MW with a higher load factor.
| GWh | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 7,301 | 6,632 | +10% |
| US | 9,330 | 7,689 | +21% |
| Brazil | 170 | 31 | +451% |
| Total | 16,800 | 14,352 | +17% |
Electricity production was up 17% in 2011, reaching 16.8 TWh and outpacing the capacity growth. The US represented the main source of growth (+21%), while Europe's growth (+10%) continues to be supported by Central and Eastern European markets.
Out of the total electricity output in 2011, 84% was sold under long-term remuneration schemes while 16% was exposed to US spot electricity prices (spot exposure will decrease further once all signed PPA contracts in the US start to contribute in 2012).
All in all, Revenues increased by 13% YoY and EBITDA increased 12% YoY, as a result of operating growth and positive non-recurrent items at the net operating costs line.

| Installed Capacity (MW) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2,201 | 2,050 | +151 |
| Portugal | 613 | 599 | +14 |
| France | 306 | 284 | +22 |
| Belgium | 57 | 57 | - |
| Poland | 190 | 120 | +70 |
| Romania | 285 | 90 | +195 |
| Europe | 3,652 | 3,200 | +452 |
| US | 3,422 | 3,224 | +198 |
| Brazil | 84 | 14 | +70 |
| EBITDA MW | 7,157 | 6,437 | +720 |
| ENEOP -Eólicas de Portugal (equity consolidated) | 326 | 239 | +87 |
| EBITDA MW + Eólicas de Portugal | 7,483 | 6,676 | +806 |
By December 2011, EDPR managed a global portfolio of 7,483 MW in 8 different countries (including its interest in the ENEOP - Eólicas de Portugal consortium, equity consolidated). During 2011, 720 MW (EBITDA) plus 87 MW (equity consolidated) were added to the installed capacity, of which 538 MW in Europe, 198 MW in the US and 70 MW in Brazil. In the 4Q11, EDPR added 203 MW of which 104 MW in Europe and 99 MW in the US.
| Under Construction (MW) | FY11 |
|---|---|
| Spain | 58 |
| Portugal | 2 |
| ROE | 100 |
| Europe | 160 |
| US | 215 |
| EBITDA MW | 375 |
| ENEOP -Eólicas de Portugal (equity consolidated) | - |
| EBITDA MW + Eólicas de Portugal | 375 |
By December 2011 EDPR had 375 MW under construction, of which 160 MW were in Europe and 215 MW in the US. In Europe, 80 MW were in construction in Poland, 58 MW in Spain and 2 MW in Portugal, while in Italy EDPR is building its first 20 MW. In the US, EDPR has 215 MW under construction from the Marble River wind farm in the State of New York.
<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->

| Capex (€m) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ % | ∆ € |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 368 | 539 | (32%) | (171) |
| US | 405 | 783 | (48%) | (378) |
| Brazil & Others | 57 | 79 | (28%) | (10) |
| Total Capex | 829 | 1,401 | (41%) | (572) |
Capex in 2011 was €829m, reflecting the ongoing capacity expansion plan. The 2011 capex decreased by 41% YoY explained by the lower capacity additions in the period and a lower unitary cost. Out of the €829m capex for 2011, €364m were related to the conclusion of new installed MW, while €466m were assigned to capacity under construction and under development.
EDPR has today a pipeline of projects in excess of 21 GW in 11 different countries, which enables the company to develop the best growth options through the execution of high quality projects located in the most profitable markets. During the 4Q11, EDPR performed a rationalisation of the long-term pipeline in the US, leading to a reduction in the volume of capacity under development in this country.
| Pipeline (MW) | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Sub-Total | Prospects | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 369 | 917 | 4,458 | 5,745 | 3,377 | 9,121 |
| North America | 775 | 4,038 | 3,285 | 8,098 | 2,195 | 10,293 |
| Brazil | 120 | 153 | 641 | 914 | 700 | 1,614 |
| Total | 1,264 | 5,107 | 8,384 | 14,756 | 6,272 | 21,028 |

| Assets (€m) | FY11 | FY10 |
|---|---|---|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 10,455 | 9,982 |
| Intangible assets and goodwill, net | 1,334 | 1,367 |
| Financial investments, net | 61 | 64 |
| Deferred tax assets | 56 | 39 |
| Inventories | 24 | 24 |
| Accounts receivable - trade, net | 146 | 144 |
| Accounts receivable - other, net | 763 | 680 |
| Financial assets held for trading | 0 | 36 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 220 | 501 |
| Total Assets | 13,058 | 12,835 |
| Equity (€m) | ||
| Share capital + share premium | 4,914 | 4,914 |
| Reserves and retained earnings | 325 | 274 |
| Consolidated net profit attrib. to equity holders of the parent | 89 | 80 |
| Non-controlling interests | 127 | 126 |
| Total Equity | 5,454 | 5,394 |
| Liabilities (€m) | ||
| Financial debt | 3,826 | 3,534 |
| Institutional partnerships | 1,024 | 1,009 |
| Provisions | 58 | 54 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 381 | 372 |
| Deferred revenues from institutional partnerships | 773 | 635 |
| Accounts payable - net | 1,542 | 1,839 |
| Total Liabilities | 7,604 | 7,442 |
| Total Equity and Liabilities | 13,058 | 12,835 |
Total assets in 2011 increased to 13.1 billion euros, of which 80% is related to net Property, plant and equipment (PP&E) reflecting the net accumulated invested capital in wind energy generation.
Total net PP&E increased to 10.5 billion euros following the new capacity additions in the period, the stronger US dollar as of Dec. 31st, 2011 (vs. Dec. 31st, 2010) and the annual depreciation charges related to the operating assets.
Total net accumulated invested capital related to wind farms in operation by the end of 2011 (excluding work in progress related to future assets and excluding the cash grants received in the US) amounted to 8.9 billion euros.

Net intangible assets mainly include the goodwill registered in EDPR books in US and Spain while accounts receivable are mainly related to loans to related parties, guarantees and tax receivables.
Cash and equivalents totalled 220 million euros and the financial assets held for trading were liquidated throughout 2011.
Total liabilities increased to 7.6 billion euros in 2011 (+162 million euros from 2010), of which 3.8 billion euros are related to financial debt and 1.0 billion euros to institutional partnerships. The increase in the financial debt is mostly explained by the operating and financial investments done in the period.
The institutional partnership stood at 1.0 billion euros. Deferred revenues from institutional partnerships represent the non-economic liability related to the tax credits already benefited by the institutional investor and to be recognized in the P&L through the useful life of the wind farms.
Deferred Tax liabilities in the amount of 381 million euros reflect mainly tax effects arising from temporary differences between assets and liabilities on an accounting basis and on tax basis. On the other hand, accounts payable include PP&E suppliers, deferred revenues related to cash grants received and derivative financial instruments.

| Consolidated Income Statement (€m) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues | 1,068.8 | 947.6 | +13% |
| Supplies and services | 225.1 | 196.2 | +15% |
| Personnel costs | 60.8 | 54.8 | +11% |
| Other operating costs / (income) | (17.8) | (16.2) | (10%) |
| Operating Costs | 268.1 | 234.9 | +14% |
| EBITDA | 800.7 | 712.7 | +12% |
| EBITDA/Revenues | 74.9% | 75.2% | (0.3 pp) |
| Provisions | (0.3) | (0.2) | (71%) |
| Depreciation and amortization | 468.5 | 434.4 | +8% |
| Compensation of subsidized assets' depreciation | (15.0) | (11.4) | (31%) |
| EBIT | 347.5 | 289.9 | +20% |
| Capital gains/(losses) | 10.5 | 0.0 | - |
| Financial income/(expense) | (244.1) | (174.1) | (40%) |
| Income/(losses) from group and associated companies | 4.8 | 5.0 | (5%) |
| Pre-Tax Profit | 118.7 | 120.8 | (2%) |
| Income taxes | (28.0) | (37.8) | +26% |
| Profit of the period | 90.6 | 83.0 | +9% |
| Equity Holders of EDPR | 88.6 | 80.2 | +10% |
| Non-controlling interests | 2.0 | 2.8 | (29%) |
In 2011, EDPR kept delivering a solid operating performance that has been translated into a 13% top-line year-on-year growth. The strong increase in electricity output and the stability of the average selling price led to 1.1 billion euros of Revenues.
EBITDA was up 12% YoY to 801 million euros following the Revenues growth and reflecting the maintenance of high efficiency levels, although negatively impacted by a weaker US Dollar and Zloty on average vs. 2010 (-16 million euros).
Depreciation and amortization charges (including comp. of subsidized asset's depreciation) increased by 7% in 2011 to 453 million euros. In the 2Q11, EDPR concluded a joint technical study with an industry independent expert on the expectable operating period turbines are expected to be economically in operation, and accordingly adjusted the useful life of its fleet to 25 years. The extension had a +55 million euros impact in the Net Income bottom line of 2011 (81M€ pre-tax), mainly as a result of lower depreciation charges.

The net financial expenses increased 40% year-on-year to 244 million euros explained by: i) the 14% growth of the interest costs, at a slower pace than the average financial debt; and ii) a negative 22 million euros forex difference related to assets and liabilities in Polish Zloty, Romania Leu and US Dollars
All in all, some non-recurrent items impacted the company's Pre-tax profit in -16 million euros: i) +11 million euros as a result of the revaluation of some of EDPR's European Assets and Liabilities (+52 million euros in EBITDA; -41 million euros in Depreciations and Amortizations); ii) -12 million euros of write-offs and other costs related to pipeline rationalisation (impact in EBITDA); iii) -22 million euros of negative forex differences (impact in Financial Costs); and iv) +10 million euros of capital gains.
Pre-tax profit totalled 119 million euros and income tax totalled 28 million euros - reflecting an effective tax rate of 24%. In 2011, EDPR obtained higher fiscal efficiency in its Spanish operations through the full control of Genesa and changed its deferred tax accounting policy in EDPR NA by starting to recognize net liabilities (against profits before taxes) vs. previous null income taxes (of which current taxes are presently zero given the tax incentives schemes in place) – this had a negative 6 million euros impact on the 2011 net income.
Net Income attributable to EDPR shareholders increased 10% YoY to 89 million euros, reflecting the operating performance in the period, the extension of the projects' useful life, the tax accounting policy in EDPR NA and non recurrent items (-16 million euros). Earnings attributable to non-controlling interests decrease 29% from 2010.
The distribution of dividends must be proposed by EDPR 's Board of Directors and authorized by a resolution approved in the Company's Shareholders Meeting. The expected dividend policy of EDPR, as announced in the IPO, is to propose dividends' distribution each year representing at least 20% of EDPR's distributable profit. Also as announced in the IPO, EDPR Board of Directors can adjust this dividend policy as required to reflect, among other things, changes to our business plan and our capital requirements, and there can be no assurance that in any given year a dividend will be proposed or declared.

| Net Income Application Proposal (€) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Income of the Period | 59,018,372.50 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total to be allocated | 59,018,372.50 | ||
| Allocation: | |||
| Legal Reserves (10%) | 5,901,837.25 | ||
| Voluntary Reserves | 53,116,535.25 | ||
| Total Distributed | 59,018,372.50 |
| Cash-Flow (€m) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA | 801 | 713 | +12% |
| FFO (Funds From Operations) | 588 | 522 | +13% |
| Operating Cash-Flow | 643 | 567 | +13% |
| Net Operating Cash-Flow | (444) | (764) | +42% |
| Decrease / (Increase) in Net Debt | (616) | (737) | +16% |
In 2011, EDPR generated an Operating Cash-Flow of €643m, delivering a 13% growth YoY, clearly demonstrating the recurrent cash generation capabilities of the operating assets.
The following are the key cash-flow items that explain the 2011 cash evolution:

| Net Debt (€m) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ € |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Debt | 3,826 | 3,534 | +293 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 220 | 501 | (281) |
| Loans to EDP Group related companies and cash pooling | 219 | 226 | (7) |
| Financial assets held for trading | 0 | 36 | (36) |
| Net Debt | 3,387 | 2,772 | +616 |
At the end of 2011, EDPR's financial debt was 3.8 billion euros (+8% YoY), being c78% of it loans with EDP Group while the remaining is debt with financial institutions, mostly related to project finance. Net Debt achieved 3.4 billion euros in 2011, increasing from the 2.8 billion euros by the end of 2010, mainly reflecting the capital expenditures and the financial investments done in the period.
EDPR's debt has a long-term profile. Most of our debt matures beyond 2018. Loans with EDP Group are closed for a 10 year period at fixed rates. Project finances also have a long-term duration. Such strategy enables the company to match to match the operating cash-flow profile with its financing costs.
As of December 2011, 53% of EDPR's financial debt was in Euros, 40% in US Dollars and 7% in other currencies, mainly Zloty and Brazilian Real. EDPR finances in local currencies for investments in Non-Euro currency geographies, such as the US, Poland and Brazil, reducing its financial exposure to forex changes.
92% of EDPR's financial debt was negotiated at a fixed rate, which mainly represents the financing agreements with EDP. EDPR follows a long-term fixed rate funding strategy to match the operating cash flow profile with its financing costs.
EDPR is a global leading energy company. Our growth has been the result of an extraordinary ability to implement projects and to smoothly integrate new companies, people and cultures. Our

markets provide attractive growth potential, mainly due to their growth prospects and the fact that they possess stable regulatory structures that allows for profitable returns.
EDPR continues to look to the renewable energy sector with a long-term outlook, believing that the environmental, economic and technological trends that have underpinned the currently favorable renewable energy market conditions will continue to drive further support for growth in the markets we are active in.
EDPR is a leading 'pure-play' renewable energy company, having derived its revenue stream from renewable energy activity. EDPR holds a leading position and "early mover" advantages in attractive high-growth markets, and continues to analyze new markets as well as new opportunities within the markets we currently operate in. This strategy continues to provide the company with a unique combination of size, focus and experience in the sector.
EDPR has a solid history of executing projects and delivering targets. We consistently increased installed capacity through the successful development of pipeline. The company's successful results stem from a unique combination of factors: strong track record in execution, first class assets with above average wind resources quality, a well balanced portfolio in terms of geography, stage of development and revenue sources, and a competitive turbine supply strategy.
The combination of diversified operations with a stable revenue base spread across countries with favorable regulatory regimes limits the exposure to market prices of electricity and provides significant visibility and stability.
Furthermore, EDPR has proven its ability to selectively identify new markets, to enter such markets and successfully integrate new countries.
At the core of EDPR's confidence in achieving these targets, is a dynamic, highly qualified and experienced team of world-wide employees with the track record and ambition to deliver upon the superior targets.

activities and processes of the company, but to be part of t
In EDPR's risk framework, risk process aims to link the company's overall strategy into manager's day-to-day decisions, enabling the company to increase the likelihood of achieving its strategic objectives.
EDPR's risk framework was designed to be not a stand-alone activity separated from the main
EDPR's general strategy is translated into major strategic questions that are grouped by risk area and then subject to EDPR's risk process. The outcome of the risk process is a set of specific guidelines per risk area that will guide managers in their decisions according to the company's risk profile.


Risk management in EDPR is supported by three distinct organizational functions:

EDPR's Risk Committee integrates and coordinates all the risk functions and assures the link between risk strategy and the company's operations.
EDPR's Risk Committee intends to be the forum to discuss how EDPR can optimize its risk-return position according to its risk profile. The key responsibilities of this committee are:

The following list summarizes the main risk areas and descriptions of EDPR's business:
The development and profitability of renewable energy projects are subject to policies and regulatory frameworks. The jurisdictions in which EDPR operates provide numerous types of incentives that support the energy generated from renewable sources.
Support for renewable energy sources has been strong in previous years, and both the European Union and various US federal and state bodies have regularly reaffirmed their wish to continue and strengthen such support.
It cannot be guaranteed that the current support will be maintained or that the electricity produced by future renewable energy projects will benefit from state purchase obligations, tax incentives, or other support measures for the electricity generation from renewable energy sources.

EDPR is managing its exposure to regulatory risks trough diversification (being present in several countries) and by being an active member in several wind associations.
EDPR faces limited market price risk as it pursues a strategy of being present in countries or regions with long term visibility on revenues. In most countries where EDPR is present, prices are determined through regulated framework mechanisms. On the markets where there is expected short term volatility on market prices, EDPR uses various financial and commodity hedging instruments in order to optimize the exposure to fluctuating electricity prices. However, it may not be possible to successfully hedge the exposures or it may face other difficulties in executing the hedging strategy.
In Europe, EDPR operates in countries where the selling price is defined by a feed-in-tariff (Spain, Portugal and France) or in markets where on top of the electricity price EDPR receives either a predefined regulated premium or a green certificate, whose price is achieved on a regulated market (Spain, Belgium, Poland, and Romania). Additionally, EDPR is developing activity in Italy and UK where current incentive system is based on green certificates, although both are in a process to change into feed in tariff.
In the case of North America, EDPR focus is developing strategy on the States which by having an RPS program in place provides higher revenues visibility, through the REC (Renewable Energy Credit) system and by non-compliance penalties. The North America market does not provide any regulated framework system for the electricity price although it may exist for the RECs in some States. Most of EDPR's capacity in the US has predefined prices determined by long-term contracts with local utilities in line with the Company's policy of signing long-term contracts for the output of its wind farms.
In Brazilian operations, selling price is defined through a public auction which is later translated into a long-term contract.
Under EDPR's global approach to optimize the exposure to market electricity prices, the Company evaluates on a permanent basis if there are any deviations to the defined limits, assessing in which markets financial hedges may be more effective to correct it. In 2010, in order to manage such

exposure, EDPR financially hedged a significant part of its generation in Spain while it closed a significant portion of its exposure through several physical and financial deals for the long-term in the US.
The amount of electricity generated by EDPR on its wind farms, and therefore EDPR's profitability, are dependent on climatic conditions, which vary across the locations of the wind farms, and from season to season and year to year. Energy output at wind farms may decline if wind speeds falls outside specific ranges, as turbines will only operate when wind speeds are within those ranges.
Variations and fluctuations in wind conditions at wind farms may result in seasonal and other fluctuations in the amount of electricity that is generated and, consequently, in the operating results and efficiency.
EDPR mitigates wind resource volatility and seasonality by having a strong knowledge in the design of its wind farms, and through the geographical diversification – in each country and in different countries – of its asset base. This "portfolio effect" enables to offset wind variations in each area and to keep the total energy generation relatively steady. Currently EDPR is present in 11 countries: Spain, Portugal, France, Belgium, Poland, Romania, UK, Italy, US, Canada and Brazil.
EDPR is exposed to fluctuations in interest rates through financing. This risk can be mitigated using fixed rates and hedging instruments, including interest rate swaps.
Also because of its presence in several countries, currency fluctuations may have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations. EDPR may attempt to hedge against currency fluctuations risks by natural hedging strategies, as well as by using hedging instruments, including forward foreign exchange contracts and Cross Interest Rate Swaps.
EDPR hedging efforts will minimize but not eliminate the impact of interest rate and exchange rate volatility.

The evolution of the financial markets is analyzed on an on-going basis in accordance to EDP Group's risk management policy approved by the EDPR`s Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors is responsible for the definition of general risk-management principles and the establishment of exposure limits following the recommendation of the risk committee.
Taking into account the risk management policy and exposure limits previously approved, the Financial Department identifies, evaluates and submits for the Board's approval the financial strategy appropriate to each project/location.
The execution of the approved strategies is also undertaken by the Financial Department, in accordance with the policies previously defined and approved.
Fixed rate, Natural hedging and Financial instruments are used to minimize potential adverse effects resulting from the interest rate and foreign exchange rate risks on its financial performance.
The purpose of the interest rate risk management policies is to reduce the exposure of long term debt cash flows from market fluctuations, mainly by issuing long term debt with a fixed rate, but also through the settlement of derivative financial instruments to swap from floating rate to fixed rate when long term debt is issued with floating rates.
EDPR has a portfolio of interest-rate derivatives with maturities between approximately 2 and 14 years. Sensitivity analyses of the fair value of financial instruments to interest-rate fluctuations are performed.
Given the policies adopted by EDPR Group, its financial cash flows are substantially independent from the fluctuation in interest rate markets.
EDPR operates internationally and is exposed to the exchange-rate risk resulting from investments in foreign subsidiaries. Currently, main currency exposure is the U.S. dollar/euro currency fluctuation risk that results principally from the shareholding in EDPR NA. With the ongoing

increasing capacity in others non-euro regions, EDPR will become also exposed to other local currencies (Poland, Romania and Brazil).
EDPR general policy is the Natural Hedging in order to match currency cash flows, minimizing the impact of exchange rates changes while value is preserved. The essence of this approach is to create financial foreign currency outflows to match equivalent foreign currency inflows.
Counterparty risk is the default risk of the other party in an agreement, either due to temporary liquidity issues or long term systemic issues.
EDPR policy in terms of the counterparty credit risk on financial transactions is managed by an analysis of the technical capacity, competitiveness, credit notation and exposure to each counterparty. Counterparties in derivatives and financial transactions are restricted to high-quality credit institutions, therefore, there cannot be considered any significant risk of counterparty noncompliance and no collateral is demanded for these transactions.
Liquidity risk is the risk that EDPR will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.
EDPR's strategy to manage liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have significant liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring in unacceptable losses or risking damage to EDPR's reputation.
Wind turbine generators (WTG) is a key element in the development of EDPR's wind-related energy projects, as the shortfall or an unexpected sharp increase in WTG prices can create a question mark on new project's development and its profitability. WTG represents the majority of a wind farm capital expenditure (on average, between 70% and 80%).

EDPR faces limited risk to the availability and prices' increase of WTG due to its framework agreements with the major global wind turbines suppliers. The Company uses a large mix of turbines suppliers in order to reduce its dependency on any one supplier being one of the worldwide wind energy developers with a more diversified and balanced portfolio.
Wind farms are subject to strict international, national, state, regional and local regulations relating to the development, construction, licensing, grid interconnection and operation of power plants. Among other things, these laws regulate: land acquisitions, leasing and use; building, transportation and distribution permits; landscape and environmental permits; and regulations on energy transmission and distribution network congestions.
EDPR mitigates this risk by having development activities in 11 different countries (Spain, Portugal, France, Belgium, Poland, Romania, UK, Italy, US, Canada and Brazil) with a portfolio of projects in several maturity stages. EDPR has a large pipeline located in the most attractive regions providing a "buffer" to overcome potential delays in the development of new projects, ensuring growth targets.
Wind farms output depend upon the availability and operating performance of the equipment necessary to operate it, mainly the components of wind turbines and transformers. Therefore the risk is that the performance of the turbine does not reach its optimum implies that the energy output is not the expected.
EDPR mitigates this risk by using a mix of turbine suppliers which minimizes technological risk, by signing a medium-term full-scope maintenance agreement with the turbine supplier and by an adequate preventive and scheduled maintenance.

Topic 3 provides a description of the key financial risks faced by EDPR. According to EDPR risk policy, and in order to manage, control or minimize impact of some of those risks, in liaise with a discipline risk management practice, EDPR uses financial derivatives and enters hedging transactions with the sole intent to protect against risks and as a consequence mitigate fluctuations of earnings.
These derivative instruments are explained in detail as part of the note 39 to the Annual Accounts.

It has been approved in the Annual Shareholder's meeting of 2010, to authorize the Board of Directors for the acquisition and transmission of own shares by the Company and/or the affiliate companies through their management bodies for a term of five years from the date of the General Shareholders Meeting. Up to date of this report the Company has not executed any acquisition and consequently transmission of own shares.
Terms and requirements are detailed in the Corporate Governance (attached).

NVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
Renewable energies have a large potential to deal with one of the great challenges of this century: climate change. Wind energy benefits from an inexhaustible and natural resource, producing energy while not compromising our world's environment with the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs).
Furthermore, wind is an endogenous resource and its use helps to diminish large import costs and the transportation carbon footprint that would otherwise be produced by other sources of energy. Wind is a clean, safe and secure source of energy available close to the population.
Our portfolio of 7.5 GW of installed capacity contributes every year to the worldwide fight against climate change. We significantly improve local and global air quality by mitigating emissions that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere due to the operation of other kinds of energy generation based on fossil fuels.
In 2011, EDPR has produced 16.8 TWh that is estimated to avoid the emission of 9,463 thousand tons of CO2.
The company growth plans of pure renewable energy represent a solid commitment to foster the use of green energy sources. Moreover, we are committed to support the use the best technologies available in order to preserve natural resources and reduce pollution.

1 Estimated as: [production x country emission factors]
In order to protect the environment, we complement our strategy of fighting against climate change with an environmentally responsible management of our wind farms. This strategy is supported by the Environmental and Biodiversity policies based on EDP Group's Guidelines that were approved by EDPR Executive Committee in January 2011.
Our policies reflect a responsible management of the environment along the whole value chain. From the very early stages of project development - when it is critical to perform environmental
ENVIRON MENTAL STRATEGY

and cultural feasibility studies - to the decommissioning of our wind farms - where our environmental strategy includes a waste management plan, environmental monitoring plans and habitat restoration. All this process is supported by an extensive local knowledge that allows us to ensure environmental compliance during the project life cycle. In 2011, we invested 12 million Euros in environmental related activities.
To ensure that our projects are designed and operated in compliance with the applicable regulation, with our environmental principles and with international best practices we have implemented numerous environmental appraisal and monitoring processes over the life cycle of our projects.
During the operation phase, we ensure the environmental legal compliance and the proper management of the environmental aspects through the EDPR Environmental Management System (EMS).
The EMS covers, among others, the procedures applicable to all wind farms in operation to establish operational controls, monitoring and measurements of the relevant environmental aspects. Environment surveillance is carried out periodically to assess the significance of the environmental aspects. The frequency of further surveillances is established in the monitoring plan given the assessment made. There are a few cases in which the surveillance is performed on a daily basis.
Contractors, who are mainly related to third party operating and maintenance service providers, are required to follow the environmental legislation as well as the environmental policies, management systems and requirements of EDPR.
The EMS in place or under implementation in Europe and Brazil is based on the ISO 14001:2004 Standard. The implementation of this system in Europe started in 2008 in some wind farms in Spain. Since then, it has been extended to other geographies, such as Portugal, France, Poland and Romania. We set as a target to have the EMS implemented in all operating wind farms in Europe were we have a controlling stake by the end of 2012.
By the end of 2011, 2,193 MW in Europe have been certified in compliance with the ISO 14001:2004 standard (61% of the wind farms in operation in Europe).
In the US, we have defined an action plan to review applicable environmental laws and regulations and conduct internal environmental audit of our wind farms to evaluate, on a yearly basis, the industrial compliance with applicable legal requirements, instead of pursuing a specific certification.
In Brazil, we are currently working to implement the EMS in all wind farms, accounting for 84 MW, to be certified according to ISO 14001:2004 standard.

All wind farms in operation covered by the EMS, have operational controls in place, to monitor and measure the environmental aspects considered significant. This includes water, electricity and other consumptions; greenhouse gases, noise and other emissions; hazardous and non-hazardous waste, among other.
Wind farms development typically occurs in rural areas where wind resource is abundant and the operation of wind farms is compatible with current land use. No loss of livelihood or economic losses are associated with the developments. Only a small percentage of the land is affected by permanent constructions and its change of use is approved by the competent authorities.
Once construction is complete, the actual land taken out of permanent production is less than 1% of the total project area. The primary use of this land is for access roads to the wind turbine locations, a small area for the wind turbine and electrical transformer, and a gravelled pad area for a crane to be used in construction and maintenance activities. The total area within a wind farm boundary can vary, depending upon the wind resource characteristics and terrain.
During 2011, in order to offset those impacts that cannot be prevented, EDPR implemented many compensation measures. These measures included partnership with environmental associations aimed at achieving a globally positive biodiversity balance.
Year after year EDPR consolidates its top tier position in the renewable energy market thanks to our people's commitment and effort. To guarantee the excellence of our employees, human capital management plays a key role in supporting our growth targets and in helping to exceed the company's operational performance. At EDPR we are committed to offer our people an attractive career development plan with opportunities to grow professionally.

OUR PEOPLE
We have a qualified and diverse team aligned with our business strategy, 72% of which hold university degrees and are less than 40 years old. This deep pool of highly qualified talent has supported EDPR's exponential growth and provides the optimal base to face future opportunities and challenges. Additionally, our people strongly reflect EDPR's energy and enthusiasm.
In 2011, EDPR employed 796 people, 37% of which are located on our North American platform and Brazil, while the remaining 63% work in our European platform.
| Headcount at year-end | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| EDPR Corporate* | 127 | 75 |
| EDPR EU | 393 | 398 |
| EDPR NA | 260 | 332 |
| EDPR SA | 16 | 17 |
| Total | 796 | 822 |
Note: Figures include four members of the M angement Team * In 2011, 22 EDPR Corporate employees were based in North America
EDPR Corporate now includes two additional departments that were previously in the North American and European platforms. This change allows for the harmonization of key processes and the sharing of best practices.
Throughout the year, 130 new employees joined EDPR while 154 are no longer with the company, resulting in a turnover ratio of 18%, which is in line with the previous year.

| Employees Turnover | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of hires | 130 | 171 |
| Number of departures | 154 | 70 |
| Total turnover | 18% | 15% |
| Turnover by gender | ||
| Male | 18% | 16% |
| Female | 18% | 12% |
| Turnover by age range | ||
| Less than 30 years old | 22% | 14% |
| Between 30 and 39 years | 16% | 14% |
| Over 40 years old | 17% | 17% |
| Turnover by platform | ||
| EDPR Corporate | 8% | 13% |
| EDPR EU | 14% | 11% |
| EDPR NA | 27% | 18% |
| EDPR BR | 28% | 41% |
Note: Turnover calculated as [((new hires + departures) / 2) / (total employees – temporary contracts)]
EDPR prides itself of having a multicultural team, with employees from 24 distinct nationalities, working in 11 geographies, of which 80 are outside their home country. This provides an important advantage, as teams benefit from multiple perspectives and deep knowledge of different markets.
Every two years, EDPR conducts a Satisfaction Survey for its employees. In 2011, the participation rate increased to 91% from 78% (in 2009), and resulted in a global score of 79%.
An in-depth analysis of the macro indicators shows an increase in the level of satisfaction with both the company and one's department. The survey revealed strong company loyalty as the highest score achieved was related to employee's desire to stay.
EDPR continues to improve the appraisal model implemented in 2010 and that is applicable to all our employees. Currently, it is based on a 360 degrees evaluation model in which the system collects information from several data sources to evaluate employee performance: oneself, peers, subordinates and manager. In 2011, audiovisual material, publications on the Intranet and workshops were carried out to educate our employees on the process.
During the 2011 appraisal process, employees had the opportunity to create their Individual Development Plan, which was aligned with their manager. The objective of this new system is to monitor the progress of improvement actions and skills development.

In order to fuel future growth, increase efficiency and drive innovation EDPR is constantly scanning globally to recruit top talent. To this extent a recruiting strategy has been developed to achieve this critical goal. As a sustainable company, EDPR aims to ensure that new recruits are aligned with the company's values:
In 2011, EDPR hired 130 employees, 68 for EDPR EU, 40 for the EDPR NA, 18 for EDPR Corporate and 4 for the EDPR BR. Additionally, the percentage of women hired increased from 27% to 32%.
| New hires | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Female | 41 | 47 |
| Male | 89 | 124 |
| Total | 130 | 171 |
EDPR is concerned with the adaptation of new hires. Thus, in EDPR EU, we organized five Welcome Days that give the opportunity to get to thoroughly know EDPR.
During this three day event, EDPR provides new hires with some basic knowledge and tools that are invaluable for the quick adaptation. Recruits are briefed on the activities and objectives of the companies departments, visit a wind farm to get an up-close view of the business and receive basic training by the Renewable Energy School.
Taking into account that all new employees must be aware of human resources policies and procedures, they must have an easy-to-handle manual to help them solve any issues. Thus EDPR developed a guide applicable to all new employees hired within Europe. This guide already exists for the North American platform.
After several meetings with country managers and heads of department to collect country's specific information, the document was finished and published. The information is available on the company intranet and will be updated on an annual basis. A road-show was taken to several countries, providing a small presentation to educate all employees on the new handbook.

During 2011 we hired 84 interns, 5 of which were brought on full-time. EDPR is committed to hiring the brightest people and seeks interns from the top universities and business schools.
| 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interns | Summer | Annual | Total | Contracts | (%) |
| EDPR Corporate | 0 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 17% |
| EDPR EU | 4 | 46 | 50 | 2 | 4% |
| EDPR NA | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| EDPR BR | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 17% |
| Total | 20 | 64 | 84 | 5 | 6% |
We are committed to offer employees an attractive career development plan, as well as continuous education and training opportunities. This vision is key in aligning current and future demands of the organization with employees' capabilities, while fulfilling their professional development expectations and supporting their continued employability.
In 2011, we increased the number of training hours from 26.734 to 37.996. Additionally, the total investment was increased by 45%, reaching 1 million euros.
In order to improve our employees' training, we created the EDPR Training Catalogue 2012, with a schedule of the training activities and the training policy. Additionally, it was included the educational field of the Renewable Energy School. These tools allowed for the creation of a common knowledge base for all employees and synergies within the EDP group.
The High-Potential Program (HIPO) is a program designed to develop soft skills in order to prepare future leaders and successors to carry EDPR to the next level.
The specific areas included when designing the program are:
The executive program was developed for managers, to consolidate their leadership and team development skills. The program is focused on:

In 2011, EDPR offered advanced training to 7 senior managers, which is a good indicator of the commitment to Talent Development undertaken by the company. They enrolled in top international business schools which contributed to further develop our values and know-how, as well as to develop our high qualified profiles.
At the beginning of 2012, a training course will be launched in all European countries on leadership and the role of the team manager. For this training session, a guide has been designed to collect and consolidate the main Human Resources aspects that Managers could find in the exercise of their responsibilities as people coordinators.
As a final result, all managers should recognize their leadership responsibilities and the leadership style expected at EDPR. The training aims to emphasize the attitudes and behaviours of an EDPR leader, as well as to leverage the "Leaders Guide". In fact, as of 2011, all Managers are given a manual that explains HR issues and processes from a managers perspective.
In 2011, the North American platform undertook a reorganization to reinforce its role as an operator of a large installed capacity. The newly formed structure in 4Q11 provided a solution for an operations company with 3.4 GW of capacity. A key component of the restructuring was the formation of three operational regions led by new regional executive vice-presidents with clear responsibilities: project management (development and construction), regulatory risk management, and origination (PPA and M&A), leading to overall P&L responsibility.
The reorganization resulted in a 15% reduction in headcount. Employees departing the company were provided with a separation package which included the provision of services with an outplacement agency to assist in finding a new position, and the extension of company-paid medical, dental and vision benefits for a specific period of time.
As an employer in the United States, EDPR also complied with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act Guide to Advance Notice of Closings and Layoffs. Employees who have worked more than six months and 20 hours a week are required to receive 60 days notice in the event of closings and layoffs.
From EDPR's 796 employees, 29% were covered by collective bargaining agreements.
Generally, collective bargaining agreements apply to all employees working under an employment relationship with and for the account of the respective companies, regardless of the type of contract, the professional group into which they are classified, their occupation or job. However, matters relating to the corporate organization itself, the laws of each country or even usage and custom in each country result in certain groups being expressly excluded from the scope of collective bargaining agreements.

Per country case law, EDPR may have a minimum period which the Company must comply with for giving formal notice of organizational changes at the companies in the Group with an impact on employees. However, it is customary to communicate significant events to the affected groups in advance.
Our global compensation policy addresses the needs of every local market, with enough flexibility to adapt to each region where the company is present. The developed system ensures that all positions are evaluated and graded according to a methodology designed to ensure fairness. Based on the organization's matrix, employees are placed within approved salary bands based on market benchmarks.
We are committed to offer a competitive benefits package to recognize the contributions and talents of our employees. The Company does not differentiate benefits between full time and part time employees.
In addition to legal requirements per country, competitive benefits are offered in the various regions (adjusted to local specificities) and include, namely, medical insurance (one of the most recognized by our employees), life insurance, pension plans or retirement plans, business travel insurance and accident insurance.
The Company offers the opportunity to participate in either a pension plan or defined contribution plan, depending on the home country. The guaranteed contributions are supplemental to and independent of those established under the Social Security System.
EDPR also has a Flexible Remuneration Package that is currently implemented in Spain and Portugal. This plan allows for employees to decide if they want to receive part of their wage paid in products or services, namely restaurant tickets, kinder garden tickets, EDPR shares, and others. This can provide tax benefits for employees.
During 2011, EDPR analyzed the possibility of extending the Flexible Remuneration Package to other geographies according to local legislations, however we were unable to find tax benefits applicable to all employees.
One of our main focuses continues to be the promotion and encouragement of work-life balance of our employees. This pursuit increases our employee's satisfaction and enjoyment, while boosting their productivity, commitment and accountability. Overall this creates positive bottomline results for the organization.
EDPR implemented work-life balance programs throughout the geographies where the company is present and aims constantly improve and provide additional benefits. This course of action was ultimately recognized with the Family-Responsible Employer Certificate.

Benefits in the work-life balance programs include, depending on the geographies, maternity leave, subsidized summer activities for dependents of employees, birthdays and others.
At the North American headquarters in Houston, EDPR promoted its Take Your Child to Work Day, an educational program promoting opportunities for children to participate in career exploration at an early age. The all-day event included craft projects, games, presentations, lunch and a movie. In Europe, our employees' children between 0 and 12 years old received a Christmas gift, along with a letter from the three Wise Men in Spain and from Santa in the rest of Europe. In order to foster the support of social causes, the gifts were purchased from UNICEF.
In 2011, we launched a UNICEF Christmas Campaign which was divided into two main courses of action: "Give a Day" in Spain and "Emergency in the Horn of Africa" in the other European countries. Both campaigns are meant to fight child malnutrition.
The total number of employees that have contributed to the UNICEF campaign reached 358, and for each one of them the company donated 28 euros, adding up to a total amount of 10,024 euros. The amount is meant to save the lives of children and/ or giving water to families in Africa.
On the other side of the Atlantic, through the Volunteer Committee, employees donated new toys for the Marine Toys for Tots Foundation. 10 teams registered for the Donation Challenge and collected 824 toys which were enough to help nearly 300 families. On average, each participating employee donated 5 toys. Additionally, the Albany New York office collected and donated their toys to families in the Schoharie County, which was impacted by hurricane Irene.

Beyond the commercial activities, EDP Renováveis supports EDP Inovação (EDPI) in developing a pilot project in order to deploy a wind turbine installed on floating structure off the Portuguese coast. Such floating structure is a patented technology named Windfloat owned by Principle Power, whom EDPI has a memorandum of understanding, providing privilege access to the technology
The innovation focus of the area is the development of a floating foundation, based on the experiences from the oil and gas industry, which will support multi-MW wind turbines in offshore applications.

The project is the first offshore wind deployment worldwide which did not require the use of any heavy lift equipment offshore. Further, this is the first offshore wind turbine in open Atlantic waters, and the first deployment of a semi-submersible structure supporting a multi-megawatt wind turbine.
The WindFloat Project, developed in partnership by EDP, Principle Power, A Silva Matos, Inovcapital and Vestas, has secured support from the Portuguese State. It will form the basis of a future ocean energy cluster in Portugal.
The WindFloat project clearly addresses the supply side of the global solution as it implies cleaner energy generation.

06 Jan – EDPR's principal shareholder EDP has convened a General Shareholders' Meeting: EDP has convened a General Shareholders' Meeting in which shareholders will decide upon the election of new members of the Executive Board of Directors. As a consequence, shall this proposal be approved, EDP as major shareholder of EDP Renováveis, intends to propose the necessary steps for Mr. João Manso Neto to assume the position of EDP Renováveis Chief Executive Officer, in substitution of Mrs. Ana Maria Fernandes.
N EVENTS OF THE PE
1
02 Fev – EDP Renováveis announces FY2011 provisional operating data: capacity increased 806 MW in 2011 to 7,483 MW (538 MW in Europe, 198 MW in the US and 70 MW in Brazil) and electricity output totalled 16,800 GWh, meaning a 17% increase comparing 2010. Load factor in Europe was 25% and in the US 33%.

10. ORPORATEOVERNANCE OVERVI
EDP Renováveis, has adopted the governance structure in effect in Spain. It comprises a General Meeting of Shareholders and a Board of Directors that represents and manages the company.
The Company's Board of Directors has set up four committees. These are the Executive Committee, the Audit and Control Committee, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, the Committee on Related-Party Transactions.
Aditionally, on 2011, the Board of Directors approved to create an Ethics Committee. The Committee has three members, which are the Presidents of the Committees of the Board of Directors.
The governance model of EDPR is designed to ensure the transparency, meticulous separation of duties and the specialization of supervision.
The purpose of the choice of this model by EDPR is to adapt the Company's corporate governance structure to the Portuguese legislation. The governance model adopted by EDPR therefore seeks, insofar as it is compatible with its personal law, to correspond to the so-called "Anglo-Saxon" model set forth in the Portuguese Commercial Companies Code, in which the management body is a Board of Directors, and the supervision and control duties are of the responsibility of an Audit and Control Committee.
The choice of this model obbeys to the purpose of establishing compatibility between two different systems of company law, which could be considered applicable to the model.
The experience of institutional operating indicates that the governance model adopted by the shareholders is appropriate to the corporate organisation of EDP Renováveis activity, especially because it affords transparency and healthy balance between the management functions of the Executive Committee, the supervisory functions of the Audit and Control Committee and oversight by different specialised Board of Directors committees.
The institutional and functional relationship between the Executive Committee, the Audit and Control Committee and the other non-executive members of the Board of Directors has been harmony conducive to the development of the company's business.
In order to ensure a better understanding of EDP Renováveis corporate governance by its shareholders, the Company posts its updated Articles of Association at www.edprenovaveis.com.

The General Meeting of Shareholders, when properly convened, has the power to decide and adopt majority decisions on matters that the law and the Articles of Association set forth that it should be decided and be submitted for its approval.
The Board of Directors has the broadest powers for the management and governance of the Company, with no limitations other than the competences expressly allocated exclusively to the General Meeting of Shareholders by law or the Articles of Association.
On 2011, Mr. António Martins da Costa, Mr. José Silva Lopes and Mr. Daniel Kammen ended their terms as Board members. The four members of the Management Team, Mr. Rui Teixeira, Mr. João Paulo Costeira, Mr. Luis Adão da Fonseca and Mr. Gabriel Alonso were appointed as Board members. All the others members of the Board were re-elected for a new term.
| Name | Position | Date of Appointment | Date of Re-election | End of Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| António Mexia | Chairman and Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Ana Maria Fernandes | Vice-Chairman, CEO | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Manso Neto | Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Nuno Alves | Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rui Teixeira | Director | 11/04/2011 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Paulo Costeira | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | Director | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| António Nogueira Leite | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Francisco de Lacerda | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Gilles August | Director (Indep.) | 14/04/2009 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Lopes Raimundo | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Jorge Santos | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| José Araújo e Silva | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |

| BOARD OF DIRECTORS executive committee António Mexia Chairman |
non-executives António Nogueira Leite Francisco de Lacerda Guilles August |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Maria Fernandes João Manso Neto Vice- Chairman and CEO Nuno Alves Rui Teixeira João Paulo Costeira Luís Adão da Fonseca |
João Lopes Raimundo João Manuel de Mello Franco Jorge Santos José Araújo e Silva Manuel Menéndez Menéndez Rafael Caldeira Valverde |
||||
| Gabriel Alonso Directors |
general secretary Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
||||
| Jorge Santos | Nominations and Remunerations Committee Francisco de Lacerda Rafael Caldeira Valverde |
Transactions João Manso Neto |
Committee on Related-Party António Nogueira Leite João Manuel de Mello Franco |
Audit and Control Committee João Manuel de Mello Franco Jorge Santos João Lopes Raimundo |
|
| MANAGEMENT TEAM | Luís Adão da Fonseca | Gabriel Alonso | João Paulo Costeira |

The EDPR share capital of EUR 4,361,540,810 is represented by 872,308,162 shares with a face value of EUR 5 each. All shares integrate a single class and series and are fully issued and paid. There are no holders of special rights and pursuant to the Article 8 of the Company's Articles of Association, there are no restrictions on the transfer of EDPR shares.
As far as the EDPR Board of Directors is aware there are currently no shareholders' agreements regarding the company.
The EDPR shareholder structure has remained unchanged since the IPO in 2008 with the EDP Group holding 77.5% of the Company's share capital and the remaining 22.5% being freely traded on the NYSE Euronext Lisbon stock market.
EDPR Shareholder Structure – 31 Dec 2011

By December 31st, 2011, EDPR's free-float comprised about 110,000 institutional and private investors spread across more than 35 different countries with special focus on Portugal, United States, and United Kingdom. Rest of Europe most represented countries are Switzerland, France and Norway.

Institutional investors represented 80% of EDPR's free-float (79% in 2010) while private investors, mostly Portuguese, stand for the remaining 20%.


Portugal Europe US UK Rest of World
Qualifying holdings in EDP are subject to the Spanish Law, which regulates the criteria and thresholds of the shareholders' holdings. As of December 31st,2011, no qualifying holdings in EDPR with the exception of EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. were identified.
| Shareholder | Number of Shares % | % Capital % Voting Rights | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDP - Energias de Portugal | |||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. - Sucursal en España | 541,027,156 | 62.00% | 62.00% |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | 135,256,700 | 15.50% | 15.50% |
| Total | 676,283,856 | 77.50% | 77.50% |
Free-Float by Geography

The shares representing 100% of the EDPR share capital were admitted to trading in the official stock exchange NYSE Euronext Lisbon on June 4th, 2008. Since then the free float level is unchanged at 22.5%.
| EUR 4,361,540,810 |
|---|
| EUR 5.00 |
| 872,308,162 |
| June 4th, 2008 |
| ES0127797019 |
| EDPR.LS |
| EDPR PL |
EDPR's equity market value at December 31st 2011 was EUR 4.12 billion, the equivalent to EUR 4.73 per share. In 2011, the share price improved 9%, outperforming the PSI-20 (the NYSE Euronext Lisbon reference index), the Euronext 100 and the Dow Jones Eurostoxx Utilities ("SX6E") which suffered a general depreciation in 2011. The year's low was recorded on August 9th (EUR 3.89) and the year's high was reached on May 2nd (EUR 5.25).general depreciation in 2011. The year's low

was recorded on August 9th (EUR 3.89) and the year's high was reached on May 2nd (EUR 5.25).

In 2011 more than 232 million EDPR shares were traded, representing 25% year-on-year decrease in its liquidity, and corresponding to a turnover of approximately EUR 1.06 billion. On average, 0.9 million shares were traded per day. The total number of shares traded represented 27% of the total shares admitted to trading and to 118% of the company's free float.

The distribution of dividends must be proposed by EDPR's Board of Directors and authorized by a resolution approved in the Company's Shareholders Meeting. In keeping with the legal provisions in force, namely the Spanish Companies Law, the EDPR Articles of Association require that profits for a business year consider:
• The amount required to serve legal reserves;
• The amount agreed by the same General Meeting to allocate to dividends of the outstanding shares;
• The amount agreed by the General Meeting to constitute or increase reserve funds or free reserves;
• The remaining amount shall be booked as surplus.
The expected dividend policy of EDPR, as announced in the IPO, is to propose dividends' distribution each year representing at least 20% of EDPR's distributable profit. Also as announced in the IPO, EDPR Board of Directors can adjust this dividend policy as required to reflect, among other things, changes to our business plan and our capital requirements, and there can be no assurance that in any given year a dividend will be proposed or declared.
In light of a challenging economic and regulatory environment in the countries in which EDPR holds investments, of the net financial results obtained in the fiscal year of 2011 and of the company's capital requirements in a harsh financial environment, the Board of Directors will propose at the Shareholder's Meeting, to be held in 2012, to retain the 2011 results as voluntary reserves apart from the minimum amount required to serve legal reserves.

13. DISCLAIME
This report has been prepared by EDP Renováveis, S.A. (the "Company") to support the presentation 2011 financial and operational performances. EDP Renováveis does not assume any responsibility for this report if it is used for different purposes.
Neither the Company -including any of its subsidiaries, any company of EDP Renováveis Group and any of the companies in which they have a shareholding-, nor their advisors or representatives assume any responsibility whatsoever, including negligence or any other concept, in relation with the damages or losses that may be derived from the use of the present document and its attachments.
Any information regarding the performance of EDP Renováveis share price cannot be used as a guide for future performance.
Neither this document nor any of its parts have a contractual nature, and it cannot be used to complement or interpret any contract or any other kind of commitment.
The present document does not constitute an offer or invitation to acquire, subscribe, sell or exchange shares or securities.
The 2011 management report contains forward-looking information and statements about the Company. Although EDP Renováveis is confident these expectations are reasonable, they are subject to several risks and uncertainties that are not predictable or quantifiable in advance. Therefore, future results and developments may differ from these forward-looking statements. Given this, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance.
The forward-looking information and statements herein contained are based on the information available at the date of the present document. Except when required by applicable law, the Company does not assume any obligation to publicly update or revise said forward-looking information or statements.
annual report 2011 | corporate governance


10 Statement of compliance with independence criteria
EDP Renováveis, S.A. (hereinafter referred to as EDP Renováveis, EDPR or the Company) is a Spanish company listed on a regulated stock exchange in Portugal. EDP Renováveis' corporate organization is subject to the recommendations contained in the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code ("Código de Governo das Sociedades") approved by the CMVM (Portuguese Securities Market Commission) in January 2010. This governance code is available to the public at CMVM website (www.cmvm.pt).
The organization and functioning of EDPR corporate governance model is designed to achieve the highest standards of corporate governance, business conduct and ethics referenced on the best national and international practices in corporate governance.
In this context, EDPR states that it has fully adopted the CMVM recommendations on the governance of listed companies provided in the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code, with the exception of Recommendation II.2.2 of the code, which has not been adopted for the reasons indicated below.
The following table shows the CMVM recommendations set forth in the code and indicates whether or not they have been fully adopted by EDPR and the place in this report in which they are described in more detail.
| Recommendation | Adoption information |
Description in Report |
|---|---|---|
| I. GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS | ||
| I.1 General Meeting Board | ||
| I.1.1 The Presiding Board of the General Meeting shall be equipped with the necessary and adequate human resources and logistic support, taking the financial position of the company into consideration. |
Adopted | 1.2.1 |
| I.1.2 The remuneration of the Presiding Board of the General Meeting shall be disclosed in the Annual Report on Corporate Governance. |
Adopted | 5.8 |
| I.2 Participation at the meeting | ||
| I.2.1 The requirement for the Board to receive statements for share deposit or blocking for participation at the general meeting shall not exceed 5 working days. |
Adopted | 4.4 |
| I.2.2 Should the General Meeting be suspended, the company shall not compel share blocking during that period until the meeting is resumed and shall then prepare itself in advance as required for the first session. |
Adopted | 4.4 |
| I.3 Voting and Exercising Voting rights | ||
| I.3.1 Companies shall not impose any statutory restriction on postal voting and whenever adopted or admissible, on electronic voting. |
Adopted | 4.6 |
| I.3.2 The statutory deadline for receiving early voting ballots by mail, may not exceed three working days. | Adopted | 4.6 |
| I.3.3 Companies shall ensure the level of voting rights and the shareholder's participation is proportional, ideally through the statutory provision that obliges the one share-one vote principal. The companies that: I) hold shares that do not confer voting right; II) establish non-casting of voting rights above a certain number, when issued solely by a shareholder or by shareholders related to former, do not comply with the proportionality principle. |
Adopted | 4.5 |
| I.4 Resolution Fixing-Quorum | ||
| I.4.1 Companies shall not set a resolution-fixing quorum that outnumbers what is prescribed by law. | Adopted | 4.7 |
| I.5 Minutes and Information on Resolutions Passed | ||
| I.5.1 Extracts from the minutes of the general meetings or documents with corresponding content must be made available to shareholders on the company's website within five days period after the General Meeting has been held, irrespective of the fact that such information may not be classified as material information. The information disclosed shall cover the resolutions passed, the represented capital and the voting results. Said information shall be kept on file on the company's website for no less than 3 year period. |
Adopted | 4.8 |
| I.6 Measures on Corporate Control | ||
| I.6.1 Measures aimed at preventing successful takeover bids, shall respect both company's and the shareholders' interests. The company's articles of association that by complying with said principal provide for the restriction of the number of votes that may be held or exercised by a sole shareholder, either individually or in concert with other shareholders, shall also foresee for a resolution by the General Assembly (5 year intervals), on whether that statutory provision is to be amended or prevails – without super quorum requirements as to the one legally in force – and that in said resolution, all votes issued be counted, without applying said restriction. |
Adopted | 4.9 |
| I.6.2 In cases such as change of control or changes to the composition of the Board of Directors, defensive measures shall not be adopted that instigate immediate and serious asset erosion in the company, and further disturb the free transmission of shares and voluntary performance assessment by the shareholders of the members of the Board of Directors. |
Adopted | 4.9 |
| II. BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SUPERVISORY BOARD | ||
| II.1 General Points | ||
| II.1.1 Structure and Duties | ||
| II.1.1.1 The Board of Directors shall assess the adopted model in its Annual Report on Corporate Governance and pin-point possible hold-ups to its functioning and shall propose measures that it deems fit for surpassing such obstacles. |
Adopted | 1.1/1.1.1 |
| II.1.1.2 Companies shall set up internal control and risk management systems in order to safeguard the company's worth and which will identify and manage the risk. Said systems shall include at least the following components: I) setting of the company's strategic objectives as regards risk assumption; II) identifying the main risks associated to the company's activity and any events that might generate risks; III) analyze and determine the extent of the impact and the likelihood that each of said potential risks will occur; IV) risk management aimed at aligning those actual incurred risks with the company's strategic options for risk assumption; V) control mechanisms for executing measures for adopted risk management and its effectiveness; VI) adoption of internal mechanisms for information and communication on several components of the system and of risk warning; VII) periodic assessment of the implemented system and the adoption of the amendments that are deemed necessary. |
Adopted | 3 |
| Recommendation | Adoption information |
Description in Report |
|---|---|---|
| II.1.1.3 The Board of Directors shall ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal control and risk management systems. The Supervisory Board shall be responsible for assessing the functioning of said systems and proposing the relevant adjustment to the company's needs. |
Adopted | 1.2.2/1.2.4/3 |
| II.1.1.4 The companies shall: I) identify the main economic, financial and legal risk that the company is exposed to during the exercise of its activity; II) describe the performance and efficiency of the risk management system, in its Annual Report on Corporate Governance. |
Adopted | 3.2 |
| II.1.1.5 The Board of Directors and the Supervisory Board shall establish internal regulations and shall have these disclosed on the company's website. |
Adopted | 1.2.2/1.2.4 |
| II.1.2 Governance Incompatibility and Independence | ||
| II.1.2.1 The Board of Directors shall include a number of non-executive members that ensure the efficient supervision, auditing and assessment of the executive members' activity. |
Adopted | 1.2.2 |
| II.1.2.2 Non-executive members must include an adequate number of independent members. The size of the company and its shareholder structure must be taken into account when devising this number and may never be less than a fourth of the total number of Board of Directors. |
Adopted | 1.3 |
| II.1.2.3 The independency assessment of its non-executive members carried out by the Board of Directors shall take into account the legal and regulatory rules in force concerning the independency requirements and the incompatibility framework applicable to members of other corporate boards, which ensure orderly and sequential coherence in applying independency criteria to all the company. An independent executive member shall not be considered as such, if in another corporate board and by force of applicable rules, may not be an independent executive member. |
Adopted | Statement on Compliance with Independence Criteria |
| II.1.3 Eligibility and Appointment Criteria | ||
| II.1.3.1 Depending on the applicable model, the Chair of the Supervisory Board and of the Auditing and Financial Matters Committees shall be independent and adequately competent to carry out his/her duties. |
Adopted | 1.2.4 |
| II.1.3.2 The selection process of candidates for non-executive members shall be conjured so as prevent interference by executive members. |
Adopted | 1.4 |
| II.1.4 Policy on the Reporting of Irregularities | ||
| II.1.4.1 The company shall adopt a policy whereby irregularities occurring within the company are reported. Such reports shall contain the following information: I) the means by which such irregularities may be reported internally, including the persons that are entitled to receive the reports; II) how the report is to be handled, including confidential treatment, should it be required by the reporter. |
Adopted | 3.4 |
| II.1.4.2 The general guidelines on this policy shall be disclosed in the Annual Report of Corporate Governance. | Adopted | 3.4 |
| II.1.5 Remuneration | ||
| II.1.5.1 The remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors shall be structured so that the formers' interests are capable of being aligned with the long-term interests of the company. Furthermore, the remuneration shall be based on performance assessment and shall discourage taking on extreme risk. Thus, remunerations shall be structured as follows: I) The remuneration of the Board of Directors carrying out executive duties shall include a variable element which is determined by a performance assessment carried out by the company's competent bodies according to pre-established quantifiable criteria. Said criteria shall take into consideration the company's real growth and the actual growth generated for the shareholders, its long-term sustainability and the risks taken on, as well as compliance with the rules applicable to the company's activity. II) The variable component of the remuneration shall be reasonable overall as regard the fixed component of the remuneration and maximum limits shall be set for all components. III) A significant part of the variable remuneration shall be deferred for a period not less than three years and its payment shall depend of the company's steady positive performance during said period; IV) Members of the Board of Directors shall not enter into contracts with the company or third parties that will have the effect of mitigating the risk inherent in the variability of the remuneration established by the company; V) The Executive Directors shall hold, up to twice the value of the total annual remuneration, the company shares that were allotted by virtue of the variable remuneration schemes, with the exception of those shares that are required to be sold for the payment of taxes on the gains of said shares; VI) When the variable remuneration includes stock options, the period for exercising same shall be deferred for a period of not less than three years; VII) The appropriate legal instruments shall be established so that in the event of a Director's dismissal without due cause, the envisaged compensation shall not be paid out if the dismissal or termination by agreement is due to the Director's inadequate performance; VIII) The remuneration of Non-Executive Directors shall not include any component the value of which is subject to the performance or the value of the company. |
Adopted | 5.1/5.2/5.3 |
| II.1.5.2 A statement on the remuneration policy of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board referred to in Article 2 of Law No. 28/2009 of June 19th, shall contain, in addition to the content therein stated, adequate information on: I) which groups of companies the remuneration policy and practices of which were taken as a baseline for setting the remuneration; II) the payments for the dismissal or termination by agreement of the Director's duties. |
Adopted | 5.2/5.4 |
| II.1.5.3 The remuneration policy statement referred to in Article 2 of Law No. 28/2009 shall also include the Director's remunerations which contain an important variable component, within the meaning of Article 248-B/3 of the Securities Code. The statement shall be detailed and the policy presented shall particularly take the long-term performance of the company, compliance with the rules applicable to its business and restraint in taking risks into account. |
Adopted | 5.4 |
| II.1.5.4 A proposal shall be submitted at the General Meeting on the approval of plans for the allotment of shares and/or options for share purchase or further yet on the variations in share process, to members of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board and other managers within the context of Article 248/3/B of the Securities Code. The proposal shall contain the regulation plan or in its absence, the plan's conditions. The main characteristics of the retirement benefit plans established for members of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board and other managers within the context of Article 248/3/B of the Securities Code, shall also be approved at the General Meeting. |
Adopted | 5.2/5.3/5.4/5.7 |
| II.1.5.5 Doesn't exist | - | |
| II.1.5.6 At least one of the Remuneration Committee's representatives shall be present at the Annual General Meeting for Shareholders. |
Adopted | 5.6 |
| II.1.5.7 The amount of remuneration received, as a whole and individually, in other companies of the group and the pension rights acquired during the financial year in question shall be disclosed in the Annual Report on Corporate Governance. |
Adopted | 5.3 |
| Recommendation | Adoption information |
Description in Report |
|---|---|---|
| II.2 Board of Directors | ||
| II.2.1 Within the limits established by law for each management and supervisory structure, and unless the company is of a reduced size, the Board of Directors shall delegate the day-to-day running and the delegated duties shall be identified in the Annual Corporate Governance Report. |
Adopted | 1.2.3 |
| II.2.2 The Board of Directors must ensure that the company acts in accordance with its goals and shall not delegate its duties, namely in what concerns: I) the definition of the company's general strategy and policies; II) the definition of the group's corporate structure; III) decisions taken that are considered to be strategic due to the amounts, risk and particular characteristics involved. |
Not Adopted ("Under Spanish Law, the matters referred to in this recommendation can be delegated by the Board of Directors to the Executive Committee. It is common practice in Spanish listed companies for the delegation of powers to be far-reaching, with the exception of matters related to the preparation of accounts"). |
- |
| II.2.3 Should the Chair of the Board of Directors carry out executive duties, the Board of Directors shall set up efficient mechanisms for coordinating non-executive members that can ensure that these may decide upon, in an independent and informed manner, and furthermore shall explain these mechanisms to the shareholders in the Corporate Governance Report. |
Adopted | 1.2.2 |
| II.2.4 The annual management report shall include a description of the activity carried out by the Non-Executive Directors and shall mention any restraints encountered. |
Adopted | 1.2.2 |
| II.2.5 The company shall expound its policy of portfolio rotation on the Board of Directors, including the person responsible for the financial portfolio, and report on same in the Annual Corporate Governance Report. |
Not Applicable | - |
| II.3 CEO, Executive Committee and Executive Board of Directors | ||
| II.3.1 When managing Directors that carry out executive duties are requested by other Directors to supply information, the former must do so in a timely manner and the information supplied must adequately suffice the request made. |
Adopted | 1.2.3 |
| II.3.2 The Chair of the Executive Committee shall send the convening notice and minutes of the meetings to the Chair of the Board of Directors and, as applicable, to the Chair of the Supervisory Board or the Auditing Committee, respectively. |
Adopted | 1.2.3 |
| II.3.3 The Chair of the Board of Directors shall send the convening notices and minutes of the meetings to the Chair of the General and Supervisory Board and the Chair of the Financial Matters Committee. |
Not applicable | - |
| II.4 General and Supervisory Board, Financial Matters Committee, Audit Committee and Supervisory Board | ||
| II.4.1 Besides carrying out its supervisory duties, the General and Supervisory Board shall advise, follow-up and carry out an on-going assessment on the management of the company by the Executive Board of Directors. Besides other subject matters, the General and Supervisory Board shall decide on: Not applicable I) the definition of the strategy and general policies of the company; II) the corporate structure of the group; and III) decisions taken that are considered to be strategic due to the amounts, risk and particular characteristics involved. |
- | |
| II.4.2 The annual reports and financial information on the activity carried out by the General and Supervisory Committee, the Financial Matters Committee, the Auditing and Supervisory Committee must be disclosed on the company's website. |
Adopted | 1.2.4 |
| II.4.3 The annual reports on the activity carried out by the General and Supervisory Board, the Financial Matters Committee, the Audit Committee and the Supervisory Board must include a description on the supervisory activity and shall mention any restraints that they may have come up against. |
Adopted | 1.2.4 |
| II.4.4 The General and Supervisory Board, the Auditing Committee and the Supervisory Board (depending on the applicable model) shall represent the company for all purposes at the external auditor, and shall propose the Adopted services supplier, the respective remuneration, ensure that adequate conditions for the supply of these services are in place within the company, as well as being liaison offer between the company and the first recipient of the reports. |
1.2.4/3.3 | |
| II.4.5 According to the applicable model, the General and Supervisory Board, Audit Committee and Supervisory Board shall assess the external auditor on an annual basis and advise the General Meeting that he/she be discharged whenever justifiable grounds are present. |
Adopted | 1.2.4/3.3 |
| II.4.6 The internal audit services and those that ensure compliance with the rules applicable to the company (compliance services) shall functionally report to the Audit Committee, the General and Supervisory Board or in the case of companies adopting the Latin model, an independent Director or Supervisory Board, regardless of the hierarchical relationship that these services have with the executive management of the company. |
Adopted | 1.2.4 |
| II.5 Special Committees | ||
| II.5.1 Unless the company is of reduced size and depending on the adopted model, the Board of Directors and the General and Supervisory Committees, shall set up the necessary Committees in order to: I) ensure that a competent and independent assessment of the Executive Director's performance is carried out, as well as its own overall performance and further yet, the performance of all existing committees; II) study the adopted governance system and verify its efficiency and propose to the competent bodies, measures to be carried out with a view to its improvements; III) in due time identify potential candidates with the high profile required for the performance of Director's duties. |
Adopted | 1.1/1.1.1/1.2.3/1.2.4/1 .2.5/1.2.6 |
| Recommendation | Adoption information |
Description in Report |
|---|---|---|
| II.5.2 Members of the Remuneration Committee or equivalent shall be independent from the members of the Board of Directors and include at least one member with knowledge and experience in matters of remuneration policy. |
Not applicable ("The members of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee are members of the Board of Directors. However, its members are considered independent members and do not therefore belong to the Executive Committee. In accordance with Articles 23 and 217 of the Spanish Companies Law, the remuneration scheme for Directors should be fixed in the articles of association. It is normal practice in Spanish companies for this remuneration to be decided upon by the General Meeting of Shareholders and for its allocation to the different members of the Board of Directors to be decided on by the Board itself."). |
1.2.5 |
| II.5.3 Any natural or legal person which provides or has provided, over the past three years, services to any structure subject to the Board of Directors, to the Board of Directors of the company or that has to do with the current consultant to the company shall not be recruited to assist the Remuneration Committee. This recommendation also applies to any natural or legal person who has an employment contract or provides services. |
Adopted | 1.2.5 |
| II.5.4 All the Committees shall draw up minutes of the meetings held. | Adopted | 1.2.3/1.2.4/ 1.2.5/1.2.6 |
| III. INFORMATION AND AUDITING | ||
| III.1 General Disclosure Obligations | ||
| III.1.1 Companies shall maintain permanent contact with the market thus upholding the principle of equality for shareholders and ensure that investors are able to access information in a uniform fashion. To this end, the company shall create an Investor Assistance Unit. |
Adopted | 6.3 |
| III.1.2 The following information that is made available on the company's Internet website shall be disclosed in the English language: a) The company, public company status, headquarters and remaining data provided for in Article 171 of the Portuguese Commercial Companies Code; b) Articles of Association; c) Credentials of the Members of the Board of Directors and the Market Liaison Officer; d) Investor Relations Office, its functions and contact information; e) Financial statements; f ) Half-yearly calendar of company events; g) Proposals submitted for discussion and voting at general meetings; h) Invitation to general meetings. |
Adopted | 6.3 |
| III.1.3. Companies shall advocate the rotation of auditors after two or three terms in accordance with four or three years respectively. Their continuance beyond this period must be based on a specific opinion for the Supervisory Board to formally consider the conditions of auditor independence and the benefits and costs of replacement. |
Adopted | 3.3 |
| III.1.4. The external auditor must, within its powers, verify the implementation of remuneration policies and systems, the efficiency and functioning of internal control mechanisms and report any shortcomings to the company's Supervisory Board. |
Adopted | 3.3 |
| III.1.5. The company shall not recruit the external auditor for services other than audit services, nor any entity with which same takes part or incorporates the same network. Where recruiting such services is called for, said services should not be greater than 30% of the value of services rendered to the company. The hiring of these services must be approved by the Supervisory Board and must be expounded in the Annual Corporate Governance Report. |
Adopted | 5.9 |
| IV. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST | ||
| IV.1 Shareholder Relationship | ||
| IV.1.1 Where deals are concluded between the company and shareholders with qualifying holdings, or entities with which same are linked in accordance with Article 20 of the Securities Code, such deals shall be carried out in normal market conditions. |
Adopted | 2 |
| IV.1.2 Where deals of significant importance are undertaken with holders of qualifying holdings, or entities, with which same are linked in accordance with Article 20 of the Securities Code, such deals shall be subject to a preliminary opinion from the Supervisory Board. The procedures and criteria required to define the relevant level of significance of these deals and other conditions shall be established by the Supervisory Board. |
Adopted (According to the Spanish law and the governance structure, these functions were delegated by the Board of Directors to the Related-Party Transactions Committee) |
1.2.6 |
The Articles of Association of EDPR, which are available for consultation on its website, (www.edprenovaveis.com), contain the rules on independence for the fulfilment of duties in any body of the Company.
The Article 20.2 of the EDPR's Articles of Association defines as independent members of the Board of Directors those that are able to perform their duties without being limited by relations with the company, its shareholders with significant holdings or its Directors and comply with the other legal requirements.
The Board of Directors of EDPR considers that the following Directors meet the independence and incompatibility criteria's required by law and the Articles of Association.
| Name | Position | Date of Appointment |
End of Term |
|---|---|---|---|
| António Nogueira Leite | Director (Independent) Chairperson of the Related-Party Transactions Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | Director (Independent) Member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Gilles August | Director (Independent) | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Lopes Raimundo | Director (Independent) Member of the Audit and Control Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Mello Franco | Director (Independent) Chairperson of Audit and Control Committee And Member of the Related-Party Transactions Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Jorge Santos | Director (Independent) Chairperson of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee and Member of the Audit and Control Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| José Araújo e Silva | Director (Independent) | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | Director (Independent) Member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
EDPR has adopted the governance structure in effect in Spain. It comprises a General Meeting of Shareholders, and a Board of Directors that represents and manages the company.
As required by law and the Articles of Association, the Company's Board of Directors has set up four committees. These are the Executive Committee, the Audit and Control Committee, the Nominations and Remunerations Committee and the Committee on Related-Party Transactions as mentioned below.
The governance model of EDPR is designed to ensure the transparent, meticulous separation of duties and the specialization of supervision. The most important bodies in the management and supervision model at EDPR are the following:
The purpose of the choice of this model by EDPR is to adapt the Company's corporate governance structure to the Portuguese legislation. The governance model adopted by EDPR therefore seeks, insofar as it is compatible with its personal law, to correspond to the so-called "Anglo-Saxon" model set forth in the Portuguese
Commercial Companies Code, in which the management body is a Board of Directors, and the supervision and control duties are of the responsibility of an Audit and Control Committee.
The choice of this model is essentially an attempt to establish compatibility between two different systems of company law, which can be considered applicable to this model.
The experience of institutional operating indicates that the governance model adopted by the shareholders is appropriate to the corporate organization of EDPR activity, especially because it affords transparency and a healthy balance between the management functions of the Executive Committee, the supervisory functions of the Audit and Control Committee and oversight by different specialized Board of Directors committees.
The institutional and functional relationship between the Executive Committee, the Audit and Control Committee and the other non-executive members of the Board of Directors has been of internal harmony conducive to the development of the company's business.
In order to ensure a better understanding of EDPR corporate governance by its shareholders, the Company posts its updated Articles of Association at www.edprenovaveis.com.
In order to comply with the Recommendation II.1.1.1 of the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code and according to the results of the reflection made by the Audit and Control Committee regarding the terms of the Recommendation II.5.1 part II), the governance model adopted has been ensuring an effective performance and articulation of EDPR Social Bodies, and proved to be adequate to the company's governance structure without any constraints to the performance of its checks and balances system adopted to justify the changes made in the Governance practices of EDPR.

