Annual Report • Dec 10, 2021
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Annual Report and Accounts 2021
easyJet aims to make travel easy, enjoyable and affordable for customers, whether it is for leisure or business.
We use our cost advantage and leading positions in primary airports to deliver low fares on an unrivalled network, seamlessly connecting Europe with the warmest welcome in the sky.
Our well-established and proven business model provides a strong foundation to drive long term shareholder returns.
Safe and responsible
On our customers' side
In it together
Always efficient
Forward thinking
The 2021 financial year has been volatile with Covid-19 posing the most significant threat to the aviation industry in its history.
Our business model and actions undertaken in the year mean that we are poised to take advantage of growth opportunities in the future.
easyJet has an outstanding network of #1 and #2 positions in the primary airports around Europe, which customers favour. Customers are increasingly looking for value for money and are prioritising leisure travel, where we are particularly well placed.
We were the world's first major airline to offset the carbon emissions from the fuel used for all flights and we continue to work tirelessly to minimise carbon across our operations.
VISIT OUR WEBSITE FOR MORE INVESTOR INFORMATION https://corporate.easyJet.com/investors A Tribute from the Board of Directors
John Barton
Shortly after the signing of the annual report and accounts on 30 November 2021, John Barton sadly passed away. John was our Chairman for nearly nine years, and only stepped down from the Board on 1 December.
John was a man of great integrity who was very much respected and liked by everyone across the Company. He was a distinguished Chair and made an outstanding contribution to the Company during his tenure.
On behalf of all of his former colleagues at easyJet and the Board, we send our heartfelt sympathies to John's family.
He will be remembered with greatest respect and admiration.
6 December 2021
| Chairman's Letter Highlights |
2 4 |
|---|---|
| Purpose | 6 |
| Chief Executive's Review | 8 |
| Business Model | 12 |
| Interview With Our Chairman, CEO, and CFO |
14 |
| Market Review | 16 |
| Our Strategy | 18 |
| Key Performance Indicators | 24 |
| Stakeholder Engagement | 26 |
| Sustainability | 38 |
| Non-Financial Information Statement |
62 |
| Financial Review | 66 |
| Risk | 78 |
| Governance | |
| Chairman's Statement on Corporate Governance |
96 |
| Board of Directors | 98 |
| Airline Management Board | 102 |
| Corporate Governance Report | 105 |
| Directors' Remuneration Report | 130 |
| Directors' Report | 154 |
| Statement of Directors' Responsibilities |
158 |
| Financials | |
| Independent Auditors' Report to the Members of easyJet plc |
159 |
| Consolidated Accounts | 170 |
| Notes to the Accounts | 175 |
| Company Accounts | 213 |
| Notes to the Consolidated Company Accounts |
216 |
| Five-Year Summary | 219 |
| Glossary – Alternative | 220 |
| Performance Measures | |
| Glossary | 222 |
| Shareholder Information | 223 |
The pandemic continued to cast a shadow over the whole aviation sector throughout the 2021 financial year with easyJet being unable to operate its fleet to anywhere near its full potential. This has put the whole company under considerable stress both operationally and financially.
Operationally we have continued to put a disciplined focus on cash generative flying, which has made running the flight schedule extremely challenging and clearly has had some impact on our customers. Financially we continued, in the early part of the year, to raise money through sale and leaseback deals on our largely owned fleet and increased borrowings. Of course, this put everyone in the business under pressure, added to which the necessary redundancy programme has made navigating our way through the year very challenging.
Despite these difficult times easyJet has maintained focus on preparing for post-pandemic conditions and driving the business forward.
The continued restrictions on travel imposed by governments in response to Covid-19 have had a devastating impact on air travel. Our focus has been on cash generative flying to minimise cash burn
while there was continued uncertainty due to the constantly changing environment. Travel restrictions were eased across much of Europe for the summer period where easyJet successfully maintained a rapid approach to match capacity to available demand, especially across UK domestics and mainland Europe.
The relaxation of restrictions in the fourth quarter was positive for easyJet, showing that the industry is moving forward and that easyJet is playing a significant role in this, with encouraging capacity levels and positive load factor momentum throughout the summer period. Capacity levels versus the 2019 financial year in the quarters were 18%, 9%, 17% and 58% which demonstrates the momentum building in the fourth quarter.
Revenue for the full year decreased to £1,458 million (2020: £3,009 million). The Group reported a headline loss before tax of £1,136 million (2020: £835 million) and basic headline loss per share of 166.9 pence (2020: 149.7 pence). Total loss before tax of £1,036 million (2020: £1,273 million) and a non-headline gain of £100 million (2019: £438 million loss) led to basic total loss per share of 159.0 pence (2020: 222.9 pence).
easyJet's dividend policy has been to pay shareholders 50% of headline profit after tax. Given that we made a loss this year, there will be no dividend paid for the 2021 financial year (2020: nil). The dividend policy will be reviewed by the Board during the 2022 financial year.
As we went through the first part of the year, the balance sheet came under pressure as we borrowed a significant amount. Despite this, we managed to maintain an investment grade balance sheet with the ratings agencies. The rights issue in September considerably reduced this pressure, although not returning us all the way back to our position pre-pandemic. The rights issue had a take up rate of over 93% which is an indication of the market's confidence in the financial strength of the Company.
Our strong business model, liquidity and unparalleled network mean we are well positioned for growth as we enter the recovery.
John Barton Non-Executive Chairman
There have been a number of changes to our Board during the year. Andrew Findlay stood down as Chief Financial Officer in February 2021, and we welcomed Kenton Jarvis as his successor. David Robbie joined the Board as an Independent Non-Executive Director in November 2020, and Charles Gurassa, Moya Greene DBE and Dr Anastassia Lauterbach stood down as Independent Non-Executive Directors in December 2020.
Following a thorough search led by the Nominations Committee, Stephen Hester joined us as an Independent Non-Executive Director and Chair designate on 1 September 2021 and will succeed me as Chair on 1 December 2021. This will therefore be my last report as your Chair, having served for nearly nine years on the Board. It has been a privilege to serve as Chair over that time, and I am proud of how easyJet has not only navigated through the pandemic but has adapted and built back stronger leaving it extremely well positioned for the future. I am delighted to handover to someone of Stephen Hester's calibre, and have been working closely with him to ensure that there is a smooth transition.
Further details of these changes are included in the Governance report on page 96.
No praise can be high enough for our employees. They have navigated us through the most difficult period the aviation industry has ever seen. The pressure has been at every level in the company and I am extremely grateful for the hard work and dedication all of our employees have given to easyJet.
There have also been a number of changes to the Airline Management Board. As mentioned above, we welcomed Kenton Jarvis as Chief Financial Officer, Stuart Birrell was appointed as Chief Data & Information Officer on 9 November 2020 and Sophie Dekkers was appointed Chief Commercial Officer on 16 December 2020. The Governance report on pages 102 to 104 sets out further detail on their experience.
Our overall sustainability goal is to lead and challenge global aviation towards net zero emissions while positively impacting our communities and our people. We continue to lead on this, as we committed to joining the Race to Zero while continuing to work on our Net Zero pathway to 2050.
We were the world's first major airline to offset the carbon emissions from the fuel used for all of our flights, and we continue to work tirelessly to minimise the carbon impact of our operations. We are supporting the development of new technologies – including hybrid, electric and hydrogen aircraft – so we can play our part in reinventing aviation to be more sustainable in the future. I am pleased with the progress that I have seen during the year, for example, at Bristol where we achieved a 97% reduction in CO2 emissions during our emissions-free turnaround trial.
This is my last Annual Report before I hand over to Stephen Hester. I feel I am leaving easyJet is in a strong position having navigated some stormy waters. The future is still unclear with the aftermath of Covid-19 still with us, however I believe our unique and established position in the industry and our strong financials has put easyJet is a great position to drive strong shareholder returns in the future.
John Barton Non-Executive Chairman
No praise can be high enough for our employees. They have navigated us through the most difficult period the aviation industry has ever seen.
Results have been heavily impacted by Covid-19 related lockdowns and government travel restrictions during the 2021 financial year.
(1,136) (835)
*2020 figure restated due to 2021 rights issue
| 2021 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2020 | |
| 2019 | 427 | |
| 2018 | 578 | |
| 2017 | 408 |
| 2021 | 458 | |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 706 | |
| 2019 | 1,376 | |
| 2018 | 1,210 | |
*2020 figure restated due to 2021 rights issue
Load factor
72.5%
2020: 87.2%
Seats flown
28.2m 2020: 55.1m
On-Time Performance
87%
2020: 84%
Number of primary airports where we hold a #1 or #2 position1
43 2020: 51
Routes operated2
927 2020: 981
Increase in fuel efficiency of neo aircraft compared to previous generation aircraft3
15%
Cost savings4,9
£512m
2020: £73m
Cash & money market deposits2,5
£3,536m
2020: £2,316m
Net debt2,8 £910m
2020: £1,125m
Number one airline brand in the UK, France & Switzerland2,6
no.1 or 2
Returning customers4,7
80% 2020: 87%
87% 2020: 84%
As at 30 September 2021 fewer airports closed. Airports where easyJet is the number one or number two carrier based on short-haul capacity. 2020 has been restated
Customer satisfaction score2
75% 2020: 75%
Percentage of seats booked by customers who made a booking in the preceding 24 months
Within net debt, borrowings of £300 million and lease liabilities of £189 million are payable within one year
Incremental cost savings versus 2020, including sustainable and tactical management actions
Our purpose defines who we are and guides our actions and decisions.
easyJet aims to make travel easy, enjoyable and affordable, whether it is for leisure or business.
We have a set of values which support and guide our strategy.
Safe and responsible
On our customers' side
In it together
Always efficient
Forward thinking
easyJet has prioritised six strategic initiatives that will continue to build on our structural advantages in the European aviation market and enable us to lead the recovery as travel returns.
These initiatives, underpinned by operational and digital safety and a continued focus on our people, will result in strong shareholder returns being delivered.
for more details please see page 19
Customer excellence
for more details please see page 20
for more details please see page 21
for more details please see page 21
for more details please see page 22
for more details please see page 23
To lead and challenge global aviation towards net zero emissions while positively impacting our communities and our people
We were the world's first major airline to offset the carbon emissions from the fuel used for all our flights, and continue to work tirelessly to minimise carbon across our operations
We are supporting the development of new technologies to achieve the decarbonisation of aviation as quickly as possible
We are working in a range of ways to take action on sustainability, beyond our carbon impact
We have continued to strengthen our organisation structures and expertise on sustainability. Initiatives include: expanding the Sustainability team; increasing the scope of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) reporting; development of an ISO 14001-compliant Environmental Management System; and additional oversight through committees and working groups, such as the Environmental Management Review Board.
for more details please see our Sustainability section on page 38
We measure our strategic progress through a mix of financial and non-financial KPIs.
Headline (loss)/profit before tax per seat
Headline (loss)/ earnings per share
Headline return on capital employed Customer satisfaction
On-Time Performance CO2 emissions per passenger kilometre
for more details please see our KPIs on page 24
It's too soon to say what impact Omicron may have on European travel and any restrictions that may result. However, we have prepared ourselves for periods of uncertainty such as this. While we've seen an increase in transfers with some softening of trading for the first quarter it is really encouraging to see that we are still seeing good levels of new bookings for the second half and we still expect that the fourth quarter of the 2022 financial year will see a return to near pre-pandemic levels of capacity as people take their long awaited summer holidays.
easyJet has optimised its network and reallocated aircraft to higher contributing bases alongside the launch of two additional seasonal bases. Our new ancillary products are delivering now, utilising innovative, industry leading dynamic revenue management to optimise returns. We have completed significant structural cost savings through seasonal contracts and improved productivity, while helping our customers navigate travel during the pandemic with our industry leading flexible policies.
Having successfully strengthened the balance sheet, we are fast tracking strategic investment and growth opportunities to deliver strong, sustainable shareholder returns. This is demonstrated by slot increases at Gatwick as well as additional slots which we have obtained in Linate, Lisbon and Porto alongside
the expansion of all seasonal bases in summer 2022. We will continue to focus on competing where it really matters, being relentlessly efficient and only investing where we can deliver strong, sustainable returns for our shareholders.
easyJet operated a disciplined flying programme throughout the 2021 financial year whilst continuing to deliver cost savings across every area of the business. As a result of the continued impact of Covid-19, easyJet has reported a headline loss before tax of £1,136 million.
Demand is accelerating with key periods such as October half term, ski and Christmas seeing strong performance. We continue to add capacity and expect to fly circa 70% of the 2019 financial year capacity in the second quarter of the 2022 financial year and expect that the fourth quarter summer capacity will be at near the 2019 financial year levels. Customers will look for value as the economy recovers and short haul leisure demand will lead the recovery. easyJet will use its inherent strengths combined with the improvements made during the pandemic to grow throughout the recovery, which is already underway, and beyond.
Total revenue decreased by 52% to £1,458 million (2020: £3,009 million) with capacity decreasing to 28.2 million seats (2020: 55.1 million) because of pandemic-related travel restrictions
and national lockdowns compared to 2020 where only the second half was impacted by the pandemic.
Passenger revenue decreased by 57% to £1,000 million (2020: £2,303 million) as we flew an optimised schedule with a focus on domestic and continental Europe where there was the least amount of restrictions over travel. Passenger RPS (Revenue Per Seat) decreased by 15% to £35.48 (2020: £41.78).
Ancillary revenue decreased by 35.1% to £458 million (2020: £706 million) as capacity reduced. However, ancillary revenue per seat increased by 20% to £15.06 (2020: £12.57) as we launched our new cabin bag proposition as well as our Standard Plus fare.
Group headline costs excluding fuel and FX gains decreased by 29% to £2,232 million (2020: £3,123 million), driven by a decrease in capacity flown and the material savings achieved across many areas of the business. easyJet has delivered £512 million of savings in the 2021 financial year as a result of the continued cost focus.
The cost per seat performance was driven overwhelmingly by the impact of Covid-19, which has resulted in dramatic capacity reductions. Airline headline cost per seat at constant currency increased by 33.0% to £91.82 (2020: £69.03). Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel and balance sheet revaluations at constant currency increased by 40.5% to £78.62 (2020: £55.94).
easyJet is emerging from the pandemic with renewed strength having transformed the business by optimising our network and flexibility, delivering significant cost savings while also step-changing ancillary revenue.
Johan Lundgren Chief Executive Officer
Non-headline items are material nonrecurring items or are items which do not reflect the trading performance of the business. These costs are separately disclosed and further detail can be found in the notes to the accounts.
A Group non-headline gain of £100 million (2020: £438 million loss) was recognised in the year. This consisted of a;
easyJet maintained a disciplined approach to capacity and cash management. As a result, cash burn (on a fixed costs plus capex basis) during 2021 was £36 million per week on average, outperforming the guidance for £40 million per week.
easyJet paid a further £455 million of customer refunds during 2021 (2020: £863 million).
easyJet's funding position remains strong with net debt as at 30 September 2021 of £910 million (2020: £1,125 million). This comprised cash and money market deposits of £3,536 million (2020: £2,316 million), debt of £3,367 million (2020: £2,731 million) and lease liabilities of £1,079 million (2020: £710 million).
As at 30 September 2021 easyJet has unrestricted access to £4.4 billion of liquidity, comprising cash and cash equivalents plus the undrawn portion of the UKEF facility and an undrawn \$400 million RCF. The remaining £300 million tranche of the CCFF was repaid in November 2021. easyJet has no other debt maturities outstanding until the 2023 financial year.
Liquidity of £4.4 billion (2020: £2.5 billion), represents material headroom compared to our revised liquidity policy being unearned revenue plus £500 million.
Headline return on capital employed (ROCE) for 2021 fell to negative 25.5% (2020: negative 19.9%). Total ROCE is negative 22.4% (2020: negative 23.0%). easyJet will use its inherent strengths combined with the improvements made during the pandemic to grow throughout the recovery.
easyJet's total fleet as at 30 September 2021 comprised 308 aircraft (30 September 2020: 342 aircraft) with the decrease driven principally by the redelivery to lessors of A319 aircraft. The average gauge of the fleet is now 178 seats per aircraft, compared to 177 seats at 30 September 2020. The average age of the fleet increased slightly to 8.6 years (30 September 2020: 8.0 years).
| Changes | Future | Purchase | Purchase | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owned | Leased | Total | % of fleet | since Sep-20 | deliveries | options | rights | |
| A319 | 45 | 52 | 97 | 31% | (17) | – | – | – |
| A320 | 105 | 55 | 160 | 52% | (5) | – | – | – |
| A320 neo | 30 | 7 | 37 | 12% | – | 1041,2 | 61 | 531 |
| A321 neo | 3 | 11 | 14 | 5% | – | 162 | – | – |
| 183 | 125 | 308 | (22) | 120 | 6 | 53 | ||
| Percentage of total fleet | 59% | 41% |
Includes the impact of Amendment to the purchase agreement with Airbus signed on 29 November 2021, which increased the number of firm future deliveries by 19, and reduced the number of purchase options by 14 and the number of purchase rights by 5.
easyJet retains the option to alter the aircraft type of future deliveries, subject to providing sufficient notification to the OEM.
As at 30 September 2021, easyJet was storing 12 leased aircraft at zero rent unless flown. These aircraft are therefore not included within our fleet numbers published as part of the graphs outlining the fleet, but with footnotes to highlight the absence.
Our flexible fleet plan allows us to expand or contract the size of the fleet depending upon the demand outlook.
| Number of aircraft | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current contractual minimum | 319 | 316 | 313 |
| Base plan | 322 | – | – |
| Current contractual maximum | 322 | 326 | 328 |
| Expected deliveries | 8 | 7 | 18 |
Over the next three years easyJet's gross capital expenditure is expected to be as follows:
| FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross capital | |||
| expenditure | |||
| (£ million) | c.900 | c.1,000 | c.1,300 |
Capex in the 2022 financial year is comprised of new Airbus fleet delivery payments, safety and maintenance-related expenditure as well as lease payments. Our capex projections assume eight aircraft deliveries in the 2022 financial year, seven deliveries in the 2023 financial year and 18 deliveries in the 2024 financial year.
Despite the challenges of Covid-19 and resulting restructuring, easyJet still has a strong reputation as an employer of choice. The high calibre of our people is a key source of differentiation for easyJet compared to our competitors, driving CSAT and customer loyalty. Our strong employer reputation attracts and retains engaged crew, with the spirit to deliver excellent service. Our Glassdoor rating of employee satisfaction is 4.2 (out of 5.0), which is the highest within the travel and hospitality sector, illustrating our marketleading position in the labour market.
The 2021 financial year has had a significant impact on our entire workforce and the pandemic has changed the way in which we support Our People. Some of the key changes and successes delivered include:
pay-freezes) and improve productivity across our network. Whilst we have protected jobs where we see future growth and avoided expensive compulsory redundancy costs in most markets, the changes delivered will continue to support our focus on productivity in the future.
On 23 December 2020, easyJet announced that the Board had passed resolutions as part of its contingency plan to ensure continued compliance with EU ownership and control requirements following the end of the Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020. Accordingly, and in line with its contingency plan, easyJet announced on 4 January 2021 that it had commenced steps to suspend voting rights in respect of certain shares held by relevant persons in accordance with easyJet's articles of association, so that a majority of the voting rights in easyJet are held by EU persons. As at 29 November 2021 the level of ownership by EU persons was 35.68%. Accordingly easyJet has suspended voting rights in respect of certain shares ('Affected Shares') held by Relevant Persons in accordance with easyJet's articles of association (the 'Articles') so that a majority of the voting rights in easyJet are held by EU Persons. As at 29 November 2021, a majority of the voting rights in easyJet are held by EU persons.
Those shareholders who own shares whose voting rights will be suspended at the AGM will receive a notice (an 'Affected Share Notice') by post from Equiniti, our Registrars, on or around 14 January 2022 notifying them of the suspension of voting rights in respect of their Affected Shares. Shareholders in receipt of an Affected Share Notice will not be entitled to attend, speak or vote at the AGM, in respect of those shares subject to an Affected Share Notice.
Note: 'EU persons' refers to nationals of EU member states plus Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, but excludes the UK. 'Relevant Persons' has the meaning given to it in the Articles. In general terms, 'Relevant Persons' refers to non-EU nationals.
Based on current travel restrictions in the markets in which we operate, easyJet expects to fly circa 66% of the 2019 financial year capacity levels in the first quarter of the 2022 financial year with load factors expected to be circa 81%. The second quarter of the 2022 financial year capacity is expected to be circa 70% of the second quarter of the 2019 financial year levels.
easyJet has been ramping up capacity as customer confidence returns and current expectations are that the fourth quarter
of the 2022 financial year capacity will have recovered to around the fourth quarter of the 2019 financial year capacity levels.
The targets easyJet has set are; grow to pre-pandemic capacity by the 2023 financial year, mid teen EBITDAR margins with low to mid teen ROCE in the medium term and having a clear roadmap for easyJet holidays to contribute £100 million plus profit before tax to the Group.
At this stage, given the continued level of short-term uncertainty, it would not be appropriate to provide any further financial guidance for the 2022 financial year. Customers are booking closer to departure and visibility remains limited.
We see a unique opportunity for easyJet to win customers and take market share from rivals in this post pandemic period.
easyJet has a strong capital base, with a market capitalisation of £5.0 billion1 and a net debt position of £910 million at 30 September 2021 (2020: £1,125 million). easyJet's credit ratings are amongst the strongest in the world for an airline.
easyJet operates a modern fleet of Airbus A320 family aircraft, of which 59% are owned. We are investing in new generation aircraft which are more fuel efficient2,3 leading to lower operating costs and lower carbon emissions over time.
easyJet has a highly skilled workforce of over 13,000 people across Europe, including over 4,000 pilots and 7,000 cabin crew members.4
easyJet partners with key suppliers to deliver many of its operational and commercial activities. Our partners are carefully selected and significant emphasis is placed on managing these relationships, with the aim of encouraging incremental innovation and performance.
easyJet has a valuable portfolio of slot pairs at slot-constrained primary airports, as well as flying rights across Europe and AOCs5 in the UK, Switzerland and Austria.
easyJet is aiming to become the world's most data-driven airline. We are seeing significant benefits already from operational resilience processes and predictive maintenance. Our revenues have been benefitting from data projects in late yield initiatives and dynamic seat pricing.
308
Aircraft4 2020: 342
OVER 13,000 Employees4
2020: >14,000
42 Average payment days 2020: 52
Capacity at slot-constrained airports6 2020: 89%
290m
Visits to all digital platforms 2020: 510m
Based on share price of £6.62 at 30 September 2021
15% fuel-saving per seat A320neo versus previous generation A320
Around 50% quieter on take-off and landing than previous-generation aircraft 4. As at 30 September 2021
Air Operator Certificates
Based on level 2 and level 3 airports as updated by IATA on 21 October 2021 and defined under IATA Worldwide Slot Guidelines as at 1 June 2020
Our robust business model makes it easy, affordable and sustainable for our customers to travel, which drives growth and returns for our shareholders.
We are a low cost European point-to-point airline. We use our cost advantage, operational efficiency and leading positions in primary airports to deliver low fares, seamlessly connecting Europe with the warmest welcome in the sky.
easyJet is one of the largest airlines in the world, with 308 aircraft and 20 million customers across 34 countries and 153 airports.
easyJet holidays was launched in 2019 in order to offer holiday packages which encourage the 84% of customers travelling on leisure to spend more with us, rather than book accommodation elsewhere.
The easyJet holidays offering has been tailored to the needs of the 'easyJet generation'.
As at 30 September 2021
Stephen Hester* Chair Designate
SH I have been an admirer of easyJet for many years, both from a business perspective and as a customer. The brand and customer delivery is exceptionally strong, and I was attracted by both the strength of the management team and the potential there is to deliver value to all our stakeholders.
SH I've been impressed with the passion, energy and commitment from the many colleagues I have been able to meet so far. Johan and his team have done really well navigating the uncertainties of the pandemic, and positioning the Company well for the future. While it has been a turbulent and difficult 18 months, the "orange spirit" is remarkable and their dedication to serving our customers is impressive.
SH I see so many opportunities for our iconic company in the coming years. We have a proven business model, unrivalled network and loyal customer base – we need to capitalise on these competitive advantages. Our rights issue will allow us to take advantage of strategic investment and growth opportunities. But the key task is to create strong shareholder value which has inevitably suffered during Covid-19 times. My job is to lead the Board and support management to successfully operate easyJet as a "best in class" company in the years ahead.
SH I am convinced we can be structural winners in the rapidly evolving European airline industry, serving customers well and delivering attractive shareholder value. I'm excited to get started on the post-pandemic recovery journey.
Stephen Hester Chair Designate
* Stephen Hester joined the Board on 1 September 2021, and will succeed John Barton as Chair on 1 December 2021
Johan Lundgren Chief Executive Officer
Johan Lundgren Chief Executive Officer
JL We are emerging from the financial year with renewed strength having transformed the business by optimising our network and delivering significant structural cost savings while also stepchanging ancillary revenue. These initiatives alongside our strong, investment grade balance sheet provide easyJet with a platform to fast track our growth and deliver strong shareholder returns.
JL There are still challenges ahead with the pandemic still being with us, however easyJet has ambitious plans for profitable growth. We are expanding our leadership positions at key bases such as Gatwick and Milan with additional slots and aircraft for summer 2022. This is underpinned by having more than 120 aircraft on order with a further 57 purchase options and rights confirmed to further build on this in the years to come.
JL We continue to lead the industry with our testing of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) flying and conducting zero emission turnarounds at Bristol airport. We also have joined the Race to Zero backed by the UN and we are progressing our pathway to Net Zero by 2050.
Kenton Jarvis Chief Financial Officer
KJ I led a detailed review of our capital structure when I arrived at easyJet in order to assess the Group's long term capital and liquidity needs. Based on this review the Board concluded that £1.2 billion was the optimal size to raise from both a defensive perspective, to provide financial resilience from further downside risk, and from an offensive perspective, positioning the Group to take advantage of long term strategic opportunities.
KJ I am confident that the rights issue was the best course of action and
formed part of a prudent and proactive capital structure management policy to optimise our balance sheet, accelerate the Group's recovery from the pandemic and enhance our long term strategic position.
KJ Our actions taken to navigate the pandemic have resulted in increased debt levels which will in turn drive additional ownership costs going forward from increased borrowings, as well as depreciation and interest charges from the sale and leaseback transactions. Industry wide, we are seeing airport and navigation charges rising as we see third parties recover their losses from the pandemic. However, we have taken action to make structural cost savings to help partially offset these, through implementing seasonal contracts for our crew and insourcing maintenance at a number of our bases.
The airline industry is a cyclical one, with demand for flights driven by economic growth. Demand is also seasonal, particularly in leisure travel.
During the pandemic, demand has primarily been driven by the imposition of travel restrictions and the uncertainty related to those restrictions.
As we move from the pandemicimpacted environment into a more normal travel environment we anticipate a short term rapid recovery driven by a combination of pent up demand before reverting to a longer term trajectory driven by economic growth.
Accumulated savings, before reverting to a longer term trajectory which will be driven by economic growth. Business demand will be slower to recover, and while there will be structural changes, we expect the majority of business purpose traffic to return over time.
The aviation industry has also been subject to other geopolitical events in recent years, as well as terror attacks and extreme weather events. These have both short term and long term consequences for demand and the structure of the industry.
Low-cost carriers such as easyJet continue to take market share from full-fare legacy carriers.
Fuel is one of the biggest costs which airlines face and one of the most volatile. Fuel represented 24% of easyJet's headline cost base for the pre-Covid-19 2019 financial year. The ICE Brent crude oil spot price has risen from pre-Covid-19 2019 financial year price of \$66 to \$79 per barrel at the end of the 2021 financial year. The price of jet fuel is strongly correlated with the price of crude oil.
Many airlines have incurred one-off costs to cover these ineffective and discontinued hedges.
The scale and flexibility of to take advantage of changes
Impact on our industry
How we are responding
The key factors which influence easyJet and all operators within the European airline industry.
Sustainability, in particular the carbon emissions from flights and the contribution to climate change, is a significant issue for the aviation industry.
According to research by Kantar Public across six European countries in September 2021, 78% of European consumers consider climate change a very serious problem.
European airspace remains a challenging environment, with a lack of air traffic resources, capacity constraints and cost cutting measures across the network.
As Europe shows signs of recovery, airline schedule instability, unexpected demand increase and system upgrades will present additional challenges moving forward.
To mitigate the capacity constraints as we return to pre-Covid-19 levels, Eurocontrol continues to re-design the airspace infrastructure with the intent to create a more efficient and sustainable network.
| 2021 | 2,128,054 |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 5,013,501 |
| 2019 | 24,482,724 |
| 2018 | 24,484,343 |
| 2017 | 15,857,711 |
Our full Sustainability Strategy and Sustainability chapter on page 38.
Air traffic control delays cause a number of issues from additional flying time and airport congestion to inefficient flight planning.
easyJet is exposed to foreign exchange rate movements, mainly resulting from Euro revenues and US dollar costs, translated into the Sterling functional currency.
Sterling has strengthened during the year against both the Euro and US dollar as risk sentiment recovered from the earlier months of the pandemic and the market anticipated UK rate hikes in the 2022 financial year. This has a favourable impact on US denominated costs for the airline (predominantly fuel, leases and maintenance) and an adverse impact on Euro revenues when translated into Sterling.
• See page 68 for details of the impact.
easyJet has prioritised six strategic initiatives that will continue to build on our structural advantages in the European aviation market and enable us to lead the recovery as travel returns.
| Network strategy | p.19 |
|---|---|
| Customer excellence | p.20 |
| Product portfolio evolution | p.21 |
| easyJet holidays | p.21 |
| Cost focus | p.22 |
easyJet has a strong network of leading number one and number two positions in primary airports, which have proven to be amongst the highest yielding in the market. This enables us to be efficient with our network choices, with an emphasis on maximising returns. We have decisively reallocated 43 aircraft to higher returning bases highlighting the strength of our network These capital reallocations focused on markets where easyJet is strong, driving confidence in delivering higher returns.
We will seek to strengthen these positions as the competitive landscape evolves, as demonstrated at London Gatwick where we are increasing our market share after reallocating aircraft to this high yielding base along with the addition of new slots.
The scale and flexibility of our network will continue to provide us with opportunities to take advantage as the competitive landscape develops during the recovery phase. easyJet's network is unrivalled and difficult to replicate. We have a golden opportunity to continue to take market share from our main competitors, who fly 120 million seats in our markets and are facing challenges. As a result of these challenges they are focusing on long-haul whilst restructuring and retrenching their short-haul operations.
To better capture summer leisure demand, easyJet opened seasonal bases in Malaga and Faro on 1 June 2021, adding to Palma which was already an existing seasonal base. All three seasonal bases are expanding with additional aircraft for summer 22 being added. Our destinationbased fleet, also including Barcelona, is now increasing from 9 in the 2019 financial year to 21 in the 2022 financial year. These bases operate leisure routes with aircraft at the destination airport instead of at the source market. This allows easyJet to manage seasonal demand profiles while reducing our fixed cost base over winter. This approach provides the flexibility to shift capacity across multiple source markets at short notice without impacting our people.
Our schedule for the summer 22 season went on sale far earlier than it would have done under normal circumstances. This enabled our customers to easily transfer any bookings which were cancelled due
to Covid-19. This represents the first time that easyJet has ever had four seasons available for sale at the same time and it significantly reduced customers' propensity to request refunds.
Our focused network strategy can be summarised as follows:
easyJet prioritises slot-constrained airports as these are where customers want to fly to and from. In our core markets, we are able to achieve cost leadership and preserve scale. We provide a balanced network portfolio across domestic, city and leisure destinations. Our scale enables us to provide market leading networks and schedules. We are maintaining our focus on country leadership in the UK, France and Switzerland and our city focus in the Netherlands, Italy and Germany.
We will build on our existing leading position in Western Europe's top leisure destinations to provide network breadth and flexibility. This will also unlock cost benefits, enabling us to manage seasonality and support the growth of easyJet holidays. It also ensures that easyJet remains top of mind for customers and is seen as the 'local airline' for governments and hoteliers.
easyJet is building a network of key cities, broadening our presence across Europe. This is a low-risk way of serving large origin markets. We will base assets in Focus Cities where it makes sense from a cost perspective.
The scale and flexibility of our network will continue to provide us with opportunities
easyJet aims to deliver a seamless and digitally enabled customer journey at every stage:
having to speak to a customer service agent. We launched a new social media strategy, offering more channels for our customers to contact us, while increasing their engagement with us through more relevant and inspiring content.
Actions delivered as part of our customer excellence initiative include:
• The launch of our chatbots, giving customers the opportunity to get answers to their queries quickly and easily without having to pick up the phone.
We want to win our customers'
This focus on customer excellence has continued to drive the strength of our brand and delivered strong customer satisfaction scores. easyJet remains first choice low cost carrier (LCC) in the UK, France, Switzerland and Berlin, best value airline in the UK and France ahead of other LCCs and legacy carriers and best value LCC in Italy, Switzerland and Berlin.
Our customer satisfaction score for the year is higher than in the 2019 pre-pandemic financial year
In the 2021 financial year, On-Time Performance increased by 3 percentage points to 87%. This reflects the strides we are taking towards leaving 'on time, every time'. This is crucially important for our operational efficiency, as well as customer satisfaction.
| OTP % arrivals within 15 minutes7 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | FY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Network | 94% | 91% | 91% | 84% | 87% |
| 2020 Network | 80% | 82% | 83% | 94% | 84% |
easyJet recognises that the continued evolution of our product portfolio represents a significant opportunity to increase revenue per seat and margins in the coming years. During the 2021 financial year we have launched a number of products, including:
The Directors believe that the continued evolution of the Group's product portfolio provides the opportunity to build on spend per customer, delivering enhanced sustainable returns. The initial performance from these products has been very encouraging with a significant spend per customer being observed.
Further opportunities within easyJet's product offering have been highlighted and will be delivered over the coming year. Inflight retail, our new retail brand and proposition is due to be launched in H2 of the 2022 financial year. This will involve direct sourcing and contracting for our on-board retail offering. We have partnered with dnata and aim to improve our customer proposition, offering a pre and during inflight shopping experience.
The Group is continuing to build on the success of the launch of easyJet holidays, Europe's fastest growing holiday company, which offers flexible holiday packages at the best prices. Customers are drawn to our trusted brand with over 40% of easyJet holidays sales coming from flight customers choosing to upgrade to a holiday after visiting easyjet.com. With 300 million visits a year to our app and website, this provides a significant opportunity going forward. We offer unbeatable prices with our holidays being the cheapest like for like on the market. This coupled with our direct hotel contracting and low fixed cost base provides easyJet with a strong business model to grow and deliver sustainable returns.
easyJet holidays bookings are underpinned by an industry leading 'Protection Promise' which has meant that the Group has been able to retain over 60% of customers whose holidays were affected by the Covid-19 pandemic in the 2021 financial year. easyJet holidays also offsets the carbon emissions directly associated with its holidays—the fuel used from flights and transfers, plus the energy from hotel stays.
We enjoy strong partnerships with leading hotels without the need for financial commitments or inventory risk. 63% of bookings are with directly contracted hotels and during the 2021 financial year, the Group signed over 40 additional flagship beach hotels which were previously under exclusive contracts with competitors. This further optimises the easyJet holidays' portfolio, whilst also establishing connectivity with some of the world's largest hotel chains including Hilton, Accor, Radisson and Intercontinental Hotel Group to improve the range of our cities offering.
Reflecting the strength of the easyJet holidays business model and the significant opportunities to grow market share, the Group sees a clear roadmap to easyJet holidays contributing annual profit before tax in excess of £100 million. Our holidays business has a highly scalable business model based on low fixed costs (96% variable1 ) with strong margins and a digital platform which will provide a base for growth.
easyJet has delivered £512 million of cost savings in the 2021 financial year, with almost half being sustainable. These cost savings help mitigate some of our cost headwinds. Savings have been delivered across every cost line. As part of our continued cost challenge we are identifying further sustainable savings to strengthen our competitive advantage.
As a result of highly constructive relationships with our trade union partners and our people, we have been able to deliver significant cost and productivity savings, including:
• easyJet outsources the majority of heavy maintenance where it is cost effective. We have extended our contract with Lufthansa Technik to 2025 and with SRT Malta to 2023, delivering cost savings and simpler work packages. We have also extended our low-cost engine shop visit contract out to 2023 and concluded a cost-effective deal on Leap engines and ongoing support. Our components deal has been extended to 2027 with additional cost savings and a Milan parts hub. We have worked closely with Airbus to create more efficient 6 and 12-year checks. We have completed insourcing of line maintenance in Berlin, Glasgow, Edinburgh and Bristol, which has delivered cost savings and higher quality. All line maintenance at Gatwick is now done in-house, with the addition of a completed third hangar bay in March 2021.
cost savings delivered the 2021 financial year, of which almost half are sustainable
132 major ground handling contracts have been renegotiated
easyJet has committed to joining the Race to Zero while continuing to work on our Net Zero pathway to 2050. Sustainability is of significant and growing importance to our customers as 78% of consumers say that they are concerned about the impact of climate change. This is something that easyJet views with the upmost importance, as we aim to pioneer sustainable travel.
There has been significant progress made during 2021, demonstrated by our first ever SAF flight at London Gatwick, using a 30% blend flight taking off on 19 October 2021. A SAF blend was then used on all flights operating from Gatwick to Glasgow throughout COP26. During the year we have also conducted an emission free turnaround trial at Bristol airport where we saw a 97% reduction in CO2 emissions using electric powered ground equipment instead of diesel.
Our Sustainability strategy has three pillars: tackling our carbon emissions; stimulating carbon innovation; and going beyond carbon.
hybrid-electric, hydrogen fuel-cell and hydrogen combustion. There is significant potential for these technologies, particularly on short-haul networks such as our own.
• Going beyond carbon: We are constantly looking for more ways to take action outside of carbon reductions including reducing the amount of plastic used on our services and having crew and pilot uniforms made from recycled plastic. By the end of the 2021 financial year we had already removed over 36 million individual items of plastic from our inflight retail. We are also aiming to reduce waste and plastic within our supply chain. We are implementing a ISO14001-compliant Environmental Management System, and can champion sustainability. We are particularly pleased that easyJet's long term work with our charity partner Unicef, who we have supported through on-board collections since 2012, is continuing by funding COVAX global vaccinations – with Unicef's aim being to deliver 2 billion vaccines by the end of 2021. Hundreds of easyJet crew members have volunteered to help at vaccination centres across Europe, with many of them having trained to deliver the vaccines.
individual items of plastic removed from inflight retail in the 2021 financial year
We were the world's first major airline to offset the carbon emissions from the fuel used on all our flights across our entire network
| 2021 | |
|---|---|
| 2020 | |
| 2019 | 4.07 |
| 2018 | 6.07 |
| 2017 | 4.71 |
Per seat metrics are for the Airline business only.
Why it is important Incremental improvements in profitability ensure that we have a platform for long term growth while generating value for all stakeholders.
* 2020 restated due to impact of the 2021 rights issue.
Delivering sustainable shareholder value is a fundamental part of our mindset as we manage our business.
| (25.5) | 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (19.9) | 2020 | ||
| 2019 | 11.4 | ||
| 2018 | 14.6 | ||
| 2017 | 11.9 |
2018 as restated, headline 2017-2018 pre IFRS 16, normalised operating profit after tax divided by average adjusted capital employed. 2019-2021 post IFRS 16.
As a low cost business, we focus on efficiency to produce customer solutions whilst also driving operational efficiencies which will maximise our return on investment.
Headline (loss)/profit before tax divided by the number of seats flown.
Headline loss before tax per seat was £39.87 (2020: £14.68 loss). Revenue per seat decreased primarily due to a full year impact of Covid-19, with sustained softness in macro-level demand as customers' confidence and ability to travel have been impacted by fluctuating infection rates across the UK and Europe, resulting in local and national lockdowns and frequent changes in travel restrictions and travel advice. This was compounded by the increase in cost per seat, as our fixed cost base has serviced a much reduced schedule.
Headline (loss)/profit after tax divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the period (adjusted for shares held in employee benefits trusts).
Headline loss per share was 166.9 pence (2020: 149.7 pence loss per share*), driven by the loss in the year. Total loss per share was 159.0 pence (2020: 222.9 pence loss per share*). Both 2020 figures have been restated due to the rights issue in 2021.
Headline operating (loss)/profit after tax, divided by average capital employed.
Headline ROCE worsened to (25.5%) (2020: (19.9%)) driven by the headline loss recognised in the year. Total ROCE improved to (22.4%) (2020: (23.0%)), a smaller decline impacted by non-headline sale and leaseback gains and restructuring provision releases.
Revised calculations in 2019, 2017-2018 restated.
Customers have increasing choice and their expectations are rising. Ensuring we meet their evolving needs will position us as the brand of choice when flying within Europe.
Our customer satisfaction index is based on the results of a customer satisfaction survey measuring how satisfied the customer was with their most recent flight.
Overall customer satisfaction was 75%, no change from the 2020 performance. Our continued focus on customers, the reduced congestion of European airspace, and our customer positive reaction to our Covid-19 safety policies have contributed to the performance.
| 2021 | 81.08 |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 70.77 |
| 2019 | 70.41 |
| 2018 | 71.56 |
| 2017 | 72.46 |
2017, 2018 and 2019 restated to align to current industry methodology.
Reliable operational performance is a key factor in our customers' perceptions of their experience with us. Managing OTP and minimising disruption will positively impact on the likelihood of our customers choosing to fly with us on a repeat basis.
Percentage of flights which arrive within 15 minutes of the scheduled arrival time.
Our OTP has increased year on year to 87% (2020: 84%). This has been driven by a full year reduction in congestion of European airspace, as well as our strong operational performance.
An important part of Our Promise to be a safe and responsible airline is to help tackle climate change. In the short term our focus is being as efficient as we can, and to drive carbon efficiencies.
How much carbon dioxide is produced for each passenger, for each kilometre they fly with us.
In 2021 our carbon emissions per passenger kilometre were 81.08g, up from 70.77g in 2020. Reduced load factors have driven the increase in emissions per passenger, which was mitigated by our efforts to be more operationally efficient, including increased use of the more efficient neo aircraft and a focus on flight efficiency initiatives.
In addition to the KPIs reported above, easyJet is introducing an additional KPI this year.
Headline EBITDAR margin for 2021: (37.8%). This metric forms part of our future targets and will be reported on an ongoing basis from this financial year.
Our stakeholders are a fundamental part of our operations and are referenced throughout this report. We have set out on the following pages details of who our key stakeholders are, how we have engaged with them and the associated outcomes.
This section also describes how the Board acted in a way it considers would most likely promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole, taking into account the factors set out in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (the 'Section 172 statement'). Further details of the Board's activities during the year can be found in the Governance section on pages 111 to 117.
Despite the continued and ever changing travel restrictions in place, we were able to fly 20.4 million passengers in 2021. This includes individuals who booked flight-only trips with us for leisure or business, as well as those who booked easyJet holidays.
A key part of Our Strategy is a focus on customer excellence, both to win our customers' loyalty but also to achieve our purpose of making travel easy, enjoyable and affordable, whether it is for leisure or business. Our understanding of who our current and future customers are, what products they need and how they perceive easyJet enables us to prioritise our efforts in driving a positive customer experience and therefore loyalty, especially given the current uncertainty in the travel environment.
It is clear that the pandemic has brought with it increased complexity and uncertainty, both from the continually changing travel restrictions imposed by governments across Europe and the need for us to dynamically manage the schedule, which has resulted in disrupted travel plans. With the customer at the heart of everything we do, we introduced a number of initiatives primarily around making travel easy and accessible for all and addressing this new, complex and uncertain travel environment. As a result of these initiatives customer satisfaction has been 75%.
The safety and wellbeing of our customers is key, and the Safety Committee continuously monitored easyJet's biosecurity standards to ensure we provide a safe and healthy environment for our customers. Our biosecurity standards are continuously adjusted as restrictions change. Policies have also been developed and tested by the Customer Safety Governance Group to understand how to continually improve customer safety and wellbeing.
Customer sentiment and feedback is regularly reported to and discussed by the Airline Management Board and the plc Board. The Board has also reflected on the above initiatives and the impact of the pandemic on customer behaviour when reviewing the Group's longer-term strategy during the year. Consequently, it is placing an increased focus on accelerating the digitisation of the customer journey as there is more work to do, with an investment in commercial systems and the inflight retail offering amongst others.
Our people are a critical part of our business and their famous 'orange spirit' a key part of our success. We want to attract, retain and develop our people by creating an inclusive and energising environment, inspiring everyone to learn and grow and do their best – and helping our 'orange spirit' to thrive. Engaging effectively with them is key to doing this successfully.
The high calibre of our people is a key source of differentiation for easyJet compared to our competitors, driving CSAT and customer loyalty. Our strong employer reputation attracts and retains engaged crew, with the spirit to deliver excellent service.
Our people have however continued to be significantly impacted during the year, whether that be as a result of being furloughed, working from home, or the restructuring programme. The pandemic has brought with it challenges around attrition and retention for some specific head office business functions that are industry agnostic, such as legal, finance and IT. As a result of the uncertainty in the aviation industry, a highly competitive external recruitment market, and no bonuses being payable, retention issues have needed to be addressed. As a result, we have developed a comprehensive strategy focusing on wellbeing, talent management, reward, recognition, skills development and the employee experience. Our Glassdoor rating of employee satisfaction is 4.2 (out of 5.0), which is the highest within the travel and hospitality sector, illustrating our market-leading position in the labour market.
Keeping employees connected to our business and ensuring they feel supported during this period has also been a key focus. As a result of our engagement with them during the year, there have been a number of initiatives put in place.
At easyJet, we have a workforce of over 13,000 employees across nine countries in Europe, including 4,000 pilots and 7,000 cabin crew.
Our current fleet of 308 aircraft is supplied by Airbus, with all engines supplied by CFM. The fleet is maintained by maintenance, repair and overhaul specialists.
Ground-handling agents manage the logistics operations at airports, such as baggage handling and aircraft loading and unloading. We have a strategic partnership with DHL to provide these services at Gatwick, Bristol and Manchester, and Menzies in Spain, whilst Swissport manage the operation in Switzerland and Berlin.
We have a number of other key suppliers, including critical technology suppliers, fuel providers, engineering and maintenance providers, aircraft lessors, and hoteliers for easyJet holidays.
We want to be number one or two in primary airports, and provide ease, value and affordability to our customers. This means having an open, constructive and effective relationship with all suppliers, as we believe they are integral to the Group's success.
Shareholders and investors are the main providers of capital with which to invest and grow the Group's business. Taking account of their views on the Company's operational and financial performance and its strategic direction are an important part of ensuring we deliver strong shareholder value. The support of the debt markets is important in ensuring access to appropriate liquidity.
Further details are set out in the Governance section which starts on page 96 and Remuneration section on page 130.
As a company listed on the London Stock Exchange, our shares are publicly traded. Some of our major shareholders are set out on page 156. We also have bonds issued under our EMTN Programme.
We operate out of 28 bases across Europe and fly from 153 airports. Our head office is at London Luton Airport, and we have training centres for crew in Milan and at London Luton and London Gatwick airports.
We value engagement with the communities where our employees live and operations are based, as they are important to the effective operation of our business.
Regulators and governments take decisions which directly impact our operations, as has been clearly seen during the Covid-19 pandemic. easyJet engages with them to understand their strategic drivers, understand the impact of any regulatory changes on the Company and customers, and ensure that policymakers have an understanding of our business and the social and economic benefits it delivers.
• Management have engaged extensively with governments, and especially with the UK Government, during the year to ensure that they understand the impact of the pandemic on our business and take appropriate risk-based decisions in relation to travel restrictions and testing in the best interests of our customers. This has included contributing to the Global Travel Taskforce, which was established to look at the safe and sustainable return to international travel, and direct lobbying on matters specific to easyJet. Our employees also participated in the 'Speak Up for Travel' campaign to raise awareness of the challenges facing the travel industry. There has been no sector specific support for the industry, but progress has been made in removing some of the confusing restrictions around the traffic light system. We continue to engage to
try and remove unnecessary and costly testing for those who are fully vaccinated.
The Directors are required to act in a way they consider, in good faith, would most likely promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole, taking into account the factors as listed in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006.
Details of how the Directors have had regard to their section 172 duty can be found throughout the Strategic and Governance reports. We set out on the previous pages details of who we consider to be our main stakeholders, how we have engaged with them during the year and the outcomes of the process. Further details on how the Directors' duties are discharged and the oversight of these duties are included in the Governance section on pages 96 to 158.
Our three pan-European airlines are regulated by Austro Control (Austria), the Civil Aviation Authority (UK) and the Federal Office of Civil Aviation (Switzerland). We engage with governments, regulators, policy makers, air traffic control operators, airline associations and tourism bodies.
At easyJet we are continuing to lead the work towards the decarbonisation of aviation. Ultimately, we want to use new aircraft technology to achieve net zero emissions flying across Europe.