The General Meeting of Shareholders is the body where the shareholders participate and when properly convened, has the power to deliberate and adopt, by majority, decisions on matters that the law and Articles of Association reserve for its decision and are submitted for its approval. In particular, it is responsible for:
The decisions of the General Meeting are binding on all shareholders, including those voting against and those who did not participate in the meeting.
A General Meeting may be ordinary or extraordinary. In either case, it is governed by the law and Articles of Association.
An Ordinary General Meeting must be held in the first six (6) months of each year for the review of the performance of the company's management, to approve the annual report and accounts of the previous year, the proposal for appropriation of profits and to approve the consolidated accounts, if appropriate. The General Meeting also decides on any other matters falling within its powers and included in the agenda.
The Chairperson of the General Meeting is appointed by the shareholders and must be a person who meets the same requirements of independence as for the independent Directors. The appointment is for three years and may only be re-elected once.
The position of Chairperson of the General Meeting has been held by Rui Chancerelle de Machete, whose professional address is PLMJ, A.M. Pereira, Sáragga Leal, Oliveira Martins, Júdice e Associados, RL, Av. da Liberdade, 224, Edifício Eurolex, 1250-148 Lisboa, Portugal. The Chairperson of the General Meeting was re-elected on April 11th, 2011.
In addition to the Chairperson, the Board of the General Meeting is constituted by the Chairperson of the Board of Directors, or his substitute, the other Directors and the Secretary of the Board of Directors. The Board of the General Meeting of Shareholders', through the Chairperson of the General Meeting, is responsible for organizing its proceedings.
The position of Secretary of the General Meeting is held by the non-member Secretary of the Board of Directors, Emilio García-Conde Noriega, whose professional address is that of the Company.
The Chairperson of the General Meeting of EDPR has the appropriate human and logistical resources for his needs, considering the economic situation of EDPR, in that, in addition to the resources from the Company Secretary and the legal support provided for that purpose, the Company hires a specialized entity to collect, process and count the votes.
On April 11th 2011, took place in Oviedo the Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of EDPR.
The Meeting's validity was ascertained by the meetings' President, and the definitive quorum of members was:
A total of 437 shareholders attended the General Meeting, including those present and those represented, holding a total of 473,210,259 shares which constitutes a nominal amount of EUR 3,716,051,295.00 of the share capital, that is, 85.200% of the mentioned share capital.
The nine proposals submitted to approval at the General Meeting were all approved. Extracts of the 2011 General Meeting minutes and the invitation, agenda, motions submitted to the General Meeting and forms of participation are available on the company's website www.edprenovaveis.com
On June 21st, 2011, took place in Oviedo an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of EDPR.
The Meeting's validity was ascertained by the meetings' President, and the definitive quorum of members was:
A total of 508 shareholders attended the General Meeting, including those present and those represented, holding a total of 750,406,619 shares which constitutes a nominal amount of EUR 3,752,033,095.00 of the share capital, that is, 86.025% of the mentioned share capital.
On the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders some important amendments to the Company's By-Laws were approved:
The six proposals submitted to approval at the General Meeting were all approved. Extracts of the 2011 General Meeting minutes and the invitation, agenda, motions submitted to the General Meeting and forms of participation are available on the company's website www.edprenovaveis.com
Pursuant to Articles 20 and 21 of the Company's Articles of Association, the Board of Directors shall consist of no less than five (5) and no more than seventeen (17) Directors. Their term of office shall be three (3) years, and they may be re-elected once or more times for equal periods.
The Board of Directors currently consists of the following seventeen (17) members
On 2011, Mr. António Martins da Costa, Mr. José Silva Lopes and Mr. Daniel Kammen ended their terms as Board members. Four members of the Management Team, Mr. Rui Teixeira, Mr. João Paulo Costeira, Mr. Luis Adão da Fonseca and Mr. Gabriel Alonso were appointed as Board members and the others members were re-elected for a new term.
The positions held by the members of the Board in the last five (5) years, those that they currently hold and positions in Group and non-Group companies are listed in Annexes I, II and III, respectively. Annex IV also gives a brief description of the Directors' professional and academic careers.
Finally, the shares of EDPR owned by each Director are described in the table in Annex V.
Pursuant to Article 19 of the Company's Articles of Association, the Board of Directors has the broadest powers for the administration, management and governance of the Company, with no limitations other than the responsibilities expressly and exclusively invested in the General Shareholders Meeting in the Company's Articles of Association or in the applicable law.
Regarding the decisions to increase the share capital, the Board of Directors, by delegation from the General Meeting, may decide to increase the share capital once or several times. This delegation, which may be the subject of replacement, can include the power to demand a pre-emptive right in the issue of shares that are the subject of delegation and with the requirements established by law.
| Board Member | Position | Date of first Appointment |
Date of Re-election | End of Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| António Mexia | Chairperson and Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Ana Maria Fernandes | Vice-Chairperson, CEO | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Manso Neto | Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Nuno Alves | Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rui Teixeira | Director | 11/04/2011 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Paulo Costeira | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Gabriel Alonso | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | Director | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| António Nogueira Leite | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Gilles August | Director (Independent) | 14/04/2009 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Lopes Raimundo | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Jorge Santos | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| José Araújo e Silva | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
On the other hand, the General Meeting may also delegate to the Board of Directors the power to implement an adopted decision to increase the share capital, indicating the date or dates of its implementation and establishing any other conditions that have not been specified by the General Meeting. This delegation may be the subject of replacement. The Board of Directors may use this delegation wholly or in part and may also decide not to perform it in consideration of the conditions of the Company, the market or any particularly relevant events or circumstances that justify said decision, of which the General Meeting must be informed at the end of the time limit or limits for performing it.
According to Article 146 of the Spanish Companies Law, the Board of Directors was authorized by the General Meeting of Shareholders to acquire its own shares issued by the parent company and/or the affiliate companies through their management bodies for a term of five years from the date of the General Shareholders Meeting held on April 13th, 2010. The terms for this acquisition are available to the public at the company's website, www.edprenovaveis.com.
In addition to the Articles of Association and the law, the Board of Directors is governed by the regulations approved on May 3rd, 2008. The regulations on the functioning of the Board are available to the public at the website www.edprenovaveis.com.
The Board of Directors must meet at least four (4) times a year, preferably once a quarter. Nonetheless, the Chairperson, on his own initiative or that of three (3) Directors, shall convene a Board meeting whenever he deems it necessary for the Company's interests. The Board of Directors held eight (8) meetings during the year ended at December 31st, 2011.
Meetings are convened by the Chairperson, who may order the Secretary to send the invitations. Invitations shall be sent at least five (5) days prior to the date of the meeting. Exceptionally, when the circumstances so require, the Chairperson may call a meeting of the Board without respecting the required advance notice.
The meetings of the Board are valid if half of the Directors plus one are present or represented. Directors shall attend Board meetings personally and, on exception, if they are unable to do so, they shall delegate their representation through a written Declaration to another Director. Without prejudice to the above, the Board of Directors shall be deemed to have been validly convened, with no need for an invitation, if all the Directors present or represented agree unanimously to hold the meeting as universal and accept the agenda to be dealt with at it.
Decisions are adopted by absolute majority among those present. Each Director present or represented has one vote and the Chairperson has the casting vote in the event of a tie.
In order for the non-executive Directors to be able to decide independently and be informed, Articles 22, 24 and 25 of the Board regulations established the following mechanisms:
• Any Director may request the hiring, on the Company's account, of legal advisers, accountants, financial or commercial specialists or other experts. The performance of the job must necessarily relate to concrete problems of a certain importance and complexity. Requests to hire experts shall be channelled through the Chairperson or Secretary of the Board of Directors, who shall be subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.
Additionally, the Executive Committee informs the Board of Directors of its decisions at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting and delivers the minutes of the meetings held to the members of the Board.
With the mechanisms set forth in the regulations, non-executive Directors have encountered no difficulties in performing their duties.
In 2011, the non-executive Directors were involved in the governance of EDPR not only by participating in meetings of the Board of Directors, where they gave their opinions on different company matters, made any suggestions they saw fit and took decisions on matters submitted to them, but also by working on the Nominations and Remunerations Committee, on the Related-Party Transactions Committee and the Audit and Control Committee, where all the members are non-executive, with the exception of the Related-Party Transactions Committee, which has one executive Director, Mr. João Manuel Manso Neto.
António Mexia
The Chairperson of the Board is the Chairperson of the Company and fully represents it, using the company name, implementing decisions of the General Meeting, Board of Directors and the Executive Committee.
Without prejudice to the powers of the Chairperson under the law and Articles of Association, he also has the following powers:
The Chairperson of the Board is appointed by the members of the Board of Directors, unless this is done by the General Meeting. The current Chairperson was elected on March 18th, 2008.
Ana Maria Fernandes
It is the Vice-Chairperson who replaces the Chairperson when he is unable to attend the meetings. The Board may also delegate executive powers to the Vice-Chairperson.
The Vice-Chairperson is appointed by the Board of Directors on the proposal of the Chairperson. The Vice-Chairperson was elected on May 14th, 2008.
| CEO | |
|---|---|
| Ana Maria Fernandes | |
The Board of Directors may appoint one or more Chief Executive Officers. Chief Executive Officers are appointed by a proposal of the Chairperson or two-thirds of the Directors. Chief Executive Officers are appointed with a vote in favour of two-thirds of the Directors and must be chosen from among the Directors.
The competences of each Chief Executive Officer are those deemed appropriate in each case by the Board, with the only requirement being that they are delegable under the law and Articles of Association.
The Chief Executive Officer was re-elected on June 21st, 2011 with competences including coordination of the implementation of Board and Executive Committee decisions, monitoring, leading and coordinating the management team appointed by the Executive Committee, representing the company in dealings with third parties and other related duties.
| Company Secretary | |
|---|---|
| Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
The duties of the Company Secretary are those set forth in current laws, the Articles of Association and Board Regulations. In particular, in accordance with the Board Regulations and in addition to those set forth in the Articles of Association, his competences are:
The Company Secretary, who is also the General Secretary and Director of the Legal Department at EDPR, was appointed on December 4th, 2007.
Pursuant to Article 27 of the Company's Articles of Association, the Executive Committee shall consist of no less than six (6) and no more than nine (9) Directors.
Its constitution, the appointment of its members and the extension of the powers delegated must be approved by two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Board of Directors.
The committee currently consists of eight (8) members, plus the Secretary. Mr. António Mexia, Mrs. Ana Maria Fernandes, Mr. João Manso Neto and Mr. Nuno Alves were re-elected on June 21st, 2011, at the Board of Directors. Mr. Rui Teixeira was appointed in April 11th, 2011 and re-elected on June 21st, 2011. Mr. João Paulo Costeira, Mr. Luis Adão da Fonseca and Mr. Gabriel Alonso were appointed on June 21st, 2011.
| Executive Committee | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chairperson | António Mexia | |
| Vice-Chairperson and CEO | Ana Maria Fernandes | |
| Gabriel Alonso João Manso Neto João Paulo Costeira Luis Adão da Fonseca Nuno Alves Rui Teixeira |
||
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
The members of the Executive Committee shall maintain their positions for as long as they are Company Directors. Nonetheless, the Board may decide to discharge members of the Executive Committee at any time and the members may resign said positions while still remaining Company Directors.
The Executive Committee is a permanent body to which all competences of the Board of Directors that are delegable under the law and the Articles of Association can be delegated, with the exception of:
The Executive Committee members have been delegated all the powers of representation of the Company so that any two of its members can act jointly in the name and on behalf of the Company.
In addition to the Articles of Association, this committee is also governed by the regulations approved on June 4th, 2008 and also by the Board Regulations. The committee's regulations are available to the public at www.edprenovaveis.com.
The Executive Committee shall meet at least once a month and whenever is deemed appropriate by its Chairperson, who may also suspend or postpone meetings when he sees fit. The Executive Committee shall also meet when requested by at least two (2) of its members. The Executive Committee held thirty (30) meetings during the year ended on December 31st, 2011.
The Executive Committee shall draft minutes for each of the meetings held and shall inform the Board of Directors of its decisions at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting.
The Chairperson of the Executive Committee, who is currently also the Chairperson of the Board of Directors, shall send the Chairperson of the Audit and Control Committee invitations to the Executive Committee meetings and the minutes of those meetings.
Meetings of the Executive Committee are valid if half of its members plus one are present or represented. Decisions shall be adopted by simple majority. In the event of a tie, the Chairperson shall have the casting vote.
Executive Directors shall provide any clarifications needed by the other corporate bodies whenever requested to do so.
Pursuant to Article 28 of the Articles of Association, the Audit and Control Committee consists of no fewer than three (3) and no more than five (5) Directors. The majority of the members shall be independent.
The Audit and Control Committee is a permanent body and performs supervisory tasks independently from the Board of Directors.
The committee currently consists of three (3) members, plus the Secretary. The three (3) members are independent Directors, as well as the Chairperson. The Chairperson of the Committee was re-elected on 2011 and the other two members, Mr. Jorge Santos and Mr. João Lopes Raimundo were appointed on June 21st, 2011 at the Board of Directors.
| Audit and Control Committee | |
|---|---|
| Chairperson | João Manuel de Mello Franco |
| João Lopes Raimundo Jorge Santos |
|
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
The committee members shall maintain their positions for as long as they are Company Directors. Nonetheless, the Board may decide to discharge members of the committee at any time and the members may resign said positions while still remaining Company Directors.
Pursuant to Article 28 of the Articles of Association, the members of the Audit and Control Committee are appointed by the Board of Directors. The term of office of the Chairperson of the Audit and Control Committee is three (3) years, after which he may only be re-elected for a new term of three (3) years. Nonetheless, chairpersons leaving the committee may continue as members of the Audit and Control Committee.
Concerning the recommendations introduced in 2010 by the Portuguese Code of Corporate Governance the referred competences were reinforced as mentioned below, with the following changes introduced on the Audit and Control Committee Regulations, to guarantee the compliance of the referred code:
In addition to the Articles of Association and the law, this committee is governed by the regulations approved on June 4th, 2008 amended on May 4th, 2010 and also by the Board regulations. The committee's regulations are at the shareholders' disposal at www.edprenovaveis.com.
The committee shall meet at least once a quarter and additionally whenever its Chairperson sees fit. In 2011, the Audit and Control Committee met six (6) times.
This committee shall draft minutes of every meeting held and inform the Board of Directors of its decisions at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting.
The meetings of the Audit and Control Committee shall be valid if at least half of the Directors on it plus one are present or represented. Decisions shall be adopted by simple majority. The Chairperson shall have the casting vote in the event of a tie.
In 2011, the Audit and Control Committee's activities included the following: (I) to monitor the closure of quarterly accounts in the first half-year, to familiarize itself with the preparation and disclosure of financial information, internal audit, internal control and risk management activities; (II) analysis of relevant rules to which the committee is subject in Portugal and Spain, (III) assessment of the external auditor's work, especially concerning with the scope of work in 2011, and approval of all "audit related" and "non audit" services, (IV) supervision of the quality and integrity of the financial information in the financial statements and participation in the Executive Committee meeting at which these documents were analyzed and discussed, (V) drafting of an opinion in the individual and consolidated annual reports and accounts, in a quarterly and yearly basis (VI) pre-approval of the 2011 Internal Audit Action Plan, (VII) supervision of the quality,
integrity and efficiency of the internal control system, risk management and internal auditing, (VIII) reflection on the corporate governance system adopted by EDPR, (IX) analysis of the evolution of the SCIRF project, (X) information about the whistle-blowing.
The Audit and Control Committee found no constraints during its control and supervision activities.
A report on the activities of the Audit and Control Committee in the year ended on December 31st 2011 is available to shareholders at www.edprenovaveis.com.
Pursuant to Article 29 of the Company's Articles of Association, the Nominations and Remunerations Committee shall consist of no less than three (3) and no more than six (6) Directors. At least one of its members must be independent and shall be the Chairperson of the committee.
The members of the committee should not be members of the Executive Committee. The Nominations and Remunerations Committee is constituted by independent members of the Board of Directors, in compliance with Recommendation 44 of the Unified Code of Good Governance approved by decision of the Board of the Spanish Securities Committee (hereinafter the CNMV), as amended by CNMV Circular 4/2007 of December 27th, which lays down that the Nominations and Remunerations Committee must be entirely made up of external Directors numbering no fewer than three (3). As it is made up of independent Directors (in Spain the committee may only be comprised of Directors) it complies to the extend possible with the recommendation indicated in point II.5.2 of the Portuguese Code of Corporate Governance.
The Nominations and Remunerations Committee currently consists of three (3) independent members, plus the Secretary. Mr. Jorge Santos and Mr. Rafael Caldeira Valverde were re-elected on 2011 and Mr. Francisco Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda was appointed on June 21st, 2011 at the Board of Directors.
| Chairperson | Jorge Santos |
|---|---|
| Francisco Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda Rafael Caldeira Valverde |
|
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
None of the committee members are spouses or up to third-degree relatives in direct line of the other members of the Board of Directors.
The committee members shall maintain their positions for as long as they are Company Directors. Nonetheless, the Board may decide to discharge members of the committee at any time and the members may resign said positions while still remaining Company Directors.
The Nominations and Remunerations Committee is a permanent body with an informative and advisory nature and its recommendations and reports are not binding.
As such, the Nominations and Remunerations Committee has no executive functions. The main functions of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee are to assist and report to the Board of Directors about appointments (including by cooption), re-elections, dismissals and remunerations of the Board and its positions, about the composition of the Board and the appointment, remuneration and dismissal of senior management personnel. The Nominations and Remunerations Committee shall also inform the Board of Directors
on general remuneration policy and incentives to them and senior management. These functions include the following:
In addition to the articles of association, the Nominations and Remunerations Committee is governed by the Regulations approved on June 4th, 2008 and also by the Board regulations. The committee's regulations are available at www.edprenovaveis.com.
This committee shall meet at least once every quarter and also whenever its Chairperson sees fit.
This committee shall draft minutes of every meeting held and inform the Board of Directors of decisions that it makes at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting.
The meetings of this committee shall be valid if at least half of the Directors on it plus one are present or represented. Decisions shall be adopted by simple majority. The Chairperson shall have the deciding vote in the event of a tie.
In 2011 the main proposals made by the Nominations and Remunerations Committee were:
Pursuant to Article 30 of the Articles of Association, the Board may set up other committees, such as the Related Party Transactions Committee. This committee shall consist of no fewer than three (3) members. The majority of the members of the Related Party Transactions Committee shall be independent, although in the case of this committee it has one non-independent Member, João Manuel Manso Neto.
Members of the Related Party Transactions Committee shall be considered independent if they can perform their duties without being conditioned by relations with EDPR, its majority shareholders or its Directors and, if this is the case, meet the other requirements of applicable legislation.
The committee currently consists of three (3) members, who were re-elected on June 21st, 2011, by the Board of Directors plus the Secretary.
| Committee on Related-Party Transactions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chairperson | António Nogueira Leite | ||
| João Manso Neto João Manuel de Mello Franco |
|||
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
The committee members shall maintain their positions for as long as they are Company Directors. Nonetheless, the Board may decide to discharge members of the committee at any time and the members may resign said positions while still remaining Company Directors.
The Related Party Transactions Committee is a body belonging to the Board of Directors and performs the following duties, without prejudice to others that the Board may assign to it:
Should the Related Party Transactions Committee not ratify business or legal relations between EDP or its related parties and EDPR and its related parties, said relations shall require the approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Board of Directors, whenever at least half of the members proposed by entities other than EDP, including independent Directors, vote in favour, unless, before submission for
ratification by the Related Party Transactions Committee, this majority of members has voiced it approval.
The previous paragraphs shall not apply to operations between EDP or its related parties and EDPR or its related parties that have standard conditions and these conditions are applied in the same way in transactions with parties not related to EDP and EDPR or their respective related parties.
In addition to the Articles of Association, the Related Party Transactions Committee is governed by the regulations approved on June 4th, 2008 and by the Board Regulations. The committee's regulations are available at www.edprenovaveis.com.
The committee shall meet at least once a quarter and additionally whenever its Chairperson sees fit.
This committee shall draft minutes of every meeting held and inform the Board of Directors of decisions that it makes at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting.
The meetings of this committee shall be valid if at least half of the Directors on it plus one are present or represented. Decisions shall be adopted by simple majority. The Chairperson shall have the casting vote in the event of a tie.
In 2011, the Related Party Transactions Committee revised, approved and proposed to the Board of Directors the approval of all agreements and contracts between related parties submitted to its consideration.
Chapter 2 of this report includes a description of the fundamental aspects of the agreements and contracts between related parties, the object of which does not pertain to the ordinary course of EDPR business.
The Related Party Transactions Committee was informed that in 2011, the average value and the maximum value regarding the transactions analyzed by the Committee was EUR 1,575,657 and EUR 3,132,771, respectively.
The total value of the operations with the EDP Group in 2011 was EUR 17 million which corresponds to a 7.6% of the total value of S&S, and EUR 225 million for total operational costs.
Following the recommendations of CMVM, Article 12 of the Board regulations requires at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the Directors to be independent Directors, who are considered to be those who can perform their duties without being conditioned by relations with the Company, its significant shareholders or Directors and, if applicable, meet the requirements of applicable laws.
In addition, pursuant to Article 23 of the Articles of Association, the following may not be Directors:
• People who are Directors of or are associated with any competitor of EDPR and those who are related to the above. A company shall be considered to be a competitor of EDPR if it is directly or indirectly involved in the generation, storage, transmission, distribution, sale or supply of electricity or combustible gases and also those that have interests opposed to those of EDPR, a competitor or any of the companies in its Group, and Directors, employees,
lawyers, consultants or representatives of any of them. Under no circumstances shall companies belonging to the same group as EDPR, including abroad, be considered competitors;
• People who are in any other situation of incompatibility or prohibition under the law or Articles of Association. Under Spanish law, people, among others, who are I) aged under eighteen (18) years, (II) disqualified, III) competitors; (IV) convicted of certain offences or (V) hold certain management positions are not allowed to be Directors.
The Nominations and Remunerations Committee, according to its Regulations, presents to the Board of Directors a proposal with the names of the candidates that the Committee considers having the best qualities to fulfil the role of Board Member. The Board of Directors presents the proposal to the General Meeting of
Shareholders that will approve by majority for an initial period of three (3) years and may be re-elected once or more times for further periods of three (3) years. Nonetheless, pursuant to Article 23 of the Articles of Association and 243 of the Spanish Companies Law, shareholders so wishing may group their shares until they constitute an amount of capital equal to or higher than the result of dividing it by the number of Directors and appoint those that, using only whole fractions, are deducted from the corresponding proportion. Those making use of this power cannot intervene in the appointment of the other members of the Board of Directors.
If there is a vacancy, pursuant to Article 23 of the Articles of Association and 243 of the Spanish Companies Law, the Board of Directors may co-opt people from the shareholders, who will occupy the position until the next General Meeting, which shall ratify the co-opted Director. Pursuant to Article 247 of the Spanish Companies Law, the co-option of Directors, as for other Board decisions, must be approved by absolute majority of the Directors at the meeting.

During 2011, EDPR has not signed any contracts with the members of its corporate bodies or with holders of qualifying holdings, excluding EDP, as mentioned below.
Regarding related party transactions, EDPR and/or its subsidiaries have signed the contracts detailed below with EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. (hereinafter, EDP) or other members of its group not belonging to the EDPR subgroup.
The contracts signed between EDPR and its related parties are analyzed by the Related-Party Transactions Committee according to its competences, as mentioned on chapter 1.2.6. of the report.
The framework agreement was signed by EDP and EDPR on May 7th, 2008 and came into effect when the latter was admitted to trading. The purpose of the framework agreement is to set out the principles and rules governing the legal and business relations existing when it came into effect and those entered into subsequently.
The framework agreement establishes that neither EDP, nor the EDP Group companies other than EDPR and its subsidiaries can engage in activities in the field of renewable energies without the consent of EDPR. EDPR shall have worldwide exclusivity, with the exception of Brazil, where it shall engage its activities through a joint venture with EDP – Energias do Brasil, S.A., for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of facilities or activities related to wind, solar, wave and/or tidal power and other renewable energy generation technologies that may be developed in the future. Nonetheless, the agreement excludes technologies being developed in hydroelectric power, biomass, cogeneration and waste in Portugal and Spain.
It lays down the obligation to provide EDP with any information that it may request from EDPR to fulfil its legal obligations and prepare the EDP Group's consolidated accounts.
The framework agreement shall remain in effect for as long as EDP directly or indirectly owns more than 50% of the share capital of EDPR or appoints more than 50% of its Directors.
On November 4th, 2008 EDP and EDPR signed an Executive Management Services Agreement and was renewed on May 4th, 2011 and effective from March 18th, 2011.
Through this contract, EDP provides management services to EDPR, including matters related to the day-to-day running of the Company. Under this agreement EDP appoints three people from EDP to be part of EDPR's Executive Committee, for which EDPR pays EDP an amount defined by the Related Party Committee, and approved by the Board of Directors and the Shareholders Meeting.
Under this contract, EDPR is due to pay an amount of EUR 380.400 corresponding to the fixed remuneration, for the management services rendered by EDP in 2011.
The term of the contract is on June 21st, 2014.
The finance agreements between EDP Group companies and EDPR Group companies were established under the above described Framework Agreement and currently include the following:
EDPR (as the borrower) has loan agreements with EDP Finance BV (as the lender), a company 100% owned by EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A.. Such loan agreements can be established both in EUR and USD, usually have a 10-year tenor and are remunerated at rates set on arm's length basis. As at December 31st, 2011, such loan agreements totalled EUR 1,451,042,386 and USD 1,986,641,541.
A counter-guarantee agreement was signed, under which EDP or EDP Energias de Portugal Sociedade Anónima, sucursal en España (hereinafter guarantor or EDP Sucursal) undertakes on behalf of EDPR, EDP Renewables Europe SLU (hereinafter EDPR EU) and EDPR North America LLC (hereinafter EDPR NA) to provide corporate guarantees or request the issue of any guarantees, on the terms and conditions requested by the subsidiaries, which have been approved on a case by case basis by the EDP executive board.
EDPR will be jointly liable for compliance by EDPR EU and EDPR NA. The subsidiaries of EDPR undertake to indemnify the guarantor for any losses or liabilities resulting from the guarantees provided under the agreement and to pay a fee established in arm's length basis. Nonetheless, certain guarantees issued prior to the date of approval of these agreements may have different conditions. As at December 31st, 2011, such counter-guarantee agreements totalled EUR 155,169,622 and USD 573,208,391.
EDP Sucursal and EDPR signed an agreement through which EDP Sucursal manages EDPR' cash accounts. The agreement also regulates a current account between both companies, remunerated on arm's length basis. As at December 31st 2011, the current account had a balance of EUR 158,622,803 and USD 50,011,596 both in favour of EDPR.
The agreement is automatically renewable on a yearly basis.
Due to the net investment in EDPR NA, the company and Group accounts of EDPR and the accounts of EDP Sucursal, were exposed to the foreign exchange risk. With the purpose of hedging this foreign exchange risk, EDP Group settled a cross currency interest rate swap (CIRS) in USD and EUR, between EDP Sucursal and EDPR for a total amount of USD 2,632,613. Also a CIRS in PLN and EUR, between EDP Sucursal and EDPR was settled for a total amount of PLN 309,307,188 related with the net investment in polish companies.
EDP Sucursal and EDPR entered into several hedge agreements with the purpose of managing the transaction exposure related with the investment payments to be done in Poland, fixing the exchange rate for EUR/PLN in accordance to the prices in the forward market in each contract date. At December 31st 2011, a total amount of EUR 38,803,000 remained outstanding.
EDP and EDP EU entered into hedge agreements for a total volume of 1,599 MWh for 2011 at the forward market price at the time of execution related with the expected sales of energy in the Spanish market.
On May 14th 2008, EDP and EDPR signed an agreement under which the former granted to the latter a non-exclusive license for the trademark "EDP Renováveis" for use in the renewable energy market and related activities.
In return for the granting of the trademark license, EDPR will pay to EDP fees calculated on the basis of the proportion of the costs pertaining to the former in the Group's annual budget for image and trademark services, which are subject to annual review. The fee established for 2011 was EUR 1,500,000.
The license is granted indefinitely and shall remain in effect until the expiry of EDP's legal ownership of the trademark or until EDP ceases to hold the majority of the capital or does not appoint the majority of Directors of EDPR. EDP may also terminate the agreement in case of non-payment or breach of contract.
The licensing agreement is restricted by the terms of the framework agreement.
On June 4th, 2008, EDP and EDPR signed a consultancy service agreement. Through this agreement, and upon request by EDPR, EDP (or through EDP Sucursal) shall provide consultancy services in the areas of legal services, internal control systems, financial reporting, taxation, sustainability, regulation and competition, risk management, human resources, information technology, brand and communication, energy planning, accounting and consolidation, corporate marketing and organizational development.
The price of the agreement is calculated as the cost incurred by EDP plus a margin. For the first year, it was fixed at 8% based on an independent expert on the basis of market research. For 2011 the estimated cost of these services is EUR 3,132,771.00. This was the total cost of services provided for EDPR, EDPR EU and EDPR NA.
The duration of the agreement is one (1) year tacitly renewable for equal periods.
On May 13th, 2008, EDP Inovação, S.A. (hereinafter EDP Inovação), an EDP Group company, and EDPR signed an agreement regulating relations between the two companies regarding projects in the field of renewable energies (hereinafter the R&D Agreement).
The object of the R&D Agreement is to prevent conflicts of interest and foster the exchange of knowledge between companies and the establishment of legal and business relationships. The agreement forbids EDP Group companies other than EDP Inovação to undertake or invest in companies that undertake the renewable energy projects described in the agreement.
The R&D Agreement establishes an exclusive right on the part of EDP Inovação to project and develop new renewable energy technologies that are already in the pilot or economic and/or commercial feasibility study phase, whenever EDPR exercises its option to undertake them.
In June 2011 EDPR requested EDP Inovação the development of services related to certain renewables projects, which are currently under execution.
The agreement shall remain in effect for as long as EDP directly or indirectly maintains control of more than 50% of both companies or appoints the majority of the members of the Board and Executive Committee of the parties to the agreement.
Management support service agreement between EDP Renováveis Portugal S.A., and EDP Valor – Gestão Integrada de Recursos, S.A.
On January 1st, 2003, EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A., holding company of the EDPR subgroup in Portugal, and EDP Valor – Gestão Integrada de Recursos, S.A. (hereinafter EDP Valor), an EDP Group company, signed a management support service agreement.
The object of the agreement is the provision to EDP Renováveis Portugal by EDP Valor of services in the areas of procurement, economic and financial management, fleet management, property management and maintenance, insurance, occupational health and safety and human resource management and training.
The remuneration paid to EDP Valor by EDP Renováveis Portugal and its subsidiaries for the services provided in 2011 totalled EUR 945,458.
The initial duration of the agreement was five (5) years from date of signing and it was tacitly renewed for a new period of five (5) years on January 1st 2008.
Either party may renounce the contract with one (1) year's notice.
Information techonology management services agreement between EDP Renováveis, S.A. and EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A.
On January 1st, 2010, EDPR, and EDP, signed an IT management services agreement.
The object of the agreement is to provide to EDPR the information technology services described on the contract and its attachments by EDP.
The amount to be paid to EDP for the services provided in 2011 totalled EUR 2,483,227.
The initial duration of the agreement is one (1) year from date of signing and it is tacitly renewed for a new period of one (1) year.
Either party may renounce the contract with one (1) month notice.
Representation agreement with Hidroeletrica del Cantábrico S.A. for the EDP Renováveis, S.A. Portfolio in Spain
On October 27th, 2011, EDPR and Hidroeletrica del Cantábrico S.A., signed an Agreement for Representation services.
The object of this agreement was to provide EDPR representation services in the market and risk management for a fix tariff based in volume (€0,12/MWh) in the electricity market.
The initial duration of the agreement is one (1) year from date of signing and it is tacitly renewed for a new period of one (1) year.
Consultancy agreement between EDP Renováveis Brasil S.A., and EDP Energias do Brasil S.A.
The object of the agreement is to provide to EDP Renováveis Brasil S.A. (hereinafter EDPR Brasil) the consultancy services described on the contract and its attachments by EDP – Energias do Brasil S.A. (hereinafter EDP Brasil). Through this agreement, and upon request by EDPR Brasil, EDP Brasil shall provide consultancy services in the areas of legal services, internal control systems, financial reporting, taxation, sustainability, regulation and competition, risk management, human resources, information technology, brand and communication, energy planning, accounting and consolidation, corporate marketing and organizational development.
The amount to be paid to EDP Brasil for the services provided in 2011 totalled BRL 1,383,840.
The initial duration of the agreement is one (1) year from date of signing and it is tacitly renewed for a new period of one (1) year.
EDPR has an Internal Control System over Financial Reporting (SCIRF) updated and monitored in line with international standards of internal control, whose mechanisms are beginning to be generally applicable to listed companies.
SCIRF covers the main aspects of the COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission): maintaining a control environment for the preparation of a financial reporting of quality, assessment of the risks of financial information, existence of control activities that mitigate risks of error, transparent communication and reporting procedures and mechanisms of the SCIRF both internally and externally and continuous supervision of the design and operation of the system.
SCIRF provides a control environment in EDPR in many ways, embodied in the Entity Level Controls. These controls cover aspects such as:
One aspect covered by SCIRF is the risk assessment of financial information. The way in which this point is dealt with by SCIRF is evidenced by the existence of processes that establish the responsibility for developing and supervising the accounts and the frequency with which financial information is reported, with the corresponding controls that allow the minimization of the occurrence of errors and irregularities. These controls satisfy the following control objectives: (I) completeness (the product of event and transaction processing presents no omissions or duplications), (II) accuracy (no data is missing or wrong), (III) validity (events and transactions are subject to formal approval) and (IV) restricted access (existence of adequate protection of resources).
In the processes set down, information capture mechanisms are specified, as well as the steps that are performed for the preparation of financial information which forms part of EDPR's financial statements. Likewise, there is a process for the communication to markets of all kinds of information required, whether financial, operational or on any relevant matter contemplated by the regulatory bodies.
Besides the elements already mentioned, SCIRF has a wide variety of control activities (embodied in Process controls and General Computer Controls) covering the various phases of activity of EDPR, from the initial promotion stage to the beginning of exploitation and sale of energy produced by the facilities, including the reflection
of these activities in the accounting as well as the work necessary for the individual and consolidated accounts disclosures or for the obtaining of financing for the management of the business.
EDPR's SCIRF Control activities also cover the systems and information technologies (General Computer Controls), following an international reference model such as COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and related Technologies). The importance of this aspect is that information systems are the tools with which financial information is prepared, thus being relevant for transactions conducted with them. It includes activities such as access control to applications and systems, management of corrective and evolutive maintenance, new projects implementation, systems, facilities and operations (back-ups, security, incidents) management and administration, and their monitoring and proper planning. These activities are developed taking into account the requirements of control and supervision.
For contracted entities that provide relevant services that support processes of financial reporting preparation, specifically in the field of information technologies, the entities are required to meet the same minimum requirements for internal control in line with those of EDPR.
As noted above, SCIRF undergoes a process of supervision and evaluation.
The SCIRF activities and their progress have been quarterly reported to the Audit and Control Committee, complying with its supervision and follow-up missions regarding the company's internal control systems and risk management.
At the year-end in accordance with CMVM Recommendation III.1.4 the external auditors, within the scope of their powers, verified the efficiency and functioning of the Internal Control Systems and reported their conclusions to the Audit and Control Committee. Additionally, KPMG reported the result of their review of SCIRF to the Audit and Control Committee.
With this report and the teamwork of the Internal Auditors the Audit and Control Committee in accordance with CMVM Recommendation II.1.1.3 made its final assessment report and presented to the Board.
EDPR's risk framework was designed to be not a stand-alone activity separated from the main activities and processes of the company, but to be part of the responsibilities of management as an integrating element of all organizational processes, including strategic planning.
In EDPR's risk framework, risk process aims to link the company's overall strategy into manager's day-to-day decisions, enabling the company to increase the likelihood of achieving its strategic objectives.
EDPR's general strategy is translated into major strategic questions that are grouped by risk area and then subject to EDPR's risk process. The outcome of the risk process is a set of specific guidelines per risk area that will guide managers in their decisions according to the company's risk profile.

Risk management in EDPR is supported by three distinct organizational functions:

EDPR's Risk Committee integrates and coordinates all the risk functions and assures the link between risk strategy and the company's operations.
EDPR's Risk Committee intends to be the forum to discuss how EDPR can optimize its risk-return position according to its risk profile. The key responsibilities of this committee are:
The following list summarizes the main risk areas and descriptions of EDPR's business:
The development and profitability of renewable energy projects are subject to policies and regulatory frameworks. The jurisdictions in which EDPR operates provide numerous types of incentives that support the energy generated from renewable sources.
Support for renewable energy sources has been strong in previous years, and both the European Union and various US federal and state bodies have regularly reaffirmed their wish to continue and strengthen such support.
It cannot be guaranteed that the current support will be maintained or that the electricity produced by future renewable energy projects will benefit from state purchase obligations, tax incentives, or other support measures for the electricity generation from renewable energy sources.
EDPR is managing its exposure to regulatory risks trough diversification (being present in several countries) and by being an active member in several wind associations.
EDPR faces limited market price risk as it pursues a strategy of being present in countries or regions with long term visibility on revenues. In most countries where EDPR is present, prices are determined through regulated framework mechanisms. On the markets where there is expected short term volatility on market prices, EDPR uses various financial and commodity hedging instruments in order to optimize the exposure to fluctuating electricity prices. However, it may not be possible to successfully hedge the exposures or it may face other difficulties in executing the hedging strategy.
In Europe, EDPR operates in countries where the selling price is defined by a feed-in-tariff (Spain, Portugal and France) or in markets where on top of the electricity price EDPR receives either a pre-defined regulated premium or a green certificate, whose price is achieved on a regulated market (Spain, Belgium, Poland, and Romania). Additionally, EDPR is developing activity in Italy and UK where current incentive system is based on green certificates, although both are in a process to change into feed in tariff.
In the case of North America, EDPR focus is developing strategy on the States which by having an RPS program in place provides higher revenues visibility, through the REC (Renewable Energy Credit) system and by non-compliance penalties. The North America market does not provide any regulated framework system for the electricity price although it may exist for the RECs in some States. Most of EDPR's capacity in the US has predefined prices determined by long-term contracts with local utilities in line with the Company's policy of signing long-term contracts for the output of its wind farms.
In Brazilian operations, selling price is defined through a public auction which is later translated into a long-term contract.
Under EDPR's global approach to optimize the exposure to market electricity prices, the Company evaluates on a permanent basis if there are any deviations to the defined limits, assessing in which markets financial hedges may be more effective to correct it. In 2011, in order to manage such exposure, EDPR financially hedged a significant part of its generation in Spain while it closed a significant portion of its exposure through several physical and financial deals for the long-term in the US.
The amount of electricity generated by EDPR on its wind farms, and therefore EDPR's profitability, are dependent on climatic conditions, which vary across the locations of the wind farms, and from season to season and year to year. Energy output at wind farms may decline if wind speeds falls outside specific ranges, as turbines will only operate when wind speeds are within those ranges.
Variations and fluctuations in wind conditions at wind farms may result in seasonal and other fluctuations in the amount of electricity that is generated and, consequently, in the operating results and efficiency.
EDPR mitigates wind resource volatility and seasonality by having a strong knowledge in the design of its wind farms, and through the geographical diversification – in each country and in different countries – of its asset base. This "portfolio effect" enables to offset wind variations in each area and to keep the total energy generation relatively steady. Currently EDPR is present in 11 countries: Spain, Portugal, France, Belgium, Poland, Romania, UK, Italy, US, Canada and Brazil.
EDPR is exposed to fluctuations in interest rates through financing. This risk can be mitigated using fixed rates and hedging instruments, including interest rate swaps.
Also because of its presence in several countries, currency fluctuations may have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations. EDPR may attempt to hedge against currency fluctuations risks by natural hedging strategies, as well as by using hedging instruments, including forward foreign exchange contracts and Cross Interest Rate Swaps.
EDPR hedging efforts will minimize but not eliminate the impact of interest rate and exchange rate volatility.
The evolution of the financial markets is analyzed on an on-going basis in accordance to EDP Group's risk management policy approved by the EDPR`s Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors is responsible for the definition of general risk-management principles and the establishment of exposure limits following the recommendation of the risk committee.
Taking into account the risk management policy and exposure limits previously approved, the Financial Department identifies, evaluates and submits for the Board's approval the financial strategy appropriate to each project/location
The execution of the approved strategies is also undertaken by the Financial Department, in accordance with the policies previously defined and approved.
Fixed rate, Natural hedging and Financial instruments are used to minimize potential adverse effects resulting from the interest rate and foreign exchange rate risks on its financial performance.
The purpose of the interest rate risk management policies is to reduce the exposure of long term debt cash flows from market fluctuations, mainly by issuing long term debt with a fixed rate, but also through the settlement of derivative financial instruments to swap from floating rate to fixed rate when long term debt is issued with floating rates.
EDPR has a portfolio of interest-rate derivatives with maturities between approximately 2 and 14 years. Sensitivity analyses of the fair value of financial instruments to interest-rate fluctuations are performed.
Given the policies adopted by EDPR Group, its financial cash flows are substantially independent from the fluctuation in interest rate markets.
EDPR operates internationally and is exposed to the exchange-rate risk resulting from investments in foreign subsidiaries. Currently, main currency exposure is the U.S. USD/EUR currency fluctuation risk that results principally from the shareholding in EDPR NA. With the ongoing increasing capacity in others non-euro regions, EDPR will become also exposed to other local currencies (Poland, Romania and Brazil).
EDPR general policy is the Natural Hedging in order to match currency cash flows, minimizing the impact of exchange rates changes while value is preserved. The essence of this approach is to create financial foreign currency outflows to match equivalent foreign currency inflows.
Counterparty risk is the default risk of the other party in an agreement, either due to temporary liquidity issues or long term systemic issues.
EDPR policy in terms of the counterparty credit risk on financial transactions is managed by an analysis of the technical capacity, competitiveness, credit notation and exposure to each counterparty. Counterparties in derivatives and financial transactions are restricted to high-quality credit institutions, therefore, there cannot be considered any significant risk of counterparty non-compliance and no collateral is demanded for these transactions.
Liquidity risk is the risk that EDPR will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.
EDPR's strategy to manage liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have significant liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring in unacceptable losses or risking damage to EDPR's reputation.
Wind turbine generators (WTG) is a key element in the development of EDPR's wind-related energy projects, as the shortfall or an unexpected sharp increase in WTG prices can create a question mark on new project's development and its profitability. WTG represents the majority of a wind farm capital expenditure (on average, between 70% and 80%).
EDPR faces limited risk to the availability and prices' increase of WTG due to its framework agreements with the major global wind turbines suppliers. The Company uses a large mix of turbines suppliers in order to reduce its dependency on any one supplier being one of the worldwide wind energy developers with a more diversified and balanced portfolio.
Wind farms are subject to strict international, national, state, regional and local regulations relating to the development, construction, licensing, grid interconnection and operation of power plants. Among other things, these laws regulate: land acquisitions, leasing and use; building, transportation and distribution permits; landscape and environmental permits; and regulations on energy transmission and distribution network congestions.
EDPR mitigates this risk by having development activities in 11 different countries (Spain, Portugal, France, Belgium, Poland, Romania, UK, Italy, US, Canada and Brazil) with a portfolio of projects in several maturity stages. EDPR has a large pipeline located in the most attractive regions providing a "buffer" to overcome potential delays in the development of new projects, ensuring growth targets.
Wind farms output depend upon the availability and operating performance of the equipment necessary to operate it, mainly the components of wind turbines and transformers. Therefore the risk is that the performance of the turbine does not reach its optimum implies that the energy output is not the expected.
EDPR mitigates this risk by using a mix of turbine suppliers which minimizes technological risk, by signing a medium-term full-scope maintenance agreement with the turbine supplier and by an adequate preventive and scheduled maintenance.
Most recently, and following the general trend in the wind sector, EDPR is externalizing some pure technical O&M activities of its wind farms.
The Audit and Control Committee is responsible for proposing to the Board of Directors for submission to the General Meeting the appointment of the Company auditors, the terms of their contracts, scope of their duties and revocation and renewal of their contracts.
In order to protect the External Auditor independence, the following competences of the Audit and Control Committee were exercised during 2011:
all the services rendered and all the services in course. The Audit and Control Committee, in order to evaluate its independence, obtained from the External Auditor information regarding their independence according to Portuguese Decree-Law n.º 224/2008, November 20th, that changes the Articles of Association of the External Auditors Association;
EDPR's External Auditor is, since the year 2007, KPMG Auditores S.L.., therefore there is still no need to rotate the auditor according to Recommendation III.1.3 of the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code.
In 2011, according to the Audit and Control Committee's competences and in line with Recommendations II.4.4 and II.4.5, it was the first recipient and the corporate body in charge of the permanent contact with the external auditor on matters that may pose a risk to their independence and any other matters related to the auditing of accounts. It also receives and stores information on any other matters provided for in legislation on audits and in auditing standards in effect at any time.
The Audit and Control Committee assessed the performance of the external auditor in providing the services hired by the Company and made a positive evaluation of their quality, considering that they meet applicable standards and that it is advisable to maintain the same auditor.
The work of the external auditor, including reports and audits of its accounts, was supervised and evaluated in accordance with applicable rules and standards, in particular international auditing standards. The external auditor in coordination with the Audit and Control Committee verifies the implementation of remuneration policies and the efficiency and functioning of internal control mechanisms. The external auditor reports to the Audit and Control Committee all the shortcomings.
EDPR has always carried out its activity by consistently implementing measures to ensure the good governance of its companies, including the prevention of incorrect practices, particularly in the areas of accounting and finance.
EDPR provides the Group workers with a channel enabling them to report directly and confidentially to the Audit and Control Committee any practice presumed illicit or any alleged accounting and/ or financial irregularity in their company, in compliance with the provisions of CMVM Regulation no. 1/2010.
With this channel for reporting irregular accounting and financial practices, EDPR aims:
Contact with the Company's Audit and Control Committee is only possible by email and post, and access to information received is restricted.
Any complaint addressed to the Audit and Control Committee will be kept strictly confidential and the whistle-blower will remain anonymous, provided that this does not prevent the investigation of the complaint. S/he will be assured that the Company will not take any retaliatory or disciplinary action as a result of exercising his/ her right to blow the whistle on irregularities, provide information or assist in an investigation.
The Secretary of the Audit and Control Committee receives all the communications and presents a quarterly report to the members of the Committee.
In 2011 there were no communications regarding any irregularity at EDPR.
EDPR is governed by a strong sense of ethics, whose principles are embodied in the day-to-day activities of its employees, according to ethical practices generally considered to be consensual but which, for reasons of appropriate disclosure, transparency and impartiality, the company decided to provide details on.
For that purpose, EDPR developed and approved a global Code of Ethics, to be adopted by all company's employees, without prejudice to other legal or regulating provisions. EDPR Employees' must comply with the Code of Ethics and with the approved corporate policies, which provide those practices and should follow main principles such as:
The Code of Ethics has been disseminated to all employees.
On 2011, the Board of Directors approved the creation of an Ethics Committee.
The Ethics Committee is a standing committee which objective is to ensure the Code of Ethics compliance within the company, processing all information received to this extent and establishing, if appropriate, corrective actions.
The main functions of the Ethics Committee are the receipt, registration, processing and reporting to the Board of Directors of information and reports received by the employees regarding violations of the Code in matters of legislation and ethics, conduct in the work environment, human rights and equal opportunities, integrity, relations with customers and suppliers, the environment and sustainability. These functions include the following:
On September 15th, 2011, the Ethics Committee was formed. The members of the Ethics Committee are the Chairpersons of the Board of Director's Committees:
| Chairperson | João Manuel de Mello Franco |
|---|---|
| António Nogueira Leite Jorge Santos |
|
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
On that meeting it was also nominated an Ethics Ombudsmen, Carlos Alberto Silva Almeida Loureiro. According to the Ethics Code regulation, the Ethics Ombudsmen is responsible for:
A "Code of Ethics" e-mail channel is available for the communication of any breach to the Code articles. In 2011 there were no communications to the Ethics Ombudsmen regarding any irregularity at EDPR.
The EDPR share capital of EUR 4,361,540,810 is represented by 872,308,162 shares with a face value of EUR 5 each. All shares integrate a single class and series and are fully issued and paid. There are no holders of special rights and pursuant to the Article 8 of the Company's Articles of Association, there are no restrictions on the transfer of EDPR shares.
As far as the EDPR Board of Directors is aware there are currently no shareholders' agreements regarding the company.
EDPR SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE
The EDPR shareholder structure has remained unchanged since the IPO in 2008 with the EDP Group holding 77.5% of the Company's share capital and the remaining 22.5% being freely traded on the NYSE Euronext Lisbon stock market.

By Dec. 31st, 2011, EDPR's free-float comprised about 110,000 institutional and private investors spread across more than 35 different countries with special focus on Portugal, United States, and United Kingdom. Rest of Europe most represented countries are Switzerland, France and Norway.
Institutional investors represented 80% of EDPR's free-float (79% in 2010) while private investors, mostly Portuguese, stand for the remaining 20%.
FREE-FLOAT BY INVESTOR TYPE


| Shareholder | Number of Shares |
% Capital |
% Voting Rights |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDP – ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL |
|||
| EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. – Sucursal en España |
541,027,156 | 62.0% | 62.0% |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. |
135,256,700 | 15.5% | 15.5% |
| Total | 676,283,856 | 77.5% | 77.5% |
All shareholders, irrespective of the number of shares that they own, may attend a General Meeting and take part in its deliberations with right to speak and vote.
In order to exercise their right to attend, the company informs in its Summon and shareholders guide of the General Meeting that the shareholders must have their shares registered in their name in the Book Entry Account at least five (5) working days in advance of the date of the General Meeting.
Moreover, although there is no express provision on the matter in the Articles of Association, in the event of the suspension of a General Meeting, EDPR plans to adopt Recommendation I.2.2 of the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code and not require the blocking of shares more than five days in advance.
Any shareholder with the right to attend may send a representative to a General Meeting, even if this person is not a shareholder. Power of
attorney is revocable. The Board of Directors may require shareholders' power of attorney to be in the Company's possession at least two (2) days in advance, indicating the name of the representative.
Power of attorney shall be specific to each General Meeting, in writing or by remote means of communication, such as post.
Each share entitles its holder to one vote.
Shares issued without this right do not have voting rights, with the exception of cases set forth by current legislation.
There is no employee share-owning system at EDPR and so no relevant control mechanisms on the exercise of voting rights by employees or their representatives have been set up.
Shareholders may vote on points on the agenda, relating to any matters of the Shareholder's competence, by mail or electronic communication. It is essential for their validity that they be received by the company by midnight of the day before the date scheduled for the first calling to order of the General Meeting.
Votes by mail shall be sent in writing to the place indicated on the invitation to the meeting accompanied by the documentation indicated in the Shareholder's Guide.
In order to vote by electronic communication, shareholders must express this intention to the Chairperson of the General Meeting of the in the form indicated in the invitation to the meeting, sufficient time in advance to permit the vote within the established time limit. They will then receive a letter containing a password for voting by electronic communication within the time limit and in the form established in the call of the General Meeting.
Remote votes can be revoked subsequently by the same means used to cast them within the time limit established for the purpose or by personal attendance at the General Meeting by the shareholder who cast the vote or his/her representative.
The Board of Directors has approved a Shareholder's Guide for the first General Meeting, detailing mail and electronic communication voting forms among other matters. It is at shareholders' disposal at www.edprenovaveis.com.
Both ordinary and extraordinary General Meetings are validly constituted when first called if the Shareholders, either present or represented by proxy, represent at least twenty five percent (25%) of the subscribed voting capital. On the second call the General Meeting will be validly constituted regardless of the amount of the capital present in order to comply with the minimum established under the Spanish Companies Law.
Nonetheless, to validly approve the issuance of bonds, the increase or reduction of capital, the transformation, merger or spin-off of the Company, and in general any necessary amendment to the Articles of Association, the Ordinary or Extraordinary Shareholders' Meeting will need: on the first call, that the Shareholders, either present or represented by proxy, represent at least fifty percent (50%) subscribed voting capital and, on the second call, that the Shareholders, either present or represented by proxy, represent at least twenty five percent (25%) of the subscribed voting capital. In the event the shareholders attending represent less than fifty percent (50%) of the subscribed voting capital, the resolutions will only be validly adopted with the favourable vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the present or represented capital in the General Meeting.
Given that EDPR is a listed company on Eurolist by NYSE Euronext Lisbon, shareholders have access to corporate governance information at www.edprenovaveis.com. Extracts of General Meeting minutes and the invitation, agenda, motions submitted to the General Meeting and forms of participation shall be placed at shareholders' disposal five (5) days after they are held.
Given the personal nature of the information involved, the history does not include attendance lists at general meetings, although, in accordance with CMVM Circular nr. 156/EMIT/DMEI/2009/515, when General Meetings are held, EDPR plans to replace them by statistical information indicating the number of shareholders present and distinguishing between the number of physical presences by mail.
EDPR therefore publishes on its website an extract of the minutes of General Meetings with all information on the constitution of the General Meeting and decisions made by it, including motions submitted and any explanations of votes.
The website also provides EDPR shareholders with information on: I) requirements for participating in the General Meeting, II) mail and electronic communication votes III) information available at the registered office.
The Company has taken no defensive measures that might seriously affect its assets in any of the cases of a change in control in its shareholder structure or the Board of Directors.
The Articles of Association contain no limitations on the transferability of shares or voting rights in any type of decision and no limitations on membership of the governing bodies of EDPR. Neither are there any decisions that come into effect as a result of a takeover bid.
The fact that the Company has not adopted any measures designed to prevent successful takeover bids is therefore in line with Recommendation I.6.1 of the CMVM Code of Corporate Governance.
On the other hand, EDPR has not entered into any agreements (current or future) subject to the condition of a change in control of the Company, other than in accordance with normal practice in case of financing of certain wind farm projects by some of its group companies.
Finally, there are no agreements between the Company and members of its Board of Directors or managers providing for compensation in the event of resignation of discharge of Directors or in the event of resignation, dismissal without just cause or cessation of the working relationship following a change in control of the Company.
Pursuant to Article 26 of the Company's Articles of Association, the remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors shall consist of a fixed amount to be determined by the General Meeting for the whole Directors and expenses for attending Board meetings.
The above article also establishes the possibility of the Directors being remunerated with Company shares, share options or other securities granting the right to obtain shares, or by means of share-indexed remuneration systems. In any case, the system chosen must be approved by the General Meeting and comply with current legal provisions.
The maximum remuneration approved for each fiscal year by the General Meeting of Shareholders, for all the members of the Board of Directors was EUR 2,500,000.
Pursuant to Article 26.4 of the Company's Articles of Association the rights and duties of any kind derived from the condition of Board Member shall be compatible with any other rights and obligations either fixed or variable that could correspond to the Board Members as a consequence of other employment or professional engagements, if any, carried out in the Company. Variable remuneration resulting from said contracts or from any other relationship, including being a Board Member, will be limited to a maximum annual amount to be established by the General Shareholders' Meeting.
The maximum remuneration approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders for this Variable remuneration in 2011 for all the members of the Board of Directors is EUR 600,000.
The Nominations and Remunerations Committee is responsible for proposing to the Board of Directors, although not bindingly, the system, distribution and amount of remuneration of the Directors on the basis of the overall amount of remuneration authorized by the General Meeting. It can also propose to the Board the terms of contracts with the Directors. The distribution and exact amount paid to each Director and the frequency and other details of the remuneration shall be determined by the Board on the basis of a proposal from the Nominations and Remunerations Committee.
The remuneration of the Executive Committee and the Management Team is built in three blocks: fixed remuneration, annual and multi-annual bonus.
The annual bonus is defined as a maximum of 68% of the annual salary and is calculated based on the following indicators in each year of their term:
• Efficiency (technical availability, OPEX/MW, CAPEX/MW).
The multi-annual bonus is defined as a maximum of 102% of the annual salary and is calculated based on the same drivers as for annual bonus but measured on a multi-year timeframe to be paid at the end of the period and with additional environmental and social perspectives including, (I) the performance of the Sustainability Index applied to EDPR (DJSI method), (II) Employee satisfaction survey, (III) Appreciation of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee.
According to the Remuneration Policy approved at the General Meeting of Shareholders', the maximum variable remuneration (annual and multi-annual) is applicable if all the above mentioned KPI's were achieved and the performance evaluation is equal or above 110%.
The remuneration to the CEO and the Executive Committee Directors that are also members of the Management Team was paid directly by EDPR while for the other members of the Executive Committee there was no direct payment to its members.
Although the remuneration for all the members of the Board of Directors is provided for the members of the Executive Committee with the exception of the CEO and those members that could likewise be part of the Management Team (who devote most of their work to the activity of EDPR) are not remunerated by EDPR.
This corporate governance practice of remuneration is in line with the model adopted by the EDP Group, in which the executive Directors of EDP do not receive any remuneration directly from the group companies on whose governing bodies they serve, but rather through EDP.
Nonetheless, in line with the above corporate governance practice, EDPR has signed an Executive Management Services Agreement with EDP, under which the Company bears the cost for the render of those services corresponding to the remuneration defined for the executive members of the Board of Directors.
The non-executive Directors only receive a fixed remuneration, which is calculated on the basis of their work exclusively as Directors or cumulatively with their membership on the Nominations and Remunerations Committee, Related Party Transactions Committee and the Audit and Control Committee.
EDPR has not incorporated any share remuneration or share purchase options plans as components of the remuneration of its Directors. No Director has entered into any contract with the company or third parties that have the effect of mitigating the risk inherent in the variability of the remuneration established by the company.
In EDPR there aren't any payments for the dismissal or termination of Director's duties.
The remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors for the year ended on December 31st 2011 was as follows:
| Fixed | Variable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration (€) | Annual | Multi- -annual |
Total | ||
| EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS | |||||
| António Mexia * | – | – | – | – | |
| Ana Maria Fernandes (CEO) | 384,000 | 167,362 | – | 551,362 | |
| João Manso Neto * | |||||
| Nuno Alves * | – | – | – | ||
| António Martins da Costa * | – | – | – | – | |
| Rui Teixeira | – | – | – | – | |
| João Paulo Costeira | – | – | – | – | |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | – | – | – | – | |
| Gabriel Alonso | – | – | – | – | |
| NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS | |||||
| António Nogueira Leite | 35,000 | – | – | 35,000 | |
| Daniel M. Kammen | 22,500 | – | – | 22,500 | |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda |
55,000 | – | – | 55,000 | |
| Gilles August | 45,000 | – | 45,000 | ||
| João Lopes Raimundo | 58,333 | – | – | 58,333 | |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | 80,000 | – | – | 80,000 | |
| Jorge Santos | 60,000 | – | – | 60,000 | |
| José Araújo e Silva | 26,250 | – | – | 26,250 | |
| José Silva Lopes | 30,000 | – | – | 30,000 | |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | 45,000 | – | – | 45,000 | |
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | 55,000 | – | – | 55,000 | |
| Total | 896,083 | 167,362 | 1,063,445 |
* With exception of the CEO and Executive Committee Directors that are also members of the Management Team the members of the Executive Committee have not received any
remuneration from EDPR. EDPR has entered in an Executive Management Services Agreement with EDP pursuant to which EDPR is due to pay to EDP EUR 380,400, corresponding to the fixed remuneration, for the management services rendered by EDP in 2011.
In 2011, Mr. António Martins da Costa, Mr. José Silva Lopes and Mr. Daniel Kammen ended their terms as Board members. The remuneration mentioned above refers only to the months when these Board members were still on duty.
The retirement savings plan for the members of the Executive Committee, excluding the Management Team members, acts as an effective retirement supplement and corresponds to 5% of their annual salary.
The non-executive directors may opt between a fixed remuneration or attendance fees per meeting, in a value equivalent to the fixed remuneration proposed for a director, taking into consideration the duties carried out as members of one or more committees.
In 2011, the remuneration of the members of the Management Team, as EDPR employees, excluding the Chief Executive Officer, was the following:
| Variable* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration (€) | Fixed | Annual | Multi- -annual |
Total |
| Rui Teixeira | 242,575 | 75,000 | 138,279 | 455,854 |
| João Paulo Costeira | 250,000 | 75,000 | 154,320 | 479,320 |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | 242,575 | 75,000 | 138,279 | 455,854 |
| Gabriel Alonso | 250,000 | 75,000 | 141,357 | 466,357 |
| Total | 985,151 | 300,000 | 572,235 | 1,857,386 |
| * Corresponds to the 2010 annual variable remuneration and 2009-2010 multi-annual variable remuneration accrued before their incorporation to the Board of Directors. |
The retirement savings plan for the members of the Executive Committee that are also members of the Management Team, acts as an effective retirement supplement with a range between 3% to 6% of their annual salary.
The Directors do not receive any relevant non-monetary benefits as remuneration.
The definition of the proposal of the remuneration policy for the members of the Board is of the responsibility of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee and is approved by the General Shareholders Meeting.
This Committee defined the remuneration to be attributed to Directors and members of the Management Team, with the purpose that it reflects the performance of each of the members in each year of their term of office (variable annual remuneration), and also their performance during their term of office establishing a variable component which is consistent with the maximisation of the Company's long term performance (variable multi-annual remuneration for a three-year period), thereby guaranteeing the alignment of the performance of the governing bodies with the interests of the shareholders.
The remuneration policy proposed by the Nominations and Remunerations Committee for the period 2011-2013, defines a structure with a fixed remuneration for all members of the Board of Directors and a variable remuneration, with an annual component and a multi-annual component for the members of the Executive Committee and the Management Team.
For the period 2011-2013, it was decided to maintain the remuneration structure in terms of its components, as well as to keep the same nominal value of fixed annual component as the one in force during the 2009-2010 period, revise the KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) for variable multi-annual and annual components, and unify for Executive Committee and Management Team the implementation of the Correlation Matrix of Goals Achievements to determine the variable remuneration.
The General Meeting is responsible for approving the statement on remuneration policy for the Company's corporate bodies submitted by the Nominations and Remunerations Committee through the Board of Directors.
One of the General Meeting's duties includes appraising the above mentioned statement.
Pursuant to Article 164 of the Spanish Companies Law, the General Meeting evaluates the performance of the company's management and makes an annual decision on whether to maintain confidence, or not, in their members.
At least one of the members of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee will be present or represented at the General Meeting of Shareholders of EDPR.
The Company has not approved any plans for share remuneration or share purchase options or plans based on share price fluctuations.
In 2011, the remuneration of the Chairperson of the General Meeting of EDPR was EUR 15,000.
For the year ended on December 31st, 2011, the fees paid to KPMG Auditores, S.L. for the audit and statutory audit of accounts and financial statements, other assurance and reliability services, tax consultancy services and other services unrelated to statutory auditing are as follows:
| Remuneration (€) | Portugal | Spain | Brazil | USA | Other | Total | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit and statutory audit of accounts and financial statements | 166,000 | 638,829 | 83,102 | 688,241 | 307,749 | 1,883,921 | 85.2% |
| Other assurance and reliability services (*) | 180,000 | 60,895 | 31,173 | 12,750 | 284,818 | 12.9% | |
| Sub-total audit related services | 346,000 | 699,724 | 83,102 | 719,414 | 320,499 | 2,168,739 | 98.1% |
| Tax consultancy services | - | - | 24,067 | 9,000 | 33,067 | 1.5% | |
| Other services unrelated to statutory auditing | 9,500 | - | 9,500 | 0.4% | |||
| Sub-total non-audit related services | 9,500 | - | 24,067 | 9,000 | 42,567 | 1.9% | |
| Total | 355,500 | 699,724 | 83,102 | 743,481 | 329,499 | 2,211,306 | 100% |
| (*) The fees of Portugal regarding the inspection of the internal control system (SCIRF) include the Spanish subsidiaries (EUR 80,000) and EDPR NA (EUR100,000) as their invoices were issued in this country. |
In EDPR there is a policy of pre-approval by the Audit and Control Committee for the selection of the External Auditor and any related entity for non-audit services, according to Recommendation III.1.5 of the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code. This policy was strictly followed during 2011.
The shares representing 100% of the EDPR share capital were admitted to trading in the official stock exchange NYSE Euronext Lisbon on June 4th, 2008. Since then the free float level is unchanged at 22.5%.
| EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share Capital | EUR 4,361,540,810 | ||||
| Nominal Share Value | EUR 5.00 | ||||
| Number of Shares | 872,308,162 | ||||
| Date of IPO | June 4th, 2008 | ||||
| NYSE Euronext Lisbon | |||||
| ISIN | ES0127797019 | ||||
| Reuters RIC | EDPR.LS | ||||
| Bloomberg Ticker | EDPR PL |
EDPR's equity market value at December 31st 2011 was EUR 4.12 billion, the equivalent to EUR 4.73 per share. In 2011, the share price improved 9%, outperforming the PSI-20 (the NYSE Euronext Lisbon reference index), the Euronext 100 and the Dow Jones Eurostoxx Utilities ("SX6E") which suffered a general depreciation in 2011. The year's low was recorded on August 9th (EUR 3.89) and the year's high was reached on May 2nd (EUR 5.25).

| PSI-20 Best & Worst Performers in 2011 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerónimo M. | +12.19% | BCP | -74.82% | |
| EDPR | +9.02% | Sonae Indús. | -66.75% | |
| Cimpor | +4.87% | BPI | -61.80% | |
| EDP | -4.01% | Banif | -60.92% | |
| Sonaecom | -10.00% | BES | -53.13% |
| Gas Natural | +15.45% | Veolia Env. | -61.28% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enel Green P. | +2.09% | Areva | -47.70% |
| EDP | -4.01% | RWE | -45.40% |
| Enagas | -4.19% | Suez Env. | -42.39% |
| Red Electrica | -6.07% | EDF | -38.75% |
In 2011 were traded more than 232 million EDPR shares, representing 25% year-on-year decrease in its liquidity, and corresponding to a turnover of approximately EUR 1.04 billion. On average, 0.9 million shares were traded per day. The total number of shares traded represented 27% of the total shares admitted to trading and to 118% of the company's free float.

| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDPR SHARES IN NYSE EURONEXT LISBON (€) | ||||
| Opening price | 4.34 | 6.63 | 5.00 | 8.00 |
| Closing price | 4.73 | 4.34 | 6.63 | 5.00 |
| Peak price | 5.25 | 7.01 | 7.75 | 8.00 |
| Minimum price | 3.89 | 3.72 | 5.00 | 3.45 |
| VARIATION IN SHARE PRICE AND REFERENCE INDICES | ||||
| EDP Renováveis | 9% | -35% | 33% | -37% |
| PSI20 | -28% | -10% | 33% | -51% |
| Dow Jones Eurostoxx Utilities | -25% | -15% | -1% | -38% |
| Euronext 100 | -14% | 1% | 25% | -45% |
| LIQUIDITY OF EDPR SHARES IN THE MARKET | ||||
| Volume in NYSE Euronext (€m) | 1,060.3 | 1,539.2 | 1,676.0 | 1,646.0 |
| Daily average volume (€m) | 4.1 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 11.0 |
| Number of shares traded (million) |
232.3 | 311.2 | 257.0 | 216.0 |
| Daily Average traded shares (million) |
0.9 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Total shares issued (million) | 872.3 | 872.3 | 872.3 | 872.3 |
| Number of own shares (million) | - | - | - | - |
| Free-float (million) | 196.3 | 196.3 | 196.3 | 196.3 |
| Annual rotation of capital (% of total shares) |
27% | 36% | 29% | 25% |
| Annual rotation of capital (% of free-float) |
118% | 159% | 131% | 110% |
| EDPR MARKET VALUE (€m) | ||||
| Market capitalisation at end of period |
4,124 | 3,783 | 5,783 | 4,364 |
The graph below shows the evolution in EDPR prices over the year and all announcements and relevant events that may had impact on them.
MAIN EDPR EVENTS IN 2011

| # | Date | Descripton | Share Price (€) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2/Feb | EDP Renováveis discloses 2010 provisional data | 4.38 |
| 2 | 24/Feb | EDP Renováveis announces 2010 results | 4.35 |
| 3 | 30/Mar | EDPR takes full control of Genesa | 5.20 |
| 4 | 7/Apr | EDP Renováveis sells its financial stake in a Spanish wind farm |
4.90 |
| 5 | 11/Apr | EDP Renováveis Annual Shareholder Meeting | 5.17 |
| 6 | 18/Apr | EDP Renováveis discloses 1Q2011 provisional data | 4.93 |
| 7 | 4/May | EDP Renováveis discloses 1Q2011 financial results | 4.90 |
| 8 | 3/Jun | EDP Renováveis is awarded new long-term contract in the US |
4.65 |
| 9 | 6/Jun | EDP Renováveis establishes a partnership for the development of 2.4 GW of wind offshore capacity in the UK |
4.61 |
| 10 | 21/Jun | EDP Renováveis Extraordinary Shareholder Meeting |
4.48 |
| 11 | 21/Jun | EDP Renováveis executes project finance for 138 MW in Romania |
4.48 |
| 12 | 28/Jun | EDPR is granted 127 MW by the Aragón Government – Spain |
4.37 |
| 13 | 11/Jul | EDP Renováveis executes project finance for 90 MW in Romania |
4.44 |
| 14 | 13/Jul | EDP Renováveis establishes a new institutional partnership structure and secures USD 116 million |
4.44 |
| 15 | 14/Jul | EDP Renováveis discloses its 1H2011 provisional data |
4.30 |
| 16 | 25/Jul | EDP Renováveis executes project finance for 70 MW in Brazil |
4.53 |
| 17 | 27/Jul | EDP Renováveis discloses its 1H2011 financial results |
4.58 |
| 18 | 14/Sep | EDP Renováveis secures a new PPA for 101 MW in the US |
4.27 |
| 19 | 13/Oct | EDP Renováveis discloses its 9M2011 provisional data |
4.20 |
| 20 | 26/Oct | EDP Renováveis discloses its 9M2011 financial results |
4.32 |
| 21 | 20/Dec | EDP Renováveis is awarded long term contracts for 120 MW at the Brazilian energy auction |
4.48 |
| 22 | 21/Dec | EDP Renováveis executes through its associated company ENEOP – Eólicas de Portugal, S.A. project finance for 376 MW in Portugal |
4.51 |
| 23 | 22/Dec | EDP Renováveis: EDP and China Three Gorges establish a strategic partnership |
4.51 |
| 24 | 22/Dec | EDP Renováveis establishes a new institutional partnership structure for 99 MW in the US |
4.51 |
The distribution of dividends must be proposed by EDPR 's Board of Directors and authorized by a resolution approved in the Company's Shareholders Meeting. In keeping with the legal provisions in force, namely the Spanish Companies Law, the EDPR Articles of Association require that profits for a business year consider:
The expected dividend policy of EDPR, as announced in the IPO, is to propose dividends' distribution each year representing at least 20% of EDPR's distributable profit. Also as announced in the IPO, EDPR Board of Directors can adjust this dividend policy as required to reflect, among other things, changes to our business plan and our capital requirements, and there can be no assurance that in any given year a dividend will be proposed or declared.
In light of a challenging economic and regulatory environment in the countries in which EDPR holds investments, of the net financial results obtained in the fiscal year of 2011 and of the company's capital requirements in a harsh financial environment, the Board of Directors will propose at the Shareholder's Meeting, to be held in 2012, to retain the 2011 results as voluntary reserves.
The Communication Policy of EDPR seeks to provide to shareholders, potential investors and stakeholders all the relevant information about the Company and its business environment. The promotion of transparent, consistent, rigorous, easily accessible and high-quality information is of fundamental importance to an accurate perception of the company's strategy, financial situation, accounts, assets, prospects, risks and significant events.
EDPR therefore look for to provide investors with information that can support them make informed, clear, concrete investment decisions.
An Investor Relations Office was created to ensure a direct and permanent contact with all market related agents and stakeholders, to guarantee the equality between shareholders and to prevent imbalances in the information access.
EDPR make use of its corporate website as a major channel to publish all the material information and ensures that all the relevant information on its activities and results is always up-to-date and available.
The EDPR Investor Relations Department is the intermediary between EDPR and its actual and potential shareholders, the financial analysts that follow the Company's activity, all investors and the financial market agents in general. The main purpose of the department is to guarantee the principle of equality among shareholders, prevent asymmetries in access to information and reduce the market perception gap of the company's strategy and intrinsic value. The department responsibility encompass developing and implementing EDPR's communication strategy and preserve an appropriate institutional and informative relationship with the financial market, the stock exchange at which EDPR shares trade and the regulatory and supervisory entities (CMVM – Comissão de Mercado de Valores Mobiliários – in Portugal and CMNV – Comisíon Nacional del Mercado de Valores – in Spain).
The company representative for relations with the market is the Executive Board of Directors member, Mr. Rui Teixeira. The Investor Relation Department is coordinated by Mr. Rui Antunes and is located at the company's head offices in Madrid, Spain. The department contacts are as follows:
Calle Serrano Galvache 56 Centro Empresarial Parque Norte Edificio Olmo – 7th Floor Phone: +34 902 830 700 Fax: +34 914 238 429 E-mail: [email protected]
Last year was particularly challenge for the stock markets, requiring the biggest effort from the EDPR management and the IR team to best deliver a clear and realistic message to all entities in the financial markets to attempt to ease concerns and to avoid investment decisions supported by speculative news flow. In 2011, we were able to discuss the investors' main topics of concerns, namely related to the perceived sector regulatory uncertainty in some European markets, the difficult market in the US, the impact from the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, the Portuguese financial assistance program from the IMF/ECB/EU and the outcome for EDPR from the 8th privatization phase of EDP – Energias de Portugal, our principal shareholder. The merger between Iberdrola and Iberdrola Renovables, the tender offer launched by EDF over EDF Energies Nouvelles and the EDPR's strategic plan pos-2012 were also relevant topics of discussion.
During 2011 EDPR was present in several events reinforcing its value creation proposition to its shareholders while prospecting new ones. In the year, the EDPR management and the IR team held more than 300 meetings in the Company's Offices and in 15 of the major financial cities of Europe and of the US, in a strong evidence of investor's interest in the company.
EDPR is clearly aware of the importance of delivering clear and detailed information to the market on time. Consequently, EDPR publishes the company's price sensitive information before the opening of the NYSE Euronext Lisbon stock exchange through CMVM's information system, and simultaneously we make that same information also available on the website investors' section and through the IR department's mailing list.
On each earnings announcement, EDPR promotes a conference call and webcast, at which the Company's management updated the market on EDPR's activities. On each of these events, shareholders, investors and analysts had the opportunity to directly submit their questions and to discuss EDPR's results as well as the company's outlook.
At the IR Department of EDPR, we remained in permanent contact with the financial analysts who evaluated the Company and with all shareholders and investors by e-mail, phone or face-to-face meetings. In 2011, as far we are aware of the sell-side analysts issued more than 200 reports evaluating EDPR's performance.
As a world leader in renewable energy, one of the biggest listed companies in the sector and one of the biggest companies of PSI20, EDPR is permanently under analysis and valuation.
At the end of the 2011, as far as the company is aware of, there were 28 institutions elaborating research reports and following actively the Company's activity. As of December 31st 2011, the average price target of those analysts was of €5.39 per share with most of them reporting "Buy" recommendations on EDPR's share: 17 Buys, 7 Neutrals, 3 Sell and only 1 Suspended.
| Company | Analyst | Recommen dation |
Price Target (€) |
Last Report Issued |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banesto | António Cruz-Guzmán |
Overweight | 6.86 | 22/07/2011 |
| Banif | Sofia Cordeiro | Buy | 5.46 | 05/05/2011 |
| Barclays Capital | Rupesh Madlani | Equalweight | 4.75 | 01/11/2011 |
| BBVA | Daniel Ortea | Outperform | 5.30 | 05/05/2011 |
| BCP | Vanda Mesquita | Buy | 6.00 | 14/10/2011 |
| Berenberg | Benita Barretto | Buy | 6.50 | 21/10/2011 |
| BES | Fernando Garcia | Buy | 4.90 | 26/09/2011 |
| BNP Paribas | José Fernandez | Underperform | 4.20 | 20/10/2011 |
| BoAML | Matthew Yates | Buy | 5.25 | 27/10/2011 |
| BPI | Flora Trindade | Buy | 6.00 | 19/09/2011 |
| Caixa BI | Helena Barbosa | Suspended | – | 16/12/2011 |
| Cheuvreux | José Porta | Underperform | 5.19 | 27/07/2011 |
| Citigroup | Manuel Palomo | Buy | 5.00 | 30/09/2011 |
| Deutsche Bank | Virginia Sanz de Madrid |
Hold | 5.00 | 26/10/2011 |
| Fidentiis | Daniel Rodríguez | Buy | 5.59 | 04/08/2011 |
| Goldman Sachs | Matija Gergolet | Neutral | 5.90 | 29/12/2011 |
| HSBC | James Magness | Overweight | 7.25 | 14/10/2011 |
| ING | Maurice Rosenthal | Sell | 3.30 | 14/12/2011 |
| Jefferies | Gerard Reid | Buy | 5.85 | 26/10/2011 |
| JP Morgan | Sarah Laitung | Overweight | 5.10 | 13/10/2011 |
| Macquarie | Shai Hill | Outperform | 5.25 | 06/07/2011 |
| Morgan Stanley | Allen Wells | Overweight | 5.40 | 12/10/2011 |
| Natixis | Céline Chérubin | Neutral | 4.70 | 27/10/2011 |
| Redburn Partners |
Archie Fraser | Buy | 6.11 | 07/02/2011 |
| Sabadell | Jorge Gonzalez | Buy | 5.06 | 26/10/2011 |
| Santander | Joaquín Ferrer | Hold | 6.20 | 23/05/2011 |
| Société Générale Jorge Alonso | Hold | 4.50 | 27/10/2011 | |
| UBS | Alberto Gandolfi | Neutral | 5.00 | 08/09/2011 |
EDPR considers online information a powerful tool in the dissemination of material information updating its website with all the relevant documents. Apart from all the required information by CMVM and CNMV regulations, the Company website also carries financial and operational updates of EDPR's activities ensuring all an easy access to information.
| Portuguese | English | Spanish | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identification of the company | |||
| Financial statements | |||
| Regulations of the management and supervisory bodies |
|||
| Audit Committee Annual report | |||
| Investor Relations Department - functions and contact details |
|||
| Articles of association | |||
| Calendar of company events | |||
| Invitation to General Meeting | |||
| Proposal submitted for discussion and voting at General Meetings |
|||
| Minutes of the General Shareholders' Meeting |
|||
| Market Liaison Officer | |||
| Credentials of the Members of the Board of Directors |
| Name | Position |
|---|---|
| António Mexia | |
| CEO of EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. Member of the General Supervisory Board of Banco Comercial Português S.A. |
|
| Ana Maria Fernandes | |
| Member of the Executive Board of Directors of EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | |
| João Manso Neto | |
| Chairperson of the Executive Committee of EDP Produção CEO and Vice-Chairperson of Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. Member of the Executive Board of Directors of EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. |
|
| Nuno Alves | Executive Director of Millennium BCP Investimento, responsible for BCP Group Treasury and Capital Markets Member of the Executive Board of Directors of EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. (CFO) |
| Rui Teixeira | |
| Chief Financial Officer of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| Member of the Management Team of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| João Paulo Costeira | |
| Chief Operating Officer for Europe of EDP Renováveis, S.A. Member of the Management Team of EDP Renováveis, S.A. |
|
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | |
| Chief Business Development Officer of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| Member of the Management Team of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | Chief Operating Officer for North America of EDP Renováveis, S.A. |
| Member of the Management Team of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| António Nogueira Leite | |
| Director of the Instituto Português de Relações Internacionais, UNL Director of Reditus, SGPS, S.A. Managing Director José de Mello, SGPS, S.A. Director of Companhia União Fabril CUF, SGPS, S.A. Director of Quimigal, S.A. Director of CUF - Químicos Industriais, S.A. Director of ADP, S.A.-CUF Adubos Director of Sociedades de Explosivos Civic, SEC, S.A. Director of Brisa, S.A. Director of Efacec Capital, SGPS, S.A. Director of Comitur, SGPS, S.A. Director of Comitur Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Expocomitur - Promoções e Gestão Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Herdade do Vale da Fonte - Sociedade Agrícola, Turística e Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Sociedade Imobiliária e Turística do Cojo, S.A. Director of Sociedade Imobiliária da Rua das Flores, nº 59, S.A. Director of José de Mello Saúde, SGPS, S.A. Vice-Chairperson of the Advisory Board of Banif Banco de Investimentos Chairperson of the General Supervisory Board of Opex, S.A. Member of the Advisory Board of IGCP Vice-Chairperson of Fórum para a Competitividade Director of José de Mello Investimentos, SGPS, S.A. Director of Fundação de Aljubarrota Chairperson of Associação Oceano XXI (cluster do Mar) |
|
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | |
| Member of the Executive Board of Directors of Banco Comercial Português, S.A. and several subsidiaries Director of Mague - SPGS, S.A. CEO of CIMPOR – Cimentos de Portugal, SGPS, S.A. |
|
| Gilles August | |
| Co-founder of August & Debouzy. He now manages the firm's corporate department. | |
| João Lopes Raimundo | |
| Chairperson of the Board of Banque BCP Luxembourg Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Banque BCP France Director of Banque Orive BCP Switzerland Managing Director of Banco Comercial Português Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Millenniun Angola Director of Banco Millennium BCP de Investimento Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Millennium Bank, NA (USA) Director of CIMPOR - Cimentos de Portugal SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Board of BCP Holdings USA, Inc Managing Director of Banco Comercial Português |
|
| João Manuel De Mello Franco | |
| Director of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Remunerations Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Evaluation Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Corporate Governance Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Sporting Clube de Portugal S.A.D. |
| Name | Position |
|---|---|
| Jorge Santos | |
| Full Professor of Economics at Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, da Universidade Técnica de Lisboa Member of the Assembly of Representatives of Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão da Universidade Técnica de Lisboa Coordinator of the PhD course in Economics at ISEG |
|
| José Araújo e Silva | |
| Director of Corticeira Amorim, SGPS, S.A. Member of the Executive Committee of Corticeira, SGPS, S.A. Director of Caixa Geral de Depósitos |
|
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | |
| Chairperson and CEO of Liberbank S.A. Chairperson of Banco de Castilla-La Mancha Chairperson of Cajastur Chairperson of Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. Chairperson of Naturgas Energía, S.A. Director of EDP Renewables Europe, SL Member of the Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis, S.A. Representative of Peña Rueda, SL in the Board of Directors of Enagas, S.A. Member of the Board of Confederación Española de Cajas de Ahorro Member of the Board of UNESA |
|
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | |
| Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors Banco Espirito Santo de Investimento, S.A. Member of the Executive Committee of Banco Espirito Santo de Investimento, S.A. |
IN COMPANIES NOT BELONGING TO THE SAME GROUP AS EDP RENOVÁVEIS, S.A. OR EDP – ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL, S.A.
| Name | Position |
|---|---|
| António Mexia | |
| Ana Maria Fernandes | Member of the General Supervisory Board of Banco Comercial Português, S.A. |
| N/A | |
| João Manso Neto | |
| Nuno Alves | N/A |
| N/A | |
| Rui Teixeira | |
| N/A | |
| João Paulo Costeira | N/A |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | |
| N/A | |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | N/A |
| António Nogueira Leite | |
| Director of the Instituto Português de Relações Internacionais, UNL Director of Reditus, SGPS, S.A. Managing Director José de Mello, SGPS, S.A. Director of Companhia União Fabril CUF, SGPS, S.A. Director of Quimigal, S.A. Director of CUF – Químicos Industriais, S.A. Director of ADP, S.A.-CUF Adubos Director of Sociedades de Explosivos Civic, SEC, S.A. Director of Brisa, S.A. Director of Efacec Capital, SGPS, S.A. Director of Comitur, SGPS, S.A. Director of Comitur Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Expocomitur – Promoções e Gestão Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Herdade do Vale da Fonte – Sociedade Agrícola, Turística e Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Sociedade Imobiliária e Turística do Cojo, S.A. Director of Sociedade Imobiliária da Rua das Flores, nº 59, S.A. Director of José de Mello Saúde, SGPS, S.A. Vice-Chairperson of the Advisory Board of Banif-Banco de Investimentos Chairperson of the General Supervisory Board of Opex, S.A. Member of the Advisory Board of IGCP Vice-Chairperson of Fórum para a Competitividade Director of José de Mello Investimentos, SGPS, S.A. Director of Fundação de Aljubarrota Chairperson of Associação Oceano XXI (cluster do Mar) |
|
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | |
| CEO of Cimpor – Cimentos de Portugal, SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of Cimpor Inversiones, S.A. Chairperson of Sociedade de Investimento Cimpor Macau, S.A. Manager of Deal Winds – Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda |
|
| Gilles August | Co-founder of August & Debouzy. He now manages the firm's corporate department. |
| João Lopes Raimundo | |
| Director of CIMPOR – Cimentos de Portugal SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Board of BCP Holdings USA, Inc Managing Director of Banco Comercial Português |
|
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | |
| Director of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Evaluation Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Corporate Governance Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Sporting Clube de Portugal S.A.D. |
|
| Jorge Santos | |
| Full Professor of Economics at Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, da Universidade Técnica de Lisboa Member of the Assembly of Representatives of Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão da Universidade Técnica de Lisboa Coordinator of the PhD course in Economics at ISEG |
|
| José Araújo e Silva | |
| Director of Corticeira Amorim, SGPS, S.A. Member of the Executive Committee of Corticeira, SGPS, S.A. Director of Caixa Geral de Depósitos Director of Artlant, S.A. Director of Caetano Auto SGPS Director of Cartolinas do Prado |
|
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | Chairperson and CEO of Liberbank, S.A. |
| Chairperson of Banco de Castilla-La Mancha Chairperson of Cajastur Representative of Peña Rueda, SL in the Board of Directors of Enagas, S.A. Member of the Board of Confederación Española de Cajas de Ahorro Member of the Board of UNESA |
|
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors Banco Espirito Santo de Investimento, S.A. |
| Member of the Executive Committee of Banco Espirito Santo de Investimento, S.A. |
| IN COMPANIES BELONGING TO THE SAME GROUP AS EDP - ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL S.A. | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| António Mexia |
Nuno Alves |
Ana Maria Fernandes |
João Manso Neto |
Manuel Ménendez Menéndez |
Rui Teixeira |
João Paulo Costeira |
Luis Adão da Fonseca |
Gabriel Alonso |
|
| EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. | CEBD | D | D | D | – | – | – | – | - |
| EDP – Gestão da Produção de Energia, S.A. |
– | – | – | CBD | – | – | – | - | - |
| EDP – Energias do Brasil, S.A. | CBD | D | D | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP – Estudos e Consultoria, S.A. | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP – Imobiliária e Participações, S.A. | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Valor – Gestão Integrada de Serviços, S.A. |
– | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Sãvida – Medicina Apoiada, S.A. | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SCS – Serviços Complementares de Saúde, S.A. |
– | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Energia RE S.A. | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | – | D | D | VCBD/CEO | CBD | – | – | – | – |
| Hidrocantábrico Energia, SAU | CBD | ||||||||
| Eléctrica de la Ribera de Ebro, SL | CBD | ||||||||
| Naturgás Energia Grupo, S.A. | – | – | – | VCBD | CBD | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Gás – SGPS, S.A. | – | – | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – |
| Balwerk – Consultadoria Económica e Participações, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. |
– | M | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP – Energias de Portugal Sociedade Anónima, Sucursal en España |
PR | PR | PR | PR | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Gás.com – Comércio de Gás Natural, S.A. |
D | – | – | – | – | – | |||
| EDP Finance BV | R | R | R | R | – | – | – | – | – |
| Electricidade de Portugal Finance Company Ireland Lt. |
– | D | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Empresa Hidroeléctrica do Guadiana, S.A. |
– | – | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Projectos SGPS, S.A. | – | – | – | D | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Energia Ibérica S.A. | D | – | – | – | – | – | |||
| EDP Inovacão, S.A. | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | D | – |
| Operacão e Manutencão Industrial, S.A. | – | – | – | – | – | – | D | – | – |
CEBD – Chairperson Executive Board of Directors CBD – Chairperson of the Board of Directors/ CEO – Chief Executive Officer
D - Director
R – Representative
PR - Permanent Representative
António Mexia Nuno Alves Ana Maria Fernandes João Manso Neto Manuel Ménendez Menéndez Rui Teixeira João Paulo Costeira Luis Adão da Fonseca Gabriel Alonso EDP Renewables North America LLC – – – – – – – – CEO EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. – – CBD – D D D D – ENEOP – Eólicas de Portugal, S.A. – – CBD – – – – – – EDP Renováveis Brasil, S.A. – – CBD – – D – D EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. – – – – – D CBD D – EDP Renewables Romania SRL – – – – – – CBD D – EDP Renewables UK Ltd – – – – – –DD– EDP Renewables France SA – – – – – – CBD – – EDP Renewables Polska, SP, z.o.o. – – – – – D D D– EDP Renewables Italia, SRL – – – – – – D D– ENEOP 2 S.A – – – – – – CBD – – Generaciones Especiales I SL – – – – –DDD– EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd –––––D D– Greenwind, S.A. – – – – – – CBD – –
CBD – Chairperson of the Board of Directors
CEO – Chief Executive Officer
D – Director MSB – Member of the Supervisory Board
PGMS – President of the General Meeting of Shareholders
M – Manager
NOTE: This Annex contains information regarding all the main companies of the EDPR Group. The information regarding all other affiliate companies where the members of the Board of Directors hold a position is available in the Annual Accounts on Note 41.

Born on July 12th, 1957. He received a degree in Economics from Université de Genève (Switzerland) in 1980, where he was also Assistant Lecturer in the Department of Economics. He was a postgraduate lecturer in European Studies at Universidade Católica. He was also a member of the governing boards of Universidade Nova de Lisboa and of Universidade Católica, where he was Director from 1982 to 1995. Served as Assistant to the Secretary of State for Foreign Trade from 1986 until 1988. From 1988 to 1990 served as Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors of ICEP (Portuguese Institute for Foreign Trade). From 1990 to 1998 was Director of Banco Espírito Santo de Investimentos and, in 1998, was appointed Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Gás de Portugal and Transgás. In 2000 joined Galp Energia as Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors. From 2001 to 2004, was the Executive Chairperson of Galp Energia and Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Petrogal, Gás de Portugal, Transgás and Transgás-Atlântico. In 2004, was appointed Minister of Public Works, Transport and Communication for Portugal's 16th Constitutional Government. He also served as Chairperson of the Portuguese Energy Association (APE) from 1999 to 2002, member of the Trilateral Commission from 1992 to 1998, Vice-Chairperson of the Portuguese Industrial Association (AIP) and Chairperson of the General Supervisory Board of Ambelis. He was also a Government representative to the EU working group for the trans-European network development. In January 2008, was appointed member of the General Supervisory Board of Banco Comercial Portugues, S.A. having before integrated the Superior Board of this Bank. On 30th March 2006, was appointed Chairperson of EDP's Executive Board of Directors to start the term of office on 30th June 2006. He was reappointed on 15th April 2009.
(Vice-Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer)

Born on 1st November, 1962. She graduated in Economics from the Faculty of Economics at Oporto (1986). She received a postgraduate degree in Finance from the Faculty of Economics of Universidade do Porto and an MBA from the Escola de Gestão do Porto (1989). She lectured at the Faculty of Economics of Universidade do Porto from 1989 until 1991. Began her professional career in 1986 at Conselho – Gestão e Investimentos, a company of the Banco Português do Atlântico Group, in the capital markets, investments and business restructuring field. In 1989 began working at Efisa, Sociedade de Investimentos, in the area of corporate finance, and was later made a director of Banco Efisa. In 1992 joined the Grupo Banco de Fomento e Exterior as director in the area of investment banking and was Head "Corporate Finance" at BPI between 1996 and 1998. In 1998 joined Gás de Portugal as Director of Strategic Planning and M&A and, in 2000, became Director of Strategy and Portfolio Management of Galp Business. She later became President of Galp Power and Director of Transgás. From 2004 until 2006 was director of the Board of Galp Energia. On 30th March 2006, was appointed member of EDP's Executive Board of Directors to start the term of office on 30th June 2006. She was reappointed on 15th April 2009.

Born on April 2nd, 1958. He graduated in Economics from Instituto Superior de Economia (1981) and received a post-graduate degree in European Economics from Universidade Católica Portuguesa (1982). He also completed a professional education course through the American Bankers Association (1982), the academic component of the master's degree programme in Economics at the Faculty of Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa and, in 1985, the "Advanced Management Program for Overseas Bankers" at the Wharton School in Philadelphia. From 1988 to 1995 worked at Banco Português do Atlântico, occupying the positions of Supervisor for the International Credit Division, Head of the International Credit Division, Department Director, Deputy Central Director for International Management and Central Director of Financial Management and Retail Commerce South. From 1995 to 2002 worked at the Banco Comercial Português, where he held the posts of General Director of Financial Management, General Manager of Large Institutional Businesses, General Manager of the Treasury, member of the Board of Directors of BCP Banco de Investimento and Vice-Chairperson of BIG Bank Gdansk. From 2002 to 2003, in Banco Português de Negócios, was the Chairperson of BPN Serviços ACE, Director of BPN SGPS, Director of Sociedade Lusa de Negócios and a member of the Board of Banco Efisa. He is still a voting Member of the OMEL Board of Directors. From 2003 to 2005 worked at EDP as Director-General and Administrator of EDP Produção. In 2005 was appointed Adviser at HC Energía, Chairperson of Genesa and Director of Naturgas Energia and OMEL. On 30th March 2006, was appointed member of EDPS' Executive Board of Directors to start the term of office on 30th June 2006. He was reappointed on 15th April 2009.

Born on April 1st, 1958. He received an undergraduate degree in Engineering and Naval Construction in 1980 and an MBA in 1985 from the University of Michigan. He began his professional career in 1988 as Supervisor in the Studies and Planning Directorate at Banco Comercial Português, where he took on the role of Sub-Director of Financial Investment in 1990. In 1991, became Director of Investor Relations. In 1994, became the Director of Private Retail Coordination. In 1996, served as Director of Capital Markets for Banco CISF, the investment bank of Banco Comercial Português, and was promoted to Director of Investment Banking in 1997. In 1999, became Chairperson of the Board of Directors of CISF Dealer, where he remained until 2000, when became Director of Milleniumbcp Investimento (formerly Banco CISF), responsible for Capital Markets and Treasury of the BCP Group. Has served as Director-General of BCP from 2000 to 2006. On 30th March 2006, was appointed member of EDP's Executive Board of Directors to start the term of office on 30th June 2006. He was reappointed on 15th April 2009.


Born in 1972. Mr. Teixeira is a member of the Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis, S.A., member of the Executive Committee, member of the Management Team and is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. From 1996 to 1997, Mr. Teixeira was assistant director of the commercial naval department of Gellweiler – Sociedade Equipamentos Maritimos e Industriaies, Lda. From 1997 to 2001, Mr. Teixeira worked as a project manager and ship surveyor for Det Norske Veritas, with responsibilities for offshore structures, shipbuilding and ship repair. Between 2001 and 2004, Mr. Teixeira was a consultant at McKinsey & Company, focussing on energy, shipping and retail banking. From 2004 to 2007, he headed the corporate planning and control division within the EDP Group. In 2007 Mr. Teixeira has also served as Chief Financial Officer of EDP Renewables Europe SL (former NEO). He was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company in 2008. Mr. Teixeira is also a Director on the board of directors of a number of subsidiaries of the Company's Group. Mr. Teixeira holds a master of science degree in naval architecture from the Institute Superior Técnico de Lisboa and a master of business administration degree from the Universidade Nova de Lisboa.

Born in 1965. He was the Commercial Director of Portgás from 1992 to 1998. In 1998 he entered Galpenergia Group (Portugal's National Oil & Gas Company), where he held several positions, as General manager of Lisboagás (Lisbon's Natural gás LDC), Managing Director of Transgás Industria (Liberalized wholesale customers), or Managing Director of Lusitaniagás (Natural gas LDC). He also was a member of the Management Team of GalpEmpresas and Galpgás. In 2006 he became Executive Board Member for Natural Gas Distribution and Marketing (Portugal and Spain). In 2007 he joined EDP Renováveis S.A., where he serves currently as Chief Operating Officer for Europe of EDP Renováveis S.A., member of the Management Team, member of the Executive Committee and Executive Board Member of EDP Renováveis S.A.. He is also Vice-President of the European Wind Association and the Spanish Wind Association (Asociación Empresarial Eólica).
He holds a degree in Electrical Engineering by the Faculdade Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, and a Master in Business Administration by IEP/ESADE (Oporto and Barcelona). He also studied the Executive Development Program at École des HEC (Université de Lausanne, 1997), the Strategic Leadership Development Program at INSEAD (Fontainebleau, 2002) and the Advanced Management Program of IESE (Barcelona, 2004).

Born in 1975. In 1998 Mr. Adão da Fonseca held the position of assistant lecturer in the Economics and Business Sciences School and in the Human Sciences School of Universidade Católica Portuguesa, until leaving later the same year to become a consultant for McKinsey & Company. Mr. Adão da Fonseca left McKinsey & Company in July 2000 to enter into a Master in Business Administration degree program at INSEAD, which he concluded with distinction in 2001. He then assumed the role of management for renewable energy development projects with the EDP Group M&A and Business Development Division. Mr. Adão da Fonseca was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of NEO (now EDP Renewables Europe SL) in January 2005, a position he held until becoming Chief Development Officer of EDP Renewables Europe SL (former NEO) in 2007. Currently he is member of the Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis S.A. and EDP Inovação.
Mr. Adão da Fonseca holds a master's degree in economics from the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, a Master of Business Administration degree from INSEAD, as well as a postgraduate degree in leading change and organizational renewal from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. In 2011 Mr. Adão da Fonseca has also received a Master Degree for Risk Management from the Stern School of Management – NYU.

Born in 1973. He has been working in the wind energy industry for over 14 years in several countries in Europe, North America and North Africa.
Gabriel joined EDP in early 2007 as Managing Director for North America, where he led EDP's entrance into the United States renewables arena through EDP's acquisition of Horizon Wind Energy from Goldman Sachs, the largest renewable energy transaction to date. He was a key member of the initial public offering (IPO) of EDPR in June 2008. He served in EDPR NA as Chief Development Officer (CDO) and Chief Operating Officer (COO), responsible for overseeing development, engineering, construction, energy management, procurement and operations and maintenance.
Gabriel Alonso is currently Chief Executive Officer for EDP Renewables North America LLC (EDPR NA), member of the Executive Committee and Board of Directors of EDP Renewables S.A. (EDPR), and member of the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors of the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA).
He holds a law degree and a Master of Science degree in economics, each from the University of Deusto in Spain, and has completed the Advanced Management Program at The University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

Born in 1962. Between 1988 and 1996, held the position of consultant to several national and international institutions, including the Bank of Portugal, the OECD and the EC. Between 1995 and 1998, was general secretary of APRITEL, and between 2000 and 2002 was a Director of APRITEL. From 1997 to 1999, was a Director of Soporcel, S.A., between 1998 and 1999, was a Director of Papercel, S.A., and in 1999, was a Director of MC Corretagem, S.A. Also in 1999, was appointed chairperson of the board of directors of Bolsa de Valores de Lisboa and became a member of the executive committee of Associação de Bolsas Ibero Americanas. Since 2000, Mr. Nogueira Leite has been a member of the consultative council of Associação Portuguesa para o Desenvolvimento das Comunicações. Between 2000 and 2002, was a consultant for Vodafone – Telecomunicações Pessoais,S.A., between 2001 and 2002, was a consultant of GE Capital, and in 2002 was a member of the consultative council of IGCP. Since 2002, he has held various positions within the José de Mello group and has held Directorships with numerous other entities including Reditus, SGPS, S.A., Quimigal, S.A, Brisa, S.A., ADP, S.A., Comitur, SGPS, S.A., Comitur Imobiliária, S.A., Expocomitur – Promoções e Gestão Imobiliária, S.A., Herdade do Vale da Fonte – Sociedade Agrícola, Turística e Imobiliária, S.A., e SGPS, S.A., Efacec Capital, SGPS, S.A., and Cuf – Químicos Industriais, S.A. He held a further Directorship with Sociedade de Explosivos Civis, SEC, S.A. from 2007 to March 2008. Between October 1999 and August 2000, was Secretary of State for Treasury and Finance and Governor Substitute of the European Bank of Investments. Additionally held positions with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Monetary Fund and was a member of the Financial and Economic Council of the European Union. He was vice-chairperson of the consultative council of Banif Banco de Investimento, S.A., and chairperson of the general and supervision council of OPEX, S.A. He is Chairperson of Associação Oceano XXI (cluster do Mar). Since 2008 is Non-Executive Director of EDPR'S Board of Directors and member of the Related-Party Transactions Committee.
Has an undergraduate degree in economics from the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, a master of science degree in economics, and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Illinois.

Born in 1960, he graduated with the highest grade on Business Administration in 1982 from Universidade Católica Portuguesa, where he returned as assistant professor in 1984 and 1985. Between 1982 and 1990 he held positions of analyst, manager and director of Locapor (Leasing), CISF and Hispano Americano Sociedade de Investimentos. Between 1990 and 2000 he developed his main activity at Banco Mello, as Executive Member of the Board of Directors since 1990 and as CEO between 1993 and 2000, being after 1997 also Vice-Chairperson, and, over that period, Chairperson or Director of several banks and financial companies' part of the Banco Mello group. He was simultaneously member of the top management team of the José de Mello group and a non-executive director of Insurance Company Império. Between 2000 and 2008, he was a member of the Executive Board of Directors of Banco Comercial Português, S.A., and in this capacity was responsible for the activities of the banking group in Central, Eastern & South-eastern Europe and in investment banking. Since 2010 he is CEO of Cimpor, a large multinational cement group. He is also Member of the Remuneration Committee of Portugal Telecom SA since 2009 and Member of the Advisory Boards of the Católica Lisbon's Master in Finance since 2006 and of Nova Business & Economics since 2009. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors, was member of the Audit and Control Committee from 2008 till 2011 and in 2011 was appointed member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee.

Born in 1957, between 1984 and 1986, was a Lawyer at Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley & Casey Law Office in Washington DC. Between 1986 and 1991he was an Associate and later became Partner at Baudel, Salès, Vincent & Georges Law Firm in Paris. In 1991 he became a Partner at Salès Vincent Georges, where he stayed until 1994. In 1995 he co-founded August & Debouzy Law firm where he is presently working as the manager of the firm's corporate department. Has been a Lecturer at École Supérieure des Sciences Economiques et Commerciales and at Collège de Polytechnique and is currently giving lecturres at CNAM (Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers). He is Knight of the Lègion d'Honneur. Since 2009 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors.
He has a Master in Laws from Georgetown University Law Center in Washington DC (1986); a Post-graduate degree in Corporate Law from University of Paris II Phantéon, DEA (1984) and a Master in Private Law from the same University (1981). He graduated from the Ècole Supérieure des Sciences Economiques et Commerciales (ESSEC).


Born in 1960. Between 1982 and 1985, he was senior auditor of BDO – Binder Dijker Otte Co. Between 1987 and 1990, he was director of Banco Manufactures Hanover (Portugal), S.A. and between 1990 and 1993 was a member of the board of TOTTAFactor, S.A. (Grupo Banco Totta e Açores) and Valores Ibéricos, SGPS, S.A. In 1993, he held Directorships with Nacional Factoring, da CISF – Imóveis and CISF Equipamentos. Between 1995 and 1997 he was a Director of CISF – Banco de Investimento and a Director of Nacional Factoring. In 1998, he was appointed to the board of several companies, including Leasing Atlântico, Comercial Leasing, Factoring Atlântico, Nacional Leasing and Nacional Factoring. From 1999 to 2000, he was a Director of BCP Leasing, BCP Factoring and Leasefactor SGPS. From 2000 to 2003, He was appointed Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Banque BCP (Luxemburg) and Chairperson of the Executive Committee of Banque BCP (France). Between 2003 and 2006 he was a member of management of Banque Prive BCP (Switzerland) and was general director of private banking of BCP. Since 2006, he has been a Director of Banco Millennium BCP de Investimento, and general Director of Banco Comercial Português and Vice-Chairperson and CEO of Millenniumbcp bank, NA. Mr. Lopes Raimundo is presently Director of CIMPOR - Cimentos de Portugal SGPS, S.A., and Chairperson of the Board of BCP Holdings USA, Inc. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors, was member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee from 2008 till 2011 and in 2011 was appointed member of the Audit and Control Committee.
Has an undergraduate degree in company management and administration from Universidade Católica Portuguesa de Lisboa, and a master of business administration degree from INSEAD.

Born in 1946. Between 1986 and 1989, he was a member of the management council of Tecnologia das Comunicações, Lda. Between 1989 to 1994, he was chairperson of the board of directors of Telefones de Lisboa e Porto, S.A., and between 1993 to 1995 he was chairperson of Associação Portuguesa para o Desenvolvimento das Comunicações. From 1994 to 1995, he was chairperson of the board of directors of Companhia Portuguesa Rádio Marconi and additionally was chairperson of the board of directors of Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações e da Guiné Telecom. From 1995 to 1997, he was vice-chairperson of the board of directors and chairperson of the executive committee of Lisnave (Estaleiros Navais) S.A. Between 1997 and 2001, he was CEO and in the last year chairperson of the board of directors of Soponata and was a director and member of the audit committee of International Shipowners Reinsurance, Co S.A. Between 2001 and 2004, he was vice-chairperson of José de Mello Imobiliária SGPS, S.A. Since 1998, he has been a director of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A., chairperson of the audit committee since 2007, member of the corporate governance committee since 2006 and member of the evaluation committee since 2008. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors, Chairperson of the Audit and Control Committee and member of the Related-Party Transactions Committee.
He was member of the remuneration committee of Portugal telecom, SGPS, S.A. between 2003 and 2008.
Since 2011 he is also chairperson of the audit committee of Sporting Clube de Portugal S.A.D.
He has an undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering from Instituto Superior Técnico. He additionally holds a certificate in strategic management and company boards and is the holder of a grant of Junta de Energia Nuclear.

Born in 1951. From 1997 to 1998, coordinated the committee for evaluation of the EC Support Framework II and was a member of the committee for the elaboration of the ex-ante EC Support Framework III. From 1998 to 2000, he was Chairperson of the Unidade de Estudos sobre a Complexidade na Economia and from 1998 to 2002 was Chairperson of the scientific council of Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão of the Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. From 2001 to 2002, he coordinated the committee for the elaboration of the Strategic Programme of Economic and Social Development for the Peninsula of Setúbal. Since 2007, he has been co-ordinator of the masters program in economics. Since 2009, he has been President of the Economics Department of Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão of the Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (ISEG). In December 2011 was elected president of the general assembly of IDEFE. Since 2008 is a Non- Executive Directors of EDPR's Board of Directors, Chairperson of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee and in 2011 was appointed member of the Audit and Control Committee
He has an undergraduate degree in economics from Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, a master degree in economics from the University of Bristol and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Kent. He additionally has a doctorate degree in economics from the Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão of Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, and has consequently held the positions of Professor Auxiliar and Professor Associado with Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. He has been appointed as university professor (catedrático) of Universidade Técnica de Lisboa and is the President of the Department of Economics at ISEG.
46

Born in 1951. Began his professional career as an assistant lecturer at Faculdade de Economia do Porto and in 1987 and 1988 he was responsible for the "Gestão Financeira Internacional" degree at the same University. From 1980 to 1983 he held a part-time position as technician for Comissão de Coordenação da Região Norte., and from 1991 he was invited to be a lecturer at Universidade Católica do Porto.He has since held the position of director of several companies, including of Banco Espírito Santo e Comercial de Lisboa and Soserfin – Sociedade Internacional de Serviços Financeiros – Oporto group. He has been involved in the finance and management coordination of Sonae Investimentos SGPS, was executive director of Sonae Participações Financeiras, SGPS, S.A. and was vice-Chairperson of Sonae Indústria, SGPS, S.A. He has additionally held directorships with Tafisa, S.A., Spread SGPS, S.A. and Corticeira Amorim, SGPS. He presently serves on the board of directors of Caixa Geral de Depósitos, S.A, and is President of Caixa Seguros e Saúde, Caixa Leasing and Factoring, and Locarent, as well as Non Executive Director in several other companies. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors.
Has an undergraduate degree in economics from the Faculdade de Economia do Porto and has obtained certificates from Universidade de Paris IX, Dauphine and the Midland Bank International banker's course in London.

Born in 1960. He is Chairperson and CEO of Liberbank S.A., a financial institution formed by the integration of the financial businesses of Caja de Ahorros de Asturias, Caja de Extremadura and Caja Cantabria, as well as Chairperson of Cajastur and Chairperson of Banco de Castilla-La Mancha. He is a member of the board of directors of CECA and of ENAGAS, on behalf of Liberbank Group. He is also Chairperson of HC Energia and Naturgás Energía and member of the Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis S.A. and EDP Renewables Europe SLU, and of UNESA (the Spanish association of the electricity industry). Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors.
He is a university professor in the Department of Business Administration and Accounting at the University of Oviedo; has a PhD in Economic Sciences and a degree in Economics and in Business Administration, both from the University of Oviedo. He has supervised several doctoral thesis', developing research work and has participated as a speaker in many courses and seminars. His main research areas are the efficiency in credit institutions, management control in decentralized companies and those in sectors with regulated economies. He is also author of many books and technical articles about the aforementioned matters.

Born in 1953. In 1987, he joined Banco Espírito Santo de Investimento, S.A. and was the Director responsible for financial services management, client management, structured financing management, capital markets management, and for the department for origination and information; between 1991 and 2005 he was also Director and Member of the Executive Committee. In March 2005, he was appointed as vice-chairperson of the board of Directors of Banco Espírito Santo de Investimento, S.A. and formed part of the executive committee of the company. He is Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors and Member of the Executive Committee of Banco Espírito Santo de Investimento, S.A. Director of BES Investimento do Brasil, S.A.; ESSI, SGPS, S.A.; ESSI COMUNICAÇÕES, SGPS, S.A.; ESSI INVESTIMENTOS, S.A. and Espírito Santo Investment Holdings Limited. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors and member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee.
Has an undergraduate degree in economics from the Instituto de Economia da Faculdade Técnica de Lisboa.

Born in 1955. In 1981, he joined Soto de Ribera Power Plant, which was owned by a consortium comprising Electra de Viesgo, Iberdrola and Hidrocantábrico, as legal counsel. In 1995, he was appointed general counsel of Soto de Ribera Power Plant, and also chief of administration and human resources of the consortium. In 1999, he was appointed as legal counsel at Hidrocantábrico, and in 2003 was appointed general counsel of Hidrocantábrico and also a member of its management committee. Presently serves as general counsel of the Company, as secretary of the Board, and is also Director and/or secretary on Boards of Directors of a number the Company's subsidiaries in Europe.
Holds a master's degree in law from the University of Oviedo.
| Board Member | Direct | Indirect | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| António Luis Guerra Nunes Mexia | 3,880 | 320 | 4,200 |
| Ana Maria Machado Fernandes | 1,510 | 0 | 1,510 |
| João Manuel Manso Neto | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nuno Maria Pestana de Almeida Alves | 5,000 | 0 | 5,000 |
| Rui Manuel Rodrigues Lopes Teixeira | 10,135 | 370 | 10,505 |
| João Paulo Nogueira de Sousa Costeira | 3,000 | 0 | 3,000 |
| Luis de Abreu Castelo-Branco Adão da Fonseca | 1,200 | 0 | 1,200 |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | 18,503 | 0 | 18,503 |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | 310 | 310 | 620 |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | 380 | 0 | 380 |
| Jorge Manuel Azevedo Henriques dos Santos | 200 | 0 | 200 |
| José Fernando Maia de Araújo e Silva | 80 | 0 | 80 |
| Rafael Caldeira de Castel-Branco Valverde | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| António do Pranto Nogueira Leite | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| João José Belard da Fonseca Lopes Raimundo | 170 | 670 | 840 |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gilles August | 0 | 0 | 0 |
www.edprenovaveis.com



The-Membersofthe-Boardof-Directorsofthe-Company-EDP-Renováveis,-S.A.-
Totheextentofourknowledge,theinformationreferredtoinsubparagrapha)ofparagraph-1of-Article- 245of-DecreeLawno.-357A/2007of-October-31andotherdocumentsrelatingtothesubmissionofannual- accounts required by current regulations have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting- standards, reflecting a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and results of- EDP- Renováveis,- S.A. and the management report fairly presents the evolution of business performance and- positionof-EDP-Renováveis,-S.A.,containingadescriptionoftheprincipalrisksanduncertaintiesthatitfaces.--
-
-
Lisbon,-February-28,-2012.-
-
| António Luís Guerra Nunes Mexia |
João Manuel Manso Neto |
|---|---|
| Ana Maria Fernandes Machado |
Nuno Maria Pestana de Almeida Alves |
| Rui Manuel Rodrigues Lopes Teixeira |
João Paulo Nogueira da Sousa Costeira |
| Luis de Abreu CasteloBranco Adão da Fonseca |
Gabriel Alonso Imaz |
| José Fernando Maia de Araújo e Silva |
Manuel Menéndez Menéndez |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco |
Jorge Manuel Azevedo Henriques dos Santos |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda |
António do Pranto Nogueira Leite |
| Gilles August |
João José Belard da Fonseca Lopes Raimundo |
-
-
Rafael-Caldeirade-CastelBranco-Valverde-
Consolidated Annual Accounts 31 December 2011
Consolidated Directors´ Report 2011
(With Auditors´Report Thereon)