Despite the impact of the pandemic, sustainability remains a fundamental part of our business. It is one of the core priorities within Our Strategy for easyJet.
This year the extreme weather events that have been seen around the world are a further warning about the impact of climate change. Meanwhile world leaders gathered at COP26 to discuss further action. At easyJet we are committed to leading the aviation industry in taking the action needed.
We are fully committed to the UK and EU targets of net zero emissions by 2050. This year I have been the Chair of Airlines for Europe and was pleased that we were able to publish Destination 2050, a European aviation industry roadmap towards net zero.
In November 2021 we joined Race to Zero, through which we committed to set an interim science-based target for 2035, as well as to reach net zero emissions by 2050, aligning with the criteria and recommendations of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). We will publish our net zero roadmap that shows how we plan to do this. We are confident that this will be deliverable through new technology, but it will also need a supportive policy
At easyJet we are continuing to lead the work towards the decarbonisation of aviation. Ultimately, we want to use new aircraft technology to achieve net zero emissions flying across Europe.
Johan Lundgren Chief Executive Officer
framework from European governments and regulators.
Our Sustainability Strategy has three pillars: tackling our carbon emissions; stimulating technological innovation; and going beyond carbon. The plc Board, the Airline Management Board and I are closely involved in our progress on this strategy.
We continue to tackle our carbon emissions today by operating a fleet of modern, fuel-efficient aircraft and by always looking for more ways to be even more fuel and carbon efficient. Our Airbus A320 / 321 neo aircraft, which have been joining our fleet since 2017, are 15% more fuel-efficient per seat than equivalent previous-generation aircraft. This year we have established a partnership with Bristol Airport to trial new technologies to reduce emissions from our operations, including an aircraft turn trial using electric ground vehicles to reduce ground-based emissions to almost zero.
This builds on our decision in 2019 to offset all our organisation's direct carbon emissions, from both our flights and ground operations (Scopes 1 and 2). easyJet was the world's first major airline to do this across our entire network and we currently remain the only major European airline to do so. We have continued to offset on behalf our customers throughout the pandemic.
In May 2021 easyJet holidays also began offsetting carbon emissions for the
package holidays we offer, becoming the first major tour operator to do this too.
We support the highest standard offsetting projects, that meet either the Gold Standard or Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) accreditation. A key focus is on projects that support reforestation, afforestation, and avoided deforestation in some of the most intense deforestation hotspots around the world. The loss of forests is one of the largest contributors to climate change, so work to protect and restore forests is a critical part of the response.
Offsetting is the right thing to do now, but it can only be an interim solution, in the period before the zero emissions technology that is being developed is available for commercial use.
We also see Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs) as another interim step in this journey. With our partner Gatwick Airport we have been trialling the use of Sustainable Aviation Fuels on some easyJet flights from the airport. This was the first time any airline at Gatwick has used SAFs.
We believe that radical action to address aviation's impact on climate change is needed and so we are also supporting the introduction of new technologies. We are working with our partners Airbus and Wright Electric to accelerate the development of zero emission technologies.
Our strategic partnership with Airbus supports their ambition to develop a zero emission, hydrogen-powered commercial aircraft by 2035.
I was pleased to participate in the Airbus Summit on sustainable aerospace in September this year, at which we talked about the industry and government collaboration on the research, development and infrastructure that will be needed to realise the potential of this technology.
We are also working with Wright Electric who are developing the Wright 1, a single-aisle aircraft capable of covering a distance up to 1,280 km. Wright Electric is targeting 2030 as the earliest date for entry into service. In October 2021 we also established a new partnership with Rolls-Royce on research into new energy and power solutions in commercial aviation. While carbon emissions are by far our biggest issue to tackle, we also want to manage our other environmental impacts. This year we have introduced a new Environmental Management System (EMS), made improvements to waste management in our operations, and added new environmental requirements to our procurement process. We have even introduced a new cabin crew and pilot uniform that uses a material made from around 45 recycled plastic bottles for each outfit. Once rolled out across the airline it has been estimated this could prevent around half a million plastic bottles being wasted each year.
The pandemic has also had an impact on the people who work at easyJet and we want to do what we can to support them through this period. We have provided our people with more advice about protecting their mental health and wellbeing.
I am pleased that we have been able to support our charity partner Unicef in their work to deliver Covid-19 vaccines to health workers and vulnerable people across the world. This summer our onboard collection for the charity's vaccine programme raised over £275,000 which could help to deliver approximately 189,000 Covid-19 vaccines.
We are absolutely committed to sustainability. It is a fundamental part of our business and we know that aviation will need to continue to do more to address climate change. I trust our progress this year shows that we are continuing to take the action that is needed.
Johan Lundgren Chief Executive Officer
We're proud to be a part of the UN's Race to Zero initiative. By joining, we've pledged our commitment to reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, and to setting an interim science-based target for 2035.
We recognise that aviation needs radical changes to keep the dream of flying alive for generations to come.
In the meantime, we're taking more measures, both now and for the future, to reduce our emissions and minimise our impact on the environment.
easyJet.com/sustainability
To lead and challenge global aviation towards net zero emissions while positively impacting our communities and our people
We were the world's first major airline to offset the carbon emissions from the fuel used for all our flights, and continue to work tirelessly to minimise carbon across our operations
We are supporting the development of new technologies to achieve the decarbonisation of aviation as quickly as possible
We are working in a range of ways to take action on sustainability, beyond our carbon impact
We have continued to strengthen our organisation structures and expertise on sustainability. Initiatives include: expanding the Sustainability team; increasing the scope of ESG reporting; development of an ISO 14001-compliant Environmental Management System; and additional oversight through committees and working groups, such as the Environmental Management Review Board.
We are fully committed to the UK and EU targets of net zero emissions by 2050. As part of Airlines for Europe we have also helped to develop Destination 2050, a European aviation industry roadmap towards net zero.
We also participated in the Aviation Working Group project-managed by the SBTi, WWF, the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), other stakeholders and other airline peers to map out what a science-based trajectory and decarbonisation approach for the aviation sector. This guidance is available at: https:// sciencebasedtargets.org/sectors/aviation
In November 2021 we joined Race to Zero, through which we committed to set an interim science-based target for 2035, as
well as to reach net zero emissions by 2050, aligning with the criteria and recommendations of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). We are developing our own detailed pathway to net zero, which we will publish in the 2022 financial year.
We are confident that this will be deliverable through new technology and a supportive policy framework from European governments and regulators. It will be based on a combination of: our ongoing carbon efficiency measures, fleet replacement, air traffic management improvements including the proposed upgrade of Single European Sky, the use of Sustainable Aviation Fuels and ultimately the introduction of zero emissions aircraft technology.
Our strategy will contribute towards the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, which are a universal call to action to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure that by 2030 all people enjoy peace and prosperity.
Throughout this chapter we have signposted where our activity contributes to the goals.
This includes the carbon offsetting for our flights and holidays. We only invest in high quality Gold Standard and VCS certified offset projects, which deliver robust carbon savings and also a wide range of social and economic benefits to livelihoods and biodiversity in developing countries, which contributes to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Since easyJet holidays launched in 2019 it has sought to integrate sustainability across the holidays business.
In May 2021, easyJet holidays became the first major UK tour operator to offset the carbon emissions directly associated with its package holidays. This means the fuel used for flights and in-destination transfers, as well as the energy used for hotel stays. This approach to offsetting was also retrospectively applied to all holidays since easyJet holidays launched in November 2019.
Recognising that carbon offsetting is an interim measure and with an ambition to raise the bar and lead the industry, in September 2021 easyJet holidays launched its inaugural Sustainability Strategy. This strategy, which is set out below, includes easyJet holidays' vision for sustainability and how they want to realise this. easyJet holidays has its own sustainability steering committee, which meets regularly to discuss and monitor progress on the strategy.
easyJet holidays this year become a member of the Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC). The organisation was
created jointly by UN agencies and international conservation NGOs to develop global standards for sustainability in travel and tourism. In becoming a member of GSTC, easyJet holidays has committed to support hotels it works with to achieve certification by a GSTC accredited certification body or certification to a GSTC recognised standard. easyJet holidays was also the first major UK tour operator to sign up to The Future of Tourism Coalition which has a global mission to place destinations at the centre of recovery strategies.
When it comes to sustainability we want to raise the bar, positively shake things up and lead the industry. To make sustainability part of our everyday culture, enabling us, our partners, and you to reduce your footprint, and make a positive impact on the people and places that make our destinations so special.
by making sustainable travel affordable and accessible to everyone
We will enable all holidaymakers to have authentic travel experiences that directly support sustainable practices
by maximising the benefits and minimising the negative impacts of tourism
We will support 100% of our hoteliers to achieve a GSTC-recognised certification and support locally owned and run businesses and activities
natural environments, wildlife and natural resources when developing and managing tourism activities
positive social and economic impacts of tourism in destinations to support livelihoods and community development
the industry forward
Transform travel for
by embedding sustainability into business decisions and behaviours and driving meaningful change in
We will embed sustainability into our culture and business decisions while using our influence to move
everyone
the industry Commitment
our people to make choices that are grounded in and guided by our commitment to sustainability
Pioneer
initiatives to bring the industry together and accelerate action on critical issues
as well as a dedicated team of experts from easyJet holidays.
The programme will culminate in September 2022, when the students will deliver their recommendation reports. easyJet holidays will then decide which projects it will champion, to develop and support sustainable practises in its focus holiday destinations.
Goals Lab
holidays that are carbon conscious
Sustainable Development
for sustainable tourism.
In November 2021 easyJet holidays and the University of Oxford launched a partnership to establish the Oxford SDG Impact Lab, to work together to identify challenges and opportunities
Inspire
sustain the world's natural and cultural resources
At the Oxford SDG Impact Lab selected students will be mentored and trained to deliver academically rigorous, evidencebased reports whose aim is to improve key areas of social and environmental development in a number of destinations where easyJet holidays operates. Twenty graduate students, mainly from the social sciences and humanities, will be supported and mentored by Oxford University staff,
The plc Board and the Airline Management Board regularly consider sustainability issues. For example, topics covered reviewing and guiding climate related strategy and monitoring and overseeing progress against goals and targets for addressing climate related issues, amongst others.
The Group Markets & Marketing Director is responsible on the Airline Management Board for the delivery of the Sustainability Strategy for the airline and easyJet holidays. The strategies are intended to mitigate risk and create opportunity through environmental and social sustainability principles, considering the differing challenges and priorities across our business.
The Sustainability Steering Committee monitors the progress being made on the strategies. The Committee has met eight times this financial year and attendees include the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Commercial Officer, the Group Markets & Marketing Director, the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary, the Director of Flight Operations, the Director of Airport Development & Procurement, the Director of Tax & Fuel Procurement, the HR & People Development Director and the Director of Sustainability and the Sustainability team.
We have a dedicated Sustainability team, led by the Director of Sustainability who reports to the Group Markets & Marketing Director. The team works with management across the business to develop and implement the Sustainability Strategy across the airline and works alongside the easyJet holidays team on their sustainability activities.
The team now includes three specialist roles:
Sustainability targets form part of the remuneration package for the CEO and CFO for this financial year.
These targets focus on the implementation of our new Environmental Management System, management of the Company's carbon emissions, partnerships on new technology development and further progress in the carbon offsetting programme.
Our 'carbon emissions per passenger kilometre' KPI, which is externally verified, is one of the business's KPIs and is the responsibility of our Director of Flight Operations. The Director of Flight Operations also leads our work in developing sustainable aviation focused partnerships with organisations and on internal initiatives to stimulate technological innovation.
More information on our latest performance on this KPI is on page 47.
Our Environment Policy sets out how the business manages and minimises our environmental impact and covers the activities of all who work for and on behalf of easyJet, including contractors, sub-contractors and temporary staff. The Environment Policy is available at: https://corporate.easyjet.com/
We have this year established an Environmental Management System to manage and continually improve our environmental performance in a systematic way.
We also joined the IATA Environmental Assessment Program, which is aligned with the ISO 14001:2015 environmental management standard, and established an Environmental Management Review Board which is chaired by the Chief Operating Officer. Further information about this is on page 53.
Since 2018 we have included sustainability risks in the Risk section of our Annual Report, as these were deemed material. The risks include carbon trading and increased taxation, while severe weather as a result of climate change is now incorporated into safety, security and operations risk profile. Our response plans are monitored regularly through our governance structure.
For a detailed explanation of our sustainability risks, including climatechange-related risks, and how these are managed, please refer to the Risks section on page 78. This year we have also strengthened our Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) reporting – there is an expanded table on pages 58 to 61.
"Cambridge's Resilience Framework supported easyJet to manage their climate change risks and opportunities. Our platform's analysis provides quantified results to inform easyJet's strategic decision making and future growth planning, while balancing investment requirements driven by evolving regulations, consumer demands, and technology innovations."
Dr Andrew Coburn,
Chief Scientist, Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies
This financial year we have worked with the Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies (CCRS), an enterprise risk management specialist, on the business risk from climate change in both our direct and indirect operations.
This work began with an assessment of the potential physical and transition risks to our business operations. As well as the CCRS experts, the assessment included input from teams across easyJet: Company Secretariat, Finance, Flight Operations, Investor Relations, Markets, Network, People, Policy, Risk, Strategy, Sustainability, and Treasury. The work with CCRS confirmed the summary risks that were outlined in our 2020 financial year Annual Report.
The output of this project will strengthen easyJet's response to our climate risk and controls frameworks. It has also informed our responses to the requirements of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
We have continued to communicate our commitment and action on sustainability to our employees.
This has included regular updates from our Chief Executive Officer and the wider AMB to all employees, updates and articles in our employee communications, and discussions about sustainability and presentations from the Sustainability team within departmental and leadership forums.
This year we carried out an employee survey about sustainability, which received nearly 500 responses. The results showed a strong interest in sustainability, support for easyJet to take further action and a desire for further information about the Company's work in this area.
We regularly communicate with our airline and holidays customers about sustainability, including during the booking process and whilst on-board our aircraft. This focuses on our work to reduce the carbon impact of our operations, our carbon offsetting for all our flights, and the development of new technology to decarbonise aviation. We also have a dedicated, customer-facing website area about sustainability issues: https://www.easyjet.com/sustainability.
Our customer insight has found that customers who are aware that their flight has been carbon offset also have a higher overall satisfaction with easyJet. The difference in overall satisfaction between the groups of customers who were aware and not aware that their flight was carbon offset was 6.3 percentage points in this financial year. Customer awareness of our carbon offsetting, based on customers who have flown with easyJet in the last 12 months, was 51.4%, compared to 44.9% in the 2020 financial year.
We continue to work closely with partners in our supply chain to ensure high sustainability standards. This year we have updated our Supplier Code of Conduct and implemented a new standard Request for Proposal template within our procurement process, to proactively screen suppliers' management of sustainability and their environmental risk.
Our Supplier Code of Conduct is also based on easyJet's Code of Business Ethics and requires our suppliers and their sub-contractors to operate to these ethical standards. Further information is on page 57.
We are also working with suppliers on specific initiatives and trials to reduce easyJet's environmental impact and that of our supply chain. Examples of these are highlighted later in this chapter, such as our sustainability partnership with Bristol Airport (page 44), our SAF trial with Gatwick and fuel suppliers (page 49) and easyJet holiday's work with hotel partners (page 57).
This year we have formed a sustainability partnership with Bristol Airport and other partners in the region to trial a range of initiatives to support the long term ambition to achieve net zero operations at the airport and contribute towards reducing easyJet's overall carbon footprint.
We are using Bristol Airport as a test-bed to trial and implement the latest technological and innovative solutions for decarbonising our operations and reducing waste. The aim is that any successful results from the trials will have the potential to be rolled out across easyJet's network.
Trials which are underway or planned include:
We are also supporting the development of a regional hydrogen economy in the south west of England to prepare the way for hydrogen powered zero emissions aircraft during the next decade.
In 2020, we participated in the CDP climate change questionnaire programme and scored a "C" ranking. We have participated in the programme again this year and the results of this detailed assessment are expected to be published by CDP in late 2021. Our full CDP submission and score is available on CDP website at www.cdp.net.
We continue to engage with policy makers across Europe on how public policy can help airlines to address their carbon emissions and stimulate the technological innovation that will be needed for zero emissions aviation.
Our Sustainability Governance framework seeks to ensure that all direct and indirect activities that engage on policy are consistent with our Sustainability Strategy. The Sustainability team works closely with easyJet's Regulatory Affairs Group and Public Affairs team, who seek to provide policy makers with information about easyJet's work on sustainability and how airlines can work with governments to address the impact of aviation on climate change.
We believe that the aviation industry needs to achieve net zero by 2050 and are committed to both the EU and UK net zero 2050 targets.
This year we have supported the EU's 'Fit for 55' proposal, a new policy framework which aims to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels, and becoming a climate-neutral continent by 2050. We have also contributed to the UK Government's consultation on its 'Jet Zero' strategy for net zero aviation.
An overview of our public policy priorities on sustainability are on the next page.
In 2019 we completed a materiality assessment about sustainability issues for our airline business.
The assessment was carried out by an independent sustainability firm in consultation with easyJet. It included in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including investors, suppliers, regulators, corporate customers, employee representative groups and trade unions, and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs). Customer and employee views were also sought through surveys.
The results of the materiality assessment were published in our 2019 and 2020 financial year Annual Reports and are available at https://corporate.easyjet.com
The assessment confirmed that the most material sustainability issue for the airline is carbon emissions. We have continued to address this, including through the project with the Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies on environmental risks and the activities described in the rest of this section of the Annual Report.
Governments will need to help the aviation industry to meet ambitious emissions reduction goals by championing financial and regulatory support for green technologies and investments in zero emission aircraft.
Zero emission flying can only be brought closer through coordinated action which should focus efforts on three key areas:
We have also identified specific policy actions.
Investing and supporting the development of new technology now:
Ensuring there are incentives for the adoption of new technology in the future:
Provide financial incentives to support the development and growth of zero emission technology, including:
Airspace charges should be modulated to incentivise early adopters of hydrogen powered aircraft
Slot priority airlines which fly hydrogen powered aircraft should be prioritised for peak slots at primary airports
And in the meantime:
This year we welcomed the ambition of the EU's 'Fit for 55' package and set out how effective aviation tax reform would support this.
We support measures which link taxes to emissions, price carbon fairly for everyone and ensure all sources of aviation emissions are covered. However, there can be no double taxation, any fuel tax must include the replacement of all the ineffective passenger taxes in Europe with a combination of a fuel tax for intra-EU flights and a flight tax for long-haul flights that reflects their emissions. This way all airlines and passengers are incentivised to fly more efficiently. Everyone needs to play their part in tackling climate change, including long haul flights which create the majority of emissions.
The European Commission's proposal for a fuel tax only for intra-EU flights means it falls short in this regard as it does not address long-haul and does not replace the current ineffective passenger taxes. Both would be required for our full support, so we have called on the Commission to address these next. Eurocontrol figures demonstrate that just 6% of flights (the long-haul ones) create 51% of the emissions from European aviation. Taxing everyday normal people, while excluding wealthy business class passengers emitting most of the CO2 on long-haul trips, is unfair and therefore we will continue to push for equal treatment.
In addition to our direct engagement with policy makers, we also participate in industry groups and forums that contribute to public policy development on sustainability issues. These include: the Aerospace Technology Institute, the Airspace Change Organisation Group, Airlines for Europe, Airlines UK, the Global Sustainable Tourism Council, the Jet Zero Council (UK Government), the Science Based Targets initiative, Sustainable Aviation (UK), the Taskforce for Scaling Voluntary Carbon Offsets, and the World Economic Forum's Target True Zero.
We continue to focus on reducing our organisational carbon footprint (Scope 1 and 2 emissions), which has been a long term priority. We have been transitioning our fleet to more modern, fuel-efficient aircraft. While we did not take any new Airbus neo aircraft in this financial year, deliveries will resume in the 2022 financial year. Maximising fuel efficiency, and optimising passenger loads as much as possible, has been and remains a key focus area.
We continue to offset all the carbon from our operational carbon footprint as an interim measure, while new technologies are developed. This year we have formed a new partnership with Rolls-Royce to commence collaborating on sustainable aviation technology solutions. We have also been increasing our targeted messaging to customers about these issues, and our own people as we all have a role to play to tackle these sustainability challenges.
The measurement and reporting of our carbon emissions are aligned to the European Union's Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol and the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate related Financial Disclosures – refer to the dedicated table below. They also meet the requirements of the UK Government's Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting regulations, 2019.
The GHG Protocol categorises emissions in three scopes:
This year we have again worked with The Carbon Trust, a global climate change and sustainability consultancy, on our carbon mapping and reporting work.
Our carbon emissions are calculated and expressed as a suite of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) figures in metric tonnes. We use the operational control approach, in which we include emissions from activities where we control the operation and use published, up to date emission factors issued by competent authorities, (e.g. UK Government departments including BEIS and DEFRA).
The 2021 financial year carbon mapping work estimated that 99.87% (2020: 99.96%) of easyJet's organisational (Scope 1 and 2) carbon emissions was as a result of the use of aircraft fuel across our fleet.
| FY21 | FY20 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global emissions | UK only emissions | Global emissions (excl. UK) |
Global emissions | UK only emissions | Global emissions (excl. UK) |
|
| Scope 1 – tonnes of CO2e | 2,114,961 | 803,463 | 1,311,498 | 4,247,159 | 2,177,784 | 2,069,375 |
| Scope 2 – tonnes of CO2e | 788 | 760 | 28 | 976 | 833 | 143 |
| Total Scope 1 & 2 – tonnes of CO2e | 2,115,749 | 804,223 | 1,311,526 | 4,248,135 | 2,178,617 | 2,069,518 |
| Scope 3 – tonnes of CO2e | 585,443 | 1,145,845 | ||||
| Total carbon footprint – S1, 2 & 3 tonnes of CO2e |
2,701,192 | 5,393,980 | ||||
| Scope 1 energy use (kWh) | 8,531,020,231 | 3,238,837,186 | 5,292,183,044 | 17,138,339,131 8,787,980,066 8,350,359,065 | ||
| Scope 2 energy use (kWh) | 3,699,537 | 3,576,743 | 122,794 | 4,131,797 | 3,570,851 | 560,946 |
| Total energy use (kWh) | ||||||
| Scope 1 & 2 | 8,534,719,768 | 3,242,413,929 | 5,292,305,838 | 17,142,470,928 | 8,791,550,917 | 8,350,920,011 |
| Carbon offsets in tonnes of CO2e | 2,120,772 | 3,146,196 |
| FY21 | FY20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intensity metric | easyJet plc gCO2/RTK |
easyJet plc gCO2/RTK |
easyJet plc gCO2/RTK |
easyJet plc gCO2/RTK |
| Carbon emissions/revenue passenger km | 81.08 | 81.89 | 70.77 | 71.48 |
| FY21 | FY20 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intensity metric | easyJet plc gCO2/RTK |
easyJet plc gCO2/RTK |
easyJet plc gCO2/RTK |
easyJet plc gCO2/RTK |
||
| Carbon emissions/revenue tonne km | 810.77 | 818.9 | N/A | N/A |
Our intensity metric is expressed as grams of carbon dioxide equivalent (gCO2e) per passenger kilometre (RPK). This is a measure of on average how many grams of carbon dioxide equivalent are emitted for each kilometre travelled by each passenger on an easyJet aircraft.
In 2021 financial year our carbon dioxide emissions per passenger kilometre was 81.08g, compared to 70.77g in the 2020 financial year.
The effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on aviation has also had a significant effect on this intensity metric. The main reason for this is that our load factor, the average proportion of seats occupied on each flight, has reduced. This means that the carbon emissions from each flight are shared between a smaller number of passengers. This effect was more significant in the 2021 financial year than the 2020 financial year as the previous financial year included the period October 2020 to February 2021 before the start of the pandemic in Europe.
We have been able to somewhat reduce this effect by prioritising the use of our more efficient A320 / A321 neo aircraft, which are typically 15% more efficient per seat kilometre flown compared to the aircraft that they replaced. However, this has not prevented the intensity metric from increasing above pre-pandemic levels.
In 2017 we set a target of a 10% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions per passenger kilometre from our flights by the end of the 2022 financial year, compared to our 2016 figures. The effects of the pandemic have significantly affected our progress towards this target and currently we do not expect to meet this planned reduction in 2022.
Our intensity metrics are verified by a third-party specialist auditor, Verifavia. Verifavia used a reasonable assurance approach to review easyJet's 2021 financial year aircraft fuel burn, Revenue Passenger Kilometre, Revenue Tonne Kilometre and associated output CO2 and CO2e KPIs. Whilst this verification approach only focuses on our airline emissions, these equated to 99.87% in the 2021 financial year of our Scope 1 and 2 carbon footprint.
Verifavia's detailed assurance statement is available at http://corporate.easyjet.com/.
Our total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions from the fuel used in our flights was 2,112,906 tonnes in the 2021 financial year, compared to 4,264,435 in the 2020 financial year.
This total figure for the 2021 financial year is significantly reduced compared to the previous year due to the reduced flying that took place due to the effects of the pandemic.
In addition to our primary intensity metric expressed as grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per passenger kilometre, we have also included grams of carbon dioxide per revenue passenger kilometre. However, as in the past we have reported in grams of carbon dioxide per revenue passenger kilometre, we have continued to include this.
For the first time this year, we have also included our carbon emissions per passenger km per Revenue Tonne Kilometre as this metric is used by some stakeholders and investors.
During the 2021 financial year, we have expanded the scope of our reporting to include fugitive emissions from chillers and air conditioning equipment which is included in Scope 1.
In the 2020 financial year, we reviewed and updated our carbon intensity calculation methodology, so that it aligned more closely with established industry methodologies. The methodology used follows the protocols outlined in the BS EN 16258 – 2012, "Methodology for calculation and declaration of energy consumption and GHG emissions of transport services (freight and passengers)" document. This is the methodology that airlines with operations within the EU and beyond follow to comply with the EU's Emissions Trading System requirements.
We have adopted the convention of using Great Circle Distance (GCD) plus a fixed correction factor of 95km for each sector in this reporting year, as recommended by the EU ETS reporting methodology. This is also in line with the ICAO Carbon Emissions Calculator Methodology. This approach is intended to better reflect the actual distance flown in each flight. Completed flight data, fuel in tanks, fuel density, booked (revenue) passengers and GCD are recorded for each flight. Internal checking processes are applied to data on a regular basis for the purpose of ensuring data is of a high, robust quality for internal and external reporting requirements.
We have used UK Government's Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs' GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting, which were last issued in June 2021.
We know that aviation also contributes to non-carbon dioxide climate effects in the atmosphere and despite recent studies highlighting these effects, more robust research is required to provide further guidance on how best to tackle these impacts.
| 2021 | 81.08 |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 70.77 |
| 2019 | 70.41 |
| 2018 | 71.56 |
| 2017 | 72.46 |
| 2016 | 73.96 |
In a trial with partners at Gatwick Airport, some easyJet flights have been powered by Sustainable
We operate a fleet of modern, efficient Airbus A320-family aircraft. In 2017 we took delivery of our first Airbus A320neo aircraft (New Engine Option technology) and in 2018 our larger capacity Airbus A321neo aircraft entered into operation, offering 49 additional seats per aircraft and further reducing fuel-burn per passenger flown.
The "neo"-type aircraft (both A320 and A321 variants), are Airbus' new generation of narrow-body aircraft, replacing the "ceo"-type (Current Engine Option) variants of the same model. Equipped with CFM International's LEAP-1A engines, these new generation aircraft have at least a 15% proven fuel-burn efficiency over their previous generation aircraft, a 50% lower noise footprint during take-off and landing, and also offer a up to 50% margin on NOx emissions versus CAEP/6 Standard.
This new generation of aircraft currently make up 16% of our fleet and will continue to increase as we take delivery of the aircraft on our orderbook and retire our older aircraft. During the period of reduced utilisation due to the Covid-19 pandemic, we focused our operation on flying these more efficient neo-type aircraft and our smaller gauge Airbus A319 aircraft, whilst storing and parking our older A320ceo aircraft.
Whilst we did not have any new aircraft deliveries in the 2021 financial year, we will take delivery of eight neo aircraft in the 2022 financial year, seven in the 2023 financial year and plan to take 18 in the 2024 financial year. easyJet is the largest single brand operator of Airbus neo aircraft in Europe.
In addition to the neo-technology aircraft, since 2013 our A320ceo aircraft have been delivered with "Sharklet" wingtips (also standard on the neo variants), reducing drag and fuel-burn by 2-3% per hour flown. To further increase the efficiency of our A320 fleet, 93% of our A320 fleet has either been delivered in, or retrofitted to the increased density Spaceflex configuration. This space-saving layout reconfigures unused space in the rear galley to increase space in the cabin, freeing up space for six additional seats. The seats of these aircraft have also been converted to the slim-line lightweight Recaro design (also standard on all of our neo deliveries), further reducing the weight (and fuel-burn) of the aircraft.
| Total | 308 | 100% |
|---|---|---|
| A321neo | 14 | 4.5% |
| A320neo | 37 | 12.0% |
| A320 | 160 | 52.0% |
| A319 | 97 | 31.5% |
| Aircraft type | Number | Percentage of fleet |
We continue to operate our aircraft as efficiently as possible and are always looking for efficiency improvements. This includes adjusting standard operating procedures, which helps to reduce fuel usage and therefore carbon emissions.
All measures are taken only when safe and practical to do so, within the constraints of the operational environment.
Initiatives include:
We also continue to retrofit our aircraft with the latest fuel efficiency upgrades, including a wiring modification to enable single engine taxiing without using the APU and a descent profile optimisation upgrade for the flight management system which supports more fuel-efficient descents.
We believe Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs) will be part of our decarbonisation pathway, as and when they become more widely available and affordable. However, we do not see SAFs as the ultimate decarbonisation solution for short-haul aviation, since current pathways are not zero emissions.
At present, SAFs are typically several times the price of jet fuel, but forecasts predict that this differential will drop as SAFs scale and are adopted.
In the long term they are best suited to long-haul flying where there may not be alternatives to using SAFs. We support the development of genuine zero emissions technologies for short-haul and are optimistic that we could begin flying our customers on planes powered by hydrogen-combustion, hydrogen-electric or a hybrid of both by the mid to late-2030s.
Airport, some easyJet flights have been powered by Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF). This was the first time any airline at Gatwick has used SAF. The trial was supplier Q8Aviation, Gatwick Airport and SAF producer Neste.
Q8Aviation delivered the first supply of Neste MY Sustainable Aviation Fuel™ on 19 October 2021 and the trial initial volume of SAF was relatively
Neste's MY SAF is produced from 100% renewable and sustainable waste and residue raw materials, such as used cooking oil and animal fat waste. In its neat form and over its life cycle, MY SAF can achieve a reduction of up to 80% of greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil jet fuel use.
As part of our ground-based energy efficiency measures, we have continued to roll out new, more-efficient LED lighting across the Luton head office campus and completed the conversion of all outside lighting at Hangar 89 at London Luton Airport.
During the Covid-19 pandemic and local lockdowns across our European network, we made the decision to mothball the majority of our office sites including our Head Office in Luton and our largest site, Hangar 89, at London Luton Airport to reduce unnecessary energy usage.
In the 2021 financial year, the percentage of renewable sources of electricity our business used across our buildings and airport partner locations increased as more locations switched their procurement choices. In the 2021 financial year, this equated to 52% of our total electricity demand.
Decarbonising our flights is a huge challenge that requires a variety of solutions. As we continue to support development of new aircraft technology and improve fuel efficiency, we also want to take what other action we can now. This is why, since November 2019, we have offset 100% of our organisation's direct carbon emissions, from both our flights and ground operations (Scope 1 and 2), while we work to reduce emissions structurally in the medium and long term. We carefully select projects that actively take carbon out of the atmosphere or avoid the release of additional carbon.
easyJet was the world's first major airline to do this across its entire network and we currently remain the only major European airline to do so.
Offsetting is a powerful tool to tackle current unavoidable emissions while driving finance to impactful, vital projects that
offer environmental benefits, but also provide capital and low-carbon technologies to local economies. These projects are key to protect and restore ecosystems, tackle deforestation and enhance biodiversity while improving the health and livelihoods of millions of people who need it most.
At easyJet we do not see carbon offsets as an alternative solution to our carbon reductions efforts. Carbon offsetting is a tool for speeding up climate action and an interim measure, in addition to our top priority being carbon reductions. That's why we're also working right now with industryleading technology partners, Airbus and Wright Electric, to accelerate the development of zero emission technologies and we are optimistic that we could begin flying our customers on planes powered by hydrogen-combustion, hydrogen-electric or a hybrid of both by the mid to late 2030s. easyJet also engages with policymakers and lawmakers to help ensure the regulatory environment supports the adoption of zero-emissions aircraft in commercial aviation.
We employ a rigorous process to select the schemes we buy credits from. Our portfolio of projects all meet either the Gold Standard or VCS (Verified Carbon Standard) certification, which are globally recognised and respected for their standards of offsetting. Their certifiers check projects to ensure the carbon reductions they are claiming would not have happened without the project, and that by reducing carbon emissions in one place they do not inadvertently increase them elsewhere.
The schemes include nature-based credits such as reforestation, afforestation, and avoided deforestation, including borehole rehabilitation and cookstoves projects, in some of the most intense deforestation hotspots around the world. These projects are effective in reducing deforestation, but they also work with local communities to deliver programmes for alternative income generation which incentivises the protection of forests over the long term.
We are a participant in the Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets (TSVCM), an initiative launched in 2020 by Mark Carney, the former Governor of the Bank of England and now UN special envoy for climate action and finance, sponsored by the Institute of International Finance.
TSVCM's objective is to set a clear pathway towards scaling voluntary carbon markets while ensuring they are well governed, transparent, verifiable and robust. A newly formed independent governance body, composed of representatives from 12 countries, with 40% from the developing world, will review the work already conducted by the taskforce and engage experts from a wide range of sectors where concerns about integrity have arisen. Representatives of indigenous and local communities are also part of the governance body.
In the 2021 financial year we retired 2.12 million carbon credits to offset the carbon emissions of the fuel used in all our flights. Since we began offsetting in November 2019, we have retired 5.27 million carbon credits.
'Retiring' a carbon credit means it is taken off the market — never to be traded again. First Climate and Carbon Clear Ltd (Eco Act) procured these credits on our behalf; and the related retirement certificates are available at https://corporate.easyjet.com/.
In May 2021, easyJet holidays began offsetting carbon emissions from its package holidays, comprising the fuel used for flights and in-destination transfers, as well as the energy used from hotel stays. easyJet holidays was the first major tour operator to do this. The offsetting was also retrospectively applied to all holidays since easyJet holidays launched in November 2019.
of easyJet's CO2 footprint (Scopes 1 and 2) offset since November 2019
Borneo, in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, is the third-largest island in the world and home to the world's oldest tropical rainforests. Known for their rich biodiversity, their forests shelter thousands of endemic animal, reptile, insect and plant species. They have also experienced the destructive effects of heavy logging and conversion to land use, such as palm oil. Local communities have proven to be the best guardians of their territories, living in balance with their environment, but as forest resources become depleted, villagers feel forced to leave their communities looking for security and job opportunities.
As part of our offsetting scheme and environment protection efforts, easyJet has been supporting one of the local initiatives, the Pulau Borneo Project, which for over a decade has successfully defended 64,500 hectares of carbon and biodiversity – rich lowland peat forest from conversion to palm oil plantations, which surround the project area and the adjacent Tanjung Puting National Park, a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. The project protects over 120 threatened and endangered species in the project area and supports over 10,000 forest-dependent community members living in and along the boundaries of the project, who have traditionally held no formal land tenure.
Working hand in hand with local staff from the Tanjung Putting National Park, the project supports the protection of forests in the project area from illegal logging, hunting of endangered species, forest fires and other illegal activities. 54 forest patrols were conducted in 2020, ensuring the protection of carbon and biodiversity stocks against degradation and deforestation.
Pulau Borneo is the world's first forest conservation project registered to the Sustainable Development Verified Impact Standard (SD VISta). SD VISta was developed by Verra, a leading standards organisation created to help countries, businesses and civil society achieve ambitious sustainable development and climate action goals, enabling projects to assess and report the sustainable development benefits they generate directly against the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Verified by a
easyJet's carbon offsetting has been supporting the Pulau Borneo Project in Indonesia, which is defending large areas of peat forest.
third-party assessor, the project has demonstrated its progress against the SDGs transparently and rigorously, keeping driving finance to support and scale up its high-impact activities.
When Covid-19 pandemic reached the remote communities in the area, where basic health services were lacking, the Pulau Borneo project was able to provide additional support. This included the provision of face masks, public health information displays and a 'floating clinic' to provide frontline care to communities in the area.
(These are of the overall project – not just activity supported by easyJet)
Community
We want to lead the decarbonisation of aviation, and ultimately achieve zero emission flying across Europe. We believe that radical action to address aviation's impact on climate change is needed and so we are supporting the introduction of new technologies.
We are working with our partners, including Airbus and Wright Electric, to accelerate the development of zero emission technologies.
In 2019 we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Airbus for research on electric, hybrid-electric and hydrogen aircraft. The aim is to study operational and infrastructure opportunities and challenges with new propulsion technologies.
In September 2020, Airbus unveiled three hydrogen-powered concept planes: a turbofan, a turboprop and blended wing body fuelled aircraft concept. Airbus' intention is to launch the ZEROe aircraft programme with a full-scale prototype by late 2020s – for entry into service by 2035.
The ZEROe concept aircraft enables Airbus to explore a variety of configurations and hydrogen technologies that will shape the development of our future zero emission aircraft.
All three ZEROe concepts are hybridhydrogen aircraft. They are powered by hydrogen combustion through modified gas turbine engines. Liquid hydrogen is used as fuel for combustion with oxygen. In addition, hydrogen fuel cells create electrical power that complements the gas turbine, resulting in a highly efficient hybrid-electric propulsion system. All of these technologies are complementary, and the benefits are additive.
A team from easyJet, including our CEO, participated in the Airbus Summit on sustainable aerospace in September this year. The event brought together the aviation industry and stakeholders to discuss the actions that will be needed to deliver this technology.
The UK Aerospace Technology Institute (ATI) last year established the FlyZero initiative to help the UK aerospace industry develop a zero carbon emission aircraft by 2030.
The FlyZero programme brings together around 100 people seconded from industry and academia and has received a £15 million grant from the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). FlyZero is conducting a detailed and holistic study of the design challenges, manufacturing
demands and market opportunity of potential zero carbon emission aircraft concepts.
Captain David Morgan, Director of Flight Operations, and Bristol based First Officer Debbie Thomas are both members of the Aerospace Technology Institute and involved in the FlyZero programme.
Debbie is currently on a secondment working within the FlyZero project as an Aircraft Modeller to help accelerate the aviation path to zero carbon aircraft. Before retraining as a commercial pilot, Debbie worked as an aerospace engineer for 16 years in modelling and simulation. She is now bringing this experience, as well as her perspective as a pilot, to the FlyZero project.
Since 2017 we have been working with Wright Electric to support the development of a zero emission aircraft.
We believe that hydrogen will play a big part in future zero emission technology, as hydrogen has the ability to be combusted directly or converted to electricity via a fuel cell. High power electric motors are therefore likely to play an important role in future zero emission aircraft, either independently or as a hybrid, together with hydrogen combustion.
Wright is currently engineering electrical systems at the megawatt scale which will be necessary for commercial aircraft. These components will form the power plant of Wright's revolutionary Wright 1 aircraft.
In September 2021 Wright announced that it had successfully produced and started testing a two megawatt electric powertrain motor, which it believes is the most powerful electric propulsion motor of its kind in development and a key component for a zero emission aircraft system. This follows the successful testing of its next-generation inverter technology earlier in 2021.
Wright is then moving to the next phase of development including integration with an in-house developed highly efficient inverter, high altitude chamber testing, and gathering testing data for future aircraft certification. Wright remains committed to pushing the development of the electric powertrain to meet the requirements of the aerospace community, with progressive development over the next two years.
Wright commenced ground testing in 2021, and has said it will focus on propulsion fan development in 2022 and flight testing will commence as early as 2023.
Our Chief Executive Officer, Johan Lundgren, is a member of the UK Government's Jet Zero Council. Members of our Sustainability, Policy and Operations teams also participate in discussions within the Council and its working groups.
The Jet Zero Council brings together the UK Government and industry to accelerate the development of a UK Sustainable Aviation Fuel industry and commercialise zero emission flight.
The current focus areas of the Jet Zero Council are:
The World Economic Forum's Target True Zero initiative is working to accelerate the deployment and scaling of zero emission aviation, including electric and hydrogen flight technologies.
easyJet is participating in the initiative, along with other partners such as Airbus, , Boeing, Rolls-Royce, Schiphol Airport, Wright Electric, Zeroavia, McKinsey and Company, and the Aviation Impact Accelerator at the University of Cambridge.
This initiative is looking at what is needed to unlock the potential of true zero emission aviation in the areas of technology, industry dynamics, infrastructure and supply chain, regulation, and public acceptance.
We are collaborating with Rolls-Royce to research and progress thinking on the operational and economic implications of deploying new energy and power solutions in the commercial aviation sector.
New forms of propulsion and energy will require new infrastructure and operational requirements. The solutions are complex and require the ecosystem to be adapted at all levels.
The work will bring together key stakeholders operating across the aviation value chain (in addition to Rolls-Royce and easyJet subject matter experts) who will model and understand the implications of deploying new energy such as hydrogen at scale. These will be key avenues of enquiry to address over the time horizon of the project.
easyJet is a member of Sustainable Aviation (SA), a coalition of UK airlines, airports, aerospace manufacturers and air navigation service providers. As a group, SA has committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050, through an international approach, working with governments around the world and through the UN.
In June 2021 Sustainable Aviation announced new interim decarbonisation targets of at least 15% by 2030 and 40% by 2040, having reaffirmed its commitment to net zero by 2050.
Sustainable Aviation's roadmap includes the use of SAFs, airspace modernisation to deliver more efficient flying, the commercialisation of carbon removal technologies, and new low and zero carbon technologies – powered by hydrogencombustion, hydrogen-electric or a hybrid of both – becoming mainstream in the 2030s.
We know that our environmental impact is wider than carbon emissions and we continue to assess, address and minimise our environmental impacts beyond carbon. This year we have focused on the implementation of the Environmental Management System (EMS), improvements to waste management in our operations, and documenting sustainability requirements in our procurement.
We have also continued to implement our Diversity and Inclusion Strategy and incorporated Wellbeing to provide holistic support for people who work at easyJet.
To improve our environmental performance in a structured, systematic, and documented way, we joined the IATA Environmental Assessment Program (IEnvA), an EMS accreditation programme specifically developed for the airline sector by airlines, IATA, and leading experts in the aviation environmental sustainability. IEnvA provides airlines with a guidance, aligned with internationally accepted environmental management standard ISO 14001:2015, to effectively address significant environmental sustainability matters that face the aviation industry today.
We began implementation of our EMS in 2020 and established a dedicated Environmental Management Review Board. The Board is chaired by the Chief Operating Officer (COO), and attendees include the Director of Flight Operations, the Director of Cabin Services, the Director of Inflight Retail, the Director of Engineering & Maintenance, the Director of Safety, Security & Compliance, the Director of Ground Operations, the Director of Airport Operations and Navigation, the Director of HR Shared Services and the Director of Sustainability. The Board meets twice a year to review the performance of the EMS and to ensure that it continues to be effective in meeting objectives and targets, addresses key operations and business activities, and provides an efficient framework for continual improvement.
To implement and embed the EMS into day-to-day activities, a cross functional EMS Working Group has been created, which is chaired by the COO. The working group includes representatives from Flight Operations, Safety, Security & Compliance, Engineering & Maintenance, Property, Inflight Retail, Ground Operations, and Crew Operations. The Groups meets on a quarterly basis and is responsible for championing environmental improvement and delivering environmental initiatives, improving environmental policy and procedures integration in their departments. 15 Environmental Action Plans have been developed across all areas to maintain environmental compliance, prevent pollution, and drive continuous environmental improvement.
Airlines are able to phase the implementation of the IEnvA programme with recognition as a Stage 1 or Stage 2 Operator. In September 2021 we were internally assessed against the IEnvA Stage 1 standards, which was followed by an external assessment by a team of IEnvA Assessors (that consists of one IOSA Lead Auditor and one certified ISO 14001 auditor) . We are committed to achieve Stage 2 recognition in the 2022 financial year.
A variety of waste streams are generated in our operations and we are committed to reducing waste across all our activities, by applying the waste hierarchy to reduce the impact of any residual waste. In our offices we segregate recyclable waste streams such as paper and cardboard, aluminium cans and plastics, and food waste.
In our Engineering and Maintenance operations we ensure hazardous waste is handled appropriately and we are working towards increased segregation of hazardous and non-hazardous waste.
We also generate waste onboard our flights. Approximately 50% of waste generated on our flights is recyclable, which includes plastic bottles, aluminium cans, cardboard, and paper, and we are committed to segregate and recycle as much as possible.
We have made changes to our inflight food and drink products and service to help reduce the amount of single-use plastic used on our flights.
Since 2020 these changes have now avoided the use of over 36 million items of plastic.
| Total waste | 314.72 |
|---|---|
| WEEE | 0.45 |
| Mixed | 3.02 |
| Hazardous waste | 35.89 |
| Wood pallets | 0.88 |
| Scrap metal | 1.96 |
| Waste oil & fuel | 5.18 |
| General commercial waste | 139.21 |
| Food | 9.60 |
| Crushed empty oil tins | 5.79 |
| Card | 112.74 |
| Waste type | Weight (by tonnes) |
| Metric | FY21 | FY20 |
|---|---|---|
| Total onboard waste (thousand tonnes)* |
1.61 | 3.39 |
| Waste per passenger (kg/pax)** |
0.08 | 0.07 |
We are not directly responsible for the disposal of onboard waste, which is typically handled by our ground handling and cleaning contractors. Waste is taken to appropriate disposal facilities at airports, with some materials being recovered for recycling and some being sent to landfill or incinerated. The interpretation and enforcement of International Catering Waste (ICW) legislation at both the local airport and national policy level often means that all waste generated onboard is deemed as ICW upon arrival, meaning that materials are being unnecessarily sent to incineration or deep landfill, when they could be recycled. Consequently, many airports do not provide recycling facilities.
Over the last year we initiated dialogue with our partners at our 12 largest airports to drive improvements in waste segregation and increasing recycling rates. In partnership with Bristol Airport, a recycling trial was set up in December 2020 and a new dedicated waste facilities were made available for our segregated onboard waste (in December 2020). The airport authority provides regular feedback, which is communicated back to our cabin crew, to ensure onboard waste is segregated and disposed of responsibly, and in line with our Environment Policy.
We issue regular communications to our cabin crew community to emphasise the importance of waste segregation and a new training module was created, explaining segregation procedures and what happens to recyclable waste once it is taken off the aircraft. This module will be used in all cabin crew new entrants and recurrent training.
Hazardous and non-hazardous waste is generated in our Engineering & Maintenance operations. We are committed to ensuring all waste is handled in a responsible manner and as much waste as possible is segregated.
Cardboard is re-used for transporting engineering parts, both in the main hub and in outstations, and cleaning clothes are made from recycled clothing materials.
Over the next year we will be working further to align the waste procedures and standards across all locations, and we will be setting reduction and improvement targets.
In the 2021 financial year, we began discussions with the Aircraft Interior Recycling Association (AIRA) – a total aircraft interior support company that provides environmentally responsible ways to recycle end of life interiors and waste materials. AIRA will review disposal options for end of life aircraft interior materials and plastic parts, with the view to establish which parts and materials can be processed and recycled if collected separately, rather than being disposed to landfill. We will be running a trial project starting early 2022.
This year we started introducing a new cabin crew and pilot uniform created with unique high-tech material, each made from around 45 recycled plastic bottles. The roll-out across the airline is estimated to prevent around half a million plastic bottles from ending up as plastic waste each year.
The new fabric, adapted to the easyJet's current style, was first trialled last year for suitability in the cabin and flight deck environments. Compared to the nonrecycled alternative, it is more abrasionresistant. It also provides even more
fabric made from 100% recycled plastic bottles. The material for each uniform uses around 45 bottles.
elasticity, a four-way stretch, improving fit and freedom of movement for enhanced comfort and durability. This development can lead to it being long lasting for the wearer, reducing the need for more uniform items to be produced in the long term.
Beyond the new fabric, plastic has also been replaced in all clothing-related packaging in favour of recyclable and biodegradable materials.
Our Engineering and Maintenance Part 145 Quality Department significantly reduced the need to print and re-scan documents in order to support easyJet engineers with their personal aircraft maintenance licence applications.
A new procedure was introduced, which was approved by the CAA, reducing the need to print all application documentation, including supporting information such certificates, logbooks and identification documents and to perform application verification by applying a wet stamp on every page and countersigning it.
On a single application this could have previously amounted to between 300 to 600 pages. This has not only significantly reduced the need to print but also improved processing efficiency and time. There is now a review of further processes to streamline engineering station procedures to move towards paperless systems with only a paper back-up as required by the regulator.