| ! " |
# | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| \$ | %&'' | ()\$) | |
| * " + !+ ,-" | ' | \$ | '& |
| \$((' | %)'\$)' | ||
| .! +/ 012+ 3 | |||
| .! +/ | ( | ()&)) | '& |
| ++ |
% | 4&\$% | 4%\$ |
| + 5" 2+ | 4\$( | 4&)()\$ | |
| .! +/2+ | 4\$\$' | 4&\$(\$\$ | |
| 4\$((% | 4)(%( | ||
| ('( | '')% | ||
| \$\$ | && | ||
| + 2+ | 4)\$()% | 4))) | |
| "" 1/ / 3 |
)%(\$ | )\$ | |
| )')%' | (%%' | ||
| 6 01 3" ! "" | )%% | 4 | |
| 7 | ) | \$&&& | ))& |
| 72+ | ) | 4&\$(& | 4()& |
| ! "+ " " | )'%\$ | &\$ | |
| "" 2 | (\$\$ | '%' | |
| * 22+ | & | 4(( | 4''&% |
| "" !5 | %\$) | (( | |
| 8 | |||
95! " |
% | ((\$) | ( |
| # 4 / | (& | ||
| "" !5 5 |
%\$) | (( | |
/ + ! 4 |
% | % |
" !5
" +!
" !5
95 95 95 ! " ! " ! " |
# # / / / |
95 9595 ! " ! " ! " |
# / / |
||
| ! " |
!+ !+ !+ |
* |
!+ !+ !+ | * * | |
| "" !5 "" !5 |
((\$) | ( | (& | ||
| 7 1 !" -!/3 |
4(' | 4% | 4''' | & | |
| 2""" !" 1 !" -!/3 |
\$ | \$'% | 4 | ||
| 7 1 " 3 |
4'\$' | ()) | ( | ||
| / 01 3 | ' | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| 2"" "/ 01 3 | 4& | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
2!/"" / |
4&\$(\$ | 4&' | 4&((\$ | 4&\$ | |
| .! +! " !5 " 2 |
4&& | 4) | 4& | \$&( | |
| +! " !5 |
&\$& | &%( | ))%% | ))% |
| ! " |
# | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| +5+9+ | \$ | )&)\$ | %%('' |
| */ | ' | (% | '' |
| 6 - | ( | ()& | ))\$ |
| * |
% | &( | )&(' |
" " |
%\$( | (( | |
| "2 | &&&&( | (&% | |
| ! " |
) | \$) | \$'& |
| .! ! | & | %(' | \$&&% |
| # 4 | \$'& | &')&(& | |
| * |
'& | )\$ | |
| )\$& | )\$& | ||
| ! " |
) | (% | %)% |
| .! ! | & | '%)\$ | (% |
| 2 | \$ | )(( | (& |
| 7 " ! /!+ " |
' | &')) | |
| ! !9 |
( | %% | &\$% |
| (%&& | \$&\$& | ||
| &'('' | (&& | ||
95 |
|||
| !+ | % | )\$&) | )\$&) |
| !+ | % | &&& | &&& |
| 4)&)& | 4%)% | ||
| .! / |
\$&& | ()) | |
| + " 95! "!+ | ((\$) | ( | |
9 95 95! "!+ 5 9 5 + |
&'\$\$ | &\$'%' | |
| # 4 / | \$&&% | &&) | |
95 |
&)&'& | &%& | |
| : | |||
| ;0: /" | \$%\$( | &%) | |
+ 5" |
\$ | %& | |
| ) | &'%( | &'(' | |
| "2 | ()\$( | '\$ | |
| * + !+ ,-" | & | '%\$(% | \$)))( |
| !+5 " |
\$ | )) | )\$' |
| .! !+5 | ' | (%& | '\$ |
| # 4: | \$&%' | \$)%)\$) | |
| ! " | &&) | '\$)' | |
| !+5 " |
\$ | ''&% | ')( |
| .! !+5 | ' | (%% | %% |
| 2 | ( | &)\$ | )(')\$ |
| : | ('% | %'& | |
| : | '\$)& | '))\$% | |
95 95: 95: |
&'('' | (&& |
95 95 |
! ! ++ + |
! |
/ / / |
2!/ 2!/2!/ "" "" "" |
<// <// |
7 |
95 95 ! ! ! " |
# 4 # 4 4 / 4 / * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| &'&&& &'&&& |
)\$&) )\$&) | &&& &&& | (& (& (& | &' | \$'& | (\$&% | &\$ &\$ &\$ | ')% |
| )) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ( | ||
| 4&\$\$ | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4\$)( | 4 | 4\$)( | ( |
| 4\$% | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4&((\$ | 4 | 4 | 4&((\$ | 4&\$ |
| (( | 4 | 4 | ( | 4 | 4 | 4 | ( | (& |
| )%)( | 4 | 4 | ( | 4&((\$ | 4\$)( | ))%% | ))% | |
| 4\$ | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4\$ |
| )\$ | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | )\$ |
| ')% | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ')% |
| %'\$ | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | %'\$ |
| %( | 4 | 4 | %( | 4 | 4 | 4 | %( | 4 |
| &%&&%& &%& |
)\$&) )\$&) | &&& &&& | \$\$) \$\$) \$\$) | 4&\$ 4&\$ | 4)% | %( | &\$'%' &\$'%' &\$'%' | &&) &&) 4 |
| 4\$(% | 4 | 4 | 4\$( | 4 | 4 | 4\$)& | 4'\$' | ()) |
| 4) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4%& | 4 | 4%& | 4%% |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||
| 4') | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4&\$(\$ | 4 | 4 | 4&\$(\$ | 4&' |
| %\$) | 4 | 4 | ((\$) | 4 | 4 | 4 | ((\$) | |
| &\$\$& | 4 | 4 | (')( | 4&\$(\$ | 4%& | 4\$)& | &\$& | &%( |
| 4)% | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4)% |
| )% | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | )% |
| && | 4 | 4 | ( | 4 | 4 | 4 | ( | )& |
| '& | 4 | 4 | ) | 4 | 4 | 4 | ) | 4&% |
| &)&'&&)&'& &)&'& |
)\$&) )\$&))\$&) | &&& &&&&&& | )&)& )&)& )&)& | 4 44 | 4)( 4)( 4)( | )&'& | &'\$\$ &'\$\$ &'\$\$ | \$&&% \$&&% |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| ! " |
||
|---|---|---|
| !" - " +/ |
||
| !+ " | %('(\$ | (%%% |
| !+ ++ | 4'\$( | 4\$ |
| !+ + 5 | 4&\$(' | 4&% |
| + | 4 | 4%'% |
| .!+ 01+5 3/ +/ |
%' | %&((' |
| \$\$(\$ | \$(% | |
| * 2 01+3 |
4&\$) | 4&\$)& |
| # !" - " +/ |
\$)& | &\$'))' |
| / |
\$)& | &\$'))' |
| !" - " / |
||
| !+ /" 8 | ||
| " "" | \$\$\$)) | ') |
| " "+ +5+9+ | )'& | %%\$ |
| .!+ "2 | \$& | ( |
| * |
()% | '% |
| )(( | '%% | |
| ( | (&\$ | |
| !+5 /" 8 | ||
| 9 " 1 " !93 ! |
4\$%)) | 4&%&'& |
| 9 "+ +5+9+ | 4(%)% | 4))% |
| 4&&& | 4)(\$( | |
| # !" - " # !" - " / / |
4' | 4)\$( |
| / |
4' | 4)\$( |
| !" - " "/ |
||
| ! " 4 / | ('% | 4 |
| + 01+5 3 " | )'%(' | &'\$ |
| * | 4\$)(% | 4&\$ |
| 6 / |
&(' | \$%) |
| * + !+ | &(\$ | )%'' |
| + 01+5 3" " |
4&'\$ | )(' |
+ |
4'\$& | 4\$ |
| + 015 3" + !+1 #3 |
) | (&% |
| # !" - " "/ |
))' | (') |
| / |
))' | (') |
| # 01 3 ! !9 # 01 3 ! !9 |
4'& | 4\$( |
"" "2!/" !! !// "!+ 1@3 |
4\$) &\$% |
)'' &((& |
| ! !9 !// "!+ 1@3 ! "!+ 1@3 ! !9 ! "!+ 1@3 |
%% | &\$% |
<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->
EDP Renováveis, Sociedad Anónima (hereinatter referred to as "EDP Renováveis") was incorporated on 4 December 2007. Its main corporate objective is to engage in activities related to the electricity sector, namely the planning, construction and maintenance of electricity generating power stations, using renewable energy sources, mainly wind. The registered offices of the company are located in Oviedo, Spain. On 18 March 2008 EDP Renováveis was converted into a company incorporated by shares (Sociedad Anónima),
As at 31 December 2011 the share capital is held 62.02% by EDP S.A. - Sucursal en España ("EDP Branch"), 15.51% by Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico. S.A. and 22.47% of the share capital is free-float in the NYSE Euronext Lisbon.
As at 31 December 2011, EDP Renováveis holds a 100% stake in the share capital of EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. ("EDPR EU"), a 100% stake in the share capital of EDP Renewables North America, L.L.C. ("EDPR NA") and a 55% stake in the share capital of EDP Renovavis Brasil, S.A. ("FDPR BR")
The Company belongs to the EDP Group, of which the parent company is EDP Energias de Portugal, S.A., with registered offices at Praça Marquês de Pombal, 12 - 4, Lisbon,
EDPR EU operates through its subsidiaries located in Portugal, Spain, France, Belgium, Poland, Romania, Italy and United Kingdom. EDPR EU's main subsidiaries are: EDP Renováveis Portugal), Genesa (renewable resources electricity generation in Spain), Agrupación Eólica (wind farms in Spain and France), Greenwind, SA (wind farms in Belgium - partnership with local investors), EDP Renewables Polska, SPZOO (wind farms in Poland). EDP Renewables Romanial. EDP Renewables Italy, SRL (wind farms in Italy) and EDPR UK (offshore development projects).
EDPR NA's main activities consist in the development and operation of wind farms in the United States of America.
The purpose of EDP Renováveis Brasil is to establish a new business unit to aggregate all the investments in the renewable energy market of Brazil.
As at 31 December 2011, EDP Renováveis and its subsidiaries ("the Group") had a fully consolidated installed copacity of 7,157 MW (6,437 MW as at 31 December 2010), operating in Spain 2,050 MW as at 31 December 2010, in Portugal 613 MN (599 MW as at 3) December 2010, in France 306 MW (84 MW as at 3) December 2010, in Belgium 57 MW (57 MW as at 31 December 2010), in Poland 190 MW (120 MW as at 31 December 2010), in Romania 285 MW (90 MW as at 31 December 2010), in the United States 3,422 MW (3 224 WW as at 3) December 2010) and in Brazil 84 MW (14 MW as at 3) December 2010) Additionally through its interest in FNFOP-Eólicas de Portugal, S.A. is attributable to EDPR - equity consolidated - 326 MW (239 MW as at 31 December 2010).
The Electrical Sector in Spain is regulated by Law 54 of 27 November 1997 and subsequent amendments to legislation.
Royal Decree 436 of 12 March 2004 was published on 24 March 2004 and set out the methodology to be used for updating and systematizing the legal and economic regime relating to electrical power production under the generation of electricity using renewable sources of energy, cogeneration, biomass and waste. This Royal Decree 2818/1998 and unified regulations applicable to special regime energies. The Royal Decree also defined a system whereby the owners of the electrical installation are entitled to sell the production or surplus electrical power to distributors. A required price was fixed for this sale, or production and surplus could be sold directly on the daily narket or through a bilgteral gareement. in which case a marketnegotiated price would be received, plus an incentive for participation in the installation was entiled to receive it.
Royal Decree 661 of 25 May 2007 was published on 26 May 2007 and reauldes electrical power produced under the special regime. This Royal Decree replaces Royal Decree 436 of 12 March 2004 and updates reaultions on electrical power production under the special regime. whilst maintaining the basic structure of the economic framework set out in this Royal Decree maintains the same system of payment for power produced under the special regime, where of the installations can opt to sell its power at a regulated price, for all the programming periods only, or sell the power directly on the daily market or through a bilateral agreement, in this case receiving the negotiated price plus a premium.
The main changes to the Royal Decree include a modification to the regulated price and the introduction of a variable premium system for certain technologies, such as wind power installations officially entering into service prior to 1 January 2008 can opt to adhere to the transitory reaine established in the first transitory provision, which stipulates that the owners of this installations may maintain the prices and premiums (with some exceptions) established in the aforementioned Royal Decree unil 31 December 2012.
RD 6/2009 of May 7 was approved and is aimingting the tariff deficit from 2013. Among other measures, it introduces a preallocation register for new renewable energy installations to obtain the entitlements set in RD 661/2007. Installations will be registered in chronological order until the government 's target is met (20,155 MW) and new remuneration scheme should be approved for following projects.
The decision on 19 November 2009 allowed in the register around 6 GW in solar thermal generation capacity in one go .The entire 8.4 GW in projects registered will receive the remuneration set in RD 661/2007. Under this decision, around 1,700 MW in wind and 500 MW in solar thermal generation will be allowed each vear until 2012. The 15th of December 2009 the Spanish Government released the list of wind facilities included in the administrative register. Out of wind capacity assigned by the Spanish Government, EDPR obtained 840 gross MW corresponding to 31 wind farms which represents 13% of the total allocated capacity.
On July 2010, the Industry Ministry established an agreement with two key renewable energy associations the Spanish Wind Energy Association and Protermosolar) to amend the existing regulation. This agreement means the approval of the RD 1614/2010 of 7 December, that defines (i) a cut, for the years 2011 and 2012, of 35% of the renewable premium applicable to the wind capacity ruled by RD 66/2007, (II) an amendment to the article 44.3 of RD 66/2007 claritying to the premium value would only be applied to the capacity that comes on line after 2012 and (ii) the definition of a limit of 2,589 hours of installed capacity operation, from which the wind farm has no right to receive any premium.
The Decree-law 14/2010, of 23 December, established several measures to reduce the tariff delicit, among other, a generation rate of 0.5 €/MWh applicable to ordinary and special regime generators.
On 28 January 2012 the Spanish Government enacted Roval-Decree Law 1/2012 that approves a temporary suspension of the premium remuneration for renewable energy capacity not included in the pre-assignation registry. Despite this regulation, the Government has emphasised its commitment towards achieving the 2020 Renewable Energy Target for Spain. Within EDPR's pipeline, wind farms aready included in the registry will not be affected by this new readation. Proiects not included in the register and therefore, ruled by Royal-Decreelaw 1/2012, dian i have beforehand a defined incordingly, EDPR planned and valued its pipeline using conservative criteria that was not counting on the existence of a new requlatory scheme. Therefore, the new Royal-Decree Law doesn I have, in proctice, any economic impact either on the value of EDPR s pipeline or the overall company. A sensitivity andysis considering one-year delay in the construction of wind farms affected by this new regulation does not induce to any impairment of relevance in the assets value.
The Portuguese legal provisions applicable to the generation of electrical power based on renewable resources are currently established by Decree-Law No. 189/88 dated 27 May 1998, as amended by Decree-Law No. 168/99 dated 18 May 1999, Decree-Law No. 312/2001 dated 10 December 2001, and Decree-Law No. 339-C/2001 dated 29 December 2001. Also relevant is Decree-Law No. 33-A/2005, dated 16 February 2005 ("DL 33-A/2005"), which establishes the current amounts used in the remula applicable to energy produced by means of renewable resources and the deadlines for the application of such remuneration formula.
The main feature of the legal framework for reneration in Portugal is that the national grid operator or the regional distribution operator must purchase all electricity producers who hold an operating license. The construction and operation of a wind farm depends on the allocation of a grid connection point issued by the State Energy Department (Direcção Geral de Geologia e Energia) ("DGGE"). The issue of the point of connection by the request of the promoters during limited periods of time set by the DGGE or by means of a public tender procedure. Award by direct negotiation is exceptional.
Decree-Law No. 225/2007 dated 31 May, establishes associated to renewable energies, predicted in National Strategy for Energy, and has reviewed the formula used in estimating of electricity supply generated by renewable power stations, and delivered to the grid of National Electric System, as well as the definition procedures of available power in the same grid and deadlines to obtain the establishment license to renewable power stations.
Since July 1, 2007, the Iberian electricity financial market "MBE." I has been fully transactions from both Portugal and Spain, including a forwards market that has operated since July 2006.
The electricity industry in France is governed primarily by Act 2000-108 (amended by Acts 2004-803 and 2006-1537) ("Act 2000)", passed on 10 February 2000, which aoverns the modernization and development of public energy services and is the framework for the operation of wind facilities in France. The operation of wind facilities in France is also subject to the French environmental and construction code. Article 10 of Act 2000-108 requires non-nationalized electric power distributors to enter into purchase obligation contracts to buy electricity produced by: {} installations that extract energy from household or similar waste or that use such sources to provide heat to a district heating system; and use renewable energy sources (including mechanical energy from wind, for which special provisions apply).
Installations that use renewable energy sources, with the exception of those using mechanical wind energy that are located in greas connected to the continental metropolitan grid or that implement energy-efficient technology such as cogeneration, do not gualify for the power purchase obligation unless they comply with defined installed capacity limits. These limits are set by a decree of the Consell d'Erat (Decree 2000-1196 of 6 December 2000) for each category of installation the power purchase obligation. With the new requlation, only wind farms operating within a ZDE (zone de développement éolien) can benefit the power purchase obligation and may exceed the former 12 MW cap. The power purchase contracts with non-nationalized distributors of electricity are premised on the rates set by ministerial order for each source of renewable energy and according to a model contract approved by the energy minister
Act 2000 provides that, operator of wind focilities may enter into long-term agreements for the purchase and sole of energy with Electricité de France (EDF). The tariffs are set by Order of July 10, 2006 which was repealed in August 2008 due to formal defect in its approval, and then republished without any amendment in December 2008. The tariffs are the first ten years of the EDF Agreement, EDF pays a fixed annual tariff, which is €82 per MWh for applications made during 2006 (tariff is amended annually based, in part, on a inflationrelated index) ill During years 11 to 15 of the EDF Agreement, the tariff is based on the annual average percentage of energy produced during the wind facility's first ten years. These tariffs are also amended annually, based, in part, on a inflation-related index. iii) Beginning in the year 16, there is no specific support structure and the wind energy generators will sell their electricity at market price.
New Decree approved on December 15th, 2009 set the following wind target: 11.500 MW in 2020. These targets include also wave and tidal energy.
Federal, state and local energy laws and requlate the development, ownership, business organization and operation of electric generating facilities and the sale of electricity in the United States. All project companies within the Group in the United States operate as exempt wholesale generators ("EWGs") or qualifying facilities ("QFs") under federal law or are dually certified. In addition, most of the project companies in the United States are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") and have market-based rates on file with FERC.
The federal government requates the wholesale electric energy sale and transmission business in interstate commerce through the Federal Eneral Requiries Commission ("FERC"), which trans the Federal Power Act the "FPA"), and from other federal legislation such as the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 ("PURPA 1978"), the Energy Policy Act of 1992") and the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ("EPACT 2005"), which, among other things, repealed and replaced the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 with the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 ("PUHCA 2005").
All of our project companies in the United States operators ("EWGs") under PUHCA 2005 or audition facilities under PURPA 1978. In addition, most of the project companies are required by FERC under Part II of the FPA and have market-based rates on file with FFRC
EWGs are owners or operators of electric generation lincluding producers of renewable energy, such as wind projects that are engaged exclusively in the business of owning and/or operating facilities and selling electric energy at wholesale rates. An EWG cannot make retail sales of electric energy and may only own or operate the limited interconnection facilities necessary to connect its generating facility to the grid.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 amended the FPA to grant FERC jurisdiction over all users, owners, and operators of the bulk power system for purposes of approving and enforcing compliance with celiability standards are requirements to provide for the reliable operation of the bulk power system. Pursuant to its authority under the North American Electric Reliability Corporation ("NERC") as the entity responsible for developing reliability standards, submitting them to FERC for and enforcing compliance with reliability standards, subject to FERC review. FERC to delegate certain functions to eight regional entities. All users, owners, and operators of the bulk power system that meet certain materially thresister with NERC and comply with numerous FERC-approved reliability standatory reliability standards may result in the imposition of civil pendlies of up to \$1 million. All of our project companies in the United States that meet the relevant materiality thresholds have registered with NERC and are required to comply with applicable FERC-approved reliability standards.
In certain states, approval of the construction of new electricity generating facilities, including renewable energy facilities such as wind forms, is obtained from a state agency, with only imited ministerial approvals required from state and local governments. However, in many states the permit process for power plants (including wind farms) also remains subject to land-use of county and city aovernments. State-level authorizations more extensive approval process, possibly including an environmental impoct evaluation and opposition by interested parties or utilities.
Both the United States federal aovernments have implemented policies designed to promote the arowth of renewable energy, including wind power. The primary federal renewable energy incentive program is the Production Tax Credit (PTC), which was established by the U.S. Congress as part of EPACT 1992, which is currently set to expire by the end of 2012. As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment of 2009, the federal government also encourages renewable energy development tax credits and cash grants from 2009 through 2013. Many states have passed legislation, principally in the form of renewable portfolio standards ("RPS"), which require utilities to purchase of their energy supply from renewable sources, similar to the Renewable Energy Directive in the EU.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes a number of energy related tax and policy provisions to beyelopment of wind energy generation, namely (i) a three year extension of the PTC until 2012 and (ii) an option to elect a 30% Investment Tax Credit ("IC") that could replace the PTC through the extension. This ITC allows the companies to receive 30% of the cash invested in projects placed in service or with the beginning of construction in 2009 and 2010. the Tax Relief. Unemployment. Insurance and Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 was approved and includes an one year extension of the ITC, which allow the companies to receive 30% of the cash invested in projects with beginning of construction until December 2011 as long as placed in service until December 2012
It is also in place a depreciation bonus on new equipment placed in service allowing businesses to depreciate of the cost of the project (less 50% of the ITC) in the year that it is placed in service. This bonus depreciation was of 100% in 2012.
The legislation applicable to renewable energy in Poland is primarily contained in an Energy Act passed on 10 April 1997, which has been amended by the Act of 24 July 2002 and the Energy Act of 2 April 2004, which came into effect in January 2005 (together, the "Energy Act"). The Energy Act implemented provisions il) of Directive 2003/54/EC of the Council of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in elective 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal mas, and fiji of Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market Detailed regulations regarding the scope of the energy secor are included in the relevant secondary regulations adopted under the Energy Act. On the basis of the Energy Act, the national energy regulatory authority-the president of the "ERA President") - was established.
Pursuant to the Energy Act, power generation from renewable sources is supported. The following are forms of such support introduced in Poland: [i] A system of obligatory purchase of crigin by the generation companies and trading companies selling electricity to the end user interconnected to a grid in Poland. These power companies are obliged to: a) obtain a certificate or origin and submit it the ERA President for cancellation, or blogy a substitute fee calculated in accordance with the power company does not purchase certificates or origin or does not pay a substitute fee, the ERA President will penalize such company by the financial penally calculated in accordance with the Energy Act.
The minimum limit of electricity generated from renewable sources in the total annual volume of electricity delivered to the end users is specified in the ordinance of Ninistry of Economy adopted under the Energy Act. In 2008, this minimum limit was 7% and will increase each year up to 12.9% in 2017. These quotas were originally fixed until 2014 but a new regulation approved in August for years 2015-2017 and increased the quota for 2013 and 2014.
The Energy law has been amended on January 2010. The main aim was to limit speculative action in the reservation power for wind farms in the energy system. Pursuant to the obligation to prepare an assessment of the impact of the installations being interconnected on the grid company. Within this new requlation, the entity applying for the conditions of interconnection must pay in advance towards the arid interconnection fee of 30 PLN per KW of interconnection capacity.
Another measure gimed at reinforcing the project is the obligation to attach to the application for interconnection conditions an excerpt from the local master plan or . if there is no such plan ing permit for the real property to which the application relates The new legislation also introduces new obligations for wind generators, among which, the obligation to prepare a forecast for 15 years when the installed capacity is of at least 50 MW.
The regulatory framework for electricity in Belgium is condition of powers between the federal and the three regional entifies: Wallonia, Flanders and Brussels-Capital. The federal regulatory field of competence includes electricity transmission levels above 70 kV, generation, tariffs, planning and nuclear energy. The relevant federal legislation is the Electricity Act of 29 April 1999 (as modified) (the "Electricity Act"). The regional regulatory entities are responsible for distribution, renewable energy and cogeneration (with the exception of offshore power plants) and energy efficiency. The relevant regional legislation, respectively, is: (a) for Flanders, the Electricity Decree of 7 July 2000; Ib) for Wallonia, the Regional Electricity Market Decree of 12 April 2001; and (c) for Brussels-Capital, the Order of 19 July 2001 on the Organization of the Electricity Market.
In view of the allocation of responsibilities between the regions. there currently exist four energy requirings: (al the federal Commission for Electricity and Gas Requlation ("CREG"); (b) the Flemish Electricity and Gas Regulatory Body ("VREC"); (c) the Walloon Energy Commission ("CwaPE"); and (d) the Regulatory Commission for Energy in the Brussels-Capital Region ("BRUGEL").
The Belgian requlatory system promotes the generation of electricity from renewable sources (and cogeneration) by a system of green certificates (each a "GC"), as described below. The Belgian federal aovernment is responsible for offshore power plants and for imposing obligations on the transmission systems . The various GC systems are very similar across the three regions and are similar to the GC system for federally-requlated offshore power plants. There are currently differences in terms of quotas, fines and thresholds for granting GCs. However, GCs issued in one region or by the Federal government in respect of offshore plants are not recognized automatically in the other regions.
The GC system aims at creating a market for GC parallet to the market of sale of electricity. In March 2009 an exchange market for GCs has been launched. Besides the GC market, there is a minimum guaranteed price system at the federal level (obligations imposed on the transmission system operator) or at a regional level (the production aid regime in Flanders and Wallonia),
New quotas of renewable generation are in a late stage of approval in Wallonia. New quotas proposed by the Government are: 11.25% in 2011, 13.50% in 2012 and 15.75% in 2013. New quotas to be approved are considerably higher than previous ones (11%, 12% and 13% for 2011,2012 and 2013).
The promotion of electricity generated from renewable energy sources in Romania was set with the Electricity Law 318/2003. In 2005 a Green Certificate mechanism was introduced with mandary quotas for suppliers, in order to comply with their EU renewable requirements. Romania must comply with its target of 33% of gross electricity consumption from renewable energy in 2010. The regulatory authority establishes a fixed quota of electricity produced from RES which suppliers are obliges to buy, and, annually reviews applications form green generators in order to be awarded green certificates. Law 220/2008 of November, 3 introduced some changes in the green certificates system. Today producers of wind energy receive 1 green certificates for each but law 220 that is likely to come into force in January 2010 (once the European Commission approves it) will allow wind generators to receive 2GC/MWh until 2015 . GC can be sold separately from the physically delivered electricity. From 2016 onwards generatificate for each MWh . The price of electricity is determined in the electricity market and the price of areen certificates is determined on a parallel market.
The trading value of green certificates has a floor of 27€ and a cap of 55€, both indexed to Romanian inflation. Law 220/2008 also guarantees the access to the National Grid for the electricity produced from renewable sources. In 2007 a new Energy Law was approved (Law 13/2007). This new requlation sets July 1st 2007 as deadline for the legal unbundling in Romania and defines the role of Implicit Supplier and of the Supplier of Last Resort.
The Romanian Parliament's proposal that regulates renewable energy was published on July 12, 2010. The proposal that has been signed into law and includes the following: (J) increases the mandatory quotas for electricity produced from renewable sources which benefit from the green certificate's promotion system. 2012 quota increases from 8.3% to 12% of the electricity production, escalating by 1% year b reach 20% by 2020 (ii) extends until 2017 (previously until 2015 the right to collect two green certificates per MWh generated by wind farms (one certificate from 2018 onwards) and (ii) reaffirms the current green certificate's floor and cap prices at 27€/MWh and increases the pendly by non-compliance to 10€ for each missing green certificate. Current prices are set in € and indexed to euro-inflation.
The Electrical Sector in Brasil is regulated by Federal Law nº 8,987 of 13 February 1995, which generally rules the concession and permission regime of public services: Law nº 9,074 of 7 July 1995, which rules the argant and extension or permission contracts; Federal Law nº 10,438 of 26 April 2002, which governs the increase in Emergency Electric Power Supply and creates the 3,300 MW Program of Incentives for Alternative Electricity Sources (PROINFA); Federal Law nº 10,762 of 11 November 2003 and Law nº 10,848 of 15 March 2004, concerning commercial rules for the trade of Electric Power and; Subsequent amendments to the legislation
The Decree nº 5.025 of 30 March 2004, requlates the "Alternative "Alternative Energy Sources" economical and legal framework. PRONFA participants have granted a PPA with ELETROBRAS, and are subject to the regulator (ANEEL) authority, However, he first stage of PROINFA has ended and the second stage is highly uncertain.
The Decree n° 5.163 of 30 July 2004 requires the Federal Law n° 10.762, establishing the possibility of distribution companies and authorized agents to buy "Distributed Energy" (Local Generation), by observing a limit of 10% of the total demand of each in addition, the Law nº 10,762 establishes the possibility of an Alternative Source Electricity to the final consumer's) (aggregated demand > 500kW), at any voltage level. As part of the regulatory incentive framework, Renewable Energy producers (or buyers) are granted a discount on the Distribution and Transmission System Use Tariff (TUSD and TUST). Public Electricity Auctions are technically lead by the state "Energy Planning and Research Company" (EPE), who registers, and allows potential participants.
In addition, the Low nº 10,438 has also reaulated the use of a special sector fund. the Fossil Fuel Consumption Quota (CCC), to low cost financing of Renewable ventures that are able to replace fossil fuel based energy production
On December 20, 2011,ANEELconducted an Power Supply Auction A-5/2011 with the objective to sell the energy produced from new power plants, by Hydro, Windand Thermal Gas by combined cycle) power sources in the so named Regulated Contract Ambient (ACR). The power supply will commence in January 1st, 2016. In this auctionEDPBRsold a 20 year product fromBaixadoFeijão! BaixadoFeiião!! andBaixadoFeiião!V power plants, totalizina 120 MW of installed potency.
The accompanying consolidated annual accounts have been prepared on the basis of the accounting records of EDP Renovaveis, S.A. and consolidated entities. The consolidated annual accounts for 2011 and 2010 have been prepared to present fairly the consolidated equity and consolidated financial position of EDP Renováveis, S.A. and subsidiaries at 31 December 2011 and 2010, the consolidated results of operations, consolidated cash flows and changes in consolidated equity for the years then ended.
In accordance with Regulation (EC) no. 1606/2002 of 19 July 2002, from the European Council and Parliament, the Group's consolidated annual accounts are prepared in accordance with International Financial REPS), as endorsed by the European Union (EU). IFRS comprise accounting standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (1ASB) and its predecessor body as well as interpretations issued by the International Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRC) and its predecessor bodies.
The Board of Directors approved these consolidated annual accounts on 28 February 2011. The annual accounts are presented in thousands of Euros, rounded to the nearest thousand.
The annual accounts have been prepared under the historical cost convention of fair value basis for derivative financial instruments, financial assets and liabilities held for trading and available-for-sale, except those for which a reliable measure of fair value is not available.
The preparation of annual accounts in accordance with the EU-IFRS requires to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses The estimates and related assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors considered with the circumstances. They form the basis for making judgments regarding the values of the assets and liabilities whose valuation is not apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The areas involving the highest or complexity, or for which the assumptions and estimates are considered significant, are disclosed in Note 3 (Critical accounting estimates and judgments in applying accounting policies).
In 2011 annual accounts (with 2010 comparatives), in order to increase the fair view of the assets, liabilities, revenues / income and expense / costs, the Management of EDPR has further disclosed in the consolidated income statement what are in fact the core business revenues and income, as well as in the consolidated statement of financial position the "Debtors and other assets" and "Trade payables and other liabilities"
Subsidiaries are entifies controlled by the Group. The annual accounts of subsidiaries are included annual accounts from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases.
The accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed when necessary to align them with the policies adopted by the Group. Losses applicable to the non-controlling interests in a subsidiary are allocated to the non-controlling interests even if doing so causes the noncontrolling interests to have a deficit balance.
Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial and operating policies. Significant influence is presumed to exist when the Group holds between 20 and 50 percent of the voting power of andher entity.
Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method initially at cost. The cost of the investment includes transaction costs.
Notes to the Consolidated Annual Accounts for the years ended 31 December 2011 and 2010
The consolidated annual accounts include the Group's share of the comprehensive income ofter adjustments to dian the accounting policies with those of the date that significant influence commences unil the date that significant influence ceases.
When the Group's share of losses exceeds its interest in an equity-accounted investee, the carrying amount of that interest, including any long-term investments, is reduced to zero, and the recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the Group has an obligation or has made payments on behalf of the investee.
Jointly controlled entiles, consolidation method, are entities over whose activities over whose activities the Group has initi control along with another company, under a contractual agreement. The consolidated annual accounts include the Group's proportionate share of the joint ventures' assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, from the date the joint control begins until it ceases.
From 1 January 2010 the Group has applied IFRS 3 Business Combinations (2008) in accounting for business combinations. The change in accounting policy has been applied prospectively and has had no material impact on earnings per share.
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method as at the acquisition date, which control is transferred to the Group. Control is the power the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, the Group takes into consideration potential voting rights that currently are exercisable
For acquisitions on or after 1 January 2010, the Group measures goodwill at the acquisition date as:
When the excess is negative, a bargain purchase gain is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
The consideration transferred does not include amounts related to the settlement of pre-existing relationships. Such amounts are generally recognised in profit or loss.
Costs related to the acquisition, other than those associated with the issue of debt or equilies, that the Group incurs in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred
Any contingent consideration payable is recognisition date. If the contingent consideration is classified as equily, it is not remeasured and settlement is accounted for within equity. Otherwise, subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration are recognised in profit or loss.
Some business combinations in the period have been determined provisionally as the Group is currently in the fair value of the net assets acquired. The identifially been recognised at their provisional value, Adjustments during the measurement period have been recorded as if the combination and comparation and comparative information for the prior year has been restated where applicable. Adjustments to provisional values only include information relating to events and circumstances existing at the acquisition date and which, had they been known, would have affected the amounts recognised at that date.
After that period, adjustments to initial measurement are only made to correct an error.
In business combinations achieved in stages, any excess of the consideration given, plus the interest previously held in the acquiree, and the net assets acquired and net liabilities assumed is recognised as goodwill. Any shortfall, after measuring the consideration given to the previously held interest and identifying and measuring the net assets acquired, is recognised in profit and loss. The Group recognises the difference between the interest previously held in the acquiree and its carrying amount in consolidated profit and loss, based on the classification of the Group also reclassifies amounts deferred in other comprehensive income in relation to the previously held interest to profit and loss or consolidated reserves, based on their nature
For acquisitions between 1 January 2010, goodwill represents the excess of the cost of the acquisition over the Group's interest in the recognised amount (generally fair value) of the identifiable assets, liabilities of the acquiree. When the excess was negative, a bargain purchase gain was recognised immediately in profit or loss.
Transaction costs, other than those associated with the issue of debt or equities, that the Group incurred in connection with business combinations were capitalised as part of the cost of the acquisition.
From 1 January 2010 the Group has applied IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (2008) in accounting for acquisitions of non-controlling interests. The change in accounting policy has been applied prospectively and has had no impact on earnings per share.
Under the new accounting policy, acquisitions of non-controlling interests are accounted for as transactions with owners in their capacity as owners and therefore no goodwill is recognised as a result of such transactions. The adjustments to non-controlling interests are based on a proportionate amount of the net assets of the subsidiary.
Previously, aoodwill was recognised on the acquisition of non-controlling interests in a subsidiant, which represented the excess of the cost of the additional investment over the carrying amount of the interest in the date of the transaction
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition, are translated to Euro at exchange rates at the reporting date. The income and expenses of foreign operations, are translated to euro at the dates of the transactions.
Foreign currency differences are recognised in other in the translation reserve. When a foreign operation is disposed of, in part or in full, the relevant amount in the transferred to profit or loss as part of the profit or loss on disposal.
When the settlement of a monetary item or payable to a foreign operation is neither planned nor likely in the foreseedble future, foreign exchange gains and losses arising from such a monetary item are considered to form part in a foreign operation and are recognised in other comprehensive income, and presented in the translation reserve in equily.
Inter-company balances and transactions, including any unrealised gains and losses on transactions between group companies, are eliminated in preparing the condensed annual accounts. Unrealised gains and losses arising from from ransactions with associates and jointly controlled entities are eliminated to the extent of the Group's interest in those entities.
The accounting for transactions among entities under common control is excluded from IFRS 3. Consequently, in the absence of specific quidance, within IFRS, the EDP Renováveis Group has developed an accounting policy for such transactions, as considered appropriate. According to the Group's policy, business combinations among entrol are accounted for in the consolidated annual accounts using the EDP consolidated book values of the acquired company (subgroup). The difference between the carrying amount of the net assets received and the consideration paid, is recognised in equity.
Until 31 December 2009 EU-IFRS did not establish specific accounting treatment for commitments related with investments in subsidiaries held by non-controlling interests at the date of acquisition of a business, the EDP Renováveis Group records these written put options at the date of acquisition of a subsequent date as an advance acquisition of these interests, recording a financial liability for the best estimate of the amount payable, irespective of the estimated probability that the options will be exercised. The difference between this amount and the amount corresponding to the percentage of the interests held in the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
Until 31 December 2009, in years subsequent to intilation the changes in the effect of the financial discount are recognised as a financial expense in the consolidated income statement, and the remaining changes are recognised as an adjustment to the cost of the business combination. Where applicable, dividends paid to minority shareholders up to the date the options are exercised are also recorded as adjustments to the business combination. In the event that the options are not exercised, the transaction would be recorded as a sale of interests to minority shareholders.
As from January 2010, the Group applies IAS 27 (2008) to new put options related to non-controlling interests and there subsequent changes in the carrying amount of the put liability are recognised in profit or loss.
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of Group entities at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are refranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at that date. The foreign currency gain or loss on monetary items is the ence between amoritied cost in the functional currency at the beginning of the period, adjusted for effective interest and the amoritied cost in foreign currency translated at the exchange rate at the end of the reporting period.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities denomingted in foreign currencies that are measured at fair yalled to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined. Foreign currency differences arising on retranslation are recognised in profit or loss, except for differences arising of available-for-sale equity instruments, a financial liability designated as a hedge of the net in a foreign operation, or qualifying cash flow hedges, which are recognised in other comprehensive income. Non-monetary items of historical cost in a foreign currency are transisted using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.
Derivative financial instruments are recognised on the rade at fair value of derivative financial instruments is re-measured on a reqular basis, being the qains on re-measurement recognised directly in the income statement, except for derivatives designated as hedging instruments. The resulting gains or losses on re-measurement of the derivatives designated as hedging instruments depends on the risk being hedged and of the hedge model used.
The fair value of derivatives correspond to their prices as provided by an exchange, or is determined by using net present value techniques, including discounted cash flows models and option pricing models, as appropriate.
The Group uses financial instruments to herest and foreign exchange risks resulting from its operational and financing activities. The derivate financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recorded as for trading.
The derivatives that are designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value, being the gains and losses recognised in accordance with the hedge accounting model adopted by the Group. Hedge accounting is used when:
li) At the inception of the hedge relationship is identified and documented:
(ii) The hedge is expected to be highly effective;
(iii) The effectiveness of the hedge can be reliably measured:
(iv) The hedge is revalued on a on-going basis and is considered to be highly effective over the reporting period; and
(v) The forecast transactions hedged are highly probable and represent a risk to changes in cash flows that could affect the income statement.
Derivatives are recognised initially at fair value; attributable transaction costs are recognised in profit or loss as incurred. Subsequent to intid recognition, derivatives are measured at fair value, and changes therein are accounted for as described below
Changes in the fair value of the derivative finat are designated as hedging instruments are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the risk being hedged. If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the accumulated gains or losses concerning the risk being hedged are amortised over the period to maturity.
The effective portion of the changes in the derivative financial instruments that are designated as hedging instruments in a cash flow hedge model is recognised in equily. The gains or losses relating to the hedging relationship are recognised in the income statement in the moment they occur.
The cumulative gains or losses recognised in equity are also reclassified to the periods in which the hedged item will affect the income statement. When the forecast transaction of a non-financial asset, the gains or losses recorded in equity are included in the acquisition cost of the asset.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for cumulative gain or loss recognised in equity at that time stays recognised in equity until the hedged transaction also affects the income statement. When the forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gains or losses recognized in the income statement.
The net investment hedge is applied on a consolidated basis to investments in foreign currencies. The exchange differences recorded gaginst exchange differences arising on consolidation are offset by the foreign currence borrowings used for the acquisition of those subsidiaries. If the hedging instrument is a derivative, the gains or losses grising from for ralue changes are also recorded against exchange differences arising on consolidation. The ineffective portion of the hedging relation is recognised in the income statement.
The Group classifies its other financial assets at acquisition date in the following categories:
This category includes: [1] financial assets held for trading which are those acquired principally for the short term and (ii) financial assets that are designated at fair value through profit or loss at inception.
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial as available-for-sale and that are not classified in any of the other categories. The Group's investments in equity securities are classified as available-for-sale financial asses.
Purchases and sales of: (j) financial assets at fij) available for sale investments, are recognised on trade date, the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the assets.
Financial assets are initially recognised at fair yalue plus transaction costs et fair yalue through profit or loss, in which case these transaction costs are directly recognised in the income statement.
Financial assets are derecognised when (i) the contractual rights to receive their cash flows have any has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership or (ii) although retaining some, but not substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership. the Group has transferred the control over the assets
After initial recognition, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value and gains and losses arising from changes in their fair value are included in the income statement in the period in which they arise
Available for sale financial assets are also subsequently carried at fair value, however, gains and losses in their fair value are recognised directly in equity, unlil the financial assets are derecognised being the cumulative agins or losses previously recognised in equity recognised in the inchange differences arising from equity investments classified as available for sale are also recognised in equily. Interest rate method and dividends, are recognised in the income statement.
The fair values on quoted investments in active markets are based on current bid prices. For unlisted securities the fair value through (i) valuation techniques, including the use of recent arm's length transactions or discounted cash flow analysis and (ij) valuation assumptions based on market information.
Financial instruments whose fair value cannot be reliably measured are carried at cost.
The Group does not reclassify, after initial recognition, a financial instrument into or out of the fair value through profit or loss category.
At each balance sheet date, an assessment is performed as to whether that a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired, namely when losses may occur in future estimated asset or group of financial assets, and it can be reliably measured.
If there is objective evidence of impairment, the financial assets is determined, the impairment losses being recognised through the income statement.
A financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired if there is objective evidence of loss as a result of occurred after their initial recognition, such as (i) for listed securities, a significant or prolonged decline in the security below its cost. and (ii) for unlisted securities, when that event (or events) has an impact on the financial asset or group of financial assets, that can be reliably estimated.
If there is objective evidence that an impairment lossets has been incurred, the cumulative loss recognised in equity, measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment losset previously recognised in the income statement, is taken to the income statement.
An instrument is classified as a financial liability when it contractual obligation to transfer cash or another financial asset, independently from its lead form. These financial li initially at fair value less transaction costs and fill subsequently at amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method.
The Group derecognises the whole or part of a financial liability when the obligations included in the contract have been satisfied or the Group is legally released of the fundamental obligation related to this liability either through a legal process or by the creditor.
The Group considers that the terms are substantially different if the current value of cash flows discounted under the new terms, including any commission paid net of any commission received, and using the original effective interest rate to an least 10% of the current discounted value of cash flows remaining from the original financial liability.
If the exchange is recognised as a cancellation of the original lightly. costs or commissions are taken to the consolidated income statement. Otherwise, costs or commissions adjust the lightlity and are amorised following the amortised cost method over the remaining term of the modified liability.
The Group recognises the difference between the carrying amount of a financial liability which has been cancelled or transferred to a third party and the consideration paid, which includes any asset transferred other than cash or the liability assumed, with a debit or credit to the consolidated income statement.
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of assets are capitalised as part of the assets. A qualifying asset is an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale. To the extent that funds are borrowed generally, the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation are determined by appliance to the expenditures on these assets. The capitalisation rate corresponds to the borrowing costs applicable to the borrowings of the enterprise that are outstanding the period, other than borrowings made specifically for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset. The amount of borrowing costs capitalised during a period does not exceed the amount of borrowing costs incurred during the period.
The capitalisation of borrowing costs commences when expenditures for the asset are being incurred borrowing costs have been incurred and activities necessary to prepare all or part of their intended use or sale are in progress. Capitalisation ceases when substantially all the activities necessary to argitiving assets for their intended use or sale are completed. Capitalisation of borrowing costs shall be suspended during extended periods in which active development is interrupted.
Property, plant and equipment are stated at acquisition cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials and direct labour. any other costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to a working condition for its intended use, and the costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which they are located. Cost also may include transfers from equity of any gain or loss on qualifying cash flow hedges of foreign currency purchases of property, plant and equipment. Purchased software that is integral to the functionality of the related equipment is capitalised as part of that equipment.
The cost of acquisition includes interest on external financing and personnel costs and other internal expensed to work in progress accrued solely during the cost of production is capitalised by charging costs attributable to the asset as own work capitalised under financial expenses and employee benefit expense in the consolidated income statement.
When parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.
Subsequent costs are recognised as separate assets only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group. All repair and maintenance costs are charged to the financial period in which they are incurred.
The Group assesses assets impairment, whenever events or circumstances may indicate that the book value of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount, the impairment being recognised in the income statement.
The recoverable amount is determined by the highest value between the net selling price and its fair value in use, this being calculated by the present value of estimated future obtained from the asset and after its disposal at the end of its economic useful life.
Land is not depreciated. Depreciation on the other assets is calculated using the restimated useful lives, as follows
| Number of years | |
|---|---|
| Buildings and other constructions | 20 to 33 |
| Plant and machinery | |
| Wind farm generation | 25 |
| Hydroelectric generation | 20 to 30 |
| Other plant and machinery | 15 to 40 |
| Transport equipment | 3 to 10 |
| Office equipment and tools | 3 to 10 |
| Other tangible fixed assets | 4 to 10 |
In the second quarter of 2011 EDPR Group, based on a study performed by an independent entity, has changed the useful life of the wind farms from 20 to 25 years, with effect from 1 April 2011 (see note 3).
The other intangible assets of the Group are booked at accumulated amortisation and impairment losses. The Group does not own intangible assets with indefinite lives.
The Group assesses for impairment, whenever events or circumstances may indicate that the asset exceeds its recoverable amount, the impairment being recognised in the recoverable value is determined by the highest amount between its net selling price and its value in use, this being calculated by the estimated future cash-flows obtained from the asset and sale price at the end of its economic useful life.
Acquired computer software licenses are capitalised on the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the specific software. These costs are amortised on the basis of their expected useful lives
Costs that are directly associated with the development of identifiable specific software applications by the Group, and that will probably generate economic benefits beyond one year, are recognised as intangible assets. These costs include employee costs directly associated with the development of the referred software and are amortised using their expected useful lives.
Maintenance costs of software are charged to the income statement when incurred.
The amortisation of industrial properly and other rights is calculated using the straight-line method for an expected of less than 6 years.
The carrying amounts of the Group's non-finan inventories and deferred tox assets, are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, the assers recoverable amount is then estimated. For goodwill the recoverable amount is estimated at each reporting date.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-gener of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tox discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are argest infows of other assets or groups of assets the "cash-gened in a business combination. for the purpose of imporment testing, is allocated to cash-generating units which are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.
An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in profit or losses recognised in respect of cash-generating units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the carrying amount of the other asses in the unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis.
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets, impairment in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment in there has been a change in circumstances that impairment. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.
The Group classifies its lease agreements as finance leases taking into consideration the substance of the transaction rather than its legal form. A lease is classified as a fint transfers to the lessee substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
Lease payments are recognised as an expense and charged to the income statement in the period to which they relate.
Inventories are stated at the lower of the acquisition cost and net realisable value. The cost of inventories includes purchases, conversion and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location. The net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated selling costs.
The cost of inventories is assigned by using the weighted average method.
The Group classifies assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as current. Current assets and lightifies are determined as follows:
Assets are classified as current when they are expected to be redised or consumption in the Group's normal operating cycle, they are held primarily for the pre expected to be realised within twelve months of the balance sheet date or are cash or a cash equivalent, unless the assets may not be exchanged or used to settle a liability for at least welve months from the balance sheet date
Liabilities are classified as current when the settled in the Group's normal operating cycle, they are held primarily for the purpose of trading, they are due to be settled within twelve months of the Group does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least twelve months after the reporting period.
Financial liabilities are dassified as current when they are due to be settled within twelve months after the reporting period, even if the original term was for a period longer than twell and agreement to refinance, or to reschedule payments, on a long-term basis is completed after the reporting period and before the consolidated annual accounts are authorised for issue.
EDP Renováveis Portugal, one of the portuguese companies of EDP Renováveis Group attribute post-refirement plans to their employees under defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans that pay complementary old-age, disability and survivingrelative pension complements, as well as early retirement pensions.
In Portugal, the defined benefits plan is financed through a restricted Pension Fund complemented by a specific provision. This Pension Fund covers liabilities for retirement pension complements as well as liabilities for early refirement.
The pension plans of the Group companies in Portugal are classified as defined benefit plans, since the criteria to determine the pension benefit to be received by employees on retirement is predefined and usually depend on factors such as a evel of salary at the age of retirement.
The lighth of the Group with pensions is calculated annually, at the balance sheet date for each plan individually, by qualified actuaries using the projected unit redit method. The discount rate used in this colouldion is determined by reference to interest rates of high-augily corporate bonds that are denominated in the benefits will be paid and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension liabilities.
Actuarial gains and losses determined annually and resulting from (j) the differences between financial assumptions used and red values obtained and lij) changes in the actuarised against equity, in accordance with the alternative method defined by IAS 19, revised on 16 December 2004.
The increase in past service costs arising from early retirements before the normal age of refirement) is recognised in the income statement when incurred.
Annually the Group recognises as cost in the income statement the net amount of, (i) the interest cost, (ii) the interest cost, (iii) the estimated return of the fund assets and (iv) the cost arising from early retirements.
In Spain, Portugal and United States of America, some Group Companies have social benefit plans of defined complement those granted by the social welfare system to the companies employees, under which they pay a contribution to these plans each year, calculated in accordance with the rules established in each plan. The cost related to defined contribution plans is recognised in the results in the period in which the contribution is made.
In Portugal some Group companies provide medical care during the period of retirement. through complementary benefits to those provided by the Social Welfare System. These medical care plans are classified benefit plans. The present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date is recognised as a defined benefit liability. Measurement and recognition of the liability with healthcare benefits is similar to the pension liability for the defined benefit plans, described above.
In accordance with the by-lows of certain Group entities, annual general meeting a percentage of profits to be paid to the employes (variable remuneration), following a proposal made by the Board of Directors. Payments to employees are recognised in the income statement in the period to which they relate.
Provisions are recognised when: (i) the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation, (ii) it is probable that settlement will be reguired in the future and (iii) a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made.
The Group recognises dismantling provisions for property, plant and equipment when a legal or contractual obligation is settled to dismantling and decommissioning those assets at the end of their useful life. Consequently, the Group has for property, plant and equipment related with wind turbines, for the expected cost of restoring sites and land to its original condition. The provisions correspond to the present value of the expected to be required to settle the obligation and are recognised as part of the initial cost or an adjustment to the respective asset, being depreciated on a straight-line basis over the asset useful life.
The assumptions used are:
| EDPR EU | EDPR NA | |
|---|---|---|
| Average cost per MW (Euros) | 14.000 | 18,549 |
| Salvage value per MW (Euros) | 25,000 | 17,776 |
| Discount rate | 6.33% | 5.38% |
| Inflation rate | 2.00% | 2.50% |
| Capitalisation (number of years) | 25 | 25 |
With the change of the useful life of the wind farms from 20 to 25 years (see note 2 h) the capitalisation rate (number of years) of the dismantling and decommissioning provisions has changed to 25 years, with a prospective application from 1 April 2011.
Decommissioning and dismantling provisions are remeasured on the best estimate of the settlement anount. The unwinding of the discount at each balance sheet date is charged to the income statement.
Costs and revenues are recorded in they refer regardless of when paid or received, in accordance with the accrual concept. Differences between amounts received and the corresponding revenue and expenditure are recorded under other assess and other liabilities.
Revenue comprises the amounts invoiced on the sale of products or of value added tax, rebates and discounts, after elimination of intra-group sales.
Revenue from electricity sales is recognised in the period that electricity is generated and transferred to customers.
Engineering revenue includes the initial amount gareed in the contract work, claims and incentive payments to the extent that it is probable that her will revenue and can be measured relight. As soon as the ourcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably, contract revenue and expensed in profit or loss in proportion to the stage of completion of the contract.
Differences between estimated and actual amounts, which are normally not significant, are recorded during the subsequent periods.
Financial results include interest payable on furds invested, dividend income, unwinding of the discount of provisions and written put options to non-controlling interests, foreign exchange gains and losses on financial instruments and the accrual of tax equity estimated interest over outstanding liability.
Interest income is recognised in the income statement based on the effective interest rate method. Dividend in the income statement on the date the entity's right to receive payments is established.
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tox are recognised in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognised directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income or loss for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assess and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognised for the following temporary differences the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that accounting nor taxable profit on loss, and differences relating to investments in subsidiatios to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. In addition, deferred tor taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill. Deferred tox is measured at the tax rates that are expected to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes authority on the some toxable entify, or on different tox entifys, but then the settle current tax lightlites and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realised simultaneously.
A deferred tax asset is recognised for unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net profit attributable to equity holders of the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding the year, excluding the average number of ordinary shares purchased by the Group and held as treasury stock.
Non-current assets or disposal groups of assets and related liabilities that include at least a non-current asset) are classified as held for sale when their carrying amounts will be recovered principally through sale and the assets or disposal aroups are available for immediate sale and its sale is highly probable.
The Group also classifies as non-current assets held for sale those non-current assets or disposal groups acquired exclusively with a view to its subsequent disposal, that are available for immediate sale and its sale is highly probable.
Immediately before classification as held for sale, the measurement of the non-current assets or all abilities in a disposal group, is adjusted in accordance with the applicable IFRS. Subsequently, these assets or disposal groups are measured at their carring amount at fair value less costs to sell
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand deposits in financial institutions. They also include other short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. An investment normally qualifies as a cash equivalent when it has a maturity of less than three months from the date of acquisition.
Government grants are recognised income under non-current liabilities when there is reasonable assurance that they will be received and that the Group with the conditions associated with the grant. Grants that compensate the Group for expenses incurred are recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis in which the expenses are recognised.
The Group takes measures to prevent, reduce or repair the environment by its activities.
Expenses derived from environmental activities are recognised as other operating expenses in the period in which they are incurred.
The Group has entered in several parth institutional investors in the United States, through limited liability companies operating agreements that apportions the cash flows generated by the wind farms between the investors and the Company and allocates the tax benefits, which include Production Tax Credits (PTC), Investment Tax Credits (ITC) and accelerated depreciation, largely to the investor.
The institutional investors purchase their minerests for an upfront cash payment with an agreed targeted internal rate of return over the period that the tax credits are generated return is computed based on the total anticipated benefit that the institutional investors will receive and includes the value of PTC's / TC's, allocated taxable income or loss and cash distributions received.
The control and management of these wind farms are a responsibility of EDPR Group and they are fully consolidated in these annual accounts.
The upfront cash payment received is recognised under "Lightlifes grising" and subsequently measured at amortised cost.
This liability is reduced by the value of tax benefits provided and cash distributional investors during the contracted period. The value of the tax benefits delivered, primarily accelerated depreciation and ITC, is recorded as non-current deferred income and is recognized as Revenue on a pro-rata basis over the 25 year useful life of the value of PTC delivered are recorded as generated.
After the Flip Date, the institutional investor retains a small non-controlling interests for the structure. The non-controlling interests percentages range from 2.5% to 6% across all structures except for 20% at Blue Canyon I. EDPR NA also has an option to purchase the institutional interests at fair market value on the Flip Date for PTC structures and the earlier of the flip date or five years for cash grant structures. The liability for residual interest is accreted on a straight line basis from the funding date through the Flip Date to reflect the institutional investors' minority interest position in the EDPR Group at the Flip Date.
The liability with institutional investors is interest accrud that is based on the outstanding liability balance and the targeted internal rate of return agreed.
The International Financial Reporting Commitee (IFRC) issued in July 2007, IFRC 12 - Service Concession Arrangements. This interpretation was approved by the European Commission on 25 March 2009 and is applicable for the annual periods beginning after that date. IFRC 12 is applicable to the public-private concession controls or regulates the services the services rendered through the utilisation of determined infrastructures as well as the price of these services any significant residual interest in those infrastructures
According to IFRIC 12, the infrastructures allocated to concessions are not recognised by the operator as tangible fixed assets or as financial leases, as the operator does not control the assets. These infrastructures are recognised according accounting models, depending on the type of remuneration commitment of the grantor within the terms of the contract:
This model is applicable when the operator has an unconditional right to receive certain monetary amounts regardless of the level of use of the infrastructures within the concession and results in the recognition of a financial asset, booked at amortised cost.
This model is applicable when the operator, within the concession, is remunerated on the basis of the infrastructures (demand risk) and results in the recognition of an intangible asset.
This model is applicable when the concession includes simultaneously guaranteed remuneration based on the level of use of the infrastructure within the concession.
Under the terms of the contracts in place throughout the Group business, the Management of EDPR concluded that IFRC 12 is not applicable.
The IFRS set forth a range of accounting treatments and require the Board of Directors to apply judgment and make in deciding which treatment is most appropriate
The main accounting estimates and judgements used in applying the accounting policies are discussed in this note to improve the understanding of how their application affects the Group's and disclosures. A broader description of the accounting policies employed by the Group is disclosed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Annual Accounts.
Although estimates are calculated by the Company's directors based on the best information available at 31 December 2011 and 31 December 2010, future events may require changes to these estimates in subsequent years. Any effect on the annual accounts of adjustments to be made in subsequent years would be recognised prospectively
Considering that in many cases there are allernatives to the accounting treatment adopted by EDP Renováveis, the Group's reported results could differ if a different treatment was chosen. EDP Renováveis believes that the choices made are appropriate and that the annual accounts are presented fairly, in all material respects, the Group's financial position and results. The alternative outcomes discussed below are presented solely to assist the reader in until accounts and are not intended to suggest that other alternatives on estimates would be more appropriate
The Group determines that available for sale inpaired when there has been a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value below its cost.
This determination of what is significant or prolonged requires judgment, the Group evaluates among other factors, the normal volatility in share price. In additions are generally obtained through listed market prices or valuation models that may require assumptions or judgment in making estimates of fair value.
Alternative methodogies and the use of different assumptions and estimates could result in a higher evel of impoirnent losses recognised with a consequent impact in the income statement of the Group.
Fair values are based on listed market prices, if available is determined either by dealer prices (both for that transaction or for similar instruments traded) or by pricing models, based on net present value of estimated future which take into account market conditions for the underlying instruments, time value, yield curves and volatility factors. These pricing models may require assumptions or judgments in estimating fair values.
Conseauently, the use of a different model or of different assumptions or judgments in applying a particular model may have produced different financial results for a particular period.
The Group reqularly reviews the useful life of its electrical generation into line line line line with the technical and economic measurements of the installations, taking into consideration their technological capacity and prestrictions.
In the second quarter of 2011 EDPR Group has changed the of the wind farms from 20 to 25 years (see note 2 h). The redefinition of the useful life of the wind generation assets was made based on a technical study performed by an independent entity which has considered the technical availability for an additional period of 5 years of useful life of these assets. The referred study has covered 95% of wind installed capacity of EDPR Group, in the different geographies (Europe and North America), considering assumptions and estimated that reguires judgements. The estimated impact of this change was approximately 81 millions of Euros (pre tax),
Impairment test are performed whenever there is an indication that the recoverable amount of property, plant, equipment and intengible assets is less than the corresponding net book value of assets.
Considering that estimated recoverable amounts related to property, plant and equipment, intrangible assed on the best information available, changes in the estimates and judgment test results which could affects the Group's reported results.
The Group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions and estimates are required in determining the global amount for income taxes.
There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimation is uncertain during the ordinary course of business Different interpretations and estimates would result in a different level of income taxes, current and deferred, recognised in the period.
Tax Authorities are entitled to review the EDP Renováves determination of its annual taxable earnings, for a determined period that may be extended in case tax losses carried forward. Therefore, it is possible that some additional taxes may be assessed, mainly as a result of differences in interpretation of the tax law. However, EDP Renovéveis and those of its subsidiaries, gre confident that there will be no material tax assessments within the context of the annual accounts.
The Board of Directors considers that Group has contracting and decommissioning of property. plant and equipment related to wind electricity generation. For these responsibilities the Group has recorded cost of restoring sites and land to its original condition. The present value of the expenditure expected to be reguired to settle the obligation.
The use of different assumptions in estimates and judgments referred may have produced different results from those that have been considered
The businesses of EDP Renovaveis Group are exposed to a variety of thancial risks, including the effects of changes in market prices, foreign exchange and interest rates. The main financial risks lie essentially in its debt portfolio, arising from interest-rate and the exchange-rate exposures. The unpredicability of the financial markets is analysed on an on-qoing basis in accordance with the EDPKs risk management policy. Financial instruments are used to minimize potential adverse effects resulting from the interest rates risks on EDP Renováveis financial performance.
The Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis is responsible for the definition of general risk-management principles and the establishment of exposure limits. The management of financial risks of EDP Renovaveis Group is outsourced to the Finance Department of EDP - Energios de Portugal, S.A., in accordance with the policies approved by the Board of Directors. The outsourcing service includes identification and evaluation of hedging mechanisms appropriate to each exposure.
All transactions undertaken using derivative financial instruments require the Board of Directors, which defines the parameters of each transaction and approves the formal documents describing their objectives
EDP Group's Financial Department is responsible for managing the Group, seeking to mitigate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the net profits of the Group, using foreign exchange derivatives, raising foreign exchange debt and /or other hedging structures with symmetrical exposure characteristics to those of the effectiveness of these hedges is reassessed and monitored throughout their lives.
EDPR operates internationally and is exposed to the exchange-rate risk resulting from investments in foreign subsidiaries. With the objective of minimizing the impact of exchange rates fluctuations, EDP Renováveis general policy is to fund each project in the currency of the operating cash flows generated by the project.
Currently, the main currency exposure is the U.S. dollar, resulting from the shareholding in EDPR NA. With the increasing capacity in other geographies, EDPR is also becoming exposed to other currencies (Brazilian Real, Polish Zloty and Romanian Lev).
To hedge the isk originated with net in EDPR NA, EDP Renováreis entered into a CRS in USD/EUR with EDP Branch (see note 39)
As a consequence a depreciation of 10% in the foreign currency exchange rate, with reference to 31 December 2011 and 2010, would originate an increase) in EDP Renováveis Group income statement and equity before taxes, as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit or loss | Equity | |||
| Thousands of Euros | +10% | -10% | +10% | -10% |
| USD / EUR | 10,516 | -12,853 | ||
| PLN / EUR | 3,309 | -4.044 | ||
| 10,516 | -12.853 | 3,309 | -4.044 |
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2010 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit or loss | Equity | ||||
| +10% | -10% | +10% | -10% | ||
| USD / EUR | 9,527 | -11.644 | |||
| PLN / EUR | 3,584 | -4,381 | |||
| 9,527 | -11,644 | 3,584 | -4.381 |
This analysis assumes that all other variables, namely interest rates, remain unchange.
The Group's operating cash flows are substantially independent from the fluctuation in interest-rate markets.
The purpose of the interest-rate risk management policies is to reduce the exposure of debt cash flows to market fluctuations. As such, whenever considered necessary and in accordance to the Group contracts derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risks
In the floating-rate financing contracts interest-rate derivative financial instruments to hedge cash flows associated with future interest payments, which have the effect of converting floating rate loans into fixed rate loans.
Notes to the Consolidated Annual Accounts for the years ended 31 December 2011 and 2010
All these hedges are undertaken on lightities in the Group's debt portfolio and are mainly perfection between changes in fair value of the hedging instrument and changes in fair value of the interest-rate risk or upcoming cash flows.
The EDP Renováveis Group has a portfolio of interest-rate derivatives with maturities between 1 and 15 years. The Financial Department of EDP Group undertakes sensitivity analyses of the fair value of financial instruments to interest-rate fluctuations or upcoming cash flows.
About 92% of EDP Renováveis Group financial debt bear interes, including operations with financial instruments
The management of interest rate risk associated to activities developed to the Financial Department of EDP Group, contracting derivative financial instruments to mitigate this risk.
Based on the debt porflolio of the EDPR EU Group and the financial instruments used to hedge associated interest rater isk, as well as on the shareholder loans received by EDP Renováveis, a change of 100 basis points in the interest rates with reference to 31 December 2011 and 2010 would increase/in EDP Renovaveis Group income statement and equity before taxes, as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Profit or loss | Equity | ||
| + 100 bp | - 100 bp | + 100 bp | - 100 bp | |
| Cash flow hedge derivatives | 37,929 | -40.540 | ||
| Unhedged debt (variable interest rates) | -1.839 | 1.839 | ||
| -1.839 | 1,839 | 37,929 | -40.540 |
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2010 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit or loss | Equity | ||||
| + 100 bp | - 100 bp | + 100 bp | - 100 bp | ||
| Cash flow hedge derivatives | 28.154 | -30.933 | |||
| Unhedged debt (variable interest rates) | -2,168 | 2,168 | |||
| -2.168 | 2.168 | 28.154 | -30.933 |
This analysis assumes that all other variables, namely foreign exchange rates, remain unchangeable.
The EDP Renovaveis Group policy in terms of the counterparty risk on financial transactions with companies outside EDP Group is managed by an analysis of the technical capacitiveness, credit rating and exposure to each counter-party. Counterparties in derivatives and financial transactions are restricted to high-quality credit institutions or to the EDP Group.
The EDP Renováveis Group documents financial operations to international standards. Most derivative financial instruments contracted with credit institutions are engaged under ISDA Master Agreements.
In the specific case of the EDPR EU Group, credit risk is not significant due to the limited average collection period for customer balances and the auglity of its debtors. The Group's main customers and distributors in the energy market of their respective countries (ONEL and MEFF in the case of the Spanish market).
In the specific case of EDPR NA Group, credit risk is not significant due to the limited avergae collection period for customer balgaces and the quality of its debtors. The Group's main customers are requlated utility companies and regional market agents in the U.S.
EDP Renováveis believes that the amount that best represents the Group's exposure to credit risk corresponds to the carrying amount of Trade receivables and Other debtors, net of the impairment losses recognised. The Group believes that the creceivables is adequate and that no significant impaired credits exist that have not been recognised as such and provided for.
Liquidity risk is the possibility that the Group will not be abligations as they fall due. The Group strategy to manage liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have significant liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group's reputation.
The liquidity policy followed ensures compliance with payment obligations acquired, through maintaining sufficient rredit facilities and having access to the EDP Group facilities.
The EDP Renováveis Group undertakes management of liquidity risk through the engagement and maintenance of credit lines and financing facilities with its main shareholder, as well as directly in the market with national financial institutions, assuring the necessary funds to perform its activities.
As at 31 December 2011, market price risk affecting the EDP Renovavis Group is not significant. In the great majority of the plans are under porwer purchase agreements, with fixed or escalating prices. In the electricity is sold in Spain directly on the daily market at spot prices plus a pre-defined premium (regulated). Nevertheless, EDPR EU has an option of selling the power through regulated tariffs, granting minimum prices. In the remaining countries, prices are mainly determined through regulated tariffs.
EDPR EU and EDPR NA have electricity sales swaps that qualify for hedge accounting (cash flow hedge) that are related to electricity sales for the year 2011 and 2010 (see note 39). The purpose of EDP Renováveis Group is to hedge a volume of energy generated to reduce its exposure to the energy price volatility.
The Group's god in managing equity, in accordance with the policies established by its main shareholder, is to safeguard the Group's capacity to continue operating as a going concern, grow steadly to meet established growth targets and maintain an optimum equity structure to reduce equity cost.
In conformity with other sector groups, the Group controls its financing structure based on the ratio is calculated as net financial borrowings divided by total earny ings. Net financial borrowings are determined as the sum of financial debt. institutional equity liabilities corrected for non-current deferred revenues, less cash and cash equivalents.
During the year ended in 31 December 2011, the consolidation perimeter of the EDP Renovaveis Group were:
· Farma Wiatrowa Wyszoarod. SP. ZO.O. was merged into Masovia Wind Farm I. S.P. ZO.O.
* EDP Renováveis holds through its subsidiaries in the United States of America legally incorporated without share capital and that as at 31 December 2011 do not have any assets, liabilities, or any operating activity.
During the year ended in 31 December 2010, the changes in the consolidation perimeter of the EDP Renovaveis Group were:
* EDP Group holds, through EDP Renováveis and its subsidiaries in the United States of America legally incorporated without share capital and that as at 31 December 2010 do not have any assets, liabilities, or any operating activity,
Revenues are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenues by business and geography: | ||
| Electricity in Europe | 634,518 | 557,457 |
| Electricity in United States of America | 302,890 | 274,969 |
| Electricity, other | 19,464 | 3,230 |
| 956,872 | 835,656 | |
| Other revenues | 17 709 | 1 841 |
| 974,581 | 837,497 | |
| Services rendered | 4,888 | 4,642 |
| Changes in inventories and cost of raw material and consumables used: | ||
| Cost of consumables used | -15,168 | -12,684 |
| Changes in inventories | -7,084 | 11,187 |
| -22,252 | -1,497 | |
| Total Revenues | 957,217 | 840,642 |
Income from institutional partnerships in US wind farms is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Der 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Income trom institutional partnerships - EDPR NA | 111.610 | 107.005 |
| 111 610 | 107.005 |
Income from institutional partnerships - EDPR NA, included to production tax credits (PTC, investments tax credits (ITC) and other tax benefits, mostly from accelerated to projects Vento , II, III, V, V, V, VI, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII, VII
Other operating income is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Amortisation of deferred income related to power purchase agreements | 10,334 | 25,776 |
| EDPR Italia | 51.695 | |
| Contract termination indemnity | 15,840 | |
| EDPR Polska | 15,000 | |
| Other income | 22.515 | 16.409 |
| 84.544 | 73,025 |
The power purchase agreements between EDPR NA and its customers were valued, at the acquisition date, using discounted cash flow techniques. At that date, these agreements were valued based on market assumptions by approximately 120 million of USD) and recorded as a non-current liability is amorised over the period of the agreements against other operating income. As at 31 December 2011, the amortisation for the period amounts to 10,334 thousands of Euros (310: 25,776 thousands of Euros).
During 2010, the Group acquired 85% of EDP Renewables Italia, S.r. I (see note 18). The EDPR Group granted the seller a put option over the remanaining 15% of the interest which, in line Group's accounting policy, has been treated as an advance purchase. The acquisition cost recognised in the annual accounts for 2011 included the balance settled in cash, consideration the successful implementation of projects underway and an amount reflecting the put option. The continent consideration and the grount of the put option are both at fair value, based on the EDPR Goup's best estimate at the purchase data (see notes 18 and 37).
In 2011, EDPR Italia increased its share captital. The minority shareholder, Energia in Natura, S.r.l, did not subscribe this increase. As a result, the percentage ownership on the non-controlling interests has fallen from 15% to 6.48% and the put option was reduced by the corresponding amount. Futhermore, at 2011 year end, the fair value of the deferred amounts for the 2010 purchase (contigent consideration and put option), taking into account the information existing at year end which in the estimated sales price of electricity to be produced and in the number of MW to be installed in the future.
In light of the above, the EDPR Group has reduced the liability associated with the put option by 34,625 thousands of Euros and with the contigent consideration by 17,070 thousands of Euros, and recognised an other operating income for the year of 51,695 thousands of Euros (see note 37).
In 2010, the caption Contract termination in the amount of 15,840 thousands of Euros, relates to an agreement between the subsidiary Poast Oak Wind LLC (EDPR NA subgroup) and its client J Aron to an early release from the last seven years of the power purchase agreement.
In 2010, the amount included in EDPR Polska caption results from the business combinations of Farma Wiatrowa Bodzanow SP ZOO, Farma Wiatrowa Starozreby SP ZOO, Farma Wiatrowa Wyszogrod SP ZOO and related purchase price allocation, that led to a revaluation of the operating assets and liabilities and the recognition of other operating income amounting to 15,000 thousands of Euros. This income is related with a purchase opportunity that resulted from the Group financial capacity.
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Supplies and services: | ||
| Leases and rents | 34,857 | 29,728 |
| Insurance | 12,842 | 11,346 |
| Transportation, travelling and representation | 7,204 | 7,651 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 126,601 | 101,677 |
| Specialised works | ||
| IT services | 3,677 | 3,487 |
| Legal fees | 4,211 | 4,371 |
| Advisory fees | 5,265 | 7,964 |
| Shared services | 7,918 | 6,495 |
| Other services | 10,108 | 5,198 |
| Other supplies and services | 12,386 | 18,294 |
| 225 069 | 196 211 |
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel costs | ||
| Management remuneration | 1,063 | 1,158 |
| Remunerations | 51,257 | 49,052 |
| Social charges on remunerations | 8,130 | 6,874 |
| Employee's variable remuneration | 15,104 | 14,241 |
| Other costs | 6,145 | 5,399 |
| Own work capitalised | -23,466 | -24,118 |
| 58,233 | 52,606 | |
| Employee benefits expenses | ||
| Costs with pension plans | 2,282 | 2,022 |
| Costs with medical care plan and other benefits | 317 | 218 |
| 2,599 | 2,240 | |
| 60,832 | 54,846 |
As at 31 December 2011, Costs with pension plans relates to defined contribution plans (2,272 thousands of Euros) and defined benefit plans (10 thousands of Euros), see also note 33.
The average breakdown by management positions and professional category of the permanent staff as of 31 and 2010 is as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Board members | 16 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| Senior management / Senior officers | 62 | 60 |
| Middle management | 453 | 442 |
| Highly-skilled and skilled employees | 206 | 220 |
| Other employees | 71 | 100 |
| 792 | 822 | |
| 809 | 838 |
The companies of EDPR Group consolidation method have contributed with 14 employees (3) December 2010: 15) included in Other employees.
The number of employees includes Management and all the subsidiaries and associates.
Other operating expenses are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Direct operating taxes | 17,946 | 15,984 |
| Indirect taxes | 16,738 | 7,668 |
| Losses on fixed assets | 11.813 | 1,845 |
| Lease costs related to the electricity generating centres | 8.998 | 7,770 |
| Other costs and losses | 11.237 | 23.599 |
| 66732 | 56 866 |
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Property, plant and equipment: | ||
| Buildings and other constructions | 1,592 | 1,473 |
| Plant and machinery: | ||
| Hydroelectric generation | 83 | 86 |
| Thermoelectric generation | - | |
| Wind generation | 415,583 | 422,140 |
| Other plant and machinery | 36 | 15 |
| Transport equipment | 328 | 234 |
| Office equipment and tools | 6,714 | 6,451 |
| Other tangible fixed assets | 1,491 | 1,764 |
| lmpairment | 5,058 | - |
| 430,885 | 432,163 | |
| Other intangible assets: | ||
| Industrial property, other rights and other intangibles | 2,120 | 2,240 |
| Impairment of goodwill | 35,488 | |
| 468,493 | 434,403 | |
| Amortisation of deferred income: | ||
| Government grants | -14,986 | -11,406 |
| -14,986 | -11,406 | |
| 453,507 | 422,997 |
Impairment of goodwill, relates essentially with the ussumptions in the estimatives of Mw to install and the energy prices in EDPR Italia Group in the amount of 34,737 thousands of Euros (see notes 8 and 18).
Gains / (losses) from the sale of financial assets , for the Group, are analysed as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Disposal % | Value Disposal % | Value | |
| Investments in subsidiaries and associates | ||||
| Sociedad Eólica de Andalucia, S.A. | 16.67% | 9.405 | ||
| Other | 1.094 | |||
| 10.499 |
In 2011, EDP Renováveis closed an agreement with Enel Green Power Spain, SA to sell its 16.67% equity shareholding in Sociedad Edica de Andalucia, SA ("SEASA") by 10.7 million of Euros, with an after-tax capital gain of 6.6 million of Euros (see note 20).
Financial income and financial expenses are analysed as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Financial income | ||
| Interest income | 10,844 | 7,355 |
| Derivative financial instruments | ||
| Interest | 19,913 | 2,576 |
| Fair value | 8,980 | 8,376 |
| Foreign exchange gains | 20,578 | 25,984 |
| Other financial income | 1,240 | 14 |
| 61,555 | 44,305 | |
| Financial expenses | ||
| Interest expense | 220,250 | 176,792 |
| Derivative financial instruments | ||
| Fair value | 3,211 | 5,356 |
| Foreign exchange losses | 42,284 | 26,142 |
| Own work capitalised | -33,927 | -68,401 |
| Unwinding | 68,279 | 71,317 |
| Other financial expenses | 5,588 | 7,245 |
| 305,685 | 218,451 | |
| Financial income / (expenses) | -244,130 | -174,146 |
Derivative financial instruments - Interest liquidations on the derivative financial instrument established between EDP Renováveis and EDP Branch (see notes 37 and 39).
In accordance with the accounting policy described on note 2g), of the 31 December 2011 consolidated annual accounts the borrowing costs (interest) capitalised in tangible fixed assets in progress as at 31 December 2011 amounted to 33,927 thousands of Euros (310: 68,401 thousands of Euros) (see note 16), and are included under Own work capitalised (financial interest rates used for this capitalisation vary in accordance with the related loans, between 2.62% (31 December 2010: 1.725% and 13.09%),
Interest expense refers to interest on loans bearing interest at contracted and market rates.
Unwinding expenses refers essentially to the financial update of provisions for dismantling and decommissioning of wind frams 2,995 thousands of Euros (3) December 2010: 2,872 thousands of Euros| (see note 34), to the financial update of the liability related with put option of EDPR Italia 1,400 thousands of Euros (310: 1,889 thousands of Euros related with pur option of Genesa Group) (see note 37) and the implied return in institutional partners 62,538 thousands of Euros (31 December 2010: 64,830 thousands of Euros) (see note 35).
In accordance with prevailing legislation, tax returns and correction by the tox authorities during subsequent years. In Portugal and Spain this period is four years, being 2006 is the last year considered to be definitively reviewed by the tax authorities. In the United States of America, generally, the statute by tax authorities (IRS) of a tax additional liquidation is three years from the date of settlement of the annual tax declaration of a company.
Tax losses generated in each year, also subject to inspection and adjustment, may be deductible from taxable profits during subsequent years (4 years in Portugal since 2010, 18 years in the USA, without an expiry date in Belgium, France and Brazil, although in Brazil it is limited to 30% of the taxable income of each period). The breakdown of tax losses carried forward and the respective expiration date are presented in Note 21. The companies of the EDP Renováveis Group are taxed, whenever possible, on a consolidated basis allowed by the tax law of the respective countries.
EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. and its subsidiary companies file individual tax declarations in accordance with prevailing tax legislation. Nevertheless, the main Group companies pay income tox following the special Tax Consolidation Regime, contained in articles 64 and 82 of Royal Legislative Decree 4/2004 whereby the revised corporate income tax law was approved. The companies of EDPR Group in Spain are included in the Tax consolidation perimeter of Genesa Group and EDP, S.A. - Sucursal en España (EDP Branch).
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Current tax | -29,060 | -28.763 |
| Deferred tax | 1.022 | -8.996 |
| -28.038 | -37.759 |
The effective income tax rate as at 31 December 2011 and 2010 is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before tax | 118.662 | 120,797 |
| Income tax | -28.038 | -37.759 |
| Effective Income Tax Rate | 23.63% | 31.26% |
The reconciliation between the nominal and the effective income tax rate for the years ended 31 December 2011 and 2010 is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit before taxes | 118,662 | 120,797 |
| Nominal income tax rate | 30.00% | 30.00% |
| Expected income taxes | -35,599 | -36,239 |
| Income taxes for the period | -28,038 | -37,759 |
| Difference | 7,561 | -1,520 |
| Tax effect of operations with institutional partnerships | -1,812 | |
| Depreciation, amortization and provisions | -835 | -3,727 |
| Capitalisation of deferred tax assets related to tax losses from previous periods | 8,221 | |
| Unrecognised deferred tax assets related to tax losses generated in the period | -2,792 | 3,206 |
| Production tax credits | 757 | -5,330 |
| Fair value of financial instruments and financial investments | 1,325 | 87 |
| Financial investments in associates | 1,432 | 1,426 |
| Difference between gains and accounting gains and losses | 3,488 | 5,114 |
| Non deductible expenses | -1,276 | -848 |
| Taxable income eliminated at consolidation | -2,140 | 381 |
| Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions | -3,175 | -558 |
| Tax benefits | 1,896 | |
| Other | 660 | 541 |
| 7,561 | -1,520 |
The income tax rates in the countries in which the EDP Renováveis Group operates are as follows:
| Tax rate | ||
|---|---|---|
| Country | Subgroup | 2011 and subsequent years |
| Spain | FDPR FLI | 30.00% |
| Portugal | EDPR EU | 29.00% |
| France | FDPR FU | 33.33% |
| Poland | FDPR FLI | 19.00% |
| Belgium | FDPR FU | 33.99% |
| Romania | EDPR EU | 16.00% |
| United States | FDPR NA | 37.22% |
| Brazil | FDPR BR | 34.00% |
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost: | ||
| Land and natural resources | 21,389 | 18,867 |
| Buildings and other constructions | 16,053 | 13,896 |
| Plant and machinery: | ||
| Hydroelectric generation | 2,619 | 2,619 |
| Thermoelectric cogeneration | 6,008 | 6,008 |
| Wind generation | 10,905,666 | 9,536,702 |
| Other plant and machinery | 524 | 290 |
| Transport equipment | 1,919 | 1,641 |
| Office equipment and tools | 48,753 | 29,186 |
| Other tangible fixed assets | 11,756 | 12,205 |
| Assets under construction | 1,203,445 | 1,666,957 |
| 12,218,132 | 11,288,371 | |
| Accumulated depreciation: | ||
| Depreciation and amortisation expense for the period | -425,827 | -432,163 |
| Impairment for the period | -5,058 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | -1,332,626 | -874,437 |
| -1,763,511 | -1,306,600 | |
| Carrying amount | 10,454,621 | 9,981,771 |
The movement in Property, plant and equipment from 31 December 2011, is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | Balance at 01 Jan |
Acquisitions / Increases |
Disposals/ Write-offs |
Transfers | Exchange Differences |
Changes in perimeter / Other |
Balance at 31 Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost: | |||||||
| Land and natural resources | 18,867 | 2,322 | 153 | -5 | 52 | 21,389 | |
| Buildings and other constructions | 13,896 | 146 | -24 | 1,993 | 158 | -116 | 16,053 |
| Plant and machinery: | |||||||
| Hydroelectric generation | 2,619 | - | 2,619 | ||||
| Thermoelectric cogeneration | 6,008 | - | 6,008 | ||||
| Wind generation | 9,536,702 | 80,835 | -6,646 | 1,158,187 | 136,548 | 40 | 10,905,666 |
| Other plant and machinery | 290 | 24 | 210 | 524 | |||
| Transport equipment | 1,641 | 321 | -119 | 56 | 20 | 1,919 | |
| Office equipment and tools | 29,186 | 3,047 | -2,262 | 17,631 | 990 | 161 | 48,753 |
| Other tangible fixed assets | 12,205 | 2,100 | -12,382 | 9,756 | 29 | 48 | 11,756 |
| Assets under construction | 1,666,957 | 741,915 | -17,615 | -1,187,720 | 1,010 | -1,102 | 1,203,445 |
| 11,288,371 | 830,710 | -39,048 | 138,786 | -687 | 12,218,132 |
| Impairment | Changes in | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at | Charge tor | Losses / | Disposals/ | Exchange | perimeter / | Balance at | |
| Thousands of Euros | 01 Jan | the period | Reverses | Write-offs | Differences | Other | 31 Dec |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses: |
|||||||
| Buildings and other constructions | 3,787 | 1,592 | -24 | 145 | -13 | 5,487 | |
| Plant and machinery: | |||||||
| Hydroelectric generation | 1,612 | 83 | -3 | 1,692 | |||
| Thermoelectric cogeneration | 6,009 | - | 6,009 | ||||
| Wind generation | 1,274,124 | 415,583 | 5,036 | -87 | 29,113 | 14 | 1,723,783 |
| Other plant and machinery | 249 | 36 | - | 25 | 310 | ||
| Transport equipment | 621 | 328 | 5 | -98 | 31 | 2 | 889 |
| Office equipment and tools | 13,454 | 6,714 | -2,261 | 314 | 18,222 | ||
| Other tangible fixed assets | 6,744 | 1,491 | 17 | -1,210 | 30 | 47 | 7,119 |
| 1,306,600 | 425,827 | 5,058 | -3,680 | 29,633 | 73 | 1,763,511 |
Plant and Machinery includes the cost of the wind farms under operation.
The caption Changes in perimeter/Other includes the effect of the sale of SubgroupVeinco made by EDPR EU during the year ended at 31 December 2011 (see note 5).
During 2011, EDPR Group changed the useful life of wind farms based on a study performed by an independent entity with prospective effect from 1 April of 2011 as described on the note 3 - Critical accounting estimates and judgements in preparing the annual accounts.
The movement in Property, plant and equipment from 31 December 2010, is analysed as follows:
| Balance at | Acquisitions / | Disposals/ | Exchange | Changes in perimeter / |
Balance at | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | 01 Jan | Increases | Write-offs | Transfers | Differences | Other | 31 Dec |
| Cost- | |||||||
| Land and natural resources | 13,119 | 5,610 | -39 | 74 | 103 | - | 18,867 |
| Buildings and other constructions | 11,041 | 2,558 | - | 297 | - | 13,896 | |
| Plant and machinery: | |||||||
| Hydroelectric generation | 2,619 | 2,619 | |||||
| Thermoelectric cogeneration | 6,008 | 6,008 | |||||
| Wind generation | 7,354,463 | 21,928 | -1,869 | 1,820,606 | 297,451 | 44,123 | 9,536,702 |
| Other plant and machinery | 255 | 21 | -1 | 15 | 290 | ||
| Transport equipment | 1,063 | 468 | 34 | 76 | 1,641 | ||
| Office equipment and tools | 21,492 | 5,018 | -98 | 1,621 | 741 | 412 | 29,186 |
| Other tangible fixed assets | 8,829 | 2,376 | -113 | 994 | 118 | 12,205 | |
| Assets under construction | 2,038,064 | 1,432,658 | -1,703 | -1,823,329 | 24,718 | -3,451 | 1,666,957 |
| 9,456,953 | 1,470,637 | -3,823 | - | 323,504 | 41,100 | 11,288,371 |
| Impairment | Changes in | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at | Charge for | Losses / | Disposals/ | Exchange | perimeter / | Balance at | |
| Thousands of Euros | 01 Jan | the period | Reverses | Write-offs | Differences | Other | 31 Dec |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses: |
|||||||
| Buildings and other constructions | 2,287 | 1,473 | 27 | 3,787 | |||
| Plant and machinery: | |||||||
| Hydroelectric generation | 1,526 | 86 | 1,612 | ||||
| Thermoelectric cogeneration | 6,009 | 6,009 | |||||
| Wind generation | 799,376 | 422,140 | -961 | 20,040 | 33,529 | 1,274,124 | |
| Other plant and machinery | 227 | 15 | 249 | ||||
| Transport equipment | 367 | 234 | 20 | - | 621 | ||
| Ottice equipment and tools | 7,050 | 6,451 | -12 | -119 | 84 | 13,454 | |
| Other tangible fixed assets | 5,100 | 1,764 | -100 | -20 | 6,744 | ||
| 821,942 | 432,163 | 1 | -1,073 | 19,948 | 33,620 | 1,306,600 |
In 2010 the caption Changes in perimeter /Other integration of the assets (and liabilities) of the subsidiary Parque Eólico Altos de Voltoya, following the acquisition of an additional 12% interest (see note 5).
Assets under construction as at 31 December 2011 and 31 December 2010 are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity business: | ||
| EDPR EU Group | 757,921 | 288,285 |
| EDPR NA Group | 433,240 | 1,293,304 |
| EDP Renováveis, S.A. | 1.566 | 7,909 |
| EDPR BR | 10,718 | 77,459 |
| 1,203,445 | 1,666,957 |
Assets under construction as at 31 December 2011 and 2010 for EDPR NA Group are essentially related to wind farms under construction and development.
Financial interests capitalised amount to 33,927 thousands of Euros as at 31 December 2011 and 68,401 thousands of Euros as at 31 December 2010 (see note 14).
Personnel costs capitalised amount to 23,466 thousands of Euros as at 31 December 2010: 24,118 thousands of Euros) (see note 10).
The EDP Renováveis Group has lease and purchase obligations as disclosed in Note 40 - Commitments.
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | ||
| Industrial property, other rights and other intangible assets | 42,462 | 41,069 |
| Intangible assets under development | 4 | |
| 42,466 | 41,069 | |
| Accumulated amortisation: | ||
| Depreciation and amortisation expense for the period | -2,120 | -2,240 |
| Accumulated depreciation | -18,527 | -16,102 |
| -20,647 | -18,342 | |
| Carrying amount | 21,819 | 22,727 |
Industrial property, other rights and other interest include 14,035 thousands of Euros and 25,500 thousands of Euros related to wind generation licenses of Portuguese companies (31 December 2010: 14,035 thousands of Euros) and EDPR NA Group (31 December 2010: 24,693 thousands of Euros), respectively.
The movement in Intangible assets from 31 December 2011, is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | Balance at 01 Jan |
Acquisitions / Increases |
Disposals/ Write-offs |
Transfers | Exchange Differences |
Changes in perimeter / Other |
Balance at 31 Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost: | |||||||
| Industrial property, other rights | |||||||
| and other intangible assets | 41,069 | 5 | 620 | 768 | 42,462 | ||
| Intangible assets under | |||||||
| development | 4 | 4 | |||||
| 41,069 | ರಿ | 620 | 768 | 42,466 | |||
| Changes in | |||||||
| Balance at | Charge | Disposals/ | Exchange | perimeter / | Balance at | ||
| Thousands of Euros | 01 Jan | for the year | Impairment | Write-offs | Differences | Other | 31 Dec |
| Accumulated amortisation: | |||||||
| Industrial property, other rights | |||||||
| and other intangible assets | 18,342 | 2,120 | 250 | -65 | 20,647 | ||
| 18.342 | 2.120 | - | 250 | -65 | 20.647 |
| Changes in | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at | Acquisitions / | Disposals/ | Exchange | perimeter / | Balance at | ||
| Thousands of Euros | 0) Jan | Increases | Write-offs | Transfers | Differences | Other | 31 Dec |
| Cost: | |||||||
| Industrial property, other rights | |||||||
| and other intangible assets | 30,378 | 2,186 | 2 | 1,062 | 7,441 | 41,069 | |
| Intangible assets under | |||||||
| development | 2,844 | 314 | -2 | -2 | -3,154 | ||
| 33,222 | 2,500 | -2 | 1,062 | 4,287 | 41,069 | ||
| Changes in | |||||||
| Balance at | Charge | Disposals/ | Exchange | perimeter / | Balance at | ||
| Thousands of Euros | 01 Jan | for the year | Impairment | Write-offs | Differences | Other | 31 Dec |
| Accumulated amortisation: | |||||||
| Industrial property, other rights | |||||||
| and other intangible assets | 15,882 | 2,240 | 220 | 18,342 | |||
| 15,882 | 2,240 | 220 | - | 18,342 |
The movement in Intangible assets from 31 December 2010, is analysed as follows:
For the Group, the breakdown of Goodwill resulting from the cost of the investments and the corresponding share of the fair value of the net assets acquired, is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | Functional Currency | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity business: | |||
| Goodwill booked in EDPR EU Group | 698,403 | 749,392 | |
| EDPR Spain Group | Euro | 534,642 | 547,488 |
| EDPR Poland Group | Zloty | 20,746 | 23,266 |
| EDPR Portugal Group | Euro | 42,588 | 42,588 |
| EDPR France Group | Euro | 65,752 | 66,504 |
| EDPR Romania Group | lei | 9.287 | 9,421 |
| EDPR Italia Group | Euro | 23,044 | 57,781 |
| Other | Euro | 2,344 | 2,344 |
| Goodwill booked in EDPR NA Group | US Dollar | 611,882 | 592,915 |
| Goodwill booked in EDPR BR Group | Brasilian Real | 1.560 | 1,699 |
| 1.311.845 | 1.344.006 |
The movements in Goodwill, by subgroup, from 31 December 2011, are andysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | Balance at 01 Jan |
Increases | Decreases | Impairment | Exchange Differences |
Changes in perimeter / Other |
Balance at 31 Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity Business | |||||||
| EDPR EU Group | |||||||
| EDPR Spain Group | 547,488 | -12,846 | - | 534,642 | |||
| EDPR Poland Group | 23,266 | - | -2,520 | 20,746 | |||
| EDPR Portugal Group | 42,588 | - | 42,588 | ||||
| EDPR France Group | 66,504 | - | -752 | 65,752 | |||
| EDPR Romania Group | 9,421 | -134 | - | 9,287 | |||
| EDPR Italia Group | 57,781 | - | -34,737 | - | 23,044 | ||
| Other | 2,344 | - | 2,344 | ||||
| EDPR NA Group | 592,915 | 18,967 | - | 611,882 | |||
| EDPR BR Group | 1,699 | -139 | - | 1,560 | |||
| 1,344,006 | -12,846 | -35,489 | 16,174 | - | 1,311,845 |
| Balance at | Exchange | Changes in perimeter / |
Balance at | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | 0) Jan | Increases | Decreases | Impairment | Differences | Other | 31 Dec |
| Electricity Business | |||||||
| EDPR EU Group | |||||||
| EDPR Spain Group | 616,332 | 124 | -68,968 | 547,488 | |||
| EDPR Poland Group | 26,410 | - | -3,144 | 23,266 | |||
| EDPR Portugal Group | 42,588 | 42,588 | |||||
| EDPR France Group | 69,706 | -3,202 | 66,504 | ||||
| EDPR Romania Group | 10,931 | -1,510 | 9,421 | ||||
| EDPR Italia Group | 57,781 | 57,781 | |||||
| Other | 2,344 | 2,344 | |||||
| EDPR NA Group | 550,868 | - | 42,047 | 592,915 | |||
| EDPR BR Group | 1,501 | 198 | 1,699 | ||||
| 1,320,680 | 57,905 | -72,170 | 37,591 | - | 1,344,006 |
The decrease in EDPR Spain Group goodwill of 12,846 thousands of Euros is related with the final price of the lidbility related with the put option of Caja Madrid over the non-controlling interests held by this entity over Genesa (3,363 thousands of Subgroup Veinco (9,483 thousands of Euros). This shareholding was sold by 15,8 million of Euros generating a gain of 732 thousands of Euros (see note 13).
In 2010 the increase in EDPR Spain Group is related with an adjustment to the contingent price (124 thousands of Euros) of Aprofitement D'Energies Renovables de la Terra Alta, S.A. The decrease in this goodwill is related with the revaluation (in proportion of 20% of full equity valuation) of the put options of Caja Madrid over Genesa amounting approximately negative 68,968 thousand Euros (see note 40).
In 2011, the update of the assumptions in the estimates of MW to install and the energy prices result an impairment in EDPR Italia Group of 34,737 thousands of Euros (see notes 8 and 12).
On 27 January 2010, EDPR Group through its subsidiary EDPR EU acquired 85% of the share capital of EDP Renewables Italia, S.r.l. Additionally, EDPR EU has a call option and Energia in Natura, S.r.l. has a put option over the remain 15% of the capital. As a consequence, as at 31 March 2010, the EDPR Group has consolidated 100% of EDP Renewables Italia, S.r.l., considering the put option as an anticipated acquisition of non-controlling interests. The EDPR Italia Group goodwill (57,781 thousands of Euros), includes the preliminary goodwill generated from the acquisition (42,444 thousand Euros), the amount of the goodwill already included in the annual accounts of Italian Wind, S.r.l. (15,149 thousands of Euros) and from the acquisition of Repano, S.r.l. (46 thousand Euros with the acquisition price of 200 thousands of Euros) and Re Plus, S.r.l. (142 thousands of Euros with the acquisition price of 1,080 thousands of Euros).
During 2010 the EDPR Group increased its inding from 49% to 61% in the share capital of Parque Eólico Altos del Voltoya, S.A. (see note 5) and has carried out the purchase price allocation that originates the recognition of an operating income of 3,170 thousand Euros (see note 8).
| Assets and | ||
|---|---|---|
| Book value | Final PPA | Liabilities at fair value |
| 32,257 | 21,671 | 53,928 |
| 7,138 | 7,138 | |
| 39,395 | 21,671 | 61,066 |
| 10,507 | 1,459 | 11,966 |
| 3,966 | 3,966 | |
| 27,344 | 27,344 | |
| 3,040 | 3,040 | |
| 30,384 | 3,966 | 34,350 |
| 9,011 | 17,705 | 14,750 |
| 11,580 | 11,580 | |
| 2,569 | -3,170 | |
In 2009, the EDPR France Group increased the goodwill (2,826 thousand Euros) related with the acquisition of 100% of the share capital of subsidiary Bon Vent de L'Ébre, including the effect of the final PPA carried out in 2010, analysed as follows:
| 2009 | 2010 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets and | Assets and | ||||
| Thousands of Euros | Book Value | Provisory PPA |
Liabilities at fair value |
Final PPA | Liabilities at fair value |
| Property, plant and equipment | 4,113 | 8,993 | 13,106 | 4,042 | 17,148 |
| Other assets (including licenses) | 1,012 | 1,012 | 1,012 | ||
| Total assets | 5,125 | 8,993 | 14,118 | 4,042 | 18,160 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 1,864 | 1,864 | 2,045 | 3,909 | |
| Current liabilities | 5,070 | 5,070 | 5,070 | ||
| Total liabilities | 5,070 | 1,864 | 6,934 | 2,045 | 8,979 |
| Net assets acquired | રે રે | 7,129 | 7,184 | 1,997 | 9,181 |
| Consideration transferred | 7,686 | 7,686 | 12,007 | ||
| Goodwill | 7,631 | 502 | 2,826 |
During the year 2010 the final purchase price allocation of subsidiary Bon Vent de L'Ébre was carried out and the goodwill of EDPR France Group has increased by 2,324 thousands of Euros.
In 2010 EDPR Poland Group acquired 100% of the share capital of the companies Farma Wiatrowa Starozreby SP ZOO and Farma Wiatrowa Wyszogrod SP ZOO and carried out the final PPA, that led to a recognition of an operating income of 15,000 thousand Euros (see note 8), analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | Bodzanow | Starozreby | Wyszogrod | Book value | Final PPA | Assets and liabilities at fair value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | ਦੇ ਪੈ | 134 | 227 | 38,533 | 38,760 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | ||||||
| Non current assets | 39 | 54 | 134 | 227 | 38,533 | 38,760 |
| Current assets | 445 | 442 | 375 | 1,262 | 1,262 | |
| Total assets | 484 | 496 | રેજિ | 1,489 | 38,533 | 40,022 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 421 | 383 | 332 | 1,136 | 7,348 | 8,484 |
| Current liabilities | -1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | ||
| Total liabilities | 422 | 382 | 346 | 1,150 | 7,348 | 8,498 |
| Net assets acquired | 62 | 114 | 163 | 339 | 31,185 | 31,524 |
| Consideration transferred | 6,132 | 5,513 | 4,879 | 16,524 | 16,524 | |
| Goodwill | 6,070 | 5,399 | 4,716 | 16,185 | -15,000 |
In 2010, the increase in EDPR Polska goodwill (329 thousands of Euros) is related with the acquisition of 100% of the share capital of Subsidiary Karpacka Mala Energetyka SP ZOO. Additionally the goodwill has decreased 3,144 thousands of Euros related with exchange differences.
The EDPR Italia Group goodwill results from the acquisition of Italian Wind, S.r.l. and Re Plus, S.r.l. During 2010, the final PPA for the Italian Wind, S.r.l., Repano, S.r.l. acquisitions was carried out and the final goodwill generated is analysed as follows:
| Assets and | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Book value | Provisory PPA | Liabilities at fair value |
| Property, plant and equipment | 4,841 | 3,964 | 8,805 |
| Other non current assets | 123 | 123 | |
| Goodwill | 15,149 | 15,149 | |
| Non current assets | 20,113 | 3,964 | 24,077 |
| Current assets | |||
| Total assets | 20,113 | 3,964 | 24,077 |
| Non current liabilities | 1,090 | 1,090 | |
| Current liabilities | 405 | 405 | |
| Total liabilities | 405 | 1,090 | 1,495 |
| Net assets acquired | 19,708 | 2,874 | 22,582 |
| Consideration transferred | 65,072 | 65,072 | |
| Goodwill | 45,364 | 42,490 |
During 2011 the EDPR Group has paid an amount of 15,317 thousands of Euros (310: 59,325 thousands of Euros) for business combinations and success fees.
The goodwill of the EDPR Group is tested for impairment each year with basis of September. In the case of operational wind farms, it is performed by determining the recoverable value in use of the different cash generating units (CGUs) comprising each of the countries where EDPR Group performs its activity. Each country coincides with subgroups disclosed before.
To perform this andysis, a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method is based on the principle that the estimated value of an entity or business is defined by its capacity to generate financial resources in the future, assuming these can be removed from the business and distributed among the company's shareholders, without compromising the maintenance of the activity.
Therefore, for the businesses developed by EDPR's CGUs, the valuation was based on free cash flows generated by the business, discounted at appropriate discount rates.
. . . . . . . . .
The future cash flows projection period used is the useful life of the assets (25 years) which is consistent with the of our wind farms and with the current depreciation method. This is also supported by the long-term off-take contracts in place and possibility of utilizing estimated price curves.
The main assumptions on which impairment tests are based are as follows:
Power produced: net capacity factors used for each CGU utilize the wind studies carried out, which takes into account the long-term predictability of wind output and that wind generation is supported in nearly all countries by regulatory mechanisms that allow for production whenever weather conditions permit;
Electricity remuneration: approved or contraction has been applied where available, as for the CGUs that benefit from reaulated remuneration or that have signed to sell their output a pre-determined during their useful life: where this is not available. prices were derived using price curves projected by the company based on its experience, internal models and using sources;
New capacity: tests were based on the best information available on the wind farms due to come operational in coming years and considered the contracted and expected prices from various suppliers, adjusted by the probability the projects planned are to be successfully completed and by the growth prospects of the Business Plan Targets, its historical growth and market size projections;
Operating costs: established contracts for land leases and maintenance gareements were used of the projected consistent with the company's experience and internal models;
Terminal value: it is used as a percentage of the initial investment in each CGU, considering inflation;
Discount rate: the discount rates used reflect EDPR Group's best estimate of the risks specific to each CGU and range as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| EDPR EU | 6.1% - 8.6% | 5.3% - 7.7% |
| EDPR NA and EDPR BR | 5.0% - 8.3% | 6 1% - 9 1% |
EDPR has performed a series of sensitivity analyses of the results of impairment tests to changes in some of the key variables, such as the ones above:
Net Capacity;
Electricity remuneration;
This sensitivity andlysis does not lead into any imparity on EDPR NA and EDPR BR, apart from Italy whereas a sensitivity of +25-50bps on the discount rate would lead to the recognition of an impart in results in the range of 4.6M€ to 9.0M€ to 0.5M€ positive impact in results driven by existing put option).
On top, on 28th of January 2012 the Spanish Government enacted Royal-Decree Law 1/2012 that approves a temporary suspension of the premium remuneration for renewable energy capacity not included in the pre-assignation registry. Despite this requirion the Government has emphasized its commitment towards achieving the 2020 Renewable Energy Target for Spain.
Within EDPKs pipeline, wind farms already included in the registry will not be offected by this new regulation. Projects not included in the registry, and therefore, ruled by Royal-Decree-law 1/2012, did not have beforehand a defined incentive schemed and valued its pipeline using conservative that was not counting on the existence of a new regulatory scheme. Therefore, the new Royal-Decree Law does not have in practice, any economic impact either on the verall company. A sensitivity andysis considering one-year delay in the construction of wind forms affected by this new regulation does not induce to any impariment of relevance in the assets value
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Investments in associates: | ||
| Equity holdings in associates | 51.381 | 45.871 |
| Carrying amount | 51.381 | 45,871 |
For the purpose of annual accounts presentation, goodwill arising from the acquisition of associated in this caption, included in the total amount of Equity holdings in associates.
| 31 Dec 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Investment | Impairment |
| Associated companies: | ||
| Seaenergy Renewables Inch Cape Limited | 14,951 | |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Canárias, S.A. | 12,372 | |
| ENEOP - Éolicas de Portugal, S.A. | 10,696 | |
| Parque Eólico Sierra del Madero S.A. | 5,040 | |
| Other | 8,322 | |
| 51,381 |
| 31 Dec 2010 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Investment | Impairment |
| Associated companies: | ||
| ENEOP - Éolicas de Portugal, S.A. | 12,869 | |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Canárias, S.A. | 11,566 | |
| Parque Eólico Sierra del Madero S.A. | 6,788 | |
| Veinco Energia Limpia subgroup | 4.790 | |
| Other | 9,858 | |
| 45 871 |
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Balance as at 1 January | 45,871 | 47,609 |
| Acquisitions | 13,592 | 3,834 |
| Disposals | -3 | |
| Share of profits of associates | 4,796 | 5,036 |
| Dividends received | -3,412 | -1,784 |
| Exchange differences | 1,419 | 131 |
| Changes in consolidation method | -4,790 | -8,955 |
| Others | -6,092 | |
| Balance as at 31 December | 51,381 | 45,871 |
Acquisitions of investments in associates are mainly related to acquisition of Seaenergy Renewables Inch Cape note 5).
Changes in consolidation method are related with the acquisition of an additional interest of 14% in the share capital of Aplicaciones Industriales de Energias Limpias S.L. (Veinco Energia Limpia subgroup), obraining the control of this company and starting to consolidate under the full consolidation method (see note 5 and 18).
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Sociedad Eólica de Andalucia, S.A. | 10,832 | |
| Parque Eólico Montes de las Navas, S.L. | 8,847 | 6,684 |
| Other | 771 | 864 |
| 9.618 | 18.380 |
In 2011, EDP Renováveis closed an agreement with Enel Green Power Spain, SA to sell its 16.67% equity shareholding in Sociedad Edica de Andalucia, SA ("SEASA") by 10.7 million of Euros, with an after-tax capital gain of 6.6 million of Euros (see note 13).
The assumptions used in the valuation models of available for sale financial assets are as the impairment test.
The interest in share capital, voting rights, net assets and net income of the investments classified as available for sale financial assets are analysed as follows:
| % of share | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head office | capital | ||||
| Paraue Eólico Montes de las Navas. S.L. | Madrid | 17.00% | 17.00% | 27.407 | 3.492 |
The EDP Renováveis Group records the tax effect arising from temporary differences between the assets and liabilities determined on an accounting basis and on a tax basis, which are analysed as follows:
| Deferred tax assets | Deferred tax liabilities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |
| Europe and Others: | |||||
| Tax losses brought forward | 19,733 | 4,487 | - | ||
| Provisions | 7,796 | 6,591 | - | ||
| Derivative financial instruments | 7,285 | 8,401 | 49 | 52 | |
| Property, plant and equipment | 19,646 | 18,563 | 1,098 | 254 | |
| Allocation of fair value to assets and liabilities | 358,243 | 357,200 | |||
| Accounting revaluations | 146 | ||||
| Other | 1,098 | 477 | 2,207 | 1,165 | |
| 55,558 | 38,519 | 361,597 | 358,817 | ||
| United States of America: | |||||
| Tax losses brought forward | 520,423 | 329,722 | - | ||
| Provisions | |||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 5,806 | 6,670 | |||
| Property, plant and equipment | - | 224,023 | 234,331 | ||
| Allocation of fair value to assets and liabilities | - | 66,902 | 50,943 | ||
| Accounting revaluations | |||||
| Income from institutional partnerships in US wind farms | 271,959 | 76,201 | |||
| Offsetting of deferred tax assets and liabilities | -543,013 | -348,692 | -543,013 | -348,692 | |
| Other | 16,784 | 12,300 | |||
| 19,871 | 12,783 | ||||
| 55,558 | 38.519 | 381.468 | 371.600 |
The movements in net deferred tax assets and liabilities during the year are analysed as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Tax Assets | lax Liabilities |
Tax Assets | ax Liabilities |
| Opening balance | 38,519 | -371,600 | 28,066 | -342,924 |
| Movements charged to the profit and loss account | 18,417 | -16,563 | 7,119 | -16,741 |
| Movements charged to reserves | -1,107 | 2,707 | 2,545 | |