The noise from our aircraft can affect those who live near airports or under flight paths. We work with individual airports and air traffic control teams to implement noise mitigation activities that best fit each location. Our pilots also use flying techniques that reduce the impact of aircraft noise, such as continuous descent approaches.
The new generation Airbus A320neo and A321neo aircraft are 50% quieter during takeoff and landing than the equivalent previous generation aircraft. The LEAP-1A engines on these aircraft meet the most stringent noise standards, ICAO's Chapter 14 regulations.
We have also carried out a retrofit programme to address a sound, associated with A320 family aircraft of all airlines, due to the airflow under the wing.
In September 2021 construction began of our new maintenance hangar at Berlin Brandenberg Airport. The hangar, which will be our first maintenance hangar outside of the UK, is due to be operational at the end of 2023.
"Delivering Covid-19 vaccines around the world is the biggest health and logistics operation in history, but easyJet's summer collection has provided vital support for our appeal. Once again, easyJet employees have gone above and beyond with their fundraising efforts, raising over £275,000 an incredible amount which could help to deliver approximately 189,000 vaccines around the world. Thank you to everyone at easyJet, we're incredibly grateful for your support."
Deputy Executive Director for Partnerships at The UK Committee for Unicef (Unicef UK)
The hangar will conform with latest November 2020 GEG Law (Gebäudeenergiegesetz) and thereby meets the EU Energy Performance Directive 2020.
The plans include a highly energy efficient underfloor heating system, with heating supplied from a district heat system.
We have a pan-European charity partnership, Change for Good, with Unicef, the world's leading children's organisation. Our cabin crew make onboard appeals for customers to make donations in support of Unicef's work to protect children around the world from disease and keep them safe during emergencies.
In summer 2021 we restarted our onboard appeals for Unicef to support the charity's Covid-19 Vaccines Appeal, in which Unicef aims to support the delivery of 2 billion
Covid-19 vaccines, tests, and treatments for health workers and the most high-risk people around the world. An individual donation from a customer of just £2/€2 could help Unicef deliver one dose of one of the Covid-19 vaccines.
For the first time we took donations by card payment, rather than cash. We also encouraged customers to donate online directly to Unicef through prompts in the easyJet mobile app and through advertising on aircraft seatbacks.
During the summer 2021 appeal, which took place through July, August and September, we were able to raised over £275,000 due to the efforts of our cabin crew and the generosity of our customers.
Since our partnership with Unicef began in 2012 it has raised over £15 million.
This year we have continued to focus on our people priorities, including the ongoing impact of the pandemic on people who work at easyJet. We have evaluated our previously introduced Diversity and Inclusion Strategy and incorporated Wellbeing to provide a holistic strategy. It is focused on creating an environment of inclusion where everyone can be themselves and people can look after their own and each other's wellbeing.
Data led design of best practice policy and process, embedding our responsibility for inclusion and wellness at easyJet
Gender makeup of easyJet employees as at 30 September 2021
Female Male
Engaging campaigns and supporting materials, designed utilising feedback from our listening channels, articulating what we mean by inclusion and wellness at easyJet
We upskill our people to instigate cultural change, creating an employee sense of belonging, an environment of inclusion and supporting wellness needs at easyJet
We focus on expert input and support for our resources, tools and services. Reflecting the different needs across our communities
Our future focus is to continue to ensure our diversity monitoring enables us to make the right decisions for our communities and embed our commitments around policy,
process and upskilling. As well as a continued commitment to broadening the health and wellbeing support across our network, our Trailblazer team and line managers continue to be critical in our ambition to create an inclusive and energising environment where everyone can learn and grow.
Although the aviation industry is not predicted to reach previous levels of demand until at least 2024, which means we will not be recruiting in the same numbers as pre-pandemic, we are committed to looking at the best ways we can make the pipeline of future aviation talent more diverse.
In March 2021 we launched a virtual pilot school visits programme. Teachers, schools and parents have been able to request a virtual visit from an easyJet pilot, to join classrooms and assemblies via video link, providing young people across the UK with the opportunity to find out what the job of a pilot is really like and to explain that it can be a career that anyone can consider.
Since 2017 easyJet pilots have visited over 400 schools and colleges across Europe, which has helped to provide visible role models for young people.
We provide our special assistance service, in partnership with airports and their special assistance providers on the ground, for customers who need some additional help when they are travelling.
Customer satisfaction amongst passengers using special assistance has continued to be higher than the average across all customers. Customer satisfaction amongst special assistance customers this financial year was 87% (based on customers who selected 'completely', 'very' or 'quite' satisfied), compared to 74.6% for all customers (2020: 83.6% for customers using special assistance, compared to 75.2% for all customers).
In 2012 we established the easyJet Special Assistance Advisory Group (ESAAG), to provide expert advice on special assistance issues. While the Group has not met during the pandemic, we continue to work with the Chair of the Group, Lord David Blunkett.
Our Supplier Code of Conduct is based on easyJet's Code of Business Ethics and requires partners to comply with easyJet societal and environmental standards, and to ensure the compliance of any subcontractors. In line with the UK Modern Slavery Act, it prohibits modern slavery and human trafficking.
easyJet holidays also encourages all its direct hotel partners to actively work towards certification that meets the Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) standards. Hotels with GSTC-recognised certifications have been independently certified against GSTC criteria which address the key elements of social, environmental, cultural, and economic sustainability. easyJet's Sustainability Director, Jane Ashton, is also a member of the GSTC Board.
Our Modern Slavery Working Group is responsible for the development and implementation of our modern slavery strategy. The Working Group was established in 2016 and is composed of senior management representatives from relevant functions across the business. It continues to monitor and assess the effectiveness of the steps we are taking in addressing modern slavery.
The human rights and modern slavery clauses in our Supplier Code of Conduct policy specifically require suppliers to respect internationally recognised human rights, including those expressed in the United Nations International Bill of Human Rights, and the internationally recognised rights and principles set out in the International Labour Organization's Core Conventions and Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Our suppliers are also required to have at all times a written policy in relation to such matters and to ensure the policy's effective implementation within their organisation.
More information is available in our latest Modern Slavery Act statement at https:// corporate.easyjet.com/.
All airlines and transport providers are at risk that their services could be used by human traffickers. We have training for all our cabin crew and pilots on how to identify and report possible human trafficking.
We have in place ethical and compliance policies, covering topics including bribery and corruption, gift giving, anti-fraud, human rights and modern slavery. These policies and our commitment to the Human Rights statement are available to all employees on the easyJet intranet.
All new entrants to easyJet receive mandatory ethics training during the onboarding process. All employees are also required to complete annual online refresher training covering ethical behaviour, anti-bribery and corruption.
A Business Integrity Committee acts as a cross-company forum to consider ethics policies and management and this has continued to meet this year. The committee receives reports of suspected unethical behaviour, identifies Group-wide trends, and monitors follow up. The committee's remit includes disciplinary issues or grievances raised with HR, environmental concerns and suspected fraud.
All employees of easyJet and our suppliers should feel able to raise concerns about any safety, legal or ethical issues. If they feel unable to report these concerns to a manager, we also provide a confidential whistleblowing process.
The 'Speak Up, Speak Out' service is run independently of easyJet and reports can be made openly or anonymously. The service is available by phone and online reporting in all countries we serve.
All reports are investigated and followed up as necessary by a dedicated easyJet senior manager responsible for business integrity. The Board oversees the whistleblowing process with the assistance of the Audit Committee. In addition, the Business Integrity Committee is a management forum on whistleblowing. It receives summaries of all reported concerns and monitors any ongoing concerns and ensures that the proposed outcomes of investigations are fair, transparent and robust, with root causes identified and remedial actions agreed.
Climate-related issues are addressed on a regular basis by the Airline Management Board (AMB), the equivalent of an Executive Committee (ExCo) that is led by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The AMB reports upwards to the plc Board. The CEO sits on the plc Board and is responsible for climate-related issues.
The AMB's members (which includes the CFO & CEO) are collectively responsible for assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities, as well as driving the performance of the airline against strategic KPIs and managing the allocation of central funds and capital.
Climate-related issues were included as specific agenda items four times at the AMB, and were discussed regularly at the plc Board during the 2021 financial year. This included regular updates from the CEO, and a formal presentation from the
sustainability team. Topics usually covered reviewing and guiding climate-related strategy and monitoring and overseeing progress against goals and targets for addressing climate-related issues, among others.
easyJet has a dedicated sustainability board called the Sustainability Steering Committee. The Committee meets on average, eight to ten times a year and comprises senior management attendees including Group Markets & Marketing Director, CFO, Chief Commercial Officer, Group General Counsel & Company Secretary, Director of Flight Operations, Director of Airport Development & Procurement, Director of Tax & Fuel Procurement, HR & People Development Director and the Director of Sustainability. Members are collectively responsible for driving the performance of the airline against strategic KPIs and managing the allocation of central funds and resource to improve our performance and the consideration of and disclosure of climate-related risks and opportunities.
During the 2021 financial year, the Sustainability Steering Committee
(chaired by the Group Markets & Marketing Director, AMB member) reviewed and discussed climate-related risks and opportunities from both a qualitative and quantitative perspective and these were presented and discussed upwards to the AMB. The Group Markets & Marketing Director, in their capacity as Chair of the Sustainability Steering Committee, approved the task to model the future trajectory of gCO2/revenue per passenger kilometre (RPK) for the airline through to 2050 (a task that feeds into the modelling of our net zero ambitions).
Refer to the section below on Metrics and targets for further information regarding our net zero pathway.
• easyJet is planning further engagement and involvement of Board-level colleagues and managers across the business to increase the visibility, knowledge and performance of climate change issues. This will include a series of risk workshops to assign further responsibilities.
Ongoing development of the Corporate Risk Management Framework is a constant at easyJet, ensuring a unified and collaborative risk management approach and risk management best practice across the Group. easyJet defines our short, medium and long term time horizons for climate risk as follows:
The key risks identified using the risk framework by the business and subsequently reviewed by the Board fall into seven broad themes – one of these thematic areas is environment and
sustainability as outlined in the risk section on page 85. The risks include:
Carbon trading schemes – i.e. adverse changes to these schemes including the existence and/or cost of the scheme (i.e. pertaining to a climate transition risk).
Increased taxation – i.e. future policy measures and regulation to tackle the impact of aviation on climate change could impact easyJet's business if they impose limitations and cost on how easyJet operates and the services it can provide (i.e. pertaining to a climate transition risk).
Significant operational disruption – in the 2021 financial year, we incorporated the impacts of climate change on our business and operations into a risk focused on significant operational disruption – i.e. climate change-related weather disruption (i.e. pertaining to physical climate risks) as
part of the Safety, Security and Operations thematic area.
easyJet worked in partnership with the Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies (CCRS) using methodology and scenarios from their Climate Resilience Analytics Framework. The scope of work included addressing the business risk from climate change in both our direct and indirect operations, across our value chain. The work commenced in the early part of the 2021 financial year whereby an assessment was made, using workshops and interviews with key internal stakeholders, regarding the potential financial risks to our business operations across the dimensions of physical and transition risks. CCRS then undertook scenario modelling of each climate risk against easyJet's current commercial and physical footprint (see below for more information).
CCRS modelled the potential financial impacts of transition risks (e.g. the changing landscape of climate and carbon taxes, charges and regulatory changes introduced by countries in our network) as well as physical risks (see below) for various climate scenarios to determine the sensitivity of impacts to different future global socioeconomic and temperature projections (see below for a full explanation of the scenarios used). easyJet relies on a number of key estimates including the ability to meet its strategic plans, future fuel and carbon tax prices and the ability to pass on cost price increases to the customer.
There are several transition risks that are prominent, as easyJet develops its business and operations in a changing landscape. They include:
The CCRS work highlighted the acute and chronic physical risks that could impact our business. In summary, these related to the increased impact to our business from severe weather like flooding, snowstorms etc.
The specific opportunities easyJet has identified include:
In terms of financial planning, easyJet defined what it deemed to be substantive financial or strategic impact on our business during the 2021 financial year with respect to the climate change risk quantification. The quantification will further assist in defining thresholds for what constitutes a risk of "major concern" e.g. substantive financial or strategic level of impact and "above risk tolerance" against this metric – the overall company materiality principal of 1% of total assets equating to a threshold of £21.5m is listed in this annual report.
For a full explanation of this materiality threshold in the context of risk quantification, refer to section 2.1b and for a full explanation of our climate-related risks and opportunities on our business and strategy, please refer to section 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4 of our 2021 CDP climate change submission which is available on the CDP website at www.cdp.net.
Overview of scenario analysis CCRS quantified our climate change risks using a 5-year Enterprise Value at Risk (5yrEV@Risk) metric which shows how the risks would impact discounted cashflows over five years within a given confidence interval, e.g. 95%, in line with how we define short and medium term time horizons for climate risks. However, the quantification and supporting research and analysis will further assist in the allocation of resource and capital to manage these risks beyond these time horizons.
The scenarios used were as follows:
These scenarios incorporate socioeconomic projections from the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs).
To assess physical risk, the changes in expected annual impacts (in terms of likelihood and severity of extreme weather events) were analysed on a 20-year time horizon (2040) relative to the present day (recent historical period) through financial models. Individual risk scenarios were modelled to assess the various mechanisms through which physical hazards (e.g. extreme temperatures, water stress, floods, and storms) impacts easyJet, including disruption to operations and to market demand. A middle-of-the-road scenario was chosen – Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP4.5) – noting that there is limited variability in physical risks across different RCPs within the near to mid-term time horizon (20 years).
The CCRS risk analysis confirmed and elaborated on the summary of risks that management had outlined in our 2020 financial year Annual Report and CCRS specifically quantified the financial value at risk over a five-year time horizon across various global emission pathways. Financial modelling enabled assessment of the magnitude of individual transition and physical risks identified and the relative materiality of these different climate risks over the same time horizon. For example, across the transition risk dimensions of policy, market, technology, reputational, and liability risk, as well as acute and chronic physical risks.
To read the full suite of cost estimates associated with the risks and opportunities, refer to section 2.3 and 2.4 of our 2021 CDP submission. Outputs from the various scenario analyses modelled by CCRS included within the quantitative assessments of the financial impacts to easyJet can be reviewed in detail in section 3.2a of our 2021 CDP submission. Further information is contained in Notes to the accounts, 1b.(ii) Critical accounting estimates on pages 184 to 185.
easyJet conducted a risk quantification exercise within a new risk framework to stress test our corporate risk register in the 2021 financial year – which included risks arising from climate change. easyJet worked in partnership with the Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies and used a "5-year Earnings Value at Risk (5yrEV@Risk)" metric which shows how the risks would impact discounted cashflows over five years within a given confidence interval, e.g. 95%.
For further information on easyJet's management of sustainability risks, see the Risk section on page 85.
An effective corporate risk management framework has a simple, yet effective methodology. This helps encourage engagement at, and across, appropriate levels of the organisation. The methodology at the heart of the new corporate risk management framework is what is commonly known as the "bow tie" approach. This encourages a range of internal stakeholders (e.g. risk, strategy and finance teams) to consider risk in a structured and consistent way, with the unwanted or unexpected event at the centre. The risk bow ties are reviewed on a regular basis to ensure stakeholders are
aware of the current causes and consequences, and that the most appropriate controls are in place and being effective. Potential causes and consequences of this event are then identified together with an assessment of the controls and mitigations that may reduce the likelihood or impact of the unwanted or unexpected event with a specific focus on prioritising those risks with a material financial impact.
easyJet will next review each transition risk identified in conjunction with the current climate change risks detailed in our Principal Risks section (see page 78). The action is to determine individual strategies and assign risk ownership through the Corporate Risk Framework. The Board is ultimately responsible for determining the nature and extent of the principal risks. However, in similar fashion to the current physical climate change risks, ownership of these risks and their risk management controls and capabilities sit across the Group. This is in addition to discussion of key risk topics and events, including emerging or changing risks, at the Airline Management Board, Audit Committee and plc Board.
For a full explanation regarding our approach and processes to manage climate-related risks and opportunities, please refer to section 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4 of our 2021 CDP climate change submission which is available on the CDP website at www.cdp.net.
easyJet worked in partnership with the Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies (CCRS) to model the potential financial impacts from various climate-related scenarios – five in total – to determine the different temperature increases according to e.g. Paris aligned reductions, BAU projections etc. Results of the analysis are quantitative assessments of financial impacts to easyJet for each of the risk scenarios, across various emissions pathways. For further information about the metrics used for the financial quantification of our climate-related risks and opportunities, please refer to section 2.3 & 2.4 of our 2021 CDP climate change submission which is available on the CDP website at www.cdp.net.
easyJet has disclosed its full value chain emissions in this Annual Report, for the second consecutive year. Refer to page 46 to read our comprehensive GHG and Energy Performance Table, incl. Scope 1, 2 & 3 emissions. For a full explanation of our GHG risks, please refer to section 2.3 of our 2021 CDP climate change submission which is available on the CDP website at www.cdp.net.
The business has an intensity (efficiency) target – to achieve a 10% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions per passenger kilometre on our flights by 2022, compared to a 2016 baseline figure – i.e. the end of next financial year. This metric, using grams of carbon dioxide per revenue passenger km is a headline KPI for the business and an important yardstick of our on-going efficiency improvements. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, including aircraft deferrals and reduced load factors, has significantly affected our progress towards our 10% efficiency target and currently we do not expect to meet this planned reduction in 2022.
In November 2021 easyJet joined Race to Zero, a global UN-backed campaign to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050 at the latest. By joining Race to Zero, we have committed to set an interim sciencebased target for 2035 as well as to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, aligning with the criteria and recommendations of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). easyJet plans to present its net-zero roadmap in the 2022 financial year.
• The business will commence programmes of work to move it towards a pathway of net zero carbon emissions by 2050 and easyJet plans to present its net zero roadmap in the 2022 financial year.
Report footnote: The Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies Climate Resilience Analytics Framework is used by global companies to facilitate strategic and financial decision making from climate change. The Centre's rigorous scenario-based framework integrates a wide range of threat classes including financial, geopolitical, technology, environmental, social and governance with the latest international standards in climate science to provide a competitive view of a corporation's balance sheet. The Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies is based within the University of Cambridge Judge Business School. The Centre works closely with business partners in tackling complex issues of management science in risk.
The table below and the information incorporated by reference comprises our Non-Financial Information Statement required by s414CA and 414CB of the Companies Act 2006. Details of our business model can be found on page 12.
• The Sustainability Steering Committee monitors the progress being made against the Group-wide Sustainability Strategy. The plc Board and AMB regularly discuss climaterelated matters and oversee progress against goals and targets for addressing climaterelated issues. For more information on our Sustainability Strategy and how we manage sustainability, please refer to pages 38 to 61.
related KPIs (where applicable) • As part of our commitment to UK and EU targets of net zero emissions by 2050, we have helped develop a European aviation industry roadmap towards net zero ("Destination 2050").
Outcomes of policies and
• Our people are fundamental to our success and a key category of principal risk is around our people, further information on which is set out on pages 94 and 95. Industrial Action and talent acquisition and retention are recognised as principal risks and we seek to control and mitigate those risks in order to reduce their impact.
• Social impact matters are not considered to be principal risks. However, these matters are considered by the plc Board as part of its stakeholder engagement programme, further information is set out on pages 26 to 37.
| Policies | Due diligence and implementation | Outcomes of policies and related KPIs (where applicable) |
Related principal risks and impact of business activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4. Human rights • easyJet is committed to human rights, both in its business and its supply chain. This includes observance of the principles set out by the International Labour Organisation Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. • We have a Supplier Code of Conduct, which is based on easyJet's Code of Business Ethics and requires partners to comply with easyJet societal and environmental standards, and to ensure the compliance of any subcontractors. In line with the UK Modern Slavery Act, it prohibits modern slavery and human trafficking. |
• The Modern Slavery Working Group is responsible for the development and implementation of our modern slavery strategy. • All supplier contracts include a clause requiring them to comply with the Supplier Code of Conduct and Modern Slavery Act. • The plc Board reviews easyJet's policies on modern slavery, due diligence processes and the way we assess and manage modern slavery annually. • Suppliers must submit an annual slavery and human trafficking report setting out steps taken to ensure that slavery and human trafficking is not taking place in supply chains or in any part of their business. • Employees are required to undertake mandatory training on modern slavery. |
• Both induction training and annual refresher training at a Group level ensures the workforce is continually mindful of human rights and modern slavery. • Ensuring policies form part of our process with new and potential suppliers in turn enhances the Group's actions to mitigate and prevent modern slavery and human trafficking. • We consulted with a number of expert stakeholders, such as not for profit organisations and investors, in developing our strategy to tackle modern slavery. We shared with them our modern slavery policy and strategy and their constructive feedback helped us to further improve our approach to tackling the issue. |
• Modern slavery was included as a key topic in this year's Safeguarding Workshop – an internal cross functional workshop aimed at assessing safeguarding risks faced by easyJet to stimulate discussion and prioritise any future management action. • We continue to look at the Global Slavery Index to support our analysis of geographic risks and assess whether the country/ area have a high prevalence of modern slavery or other labour rights violations. |
| 5. Anti-corruption and anti-bribery • Code of Ethics, which includes ethical and compliance policies, covering topics that include bribery and corruption, gift giving and fraud. • 'Speak Up, Speak Out' policy. • Supplier Code of Conduct. • Gifts and Hospitality Register. |
• Ethical and compliance policies are monitored by the Business Integrity Committee and People team. • All existing and new employees receive mandatory ethics training annually and upon joining the business. • Risks associated with bribery and corruption are reviewed quarterly by the Audit Committee. • A Gifts and Hospitality Register ensures any gifts or hospitality received are recorded and monitored |
• Ensuring appropriate controls are in place to monitor and mitigate bribery and corruption, both external and internal, has ensured a zero tolerance approach is maintained throughout the Group. • In order to understand industry-wide trends, the Business Integrity Committee set up a UK Airline Fraud Forum and has invited several UK airlines to attend. |
• Compliance and regulatory risks are recognised as a principal risk. More details can be found on pages 90 to 91. |
in line with regulatory requirements.
Our focus over the winter season was on raising liquidity, implementing strong cost control measures and cash generative flying to minimise cash burn and as we entered the Summer peak easyJet successfully maintained this disciplined approach by matching capacity to rising demand across UK domestics and mainland Europe.
Chief Financial Officer
| £ million (Reported) – Group | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Group revenue | 1,458 | 3,009 |
| Headline costs excluding fuel, balance sheet FX and ownership costs | (1,638) | (2,561) |
| Fuel | (371) | (721) |
| Headline EBITDAR | (551) | (273) |
| Balance sheet foreign exchange gain | 9 | – |
| Other ownership costs | (594) | (562) |
| Group headline loss before tax | (1,136) | (835) |
| Headline tax credit | 236 | 110 |
| Group headline loss after tax | (900) | (725) |
| Non-headline items | 100 | (438) |
| Non-headline tax credit/(charge) | (58) | 84 |
| Group total loss after tax | (858) | (1,079) |
| £ per seat – Airline only | 2021 | 2020 |
| Airline revenue | 50.54 | 54.35 |
| Headline costs excluding fuel, balance sheet FX and ownership costs | (56.62) | (45.74) |
| Fuel | (13.16) | (13.09) |
| Headline EBITDAR | (19.24) | (4.48) |
| Balance sheet foreign exchange gain | 0.32 | – |
| Other ownership costs | (20.95) | (10.20) |
| Airline headline loss before tax | (39.87) | (14.68) |
| Headline tax credit | 8.39 | 1.92 |
| Airline headline loss after tax | (31.48) | (12.76) |
| Non-headline items | 3.53 | (7.98) |
| Non-headline tax credit | (2.07) | 1.52 |
| Airline total loss after tax | (30.02) | (19.22) |
Due to the continued impact of Covid-19, in the 2021 financial year easyJet flew 20.4 million passengers (2020: 48.1 million), down 58% on the prior year. As a result, Group headline loss before tax was £1,136 million for the year ended 30 September 2021 (2020: loss of £835 million) and Group total reported loss after tax for the year was £858 million (2020: loss of £1,079 million).
With a full year impact of Covid-19 driving reduced flying and the softer macro-level demand, Group revenue for the full year decreased by 51.6% to £1,458 million (2020: £3,009 million), and Airline revenue per seat for the year fell 7.0% to £50.54 (2020: £54.35), and by
6.4% at constant currency. It should be noted that Covid-19 restrictions started in March 2020 and therefore did not impact the first half of the 2020 comparative financial year when easyJet delivered revenue per seat 9.6% higher than 2019 and load factors of 90.3%.
The ongoing restrictions on travel imposed by governments in response to Covid-19 have continued to adversely impact air travel. Our focus over the winter season was on cash generative flying to minimise cash burn. During the second half of the year, there was continued uncertainty due to the changing environment, however travel restrictions were eased across much of Europe. easyJet successfully maintained a disciplined focus and agile approach on matching capacity to available demand especially across UK domestics and mainland Europe.
As a result, cash burn (on a fixed costs plus capex basis) during 2021 was £36 million per week on average, outperforming the guidance for £40 million per week. Strong cash management also meant that operating cash generation was broadly flat in H2 with a £10 million cash outflow versus £1,438 million in H1.
Group headline costs excluding fuel, balance sheet FX revaluations and ownership costs for the full year fell by 36% to £1,638 million (2020: £2,561 million), mainly as a result of the reduced level of flying. Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel, balance sheet FX revaluations and ownership costs increased to £56.62 (2020: £45.74), driven by lower volumes, with fixed costs being spread over lower flown capacity. easyJet's cost reduction programme which was implemented in 2020 continues to achieve significant savings with the Group also benefitting from the extension of furlough schemes in the UK and across Europe.
Group fuel costs of £371 million were £350 million lower than the 2020 financial year (2020: £721 million) primarily as a result of the reduced flying. Airline fuel cost per seat of £13.16 (2020: £13.09) was in line with the prior year. There was an underlying decrease in the market price of fuel by 3.7% which was offset by the comparative benefits of the carbon credits asset sales in 2020. When considering easyJet's fuel and US dollar hedging programme, the effective fuel price decreased by 4.1% to £469 per tonne (2020: £489 per tonne).
Group ownership costs increased by 4.1% to £585 million (2020: £562 million) predominantly driven by increased interest costs as a result of higher levels of debt, partially offset by lower maintenance related depreciation as a result of the reduction in flying volumes.
A Group non-headline gain of £100 million (2020: £438 million loss) was recognised in the year. This consisted of a £65 million gain as a result of the sale and leaseback of 35 aircraft and 2 engines during the year, a £61 million credit in relation to our restructuring programme; offset by a £27 million net charge related to hedge discontinuation and ineffectiveness.
All per seat metrics are for the Airline business only as the inclusion of hotel-related revenue and costs from the holidays business will distort the revenue per seat and cost per seat metrics as these are not directly correlated to the seats flown by the Airline business. The segmental note within the consolidated financial statements shows the contribution of each operating segment towards the Group's performance. All seats flown relate directly to the Airline business and are therefore included in total for the per seat metrics. The overall contribution of the holidays segment to the financial performance of the consolidated Group for the year ended 30 September 2021 was not significant. As a result, presenting the Airline-only financial performance metrics below does not materially distort the financial performance of the Group as a whole.
Amounts presented at constant currency are an alternative performance measure and not determined in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards but provide relevant and comparative reporting for users.
The Group total tax credit for the year was £178 million (2020: £194 million credit). The effective tax rate for the year was 17.2% (2020: 15.3%).
| 2021 | 2020* | Change in | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pence per share | Pence per share | pence per share | ||
| Basic headline loss per share | (166.9) | (149.7) | (17.2) | |
| Basic total loss per share | (159.0) | (222.9) | 63.9 | |
| Diluted headline loss per share | (166.9) | (149.7) | (17.2) |
During the year a rights issue, which gave rise to £1,197 million net proceeds, resulted in the prior year basic and diluted loss per share needing to be restated.
Basic headline loss per share was 166.9 pence (2020: loss per share 149.7 pence) and basic total loss per share was 159.0 pence (2020: loss per share 222.9 pence) driven by the losses for the year. Weighted average shares in issue in the 2021 financial year were 539 million (diluted 544 million) (2020: 484 million, diluted 489 million, restated due to the rights issue from 407 million, diluted 412 million).
In line with easyJet's dividend policy of a pay-out ratio of 50% of headline profit after tax, the Board did not recommend the payment of a dividend in respect of the year ended 30 September 2021 (2020: £nil). No dividend payments have been made in the year (2020: 43.9 pence per share was paid for the 2019 dividend). The dividend policy will be reviewed by the Board during the 2022 financial year.
* Restated as a result of the 2021 rights issue.
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Headline Return on capital employed | (25.5%) | (19.9%) |
| Total Return on capital employed | (22.4%) | (23.0%) |
Headline ROCE for the year was (25.5)%, a decline of 5.6 percentage points on the prior year, driven by the increased loss for the year. Total ROCE for the year was (22.4)%, in line with last year. The total ROCE improvement is mainly driven by the non-headline sale and leaseback gain and restructuring credit impact on operating profit.
ROCE is calculated by taking operating loss, less tax at the prevailing UK corporation tax rate at the end of the financial year, divided by average capital employed. Capital employed is shareholders' equity less net debt.
The proportion of revenue denominated in currencies other than Sterling remained broadly consistent year on year, although the proportion of Sterling revenue has declined as a result of a faster recovery in demand across Europe. The proportion of US Dollar by currency has changed significantly year on year as a result of the US Dollar exchange impact of sale and leaseback proceeds. Average effective exchange rates include the impact of hedging:
| Revenue | Costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Sterling | 34% | 42% | 42% | 50% | |
| Euro | 52% | 47% | 21% | 31% | |
| US dollar | 0% | 1% | 32% | 13% | |
| Other (principally Swiss franc) | 14% | 10% | 5% | 6% |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Euro – revenue | €1.14 | €1.13 |
| Euro – costs | €1.16 | €1.15 |
| US dollar | \$1.16 | \$1.39 |
| Swiss franc | CHF 1.21 | CHF 1.26 |
The Group's foreign currency risk management policy aims to reduce the impact of fluctuations in exchange rates on future cash flows; however, the timing of cash flows can be different to the timing of recognition within the income statement resulting in foreign exchange movements.
As a result of the reduced flying programme the Group's near term exposures for jet fuel and foreign currency were significantly reduced. This caused a proportion of derivatives previously hedge accounted for to be discontinued from hedge relationships. The full fair value at the time of discontinuation recorded in the income statement as a non-headline item and subsequent movements in fair value recorded as headline items.
To minimise the effects of over-hedging going forward, easyJet temporarily reduced its operational hedging activity throughout the year.
Please see note 25 for further detail on hedging activities during the year.
| Favourable/(adverse) | Euro £ million |
Swiss franc £ million |
US dollar £ million |
Other £ million |
Total £ million |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | (7) | (2) | – | (1) | (10) |
| Fuel | – | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Headline costs excluding fuel | 17 | 4 | 8 | (1) | 28 |
| Prior year balance sheet revaluations | – | 3 | 2 | – | 5 |
| Headline total before tax | 10 | 5 | 11 | (2) | 24 |
| Favourable/(adverse) | Euro £ million |
Swiss franc £ million |
US dollar £ million |
Other £ million |
Total £ million |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-headline costs | 7 | – | (19) | – | (12) |
| Non-headline total before tax | 7 | – | (19) | – | (12) |
There was a £12 million favourable (2020: £9 million favourable) impact on total loss due to the year-on-year changes in exchange rates. A £24 million favourable (2020: £29 million favourable) impact on headline profit was partially offset by a £12 million adverse (2020: £20 million adverse) impact on the non-headline items.
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group £ million |
Airline £ per seat |
Group £ million |
Airline £ per seat |
||
| Passenger revenue | 1,000 | 35.48 | 2,303 | 41.78 | |
| Ancillary revenue | 458 | 15.06 | 706 | 12.57 | |
| Total revenue | 1,458 | 50.54 | 3,009 | 54.35 |
The total number of passengers carried decreased by 57.6% to 20.4 million (2020: 48.1 million), driven by a reduction in seats flown of 48.8% to 28.2 million seats (2020: 55.1 million) as a result of lower levels of flying due to the ongoing impact of Covid-19 on travel restrictions. Load factor decreased by 14.7 percentage points to 72.5% (2020: 87.2%).
During 2021 the airline industry has continued to be heavily disrupted by Covid-19, which has resulted in sustained softness in macro-level demand as customers' confidence and ability to travel have been impacted by fluctuating infection rates across the UK and Europe, resulting in local and national lockdowns and frequent changes in travel restrictions and travel advice.
With an annualised impact of Covid-19, Group revenue for the full year decreased by 51.6% to £1,458 million (2020: £3,009 million), and Airline revenue per seat for the year fell 7.0% to £50.54 (2020: £54.35), and by 6.4% at constant currency. It should be noted that during the first half of the 2020 comparative financial year, easyJet delivered very strong underlying trading, with Covid-19 restrictions affecting the second half.
As a result of reduced travel restrictions, revenue rose 94.4% to £1,218 million for the second half of the 2021 financial year compared to the second half of last year (H2 2020: £627 million).
Our dynamic capacity management and contribution forecasting allowed us to adapt our schedule to maximise profitable flying and to mitigate costs, with our flexible policies providing customers the reassurance to book. During the fourth quarter travel restrictions have begun to stabilise and to ease, which has led to an improvement in new bookings towards the end of the quarter for 2022 departures.
During the year we launched our new cabin bag proposition as well as our Standard Plus fare, which have provided us the tools to enhance our ancillary customer proposition and to deliver ancillary revenue per seat of £15.06, 19.9% higher than last year (2020: £12.57).
Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel increased by 38.1% to £77.25 (2020: £55.94) and increased by 40.6% at constant currency.
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group £ million |
Airline £ per seat |
Group £ million |
Airline £ per seat |
|
| Operating costs and income | ||||
| Airports, ground handling and other operating costs | 446 | 15.01 | 938 | 16.88 |
| Crew | 495 | 17.56 | 629 | 11.42 |
| Navigation | 102 | 3.62 | 206 | 3.74 |
| Maintenance | 222 | 7.90 | 278 | 5.04 |
| Selling and marketing | 60 | 1.94 | 107 | 1.70 |
| Other costs | 319 | 10.80 | 426 | 7.38 |
| Other income | (6) | (0.21) | (23) | (0.42) |
| 1,638 | 56.62 | 2,561 | 45.74 | |
| Ownership costs | ||||
| Aircraft dry leasing | 5 | 0.20 | 1 | 0.02 |
| Depreciation | 456 | 16.18 | 485 | 8.81 |
| Amortisation | 24 | 0.74 | 18 | 0.30 |
| Net finance charges | 109 | 3.83 | 58 | 1.07 |
| Balance sheet foreign exchange gain | (9) | (0.32) | – | – |
| 585 | 20.63 | 562 | 10.20 | |
| Headline costs excluding fuel | 2,223 | 77.25 | 3,123 | 55.94 |
2020 Group Other costs and Other income have been restated to reflect the grossing up of the sale and leaseback gains and losses.
Group headline costs excluding fuel were £2,223 million (2020: £3,123 million), a decrease of 28.8% or £900 million on the prior year. The holidays business contributed £54 million to headline costs in 2021 (2020: £45 million), mainly driven by marketing spend, headcount costs and costs directly related to holidays provided in the year.
Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel increased by 38.1% to £77.25 (2020: £55.94) and increased by 40.6% at constant currency. Most of the headline cost per seat adverse variance was driven by the full year impact of significantly reduced flown capacity resulting in fixed costs being spread over fewer flown seats. Partially offsetting this was the benefit of furlough support from the UK and European governments and easyJet's cost reduction programme which continues to achieve significant savings.
Group headline airports, ground handling and other operating costs decreased by 52.5% to £446 million. Airline cost per seat decreased by 11.1% to £15.01, and by 8.5% at constant currency driven by reduced load factors compared to last year.
Group headline crew costs decreased by 21.4% to £495 million, with Airline cost per seat increasing by 53.8% to £17.56, and by 55.1% at constant currency, partly driven by reduced job retention scheme support, but mainly reflecting significantly reduced productivity due to lower flying levels.
Group headline navigation costs decreased by 50.4% to £102 million resulting from decreased sectors flown, with Airline cost per seat decreasing by 3.0% to £3.62 and by 0.4% at constant currency due to network mix.
Group headline maintenance costs decreased by 19.9% to £222 million, with Airline cost per seat increasing by 56.6% to £7.90, and by 56.6% at constant currency, reflecting reduced capacity where fixed costs remain.
Group headline other costs decreased by 25.1% to £319 million, with Airline cost per seat increasing by 46.3% to £10.80, and by 46.9% at constant currency. The significant driver in the increase in the cost per seat is a result of fixed costs being spread over lower flown capacity. In addition to the capacity impact, there were a number of asset write-offs as a result of focus on spares and projects.
Group depreciation costs have decreased 6.0% to £456 million (2020: £485 million) primarily due to both lower maintenance related depreciation as a result of the reduction in flying volumes , an increased benefit arising from discounting the maintenance provision due to changes in underlying interest rates, and the reduction in our fleet size, partially offset by a revision to our aircraft depreciation policy.
Group net finance charges have increased from £58 million in 2020 to £109 million in 2021, due to increased interest payable from additional debt facilities and increased leased aircraft resulting in higher lease-related interest.
| Fuel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Group £ million |
Airline £ per seat |
Group £ million |
Airline £ per seat |
|
| Fuel | 371 | 13.16 | 721 | 13.09 |
Group headline fuel costs of £371 million were £350 million lower than 2020. Airline fuel cost per seat of £13.16 was 0.5% higher than last year, and by 0.7% at constant currency.
Group fuel costs of £371 million were £350 million lower than the 2020 financial year (2020: £721 million) primarily as a result of reduced flying. Airline fuel cost per seat of £13.16 (2020 £13.09) was broadly in line with the prior year, despite a one off credit in last year of £55 million which came from the sale of EU ETS credits. There was an underlying decrease in the pre hedge cost of fuel by 3.7% driven by lower fuel usage from reduced burn per block hour offset by increased market price. When taking into account easyJet's fuel and US dollar hedging programme, the effective fuel price decreased by 4.1% to \$469 (2020: £489 per tonne).
The impact of the Sterling/US dollar exchange rate movement on fuel costs was £1 million favourable (2020: £14 million favourable).
easyJet continues to participate in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and Swiss Emissions Trading System (CH ETS). As a result of Brexit, easyJet has also participated in the UK Emissions Trading System (UK ETS) from January 2021. These systems require easyJet's carbon footprint to be offset by submitting carbon allowances to the relevant Environment Agencies. The charge of the ETS systems is included within fuel costs.
The Group uses jet fuel derivatives to hedge against sudden and significant increases in jet fuel prices to mitigate volatility in the income statement in the short term.
As a result of the reduced flying programme the Group's near-term exposures for jet fuel and foreign currency were significantly reduced. This caused a proportion of derivatives previously hedge accounted for, to be discontinued from hedge relationships. The full fair value at the time of discontinuation was recorded in the income statement as a non-headline item and subsequent movements in fair value recorded as headline.
To minimise the effects of over-hedging going forward, easyJet temporarily reduced its operational hedging activity throughout the year.
Non-headline items are non-recurring items or items which are not considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the business.
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group £ million |
Airline £ per seat |
Group £ million |
Airline £ per seat |
||
| Restructuring credit/(charge) | 61 | 2.19 | (123) | (2.22) | |
| Sale and leaseback gain | 65 | 2.28 | 38 | 0.69 | |
| Fair value adjustment | (26) | (0.94) | (311) | (5.69) | |
| Impairment charge | – | – | (37) | (0.68) | |
| Balance sheet foreign exchange loss | – | – | (5) | (0.08) | |
| Non-headline items before tax | 100 | 3.53 | (438) | (7.98) |
Group non-headline loss before tax items of £100 million credit comprise:
During the 2021 financial year foreign exchange gains or losses arising from the re-translation of monetary assets and liabilities held on the balance sheet have been recognised as headline items and will no longer be reported as non-headline items. No reclassification has been made to the prior year due to the immaterial value.
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
Change £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating loss | (910) | (899) | (11) |
| Depreciation and amortisation | 480 | 503 | (23) |
| Increase/(decrease) in unearned revenue | 232 | (455) | 687 |
| Other net working capital movement | (638) | 263 | (901) |
| Net capital expenditure | (149) | (695) | 546 |
| Net proceeds from sale and leaseback of aircraft | 836 | 702 | 134 |
| Repayment of capital element of leases | (261) | (230) | (31) |
| Increase in lease liabilities | (369) | (132) | (237) |
| Loss on disposal of intangibles, property, plant and equipment | (30) | (30) | – |
| Net tax received | 1 | 13 | (12) |
| Net decrease/(increase) in restricted cash | 5 | (15) | 20 |
| Other (including the effect of exchange rates) | (120) | (52) | (68) |
| Net proceeds from issue of ordinary share capital | 1,144 | 409 | 735 |
| Purchase of own shares for employee share schemes | (6) | (7) | 1 |
| Ordinary dividend paid | – | (174) | 174 |
| Decrease/(increase) in net debt | 215 | (799) | 1,014 |
| Net debt at the beginning of the year | (1,125) | (326) | (799) |
| Net debt at end of year | (910) | (1,125) | 215 |
Net debt as at 30 September 2021 was £910 million (2020: £1,125 million) and comprised cash and money market deposits of £3,536 million (2020: £2,316 million), debt of £3,367 million (2020: £2,731 million) and lease liabilities of £1,079 million (2020: £710 million).
Debt increased by £636 million largely driven by two new sources of debt, partially offset by repayments in the year. A new five-year term loan facility of \$1.87 billion (circa £1.4 billion) was entered, underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported by a partial guarantee from UK Export Finance under their Export Development Guarantee scheme. easyJet drew down \$1.05 billion of this in the period. In addition, a €1.2 billion 7-year bond was issued in the period under the Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) programme. During the year repayments of £300 million from the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF), \$500 million Revolving Credit Facility and circa £400 million of term loans were made.
Unearned revenue increased by £232 million during 2021, reflecting increased forward flying bookings in the last quarter of the year and pent up demand for travel, compared with a £455 million year on year decline in 2020 as a result of the pandemic.
The movement in Other net working capital of £638 million over 2021 relates to an increase in current intangible assets (mainly due to increased ETS carbon allowances held), a reduction in provisions (mainly due to lower maintenance, restructuring and disruption provisions), derivative financial instruments (driven by exchange rate movements and jet forward curve) and a decrease in trade and other payables reflecting a reduction in revenue refund accruals and APD deferrals offset by increased levels of flying.
Net capital expenditure decreased by £546 million to aid cash preservation and as a result of no final delivery payments made for the acquisition of aircraft in the year (2020: 14 aircraft). The number of aircraft in the fleet decreased from 342 as at 30 September 2020 to 308 as at 30 September 2021 (which excluded 12 aircraft held under power by the hour agreements).
Net proceeds of £836 million were received as a result of the sale and leaseback of 35 aircraft and 2 engines in the year (2020: £702 million from 33 aircraft).
Lease liabilities and capital repayments on lease liabilities have both increased during the year. This is driven by the increased sale and leasebacks completed in the year of 35 aircraft and 2 engines (2020: 33 aircraft).
Corporate tax receipts in the year amounted to £1 million (2020: £13 million).
A rights issue in the year gave rise to £1,197 million of net proceeds, with £1,144 million of cash received in the year. As at 30 September 2021, there were £91 million of proceeds outstanding, which have been subsequently received. Costs of £38 million were incurred on the rights issue and were still payable as at 30 September 2021. During the 2020 financial year an equity placing raised £409 million proceeds net of associated costs.
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
Change £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwill and other non-current intangible assets | 582 | 597 | (15) |
| Property, plant and equipment (excluding RoU assets) | 3,639 | 4,409 | (770) |
| Right of use (RoU) assets | 1,096 | 644 | 452 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 203 | (327) | 530 |
| Equity investments | 30 | 33 | (3) |
| Other assets (excluding cash and money market deposits) | 619 | 364 | 255 |
| Unearned revenue | (846) | (614) | (232) |
| Trade and other payables | (1,128) | (1,242) | 114 |
| Other liabilities (excluding debt) | (646) | (840) | 194 |
| Capital employed | 3,549 | 3,024 | 525 |
| Cash and money market deposits* | 3,536 | 2,316 | 1,220 |
| Debt (excluding lease liabilities) | (3,367) | (2,731) | (636) |
| Lease liabilities | (1,079) | (710) | (369) |
| Net debt | (910) | (1,125) | 215 |
| Net assets | 2,639 | 1,899 | 740 |
* Excludes restricted cash
Since 30 September 2020 net assets have increased by £740 million. This reflects the rights issue undertaken in the year, offset by the loss for the year and increased debt.
Goodwill and other intangible assets have decreased by £15 million predominantly due to amortisation of computer software.
The net book value of property, plant and equipment excluding right of use assets, has decreased by £770 million due to the sale and leaseback of 35 aircraft and 2 engines during the year.
At 30 September 2021, right of use assets amounted to £1,096 million (2020: £644 million) and lease liabilities amounted to £1,079 million (2020: £710 million) which reflects additions during the year as a result of aircraft sale and leasebacks, as well as the impact of lease payments and extensions.
There has been a £530 million movement on net derivative financial instruments with a closing net asset balance of £203 million (2020: £327 million liability). This movement is largely due to mark-to-market gains on jet fuel contracts as well as many out-of-the-money jet trades held at the end of the previous financial year having matured. This gain was partially offset by a loss on cross-currency interest rate swaps.
The equity investment of £30 million (2020: £33 million) represents a 13.2% shareholding in a non-listed entity, The Airline Group Limited, which has a shareholding of 41.9% in NATS Holdings Limited – the provider of UK air traffic control services for the UK. This investment is held at fair value, with movements recognised in other comprehensive income.
Other assets have increased by £255 million, mainly driven by increased current intangible assets driven by an increased number of ETS credits held, and increased trade and other debtors driven by amounts receivable from the rights issue.
Unearned revenue increased by £232 million reflecting increased forward flying bookings driven by pent up demand for travel.
Trade and other payables have decreased by £114 million reflecting a reduction in revenue refund accruals and APD deferrals offset by increased levels of flying.
Other liabilities have decreased by £194 million, mainly driven by a reduced maintenance and restructuring provisions. Other liabilities also include a £37 million post-employment benefit obligation in relation to a Swiss retirement benefit scheme (2020: £45 million).
Debt has increased by £636 million mainly as a result of two new debt facilities, a €1.2 billion bond issuance and \$1.05 billion drawn down from a \$1.87 billion term loan facility with repayments of £300 million from the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF), the \$500 million Revolving Credit Facility and circa £400 million of term loans being made in the year.
As at 30 September 2021, the Group is unable to assess the likely outcome or quantum of the claims of the investigation by the ICO (Information Commissioner's Office), group action and other claims following the cyber-attack in May 2020 and no provision has been recognised. (See note 1 under critical accounting judgements – contingency liability recognition).
| 2021 | 2020 | Increase/ decrease |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating measures | |||
| Seats flown (millions) | 28.2 | 55.1 | (48.9%) |
| Passengers (millions) | 20.4 | 48.1 | (57.5%) |
| Load factor | 72.5% | 87.2% | (14.7ppts) |
| Available seat kilometres (ASK) (millions) | 33,348 | 62,380 | (46.5%) |
| Revenue passenger kilometres (RPK) (millions) | 23,594 | 58,914 | (60.0%) |
| Average sector length (kilometres) | 1,184 | 1,132 | 4.6% |
| Sectors | 155,664 | 311,477 | (50.0%) |
| Block hours ('000) | 311 | 613 | (49.3%) |
| Number of aircraft owned/leased at end of year | 308 | 342 | (9.9%) |
| Average number of aircraft owned/leased during year | 331 | 337 | (1.8%) |
| Number of aircraft operated at end of year | 239 | 157 | 52.2% |
| Average number of aircraft operated during year | 198 | 237 | (16.5%) |
| Number of routes operated at end of year | 927 | 981 | (5.5%) |
| Number of airports served at end of year | 153 | 154 | (0.6%) |
| Financial measures | |||
| Total return on capital employed | (22.4%) | (23.0%) | 0.6ppt |
| Headline return on capital employed | (25.5%) | (19.9%) | (5.6ppt) |
| Airline total loss before tax per seat (£) | (36.33) | (22.66) | 60.3% |
| Airline headline loss before tax per seat (£) | (39.87) | (14.68) | 171.6% |
| Airline total loss before tax per ASK (pence) | (3.11) | (2.04) | 52.5% |
| Airline headline loss before tax per ASK (pence) | (3.41) | (1.34) | 154.5% |
| Revenue | |||
| Airline revenue per seat (£) | 50.54 | 54.35 | (7.0%) |
| Airline revenue per seat at constant currency (£) | 50.90 | 54.35 | (6.4%) |
| Airline revenue per ASK (pence) Airline revenue per ASK at constant currency (pence) |
4.37 | 4.82 4.82 |
(9.4%) (8.7%) |
| Airline revenue per passenger (£) | 4.40 71.37 |
62.61 | 14.0% |
| Airline revenue per passenger at constant currency (£) | 71.86 | 62.61 | 14.8% |
| Costs | |||
| Per seat measures | |||
| Airline headline cost per seat (£) | 90.41 | 69.03 | (31.0%) |
| Airline non-headline (income)/cost per seat (£) | (3.53) | 7.98 | 144.2% |
| Airline total cost per seat (£) | 86.87 | 77.01 | (12.8%) |
| Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel (£) | 77.25 | 55.94 | (38.1%) |
| Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel at constant currency (£) | 78.62 | 55.94 | (40.5%) |
| Airline total cost per seat excluding fuel (£) | 73.72 | 63.92 | (15.3%) |
| Airline total cost per seat excluding fuel at constant currency (£) | 74.66 | 63.92 | (16.8%) |
| Per ASK measures | |||
| Airline headline cost per ASK (pence) | 7.64 | 6.16 | (24.0%) |
| Airline non-headline cost per ASK (pence) | (0.30) | 0.70 | 142.5% |
| Airline total cost per ASK (pence) | 7.34 | 6.86 | (6.9%) |
| Airline headline cost per ASK excluding fuel (pence) | 6.53 | 5.01 | (30.4%) |
| Airline headline cost per ASK excluding fuel at constant currency (pence) | 6.62 | 5.01 | (32.2%) |
| Airline total cost per ASK excluding fuel (pence) | 6.23 | 5.71 | (9.1%) |
| Airline total cost per ASK excluding fuel at constant currency (pence) | 6.19 | 5.71 | (8.5%) |
The Strategic Report on pages 2 to 95 sets out the activities of the Group and the factors likely to impact its future development, performance and position. The Finance Review on pages 66 to 77 sets out the financial position of the Group, and Group cash flows, liquidity position and borrowing activity. The notes to the accounts include the objectives, policies and procedures for managing capital, financial risk management objectives, details of financial instruments and hedging activities, and exposure to credit risk and liquidity risk.
In accordance with the requirements of the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code, the Directors have assessed the long term prospects of the Group, taking into account its current position and a range of internal and external factors, including the principal risks. The Directors have determined that a three-year period is an appropriate timeframe for this viability assessment. In concluding on a threeyear period, the Directors considered the reliability of forecast information, duration and the impact of Covid-19 and longer term management incentives.
The assessment of the prospects of the Group includes the following factors:
• The strategic plan – which takes into consideration market conditions, future commitments, cash flow, expected impact of key risks, funding requirements and maturity of existing financing facilities (see below)
| Maturity date | Available funds (drawn and undrawn) |
|
|---|---|---|
| At 30 September 2021 | ||
| Eurobonds | February 2023 | €500m |
| October 2023 | €500m | |
| June 2025 | €500m | |
| March 2028 | €1,200m | |
| Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) | November 2021 | £300m |
| Revolving credit facility | September 2025 (*) | \$400m |
| Term loan facility | January 2026 | \$1,870m |
The Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) was repaid on 18 November 2021.
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic continues to have a wide impact across the travel industry. Restrictions on travel and quarantine requirements continue to be imposed by governments across our markets. The speed of vaccine programmes, efficacy of vaccines, along with differing governmental testing requirements continues to result in lower expected customer demand and load factors in the short term when compared to historical levels of flying prior to the pandemic.
Since the start of the pandemic, the Group has successfully raised circa £7 billion of liquidity through a diverse range of funding sources. Since the 30 September 2020 year end this includes raising \$1.1 billion of sale and leaseback proceeds, securing a five year term loan facility of \$1.9 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported by a partial guarantee from UK Export Finance, issuing a seven year bond of €1.2 billion, a rights issue raising £1.2 billion and securing a new revolving credit facility of \$400 million. Term loans of £400 million, £300 million of the CCFF and the \$500 million revolving credit facility were repaid and cancelled in the period. The bond issuance was heavily oversubscribed which demonstrates external confidence in the easyJet business model and balance sheet.
Cash collateralisation triggers for key credit card acquirers have been renegotiated to reduce the risk of collateralisation.
The Directors have reviewed the financial forecasts and funding requirements with consideration given to the potential impact of severe but plausible risks. easyJet has modelled a base case representing managements best estimation of how the business plans to increase flying which assumes a phased increase to the schedule over the forecast period, returning to near 2019 financial year levels by the second half of the 2022 financial year and full recovery by the second half of the 2023 financial year.
The corporate risk management framework facilitates the identification, analysis, and response to plausible risk, including emerging risks as our business evolves, in an increasingly volatile environment. Through our corporate risk management process, a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the organisation has been performed (see pages 78 to 95) and the controls and mitigations identified.
Due to the ongoing uncertainty created by the global Covid-19 pandemic, there remains a risk that the recovery from the pandemic could affect our markets, leading to travel restrictions being imposed at short notice and reducing customer confidence in travel. Accordingly, easyJet has considered the severe but plausible downside scenarios based on the potential impact of risk factors on the Group's future performance and liquidity, including combinations of government lockdowns and international travel bans, leading to a prolonged recovery period, reduction in revenue yield, lower load factors, cash collateralisation of unearned revenue by card acquirers, and a reduction to anticipated forward bookings.
Both individually and combined these potential risks are unlikely to require significant additional management actions to support the business to remain viable, however there could be actions that management would deem necessary to reduce the impact of the risks. The stress testing scenarios identified in the table below show that there is sufficient liquidity assuming the refinancing of the existing bonds.
In adopting the going concern basis for preparing these financial statements, the Directors have considered easyJet's business activities, together with factors likely to affect its future development and performance, as well as easyJet's principal risks and uncertainties.
After taking into account the net proceeds of the rights issue, the new revolving credit facility and the other sources of funding described above, easyJet has unrestricted access to £4.4 billion of liquidity and has retained ownership of 59% of the total fleet with 44% being unencumbered. This presents an improved liquidity position of £2.1 billion since 30 September 2020 year end.
In modelling the impact of severe but plausible downside risks, the Directors have considered travel restrictions including government lockdowns and international travel bans, leading to a prolonged recovery period, reduction in revenue yield, lower load factors, cash collaterisation of unearned revenue by card acquirers, and a reduction to anticipated forward bookings.
After reviewing the current liquidity position, financial forecasts, stress testing of potential risks and considering the uncertainties described above and the committed funding facilities, the Directors believe it appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the Group financial statements without the inclusion of material uncertainty which has been removed since the interim financial statements as at 31 March 2021 and the full year financial statements as at 30 September 2020.
Based on the assessment performed, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet all liabilities as they fall due up to September 2024. In making this statement, the Directors have made the following key assumptions:
The key risks that are most likely to have a significant impact of easyJet's viability are shown below along with how the risk has been considered in the stress testing and what actions are in place to mitigate against the identified risk. The principal risks have continued to be assessed for any changes in the risk environment.
| Risk theme | Impact on viability | Risks considered and stress testing performed | Management action and Board considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset efficiency and effectiveness |
1. Unavailability of slots or partial fleet 2. Single aircraft type operation |
• Schedule reductions/cancellations or partial grounding leading to reduction in revenue of 10% (1,2) • Loss of market share due to increased competitor capacity (1) • Significant increase in costs (1) |
• Robust effective cross functional governance structures (1) • Work closely with Airbus to retain some flexibility in fleet planning (2) |
| Environment and sustainability |
3. Future environmental legislation 4. Changes to carbon trading scheme 5. Reputational damage 6. Increased taxation |
• Closure of existing ETS scheme leading to increased cost (4) • Increased cost of carbon offsetting and introduction of eco-taxes (3,4,6) • Reduction in revenue of up 10% due to customer demand (5) |
• Sustainability strategy and governance structure implemented (3,4,5,6) • Emission reduction or offset programmes (3,4,5) • Work with relevant industry bodies and stakeholders (3,4) • More fuel efficient A320 and A321 neos (3,4,5,6) |
| Legislative/ regulatory landscape |
7. Brand licence impact 8. Failure to comply with requirements |
• Loss of brand licence (7) • Sustained adverse media coverage leading to reduction in revenue of up to 10% (7,8) • Significant spike in costs operationally (8) • Material legal and settlement costs (8) |
• Regular engagement with easyGroup holdings and proactive management of brand-related issues (7) • Compliance framework in place including mandatory training (8) |
| Macro-economic and geopolitical |
9. Supply/demand imbalance including slower recovery from Covid-19 10. Refinancing risk and access to alternative financing when required 11. Market price risk: increase in fuel price, foreign exchange rates, carbon prices and inflation rates |
• Slower return to previous flying levels and low levels for the next financial year. Impact of management initiatives (9) • Modelling excluding uncommitted funding (10) • Fuel sensitivities to \$800/MT, adverse foreign exchange rate movement by 5% and fluctuating carbon prices. Cost inflation estimates increased up to 3% (11) |
• Strategic planning to ensure flying schedules are responsive to demand and contribution positive (9) • Consideration of various sensitivities and stress testing to the forecast presented to the Board on an on-going basis (9,10,11) • Review funding requirements and opportunities in scenarios considered (10) • Finance Committee regular monitoring of hedging policies to reduce exposure to market price exposures for fuel and foreign exchange (11) |
| Risk theme | Impact on viability | Risks considered | Management action and Board considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| People | 12. Industrial action 13. Talent recruitment and retention within the Group |
• Operation disruption and increase of costs (12,13) • Sustained inability to deliver strategic initiatives leading to a reduction in revenue (12,13) • Reduction in revenue of up to 10% (12) |
• Positive and on-going relationship with trade unions and employee workforce (12) • Regular employee surveys and action groups to focus on well-being, talent and retention (13) • Creation of Retention programme (13) • Hybrid working (13) |
| Safety, security, and operations |
14. Major flight safety, security incident or health and safety incident 15. Supply chain challenges |
• Operational disruption and increase of costs (14) • Significant media coverage and reduction in future revenue of up to 10% (14) • Fines/regulatory sanctions (14) • Inefficient use of aircraft/crew leading to increased costs (15) |
• easyJet Safety Board meet monthly. Functional Safety Action Groups in place across the business (14) • Hull and Liability insurance in place (14, 15) • A safety policy is published (14) |
| Technology and cyber |
16. Failure of critical technologies 17. Data breach and Ransomware |
• Material legal and settlement costs (17) • Immediate loss of website and reduction in revenue of up to 10% (16,17) |
• Regular Board updates on Cyber Security (17) • Dedicated Information Security team (17) • Ongoing monitoring of critical technologies and interdependencies (16) • IT governance structure (16,17) • IT major incident management team (16,17) • Cross functional committee to address customers legal and regulatory concerns (17) |
The Board approves the strategy for easyJet, including strategic initiatives and objectives, and ensures suitable oversight and governance through several management methods, including monitoring and reporting, strategic reviews, oversight committees and deep dives into specific risk areas.
The Board is ultimately responsible for determining the nature and extent of the principal risks it is willing to take to achieve its strategic objectives, its risk appetite, and maintaining the Group's systems of internal control and risk management.
The Audit Committee, on behalf of the Board, is accountable for reviewing and assessing the risk management processes. The Risk and Assurance team, which reports jointly to the Chair of the Audit Committee and CFO, ensures that robust processes are in place for identifying and assessing the Company's emerging and principal risks.
The Risk and Assurance team is responsible for creating, implementing, and delivering the corporate risk framework and reporting the principal and emerging risks to the Board. The team maintains a programme of risk monitoring with each function to ensure that risks are managed within the framework and to promote cross-functional management of risks. A key element of the corporate risk framework is ensuring that new risks and lessons learned from across the business are fed back into the risk management process and are shared across all functions. During 2021, supplementary financial modelling and analysis was performed by the Judge Business School at Cambridge University to model the corporately reported risks for a variety of interlinked scenarios. This analysis supported further deep dives into risk areas across the business, for example the impacts of climate change.
Each function across easyJet is responsible for understanding and managing its risks, whether they are categorised as principal, functional or emerging. Functions manage the risks arising from their functional plans, which incorporate easyJet's strategic initiatives. This includes identifying and assessing the controls and competencies in place to manage or mitigate risks.
Ongoing development of the corporate risk management framework is a constant at easyJet, identifying risk management best practice across the Group and ensuring a unified and collaborative risk management approach. The Risk and Assurance team identify topics and relevant lessons learned from across industry, both within the aviation sector and beyond. These lessons are used to identify emerging risks and further enhance the easyJet corporate risk framework. These lessons are fed into the functional risk plans through continual dialogue with functional risk contacts.
easyJet continues to use the bow-tie methodology to identify the cause, effect, and risk management control of each principal risk. The information collated using the bow-tie methodology is used to set a framework of assurance activity. The Risk and Assurance team will work with relevant functions to ensure that risk information remains relevant and control deficiencies or gaps are identified, and development actions are implemented.
Risk transfer opportunities are developing. The Risk and Assurance team is tasked with identifying risks that could be beneficial to transfer from easyJet's balance sheet to another party e.g. an insurer. This involves analysis of the risk and associated risk management controls and capabilities, to identify attractive solutions to jointly manage or transfer risks with the benefit of increased intelligence from third-party risk partners. This ranges from risk analysis and solution development to additional risk management expertise.
Identification of emerging risks is a responsibility of both the Risk and Assurance team as well as each function within easyJet, leveraging risk and subject matter experts across the Group. If an emerging risk is identified by the Risk and Assurance team it is raised with the relevant function. An example of this in practice is the risks arising from climate change. The Risk and Assurance team worked in partnership with our Sustainability team to identify, analyse, quantify and evaluate the climate change risks that easyJet is facing. This was supported with further analysis from Judge Business School at Cambridge University. Further detail is found below.
The Board has responsibility to ensure that risks are identified and mitigated where possible. Whilst easyJet can monitor risks and prepare for adverse scenarios, the ability to affect the core drivers of many risks is not within the Group's control (for example adverse weather, pandemics, acts of terrorism, changes in government regulation and macro-economic issues).
The principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Group include the following types of risks:
As with all businesses, our principal risks and uncertainties are continually evolving.
Climate change presents significant financial impacts to easyJet from both physical and transition risks. In the next five years, in light of the challenge of coordinating global climate action, modest political, economic, and social changes will drive financial impact. More significant action to stimulate a low-carbon transition will accelerate the rate of transition and increase the magnitude of impacts to the business.
easyJet currently has the following risk management controls and capabilities to limit the impacts of climate change:
To limit the impact of our carbon emissions, easyJet has already taken several steps:
requirements/standards: Our participation in the EU, UK and Swiss Emissions Trading System (ETS) drives us to focus on continuing to be as efficient as we can; i.e. by investing in transitioning our fleet to more modern, fuel efficient aircraft; using technological developments and flying techniques to operate them in ways which avoid unnecessary use of fuel and therefore carbon emissions.
A focus on energy efficiency: easyJet operates from sites across Europe including a large office and engineering operational presence in Luton in the UK and Berlin in Germany. Living up to 'Our Promise' to be Safe and Responsible informs how we operate day-to-day and that includes our ground-based operations. We have initiatives in place focused on deploying the latest energy-efficiency technologies and procedures to reduce our ground-based emissions. For more information, refer to page 49.
easyJet supports the development of innovative aviation technologies, working with industry partners to reinvent aviation over the long term to achieve net zero carbon emissions. easyJet has a partnership with Airbus to jointly research the opportunities and challenges of introducing planes powered by hydrogencombustion, hydrogen-electric, or a hybrid of both for short-haul flying in Europe by the mid-late 2030s. Furthermore, easyJet has been supporting Wright Electric over the last five years, which is aiming to produce a zero carbon emissions commercial aircraft which could be used for short-haul flights. easyJet also engages with policymakers and lawmakers to help ensure the regulatory environment supports the adoption of zero emissions aircraft in commercial aviation.
announced in November 2019, we were the world's first major airline to offset the carbon emissions from the fuel used for all flights. We are doing this by offsetting the carbon emissions from the fuel used for all our flights, our ground-based operations and package holidays, through schemes certified by the highest verification standards. Since then, we have gone further, offsetting our organisational carbon emissions (Scope 1 & 2) and, for package holidays, offsetting the carbon emissions from the fuel used for transfers, and from the energy for hotel stays.
Only programmes which meet either the Gold Standard or Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) certifications are supported, including projects that protect against deforestation and renewable energy projects. Certifiers ensure reductions claimed by individual programmes would not have happened without that project and that reducing carbon emissions in one place does not inadvertently increase emissions elsewhere.
We know that offsetting is an interim solution and so we also continue to strive to reduce our carbon emissions and support the development of new technologies. Therefore, during 2021, easyJet worked in partnership with the Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies (CCRS) to conduct a detailed assessment to
identify the physical and transitional climate change risks it is facing. Our climate change risks were quantified using a 5-year Enterprise Value at Risk (5yrEV@Risk) metric which shows how the risks would impact discounted cash flows over five years within a given confidence interval, e.g. 95%. The quantification and supporting research and analysis will further assist in the allocation of resource and capital to manage these risks.
In the near-term horizon, the potential range of impacts is driven mainly by transition risk. In the next five years, transition risk is likely to evolve rapidly with developments in regulation, energy supply/ demand, legal process, etc. There is significant variation in transition risk across emission pathways, with the most ambitious mitigation strategies resulting in the greatest risk.
There are several transition risks that are prominent, as easyJet develops its business and operations in a changing landscape.
The five transition risks above were identified through easyJet's corporate risk management framework, in addition to the physical disruption arising from climate change (physical risk). The physical risks were reviewed and incorporated into current principal risks, specifically Significant Operational Disruption and Pandemic.
Plans are in place to review each transition risk in conjunction with the current climate change risks detailed below in the principal risks. The action is to determine individual strategies and assign risk ownership through the corporate risk management framework. In similar fashion to the current physical climate change risks, ownership of these risks and their risk management controls and capabilities sits across the Group and ultimately with the Airline Management Board.
An update on easyJet's climate change transition risks will be provided at the 2022 Financial Half Year Trading Update.
easyJet's number one priority is the safety and security of its customers, colleagues, and contractors. The delivery of a safe and secure operation which meets the needs and expectations of our customers is critical to our business.
• Chief Operating Officer
Share price movement
Functional Safety Action Groups from across the airline are chaired by the appropriate senior manager and are responsible for the identification, evaluation, and control of safety-related risks.
disruption events reduced significantly in 2021 due to reduced air traffic control and airport congestion.
• Chief Operating Officer
• Maintaining operational resilience through:
• Chief Financial Officer
The likelihood of another epidemic and pandemic event occurring has increased but, through the actions we have taken to manage the impacts of Covid-19 and increase preparedness, easyJet is better prepared for future events.
Share price movement
A Biosecurity Standards Group is in place and includes safety and security experts including our company doctor and representatives from across the airline. The Group is responsible for developing and maintaining our single set of easyJet biosecurity standards, which set out the requirements to ensure a safe and healthy environment for our people, customers, and contractors. Standards are translated into our Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Communications.
The nature of these risks, easyJet's reliance on technology (particularly online devices) and the ever-increasing sophistication of serious organised crime groups, terrorists, nation states and even lone parties means that, despite all the mitigation detailed, easyJet will inevitably retain an element of vulnerability regarding the availability, confidentiality and integrity of its information and data.
• The aviation sector is facing into an increasingly sophisticated and persistent cyber threat and easyJet is continually defending its operation against disruption from attackers. The risk from a human operated ransomware attack and/ or data breach has increased exponentially. Ransomware is a type of malware that holds computers or files to ransom. To regain access, the victim is required to pay a large fee. Double exploitation (where ransomware is coupled with a data breach) is a growing threat. Prevention of ransomware is a strategic priority for easyJet.
• A data breach involves the unauthorised access to customer or employee data. Protecting that data and its privacy remains a priority for easyJet.
• General Counsel and Company Secretary
Loss of colleague/customer trust
A data and cyber risk governance structure exists to regularly review the data and cyber risk landscape and determine required action to take place to manage risk effectively.
• easyJet relies on several critical technologies that are key to the delivery of essential business processes.
• Chief Information and Data Officer
Share price movement
Monitoring and alerting of availability of critical technologies and their inter-dependencies.
The environment and sustainability risks include the impacts of climate change on our business and operations, carbon credit programmes, regulation/taxation, and changing consumer and colleague expectations. easyJet's promise is to be a safe and responsible airline. This is what guides our approach to sustainability, whether that be related to climate change, health and safety, diversity, or employee engagement. An update on easyJet's climate change transition risks will be provided at the 2022 Financial Half Year Trading Update.
• Adverse changes to carbon trading schemes, including the existence and/or cost of the scheme.
• Chief Financial Officer
Inability to hedge in line with fuel policy
easyJet influences future and existing policy and regulations which affect the airline industry through several different channels, including working with relevant industry bodies to assist in this.
• Future policy measures and regulation to tackle the impact of aviation on climate change could impact easyJet's business if they impose limitations and cost on how easyJet operates and the services it can provide.
• Chief Financial Officer
Pressure on margins
By engaging with key stakeholders, easyJet seeks to reach a common understanding on the drive to impose policy measures and regulation to address the impact of aviation on climate change. This includes advocating for fair and proportionate measures which incentivise airlines to be efficient and which cover all sources of aviation emissions.
We maintain our competitive cost advantage by making the best use of capacity/slots and fleet mix in the right airports at the right prices and driving value through our supply chain.
• Flying to primary airports is an important element of our customer proposition. The airports to which we fly may already be or may become congested.
• Chief Commercial Officer
Significant increase in costs
Where easyJet is affected by industrial action or other service interruption by a key supplier, resources are deployed to manage this as effectively as possible.
• easyJet is dependent on a mixture of critical technology and processes, employees, buildings/ facilities and third-party suppliers. A loss of one or more of the above components could lead to significant disruption to operations and could have an adverse reputational, financial or legal impact.
• Chief Operating Officer
Operational disruption
The four key areas of business resilience (IT and processes, people, premises, and suppliers) all form part of easyJet's functional business and airport Business Continuity Plans.
• The business continues to undertake several initiatives to support its strategy.
• Chief Data and Information Officer
Inefficient use of resource
Complex, large-scale programmes have been initiated and prioritised through the Enterprise Project Management Office.
• easyJet is dependent on Airbus as its sole supplier for aircraft. The Board considers that the efficiencies achieved by operating a single fleet type outweigh the risks associated with easyJet's single fleet strategy.
• Chief Financial Officer
The airline industry is heavily regulated and there is a continual need to keep well informed and adapt (as required) to any legislative or regulatory changes across the jurisdictions in which easyJet operates.
• General Counsel and Company Secretary
• Eventual loss of the brand licence
• Failure to comply with legislation and regulation, such as local consumer laws, new case law or policy changes in relation to customer compensation, environmental or airport regulation, in the jurisdictions in which easyJet operates, or data protection/ information protection regulations could have an adverse reputational and financial impact.
• General Counsel and Company Secretary
and to assist the business in interpreting any formal regulatory requirements. Where appropriate, this expertise is supplemented with specialist external support relevant to a specific discipline or jurisdiction.
The airline industry can be sensitive to macro-economic and geopolitical conditions. These risk events can affect our financial performance including supply/demand imbalance, general economic trends, as well as impact of fuel cost, foreign exchange rates, and counterparty performance.
• easyJet's success in the highly competitive European short-haul aviation market is built on our key competitive advantages: our network, cost base, brand, digital innovation, and efficient and robust capital structure.
• Chief Commercial Officer
Share price movement
Enhancements to our commercial organisation to provide even further focus on existing and new initiatives to optimise the revenue position.
• easyJet is exposed to a variety of financial markets, volatility in which could give rise to adverse pressure on the cash flows of the Group.
• Chief Financial Officer
Significant increase in costs
The Finance Committee (a committee of the plc Board) oversees the Group's treasury and funding policies and activities.
Having the right people is a key part of Our Plan. In today's environment, we need to create an inclusive and energising environment that attracts the right people and inspires everyone to learn and grow.
• Group People Director
Loss of colleague/customer trust
easyJet seeks to maintain positive working relationships with all trade unions and other representative bodies and has a framework in place for consulting and engaging with trade unions and consultative bodies.
• In today's shifting environment, we need to place even more focus on recruiting the right people and building the right talent.
• Group People Director
• Retention of critical talent continues to be a risk and is proactively managed, particularly given the continued uncertainty and challenge of our industry and our inability to offer compelling shortterm financial reward.
• Sustained inability to deliver key strategic initiatives
John Barton Non-Executive Chairman
| Board and Airline Management Board profiles |
page 98 |
|---|---|
| Our governance framework |
page 105 |
| Board activity in 2021 | page 111 |
| Board Committees and activities during the year |
page 118 |
| Directors' Report | page 154 |
I am pleased to introduce this report, which describes the activities of your Board during the year and our governance arrangements. This will be my last report as your Chair, having served for nearly nine years on the Board when I step down in December 2021. It has been an absolute privilege to serve as Chair. easyJet is a unique, dynamic and customer-centric business, driven by the passion of its people. I am proud of how easyJet has not only navigated so well through the pandemic, but has adapted and built back even stronger leaving it extremely well positioned for the future. I am delighted to hand over to someone of Stephen Hester's calibre. His significant and varied experience leading major international businesses in regulated industries, coupled with his outstanding strategic thinking, will serve the airline well as it leads the recovery in the post-pandemic era, complementing and adding to the skills of the existing Board and leadership team.
Our purpose at easyJet is to make travel easy, enjoyable and affordable, whether it is for leisure or business, seamlessly connecting Europe with the warmest welcome in the sky. Our ability to deliver this has continued to be heavily impacted by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. As a Board, we have remained focused on guiding easyJet through this period of sustained uncertainty and ensuring we are well positioned for the recovery, work which has been underpinned by our robust governance framework.
A large part of the Board's focus during the year has therefore remained on liquidity, with the approval of a new five-year term loan facility of \$1.87 billion under the UK Export Finance scheme in January 2021, the issuance of €1.2 billion of bonds under the Euro Medium Term Note Programme in March 2021, and the launch of a £1.2 billion rights issue in September 2021. This was in addition to a number of sale and leaseback transactions, and the cost reduction programme. The Board has acted decisively to make sure easyJet navigated the ongoing impact of the pandemic, and ensure it is well-placed to take advantage of the strategic investment and growth opportunities that will deliver strong shareholder value in future.
The Board has also been focused on refining its post-pandemic strategy, ensuring the safe ramp-up of operations as the flying programme has increased, and supporting and developing our people through the pandemic. A fuller summary of the Board's activity during the year can be found on page 111.
The Board keeps its balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity under regular review, and is mindful of the best practice requirements under the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the 'Code' or '2018 Code').
There have been a number of changes to the Board since the last Annual Report. Andrew Findlay stood down as Chief Financial Officer in February 2021, and we welcomed Kenton Jarvis as his successor. Kenton brings a wealth of industry experience and highly relevant skills to the role and we are delighted to welcome him. David Robbie joined the Board as an Independent Non-Executive Director in November 2020, and Charles Gurassa, Moya Greene DBE and Dr Anastassia Lauterbach stood down as Independent Non-Executive Directors in December 2020.
Stephen Hester joined us as an Independent Non-Executive Director and Chair designate on 1 September 2021 and will succeed me as Chair on 1 December 2021. I have been working closely with Stephen to ensure that there is a smooth handover. Stephen and our other new Board members have also participated in a comprehensive induction programme.
New appointments are subject to a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure, led by the Nominations Committee, and further details can be found on pages 121 to 123. Information on the induction process can be found on page 114.
The issue of diversity, both in the boardroom and throughout the entire Group, is taken very seriously by the Board as we believe this improves effectiveness, encourages constructive debate, delivers strong performance and enhances the success of the business. Ensuring that we have a culture which promotes and values diversity, and one which is maintained throughout the business, is a continual prime focus and is underpinned by our Diversity and Inclusion Policy which sets our objectives. The importance of this area also forms the basis for Board diversity and
succession planning as we consider the best constitution of the Board to successfully take the Company forward. You can read more about our overall approach to diversity and inclusion in our other senior leadership positions and across easyJet, on page 56.
I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to all Board members who served during another challenging year for the Group.
The Board takes account of the impact of its decisions on all our stakeholders be they customers, employees, suppliers, shareholders, the communities we operate in, or regulators, while taking steps to secure the Group's longer-term success. There has been a constant dialogue with our stakeholder groups, and on behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to thank them all for their partnership during the year. Working together has been vital, and will continue to be so as we seek a sustainable future together.
easyJet's people continue to be fundamental to its success. Moya Greene DBE had been our Employee Representative Non-Executive Director under the Code since January 2019. When Moya stepped down, the Board took the opportunity to review the mechanism by which the employee voice is brought into the boardroom. You can read about our revised approach on page 109.
Details of how we have engaged with all our stakeholders to understand their views can be found on pages 26 to 37. A statement on how the Directors have had regard to the matters set out in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 can be found on page 36.
Our last external Board review took place in 2018, therefore our Nominations Committee oversaw an externally facilitated review of the performance and effectiveness of the Board during the year in line with the Code requirement to do this every three years. A full report on the activities and the outcomes of the evaluation can be found on pages 115 to 117.
The Board activated its EU ownership contingency plan to ensure continued compliance with EU ownership and control requirements at the end of the Brexit transition period in December 2020. Accordingly, easyJet has been required to suspend voting rights in respect of certain shares held by non-EU nationals so that the majority of voting rights in the Company are held by EU nationals. The work easyJet has undertaken to prepare for Brexit means that flying rights between the EU and the UK have been maintained.
Throughout the year the Board has followed strong corporate governance standards and it has been a fundamental underpin to all of its actions. This is demonstrated through its full compliance with the Code. The requirements of the Code are described throughout this report, together with explanations as to how we have complied with its requirements, and signposts directing you to the relevant page where more detail can be found on how the Company has complied with its various provisions.
The following pages set out details of the composition of our Board, its corporate governance arrangements, processes and activities during the year, and reports from each of the Board's Committees.
I wish all at easyJet the very best success for the future.
John Barton Non-Executive Chairman
John Barton Non-Executive Chairman
Nationality: British
Appointed: May 2013
Key areas of expertise: Finance, Governance
John has significant board experience having previously served as Chairman of Next plc, Catlin Group Limited, Cable and Wireless Worldwide plc, Brit Holdings plc and Wellington Underwriting plc. He was previously Senior Independent Director of Luceco plc, WH Smith plc, Hammerson plc and SSP Group plc. He was also the Chief Executive of insurance broker JIB Group plc. After JIB's merger with Lloyd Thompson, he became Chairman of the combined Group, Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group plc, until 2001. John is a qualified chartered accountant and has an MBA from Strathclyde University.
Chairman of Ted Baker plc and Non-Executive Director of Matheson & Co Ltd.
Stephen Hester Non-Executive Director and Chair Designate
Nationality: British
Appointed: September 2021
Key areas of expertise: Strategy, Finance
Stephen is a highly strategic and successful leader with more than 35 years of wide-ranging experience at major businesses, bringing a strong track record of value creation and listed board experience. Stephen has served as Chief Executive of RSA Insurance Group plc from February 2014 to May 2021, as Chief Executive of Royal Bank of Scotland Group, Chief Executive of British Land plc and Chief Operating Officer of Abbey National plc, as well as holding a number of senior executive roles at Credit Suisse First Boston in London and New York. He has also held senior non-executive positions as deputy chairman of Northern Rock. Stephen holds a BA (Hons.) in Politics, Philosophy and Economics from Oxford University.
Senior Independent Director of Centrica plc and Lead Independent Director of Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
Julie Southern Senior Independent Non-Executive Director
Nationality: British
Appointed: August 2018
Key areas of expertise: Finance, Aviation
Julie has significant board experience and has held a number of commercially oriented finance and related roles during her career. She was Chief Commercial Officer of Virgin Atlantic Limited between 2010 and 2013, responsible for the commercial strategy of Virgin Atlantic Airways and Virgin Holidays. Prior to this, Julie was Chief Financial Officer of Virgin Atlantic Limited for 10 years. In addition, Julie was previously Group Finance Director at Porsche Cars Great Britain and Finance and Operations Director at WH Smith – HJ Chapman & Co. Ltd. She was previously the Non-Executive Director of Stagecoach Group plc, Gategroup AG, Cineworld plc and DFS Furniture plc. Julie holds a BA (Hons.) in Economics from the University of Cambridge and is a qualified chartered accountant.
Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Audit Committees of Rentokil Initial plc and NXP Semi-Conductors N.V., Non-Executive Director, Chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Remuneration Committee at Ocado Group plc.
Johan Lundgren Chief Executive Officer
Nationality: Swedish
Appointed: December 2017
Key areas of expertise: Travel and Tourism
Johan has more than 30 years' experience working in the travel industry, starting his career as a tour guide and occupying various roles in travel marketing and sales. Prior to joining easyJet in December 2017 as Chief Executive, Johan was the Group Deputy Chief Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer of Mainstream Tourism at TUI AG. Prior to this Johan was the Managing Director for the Northern Region at TUI Travel plc from 2007 until 2011. From 2003 until 2007, he was the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of TUI Nordic. Johan led MyTravel's businesses out of Canada and Sweden between 1999 and 2003, prior to which he was Managing Director of Always Tour Operations from 1996.
Senior Adviser, Blackstone (private equity group).
Kenton Jarvis Chief Financial Officer
Nationality: British
Appointed: February 2021
Key areas of expertise: Finance
Kenton was previously CEO of Aviation, and Business Improvement Director – Markets, at TUI Group, having held a number of senior group and divisional finance roles at TUI since 2003. Kenton holds a BSc (Hons) in Biochemistry from the University of Manchester. Before joining TUI, Kenton was the Finance Director of Airtours Holidays and held a number of commercial finance roles at Adidas, prior to which he qualified as a chartered accountant with PwC.
Current external appointments None.
Dr Andreas Bierwirth Independent Non-Executive Director
Nationality: German
Appointed: July 2014
Key areas of expertise: Aviation, European Perspective
Andreas previously served as a Director and Chief Commercial Officer at Austrian Airlines AG. Andreas also served as Vice President of Marketing at Deutsche Lufthansa AG (Frankfurt) and Chairman of the Supervisory Board at T-Mobile Polska SA. Prior to this, Andreas was firstly Deputy Managing Director and later Managing Director at Germanwings.
Chief Executive Officer of Magenta Telekom (formerly T-Mobile Austria). Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Do&Co AG and Member of the Supervisory Board of Telekom Deutschland GmbH.
Catherine Bradley CBE Independent Non-Executive Director
Nationality: French and British Appointed: January 2020
Key areas of expertise: Finance, Regulatory
Catherine has held a number of senior finance roles for 33 years in investment banking and risk management, in the US, then the UK and finally Asia, starting with Merrill Lynch for ten years. Latterly she joined Credit Suisse as Managing Director for 9 years, first in London since 2003 as Head of Client Coverage and then in Hong Kong from 2008 to 2012 as Head of Equity-Linked Solutions Group for Asia-Pacific. She finished that phase of her career as Head of Advisory Global Markets with Societe Generale Asia until 2014. From 2014 until July 2020, she was a Non-Executive Director of the UK Financial Conduct Authority and Chair of its Audit Committee, a Non-Executive Director of WS Atkins plc from 2015 until its delisting in 2017, and a Member of the Supervisory Board, Chair of the Finance and Audit Committee, and Appointments, Compensation and Governance Committee member for Peugeot S.A. from 2016 to 2021. Catherine graduated from HEC Paris with a major in Finance and International Economics, and was awarded a CBE in 2019.
Non-Executive Director of Johnson Electric Holdings Limited and Senior Independent Director of Kingfisher plc. Board Member of the Value Reporting Foundation and Co-Chair of its Audit Committee.
Nick Leeder Independent Non-Executive Director
Nationality: Australian and French
Appointed: January 2019
Key areas of expertise: Information Technology
Nick has substantial leadership experience with deep expertise of print to digital business transformation within the media sector. Nick has spent the last eight years leading Google's businesses in Australia, New Zealand and France before moving to Ireland. Prior to Google, Nick was at News Corporation, firstly as Chief Operating Officer of News Digital Media and latterly as Deputy Chief Executive of national broadsheet newspaper, 'The Australian'. Before that he was Chief Operating Officer of newspaper group, Fairfax Digital. He has a degree in pure mathematics from University of Sydney and an MBA from Insead.
Vice President at Google Ireland, EMEA Headquarters.
Moni Mannings Independent Non-Executive Director
Nationality: British
Appointed: August 2020
Key areas of expertise: Commercial, Legal
Moni has held a number of non-executive positions, including as a Board member of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (chairing its Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Committee) and at Cranfield University. Until 2017, Moni was Chief Operating Officer of Aistemos Limited, a leading IP data analytics and strategy company. From 2000 until 2016, Moni was a Partner and Head of the International Banking and Finance Division of Olswang LLP, before which she held senior positions with Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP, Simmons & Simmons and Clifford Chance LLP. Moni also served as a non-executive director of Polypipe Group plc (2014 to 2019), Dairy Crest Group plc (2017 until their acquisition and delisting in 2019) and Breedon Group plc (2019 to 2021).
Independent non-executive director of Hargreaves Lansdown plc and Investec Bank plc, non-executive director and Chair of the Remuneration Committee of Cazoo Group Ltd, Deputy Chair of the charity Barnardo's.
Independent Non-Executive Director
Nationality: British
Appointed: November 2020
Key areas of expertise: Finance, Governance
David has significant international corporate and board experience. He was Finance Director of Rexam plc from 2005 until 2016. Prior to his role at Rexam, David served in senior finance roles at Invensys plc before becoming Group Finance Director at CMG plc in 2000 and then Chief Financial Officer at Royal P&O Nedlloyd N.V. in 2004. He served as interim Chairman, Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Audit Committee of FirstGroup plc from 2018 to 2021, and Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Audit Committee for the BBC between 2006 and 2010. David qualified as a chartered accountant at KPMG and holds an MA in English Literature from St. Andrew's University.
Independent non-executive director and Chair of the Audit Committee at DS Smith plc.
easyJet recognises the benefits of having diversity across the Board to ensure effective engagement with key stakeholders and effective delivery of the business strategy.
Peter Bellew Chief Operating Officer
Nationality: Irish Appointed: January 2020
Key areas of expertise: Aviation, Flight Operations
Peter has considerable experience across commercial and operational roles in both low cost and full-service airlines. Peter joined easyJet from Ryanair, where he was Chief Operating Officer responsible for all aspects of Ryanair's flight operations, leading an international workforce of 18,000 and working with HR to build relationships with European trade unions. Prior to this, Peter was at Malaysia Airlines for two years, latterly as the CEO, and before that he worked at Ryanair for nine years, where he held a number of roles including Head of Sales & Marketing and Director of Flight Operations.
Ella Bennett Group People Director
Nationality: British
Appointed: May 2018
Key areas of expertise: People, Reward and Digital Transformation
Ella is a skilled Group HR Director with strong experience in the UK and internationally in lean and digital transformation, large-scale change as well as talent development and reward. Ella joined easyJet from Sainsbury's Argos, where she led the integration of their non-food business to create a multiproduct, multi-channel business with fast delivery networks. Ella was also Group HR Director at Home Retail Group leading the people aspects of Argos' digital transformation. Prior to this she was a member of the executive management team at Fujitsu. She earned her BA (Hons) in English Literature from the University of Bristol and her Master's degree from the University of London.
Stuart Birrell Chief Data & Information Officer
Nationality: British
Appointed: November 2020
Key areas of expertise: Data and Information Technology
Stuart spent five years as a Director and Chief Information Officer at Heathrow Airport Ltd before joining easyJet. He previously held the role of CIO at Formula 1's McLaren Technology Group where he worked in the high-performance environment building a team of in-house experts and specialist suppliers. Prior to that he spent three years at Gatwick Airport where he successfully separated the airport systems from BAA and brought improvements to complex IT foundations and transformation processes. Stuart brings with him significant experience and expertise in IT security, cloud-based solutions, big data sets and technology to support business expansion.
Maaike de Bie Group General Counsel & Company Secretary
Nationality: Dutch and British Appointed: June 2019
Key areas of expertise: Legal, Compliance and Regulatory
Maaike is an experienced international lawyer with over 25 years' practical experience in a variety of sectors. Maaike joined easyJet in June 2019 from Royal Mail plc where she was Group General Counsel accountable for all legal, compliance, claims management, security and information governance matters. Prior to Royal Mail, Maaike was a Legal Director and part of the governance body of EY LLP. Maaike also spent six years with General Electric, five years as General Counsel for one of its Capital companies in EMEA and was then promoted into the HQ office of GE Capital in Europe to lead the improvement of enterprise risk management & corporate governance across EMEA. She has also held senior international legal positions at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development LLP in London and White & Case LLP in New York. She obtained her legal degrees in the Netherlands (in Amsterdam) and Canada (McGill in Montreal) and is qualified to practise as a solicitor in both New York and the UK. Maaike is also a trustee for Blueprint for Better Business, an independent charity helping business to be guided by a purpose that respects people and contributes to a better society.
Sophie Dekkers Chief Commercial Officer
Nationality: British
Appointed: December 2020
Key areas of expertise: Aviation and Strategy
Before joining the Airline Management Board, Sophie held the role of Customer Director for easyJet. Prior to this she was Director of Scheduling for the airline, implementing systems and process improvements. She has also led easyJet in the UK as Country Director for five years, where she was responsible for driving the airline's commercial success and strategic direction in the UK as well as representing aviation at both House of Lords and House of Commons Select Committees. Previous roles in the airline include Head of Change Management and Customer Insight, with a background in customer insight working with a range of brands from Jaguar Land Rover to Mars, Unilever and Vodafone. Sophie was also Non-Executive Director for Airport Co-ordination Limited from 2017 to 2021 and sat on their Remuneration and Nomination Committees. Sophie is easyJet's business lead on Diversity & Inclusion, a qualified MindGym coach, business mentor, and a founding member of easyJet's Women's Network.
Thomas Haagensen Group Markets & Marketing Director
Nationality: Danish
Appointed: May 2018
Key areas of expertise: Commercial and Operations Management
Thomas has over 20 years' experience in operations management built in a variety of roles across Europe. Danish, born and educated in Switzerland, Thomas began his career with Tetra Pak working his way up to Regional Manager of the East Med where he developed and succeeded in implementing ambitious growth and profitability improvement plans. Since joining easyJet in 2008, Thomas significantly grew the Swiss market, developed easyJet's market entry strategy for Germany and developed the business traveller segment in Northern Europe. Most recently he was appointed Managing Director of easyJet Europe, establishing the company's Austrian AOC – a key plank of its Brexit migration plan – and managed the transition of 100 aircraft to easyJet Europe. Thomas holds a degree in Business Administration with a focus on management and marketing from University of Lausanne.
Garry Wilson Chief Executive Officer, easyJet holidays
Nationality: British
Appointed: November 2018
Travel, Business Transformation and Global Markets
Garry is a highly experienced commercial leader working across international organisations, and has over 21 years' experience in the holiday and travel sector. He joined the business from TUI Group where he most recently held the role of Managing Director for Group Product and Purchasing, leading commercial strategies across a number of markets and heading a global team across 20 countries. Prior to this, Garry worked in a number of senior commercial roles at TUI Group. He also held the position of Director of Europe, Middle East and Africa for American travel group Orbitz Worldwide (now Expedia Inc.). Garry has worked extensively with overseas governments, PwC and the Travel Foundation to create sustainable tourism policies to promote major economic growth and positive social change whilst minimising negative environmental impact. He was appointed to the Board of ABTA in April 2021. He holds a BCom (Hons) degree in Business Management and Languages from the University of Edinburgh.
Johan Lundgren Chief Executive
See Board of Directors' profiles on page 99
Kenton Jarvis Chief Financial Officer
See Board of Directors' profiles on page 99
easyJet recognises the benefits of having diversity across the executive leadership team to inspire innovation and increased performance.
The Chairman is responsible for the leadership of the easyJet plc Board (the 'Board') and for ensuring that it operates effectively through productive debate and challenge.
The Board is responsible for providing leadership to the Group. It does this by setting strategic priorities and overseeing their delivery in a way that is aligned with easyJet's culture and enables sustainable long term growth, whilst maintaining a balanced approach to risk within a framework of effective controls and taking into account the interests of a diverse range of stakeholders. There are certain matters which are reserved for the Board's decision.
The terms of reference of each Committee are documented and agreed by the Board. The Committees' terms of reference are reviewed annually and are available in the Governance section of easyJet's corporate website at corporate.easyjet.com. The key responsibilities of each Committee are set out below.
| SAFETY COMMITTEE To examine specific safety issues as requested by the Board or any member of the Committee. To receive, examine and monitor reports on actions taken by departments. To review and monitor the implementation of easyJet's annual safety plan. |
NOMINATIONS COMMITTEE To keep under review the composition, structure and size of, and succession to, the Board and its Committees. To provide succession planning for senior executives and the Board, leading the process for all Board appointments. To evaluate the balance of skills, knowledge, experience and diversity |
AUDIT COMMITTEE To monitor the integrity of the Group's accounts, and the adequacy and effectiveness of the systems of internal control. To monitor the effectiveness and independence of the internal and external auditors. |
FINANCE COMMITTEE To review and monitor the Group's treasury policies, treasury operations and funding activities, along with the associated risks. |
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE To set remuneration for all Executive Directors, the Chairman and the AMB, including pension rights and any compensation payments. To oversee remuneration and workforce policies and practices and take these into account when setting the policy for Directors' remuneration. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Committee report on pages 119 to 120 |
on the Board. Committee report on pages 121 to 123 |
Committee report on pages 124 to 129 |
Committee report on page 118 |
Committee report on pages 130 to 153 |
Responsible for the day-to-day running of the Group's business and performance, and the development and implementation of strategy.
Led by the Chief Executive, the AMB members are collectively responsible for driving the performance of the Group against strategic KPIs and managing the allocation of central funds and capital.
| 1 | Board leadership and company purpose |
page 106 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Division of responsibilities |
page 110 |
| 3 | Composition, succession and evaluation |
page 113 |
| 4 | Audit, risk and internal control |
page 117 |
| 5 | Remuneration | page 117 |
The UK Corporate Governance Code (the 'Code' or '2018 Code') sets out the standards of good practice in relation to how a company should be directed and governed. easyJet follows the principles set out in the Code, the full text of which is available at www.frc.org.uk, and is required to disclose whether it has complied with the provisions of the Code during the financial year. The Board is pleased to confirm that the Company complied with the Code throughout the year. Our compliance with key areas of the Code is summarised below, together with crossreferences, where applicable, to the relevant sections of this report where more information can be found. Further details are set out in this section of the Annual Report (together with the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 130 to 153 and the Directors' Report on pages 154 to 157).
The Board is collectively responsible for promoting the long term sustainable success of the Group, generating value for shareholders as a whole and contributing to wider society by fulfilling its purpose. In exercising this responsibility, the Board takes into account all relevant stakeholders including customers, employees, suppliers, shareholders, the communities we operate in, regulators and governments, and the effect of the activities of the Group on the environment. Further details are set out on pages 26 to 37.
The Board provides effective leadership by setting the strategic priorities of the Group and overseeing management's execution of the strategy in a way that enables sustainable long term growth, while maintaining a balanced approach to risk within a framework of prudent and effective controls. Further information on easyJet's principal risks and uncertainties is set out on pages 78 to 95.
easyJet is a low-cost point to point airline that provides considerable choice and affordability for travel across a market leading European network. The Board considers easyJet's purpose as providing this vital connectivity and in a way that is easy, enjoyable and affordable – described as "seamlessly connecting Europe with the warmest welcome in the sky".
Air travel provides connectivity on a national, regional and international scale, enabling personal connections and economic growth and development. This connectivity is important for wider society for a number of reasons. It facilitates travel for leisure, such as holidays and tourism and reuniting family for important events. It also allows travel for business, providing connectivity between workplaces and allowing business relationships and networks to be built.
While the pandemic has accelerated the use of virtual technologies, physical travel will remain an important part of the global economic recovery.
Further information on the way that easyJet uses its resources to fulfil this purpose and create sustainable value is set out in our business model on page 12.
The Board understands easyJet's unique culture, which is open, engaging, positive and collaborative, and seeks to ensure these values are integrated into its decision making and that the policies and procedures put in place maintain this culture. Where policies, practices or behaviour are not aligned with the Company's purpose, values or strategy, the Board and management seek to ensure that appropriate action is taken.
The culture is underpinned by the values and behaviours which we call 'Our Promise':
During the year, the Board used a number of methods to understand and monitor the Company's culture:
• Health and safety – easyJet has a safety policy that promotes a 'just culture' within the airline, to ensure that any incidents are openly reported without negative repercussions for individuals. The Board's Safety Committee regularly reviews internal and external safety incidents (including near misses) and risks to ensure appropriate mitigations are in place and any trends identified, which are then reported to the Board.
We invest in training and developing our workforce as set out on pages 56 to 57, and page 63. We also facilitate participation in share schemes as set out on page 150.
Details of the engagement with all stakeholders, including customers, employees, communities, suppliers, regulators and shareholders, are set out on pages 26 to 37. Additional information is set out below.