| Change in the applicable tax rate | -441 | |||
| Other movements | -271 | 7,134 | 627 | -14,480 |
| 55,558 | -381.468 | 38.519 | -371.600 |
As refered above, the opening balance of tax liabilities as at 1 January 2010 includes the effect of the final purchase price allocation of Bon Vent de L'Ebre (2,045 thousands of Euros) and Kresy (-541 thousands of Euros), performed during 2010.
Other movements of deferred tax liabilities relates mainly to the effect of purchase price allocations occurring in 2010 related to Neo Catalunia, Italy, Parque Eólico Altos del Voltoya (12,404 thousands of Euros).
Details of deferred tax assets and liabilities that will be realised or reversed in over 12 months are as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Tax Assets | Tax Liabilities |
| Tax losses brought forward | 15,786 | |
| Provisions | 3,264 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 7,285 | ന |
| Allocation of acquired assets and liabilities fair values | 344,662 | |
| Property, plant and equipement | 18,078 | 909 |
| Accounting revaluations | - | |
| Others | 1.082 | 554 |
| 45.495 | 346.128 |
The Group tax losses and tax credits carried forward are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Expiration date: | ||
| 2011 | - | 229 |
| 2012 | 352 | 197 |
| 2013 | 249 | 164 |
| 2014 | 239 | 193 |
| 2015 | 7,556 | 7 633 |
| 2016 | 20,882 | 2 822 |
| 2017 to 2031 | 1,364,112 | 985 906 |
| Without expiration date | 275,396 | 155 987 |
| 1,668,786 | 1,153,131 |
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Advances on account ot purchases | 8,344 | 3,549 |
| Finished and intermediate products | 12.194 | 18.669 |
| Raw and subsidiary materials and consumables: | ||
| Other consumables | 3,213 | 1.944 |
| 23 751 | 74 162 |
The Finished and intermediate products are essentially related with wind farms construction in progress.
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables - Current: | ||
| Europe: | ||
| Spain | 63,082 | 81,619 |
| Portugal | 11,708 | 13,664 |
| Poland | 12,420 | 8,967 |
| Rest of Europe | 20,891 | 11,106 |
| 108,101 | 115,356 | |
| United States of America | 31,660 | 27,945 |
| Other | 6,344 | 349 |
| 146,105 | 143,650 | |
| Doubtful debts | 1,437 | 2,339 |
| Impairment losses | -1,437 | -2,339 |
| 146,105 | 143,650 |
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Debtors and other assets from commercial activities - Current: | ||
| Prepaid turbine maintenance | 6,775 | 3,651 |
| Services rendered | 5,167 | 8,103 |
| Advances to suppliers | 45,445 | 55,917 |
| Sundry debtors and other operations | 22,642 | 23,748 |
| 80,029 | 91,419 | |
| Debtors and other assets from commercial activities - Non-current: | ||
| Deferred costs (EDP Renováveis Portugal Group) | 44,715 | 46,588 |
| Deferred PPA costs (High Trail) | 5,076 | 5,275 |
| Mapple Ridge I NYSERDA REC contract (EDPR NA) | 4,959 | 6,317 |
| Sundry debtors and other operations | 9,461 | 4,572 |
| 64,211 | 62,752 | |
| 144.240 | 154.171 |
Deferred costs (EDP Renováveis Portugal Group) - non current rents and surface rights paid to land owners and up-front network rents paid to EDP Distribuição. These costs are defered on the balance sheet and are recognised on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets.
Advances to suppliers includes mainly a advance for Gamesa of 38,247 thousands of Euros, supplier of wind turbines.
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Other debtors and other assets - Current: | ||
| Loans to related parties | 324,242 | 358,795 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 9,430 | 5,402 |
| Guarantees and tied deposits | 14,943 | 15,678 |
| Sundry debtors and other operations | 30,631 | 4,026 |
| 379,246 | 383,901 | |
| Other debtors and other assets - Non-current: | ||
| Loans to related parties | 123,560 | 6,955 |
| Guarantees and tied deposits | 45,828 | 35,957 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 8,650 | 4,068 |
| Deferred costs related with institutional partnerships in US wind tarms | 12,948 | 11,631 |
| Sundry debtors and other operations | 7,286 | 1,948 |
| 198,272 | 60,559 | |
| 577,518 | 444,460 |
Loans to related parties - Current includes mainly 99,324 thousands of Euros of bans granted by EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. to ENEOP Group (31 December 2010: 129,648 thousands of Euros), 19,920 thousands of Euros granted by EDPR EU to EDP, S.A. -Sucursal en España (31 December 2010: 55,399 thousands of Euros (31 December 2010: 171,081 thousands of Euros) of loans granted by EDP Renováveis, S.A. to EDP S.A. - Sucursal en España.
Loans to related parties - Non-current includes mainly 17,880 thousands of Euros of loans granted by EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. to Eneop Group.
Guarantees and tied deposits - Non Current are related to project finance agreements, which of EDPR EU Group companies are obliged to hold these amounts in bank accounts in order to ensure its capacity of comply with responsibilities.
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| State and other public entities: | ||
| Income tax | 15,163 | 19,131 |
| Value added tax (VAT) | 21,738 | 53,109 |
| Other taxes | 4.387 | 8,810 |
| 41,288 | 81,050 |
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Equity securities: | ||
| Investment funds | 35,335 | |
| Debt securities: | ||
| Bonds | 211 | 409 |
| 211 | 35,744 |
In 2011, EDPR NA the sold of Neomai Inversiones SICAV, SA which held the investments funds (see note 5).
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash: | ||
| Cash in hand | 2 | ব |
| Bank deposits: | ||
| Current deposits | 188,607 | 234,231 |
| Specific demand deposits in relation to institutional partnerships | 24,636 | 76,939 |
| Other deposits | 6,677 | 189,465 |
| 219,920 | 500,635 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 219,922 | 500,639 |
As at December 2011, the EDP Renováveis Group made a change in prestricted to restricted cash. The Group believes this presentation is more appropriate and provides the users of the annual accounts with more relevant information pergining to Cash and cash equivalents. Specific demand deposits in relational partnerships are funds required to be held in escrow sufficient to pay the remaining construction related costs of projects in institutional equity partnerships (see note 35). The governing agreements of these partnerships and specific escrow agreements define the appropriate expenditure of these funds. Prior to 2011, amounts included in Specific demand deposits were previously included as a component of restricted cash in Other assets - Current - Tied deposits (see note 25). The Group has re-classified these amounts that are expected to be used in the next included them within Cash and cash equivalents. In accordance with IAS 1, the Group has retrospectively reclassified amounts within 2010 comparative figures to conform to this change in presentation. The Group reclassified 24,636 thousands of Euros as 31 December 2011 and 2010, respectively, from Other assets . Current - Tied deposits to Cash and cash equivalents.
In 31 December 2010, the Other deposits includes 182,633 thousands of EDP Finance BV in USD, with a maturity until one month, which earn interests from 5% to 5.5%.
At 31 December 2011 and 2010, the share capital of the Company is represented by 872,308,162 ordinary bearer shares of Euros 5 par value each, all fully paid. These shares have the same voting and profits. These shares are freely transferable.
Companies which hold a direct or indirect of at least 10% in the share capital of the Company at 31 December 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
EDP Renováveis, S.A. shareholder's structure as at 31 December 2011 is analysed as follows:
| N.º of Shares | % Capital | % Voting | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. Sucursal en España (EDP Branch) | 541,027,156 | 62.02% | 62.02% |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | 135,256,700 | 15.51% | 15.51% |
| Other(*) | 196,024,306 | 22.47% | 22.47% |
| 872,308,162 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
(*) Shares quoted on the Lisbon stock exchange
In 2007 and 2008 the Company carried out various share capital increases, which were subscribed through non-monetary contributions comprising 100% of the shares in EDPR NA and EDPR EU.
The contributions are applicable to the special tax treatment for mergers, spin-offs, transfers of assess and conversion of securities foreseen in Chapter VII of Section VII of Royal Decree 4 dated 5 March 2004 which approved the revised Spanish tax law. The disclosures required by prevailing legislation were included in the annual accounts for 2007 and 2008.
Earning per share attributable to the shareholders of EDPR are analysed as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Profit attributable to the equity holders of the parent in thousands of Euros | 88,604 | 80,203 |
| Profit from continuing operations attributable to the equity holders ot the parent | ||
| in thousands of Euros | 88,604 | 80,203 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding | 872,308,162 | 872,308,162 |
| Weighted average number of diluted ordinary shares outstanding | 872,308,162 | 872,308,162 |
| Earnings per share (basic) attributable to equity holders of the parent in Euros | 0.10 | 0 09 |
| Earnings per share (diluted) attributable to equity holders of the parent in Euros | 0.10 | 0.09 |
| Earnings per share (basic) from continuing operations attributable to the equity | ||
| holders of the parent in Euros | 0.10 | 0.09 |
| Earnings per share (diluted) trom continuing operations attributable to the equity | ||
| holders of the parent in Euros | 0.10 | 0.09 |
The EDPR Group calculates its basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.
The company does not hold any treasury stock as at 31 December 2011.
The average number of shares was determined as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares issued at the beginning of the period | 872,308,162 | 872,308,162 |
| Effect of shares issued during the year | ||
| Average number of realised shares | 872,308,162 | 872,308,162 |
| Average number of shares during the year | 872,308,162 | 872,308,162 |
| Diluted average number of shares during the year | 872,308,162 | 872,308,162 |
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Reserves | ||
| Fair value reserve (cash flow hedge) | -14,118 | -4,913 |
| Fair value reserve (available for sale financial assets) | 4,575 | 10,980 |
| Exchange differences arising on consolidation | -31,002 | -15,316 |
| -40,545 | -9,249 | |
| Other reserves and retained earnings: | ||
| Retained earnings | 286,175 | 208,493 |
| Additional paid in capital | 60,666 | 60,666 |
| Legal reserve | 18,690 | 14,281 |
| 365,531 | 283,440 | |
| 324,986 | 274,191 | |
The accounting for transactions among entities under common control is excluded from IFRS 3. Consequently, in the absence of specific guidance, within IFRS, the Group EDPR has adopted an accounting policy for such transactions, as considered appropriate. Accraing to the Group's policy, business combinations among entiles under common control are accounted for in the consolidated annual accounts using the book values of the acquired company (subgroup) in the EDPR consolidated annual accounts. The difference between the carrying amount of the net assets received and the consideration paid is recognised in equity.
The legal reserve has been appropriated in accordance with Article 274 of the Spanish Companies are obliged to transfer 10% of the profits for the year to a legal reserve reaches an amount equal to 20% of the share capital. This reserve is not distributable to shareholders and may only be used if no other reserves are available or to increase the share capid.
The EDP Renováveis, S.A. proposal for 2011 profits distribution to be presented in the Annual General Meeting is as follows:
| Euros | |
|---|---|
| Profit for the period | 59,018,372.50 |
| Distribution Legal reserve |
5,901,837.25 |
| Retained earnings | 53,116,535.25 |
| 59,018,372.50 |
The EDP Renováveis, S.A. 2010 profits distribution approved in the Annual General Meeting on 12 April 2011 was as follows:
| ru os | |
|---|---|
| Profit for the period | 44,091,046.97 |
| Distribution | |
| Legal reserve | 4,409,104.70 |
| Retained earnings | 39,681,942.27 |
| 44,091,046.97 | |
Fair value reserve (cash flow hedge)
The Fair value reserve (cash flow hedge) comprises the effective portion of the fair value of cash flow hedging
Fair value reserve (available-for-sale financial assets)
This reserve includes the accumulated net change in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets as at the balance sheet date.
| Thousands of Euros | |
|---|---|
| Balance as at 1 January 2010 | 8,659 |
| Sociedad Eólica de Andalucia | -934 |
| Parque Eólico Montes de las Navas, S.L. | 3,255 |
| Balance as at 31 December 2010 | 10,980 |
| Sociedad Eólica de Andalucia | -7,725 |
| Parque Eólico Montes de las Navas, S.L. | 1,320 |
| Balance as at 31 December 2011 | 4,575 |
Exchange differences arising on consolidation
This caption reflects the amount arising on the annual accounts of subsidiaries and associated companies from their functional currency into Euros. The exchange rates used in the condensed consolidated annual are as follows:
| Exchange rates as at 31 December 2011 |
Exchange rates as at 31 December 2010 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closing | Average | Closing | Average | |
| Rate | Rate | Rate | Rate | |
| വടമ | 1.294 | 1.392 | 1.336 | 1.326 |
| PLN | 4.458 | 4.121 | 3.975 | 3.995 |
| BRL | 2.416 | 2327 | 2.218 | 2.331 |
| RON | 4.323 | 4.239 | 4.262 | 4.212 |
| GBP | 0.835 | 0.868 | 0.861 | 0.858 |
| CAD | 1.322 | 1.376 | 1.332 | 1.365 |
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-controlling interests in income statement | 2.020 | 2,835 |
| Non-controlling interests in share capital and reserves | 124.539 | 122.706 |
| 126.559 | 125.541 |
Non-controlling interests , by subgroup, are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| EDPR EU Group | 115.937 | 114.216 |
| EDPR BR Group | 10.622 | 11,325 |
| 126.559 | 125.541 |
The movement in non-controlling interests of EDP Renovaveis Group is mainly related to:(i) profits attributable to non-controlling interests of 2,020 thousands of Euros; (i) variations resulting from share capital increases attributable to non-controlling interests of EDPR EU subsidiaries lEólica Alfoz. S.L. Morav Offshore Renewables Limited. Pestera Wind Farm. S.A., Investigación y Desarrollo de Energias Renovables. S. L. and Pochidia Wind Farm, S.A.) and EDP Renováveis Brasil, S.A., totalling 10,324 thousands of Euros and 1,493 thousands of Euros, respectively; and, the acquisition of an additional interest in the share capital of Aplicaciones Industriales de Energias Limpias, S.L. (8,055 housands of Euros) (see note 5); (iii) and dividends from EDPR EU amount to 3,419 thousands of Euros.
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Financial debt - Current | ||
| Bank loans: | ||
| EDPR EU Group | 66,876 | 125,408 |
| EDPR BR Group | 59,165 | 72,485 |
| Other loans: | ||
| EDPR EU Group | 2,061 | 3,634 |
| EDPR NA Group | 1,050 | વેરૂ ર |
| Interest payable | 5,902 | 5,185 |
| 135,054 | 207,647 | |
| Financial debt - Non-current | ||
| Bank loans: | ||
| EDPR EU Group | 588,353 | 491,588 |
| EDPR BR Group | 91,997 | 8,052 |
| Loans from shareholders of group entities: | ||
| EDP Renováveis , S.A. | 2,986,433 | 2,799,548 |
| Other loans: | ||
| EDPR EU Group | 21,893 | 23,423 |
| EDPR NA Group | 2,392 | 3,332 |
| 3,691,068 | 3,325,943 | |
| 3,826,122 | 3,533,590 |
Financial debt Non-current for EDP Renováveis, mainly refers to a set of loans granted by EDP Finance BV (2,986,433 thousands of Euros). These loans have an average maturity of 7.2 years and bear interest at fixed market rates.
The Group has project finance financings that include the usual guarantees on this type of financings, namely the pleage or a promise of pledge of bank accounts and assets of the related projects. As at 31 December 2017, these financings amount to 570,933 thousands of Euros (624,878 thousands of Euros as at 31 December 2010), which are already included in the total debt of the Group.
The breakdown of Financial debt by maturity, is as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Bank loans: | ||
| Up to 1 year | 129,512 | 202,184 |
| 1 to 5 years | 295,382 | 215,135 |
| Over 5 years | 384,968 | 284,505 |
| 809,862 | 701,824 | |
| Loans from shareholders of group entities: | ||
| Up to 1 year | 2,431 | 894 |
| 1 to 5 years | 241,000 | - |
| Over 5 years | 2,745,433 | 2,799,548 |
| 2,988,864 | 2,800,442 | |
| Other loans: | ||
| Up to 1 year | 3,111 | 4,569 |
| 1 to 5 years | 24,285 | 16,545 |
| Over 5 years | 10,210 | |
| 27,396 | 31,324 | |
| 3.826.122 | 3.533.590 |
The fair value of EDP Renováveis Group's debt is analysed as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying | Market | Carrying | Market | |
| Thousands of Euros | Value | Value | Value | Value |
| Financial debt - Current | 135.054 | 135.054 | 207.647 | 207,647 |
| Financial debt - Non current | 3,691,068 | 3,262,999 | 3,325,943 | 3,178,811 |
| 3,826,122 | 3,398,053 | 3,533,590 | 3,386,458 |
The market value of the medium/long-term (non-current) debt and borrowings that bear a fixed interest rate is calculated based on the discounted cash flows at the rates ruling at the balance sheet date. The market value of debt and bear a floating interest rate is considered not to differ from its book value as these loans bear interest at a rate indexed to Euribor. The short-term (current) debt and borrowings is considered to be the market value.
As at 31 December 2011, the scheduled repayments of Group's debt are as follows:
| Subsequent | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Total | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | vegirs |
| Debt and borrowings - Current | 135.054 | 135.054 | |||||
| Debt and borrowings - Non | |||||||
| current | 3.691.068 | 80.281 | 88.444 | 73.638 | 318.304 | 3,130,401 | |
| 3,826,122 | 135,054 | 80.281 | 88.444 | 73.638 | 318,304 | 3,130,401 |
The breakdown of guarantees is presented in note 40 to the condensed consolidated annual accounts.
The breakdown of Finance debt, by currency, is as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Loans denominated in EUR | 2.035.563 | 1.844.113 |
| Loans denominated in USD | 1,538,832 | 1,452,120 |
| Loans denominated in other currencies | 251.727 | 237,357 |
| 3,826,122 | 3.533.590 |
C. Jan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Employee benefits balance are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Provisions for social liabilities and benefits | 103 | 36 |
| Provisions for healthcare lighilities | 60 | 59 |
| 163 | વે ર |
Some EDP Renováveis Group companies grant post-relits to employees, under defined benefit plans, namely pension plans that ensure relirement complements to age, disability and surving pensions. In some cases healthcare is provided during relirement and early retirement, through mechanisms to those provided by the National Health Service.
The existing plans are presented hereunder, with a brief description of each and of the companies covered by them, as well as of the economic and financial data:
The EDP Renováveis Group companies in Portugal have a social benefits plan fund, complemented by a specific provision. The EDP Pension Fund is management of the management of the assets subcontracted to external asset management entities.
This Pension Fund covers the liability for reitrements (age, disability and survivor pension) as well as the liability for edry retirement.
The following financial and actuarial assumptions were used to calculate the liability of the EDP Renováveis Group pension plans:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Assumptions | ||
| Expected return of plan assets | 5.00% | 5.60% |
| Discount rate | 5.00% | 5.00% |
| Salary increase rate | 3.50% | 3.70% |
| Pension increase rate | 2.50% | 2.70% |
| Social Security salary appreciation | 1.90% | 1.90% |
| Inflation rate | 2.00% | 2.00% |
| Mortality table | Age >60 -TV88/90 | Age >60 -TV88/90 |
| Age <= 60 years - TV99/01 | Age <= 60 years -TV99/01 | |
| Disability table | 50%EKV 80 | 50%EKV 80 |
| Expected % of eligible employees accepting early retirement | 40% | 40% |
EDPR EU in Spain, has social benefit plans of defined contribution that complement those granted by the Social Welfare System to the companies' employees, under which they pay a contribution to these plans each year, calculated in accordance with the rules established in each case.
The Group companies in Portugal resulting from the spin-off of EDP in 1994 have a Medical Care Plan which is fully covered by a provision.
The actuarial assumptions used to calculate the liability for Medical Care Plans are as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Assumptions | ||
| Discount rate | 5.00% | 5.00% |
| Annual increase rate of medical service costs | 4.00% | 4.00% |
| Estimated administrative expenses per beneficiary per year (Euros) | 200 | 175 |
| Mortality table | Age >60 -TV88/90 | Age >60 -TV88/90 |
| Age <= 60 years -TV99/01 | Age<=60 years -TV99/01 | |
| Disabilitv table | 50%EKV 80 | 50%EKV 80 |
| Expected % of subscription of early retirement by employees eligible | 40% | 40% |
The Medical Plan liability is recognised in the Group's accounts that totally cover the liability.
Provisions are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Dismantling and decommission provisions | 57,694 | 53,156 |
| Provision for other liabilities and charges | 288 | 631 |
| 57.982 | 53.787 |
Dismantling and decommission provisions refer to the costs to be incurred with dismantling wind farms and land to their original condition, in accordance with the accounting policy described in Note 2 o). The above amount respects to 34,523 thousands of Euros for wind farms in the United States of America (31 December 2010: 28,813 thousands of Euros for wind farms in Spain (31 December 2010: 15,904 thousands of Euros for wind farms in Portugal (31 December 2010: 4,610 thousands of Euros), 896 thousands of Euros in Brazil (31 December 2010: 639 thousands of Euros), 1,622 thousands of Euros for wind farms in France (3) December 2010: 2,010 thousands of Euros for wind farms in Romania, 886 housands of Euros for wind farms in Poland (31 December 2010: 781 thousands of Euros for wind farms in Belgium (31 December 2010: 399 thousands of Euros).
EDP Renováveis believes that the provisions booked on the consolidated statement of financial position adequately cover the risks described in this note. Therefore, it is not expected that they will give rise to liabilities in addition to those recorded.
As at 31 December 2011 and 31 December 2010, the EDP Renováveis Group does not have any significant tox-related contingent liabilities or contingent assets related to unresolved disputes with the tax authorities.
The movements in Provisions for dismantling and decommission are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Balance at the beginning of the year | 53.156 | 63,956 |
| Capitalised amount for the year and other | 452 | 3,771 |
| Unwinding | 2.995 | 2,872 |
| Other and exchange differences | 1.091 | -17.443 |
| Balance at the end of the year | 57.694 | 53,156 |
Capitalised amount for the year and other inpact of the update of dismantling provisions assumptions.
The movements in Provision for other liabilities and charges are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Balance at the beginning of the year | 631 | 3,129 |
| Charge for the year | ||
| Write back for the year | -266 | -155 |
| Other and exchange differences | -77 | -2.343 |
| Balance at the end of the year | 288 | 631 |
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Deferred income related to benefits provided | 773.252 | 635.271 |
| Liabilities arising from institutional partnerships in US wind tarms | 1.023.557 | 1.008.777 |
| 1 706 800 | 1 611 018 |
The movements in Institutional partnerships in US wind farms are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Balance at the beginning ot the year | 1,644,048 | 1,353,612 |
| Proceeds received from institutional investors | 153,192 | 245,252 |
| Cash paid to institutional investors | -11,966 | -16,893 |
| Income (see note 7) | -111,610 | -107,005 |
| Unwinding (see note 14) | 62.538 | 64,830 |
| Exchange differences | 60.607 | 104,252 |
| Balance at the end of the year | 1,796,809 | 1,644,048 |
The Group has entered in several partnerships with investors in the United States, through limited liability companies operating agreements that apportions the cash flows generated by the wind farms between the investors and the Company and allocates the tax benefits, which include Production Tax Credits (PTC), Investment Tax Credits (ITC) and accelerated depreciation, largely to the investor.
During 2011 EDPR Group, through its subsidiary EDPR NA, has secured 116 million of USD (approximately 83 million of Euros) of institutional equity financing from Bank of America Corporation and Paribas North America in the Vento IX portblio and 124 million of USD which 97 million of USD (approximately 70 million of Euros) were realized upfront of institutional equity financing from JPM Capital Corporation and Wells Fargo Wind Holdings in exchange for an interest in Vento X Portofolio.
Trade and other payables from commercial activities are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Trade and other payables from commercial activities - Current: | ||
| Suppliers | 82,972 | 40,453 |
| Property and equipment suppliers | 582,280 | 665,443 |
| Variable remuneration to employees | 20,584 | 16,881 |
| Other creditors and sundry operations | 21,754 | 11,606 |
| 707,590 | 734,383 | |
| Trade and other payables from commercial activities - Non-current: | ||
| Government grants / subsidies for investments in fixed assets | 339,209 | 341,842 |
| Electricity sale contracts - EDPR NA | 61,663 | 71,991 |
| Other creditors and sundry operations | 3,361 | 2,898 |
| 404,233 | 416,731 | |
| 1,111,823 | 1,151,114 |
Government grants for investments in fixed assets are essentially related by EDPR NA subgroup under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act promoted by the United States of America Government (see note 1).
Electricity sales contracts - EDPR NA relair value of the contracts entered into by EDPR NA with its customers, deternined under Power purchase agreements (see note 8).
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Other liabilities and other payables - Current: | ||
| Liabilities arising from options with non-controlling interests | 756 | 234,754 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 129,582 | 10,673 |
| Other operations with related parties | 37,891 | 16,257 |
| Other creditors and sundry operations | 20,890 | 39,715 |
| 189,119 | 301,399 | |
| Other liabilities and other payables - Non-current: | ||
| Success fees payable for the acquisition of subsidiaries | 48,053 | 76,621 |
| Payables - Group companies | 31,103 | 61,806 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 106,115 | 162,042 |
| Liabilities arising from options with non-controlling interests | 3,356 | 36,584 |
| Other creditors and sundry operations | 623 | 207 |
| 189,250 | 337,260 | |
| 378,369 | 638,659 |
Success fees payable for the acquisition of subsidiaries Non-Current include the contingent prices of the acquisitions of the EDPR Italy, Relax Wind Group , EDPR Romand, Bodzanow, Starozreby, Wyszorod, Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy and Elebras. The decrease on this caption is due to reestimation of contigent consideration in 17,070 thousands of Euros (see note 8) and payments.
As at 31 December 2010 the Liabilities arising from options with non-controlling interests - Current includes the liability for the put option contracted with Caja Madrid for a 20% interest in the Genesa Group in the amount of 234,754 thousands of Euros equivalent to 20% of Genesa's full equity valuation. The option was exercised by Caja Madrid within the exercise of 2011 EDPR Group has paid 231 million.
As at 31 December 2011 the decrease on Liabilities arising from written put options with non-controlling interests - Non current , is mainly due to the reestimation of fair value of the written of non-controlling interests in 34,625 thousands of Euros (see note 8 and note 40).
As at 31 December 2011, Derivative financial instrument includes 79,184 thousands of Euros related to a hedge instrument of USD and Euros with EDP Branch, which was formalised in order the foreign exchange risk of the net investment held in EDPR NA, expressed in USD (see note 39).
According to Spanish law 15/2010 of 5 July the Group disclose the details of payments made to spanish suppliers during the year 2011 (distinguishing those who have exceeded the legal limits of postponement), the outstanding balances that at 31 December 2011 with an overdue greater than the legal period, are the following:
| Payments and outstandig payments at year end | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Value | 8 | ||
| Within the legal deadline | 200,088 | 48.19% | ||
| Rest | 215,150 | 51.81% | ||
| Total payments for the year | 415,238 | 100.00% | ||
| Average payment period (days) | 31.76 | |||
| Outstanding balances with an overdue greater than the legal period | 27,873 |
At 31 December 2011, the outstanding balances with an overder then the legal period includes 22,165 thousands of Euros regarding group companies.
At 31 December 2010, the balance of Spanish suppliers with a maturity date over 85 days is 15,616 thousands of Euros, from which 1,024 thousands of Euros are related with group companies.
This balance is analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| State and other public entities: | ||
| Income tax | 8,838 | 10,122 |
| Withholding tax | 24,026 | 22,474 |
| Value added tax (VAT) | 15,320 | 14,169 |
| Other taxes | 3,232 | 1,981 |
| 51,416 | 48,746 |
In accordance with IAS 39, the Group classifies the derivative financial instruments as a fair value hedge of an asset or liability recognised, as a cash flow hedge of recorded liabilities and forecast transactions considered highly probable or net investment hedged in foreign operations.
As of 31 December 2011, the fair value and maturity of derivatives is analysed as follows:
| Notional | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From 1 | More than | ||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Until 1 year | to 5 years | 5 years | Total | ||
| 7,807 | -208,460 | 1,132,501 | 77,008 | 693,674 | 1,903,183 | ||
| 7,807 | -208,460 | 1,132,501 | 77,008 | 693,674 | 1,903,183 | ||
| 5,961 | -29 | 61,500 | 1,098 | 62,598 | |||
| 5 | -26,931 | 41,846 | 184,337 | 198,763 | 424,946 | ||
| 5,966 | -26,960 | 103,346 | 185,435 | 198,763 | 487,544 | ||
| 2,251 | -277 | 2,101 | 551 | 2,652 | |||
| 2,056 | 38,803 | 38,803 | |||||
| 4,307 | -277 | 40,904 | 551 | 41,455 | |||
| 18,080 | -235,697 | 1,276,751 | 262,994 | 892,437 | 2,432,182 | ||
| Fair Value |
As of 31 December 2010, the fair value and maturity of derivatives is analysed as follows:
| Fair Value | Notional | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 to | More than | ||||||
| Thousands of Euros | Assets | Liabilities | Until 1 year | 5 years | 5 years | Total | |
| Net investment hedge | |||||||
| Cross currency rate swaps | -145,123 | 59,627 | 1,826,174 | 1,885,801 | |||
| -145,123 | 59,627 | 1,826,174 | 1,885,801 | ||||
| Cash flow hedge | |||||||
| Power price swaps | 7,438 | -7,725 | 74,039 | 3,940 | 77,979 | ||
| Interest rate swaps | 268 | -17,994 | 106,101 | 159,221 | 179,075 | 444,397 | |
| Currency forwards | -1,368 | 38,803 | 38,803 | ||||
| 7,706 | -27,087 | 218,943 | 163,161 | 179,075 | 561,179 | ||
| Trading | |||||||
| Power price swaps | 1,764 | -407 | 2,032 | 269 | 2,301 | ||
| Interest rate swaps | -98 | 17,381 | 17,381 | ||||
| 1,764 | -505 | 2,032 | 17,650 | 19,682 | |||
| 9,470 | -172,715 | 220,975 | 240,438 | 2,005,249 | 2,466,662 |
The fair value of derivative financial instruments is recorded under Other assets thote 25) or Other lightities and other payables (note 37), if the fair value is positive or negative, respectively.
The net investment derivatives are related to the Group CRS in USD and EUR with EDP Branch as referred in the fori value is based on internal valuation models, as described in note 42.
Interest rate swaps are related to the project finances and intend to convert variable to fixed interest rates.
Currency forwards related to exchange rate risk in Neólica Polska, derived from the supplying contracts defined in Euros, for which will be necessary financings in Polish Zlotis, are no longer qualified as cashflow hedge but presented as trading.
Cash flow hedge power price swaps are related to the hedging of the sales price. EDPR NA has entered into a power price swap to hedge the variability in the spot market prices received for a portion of Maple Ridge I project. Additionally, both EDPR NA and EDPR EU have entered in short term hedge the short term volatility of certain un-contracted generation of its wind farms.
In certain US power markets, EDPR NA is exposed to congestion and line loss risks which typically have a negative impact on the price received for power generated in these markets. To economically hedge these risk exposures, EDPR NA entered into Financial Transmission Rights ("FTR") and a three vear fixed for floating Locational Marainal Price (LMP) swap J
The trading derivative financial instruments are derivatives contracted for economic hedging that are not eligible for hedge accounting.
Fair value of derivatives is based on quotes indicated by external entities (investment banks). These entities use discount cash flows techniques usually accepted and data from public markets.
The changes in the fair value of hedging instruments and risks being hedged are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | Hedged | 2011 Changes in fair value |
2010 Changes in fair value |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hedging | ||||||
| Type of hedge | instrument | item | Instrument | Risk | Instrument | Risk |
| Net Investment hedge | Cross currency rate swaps | Subsidiary accounts in USD and PLN |
||||
| -55,530 | 55,530 | -143,855 | 143,855 | |||
| Cashflow hedge | Interest rate swap | Interest rate | -15,999 | -233 | ||
| Cashflow hedge | Power price swaps | Power price | 6,219 | -17,778 | ||
| Cashflow hedge | Currency torward Exchange rate | 2,789 | -756 | |||
| -67 521 | 55 530 | -169 627 | 143 855 |
The movements in cash flow hedge reserve have been as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Balance at the beginning of the year | -13,632 | 14,094 |
| Fair value changes | ||
| Interest rate swaps | -16,333 | -5,186 |
| Power price swaps | 6,110 | -18,448 |
| Currency forward | 2,789 | -756 |
| Transfers to results | -4,502 | -3,222 |
| Ineffectiveness | -32 | |
| Non-controlling interests included in fair value changes | 1,109 | -82 |
| Balance at the end of the year | -24,458 | -13,632 |
The gains and losses on the financial instruments portfolio booked in the income statement are as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash-flow hedge | ||
| Transfers to results | 4,502 | 3,222 |
| Ineffectiveness | - | 32 |
| Non eligible for hedge accounting derivatives | 1.268 | -234 |
| 5,769 | 3,020 |
The effective interest rates for derivative financial instruments associated with financing operations during 2011, were as follows:
| EDP Renováveis Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | Pays | Receives | |
| Interest rate contracts: | |||
| Interest rate swaps | EUR | 12.68% 5.01% 1 - |
[1.43% - 1.81%] |
| Interest rate swaps | PLN | 5.41% | 4.90% |
| Currency and interest rate contracts | |||
| CIRS (currency interest rate swaps) | EUR/PLN | [3,91% - 4,03%] | 1.39% |
The effective interest rates for derivative financial instruments associated with financing operations during 2010, were as follows:
| EDP Renováveis Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | Pays | Receives | |
| Interest rate contracts: | |||
| Interest rate swaps | EUR | 12.52% - 5.01% 1 | 10.72% - 1.11% 1 |
| Interest rate swaps | PLN | 5.41% | 1.00% |
As at 31 December 2011 and 31 December 2010, the financial commitments not included in the statement of financial position in respect of financial and real guarantees provided, are analysed as follows:
Thousands of Euros
| Type | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Guarantees of a financial nature | ||
| EDP Renováveis | 19,453 | |
| EDPR EU Group | 2,178 | 2,178 |
| EDPR NA Group | 3,478 | 3,368 |
| 5,656 | 24,999 | |
| Guarantees of an operational nature | ||
| EDP Renováveis | 469,459 | 538,122 |
| EDPR EU Group | 20,140 | 50,998 |
| EDPR NA Group | 1,740,496 | 1,304,742 |
| 2,230,095 | 1,893,862 | |
| Total | 2,235,751 | 1,918,861 |
| Real guarantees | 12,360 | 12,718 |
The Group has project finance financings that include the usual guarantees on this type of financings, namely the pleage or a promise of pledge of bank accounts and assets of the related projects. As at 31 December 2011, these financings amount to 570,933 thousands of Euros (31 December 2010: 624,878 thousands of Euros), which are already included in the total debt of the Group.
The EDPR Group financial debt, lease and purchase obligations by maturity date are as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt capital by period | |||||
| Up to | 1 to | 3 to | More than | ||
| Thousands of Euros | Total | 1 year | 3 years | 5 years | 5 years |
| Financial debt (including interests) | 5,184,933 | 326,786 | 545,454 | 515,460 | 3,797,233 |
| Operating lease rents not yet due | 918.874 | 35.694 | 72.745 | 70,520 | 739,915 |
| Purchase obligations | 1,619,040 | 906.488 | 669,351 | 23.917 | 19,284 |
| 7,722,847 | 1,268,968 | 1,287,550 | 609,897 | 4,556,432 |
| 31 Dec 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt capital by period | ||||||
| Up to | 1 to | 3 to | More than | |||
| Thousands of Euros | Total | l year | 3 years | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Financial debt (including interests) | 4,896,942 | 377,159 | 442,334 | 437,899 | 3,639,550 | |
| Operating lease rents not yet due | 769,109 | 42.363 | 85.458 | 84.370 | 556,918 | |
| Purchase obligations | 2,676,437 | 1,063,288 | 1,180,820 | 429,303 | 3,026 | |
| 8,342,488 | 1,482,810 | 1,708,612 | 951,572 | 4,199,494 |
Purchase obligations include debts related with long-term agreements of product and services supply related to the Group operational activity. When prices are defined under "forward" contracts, these are used in estimating the contractual commiments.
The Operating lease rents not yet due are essentially related with the land farms are built. Usually the leasing period cover the useful life of the wind farms.
As at 31 December 2011 the Group has the following contingent liabilities/rights related with call and put oplions on investments:
EDP Renováveis, through its subsidiary EDPR FR, holds a call option over Cajastur on company "Quinze Mines" (51% of share capital). Cajastur holds an equivalent put option on these shares over EDPR FR. These options will be determined under an investment bank valuation process. The options can be exercised between 1 January 2013, inclusively.
EDP Renováveis, through its subsidiary EDPR FR, holds a call option over Cajastur in the companies Sauvageons, Le Mee and Petite Pièce. Cajastur holds an equivalent put option on these shares over EDPR FR. The price of exercising these options will be determined under an investment bank valuation process. The options can be exercised between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014.
EDP Renováveis, through its subsidiary Santa Quiteira Energia, S.L.U., holds a coll option over Jorge, S.L. for 8.5% of interest held by Jorge, S.L. on company "Apineli Aplicaciones Industriales de Energias Limpias, SL" (Apineli). The price of exercising these of Euros. The option can be exercised when Jorge, S.L. obtain the windfarms "Dehesa del Coscojar" and "El Aguild", until 30 days after the notification of the suspensive condition with a limit date of 18 April 2014.
EDP Renováveis, through its subsidiary EDPR EU, holds a call option over Copcisa on companies Corbera and Vilalba (49% of share capital).
EDP Renováveis holds, through its subsidiary EDPR EU, a call option of remaining 6.48% of the share capital of EDPR Itália, with an execcise price based on an independent process evaluation conducted by an independent expert. Energia in Natura, S.r.l. holds a put option for 6.48% (15% in 2010, see note 8) of the share capital of EDPR Italia, whose exercise price over 85% of market value of participation (see note 37). The exercise period of the options is 2 years after occurrence of one of the following events:
· Fifth anniversary of the execution of the shareholders agreement (27 January 2015);
· When EDP Renováveis Italy is able to build, develop and operate 350 MW in Italy.
EDP Renováveis, through its subsidiary EDPR EU, holds a call option over the remaining shareholders of Re Plus (WPG, Gallea and Gant Partners) for 10% of its share capital. The price of exercising these options is 7,500 thousands of Euros. The exercised (ji f a change occur in the shareholding structure of the Plus and lijl always before the last project starts in operation.
EDP Renováveis, through its subsidiary EDPR EU, holds a put option of 15% of the share capital of Rowy, over the other shareholders. The exercise price is 80% of equity value with a cap of 5,000 thousands of Euros. The earlier of (I) two years following the begining of construction date or (ii) 31 December 2019.
The number of shares held by company officers as at 31 December 2011 are as follows:
| 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N.º of shares | N.º of shares | ||
| Executive Board of Directors | |||
| António Luis Guerra Nunes Mexía | 4,200 | 4,200 | |
| Ana Maria Machado Fernandes | 1,510 | 1,510 | |
| Nuno Maria Pestana de Almeida Alves | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| Rui Manuel Rodrigues Lopes Teixeira | 10,505 | ||
| João Pedro Nogueira Sousa Costeira | 3,000 | ||
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | 18,503 | ||
| Luís Abreu Castelo-Branco Adão da Fonseca | 1,200 | ||
| António Fernando Melo Martins da Costa | 1,480 | ||
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | 620 | 620 | |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | 380 | 380 | |
| Jorge Manuel Azevedo Henriques dos Santos | 200 | 200 | |
| José Silva Lopes | 760 | ||
| José Fernando Maia de Araújo e Silva | 80 | 80 | |
| João José Belard da Fonseca Lopes Raimundo | 840 | 840 | |
| 46.038 | 15.070 |
The members of Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis have not communicated or the parent company has knowledge of any conflict of interests included in the article 229° of "Ley de Sociedades Anónimas" (Spanish Public Companies' Law).
The board members of the parent company, complying with the article 229° of the Spanish Companies Act, declared that they and related parties to them have not exercised positions of responsibility in companies with the same, similar of EDP Renováveis Group parent company, and they do not have exercised by their own or through third entities any activity in companies with the same, similar or complementary activity of EDP Renováveis Group parent company, with the following exceptions:
| Board Member | Position | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Company | |||
| António Luis Guerra Nunes Mexía: | |||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | Chairperson of the Executive Board of Directors | ||
| EDP - Energias do Brasil, S.A. | Chairperson of the Board of Directors | ||
| Ana Maria Machado Fernandes: | |||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | Director | ||
| EDP - Energias do Brasil, S.A. | Director | ||
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | Director | ||
| EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. | Chairperson | ||
| EDP Renováveis Brasil, S.A. | Chairperson | ||
| ENEOP - Eólicas de Portugal, S.A. | Chairperson | ||
| João Manuel Manso Neto: | |||
| Naturgás Energia, S.A. | Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors | ||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | Director | ||
| EDP - Gestão da Produção de Energia, S.A. | Chairperson of the Board of Directors | ||
| EDP Gás.com - Comércio de Gás Natural, S.A. | Director | ||
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors | ||
| Electrica de la Ribera de Ebro, S.L. (Elebro) | Chairperson of the Board of Directors | ||
| Hidrocantábrico Energia , S.A.U. | Chairperson of the Board of Directors | ||
| Empresa Hidroeléctrica do Guadiana, S.A. | Chairperson of the Board of Directors | ||
| EDP Energia Ibérica S.A. | Director |
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | Director |
|---|---|
| EDP - Energias do Brasil, S.A. | Director |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico S A | Director |
| Board Member | Position |
|---|---|
| Company | |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez: | |
| Naturgás Energía, S.A. | Chairperson of the Board of Directors |
| Enagas, S.A. | Permanent Representative |
| EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. | Director |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | Chairperson of the Board of Directors |
| Rui Manuel Rodrigues Lopes Texeira: | |
| EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. | Director |
| Generaciones Especiales I, S.L. | Director |
| EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. | Director |
| Malhadizes - Energia Eólica, S.A. | Director |
| EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd | Director |
| Relax Wind Park III SP. Z O.O. | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| Relax Wind Park I SP. Z O.O. | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| EDP Renewables Polska SP. Z O.O | Director |
| Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy I SP. Z O.O. | Director |
| Masovia Wind Farm I SP. Z 0.0. | Director |
| Farma Wiatrowa Starozreby SP. Z O.O. | Director |
| Karpacka Mala Energetyka SP. Z O.O | Director |
| Relax Wind Park IV SP. Z 0.0 | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| Relax Wind Park II SP. Z O.O | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| EDP Renováveis Brasil, S.A. | Director |
| Luís Abreu Castello-Branco Adão da Fonseca: EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. |
Director |
| Generaciones Especiales I, S.L. | Director |
| EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. | Director |
| EDP Renewables Romania, Srl | Director |
| Cernavoda Power, Srl | Director |
| Pochidia Wind Farm, S.A. | Director |
| EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd | Director |
| Relax Wind Park III SP. Z O.O. | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| Relax Wind Park I SP. Z O.O. | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| EDP Renewables Polska SP. Z O.O | Director |
| Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy I SP. Z O.O. | Director |
| Masovia Wind Farm I SP. Z 0.0. | Director |
| Farma Wiatrowa Starozreby SP. Z O.O. | Director |
| Karpacka Mala Energetyka SP. Z O.O | Director |
| Relax Wind Park IV SP. Z O.O | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| Relax Wind Park II SP. Z O.O | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| EDPR UK, Ltd | Director |
| Moray Offshore Renewables, Ltd | Director |
| Maccoll Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Director |
| Stevenson Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Director |
| Telford Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Director |
| EDP Renewables Italia, Srl | Director |
| EDP Renováveis Brasil, S.A. | Director |
| FDP Inovacão S A | Director |
| Board Member | Position |
|---|---|
| Company | |
| João Paulo Nogueira Sousa Costeira: | |
| Eneroliva S.A. | Director |
| EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. | Director |
| Generaciones Especiales I, S.L. | Director |
| EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. | President |
| Malhadizes - Energia Eólica, S.A. | President |
| Eólica da Serra das Alturas, S.A. | Director |
| Eólica de Montenegrelo, S.A. | Director |
| ENEOP 2 - Exploração de Parques Eolicos, S.A. | President |
| Eólica dos Altos de Salgueiros-Guilhado, S.A. | President of the General Meeting |
| Eólica de Alvarrões, S.A. | President |
| Eólica do Espigão, S.A. | Director |
| Eólica do Bravo, S.A | President of the General Meeting |
| Eólica do Campanário, S.A. | President of the General Meeting |
| Eólica da Terra do Mato, S.A. | Director |
| Eólica do Alto da Lagoa, S.A. | Director |
| Eólica do Alto do Mourisco, S.A. | Director |
| Eólica das Serras das Beiras, S.A. | Director |
| Eólica do Alto Douro, S.A. | Director |
| Eólica do Monte das Castelhanas, S.A | President |
| Eólica da Lomba, S.A. | President |
| Eólica do Cachopo, S.A. | President of the General Meeting |
| Eólica do Cotão, S.A. | Chairperson |
| EDP Renewables Romania, Srl | Director |
| Cernavoda Power, Srl | Director |
| Greenwind, S.A. | President |
| EDP Renewables France, S.A. | President |
| Centrale Eolienne Neo Truc de l'Homme, SAS | President |
| Eolienne de Callengeville, SAS | President |
| Neo Plouvien, SAS | President |
| Parc Eolien de la Hetroye, SAS | President |
| Eolienne de Saugueuse, SARL | Manager ("Gerant") |
| Eolienne des Bocages, SARL | Manager ("Gerant") |
| Eolienne d'Etalondes, SARL | Manager ("Gerant") |
| Parc Eolien d'Ardennes, SARL Parc Eolien de Mancheville, SARL |
Manager ("Gerant") Manager ("Gerant") |
| Parc Eolien de Roman, SARL | Manager ("Gerant") |
| Relax Wind Park III SP. Z O.O. | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| Relax Wind Park I SP. Z O.O. | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| EDP Renewables Polska SP. Z O.O | |
| Director | |
| Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy I SP. Z O.O. | Director |
| Masovia Wind Farm I SP. Z O.O. | Director |
| Farma Wiatrowa Starozreby SP. Z O.O. | Director |
| Karpacka Mala Energetyka SP. Z O.O | Director |
| Relax Wind Park IV SP. Z 0.0 | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| Relax Wind Park II SP. Z O.O | Member of the Supervisory Board |
| EDPR UK, Ltd | Director |
| Moray Offshore Renewables, Ltd | Director |
| Maccoll Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Director |
| Stevenson Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Director |
| Telford Offshore Windfarm, Ltd | Director |
| EDP Renewables Italia, Srl | Director |
| Operação e Manuntenção Industrial, S.A. | Director |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz: | |
|---|---|
| EDP Renewables Canada. Ltd. |
| EDP Renewables Canada. Ltd. | Chairman of the Bodrd |
|---|---|
| EDP Renewables North America. LLC and subsidiaries | Chairman of the Board |
Additionally the board members have comunicated that they do not own any interest in the share capital of any other company with the same, similar or complementary activity of EDP Renováveis Group, with the following exceptions:
| Board Member | Number of shares | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Company | |||
| António Luis Guerra Nunes Mexía: | |||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | 41,000 | ||
| EDP - Energias do Brasil, S.A. | l | ||
| Joao Manuel Manso Neto: | |||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | 1,268 | ||
| Nuno Maria Pestana de Almeida Alves: | |||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | 100,000 | ||
| EDP - Energias do Brasil, S.A. | l | ||
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz: | |||
| lberdrola | 50 | ||
| Jogo Manuel de Mello Franco: | |||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | 4,550 | ||
| REN - Redes Energéticas Nacionais, S.G.P.S., S.A. | 380 | ||
| Jorge Manuel Azevedo Henriques dos Santos: | |||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | 2,379 | ||
In accordance with the Company's by-laws, the remuners of the Board of Directors is proposed by the Nominations and Remunerations Committee to the Board of Directors on the overall amount of remuneration authorized by the General Meeting, The Board of Directors approves the distribution and exact amount paid to each director on the basis of this proposal.
The remuneration attributed to the members of the Executive Board of Directors in 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | 551.362 | 592.939 |
| Board members | 512,083 | 565,000 |
| 1,063,445 | 1.157.939 |
On 4 November 2008 EDP and EDP Renováveis signed an Executive Management that was renewed on 4 May 2011 and effective from 18 March 2011. Through this contract, EDP provides management services to EDP Renováveis, including matters related to the day-to-day running of the Company. Under this agreement EDP appoints three people from EDP to be part of EDPR's Executive Committee, for which EDP Renováveis pays EDP an amount defined by the the Related Party Commitee, and approved by the Board of Directors and the Shareholders Meeting.
Under this contract, EDP Renováveis is due to pay an amount of 380 thousands of Euros for management services rendered by EDP through 2011 (836 thousands of Euros in 2010).
Additionally, the remuneration of the Management Team, defined as Key Management and not including the Chief Executive Officer, was in 2011 1,857 thousands of Euros (310: 1,252 thousands of Euros). They do not receive any relevant non-monetary benefits as remuneration.
The retirement savings plan for the members of the Management Team not including the Chief Executive Officer range betweeen 3% to 6% of their annual salary.
As at 31 December 2011 and 2010 there are no outstanding loans and advances with company officers and key management.
As at 31 December 2011, assets and liabilities with related parties, are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | Assets | Liabilities | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDP Energias de Portugal, S.A. | 10,025 | 5,574 | 4,451 |
| EDP Energias de Portugal, S.A. Sucursal en España (EDP Branch) | 247,999 | 108,110 | 139,889 |
| EDP Group companies | 42,862 | 2,994,639 | -2,951,777 |
| Hidrocantábrico Group companies | 46,370 | 1,746 | 44,624 |
| Associated companies | 224,114 | 2,169 | 221,945 |
| Jointly controlled entities | 5,030 | 840 | 4,190 |
| Other | 591 | -591 | |
| 576,400 | 3,113,669 | -2,537,269 |
Liabilities includes essentially loans obtained by EDP Renovaveis from EDP Finance BV in the amount of Euros.
As at 31 December 2010, assets and liabilities with related parties, are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | Assets | Liabilities | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDP Energias de Portugal, S.A. | ব | 15,079 | -15,075 |
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. Sucursal en España (EDP Branch) | 226,106 | 156,902 | 69,204 |
| EDP Group companies | 45,169 | 2,803,263 | -2,758,094 |
| Hidrocantábrico Group companies | 48,498 | 2,017 | 46,481 |
| Associated companies | 132,535 | 2,266 | 130,269 |
| Jointly controlled entities | 7,239 | 840 | 6,399 |
| Other | 757 | 2,733 | -1,976 |
| 460,308 | 2,983,100 | -2,522,792 |
Transactions with related parties for the year ended 31 December 2011 are analysed as follows:
| Operating | Financial | Operating | Financial | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | income | income | expenses | expenses |
| EDP Energias de Portugal, S.A. | - | 4,861 | -11,285 | -3,197 |
| EDP Energias de Portugal, S.A. Sucursal en España (EDP Branch) | 15,633 | -8,368 | -2,174 | |
| EDP Group companies | 136,903 | 343 | -6,354 | -152,362 |
| Hidrocantábrico Group companies | 358,814 | -4,994 | -700 | |
| Associated companies | 1,533 | 6,820 | -69 | |
| Jointly controlled entities | 767 | 5,618 | - | |
| Other | 233 | -638 | ||
| 498,250 | 33,275 | -31,639 | -158,502 |
Transactions with related parties for the year ended 31 December 2010 are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Euros | Operating income |
Financial income |
Operating expenses |
Financial expenses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDP Energias de Portugal, S.A. | 11,664 | 2,332 | -2,929 | -3,053 |
| EDP Energias de Portugal, S.A. Sucursal en España (EDP Branch) | 3,015 | -6,969 | -1,438 | |
| EDP Group companies | 138,124 | 756 | -3,217 | -140,074 |
| Hidrocantábrico Group companies | 249,062 | -4,336 | ||
| Associated companies | 1,226 | 2,971 | ||
| Jointly controlled entities | 644 | 4,710 | ||
| Other | 5,702 | 663 | -99 | |
| 406,422 | 14,447 | -17,550 | -144,565 |
With the purpose of hedging the foreign exchange risk existing in the company and Group accounts of EDP Renováveis and in the company accounts of EDP Branch, the EDP Group settled a CRS in USD and Euros between EDP Renováveis. At each reporting date, this CRS is revalued to its market value, which corresponds to a spot foreign exchange revaluation of the investment in EPDR NA and of the USD external financing). As at 31 December 2011, the amount payable by EDP Branch related to this CIRS amounts to 208,460 thousands of Euros (310: 144,049 thousands of Euros -payable) (see note 37 and 39).
As part of its operational activities, the EDP Renovaveis Group must present guarantees in favor of certain with renewable energy contracts. Usually, these guarantees are granted by EDP, S.A., through EDP Branch. As at 31 December 2011, EDP, S.A. and Hidrocantábrico granted financial (30,768 thousands of Euros, 31 December 2010: 57,951 thousands of Euros) and operational (36,623 thousands of Euros, 31 December 2010: 439,195 thousands of Euros) guarantees to suppliers in favour of EDPR NA. The operational guarantees are issued following the commitments assumed by EDPR NA in relation to f property, plant and equipment, supply agreements, turbines and energy contracts (Power purchase agreements) (see note 40).
In the normal course of its activity, EDP Renováveis performs business transactions based on normal market conditions with related parties
The Company has no pension or life insurance obligations with its former or current directors in 2011 or 2010.
Fair value of financial instruments is based, whenever available, on quoted market prices. Otherwise, fair value is determined through internal models, which are based on generally accepted cash flow discounting techniques and option valuation models or through quotations supplied by third parties.
Non-standard instruments may require allernative techniques, which characteristics and the generally accepted market practices applicable to such instruments. These modering the market variables that affect the underlying instrument, namely yield curves, exchange rates and volatility factors.
Market data is obtained from generally accepted suppliers of financial data (Bloomberg and Reuters).
As at 31 December 2011 and 2010, the following table curves of the major currencies to which the Group is exposed. These interest rates were used as the fair value calculations made through internal models referred above:
| 31 Dec 2011 Currencies |
31 Dec 2010 Currencies |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR | USD | BRL | EUR | USD | BRL | ||
| 3 months | 1.36% | 0.58% | 10.41% | 1.01% | 0.30% | 10.90% | |
| 6 months | 1.62% | 0.81% | 10.15% | 1.23% | 0.46% | 11.61% | |
| 9 months | 1.79% | 0.97% | 10.04% | 1.37% | 0.61% | 11.90% | |
| l vear | 1.95% | 1.13% | 10.04% | 1.51% | 0.78% | 12.04% | |
| 2 years | 1.31% | 0.73% | 10.48% | 1.56% | 0.79% | 12.27% | |
| 3 vears | 1.36% | 0.82% | 10.75% | 1.89% | 1.26% | 12.15% | |
| 5 vears | 1.72% | 1.23% | 10.98% | 2.49% | 2.17% | 11.95% | |
| 7 vears | 2.07% | 1.64% | 11.05% | 2.93% | 2.83% | 11.85% | |
| 10 vears | 2.38% | 2.03% | 11.22% | 3.32% | 3.41% | 11.90% |
Non-listed equity instruments, for which a reliable and consistent fair value estimate is not available ither by internal models or external providers, are recognized at their historical cost.
Listed financial instruments are recognized at fair value based on market prices. The financial instruments for which reliable fair value estimates are not available, are recorded in the balance sheet at their fair value (note 20).
These financial instruments include mainly short first firen their short term nature at the reporting date, their book values are not significantly different from their fair values.
The fair value of the financial debtis estimated through internal models, which are based on generally accepted cash flow discounting techniques. At the reporting date, the carrying amount of flocting rate loans is approximately their fair value. In case of fixed rate loans, mainly the intercompany loans granted by EDP Group, their value is obtained through internal models based on generally accepted discounting techniques.
All derivatives are accounted at their fair value. For those which are quoted in organized market price is used. For over-the-counter derivatives, fair value is estimated through the use on cash flow discounting techniques and option valuation models generally accepted by the market, or by dealer price quotations.
With the purpose of hedging the foreign exchange risk resulting from the net investment in EDPR NA, the Group entered into a CRS in USD and EUR with EDP Branch. This financial derivative is presented on the balance sheet at its fair value, which is estimated by discounting the projected USD and EUR cash flows. The discount rates were based on the interest rate curves referred to above and the USD/EUR exchange rate is disclosed on note 30. See also notes 14, 24, 25 and 29.
The fair values of assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2010 are andysed as follows:
| 31 December 2011 | 31 December 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Furos | Carrying amount |
Fair value | Difference | Carrying amount |
Fair value | Difference |
| Financial assets | ||||||
| Available for sale investments | 9,618 | 9,618 | 18,380 | 18,380 | - | |
| Trade receivables | 146,105 | 146,105 | - | 143,650 | 143,650 | - |
| Debtors and other assets from commercial activities |
144,240 | 144,240 | - | 154,171 | 154,171 | |
| Other debtors and other assets | 559,438 | 559,438 | - | 434,990 | 434,990 | |
| Derivative financial instruments | 18,080 | 18,080 | - | 9,470 | 9,470 | - |
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 211 | 211 | - | 35,744 | 35,744 | - |
| Cash and cash equivalents (assets) | 219,922 | 219,922 | 500,639 | 500,639 | - | |
| 1,097,614 | 1,097,614 | 1,297,044 | 1,297,044 | |||
| Financial liabilities | ||||||
| Financial debt | 3,826,122 | 3,398,053 | -428,069 | 3,533,590 | 3,386,458 | -147,132 |
| Suppliers | 665,252 | 665,252 | 705,896 | 705,896 | ||
| Institutional partnerships in US wind farms | 1,796,809 | 1,796,809 | 1,644,048 | 1,644,048 | ||
| Trade and other payables from commercial activities |
446.571 | 446,571 | 445,218 | 445.218 | ||
| Other liabilities and other payables | 142,672 | 142,672 | - | 465,944 | 465,944 | - |
| Derivative financial instruments | 235,691 | 235,697 | 172,715 | 172,715 | ||
| 7,113,123 | 6,685,054 | -428,069 | 6,967,411 | 6,820,279 | -147,132 | |
The fair value levels used to valuate EDP Renováveis Group financial assets and liabilities are defined as follows:
Level 1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active market for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2 - Inputs other that quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the directly i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices);
Level 3 - Inputs for the assets or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
| 31 December 2011 | 31 December 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands of Euros | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| Financial assets | ||||||
| Available for sale investments | 9,618 | 18,380 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | - | 18,080 | 9,470 | |||
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 211 | 35,335 | 409 | |||
| 18,291 | 9,618 | 35,335 | 9,879 | 18,380 | ||
| Financial liabilities | ||||||
| Liabilities arising from options with non- | ||||||
| controlling interests | 4,112 | 271,338 | ||||
| Derivative financial instruments | 235,697 | 172,715 | ||||
| 235,697 | 4,112 | 172,715 | 271,338 |
The movement in 2011 and 2010 of the financial assets and lightlities within Level 3 are analysed was as follows:
| Available | Trade | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| for sale investments | and other payables | |||
| Thousands of Euros | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 | 31 Dec 2011 | 31 Dec 2010 |
| Balance at the begining of the year | 18,380 | 12,630 | 271,338 | 303,783 |
| Gains / (Losses) in other comprehensive income | 2,070 | -934 | ||
| Purchases | 6,684 | 3,356 | 36,584 | |
| Fair value changes/Payments | -270,582 | -69,029 | ||
| Disposals | -10,832 | |||
| Transfers into / (out of) Level 3 | - | |||
| Balance at the end of the year | 9.618 | 18,380 | 4,112 | 271,338 |
The trade and other payables within level 3 are related with Liabilities arising from options with non-controlling interests (see note 31).
China Three Gorges Corporation ("CTG") notified EDP that it has entered into a Strategic Direct Sale Agreement with Parpóblica - Participações Públicas (S.G.P.S.), S.A for the acquisition of 780,633,782 ordinary shares of EDP, which correspond to 21.35%od EDP's share capital and 21.35% of the respective voling rights. The imputation of a qualifying holding results from from the signatue of said and this the context of the implementation of EDP's 8th reprivatization phase.
The referred acquisition of shares is subject to the prior satisfaction of conditions of aprovals from relevant regulatory authorities from certain jurisdictions.
Although the acquisiton of the above mentioned stake has not been concluded, Portuguese Law deems relevant, for certain prurposes, the attribuition of voling rights, as a result of the execution of a purchase agreement over listed companies' shares.
The new standards and interpretation that have been issued effective and that the Group has applied on its consolidated annual accounts can be analysed as follows:
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued in November 2009, the IAS 24 (Revised) - Related Party Disclosures, with effective date of mandatory application of 1 January 2011, being allowed its early adoption.
This revised version simplifies the disclosure requirement related parties and clarifies the definition of a related party Therefore, this standard establishes that the companies disclose in its financial statements the transactions with related parties. In broad terms, two parties are related to each other if one party controls, or significantly influences, the other party.
The principal changes are the following:
partial exemption of the requirements on the paragraph 18 for transactions with government related entities;
simplification of "Related Party" definition.
No significant impact in the Group resulted from the adoption of this amendment.
The International Accounting Standards Board IIASB). issued in November 2009. amendments of a Minimum Funding Requirement, with effective date of mandatory opplication of I January 2011, being early adoption allowed. These ammendments were adopted by European Union in July 2010.
The amendment to IFRC 14, is it self an interpretation of IASB 19 Employee Benefits. The amendment applies in the limited circumsfances when an entity is subject to minimum funding requirements and makes an early payment of contributions to cover those requirements. The amendment permits such an entity to treat the benefit of such an early payment as an asset.
No significant impact in the Group resulted from the adoption of this interpretation.
The International Accounting Standard Board (JASB), issued in November 2009, the IFRC 19 - Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments, with effective date of mandatory application for the exercises beginning affer 30 June 2010, being early adoption allowed.
This interpretation clarifies how an entity renes of a financial liability with its creditor and the creditor agrees to accept the entity's shares or other equity instruments to settle the financial liability fully or partially.
This interpretation cannot be applied if:
the creditor is also a direct or indirect shareholder and is acting in its capacity as direct shareholder;
the creditor and the entity are controlled by the same parties before and after the transaction, and the substance of the transaction includes an equity distribution from, or contribution to the entity;
-extinguishing the financial liability by issuing equity shares is in accordance with the original terms of the financial liability.
This interpretation clarifies:
the entity's equity instruments issued to a creditor are part of the consideration paid to extinguish the financial liability;
the equity instruments issued are measured at their fair value cannot be reliably measured, the equily instruments should be measured to reflect the fair value of the financial liability extinguished ;
the difference between the carrying amount of the finguished and the initial measurement amount of the equity instruments issued is included in the equity's profit or losses for the year.
No significant impact in the Group resulted from the adoption of this interpretation.
In May 2010, IASB published the Annual Inprovement Project that implied changes to the standards in force. However, the effective date of the referred changes depends on each specific standard.
• Changes to IFRS 1 – First -Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, which is effective from 1 January 2011. This change establishes that: (j) in case of an entity changes its ascounting contained in this standard , it shall explain the changes between its first interim financial statements; (ii) if an entity uses the exemption provided in the standard for operations subject to rate requlation . it shall disclose that fact and the basis on which carrying amounts, were previous deternined.
No significant impact in the Group resulted from the adoption of this change.
· Changes to IFRS 3 - Business Combinations, effective from 1 January 2011. This changes clarifies that. (i) contigent consideration balances arising from business combinations whose preceded the date when an entity first applied this standard; (iji f a business combination agreement provides for an adjustment of the combination contigent on future events, the acquirer shall include the amount of that adjustment in the combination at the acquisition data if the adjustment is probable and can be measured reliably; and (ii) a business combination agreement may allow for adjustments to the combination that are contigent on one or more future events
No significant impact in the Group resulted from the adoption of this change.
Changes to FRS 7 - Financial Instruments: Disclosures, effective from 1 January 2011. This amendment simplifies the quanitave disclosures, ● since that is no longer necessary: (i) disclose the carrying amount of financial assets that would otherwise be past due or impaired whose terms have been renegotiated , and (ii) describe the collateral held by the entity as security and other credit enhancements and, unless impracticable, an estimate of fair value related to financial assets renegotiated.
No significant impact in the Group resulted from the adoption of this change.
Changes to JAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Assets, effective from 1 January 2011. The amendment of ● changes in equity for each component of equity, a reconciliation between the carrying at the end of the period, separately disclosing changes resulting from: (i) other comprehensive income; and (ii) transactions with owners in their capacity as owners, showing separately contributions to owners and changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result in a loss of control.
No significant impact in the Group resulted from the adoption of this change.
• Changes to IAS 34 - Interim Finacial Reporting, effective from 1 January 2011. The amendment clarifies and emphasis the information that must be disclosed when the interim financial reporting.
No significant impact in the Group resulted from the adoption of this change.
Changes to IFRC 13 - Customer Loyally Programmes, effective from 1 January 2011. This amendment estimate the fair value of award credits by reference to the awards for which they could be redeemed. Thar fair value of the award credits takes into account: (i) the amount of the discounted or incentives that would otherwise who have not earned award credits from an initial sale; and (ii) the proportion of award credits that are not expected to be restomers.
No significant impact in the Group resulted from the adoption of this change.
The International Accounting Standards Board (ASB), issued in December 2010, amendments to IRS 1— First-Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting standards, with effective date of mandatory application of July 2011, being early adoption allowed. These amendments have not been adopted by the European Union.
The amendment to IFRS 1 , introduces a specific exeption of IFRS for entities operating in economies previous classifid as hyper-inflation, so that when the date of transition is the date on which the functional currency stable, the entity may elect to measure on the transition date, all assets and liabilities held at the time of standardization, af fair value.
No significant impact in the Group is expected from the adoption of this change.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), issued in December 2017, amendments to IFRS 7 — Financial Instruments: Disclosures, with effective date of mandatory application of 1 July 2013, being early adoption allowed.
With this change, the disclosures of financial instruments include information that will evaluate the effect or the compensation arrangements, including recognised as asses and financial liabilities in the statement of financial position.
The adoption of this amendement will only have impact on the financial statement disclosures.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), issued in October 2010, amendments to IFRS 7 — Financial Instruments: Disclosures, with effective date of mandatory application of 1 July 2011, being early adoption allowed.
The amendment to IFRS 7, clarifies the discliosures required to all financial assets that are not derecognised and for any continuing involvement in a transferred asset, existing at the reporting date, irrespective of when the related transfer transaction ocucurred.
An entity transfers all or part of a financial asset, if, and only if, it either:
transfers the contractual rights to receive the cash flows of that financial asset ; or
retains the contractual rights to receive the cash flow of that financial asset, but assumes a contractual obligation to pay the cash flows fo one or more recipients in an arrangement.
The entity shall disclose at each reporting date for each classets that are not derecognised in their entirety: (i) the nature of transferred assets; (ii) the nature of the risks and rewards between the transferred liabilities.
For transferred financial assets that are derecognised in their entirely the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities that are recognised in the entity's statement of financial position and represent the entity's continuing involvement in the derecognised financial assets , and the ine in which the carrying amount of those are recognised; (ij) the fair value of the assets and liabilities that represent the entinuing involvement in the derecognised financial assets; (iii) the amount that best represents the entity's maximum exposure to loss from its continuing involvement in the de recognised financial assets, and information showing how the maximum exposure to loss is determined and fivit he undiscounted cash outflows that would or may be requird to repurchase derecognised financial assets or other amounts payable to the transfered assets.
In addition, an entity shall disclose for each type of continuing involvement:
the gain or loss recognised at the date of transfer of the assets:
income and expenses recognised, bith in the reporting period and cumulatively, from the entity's continuing involvement in the derecognised financial assets:
if the total amount of proceeds from transfer activity in a reporting period is not evenly distributed throughout the reporting period;
when the greatest transfer activity took place within that reporting period;
the amount recognised from transfer activity in that part of the reporting period; and
the total amount of proceeds from transfer activity in that part of the reporting period.
An entity shall provide this informaton for each period for which a statement of comprehensive income is presented.
The adoption of this amendement will only have impact on the financial statement disclosures.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued in November 2009, IFRS 9 - Financial instruments part I: Classification and measurement, with effective date of mandatory application for periods beginning on or affer 1 January 2013, being allowed its early adoption. This standard has not vet been adopted by the European Union.
This standard is included in phase I of the IASB's comprehensive project to replace IAS 39 and relates to issues of classification and measurement of financial assets. The main issues considered are as follows:
the financial assets can be classified in two categories: at amortised cost or at fair value. This decision will be made upon the initial recognition of the financial assets. Its classification depends these financial asses and the contractual cash flows associated to each financial asset in the business;
debt instruments model can be measured at amortised cost when the contractual cash-flows represent only principal and interest payments, which means that it contains only basic loan features, and for which an entity holds the contractual cash flows. All the other debt instruments are recognised at fair value; and
equity instruments issued by third parties are recognised at fair value with subsequent changes recognised in the profit and loss. However an entity could irrevocably elect equity instruments at initial recognition for which fair value changes and the realised gain or loss are recognised in fair value reserves. Gains and losses recognised in fair value recycled to profit and loss. This is a discretionary decision, and does not imply that all the equity instruments should be treated on this basis. The dividends received are recognised as income for the year.
The Group is evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.
The International Accounting Standards Board IIASB issued in May 2011. IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial State of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, being allowed its early adoption. This standard has not yet been adopted by the European Union.
This standard introduces a new approach in determining which investments should be consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and SIC 12 - Consolidation SPE. This standard establishes a single in assessing the existence of control over subsidiaries, where an investor has control over it is exposed, or has the right, the variable returns arising from his involvement in the subsidiary and has the ability to influence these returns because of the power over it.
The Group is evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.
The International Accounting Standards Board (JASB) issued in May 2011, IFRS 11 - Joint Arrangements, with effective date of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, being allowed its early adoption. This standard has not yet been adopted by the European Union.
This standard superseded IAS 31 - Interes and introduces several changes for accounting ipintly controlled investments, the main aspect is the elimination of the option to consolional method, which must be booked by the equity method.
The structure of a joint agreement ceases to be the main factor in determining the classification of a joint agreement requires the identification and evaluation of the structure. leagl form of the contractual agreement and other facts and circumstances
The Group is evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued in May 2011, IFRS 10 - Consolidated financial state of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, being allowed its early adoption. This standard has not yet been adopted by the European Union.
The information disclosed has to help users of the financial statements evaluate the nature and riosks associated with its interestes in other entitiesand the effects of those interests on the financial statements. The main issues considered are as follows:
for the interests in subsidiaries, should be disclosed: (j) the composition of the group;(ii) significant restrictions on the parent's ability to access or use the the liabilities of its subsidiares; (iv) the nature of, and changes in, the risks assocoated with interests in consolidated strsctured entities; and (v) changes in its ownership interest that did or did not result in a loss of control during the reporting period.
for the interests in ioint arrangements and associated, title nature, extent and financial effects of its interests in ioint arrangements and associates, including information about contractionships with other parties; and fijl the nature of, and the changes in, the associated risks with its interests in ioint ventures and associates.
for the interest in unconsolidated structured entities; (i) the nature and the extent of its interests in unconsolidated strectured entities; and (ii) the evaluation of the risks associated with the interests in unconsolidated structured entities.
No significant impact in the Group is expected from the adoption of this standard.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued in May 2011, FRS 13 - Fair Value Measurement, with effective date of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, being allowed its early adoption. This standard has not yet been adopted by the European Union.
IFRS 13 defines fair value, provides quidance on its determination and introduces consistent requirements for disclosures on fair value measurement. The standard does not include requirement is required; it prescribes how fair value is to be measured if another standard requires it.
No significant impact in the Group is expected from the adoption of this standard.
The International Accounting Standards Board (ASB) issued in June 2011, IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements: Presentation of imes of other comprehensive income, with effective date of mandatory application for affer 1 July 2012, being allowed its early adoption. These amendments have not yet been adopted by the European Union.
The principal changes are the following:
The amendments retain the option to present profit or loss and other comprehensive income ineither a single continuos statement or in two separate but consecutive statements:
items of other comprehensive are required to be grouped into those that will not subsequently be reclassified to profit or loss; and - tax on items of other comprehensive income is required to be alocated on the same basis.
No significant impact in the Group is expected from the adoption of this change.
The International Accounting Standards Board IIASB issued in December 2011. JAS 12 - Income Taxes: Recovery of underlying asses, with effective date of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012, being allowed its early adoption. These amendments have not vet been adopted by the European Union.
The amendment to IAS 12 clarifies that, in the case of investment property measured at fair value there is a presumption that the recovery value will always be the sale for the purpose of determining their fiscal impact.
No significant impact in the Group is expected from the adoption of this change.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued in June 2011, IAS 19 (Amended) - Employee Benefits, with effective date of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, being allowed its early adoption. These amendments have not yet been adopted by the European Union.
The amendments to IAS 19, make important improvements by:
eliminating an option to defer the recognition of gains and losses, know as the "corridor method", improving comparability and faithfulnesss of presentation:
streamlining the presentation of changes in assets and lidbilities arising from defined benefit plans, including requiring remeasurements to be presented in other comprehensive income, thereby separating those changes that many perceive to be the result of an entity's day-to-day operations; and
enhancing the disclosure requirements for defined better information about the characteristics of defined benefit plans and the risks that entities are exposed to through participation in those plans.
No significant impact in the Group is expected from the adoption of this change.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued in May 2011, IAS 27 (Amended) - Separate Financial Statements, with effective date of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, being allowed its early adoption. This not yet been adopted by the European Union.
The amendment of IAS 27 in 2011 resulted from the Board's project on consolidation. A new IFRS, IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial Statements, addresses the principal of control and requirments relating to the preparation of consolidated financial statements. As a result, IAS 27 now contains requirements relating only to separate finance is reflected in the standard's amended title, Separate financial statements
No significant impact in the Group is expected from the adoption of this change.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued in May 2011, IAS 28 (Amended) - Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, with effective date of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, being allowed its early adoption. This amendment has not yet been adopted by the European Union.
The amendment of IAS 28 in 2011 resulted from the Board's projecton incorporate the accounting foi ionn ventures in this standard since the equitty method is applied in the joint ventures and associates.
No significant impact in the Group is expected from the adoption of this change.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued in December 2011, IAS 32 (Amended) - Financial Statements: Presentation, with effective date of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014, being allowed its early adoption. These amendments have not yet been adopted by the European Union.
This amendment clarifies: (J) the criterion that a legally enforcable right to set off the recognised amounts"; and (i) the criterion that na entity "intends either to settleon a net basis, or to realise than settle the lightly simultaneously".
No significant impact in the Group is expected from the adoption of this change.
Expenses of environmental nature are the expenses that were identified and incurred to avoid, reduce or an environmental nature that result from the Group's normal activity.
These expenses are booked in the income statement of they qualify to be recognised as an asset, as according to IAS 16.
During the period, the environmental expensed in the income statement refer to costs with the environmental management plan are analysed as follows:
| Thousands of Furos | 31 Der 2011 | 31 Dar 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| .910 | 802 | |
| 1.910 | .802 |
The development of an Environment System (EMS) was started in 2008. The purpose of the EMS is to stimulate good environmental practices focused on protecting natural resources and spill management, with a commiment to continuous improvement of environmental performance.
In Europe, EDP Renovaveis renewed certification obtained for thirty three of its wind farms (958 MW) in operation under the ISO 14001.
As referred in accounting policy 20), the Group has established provisions for dismantling and decommissioning of property, plant and equipment when a legal or contractual obligation exists to dismantle and decommission those assets at the end of their useful lifes. Consequently, the Group has booked provisions for property, plant and equipment related to electricity wind generation for the responsibilities of restoring sites and land to its original condition, in the amount of 57,694 thousands of Euros as at 31 December 2000 (31 December 2010: 53 156 thousands of Euros) (see note 32)
The Group generates energy from reportable seaments which are the Group's strategic business units. Portugal, Spain, Rest of Europe and USA. The strategic business units have operations in different geographic zones, and are managed separately because their characteristics are quite different mainly as a consequence of different regulations in each of the strategic business units, the Group's CEO reviews internal management reports on at least a quarterly basis.
Other operations include the EDPR BR subgroup companies, the financial investments and remaining activities (Biomass and mini-hydric oenerglion plants) not included in the reportable segments meets any of the quantitative thresholds for determining reportable seaments in 2011 or 2010.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as described in note 3. Information regarding the results of each reportable segment is included in Annex 2. Performance is measured based on segment profit, as included in the internal management reports that are reviewed by the Group's CEO. Segment profit is used to measure performance as management believes that such information is the most relevant in evaluating the results of certains that operate within these industries. Intersegment pricing is determined on an arm's length basis.
A business segment is an identifiable component of the Group, aimed at product or service, or a group of related products or services, and it is subject to risks and returns that can be distinguished from those of other business segments.
A geographical segment is an identifiable component of the Group, aimed at providing a single product or service, or a group of related products or services, within a specific economic environment, and it is subject to risks and returns that can be differentiated from those that operate in other economic environments.
The Group generates energy from renewable sources in several locativity is managed based on the following business segments:
The segment "Adjustments" corresponds to the annulation of financial investments in subsidiaries of EDPR Group and to the other consolidation and intra-segment adjustments.
The amounts reported in each business segment result from the aggregation of the subsidiaries units defined in each segment perimeter and the elimination of the intra-segment transactions.
The statement of financial position of each subsidiary and business unit is determined based in the amounts booked directly in the subsidiaries that compose the segment innullations, without any inter-segment allocation adjustment.
The income statement for each segment is determined based directly in the subsidiaries financial statements and business units, adjusted by the intra-segments annullations.
KPMG has audied the consolidated annual accounts of EDP Renováveis Group for 2011 and 2010. This company and the other related entities and persons in accordance with Law 19/1988 of 12 July, have invoiced for the year ended in 31 December 2011 and 2010, fees and expenses for professional services, according to the following detail (amounts in thousands of Euros):
| 31 December 2011 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portugal | Spain | Brasil | United States of America |
Other | Total | |
| Audit and statutory audit of accounts | 166 | 639 | 83 | ୧୫୫ | 308 | 1,884 |
| Other audit services | 180 | 61 | 31 | 13 | 285 | |
| 346 | 700 | 83 | 719 | 321 | 2,169 | |
| Tax consultancy services | 24 | 9 | 33 | |||
| Other services | 0 | - | - | ರ | ||
| 9 | 0 | 24 | 9 | 42 | ||
| Total | રૂટર | 700 | 83 | 743 | 330 | 2,211 |
| 31 December 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portugal | Spain | Brasil | United States of America |
Other | Total | |
| Audit and statutory audit of accounts | 193 | 690 | 69 | 728 | 221 | 1,901 |
| Other audit services | 210 | 52 | 174 | 13 | 449 | |
| 403 | 742 | 69 | 902 | 234 | 2,350 | |
| Tax consultancy services | 17 | 481 | - | 498 | ||
| Other services | ||||||
| 1 | 17 | - | 481 | 499 | ||
| Total | 404 | 759 | રેત્વે સ્વિ | 1,383 | 234 | 2,849 |
The Subsidiary Companies consolidated under the full consolidated method, as at 31 December 2011 and 2010, are as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Head Office |
Auditor | % of capital |
% of voting rights |
જ of capital |
% of voting rights |
| Group's parent holding company: | ||||||
| EDP Renováveis, S.A. | Oviedo | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Parent Company: | ||||||
| EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. | Oviedo | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Electricity business: Portugal: |
||||||
| EDP Renovāveis Portugal, S.A. | Porto | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Eolica da Alagoa, S.A. | Arcos de Valdevez |
KPMG | 60.00% | 60.00% | 59.99% | 59.99% |
| Vila Pouca de | ||||||
| Eólica de Montenegrelo, Lda | Aguiar | KPMG | 50.10% | 50.10% | 50.10% | 50.10% |
| Eólica da Serra das Alturas, S.A. | Boticas | KPMG | 50.10% | 50.10% | 50.10% | 50.10% |
| Malhadizes - Energia Eólica, S.A. | Porto | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Spain: Acampo Arias,S.L. |
Zaragoza | KPMG | 98.19% | 98.19% | 98.19% | 98.19% |
| Agrupación Eólica, S.L.U. | Zaragoza | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Aplicaciones Industriales de Energías Limpias, S.L. | Zaragoza | n.a. | 61.50% | 61.50% | ||
| Aprofitament D'Energies Renovables de la Terra | ||||||
| Alta, S.A. | Barcelona | KPMG | 48.70% | 60.63% | 48.70% | 60.63% |
| Bon Vent de Corbera, S.L. | Barcelona | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Bon Vent de L'Ebre, S.L. | Barcelona | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Bon Vent de Vilalba, S.L. | Barcelona | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Ceasa Promociones Eólicas, S.L.U. | Zaragoza | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Ceprastur, AlE | Oviedo | n.a. | 56.76% | 56.76% | 56.76% | 56.76% |
| Cía. Eléctrica de Energías Renovables | ||||||
| Alternativas, S.A.U. | Zaragoza | Deloitte | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Compañía Eólica Campo de Borja, S.A. | Zaragoza | KPMG | 75.83% | 75.83% | 75.83% | 75.83% |
| Corporación Empresarial de Renovables Alternativas, S.L.U. |
Zaragoza | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Desarrollo Eólico Almarchal, S.A.U. | Cádiz | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Desarrollo Eólico Buenavista, S.A.U. | Cádiz | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Desarrollo Eólico de Corme, S.A. | La Coruña | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Desarrollo Eólico de Lugo, S.A.U. | Lugo | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Desarrollo Eólico de Tarifa, S.A.U. | Cádiz | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Desarrollo Eólico Dumbria, S.A.U. | La Coruña | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Desarrollo Eólico Rabosera, S.A. | Huesca | KPMG | 95.08% | 95.08% | 95.00% | 95.00% |
| Desarrollo Eólico Santa Quiteria, S.L. | Huesca | KPMG | 83.96% | 100.00% | 58.33% | 58.33% |
| Desarrollos Catalanes Del Viento,S.L | Barcelona | KPMG | 60.00% | 60.00% | 60.00% | 60.00% |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Galicia, S.A. | La Coruña | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Desarrollos Eólicos de Teruel, S.L. | Zaragoza | n.a. | 51.00% | 51.00% | 51.00% | 51.00% |
| Desarrollos Eólicos Promocion, S.A. | Sevilla Sevilla |
KPMG KPMG |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% 100.00% |
| Desarrollos Eólicos, S.A. EDP Renovaveis Cantābria, S.L. |
Madrid | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Madrid | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Energias Eólicas La Manchuela, S.L.U. Eneroliva, S.A. |
Sevilla | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Eolica Alfoz, S.L. | Madrid | KPMG | 83.73% | 83.73% | 84.98% | 84.98% |
| Eólica Arlanzón, S.A. | Madrid | KPMG | 77.50% | 77.50% | 77.50% | 77.50% |
| Eólica Campollano, S.A. | Madrid | KPMG | 75.00% | 75.00% | 75.00% | 75.00% |
| Eólica Curiscao Pumar. S.A. | Madrid | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of | % of | ||||||
| Head | % | voting | % | voting | |||
| Company | Office | Auditor | of capital | rights | of capital | rights | |
| Eólica de Radona S.L. | Madrid | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Eolica Don Quijote, S.L. | Albacete | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Eólica Dulcinea, S.L. | Albacete | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Eólica Fontesilva, S.L. | La Coruña | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Eólica Garcimuñoz, S.L. | Madrid | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Eólica Guadalteba, S.L. | Sevilla | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Eólica La Janda, S.L. | Madrid | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Eólica La Navica, S.L. | Madrid | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Eólica Sierra de Avila, S.L. | Madrid | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 89.99% | 89.99% | |
| Generaciones Especiales I, S.L. | Madrid | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Hidroelectrica del Rumblar, S.L. | Madrid | n.a. | 80.00% | 80.00% | 80.00% | 80.00% | |
| Hidroelectrica Fuentermosa, S.L. | Oviedo | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Hidroeléctrica Gormaz, S.A. | Salamanca | n.a. | 75.00% | 75.00% | 75.00% | 75.00% | |
| lberia Aprovechamientos Eólicos, S.A.U. | Zaragoza | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Industrias Medioambientales Rio Carrión, S.A. | Madrid | n.a. | 90.00% | 90.00% | 90.00% | 90.00% | |
| Investigación y Desarrollo de Energías | |||||||
| Renovables, S. L. | León | KPMG | 59.59% | 59.59% | 59.59% | 59.59% | |
| Molino de Caragüeyes, S.L. | Zaragoza | KPMG | 80.00% | 80.00% | 80.00% | 80.00% | |
| Muxia I e II | La Coruña | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| NEO Catalunya, S.L. | Barcelona | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| NEO Energia Aragón, S.L. | Madrid | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Neomai Inversiones SICAV, S.A. | Madrid | PWC | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Parc Eolic Coll de la Garganta, S.L. | Barcelona | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eòlic de Coll de Moro, S.L. | Barcelona | KPMG | 60.00% | 100.00% | 60.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eòlic de Torre Madrina, S.L | Barcelona | KPMG | 60.00% | 100.00% | 60.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eòlic de Vilalba dels Arcs, S.L. | Barcelona | KPMG | 60.00% | 100.00% | 60.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolic Molinars, S.L. | Girona | n.a. | 54.00% | 90.00% | 54.00% | 90.00% | |
| Parc Eolic Serra Voltorera, S.L. | Barcelona | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parque Eólico Altos del Voltoya, S.A. | Madrid | KPMG | 61.00% | 61.00% | 61.00% | 61.00% | |
| Parque Eolico Belchife, S.L. | Zaragoza | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parque Eòlico La Sotonera, S.L. | Zaragoza | KPMG | 64.84% | 64.84% | 64.84% | 64.84% | |
| Parque Eòlico Los Cantales, S.L.U. | Zaragoza | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parque Eólico Montes de Castejón, S.L. | Zaragoza | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parque Eólico Plana de Artajona, S.L.U. | Zaragoza | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parques de Generación Eólica, S.L. | Burgos | KPMG | 60.00% | 60.00% | 60.00% | 60.00% | |
| Parques Eólicos del Cantabrico, S.A. | Oviedo | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Rasacal Cogeneración S.A. | Madrid | n.a. | 60.00% | 60.00% | 60.00% | 60.00% | |
| Renovables Castilla La Mancha, S.A. | Albacete | KPMG | 90.00% | 90.00% | 90.00% | 90.00% | |
| Santa Quiteria Energia, S.L.U. | Zaragoza | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Sierra de la Peña, S.A. | Madrid | KPMG | 84.90% | 84.90% | 84.90% | 84.90% | |
| Siesa Renovables Canarias, S.L. | Gran Canaria | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Sinae Inversiones Eólicas, S.A. | Madrid | KPMG | 100 00% | 100.00% | 100 00% | 100.00% | |
| Sotromal, S.A. | Soria | n.a. | 90.00% | 90.00% | 90.00% | 90.00% | |
| Subgrupo Veinco | Zaragoza | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Tratamientos Medioambientales del Norte, S.A. | Madrid | n.a. | 80.00% | 80.00% | 80.00% | 80.00% | |
| France: | 100.00% | ||||||
| C.E. Canet-Pont de Salars, S.A.S. | Paris | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| C.E. Gueltas Noyal-Pontivy, S.A.S. | Paris | KPMG KPMG |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% | |
| C.E. NEO Truc L'homme, S.A.S. | Paris | 100.00% | |||||
| C.E. Patay, S.A.S. | Paris | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% | 100.00% | |
| C.E. Saint Barnabe, S.A.S. | Paris | KPMG KPMG |
100.00% | 100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% | ||
| C.E. Segur, S.A.S. | Paris Paris |
KPMG | 100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% | 100.00% 100.00% |
|
| EDP Renewables France, S.A.S. | FXCO | 100.00% | |||||
| Eolienne de Callengeville, S.A.S. | Elbeuf | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Eolienne de Saugueuse, S.A.R.L. | Elbeut | n.a. | 100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% | |
| Eolienne des Bocages, S.A.R.L. | Elbeuf Elbeuf |
n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Eolienne D'Etalondes, S.A.R.L. | n.a. | 100.00% |
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Head Office |
Auditor | % of capital |
% of voling rights |
% of capital |
% of voting rights |
|
| Le Mee, S.A. R.L. | Toulouse | KPMG | 100.00% | 49.00% | 100.00% | 49.00% | |
| Mardelle, S.A.R.L | Toulouse | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolien D'Ardennes | Elbeuf | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolien de La Hetroye, S.A.S. | Elbeuf | EXCO | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolien de Mancheville, S.A.R.L. | Elbeuf | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolien de Roman, S.A.R.L. | Elbeuf | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolien de Varimpre, S.A.S. | Flbeuf | EXCO | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolien des Bocages, S.A.R.L. | Elbeuf | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolien des Longs Champs, S.A.R.L. | Elbeuf | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolien des Vatines, S.A.S. | Elbeuf | EXCO | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Parc Eolien du Clos Bataille, S.A.S. | Elbeuf | ന.വ. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Petite Piece, S.A.R.L. | Toulouse | KPMG | 100.00% | 49.00% | 100.00% | 49.00% | |
| Plouvien Breiz, S.A.S. | Carhaix | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Quinze Mines, S.A.R.L. | Toulouse | n.a. | 100.00% | 49.00% | 100.00% | 49.00% | |
| Sauvageons, S.A.R.L. | Toulouse | KPMG | 100.00% | 49.00% | 100.00% | 49.00% | |
| Vallée du Moulin, S.A.R.L. | Toulouse | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Poland: EDP Renewables Polska, S.P. ZO.O |
Warsaw | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Elektrownia Wiatrowa Kresy I, S.P. ZO.O | Warsaw | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Warsaw | m.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Farma Wiatrowa Starozreby, SP. ZO.O. Farma Wiatrowa Wyszogrod, SP. ZO.O. |
Warsaw | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||||
| Warsaw | n.a. n.a. |
100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Karpacka Mala Energetyka, SP. ZO.O. | |||||||
| Masovia Wind Farm I, S.P. ZO.O (former Farma | Warsaw | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Wiatrowa Bodzanow, S.P. Z0.0 Relax Wind Park I, S.P. Z0.0 |
Warsaw | KPMG | 96.43% | 96.43% | 96.43% | 96.43% | |
| Relax Wind Park II, S.P. ZO.O | Warsaw | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 51.00% | 51.00% | |
| Relax Wind Park III, S.P. ZO.O | Warsaw | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Relax Wind Park IV, S.P. ZO.O | Warsaw | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 51.00% | 51.00% | |
| Belgium: Greenwind, S.A. |
Louvain-la- Neuve |
KPMG | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | 70.00% | |
| Brazil: | |||||||
| Central Nacional de Energia Eolica, S.A. | São Paulo | KPMG | 55.00% | 100.00% | 55.00% | 100.00% | |
| EDP Renováveis Brasil, S.A. | São Paulo | KPMG | 55.00% | 55.00% | 55.00% | 55.00% | |
| Elebrās Projectos, Ltda | São Paulo | n.a. | 55.00% | 100.00% | 55.00% | 100.00% | |
| Romania: Cernavoda Power, S.R.L. |
Bucharest | KPMG | 85.00% | 85.00% | 85.00% | 85.00% | |
| EDP Renewables Romania, S.R.I | Bucharest | KPMG | 85 00% | 85 00% | 85 00% | 85 00% | |
| Pestera Wind Farm, S.A. | Bucharest | KPMG | 85.00% | 85.00% | |||
| Pochidia Wind Farm, S.A. | Bucharest | n.a. | 85.00% | 85.00% | |||
| S.C. Ialomita Power, S.R.L. | Bucharest | n.a. | 85.00% | 85.00% | |||
| Holland: Tarcan, BV |
Amsterdam | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Great Britain: EDPR UK Limited |
Cardiff | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| MacColl Offshore Windfarm Limited | Cardiff | m.a. | 66.64% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | |
| Moray Offshore Renewables Limited | Cardiff | KPMG | 66.64% | 66.64% | 75.00% | 75.00% | |
| Stevenson Offshore Windfarm Limited | Cardiff | n.a. | 66.64% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | |
| Telford Offshore Windfarm Limited | Cardiff | m.a. | 66.64% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | |
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Head Office |
Auditor | % of capital |
% of voting rights |
જ of capital |
% of voting rights |
||
| Italy: | ||||||||
| EDP Renewables Italia, S.R.L. | Verbania | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Re Plus - S.R.L. | Roma | n.a. | 80.00% | 80.00% | 80.00% | 80.00% | ||
| Repano Wind S.R.L. Villa Castelli Wind, S.R.L. |
Verbania Verbania |
n.a. n.a. |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% 100.00% |
100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Canada: EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd |
Ontario | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Parent Company: EDP Renewables North America, L.L.C. (former Horizon Wind Energy, L.L.C.) |
Texas, USA | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Electricity business: USA: |
||||||||
| 17th Star Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Ohio | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2007 Vento I, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2007 Vento II | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2008 Vento III | lexas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2009 Vento IV, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2009 Vento V, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2009 Vento VI, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2010 Vento VII, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2010 Vento VIII, L.L.C | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2011 Vento IX, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2011 Vento X, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||||
| Alabama Ledge Wind Farm, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Antelope Ridge Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Arkwright Summit Wind Farm, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Arlington Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Oregon | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Aroostook Wind Energy, L.L.C. | Maine | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Ashtord Wind Farm, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Athena-Weston Wind Power Project II, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Athena-Weston Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| AZ Solar, L.L.C. | Arizona | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| BC2 Maple Ridge Holdings, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| BC2 Maple Ridge Wind, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Black Prairie Wind Farm II, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Black Prairie Wind Farm III, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Black Prairie Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blackstone Wind Farm II, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blackstone Wind Farm III, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blackstone Wind Farm IV, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blackstone Wind Farm V, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blackstone Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Illionois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blue Canyon Wind Power VII, L.L.C. | Oklahoma | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blue Canyon Windpower II, L.L.C. | Oklahoma | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blue Canyon Windpower III, L.L.C. | Oklahoma | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blue Canyon Windpower IV, L.L.C. | Oklahoma | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blue Canyon Windpower V, L.L.C. | Oklahoma | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Blue Canyon Windpower VI, L.L.C. | Oklahoma | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Broadlands Wind Farm II, L.L.C. | Illionois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Broadlands Wind Farm III, L.L.C. | Illionois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Broadlands Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Illionois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Buttalo Blutt Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Wyoming | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Chateaugay River Wind Farm, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Clinton County Wind Farm, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of | % of | |||||||
| Head | % | voting | % | voting | ||||
| Company | Office | Auditor | of capital | rights | of capital | rights | ||
| Cloud County Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Kansas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Cloud West Wind Project, L.L.C. | Kansas | n.a. | 100 00% | 100 00% | 100 00% | 100.00% | ||
| Coos Curry Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Cropsey Ridge Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Crossing Trails Wind, Power Project, L.L.C. | Colorado | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Dairy Hills Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Diamond Power Partners, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| East Klickitat Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Washington | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Eastern Nebraska Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Nebraska | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||||
| EDPR Wind Ventures X, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||||
| Five-Spot, L.L.C. | California | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Ford Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Franklin Wind Farm, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Gulf Coast Windpower Management Company, L.L.C. |
Indiana | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Headwaters Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Indiana | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Hidalgo Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Minnesota | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| High Prairie Wind Farm II, L.L.C. | 100.00% | |||||||
| High Trail Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Illionois | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Horizon Wind Chocolate Bayou, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy International | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Midwest IX, L.L.C. | Kansas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest I, L.L.C. | Washington | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest IV, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest VII, L.L.C. | Washington | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest X, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Northwest XI, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Panhandle I, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest I, L.L.C. | New Mexico | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest II, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest III, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Southwest IV, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Energy Valley I, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind MREC lowa Partners, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Ventures I, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Ventures IB, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Ventures IC, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Ventures II, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Ventures III, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Ventures IX, L.L.C. | lexas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Ventures VI, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Ventures VII, L.L.C. | lexas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind Ventures VIII, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wind, Freeport Windpower I, L.L.C. | Texas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Horizon Wyoming Transmission, L.L.C. | Wyoming | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Jericho Rise Wind Farm, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Juniper Wind Power Partners, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm II, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm III, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Lost Lakes Wind Farm, L.L.C. | lowa | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Machias Wind Farm, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Madison Windpower, L.L.C. | New York | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Marble River, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Martinsdale Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Colorado | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm II, L.L.C. | Indiana | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm IV, L.L.C. | Indiana | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm V, L.L.C. | Indiana | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Head Office |
Auditor | % of capital |
% of voting rights |
ళ్ళా of capital |
% of voting rights |
|||
| Meadow Lake Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Indiana | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Meadow Lake Windfarm III, L.L.C. | Indiana | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Mesquite Wind, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| New Trail Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Illinois | m.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| North Slope Wind Farm, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Number Nine Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Maine | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Old Trail Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Illinois | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| OPQ Property, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Pacific Southwest Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Arizona | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Paulding Wind Farm II, L.L.C. | Ohio | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Paulding Wind Farm III, L.L.C. | Ohio | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Paulding Wind Farm IV, L.L.C | Ohio | ന.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||||
| Paulding Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Ohio | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Peterson Power Partners, L.L.C. | California | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Pioneer Prairie Interconnection, L.L.C. | lowa | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Pioneer Prairie Wind Farm I, L.L.C. | lowa | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Pioneer Prairie Wind Farm II, L.L.C. | lowa | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Post Oak Wind, L.L.C. | Texas | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Quilt Block Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Wisconsin | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Rail Splitter | Illinois | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Rio Blanco Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Texas | m.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Rising Tree Wind Farm, L.L.C. | California | m.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Rush County Wind Farm, L.L.C | Kansas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||||
| Saddleback Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Washington | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Sagebrush Power Partners, L.L.C. | Washington | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Sardinia Windpower, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Signal Hill Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Colorado | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm II, L.L.C. | Wyoming | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm III, L.L.C. | Wyoming | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm IV, L.L.C. | Wyoming | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm V, L.L.C. | Wyoming | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Simpson Ridge Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Wyoming | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Stinson Mills Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Colorado | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Stone Wind Power, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Telocaset Wind Power Partners, L.L.C. | Oregon | KPMG | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| The Nook Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Tug Hill Windpower, L.L.C. | New York | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Tumbleweed Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Colorado | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Turtle Creek Wind Farm, L.L.C. | lowa | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Waverly Wind Farm, L.L.C. | Kansas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Western Trail Wind Project I, L.L.C. | Kansas | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |||
| Wheatfield Wind Power Project, L.L.C. | Oregon | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Head Office |
Auditor | % of capital |
% of voting rights |
ళ్ళా of capital |
% of voting rights |
|
| Whiskey Ridge Power Partners, L.L.C. | Washington | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Whistling Wind WI Energy Center, L.L.C. | Wisconsin | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Whitestone Wind Purchasing, L.L.C. | Illinois | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Wilson Creek Power Partners, L.L.C. | Nevada | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| Wind Turbine Prometheus, L.P. | California | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| WTP Management Company, L.L.C. | California | n.a. | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
The main financial indicators of the jointly controlled in the consolidation under the proportionate consolidation method as at 31 December 2011, are as follows:
| Jointly Controlled Companies | Head Office |
Share Capital / Currency |
Non Current Assets 31-Dec-11 Euro'OOO |
Current Assets 31-Dec-11 Euro'000 |
Non Current Current Liabilities 31-Dec-11 Euro'000 |
Liabilities 31-Dec-11 Euro'000 |
Total Equity 31-Dec-11 Euro'000 |
Total Incomes 31-Dec-11 Euro'000 |
Total Costs 31-Dec-11 Euro'000 |
Net Results 31-Dec-11 Euro 000 |
% of capital |
% Voting rigths |
Auditor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity business Compañía Eólica Aragonesa, S.A. |
Zaragosa | 6.701.165 EUR | 47.204 | 9.709 | 19.424 | 6.826 | 30.663 | 17.986 | -10.214 | 7.772 | 50,00% | 50,00% Deloitte | ||
| Desarrollos Energeticos Canarios | ||||||||||||||
| SA | Las Palmas | 15 025 | FUR | -5 | 49,90% | 49,90% n.a. | ||||||||
| Evolución 2000, S.L. | Albacete | 117.994 | FUR | 23.319 | 5.025 | 18 850 | 2.134 | 7.360 | 5.255 | -3.578 | 1.677 | 49,15% | 49.15% KPMG | |
| Flat Rock Windpower, L.L.C. | New York | 522 818 885 | USD | 158 947 | 3.125 | 1.265 | 28 | 160 774 | 11.565 | -13.815 | -2.250 | 50,00% | 50,00% | E&Y |
| Flat Rock Windpower II, L.L.C. | New York | 207 447 187 | USD | 63 658 | 863 | 487 | 68 | 63 966 | 2 740 | -4 609 | -1.869 | 50.00% | 50.00% | E&Y |
| Tebar Eolica, S.A. | Cuenca | 4.720.400 EUR | 14.607 | 6.095 | 13.063 | 2.220 | 5.419 | 4.108 | -3.276 | 832 | 50.00% | 50.00% Abante Audit |
The main financial indicators of the joinly controlled in the consolidation under the proportionate consolidation method as at 31 December 2010, are as follows:
| Jointly Controlled Companies | Head Office |
Share Capital / Currency |
Non Current Assets 31-Dec-10 Euro'000 |
Current Assets 31-Dec-10 Euro'000 |
Non Current Current Liabilities 31-Dec-10 Euro'000 |
Liabilities 31-Dec-10 Euro'000 |
Total Equity 31-Dec-10 Euro'000 |
Total Incomes 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-10 Euro'000 |
Total Costs Euro'000 |
Net Results Euro'000 |
ళ్ళా of capital |
% Voting riaths |
Auditor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity business | ||||||||||||||
| Compañía Eólica Aragonesa, S.A. | Zaraaosa | 6.701.165 EUR | 49.736 | 8.604 | 26.168 | 6.993 | 25.180 | 16.808 | -10.103 | 6.705 | 50,00% | 50,00% Deloitte | ||
| Desarrollos Energeticos Canarios | ||||||||||||||
| SA | Las Palmas | 15.025 | FUR | 49,90% | 49,90% n.a. | |||||||||
| Evolución 2000, S.L. | Albacete | 117 994 | FIJR | 24.435 | 7.102 | 20 293 | 4 073 | 7.172 | 4.988 | -3.490 | 1.498 | 49.15% | 49.15% KPMG | |
| Flat Rock Windpower, L.L.C. | New York | 527 818 885 | USD | 162 186 | 3.686 | 1 146 | 43 | 164 682 | 11 813 | -15 578 | -3.765 | 50.00% | 50.00% E&Y | |
| Flat Rock Windpower II, L.L.C. | New York | 207 447 187 | USD | 64 868 | 1.026 | 437 | ર્ રે | 65.402 | 2.908 | -5.132 | -2.224 | 50.00% | 50.00% | E&Y |
| Tebar Eolica, S.A. | Cuenca | 4.720.400 EUR | 16 135 | 5.398 | 14.611 | 1.900 | 5 022 | 4.044 | -3.433 | 50.00% | 50.00% Abante Audit |
The Associated Companies included in the consolidation under the equity method as at 31 December 2011 and 2010, are as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | Head Office |
Auditor | 96 of capital |
% of voting rights |
% of capital |
% of voting rights |
|
| Aprofitament D'Energies Renovables de L'Ebre, S.A. |
Barcelona | n.a. | 18.97% | 38.96% | 48.70% | 60.63% | |
| Biomasas del Pirineo, S.A. | Huesca | PWC | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | |
| Cultivos Energéticos de Castilla, S.A. | Burgos | n.a. | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | 30.00% | |
| Desarollos Eolicos de Canárias, S.A. | Gran Canaria | KPMG | 44.75% | 44.75% | 44.75% | 44.75% | |
| ENEOP - Eolicas de Portugal, S.A. | Lisboa | Mazars | 35.96% | 35.96% | 35.96% | 35.96% | |
| Hidroastur, S.A. | Oviedo | KPMG | 25.00% | 25.00% | 25.00% | 25.00% | |
| Naturneo Energía, S.L. | Bilbau | Mazars | 49.01% | 49.01% | 49.01% | 49.01% | |
| Parque Eólico Belmonte, S.A. | Asturias | Centium | 29.90% | 29.90% | 29.90% | 29.90% | |
| Parque Eólico Sierra del Madero, S.A. | Soria | n.g. | 42.00% | 42.00% | 42.00% | 42.00% | |
| SeaEnergy Renewables Inch Cape Limited | Edimburg | Deloitte | 49.00% | 49.00% | |||
| Sodecoan, S.L. | Sevilla | Ernst & Young | 50.00% | 50.00% | |||
| Solar Siglo XXI, S.A. | Ciudad Real | KPMG | 25.00% | 25.00% | 25.00% | 25.00% | |
ANNEX 2
| WIND ENERGY OPERATIONS | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUROPE | |||||||||
| Rest of | Other and | Renováveis | |||||||
| Thousands of Euros | Portugal | Spain | Europe * | Others | Adjustments | Total | U.S.A. | Adjustments | Group |
| Revenue | 138,576 | 379,527 | 126,212 | 18,292 | -27,744 | 634,863 | 302,890 | 19,464 | 957,217 |
| Income from institutional partnerships in US wind farms | 111,610 | 111,610 | |||||||
| 138,576 | 379,527 | 126,212 | 18,292 | -27,744 | 634,863 | 414,500 | 19,464 | 1,068,827 | |
| Other operating income / (expenses) | |||||||||
| Other operating income | 2,094 | 5,502 | 1,606 | 8,195 | 45,159 | 62,556 | 17,712 | 4,276 | 84,544 |
| Supplies and services | -21,481 | -66,595 | -23,138 | -14,543 | 19,103 | -106,654 | -101,262 | -17,153 | -225,069 |
| Personnel costs | -2,988 | -6,856 | -3,948 | -9,050 | -22,842 | -25,936 | -12,054 | -60,832 | |
| Other operating expenses | -5,455 | -16,459 | -6,626 | -1,238 | 1,130 | -28,648 | -34,839 | -3,245 | -66,732 |
| -27,830 | -84,408 | -32,106 | -16,636 | 65,392 | -95,588 | -144,325 | -28,176 | -268,089 | |
| 110,746 | 295,119 | 94,106 | 1,656 | 37,648 | 539,275 | 270,175 | -8,712 | 800,738 | |
| Provisions | 266 | 266 | 266 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation expense | -28,643 | -133,675 | -49,084 | -5,338 | -35,488 | -252,228 | -209,653 | -6,612 | -468,493 |
| Amortisation of deferred income / Government grants | 913 | 140 | 242 | 1,296 | 13.690 | 14,986 | |||
| 83,016 | 161,850 | 45,264 | -3,681 | 2,160 | 288,609 | 74,212 | -15,324 | 347,497 | |
| Gains / (losses) from the sale of financial assets | 10,499 | 10,499 | 10,499 | ||||||
| Other financial income | 906 | 19,660 | 25,020 | -23,842 | 21,744 | 8,299 | 756 | 30,799 | |
| Interest income | 7,072 | 6,269 | 1,515 | 178,452 | -179,101 | 14,207 | 539 | 16,010 | 30,756 |
| Other financial expenses | -280 | -1,869 | -33,548 | -12,751 | 10,275 | -38,173 | -72,098 | -9,091 | -119,362 |
| Interest expense | -35,050 | -114,724 | -63,808 | -247,094 | 179,057 | -281,619 | 1.283 | 94,013 | -186,323 |
| Share of profit of associates | 2,167 | 1,746 | -7 | 889 | 4,795 | 1 | 4,796 | ||
| Profit before tax | 56,925 | 64,677 | -30,924 | -59,165 | -11,451 | 20,062 | 12,235 | 86,365 | 118,662 |
| Income tax expense | -15,665 | -16,277 | 2,759 | 30,805 | 2,365 | 3,987 | -5,813 | -26,212 | -28,038 |
| Profit (loss) for the period | 41,260 | 48,400 | -28,165 | -28,360 | -9,086 | 24,049 | 6,422 | 60,153 | 90,624 |
| Attributable to: | |||||||||
| Equity holders of EDP Renováveis | 39,733 | 44,995 | -26,586 | -28,329 | -9,086 | 20,727 | 6,422 | 61,455 | 88,604 |
| Non-Controlling Interest | 1,527 | 3,405 | -1,579 | -31 | 3,322 | -1,302 | 2,020 | ||
| Profit (loss) for the period | 41,260 | 48,400 | -28,165 | -28,360 | -9,086 | 24,049 | 6,422 | ૨૦ ૧૯૩ | 90,624 |
| Assels | |||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 526,275 | 3,152,540 | 1,356,113 | 47,049 | 5,081,977 | 5,162,441 | 210,203 | 10,454,621 | |
| Intangible assets and Goodwill | 42,494 | 97,172 | 90,416 | ୧୦ | 470,034 | 700,185 | 618,437 | 15,042 | 1,333,664 |
| Investments in associates | 9,381 | 14,700 | 25,423 | 49,504 | 1,877 | 51,381 | |||
| Current assets | 133,706 | 445,113 | 144,866 | 1,430,075 | -1,496,724 | 657,036 | 137,865 | 95,651 | 890,552 |
| Equity and Liabilities | |||||||||
| Equity and Non-Controlling Interest | 97,953 | 936,440 | 223,278 | 121,189 | -935,817 | 443,043 | 3,332,379 | 1,678,303 | 5,453,725 |
| Current Liabilities | 229,146 | 1,005,260 | 554,386 | 463,909 | -1,371,231 | 881,470 | 396,278 | -194,569 | 1,083,179 |
| Other information: | |||||||||
| Increase of the period | |||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 10,119 | 168,898 | 155,079 | 28,771 | 362,867 | 407,894 | 59,949 | 830,710 | |
| Intangible assets and Goodwill | 5 | 5 | 9 | ||||||
| WIND ENERGY OPERATIONS | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUROPE | |||||||||
| Thousands of Euros | Portugal | Spain | Rest of Europe · |
Others | Adjustments | Total | U. S. A. | Other and Adjustments |
Renováveis Group |
| Revenue | 140,251 | 331,202 | 78,458 | 19,736 | -7,415 | 562,232 | 274,969 | 3,441 | 840,642 |
| Income from institutional partnerships in US wind farms | 107,005 | 107,005 | |||||||
| 140,251 | 331,202 | 78,458 | 19,736 | -7,415 | 562,232 | 381,974 | 3,441 | 947,647 | |
| Other operating income / (expenses) | |||||||||
| Other operating income | 1,657 | 7,185 | 16,376 | 2,655 | -991 | 26,882 | 46,022 | 121 | 73,025 |
| Supplies and services | -18,234 | -୧୦`୧86 | -17,851 | -10,732 | 20,094 | -87,409 | -93,026 | -15,776 | -196,211 |
| Personnel costs | -2,702 | -5,568 | -3,120 | -8,736 | -20,126 | -24,333 | -10,387 | -54,846 | |
| Other operating expenses | -5,296 | -9,889 | -2,492 | -2,213 | -23 | -19,913 | -22,303 | -14,650 | -56,866 |
| -24,575 | -68,958 | -7,087 | -19,026 | 19,080 | -100,566 | -93,640 | -40,692 | -234,898 | |
| 115,676 | 262,244 | 71,371 | 710 | 11,665 | 461,666 | 288,334 | -37,251 | 712,749 | |
| Provisions | 8 | 147 | ારક | 155 | |||||
| Depreciation and amortisation expense | -34,964 | -138,271 | -30,708 | -5,242 | -209,185 | -222,263 | -2,955 | -434,403 | |
| Amorlisation of deferred income / Government grants | 1,100 | 214 | 222 | 1,536 | 9,869 | 11,406 | |||
| 81,820 | 124,334 | 40,885 | -4,532 | 11,665 | 254 172 | 75,940 | -40,205 | 289,907 | |
| Gains / (losses) from the sale of financial assets | |||||||||
| Other financial income | 290 | ୧୫୫ | 17,144 | 46,865 | -46,865 | 18,122 | 6,131 | 10,121 | 34,374 |
| Interest income | 3,160 | 1,949 | 468 | 170,012 | -167,321 | 8,268 | 308 | 1,355 | 9,931 |
| Other financial expenses | -306 | -1,680 | -21,546 | -19,960 | 14,969 | -28,523 | -73,355 | -8,182 | -110,060 |
| Interest expense | -32,711 | -98,159 | -30,190 | -233,849 | 167,474 | -227,435 | 3,400 | 115,644 | -108,391 |
| Share of profit of associates | 2,128 | 2,908 | 5,036 | 5,036 | |||||
| Profit before tax | 54,381 | 30,040 | 6,761 | -41,464 | -20,078 | 29,640 | 12,424 | 78,733 | 120,797 |
| Income tax expense | -15,118 | -8,306 | 429 | 10,210 | -12,785 | -24,974 | -37,759 | ||
| Profit (loss) for the period | 39,263 | 21,734 | 7,190 | -31,254 | -20,078 | ારે ૪૨૨ | 12,424 | 53,759 | 83,038 |
| Attributable to: | |||||||||
| Equity holders of EDP Renováveis | 37,766 | 14,015 | 7,092 | -25,875 | -20,078 | 12,920 | 12,424 | 54,859 | 80,203 |
| Minority interest | 1,497 | 7,719 | 98 | -5,379 | 3,935 | -1,100 | 2,835 | ||
| Profit (loss) for the period | 39,263 | 21,734 | 7,190 | -31,254 | -20,078 | 16,855 | 12,424 | 53,759 | 83,038 |
| Assels | |||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 544,126 | 3,105,798 | 1,300,198 | 50,158 | 5,000,280 | 4,814,548 | 166,943 | 9,981,771 | |
| Intangible assets and Goodwill | 43,167 | 106,656 | 93,194 | 72 | ૨૦૧૪ 886 | 751,975 | 600,317 | 14,441 | 1,366,733 |
| Investments in associates | 15,915 | 12 | 28,127 | 44,054 | 1,817 | 45,871 | |||
| Current assets | 161,590 | 410,772 | 148,131 | 1,223,267 | -1,184,134 | 759,626 | 199,503 | 301,436 | 1,260,565 |
| Equity and Liabilities | |||||||||
| Equity and Minority Interest | 74,258 | 860,192 | 253,527 | 48,858 | -794,532 | 442,303 | 3,146,741 | 1,804,467 | 5,393,511 |
| Current Liabilities | 151,655 | 930,649 | 409,258 | 393,605 | -813,227 | 1,071,940 | 428,332 | -208,097 | 1,292,175 |
| Other information: | |||||||||
| Increase of the period | |||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 7,859 | 128,435 | 467,018 | 4,370 | 607,682 | 783,436 | 79,519 | 1,470,637 | |
| Intangible assets and Goodwill | 124 | 57,781 | 57,905 | 2,185 | 315 | 60,405 |