Understanding the views of our shareholders, and acting fairly between them, has been a priority for the Board during the year. The Chairman, CEO and CFO have updated the Board on the opinions of investors regularly and the views of shareholders and market perceptions are also communicated to the Board via presentations from the Director of Investor Relations at least every quarter and engagement with the brokers and other advisers.
The Annual General Meeting (AGM) allows shareholders the opportunity to communicate directly with the Board and encourages their participation. Shareholders are given the opportunity to raise issues formally at the AGM or informally with Directors after the meeting. All Directors attend the AGM where possible and the Chairs of the Committees are available to answer questions.
The Company's 2021 AGM was brought forward to 23 December 2020 to provide shareholders with an opportunity to engage with the Board prior to the end of the Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020 and to notify them of the actions easyJet needed to take to continue to comply with European ownership and control requirements.
Due to restrictions imposed by the Government as a result of the pandemic, shareholders were unable to attend the AGM in person. The Company put in place arrangements for shareholders to vote at the AGM electronically and to attend by conference call to listen to the business of the meeting and ask questions in real time. Alternatively, shareholders were able to submit questions in advance of the AGM.
While the resolutions relating to the appointment and re-appointment of all of the Directors were passed with the necessary majority, they received less than 58% in favour. As the Board noted when publishing the AGM results, this voting outcome was predominantly the result of the Company's largest shareholder (and its related parties) (at the time being the holders of 28.7% of the issued share capital of the Company) voting against these resolutions. The views of the Company's largest shareholder and their reasons for voting against the resolutions relate primarily to the Company's fleet strategy, are well-known to the Board and the Company's other shareholders and have been well publicised. The Board has continued to engage with the Company's largest shareholder since the AGM and throughout the year.
A circular for the Company's next AGM, comprising a letter from the Chairman, Notice of Meeting and explanatory notes on the resolutions proposed, will be issued separately at the appropriate time and will also be published on easyJet's corporate website at https://corporate.easyjet.com/ investors.
| October 2020 Trading update for year ending 30 September 2020 |
|---|
| November 2020 Full Year Results |
| December 2020 Discussions with investors and advisory bodies ahead of AGM |
| January 2021 First quarter trading update |
| February 2021 Bond issuance |
| April 2021 Trading update for six months to 31 March 2021 Discussions on remuneration proposals |
| May 2021 Half Year Results |
| July 2021 Third quarter trading update |
www.easyJet.com 107
easyJet consulted with a number of major shareholders on its Directors' remuneration policy prior to the formal approval at the AGM. Engagement has also taken place during the year in relation to the performance targets that will apply to the 2020 LTIP awards, and on our approach to executive remuneration in advance of any revised remuneration policy being put to the next AGM.
Andreas Bierwirth, Catherine Bradley CBE, Nick Leeder and Moni Mannings are the Employee Representative Directors, who are tasked with engaging with the workforce in accordance with the Code. Further information is set out on page 109.
Decision: Launching a 31 for 47 rights issue in September 2021 to raise gross proceeds of £1.2 billion.
Considerations: The Board considered a number of factors when looking at launching an equity raise during the year, including the best interests of customers, employees and investors, amongst other stakeholders.
As a result of this engagement, management reflected on the feedback received and articulated the growth ambitions in their presentations around capacity, EBITDAR and ROCE.
The ability to use the proceeds to invest in the customer proposition and take advantage of growth opportunities, and strengthening the ability to continue to invest in sustainability, was also considered to be important for customers.
Outside of the specific events highlighted above, the Group actively engages with investors and seeks their feedback. easyJet has an Investor Relations function which runs an active programme of engagement with actual and potential investors based on the financial reporting calendar as set out on the timeline on page 107. This year the programme has included one-toone meetings with institutional investors, roadshows and conferences.
easyJet has particularly targeted and engaged with European investors during the year as part of an enhanced programme related to disenfranchisement. There is also regular communication with institutional investors on key business issues.
At easyJet, we have a wide workforce of over 13,000 employees across nine countries in Europe, including 4,000 pilots and 7,000 cabin crew. Our people are key to the Company's success, and the uncertainties brought by the pandemic means that engagement with them has never been so important.
Following the Code recommendation that boards have a specific method for engaging with the workforce, Moya Greene was appointed the Board's Employee Representative Director in January 2019. When Moya stepped down from the Board in December 2020, the Board took the opportunity to review the approach and consider if there was a way to enhance the engagement mechanism using the skills, expertise and geographic spread of more of the current Board members.
The Nominations Committee reviewed the available options, including the choices set out in the Code. Given the geographic spread of easyJet's employees, and the nature of their working arrangements (with crew, pilots and M&A populations working different shift patterns), it was felt that having more than one Director engaging with the workforce would increase the Board's visibility among employees and ensure that the views of employees were captured more effectively. The Nominations Committee therefore recommended to the Board that four Directors be nominated to engage directly with the workforce, to be known as Employee Representative Directors.
The Board considered this proposed approach and agreed that four Non-Executive Directors serve as Employee Representative Directors. The new structure was implemented from May 2021 and Andreas Bierwirth, Moni Mannings, Nick Leeder and Catherine Bradley were nominated to serve as the first Employee Representative Directors. They were selected by the Board due to their experience, geographic location and language skills. For biographical information on these Board members, please see pages 98 to 100.
The Employee Representative Directors are expected to meet individually with the Company's European Works Council ('EWC') and Management & Administration Consultative Group ('MACG') at least once a year, and other Works Councils on a periodic basis. In addition, other more informal engagement is envisaged, including informal employee gatherings in geographic locations or relevant functional groupings. When interacting with representative groups, the Employee Representative Directors are free to consider the most appropriate combination of engagement mechanisms to ensure inclusivity and encourage an open exchange.
A standing agenda item allows the Employee Representative Directors to report to the Board regularly on their discussions, and they are encouraged to bring the employee voice into
conversations in the boardroom whenever possible.
It is important to note that our employees continue to be able to raise any concerns confidentially, should they wish to do so, using easyJet's whistleblowing ('Speak Up, Speak Out') arrangements.
During the period from May to September 2021, Moni Mannings met with the MACG group and Catherine Bradley met with the Spanish Works Council. The themes raised in these meetings were shared with the Board at their subsequent Board meeting and reflected the impact of the prior 18 months on both groups. The Board acknowledged the challenges employees have faced over that time and the resilience they demonstrated during the year. The Board noted that the experience of employees was not uniform across the workforce, with some employees having been furloughed for a significant part of the year and others working long hours mostly from home to deal with the numerous challenges the business faced. It discussed the impact on employees as well as opportunities to address this and some of the concerns that had been raised. It also discussed the fact that employees were perhaps not as familiar with the Board or its purpose, and agreed it would look to address this in the coming year.
For further details on our engagement with employees please refer to page 28.
An understanding of, and connection with, easyJet's business are fundamental for our Non-Executive Directors to enable them to maximise their contribution to Board discussion and understand our stakeholders. With this in mind, we aim to take the Board to visit one of our European operations at least once a year. These visits increase the visibility of the Board and provide our Non-Executive Directors with a valuable opportunity to engage with local management and crew, and gain insight into how the culture and values of the business are translated into day-to-day operations.
The Board's ability to undertake an overseas base visit during the year was impacted by the continued travel
restrictions. However in September 2021 the Board was able to visit easyJet's operations at London Gatwick, which is the Company's largest base. The Board toured some of the customer areas to understand the key points on a customer's journey through the airport, and had an opportunity to meet with local base staff and find out how they had navigated through the challenges of the pandemic.
The Board also had the opportunity to hear first-hand from external stakeholders by meeting with the executive management of Gatwick Airport. This allowed them to gain a deeper understanding of how Gatwick works with easyJet to drive commercial benefit. Particular emphasis was placed on ways to
stimulate a faster traffic recovery postpandemic, and how Gatwick can help support easyJet's business model of best in class cost and efficiency when operating at highly constrained airports.
The Board welcomed the opportunity to meet and discuss easyJet's progress and strategic priorities with the executive and local management. The visit also proved helpful for the new Board members to better understand easyJet's operation and views of the local external stakeholders.
Additional details of the engagement with stakeholders during the year, and the s172 statement, are set out on pages 26 to 37.
The Board comprised 10 Directors at the year-end: two Executive Directors and eight Non-Executive Directors. Over half of our Board (excluding the Chairman) are deemed Independent Non-Executive Directors and the composition of all Board Committees complies with the Code. Additionally, the Chairman and Chair Designate were considered independent on their appointment. More information about the Board members is available on pages 98 to 101.
The independence of the Non-Executive Directors is considered by the Board and reviewed on an annual basis, as part of the Board effectiveness review. The Board considers factors such as length of tenure and relationships or circumstances that are likely to affect, or appear to affect, the Directors' judgement, in determining whether they remain independent. Non-Executive Directors do not participate in any of the Group's share option or bonus schemes.
Following this year's Board effectiveness review, the Board concluded that all of the Non-Executive Directors continue to remain independent in character and judgement and are free from any business or other relationships that could materially affect the exercise of their judgement. The Board and Nominations Committee also review Committee membership annually to ensure that undue reliance is not placed on any individual.
The Board has a formal schedule of matters reserved for its decision. Certain governance responsibilities have been delegated by the Board to Board Committees, to ensure that there is independent oversight of internal control and risk management and to assist the Board with carrying out its responsibilities. The Board Committees comprise Independent Non-Executive Directors and, in some cases, the Chairman. Each individual Committee's Chair reports to the Board on matters discussed at Committee meetings and highlights any significant issue that requires Board attention. For a summary of the roles of each Committee, see the governance framework on page 105. The matters reserved for the Board and the terms of reference of the Board Committees are available in the Governance section of easyJet's corporate website at https://corporate.easyjet.com.
The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive are set out in writing, clearly defined and approved by the Board. These are also available on easyJet's corporate website at https://corporate.easyjet.com. Day-today management responsibility rests with the Airline Management Board ('AMB'), the members of which are listed on pages 102 to 104.
The Chairman, John Barton, is responsible for leadership of the Board and ensuring effectiveness in all aspects of its role. He is responsible for setting the Board's agenda and ensuring adequate time is available for discussion of all agenda items, including strategic issues. He is responsible for encouraging and facilitating active engagement by and between all Directors, ensuring a culture of openness is maintained and drawing on each of their extensive skills, knowledge and experience. Stephen Hester will assume the role of Chairman on 1 December 2021, at which point John will step down from the Board.
The Senior Independent Director, Julie Southern, acts as a sounding board for the Chairman and acts as an intermediary for the other Directors when necessary. She is also available to address shareholders' concerns that have not been resolved through the normal channels of communication with the Chairman, Chief Executive or Chief Financial Officer. She is responsible for evaluating the performance of the Chairman in consultation with the other Non-Executive Directors.
The Non-Executive Directors provide an external perspective, sound judgement and objectivity to the Board's deliberations and decision making. With their diverse range of skills and expertise, they support and constructively challenge the Executive Directors and monitor and scrutinise the Group's performance against agreed goals and objectives. The Non-Executive Directors are also responsible for determining appropriate levels of executive remuneration, appointing and removing Executive Directors, and succession planning through their membership of the Remuneration and Nominations Committees. The Non-Executive Directors together with the Chairman meet regularly without any Executive Directors being present.
Johan Lundgren, as Chief Executive Officer, has specific responsibility for recommending the Group's strategy to the Board and for delivering the strategy once approved. In undertaking such responsibilities, the Chief Executive Officer takes advice from, and is provided with support by, his senior management team and all Board colleagues. Together with the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Executive Officer monitors the Group's operating and financial results and directs the day-to-day business of the Group. The Chief Executive Officer is also responsible for recruitment, leadership and development of the Group's executive management team below Board level.
The Company Secretary, Maaike de Bie, supports and works closely with the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairs of the Board Committees in setting agendas for meetings of the Board and its Committees. She supports the provision of accurate, timely and clear information flows to and from the Board and the Board Committees, and between Directors and senior management in order to ensure that the Board has the information and resources it needs in order to function effectively. In addition, she supports the Chairman in designing and delivering Directors' induction programmes and the Board and Committee performance evaluations. She also advises the Board on corporate governance matters and Board procedures, and is responsible for administering the Share Dealing Code and the AGM.
The appointment and removal of the Company Secretary is a matter requiring Board approval.
The Board meets regularly and held 17 meetings during the year, including two strategy sessions in October and May. It is standard practice that each regular Board meeting follows a carefully tailored agenda agreed in advance by the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Company Secretary. A typical meeting will comprise reports on current trading and financial performance from the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, legal and governance updates, safety and investor relations updates and 'deep dives' into areas of particular strategic importance. A summary of the key activities covered during the year is set out on page 111. In addition, to allow for opportunities for the Board to engage with senior management to discuss key elements of the business, two Board dinners were held.
The Strategic and Financial Review explains this in more detail on pages 2 to 77. Our Risk Management Framework and Principal Risks are set out on pages 78 to 95
Safety is a key priority: read more about how we are ensuring this on pages 119 to 120
You can read more about this on pages 121 to 123
To see how we comply with the UK Corporate Governance Code please turn to page 106
| Customers | Employees | Suppliers | Shareholders | Community |
|---|---|---|---|---|
The Directors' attendance at the Board and Committee meetings held during the year are shown in the table below. The Board would typically hold 10 scheduled meetings during the year, including a strategy day, but due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the Board continued to meet on a more regular basis and as a result the total number of Board meetings held during the year was 17. As set out in the table, attendance rates remained very high.
The core activities of the Board and its Committees are covered in scheduled meetings held during the year. Additional ad hoc meetings are also held to consider and decide matters outside of the scheduled meetings. Non-Executive Directors are encouraged to communicate directly with each other and senior management between Board meetings.
In addition to the meetings set out below, five meetings of the Covid Sub-Committee (Financing) were held between October 2020 and March 2021 to review and approve various specific Covid related financing activities in the period, given the Board's focus on liquidity. The Committee comprised John Barton, Catherine Bradley CBE, Andrew Findlay (to February 2021), Kenton Jarvis (from February 2021), Johan Lundgren, Charles Gurassa (until December 2020) and Julie Southern. It is anticipated that the Covid Sub-Committee (Financing) will be disbanded as the Board's activity returns to a more normal pattern.
Directors are encouraged and invited to attend all Board and Committee meetings, but in certain circumstances meetings are called at short notice and due to prior business commitments and time differences Directors may not always be able to attend.
Even if a Director is unable to attend a meeting because of exceptional circumstances, they continue to receive the papers in advance of the meeting and have the opportunity to discuss with the relevant Chair or the Company Secretary any matters on the agenda which they wish to raise. Feedback is provided to the Directors not able to attend on the decisions taken at the meeting.
In addition, and in line with the Code, the Chairman holds meetings with the Independent Non-Executive Directors without the Executive Directors present. There is a standing agenda item at the end of each Board meeting for the Independent Non-Executive Directors to meet without the Executive Directors.
For further information regarding when Board members joined or stepped down from Committees during the financial year, please refer to the 'Committee changes' sections in the relevant Committee reports (pages 118 to 153).
| Board (Scheduled) |
Board (ad hoc) |
Audit | Finance | Nominations | Remuneration | Safety | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of meetings | 11 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Executive Directors | |||||||
| Johan Lundgren | 11/11 | 6/6 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Andrew Findlay1 | 4/4 | 3/3 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Kenton Jarvis2 | 7/7 | 3/3 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Non-Executive Directors | |||||||
| John Barton | 11/11 | 6/6 | – | – | 4/4 | – | – |
| Stephen Hester3 | 1/1 | 2/2 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Charles Gurassa4 | 2/2 | 1/2 | – | 1/1 | 1/1 | 2/2 | – |
| Catherine Bradley CBE | 11/11 | 6/6 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4/4 | – | – |
| Dr Andreas Bierwirth | 11/11 | 6/6 | – | 5/5 | – | – | 5/5 |
| Moya Greene DBE4 | 2/2 | 2/2 | – | – | 1/1 | 2/2 | 1/1 |
| Dr Anastassia Lauterbach5 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 1/1 | – | – | – | – |
| Nick Leeder | 10/11 | 5/6 | – | – | 4/4 | – | 4/5 |
| Moni Mannings | 11/11 | 5/6 | – | – | – | 4/5 | – |
| David Robbie6 | 10/10 | 4/4 | 4/4 | 4/4 | – | 3/3 | – |
| Julie Southern | 11/11 | 6/6 | 5/5 | – | 4/4 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Notes:
Andrew Findlay stepped down from the Board on 3 February 2021.
Kenton Jarvis joined the Board on 3 February 2021.
Stephen Hester joined the Board on 1 September 2021.
Charles Gurassa and Moya Greene DBE stepped down from the Board on 23 December 2020.
Dr Anastassia Lauterbach stepped down from the Board on 21 December 2020.
David Robbie joined the Board on 17 November 2020.
Non-attendance at meetings was due to unavoidable prior commitments and some meetings being called at short notice.
Following the Board evaluation process, detailed further below, the Board has considered the individual Directors' attendance, their contribution, and their external appointments, and is satisfied that each of the Directors is able to allocate sufficient time to the Group to discharge his or her responsibilities effectively.
As evidenced by the attendance table earlier in this report, the attendance remained high and demonstrates the Directors' ability to devote sufficient time.
Contracts and letters of appointment with Directors are made available at the AGM or upon request. The standard terms and conditions of the appointment of Non-Executive Directors are also available in the Governance section of easyJet's corporate website at https://corporate.easyjet.com.
Executive Directors and the AMB are permitted to take up non-executive positions on the board of one other listed company so long as this is not deemed to interfere with the business of the Group.
In line with the 2018 Code, Directors are required to seek Board approval prior to taking on any additional significant external appointments and the following were approved during the year in line with this requirement:
Prior to these appointments, the Board considered the time required, including whether they would impact their ability to devote sufficient time to their current role. The Board considered that the appointments, and related arrangements to manage conflicts of interest, would not interfere with their roles with the Company.
All members of the Board are supplied with appropriate, clear and accurate information in a timely manner covering matters which are to be considered at forthcoming Board or Committee meetings. The papers for each meeting are made available via an electronic Board portal along with a wealth of supporting and reference material.
Directors have direct access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary, who is responsible for advising the Board on all governance matters and ensuring that Board procedures are complied with. Where Directors deem it necessary to seek independent legal advice about the performance of their duties with the Group, they are entitled to do so at the Group's expense.
The Nominations Committee leads the process for Board appointments and makes recommendations to the Board. The activities of the Nominations Committee and a description of the Board's policy on diversity and inclusion are on pages 121 to 123.
The Board has processes in place to appoint Non-Executive Directors who can apply their wider business skills, knowledge and experience to the oversight of the Group, and provide input and challenge in the boardroom to assist in the development and execution of the Board's strategy. Similarly, Executive Director appointments are made to ensure the effective formulation and implementation of the Group's strategy.
The Nominations Committee, on behalf of the Board, reviews the skills of Board members at least annually, identifying any areas of skills, experience and knowledge that can be strengthened further. All Director appointments are made by the Board and are subject to a formal, rigorous and transparent process.
A number of changes were made to the composition of the Board and its Committees during the year. In making these changes, the Nominations Committee and Board took into account various considerations including Board diversity, independence and the combination of skills, knowledge and experience of the Directors:
• Following a comprehensive search process Stephen Hester was appointed as Non-Executive Director and Chair Designate on 1 September 2021. Stephen will succeed John Barton as a Chair on 1 December 2021, at which point John will step down from the Board after nearly nine years as Chairman.
Details of the induction programmes for the new Directors are set out on page 114.
The Board plans to continue to execute against its succession plans as the longer-serving members step down and it is anticipated that there will be further changes to the Board in the coming year.
All Board appointments are subject to continued satisfactory performance following the Board's annual effectiveness review. The Company's Articles of Association require the Directors to submit themselves for election or re-election by shareholders at every AGM. All continuing Executive and Non-Executive Directors will stand for election or re-election at the Company's next AGM.
The lengths of tenure of the Chairman and Non-Executive Directors at 30 September 2021 are set out on page 101.
On joining the Board, it is the responsibility of the Chairman to ensure that all newly appointed Directors receive a full, formal and tailored induction, which is organised by the Company Secretary. The induction programme covers a range of key areas of the business including, amongst other things, the business and functions of the Group, their legal and regulatory responsibilities as Directors, briefings and presentations from relevant executives, and opportunities to visit and experience easyJet's business operations. Details of the Board induction programme provided for David Robbie, Stephen Hester and Kenton Jarvis are set out on page 114.
Directors' training and development needs are of key importance in order to discharge their duties effectively and opportunities are made available for them to update their skills and knowledge. Directors are encouraged to highlight specific areas where they feel their skills or knowledge would benefit from further development as part of the annual Board evaluation process. Training opportunities are provided through internal meetings, workshops, presentations and briefings by internal advisers and business heads, as well as external advisers.
David Robbie, Kenton Jarvis and Stephen Hester, who were appointed during the year, followed a tailored induction programme covering a range of key areas of the business, a sample of which is given below. They were provided with a Board induction pack containing Company and Board information to assist with building an understanding of the nature of the Group, its business, markets and people, and to provide an understanding of the Group's main relationships. The pack also included information to help facilitate a thorough understanding of the role of a Director and the framework within which the Board operates. In addition, they met with key colleagues across the business and were provided with a briefing pack before each session to better understand the areas of the business. These meetings were tailored to the nature of the role that they would be undertaking. For example in addition to the meetings set out in this section, Stephen Hester met with all of the Board and AMB on an individual basis, as well as an expanded group of easyJet colleagues including the Director of Governmental Affairs, Chief Pilot and Director of Cabin Services, amongst others. Stephen also attended a meeting of the Leadership 50, comprised of the senior leaders across the organisation.
• Attended a session hosted by the Director of Safety, Security and Compliance which included briefings on the regulatory framework, safety management system, AOC structures, safety governance,
compliance monitoring and current risks and priorities
• Met with the Chief Operating Officer to discuss Summer 21 Readiness programme framework, cost efficiency programme in relation to costs, fleet profile and customer satisfaction statistics
• Attended briefing sessions on easyJet's trading performance, the 2021 financial year budget, cash burn, liquidity forecast, cost efficiency programme and financial controls with the Director of Financial Planning & Analysis
Given the Board's activities during 2019/20 were dominated by reacting to the unique challenges posed by the pandemic, a shorter and more targeted evaluation was undertaken, seeking feedback from Board members on how they felt the Board had collectively responded to these challenges and how it should evolve its approach in future.
The unprecedented nature of the Board's activity in the year was noted, including the volume of meetings and the related impact on the Board and management's workloads. The key areas identified for increased focus and development during the 2020 financial year were as set out below.
| Areas | Actions taken |
|---|---|
| Succession planning – continued focus on succession planning for Board and senior management, to ensure that the Board are satisfied that appropriate plans are in place |
The Nominations Committee and Board continued to treat this as a priority during the year. Four Directors have stepped down from the Board (Charles Gurassa, Moya Greene, Anastassia Lauterbach and Andrew Findlay) and three new Directors were appointed (David Robbie, Kenton Jarvis and Stephen Hester) during the year. The Nominations Committee reviewed the composition and skills of the Board prior to these appointments and will continue to keep Board and senior management succession under review when Stephen Hester succeeds John Barton as chair. |
| Strategic oversight – the Board would need to focus on the strategy of the business post the pandemic and ensuring the business was well placed to deliver a strong recovery |
The Board held two deep dive strategy sessions in October 2020 and May 2021, reviewing the response to the pandemic and the future strategic direction of the Company, including as part of the preparations for the rights issue in September 2021. The Board will continue to focus on this in the coming year, led by the incoming Chair. |
| Building relationships – Whilst participating in remote meetings had worked well, it would be important for the Board and management to resume meeting in person when circumstances allowed, to help continue to build relationships particularly for the new members of the Board |
The Board has held a number of physical meetings where restrictions have allowed, including the visit to London Gatwick in September 2021. Members of the AMB attended a dinner with the Board at Gatwick, which allowed new Board and new AMB members to meet and build relationships. Future meetings and dinners are planned, subject to the prevailing restrictions at the time. |
For the 2021 Board performance review, following an RFP process the Board engaged Lorna Parker and Elaine Sullivan of Manchester Square Partners (MSP) to conduct an independent evaluation of the performance of the Board and its Committees. easyJet has previously worked with a separate division at MSP in relation to professional development activities for the AMB, but as the Board performance review was undertaken by a separate team within MSP, who had no experience of or connection to the Company, no conflict was deemed to exist. The use of two expert evaluators in Lorna and Elaine was also felt to help bring an independent check and balance to the review of the Board and its activities. MSP has no other connection with the Group or individual Directors.
The evaluation was designed in consultation with the outgoing Chair, the Senior Independent Director and the Company Secretary, with a focus on how the Board could capitalise on its strengths but evolve to address the needs of the medium term, including the postpandemic recovery. Strong emphasis was placed on the role of the Board, composition and succession, culture and values, dynamics among Board members and management, and governance and leadership. The process that MSP followed for the review can be found on page 116.
| Preparation | • Held briefing sessions with the outgoing Chair, Senior Independent Director and Company Secretary to understand context and priorities • Review of Board and Committee papers for the previous 12 months and other relevant documentation, including Strategy papers and the Board Forward Agenda • Individual interviews were scheduled with all of the Non-Executive Directors, the Chair, Company Secretary, Group People Director, and one of the Company's brokers for an external view. |
|---|---|
| Formal interviews |
• Developed a set of comprehensive questions for the interviews and interviews conducted with the group identified above. |
| Board observation |
• Observed the Board meeting held at London Gatwick in September 2021 to observe the Board dynamics, and also had the opportunity to observe Board's interaction with stakeholders. |
| Reporting | • Key findings and recommendations were shared with the outgoing Chair, the incoming Chair, the Senior Independent Director and Company Secretary, and a draft report was prepared for review. • The final report was circulated to the full Board, with a discussion held during a meeting of the Board to consider the outcomes and agree recommended actions. |
The review concluded that while the prior 18 months had been one of the most demanding and challenging periods the Board had ever seen, and despite the number of changes to its membership in that time, the Board had continued to function extremely well and the dynamics were good. The Board's culture was seen as open, collegiate and cohesive, and all Board members were well prepared and engaged, which was particularly noteworthy given the increased demands made on their time with the elevated number of Board and Committee meetings. It was noted that the Board had been required to shift its focus to shorter term decisions around the balance sheet, cost control, and safety, which it had done well. The Board's effectiveness was felt to be demonstrated through the following:
The review also concluded that to build on these strengths and set the Board up for success in future, there would be an opportunity to 'reset and restart' following the pandemic, with an emphasis on moving from short term crisis management to longer term strategy, with the Board playing a key role in shaping, debating and testing the ambition, vision and strategy alongside the Executives. The focus areas and related actions are set out below.
| Area | Actions to be taken |
|---|---|
| Exploring opportunities to allow more open-ended discussions and collaboration on strategic matters |
• The Board forward agendas will be reviewed to ensure that regular, structured and iterative strategy discussions take place throughout the year, including one or more dedicated days to discuss strategic matters • Continued build on the individual briefings on major decisions ahead of Board meetings, enabling all Board members to be brought up to the same knowledge level and enabling better discussions in the boardroom, while also facilitating relationship building |
| Increasing time spent together, formally and informally, to continue to build relationships with newer members of the Board and Management, and review the evolution of the Board over time |
• In person meetings to be held where possible, with a two day offsite in June 2022, ideally overseas at a European base subject to any prevailing restrictions. • Regular NED only sessions to continue to be held, including dinners where appropriate • Other opportunities to increase exposure to management and allow for informal time spent together will be identified by the Chair, CEO and Company Secretary. |
Rebalancing the Board forward agenda, with a return to a more normal forward-looking and strategic agenda incorporating forward looking matters, including Strategy; Stakeholders (Customers, People, Shareholders, Regulators); Sustainability; Brand and Marketing; succession, culture, diversity and inclusion
Enhancing discussions around risk and risk appetite as the Board looks to the post-pandemic recovery phase
Reviewing the remit and membership of the Board's Committees to ensure the Board is focused on value add
Continued focus on Board composition and succession, with a view to enhancing European and aviation experience on the Board
As part of the external Board performance review, the performance of the Chair was also discussed. It was noted that John Barton's contribution had been significant both during the year and over the last nine years of his tenure, and that he demonstrated effective leadership. However, with the transition from John Barton to Stephen Hester due to take place in December 2021, the primary focus of the review was how the Board as a whole could set itself up for success in the future.
The report of the Audit Committee, including details of its composition and activities in the year, is set out on pages 124 to 129.
The Strategic Report on pages 4 to 95 explains the Group's business model and the strategy for delivering the objectives of the Group. The Statement on Directors' Responsibilities in relation to the Annual Report and Accounts being fair, balanced and understandable can be found on page 158 and a statement on the Group as a going concern and the viability statement is set out on pages 74 to 77.
The Board has overall responsibility for easyJet's risk management and systems of internal control. The Board has carried out a robust assessment of the principal and emerging risks facing the Group and how those risks affect the prospects of the Group. Please refer to pages 78 to 95 for further information on the risk
management process and the Group's principal and emerging risks and uncertainties, and pages 76 and 77 for their impact on the longer-term viability and prospects of the Group.
Ongoing risk management and assurance is provided through the various monitoring reviews and reporting mechanisms that are embedded in the business operations. The results of these reviews are reported to the Audit Committee and the Board, which consider whether these high-level risks are being effectively controlled.
Regular operational (including safety), commercial, financial and IT functional meetings are held to review performance and to consider key risks and issues (please refer to pages 119 and 120 for details of the Safety Committee).
Executive management meets regularly to consider significant risks, the status of risk mitigations and overall business performance; this ensures key issues are escalated through the management team and, if appropriate, ultimately to the Board. The Directors review the effectiveness of internal controls, including operating, financial and compliance controls.
The Audit Committee undertakes an annual review of the appropriateness of the risk management processes to ensure that they are sufficiently robust to meet the needs of the Group (please refer to pages 124 to 129 for details of the Audit Committee's responsibilities).
The Group's internal control systems are designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business objectives. By their nature, they can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss. The overall responsibility for easyJet's systems of internal control and for reviewing their effectiveness rests with the Board. The Board has conducted an annual review of the effectiveness of the systems of internal control during the year under the auspices of the Audit Committee. Further information on the Group's internal control systems is set out on pages 125 to 129.
Details of the Internal Audit function and external auditors are provided within this report on pages 127 to 129.
The responsibility for determining remuneration arrangements for the Chairman and Executive Directors has been delegated to the Remuneration Committee. For further information on the Group's compliance with the Code provisions relating to remuneration, please refer to the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 130 to 153 for the level and components of remuneration, and page 143 (the Remuneration Committee Report) for procedures relating to remuneration.
The Group's internal control systems are designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business objectives.
The Committee consists of the Independent Non-Executive Directors listed above. All members of the Committee are Independent Non-Executive Directors. Member biographies setting out their skills and experience can be found on pages 98 to 101.
David Robbie became a member of the Committee on 17 November 2020 on joining the Board. Charles Gurassa stepped down from the Committee and the Board on 23 December 2020. The Company Secretary acts as Secretary to the Committee and members of the executive management are invited to attend meetings.
The Committee met five times during the year. Meeting attendance can be found in the table on page 112.
The Committee's terms of reference can be found on the Company's website at https://corporate.easyjet.com.
Catherine Bradley CBE Chair of the Finance Committee
I am pleased to present the Finance Committee (the 'Committee') report covering the work of the Committee for the year ended 30 September 2021.
The Committee's key role is to review and monitor the Group's treasury policies, treasury operations and funding activities along with associated risks. It is responsible for regulating the treasury activities of the Company and controlling the associated risks, determining and approving material inter-company distributions, and changes to share warehousing policies and loan facility arrangements. The Committee is also responsible for providing approvals in relation to hedging, International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) arrangements, letters of credit, guarantees in line with the delegated authority and the Treasury Policy.
The Committee continued to monitor both the hedging and liquidity policies due to the uncertainty in the operating environment. The Committee ensured easyJet maintained significant levels of liquidity throughout the year, as well as making sure all hedging positions were being managed appropriately. easyJet entered into a number of financing arrangements throughout the year, significantly increasing its cash balance. To ensure the additional cash was invested safely and securely, the Committee regularly reviewed the counterparty credit limits to make sure they were fit for purpose. The Committee also undertook a deep dive on easyJet's carbon exposures, which resulted in easyJet updating the treasury policy used for purchasing carbon allowances in relation to Emissions Trading System (ETS) compliance.
Rapidly changing travel restrictions led to easyJet operating a reduced flying programme to remain operationally flexible. This meant changing our existing hedging strategies. The Committee focused on ensuring that easyJet's over-hedged exposures were closed and that it was able to manage its exposures to minimise losses. The key activities of the Committee are set out below. There were five meetings during the year and after each Committee meeting, an update was presented to the Board on the key issues discussed during our meetings.
Catherine Bradley CBE Chair of the Finance Committee
easyJet's Treasury team maintains a risk and control matrix, to highlight the key areas of risk as well as the mitigating controls in place. During the year, the Committee received an update on the treasury controls environment to ensure it remained effective.
The Committee also approved the onboarding of two new counterparts during the year, for onward recommendation for the Board.
The Committee continued to monitor activities by receiving regular reports from the Treasury function setting out details of cash and deposits, hedging positions for fuel, foreign exchange and carbon, debt maturity, interest rate analysis and monitoring of credit ratings, amongst other matters.
Dr Andreas Bierwirth Chair of the Safety Committee
The Committee consists of the Independent Non-Executive Directors listed above. Moya Greene DBE did not stand for re-election at the Company's AGM and as a result stepped down from the Board and the Committee on 23 December 2020. Member biographies can be found on pages 98 to 101.
The Committee met five times during the year. The Director of Safety, Security and Compliance has attended all Safety Committee meetings during the year. Other key invitees include the Chief Operating Officer, the Director of Flight Operations, Director of Engineering & Maintenance and Head of Safety. Subject matter experts in flight operations, engineering and other functions have attended as required.
Meeting attendance can be found in the table on page 112.
The Committee's terms of reference can be found on the Company's website at https://corporate.easyjet.com. On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the Safety Committee (the 'Committee') report covering the work of the Committee for the year ended 30 September 2021. These pages outline how the Committee discharged the responsibilities delegated to it by the Board over the course of the year, and the key topics it considered in doing so.
The Committee is responsible for overseeing the Group's management of health, safety, security and regulatory compliance in line with the Group's values and commitment. The primary focus of the Committee was to oversee the quality and effectiveness of easyJet's safety strategies, standards, policies and initiatives, together with risk exposures, targets and performance, in order to ensure that safety consistently receives the highest level of Board attention.
The safety of our passengers and employees remains our highest priority. The global crisis created by the pandemic has continued in 2021 due to the uncertainty caused by new variants of Covid-19 and associated flying restrictions. During the year, the Committee was actively engaged in overseeing easyJet's preparations for the safe ramp up in flying as volumes returned on the relaxation of restrictions. To manage safety during this time, we have put risk management and management of change at the centre of what we do. This approach has helped us to ensure we are appropriately organised and resourced.
There were five meetings during the year and after each Committee meeting, I provided an update to the Board on the key issues discussed during our meetings.
Dr Andreas Bierwirth Chair of the Safety Committee
Whilst the rate of transmission of Covid-19 decreased from the peaks seen earlier in 2020, there continued to be new cases of infection in many countries leading to dynamic and ever changing travel restrictions, regulations, guidelines and requirements. The Committee remained focused on the delivery of a safe and secure operation which meets the needs and expectations of our customers.
The Director of Safety, Security and Compliance reports regularly reports to the Committee and Airline Management Board on easyJet's safety, security and compliance standards. He has the right of direct access to Dr Andreas Bierwirth as Committee Chair and to the Board Chairman, which reinforces the independence of safety oversight. The Committee Chair reports to the Board with his own assessment of safety management within the airline throughout the year.
During the year the Committee undertook a number of significant activities. These included an overview of easyJet's readiness for summer 2021, BAU activities, focus risks, significant operational changes, management system developments, security oversight and influencing regulators and authorities where and when appropriate. The Committee also undertook a review of biosecurity standards, which include all aircraft having industry leading filtration systems, the cleaning and disinfecting of aircraft daily, and passengers and crew wearing masks on board all our flights.
Furthermore, the Committee monitored the safety, security and compliance priorities including BAU and support activities, summer readiness framework and risk management framework to ensure easyJet remained safe and responsible and foundations were in place to thrive through the recovery phase. In addition, the Committee continued to monitor notable incidents to ensure process improvements and mitigating actions had been undertaken, where necessary.
The Committee received regular reports from the Director of Safety, Security and Compliance to ensure the Safety team had adequate resources and appropriate information to perform its function effectively and in accordance with the relevant professional standards.
The easyJet Safety Board (ESB), which reports to the Airline Management Board, supported the role of the Committee in ensuring the safety risks and issues are identified and prioritised and action plans are in place to mitigate any risks. The ESB met monthly throughout the year, including during the period of lockdown and when easyJet operations were scaled back.
The Committee received an update on the easyJet's readiness programme to ensure teams were properly resourced with defined ways of working, crew remained fit and competent for duty, aircrafts returned to service and third-party suppliers were capable to support operations. The readiness programme also covered the biosecurity documentation required throughout the organisation for smooth operations.
The Committee provided oversight to easyJet's biosecurity standards including creation of easyJet's Biosecurity Standards Groups in order to maintain a co-ordinated set of biosecurity standards across different countries and health authorities' requirements. Due to the implementation of clear masks policy and associated communications to crew and customers, easyJet's biosecurity performance remained satisfactory.
Another key area of focus was reviewing progress against the safety plan covering the safety and security development and action plans. This included assessment of key risks and how easyJet was working with the rest of the industry to ensure highest safety standards were followed.
To ensure easyJet is able to respond to an incident or crisis quickly, effectively and appropriately, the Committee continues to monitor the outcome of the crisis management exercise undertaken by the management. During the year a crisis management exercise had been facilitated which demonstrated a good understanding between different crisis teams and ability to respond remotely.
The Committee received updates on the detailed preparation and delivery of the ramp up of the flying programme in Summer 2021. The external environment continued to remain fluid as lockdown and travel restrictions evolved around the network. The Committee took note of the status of the readiness programme and the actions taken to manage suppliers to reduce the safety and operational risks around the ramp up. The Committee also received updates on the improvement of the Integrated Management System to establish a common approach to Safety, Security, Compliance and the Environment across the organisation. This will enable us to provide safe and responsible journeys for our customers and a safe working environment for our employees and suppliers.
Over the next year, the Committee will continue to monitor and review the safety plan which includes operational safety, health and safety, operations critical IT systems, environmental safety and compliance and associated outcomes. More generally, we will continue to provide support to management on embedding the strong safety culture which will ensure high standards of safety continue to be delivered across the Group and all its operating entities.
John Barton Chair of the Nominations Committee
The Committee consists of the Independent Non-Executive Directors listed above. All members of the Committee are Independent Non-Executive Directors. Member biographies can be found on pages 98 to 101.
The Chairman of the Board acts as Chair of the Committee with members of the executive management invited to attend meetings. The Company Secretary acts as Secretary to the Committee.
The Committee met four times in the year. Meeting attendance can be found in the table on page 112.
The Committee's terms of reference can be found on the Company's website at https://corporate.easyjet.com. I am pleased to present the Nominations Committee (the 'Committee') report on the progress made during 2021.
The main purpose of the Committee is to ensure plans are in place for orderly succession of Board and senior management positions whilst maintaining an appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and diversity. The Committee regularly reviews the structure, size and composition of the Board and makes recommendation to the Board with regard to any changes.
There were four meetings during the year and after each Committee meeting, I provided an update to the Board on the key issues discussed during our meetings.
There have been a number of changes to the Board and its Committees during the year. The Committee oversaw the appointment process which resulted in the appointment of David Robbie with effect from 17 November 2020. Dr Anastassia Lauterbach stepped down from the Board with effect from 21 December 2020. Charles Gurassa and Moya Greene DBE stepped down from the Board on 23 December 2020 following the AGM after serving nine and three years on the Board respectively.
As reported earlier and in accordance with best practice under the Code, I will step down as the Chairman on 1 December 2021 after nearly nine years on the Board. Following a comprehensive search process led by the Nominations Committee, we appointed Stephen Hester as Chair Designate and Independent Non-Executive Director with effect from 1 September 2021. He will succeed me as the Chairman on 1 December 2021. Stephen has brought over
35 years of wide-ranging experience, a strong track record of value creation and listed board experience. Stephen will also serve on the Committee, which he will chair in due course. As the outgoing Chair, I did not participate in the search and selection process.
With the Board's succession plans underway, the Committee has also reviewed succession planning for the Airline Management Board and executive leadership team during the year. Following an independent search facilitated by Russell Reynolds we welcomed Kenton Jarvis as the Chief Financial Officer with effect from 3 February 2021.
Implementation of the annual Board evaluation process to assess the performance of individual Directors and the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees is also one of the key responsibilities of the Committee. The Committee appointed MSP to undertake an independent external evaluation process during the year. I am pleased to report that the Board was deemed to operate effectively, and the outcome of the evaluation and areas of focus are set out further on page 116 to 117.
John Barton Chair of the Nominations Committee
The Committee had previously identified the need for a number of non-executive appointments as part of its succession plans, and during the year it oversaw the process which led to the recommendation that David Robbie be appointed as an additional Non-Executive Director.
Having identified the desired skills and experience sought in the new Directors and having due regard to the Board Inclusion and Diversity Policy, after a selection process the Committee engaged search consultants Lygon Group to act on behalf of easyJet. Lygon Group do not have any other connection with the Company nor individual Directors, except where they may have liaised with them as prospective candidates for other board positions.
The Committee considered a list of potential candidates provided by the search consultant, and took into account the balance of skills, knowledge, independence, diversity and experience of the Board together with an assessment of the time commitment expected.
Following an interview process, a shortlist of candidates was discussed by the Committee and David's appointment was recommended to the Board. His experience further strengthens the diverse mix of skills and experience on the Board. The Committee oversaw the induction programme for David, further details of which are set out on page 114.
The Committee continues to review membership and composition of the Board and it is anticipated that there will be further changes in the coming year as it continues to execute against its succession plans and ensure the mix of skills and experience remains appropriate.
Following the resignation of Andrew Findlay in May 2020, the Board commenced the search for a new Chief Financial Officer. Having identified the desired skills and experience sought from the new CFO, after a selection process search consultants Russell Reynolds were appointed to act on behalf of easyJet. Russell Reynolds do not have any other connection with the Company nor individual Directors, except where they may have liaised with them as prospective candidates for other board positions.
Following an interview and referencing process, a shortlist of candidates was discussed by the Committee, and Kenton's appointment was subsequently recommended to the Board by the Committee.
Under the Code, nine years is the recommended maximum for the Chair to serve on the Board. As a result, the Committee took the appropriate steps to identify potential successors in preparation for John Barton's nine-year tenure coming to an end. The process was led by the Committee on behalf of the Board and the incumbent Chair did not participate. The Committee worked with executive search consultants, Lygon Group, to refine the role description, key attributes sought and search profile, which included amongst others: substantial prior board experience, credibility when representing the business to the city and investors, experience of business transformation and managing cost and capital restructuring, and experience managing complex stakeholders. Lygon then undertook a comprehensive search for prospective candidates who met the profile.
Given the importance of the appointment, all Board members were consulted as part of the shortlisting process. A number of candidates were selected for the shortlist and an interview process undertaken by all Board members.
Following the interview process and after consideration of the appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity on the Board, and the attributes sought from the new Chair, the Committee recommended the appointment of Stephen Hester as Chair Designate with effect from 1 September 2021 and for him to succeed John Barton on 1 December 2021.
To ensure that the Board Committees retain the correct balance of skills and experience, the Committee monitors overall composition and membership. As a result of the changes to the Board during the year, a number of changes to the membership of Board Committees were recommended and approved by the Board:
During 2021, in order to strengthen the employee voice in the boardroom and use the opportunity to review the mechanism when Moya Greene stepped down, the Committee considered the evolution of the role of Employee Representative Director, recommending that the responsibility be shared amongst several Non-Executive Directors to utilise their experience and geographic location. This recommendation was approved by the Board and from May 2021, four Non-Executive Directors were nominated as Employee Representative Directors. Further details can be found on page 109.
The Board continues to satisfy itself that plans are in place for orderly succession for appointments to the Board so that the right balance of appropriate skills and experience is represented, building on the work previously undertaken. During the year, the Committee reviewed the balance of skills, experience, diversity and independence of Board members, to ensure appropriate succession plans were in place. The Committee also seeks to ensure that there are succession plans and leadership development plans in place for the members of the AMB and ELT, noting that further initiatives are planned in this area.
The effectiveness and commitment of each of the Non-Executive Directors is reviewed annually as part of the Board evaluation. The Committee has satisfied itself as to the individual skills, relevant experience, contributions and time commitment of all the Non-Executive Directors, taking into account their other external appointments and interests held.
The Board is recommending the election or re-election of all of the continuing Directors at this year's AGM. Details of the service agreements for the Executive Directors and letters of appointment for the Non-Executive Directors, and their availability for inspection, are set out in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 151.
The Committee and Board are committed to ensuring that together the Directors possess the requisite diversity of skills, experience, knowledge and perspectives to support the long-term success of the Company. In this regard, the role of diversity in promoting balanced and considered decision making which aligns with the Group's purpose, values and strategy is fully recognised. All Board appointments are made on an objective and shared understanding of merit, in line with required competencies relevant to the Company as identified by the Committee, and consistent with the Company's Diversity and Inclusion Policy ('Policy').
The Policy covers diversity and inclusion across the Company, but in relation to the Board it specifically notes that:
Following the appointment of a new Chair and the conclusion of the Board performance review, the Committee will be reviewing the composition of the Board in the coming year with due regard to the Company's Board Diversity and Inclusion Policy and taking into account the recommendations set out in the Hampton-Alexander Review (which recommends that at least 33% of board and executive committee members of FTSE 350 companies should be female), the McGregor-Smith Review and the Parker Review (which recommends at least one director from an ethnic minority background for FTSE 100 companies by 2021).
At the start of 2020 the Board had a 45% female representation, exceeding the 33% recommended by the Hampton-Alexander Review and one Director from an ethnic minority background. Following the changes to the Board during the year, at the year end the female representation was 30% (three out of ten). When John Barton steps down from the Board on 1 December 2021 the level of female representation will increase to 33% (three out of nine). We continue to have one Director from an ethnic minority background.
The Nominations Committee also oversees the development of a diverse pipeline for future succession to Board and senior management appointments, including reviewing the gender balance of senior management and its direct reports. Where there is a known desire to improve diversity at a certain level or in a certain function in the organisation, the recruiting team will ask to see a higher proportion of candidates fitting the diversity criteria. However, the final selection will always be on merit.
As at 30 September 2021, the AMB has 33% female representation, and amongst their direct reports female representation is 26%.
easyJet's People team monitors the Group's diversity on at least an annual basis and highlights any areas of concern to the AMB. The Sustainability section of the Annual Report on page 56 reports in further detail on the approach being taken to diversity and inclusion, and the implementation of the policy across the Group.
In line with the Code, the Board conducts its annual evaluation exercise via an independent external facilitator once every three years. The last externally facilitated evaluation was conducted in 2018 and consequently an external evaluation facilitated by Manchester Square Partners was conducted during the financial year to evaluate the performance of the Board, its Committees and the Chairman in line with the Committee's terms of reference. Further details can be found on pages 115 to 117.
Julie Southern Chair of the Audit Committee
The Committee consists of the Independent Non-Executive Directors listed above. All members of the Committee are Independent Non-Executive Directors. Member biographies can be found on pages 98 to 101.
The Board has confirmed that it is satisfied that Committee members have recent and relevant financial experience
and offer a depth of financial and commercial experience including the travel sector in which the Company operates. The Board also confirmed that Julie Southern has recent and relevant financial experience.
David Robbie became a member of the Committee with effect from 17 November 2020 and Dr. Anastassia Lauterbach stepped down as a member of the Committee on 21 December 2020. The Company Secretary acts as Secretary to the Committee.
The Committee met five times during the year, with members of senior management required to attend as and when appropriate. Meeting attendance
can be found on page 112. The Committee also met with the internal and external auditors and Director of Risk and Assurance separately after each meeting. In addition, the Committee Chair holds regular private sessions with the Chief Financial Officer and the senior finance team, the Director of Risk and Assurance and the external audit team, to ensure that open and informal lines of communication exist should they wish to raise any concerns outside formal meetings.
The Committee's terms of reference can be found on the Company's website at https://corporate.easyjet.com.
I am pleased to present the Audit Committee (the 'Committee') report for the year ended 30 September 2021.
During the year the Committee continued to play a key role in assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility.
The Committee oversaw and supported the development of financial control improvements in light of the Government's proposed audit and governance reforms. The Committee also spent time reviewing the internal controls over financial reporting to ensure that the additional stresses imposed by the impact of Covid had been properly managed. It was clear that the level of flight cancellations and amendments continued to drive an extraordinary workload in revenue management in particular and the committee were pleased to see additional resources deployed to ensure that we could still have confidence in the underlying accounting. The Committee are very
grateful for the continued commitment and professionalism of the finance team in the face of a very heavy workload in 2021.
The Committee played a key role in providing independent oversight of any impacts on the risk management processes and internal control frameworks and challenging management on the significant accounting judgements made as a part of our financial reporting and going concern statements.
We engaged with the FRC as part of their thematic review of climate disclosures during the year, responding to questions they had on the information set out in our 2019 Annual Report and Accounts. Further details can be found on page 126.
We have considered the processes underpinning the production and approval of this year's Annual Report and Accounts, and also assessed the viability of the Group over a three-year period.
There were five meetings during the year and after each Committee meeting, I provided an update to the Board on the key issues discussed during our meetings. I have also met separately with the external audit partner and key management on a number of occasions during the year, and the Committee met with the external auditors after each Committee meeting without management present.
Julie Southern Chair of the Audit Committee
| The principal roles and responsibilities of the Committee are set out in its terms of reference, and include, but are not limited to: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | • monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the Company and the Group, preliminary results and announcements • review the appropriateness and consistency of significant accounting policies • review and report to the Board on significant financial issues and judgements |
||||
| Internal control and risk management |
• carry out a robust assessment of the Group's emerging and principal risks on an annual basis • review the effectiveness of the Group's risk management system and the assurance reports from management on the internal control and risk management system |
||||
| Compliance, whistleblowing and fraud |
• review the adequacy and security of the Group's arrangements for employees to raise concerns about possible wrongdoing in financial reporting or other matters on behalf of the Board |
||||
| Internal and external audit |
• review and approve the role and mandate of Internal Audit, monitor and review the effectiveness of its work and carry out a periodic assessment of the effectiveness of the Internal Audit function • consider and make recommendations to the Board, to be put to shareholders for approval at the Annual General Meeting (AGM), in relation to the appointment, reappointment and removal of the Company's external auditor • oversee the relationship with the external auditor |
The Committee's full terms of reference are approved annually and are available on the Company's website at https://corporate.easyjet.com.
The main areas of Committee activity during the 2021 financial year included the planning, monitoring, reviewing and approval of the following areas:
stakeholder feedback on the quality of Internal Audit activity
Internal Audit's compliance with prevailing professional standards
The Committee assessed and recommended to the Board that, taken as a whole, the 2021 Annual Report and Accounts (which the Board subsequently approved) are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the necessary information for shareholders to assess the Group and Company's position and performance, business model and strategy. In reaching this conclusion, the Committee considered the overall review and confirmation process around the Annual Report and Accounts, including:
The Committee was provided with, and commented on, a draft copy of the Annual Report and Accounts.
In carrying out the above processes, key considerations included ensuring that there was consistency between the financial statements and the narrative provided in the front half of the Annual Report, and that there was an appropriate balance between the reporting of weaknesses, difficulties and challenges, as well as successes, in an open and balanced manner including linkage between key messages throughout the document.
Through its activities, the Committee focuses on maintaining the integrity and quality of our financial reporting, considering the significant accounting judgements made by management and the findings of the external auditors. The Committee assesses whether suitable accounting policies have been adopted and whether management has made appropriate estimates and judgements. The Committee reviewed accounting papers prepared by management which provided details of significant financial reporting judgements. The Committee also reviewed the reports by the external auditors on the half-year, Q3 and full-year results, which highlighted any issues arising from the work undertaken on the audit.
The Committee's process included the comprehensive review of financial issues through the challenge of management, consideration of the findings of the external auditors and comparison with other organisations. The significant issues considered in relation to the financial statements are detailed below.
Management is responsible for maintaining adequate internal control over the financial reporting of the Group. A summary of the Group's financial results and commentary on performance measures is provided to the Board each month. Controls are in place over the preparation of financial data including: balance sheet reconciliations, review meetings on key balances and commentary on variances to forecast and prior periods. On a monthly basis, senior management, including the Group Financial Controller and Chief Financial Officer, review the management reporting packs.
The Annual Report and Accounts are produced by the Group Financial Control team based on submissions from individual teams across the business including Investor Relations, Finance, HR, Company Secretariat and Risk and Assurance. The report contributors are required to maintain supporting evidence for their submissions and ensure they are reviewed. The figures are then independently validated by the Group Financial Control team and the Risk and Assurance team perform sample tests of tying disclosures back to supporting evidence.
The Annual Report and Accounts are reviewed by the AMB, Board of Directors and Audit Committee for accuracy and to ensure a fair, balanced and understandable view is presented. Senior members of the Finance team including the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accountant and Group Financial Controller meet with the Audit Committee to present key events and discuss areas of judgement or estimates as outlined below. In-depth presentations on significant areas are provided throughout the year as appropriate.
The Finance team have regular proactive conversations with the external auditors on topics which are of audit relevance. The external auditors perform audit procedures and challenge of the Annual Report and Accounts and present their findings to the Audit Committee.
The Going Concern and Viability Statements are on pages 74 to 77.
As part of the FRC's thematic review of climate disclosures, the FRC Conduct Committee wrote to the Company with questions relating to information within our 2019 Annual Report and Accounts. These questions primarily related to seeking clarity about how the climate transition had been taken into account in estimating the carrying value and useful life of certain assets. easyJet responded to the FRC's questions providing clarifying information and noting specific enhancements it was planning to make to its 2020 Annual Report and Accounts that would address the questions and comments raised. These enhancements included expanding the notes to the accounts to incorporate additional information about how management took account of the impact of climate change and their use of stress testing in areas of critical judgements and estimates. The enhanced disclosures around risk, sustainability and TCFD disclosures, and the Viability Statement were highlighted. The presentation of this information has also been considered when preparing these Annual Report and Accounts.
The FRC requested that in disclosing this engagement we note the limitations of their review, namely that it was based on their reading of the Annual Report and Accounts and did not benefit from a detailed knowledge of our business or an understanding of the underlying transactions entered into. They also noted that their review provided no assurance that the report and accounts are correct in all material respects but rather that the FRC's role is not to verify the information provided but to consider compliance with reporting requirements.
Having provided the clarifications and noting the specific enhancements made to the 2020 Annual Report and Accounts, the review was concluded satisfactorily.
As part of its process for monitoring the standards of audit work, the Audit Quality Review team of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) reviewed PwC's audit of the Group accounts for the year ended 30 September 2020, with the FRC report received in November 2021. The key finding for improvement related to the audit approach to flight bookings that utilised credit vouchers and ensuring they originated from cash receipts. PwC has confirmed that it has amended its approach for the year ended 30 September 2021 to address this FRC review finding.
Details of the risk framework and the principal risks and uncertainties are set out on pages 78 to 95.
The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the work of the Internal Audit function. It reviews and approves the scope of the Internal Audit annual plan and assesses the quality of Internal Audit reports, along with management's actions relating to findings and the closure of recommended actions. The Audit Committee also considers stakeholder feedback on the quality of Internal Audit's work and the Internal Audit function is subject to an independent External Quality Assessment (EQA) every five years in line with the Institute of Internal Auditors Standards. The last EQA was conducted in 2017. Given the disruption to operations caused by the pandemic and the related impact on internal audit activity, the Committee considered that an independent internal quality assessment should be undertaken during the year, as an external review would not add significant value. The outcomes of the review were discussed by the Committee, including changes made to the internal audit charter and processes, but with no significant concerns raised. It is anticipated that an external EQA will be undertaken in the next two years once activity was less affected by the pandemic.
During 2021, a carefully targeted internal audit plan was agreed and undertaken across easyJet's operations, systems and support functions, with subsequent reports, including management responses, recommended action plans and follow-up reviews being considered by the Audit Committee during its meetings.
In order to safeguard the independence of the Internal Audit function, the Director of Risk and Assurance (who heads up the Internal Audit function) is given the opportunity to meet privately with the Audit Committee without any other members of management being present.
The Board as a whole, including the Audit Committee members, considers the nature and extent of easyJet's risk management framework and the risk profile that is acceptable in order to achieve the Group's strategic objectives. The Audit Committee has reviewed the work undertaken by management, the Committee itself and the Board on the assessment of the Group's emerging and principal risks, including their impact on the prospects of the Group. As a result, it is considered that the Board has fulfilled its obligations under the Code in relation to risk management and internal controls. Further details on the Group's principal risks and uncertainties and their
Given the continued uncertain nature of the current economic environment, the Committee reviewed the assumptions made in reaching the going concern conclusion, including the financial forecasts, liquidity position, the output of the stress testing performed and the consideration of risks and uncertainties, as well as the enhanced going concern disclosure.
The Committee considered whether the carrying value of goodwill, landing rights and aircraft assets held by easyJet should be impaired. There is judgement in the assumptions underlying the calculation of the value in use of the business being tested for impairment – primarily whether the forecasted cash flows are achievable, the potential impact of climate change on those cash flows, and the overall macroeconomic assumptions. The Committee addressed these matters using reports received from management outlining the basis for assumptions used, the stress testing performed on the calculation of the value in use and other relevant information used to support the carrying value of assets. The forecasted cash flows used in the calculation were presented to the Board.
The Committee reviewed the
maintenance provision at the year end. A number of judgements are used in the calculation of the provision, primarily pricing, utilisation of aircraft and timing of maintenance checks. The Committee addressed these matters using reports received from management which underpin the basis of assumptions used. The Committee also discussed with the external auditors their review of the assumptions underlying the estimates used.
The Committee reviewed the level and calculations of key accruals and provisions which are judgemental in nature, including customer claims in respect of flight delays and cancellations, and the restructuring provision. The Committee also considered the appropriateness of the recognition of contingent liabilities as at the year end. The Committee addressed these matters using reports received from management which set out the key assumptions used and the judgements involved. The Committee also discussed with the external auditors their review of the assumptions underlying the estimates used.
The Committee has considered the recoverability of the deferred tax asset based on the expected future taxable income of the Group. The Committee reviewed a report received from management outlining the basis of key assumptions used and the judgements involved.
The Committee have considered the appropriateness of the estimates used for the useful economic life and residual value of aircraft. The Committee considered these matters using reports received from management and external experts which underpin the estimations. The Committee also discussed with the external auditors their review of the assumptions underlying the estimates used.
impact on the prospects of the Group are set out on pages 78 to 95.
easyJet's system of internal controls, along with its design and operating effectiveness, which includes the Group's financial reporting process, is subject to review by the Audit Committee, through reports received from management, along with those from both internal and external auditors. Any control deficiencies identified are followed up, with action plans tracked by the AMB and the Committee.
The Code includes a provision that there should be a means for the workforce to raise concerns and that the Board should routinely review this mechanism and the reports arising from its operation. The Board and Audit Committee receive regular reports on this subject, and the Audit Committee assists the Board in ensuring that adequate arrangements are in place for the proportionate and independent investigation of such matters and for appropriate follow-up action, with the findings being regularly reported to the Board.
The Group is committed to the highest standards of quality, honesty, openness and accountability. The Group and all operating companies have whistleblowing policies in place. Employees are encouraged to raise concerns under the policy and any concerns raised are investigated carefully and thoroughly to assess what action, if any, should be taken. The Business Integrity Committee is a management forum on whistleblowing. It receives summaries of all reported concerns; it monitors any ongoing concerns and ensures that the proposed outcomes of investigations are fair, transparent and robust, with root causes identified and remedial actions agreed. Any matters of significance are reported to the Audit Committee and the Board, along with a comprehensive full year report. The Board supports the objectives of the Bribery Act 2010 and procedures have been established to ensure that compliance is achieved. These set out what is expected from our colleagues and stakeholders to ensure that they protect themselves, as well as the Group's reputation and assets. Training has been provided to the Board, senior management and all employees and is refreshed on a regular basis. Any breach of the Bribery Act will be regarded as serious misconduct, potentially justifying immediate dismissal.
PwC, as the external auditor, is engaged to conduct a statutory audit and express an opinion on the financial statements. Its audit includes the review of the systems of internal financial control and data which are used to produce the information contained in the financial statements. PwC was reappointed as auditor of the Group at the AGM held on 23 December 2020. The last tender process was undertaken in 2015 for the year ended 30 September 2016.
The current external audit engagement partner is Owen Mackney, Senior Statutory Auditor, who took over the role during the year from Andrew Kemp. The external audit plan and the £1.1 million fee proposal for the financial year under review (2020: £0.8 million) was prepared by PwC and presented to the Committee for consideration and approval.
Senior management monitors the external auditor's performance, behaviour and effectiveness during the exercise of its duties, which informs the Audit Committee's decision on whether to recommend reappointment on an annual basis.
The Audit Committee also assesses the effectiveness, independence and objectivity of the external auditor by, amongst other things:
The Committee was satisfied that the external audit had provided appropriate focus to those areas identified as the key risk areas to be considered by the Audit Committee and that the auditors had challenged management as part of the process. It had also continued to address the areas of significant accounting estimates. On this basis, and considering the views of senior management, the Committee concurred that the external audit had been effective and that PwC remained independent.
To preserve objectivity and independence, the external auditor does not provide consulting services unless this is in compliance with the Group's Non-audit Services Policy which reflects the applicable audit regulations and the FRC's Revised Ethical Standard 2016. This policy is available in the Governance section of easyJet's corporate website at corporate. easyjet.com.
In the 2021 financial year, PwC undertook audit-related non-audit services for the Company, as set out in note 3 to the financial statements. In addition, they undertook the non-audit work below in relation to the rights issue.
As part of the preparations for the rights issue announced in September 2021, certain non-audit assurance was required of the financial information presented in the prospectus. Management felt that PwC would be best placed to undertake this work if appropriate safeguards could be put in place, and this was discussed and approved by the Committee prior to work taking place. The fees for the non-audit work were £1.2 million and agreed by the Committee. This resulted in the 70% fee cap (70% of the average of the UK/Group fees paid in the last three consecutive financial years for the statutory audit) being exceeded, therefore approval was sought from the FRC for PwC to perform the work. The FRC provided such approval and granted dispensation for PwC to perform the work before the services commenced. A number of measures were implemented to ensure that the objectivity of PwC as auditors of the Company was safeguarded:
All fees for the additional reporting accountant services were invoiced and settled in full before the audit work was finalised.
A Quality Review Partner would be involved in the audit, and be responsible for performing a further review over the performance of the audit.
The one off nature of these non-audit services and that they were assurance based was also deemed to ensure that the objectivity of PwC was safeguarded.
PwC was first appointed to audit the Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 30 September 2006, and has therefore served a 15-year term. Under applicable audit legislation, companies are required to have a mandatory tender of auditors after 10 years, or 20 years if there is a competitive re-tender at 10 years. During the 2015 financial year, the Committee led a tender process for external audit services, following which the Audit Committee agreed to recommend that the Board reappoint PwC as, on balance, it performed best against the Committee's pre-agreed selection and
assessment criteria. Due to the tender undertaken in 2015, and the rotation of the Audit Partner in 2020, the Committee believes that a tender being undertaken in the 2024/25 financial year remains appropriate and is in the best interests of shareholders. The Company confirms that it has complied with the provisions of the Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory Use of Competitive Tender Processes and Audit Committee Responsibilities) Order 2014 relating to tendering and non-audit services.
The Committee will continue to consider the financial reporting of the Group and review the Group's accounting policies and annual statements. In particular, any major accounting issues of a subjective nature will be discussed by the Committee.
The Committee will also continue to review internal and external audit activity and the effectiveness of the risk management process.
PwC appointed
Full competitive tender; PwC reappointed for year ending 30 September 2016
Mandatory appointment of new external audit lead partner after five years to sign off on the 2021 financial year (see the 'External auditor' paragraph above)
Competitive tender to take place unless carried out earlier
PwC cannot continue beyond financial year end 30 September 2025 and a competitive tender will take place
(if not already effected prior to this date)
There were three changes to the membership of the Committee during the year as set out above. The Company Secretary acts as Secretary of the Committee. Other key invitees include the Chief Executive, the Group People Director, the Reward Director, the Chief Financial Officer, and external advisers as relevant.
Member biographies setting out their skills and experience can be found on pages 98 to 101. The Committee met five times during the year. Meeting attendance can be found in the table on page 112.
The Committee's terms of reference can be found on the Company's website at https://corporate.easyjet.com. This has been a busy year for the Committee as we have reviewed the impact of the pandemic upon our people and the remuneration framework, together with a review of the Remuneration policy and the considerations of the rights issue. I am delighted that I have had the opportunity to engage with our major shareholders over the year to discuss these topics.
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the Directors' Remuneration Report (the 'Report') for the year ended 30 September 2021, my first as Chair of the Committee. This has been a challenging year due to the pandemic and the impact this has had on our teams, as well as our financial performance. Many individuals continued to be placed on furlough and everyone faced the lockdowns that continued for much of the year across Europe. This has impacted on individuals reward opportunities during this year both in terms of salary increases and bonus, and as a Committee we have been mindful of this. We have taken this into account, along with the impact on our shareholder experience, in all our considerations.
This Report contains:
In light of continued market uncertainty, the annual bonus targets were set separately for the first and second half of the financial year to allow flexibility and agility. The measures selected for the bonus aligned with our key priorities for the year and were EBITDA (30%), cost reduction programme (20%), free cash flow (20%), customer satisfaction (10%) and individual performance (20%). Recognising the importance of our ESG agenda, individual targets included sustainability measures as well as measures linked to strategy execution.
Due to the continuing restrictions on airline travel and the impact of this on our performance no annual bonus in respect of the year ended 30 September 2021 will be paid.
Awards granted in 2018 were due to vest based on performance to 30 September 2021. Awards were based on a combination of performance conditions, being threeyear average headline ROCE, total headline EPS and relative TSR compared to FTSE 51-150 companies measured over the three financial years to 30 September 2021.
The stretching performance targets for the 2018 LTIP award, which were set before the pandemic, were not met and therefore this award will lapse.
In December 2020 the Committee made awards to the executives under the LTIP. Due to the prevailing uncertainty at the time of award, and in line with the flexibility provided in the Investment Association's Covid-19 guidance, the decision was made to delay target setting for up to six months when we hoped the long term economic situation would be clearer. However, with lockdowns ongoing within the UK and much of Europe in early 2021 along with
continued restrictions on travel, there was still a high level of uncertainty over the medium-term outlook.
Our LTIP awards were normally based on headline ROCE (40%), headline EPS (40%) and relative TSR (20%). However, the continued external uncertainty meant that the previous approach for the LTIP of setting a mix of three-year financial targets was very challenging and was likely to remain so for some time. In light of this, the Committee concluded that setting financial targets for the 2020 LTIP award would not be fair and could result in either unduly difficult or easy targets driven by external events rather than management action.
The Committee's view was that in the circumstances, shareholder alignment is a key measure of success where management will benefit if shareholders do and vice versa. It was therefore decided that the 2020 LTIP award would be based 100% on TSR performance. The Committee believes basing the award 100% on TSR is a clear and simple approach and ensures that the vesting outcome is fully aligned with the shareholder experience. It also removes the need to set financial targets in uncertain economic times whilst providing clarity for management and shareholders.
In line with best practice and shareholder expectations the Committee shall retain discretion to adjust the vesting outcome where outcomes are not considered to be reflective of underlying financial or non-financial performance of the business, the performance of the individual or where the outcome is not considered appropriate in the context of the experience of shareholders or other stakeholders. Similarly, the Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to make any adjustments to ensure that the Executive Directors do not benefit unduly from
windfall gains when the market recovers and determine a fair outcome based on the performance of easyJet over the entire performance period.
I consulted with a number of major shareholders on behalf of the Committee regarding this approach who were supportive.
During the year the Committee undertook a detailed review of our Directors' remuneration policy to ensure that the remuneration arrangements we have in place will support long term strategic decision making, directly align management with the interests of shareholders, are appropriate to support the business as we continue to recover from the pandemic, and that they motivate Executive Directors, the Airline Management Board and the broader management population to drive the business and reward them in line with the shareholder experience.
After careful consideration and consultation with our largest shareholders, the Remuneration Committee has concluded that a Restricted Share Plan is the best approach for the Company going forward to align management with shareholders, support the execution of our strategy and the creation of long term sustainable shareholder value. We will therefore be putting forward a revised Directors' remuneration policy to the 2022 AGM incorporating such a plan. Details of the other changes proposed are set out on the following pages.
This Report describes the implementation of easyJet's remuneration policy for Executive and Non-Executive Directors and discloses the amounts earned relating to the year ended 30 September 2021. The Report complies with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 and supporting regulations. The Report has been prepared in line with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code and the requirements of the UK Listing Authority Listing Rules.
The Directors' remuneration policy (set out on pages 136 to 142) will be put to shareholders in a binding vote at the forthcoming AGM and, if approved, will formally supersede the current policy with immediate effect. The Annual Statement by the Chair of the Remuneration Committee (set out on pages 130 to 133) and the Annual Report on Remuneration (set out on pages 143 to 153) will together be subject to an advisory vote at the forthcoming AGM.
After careful consideration and consultation with our largest shareholders, the Remuneration Committee has concluded that the LTIP should be replaced with a Restricted Share Plan. We believe that this is the best approach for the Company going forward to support the execution of our strategy and the creation of long term shareholder value.
The Committee believes that amending the policy to include a Restricted Share Plan (RSP) is appropriate for easyJet for the following reasons:
| Reason | Rationale | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| easyJet is an asset heavy business that requires long term decision making |
The Company is focused on making long term investments to drive long term sustainable value creation. The Committee believes that three-year performance targets risk creating too much focus on delivering for the medium rather than the long term. We believe that an RSP, which does not rely on hitting three-year targets, will better support the longer-term decision making required to deliver superior long term shareholder value creation |
|||||
| Aligns management and shareholders for long term sustainable value creation |
The past two years have been challenging and we are grateful to shareholders for their support, particularly in relation to the recent rights issue. Going forward we want to have a remuneration framework which clearly aligns management with our shareholders for long term value. The Committee believes that the RSP will better align management with the experience of shareholders through the alignment of reward outcomes with the share price. |
|||||
| easyJet's performance is heavily influenced by external factors |
The airline and travel sector is exposed to external factors outside of management's control which make it challenging to set realistic but stretching performance targets for the Company over the long term. This includes for example changing governmental requirements, the impact of Covid-19 or security issues. This has led to significant variability of previous LTIP outcomes (set out in the chart below). This variability, which has been largely impacted by external factors rather than underlying operational performance, has impacted the motivational impact of the LTIP for management. An RSP would simplify our approach to reward policy, strongly aligning the interests of management with those of shareholders and thereby improving the motivational impact of incentives. easyJet's historical LTIP payouts (% of max) Vesting levels (%) 100 100 100 92 70 32 15 0 0 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 |
|||||
| Medium-term uncertainty in the sector and business |
Given the difficulties in rebuilding the sector, simplifying our approach to remuneration will act as a retention tool across our management teams as we navigate out of the initial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and take the necessary steps required to ensure the business recovers. |
|||||
| RSP Awards have been used before in the business for more junior roles |
Given the strategic rationale, we are already issuing RSPs within the wider workforce as an effective component on the reward framework. Implementing Restricted Share Plan Awards for the Executive Directors would ensure a consistent approach with other employees where RSP awards have already been used and so better align executive pay across the Airline Management Board and other executives and managers in the business. |
|||||
| Fits with easyJet's reward principles |
Including an RSP ties in with easyJet's remuneration principles i.e. simple and cost effective, aligned with business strategy and further aligns executives with shareholders and other stakeholders in the business. |
The following provides a summary of how the RSP will operate:
This approach is illustrated here:
Whole award subject to holding period of 5 years `
The Committee intends to review the underpins to be applied in subsequent years.
I consulted with a number of our major shareholders on behalf of the Committee regarding the move to a Restricted Share Plan. During these discussions shareholders recognised and understood the rationale to implement an RSP and provided their feedback on the suggested approach. This feedback has been considered carefully by the Committee.
In light of the circumstances of the business and our commitments under our CCFF and UKEF financing, Executive Directors will not receive a salary increase for the year ended 30 September 2022. Salaries will therefore remain at £740,000 for the CEO and £520,000 for the CFO.
The operation of the annual bonus will continue broadly unchanged although we will revert back to being based on full year targets. The maximum opportunity will continue to be 200% of base salary (Chief Executive) and 175% of base salary (Chief Financial Officer).
For the year ended 30 September 2022 the annual bonus will be based 30% on EBITDAR performance, 50% on a balanced scorecard of financial and operational objectives including Free Cash Flow, Ancillary Yield, Cost Programme Performance and CSAT and 20% based on individual performance. Individual performance includes measures linked to our sustainability strategy, recognising the increasing importance of this to the business, as well as measures linked to easyJet holiday's performance and employee engagement. The Committee has chosen to use a balanced scorecard approach to assessing performance for 50% of the bonus this year to ensure that we are providing a balanced incentive to drive performance across a range of areas. The Committee will consider performance against each measure and determine an appropriate total outcome for the scorecard at the end of the year. At least 40% of the scorecard will be linked to financial measures ensuring that at least 50% of the overall bonus is linked to financial measures. In addition, as in previous years, a safety underpin applies such that the Committee may scale back the bonus earned (including to zero) in the event that there is a safety event which it considers warrants the use of such discretion.
Any payment will be additionally assessed against the requirements for the UKEF.
In September 2021 the Board undertook a rights issue raising £1.2bn to facilitate the Group's recovery from the impact of the pandemic and to materially improve easyJet's ability to deliver long-term value to shareholders through providing the Group with the flexibility to take advantage of strategic and investment opportunities. We thank our shareholders for their support in this process.
In accordance with standard practice we have adjusted outstanding share awards to reflect the impact of the rights issue. We will also be reviewing targets for outstanding incentive awards for the impact of the rights issue to ensure that the degree of stretch remains appropriate.
During the year we were delighted to welcome Kenton Jarvis who joined us as CFO on 3 February 2021. In the 2020 Directors' Remuneration Report we outlined that we had provided Kenton with a combination of buy-out awards to replace awards he forfeited on leaving his previous employer. Having considered this approach further, the Committee and Kenton agreed that, taking into account the likelihood of vesting of the forfeited share awards, share buy-out awards would not be granted at this time. The cash buy-out awards, totalling £300,000, are due to be paid, net of appropriate withholdings, in the December 2021 payroll. Also, following his appointment, in May 2021 Kenton was granted a normal award of 200% of base salary under the LTIP. This award was granted on the same terms and linked to the same performance conditions as the LTIP awards granted to other senior executives in December 2020 as outlined above.
On behalf of the Committee I would like to thank shareholders for their continued support during 2021 and ahead of the next AGM.
www.easyJet.com 133
The Remuneration Committee's primary objective is to design a remuneration framework which promotes the long-term success of the Group. For some time, we have been guided by the following reward principles:
| Principle | Application in remuneration framework |
|---|---|
| Simple and cost effective |
To establish a simple and cost-effective reward package in line with our low-cost and efficient business model. |
| Aligned with business strategy |
To support the achievement of our business strategy of long term sustainable growth and returns. The combination of our annual bonus plan based on a mix of financial, operational and strategic targets and our new long term Restricted Share Plan ensures that value is delivered to shareholders and that Executive Directors are rewarded for the successful and sustained delivery of the key strategic objectives of the Group. |
| Sustainable long term success |
Total remuneration is weighted towards elements which align with sustainable long term shareholder value creation. This ensures that there is a clear link between the value created for shareholders and the amount paid to our Executive Directors. |
| Mindful of the wider stakeholder experience |
Notwithstanding the financial performance of the business, overall remuneration outcomes will be mindful of the wider stakeholder experience to ensure Executive Director remuneration remains fair, responsible, and sustainable. |
Johan Lundgren (Chief Executive)
| 2021 | £794 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | £755 | |||||||||
| Kenton Jarvis (Chief Financial Officer)1 | ||||||||||
| 2021 | XX £363 |
|||||||||
| £0 | £100 | £200 | £300 | £400 | £500 | £600 | £700 | £800 | £900 | £1000 |
| Element | Policy | Implementation of policy for the 2022 financial year |
|---|---|---|
| Salary | Increases normally up to the average workforce level (though may be increased at higher rates in certain circumstances, for example where a new Executive Director has been appointed to the Board at a lower than typical market salary to allow for growth in the role). |
In line with the wider workforce pay freezes, the salaries for Johan Lundgren and Kenton Jarvis will not be increased during the 2022 financial year. Salaries will therefore continue to be £740,000 for the CEO and £520,000 for the CFO. |
| Benefits and pension |
Modest benefits with pension provision aligned to the wider workforce. |
Pension allowance of 6.15% of salary (being the cash alternative to a 7% employer contribution less the equivalent value of UK employers' national insurance contributions) plus modest benefits aligned to the market. |
| Annual bonus | Maximum opportunity is 200% of base salary (Chief Executive) and 175% of base salary (Chief Financial Officer). One-third of bonus is deferred into shares for three years. Majority based on financial metrics. Withholding and recovery provisions apply. |
Maximum will remain at 200% of base salary for the Chief Executive and at 175% of base salary for the Chief Financial Officer. The bonus for the 2022 financial year will be based 30% on EBITDAR performance, 50% on a balanced score card of Company performance targets including free cash flow, cost control, customer feedback, operational performance and ancillary revenue, and 20% on individual performance including measures linked to sustainability, strategy and employee engagement. The Committee will review performance against these measures and has the discretion to determine the appropriate level of award at the end of the financial year based on performance achieved. As in previous years a safety underpin applies such that the Committee may scale back the bonus earned (including to zero) in the event that there is a safety event which it considers warrants the use of such discretion. |
| Restricted Share Plan (RSP) |
Normal maximum awards of 125% of salary (Chief Executive) and 100% of salary (Chief Financial Officer). Up to 150% of salary in exceptional circumstances. Three-year performance period plus two-year post-vesting holding period. Awards will be subject to performance underpins measured over the vesting periods. Withholding and recovery provisions apply. |
The normal maximum award will be 125% of salary for the Chief Executive and 100% of salary for the Chief Financial Officer. Performance underpins will be: (i) That easyJet does not fall below its minimum liquidity target (such that a credit risk is triggered) through the vesting period; and (ii) Satisfactory governance performance including no ESG issues that result in material reputational damage to the reputation of the Company (as determined by the Board). If the Company does not meet one or more of the underpins the Committee would consider whether it was appropriate to scale back the level of payout under the award to reflect this. The Committee would retain discretion to determine what level of scale back, if any, was appropriate. |
| The Committee will also operate a further underpin such that if the Company's performance taken as a whole materially underperforms what might reasonably have been expected for the sector for reasons attributable to management action or inaction, the Committee will at its discretion reduce the award quantum appropriately. The Committee will review the appropriate underpins to be used for |
||
| each award. Similarly, the Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to make any adjustments to ensure that the Executive Directors do not benefit unduly from windfall gains when the market recovers and determine a fair outcome. |
||
| Share ownership guidelines |
250% of salary (Chief Executive) and 200% of salary (Chief Financial Officer). Expected to retain 50% of post-tax shares vesting under the RSP and 100% of post-tax deferred bonus shares until guideline is met. |
250% of base salary for the Chief Executive and 200% of base salary for the Chief Financial Officer. These guidelines will apply to all new Director appointments and all current Directors not under notice. |
| Post cessation share ownership guidelines |
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer required to hold up to 100% of their shareholding requirement for two years after leaving office. |
Executive Directors will be expected to maintain a minimum shareholding equal to the guideline (or their actual shareholding if lower) for two years following stepping down as an Executive Director. These guidelines will only apply to any shares from incentive awards for all new and current Directors not under notice. |
Executive Director remuneration policy – at a glance
This part of the Directors' Remuneration Report sets out easyJet's Directors' remuneration policy. This revised policy will be put to shareholders for approval in a binding vote at the AGM on 10 February 2022 and will be effective from this date. The Committee's current intention is that the policy will operate for a three-year period.
As outlined in the Remuneration Committee Chair's statement, following extensive consideration and consultation with shareholders, the Committee has concluded that going forwards replacing our existing LTIP with a Restricted Share Plan (RSP) is the best approach to support the execution of our strategy and the creation of long term shareholder value. Under the RSP the awards will be lower, however vesting will be subject to the achievement of performance underpins only rather than stretching performance targets.
Other than the introduction of the RSP there are no other major changes to this policy compared to the 2020 Directors' remuneration policy. Minor changes have been made to the wording of the policy in certain areas to aid operation and to increase clarity.
The Remuneration Committee has responsibility for determining remuneration for the Executive Directors, the Chairman of the Board, and members of the Airline Management Board. The Committee takes into account the need to recruit and retain executives and ensure that they are properly motivated to perform in the long term interests of the Company and its shareholders, while paying no more than is necessary. In addition, the Committee will review and be appraised on the application of the remuneration policy for senior management and all employee populations across the Group to ensure that decisions remain mindful of the wider employee experience.
In determining the new Directors' remuneration policy, the Committee followed a robust process which included discussions on the content of the policy at Remuneration Committee meetings during the year. The Committee considered the input from management and independent advisers, as well as extensively consulting on best practice with major shareholders and proxy and advisory services.
The primary objective of the Group's remuneration policy is to align management interests with the long term interests of shareholders and to promote the sustainable long term success of the business by operating pay arrangements which are appropriately competitive. When setting the policy for Executive Directors' remuneration, the Committee takes into account total remuneration levels operating in companies of a similar size and complexity as well as companies in the wider aviation and travel & leisure sector, the responsibilities of each individual role, individual performance and an individual's experience.
Our overall policy, having given due regard to the factors noted above, is to weight remuneration towards elements which aligns management with sustainable long term shareholder value creation. This is typically achieved through setting base pay at a competitive level, offering modest benefits with pension provision at similar levels to the wider UK workforce, and providing the potential to earn a performance based annual bonus linked to Group financial and strategic or operational targets. An award of restricted shares supports long term decision making and aligns management's interest with those of shareholders.
In setting remuneration for the Executive Directors, the Committee takes note of the overall approach to reward for employees in the Group. Salary increases will ordinarily be (in percentage of salary terms) no higher than those of the wider workforce (other than in circumstances described below).
Effective 1 January 2019, the Group appointed Moya Greene as their Employee Representative Director to enhance the voice of the employee in the boardroom. As set out on page 109, the Board revised this mechanism during the year and appointed four Non-Executive Directors as Employee Representative Directors. The Employee Representative Directors are expected to meet individually with the Company's European Works Council ('EWC') and Management & Administration Consultative Group ('MACG') at least once
a year, and other Works Councils on a periodic basis. In addition, other more informal engagement is envisaged. A standing agenda item allows the Employee Representative Directors to report to the Board regularly on their discussions, and they are encouraged to bring the employee voice into conversations in the boardroom whenever possible, including any matters that may contribute to the decision making of the Committee.
During the year Moni Mannings met with the MACG to discuss a range of topics and answer their questions. Feedback was received on the reward framework at easyJet and what changes may be considered in the future to support retention and engagement.
In addition, the Group People Director and Reward Director meet with the EWC and MACG to update them on reward activities, answer questions and receive feedback, which is then reported to the Committee. During 2021 the Reward Director specifically met with the MACG to discuss the rights issue and the reward structure at all levels and with the EWC to update them on the impact of the rights issue on employee share schemes, together with other reward related questions. Feedback received at these meetings has directly resulted in some changes and enhancements to the benefit offering for employees.
The Committee also considers developments in best practice expectations from institutional investors' and the views expressed by shareholders during any dialogue when making executive remuneration decisions.
easyJet remains committed to shareholder dialogue and takes an active interest in voting outcomes. We consult extensively with our major shareholders when setting our remuneration policy or when considering any significant changes to our remuneration arrangements. The Committee also considers shareholder feedback received in relation to the Directors' Remuneration Report each year following the AGM. This, plus any additional feedback received from time to time, is then considered as part of the Committee's annual review of the remuneration policy and its implementation.
The table below sets out the main components of easyJet's remuneration policy:
| Element, purpose and link to strategy |
Operation (including maximum levels where applicable) |
Framework used to assess performance and provisions for the recovery of sums paid |
|---|---|---|
| Base salary To provide the core reward for the role. Set at a sufficient level to recruit and retain individuals of the necessary calibre to execute the Company's business strategy. |
Salaries are normally reviewed annually, with changes typically effective from 1 January. Salaries are typically set after considering salary levels in companies of a similar size and complexity as well as companies in the wider aviation and travel & leisure sector, the responsibilities of each individual role, progression within the role, individual performance, and an individual's experience. Our overall policy, having given due regard to the factors noted, is normally to target salaries at a broadly market competitive level in the context of the total package. Salaries may be increased, and any increase will ordinarily be no higher than those of the wider workforce (in percentage of salary terms). However, increases beyond those granted to the wider workforce (in percentage of salary terms) may be awarded in certain circumstances such as to reflect performance, significant changes in market practice or the size of the Company, to recognise changes in roles and responsibilities or where a new Executive Director has been appointed to the Board at a lower than typical market salary to allow for growth in the role. |
The Committee considers individual salaries at the appropriate Committee meeting each year after having due regard to the factors noted in operating the salary policy. No recovery provisions apply to base salary. |
| Benefits In line with the Company's policy to keep remuneration simple and consistent. |
Executive Directors are entitled to a combination of modest benefits aligned to the market, such as life assurance and other insurance arrangements as well as a range of voluntary benefits including the purchase of additional holiday. The Company provides Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance and may provide an indemnity to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies Act (see Directors' Report section). Where required, a car allowance or the use of a driver for Company business may be provided. Executive Directors shall be reimbursed for all reasonable business expenses and the Company may settle any tax incurred in relation to these where appropriate. Where an Executive Director is required to relocate to perform their role, appropriate one-off or ongoing benefits may be provided (such as housing support, schooling etc). Executive Directors are also eligible to participate in any all-employee share plans operated by the Company, in line with HMRC guidelines currently prevailing (where relevant), on the same basis as for other eligible employees. The Committee may introduce other benefits if it is considered appropriate to do so. |
Not applicable. No recovery provisions apply to benefits. |
| Pension To provide employees with long term savings via pension provisions in line with the Company's strategy to keep remuneration simple and consistent. |
Defined contribution plan with the same monthly employer contributions as those offered to eligible employees in the wider UK workforce (i.e. up to 7% of base salary); or a cash alternative to the same value, which will normally be less the equivalent value of employer National Insurance contribution costs. easyJet operates a pension salary sacrifice arrangement whereby all UK employees, including Executive Directors, can exchange part of their salary for Company-paid pension contributions. Where employees exchange salary this reduces employer National Insurance contributions. easyJet credits half of this NI reduction (currently 6.9% of the salary exchanged) to the individual's pension plan. |
Not applicable. No recovery provisions apply to employer pension contributions. |
| Element, purpose and link to strategy |
Operation (including maximum levels where applicable) |
Framework used to assess performance and provisions for the recovery of sums paid |
|---|---|---|
| Annual bonus To incentivise and recognise execution of the business strategy on an annual basis. Rewards the achievement of annual financial and operational goals. Compulsory deferral of a portion of the bonus provides alignment with shareholders. |
Maximum opportunity of 200% of salary for Chief Executive and 175% of salary for other Executive Directors. One-third of the pre-tax bonus earned is normally subject to compulsory deferral into shares (or equivalent), typically for a period of three years, and is normally subject to continued employment. The remainder of the bonus is typically paid in cash. Dividend equivalent payments may be made on the deferred bonus at the time of vesting and may assume the reinvestment of dividends. All bonus payments are at the discretion of the Committee, as set out following this table. |
In line with last year, bonuses are normally based on stretching financial and non-financial measures, including personal or strategic performance measures. Performance measures are set and assessed by the Committee at its discretion, with performance normally measured over a one-year period. Financial measures will normally represent the majority of the bonus, with other non-financial measures representing the balance. Safety underpins all of the operational activities of the Group and the bonus plan includes a provision that enables the Committee to scale back the bonus earned (including to zero) in the event that there is a safety event which it considers warrants the use of such discretion. The annual bonus plan includes provisions which enable the Committee (in respect of both the cash and the deferred elements of bonuses) to recover or withhold value in the event of certain defined circumstances. The Committee may, at its discretion, adjust the level of bonus payout if it considers that the payout would not reflect the underlying performance of the executive, the Group, the experience of shareholders, other stakeholders or if such a level |
| Restricted Share Plan (RSP) award To incentivise the execution of the business strategy over the longer term. Rewards sustained increase in shareholder value1 |
Each year RSP awards may be granted. Awards normally vest over a three-year period. A holding period applies to RSP awards which requires the Executive Directors to retain the after-tax value of shares for 24 months from the vesting date – including post cessation of employment. The maximum opportunity contained within the plan rules for RSP awards is 125% of salary (with awards up to 150% of salary eligible to be made in exceptional circumstances). The normal maximum face value of annual awards will be 125% of base salary for the Chief Executive and 100% of base salary for other Executive Directors. Dividend equivalent awards may be made on RSP awards that vest and may assume the reinvestment of dividends. |
would not be appropriate in the circumstances. Awards will be subject to performance underpins measured over the vesting periods. If the Company does not meet one or more of the underpins the Committee would consider whether it was appropriate to scale back the level of payout under the award to reflect this. The Committee would retain discretion to determine what level of scale back, if any, was appropriate. The RSP includes provisions which enable the Committee to recover or withhold value in the event of certain defined circumstances. The Committee retains discretion to review the performance underpins, and to set the triggers for each underpin. The Committee may, at its discretion, adjust the vesting level of an award if it considers that the vesting level would not reflect the underlying performance of the executive, the Group, the experience of shareholders, other stakeholders or if such a level would not be appropriate in the circumstances. |
| Share ownership To ensure alignment between the interests of Executive Directors and shareholders. Post-employment share ownership guideline |
The Chief Executive and the Chief Financial Officer are expected to build and maintain a holding equivalent to 250% and 200% of salary respectively over a period of five years from appointment. Executive Directors are expected to retain 50% of the post-tax shares vesting under the Long Term Incentive Plans, the RSP and 100% of the post-tax deferred bonus shares until the guideline is met. Executive Directors are now required to hold up to 100% of their shareholding requirement for two years after stepping down from the Board in respect of shares from incentive awards. The Committee retains discretion to waive this guideline if it is not considered appropriate in the specific circumstances. |
Not applicable. Not applicable. |
Outstanding awards under the LTIP will vest in line with the remuneration policy in force at the time of grant.
The Committee will operate the annual bonus plan and RSP according to their respective rules (or relevant documents) and in accordance with the Listing Rules where relevant. The Committee retains discretion, consistent with market practice, in a number of regards to the operation and administration of these plans. In relation to the annual bonus plan, the Committee retains discretion over:
In relation to the RSP and annual bonus deferred in shares, the Committee retains discretion on the following:
In relation to both the Group's RSP and the annual bonus plan, the Committee retains the ability to adjust the targets (in the case of the annual bonus) or underpins (in the case of the RSP) and/or set different measures if events occur which cause it to determine that the conditions are no longer appropriate (e.g. material acquisition and/or divestment of a Group business), and the amendment is required so that the conditions achieve their original purpose and are not materially less difficult to satisfy.
Any use of the above discretions would be explained in the Annual Report on Remuneration and may be the subject of consultation with the Company's major shareholders.
The use of discretion in relation to the Group's Save As You Earn, and Share Incentive Plans will be as permitted under HMRC rules and the Listing Rules.
Details of share awards granted to existing Executive Directors are set out on page 147. These remain eligible to vest based on their original award terms.
Malus and clawback provisions are included in all incentives: the annual bonus (up to three years from date of award), and the RSP (up to six years from the date of award). The circumstances in which malus and clawback could apply may include some or all of the following as determined by the Board:
The choice of the performance metrics applicable to the annual bonus plan reflect the Committee's belief that any incentive compensation should be appropriately challenging and tied to the delivery of a blend of key financial and non-financial measures. These bonus measures are intended to ensure that Executive Directors are incentivised to deliver across a range of objectives for which they are accountable. Financial measures will normally be used for the majority of the bonus and will be selected in order to provide a clear indication of how successful the Group has been in managing operations effectively overall. The remainder of the bonus may be based on key operational or strategic objectives, which are set annually.
Since safety is of central importance to the business, the award of any bonus is subject to an underpin that enables the Committee to reduce the bonus earned (including to zero) in the event that there is a safety event that it considers warrants the use of such discretion.
RSP awards are subject to performance underpins. These are intended to represent a minimum level of performance below which vesting may not be appropriate. The performance underpins will normally be linked to key financial, operational or governance minimum standards. Underpins are set taking into account what would be considered to be a minimum acceptable level of performance.
The Committee has retained flexibility on the specific measures which can be used for the annual bonus plan and the underpins for the RSP to ensure that they will be fully aligned with the strategic imperatives prevailing at the time they are set. Performance targets are set taking into account internal and external expectations of performance to align with our remuneration philosophy and principles.
No performance targets are set for Save As You Earn awards since these are purposefully designed to encourage employees across the Group to purchase shares in the Company. A measure of Group performance based on financial and operational targets set in the prior year is used in determining awards under the Share Incentive Plan.
The Committee reserves the right to make any remuneration payments and/or payments for loss of office (including exercising any discretions available to it in connection with such payments) notwithstanding that they are not in line with the policy set out above where the terms of the payment were agreed (i) before the policy set out above came into effect, provided that the terms of the payment were consistent with any applicable shareholder-approved Directors' remuneration policy in force at the time they were agreed or where otherwise approved by shareholders; or (ii) at a time when the relevant individual was not a Director of the Company (or other persons to whom the policy set out above applies) and, in the opinion of the Committee, the payment was not in consideration for the individual becoming a Director of the Company or such other person. For these purposes 'payments' include the Committee satisfying awards of variable remuneration and, in relation to an award over shares, the terms of the payment are 'agreed' no later than the time the award is granted. This policy applies equally to any individual who is required to be treated as a Director under the applicable regulations.
In line with the Group's policy to keep remuneration simple, aligned, and performance-based, the benefit and pension arrangements for the current Executive Directors are typically on broadly the same terms as those offered to eligible UK employees in the wider workforce. In addition, all employees have the opportunity to participate in a number of broad-based share plans.
However, the overall remuneration policy for the Executive Directors is more heavily weighted towards variable and share-based pay than for other employees. This is to ensure that a greater proportion of executive pay is linked directly to the creation of value for shareholders. This approach is to create a clear link between the value created for shareholders and the remuneration received by the Executive Directors.
The charts below show how much the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer could earn through easyJet's remuneration policy under different performance scenarios in the 2022 financial year. The following assumptions have been made:
Minimum (performance below threshold) – fixed pay only, with no vesting under any of easyJet's incentive plans.
Mid (performance in line with expectations) – fixed pay plus a bonus at the mid-point of the range (giving 50% of the maximum opportunity), plus 100% vesting of the Restricted Share Plan.
Maximum (performance meets or exceeds maximum) – fixed pay plus maximum bonus, plus 100% vesting of the Restricted Share Plan.
Fixed pay comprises:
Salaries – salary effective as at 1 January 2022.
Benefits – amount received in the 2022 financial year.
Pension – employer contributions or cash-equivalent payments received in the 2022 financial year.
Matching Shares under the all-employee Share Incentive Plan.
Were easyJet's share price to increase by 50%, Johan Lundgren's total remuneration would increase to £3,667k under a 'maximum' scenario – driven by the increased value of the RSP awards
Were easyJet's share price to increase by 50%, Kenton Jarvis' total remuneration would increase to £2,256k under a 'maximum' scenario – driven by the increased value of the RSP awards
The scenarios shown above do not include any dividend assumptions. It should be noted that since the analysis above shows what could be earned by the Executive Directors based on the remuneration policy described above (ignoring the potential impact of share price growth), these numbers will differ to values included in the table on page 145 detailing the actual earnings by Executive Directors.
The Group's policy is for Executive Directors to have service contracts which may be terminated with no more than 12 months' notice from either party.
The Executive Directors' service contracts are available for inspection by shareholders at the Company's registered office.
If notice is served by either party, the Executive Director can continue to receive basic salary, benefits and pension for the duration of their notice period, during which time the business may require the individual to continue to fulfil their current duties or may assign a period of garden leave.
A payment in lieu of notice may be made, and, in this event, the Committee's normal policy is to make the payment in up to 12 monthly instalments which may be reduced if alternative employment is taken up during this period.
For good leavers, bonus payments may be made on a pro-rata basis, but only for the period of time served from the start of the financial year to the date of termination, and not for any period in lieu of notice. Any bonus paid would be subject to the normal bonus targets, tested at the end of the financial year.
In relation to a termination of employment, the Committee may make any payment in relation to statutory entitlements or to settle or compromise claims in connection with a termination of any existing or future Executive Director as necessary. The Committee also retains the discretion to reimburse reasonable legal expenses incurred in relation to a termination of employment and to meet any outplacement costs if deemed necessary.
The rules of the Company's share plans set out what happens to awards if a participant ceases to be an employee or Director of easyJet before the end of the vesting period. Generally, any outstanding share awards will lapse on such cessation, except in certain circumstances.