MANAGEMENT REPORT DECEMBER 2011

of EDP Renováveis Group (EDPR)
| 0. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART |
|---|
| 1. MAIN EVENTS OF THE PERIOD |
| 2. PERFORMANCE OF 2011 |
| 3. RISK MANAGEMENT |
| 4. FINANCIAL HEDGING DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS |
| 5. TREASURY STOCKS (OWN SHARES) |
| 6. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE |
| 7. HUMAN CAPITAL |
| 8. RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT |
| 9. REEVANT SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
| 10. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
| 11. SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE |
| 12. САРГАL MARKETS |
| 13. DISCLAIMER |
– EDP RENOVÁVEIS CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACCOUNTS AS OF 31/DEC/2011


1 2
1 Non-exhaustive Organization Chart, illustrating simplified geography of presence rather than comprehensive list of legal entities.
² 100% owned by EDPR, operationally integrated in EDPR NA

1
02 Feb – EDP Renováveis announces YE2010 provisional operating data: EDP Renováveis installed 1,101 MW and achieved an electricity output 14,352 GWh, more 32% than in 2009. Load factor in Europe was 27% and in the US 32%.
24 Feb – EDP Renováveis announces YE2010 results: Revenues and EBITDA increased by 31% YoY, reaching €947.6 million and €712.7 million, respectively. EBITDA margin stood at 75.2% and Net Income totalled €80.2 million (-30% YoY).
30 Mar – EDP Renováveis takes full control of Genesa: EDPR takes full control of Genesa, following the decision of Caja Madrid to exercise its put option over its 20% stake in Genesa, in accordance to the provisions under the shareholders' agreement. The strike price of the put option was set at €231 million.
07 Apr – EDP Renováveis sells financial stake in Spanish wind farm: EDPR closed an agreement with Enel Green Power to sell its stake in SEASA – a company with 74 operating MW in Spain. EDPR sells its 16.67% equity shareholding by €10.7 million (or 24.5 million of enterprise value, including the equivalent net debt as of Dec-10).
18 Apr – EDP Renováveis announces 1Q2011 provisional operating data: capacity increased by 188 MW and electricity output reached 4,421 GWh, more 21% than in 1st quarter of 2010. Load factor in Europe was 29% and in the US 35%.
4 May – EDP Renováveis announces 1Q2011 results: Revenues amounted to €284.3 million in the quarter (+17% YoY), EBITDA totalled €220.1 million (+19% YoY), reaching an EBITDA margin of 77.4%. Net income was €49.2 million (+16% YoY).

03 Jun – EDP Renováveis is awarded a new long-term contract in the US: EDPR was awarded a 10-year contract by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) in conjunction with the Public Service Commission (PSC) to sell the renewable energy credits (RECs) equivalent to 45 MW from its Marble River Wind Farm project in the New York state, to be commissioned in 2012.
06 Jun – EDP Renováveis establishes a partnership for the development of 2.4 GW of wind offshore capacity in the UK: EDPR entered into a partnership with Repsol to jointly develop 2.4 GW of offshore wind projects in the UK. EDPR will lead the partnership with a 60% share in the overall capacity to be developed.
21 Jun – EDP Renováveis executes a project finance for 138 MW in Romania: EDPR has executed a project finance structure agreement with a consortium of banks led by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, for 138 MW in Romania. The long-term contracted debt facility amounts to €115 million.
28 Jun – EDP Renováveis is awarded with 127 MW in Spain: EDPR was awarded with 127 MW in the region of Aragón, corresponding to 11% of the total 1.2 GW granted by the Spanish regional Government in its tender to award electricity production licenses through wind energy.
11 Jul – EDP Renováveis executes a project finance for 90 MW in Romania: EDPR has executed another project finance structure agreement with a consortium of banks led by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, for the 90 MW Pestera wind farm in Romania. The long-term contracted debt facility amounts to €73 million.
13 Jul – EDP Renováveis establishes a new institutional partnership structure for 99 MW in the US: EDPR has signed an agreement to secure USD116 million of institutional equity financing from Bank of America Corporation and Paribas North America, Inc., a subsidiary of BNP Paribas, in exchange for a partial interest in its 99 MW Timber Road II wind farm.
14 Jul – EDP Renováveis announces 1H2011 provisional operating data: capacity increased 486 MW (362 MW in Europe, 70 MW in Brazil and 54 MW in the US) and electricity output totalled 8,790 GWh, meaning a 27% increase comparing with the 1st half of 2010. Load factor in Europe was 26% and in the US 36%.

25 Jul – EDP Renováveis executes a project finance for 70 MW in Brazil: EDPR has executed a project finance structure agreement with the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES) for its 70 MW Tramandaí wind farm in Brazil, in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, fully commissioned in May 2011. The long-term contracted debt facility amounts to R\$ 228 million.
27 Jul – EDP Renováveis announces 1H2011 results: Revenues were €546.6 million (+18% YoY) and EBITDA €409.2 million (+19% YoY), with an EBITDA margin of 74.9%. Net income increased 109% YoY to €89.5 million reflecting the operating performance in the period, the extension of the projects' useful life to 25 years and the capital gain from the sale of EDPR's stake in SEASA.
14 Sep – EDP Renováveis secures a new PPA for 101 MW in the US: EDPR signed a 19-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Tennessee Valley Authority to sell the renewable energy produced by its 101 MW Lost Lakes wind farm in Iowa, US.
13 Oct – EDP Renováveis announces 9M2011 provisional operating data: capacity increased 604 MW (435 MW in Europe, 99 MW in the US and 70 MW in Brazil) and electricity output totalled 11,975 GWh, meaning a 22% increase comparing with the nine months of 2010. Load factor in Europe was 25% and in the US 31%.
26 Oct – EDP Renováveis announces 9M2011 results: Revenues were €768.8 million (+16% YoY) and EBITDA €548.3 million (+16% YoY), with an EBITDA margin of 71.3%. Net income reached €62.6 million, having increased 182% YoY reflecting the operating performance in the period and the extension of the projects' useful life but partially offset by the negative forex differences.
20 Dec – EDP Renováveis is awarded long-term contracts for 120 MW at the Brazilian energy auction: EDPR has secured four 20-year Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) at the Brazilian energy A-5 auction to sell electricity in the regulated market. The four PPA are related to the equivalent renewable energy produced by four wind farms totalling 120 MW, to be installed in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, in Brazil.
21 Dec – ENEOP executes a project finance of €260 million for 376 MW in Portugal: EDPR's associated company ENEOP – Eólicas de Portugal has executed a project finance structure with the European Investment Bank (EIB) for its second group of wind farms developed in Portugal, totalling 376 MW.

22 Dec – EDPR's principal shareholder EDP and China Three Gorges establish a strategic partnerhip: EDPR's principal shareholder EDP established a strategic partnership with China Three Gorges, following the selection of the Chinese company to be the purchaser of a 21.35% stake in EDP formerly owned by the Portuguese Government, in the context of the 8th reprivatisation phase of EDP.
22 Dec – EDP Renováveis establishes a new institutional partnership structure for 99 MW in the US: EDPR has secured c.USD 124 million of institutional equity financing from JPM Capital Corporation and Wells Fargo, in exchange for a partial interest in its 99 MW Blue Canyon VI wind farm that has started operating in the State of Oklahoma.

| EBITDA MW | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 3,978 | 3,439 | +538 |
| US | 3,422 | 3,224 | +198 |
| Brazil | 84 | 14 | +70 |
| Total | 7,483 | 6,676 | +806 |
Note: Including ENEOP (attributable to EDPR)
EDPR added 806 MW to its EBITDA+ENEOP installed capacity in 2011, of which 538 MW (87 MW from ENEOP) were in Europe, 198 MW in the US and 70 MW in Brazil. As of Dec-11, EDPR had 90% of its portfolio under long-term contracts and visible regulatory frameworks, and only 10% purely exposed to US spot electricity markets.
| Load Factor | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 25% | 27% | (2 pp) |
| US | 33% | 32% | +1 pp |
| Brazil | 35% | 26% | +9 pp |
| Total | 29% | 29% | - |
In 2011, the average load factor was stable YoY at 29%, keeping its position as one of the highest in the wind sector, as the company continues to leverage on its competitive advantages to maximize wind farm's output and on its diversified portfolio to mitigate the wind volatility risk. In Europe, the load factor decreased to 25% in 2011, given a lower wind resource in the period, particularly in the 4Q (27%, -3pp YoY). In the US, the 2011 load factor improved by 1pp YoY to 33%, having remained stable in the 4Q11 at 37%. In Brazil, load factors increased 9pp YoY to 35% following the strong wind resource in the 4Q11 and the commissioning of 70 MW with a higher load factor.
| GWh | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 7,301 | 6,632 | +10% |
| US | 9,330 | 7,689 | +21% |
| Brazil | 170 | 31 | +451% |
| Total | 16,800 | 14,352 | +17% |

Electricity production was up 17% in 2011, reaching 16.8 TWh and outpacing the capacity growth. The US represented the main source of growth (+21%), while Europe's growth (+10%) continues to be supported by Central and Eastern European markets.
Out of the total electricity output in 2011, 84% was sold under long-term remuneration schemes while 16% was exposed to US spot electricity prices (spot exposure will decrease further once all signed PPA contracts in the US start to contribute in 2012).
All in all, Revenues increased by 13% YoY and EBITDA increased 12% YoY, as a result of operating growth and positive non-recurrent items at the net operating costs line.
| Installed Capacity (MW) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2,201 | 2,050 | +151 |
| Portugal | 613 | 599 | +14 |
| France | 306 | 284 | +22 |
| Belgium | 57 | 57 | - |
| Poland | 190 | 120 | +70 |
| Romania | 285 | 90 | +195 |
| Europe | 3,652 | 3,200 | +452 |
| US | 3,422 | 3,224 | +198 |
| Brazil | 84 | 14 | +70 |
| EBITDA MW | 7,157 | 6,437 | +720 |
| ENEOP -Eólicas de Portugal (equity consolidated) | 326 | 239 | +87 |
| EBITDA MW + Eólicas de Portugal | 7,483 | 6,676 | +806 |
By December 2011, EDPR managed a global portfolio of 7,483 MW in 8 different countries (including its interest in the ENEOP - Eólicas de Portugal consortium, equity consolidated). During 2011, 720 MW (EBITDA) plus 87 MW (equity consolidated) were added to the installed capacity, of which 538 MW in Europe, 198 MW in the US and 70 MW in Brazil. In the 4Q11, EDPR added 203 MW of which 104 MW in Europe and 99 MW in the US.

| Under Construction (MW) | FY11 |
|---|---|
| Spain | 58 |
| Portugal | 2 |
| ROE | 100 |
| Europe | 160 |
| US | 215 |
| EBITDA MW | 375 |
| ENEOP -Eólicas de Portugal (equity consolidated) | - |
| EBITDA MW + Eólicas de Portugal | 375 |
By December 2011 EDPR had 375 MW under construction, of which 160 MW were in Europe and 215 MW in the US. In Europe, 80 MW were in construction in Poland, 58 MW in Spain and 2 MW in Portugal, while in Italy EDPR is building its first 20 MW. In the US, EDPR has 215 MW under construction from the Marble River wind farm in the State of New York.
| Capex (€m) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ % | ∆ € |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 368 | 539 | (32%) | (171) |
| US | 405 | 783 | (48%) | (378) |
| Brazil & Others | 57 | 79 | (28%) | (10) |
| Total Capex | 829 | 1,401 | (41%) | (572) |
Capex in 2011 was €829m, reflecting the ongoing capacity expansion plan. The 2011 capex decreased by 41% YoY explained by the lower capacity additions in the period and a lower unitary cost. Out of the €829m capex for 2011, €364m were related to the conclusion of new installed MW, while €466m were assigned to capacity under construction and under development.
EDPR has today a pipeline of projects in excess of 21 GW in 11 different countries, which enables the company to develop the best growth options through the execution of high quality projects located in the most profitable markets. During the 4Q11, EDPR performed a rationalisation of the long-term pipeline in the US, leading to a reduction in the volume of capacity under development in this country.
| Pipeline (MW) | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Sub-Total | Prospects | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 369 | 917 | 4,458 | 5,745 | 3,377 | 9,121 |
| North America | 775 | 4,038 | 3,285 | 8,098 | 2,195 | 10,293 |
| Brazil | 120 | 153 | 641 | 914 | 700 | 1,614 |
| Total | 1,264 | 5,107 | 8,384 | 14,756 | 6,272 | 21,028 |

| Assets (€m) | FY11 | FY10 |
|---|---|---|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 10,455 | 9,982 |
| Intangible assets and goodwill, net | 1,334 | 1,367 |
| Financial investments, net | 61 | 64 |
| Deferred tax assets | 56 | 39 |
| Inventories | 24 | 24 |
| Accounts receivable - trade, net | 146 | 144 |
| Accounts receivable - other, net | 763 | 680 |
| Financial assets held for trading | 0 | 36 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 220 | 501 |
| Total Assets | 13,058 | 12,835 |
| Equity (€m) | ||
| Share capital + share premium | 4,914 | 4,914 |
| Reserves and retained earnings | 325 | 274 |
| Consolidated net profit attrib. to equity holders of the parent | 89 | 80 |
| Non-controlling interests | 127 | 126 |
| Total Equity | 5,454 | 5,394 |
| Liabilities (€m) | ||
| Financial debt | 3,826 | 3,534 |
| Institutional partnerships | 1,024 | 1,009 |
| Provisions | 58 | 54 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 381 | 372 |
| Deferred revenues from institutional partnerships | 773 | 635 |
| Accounts payable - net | 1,542 | 1,839 |
| Total Liabilities | 7,604 | 7,442 |
| Total Equity and Liabilities | 13,058 | 12,835 |
Total assets in 2011 increased to 13.1 billion euros, of which 80% is related to net Property, plant and equipment (PP&E) reflecting the net accumulated invested capital in wind energy generation.
Total net PP&E increased to 10.5 billion euros following the new capacity additions in the period, the stronger US dollar as of Dec. 31st, 2011 (vs. Dec. 31st, 2010) and the annual depreciation charges related to the operating assets.
Total net accumulated invested capital related to wind farms in operation by the end of 2011 (excluding work in progress related to future assets and excluding the cash grants received in the US) amounted to 8.9 billion euros.

Net intangible assets mainly include the goodwill registered in EDPR books in US and Spain while accounts receivable are mainly related to loans to related parties, guarantees and tax receivables.
Cash and equivalents totalled 220 million euros and the financial assets held for trading were liquidated throughout 2011.
Total liabilities increased to 7.6 billion euros in 2011 (+162 million euros from 2010), of which 3.8 billion euros are related to financial debt and 1.0 billion euros to institutional partnerships. The increase in the financial debt is mostly explained by the operating and financial investments done in the period.
The institutional partnership stood at 1.0 billion euros. Deferred revenues from institutional partnerships represent the non-economic liability related to the tax credits already benefited by the institutional investor and to be recognized in the P&L through the useful life of the wind farms.
Deferred Tax liabilities in the amount of 381 million euros reflect mainly tax effects arising from temporary differences between assets and liabilities on an accounting basis and on tax basis. On the other hand, accounts payable include PP&E suppliers, deferred revenues related to cash grants received and derivative financial instruments.

| Consolidated Income Statement (€m) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues | 1,068.8 | 947.6 | +13% |
| Supplies and services | 225.1 | 196.2 | +15% |
| Personnel costs | 60.8 | 54.8 | +11% |
| Other operating costs / (income) | (17.8) | (16.2) | (10%) |
| Operating Costs | 268.1 | 234.9 | +14% |
| EBITDA | 800.7 | 712.7 | +12% |
| EBITDA/Revenues | 74.9% | 75.2% | (0.3 pp) |
| Provisions | (0.3) | (0.2) | (71%) |
| Depreciation and amortization | 468.5 | 434.4 | +8% |
| Compensation of subsidized assets' depreciation | (15.0) | (11.4) | (31%) |
| EBIT | 347.5 | 289.9 | +20% |
| Capital gains/(losses) | 10.5 | 0.0 | - |
| Financial income/(expense) | (244.1) | (174.1) | (40%) |
| Income/(losses) from group and associated companies | 4.8 | 5.0 | (5%) |
| Pre-Tax Profit | 118.7 | 120.8 | (2%) |
| Income taxes | (28.0) | (37.8) | +26% |
| Profit of the period | 90.6 | 83.0 | +9% |
| Equity Holders of EDPR | 88.6 | 80.2 | +10% |
| Non-controlling interests | 2.0 | 2.8 | (29%) |
In 2011, EDPR kept delivering a solid operating performance that has been translated into a 13% top-line year-on-year growth. The strong increase in electricity output and the stability of the average selling price led to 1.1 billion euros of Revenues.
EBITDA was up 12% YoY to 801 million euros following the Revenues growth and reflecting the maintenance of high efficiency levels, although negatively impacted by a weaker US Dollar and Zloty on average vs. 2010 (-16 million euros).
Depreciation and amortization charges (including comp. of subsidized asset's depreciation) increased by 7% in 2011 to 453 million euros. In the 2Q11, EDPR concluded a joint technical study with an industry independent expert on the expectable operating period turbines are expected to be economically in operation, and accordingly adjusted the useful life of its fleet to 25 years. The extension had a +55 million euros impact in the Net Income bottom line of 2011 (81M€ pre-tax), mainly as a result of lower depreciation charges.

The net financial expenses increased 40% year-on-year to 244 million euros explained by: i) the 14% growth of the interest costs, at a slower pace than the average financial debt; and ii) a negative 22 million euros forex difference related to assets and liabilities in Polish Zloty, Romania Leu and US Dollars
All in all, some non-recurrent items impacted the company's Pre-tax profit in -16 million euros: i) +11 million euros as a result of the revaluation of some of EDPR's European Assets and Liabilities (+52 million euros in EBITDA; -41 million euros in Depreciations and Amortizations); ii) -12 million euros of write-offs and other costs related to pipeline rationalisation (impact in EBITDA); iii) -22 million euros of negative forex differences (impact in Financial Costs); and iv) +10 million euros of capital gains.
Pre-tax profit totalled 119 million euros and income tax totalled 28 million euros - reflecting an effective tax rate of 24%. In 2011, EDPR obtained higher fiscal efficiency in its Spanish operations through the full control of Genesa and changed its deferred tax accounting policy in EDPR NA by starting to recognize net liabilities (against profits before taxes) vs. previous null income taxes (of which current taxes are presently zero given the tax incentives schemes in place) – this had a negative 6 million euros impact on the 2011 net income.
Net Income attributable to EDPR shareholders increased 10% YoY to 89 million euros, reflecting the operating performance in the period, the extension of the projects' useful life, the tax accounting policy in EDPR NA and non recurrent items (-16 million euros). Earnings attributable to non-controlling interests decrease 29% from 2010.
The distribution of dividends must be proposed by EDPR 's Board of Directors and authorized by a resolution approved in the Company's Shareholders Meeting. The expected dividend policy of EDPR, as announced in the IPO, is to propose dividends' distribution each year representing at least 20% of EDPR's distributable profit. Also as announced in the IPO, EDPR Board of Directors can adjust this dividend policy as required to reflect, among other things, changes to our business plan and our capital requirements, and there can be no assurance that in any given year a dividend will be proposed or declared.

| Net Income Application Proposal (€) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distribution basis: | ||||
| Net Income of the Period | 59,018,372.50 | |||
| Total to be allocated | 59,018,372.50 | |||
| Allocation: | ||||
| Legal Reserves (10%) | 5,901,837.25 | |||
| Voluntary Reserves | 53,116,535.25 | |||
| Total Distributed | 59,018,372.50 |
| Cash-Flow (€m) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ 11/10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA | 801 | 713 | +12% |
| FFO (Funds From Operations) | 588 | 522 | +13% |
| Operating Cash-Flow | 643 | 567 | +13% |
| Net Operating Cash-Flow | (444) | (764) | +42% |
| Decrease / (Increase) in Net Debt | (616) | (737) | +16% |
In 2011, EDPR generated an Operating Cash-Flow of €643m, delivering a 13% growth YoY, clearly demonstrating the recurrent cash generation capabilities of the operating assets.
The following are the key cash-flow items that explain the 2011 cash evolution:

| Net Debt (€m) | FY11 | FY10 | ∆ € |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Debt | 3,826 | 3,534 | +293 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 220 | 501 | (281) |
| Loans to EDP Group related companies and cash pooling | 219 | 226 | (7) |
| Financial assets held for trading | 0 | 36 | (36) |
| Net Debt | 3,387 | 2,772 | +616 |
At the end of 2011, EDPR's financial debt was 3.8 billion euros (+8% YoY), being c78% of it loans with EDP Group while the remaining is debt with financial institutions, mostly related to project finance. Net Debt achieved 3.4 billion euros in 2011, increasing from the 2.8 billion euros by the end of 2010, mainly reflecting the capital expenditures and the financial investments done in the period.
EDPR's debt has a long-term profile. Most of our debt matures beyond 2018. Loans with EDP Group are closed for a 10 year period at fixed rates. Project finances also have a long-term duration. Such strategy enables the company to match to match the operating cash-flow profile with its financing costs.
As of December 2011, 53% of EDPR's financial debt was in Euros, 40% in US Dollars and 7% in other currencies, mainly Zloty and Brazilian Real. EDPR finances in local currencies for investments in Non-Euro currency geographies, such as the US, Poland and Brazil, reducing its financial exposure to forex changes.
92% of EDPR's financial debt was negotiated at a fixed rate, which mainly represents the financing agreements with EDP. EDPR follows a long-term fixed rate funding strategy to match the operating cash flow profile with its financing costs.
EDPR is a global leading energy company. Our growth has been the result of an extraordinary ability to implement projects and to smoothly integrate new companies, people and cultures. Our

markets provide attractive growth potential, mainly due to their growth prospects and the fact that they possess stable regulatory structures that allows for profitable returns.
EDPR continues to look to the renewable energy sector with a long-term outlook, believing that the environmental, economic and technological trends that have underpinned the currently favorable renewable energy market conditions will continue to drive further support for growth in the markets we are active in.
EDPR is a leading 'pure-play' renewable energy company, having derived its revenue stream from renewable energy activity. EDPR holds a leading position and "early mover" advantages in attractive high-growth markets, and continues to analyze new markets as well as new opportunities within the markets we currently operate in. This strategy continues to provide the company with a unique combination of size, focus and experience in the sector.
EDPR has a solid history of executing projects and delivering targets. We consistently increased installed capacity through the successful development of pipeline. The company's successful results stem from a unique combination of factors: strong track record in execution, first class assets with above average wind resources quality, a well balanced portfolio in terms of geography, stage of development and revenue sources, and a competitive turbine supply strategy.
The combination of diversified operations with a stable revenue base spread across countries with favorable regulatory regimes limits the exposure to market prices of electricity and provides significant visibility and stability.
Furthermore, EDPR has proven its ability to selectively identify new markets, to enter such markets and successfully integrate new countries.
At the core of EDPR's confidence in achieving these targets, is a dynamic, highly qualified and experienced team of world-wide employees with the track record and ambition to deliver upon the superior targets.

activities and processes of the company, but to be part of t
In EDPR's risk framework, risk process aims to link the company's overall strategy into manager's day-to-day decisions, enabling the company to increase the likelihood of achieving its strategic objectives.
EDPR's risk framework was designed to be not a stand-alone activity separated from the main
EDPR's general strategy is translated into major strategic questions that are grouped by risk area and then subject to EDPR's risk process. The outcome of the risk process is a set of specific guidelines per risk area that will guide managers in their decisions according to the company's risk profile.


Risk management in EDPR is supported by three distinct organizational functions:

EDPR's Risk Committee integrates and coordinates all the risk functions and assures the link between risk strategy and the company's operations.
EDPR's Risk Committee intends to be the forum to discuss how EDPR can optimize its risk-return position according to its risk profile. The key responsibilities of this committee are:

The following list summarizes the main risk areas and descriptions of EDPR's business:
The development and profitability of renewable energy projects are subject to policies and regulatory frameworks. The jurisdictions in which EDPR operates provide numerous types of incentives that support the energy generated from renewable sources.
Support for renewable energy sources has been strong in previous years, and both the European Union and various US federal and state bodies have regularly reaffirmed their wish to continue and strengthen such support.
It cannot be guaranteed that the current support will be maintained or that the electricity produced by future renewable energy projects will benefit from state purchase obligations, tax incentives, or other support measures for the electricity generation from renewable energy sources.

EDPR is managing its exposure to regulatory risks trough diversification (being present in several countries) and by being an active member in several wind associations.
EDPR faces limited market price risk as it pursues a strategy of being present in countries or regions with long term visibility on revenues. In most countries where EDPR is present, prices are determined through regulated framework mechanisms. On the markets where there is expected short term volatility on market prices, EDPR uses various financial and commodity hedging instruments in order to optimize the exposure to fluctuating electricity prices. However, it may not be possible to successfully hedge the exposures or it may face other difficulties in executing the hedging strategy.
In Europe, EDPR operates in countries where the selling price is defined by a feed-in-tariff (Spain, Portugal and France) or in markets where on top of the electricity price EDPR receives either a predefined regulated premium or a green certificate, whose price is achieved on a regulated market (Spain, Belgium, Poland, and Romania). Additionally, EDPR is developing activity in Italy and UK where current incentive system is based on green certificates, although both are in a process to change into feed in tariff.
In the case of North America, EDPR focus is developing strategy on the States which by having an RPS program in place provides higher revenues visibility, through the REC (Renewable Energy Credit) system and by non-compliance penalties. The North America market does not provide any regulated framework system for the electricity price although it may exist for the RECs in some States. Most of EDPR's capacity in the US has predefined prices determined by long-term contracts with local utilities in line with the Company's policy of signing long-term contracts for the output of its wind farms.
In Brazilian operations, selling price is defined through a public auction which is later translated into a long-term contract.
Under EDPR's global approach to optimize the exposure to market electricity prices, the Company evaluates on a permanent basis if there are any deviations to the defined limits, assessing in which markets financial hedges may be more effective to correct it. In 2010, in order to manage such

exposure, EDPR financially hedged a significant part of its generation in Spain while it closed a significant portion of its exposure through several physical and financial deals for the long-term in the US.
The amount of electricity generated by EDPR on its wind farms, and therefore EDPR's profitability, are dependent on climatic conditions, which vary across the locations of the wind farms, and from season to season and year to year. Energy output at wind farms may decline if wind speeds falls outside specific ranges, as turbines will only operate when wind speeds are within those ranges.
Variations and fluctuations in wind conditions at wind farms may result in seasonal and other fluctuations in the amount of electricity that is generated and, consequently, in the operating results and efficiency.
EDPR mitigates wind resource volatility and seasonality by having a strong knowledge in the design of its wind farms, and through the geographical diversification – in each country and in different countries – of its asset base. This "portfolio effect" enables to offset wind variations in each area and to keep the total energy generation relatively steady. Currently EDPR is present in 11 countries: Spain, Portugal, France, Belgium, Poland, Romania, UK, Italy, US, Canada and Brazil.
EDPR is exposed to fluctuations in interest rates through financing. This risk can be mitigated using fixed rates and hedging instruments, including interest rate swaps.
Also because of its presence in several countries, currency fluctuations may have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations. EDPR may attempt to hedge against currency fluctuations risks by natural hedging strategies, as well as by using hedging instruments, including forward foreign exchange contracts and Cross Interest Rate Swaps.
EDPR hedging efforts will minimize but not eliminate the impact of interest rate and exchange rate volatility.

The evolution of the financial markets is analyzed on an on-going basis in accordance to EDP Group's risk management policy approved by the EDPR`s Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors is responsible for the definition of general risk-management principles and the establishment of exposure limits following the recommendation of the risk committee.
Taking into account the risk management policy and exposure limits previously approved, the Financial Department identifies, evaluates and submits for the Board's approval the financial strategy appropriate to each project/location.
The execution of the approved strategies is also undertaken by the Financial Department, in accordance with the policies previously defined and approved.
Fixed rate, Natural hedging and Financial instruments are used to minimize potential adverse effects resulting from the interest rate and foreign exchange rate risks on its financial performance.
The purpose of the interest rate risk management policies is to reduce the exposure of long term debt cash flows from market fluctuations, mainly by issuing long term debt with a fixed rate, but also through the settlement of derivative financial instruments to swap from floating rate to fixed rate when long term debt is issued with floating rates.
EDPR has a portfolio of interest-rate derivatives with maturities between approximately 2 and 14 years. Sensitivity analyses of the fair value of financial instruments to interest-rate fluctuations are performed.
Given the policies adopted by EDPR Group, its financial cash flows are substantially independent from the fluctuation in interest rate markets.
EDPR operates internationally and is exposed to the exchange-rate risk resulting from investments in foreign subsidiaries. Currently, main currency exposure is the U.S. dollar/euro currency fluctuation risk that results principally from the shareholding in EDPR NA. With the ongoing
<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->

increasing capacity in others non-euro regions, EDPR will become also exposed to other local currencies (Poland, Romania and Brazil).
EDPR general policy is the Natural Hedging in order to match currency cash flows, minimizing the impact of exchange rates changes while value is preserved. The essence of this approach is to create financial foreign currency outflows to match equivalent foreign currency inflows.
Counterparty risk is the default risk of the other party in an agreement, either due to temporary liquidity issues or long term systemic issues.
EDPR policy in terms of the counterparty credit risk on financial transactions is managed by an analysis of the technical capacity, competitiveness, credit notation and exposure to each counterparty. Counterparties in derivatives and financial transactions are restricted to high-quality credit institutions, therefore, there cannot be considered any significant risk of counterparty noncompliance and no collateral is demanded for these transactions.
Liquidity risk is the risk that EDPR will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.
EDPR's strategy to manage liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have significant liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring in unacceptable losses or risking damage to EDPR's reputation.
Wind turbine generators (WTG) is a key element in the development of EDPR's wind-related energy projects, as the shortfall or an unexpected sharp increase in WTG prices can create a question mark on new project's development and its profitability. WTG represents the majority of a wind farm capital expenditure (on average, between 70% and 80%).

EDPR faces limited risk to the availability and prices' increase of WTG due to its framework agreements with the major global wind turbines suppliers. The Company uses a large mix of turbines suppliers in order to reduce its dependency on any one supplier being one of the worldwide wind energy developers with a more diversified and balanced portfolio.
Wind farms are subject to strict international, national, state, regional and local regulations relating to the development, construction, licensing, grid interconnection and operation of power plants. Among other things, these laws regulate: land acquisitions, leasing and use; building, transportation and distribution permits; landscape and environmental permits; and regulations on energy transmission and distribution network congestions.
EDPR mitigates this risk by having development activities in 11 different countries (Spain, Portugal, France, Belgium, Poland, Romania, UK, Italy, US, Canada and Brazil) with a portfolio of projects in several maturity stages. EDPR has a large pipeline located in the most attractive regions providing a "buffer" to overcome potential delays in the development of new projects, ensuring growth targets.
Wind farms output depend upon the availability and operating performance of the equipment necessary to operate it, mainly the components of wind turbines and transformers. Therefore the risk is that the performance of the turbine does not reach its optimum implies that the energy output is not the expected.
EDPR mitigates this risk by using a mix of turbine suppliers which minimizes technological risk, by signing a medium-term full-scope maintenance agreement with the turbine supplier and by an adequate preventive and scheduled maintenance.

Topic 3 provides a description of the key financial risks faced by EDPR. According to EDPR risk policy, and in order to manage, control or minimize impact of some of those risks, in liaise with a discipline risk management practice, EDPR uses financial derivatives and enters hedging transactions with the sole intent to protect against risks and as a consequence mitigate fluctuations of earnings.
These derivative instruments are explained in detail as part of the note 39 to the Annual Accounts.

It has been approved in the Annual Shareholder's meeting of 2010, to authorize the Board of Directors for the acquisition and transmission of own shares by the Company and/or the affiliate companies through their management bodies for a term of five years from the date of the General Shareholders Meeting. Up to date of this report the Company has not executed any acquisition and consequently transmission of own shares.
Terms and requirements are detailed in the Corporate Governance (attached).

NVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
Renewable energies have a large potential to deal with one of the great challenges of this century: climate change. Wind energy benefits from an inexhaustible and natural resource, producing energy while not compromising our world's environment with the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs).
Furthermore, wind is an endogenous resource and its use helps to diminish large import costs and the transportation carbon footprint that would otherwise be produced by other sources of energy. Wind is a clean, safe and secure source of energy available close to the population.
Our portfolio of 7.5 GW of installed capacity contributes every year to the worldwide fight against climate change. We significantly improve local and global air quality by mitigating emissions that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere due to the operation of other kinds of energy generation based on fossil fuels.
In 2011, EDPR has produced 16.8 TWh that is estimated to avoid the emission of 9,463 thousand tons of CO2.
The company growth plans of pure renewable energy represent a solid commitment to foster the use of green energy sources. Moreover, we are committed to support the use the best technologies available in order to preserve natural resources and reduce pollution.

1 Estimated as: [production x country emission factors]
In order to protect the environment, we complement our strategy of fighting against climate change with an environmentally responsible management of our wind farms. This strategy is supported by the Environmental and Biodiversity policies based on EDP Group's Guidelines that were approved by EDPR Executive Committee in January 2011.
Our policies reflect a responsible management of the environment along the whole value chain. From the very early stages of project development - when it is critical to perform environmental
ENVIRON MENTAL STRATEGY

and cultural feasibility studies - to the decommissioning of our wind farms - where our environmental strategy includes a waste management plan, environmental monitoring plans and habitat restoration. All this process is supported by an extensive local knowledge that allows us to ensure environmental compliance during the project life cycle. In 2011, we invested 12 million Euros in environmental related activities.
To ensure that our projects are designed and operated in compliance with the applicable regulation, with our environmental principles and with international best practices we have implemented numerous environmental appraisal and monitoring processes over the life cycle of our projects.
During the operation phase, we ensure the environmental legal compliance and the proper management of the environmental aspects through the EDPR Environmental Management System (EMS).
The EMS covers, among others, the procedures applicable to all wind farms in operation to establish operational controls, monitoring and measurements of the relevant environmental aspects. Environment surveillance is carried out periodically to assess the significance of the environmental aspects. The frequency of further surveillances is established in the monitoring plan given the assessment made. There are a few cases in which the surveillance is performed on a daily basis.
Contractors, who are mainly related to third party operating and maintenance service providers, are required to follow the environmental legislation as well as the environmental policies, management systems and requirements of EDPR.
The EMS in place or under implementation in Europe and Brazil is based on the ISO 14001:2004 Standard. The implementation of this system in Europe started in 2008 in some wind farms in Spain. Since then, it has been extended to other geographies, such as Portugal, France, Poland and Romania. We set as a target to have the EMS implemented in all operating wind farms in Europe were we have a controlling stake by the end of 2012.
By the end of 2011, 2,193 MW in Europe have been certified in compliance with the ISO 14001:2004 standard (61% of the wind farms in operation in Europe).
In the US, we have defined an action plan to review applicable environmental laws and regulations and conduct internal environmental audit of our wind farms to evaluate, on a yearly basis, the industrial compliance with applicable legal requirements, instead of pursuing a specific certification.
In Brazil, we are currently working to implement the EMS in all wind farms, accounting for 84 MW, to be certified according to ISO 14001:2004 standard.

All wind farms in operation covered by the EMS, have operational controls in place, to monitor and measure the environmental aspects considered significant. This includes water, electricity and other consumptions; greenhouse gases, noise and other emissions; hazardous and non-hazardous waste, among other.
Wind farms development typically occurs in rural areas where wind resource is abundant and the operation of wind farms is compatible with current land use. No loss of livelihood or economic losses are associated with the developments. Only a small percentage of the land is affected by permanent constructions and its change of use is approved by the competent authorities.
Once construction is complete, the actual land taken out of permanent production is less than 1% of the total project area. The primary use of this land is for access roads to the wind turbine locations, a small area for the wind turbine and electrical transformer, and a gravelled pad area for a crane to be used in construction and maintenance activities. The total area within a wind farm boundary can vary, depending upon the wind resource characteristics and terrain.
During 2011, in order to offset those impacts that cannot be prevented, EDPR implemented many compensation measures. These measures included partnership with environmental associations aimed at achieving a globally positive biodiversity balance.
Year after year EDPR consolidates its top tier position in the renewable energy market thanks to our people's commitment and effort. To guarantee the excellence of our employees, human capital management plays a key role in supporting our growth targets and in helping to exceed the company's operational performance. At EDPR we are committed to offer our people an attractive career development plan with opportunities to grow professionally.

OUR PEOPLE
We have a qualified and diverse team aligned with our business strategy, 72% of which hold university degrees and are less than 40 years old. This deep pool of highly qualified talent has supported EDPR's exponential growth and provides the optimal base to face future opportunities and challenges. Additionally, our people strongly reflect EDPR's energy and enthusiasm.
In 2011, EDPR employed 796 people, 37% of which are located on our North American platform and Brazil, while the remaining 63% work in our European platform.
| Headcount at year-end | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| EDPR Corporate* | 127 | 75 |
| EDPR EU | 393 | 398 |
| EDPR NA | 260 | 332 |
| EDPR SA | 16 | 17 |
| Total | 796 | 822 |
Note: Figures include four members of the M angement Team * In 2011, 22 EDPR Corporate employees were based in North America
EDPR Corporate now includes two additional departments that were previously in the North American and European platforms. This change allows for the harmonization of key processes and the sharing of best practices.
Throughout the year, 130 new employees joined EDPR while 154 are no longer with the company, resulting in a turnover ratio of 18%, which is in line with the previous year.

| Employees Turnover | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of hires | 130 | 171 |
| Number of departures | 154 | 70 |
| Total turnover | 18% | 15% |
| Turnover by gender | ||
| Male | 18% | 16% |
| Female | 18% | 12% |
| Turnover by age range | ||
| Less than 30 years old | 22% | 14% |
| Between 30 and 39 years | 16% | 14% |
| Over 40 years old | 17% | 17% |
| Turnover by platform | ||
| EDPR Corporate | 8% | 13% |
| EDPR EU | 14% | 11% |
| EDPR NA | 27% | 18% |
| EDPR BR | 28% | 41% |
Note: Turnover calculated as [((new hires + departures) / 2) / (total employees – temporary contracts)]
EDPR prides itself of having a multicultural team, with employees from 24 distinct nationalities, working in 11 geographies, of which 80 are outside their home country. This provides an important advantage, as teams benefit from multiple perspectives and deep knowledge of different markets.
Every two years, EDPR conducts a Satisfaction Survey for its employees. In 2011, the participation rate increased to 91% from 78% (in 2009), and resulted in a global score of 79%.
An in-depth analysis of the macro indicators shows an increase in the level of satisfaction with both the company and one's department. The survey revealed strong company loyalty as the highest score achieved was related to employee's desire to stay.
EDPR continues to improve the appraisal model implemented in 2010 and that is applicable to all our employees. Currently, it is based on a 360 degrees evaluation model in which the system collects information from several data sources to evaluate employee performance: oneself, peers, subordinates and manager. In 2011, audiovisual material, publications on the Intranet and workshops were carried out to educate our employees on the process.
During the 2011 appraisal process, employees had the opportunity to create their Individual Development Plan, which was aligned with their manager. The objective of this new system is to monitor the progress of improvement actions and skills development.

In order to fuel future growth, increase efficiency and drive innovation EDPR is constantly scanning globally to recruit top talent. To this extent a recruiting strategy has been developed to achieve this critical goal. As a sustainable company, EDPR aims to ensure that new recruits are aligned with the company's values:
In 2011, EDPR hired 130 employees, 68 for EDPR EU, 40 for the EDPR NA, 18 for EDPR Corporate and 4 for the EDPR BR. Additionally, the percentage of women hired increased from 27% to 32%.
| New hires | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| Female | 41 | 47 |
| Male | 89 | 124 |
| Total | 130 | 171 |
EDPR is concerned with the adaptation of new hires. Thus, in EDPR EU, we organized five Welcome Days that give the opportunity to get to thoroughly know EDPR.
During this three day event, EDPR provides new hires with some basic knowledge and tools that are invaluable for the quick adaptation. Recruits are briefed on the activities and objectives of the companies departments, visit a wind farm to get an up-close view of the business and receive basic training by the Renewable Energy School.
Taking into account that all new employees must be aware of human resources policies and procedures, they must have an easy-to-handle manual to help them solve any issues. Thus EDPR developed a guide applicable to all new employees hired within Europe. This guide already exists for the North American platform.
After several meetings with country managers and heads of department to collect country's specific information, the document was finished and published. The information is available on the company intranet and will be updated on an annual basis. A road-show was taken to several countries, providing a small presentation to educate all employees on the new handbook.

During 2011 we hired 84 interns, 5 of which were brought on full-time. EDPR is committed to hiring the brightest people and seeks interns from the top universities and business schools.
| 2011 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interns | Summer | Annual | Total | Contracts | (%) |
| EDPR Corporate | 0 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 17% |
| EDPR EU | 4 | 46 | 50 | 2 | 4% |
| EDPR NA | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| EDPR BR | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 17% |
| Total | 20 | 64 | 84 | 5 | 6% |
We are committed to offer employees an attractive career development plan, as well as continuous education and training opportunities. This vision is key in aligning current and future demands of the organization with employees' capabilities, while fulfilling their professional development expectations and supporting their continued employability.
In 2011, we increased the number of training hours from 26.734 to 37.996. Additionally, the total investment was increased by 45%, reaching 1 million euros.
In order to improve our employees' training, we created the EDPR Training Catalogue 2012, with a schedule of the training activities and the training policy. Additionally, it was included the educational field of the Renewable Energy School. These tools allowed for the creation of a common knowledge base for all employees and synergies within the EDP group.
The High-Potential Program (HIPO) is a program designed to develop soft skills in order to prepare future leaders and successors to carry EDPR to the next level.
The specific areas included when designing the program are:
The executive program was developed for managers, to consolidate their leadership and team development skills. The program is focused on:

In 2011, EDPR offered advanced training to 7 senior managers, which is a good indicator of the commitment to Talent Development undertaken by the company. They enrolled in top international business schools which contributed to further develop our values and know-how, as well as to develop our high qualified profiles.
At the beginning of 2012, a training course will be launched in all European countries on leadership and the role of the team manager. For this training session, a guide has been designed to collect and consolidate the main Human Resources aspects that Managers could find in the exercise of their responsibilities as people coordinators.
As a final result, all managers should recognize their leadership responsibilities and the leadership style expected at EDPR. The training aims to emphasize the attitudes and behaviours of an EDPR leader, as well as to leverage the "Leaders Guide". In fact, as of 2011, all Managers are given a manual that explains HR issues and processes from a managers perspective.
In 2011, the North American platform undertook a reorganization to reinforce its role as an operator of a large installed capacity. The newly formed structure in 4Q11 provided a solution for an operations company with 3.4 GW of capacity. A key component of the restructuring was the formation of three operational regions led by new regional executive vice-presidents with clear responsibilities: project management (development and construction), regulatory risk management, and origination (PPA and M&A), leading to overall P&L responsibility.
The reorganization resulted in a 15% reduction in headcount. Employees departing the company were provided with a separation package which included the provision of services with an outplacement agency to assist in finding a new position, and the extension of company-paid medical, dental and vision benefits for a specific period of time.
As an employer in the United States, EDPR also complied with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act Guide to Advance Notice of Closings and Layoffs. Employees who have worked more than six months and 20 hours a week are required to receive 60 days notice in the event of closings and layoffs.
From EDPR's 796 employees, 29% were covered by collective bargaining agreements.
Generally, collective bargaining agreements apply to all employees working under an employment relationship with and for the account of the respective companies, regardless of the type of contract, the professional group into which they are classified, their occupation or job. However, matters relating to the corporate organization itself, the laws of each country or even usage and custom in each country result in certain groups being expressly excluded from the scope of collective bargaining agreements.