If an Executive Director ceases to be an employee or Director of easyJet as a result of death, injury, retirement, the sale of the business or company that employs the individual, or any other reason at the discretion of the Committee, then they will be treated as a 'good leaver' under the relevant plan's rules. Under the deferred bonus, the shares for a good leaver will normally vest in full on the normal vesting date (or on cessation of employment in the case of death) and if the award is in the form of an option, there is a 12 month
window in which the award can be exercised. Awards structured as options which have vested prior to cessation can be exercised within 12 months of cessation of office or employment.
Under the RSP, a good leaver's unvested awards will vest (either on the normal vesting date or the relevant date of cessation, if determined by the Committee) subject to achievement of the performance underpin, with a pro-rata reduction to reflect the proportion of the vesting period served. The holding period shall normally continue to apply. The Committee has the discretion to dis-apply time pro-rating if it considers it appropriate to do so. A good leaver may exercise their vested awards structured as options for a period of 12 months following the individual's cessation of office or employment. Unvested awards may be exercised within 12 months of vesting.
Under the LTIP (the plan under which awards were granted up to and including 2020), a good leaver's unvested awards will vest (either on the normal vesting date or the relevant date of cessation, as determined by the Committee) subject to achievement of any relevant performance conditions, with a pro-rata reduction to reflect the proportion of the vesting period served. The holding period shall normally continue to apply. The Committee has the discretion to dis-apply time pro-rating if it considers it appropriate to do so. A good leaver may exercise their vested awards structured as options for a period of 12 months following the individual's cessation of office or employment. Unvested awards may be exercised within 12 months of vesting.
In determining whether an Executive Director should be treated as a good leaver, and the extent to which their award may vest, the Committee will take into account the circumstances of an individual's departure.
In the event of a takeover or winding-up of easyJet plc (which is not part of an internal reorganisation of the easyJet Group, in circumstances where equivalent replacement awards are not granted) all awards will vest taking into account the achievement of any relevant performance underpins (in the case of the RSP)/ performance conditions (in the case of the LTIP) with a pro-rata reduction to reflect the proportion of the vesting period served. The Committee has discretion to dis-apply time pro-rating if it considers it appropriate to do so. In the event of a takeover, the Committee may determine, with the agreement of the acquiring company, that awards will be exchanged for equivalent awards in another company.
Executive Directors are permitted to accept appropriate outside non-executive director appointments so long as the overall commitment is compatible with their duties as Executive Directors and is not thought to interfere with the business of the Group. Any fees received in respect of these appointments are normally retained directly by the relevant Executive Director.
Base salary levels will normally be set in accordance with easyJet's remuneration policy as well as taking into account the experience and calibre of the individual. Benefits will normally be provided in accordance with easyJet's remuneration policy taking into account those offered to other employees. Where an Executive Director is required to relocate from their home location to take up their role, the Committee may provide assistance with relocation (via either one-off or ongoing payments or benefits).
The maximum level of variable pay that may be offered on an ongoing basis and the structure of remuneration will be in accordance with the approved policy detailed above, i.e. at an aggregate maximum of up to 325% of salary (200% annual bonus and 125% under the RSP) and 350% in exceptional circumstances (200% annual bonus and 150% under the RSP), taking into account annual and long term variable pay. This limit does not include the value of any buy-out arrangements.
Different performance measures may be set initially for the annual bonus, taking into account the responsibilities of the individual, and the point in the financial year that they joined. RSP awards can be made shortly following an appointment (assuming the Company is not in a closed period).
The above policy applies to both an internal promotion to the Board or an external hire.
Where an individual forfeits outstanding variable pay opportunities or contractual rights at a previous employer as a result of appointment, the Committee may offer compensatory payments or awards if after careful consideration it is determined that it is appropriate to offer a buy-out. Any buy-out may be in such form as the Committee considers appropriate, taking into account relevant factors including the form of awards, expected value and vesting timeframe of forfeited opportunities.
To the extent that it was not possible or practical to provide the buy-out within the terms of the Company's existing incentive plans, a bespoke arrangement may be used (including granting an award under the Listing Rule 9.4.2 which allows for the granting of awards, to facilitate, in unusual circumstances, the recruitment of an Executive Director).
In the case of an internal promotion, any outstanding variable pay awarded in relation to the previous role will be paid according to its terms of grant (adjusted as relevant to take into account the Board appointment).
On the appointment of a new Chairman or Non-Executive Director, fees will be set taking into account the experience and calibre of the individual. Where specific cash or share arrangements are delivered
to Non-Executive Directors, these will not include share options or other performance-related elements.
The Board evaluation and succession planning processes in place are designed to ensure there is the correct balance of skills, experience, and knowledge on the Board. The activities of the Nominations Committee overseeing these matters are disclosed in the Nominations Committee report on pages 121 to 123.
The Non-Executive Directors receive an annual fee (normally paid in monthly instalments). The fee for the Non-Executive Chairman is set by the Remuneration Committee and the fees for the other Non-Executive Directors are approved by the Board, on the recommendation of the Chairman and Chief Executive.
| Element | Purpose and link to strategy | Operation (including maximum levels where applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| Fees | To attract and retain a high | The Chairman is paid an all-inclusive fee for all Board responsibilities. |
| calibre Chairman, Deputy Chairman and Non-Executive Directors by offering market competitive fee levels |
The other Non-Executive Directors receive a basic Board fee, with supplementary fees payable for additional responsibilities including Board or Committee responsibilities. |
|
| The Chairman and Non-Executive Directors do not participate in any of the Group's incentive arrangements. |
||
| Fee levels are reviewed on a regular basis, and may be increased, taking into account factors such as the time commitment of the role and market levels in companies of comparable size and complexity. |
||
| Flexibility is retained to exceed current fee levels if it is necessary to do so in order to appoint a new Chairman or Non-Executive Director of an appropriate calibre. |
||
| In exceptional circumstances, if there is a temporary yet material increase in the time commitments for Non-Executive Directors, the Board may pay extra fees to recognise the additional workload. |
||
| Necessary expenses incurred will be reimbursed so that the Chairman and Non Executive Directors are not worse off, on a net of tax basis, as a result of fulfilling Company duties. |
||
| No other benefits or remuneration are provided to the Chairman or Non-Executive Directors. Selected benefits may be introduced if considered appropriate. |
||
The terms of appointment of the Chairman and the other Non-Executive Directors are recorded in letters of appointment. The required notice from the Company is three months. The Non-Executive Directors are not entitled to any compensation on loss of office.
The Non-Executive Directors' letters of appointment are available for inspection by shareholders at the Company's registered office.
When developing the proposed remuneration policy and considering its implementation for 2022, the Committee was mindful of the UK Corporate Governance Code and considers that the executive remuneration framework appropriately addresses the following factors:
Role of the Remuneration Committee
The key role of the Committee is to make recommendations to the Board on executive remuneration packages and to ensure that remuneration policy and practices of the Company reward fairly and responsibly, with a clear link to corporate and individual performance. The Committee's terms of reference can be found on the Company's website at https://corporate.easyjet.com.
There were three changes to the membership of the Committee during the year as set out above. The Company Secretary acts as Secretary of the Committee. Other key invitees include the Chief Executive, the Group People Director, the Reward Director, the Chief Financial Officer, and external advisers as relevant.
Member biographies setting out their skills and experience can be found on pages 98 to 101. The Committee met five times during the year. Meeting attendance can be found in the table on page 112.
On balance, having taken into account a number of internal and external measures as well as the pay ratio analysis, the Committee believes the proposed remuneration decisions in this report appropriately reflect the needs of the business and long term interests of shareholders. The Committee also believes the remuneration policy operated as intended in terms of reflecting Company performance and the overall level of quantum delivered was considered appropriate given the business context.
The current and proposed salaries of the Executive Directors are:
| Kenton Jarvis1 | £520,000 | £520,000 | 0% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Lundgren | £740,000 | £740,000 | 0% |
| 1 January 2022 salary |
1 January 2021 salary |
Change vs 1 January 20212 |
Effective on joining 3 February 2021
For comparison, the typical rate of salary increases to be awarded to our wider UK workforce will also be 0%
The maximum bonus opportunity remains at 200% of base salary for the Chief Executive and at 175% for the Chief Financial Officer. There will be no change to bonus maximum levels. For the year ended 30 September 2022 the annual bonus will be based on 30% on EBITDAR performance, 50% on a balanced scorecard of financial and operational objectives including Free Cash Flow, Ancillary Yield, Cost Programme Performance and CSAT and 20% based on individual performance. Individual performance includes measures linked to our sustainability strategy, recognising the increasingly importance of this to the business, as well as measures linked to easyJet holiday's performance and employee engagement. The Committee has chosen to use a balanced scorecard approach to assessing performance for 50% of the bonus this year to ensure that we are providing a balanced incentive to drive performance across a range of areas. The Committee will consider performance against each measure and determine an appropriate total outcome for the scorecard at the end of the year. At least 40% of the scorecard will be linked to financial measures ensuring that at least 50% of the overall bonus is linked to financial measures. The safety of our customers and people underpins all of the operational activities of the Group and the bonus plan includes a provision that enables the Committee to scale back (including to zero) the bonus awarded in the event that a safety event has occurred, which it considers warrants the use of such discretion. One-third of the pre-tax bonus earned will be deferred into shares for a period of three years and will be subject to continued employment.
Bonus payments may be withheld or recovered if, within a period of three years from the date of payment or at vesting in the case of the deferred bonus, there is: a case of serious personal misconduct; a misstatement of accounts; an error in calculation of results; an instance of corporate failure; or material damage to the Company's reputation as a result of a safety event.
As outlined in the Chair's statement, after careful consideration and consultation with our largest shareholders, the Remuneration Committee has concluded that a Restricted Share Plan is the best approach for the Company going forward to support the execution of our strategy and the creation of long term shareholder value.
Subject to shareholder approval of our revised Directors' remuneration policy at the AGM in February 2022, the Committee intends to grant RSP awards to Executive Directors.
The proposed award levels for the 2022 financial year are 125% of salary for the CEO and 100% of salary for the CFO.
Awards will vest 100% on the third anniversary of the award and will then be subject to a two-year holding period so that the total time horizon is five years for the entire award.
Awards will be subject to the following performance underpins measured over the vesting periods. If any underpin is not met, the Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to reduce the portion of the award vesting, based on its judgement of the context. Theproposed underpins are:
If the Company does not meet one or more of the underpins the Committee would consider whether it was appropriate to scale back the level of payout under the award to reflect this.
The Committee will operate a further underpin such that if the Company's performance taken as a whole materially underperforms what might reasonably have been expected for the sector for reasons attributable to management action or inaction, the Committee will at its discretion reduce the award quantum appropriately.
The Committee would also retain discretion to determine what level of scale back, if any, was appropriate. The Committee also may, at its discretion, adjust the vesting level of an award if it considers that the vesting level would not reflect the underlying performance of the executive, the Group, the experience of shareholders, other stakeholders or if such level would not be appropriate in the circumstances.
The fees for the Chairman and Non-Executive Directors from 1 January 2022 will remain as:
| Chairman | £314,568 |
|---|---|
| Basic fee for other Non-Executive Directors | £62,914 |
| Fees for SID role1 | £25,000 |
| Chair of the Audit, Safety and Remuneration Committees1 | £15,000 |
| Chair of the Finance Committee1 | £10,000 |
Fees payable to the Non-Executive Directors are reviewed annually. The basic fee will not increase from 1 January 2022, which aligns with the wider UK workforce pay freeze.
The table below sets out the amounts earned by the Directors (audited).
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £'000 | Fees and Salary |
Benefits7 | Bonus | LTIP | Pension8 | Total | Total Fixed |
Total Variable |
Fees and Salary |
Benefits | Bonus | LTIP | Pension | Total | Total Fixed |
Total Variable |
| Executive | ||||||||||||||||
| Johan Lundgren |
740 | 8 | – | – | 46 | 794 | 794 | – | 698 | 14 | – | – | 43 | 755 | 755 | – |
| Kenton Jarvis1 |
342 | – | – | – | 21 | 363 | 363 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Andrew Findlay2 |
386 | – | – | – | 22 | 408 | 408 | – | 513 | – | – | – | 32 | 545 | 545 | – |
| Non Executive |
||||||||||||||||
| John Barton | 315 | – | – | – | – | 315 | 315 | – | 297 | – | – | – | – | 297 | 297 | – |
| Stephen Hester3 |
5 | – | – | – | – | 5 | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Dr Andreas Bierwirth |
78 | – | – | – | – | 78 | 78 | – | 74 | – | – | – | – | 74 | 74 | – |
| Catherine Bradley CBE |
73 | – | – | – | – | 73 | 73 | – | 45 | – | – | – | – | 45 | 45 | – |
| Moya Greene DBE4 |
19 | – | – | – | – | 19 | 19 | – | 81 | – | – | – | – | 81 | 81 | – |
| Charles Gurassa4 |
22 | – | – | – | – | 22 | 22 | – | 84 | – | – | – | – | 84 | 84 | – |
| Dr Anastassia Lauterbach5 |
16 | – | – | – | – | 16 | 16 | – | 59 | – | – | – | – | 59 | 59 | – |
| Nicholas Leeder |
63 | – | – | – | – | 63 | 63 | – | 59 | – | – | – | – | 59 | 59 | – |
| Moni Mannings |
78 | – | – | – | – | 78 | 78 | – | 10 | – | – | – | – | 10 | 10 | – |
| Andy Martin | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 63 | – | – | – | – | 63 | 63 | – |
| David Robbie6 |
52 | – | – | – | – | 52 | 52 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Julie Southern |
103 | – | – | – | – | 103 | 103 | – | 78 | – | – | – | – | 78 | 78 | – |
| Total | 2,292 | 8 | – | – | 89 2,389 2,389 | – | 2,061 | 14 | – | – | 75 | 2,150 | 2,150 | – |
Appointed Executive Director on 3 February 2021
Stepped down as Executive Director on 3 February 2021, employed until 25 May 2021. Includes payment of £29,615 for accrued holiday.
Appointed to the Board on 1 September 2021 and Chair from 1 December 2021
Stepped down from the Board on 23 December 2020
Stepped down from the Board on 21 December 2020
Appointed to Board on 17 November 2020
Benefits relate to the cost to the Company of life assurance cover and the value of all employee shares received during the year under the Company's Share Incentive Plan, as well as reimbursements made to the Chief Executive for business-related travel expenses in respect of domestic car travel to the value of £7,790
Johan Lundgren, Kenton Jarvis, and Andrew Findlay received a cash alternative to pension contributions equivalent to 6.15% of base salary
Andrew Findlay stepped down as a Director of easyJet plc and as Chief Financial Officer on 3 February 2021.
He received his salary and benefits (including pension contribution) on a monthly basis for the duration of his notice period through to 25 May 2021. He also received a payment on leaving of £29,615 for accrued holiday. All unvested LTIP and deferred bonus share awards lapsed on the termination of his employment on 25 May 2021. His vested LTIP and deferred bonus share awards continued to be exercisable in accordance with the relevant plan rules until his termination date, at which point any unexercised awards lapsed. He was not eligible to receive a bonus for the 2021 financial year and was not granted any further LTIP or deferred bonus share awards.
Other than the amounts disclosed above, no other remuneration payment was made to Andrew Findlay in the year.
No other payments for loss of office or any other payments have been made to any former Directors during the year.
In light of continued market uncertainty, the annual bonus targets were set separately for the first and second half of the 2021 financial year to allow flexibility and agility. The measures selected for the bonus aligned with our key priorities for 2021 and were EBITDA (30%), cost reduction programme (20%), free cash flow (20%), customer satisfaction (10%) and individual performance (20%).
A sliding scale of financial and operational bonus targets was set at the start of the 2021 financial year. 10% of each element is payable for achieving the threshold target, increasing to 50% for on-target performance and 100% for achieving maximum performance. Achievements between these points are calculated on a straight-line basis.
| Measure | CEO & CFO | Threshold | On-target | Maximum | Threshold | On-target | Maximum | Actual | Payout | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 2021 Targets | H2 2021 Targets | H1 | H2 | |||||||
| EBITDA £m | 30% | (595) | (541) | (487) | 650 | 722 | 794 | (470) | (91) | 0% |
| Cost reduction programme £m | 20% | 194 | 216 | 238 | 269 | 299 | 329 | 250 | 262 | 0% |
| Free cash flow £m | 20% | (1,156) | (1,051) | (946) | 260 | 289 | 318 | (1,336) | 50 | 0% |
| Customer satisfaction | 10% | 75% | 77% | 79% | 69% | 71% | 73% | 80% | 73% | 0% |
| Individual1 | 20% | n/a | 50% | 100% | n/a | 50% | 100% | n/a | n/a | 0% |
| Total | 100% |
Despite the Customer satisfaction target being met, due to the continuing restrictions on airline travel and the impact of this on our overall performance no annual bonus in respect of 2021 will be paid.
The 2018 LTIP awards vesting in respect of the performance years to 30 September 2021 were subject to a combination of performance conditions based on three-year average headline ROCE and relative TSR compared to FTSE 51-150 companies measured over the prior three financial years. The percentage which could be earned was determined using the following vesting schedule:
| Below threshold (0% vesting) |
Threshold (25% vesting) |
On-target (50% vesting) |
Maximum (100% vesting) |
Actual | Vesting (% of element) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE awards (40% of total) | <11.0% | 11.0% | 13.0% | 15.0% | Below threshold | 0% |
| EPS awards (40% of total) | <383p | 383p | 414p | 446p | Below threshold | 0% |
| Upper | ||||||
| TSR awards (20% of total) | < Median | Median | n/a | quartile | < Median | 0% |
Three-year average headline EPS and ROCE performance along with TSR performance were below threshold due to the impact of Covid-19 on the business. The Committee considered this outcome and determined that no payment was an appropriate outcome given the current business context.
Details of share options and share awards outstanding at the financial year end are shown in the following tables:
| Market | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scheme | No. of shares/ options at 30 September 2020 |
Shares/ options granted in year |
Rights issue adjustment1 |
Shares/ options lapsed in year |
Shares/ options exercised in year |
No. of shares/ options at 30 September 2021 |
Date of grant | Exercise price (£) |
price on exercise date (£) |
Date from which exercisable |
Expiry date |
| A | 134,350 | – | – | (134,350) | – | – | 19 Dec 20174 | – | – | 19 Dec 2020 | 19 Dec 2027 |
| A | 167,003 | – | 31,358 | – | – | 198,361 | 19 Dec 20185 | – | – | 19 Dec 2021 | 19 Dec 2028 |
| A | 129,461 | – | 24,309 | – | – | 153,770 | 19 Dec 20196 | – | – | 19 Dec 2022 | 19 Dec 2029 |
| A | – | 214,369 | 40,252 | – | – | 254,621 | 29 Dec 20207 | – | – | 29 Dec 2023 | 29 Dec 2030 |
| B | 26,871 | – | 5,045 | – | – | 31,916 | 19 Dec 2018 | – | – | 19 Dec 2021 | 19 Dec 2028 |
| B | 5,282 | – | 991 | – | – | 6,273 | 19 Dec 2019 | – | – | 19 Dec 2022 | 19 Dec 2029 |
| C | 282 | – | 49 | – | – | 331 | 5 Apr 2019 | – | – | 5 Apr 2022 | n/a |
| D | 1,571 | – | 294 | – | – | 1,8653 | 14 Jun 2019 | 6.751 | – | 1 Aug 2022 | 1 Feb 2023 |
| Market | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of shares/ | Shares/ | Shares/ | Shares/ | No. of shares/ | price on | ||||||
| options at | options | Rights | options | options | options at | Exercise | exercise | ||||
| 30 September | granted | issue | lapsed | exercised | 30 September | price | date | Date from which | |||
| Scheme | 2020 | in year | adjustment1 | in year | in year | 2021 | Date of grant | (£) | (£) | exercisable | Expiry date |
| A | – | 134,541 | 25,262 | – | – | 159,803 | 20 May 20218 | – | – | 29 Dec 2023 | 29 Dec 2030 |
| D | – | 1,653 | 310 | – | – | 1,9633 | 20 Jul 2021 | 6.421 | – | 1 Sep 2024 | 1 Mar 2025 |
| Market | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of shares/ | Shares/ | Shares/ | Shares/ | No. of shares/ | price on | ||||||
| options at | options | Rights | options | options | options at | Exercise | exercise | ||||
| 30 September | granted | issue | lapsed | exercised | 30 September | price | date | Date from which | |||
| Scheme | 2020 | in year | adjustment1 | in year | in year | 2021 | Date of grant | (£) | (£) | exercisable | Expiry date |
| B | 12,789 | – | n/a | – | (12,789) | – | 19 Dec 20174 | – | 9.99 | 19 Dec 2020 | 19 Dec 2027 |
| D | 557 | – | n/a | (557) | – | – | 15 Jun 2017 | 9.69 | – | 1 Aug 2020 | 1 Feb 2021 |
The closing share price of the Company's ordinary shares at 30 September 2021 was £6.63 and the closing price range during the year ended 30 September 2021 was £3.96 to £11.67.
Key:
A Long Term Incentive Plan – Performance Shares
B Deferred Share Bonus Plan
C Share Incentive Plan – Performance (Free) Shares
D Save As You Earn Awards (SAYE)
Formulaic adjustments were made during the year as a result of the rights issue in September 2021
Stepped down from the Board on 3 February 2021
The number of shares is calculated according to the scheme rules of individual plans based on the middle-market closing share price on the day prior to grant. As is usual market practice, the option price for SAYE awards is determined by the Committee in advance of the award by reference to the share price following announcement of the half year results the day immediately preceding the date the invitations are sent.
40% of vesting is based on three-year average Headline ROCE (including lease adjustment) performance for the three financial years ending 30 September 2020; 40% of vesting is based on three-year total Headline EPS performance for the three financial years ending 30 September 2020; and 20% of vesting is based on relative TSR performance compared to companies ranked FTSE 51-150.
The face value of the award granted was £1,850,000 (250% of base salary) to Johan Lundgren. The below targets applied for these awards and as none of the targets were met, the options have all lapsed within the year:
| Vested in December 2020 | Below threshold (0% vesting) |
Threshold (25% vesting) |
Target (50% vesting) |
Maximum (100% vesting) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE awards (40% of total award) | <9.0% | 9.0% | 11.2% | 13.0% |
| EPS awards (40% of total award) | < 278p | 278p | 310p | 335p |
| TSR awards (20% of total award) | < Median | Median | n/a Upper quartile |
40% of vesting is based on three-year average Headline ROCE (including lease adjustment) performance for the three financial years ending 30 September 2021; 40% of vesting is based on three-year total headline EPS performance for the three financial years ending 30 September 2021; and 20% of vesting is based on relative TSR performance compared to companies ranked FTSE 51-150. In addition, the TSR awards will not vest unless there has been positive TSR over the performance period.
The face value of the award granted was £1,800,300 (250% of salary) to Johan Lundgren. The below targets applied for these awards and as none of the targets were met, the options will now lapse:
| Vesting in December 2021 | Below threshold (0% vesting) |
Threshold (25% vesting) |
Target (50% vesting) |
Maximum (100% vesting) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE awards (40% of total award) | < 11.0% | 11.0% | 13.0% | 15.0% |
| EPS awards (40% of total award) | < 383p | 383p | 414p | 446p |
| TSR awards (20% of total award) | < Median | Median | n/a Upper quartile |
40% of vesting is based on three-year average Headline ROCE (including lease adjustment) performance for the three financial years ending 30 September 2022; 40% of vesting is based on three-year total headline EPS performance for the three financial years ending 30 September 2022; and 20% of vesting is based on relative TSR performance compared to companies ranked FTSE 51-150. In addition, the TSR awards will not vest unless there has been positive TSR over the performance period.
The face value of the award granted was £1,850,000 (250% of salary) to Johan Lundgren. The following targets apply for this award:
| Vesting in December 2022 | Below threshold (0% vesting) |
Threshold (25% vesting) |
Target (50% vesting) |
Maximum (100% vesting) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE awards (40% of total award) | <9.5% | 9.5% | 11.5% | 13.5% |
| EPS awards (40% of total award) | <288p | 288p | 310p | 335p |
| TSR awards (20% of total award) | < Median | Median | n/a Upper quartile |
The face value of the award granted to Johan Lundgren was £1,850,000 (250% of salary). The award is based 100% on TSR performance compared to companies from the FTSE 51-151 and will vest on 29 December 2023. In addition, the TSR awards will not vest unless there has been positive TSR over the performance period.
The face value of the award granted to Kenton Jarvis was £1,040,000 (200% of salary). The award is based 100% on TSR performance compared to companies from the FTSE 51-151 and will vest on 29 December 2023. In addition, the TSR awards will not vest unless there has been positive TSR over the performance period.
In 2021 the shareholding guidelines increased with the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer expected to build up a shareholding of 250% and 200% of salary respectively (from 200% and 175%), over the first five years from appointment to the Board. The Committee has discretion to extend the five-year timeframe in certain circumstances, for example where there have been limited payouts under the incentive schemes. Until the guideline is met, Executive Directors are required to retain 50% of net vested shares from the LTIP and RSP and 100% of net vested deferred bonus shares. Similarly, the Non-Executive Directors, including the Chairman of the Board, are required to build up a shareholding of 100% of annual fees over a period of five years from appointment. All directors participated in the rights issue that took place in September 2021 and details of their holdings are set out overleaf.
The following table provides details on current Directors' interests in shares at 30 September 2021 (unless otherwise noted).
| Interests in share schemes |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unconditionally owned shares1 |
Shareholding guidelines achieved2 |
Deferred bonus |
LTIP3 | SAYE | SIP4 | Total interest in share schemes |
|
| John Barton | 74,680 | 100% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Stephen Hester6 | 73,000 | 100% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Johan Lundgren10 | 66,382 | 34% | 38,189 | 606,752 | 1,865 | 331 | 647,137 |
| Kenton Jarvis5 | – | – | – | 159,803 | 1,963 | 42 | 161,808 |
| Andrew Findlay7 | 71,017 | 100% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Dr Andreas Bierwirth | 8,715 | 100% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Catherine Bradley CBE | 2,489 | 39% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Moya Greene DBE8 | 14,439 | 100% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Charles Gurassa8 | 108,439 | 100% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Dr Anastassia Lauterbach9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Nicholas Leeder | 3,847 | 57% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Moni Mannings | 4,351 | 35% | – | – | – | – | – |
| David Robbie | 16,596 | 100% | – | – | – | – | – |
| Julie Southern | 7,451 | 61% | – | – | – | – | – |
Includes SIP Partnership Shares, vested SIP Performance (Free) Shares, vested SIP Matching Shares, and any shares owned by connected persons
Based on unconditionally owned shares and post-tax value of share interests under the deferred bonus plan as per the Committee's policy on shareholding guidelines
LTIP shares are granted in the form of nil cost options subject to performance
Consists of unvested SIP Performance (Free) Shares and unvested SIP Matching Shares
Kenton Jarvis was appointed to the Board on 3 February 2021
Stephen Hester was appointed to the Board on 1 September 2021
As at 3 February 2021, the date Andrew Findlay stepped down from the Board
As at 23 December 2020, the date Moya Greene DBE and Charles Gurassa stepped down from the Board
As at 21 December 2020, the date Anastassia Lauterbach stepped down from the Board
Shareholding guideline increased from 200% to 250% during the year. Given the participation in the rights issue, and the limited incentive payouts over the last four years, the Committee is currently satisfied with the progress being made towards meeting the shareholding guidelines.
Changes in share ownership levels throughout the year may be found on our corporate website https://corporate.easyjet.com.
Executive Directors are deemed to be interested in the unvested shares held by the easyJet Share Incentive Plan and the easyJet plc Employee Benefit Trust. At 30 September 2021, ordinary shares held in the Trusts were as follows:
| Total | 2,063,058 |
|---|---|
| easyJet plc Employee Benefit Trust | 288,258 |
| easyJet Share Incentive Plan Trust | 1,774,800 |
| Number of ordinary shares |
Changes since the year end: as at 29 November 2021, there were no changes to the easyJet plc Share Incentive Plan Trust balance and the easyJet plc Employee Benefit Trust held 281,899 shares.
easyJet complies with the Investment Association's Principles of Remuneration with regard to dilution limits. These principles require that commitments under all of the Company's share incentive schemes must not exceed 10% of the issued share capital in any rolling 10-year period. Share awards under all current incentive plans are within the Company's maximum 10% dilution limit.
A key component of easyJet's reward philosophy is to provide share ownership opportunities throughout the Group by making annual awards of performance-related shares to all eligible employees. In addition, easyJet operates a voluntary discounted share purchase arrangement for all employees via a Save As You Earn scheme and a Buy As You Earn arrangement with matching shares in the UK under the tax-approved Share Incentive Plan. A 20% discount was offered on Save As You Earn 2021, however, Matching Shares remain suspended.
Details of the service contracts and letters of appointment in place as at 30 September 2021 for Directors are as follows:
| Date of appointment |
Date of current service contract |
Unexpired term at 30 September 2021 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| John Barton | 1 May 2013 | 3 May 2016 | |
| Stephen Hester | 1 September 2021 | 20 August 2021 | Letters of appointment for |
| Johan Lundgren | 1 December 2017 | 10 November 2017 | the Non-Executive Directors |
| Kenton Jarvis | 3 February 2021 | 15 September 2020 | do not contain fixed term |
| Dr Andreas Bierwirth | 22 July 2014 | 19 July 2017 | periods; however, they are |
| Catherine Bradley CBE | 1 January 2020 | 9 December 2019 | appointed in the expectation |
| Nicholas Leeder | 1 January 2019 | 14 December 2018 | that they will serve for a |
| Moni Mannings | 6 August 2020 | 5 August 2020 | maximum of nine years, subject to satisfactory |
| David Robbie | 17 November 2020 | 16 November 2020 | performance and re-election |
| Julie Southern | 1 August 2018 | 7 June 2018 | at AGMs. |
The chart below sets out the TSR performance of the Company relative to the FTSE 250, FTSE 100, and a group of European airlines1 since 30 September 2011. The FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 were chosen as easyJet has been a member of both indices during the period.
This graph shows the value, by 30 September 2021, of £100 invested in easyJet on 30 September 2011, compared with the value of £100 invested in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 Indices or a comparator group of airlines on the same date.
The other points plotted are the values at intervening financial year ends. Overseas companies have been tracked in their local currency, i.e. ignoring exchange rate movements since 30 September 2011.
The table below shows the total remuneration figure for the Chief Executive over the same 10-year period. The total remuneration figure includes the annual bonus and LTIP awards which vested based on performance in those years.
The annual bonus and LTIP vesting percentages show the payout for each year as a percentage of the maximum.
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johan Lundgren |
– | – | – | – | – | – | 1,500 | 1,006 | 7551 | 794 | |
| Single total figure of remuneration (£'000) |
Carolyn McCall |
3,694 | 7,777 | 9,2095 | 6,2414 | 1,4533 | 757 | 125 | – | – | – |
| Johan Lundgren |
– | – | – | – | – | – | 73% | 16% | 0% | 0% | |
| Annual bonus (%) | Carolyn McCall |
96% | 87% | 76% | 66% | 13% | 0% | – | – | – | – |
| Johan Lundgren |
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0% | 0% | |
| LTIP vesting (%) | Carolyn McCall |
92% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 32% | 0% | – | – | – | – |
This amount is after the voluntary 20% reduction in base salary during April, May, and June 2020
Johan Lundgren was appointed to the Board on 1 December 2017 and Carolyn McCall stepped down from the Board on 30 November 2017
Includes 48,509 LTIP shares (inclusive of dividend equivalents) at the vesting date share price of £10.43, a decrease of 30% on the share price at grant of £14.99
Includes 266,899 LTIP shares vesting for the period; share price is £17.15 (the actual share price at vesting), an increase of 133% on the share price at grant of £7.37
Includes 445,575 LTIP shares vesting for the period; share price was £16.71 (the actual share price at vesting), an increase of 325% on the share price at grant of £3.93
The table below shows the year-on-year percentage change in salary, benefits and annual bonus earned between the year ended 30 September 2021 and the year ended 30 September 2020 for the Directors, compared to the average earnings of all other easyJet UK employees.
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salary | Benefits12 | Annual bonus13 | Salary | Benefits | Annual bonus | ||
| Johan Lundgren1 | 6.0% | (43)% | – | (2.6)% | 0% | (100)% | |
| Kenton Jarvis2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Andrew Findlay1,3 | (24.8)% | – | – | 1.0% | 0% | (100)% | |
| John Barton1,3 | 6.1% | – | – | (2.6)% | – | – | |
| Stephen Hester4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Dr Andreas Bierwirth1 | 5.4% | – | – | (2.6)% | – | – | |
| Catherine Bradley CBE1,9 | 62.2% | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Moya Greene DBE1,5 | (76.5)% | – | – | 19.1% | – | – | |
| Charles Gurassa1,5 | (73.8)% | – | – | (16.8)% | – | – | |
| Dr Anastassia Lauterbach1,6 | (72.9)% | – | – | 28.3% | – | – | |
| Nicholas Leeder1 | 6.8% | – | – | 28.3% | – | – | |
| Moni Mannings8 | 680.0% | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Andy Martin1 | – | – | – | (11.3)% | – | – | |
| David Robbie7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Julie Southern1,10 | 32.1% | – | – | 8.3% | – | – | |
| Average pay based on easyJet's UK employees11 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0% | 0% | (100)% |
Voluntary 20% reduction between April to June 2020
Appointed Executive Director on 3 February 2021
Stepped down as Executive Director on 3 February 2021, employed until 25 May 2021 and voluntary 20% reduction of salary between April to June 2020 4. Appointed to the Board on 1 September 2021 and Chair from 1 December 2021
Stepped down from the Board on 23 December 2020
Stepped down from the Board on 21 December 2020
Appointed to the Board on 17 November 2020
Appointed to the Board on 6 August 2020
Appointed to the Board on 1 January 2020
10.Appointed SID on 5 August 2020
12.Chief Executive benefits include reimbursements for business-related travel expenses in respect of domestic car travel which were lower in 2021 than 2020
The table below shows the total pay for all of easyJet's employees compared to other key financial indicators.
| Year ended 30 September 2021 |
Year ended 30 September 2020 |
Change % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee costs (£ million) | 623 | 862 | (28)% |
| Ordinary dividend (£ million) | – | – | 0% |
| Average monthly number of employees | 12,389 | 14,566 | (15)% |
| Revenue (£ million) | 1,458 | 3,009 | (52)% |
| Headline (loss)/profit before tax (£ million) | (1,136) | (835) | (36)% |
The table below sets out the Chief Executive pay ratios as at 30 September 2021. The report will build up over time to show a rolling 10-year period. The ratios compare the single total figure of remuneration of the Chief Executive with the equivalent figures for the lower quartile (P25), median (P50) and upper quartile (P75) employees.
We have used the 'Option A' methodology which uses actual earnings for the Chief Executive Officer and UK employees over the financial year to provide the most accurate comparison. The total FTE remuneration paid during the year for each employee in each of the groups was then calculated, on the same basis as the information set out in the 'single figure' table for the Chief Executive on page 134.
In calculating the figures, the following considerations were made:
| Year | Method | 25th percentile pay ratio |
Median pay ratio | 75th percentile pay ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Option A | 30:1 | 23:1 | 12:1 |
| 2021 | Option A | 27:1 | 21:1 | 10:1 |
| 2021 | Total pay and benefits | £29,981 | £38,992 | £78,134 |
| 2021 | Salary | £20,300 | £24,360 | £71,002 |
Unlike the total remuneration for the majority of employees, total remuneration for the Chief Executive is mostly dependent on business performance and share price movements over time. As a result, the ratios may fluctuate significantly from year to year.
The Committee has agreed that the ratio reflects easyJet's wider policies on pay and reward in line with market, experience, and skills.
The table below provides details of shareholder voting in respect of the Directors' remuneration policy (approved in December 2020), and the Annual Report on Remuneration (in December 2020).
| Policy (December 2020 AGM) |
Annual Report on Remuneration (December 2020 AGM) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Votes cast in favour | 170,640,512 | 95.79% | 177,627,469 | 99.72% |
| Votes cast against | 7,497,351 | 4.21% | 498,511 | 0.28% |
| Total votes cast in favour or against | 178,137,863 | 100% | 178,125,980 | 100% |
| Votes withheld | 131,196,347 | – | 131,206,724 | – |
Deloitte was appointed as the new independent adviser, with effect from 21 January 2021 following an independent review process. Deloitte advises the Committee on developments in executive pay and on the operation of easyJet's incentive plans. Other than to the Committee, advice is also provided to easyJet in relation to, for example, senior management pay practices and the fees of the Non-Executive Directors. Total fees (excluding VAT) paid to Deloitte and Willis Towers Watson, the previous advisers, in respect of services to the Committee during the 2021 financial year were £72,950 and £31,200 respectively, based on time and materials. Deloitte is a founding member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and a signatory to its Code of Conduct. Any advice received is governed by that code. The Committee is satisfied that the Deloitte engagement team, which provide remuneration advice to the Committee, do not have connections with easyJet plc or its Directors that may impair their independence. The Committee has reviewed the operating processes in place at Deloitte and is satisfied that the advice it receives is independent and objective.
The Directors present their Annual Report and Accounts together with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2021. This Directors' Report and the Strategic Report, which includes the trends and factors likely to affect the future development, performance and position of the business and a description of the principal risks and uncertainties of the Group (which can be found on pages 78 to 95 and are incorporated by reference), collectively comprise the management report as required under the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules ('DTRs').
The loss for the financial year after taxation amounts to £858 million (last year: loss of £1,079 million).
As a result of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Group, and the losses incurred, the Board is not recommending the payment of a dividend in respect of the year ended 30 September 2021. The Board recognises the importance of dividends to shareholders and will seek to resume payments when the operating environment and the financial performance of the Group permits. The Board expects to update shareholders as to when it anticipates resuming paying dividends and on its future dividend policy, assuming the market environment and circumstances permit, when it announces its full year results for the financial year ending 30 September 2022.
Details of the Directors who held office at the end of the year and their biographical details are set out on pages 98 to 101. Changes to the Board during the year and up to the date of this report are set out on page 113. The Directors' interest in the ordinary shares and options of the Company are disclosed within the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 130 to 153.
The Directors may from time to time appoint one or more Directors. Any such Director shall hold office only until the next Annual General Meeting (AGM) and shall then be subject to appointment by the Company's shareholders.
It is the current intention that at the Company's next AGM all continuing Executive and Non-Executive Directors will retire and offer themselves for reappointment in compliance with the 2018 Code.
Directors have a statutory duty to avoid situations in which they have, or may have, interests that conflict with those of easyJet, unless that conflict is first authorised by the Board. The Company has in place procedures for managing conflicts of interest. The Company's Articles of Association also contain provisions to allow the Directors to authorise potential conflicts of interest so that a Director is not in breach of his or her duty under company law. Should a Director become aware that he or she has an interest, directly or indirectly, in an existing or proposed transaction with easyJet, he or she should notify the Board in line with the Company's Articles of Association. Directors have a continuing duty to update any changes to their conflicts of interest.
Directors' and officers' insurance cover has been established for all Directors to provide appropriate cover for their reasonable actions on behalf of the Company. A deed was executed in 2007 indemnifying each of the Directors of the Company and/or its subsidiaries as a supplement to the directors' and officers' insurance cover. The indemnities, which constitute a qualifying third-party indemnity provision as defined by section 234 of the Companies Act 2006, were in force during the 2021 financial year and remain in force for all current and past Directors of the Company.
The Company's approach to providing support to disabled applicants and employees is detailed in our Diversity and Inclusion Strategy on page 56.
Details on how the Board and management have communicated and engaged with employees and the wider workforce while taking into account their interests in decision-making during the year can be found in the Stakeholder engagement section on pages 27 to 28 and Sustainability section on pages 43 of the Strategic Report and the Corporate Governance Report on pages 107 to 109.
A key component of easyJet's reward philosophy is to provide share ownership opportunities throughout the Group by making annual awards of performancerelated shares to all eligible employees when certain criteria are met. In addition, easyJet operates a voluntary discounted share purchase arrangement for all employees via a Save As You Earn scheme, and a Buy As You Earn arrangement with Matching Shares in the UK under the tax-approved Share Incentive Plan. In response to the Covid-19 pandemic Matching Shares were suspended from April 2020. Further details of the Company's share schemes are set out in the Directors' Remuneration Report on page 150.
Details on the methods the Board has used to engage and build strong business relationships with the Group's suppliers, customers and other key stakeholders are given on pages 26 to 37 of the Strategic Report and the Corporate Governance Report on pages 106 to 109. The Section 172 Statement is available on page 36 of the Strategic Report.
The Company's issued share capital as at 30 September 2021 comprised a single class of ordinary shares. Further details of the Company's share capital during the year are disclosed in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
All of the issued ordinary shares are fully paid and rank equally in all respects. The rights and obligations attaching to the Company's ordinary shares are set out in its Articles of Association. Holders of ordinary shares are entitled, subject to any applicable law and the Company's Articles of Association, to:
Subject to applicable law and the Company's Articles of Association the Directors may exercise all powers of the Company, including the power to authorise the issue and/or market purchase of the Company's shares (subject to an appropriate authority being given to the Directors by shareholders in a general meeting and any conditions attaching to such authority).
At the AGM held on 23 December 2020, the Directors were given the following authority:
As part of a review of its capital structure, the Board concluded that raising additional equity would protect and strengthen easyJet's long term positioning in the European aviation sector. As a result, the Company launched a fully underwritten rights issue on 9 September 2021 to raise net proceeds of approximately £1.2 billion using the authorities outlined above. This comprised offering 31 New Shares to qualifying shareholders for every 47 Existing Shares held. The allotment of 301,260,394 New Shares (representing approximately 66% of the Company's existing issued share capital) was effective on 27 September 2021 and the Company's issued share capital was increased to 758,010,025 ordinary shares as of that date.
No other shares were allotted or bought back under the above authorities during the year and up to the date of this report. The standard authorities expire on 31 March 2022 or at the conclusion of the 2022 AGM, whichever is earlier. The Directors will seek to renew the authorities at the next AGM as a matter of routine.
None of the ordinary shares carry any special rights with regard to control of the Company. There are no restrictions on transfers of shares other than:
There are no restrictions on exercising voting rights save in situations where the Company is legally entitled to impose such a restriction (for example under the Articles of Association where an Affected Share Notice has been served, amounts remain unpaid in the shares after request, or the holder is otherwise in default of an obligation to the Company). Those shareholders who own shares whose voting rights will be suspended at the AGM will receive an Affected Share Notice by post from Equiniti, our Registrars, on or around 14 January 2022 notifying them of the suspension of voting rights in respect of their Affected Shares. Shareholders in receipt of an Affected Share Notice will not be entitled to attend, speak or vote at the AGM, in respect of those shares subject to an Affected Share Notice. The Company is not aware of any other arrangements between shareholders that may result in restrictions on the transfer of securities or voting rights.
Subject to the Companies Act 2006, rights attached to any class of shares may be varied with the consent in writing of the holders of three-quarters in nominal value of the issued shares of the class or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate general meeting of such class.
The trustees of the easyJet UK Share Incentive Plan, which is used to acquire and hold shares in the Company for participants in the UK Share Incentive Plan, does not seek to exercise voting rights on shares held other than on direction of the underlying beneficiaries. The trustees take no action in respect of ordinary shares for which they have received no direction to vote, or in respect of ordinary shares which are unallocated.
The trustee of the easyJet plc Employee Benefit Trust ('the Trust'), which is used to acquire and hold shares in the Company for the benefit of employees, including in connection with the easyJet Long Term Incentive Plan, the International Share Incentive Plan and Save As You Earn plans, has the power to vote or not vote, at its absolute discretion, in respect of any shares in the Company held unallocated in the Trust. However, in accordance with good practice, the trustee adopts a policy of not voting in respect of such shares. Both the trustees of the easyJet UK Share Incentive Plan and the easyJet plc Employee Benefit Trust have a dividend waiver in place in respect of shares which are the beneficial property of each of the trusts.
In accordance with DTR 5, as at 30 September 2021 the Company had been notified of the following disclosable interests in its issued ordinary shares:
| Number of | % of issued share | |
|---|---|---|
| shares as | capital as at | |
| notified to the | 30 September | |
| Company | 2021 | |
| The Haji-Ioannou family concert party shareholding, consisting of easyGroup Holdings Limited | ||
| (holding vehicle for Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou and Clelia Haji-Ioannou) and Polys Haji-Ioannou | ||
| (through his holding vehicle Polys Holdings Limited) | 115,737,821 | 15.27% |
| The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc | 49,382,199 | 6.51% |
Between 30 September 2021 and 29 November 2021, the Company received a number of notifications under DTR 5 which are available at https://corporate.easyjet.com/investors/directors-and-substantial-interests/substantial-interests. As at 29 November 2021, the Company had been notified that the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc interest had changed to 11,637,661 shares representing 1.54% of voting rights, Societe Generale had a notifiable interest of 40,071,333 shares representing 5.28% of voting rights, and Bank of America Corporation had a notifiable interest of 50,448,298 shares, representing 6.66% of voting rights.
The Board currently intends to hold the AGM on 10 February 2022 at 11.00am, subject to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic and any UK Government guidance on social distancing, non-essential travel or public gatherings. The arrangements for the Company's 2022 AGM and details of the resolutions to be proposed, together with explanatory notes, will be set out in the Notice of AGM to be published on the Company's website. Guidance on whether physical attendance by shareholders will be possible will be determined nearer the time of the AGM.
The Company's Articles of Association may only be amended by a special resolution at a general meeting of the shareholders. The Company's Articles of Association were last amended at the AGM on 23 December 2020. A copy of the Articles is available on the Company's website: https://corporate. easyjet.com/investors.
The Group, through various subsidiaries, has established branches in France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain, in which the business operates.
Details of the Group's use of financial instruments, together with information on our financial risk management objectives and policies, hedging policies and our exposure to financial risks, can be found in Notes 24 to 26 of the consolidated financial statements.
The Company's going concern and viability statement are detailed on pages 74 to 77 of the Strategic Report.
Each Director has taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as a Director in order to make themself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Group's auditor is aware of that information. So far as each Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Group's auditor is unaware. A resolution to reappoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor of the Group will be put to shareholders at the forthcoming AGM.
easyJet works constructively with all levels of government across its network, regardless of political affiliation. easyJet believes in the rights of individuals to engage in the democratic process; however, it is easyJet's policy not to make political donations. There were no political donations made or political expenditure incurred during the 2021 financial year.
Details of the Company's greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), energy consumption, energy efficiency action and Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) disclosures can be found on pages 46 to 49 of the Strategic Report.
The Company licenses the easyJet brand from easyGroup Limited. Further details are set out in note 28 to the financial statements.
The following significant agreements, which were in force at 30 November 2021, take effect, alter or terminate on a change of control of the Company.
On 7 January 2016, the Group established a Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the 'EMTN Programme') which provides the Group with a standardised documentation platform to allow for senior unsecured debt issuance in the Eurobond markets. The maximum potential issuance under the EMTN Programme is £3 billion. The EMTN Programme was subsequently updated in March 2021 with the issue of further Eurobonds.
Under the EMTN Programme, the following notes (the 'Notes') have been issued by the Company:
• Pursuant to the final terms attaching to the Notes, the Company will be required to make an offer to redeem or purchase the notes at their principal amount plus interest up to the date of redemption or repurchase if there is a change of control of the Company which results in a downgrade of the credit rating of the Notes to a non-investment grade rating or withdrawal of the rating by both Moody's and Standard & Poor's.
The Group is party to a Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) which contains change of control provisions. The current RCF amounts to a \$400 million commitment, supported by a consortium of five banks, and has a termination date of September 2025 (unless extended).
On 6 April 2020 easyJet issued a £600 million Commercial Paper through the Covid-19 Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF). This is an unsecured, short-term paper issued at a discount, of which £300 million was repaid in March 2021 and the remaining £300 million was repaid in November 2021.
On 7 January 2021, easyJet entered into a new five-year term loan facility of \$1.87 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported by a partial guarantee from UK Export Finance under their Export Development Guarantee Scheme.
The Company does not have agreements with any Director or employee that would provide compensation for loss of office or employment resulting from a change of control on takeover, except that provisions of the Company's share schemes and plans may cause options and awards granted to employees under such schemes and plans to vest on a takeover.
The Annual Report and Accounts have been drawn up and presented in accordance with UK company law and the liabilities of the Directors in connection with the report shall be subject to the limitations and restrictions provided by such law.
easyJet plc is incorporated as a public limited company and is registered in England under number 3959649. easyJet plc's registered office is Hangar 89, London Luton Airport, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU2 9PF.
The Strategic Report (comprising pages 2 to 95) and Directors' Report (comprising pages 96 to 129 and 154 to 157) were approved by the Board and signed on its behalf by the Company Secretary.