Per country case law, EDPR may have a minimum period which the Company must comply with for giving formal notice of organizational changes at the companies in the Group with an impact on employees. However, it is customary to communicate significant events to the affected groups in advance.
Our global compensation policy addresses the needs of every local market, with enough flexibility to adapt to each region where the company is present. The developed system ensures that all positions are evaluated and graded according to a methodology designed to ensure fairness. Based on the organization's matrix, employees are placed within approved salary bands based on market benchmarks.
We are committed to offer a competitive benefits package to recognize the contributions and talents of our employees. The Company does not differentiate benefits between full time and part time employees.
In addition to legal requirements per country, competitive benefits are offered in the various regions (adjusted to local specificities) and include, namely, medical insurance (one of the most recognized by our employees), life insurance, pension plans or retirement plans, business travel insurance and accident insurance.
The Company offers the opportunity to participate in either a pension plan or defined contribution plan, depending on the home country. The guaranteed contributions are supplemental to and independent of those established under the Social Security System.
EDPR also has a Flexible Remuneration Package that is currently implemented in Spain and Portugal. This plan allows for employees to decide if they want to receive part of their wage paid in products or services, namely restaurant tickets, kinder garden tickets, EDPR shares, and others. This can provide tax benefits for employees.
During 2011, EDPR analyzed the possibility of extending the Flexible Remuneration Package to other geographies according to local legislations, however we were unable to find tax benefits applicable to all employees.
One of our main focuses continues to be the promotion and encouragement of work-life balance of our employees. This pursuit increases our employee's satisfaction and enjoyment, while boosting their productivity, commitment and accountability. Overall this creates positive bottomline results for the organization.
EDPR implemented work-life balance programs throughout the geographies where the company is present and aims constantly improve and provide additional benefits. This course of action was ultimately recognized with the Family-Responsible Employer Certificate.

Benefits in the work-life balance programs include, depending on the geographies, maternity leave, subsidized summer activities for dependents of employees, birthdays and others.
At the North American headquarters in Houston, EDPR promoted its Take Your Child to Work Day, an educational program promoting opportunities for children to participate in career exploration at an early age. The all-day event included craft projects, games, presentations, lunch and a movie. In Europe, our employees' children between 0 and 12 years old received a Christmas gift, along with a letter from the three Wise Men in Spain and from Santa in the rest of Europe. In order to foster the support of social causes, the gifts were purchased from UNICEF.
In 2011, we launched a UNICEF Christmas Campaign which was divided into two main courses of action: "Give a Day" in Spain and "Emergency in the Horn of Africa" in the other European countries. Both campaigns are meant to fight child malnutrition.
The total number of employees that have contributed to the UNICEF campaign reached 358, and for each one of them the company donated 28 euros, adding up to a total amount of 10,024 euros. The amount is meant to save the lives of children and/ or giving water to families in Africa.
On the other side of the Atlantic, through the Volunteer Committee, employees donated new toys for the Marine Toys for Tots Foundation. 10 teams registered for the Donation Challenge and collected 824 toys which were enough to help nearly 300 families. On average, each participating employee donated 5 toys. Additionally, the Albany New York office collected and donated their toys to families in the Schoharie County, which was impacted by hurricane Irene.

Beyond the commercial activities, EDP Renováveis supports EDP Inovação (EDPI) in developing a pilot project in order to deploy a wind turbine installed on floating structure off the Portuguese coast. Such floating structure is a patented technology named Windfloat owned by Principle Power, whom EDPI has a memorandum of understanding, providing privilege access to the technology
The innovation focus of the area is the development of a floating foundation, based on the experiences from the oil and gas industry, which will support multi-MW wind turbines in offshore applications.

The project is the first offshore wind deployment worldwide which did not require the use of any heavy lift equipment offshore. Further, this is the first offshore wind turbine in open Atlantic waters, and the first deployment of a semi-submersible structure supporting a multi-megawatt wind turbine.
The WindFloat Project, developed in partnership by EDP, Principle Power, A Silva Matos, Inovcapital and Vestas, has secured support from the Portuguese State. It will form the basis of a future ocean energy cluster in Portugal.
The WindFloat project clearly addresses the supply side of the global solution as it implies cleaner energy generation.

06 Jan – EDPR's principal shareholder EDP has convened a General Shareholders' Meeting: EDP has convened a General Shareholders' Meeting in which shareholders will decide upon the election of new members of the Executive Board of Directors. As a consequence, shall this proposal be approved, EDP as major shareholder of EDP Renováveis, intends to propose the necessary steps for Mr. João Manso Neto to assume the position of EDP Renováveis Chief Executive Officer, in substitution of Mrs. Ana Maria Fernandes.
N EVENTS OF THE PE
1
02 Fev – EDP Renováveis announces FY2011 provisional operating data: capacity increased 806 MW in 2011 to 7,483 MW (538 MW in Europe, 198 MW in the US and 70 MW in Brazil) and electricity output totalled 16,800 GWh, meaning a 17% increase comparing 2010. Load factor in Europe was 25% and in the US 33%.

10. ORPORATEOVERNANCE OVERVI
EDP Renováveis, has adopted the governance structure in effect in Spain. It comprises a General Meeting of Shareholders and a Board of Directors that represents and manages the company.
The Company's Board of Directors has set up four committees. These are the Executive Committee, the Audit and Control Committee, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, the Committee on Related-Party Transactions.
Aditionally, on 2011, the Board of Directors approved to create an Ethics Committee. The Committee has three members, which are the Presidents of the Committees of the Board of Directors.
The governance model of EDPR is designed to ensure the transparency, meticulous separation of duties and the specialization of supervision.
The purpose of the choice of this model by EDPR is to adapt the Company's corporate governance structure to the Portuguese legislation. The governance model adopted by EDPR therefore seeks, insofar as it is compatible with its personal law, to correspond to the so-called "Anglo-Saxon" model set forth in the Portuguese Commercial Companies Code, in which the management body is a Board of Directors, and the supervision and control duties are of the responsibility of an Audit and Control Committee.
The choice of this model obbeys to the purpose of establishing compatibility between two different systems of company law, which could be considered applicable to the model.
The experience of institutional operating indicates that the governance model adopted by the shareholders is appropriate to the corporate organisation of EDP Renováveis activity, especially because it affords transparency and healthy balance between the management functions of the Executive Committee, the supervisory functions of the Audit and Control Committee and oversight by different specialised Board of Directors committees.
The institutional and functional relationship between the Executive Committee, the Audit and Control Committee and the other non-executive members of the Board of Directors has been harmony conducive to the development of the company's business.
In order to ensure a better understanding of EDP Renováveis corporate governance by its shareholders, the Company posts its updated Articles of Association at www.edprenovaveis.com.

The General Meeting of Shareholders, when properly convened, has the power to decide and adopt majority decisions on matters that the law and the Articles of Association set forth that it should be decided and be submitted for its approval.
The Board of Directors has the broadest powers for the management and governance of the Company, with no limitations other than the competences expressly allocated exclusively to the General Meeting of Shareholders by law or the Articles of Association.
On 2011, Mr. António Martins da Costa, Mr. José Silva Lopes and Mr. Daniel Kammen ended their terms as Board members. The four members of the Management Team, Mr. Rui Teixeira, Mr. João Paulo Costeira, Mr. Luis Adão da Fonseca and Mr. Gabriel Alonso were appointed as Board members. All the others members of the Board were re-elected for a new term.
| Name | Position | Date of Appointment | Date of Re-election | End of Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| António Mexia | Chairman and Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Ana Maria Fernandes | Vice-Chairman, CEO | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Manso Neto | Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Nuno Alves | Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rui Teixeira | Director | 11/04/2011 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Paulo Costeira | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | Director | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| António Nogueira Leite | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Francisco de Lacerda | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Gilles August | Director (Indep.) | 14/04/2009 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Lopes Raimundo | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Jorge Santos | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| José Araújo e Silva | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | Director (Indep.) | 04/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |

| executive committee | BOARD OF DIRECTORS António Mexia Chairman |
non-executives Francisco de Lacerda Guilles August |
António Nogueira Leite | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Maria Fernandes João Manso Neto Vice- Chairman and CEO Nuno Alves Rui Teixeira João Paulo Costeira Luís Adão da Fonseca |
João Lopes Raimundo João Manuel de Mello Franco Jorge Santos José Araújo e Silva Manuel Menéndez Menéndez Rafael Caldeira Valverde |
|||||
| Gabriel Alonso Directors |
general secretary Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
|||||
| Nominations and Remunerations Committee Transactions Jorge Santos Francisco de Lacerda Rafael Caldeira Valverde João Manso Neto |
Committee on Related-Party António Nogueira Leite João Manuel de Mello Franco |
Audit and Control Committee João Manuel de Mello Franco Jorge Santos João Lopes Raimundo |
||||
| MANAGEMENT TEAM | Luís Adão da Fonseca | Gabriel Alonso | João Paulo Costeira |

The EDPR share capital of EUR 4,361,540,810 is represented by 872,308,162 shares with a face value of EUR 5 each. All shares integrate a single class and series and are fully issued and paid. There are no holders of special rights and pursuant to the Article 8 of the Company's Articles of Association, there are no restrictions on the transfer of EDPR shares.
As far as the EDPR Board of Directors is aware there are currently no shareholders' agreements regarding the company.
The EDPR shareholder structure has remained unchanged since the IPO in 2008 with the EDP Group holding 77.5% of the Company's share capital and the remaining 22.5% being freely traded on the NYSE Euronext Lisbon stock market.
EDPR Shareholder Structure – 31 Dec 2011

By December 31st, 2011, EDPR's free-float comprised about 110,000 institutional and private investors spread across more than 35 different countries with special focus on Portugal, United States, and United Kingdom. Rest of Europe most represented countries are Switzerland, France and Norway.

Institutional investors represented 80% of EDPR's free-float (79% in 2010) while private investors, mostly Portuguese, stand for the remaining 20%.


Portugal Europe US UK Rest of World
Qualifying holdings in EDP are subject to the Spanish Law, which regulates the criteria and thresholds of the shareholders' holdings. As of December 31st,2011, no qualifying holdings in EDPR with the exception of EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. were identified.
| Shareholder | Number of Shares % | % Capital % Voting Rights | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDP - Energias de Portugal | |||
| EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. - Sucursal en España | 541,027,156 | 62.00% | 62.00% |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | 135,256,700 | 15.50% | 15.50% |
| Total | 676,283,856 | 77.50% | 77.50% |
Free-Float by Geography

The shares representing 100% of the EDPR share capital were admitted to trading in the official stock exchange NYSE Euronext Lisbon on June 4th, 2008. Since then the free float level is unchanged at 22.5%.
| EUR 4,361,540,810 |
|---|
| EUR 5.00 |
| 872,308,162 |
| June 4th, 2008 |
| ES0127797019 |
| EDPR.LS |
| EDPR PL |
EDPR's equity market value at December 31st 2011 was EUR 4.12 billion, the equivalent to EUR 4.73 per share. In 2011, the share price improved 9%, outperforming the PSI-20 (the NYSE Euronext Lisbon reference index), the Euronext 100 and the Dow Jones Eurostoxx Utilities ("SX6E") which suffered a general depreciation in 2011. The year's low was recorded on August 9th (EUR 3.89) and the year's high was reached on May 2nd (EUR 5.25).general depreciation in 2011. The year's low

was recorded on August 9th (EUR 3.89) and the year's high was reached on May 2nd (EUR 5.25).

In 2011 more than 232 million EDPR shares were traded, representing 25% year-on-year decrease in its liquidity, and corresponding to a turnover of approximately EUR 1.06 billion. On average, 0.9 million shares were traded per day. The total number of shares traded represented 27% of the total shares admitted to trading and to 118% of the company's free float.

The distribution of dividends must be proposed by EDPR's Board of Directors and authorized by a resolution approved in the Company's Shareholders Meeting. In keeping with the legal provisions in force, namely the Spanish Companies Law, the EDPR Articles of Association require that profits for a business year consider:
• The amount required to serve legal reserves;
• The amount agreed by the same General Meeting to allocate to dividends of the outstanding shares;
• The amount agreed by the General Meeting to constitute or increase reserve funds or free reserves;
• The remaining amount shall be booked as surplus.
The expected dividend policy of EDPR, as announced in the IPO, is to propose dividends' distribution each year representing at least 20% of EDPR's distributable profit. Also as announced in the IPO, EDPR Board of Directors can adjust this dividend policy as required to reflect, among other things, changes to our business plan and our capital requirements, and there can be no assurance that in any given year a dividend will be proposed or declared.
In light of a challenging economic and regulatory environment in the countries in which EDPR holds investments, of the net financial results obtained in the fiscal year of 2011 and of the company's capital requirements in a harsh financial environment, the Board of Directors will propose at the Shareholder's Meeting, to be held in 2012, to retain the 2011 results as voluntary reserves apart from the minimum amount required to serve legal reserves.

13. DISCLAIME
This report has been prepared by EDP Renováveis, S.A. (the "Company") to support the presentation 2011 financial and operational performances. EDP Renováveis does not assume any responsibility for this report if it is used for different purposes.
Neither the Company -including any of its subsidiaries, any company of EDP Renováveis Group and any of the companies in which they have a shareholding-, nor their advisors or representatives assume any responsibility whatsoever, including negligence or any other concept, in relation with the damages or losses that may be derived from the use of the present document and its attachments.
Any information regarding the performance of EDP Renováveis share price cannot be used as a guide for future performance.
Neither this document nor any of its parts have a contractual nature, and it cannot be used to complement or interpret any contract or any other kind of commitment.
The present document does not constitute an offer or invitation to acquire, subscribe, sell or exchange shares or securities.
The 2011 management report contains forward-looking information and statements about the Company. Although EDP Renováveis is confident these expectations are reasonable, they are subject to several risks and uncertainties that are not predictable or quantifiable in advance. Therefore, future results and developments may differ from these forward-looking statements. Given this, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance.
The forward-looking information and statements herein contained are based on the information available at the date of the present document. Except when required by applicable law, the Company does not assume any obligation to publicly update or revise said forward-looking information or statements.
annual report 2011 | corporate governance


10 Statement of compliance with independence criteria
EDP Renováveis, S.A. (hereinafter referred to as EDP Renováveis, EDPR or the Company) is a Spanish company listed on a regulated stock exchange in Portugal. EDP Renováveis' corporate organization is subject to the recommendations contained in the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code ("Código de Governo das Sociedades") approved by the CMVM (Portuguese Securities Market Commission) in January 2010. This governance code is available to the public at CMVM website (www.cmvm.pt).
The organization and functioning of EDPR corporate governance model is designed to achieve the highest standards of corporate governance, business conduct and ethics referenced on the best national and international practices in corporate governance.
In this context, EDPR states that it has fully adopted the CMVM recommendations on the governance of listed companies provided in the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code, with the exception of Recommendation II.2.2 of the code, which has not been adopted for the reasons indicated below.
The following table shows the CMVM recommendations set forth in the code and indicates whether or not they have been fully adopted by EDPR and the place in this report in which they are described in more detail.
| Recommendation | Adoption information |
Description in Report |
|---|---|---|
| I. GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS | ||
| I.1 General Meeting Board | ||
| I.1.1 The Presiding Board of the General Meeting shall be equipped with the necessary and adequate human resources and logistic support, taking the financial position of the company into consideration. |
Adopted | 1.2.1 |
| I.1.2 The remuneration of the Presiding Board of the General Meeting shall be disclosed in the Annual Report on Corporate Governance. |
Adopted | 5.8 |
| I.2 Participation at the meeting | ||
| I.2.1 The requirement for the Board to receive statements for share deposit or blocking for participation at the general meeting shall not exceed 5 working days. |
Adopted | 4.4 |
| I.2.2 Should the General Meeting be suspended, the company shall not compel share blocking during that period until the meeting is resumed and shall then prepare itself in advance as required for the first session. |
Adopted | 4.4 |
| I.3 Voting and Exercising Voting rights | ||
| I.3.1 Companies shall not impose any statutory restriction on postal voting and whenever adopted or admissible, on electronic voting. |
Adopted | 4.6 |
| I.3.2 The statutory deadline for receiving early voting ballots by mail, may not exceed three working days. | Adopted | 4.6 |
| I.3.3 Companies shall ensure the level of voting rights and the shareholder's participation is proportional, ideally through the statutory provision that obliges the one share-one vote principal. The companies that: I) hold shares that do not confer voting right; II) establish non-casting of voting rights above a certain number, when issued solely by a shareholder or by shareholders related to former, do not comply with the proportionality principle. |
Adopted | 4.5 |
| I.4 Resolution Fixing-Quorum | ||
| I.4.1 Companies shall not set a resolution-fixing quorum that outnumbers what is prescribed by law. | Adopted | 4.7 |
| I.5 Minutes and Information on Resolutions Passed | ||
| I.5.1 Extracts from the minutes of the general meetings or documents with corresponding content must be made available to shareholders on the company's website within five days period after the General Meeting has been held, irrespective of the fact that such information may not be classified as material information. The information disclosed shall cover the resolutions passed, the represented capital and the voting results. Said information shall be kept on file on the company's website for no less than 3 year period. |
Adopted | 4.8 |
| I.6 Measures on Corporate Control | ||
| I.6.1 Measures aimed at preventing successful takeover bids, shall respect both company's and the shareholders' interests. The company's articles of association that by complying with said principal provide for the restriction of the number of votes that may be held or exercised by a sole shareholder, either individually or in concert with other shareholders, shall also foresee for a resolution by the General Assembly (5 year intervals), on whether that statutory provision is to be amended or prevails – without super quorum requirements as to the one legally in force – and that in said resolution, all votes issued be counted, without applying said restriction. |
Adopted | 4.9 |
| I.6.2 In cases such as change of control or changes to the composition of the Board of Directors, defensive measures shall not be adopted that instigate immediate and serious asset erosion in the company, and further disturb the free transmission of shares and voluntary performance assessment by the shareholders of the members of the Board of Directors. |
Adopted | 4.9 |
| II. BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SUPERVISORY BOARD | ||
| II.1 General Points | ||
| II.1.1 Structure and Duties | ||
| II.1.1.1 The Board of Directors shall assess the adopted model in its Annual Report on Corporate Governance and pin-point possible hold-ups to its functioning and shall propose measures that it deems fit for surpassing such obstacles. |
Adopted | 1.1/1.1.1 |
| II.1.1.2 Companies shall set up internal control and risk management systems in order to safeguard the company's worth and which will identify and manage the risk. Said systems shall include at least the following components: I) setting of the company's strategic objectives as regards risk assumption; II) identifying the main risks associated to the company's activity and any events that might generate risks; III) analyze and determine the extent of the impact and the likelihood that each of said potential risks will occur; IV) risk management aimed at aligning those actual incurred risks with the company's strategic options for risk assumption; V) control mechanisms for executing measures for adopted risk management and its effectiveness; VI) adoption of internal mechanisms for information and communication on several components of the system and of risk warning; VII) periodic assessment of the implemented system and the adoption of the amendments that are deemed necessary. |
Adopted | 3 |
| Recommendation | Adoption information |
Description in Report |
|---|---|---|
| II.1.1.3 The Board of Directors shall ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal control and risk management systems. The Supervisory Board shall be responsible for assessing the functioning of said systems and proposing the relevant adjustment to the company's needs. |
Adopted | 1.2.2/1.2.4/3 |
| II.1.1.4 The companies shall: I) identify the main economic, financial and legal risk that the company is exposed to during the exercise of its activity; II) describe the performance and efficiency of the risk management system, in its Annual Report on Corporate Governance. |
Adopted | 3.2 |
| II.1.1.5 The Board of Directors and the Supervisory Board shall establish internal regulations and shall have these disclosed on the company's website. |
Adopted | 1.2.2/1.2.4 |
| II.1.2 Governance Incompatibility and Independence | ||
| II.1.2.1 The Board of Directors shall include a number of non-executive members that ensure the efficient supervision, auditing and assessment of the executive members' activity. |
Adopted | 1.2.2 |
| II.1.2.2 Non-executive members must include an adequate number of independent members. The size of the company and its shareholder structure must be taken into account when devising this number and may never be less than a fourth of the total number of Board of Directors. |
Adopted | 1.3 |
| II.1.2.3 The independency assessment of its non-executive members carried out by the Board of Directors shall take into account the legal and regulatory rules in force concerning the independency requirements and the incompatibility framework applicable to members of other corporate boards, which ensure orderly and sequential coherence in applying independency criteria to all the company. An independent executive member shall not be considered as such, if in another corporate board and by force of applicable rules, may not be an independent executive member. |
Adopted | Statement on Compliance with Independence Criteria |
| II.1.3 Eligibility and Appointment Criteria | ||
| II.1.3.1 Depending on the applicable model, the Chair of the Supervisory Board and of the Auditing and Financial Matters Committees shall be independent and adequately competent to carry out his/her duties. |
Adopted | 1.2.4 |
| II.1.3.2 The selection process of candidates for non-executive members shall be conjured so as prevent interference by executive members. |
Adopted | 1.4 |
| II.1.4 Policy on the Reporting of Irregularities | ||
| II.1.4.1 The company shall adopt a policy whereby irregularities occurring within the company are reported. Such reports shall contain the following information: I) the means by which such irregularities may be reported internally, including the persons that are entitled to receive the reports; II) how the report is to be handled, including confidential treatment, should it be required by the reporter. |
Adopted | 3.4 |
| II.1.4.2 The general guidelines on this policy shall be disclosed in the Annual Report of Corporate Governance. | Adopted | 3.4 |
| II.1.5 Remuneration | ||
| II.1.5.1 The remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors shall be structured so that the formers' interests are capable of being aligned with the long-term interests of the company. Furthermore, the remuneration shall be based on performance assessment and shall discourage taking on extreme risk. Thus, remunerations shall be structured as follows: I) The remuneration of the Board of Directors carrying out executive duties shall include a variable element which is determined by a performance assessment carried out by the company's competent bodies according to pre-established quantifiable criteria. Said criteria shall take into consideration the company's real growth and the actual growth generated for the shareholders, its long-term sustainability and the risks taken on, as well as compliance with the rules applicable to the company's activity. II) The variable component of the remuneration shall be reasonable overall as regard the fixed component of the remuneration and maximum limits shall be set for all components. III) A significant part of the variable remuneration shall be deferred for a period not less than three years and its payment shall depend of the company's steady positive performance during said period; IV) Members of the Board of Directors shall not enter into contracts with the company or third parties that will have the effect of mitigating the risk inherent in the variability of the remuneration established by the company; V) The Executive Directors shall hold, up to twice the value of the total annual remuneration, the company shares that were allotted by virtue of the variable remuneration schemes, with the exception of those shares that are required to be sold for the payment of taxes on the gains of said shares; VI) When the variable remuneration includes stock options, the period for exercising same shall be deferred for a period of not less than three years; VII) The appropriate legal instruments shall be established so that in the event of a Director's dismissal without due cause, the envisaged compensation shall not be paid out if the dismissal or termination by agreement is due to the Director's inadequate performance; VIII) The remuneration of Non-Executive Directors shall not include any component the value of which is subject to the performance or the value of the company. |
Adopted | 5.1/5.2/5.3 |
| II.1.5.2 A statement on the remuneration policy of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board referred to in Article 2 of Law No. 28/2009 of June 19th, shall contain, in addition to the content therein stated, adequate information on: I) which groups of companies the remuneration policy and practices of which were taken as a baseline for setting the remuneration; II) the payments for the dismissal or termination by agreement of the Director's duties. |
Adopted | 5.2/5.4 |
| II.1.5.3 The remuneration policy statement referred to in Article 2 of Law No. 28/2009 shall also include the Director's remunerations which contain an important variable component, within the meaning of Article 248-B/3 of the Securities Code. The statement shall be detailed and the policy presented shall particularly take the long-term performance of the company, compliance with the rules applicable to its business and restraint in taking risks into account. |
Adopted | 5.4 |
| II.1.5.4 A proposal shall be submitted at the General Meeting on the approval of plans for the allotment of shares and/or options for share purchase or further yet on the variations in share process, to members of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board and other managers within the context of Article 248/3/B of the Securities Code. The proposal shall contain the regulation plan or in its absence, the plan's conditions. The main characteristics of the retirement benefit plans established for members of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board and other managers within the context of Article 248/3/B of the Securities Code, shall also be approved at the General Meeting. |
Adopted | 5.2/5.3/5.4/5.7 |
| II.1.5.5 Doesn't exist | - | |
| II.1.5.6 At least one of the Remuneration Committee's representatives shall be present at the Annual General Meeting for Shareholders. |
Adopted | 5.6 |
| II.1.5.7 The amount of remuneration received, as a whole and individually, in other companies of the group and the pension rights acquired during the financial year in question shall be disclosed in the Annual Report on Corporate Governance. |
Adopted | 5.3 |
| Recommendation | Adoption information |
Description in Report |
|---|---|---|
| II.2 Board of Directors | ||
| II.2.1 Within the limits established by law for each management and supervisory structure, and unless the company is of a reduced size, the Board of Directors shall delegate the day-to-day running and the delegated duties shall be identified in the Annual Corporate Governance Report. |
Adopted | 1.2.3 |
| II.2.2 The Board of Directors must ensure that the company acts in accordance with its goals and shall not delegate its duties, namely in what concerns: I) the definition of the company's general strategy and policies; II) the definition of the group's corporate structure; III) decisions taken that are considered to be strategic due to the amounts, risk and particular characteristics involved. |
Not Adopted ("Under Spanish Law, the matters referred to in this recommendation can be delegated by the Board of Directors to the Executive Committee. It is common practice in Spanish listed companies for the delegation of powers to be far-reaching, with the exception of matters related to the preparation of accounts"). |
- |
| II.2.3 Should the Chair of the Board of Directors carry out executive duties, the Board of Directors shall set up efficient mechanisms for coordinating non-executive members that can ensure that these may decide upon, in an independent and informed manner, and furthermore shall explain these mechanisms to the shareholders in the Corporate Governance Report. |
Adopted | 1.2.2 |
| II.2.4 The annual management report shall include a description of the activity carried out by the Non-Executive Directors and shall mention any restraints encountered. |
Adopted | 1.2.2 |
| II.2.5 The company shall expound its policy of portfolio rotation on the Board of Directors, including the person responsible for the financial portfolio, and report on same in the Annual Corporate Governance Report. |
Not Applicable | - |
| II.3 CEO, Executive Committee and Executive Board of Directors | ||
| II.3.1 When managing Directors that carry out executive duties are requested by other Directors to supply information, the former must do so in a timely manner and the information supplied must adequately suffice the request made. |
Adopted | 1.2.3 |
| II.3.2 The Chair of the Executive Committee shall send the convening notice and minutes of the meetings to the Chair of the Board of Directors and, as applicable, to the Chair of the Supervisory Board or the Auditing Committee, respectively. |
Adopted | 1.2.3 |
| II.3.3 The Chair of the Board of Directors shall send the convening notices and minutes of the meetings to the Chair of the General and Supervisory Board and the Chair of the Financial Matters Committee. |
Not applicable | - |
| II.4 General and Supervisory Board, Financial Matters Committee, Audit Committee and Supervisory Board | ||
| II.4.1 Besides carrying out its supervisory duties, the General and Supervisory Board shall advise, follow-up and carry out an on-going assessment on the management of the company by the Executive Board of Directors. Besides other subject matters, the General and Supervisory Board shall decide on: I) the definition of the strategy and general policies of the company; II) the corporate structure of the group; and III) decisions taken that are considered to be strategic due to the amounts, risk and particular characteristics involved. |
Not applicable | - |
| II.4.2 The annual reports and financial information on the activity carried out by the General and Supervisory Committee, the Financial Matters Committee, the Auditing and Supervisory Committee must be disclosed on the company's website. |
Adopted | 1.2.4 |
| II.4.3 The annual reports on the activity carried out by the General and Supervisory Board, the Financial Matters Committee, the Audit Committee and the Supervisory Board must include a description on the supervisory activity and shall mention any restraints that they may have come up against. |
Adopted | 1.2.4 |
| II.4.4 The General and Supervisory Board, the Auditing Committee and the Supervisory Board (depending on the applicable model) shall represent the company for all purposes at the external auditor, and shall propose the services supplier, the respective remuneration, ensure that adequate conditions for the supply of these services are in place within the company, as well as being liaison offer between the company and the first recipient of the reports. |
Adopted | 1.2.4/3.3 |
| II.4.5 According to the applicable model, the General and Supervisory Board, Audit Committee and Supervisory Board shall assess the external auditor on an annual basis and advise the General Meeting that he/she be discharged whenever justifiable grounds are present. |
Adopted | 1.2.4/3.3 |
| II.4.6 The internal audit services and those that ensure compliance with the rules applicable to the company (compliance services) shall functionally report to the Audit Committee, the General and Supervisory Board or in the case of companies adopting the Latin model, an independent Director or Supervisory Board, regardless of the hierarchical relationship that these services have with the executive management of the company. |
Adopted | 1.2.4 |
| II.5 Special Committees | ||
| II.5.1 Unless the company is of reduced size and depending on the adopted model, the Board of Directors and the General and Supervisory Committees, shall set up the necessary Committees in order to: I) ensure that a competent and independent assessment of the Executive Director's performance is carried out, as well as its own overall performance and further yet, the performance of all existing committees; II) study the adopted governance system and verify its efficiency and propose to the competent bodies, measures to be carried out with a view to its improvements; III) in due time identify potential candidates with the high profile required for the performance of Director's duties. |
Adopted | 1.1/1.1.1/1.2.3/1.2.4/1 .2.5/1.2.6 |
| Recommendation | Adoption information |
Description in Report |
|---|---|---|
| II.5.2 Members of the Remuneration Committee or equivalent shall be independent from the members of the Board of Directors and include at least one member with knowledge and experience in matters of remuneration policy. |
Not applicable ("The members of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee are members of the Board of Directors. However, its members are considered independent members and do not therefore belong to the Executive Committee. In accordance with Articles 23 and 217 of the Spanish Companies Law, the remuneration scheme for Directors should be fixed in the articles of association. It is normal practice in Spanish companies for this remuneration to be decided upon by the General Meeting of Shareholders and for its allocation to the different members of the Board of Directors to be decided on by the Board itself."). |
1.2.5 |
| II.5.3 Any natural or legal person which provides or has provided, over the past three years, services to any structure subject to the Board of Directors, to the Board of Directors of the company or that has to do with the current consultant to the company shall not be recruited to assist the Remuneration Committee. This recommendation also applies to any natural or legal person who has an employment contract or provides services. |
Adopted | 1.2.5 |
| II.5.4 All the Committees shall draw up minutes of the meetings held. | Adopted | 1.2.3/1.2.4/ 1.2.5/1.2.6 |
| III. INFORMATION AND AUDITING | ||
| III.1 General Disclosure Obligations | ||
| III.1.1 Companies shall maintain permanent contact with the market thus upholding the principle of equality for shareholders and ensure that investors are able to access information in a uniform fashion. To this end, the company shall create an Investor Assistance Unit. |
Adopted | 6.3 |
| III.1.2 The following information that is made available on the company's Internet website shall be disclosed in the English language: a) The company, public company status, headquarters and remaining data provided for in Article 171 of the Portuguese Commercial Companies Code; b) Articles of Association; c) Credentials of the Members of the Board of Directors and the Market Liaison Officer; d) Investor Relations Office, its functions and contact information; e) Financial statements; f ) Half-yearly calendar of company events; g) Proposals submitted for discussion and voting at general meetings; h) Invitation to general meetings. |
Adopted | 6.3 |
| III.1.3. Companies shall advocate the rotation of auditors after two or three terms in accordance with four or three years respectively. Their continuance beyond this period must be based on a specific opinion for the Supervisory Board to formally consider the conditions of auditor independence and the benefits and costs of replacement. |
Adopted | 3.3 |
| III.1.4. The external auditor must, within its powers, verify the implementation of remuneration policies and systems, the efficiency and functioning of internal control mechanisms and report any shortcomings to the company's Supervisory Board. |
Adopted | 3.3 |
| III.1.5. The company shall not recruit the external auditor for services other than audit services, nor any entity with which same takes part or incorporates the same network. Where recruiting such services is called for, said services should not be greater than 30% of the value of services rendered to the company. The hiring of these services must be approved by the Supervisory Board and must be expounded in the Annual Corporate Governance Report. |
Adopted | 5.9 |
| IV. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST | ||
| IV.1 Shareholder Relationship | ||
| IV.1.1 Where deals are concluded between the company and shareholders with qualifying holdings, or entities with which same are linked in accordance with Article 20 of the Securities Code, such deals shall be carried out in normal market conditions. |
Adopted | 2 |
| IV.1.2 Where deals of significant importance are undertaken with holders of qualifying holdings, or entities, with which same are linked in accordance with Article 20 of the Securities Code, such deals shall be subject to a preliminary opinion from the Supervisory Board. The procedures and criteria required to define the relevant level of significance of these deals and other conditions shall be established by the Supervisory Board. |
Adopted (According to the Spanish law and the governance structure, these functions were delegated by the Board of Directors to the Related-Party Transactions Committee) |
1.2.6 |
The Articles of Association of EDPR, which are available for consultation on its website, (www.edprenovaveis.com), contain the rules on independence for the fulfilment of duties in any body of the Company.
The Article 20.2 of the EDPR's Articles of Association defines as independent members of the Board of Directors those that are able to perform their duties without being limited by relations with the company, its shareholders with significant holdings or its Directors and comply with the other legal requirements.
The Board of Directors of EDPR considers that the following Directors meet the independence and incompatibility criteria's required by law and the Articles of Association.
| Name | Position | Date of Appointment |
End of Term |
|---|---|---|---|
| António Nogueira Leite | Director (Independent) Chairperson of the Related-Party Transactions Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | Director (Independent) Member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Gilles August | Director (Independent) | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Lopes Raimundo | Director (Independent) Member of the Audit and Control Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Mello Franco | Director (Independent) Chairperson of Audit and Control Committee And Member of the Related-Party Transactions Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Jorge Santos | Director (Independent) Chairperson of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee and Member of the Audit and Control Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| José Araújo e Silva | Director (Independent) | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | Director (Independent) Member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee |
21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
EDPR has adopted the governance structure in effect in Spain. It comprises a General Meeting of Shareholders, and a Board of Directors that represents and manages the company.
As required by law and the Articles of Association, the Company's Board of Directors has set up four committees. These are the Executive Committee, the Audit and Control Committee, the Nominations and Remunerations Committee and the Committee on Related-Party Transactions as mentioned below.
The governance model of EDPR is designed to ensure the transparent, meticulous separation of duties and the specialization of supervision. The most important bodies in the management and supervision model at EDPR are the following:
The purpose of the choice of this model by EDPR is to adapt the Company's corporate governance structure to the Portuguese legislation. The governance model adopted by EDPR therefore seeks, insofar as it is compatible with its personal law, to correspond to the so-called "Anglo-Saxon" model set forth in the Portuguese
Commercial Companies Code, in which the management body is a Board of Directors, and the supervision and control duties are of the responsibility of an Audit and Control Committee.
The choice of this model is essentially an attempt to establish compatibility between two different systems of company law, which can be considered applicable to this model.
The experience of institutional operating indicates that the governance model adopted by the shareholders is appropriate to the corporate organization of EDPR activity, especially because it affords transparency and a healthy balance between the management functions of the Executive Committee, the supervisory functions of the Audit and Control Committee and oversight by different specialized Board of Directors committees.
The institutional and functional relationship between the Executive Committee, the Audit and Control Committee and the other non-executive members of the Board of Directors has been of internal harmony conducive to the development of the company's business.
In order to ensure a better understanding of EDPR corporate governance by its shareholders, the Company posts its updated Articles of Association at www.edprenovaveis.com.
In order to comply with the Recommendation II.1.1.1 of the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code and according to the results of the reflection made by the Audit and Control Committee regarding the terms of the Recommendation II.5.1 part II), the governance model adopted has been ensuring an effective performance and articulation of EDPR Social Bodies, and proved to be adequate to the company's governance structure without any constraints to the performance of its checks and balances system adopted to justify the changes made in the Governance practices of EDPR.

The General Meeting of Shareholders is the body where the shareholders participate and when properly convened, has the power to deliberate and adopt, by majority, decisions on matters that the law and Articles of Association reserve for its decision and are submitted for its approval. In particular, it is responsible for:
The decisions of the General Meeting are binding on all shareholders, including those voting against and those who did not participate in the meeting.
A General Meeting may be ordinary or extraordinary. In either case, it is governed by the law and Articles of Association.
An Ordinary General Meeting must be held in the first six (6) months of each year for the review of the performance of the company's management, to approve the annual report and accounts of the previous year, the proposal for appropriation of profits and to approve the consolidated accounts, if appropriate. The General Meeting also decides on any other matters falling within its powers and included in the agenda.
The Chairperson of the General Meeting is appointed by the shareholders and must be a person who meets the same requirements of independence as for the independent Directors. The appointment is for three years and may only be re-elected once.
The position of Chairperson of the General Meeting has been held by Rui Chancerelle de Machete, whose professional address is PLMJ, A.M. Pereira, Sáragga Leal, Oliveira Martins, Júdice e Associados, RL, Av. da Liberdade, 224, Edifício Eurolex, 1250-148 Lisboa, Portugal. The Chairperson of the General Meeting was re-elected on April 11th, 2011.
In addition to the Chairperson, the Board of the General Meeting is constituted by the Chairperson of the Board of Directors, or his substitute, the other Directors and the Secretary of the Board of Directors. The Board of the General Meeting of Shareholders', through the Chairperson of the General Meeting, is responsible for organizing its proceedings.
The position of Secretary of the General Meeting is held by the non-member Secretary of the Board of Directors, Emilio García-Conde Noriega, whose professional address is that of the Company.
The Chairperson of the General Meeting of EDPR has the appropriate human and logistical resources for his needs, considering the economic situation of EDPR, in that, in addition to the resources from the Company Secretary and the legal support provided for that purpose, the Company hires a specialized entity to collect, process and count the votes.
On April 11th 2011, took place in Oviedo the Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of EDPR.
The Meeting's validity was ascertained by the meetings' President, and the definitive quorum of members was:
A total of 437 shareholders attended the General Meeting, including those present and those represented, holding a total of 473,210,259 shares which constitutes a nominal amount of EUR 3,716,051,295.00 of the share capital, that is, 85.200% of the mentioned share capital.
The nine proposals submitted to approval at the General Meeting were all approved. Extracts of the 2011 General Meeting minutes and the invitation, agenda, motions submitted to the General Meeting and forms of participation are available on the company's website www.edprenovaveis.com
On June 21st, 2011, took place in Oviedo an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of EDPR.
The Meeting's validity was ascertained by the meetings' President, and the definitive quorum of members was:
A total of 508 shareholders attended the General Meeting, including those present and those represented, holding a total of 750,406,619 shares which constitutes a nominal amount of EUR 3,752,033,095.00 of the share capital, that is, 86.025% of the mentioned share capital.
On the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders some important amendments to the Company's By-Laws were approved:
The six proposals submitted to approval at the General Meeting were all approved. Extracts of the 2011 General Meeting minutes and the invitation, agenda, motions submitted to the General Meeting and forms of participation are available on the company's website www.edprenovaveis.com
Pursuant to Articles 20 and 21 of the Company's Articles of Association, the Board of Directors shall consist of no less than five (5) and no more than seventeen (17) Directors. Their term of office shall be three (3) years, and they may be re-elected once or more times for equal periods.
The Board of Directors currently consists of the following seventeen (17) members
On 2011, Mr. António Martins da Costa, Mr. José Silva Lopes and Mr. Daniel Kammen ended their terms as Board members. Four members of the Management Team, Mr. Rui Teixeira, Mr. João Paulo Costeira, Mr. Luis Adão da Fonseca and Mr. Gabriel Alonso were appointed as Board members and the others members were re-elected for a new term.
The positions held by the members of the Board in the last five (5) years, those that they currently hold and positions in Group and non-Group companies are listed in Annexes I, II and III, respectively. Annex IV also gives a brief description of the Directors' professional and academic careers.
Finally, the shares of EDPR owned by each Director are described in the table in Annex V.
Pursuant to Article 19 of the Company's Articles of Association, the Board of Directors has the broadest powers for the administration, management and governance of the Company, with no limitations other than the responsibilities expressly and exclusively invested in the General Shareholders Meeting in the Company's Articles of Association or in the applicable law.
Regarding the decisions to increase the share capital, the Board of Directors, by delegation from the General Meeting, may decide to increase the share capital once or several times. This delegation, which may be the subject of replacement, can include the power to demand a pre-emptive right in the issue of shares that are the subject of delegation and with the requirements established by law.
| Board Member | Position | Date of first Appointment |
Date of Re-election | End of Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| António Mexia | Chairperson and Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Ana Maria Fernandes | Vice-Chairperson, CEO | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Manso Neto | Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Nuno Alves | Director | 18/03/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rui Teixeira | Director | 11/04/2011 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Paulo Costeira | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Gabriel Alonso | Director | 21/06/2011 | - | 21/06/2014 |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | Director | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| António Nogueira Leite | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Gilles August | Director (Independent) | 14/04/2009 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Lopes Raimundo | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Jorge Santos | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| José Araújo e Silva | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | Director (Independent) | 4/06/2008 | 21/06/2011 | 21/06/2014 |
On the other hand, the General Meeting may also delegate to the Board of Directors the power to implement an adopted decision to increase the share capital, indicating the date or dates of its implementation and establishing any other conditions that have not been specified by the General Meeting. This delegation may be the subject of replacement. The Board of Directors may use this delegation wholly or in part and may also decide not to perform it in consideration of the conditions of the Company, the market or any particularly relevant events or circumstances that justify said decision, of which the General Meeting must be informed at the end of the time limit or limits for performing it.
According to Article 146 of the Spanish Companies Law, the Board of Directors was authorized by the General Meeting of Shareholders to acquire its own shares issued by the parent company and/or the affiliate companies through their management bodies for a term of five years from the date of the General Shareholders Meeting held on April 13th, 2010. The terms for this acquisition are available to the public at the company's website, www.edprenovaveis.com.
In addition to the Articles of Association and the law, the Board of Directors is governed by the regulations approved on May 3rd, 2008. The regulations on the functioning of the Board are available to the public at the website www.edprenovaveis.com.
The Board of Directors must meet at least four (4) times a year, preferably once a quarter. Nonetheless, the Chairperson, on his own initiative or that of three (3) Directors, shall convene a Board meeting whenever he deems it necessary for the Company's interests. The Board of Directors held eight (8) meetings during the year ended at December 31st, 2011.
Meetings are convened by the Chairperson, who may order the Secretary to send the invitations. Invitations shall be sent at least five (5) days prior to the date of the meeting. Exceptionally, when the circumstances so require, the Chairperson may call a meeting of the Board without respecting the required advance notice.
The meetings of the Board are valid if half of the Directors plus one are present or represented. Directors shall attend Board meetings personally and, on exception, if they are unable to do so, they shall delegate their representation through a written Declaration to another Director. Without prejudice to the above, the Board of Directors shall be deemed to have been validly convened, with no need for an invitation, if all the Directors present or represented agree unanimously to hold the meeting as universal and accept the agenda to be dealt with at it.
Decisions are adopted by absolute majority among those present. Each Director present or represented has one vote and the Chairperson has the casting vote in the event of a tie.
In order for the non-executive Directors to be able to decide independently and be informed, Articles 22, 24 and 25 of the Board regulations established the following mechanisms:
• Any Director may request the hiring, on the Company's account, of legal advisers, accountants, financial or commercial specialists or other experts. The performance of the job must necessarily relate to concrete problems of a certain importance and complexity. Requests to hire experts shall be channelled through the Chairperson or Secretary of the Board of Directors, who shall be subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.
Additionally, the Executive Committee informs the Board of Directors of its decisions at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting and delivers the minutes of the meetings held to the members of the Board.
With the mechanisms set forth in the regulations, non-executive Directors have encountered no difficulties in performing their duties.
In 2011, the non-executive Directors were involved in the governance of EDPR not only by participating in meetings of the Board of Directors, where they gave their opinions on different company matters, made any suggestions they saw fit and took decisions on matters submitted to them, but also by working on the Nominations and Remunerations Committee, on the Related-Party Transactions Committee and the Audit and Control Committee, where all the members are non-executive, with the exception of the Related-Party Transactions Committee, which has one executive Director, Mr. João Manuel Manso Neto.
António Mexia
The Chairperson of the Board is the Chairperson of the Company and fully represents it, using the company name, implementing decisions of the General Meeting, Board of Directors and the Executive Committee.
Without prejudice to the powers of the Chairperson under the law and Articles of Association, he also has the following powers:
The Chairperson of the Board is appointed by the members of the Board of Directors, unless this is done by the General Meeting. The current Chairperson was elected on March 18th, 2008.
Ana Maria Fernandes
It is the Vice-Chairperson who replaces the Chairperson when he is unable to attend the meetings. The Board may also delegate executive powers to the Vice-Chairperson.
The Vice-Chairperson is appointed by the Board of Directors on the proposal of the Chairperson. The Vice-Chairperson was elected on May 14th, 2008.
| CEO | |
|---|---|
| Ana Maria Fernandes | |
The Board of Directors may appoint one or more Chief Executive Officers. Chief Executive Officers are appointed by a proposal of the Chairperson or two-thirds of the Directors. Chief Executive Officers are appointed with a vote in favour of two-thirds of the Directors and must be chosen from among the Directors.
The competences of each Chief Executive Officer are those deemed appropriate in each case by the Board, with the only requirement being that they are delegable under the law and Articles of Association.
The Chief Executive Officer was re-elected on June 21st, 2011 with competences including coordination of the implementation of Board and Executive Committee decisions, monitoring, leading and coordinating the management team appointed by the Executive Committee, representing the company in dealings with third parties and other related duties.
| Company Secretary | |
|---|---|
| Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
The duties of the Company Secretary are those set forth in current laws, the Articles of Association and Board Regulations. In particular, in accordance with the Board Regulations and in addition to those set forth in the Articles of Association, his competences are:
The Company Secretary, who is also the General Secretary and Director of the Legal Department at EDPR, was appointed on December 4th, 2007.
Pursuant to Article 27 of the Company's Articles of Association, the Executive Committee shall consist of no less than six (6) and no more than nine (9) Directors.
Its constitution, the appointment of its members and the extension of the powers delegated must be approved by two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Board of Directors.
The committee currently consists of eight (8) members, plus the Secretary. Mr. António Mexia, Mrs. Ana Maria Fernandes, Mr. João Manso Neto and Mr. Nuno Alves were re-elected on June 21st, 2011, at the Board of Directors. Mr. Rui Teixeira was appointed in April 11th, 2011 and re-elected on June 21st, 2011. Mr. João Paulo Costeira, Mr. Luis Adão da Fonseca and Mr. Gabriel Alonso were appointed on June 21st, 2011.
| Executive Committee | |
|---|---|
| Chairperson | António Mexia |
| Vice-Chairperson and CEO | Ana Maria Fernandes |
| Gabriel Alonso João Manso Neto João Paulo Costeira Luis Adão da Fonseca Nuno Alves Rui Teixeira |
|
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
The members of the Executive Committee shall maintain their positions for as long as they are Company Directors. Nonetheless, the Board may decide to discharge members of the Executive Committee at any time and the members may resign said positions while still remaining Company Directors.
The Executive Committee is a permanent body to which all competences of the Board of Directors that are delegable under the law and the Articles of Association can be delegated, with the exception of:
The Executive Committee members have been delegated all the powers of representation of the Company so that any two of its members can act jointly in the name and on behalf of the Company.
In addition to the Articles of Association, this committee is also governed by the regulations approved on June 4th, 2008 and also by the Board Regulations. The committee's regulations are available to the public at www.edprenovaveis.com.
The Executive Committee shall meet at least once a month and whenever is deemed appropriate by its Chairperson, who may also suspend or postpone meetings when he sees fit. The Executive Committee shall also meet when requested by at least two (2) of its members. The Executive Committee held thirty (30) meetings during the year ended on December 31st, 2011.
The Executive Committee shall draft minutes for each of the meetings held and shall inform the Board of Directors of its decisions at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting.
The Chairperson of the Executive Committee, who is currently also the Chairperson of the Board of Directors, shall send the Chairperson of the Audit and Control Committee invitations to the Executive Committee meetings and the minutes of those meetings.
Meetings of the Executive Committee are valid if half of its members plus one are present or represented. Decisions shall be adopted by simple majority. In the event of a tie, the Chairperson shall have the casting vote.
Executive Directors shall provide any clarifications needed by the other corporate bodies whenever requested to do so.
Pursuant to Article 28 of the Articles of Association, the Audit and Control Committee consists of no fewer than three (3) and no more than five (5) Directors. The majority of the members shall be independent.
The Audit and Control Committee is a permanent body and performs supervisory tasks independently from the Board of Directors.
The committee currently consists of three (3) members, plus the Secretary. The three (3) members are independent Directors, as well as the Chairperson. The Chairperson of the Committee was re-elected on 2011 and the other two members, Mr. Jorge Santos and Mr. João Lopes Raimundo were appointed on June 21st, 2011 at the Board of Directors.
| Audit and Control Committee | |
|---|---|
| Chairperson | João Manuel de Mello Franco |
| João Lopes Raimundo Jorge Santos |
|
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
The committee members shall maintain their positions for as long as they are Company Directors. Nonetheless, the Board may decide to discharge members of the committee at any time and the members may resign said positions while still remaining Company Directors.
Pursuant to Article 28 of the Articles of Association, the members of the Audit and Control Committee are appointed by the Board of Directors. The term of office of the Chairperson of the Audit and Control Committee is three (3) years, after which he may only be re-elected for a new term of three (3) years. Nonetheless, chairpersons leaving the committee may continue as members of the Audit and Control Committee.
Concerning the recommendations introduced in 2010 by the Portuguese Code of Corporate Governance the referred competences were reinforced as mentioned below, with the following changes introduced on the Audit and Control Committee Regulations, to guarantee the compliance of the referred code:
In addition to the Articles of Association and the law, this committee is governed by the regulations approved on June 4th, 2008 amended on May 4th, 2010 and also by the Board regulations. The committee's regulations are at the shareholders' disposal at www.edprenovaveis.com.
The committee shall meet at least once a quarter and additionally whenever its Chairperson sees fit. In 2011, the Audit and Control Committee met six (6) times.
This committee shall draft minutes of every meeting held and inform the Board of Directors of its decisions at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting.
The meetings of the Audit and Control Committee shall be valid if at least half of the Directors on it plus one are present or represented. Decisions shall be adopted by simple majority. The Chairperson shall have the casting vote in the event of a tie.
In 2011, the Audit and Control Committee's activities included the following: (I) to monitor the closure of quarterly accounts in the first half-year, to familiarize itself with the preparation and disclosure of financial information, internal audit, internal control and risk management activities; (II) analysis of relevant rules to which the committee is subject in Portugal and Spain, (III) assessment of the external auditor's work, especially concerning with the scope of work in 2011, and approval of all "audit related" and "non audit" services, (IV) supervision of the quality and integrity of the financial information in the financial statements and participation in the Executive Committee meeting at which these documents were analyzed and discussed, (V) drafting of an opinion in the individual and consolidated annual reports and accounts, in a quarterly and yearly basis (VI) pre-approval of the 2011 Internal Audit Action Plan, (VII) supervision of the quality,
integrity and efficiency of the internal control system, risk management and internal auditing, (VIII) reflection on the corporate governance system adopted by EDPR, (IX) analysis of the evolution of the SCIRF project, (X) information about the whistle-blowing.
The Audit and Control Committee found no constraints during its control and supervision activities.
A report on the activities of the Audit and Control Committee in the year ended on December 31st 2011 is available to shareholders at www.edprenovaveis.com.
Pursuant to Article 29 of the Company's Articles of Association, the Nominations and Remunerations Committee shall consist of no less than three (3) and no more than six (6) Directors. At least one of its members must be independent and shall be the Chairperson of the committee.
The members of the committee should not be members of the Executive Committee. The Nominations and Remunerations Committee is constituted by independent members of the Board of Directors, in compliance with Recommendation 44 of the Unified Code of Good Governance approved by decision of the Board of the Spanish Securities Committee (hereinafter the CNMV), as amended by CNMV Circular 4/2007 of December 27th, which lays down that the Nominations and Remunerations Committee must be entirely made up of external Directors numbering no fewer than three (3). As it is made up of independent Directors (in Spain the committee may only be comprised of Directors) it complies to the extend possible with the recommendation indicated in point II.5.2 of the Portuguese Code of Corporate Governance.
The Nominations and Remunerations Committee currently consists of three (3) independent members, plus the Secretary. Mr. Jorge Santos and Mr. Rafael Caldeira Valverde were re-elected on 2011 and Mr. Francisco Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda was appointed on June 21st, 2011 at the Board of Directors.
| Chairperson | Jorge Santos |
|---|---|
| Francisco Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda Rafael Caldeira Valverde |
|
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
None of the committee members are spouses or up to third-degree relatives in direct line of the other members of the Board of Directors.
The committee members shall maintain their positions for as long as they are Company Directors. Nonetheless, the Board may decide to discharge members of the committee at any time and the members may resign said positions while still remaining Company Directors.
The Nominations and Remunerations Committee is a permanent body with an informative and advisory nature and its recommendations and reports are not binding.
As such, the Nominations and Remunerations Committee has no executive functions. The main functions of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee are to assist and report to the Board of Directors about appointments (including by cooption), re-elections, dismissals and remunerations of the Board and its positions, about the composition of the Board and the appointment, remuneration and dismissal of senior management personnel. The Nominations and Remunerations Committee shall also inform the Board of Directors
on general remuneration policy and incentives to them and senior management. These functions include the following:
In addition to the articles of association, the Nominations and Remunerations Committee is governed by the Regulations approved on June 4th, 2008 and also by the Board regulations. The committee's regulations are available at www.edprenovaveis.com.
This committee shall meet at least once every quarter and also whenever its Chairperson sees fit.
This committee shall draft minutes of every meeting held and inform the Board of Directors of decisions that it makes at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting.
The meetings of this committee shall be valid if at least half of the Directors on it plus one are present or represented. Decisions shall be adopted by simple majority. The Chairperson shall have the deciding vote in the event of a tie.
In 2011 the main proposals made by the Nominations and Remunerations Committee were:
Pursuant to Article 30 of the Articles of Association, the Board may set up other committees, such as the Related Party Transactions Committee. This committee shall consist of no fewer than three (3) members. The majority of the members of the Related Party Transactions Committee shall be independent, although in the case of this committee it has one non-independent Member, João Manuel Manso Neto.
Members of the Related Party Transactions Committee shall be considered independent if they can perform their duties without being conditioned by relations with EDPR, its majority shareholders or its Directors and, if this is the case, meet the other requirements of applicable legislation.
The committee currently consists of three (3) members, who were re-elected on June 21st, 2011, by the Board of Directors plus the Secretary.
| Committee on Related-Party Transactions | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chairperson | António Nogueira Leite | ||
| João Manso Neto João Manuel de Mello Franco |
|||
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
The committee members shall maintain their positions for as long as they are Company Directors. Nonetheless, the Board may decide to discharge members of the committee at any time and the members may resign said positions while still remaining Company Directors.
The Related Party Transactions Committee is a body belonging to the Board of Directors and performs the following duties, without prejudice to others that the Board may assign to it:
Should the Related Party Transactions Committee not ratify business or legal relations between EDP or its related parties and EDPR and its related parties, said relations shall require the approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Board of Directors, whenever at least half of the members proposed by entities other than EDP, including independent Directors, vote in favour, unless, before submission for
ratification by the Related Party Transactions Committee, this majority of members has voiced it approval.
The previous paragraphs shall not apply to operations between EDP or its related parties and EDPR or its related parties that have standard conditions and these conditions are applied in the same way in transactions with parties not related to EDP and EDPR or their respective related parties.
In addition to the Articles of Association, the Related Party Transactions Committee is governed by the regulations approved on June 4th, 2008 and by the Board Regulations. The committee's regulations are available at www.edprenovaveis.com.
The committee shall meet at least once a quarter and additionally whenever its Chairperson sees fit.
This committee shall draft minutes of every meeting held and inform the Board of Directors of decisions that it makes at the first Board meeting held after each committee meeting.
The meetings of this committee shall be valid if at least half of the Directors on it plus one are present or represented. Decisions shall be adopted by simple majority. The Chairperson shall have the casting vote in the event of a tie.
In 2011, the Related Party Transactions Committee revised, approved and proposed to the Board of Directors the approval of all agreements and contracts between related parties submitted to its consideration.
Chapter 2 of this report includes a description of the fundamental aspects of the agreements and contracts between related parties, the object of which does not pertain to the ordinary course of EDPR business.
The Related Party Transactions Committee was informed that in 2011, the average value and the maximum value regarding the transactions analyzed by the Committee was EUR 1,575,657 and EUR 3,132,771, respectively.
The total value of the operations with the EDP Group in 2011 was EUR 17 million which corresponds to a 7.6% of the total value of S&S, and EUR 225 million for total operational costs.
Following the recommendations of CMVM, Article 12 of the Board regulations requires at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the Directors to be independent Directors, who are considered to be those who can perform their duties without being conditioned by relations with the Company, its significant shareholders or Directors and, if applicable, meet the requirements of applicable laws.
In addition, pursuant to Article 23 of the Articles of Association, the following may not be Directors:
• People who are Directors of or are associated with any competitor of EDPR and those who are related to the above. A company shall be considered to be a competitor of EDPR if it is directly or indirectly involved in the generation, storage, transmission, distribution, sale or supply of electricity or combustible gases and also those that have interests opposed to those of EDPR, a competitor or any of the companies in its Group, and Directors, employees,
lawyers, consultants or representatives of any of them. Under no circumstances shall companies belonging to the same group as EDPR, including abroad, be considered competitors;
• People who are in any other situation of incompatibility or prohibition under the law or Articles of Association. Under Spanish law, people, among others, who are I) aged under eighteen (18) years, (II) disqualified, III) competitors; (IV) convicted of certain offences or (V) hold certain management positions are not allowed to be Directors.
The Nominations and Remunerations Committee, according to its Regulations, presents to the Board of Directors a proposal with the names of the candidates that the Committee considers having the best qualities to fulfil the role of Board Member. The Board of Directors presents the proposal to the General Meeting of
Shareholders that will approve by majority for an initial period of three (3) years and may be re-elected once or more times for further periods of three (3) years. Nonetheless, pursuant to Article 23 of the Articles of Association and 243 of the Spanish Companies Law, shareholders so wishing may group their shares until they constitute an amount of capital equal to or higher than the result of dividing it by the number of Directors and appoint those that, using only whole fractions, are deducted from the corresponding proportion. Those making use of this power cannot intervene in the appointment of the other members of the Board of Directors.
If there is a vacancy, pursuant to Article 23 of the Articles of Association and 243 of the Spanish Companies Law, the Board of Directors may co-opt people from the shareholders, who will occupy the position until the next General Meeting, which shall ratify the co-opted Director. Pursuant to Article 247 of the Spanish Companies Law, the co-option of Directors, as for other Board decisions, must be approved by absolute majority of the Directors at the meeting.

During 2011, EDPR has not signed any contracts with the members of its corporate bodies or with holders of qualifying holdings, excluding EDP, as mentioned below.
Regarding related party transactions, EDPR and/or its subsidiaries have signed the contracts detailed below with EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. (hereinafter, EDP) or other members of its group not belonging to the EDPR subgroup.
The contracts signed between EDPR and its related parties are analyzed by the Related-Party Transactions Committee according to its competences, as mentioned on chapter 1.2.6. of the report.
The framework agreement was signed by EDP and EDPR on May 7th, 2008 and came into effect when the latter was admitted to trading. The purpose of the framework agreement is to set out the principles and rules governing the legal and business relations existing when it came into effect and those entered into subsequently.
The framework agreement establishes that neither EDP, nor the EDP Group companies other than EDPR and its subsidiaries can engage in activities in the field of renewable energies without the consent of EDPR. EDPR shall have worldwide exclusivity, with the exception of Brazil, where it shall engage its activities through a joint venture with EDP – Energias do Brasil, S.A., for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of facilities or activities related to wind, solar, wave and/or tidal power and other renewable energy generation technologies that may be developed in the future. Nonetheless, the agreement excludes technologies being developed in hydroelectric power, biomass, cogeneration and waste in Portugal and Spain.
It lays down the obligation to provide EDP with any information that it may request from EDPR to fulfil its legal obligations and prepare the EDP Group's consolidated accounts.
The framework agreement shall remain in effect for as long as EDP directly or indirectly owns more than 50% of the share capital of EDPR or appoints more than 50% of its Directors.
On November 4th, 2008 EDP and EDPR signed an Executive Management Services Agreement and was renewed on May 4th, 2011 and effective from March 18th, 2011.
Through this contract, EDP provides management services to EDPR, including matters related to the day-to-day running of the Company. Under this agreement EDP appoints three people from EDP to be part of EDPR's Executive Committee, for which EDPR pays EDP an amount defined by the Related Party Committee, and approved by the Board of Directors and the Shareholders Meeting.
Under this contract, EDPR is due to pay an amount of EUR 380.400 corresponding to the fixed remuneration, for the management services rendered by EDP in 2011.
The term of the contract is on June 21st, 2014.
The finance agreements between EDP Group companies and EDPR Group companies were established under the above described Framework Agreement and currently include the following:
EDPR (as the borrower) has loan agreements with EDP Finance BV (as the lender), a company 100% owned by EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A.. Such loan agreements can be established both in EUR and USD, usually have a 10-year tenor and are remunerated at rates set on arm's length basis. As at December 31st, 2011, such loan agreements totalled EUR 1,451,042,386 and USD 1,986,641,541.
A counter-guarantee agreement was signed, under which EDP or EDP Energias de Portugal Sociedade Anónima, sucursal en España (hereinafter guarantor or EDP Sucursal) undertakes on behalf of EDPR, EDP Renewables Europe SLU (hereinafter EDPR EU) and EDPR North America LLC (hereinafter EDPR NA) to provide corporate guarantees or request the issue of any guarantees, on the terms and conditions requested by the subsidiaries, which have been approved on a case by case basis by the EDP executive board.
EDPR will be jointly liable for compliance by EDPR EU and EDPR NA. The subsidiaries of EDPR undertake to indemnify the guarantor for any losses or liabilities resulting from the guarantees provided under the agreement and to pay a fee established in arm's length basis. Nonetheless, certain guarantees issued prior to the date of approval of these agreements may have different conditions. As at December 31st, 2011, such counter-guarantee agreements totalled EUR 155,169,622 and USD 573,208,391.
EDP Sucursal and EDPR signed an agreement through which EDP Sucursal manages EDPR' cash accounts. The agreement also regulates a current account between both companies, remunerated on arm's length basis. As at December 31st 2011, the current account had a balance of EUR 158,622,803 and USD 50,011,596 both in favour of EDPR.
The agreement is automatically renewable on a yearly basis.
Due to the net investment in EDPR NA, the company and Group accounts of EDPR and the accounts of EDP Sucursal, were exposed to the foreign exchange risk. With the purpose of hedging this foreign exchange risk, EDP Group settled a cross currency interest rate swap (CIRS) in USD and EUR, between EDP Sucursal and EDPR for a total amount of USD 2,632,613. Also a CIRS in PLN and EUR, between EDP Sucursal and EDPR was settled for a total amount of PLN 309,307,188 related with the net investment in polish companies.
EDP Sucursal and EDPR entered into several hedge agreements with the purpose of managing the transaction exposure related with the investment payments to be done in Poland, fixing the exchange rate for EUR/PLN in accordance to the prices in the forward market in each contract date. At December 31st 2011, a total amount of EUR 38,803,000 remained outstanding.
EDP and EDP EU entered into hedge agreements for a total volume of 1,599 MWh for 2011 at the forward market price at the time of execution related with the expected sales of energy in the Spanish market.
On May 14th 2008, EDP and EDPR signed an agreement under which the former granted to the latter a non-exclusive license for the trademark "EDP Renováveis" for use in the renewable energy market and related activities.
In return for the granting of the trademark license, EDPR will pay to EDP fees calculated on the basis of the proportion of the costs pertaining to the former in the Group's annual budget for image and trademark services, which are subject to annual review. The fee established for 2011 was EUR 1,500,000.
The license is granted indefinitely and shall remain in effect until the expiry of EDP's legal ownership of the trademark or until EDP ceases to hold the majority of the capital or does not appoint the majority of Directors of EDPR. EDP may also terminate the agreement in case of non-payment or breach of contract.
The licensing agreement is restricted by the terms of the framework agreement.
On June 4th, 2008, EDP and EDPR signed a consultancy service agreement. Through this agreement, and upon request by EDPR, EDP (or through EDP Sucursal) shall provide consultancy services in the areas of legal services, internal control systems, financial reporting, taxation, sustainability, regulation and competition, risk management, human resources, information technology, brand and communication, energy planning, accounting and consolidation, corporate marketing and organizational development.
The price of the agreement is calculated as the cost incurred by EDP plus a margin. For the first year, it was fixed at 8% based on an independent expert on the basis of market research. For 2011 the estimated cost of these services is EUR 3,132,771.00. This was the total cost of services provided for EDPR, EDPR EU and EDPR NA.
The duration of the agreement is one (1) year tacitly renewable for equal periods.
On May 13th, 2008, EDP Inovação, S.A. (hereinafter EDP Inovação), an EDP Group company, and EDPR signed an agreement regulating relations between the two companies regarding projects in the field of renewable energies (hereinafter the R&D Agreement).
The object of the R&D Agreement is to prevent conflicts of interest and foster the exchange of knowledge between companies and the establishment of legal and business relationships. The agreement forbids EDP Group companies other than EDP Inovação to undertake or invest in companies that undertake the renewable energy projects described in the agreement.
The R&D Agreement establishes an exclusive right on the part of EDP Inovação to project and develop new renewable energy technologies that are already in the pilot or economic and/or commercial feasibility study phase, whenever EDPR exercises its option to undertake them.
In June 2011 EDPR requested EDP Inovação the development of services related to certain renewables projects, which are currently under execution.
The agreement shall remain in effect for as long as EDP directly or indirectly maintains control of more than 50% of both companies or appoints the majority of the members of the Board and Executive Committee of the parties to the agreement.
Management support service agreement between EDP Renováveis Portugal S.A., and EDP Valor – Gestão Integrada de Recursos, S.A.
On January 1st, 2003, EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A., holding company of the EDPR subgroup in Portugal, and EDP Valor – Gestão Integrada de Recursos, S.A. (hereinafter EDP Valor), an EDP Group company, signed a management support service agreement.
The object of the agreement is the provision to EDP Renováveis Portugal by EDP Valor of services in the areas of procurement, economic and financial management, fleet management, property management and maintenance, insurance, occupational health and safety and human resource management and training.
The remuneration paid to EDP Valor by EDP Renováveis Portugal and its subsidiaries for the services provided in 2011 totalled EUR 945,458.
The initial duration of the agreement was five (5) years from date of signing and it was tacitly renewed for a new period of five (5) years on January 1st 2008.
Either party may renounce the contract with one (1) year's notice.
Information techonology management services agreement between EDP Renováveis, S.A. and EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A.
On January 1st, 2010, EDPR, and EDP, signed an IT management services agreement.
The object of the agreement is to provide to EDPR the information technology services described on the contract and its attachments by EDP.
The amount to be paid to EDP for the services provided in 2011 totalled EUR 2,483,227.
The initial duration of the agreement is one (1) year from date of signing and it is tacitly renewed for a new period of one (1) year.
Either party may renounce the contract with one (1) month notice.
Representation agreement with Hidroeletrica del Cantábrico S.A. for the EDP Renováveis, S.A. Portfolio in Spain
On October 27th, 2011, EDPR and Hidroeletrica del Cantábrico S.A., signed an Agreement for Representation services.
The object of this agreement was to provide EDPR representation services in the market and risk management for a fix tariff based in volume (€0,12/MWh) in the electricity market.
The initial duration of the agreement is one (1) year from date of signing and it is tacitly renewed for a new period of one (1) year.
Consultancy agreement between EDP Renováveis Brasil S.A., and EDP Energias do Brasil S.A.
The object of the agreement is to provide to EDP Renováveis Brasil S.A. (hereinafter EDPR Brasil) the consultancy services described on the contract and its attachments by EDP – Energias do Brasil S.A. (hereinafter EDP Brasil). Through this agreement, and upon request by EDPR Brasil, EDP Brasil shall provide consultancy services in the areas of legal services, internal control systems, financial reporting, taxation, sustainability, regulation and competition, risk management, human resources, information technology, brand and communication, energy planning, accounting and consolidation, corporate marketing and organizational development.
The amount to be paid to EDP Brasil for the services provided in 2011 totalled BRL 1,383,840.
The initial duration of the agreement is one (1) year from date of signing and it is tacitly renewed for a new period of one (1) year.
EDPR has an Internal Control System over Financial Reporting (SCIRF) updated and monitored in line with international standards of internal control, whose mechanisms are beginning to be generally applicable to listed companies.
SCIRF covers the main aspects of the COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission): maintaining a control environment for the preparation of a financial reporting of quality, assessment of the risks of financial information, existence of control activities that mitigate risks of error, transparent communication and reporting procedures and mechanisms of the SCIRF both internally and externally and continuous supervision of the design and operation of the system.
SCIRF provides a control environment in EDPR in many ways, embodied in the Entity Level Controls. These controls cover aspects such as:
One aspect covered by SCIRF is the risk assessment of financial information. The way in which this point is dealt with by SCIRF is evidenced by the existence of processes that establish the responsibility for developing and supervising the accounts and the frequency with which financial information is reported, with the corresponding controls that allow the minimization of the occurrence of errors and irregularities. These controls satisfy the following control objectives: (I) completeness (the product of event and transaction processing presents no omissions or duplications), (II) accuracy (no data is missing or wrong), (III) validity (events and transactions are subject to formal approval) and (IV) restricted access (existence of adequate protection of resources).
In the processes set down, information capture mechanisms are specified, as well as the steps that are performed for the preparation of financial information which forms part of EDPR's financial statements. Likewise, there is a process for the communication to markets of all kinds of information required, whether financial, operational or on any relevant matter contemplated by the regulatory bodies.
Besides the elements already mentioned, SCIRF has a wide variety of control activities (embodied in Process controls and General Computer Controls) covering the various phases of activity of EDPR, from the initial promotion stage to the beginning of exploitation and sale of energy produced by the facilities, including the reflection
of these activities in the accounting as well as the work necessary for the individual and consolidated accounts disclosures or for the obtaining of financing for the management of the business.
EDPR's SCIRF Control activities also cover the systems and information technologies (General Computer Controls), following an international reference model such as COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and related Technologies). The importance of this aspect is that information systems are the tools with which financial information is prepared, thus being relevant for transactions conducted with them. It includes activities such as access control to applications and systems, management of corrective and evolutive maintenance, new projects implementation, systems, facilities and operations (back-ups, security, incidents) management and administration, and their monitoring and proper planning. These activities are developed taking into account the requirements of control and supervision.
For contracted entities that provide relevant services that support processes of financial reporting preparation, specifically in the field of information technologies, the entities are required to meet the same minimum requirements for internal control in line with those of EDPR.
As noted above, SCIRF undergoes a process of supervision and evaluation.
The SCIRF activities and their progress have been quarterly reported to the Audit and Control Committee, complying with its supervision and follow-up missions regarding the company's internal control systems and risk management.
At the year-end in accordance with CMVM Recommendation III.1.4 the external auditors, within the scope of their powers, verified the efficiency and functioning of the Internal Control Systems and reported their conclusions to the Audit and Control Committee. Additionally, KPMG reported the result of their review of SCIRF to the Audit and Control Committee.
With this report and the teamwork of the Internal Auditors the Audit and Control Committee in accordance with CMVM Recommendation II.1.1.3 made its final assessment report and presented to the Board.
EDPR's risk framework was designed to be not a stand-alone activity separated from the main activities and processes of the company, but to be part of the responsibilities of management as an integrating element of all organizational processes, including strategic planning.
In EDPR's risk framework, risk process aims to link the company's overall strategy into manager's day-to-day decisions, enabling the company to increase the likelihood of achieving its strategic objectives.
EDPR's general strategy is translated into major strategic questions that are grouped by risk area and then subject to EDPR's risk process. The outcome of the risk process is a set of specific guidelines per risk area that will guide managers in their decisions according to the company's risk profile.

Risk management in EDPR is supported by three distinct organizational functions:

EDPR's Risk Committee integrates and coordinates all the risk functions and assures the link between risk strategy and the company's operations.
EDPR's Risk Committee intends to be the forum to discuss how EDPR can optimize its risk-return position according to its risk profile. The key responsibilities of this committee are:
The following list summarizes the main risk areas and descriptions of EDPR's business:
The development and profitability of renewable energy projects are subject to policies and regulatory frameworks. The jurisdictions in which EDPR operates provide numerous types of incentives that support the energy generated from renewable sources.
Support for renewable energy sources has been strong in previous years, and both the European Union and various US federal and state bodies have regularly reaffirmed their wish to continue and strengthen such support.
It cannot be guaranteed that the current support will be maintained or that the electricity produced by future renewable energy projects will benefit from state purchase obligations, tax incentives, or other support measures for the electricity generation from renewable energy sources.
EDPR is managing its exposure to regulatory risks trough diversification (being present in several countries) and by being an active member in several wind associations.
EDPR faces limited market price risk as it pursues a strategy of being present in countries or regions with long term visibility on revenues. In most countries where EDPR is present, prices are determined through regulated framework mechanisms. On the markets where there is expected short term volatility on market prices, EDPR uses various financial and commodity hedging instruments in order to optimize the exposure to fluctuating electricity prices. However, it may not be possible to successfully hedge the exposures or it may face other difficulties in executing the hedging strategy.
In Europe, EDPR operates in countries where the selling price is defined by a feed-in-tariff (Spain, Portugal and France) or in markets where on top of the electricity price EDPR receives either a pre-defined regulated premium or a green certificate, whose price is achieved on a regulated market (Spain, Belgium, Poland, and Romania). Additionally, EDPR is developing activity in Italy and UK where current incentive system is based on green certificates, although both are in a process to change into feed in tariff.
In the case of North America, EDPR focus is developing strategy on the States which by having an RPS program in place provides higher revenues visibility, through the REC (Renewable Energy Credit) system and by non-compliance penalties. The North America market does not provide any regulated framework system for the electricity price although it may exist for the RECs in some States. Most of EDPR's capacity in the US has predefined prices determined by long-term contracts with local utilities in line with the Company's policy of signing long-term contracts for the output of its wind farms.
In Brazilian operations, selling price is defined through a public auction which is later translated into a long-term contract.
Under EDPR's global approach to optimize the exposure to market electricity prices, the Company evaluates on a permanent basis if there are any deviations to the defined limits, assessing in which markets financial hedges may be more effective to correct it. In 2011, in order to manage such exposure, EDPR financially hedged a significant part of its generation in Spain while it closed a significant portion of its exposure through several physical and financial deals for the long-term in the US.
The amount of electricity generated by EDPR on its wind farms, and therefore EDPR's profitability, are dependent on climatic conditions, which vary across the locations of the wind farms, and from season to season and year to year. Energy output at wind farms may decline if wind speeds falls outside specific ranges, as turbines will only operate when wind speeds are within those ranges.
Variations and fluctuations in wind conditions at wind farms may result in seasonal and other fluctuations in the amount of electricity that is generated and, consequently, in the operating results and efficiency.
EDPR mitigates wind resource volatility and seasonality by having a strong knowledge in the design of its wind farms, and through the geographical diversification – in each country and in different countries – of its asset base. This "portfolio effect" enables to offset wind variations in each area and to keep the total energy generation relatively steady. Currently EDPR is present in 11 countries: Spain, Portugal, France, Belgium, Poland, Romania, UK, Italy, US, Canada and Brazil.
EDPR is exposed to fluctuations in interest rates through financing. This risk can be mitigated using fixed rates and hedging instruments, including interest rate swaps.
Also because of its presence in several countries, currency fluctuations may have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations. EDPR may attempt to hedge against currency fluctuations risks by natural hedging strategies, as well as by using hedging instruments, including forward foreign exchange contracts and Cross Interest Rate Swaps.
EDPR hedging efforts will minimize but not eliminate the impact of interest rate and exchange rate volatility.
The evolution of the financial markets is analyzed on an on-going basis in accordance to EDP Group's risk management policy approved by the EDPR`s Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors is responsible for the definition of general risk-management principles and the establishment of exposure limits following the recommendation of the risk committee.
Taking into account the risk management policy and exposure limits previously approved, the Financial Department identifies, evaluates and submits for the Board's approval the financial strategy appropriate to each project/location
The execution of the approved strategies is also undertaken by the Financial Department, in accordance with the policies previously defined and approved.
Fixed rate, Natural hedging and Financial instruments are used to minimize potential adverse effects resulting from the interest rate and foreign exchange rate risks on its financial performance.
The purpose of the interest rate risk management policies is to reduce the exposure of long term debt cash flows from market fluctuations, mainly by issuing long term debt with a fixed rate, but also through the settlement of derivative financial instruments to swap from floating rate to fixed rate when long term debt is issued with floating rates.
EDPR has a portfolio of interest-rate derivatives with maturities between approximately 2 and 14 years. Sensitivity analyses of the fair value of financial instruments to interest-rate fluctuations are performed.
Given the policies adopted by EDPR Group, its financial cash flows are substantially independent from the fluctuation in interest rate markets.
EDPR operates internationally and is exposed to the exchange-rate risk resulting from investments in foreign subsidiaries. Currently, main currency exposure is the U.S. USD/EUR currency fluctuation risk that results principally from the shareholding in EDPR NA. With the ongoing increasing capacity in others non-euro regions, EDPR will become also exposed to other local currencies (Poland, Romania and Brazil).
EDPR general policy is the Natural Hedging in order to match currency cash flows, minimizing the impact of exchange rates changes while value is preserved. The essence of this approach is to create financial foreign currency outflows to match equivalent foreign currency inflows.
Counterparty risk is the default risk of the other party in an agreement, either due to temporary liquidity issues or long term systemic issues.
EDPR policy in terms of the counterparty credit risk on financial transactions is managed by an analysis of the technical capacity, competitiveness, credit notation and exposure to each counterparty. Counterparties in derivatives and financial transactions are restricted to high-quality credit institutions, therefore, there cannot be considered any significant risk of counterparty non-compliance and no collateral is demanded for these transactions.
Liquidity risk is the risk that EDPR will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.
EDPR's strategy to manage liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have significant liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring in unacceptable losses or risking damage to EDPR's reputation.
Wind turbine generators (WTG) is a key element in the development of EDPR's wind-related energy projects, as the shortfall or an unexpected sharp increase in WTG prices can create a question mark on new project's development and its profitability. WTG represents the majority of a wind farm capital expenditure (on average, between 70% and 80%).
EDPR faces limited risk to the availability and prices' increase of WTG due to its framework agreements with the major global wind turbines suppliers. The Company uses a large mix of turbines suppliers in order to reduce its dependency on any one supplier being one of the worldwide wind energy developers with a more diversified and balanced portfolio.
Wind farms are subject to strict international, national, state, regional and local regulations relating to the development, construction, licensing, grid interconnection and operation of power plants. Among other things, these laws regulate: land acquisitions, leasing and use; building, transportation and distribution permits; landscape and environmental permits; and regulations on energy transmission and distribution network congestions.
EDPR mitigates this risk by having development activities in 11 different countries (Spain, Portugal, France, Belgium, Poland, Romania, UK, Italy, US, Canada and Brazil) with a portfolio of projects in several maturity stages. EDPR has a large pipeline located in the most attractive regions providing a "buffer" to overcome potential delays in the development of new projects, ensuring growth targets.
Wind farms output depend upon the availability and operating performance of the equipment necessary to operate it, mainly the components of wind turbines and transformers. Therefore the risk is that the performance of the turbine does not reach its optimum implies that the energy output is not the expected.
EDPR mitigates this risk by using a mix of turbine suppliers which minimizes technological risk, by signing a medium-term full-scope maintenance agreement with the turbine supplier and by an adequate preventive and scheduled maintenance.
Most recently, and following the general trend in the wind sector, EDPR is externalizing some pure technical O&M activities of its wind farms.
The Audit and Control Committee is responsible for proposing to the Board of Directors for submission to the General Meeting the appointment of the Company auditors, the terms of their contracts, scope of their duties and revocation and renewal of their contracts.
In order to protect the External Auditor independence, the following competences of the Audit and Control Committee were exercised during 2011:
all the services rendered and all the services in course. The Audit and Control Committee, in order to evaluate its independence, obtained from the External Auditor information regarding their independence according to Portuguese Decree-Law n.º 224/2008, November 20th, that changes the Articles of Association of the External Auditors Association;
EDPR's External Auditor is, since the year 2007, KPMG Auditores S.L.., therefore there is still no need to rotate the auditor according to Recommendation III.1.3 of the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code.
In 2011, according to the Audit and Control Committee's competences and in line with Recommendations II.4.4 and II.4.5, it was the first recipient and the corporate body in charge of the permanent contact with the external auditor on matters that may pose a risk to their independence and any other matters related to the auditing of accounts. It also receives and stores information on any other matters provided for in legislation on audits and in auditing standards in effect at any time.
The Audit and Control Committee assessed the performance of the external auditor in providing the services hired by the Company and made a positive evaluation of their quality, considering that they meet applicable standards and that it is advisable to maintain the same auditor.
The work of the external auditor, including reports and audits of its accounts, was supervised and evaluated in accordance with applicable rules and standards, in particular international auditing standards. The external auditor in coordination with the Audit and Control Committee verifies the implementation of remuneration policies and the efficiency and functioning of internal control mechanisms. The external auditor reports to the Audit and Control Committee all the shortcomings.
EDPR has always carried out its activity by consistently implementing measures to ensure the good governance of its companies, including the prevention of incorrect practices, particularly in the areas of accounting and finance.
EDPR provides the Group workers with a channel enabling them to report directly and confidentially to the Audit and Control Committee any practice presumed illicit or any alleged accounting and/ or financial irregularity in their company, in compliance with the provisions of CMVM Regulation no. 1/2010.
With this channel for reporting irregular accounting and financial practices, EDPR aims:
Contact with the Company's Audit and Control Committee is only possible by email and post, and access to information received is restricted.
Any complaint addressed to the Audit and Control Committee will be kept strictly confidential and the whistle-blower will remain anonymous, provided that this does not prevent the investigation of the complaint. S/he will be assured that the Company will not take any retaliatory or disciplinary action as a result of exercising his/ her right to blow the whistle on irregularities, provide information or assist in an investigation.
The Secretary of the Audit and Control Committee receives all the communications and presents a quarterly report to the members of the Committee.
In 2011 there were no communications regarding any irregularity at EDPR.
EDPR is governed by a strong sense of ethics, whose principles are embodied in the day-to-day activities of its employees, according to ethical practices generally considered to be consensual but which, for reasons of appropriate disclosure, transparency and impartiality, the company decided to provide details on.
For that purpose, EDPR developed and approved a global Code of Ethics, to be adopted by all company's employees, without prejudice to other legal or regulating provisions. EDPR Employees' must comply with the Code of Ethics and with the approved corporate policies, which provide those practices and should follow main principles such as:
The Code of Ethics has been disseminated to all employees.
On 2011, the Board of Directors approved the creation of an Ethics Committee.
The Ethics Committee is a standing committee which objective is to ensure the Code of Ethics compliance within the company, processing all information received to this extent and establishing, if appropriate, corrective actions.
The main functions of the Ethics Committee are the receipt, registration, processing and reporting to the Board of Directors of information and reports received by the employees regarding violations of the Code in matters of legislation and ethics, conduct in the work environment, human rights and equal opportunities, integrity, relations with customers and suppliers, the environment and sustainability. These functions include the following:
On September 15th, 2011, the Ethics Committee was formed. The members of the Ethics Committee are the Chairpersons of the Board of Director's Committees:
| Chairperson | João Manuel de Mello Franco |
|---|---|
| António Nogueira Leite Jorge Santos |
|
| Secretary | Emilio García-Conde Noriega |
On that meeting it was also nominated an Ethics Ombudsmen, Carlos Alberto Silva Almeida Loureiro. According to the Ethics Code regulation, the Ethics Ombudsmen is responsible for:
A "Code of Ethics" e-mail channel is available for the communication of any breach to the Code articles. In 2011 there were no communications to the Ethics Ombudsmen regarding any irregularity at EDPR.
The EDPR share capital of EUR 4,361,540,810 is represented by 872,308,162 shares with a face value of EUR 5 each. All shares integrate a single class and series and are fully issued and paid. There are no holders of special rights and pursuant to the Article 8 of the Company's Articles of Association, there are no restrictions on the transfer of EDPR shares.
As far as the EDPR Board of Directors is aware there are currently no shareholders' agreements regarding the company.
EDPR SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE
The EDPR shareholder structure has remained unchanged since the IPO in 2008 with the EDP Group holding 77.5% of the Company's share capital and the remaining 22.5% being freely traded on the NYSE Euronext Lisbon stock market.

By Dec. 31st, 2011, EDPR's free-float comprised about 110,000 institutional and private investors spread across more than 35 different countries with special focus on Portugal, United States, and United Kingdom. Rest of Europe most represented countries are Switzerland, France and Norway.
Institutional investors represented 80% of EDPR's free-float (79% in 2010) while private investors, mostly Portuguese, stand for the remaining 20%.
FREE-FLOAT BY INVESTOR TYPE


| Shareholder | Number of Shares |
% Capital |
% Voting Rights |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDP – ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL |
|||
| EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. – Sucursal en España |
541,027,156 | 62.0% | 62.0% |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. |
135,256,700 | 15.5% | 15.5% |
| Total | 676,283,856 | 77.5% | 77.5% |
All shareholders, irrespective of the number of shares that they own, may attend a General Meeting and take part in its deliberations with right to speak and vote.
In order to exercise their right to attend, the company informs in its Summon and shareholders guide of the General Meeting that the shareholders must have their shares registered in their name in the Book Entry Account at least five (5) working days in advance of the date of the General Meeting.
Moreover, although there is no express provision on the matter in the Articles of Association, in the event of the suspension of a General Meeting, EDPR plans to adopt Recommendation I.2.2 of the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code and not require the blocking of shares more than five days in advance.
Any shareholder with the right to attend may send a representative to a General Meeting, even if this person is not a shareholder. Power of
attorney is revocable. The Board of Directors may require shareholders' power of attorney to be in the Company's possession at least two (2) days in advance, indicating the name of the representative.
Power of attorney shall be specific to each General Meeting, in writing or by remote means of communication, such as post.
Each share entitles its holder to one vote.
Shares issued without this right do not have voting rights, with the exception of cases set forth by current legislation.
There is no employee share-owning system at EDPR and so no relevant control mechanisms on the exercise of voting rights by employees or their representatives have been set up.
Shareholders may vote on points on the agenda, relating to any matters of the Shareholder's competence, by mail or electronic communication. It is essential for their validity that they be received by the company by midnight of the day before the date scheduled for the first calling to order of the General Meeting.
Votes by mail shall be sent in writing to the place indicated on the invitation to the meeting accompanied by the documentation indicated in the Shareholder's Guide.
In order to vote by electronic communication, shareholders must express this intention to the Chairperson of the General Meeting of the in the form indicated in the invitation to the meeting, sufficient time in advance to permit the vote within the established time limit. They will then receive a letter containing a password for voting by electronic communication within the time limit and in the form established in the call of the General Meeting.
Remote votes can be revoked subsequently by the same means used to cast them within the time limit established for the purpose or by personal attendance at the General Meeting by the shareholder who cast the vote or his/her representative.
The Board of Directors has approved a Shareholder's Guide for the first General Meeting, detailing mail and electronic communication voting forms among other matters. It is at shareholders' disposal at www.edprenovaveis.com.
Both ordinary and extraordinary General Meetings are validly constituted when first called if the Shareholders, either present or represented by proxy, represent at least twenty five percent (25%) of the subscribed voting capital. On the second call the General Meeting will be validly constituted regardless of the amount of the capital present in order to comply with the minimum established under the Spanish Companies Law.
Nonetheless, to validly approve the issuance of bonds, the increase or reduction of capital, the transformation, merger or spin-off of the Company, and in general any necessary amendment to the Articles of Association, the Ordinary or Extraordinary Shareholders' Meeting will need: on the first call, that the Shareholders, either present or represented by proxy, represent at least fifty percent (50%) subscribed voting capital and, on the second call, that the Shareholders, either present or represented by proxy, represent at least twenty five percent (25%) of the subscribed voting capital. In the event the shareholders attending represent less than fifty percent (50%) of the subscribed voting capital, the resolutions will only be validly adopted with the favourable vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the present or represented capital in the General Meeting.
Given that EDPR is a listed company on Eurolist by NYSE Euronext Lisbon, shareholders have access to corporate governance information at www.edprenovaveis.com. Extracts of General Meeting minutes and the invitation, agenda, motions submitted to the General Meeting and forms of participation shall be placed at shareholders' disposal five (5) days after they are held.
Given the personal nature of the information involved, the history does not include attendance lists at general meetings, although, in accordance with CMVM Circular nr. 156/EMIT/DMEI/2009/515, when General Meetings are held, EDPR plans to replace them by statistical information indicating the number of shareholders present and distinguishing between the number of physical presences by mail.
EDPR therefore publishes on its website an extract of the minutes of General Meetings with all information on the constitution of the General Meeting and decisions made by it, including motions submitted and any explanations of votes.
The website also provides EDPR shareholders with information on: I) requirements for participating in the General Meeting, II) mail and electronic communication votes III) information available at the registered office.
The Company has taken no defensive measures that might seriously affect its assets in any of the cases of a change in control in its shareholder structure or the Board of Directors.
The Articles of Association contain no limitations on the transferability of shares or voting rights in any type of decision and no limitations on membership of the governing bodies of EDPR. Neither are there any decisions that come into effect as a result of a takeover bid.
The fact that the Company has not adopted any measures designed to prevent successful takeover bids is therefore in line with Recommendation I.6.1 of the CMVM Code of Corporate Governance.
On the other hand, EDPR has not entered into any agreements (current or future) subject to the condition of a change in control of the Company, other than in accordance with normal practice in case of financing of certain wind farm projects by some of its group companies.
Finally, there are no agreements between the Company and members of its Board of Directors or managers providing for compensation in the event of resignation of discharge of Directors or in the event of resignation, dismissal without just cause or cessation of the working relationship following a change in control of the Company.
Pursuant to Article 26 of the Company's Articles of Association, the remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors shall consist of a fixed amount to be determined by the General Meeting for the whole Directors and expenses for attending Board meetings.
The above article also establishes the possibility of the Directors being remunerated with Company shares, share options or other securities granting the right to obtain shares, or by means of share-indexed remuneration systems. In any case, the system chosen must be approved by the General Meeting and comply with current legal provisions.
The maximum remuneration approved for each fiscal year by the General Meeting of Shareholders, for all the members of the Board of Directors was EUR 2,500,000.
Pursuant to Article 26.4 of the Company's Articles of Association the rights and duties of any kind derived from the condition of Board Member shall be compatible with any other rights and obligations either fixed or variable that could correspond to the Board Members as a consequence of other employment or professional engagements, if any, carried out in the Company. Variable remuneration resulting from said contracts or from any other relationship, including being a Board Member, will be limited to a maximum annual amount to be established by the General Shareholders' Meeting.
The maximum remuneration approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders for this Variable remuneration in 2011 for all the members of the Board of Directors is EUR 600,000.
The Nominations and Remunerations Committee is responsible for proposing to the Board of Directors, although not bindingly, the system, distribution and amount of remuneration of the Directors on the basis of the overall amount of remuneration authorized by the General Meeting. It can also propose to the Board the terms of contracts with the Directors. The distribution and exact amount paid to each Director and the frequency and other details of the remuneration shall be determined by the Board on the basis of a proposal from the Nominations and Remunerations Committee.
The remuneration of the Executive Committee and the Management Team is built in three blocks: fixed remuneration, annual and multi-annual bonus.
The annual bonus is defined as a maximum of 68% of the annual salary and is calculated based on the following indicators in each year of their term:
• Efficiency (technical availability, OPEX/MW, CAPEX/MW).
The multi-annual bonus is defined as a maximum of 102% of the annual salary and is calculated based on the same drivers as for annual bonus but measured on a multi-year timeframe to be paid at the end of the period and with additional environmental and social perspectives including, (I) the performance of the Sustainability Index applied to EDPR (DJSI method), (II) Employee satisfaction survey, (III) Appreciation of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee.
According to the Remuneration Policy approved at the General Meeting of Shareholders', the maximum variable remuneration (annual and multi-annual) is applicable if all the above mentioned KPI's were achieved and the performance evaluation is equal or above 110%.
The remuneration to the CEO and the Executive Committee Directors that are also members of the Management Team was paid directly by EDPR while for the other members of the Executive Committee there was no direct payment to its members.
Although the remuneration for all the members of the Board of Directors is provided for the members of the Executive Committee with the exception of the CEO and those members that could likewise be part of the Management Team (who devote most of their work to the activity of EDPR) are not remunerated by EDPR.
This corporate governance practice of remuneration is in line with the model adopted by the EDP Group, in which the executive Directors of EDP do not receive any remuneration directly from the group companies on whose governing bodies they serve, but rather through EDP.
Nonetheless, in line with the above corporate governance practice, EDPR has signed an Executive Management Services Agreement with EDP, under which the Company bears the cost for the render of those services corresponding to the remuneration defined for the executive members of the Board of Directors.
The non-executive Directors only receive a fixed remuneration, which is calculated on the basis of their work exclusively as Directors or cumulatively with their membership on the Nominations and Remunerations Committee, Related Party Transactions Committee and the Audit and Control Committee.
EDPR has not incorporated any share remuneration or share purchase options plans as components of the remuneration of its Directors. No Director has entered into any contract with the company or third parties that have the effect of mitigating the risk inherent in the variability of the remuneration established by the company.
In EDPR there aren't any payments for the dismissal or termination of Director's duties.
The remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors for the year ended on December 31st 2011 was as follows:
| Remuneration (€) | Fixed | Variable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual | Multi- -annual |
Total | ||
| EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS | ||||
| António Mexia * | – | – | – | – |
| Ana Maria Fernandes (CEO) | 384,000 | 167,362 | – | 551,362 |
| João Manso Neto * | ||||
| Nuno Alves * | – | – | – | |
| António Martins da Costa * | – | – | – | – |
| Rui Teixeira | – | – | – | – |
| João Paulo Costeira | – | – | – | – |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | – | – | – | – |
| Gabriel Alonso | – | – | – | – |
| NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS | ||||
| António Nogueira Leite | 35,000 | – | – | 35,000 |
| Daniel M. Kammen | 22,500 | – | – | 22,500 |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda |
55,000 | – | – | 55,000 |
| Gilles August | 45,000 | – | 45,000 | |
| João Lopes Raimundo | 58,333 | – | – | 58,333 |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | 80,000 | – | – | 80,000 |
| Jorge Santos | 60,000 | – | – | 60,000 |
| José Araújo e Silva | 26,250 | – | – | 26,250 |
| José Silva Lopes | 30,000 | – | – | 30,000 |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | 45,000 | – | – | 45,000 |
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | 55,000 | – | – | 55,000 |
| Total | 896,083 | 167,362 | 1,063,445 |
* With exception of the CEO and Executive Committee Directors that are also members of the Management Team the members of the Executive Committee have not received any
remuneration from EDPR. EDPR has entered in an Executive Management Services Agreement with EDP pursuant to which EDPR is due to pay to EDP EUR 380,400, corresponding to the fixed remuneration, for the management services rendered by EDP in 2011.
In 2011, Mr. António Martins da Costa, Mr. José Silva Lopes and Mr. Daniel Kammen ended their terms as Board members. The remuneration mentioned above refers only to the months when these Board members were still on duty.
The retirement savings plan for the members of the Executive Committee, excluding the Management Team members, acts as an effective retirement supplement and corresponds to 5% of their annual salary.
The non-executive directors may opt between a fixed remuneration or attendance fees per meeting, in a value equivalent to the fixed remuneration proposed for a director, taking into consideration the duties carried out as members of one or more committees.
In 2011, the remuneration of the members of the Management Team, as EDPR employees, excluding the Chief Executive Officer, was the following:
| Variable* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration (€) | Fixed | Annual | Multi- -annual |
Total |
| Rui Teixeira | 242,575 | 75,000 | 138,279 | 455,854 |
| João Paulo Costeira | 250,000 | 75,000 | 154,320 | 479,320 |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | 242,575 | 75,000 | 138,279 | 455,854 |
| Gabriel Alonso | 250,000 | 75,000 | 141,357 | 466,357 |
| Total | 985,151 | 300,000 | 572,235 | 1,857,386 |
| * Corresponds to the 2010 annual variable remuneration and 2009-2010 multi-annual variable remuneration accrued before their incorporation to the Board of Directors. |
The retirement savings plan for the members of the Executive Committee that are also members of the Management Team, acts as an effective retirement supplement with a range between 3% to 6% of their annual salary.
The Directors do not receive any relevant non-monetary benefits as remuneration.
The definition of the proposal of the remuneration policy for the members of the Board is of the responsibility of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee and is approved by the General Shareholders Meeting.
This Committee defined the remuneration to be attributed to Directors and members of the Management Team, with the purpose that it reflects the performance of each of the members in each year of their term of office (variable annual remuneration), and also their performance during their term of office establishing a variable component which is consistent with the maximisation of the Company's long term performance (variable multi-annual remuneration for a three-year period), thereby guaranteeing the alignment of the performance of the governing bodies with the interests of the shareholders.
The remuneration policy proposed by the Nominations and Remunerations Committee for the period 2011-2013, defines a structure with a fixed remuneration for all members of the Board of Directors and a variable remuneration, with an annual component and a multi-annual component for the members of the Executive Committee and the Management Team.
For the period 2011-2013, it was decided to maintain the remuneration structure in terms of its components, as well as to keep the same nominal value of fixed annual component as the one in force during the 2009-2010 period, revise the KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) for variable multi-annual and annual components, and unify for Executive Committee and Management Team the implementation of the Correlation Matrix of Goals Achievements to determine the variable remuneration.
The General Meeting is responsible for approving the statement on remuneration policy for the Company's corporate bodies submitted by the Nominations and Remunerations Committee through the Board of Directors.
One of the General Meeting's duties includes appraising the above mentioned statement.
Pursuant to Article 164 of the Spanish Companies Law, the General Meeting evaluates the performance of the company's management and makes an annual decision on whether to maintain confidence, or not, in their members.
At least one of the members of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee will be present or represented at the General Meeting of Shareholders of EDPR.
The Company has not approved any plans for share remuneration or share purchase options or plans based on share price fluctuations.
In 2011, the remuneration of the Chairperson of the General Meeting of EDPR was EUR 15,000.
For the year ended on December 31st, 2011, the fees paid to KPMG Auditores, S.L. for the audit and statutory audit of accounts and financial statements, other assurance and reliability services, tax consultancy services and other services unrelated to statutory auditing are as follows:
| Remuneration (€) | Portugal | Spain | Brazil | USA | Other | Total | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit and statutory audit of accounts and financial statements | 166,000 | 638,829 | 83,102 | 688,241 | 307,749 | 1,883,921 | 85.2% |
| Other assurance and reliability services (*) | 180,000 | 60,895 | 31,173 | 12,750 | 284,818 | 12.9% | |
| Sub-total audit related services | 346,000 | 699,724 | 83,102 | 719,414 | 320,499 | 2,168,739 | 98.1% |
| Tax consultancy services | - | - | 24,067 | 9,000 | 33,067 | 1.5% | |
| Other services unrelated to statutory auditing | 9,500 | - | 9,500 | 0.4% | |||
| Sub-total non-audit related services | 9,500 | - | 24,067 | 9,000 | 42,567 | 1.9% | |
| Total | 355,500 | 699,724 | 83,102 | 743,481 | 329,499 | 2,211,306 | 100% |
| (*) The fees of Portugal regarding the inspection of the internal control system (SCIRF) include the Spanish subsidiaries (EUR 80,000) and EDPR NA (EUR100,000) as their invoices were issued in this country. |
In EDPR there is a policy of pre-approval by the Audit and Control Committee for the selection of the External Auditor and any related entity for non-audit services, according to Recommendation III.1.5 of the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code. This policy was strictly followed during 2011.
The shares representing 100% of the EDPR share capital were admitted to trading in the official stock exchange NYSE Euronext Lisbon on June 4th, 2008. Since then the free float level is unchanged at 22.5%.
| EDP Renováveis, S.A. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share Capital | EUR 4,361,540,810 | |||
| Nominal Share Value | EUR 5.00 | |||
| Number of Shares | 872,308,162 | |||
| Date of IPO | June 4th, 2008 | |||
| NYSE Euronext Lisbon | ||||
| ISIN | ES0127797019 | |||
| Reuters RIC | EDPR.LS | |||
| Bloomberg Ticker | EDPR PL |
EDPR's equity market value at December 31st 2011 was EUR 4.12 billion, the equivalent to EUR 4.73 per share. In 2011, the share price improved 9%, outperforming the PSI-20 (the NYSE Euronext Lisbon reference index), the Euronext 100 and the Dow Jones Eurostoxx Utilities ("SX6E") which suffered a general depreciation in 2011. The year's low was recorded on August 9th (EUR 3.89) and the year's high was reached on May 2nd (EUR 5.25).

| PSI-20 Best & Worst Performers in 2011 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerónimo M. | +12.19% | BCP | -74.82% | |
| EDPR | +9.02% | Sonae Indús. | -66.75% | |
| Cimpor | +4.87% | BPI | -61.80% | |
| EDP | -4.01% | Banif | -60.92% | |
| Sonaecom | -10.00% | BES | -53.13% |
| Gas Natural | +15.45% | Veolia Env. | -61.28% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enel Green P. | +2.09% | Areva | -47.70% |
| EDP | -4.01% | RWE | -45.40% |
| Enagas | -4.19% | Suez Env. | -42.39% |
| Red Electrica | -6.07% | EDF | -38.75% |
In 2011 were traded more than 232 million EDPR shares, representing 25% year-on-year decrease in its liquidity, and corresponding to a turnover of approximately EUR 1.04 billion. On average, 0.9 million shares were traded per day. The total number of shares traded represented 27% of the total shares admitted to trading and to 118% of the company's free float.

| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDPR SHARES IN NYSE EURONEXT LISBON (€) | |||||
| Opening price | 4.34 | 6.63 | 5.00 | 8.00 | |
| Closing price | 4.73 | 4.34 | 6.63 | 5.00 | |
| Peak price | 5.25 | 7.01 | 7.75 | 8.00 | |
| Minimum price | 3.89 | 3.72 | 5.00 | 3.45 | |
| VARIATION IN SHARE PRICE AND REFERENCE INDICES | |||||
| EDP Renováveis | 9% | -35% | 33% | -37% | |
| PSI20 | -28% | -10% | 33% | -51% | |
| Dow Jones Eurostoxx Utilities | -25% | -15% | -1% | -38% | |
| Euronext 100 | -14% | 1% | 25% | -45% | |
| LIQUIDITY OF EDPR SHARES IN THE MARKET | |||||
| Volume in NYSE Euronext (€m) | 1,060.3 | 1,539.2 | 1,676.0 | 1,646.0 | |
| Daily average volume (€m) | 4.1 | 6.0 | 6.4 | 11.0 | |
| Number of shares traded (million) |
232.3 | 311.2 | 257.0 | 216.0 | |
| Daily Average traded shares (million) |
0.9 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | |
| Total shares issued (million) | 872.3 | 872.3 | 872.3 | 872.3 | |
| Number of own shares (million) | - | - | - | - | |
| Free-float (million) | 196.3 | 196.3 | 196.3 | 196.3 | |
| Annual rotation of capital (% of total shares) |
27% | 36% | 29% | 25% | |
| Annual rotation of capital (% of free-float) |
118% | 159% | 131% | 110% | |
| EDPR MARKET VALUE (€m) | |||||
| Market capitalisation at end of period |
4,124 | 3,783 | 5,783 | 4,364 |
The graph below shows the evolution in EDPR prices over the year and all announcements and relevant events that may had impact on them.
MAIN EDPR EVENTS IN 2011

| # | Date | Descripton | Share Price (€) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2/Feb | EDP Renováveis discloses 2010 provisional data | 4.38 |
| 2 | 24/Feb | EDP Renováveis announces 2010 results | 4.35 |
| 3 | 30/Mar | EDPR takes full control of Genesa | 5.20 |
| 4 | 7/Apr | EDP Renováveis sells its financial stake in a Spanish wind farm |
4.90 |
| 5 | 11/Apr | EDP Renováveis Annual Shareholder Meeting | 5.17 |
| 6 | 18/Apr | EDP Renováveis discloses 1Q2011 provisional data | 4.93 |
| 7 | 4/May | EDP Renováveis discloses 1Q2011 financial results | 4.90 |
| 8 | 3/Jun | EDP Renováveis is awarded new long-term contract in the US |
4.65 |
| 9 | 6/Jun | EDP Renováveis establishes a partnership for the development of 2.4 GW of wind offshore capacity in the UK |
4.61 |
| 10 | 21/Jun | EDP Renováveis Extraordinary Shareholder Meeting |
4.48 |
| 11 | 21/Jun | EDP Renováveis executes project finance for 138 MW in Romania |
4.48 |
| 12 | 28/Jun | EDPR is granted 127 MW by the Aragón Government – Spain |
4.37 |
| 13 | 11/Jul | EDP Renováveis executes project finance for 90 MW in Romania |
4.44 |
| 14 | 13/Jul | EDP Renováveis establishes a new institutional partnership structure and secures USD 116 million |
4.44 |
| 15 | 14/Jul | EDP Renováveis discloses its 1H2011 provisional data |
4.30 |
| 16 | 25/Jul | EDP Renováveis executes project finance for 70 MW in Brazil |
4.53 |
| 17 | 27/Jul | EDP Renováveis discloses its 1H2011 financial results |
4.58 |
| 18 | 14/Sep | EDP Renováveis secures a new PPA for 101 MW in the US |
4.27 |
| 19 | 13/Oct | EDP Renováveis discloses its 9M2011 provisional data |
4.20 |
| 20 | 26/Oct | EDP Renováveis discloses its 9M2011 financial results |
4.32 |
| 21 | 20/Dec | EDP Renováveis is awarded long term contracts for 120 MW at the Brazilian energy auction |
4.48 |
| 22 | 21/Dec | EDP Renováveis executes through its associated company ENEOP – Eólicas de Portugal, S.A. project finance for 376 MW in Portugal |
4.51 |
| 23 | 22/Dec | EDP Renováveis: EDP and China Three Gorges establish a strategic partnership |
4.51 |
| 24 | 22/Dec | EDP Renováveis establishes a new institutional partnership structure for 99 MW in the US |
4.51 |
The distribution of dividends must be proposed by EDPR 's Board of Directors and authorized by a resolution approved in the Company's Shareholders Meeting. In keeping with the legal provisions in force, namely the Spanish Companies Law, the EDPR Articles of Association require that profits for a business year consider:
The expected dividend policy of EDPR, as announced in the IPO, is to propose dividends' distribution each year representing at least 20% of EDPR's distributable profit. Also as announced in the IPO, EDPR Board of Directors can adjust this dividend policy as required to reflect, among other things, changes to our business plan and our capital requirements, and there can be no assurance that in any given year a dividend will be proposed or declared.
In light of a challenging economic and regulatory environment in the countries in which EDPR holds investments, of the net financial results obtained in the fiscal year of 2011 and of the company's capital requirements in a harsh financial environment, the Board of Directors will propose at the Shareholder's Meeting, to be held in 2012, to retain the 2011 results as voluntary reserves.
The Communication Policy of EDPR seeks to provide to shareholders, potential investors and stakeholders all the relevant information about the Company and its business environment. The promotion of transparent, consistent, rigorous, easily accessible and high-quality information is of fundamental importance to an accurate perception of the company's strategy, financial situation, accounts, assets, prospects, risks and significant events.
EDPR therefore look for to provide investors with information that can support them make informed, clear, concrete investment decisions.
An Investor Relations Office was created to ensure a direct and permanent contact with all market related agents and stakeholders, to guarantee the equality between shareholders and to prevent imbalances in the information access.
EDPR make use of its corporate website as a major channel to publish all the material information and ensures that all the relevant information on its activities and results is always up-to-date and available.
The EDPR Investor Relations Department is the intermediary between EDPR and its actual and potential shareholders, the financial analysts that follow the Company's activity, all investors and the financial market agents in general. The main purpose of the department is to guarantee the principle of equality among shareholders, prevent asymmetries in access to information and reduce the market perception gap of the company's strategy and intrinsic value. The department responsibility encompass developing and implementing EDPR's communication strategy and preserve an appropriate institutional and informative relationship with the financial market, the stock exchange at which EDPR shares trade and the regulatory and supervisory entities (CMVM – Comissão de Mercado de Valores Mobiliários – in Portugal and CMNV – Comisíon Nacional del Mercado de Valores – in Spain).
The company representative for relations with the market is the Executive Board of Directors member, Mr. Rui Teixeira. The Investor Relation Department is coordinated by Mr. Rui Antunes and is located at the company's head offices in Madrid, Spain. The department contacts are as follows:
Calle Serrano Galvache 56 Centro Empresarial Parque Norte Edificio Olmo – 7th Floor Phone: +34 902 830 700 Fax: +34 914 238 429 E-mail: [email protected]
Last year was particularly challenge for the stock markets, requiring the biggest effort from the EDPR management and the IR team to best deliver a clear and realistic message to all entities in the financial markets to attempt to ease concerns and to avoid investment decisions supported by speculative news flow. In 2011, we were able to discuss the investors' main topics of concerns, namely related to the perceived sector regulatory uncertainty in some European markets, the difficult market in the US, the impact from the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, the Portuguese financial assistance program from the IMF/ECB/EU and the outcome for EDPR from the 8th privatization phase of EDP – Energias de Portugal, our principal shareholder. The merger between Iberdrola and Iberdrola Renovables, the tender offer launched by EDF over EDF Energies Nouvelles and the EDPR's strategic plan pos-2012 were also relevant topics of discussion.
During 2011 EDPR was present in several events reinforcing its value creation proposition to its shareholders while prospecting new ones. In the year, the EDPR management and the IR team held more than 300 meetings in the Company's Offices and in 15 of the major financial cities of Europe and of the US, in a strong evidence of investor's interest in the company.
EDPR is clearly aware of the importance of delivering clear and detailed information to the market on time. Consequently, EDPR publishes the company's price sensitive information before the opening of the NYSE Euronext Lisbon stock exchange through CMVM's information system, and simultaneously we make that same information also available on the website investors' section and through the IR department's mailing list.
On each earnings announcement, EDPR promotes a conference call and webcast, at which the Company's management updated the market on EDPR's activities. On each of these events, shareholders, investors and analysts had the opportunity to directly submit their questions and to discuss EDPR's results as well as the company's outlook.
At the IR Department of EDPR, we remained in permanent contact with the financial analysts who evaluated the Company and with all shareholders and investors by e-mail, phone or face-to-face meetings. In 2011, as far we are aware of the sell-side analysts issued more than 200 reports evaluating EDPR's performance.
As a world leader in renewable energy, one of the biggest listed companies in the sector and one of the biggest companies of PSI20, EDPR is permanently under analysis and valuation.
At the end of the 2011, as far as the company is aware of, there were 28 institutions elaborating research reports and following actively the Company's activity. As of December 31st 2011, the average price target of those analysts was of €5.39 per share with most of them reporting "Buy" recommendations on EDPR's share: 17 Buys, 7 Neutrals, 3 Sell and only 1 Suspended.
| Company | Analyst | Recommen dation |
Price Target (€) |
Last Report Issued |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banesto | António Cruz-Guzmán |
Overweight | 6.86 | 22/07/2011 | |
| Banif | Sofia Cordeiro | Buy | 5.46 | 05/05/2011 | |
| Barclays Capital | Rupesh Madlani | Equalweight | 4.75 | 01/11/2011 | |
| BBVA | Daniel Ortea | Outperform | 5.30 | 05/05/2011 | |
| BCP | Vanda Mesquita | Buy | 6.00 | 14/10/2011 | |
| Berenberg | Benita Barretto | Buy | 6.50 | 21/10/2011 | |
| BES | Fernando Garcia | Buy | 4.90 | 26/09/2011 | |
| BNP Paribas | José Fernandez | Underperform | 4.20 | 20/10/2011 | |
| BoAML | Matthew Yates | Buy | 5.25 | 27/10/2011 | |
| BPI | Flora Trindade | Buy | 6.00 | 19/09/2011 | |
| Caixa BI | Helena Barbosa | Suspended | – | 16/12/2011 | |
| Cheuvreux | José Porta | Underperform | 5.19 | 27/07/2011 | |
| Citigroup | Manuel Palomo | Buy | 5.00 | 30/09/2011 | |
| Deutsche Bank | Virginia Sanz de Madrid |
Hold | 5.00 | 26/10/2011 | |
| Fidentiis | Daniel Rodríguez | Buy | 5.59 | 04/08/2011 | |
| Goldman Sachs | Matija Gergolet | Neutral | 5.90 | 29/12/2011 | |
| HSBC | James Magness | Overweight | 7.25 | 14/10/2011 | |
| ING | Maurice Rosenthal | Sell | 3.30 | 14/12/2011 | |
| Jefferies | Gerard Reid | Buy | 5.85 | 26/10/2011 | |
| JP Morgan | Sarah Laitung | Overweight | 5.10 | 13/10/2011 | |
| Macquarie | Shai Hill | Outperform | 5.25 | 06/07/2011 | |
| Morgan Stanley | Allen Wells | Overweight | 5.40 | 12/10/2011 | |
| Natixis | Céline Chérubin | Neutral | 4.70 | 27/10/2011 | |
| Redburn Partners |
Archie Fraser | Buy | 6.11 | 07/02/2011 | |
| Sabadell | Jorge Gonzalez | Buy | 5.06 | 26/10/2011 | |
| Santander | Joaquín Ferrer | Hold | 6.20 | 23/05/2011 | |
| Société Générale Jorge Alonso | Hold | 4.50 | 27/10/2011 | ||
| UBS | Alberto Gandolfi | Neutral | 5.00 | 08/09/2011 |
EDPR considers online information a powerful tool in the dissemination of material information updating its website with all the relevant documents. Apart from all the required information by CMVM and CNMV regulations, the Company website also carries financial and operational updates of EDPR's activities ensuring all an easy access to information.
| Portuguese | English | Spanish | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identification of the company | |||
| Financial statements | |||
| Regulations of the management and supervisory bodies |
|||
| Audit Committee Annual report | |||
| Investor Relations Department - functions and contact details |
|||
| Articles of association | |||
| Calendar of company events | |||
| Invitation to General Meeting | |||
| Proposal submitted for discussion and voting at General Meetings |
|||
| Minutes of the General Shareholders' Meeting |
|||
| Market Liaison Officer | |||
| Credentials of the Members of the Board of Directors |
| Name | Position |
|---|---|
| António Mexia | |
| CEO of EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. Member of the General Supervisory Board of Banco Comercial Português S.A. |
|
| Ana Maria Fernandes | |
| Member of the Executive Board of Directors of EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. | |
| João Manso Neto | |
| Chairperson of the Executive Committee of EDP Produção CEO and Vice-Chairperson of Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. Member of the Executive Board of Directors of EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. |
|
| Nuno Alves | Executive Director of Millennium BCP Investimento, responsible for BCP Group Treasury and Capital Markets Member of the Executive Board of Directors of EDP - Energias de Portugal, S.A. (CFO) |
| Rui Teixeira | |
| Chief Financial Officer of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| Member of the Management Team of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| João Paulo Costeira | |
| Chief Operating Officer for Europe of EDP Renováveis, S.A. Member of the Management Team of EDP Renováveis, S.A. |
|
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | |
| Chief Business Development Officer of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| Member of the Management Team of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | Chief Operating Officer for North America of EDP Renováveis, S.A. |
| Member of the Management Team of EDP Renováveis, S.A. | |
| António Nogueira Leite | |
| Director of the Instituto Português de Relações Internacionais, UNL Director of Reditus, SGPS, S.A. Managing Director José de Mello, SGPS, S.A. Director of Companhia União Fabril CUF, SGPS, S.A. Director of Quimigal, S.A. Director of CUF - Químicos Industriais, S.A. Director of ADP, S.A.-CUF Adubos Director of Sociedades de Explosivos Civic, SEC, S.A. Director of Brisa, S.A. Director of Efacec Capital, SGPS, S.A. Director of Comitur, SGPS, S.A. Director of Comitur Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Expocomitur - Promoções e Gestão Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Herdade do Vale da Fonte - Sociedade Agrícola, Turística e Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Sociedade Imobiliária e Turística do Cojo, S.A. Director of Sociedade Imobiliária da Rua das Flores, nº 59, S.A. Director of José de Mello Saúde, SGPS, S.A. Vice-Chairperson of the Advisory Board of Banif Banco de Investimentos Chairperson of the General Supervisory Board of Opex, S.A. Member of the Advisory Board of IGCP Vice-Chairperson of Fórum para a Competitividade Director of José de Mello Investimentos, SGPS, S.A. Director of Fundação de Aljubarrota Chairperson of Associação Oceano XXI (cluster do Mar) |
|
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | |
| Member of the Executive Board of Directors of Banco Comercial Português, S.A. and several subsidiaries Director of Mague - SPGS, S.A. CEO of CIMPOR – Cimentos de Portugal, SGPS, S.A. |
|
| Gilles August | |
| Co-founder of August & Debouzy. He now manages the firm's corporate department. | |
| João Lopes Raimundo | |
| Chairperson of the Board of Banque BCP Luxembourg Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Banque BCP France Director of Banque Orive BCP Switzerland Managing Director of Banco Comercial Português Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Millenniun Angola Director of Banco Millennium BCP de Investimento Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Millennium Bank, NA (USA) Director of CIMPOR - Cimentos de Portugal SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Board of BCP Holdings USA, Inc Managing Director of Banco Comercial Português |
|
| João Manuel De Mello Franco | |
| Director of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Remunerations Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Evaluation Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Corporate Governance Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Sporting Clube de Portugal S.A.D. |
| Name | Position |
|---|---|
| Jorge Santos | |
| Full Professor of Economics at Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, da Universidade Técnica de Lisboa Member of the Assembly of Representatives of Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão da Universidade Técnica de Lisboa Coordinator of the PhD course in Economics at ISEG |
|
| José Araújo e Silva | |
| Director of Corticeira Amorim, SGPS, S.A. Member of the Executive Committee of Corticeira, SGPS, S.A. Director of Caixa Geral de Depósitos |
|
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | |
| Chairperson and CEO of Liberbank S.A. Chairperson of Banco de Castilla-La Mancha Chairperson of Cajastur Chairperson of Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. Chairperson of Naturgas Energía, S.A. Director of EDP Renewables Europe, SL Member of the Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis, S.A. Representative of Peña Rueda, SL in the Board of Directors of Enagas, S.A. Member of the Board of Confederación Española de Cajas de Ahorro Member of the Board of UNESA |
|
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | |
| Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors Banco Espirito Santo de Investimento, S.A. Member of the Executive Committee of Banco Espirito Santo de Investimento, S.A. |
IN COMPANIES NOT BELONGING TO THE SAME GROUP AS EDP RENOVÁVEIS, S.A. OR EDP – ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL, S.A.
| Name | Position |
|---|---|
| António Mexia | |
| Ana Maria Fernandes | Member of the General Supervisory Board of Banco Comercial Português, S.A. |
| N/A | |
| João Manso Neto | |
| Nuno Alves | N/A |
| N/A | |
| Rui Teixeira | |
| N/A | |
| João Paulo Costeira | N/A |
| Luis Adão da Fonseca | |
| N/A | |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | N/A |
| António Nogueira Leite | |
| Director of the Instituto Português de Relações Internacionais, UNL Director of Reditus, SGPS, S.A. Managing Director José de Mello, SGPS, S.A. Director of Companhia União Fabril CUF, SGPS, S.A. Director of Quimigal, S.A. Director of CUF – Químicos Industriais, S.A. Director of ADP, S.A.-CUF Adubos Director of Sociedades de Explosivos Civic, SEC, S.A. Director of Brisa, S.A. Director of Efacec Capital, SGPS, S.A. Director of Comitur, SGPS, S.A. Director of Comitur Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Expocomitur – Promoções e Gestão Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Herdade do Vale da Fonte – Sociedade Agrícola, Turística e Imobiliária, S.A. Director of Sociedade Imobiliária e Turística do Cojo, S.A. Director of Sociedade Imobiliária da Rua das Flores, nº 59, S.A. Director of José de Mello Saúde, SGPS, S.A. Vice-Chairperson of the Advisory Board of Banif-Banco de Investimentos Chairperson of the General Supervisory Board of Opex, S.A. Member of the Advisory Board of IGCP Vice-Chairperson of Fórum para a Competitividade Director of José de Mello Investimentos, SGPS, S.A. Director of Fundação de Aljubarrota Chairperson of Associação Oceano XXI (cluster do Mar) |
|
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | |
| CEO of Cimpor – Cimentos de Portugal, SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of Cimpor Inversiones, S.A. Chairperson of Sociedade de Investimento Cimpor Macau, S.A. Manager of Deal Winds – Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda |
|
| Gilles August | Co-founder of August & Debouzy. He now manages the firm's corporate department. |
| João Lopes Raimundo | |
| Director of CIMPOR – Cimentos de Portugal SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Board of BCP Holdings USA, Inc Managing Director of Banco Comercial Português |
|
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | |
| Director of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Evaluation Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Member of the Corporate Governance Committee of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A. Chairperson of the Audit Committee of Sporting Clube de Portugal S.A.D. |
|
| Jorge Santos | |
| Full Professor of Economics at Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, da Universidade Técnica de Lisboa Member of the Assembly of Representatives of Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão da Universidade Técnica de Lisboa Coordinator of the PhD course in Economics at ISEG |
|
| José Araújo e Silva | |
| Director of Corticeira Amorim, SGPS, S.A. Member of the Executive Committee of Corticeira, SGPS, S.A. Director of Caixa Geral de Depósitos Director of Artlant, S.A. Director of Caetano Auto SGPS Director of Cartolinas do Prado |
|
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | Chairperson and CEO of Liberbank, S.A. |
| Chairperson of Banco de Castilla-La Mancha Chairperson of Cajastur Representative of Peña Rueda, SL in the Board of Directors of Enagas, S.A. Member of the Board of Confederación Española de Cajas de Ahorro Member of the Board of UNESA |
|
| Rafael Caldeira Valverde | Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors Banco Espirito Santo de Investimento, S.A. |
| Member of the Executive Committee of Banco Espirito Santo de Investimento, S.A. |
| IN COMPANIES BELONGING TO THE SAME GROUP AS EDP - ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL S.A. | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| António Mexia |
Nuno Alves |
Ana Maria Fernandes |
João Manso Neto |
Manuel Ménendez Menéndez |
Rui Teixeira |
João Paulo Costeira |
Luis Adão da Fonseca |
Gabriel Alonso |
|
| EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. | CEBD | D | D | D | – | – | – | – | - |
| EDP – Gestão da Produção de Energia, S.A. |
– | – | – | CBD | – | – | – | - | - |
| EDP – Energias do Brasil, S.A. | CBD | D | D | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP – Estudos e Consultoria, S.A. | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP – Imobiliária e Participações, S.A. | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Valor – Gestão Integrada de Serviços, S.A. |
– | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Sãvida – Medicina Apoiada, S.A. | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SCS – Serviços Complementares de Saúde, S.A. |
– | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Energia RE S.A. | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A. | – | D | D | VCBD/CEO | CBD | – | – | – | – |
| Hidrocantábrico Energia, SAU | CBD | ||||||||
| Eléctrica de la Ribera de Ebro, SL | CBD | ||||||||
| Naturgás Energia Grupo, S.A. | – | – | – | VCBD | CBD | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Gás – SGPS, S.A. | – | – | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – |
| Balwerk – Consultadoria Económica e Participações, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. |
– | M | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP – Energias de Portugal Sociedade Anónima, Sucursal en España |
PR | PR | PR | PR | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Gás.com – Comércio de Gás Natural, S.A. |
D | – | – | – | – | – | |||
| EDP Finance BV | R | R | R | R | – | – | – | – | – |
| Electricidade de Portugal Finance Company Ireland Lt. |
– | D | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Empresa Hidroeléctrica do Guadiana, S.A. |
– | – | – | CBD | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Projectos SGPS, S.A. | – | – | – | D | – | – | – | – | – |
| EDP Energia Ibérica S.A. | D | – | – | – | – | – | |||
| EDP Inovacão, S.A. | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | D | – |
| Operacão e Manutencão Industrial, S.A. | – | – | – | – | – | – | D | – | – |
CEBD – Chairperson Executive Board of Directors CBD – Chairperson of the Board of Directors/ CEO – Chief Executive Officer
D - Director
R – Representative
PR - Permanent Representative
António Mexia Nuno Alves Ana Maria Fernandes João Manso Neto Manuel Ménendez Menéndez Rui Teixeira João Paulo Costeira Luis Adão da Fonseca Gabriel Alonso EDP Renewables North America LLC – – – – – – – – CEO EDP Renewables Europe, S.L. – – CBD – D D D D – ENEOP – Eólicas de Portugal, S.A. – – CBD – – – – – – EDP Renováveis Brasil, S.A. – – CBD – – D – D EDP Renováveis Portugal, S.A. – – – – – D CBD D – EDP Renewables Romania SRL – – – – – – CBD D – EDP Renewables UK Ltd – – – – – –DD– EDP Renewables France SA – – – – – – CBD – – EDP Renewables Polska, SP, z.o.o. – – – – – D D D– EDP Renewables Italia, SRL – – – – – – D D– ENEOP 2 S.A – – – – – – CBD – – Generaciones Especiales I SL – – – – –DDD– EDP Renewables Canada, Ltd –––––D D– Greenwind, S.A. – – – – – – CBD – –
CBD – Chairperson of the Board of Directors
CEO – Chief Executive Officer
D – Director MSB – Member of the Supervisory Board
PGMS – President of the General Meeting of Shareholders
M – Manager
NOTE: This Annex contains information regarding all the main companies of the EDPR Group. The information regarding all other affiliate companies where the members of the Board of Directors hold a position is available in the Annual Accounts on Note 41.

Born on July 12th, 1957. He received a degree in Economics from Université de Genève (Switzerland) in 1980, where he was also Assistant Lecturer in the Department of Economics. He was a postgraduate lecturer in European Studies at Universidade Católica. He was also a member of the governing boards of Universidade Nova de Lisboa and of Universidade Católica, where he was Director from 1982 to 1995. Served as Assistant to the Secretary of State for Foreign Trade from 1986 until 1988. From 1988 to 1990 served as Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors of ICEP (Portuguese Institute for Foreign Trade). From 1990 to 1998 was Director of Banco Espírito Santo de Investimentos and, in 1998, was appointed Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Gás de Portugal and Transgás. In 2000 joined Galp Energia as Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors. From 2001 to 2004, was the Executive Chairperson of Galp Energia and Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Petrogal, Gás de Portugal, Transgás and Transgás-Atlântico. In 2004, was appointed Minister of Public Works, Transport and Communication for Portugal's 16th Constitutional Government. He also served as Chairperson of the Portuguese Energy Association (APE) from 1999 to 2002, member of the Trilateral Commission from 1992 to 1998, Vice-Chairperson of the Portuguese Industrial Association (AIP) and Chairperson of the General Supervisory Board of Ambelis. He was also a Government representative to the EU working group for the trans-European network development. In January 2008, was appointed member of the General Supervisory Board of Banco Comercial Portugues, S.A. having before integrated the Superior Board of this Bank. On 30th March 2006, was appointed Chairperson of EDP's Executive Board of Directors to start the term of office on 30th June 2006. He was reappointed on 15th April 2009.
(Vice-Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer)

Born on 1st November, 1962. She graduated in Economics from the Faculty of Economics at Oporto (1986). She received a postgraduate degree in Finance from the Faculty of Economics of Universidade do Porto and an MBA from the Escola de Gestão do Porto (1989). She lectured at the Faculty of Economics of Universidade do Porto from 1989 until 1991. Began her professional career in 1986 at Conselho – Gestão e Investimentos, a company of the Banco Português do Atlântico Group, in the capital markets, investments and business restructuring field. In 1989 began working at Efisa, Sociedade de Investimentos, in the area of corporate finance, and was later made a director of Banco Efisa. In 1992 joined the Grupo Banco de Fomento e Exterior as director in the area of investment banking and was Head "Corporate Finance" at BPI between 1996 and 1998. In 1998 joined Gás de Portugal as Director of Strategic Planning and M&A and, in 2000, became Director of Strategy and Portfolio Management of Galp Business. She later became President of Galp Power and Director of Transgás. From 2004 until 2006 was director of the Board of Galp Energia. On 30th March 2006, was appointed member of EDP's Executive Board of Directors to start the term of office on 30th June 2006. She was reappointed on 15th April 2009.

Born on April 2nd, 1958. He graduated in Economics from Instituto Superior de Economia (1981) and received a post-graduate degree in European Economics from Universidade Católica Portuguesa (1982). He also completed a professional education course through the American Bankers Association (1982), the academic component of the master's degree programme in Economics at the Faculty of Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa and, in 1985, the "Advanced Management Program for Overseas Bankers" at the Wharton School in Philadelphia. From 1988 to 1995 worked at Banco Português do Atlântico, occupying the positions of Supervisor for the International Credit Division, Head of the International Credit Division, Department Director, Deputy Central Director for International Management and Central Director of Financial Management and Retail Commerce South. From 1995 to 2002 worked at the Banco Comercial Português, where he held the posts of General Director of Financial Management, General Manager of Large Institutional Businesses, General Manager of the Treasury, member of the Board of Directors of BCP Banco de Investimento and Vice-Chairperson of BIG Bank Gdansk. From 2002 to 2003, in Banco Português de Negócios, was the Chairperson of BPN Serviços ACE, Director of BPN SGPS, Director of Sociedade Lusa de Negócios and a member of the Board of Banco Efisa. He is still a voting Member of the OMEL Board of Directors. From 2003 to 2005 worked at EDP as Director-General and Administrator of EDP Produção. In 2005 was appointed Adviser at HC Energía, Chairperson of Genesa and Director of Naturgas Energia and OMEL. On 30th March 2006, was appointed member of EDPS' Executive Board of Directors to start the term of office on 30th June 2006. He was reappointed on 15th April 2009.

Born on April 1st, 1958. He received an undergraduate degree in Engineering and Naval Construction in 1980 and an MBA in 1985 from the University of Michigan. He began his professional career in 1988 as Supervisor in the Studies and Planning Directorate at Banco Comercial Português, where he took on the role of Sub-Director of Financial Investment in 1990. In 1991, became Director of Investor Relations. In 1994, became the Director of Private Retail Coordination. In 1996, served as Director of Capital Markets for Banco CISF, the investment bank of Banco Comercial Português, and was promoted to Director of Investment Banking in 1997. In 1999, became Chairperson of the Board of Directors of CISF Dealer, where he remained until 2000, when became Director of Milleniumbcp Investimento (formerly Banco CISF), responsible for Capital Markets and Treasury of the BCP Group. Has served as Director-General of BCP from 2000 to 2006. On 30th March 2006, was appointed member of EDP's Executive Board of Directors to start the term of office on 30th June 2006. He was reappointed on 15th April 2009.


Born in 1972. Mr. Teixeira is a member of the Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis, S.A., member of the Executive Committee, member of the Management Team and is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. From 1996 to 1997, Mr. Teixeira was assistant director of the commercial naval department of Gellweiler – Sociedade Equipamentos Maritimos e Industriaies, Lda. From 1997 to 2001, Mr. Teixeira worked as a project manager and ship surveyor for Det Norske Veritas, with responsibilities for offshore structures, shipbuilding and ship repair. Between 2001 and 2004, Mr. Teixeira was a consultant at McKinsey & Company, focussing on energy, shipping and retail banking. From 2004 to 2007, he headed the corporate planning and control division within the EDP Group. In 2007 Mr. Teixeira has also served as Chief Financial Officer of EDP Renewables Europe SL (former NEO). He was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company in 2008. Mr. Teixeira is also a Director on the board of directors of a number of subsidiaries of the Company's Group. Mr. Teixeira holds a master of science degree in naval architecture from the Institute Superior Técnico de Lisboa and a master of business administration degree from the Universidade Nova de Lisboa.

Born in 1965. He was the Commercial Director of Portgás from 1992 to 1998. In 1998 he entered Galpenergia Group (Portugal's National Oil & Gas Company), where he held several positions, as General manager of Lisboagás (Lisbon's Natural gás LDC), Managing Director of Transgás Industria (Liberalized wholesale customers), or Managing Director of Lusitaniagás (Natural gas LDC). He also was a member of the Management Team of GalpEmpresas and Galpgás. In 2006 he became Executive Board Member for Natural Gas Distribution and Marketing (Portugal and Spain). In 2007 he joined EDP Renováveis S.A., where he serves currently as Chief Operating Officer for Europe of EDP Renováveis S.A., member of the Management Team, member of the Executive Committee and Executive Board Member of EDP Renováveis S.A.. He is also Vice-President of the European Wind Association and the Spanish Wind Association (Asociación Empresarial Eólica).
He holds a degree in Electrical Engineering by the Faculdade Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, and a Master in Business Administration by IEP/ESADE (Oporto and Barcelona). He also studied the Executive Development Program at École des HEC (Université de Lausanne, 1997), the Strategic Leadership Development Program at INSEAD (Fontainebleau, 2002) and the Advanced Management Program of IESE (Barcelona, 2004).

Born in 1975. In 1998 Mr. Adão da Fonseca held the position of assistant lecturer in the Economics and Business Sciences School and in the Human Sciences School of Universidade Católica Portuguesa, until leaving later the same year to become a consultant for McKinsey & Company. Mr. Adão da Fonseca left McKinsey & Company in July 2000 to enter into a Master in Business Administration degree program at INSEAD, which he concluded with distinction in 2001. He then assumed the role of management for renewable energy development projects with the EDP Group M&A and Business Development Division. Mr. Adão da Fonseca was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of NEO (now EDP Renewables Europe SL) in January 2005, a position he held until becoming Chief Development Officer of EDP Renewables Europe SL (former NEO) in 2007. Currently he is member of the Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis S.A. and EDP Inovação.
Mr. Adão da Fonseca holds a master's degree in economics from the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, a Master of Business Administration degree from INSEAD, as well as a postgraduate degree in leading change and organizational renewal from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. In 2011 Mr. Adão da Fonseca has also received a Master Degree for Risk Management from the Stern School of Management – NYU.

Born in 1973. He has been working in the wind energy industry for over 14 years in several countries in Europe, North America and North Africa.
Gabriel joined EDP in early 2007 as Managing Director for North America, where he led EDP's entrance into the United States renewables arena through EDP's acquisition of Horizon Wind Energy from Goldman Sachs, the largest renewable energy transaction to date. He was a key member of the initial public offering (IPO) of EDPR in June 2008. He served in EDPR NA as Chief Development Officer (CDO) and Chief Operating Officer (COO), responsible for overseeing development, engineering, construction, energy management, procurement and operations and maintenance.
Gabriel Alonso is currently Chief Executive Officer for EDP Renewables North America LLC (EDPR NA), member of the Executive Committee and Board of Directors of EDP Renewables S.A. (EDPR), and member of the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors of the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA).
He holds a law degree and a Master of Science degree in economics, each from the University of Deusto in Spain, and has completed the Advanced Management Program at The University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

Born in 1962. Between 1988 and 1996, held the position of consultant to several national and international institutions, including the Bank of Portugal, the OECD and the EC. Between 1995 and 1998, was general secretary of APRITEL, and between 2000 and 2002 was a Director of APRITEL. From 1997 to 1999, was a Director of Soporcel, S.A., between 1998 and 1999, was a Director of Papercel, S.A., and in 1999, was a Director of MC Corretagem, S.A. Also in 1999, was appointed chairperson of the board of directors of Bolsa de Valores de Lisboa and became a member of the executive committee of Associação de Bolsas Ibero Americanas. Since 2000, Mr. Nogueira Leite has been a member of the consultative council of Associação Portuguesa para o Desenvolvimento das Comunicações. Between 2000 and 2002, was a consultant for Vodafone – Telecomunicações Pessoais,S.A., between 2001 and 2002, was a consultant of GE Capital, and in 2002 was a member of the consultative council of IGCP. Since 2002, he has held various positions within the José de Mello group and has held Directorships with numerous other entities including Reditus, SGPS, S.A., Quimigal, S.A, Brisa, S.A., ADP, S.A., Comitur, SGPS, S.A., Comitur Imobiliária, S.A., Expocomitur – Promoções e Gestão Imobiliária, S.A., Herdade do Vale da Fonte – Sociedade Agrícola, Turística e Imobiliária, S.A., e SGPS, S.A., Efacec Capital, SGPS, S.A., and Cuf – Químicos Industriais, S.A. He held a further Directorship with Sociedade de Explosivos Civis, SEC, S.A. from 2007 to March 2008. Between October 1999 and August 2000, was Secretary of State for Treasury and Finance and Governor Substitute of the European Bank of Investments. Additionally held positions with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Monetary Fund and was a member of the Financial and Economic Council of the European Union. He was vice-chairperson of the consultative council of Banif Banco de Investimento, S.A., and chairperson of the general and supervision council of OPEX, S.A. He is Chairperson of Associação Oceano XXI (cluster do Mar). Since 2008 is Non-Executive Director of EDPR'S Board of Directors and member of the Related-Party Transactions Committee.
Has an undergraduate degree in economics from the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, a master of science degree in economics, and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Illinois.

Born in 1960, he graduated with the highest grade on Business Administration in 1982 from Universidade Católica Portuguesa, where he returned as assistant professor in 1984 and 1985. Between 1982 and 1990 he held positions of analyst, manager and director of Locapor (Leasing), CISF and Hispano Americano Sociedade de Investimentos. Between 1990 and 2000 he developed his main activity at Banco Mello, as Executive Member of the Board of Directors since 1990 and as CEO between 1993 and 2000, being after 1997 also Vice-Chairperson, and, over that period, Chairperson or Director of several banks and financial companies' part of the Banco Mello group. He was simultaneously member of the top management team of the José de Mello group and a non-executive director of Insurance Company Império. Between 2000 and 2008, he was a member of the Executive Board of Directors of Banco Comercial Português, S.A., and in this capacity was responsible for the activities of the banking group in Central, Eastern & South-eastern Europe and in investment banking. Since 2010 he is CEO of Cimpor, a large multinational cement group. He is also Member of the Remuneration Committee of Portugal Telecom SA since 2009 and Member of the Advisory Boards of the Católica Lisbon's Master in Finance since 2006 and of Nova Business & Economics since 2009. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors, was member of the Audit and Control Committee from 2008 till 2011 and in 2011 was appointed member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee.

Born in 1957, between 1984 and 1986, was a Lawyer at Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley & Casey Law Office in Washington DC. Between 1986 and 1991he was an Associate and later became Partner at Baudel, Salès, Vincent & Georges Law Firm in Paris. In 1991 he became a Partner at Salès Vincent Georges, where he stayed until 1994. In 1995 he co-founded August & Debouzy Law firm where he is presently working as the manager of the firm's corporate department. Has been a Lecturer at École Supérieure des Sciences Economiques et Commerciales and at Collège de Polytechnique and is currently giving lecturres at CNAM (Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers). He is Knight of the Lègion d'Honneur. Since 2009 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors.
He has a Master in Laws from Georgetown University Law Center in Washington DC (1986); a Post-graduate degree in Corporate Law from University of Paris II Phantéon, DEA (1984) and a Master in Private Law from the same University (1981). He graduated from the Ècole Supérieure des Sciences Economiques et Commerciales (ESSEC).


Born in 1960. Between 1982 and 1985, he was senior auditor of BDO – Binder Dijker Otte Co. Between 1987 and 1990, he was director of Banco Manufactures Hanover (Portugal), S.A. and between 1990 and 1993 was a member of the board of TOTTAFactor, S.A. (Grupo Banco Totta e Açores) and Valores Ibéricos, SGPS, S.A. In 1993, he held Directorships with Nacional Factoring, da CISF – Imóveis and CISF Equipamentos. Between 1995 and 1997 he was a Director of CISF – Banco de Investimento and a Director of Nacional Factoring. In 1998, he was appointed to the board of several companies, including Leasing Atlântico, Comercial Leasing, Factoring Atlântico, Nacional Leasing and Nacional Factoring. From 1999 to 2000, he was a Director of BCP Leasing, BCP Factoring and Leasefactor SGPS. From 2000 to 2003, He was appointed Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Banque BCP (Luxemburg) and Chairperson of the Executive Committee of Banque BCP (France). Between 2003 and 2006 he was a member of management of Banque Prive BCP (Switzerland) and was general director of private banking of BCP. Since 2006, he has been a Director of Banco Millennium BCP de Investimento, and general Director of Banco Comercial Português and Vice-Chairperson and CEO of Millenniumbcp bank, NA. Mr. Lopes Raimundo is presently Director of CIMPOR - Cimentos de Portugal SGPS, S.A., and Chairperson of the Board of BCP Holdings USA, Inc. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors, was member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee from 2008 till 2011 and in 2011 was appointed member of the Audit and Control Committee.
Has an undergraduate degree in company management and administration from Universidade Católica Portuguesa de Lisboa, and a master of business administration degree from INSEAD.

Born in 1946. Between 1986 and 1989, he was a member of the management council of Tecnologia das Comunicações, Lda. Between 1989 to 1994, he was chairperson of the board of directors of Telefones de Lisboa e Porto, S.A., and between 1993 to 1995 he was chairperson of Associação Portuguesa para o Desenvolvimento das Comunicações. From 1994 to 1995, he was chairperson of the board of directors of Companhia Portuguesa Rádio Marconi and additionally was chairperson of the board of directors of Companhia Santomense de Telecomunicações e da Guiné Telecom. From 1995 to 1997, he was vice-chairperson of the board of directors and chairperson of the executive committee of Lisnave (Estaleiros Navais) S.A. Between 1997 and 2001, he was CEO and in the last year chairperson of the board of directors of Soponata and was a director and member of the audit committee of International Shipowners Reinsurance, Co S.A. Between 2001 and 2004, he was vice-chairperson of José de Mello Imobiliária SGPS, S.A. Since 1998, he has been a director of Portugal Telecom SGPS, S.A., chairperson of the audit committee since 2007, member of the corporate governance committee since 2006 and member of the evaluation committee since 2008. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors, Chairperson of the Audit and Control Committee and member of the Related-Party Transactions Committee.
He was member of the remuneration committee of Portugal telecom, SGPS, S.A. between 2003 and 2008.
Since 2011 he is also chairperson of the audit committee of Sporting Clube de Portugal S.A.D.
He has an undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering from Instituto Superior Técnico. He additionally holds a certificate in strategic management and company boards and is the holder of a grant of Junta de Energia Nuclear.

Born in 1951. From 1997 to 1998, coordinated the committee for evaluation of the EC Support Framework II and was a member of the committee for the elaboration of the ex-ante EC Support Framework III. From 1998 to 2000, he was Chairperson of the Unidade de Estudos sobre a Complexidade na Economia and from 1998 to 2002 was Chairperson of the scientific council of Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão of the Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. From 2001 to 2002, he coordinated the committee for the elaboration of the Strategic Programme of Economic and Social Development for the Peninsula of Setúbal. Since 2007, he has been co-ordinator of the masters program in economics. Since 2009, he has been President of the Economics Department of Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão of the Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (ISEG). In December 2011 was elected president of the general assembly of IDEFE. Since 2008 is a Non- Executive Directors of EDPR's Board of Directors, Chairperson of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee and in 2011 was appointed member of the Audit and Control Committee
He has an undergraduate degree in economics from Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, a master degree in economics from the University of Bristol and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Kent. He additionally has a doctorate degree in economics from the Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão of Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, and has consequently held the positions of Professor Auxiliar and Professor Associado with Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. He has been appointed as university professor (catedrático) of Universidade Técnica de Lisboa and is the President of the Department of Economics at ISEG.
46

Born in 1951. Began his professional career as an assistant lecturer at Faculdade de Economia do Porto and in 1987 and 1988 he was responsible for the "Gestão Financeira Internacional" degree at the same University. From 1980 to 1983 he held a part-time position as technician for Comissão de Coordenação da Região Norte., and from 1991 he was invited to be a lecturer at Universidade Católica do Porto.He has since held the position of director of several companies, including of Banco Espírito Santo e Comercial de Lisboa and Soserfin – Sociedade Internacional de Serviços Financeiros – Oporto group. He has been involved in the finance and management coordination of Sonae Investimentos SGPS, was executive director of Sonae Participações Financeiras, SGPS, S.A. and was vice-Chairperson of Sonae Indústria, SGPS, S.A. He has additionally held directorships with Tafisa, S.A., Spread SGPS, S.A. and Corticeira Amorim, SGPS. He presently serves on the board of directors of Caixa Geral de Depósitos, S.A, and is President of Caixa Seguros e Saúde, Caixa Leasing and Factoring, and Locarent, as well as Non Executive Director in several other companies. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors.
Has an undergraduate degree in economics from the Faculdade de Economia do Porto and has obtained certificates from Universidade de Paris IX, Dauphine and the Midland Bank International banker's course in London.

Born in 1960. He is Chairperson and CEO of Liberbank S.A., a financial institution formed by the integration of the financial businesses of Caja de Ahorros de Asturias, Caja de Extremadura and Caja Cantabria, as well as Chairperson of Cajastur and Chairperson of Banco de Castilla-La Mancha. He is a member of the board of directors of CECA and of ENAGAS, on behalf of Liberbank Group. He is also Chairperson of HC Energia and Naturgás Energía and member of the Board of Directors of EDP Renováveis S.A. and EDP Renewables Europe SLU, and of UNESA (the Spanish association of the electricity industry). Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors.
He is a university professor in the Department of Business Administration and Accounting at the University of Oviedo; has a PhD in Economic Sciences and a degree in Economics and in Business Administration, both from the University of Oviedo. He has supervised several doctoral thesis', developing research work and has participated as a speaker in many courses and seminars. His main research areas are the efficiency in credit institutions, management control in decentralized companies and those in sectors with regulated economies. He is also author of many books and technical articles about the aforementioned matters.

Born in 1953. In 1987, he joined Banco Espírito Santo de Investimento, S.A. and was the Director responsible for financial services management, client management, structured financing management, capital markets management, and for the department for origination and information; between 1991 and 2005 he was also Director and Member of the Executive Committee. In March 2005, he was appointed as vice-chairperson of the board of Directors of Banco Espírito Santo de Investimento, S.A. and formed part of the executive committee of the company. He is Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Directors and Member of the Executive Committee of Banco Espírito Santo de Investimento, S.A. Director of BES Investimento do Brasil, S.A.; ESSI, SGPS, S.A.; ESSI COMUNICAÇÕES, SGPS, S.A.; ESSI INVESTIMENTOS, S.A. and Espírito Santo Investment Holdings Limited. Since 2008 is a Non-Executive Director of EDPR's Board of Directors and member of the Nominations and Remunerations Committee.
Has an undergraduate degree in economics from the Instituto de Economia da Faculdade Técnica de Lisboa.

Born in 1955. In 1981, he joined Soto de Ribera Power Plant, which was owned by a consortium comprising Electra de Viesgo, Iberdrola and Hidrocantábrico, as legal counsel. In 1995, he was appointed general counsel of Soto de Ribera Power Plant, and also chief of administration and human resources of the consortium. In 1999, he was appointed as legal counsel at Hidrocantábrico, and in 2003 was appointed general counsel of Hidrocantábrico and also a member of its management committee. Presently serves as general counsel of the Company, as secretary of the Board, and is also Director and/or secretary on Boards of Directors of a number the Company's subsidiaries in Europe.
Holds a master's degree in law from the University of Oviedo.
| Board Member | Direct | Indirect | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| António Luis Guerra Nunes Mexia | 3,880 | 320 | 4,200 |
| Ana Maria Machado Fernandes | 1,510 | 0 | 1,510 |
| João Manuel Manso Neto | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nuno Maria Pestana de Almeida Alves | 5,000 | 0 | 5,000 |
| Rui Manuel Rodrigues Lopes Teixeira | 10,135 | 370 | 10,505 |
| João Paulo Nogueira de Sousa Costeira | 3,000 | 0 | 3,000 |
| Luis de Abreu Castelo-Branco Adão da Fonseca | 1,200 | 0 | 1,200 |
| Gabriel Alonso Imaz | 18,503 | 0 | 18,503 |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda | 310 | 310 | 620 |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco | 380 | 0 | 380 |
| Jorge Manuel Azevedo Henriques dos Santos | 200 | 0 | 200 |
| José Fernando Maia de Araújo e Silva | 80 | 0 | 80 |
| Rafael Caldeira de Castel-Branco Valverde | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| António do Pranto Nogueira Leite | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| João José Belard da Fonseca Lopes Raimundo | 170 | 670 | 840 |
| Manuel Menéndez Menéndez | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gilles August | 0 | 0 | 0 |
www.edprenovaveis.com



Membersofthe-Boardof-Directorsofthe-Company-EDP-Renováveis,-S.A.-
Totheextentofourknowledge,theinformationreferredtoinsubparagrapha)ofparagraph-1of-Article- 245 of- DecreeLaw no.- 357A/2007 of- October- 31 and other documents relating to the submission of- accounts required by current regulations have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting- standards, reflecting a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and results of- EDP- Renováveis,-S.A.andthecompaniesincludedinitsscopeofconsolidationandthemanagementreportfairly- presents the evolution of business performance and position of- EDP- Renováveis,- S.A. and the companies- includedinitsscopeofconsolidation,containingadescriptionoftheprincipalrisksanduncertaintiesthat- theyface.--
-
-
Lisbon,-February-28,-2012.-
-
| António Luís Guerra Nunes Mexia |
João Manuel Manso Neto |
|---|---|
| Ana Maria Fernandes Machado |
Nuno Maria Pestana de Almeida Alves |
| Rui Manuel Rodrigues Lopes Teixeira |
João Paulo Nogueira da Sousa Costeira |
| Luis de Abreu CasteloBranco Adão da Fonseca |
Gabriel Alonso Imaz |
| José Fernando Maia de Araújo e Silva |
Manuel Menéndez Menéndez |
| João Manuel de Mello Franco |
Jorge Manuel Azevedo Henriques dos Santos |
| Francisco José Queiroz de Barros de Lacerda |
António do Pranto Nogueira Leite |
| Gilles August |
João José Belard da Fonseca Lopes Raimundo |
-
-
Rafael-Caldeirade-CastelBranco-Valverde-
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.