By order of the Board
Maaike de Bie Company Secretary
London, 30 November 2021
The information to be included in the 2021 Annual Report and Accounts under LR 9.8.4, where applicable, can be located as set out below.
| Information | Page |
|---|---|
| Details of long term incentive schemes | 201-202 |
| Shareholder waiver of future dividends | 155 |
| Other information that is relevant to this report, and which is incorporated by reference, can be located as follows: | |
| Information | Page |
| Membership of Board during 2021 financial year | 98-101 |
| Directors' service contracts | 151 |
| Financial instruments and financial risk management | 204-211 |
| Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and energy efficiency | 46-48 |
| Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) matters | 38-55, 58-61 |
| Corporate governance report | 96 |
| Future developments of the business of the Group | 8-23 |
| Employee equality, diversity and inclusion | 56-57 |
| Employee engagement | 28, 43, 63, 109 |
| Stakeholder engagement | 26-37 |
| Section 172 Statement | 36 |
| Hedge accounting policies | 180-181 |
| Activities in relation to Research and Development | 29, 45, 51-52, 79 |
| Post Balance Sheet Events | 212 |
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report, the Directors' Remuneration Report and the accounts in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have prepared the group and the company financial statements in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. Additionally, the Financial Conduct Authority's Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules require the Directors to prepare the group financial statements in accordance with international financial reporting standards adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union. Under company law, Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the group and company and of the profit or loss of the group for that period.
In preparing these accounts, the Directors are required to:
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group's and the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group and the Company. This enables them to ensure that the accounts and the Directors' remuneration report comply with the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group accounts, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of, amongst other things, the financial and corporate governance information provided on the easyJet website (https://corporate.easyjet. com). Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of accounts may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
The Directors consider that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group's and the Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed on pages 98 to 101, confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:
In accordance with section 418 of the Companies Act 2006, each Director in office at the date the Directors' Report is approved, confirms that:
The Annual Report on pages 1 to 158 was approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 30 November 2021 and signed on its behalf by:
JOHAN LUNDGREN Chief Executive
KENTON JARVIS Chief Financial Officer
In our opinion, easyJet plc's Group financial statements and Company financial statements (the ''financial statements''):
We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual Report and Accounts 2021 (the ''Annual Report''), which comprise: Consolidated and Company statements of financial position as at 30 September 2021; Consolidated income statement and Consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the Consolidated and Company statements of changes in equity, and the Consolidated and Company statements of cash flows for the year then ended; and the notes to the financial statements, which include a description of the significant accounting policies.
Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee.
As explained in note 1 to the financial statements, the Group, in addition to applying international accounting standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, has also applied international financial reporting standards adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union.
In our opinion, the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with international financial reporting standards adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (''ISAs (UK)'') and applicable law. Our responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors' responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We remained independent of the Group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, which includes the FRC's Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services prohibited by the FRC's Ethical Standard were not provided.
Other than those disclosed in note 3 to the Group financial statements and the Audit Committee Report, we have provided no non-audit services to the Company in the period under audit.
There were no significant changes to the Group's operations during the year. However, travel restrictions remained in place for much of the period due to Covid-19 and this continued to put significant pressure on the Group's financial performance, financial position and liquidity.
There are a number of changes to our key audit matters this year as explained later in the report. This year we have also specifically set out our consideration of the impact of climate change on the audit which is further explained below.
Climate change risk is expected to have a significant impact on the aviation industry. As explained in the Sustainability Report, the Group is clearly mindful of its impact on the environment and focussed on ways to reduce climate related impacts as they continue to work towards their Net Zero pathway to 2050.
In planning and executing our audit we have considered the Group's risk assessment process following their work with the Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies (described in the Sustainability Report above). This, together with discussions with our own sustainability specialists, provided us with a good understanding of the potential impact of climate change on the financial statements. We assessed that the key financial statement line items and estimates which are more likely to be materially impacted by climate risks are those associated with future cash flows, given the more notable impacts of climate change on the business are expected to arise in the medium to long term. These include the impairment assessment of goodwill and landing rights, the assessment of impairment of investments held by easyJet plc as a standalone Company and the recoverability of the Group's deferred tax assets; our key audit matters further explain how we have evaluated the impact of climate change. We have also specifically considered the impact of climate change on likely aircraft ownership periods, residual value changes for less fuel-efficient aircraft, and the related impact on ongoing depreciation charges.
Whilst the Group is targeting net zero carbon emissions by 2050, they are continuing to work on their pathway towards this. The Group has started to quantify some of the impacts that may arise on this pathway; the future financial impacts are clearly uncertain given the medium to long term time horizon. We have discussed with management and the Audit Committee that the estimated financial impacts of climate change will need to be frequently reassessed and our expectation that climate change disclosures will continue to evolve as greater understanding of the actual and potential impacts on the Group's future operations are obtained.
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular, we looked at where the directors made subjective judgements, for example in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors' professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.
Going concern, Estimates in assessing the carrying value of owned aircraft assets and Recoverability of deferred tax assets are new key audit matters this year. Discontinuation of hedge accounting, Valuation of restructuring provisions and Risk of fraud arising from cyberattack, which were key audit matters last year, are no longer included because of the risks associated with these matters having either significantly reduced in the current year or they relate specifically to events which arose in the prior year and have not reoccurred. Otherwise, the key audit matters below are consistent with last year.
In the 2020 Annual Report and Accounts the occurrence of multiple downside potential risks, including cash collateralisation of unearned revenue by card acquirers and easyJet's ability to obtain additional funding resulted in the conclusion that there was a material uncertainty that could cast significant doubt upon the Group's ability to continue as a going concern.
In forming its assessment for the 2021 Annual Report and Accounts the Board has concluded that the financial statements should be prepared on a going concern basis with the removal of the material uncertainty disclosure. In assisting the Directors reach their conclusion management has modelled both a base case and a downside case which it considers to be severe but plausible to assess whether there is sufficient access to liquidity across the going concern outlook period based on the financing facilities currently in place.
We have focussed on this area given the continuing uncertainty in respect of the short term recovery of the airline industry and in light of the conclusions reached in the previous year.
Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and estimates note (note 1) and the going concern statement on page 75, for management's disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates involved in assessing going concern.
Based on the work performed, as summarised above, we concur with the Board's conclusion to adopt the going concern basis of preparation and that the removal of the previously disclosed material uncertainty is appropriate.
The Group operates aircraft which are held under lease arrangements and for which it incurs liabilities for maintenance costs during the term of the lease. These arise from legal and contractual obligations relating to the condition of the aircraft when they are returned to the lessor. Maintenance provisions of £550 million (2020: £597 million) for aircraft maintenance costs in respect of leased aircraft were recorded in the financial statements at 30 September 2021. At each statement of financial position date, the calculation of the maintenance provision includes a number of variable factors and assumptions including primarily the expected cost of the heavy maintenance check at the time it is expected to occur.
We focused on this area because of the inherent level of management judgement required in calculating the amount of provision needed as a result of the complex and subjective elements around these variable factors and assumptions.
Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and estimates note (note 1 and note 18), for management's disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates involved in assessing this provision valuation. Refer to the Audit Committee report on page 127 for a description of its assessment of significant judgements.
Based on the work performed, as summarised above, we have concluded the Group's valuation of maintenance provisions on leased aircraft is materially appropriate.
At 30 September 2021, the aggregate value of goodwill and landing rights, which are both assessed to have indefinite lives, amounted to £533 million (2020: £533 million). Under IAS 36 'Impairment of Assets', goodwill must be tested for impairment at least annually.
All goodwill, landing rights and aircraft and spares belong to a single cash-generating unit (''CGU''), being easyJet's route network, and a single value in use (''VIU'') calculation is performed in order to assess their recoverability.
We focused on the risk of impairment as the impairment test involves a number of subjective judgements and estimates by management, many of which are forward-looking. These estimates include key assumptions underpinning the strategic plan, fuel prices, exchange rates, long-term economic growth rates and discount rates.
Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and estimates note (note 1) and note 10, for management's disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates involved in assessing goodwill and landing rights for impairment. Refer to the Audit Committee report on page 127 for a description of its assessment of significant judgements.
Based on our work summarised above, we have concluded that goodwill and other intangible assets balances are not impaired at 30 September 2021 and that appropriate assumption and sensitivity disclosures have been made in the financial statements.
At 30 September 2021, the aggregate value of owned aircraft amounted to £3,497 million (2020: £4,246 million). The recoverable amount of these assets is supported as part of the VIU assessment described in the key audit matter above. The carrying value of these assets and the resulting depreciation charge recognised in the income statement is dependent on the estimated useful economic lives (''UELs'') and residual values used.
Whilst these estimates are required to be assessed annually more focus has been placed on them in the light of the more volatile aircraft valuations being seen in the market and identified changes to intended holding periods.
Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and estimates note (note 1) and note 11, for management's disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates involved in assessing UELs and residual values. Refer to the Audit Committee report on page 127 for a description of its assessment of significant judgements.
Based on our work summarised above, we have concluded that the estimates used to determine the current carrying value of owned aircraft assets and the related depreciation charge in the year were appropriate. The date of the application of the prospective change was considered appropriate and appropriate disclosures have been made in the financial statements.
At 30 September 2021 significant deferred tax assets (''DTAs'') of £425 million (Sep 20: £275 million) have been recognised, primarily in respect of aggregated UK tax losses.
We have focussed on this area given the significant judgement required in assessing whether full recognition and recoverability of the asset is appropriate. When considering the additional losses reported in the current year alongside the existence of the significant losses brought forward there is an increased time horizon associated with the future recovery of the DTAs and as a result an increased level of uncertainty. Combined with the continuing uncertainty arising from Covid-19 and climate change on future forecasts this acts to increase the overall level of judgement in making this assessment.
Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and estimates note (note 1) and note 6, for management's disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates involved in assessing the recoverability of DTAs. Refer to the Audit Committee report on page 127 for a description of its assessment of significant judgements.
Based on our work summarised above, we have concluded that the full recognition of the DTAs at 30 September 2021 is appropriate and that appropriate disclosure of the judgements applied has been included within the financial statements.
Throughout the year the Group and Company have continued to operate and trade in an environment that has seen significantly reduced levels of flying when compared to historical levels. Management has considered the impact of Covid-19 on the Group and Company financial statements. Primarily these considerations related to the possible impairment of intangible and tangible assets, the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the recognition of income from furlough and temporary government unemployment support schemes, the appropriate accounting for sale and leaseback transactions and the Board's going concern assessment.
There is a risk that the financial impact arising from Covid-19 which has been recorded by management is inappropriate or that we are unable to obtain sufficient audit evidence to support our conclusions in respect of this assessment. Our audit focused on those areas where management identified potential financial impacts arising as a result of the pandemic which, based on our independent risk assessment, could give rise to a risk of material misstatement.
Refer to Accounting Policies note (notes 1a and 1b), note 5, note 18 and note 27 as well as the Directors' Report and Strategic Report for management's disclosures of the relevant judgements, estimates and impacts related to these items.
In advance of the year end and throughout the course of the audit we continued to assess the risks arising from the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. We focussed on areas where significant additional audit effort might be required as well as those areas which might be susceptible to a material financial impact on the performance and position of the Group or Company for the year ended 30 September 2021. Other than as already described in the key audit matters above, we noted the following key material impacts on the financial statements, arising from Covid-19:
Based on the work performed, as summarised above, we have concluded that the Group's conclusions in respect of the impact of Covid-19 are appropriate.
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group and the Company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which they operate.
The Group operates through the Company and its fourteen subsidiary undertakings of which eight were actively trading through the year. The remaining subsidiaries are either holding companies, dormant or have been newly established during the year and not yet started to actively trade. The accounting for these subsidiaries, each of which is considered to be a separate component in the way we scope our audit, is primarily centralised in the UK.
We determined the most effective approach to scoping was to perform full scope audit procedures over the Company and one individually significant component in the Group which is registered in the UK. Procedures over material financial statements lines were performed in four further components. In some cases, financial statement line items are tested in aggregate to the Group materiality level where items across more than one component are homogenous. All Group audit work has been performed by the UK Group engagement team.
Additional audit procedures were performed in relation to consolidation adjustments by the UK Group engagement team. The testing approach ensured that appropriate audit evidence was obtained over all financial statement line items in order to support our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. Based on the detailed audit work performed across the Group, we have obtained coverage of 97% of external consolidated revenue and 98% of the loss before tax.
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:
| Financial statements – group | Financial statements – company | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall materiality | £21,500,000 (2020: £21,500,000). | £19,350,000 (2020: £19,350,000). |
| How we determined it | 5% of headline loss before tax, capped at £21.5 million | 1% of total assets, capped at 90% of Group materiality |
| Rationale for benchmark applied |
We consider that the income statement remains the principal measure used by the shareholders in assessing the underlying performance of the Group and therefore an approach to materiality based on 5% of the headline loss before tax has been applied. However, given the context of this year's headline loss before tax, we capped the level of overall materiality at £21.5 million. This is in line with the level used in 2020 when the same cap was applied, in line with the materiality level applied in 2019. |
We believe that a total asset benchmark is appropriate given that the Company does not generate revenues of its own. The value is capped at 90% of the Group overall materiality. |
For each component in the scope of our Group audit, we allocated a materiality that is less than our overall Group materiality. The materiality allocated to the two significant components was £19,350,000.
We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% of overall materiality, amounting to £16,125,000 for the Group financial statements and £14,500,000 for the Company financial statements.
In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk assessment and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls - and concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range was appropriate.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £1,075,000 (Group audit) (2020: £1,075,000) and £1,075,000 (Company audit) (2020: £1,075,000) as well as misstatements below those amounts that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.
Our evaluation of the directors' assessment of the Group's and the Company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group's and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the Group's and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
In relation to the directors' reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors' report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information which includes reporting based on the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.
With respect to the Strategic report and Directors' Report, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK Companies Act 2006 have been included.
Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions and matters as described below.
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic report and Directors' Report for the year ended 30 September 2021 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit, we did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic report and Directors' Report.
In our opinion, the part of the Directors' Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
The Listing Rules require us to review the directors' statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the corporate governance statement relating to the Company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other information are described in the Reporting on other information section of this report.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement, included within the of the Annual Report and Accounts is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
Our review of the directors' statement regarding the longer-term viability of the Group was substantially less in scope than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors' process supporting their statement; checking that the statement is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the Group and Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit.
In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the directors' statement relating to the Company's compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review by the auditors.
As explained more fully in the Directors' responsibilities and statements in the Directors' Report, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group's and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors' report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.
Based on our understanding of the Group and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations related to other environmental regulations, adherence to data protection requirements in the jurisdictions in which easyJet operates and holds data, UK and overseas tax legislation not being adhered to and non-compliance with employment regulations in the UK and other jurisdictions in which the Group operates, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the financial statements. We evaluated management's incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to inappropriate journal entries, either in the underlying books and records or as part of the consolidation process, and management bias in accounting estimates. Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included:
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.
Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. We will often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample is selected.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC's website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors' report.
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the Company's members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.
Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the members on 22 February 2006 to audit the financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2006 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is 16 years, covering the years ended 30 September 2006 to 30 September 2021.
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors Watford
1 December 2021
| Year ended 30 September 2021 | Year ended 30 September 2020 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | Headline £ million |
Non-headline £ million |
Total £ million |
Headline £ million |
Non-headline £ million |
Total £ million |
| Passenger revenue | 1,000 | – | 1,000 | 2,303 | – | 2,303 |
| Ancillary revenue | 458 | – | 458 | 706 | – | 706 |
| 8 Total revenue |
1,458 | – | 1,458 | 3,009 | – | 3,009 |
| Fuel | (371) | – | (371) | (721) | – | (721) |
| Airports, ground handling and other | ||||||
| operating costs | (446) | – | (446) | (938) | – | (938) |
| Crew | (495) | – | (495) | (629) | – | (629) |
| Navigation | (102) | – | (102) | (206) | – | (206) |
| Maintenance | (222) | – | (222) | (278) | – | (278) |
| Selling and marketing | (60) | – | (60) | (107) | – | (107) |
| Other costs | (319) | 47 | (272) | (426) | (130 )* | (556) |
| Other income | 6 | 79 | 85 | 23 | 45 * | 68 |
| EBITDAR | (551) | 126 | (425) | (273) | (85 ) | (358) |
| Aircraft dry leasing | (5) | – | (5) | (1) | – | (1) |
| Impairment | – | – | – | – | (37 ) | (37) |
| Depreciation 11 |
(456) | – | (456) | (485) | – | (485) |
| Amortisation of intangible assets 10 |
(24) | – | (24) | (18) | – | (18) |
| Operating (loss)/profit | (1,036) | 126 | (910) | (777) | (122 ) | (899) |
| Interest receivable and other financing income | 50 | 33 | 83 | 12 | 105 | 117 |
| Interest payable and other financing charges | (150) | (59) | (209) | (70) | (421 ) | (491) |
| Net finance charges 2 |
(100) | (26) | (126) | (58) | (316 ) | (374) |
| 3 (Loss)/profit before tax |
(1,136) | 100 | (1,036) | (835) | (438 ) | (1,273) |
| Tax credit/(charge) 6 |
236 | (58) | 178 | 110 | 84 | 194 |
| (Loss)/profit for the year | (900) | 42 | (858) | (725) | (354 ) | (1,079) |
| Loss per share, pence | ||||||
| Basic 7 |
(159.0) | (222.9) | ||||
| Diluted 7 |
(159.0) | (222.9) |
* Sale and leaseback gains and losses recognised in the prior year have been re-presented, see note 5.
| Year ended 30 September |
Year ended 30 September |
|
|---|---|---|
| Notes | 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
| Loss for the year | (858) | (1,079) |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) | ||
| Items that may be reclassified to the income statement: | ||
| Cash flow hedges | ||
| Fair value gains/(losses) in the year | 477 | (628) |
| (Gains)/losses transferred to income statement | (17) | 39 |
| Hedge discontinuation losses transferred to income statement | 25 | 284 |
| Related tax (charge)/credit 6 |
(93) | 55 |
| Cost of hedging | (3) | (8) |
| Related tax credit | 1 | 1 |
| Items that will not be reclassified to the income statement: | ||
| Remeasurement gain of post-employment benefit obligations 19 |
5 | 3 |
| Related deferred tax credit 6 |
(4) | – |
| Fair value loss on equity investment | (3) | (15) |
| 388 | (269) | |
| Total comprehensive loss for the year | (470) | (1,348) |
Fair valuation gains in the year primarily due to increases in the market price of jet fuel, along with movements in foreign exchange rates used when valuing derivatives held in the hedging reserve.
For capital expenditure cash flow hedges, the accumulated gains and losses recognised in other comprehensive income will be transferred to the initial carrying amount of the asset acquired, within property, plant and equipment.
Losses/(gains) on cash flow hedges reclassified from other comprehensive income in income statement captions are as follows:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | (8) | (16) |
| Fuel | 41 | 43 |
| Maintenance | – | (6) |
| Eurobonds | (49) | 21 |
| Other costs | (1) | (3) |
| (17) | 39 |
| As at 30 September |
As at 30 September |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
| Non-current assets | |||
| Goodwill | 10 | 365 | 365 |
| Other intangible assets | 10 | 217 | 232 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 11 | 4,735 | 5,053 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 24 | 86 | 89 |
| Equity investment | 24 | 30 | 33 |
| Restricted cash | 14 | 1 | 5 |
| Other non-current assets | 12 | 135 | 133 |
| Deferred tax assets | 6 | 39 | – |
| Current assets | 5,608 | 5,910 | |
| Trade and other receivables | 13 | 193 | |
| 291 | |||
| Intangible assets | 10 | 140 | 12 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 24 | 185 | 21 |
| Current tax assets | – | 7 | |
| Restricted cash | 14 | 13 | 14 |
| Money market deposits | 14 | – | 32 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 14 | 3,536 | 2,284 |
| 4,165 | 2,563 | ||
| Current liabilities | |||
| Trade and other payables | 15 | (1,128) | (1,242) |
| Unearned revenue | 15 | (844) | (614) |
| Borrowings | 16 | (300) | (987) |
| Lease liabilities | 17 | (189) | (224) |
| Derivative financial instruments | 24 | (31) | (352) |
| Current tax payable | (2) | – | |
| Provisions for liabilities and charges | 18 | (183) | (407) |
| (2,677) | (3,826) | ||
| Net current assets/(liabilities) | 1,488 | (1,263) | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 16 | (3,067) | (1,744) |
| Unearned revenue | (2) | – | |
| Lease liabilities | 17 | (890) | (486) |
| Derivative financial instruments | 24 | (37) | (85) |
| Non-current deferred income | (4) | (5) | |
| Post-employment benefit obligation | 19 | (45) | |
| (37) | |||
| Provisions for liabilities and charges | 18 | (420) | (332) |
| Deferred tax | – (4,457) |
(51) (2,748) |
|
| Net assets | 2,639 | 1,899 | |
| Shareholders' equity | |||
| Share capital | 20 | 207 | 125 |
| Share premium | 2,166 | 1,051 | |
| Hedging reserve | 156 | (236) | |
| Cost of hedging reserve | (1) | 1 | |
| Translation reserve | – | (2) | |
| Retained earnings | 111 | 960 | |
| Total equity | 2,639 | 1,899 |
The financial statements on pages 170 to 212 were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 30 November 2021 and signed on behalf of the Board.
JOHAN LUNDGREN KENTON JARVIS Director Director
| Share Capital £ million |
Share premium £ million |
Hedging reserve £ million |
Cost of hedging reserve £ million |
Translation reserve £ million |
Retained earnings £ million |
Total £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2020 | 125 | 1,051 | (236) | 1 | (2) | 960 | 1,899 |
| Loss for the period | – | – | – | – | – | (858) | (858) |
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) | – | – | 392 | (2) | – | (2) | 388 |
| Total comprehensive income/(loss) | – | – | 392 | (2) | – | (860) | (470) |
| Net proceeds from rights issue (note 20) |
82 | 1,115 | – | – | – | – | 1,197 |
| Share incentive schemes | |||||||
| Value of employee services | – | – | – | – | – | 15 | 15 |
| Related tax (note 6) | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Purchase of own shares | – | – | – | – | – | (6) | (6) |
| Currency translation differences | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | 2 |
| At 30 September 2021 | 207 | 2,166 | 156 | (1) | – | 111 | 2,639 |
| Cost of | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share Capital £ million |
Share premium £ million |
Hedging reserve £ million |
hedging reserve £ million |
Translation reserve £ million |
Retained earnings £ million |
Total £ million |
|
| At 1 October 2019 | 108 | 659 | (4) | 8 | (1) | 2,215 | 2,985 |
| Loss for the period | – | – | – | – | – | (1,079) | (1,079) |
| Other comprehensive loss | – | – | (250) | (7) | – | (12) | (269) |
| Total comprehensive loss | – | – | (250) | (7) | – | (1,091) | (1,348) |
| Transfer to property plant and | |||||||
| equipment | – | – | 18 | – | – | – | 18 |
| Dividends paid (note 9) | – | – | – | – | – | (174) | (174) |
| Net proceeds from shares issued | 17 | 392 | – | – | – | – | 409 |
| Share incentive schemes | |||||||
| Value of employee services | – | – | – | – | – | 18 | 18 |
| Related tax (note 6) | – | – | – | – | – | (1) | (1) |
| Purchase of own shares | – | – | – | – | – | (7) | (7) |
| Currency translation differences | – | – | – | – | (1) | – | (1) |
| At 30 September 2020 | 125 | 1,051 | (236) | 1 | (2) | 960 | 1,899 |
On 9 September 2021 the Company invited its shareholders to subscribe to a rights issue of 301,260,394 ordinary shares at an issue price of 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held, with such shares issued on 28 September 2021.
The rights issue resulted in £1,235 million of gross proceeds. Shares totalling 280.2 million were taken up by existing shareholders (93%) with the remaining rump of 21.0 million shares being underwritten. As at 30 September 2021, there were £91 million of proceeds outstanding, which have been subsequently received. Costs of £38 million were incurred on the rights issue.
In June 2020, easyJet successfully raised net proceeds of £409 million through an equity placing of new shares.
The hedging reserve comprises the effective portion of the cumulative net change in fair value of cash flow hedging instruments relating to highly probable transactions that are forecast to occur after the year end. Included within the hedging reserve are amounts totalling a £13 million gain related to derivative hedge trades that were mutually early terminated with counterparty banks in the year ended 30 September 2020 (2020: £46 million gain), as these trades had an effective hedge relationship at the point of termination, the fixed fair value is held in the hedging reserve and recycled to the income statement in line with when the original hedge item also impacts the income statement. See section 'Foreign currency risk management in note 25 for further details.
At 30 September 2021 amounts in the hedging reserve comprised of £nil related to cross-currency basis (2020: £4 million gain) and a £1 million loss related to the time value of options (2020: £3 million loss).
| Year ended 30 September |
Year ended 30 September |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Cash used from operations | 22 | (755) | (542) |
| Ordinary dividends paid | 9 | - | (174) |
| Interest and other financing charges paid | (282) | (71) | |
| Interest and other financing income received | 1 | 12 | |
| Net tax received | 1 | 13 | |
| Net cash used in operating activities | (1,035) | (762) | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | 11 | (140) | (659) |
| Purchase of non-current intangible assets | 10 | (9) | (36) |
| Net decrease in money market deposits | 23 | 32 | 259 |
| Net proceeds from sale and leasebacks | 836 | 702 | |
| Net cash generated by investing activities | 719 | 266 | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Net proceeds from issue of ordinary shares | 1,144 | 409 | |
| Purchase of own shares for employee share schemes | (6) | (7) | |
| Proceeds from debt financing | 23 | 1,804 | 1,399 |
| Repayment of bank loans and other borrowings | 23 | (1,045) | – |
| Repayment of capital element of leases | 23 | (261) | (230) |
| Decrease/(increase) in restricted cash | 14 | 5 | (15) |
| Net cash generated from financing activities | 1,641 | 1,556 | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes | (73) | (61) | |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 1,252 | 999 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 2,284 | 1,285 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | 14 | 3,536 | 2,284 |
easyJet plc (the 'Company') and its subsidiaries ('easyJet' or the 'Group' as applicable) is a low-cost airline carrier operating principally in Europe. The Company is a public limited company (company number 03959649) whose shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol EZJ and is incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom. The address of its registered office is Hangar 89, London Luton Airport, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU2 9PF.
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union. The financial statements have also been prepared in accordance with IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRS IC) interpretations issued and effective at the time of preparing these financial statements.
The financial statements are prepared based on the historical cost convention except for certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative financial instruments, financial guarantees, equity investments and certain contingent liabilities and commitments, which are measured at fair value.
easyJet's business activities, together with factors likely to affect its future development and performance, are described in the Strategic report on pages 2 to 95. Principal risks and uncertainties are described on pages 78 to 95. Note 25 to the financial statements sets out the Group's objectives, policies and procedures for managing its capital and gives details of the risks related to financial instruments held by the Group.
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. In adopting the going concern basis for preparing these financial statements, the Directors have considered easyJet's business activities, together with factors likely to affect its future development and performance, as well as easyJet's principal risks and uncertainties and liquidity position.
After taking into account the net proceeds of the rights issue, the new revolving credit facility and the other sources of funding described above, easyJet has unrestricted access to £4.4 billion of liquidity and has retained ownership of 59% of the total fleet with 44% being unencumbered. This presents an improved liquidity position of £2.1 billion since 30 September 2020 year end.
In modelling the impact of severe but plausible downside risks, the Directors have considered travel restrictions including government lockdowns and international travel bans, leading to a prolonged recovery period, reduction in revenue yield, lower load factors, cash collaterisation of unearned revenue by card acquirers, and a reduction to anticipated forward bookings.
After reviewing the current liquidity position, financial forecasts, stress testing of potential risks and considering the uncertainties described above and the committed funding facilities, the Directors believe it appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the Group financial statements without the inclusion of material uncertainty which has been removed since the interim financial statements as at 31 March 2021 and the full year financial statements as at 30 September 2020.
The use of critical accounting estimates and management judgement is required in applying the accounting policies. Areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements, are highlighted on pages 183 to 185.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors have considered the impact of climate change, particularly in the context of the climate change risks identified in the Sustainability section of the Strategic Report and the Group's stated target of net zero carbon emissions by 2050.
These considerations did not have a material impact on the financial reporting judgements and estimates in the current year. This reflects the conclusion that climate change is not expected to have a significant impact on the Group's short-term cash flows including those considered in the going concern and viability assessments.
However, in preparing the financial statements, the directors have considered the medium and longer term cash flow impacts of climate change on a number of key estimates within the financial statements, including:
The significant accounting policies applied are summarised below. Unless otherwise stated they have been applied consistently to both years presented. The explanations of these policies focus on areas where judgement is applied or which are particularly significant in the financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements incorporate those of easyJet plc and its subsidiaries for the years ended 30 September 2020 and 2021. A full list of subsidiaries can be found in the Notes to the Company financial statements on page 217.
A subsidiary is an entity controlled by easyJet plc. Control is achieved when easyJet is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power, directly or indirectly, over the investee.
Intragroup balances, transactions and any unrealised gains and losses arising from intragroup transactions are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
The primary economic environment in which a subsidiary operates determines its functional currency. The consolidated financial statements of easyJet are presented in Sterling, rounded to the nearest £ million, which is the Company's functional currency and the Group's presentation currency. Certain subsidiaries have operations that are primarily influenced by a currency other than Sterling. Exchange differences arising on the translation of these foreign operations are taken to shareholders' equity until all or part of the interest is sold, when the relevant portion of the accumulated exchange gains or losses is recognised in the income statement. Profits and losses of foreign operations are translated into Sterling at average rates of exchange during the year, since this approximates the rates on the dates of the transactions.
Transactions arising in foreign currencies are recorded using the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into functional currency using the rate of exchange ruling at the end of a reporting period and (except where the asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge) the gains or losses on translation are included in the income statement within Interest receivable and other financing income and Interest payable and other financing charges. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Sterling at foreign exchange rates ruling at the dates the transactions were effected.
Goodwill arising on acquisition is recognised as an asset and initially measured at cost, being the excess of the cost of the business combination over easyJet's interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. It has an indefinite expected useful life and is tested for impairment at least annually or where there is any indication of impairment.
Landing rights are stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. They are considered to have an indefinite useful life as they will remain available for use for the foreseeable future provided minimum utilisation requirements are observed, and are tested for impairment at least annually or where there is any indication of impairment.
Licence agreements to use cloud software are capitalised if easyJet has both a contractual right to the software and the ability to run the software independently of the host vendor. If this is not deemed the case the costs are expensed and treated as a service agreement.
When assessing for impairment or reassessing useful economic lives, easyJet consider significant future changes including in relation to market, technological, economic and legal developments. The potential future impacts of climate change have been incorporated by including the estimated financial impact within cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbon-offsetting, the future estimated price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage.
Other intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation, which is calculated to write off their cost, less estimated residual value, on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives. Expected useful lives and residual values are reviewed annually.
| Expected useful life | |
|---|---|
| Computer software | 3-7 years |
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost, less estimated residual value, of assets on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives. Expected useful lives and residual values are reviewed annually.
| Expected useful life | |
|---|---|
| Aircraft* | 18-23 years |
| Aircraft spares | 14 years |
| Aircraft – prepaid maintenance | 7-10 years |
| Leasehold improvements** | 5-10 years or the length of lease if shorter |
| Freehold land | Not depreciated |
| Fixtures, fittings and equipment** | 3 years or length of lease of property where equipment is used if shorter |
| Computer hardware** | 3-5 years |
* Aircraft held as right of use assets are depreciated over the lease term see leases section. Additional capitalised maintenance associated with leased aircraft is depreciated based on usage over its expected period of utilisation.
** 'Other' assets within note 11.
Residual values are reviewed annually against prevailing market rates at the end of the reporting period for equivalently aged assets and depreciation rates are adjusted accordingly on a prospective basis. The carrying value is reviewed for impairment at least annually or where there is any indication of impairment within the cash generating unit of which the asset is part. For aircraft, easyJet is dependent on Airbus as its sole supplier. This gives rise to an increased valuation risk which crystallises when aircraft exit the fleet, where easyJet is reliant on the future demand for second-hand aircraft. Future developments, such as the impact of climate change on the technological, market, economic or legal environment, are considered when assessing residual values, useful economic lives and impairment. In the year, the expected useful economic life estimate for CEO aircraft was revised from 23 years to 18 years in line with expected usage. This was applied prospectively from 1 July 2021 and had an immaterial impact.
An element of the cost of a new aircraft is attributed on acquisition to prepaid maintenance and is depreciated over a period ranging from seven to ten years from the date of manufacture. Subsequent costs incurred which lend enhancement to future periods, such as long-term scheduled maintenance and major overhaul of aircraft and engines, are capitalised and depreciated over the length of the period benefitting from these enhancements. All other maintenance costs for owned aircraft are charged to the income statement as incurred.
Pre-delivery and option payments made in respect of aircraft are recorded in property, plant and equipment at cost. These amounts are not depreciated. Interest attributed to pre-delivery and option payments made in respect of aircraft and other qualifying assets under construction are capitalised and added to the cost of the asset concerned.
Gains and losses on disposals (other than aircraft-related sale and leaseback transactions) are determined by comparing the net proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognised in the income statement.
Freehold land is recorded at cost and not depreciated as it is considered to have an indefinite useful life.
When a contractual arrangement contains a lease easyJet recognises a lease liability and a corresponding right of use asset at the commencement of the lease.
At the commencement date the lease liability is measured at the present value of the future lease payments, discounted using the Group's incremental borrowing rate where the interest rate in the lease is not readily determined. Subsequently, the lease liability is adjusted by increasing the carrying amount to reflect interest on the lease liability, reducing the carrying amount to reflect the lease payments made and remeasuring the carrying amount to reflect any reassessment or lease modifications.
The lease term is determined from the commencement date of the lease and the duration of the non-cancellable term. If easyJet has an extension option, which it considers it reasonably certain to exercise, then the lease term will be considered to extend beyond that noncancellable period. If easyJet has a termination option, which it considers it reasonably certain to exercise, then the lease term will be considered to be until the point the termination option will take effect.
At the commencement date the right of use asset is measured at an amount equal to the lease liability plus any lease payments made before the commencement date and any initial direct costs, less any lease incentive payments. An estimate of costs to be incurred in restoring an asset, in accordance with the terms of the lease, is also included in the right of use asset at initial recognition. Subsequently, the right of use asset is measured in accordance with the accounting policy for property, plant and equipment. Adjustment is also made to the right of use asset to reflect any remeasurement of the corresponding lease liability. The right of use assets are also subject to impairment testing under IAS 36.
Short-term leases less than 12 months in length and low-value leases are not recognised as lease liabilities and right of use assets, but are recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the lease term. Payments for the interest element of recognised lease liabilities are included in Interest and other financing charges paid within cash flows from operating activities. Payments for the principal element of recognised lease liabilities are presented within cash flows from financing activities.
easyJet periodically enters into sale and leaseback transactions whereby it sells either new or mid-life aircraft or engines to a third party and immediately leases them back. For each transaction, where the sale proceeds and lease payments are judged to be at fair value, any gain or loss arising on disposal is recognised in the income statement, to the extent that it relates to the rights that have been transferred. Gains and losses that relate to the rights that have been retained are included in the carrying amount of the right of use asset recognised at commencement of the lease. Where sale proceeds and lease payments are not at fair value, any below market terms are recognised as a prepayment of lease payments, and above market terms are recognised as additional financing provided by the lessor. Gains on sale and leaseback transactions are recognised in other income, with losses on sale and leaseback transactions recognised in other costs. This has been retrospectively applied to the comparative financial year. See note 5 for further details.
Payments for aircraft and engine maintenance, as stipulated in the respective lease agreements, have historically been made to some lessors as security for the performance of future heavy maintenance works. These payments are recorded within current and noncurrent assets (as applicable) as receivables from the lessors until the respective maintenance event occurs and the reimbursement with the lessor is finalised. Any payment that is not expected to be reimbursed by the lessor is recognised immediately within operating expenses in the statement of comprehensive income. Amounts due to easyJet from lessors for maintenance related to use before easyJet acquired the aircraft are also recognised in this category.
If a claim on a financial guarantee given to a third party becomes probable, the obligation is recognised at fair value. For subsequent measurement, the carrying amount is the higher of initial measurement and best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the reporting date.
Tax expense in the income statement consists of current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the income statement except when it relates to items credited or charged directly to other comprehensive income or shareholders' equity, in which case it is recognised in other comprehensive income or shareholders' equity. The charge for current tax is based on the results for the year as adjusted for income that is exempt and expenses that are not deductible, using tax rates that are applicable to the taxable income.
Deferred tax is provided in full on temporary differences relating to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, where it is probable that the recovery or settlement will result in an obligation to pay more, or a right to pay less, tax in the future, with the following exceptions:
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods in which recovery of assets and settlement of liabilities are expected to take place, based on tax rates or laws enacted or substantively enacted at the date of the statement of financial position.
Deferred tax assets represent amounts recoverable in future periods in respect of deductible temporary differences, losses and tax credits carried forwards. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that these are estimated to be fully recoverable against the unwind of taxable temporary differences and future taxable income.
Deferred tax liabilities represent the amount of income taxes payable in future periods in respect of taxable temporary differences.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and it is the intention to settle these on a net basis.
Provisions are recognised when a present legal or constructive obligation arises as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Group will be required to settle that obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Amounts provided for represent the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the statement of financial position date, taking into account all related risks and uncertainties.
As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, easyJet implemented a major co-ordinated restructuring programme to reduce the number of bases, and the number of employees. Provisions have been made based on the expected outcome of consultations with staff, including pilots and crew. Where specific individuals at risk have not been identified, estimations have been based on information available such as average payroll data, employee age and length of service.
Provisions for customer claims comprise amounts payable to customers who make claims in respect of flight delays and cancellations, and refunds of air passenger duty or similar charges. Provisions are measured based on known eligible events, passengers impacted and historical claim rates.
easyJet incurs liabilities for maintenance costs in respect of aircraft leased during the term of the lease. These arise from legal and constructive contractual obligations relating to the condition of the aircraft when it is returned to the lessor. On recognition of a right of use asset under IFRS 16 a provision is made in full for maintenance not dependent on use of the aircraft, plus maintenance relating to previous use, based on hours or cycles flown, to provide for the cost of these obligations. Contractual obligations which are dependent on the ongoing use of the aircraft are provided over the term of the lease based on the estimated future costs, discounted to present value. These are capitalised to the right of use asset rather than recognised in maintenance in the income statement. These assets are depreciated immediately as the obligation has arisen as a result of flying hours already undertaken.
Other provisions include amounts in respect of potential liabilities for employee related matters and litigation which arises in the normal course of business.
easyJet contributes to defined contribution pension schemes for the benefit of employees (see below for the Swiss scheme treatment). The assets of the schemes are held separately from those of easyJet in independently administered funds. easyJet's contributions are charged to the income statement in the year in which they are incurred. easyJet has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid for defined contribution schemes.
The expected cost of compensated annual leave and other employee benefits is recognised at the time that the related employees' services are provided.
easyJet contributes to an independently administered post-employment fund for employees in Switzerland. The final benefit is contribution-based with certain minimum guarantees required by Swiss law. Due to these minimum guarantees, the Swiss pension plan meets IAS 19 Employee Benefits requirements to be treated as a defined benefit plan for the purposes of these consolidated financial statements.
The easyJet portion of the current service costs and the net interest cost are charged to the consolidated income statement in the year in which they relate. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and in the consolidated statement of financial position reflects the net surplus or deficit at the statement of financial position date.
The actuarial assumptions used to calculate the defined benefit obligation are based on the requirements set out in IAS 19. They are set by management, based on advice from independent actuaries. The defined benefit obligation is calculated using the projected unit credit method. Costs of managing the plan assets are deducted as incurred in determining the return on plan assets and the present value of projected future general administration expenses that are a direct consequence of past service are included as part of the retirement benefit obligation.
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new ordinary shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
Where any Group company or employee benefit trust purchases the Company's equity shares, the consideration paid and any directly attributable incremental costs are deducted from retained earnings until the shares are cancelled or reissued. Proceeds from re-issue are shown as a credit to retained earnings.
easyJet settles share awards under the Long Term Incentive Plan, the Save As You Earn scheme, Restricted Share Plan and Share Incentive Plans by purchasing its own shares on the market through employee benefit trusts. The cost of such purchases is deducted from retained earnings in the period that the transaction occurs.
Dividend distributions to the Company's shareholders are recognised as a liability in the period in which the dividends are approved by the Company's shareholders.
easyJet has a number of equity-settled share incentive schemes. The fair value of share options granted under the Save As You Earn scheme is measured at the date of grant using the Binomial Lattice option pricing model. The fair value of grants under the Long Term Incentive Plan is measured at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model for awards based on ROCE performance targets, and the Stochastic model (also known as the Monte Carlo model) for awards based on TSR performance targets. The fair value of all other awards is the share price at the date of grant.
The fair value of the estimated number of options and awards that are expected to vest is expensed to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period that employees' services are rendered, with a corresponding increase in shareholders' equity. Where non-market performance criteria (such as ROCE) attached to the share options and awards are not met, any cumulative expense previously recognised is reversed. For awards with market-related performance criteria (such as TSR), an expense is recognised irrespective of whether the market condition is satisfied.
The social security obligations payable in connection with the grant of the share options are an integral part of the grant itself and the charge is treated as a cash-settled transaction.
Financial instruments are recognised when easyJet becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the relevant instrument and derecognised when it ceases to be a party to such provisions. Financial assets are also derecognised (written-off) when the Group has no reasonable expectation of recovering the financial asset.
With the exception of trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component, financial instruments are initially measured at fair value plus or minus (in the case of a financial asset or financial liability not at fair value through profit or loss) directly attributable transaction costs. Trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component are initially measured at the transaction price.
Where market values are not available, the fair value of financial instruments is calculated by discounting expected cash flows at prevailing interest rates and by applying period end exchange rates.
The equity investment in The Airline Group Limited is measured at fair value. Movements in fair value are assessed at each reporting period and recorded in other comprehensive income. The fair value is measured using a combination of income and market valuation techniques in line with IFRS 13 requirements. See note 24 for further details.
Non-derivative financial assets are classified and measured according to easyJet's business model for managing a specified group of financial assets, and the nature of the contractual cash flows arising from that group of financial assets.
Subsequent to initial recognition, this classification of financial asset is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
Financial assets are measured at amortised cost when both of the following criteria are met:
• The financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows; and • The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amounts outstanding.
Financial assets measured at amortised cost include refundable lease deposits and other refundable lease contributions, restricted cash, trade and other receivables, money market deposits and cash and cash equivalents (excluding money market funds).
Restricted cash comprises cash deposits which have restrictions governing their use and is classified as a current or non-current asset based on the estimated remaining length of the restriction.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash held in bank accounts with no access restrictions and bank term deposits and tri-party repos repayable on demand or maturing within three months of inception.
Money market deposits comprise term deposits and tri-party repos maturing greater than three months from inception.
On initial recognition, equity investments, excluding interests in associates, are irrevocably designated as measured at fair value through other comprehensive income. Subsequently they are measured at fair value with changes recognised in other comprehensive income with no recycling of these gains and losses.
Financial assets are measured at fair value through profit or loss when they do not meet the criteria to be measured at amortised cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income.
Subsequent to initial recognition, this classification of financial asset is measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss solely comprise money market funds at 30 September 2021.
At each reporting date easyJet recognises a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost.
In establishing the appropriate amount of loss allowance to be recognised, easyJet applies either the general approach or the simplified approach, depending on the nature of the underlying group of financial assets.
The general approach is applied to the impairment assessment of refundable lease deposits and other refundable lease contributions, restricted cash, money market deposits and cash and cash equivalents.
Under the general approach easyJet recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the 12-month expected credit losses, unless the credit risk on the financial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition, in which case a loss allowance is recognised at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses.
The simplified approach is applied to the impairment assessment of trade and other receivables.
Under the simplified approach easyJet always recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses.
Non-derivative financial liabilities are initially recorded at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs, and subsequently at amortised cost, and include trade and other payables and borrowings. Interest expense on borrowings is recognised using the effective interest method.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless there is an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting period date.
Subsequent to initial recognition, this classification of financial asset is measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost include trade and other payables, lease liabilities and borrowings.
Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value through profit or loss with the exception of derivative financial instruments that are designated as a hedging instrument in a cash flow for hedge relationship.
easyJet uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge foreign currency risks on transactions denominated in US dollars, Euros or Swiss francs. These transactions primarily affect revenue, fuel, fixed costs, and the carrying value of owned aircraft. easyJet also uses cross-currency interest rate swaps to hedge currency and interest rate risk on certain borrowings, and jet fuel forward swap and option contracts to hedge fuel price risks. Hedge accounting is applied to those derivative financial instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges.
Changes in the fair values of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the fair values of the hedged assets or liabilities that are attributable to the hedged risk. Any differences between the hedge item and hedge instrument fair valuation is recorded as hedge ineffectiveness as a non-headline item within the income statement.
Fair value changes in the derivative instrument attributable to currency basis are not designated as part of the hedged instrument. Such fair value changes are recognised through other comprehensive income as a cost of hedging and are recycled to profit or loss on a rational basis, according to the nature of the underlying hedged item.
Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of foreign exchange forwards, jet fuel forward swaps, jet fuel options and crosscurrency interest rate swap contracts designated as cash flow hedges are recognised in other comprehensive income and deferred in the hedging reserve to the extent that the hedges are determined to be effective.
All foreign exchange contracts in a cash flow hedge relationship are designated on a forward basis with the full fair value as the hedge instrument. Jet fuel option contracts in a cash flow hedge relationship are designated using the intrinsic value of the derivative as the hedge instrument only. The time value element of the full fair value for these derivatives is recognised through other comprehensive income as a cost of hedging and recycled to profit or loss at the same time as the hedge item also impacts profit and loss.
Fair value changes in foreign currency derivative instruments attributable to currency basis are not designated as part of the hedged instrument. Such fair value changes are recognised through other comprehensive income as a cost of hedging and are recycled to profit or loss on a rational basis, according to the nature of the underlying hedged item. All other changes in fair value are recognised immediately in the income statement.
When the hedged forecast transaction relates to an item of property, plant and equipment, the relevant accumulated gains and losses are transferred from the hedging reserve and included in the initial carrying amount of that purchased asset. Otherwise they are recognised in the income statement in the same period in which the hedged transaction affects the income statement and against the same line item.
In the event that a hedged forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, any related gains and losses are immediately transferred from the hedging reserve and recognised in the income statement. Derivative instruments that have been derecognised from hedge relationships are classified as fair value through profit or loss thereafter with subsequent fair valuation movements impacting the income statement.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when a hedging instrument is derecognised (e.g. through expiry, disposal or termination of a derivative), or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Where the hedged item continues to be expected to occur, the related gains and losses remain deferred in the hedging reserve until the transaction takes place.
The Group determines that the criteria for each hedge accounting relationship are met when:
Free allocations received from the government under the EU ETS scheme are recognised at fair value on the date received with a corresponding liability recognised. Purchased carbon credits are recognised at the purchase price. Both purchased and free credits are not subsequently revalued as they are held for own use. Carbon assets are derecognised when they are used to settle the ETS liabilities subsequent to the end of each calendar year. These assets are presented as current intangible assets and are reviewed for impairment annually or when there is an indication of impairment within the airline cash generating unit.
easyJet categorises total revenue earned on the face of the income statement between passenger and ancillary revenue. Passenger revenue arises from the sale of flight seats and administration fees and is measured as the price paid by the customer. Passenger revenue is recognised when the performance obligation has been completed. This is when the flight takes place. Amounts paid by 'noshow' customers are recognised as passenger revenue when the booked service is provided, as such customers are not generally entitled to change flights or seek refunds once a flight has departed.
Ancillary revenue includes revenue from the provision of checked baggage, allocated seating and change fees, package holidays revenue (excluding flights which are recognised as passenger revenue) and revenue arising from commissions earned from services sold on behalf of partners and inflight sales. It is measured as the price paid by the customer for the service booked. Ancillary revenue is recognised when the performance obligation is complete, which is generally when the related flight takes place, with the following exceptions:
Package holiday revenue is recognised evenly over the duration of the holiday. Package holiday revenue is measured as the price paid by the customer for the service booked.
Airline flights and package holiday deposits are paid for at the point of booking. Package holiday balances due from customers are offset against the customer deferred revenue until paid in full, due 28 days before departure. Unearned revenue from flights not yet flown is held in the statement of financial position until it is realised in the income statement when the performance obligation is complete and until then represents a contract liability. Unearned revenue also includes non-flight elements of package holidays for which the customer has paid but has not yet taken place, and is held in the statement of financial position until it is realised in the income statement when the performance obligation is complete. Vouchers issued by easyJet in lieu of refunds are held in the statement of financial position in other payables as a contract liability until they are redeemed against a new booking, at which point they are recognised as unearned revenue, or when the performance obligation is complete, at which point they will be recognised as revenue.
If easyJet cancels a flight or holiday, unless a customer immediately re-books on an alternative flight or holiday, at the point of the cancellation the amount paid for the flight is derecognised from unearned revenue and a contract liability is recognised within trade and other payables to refund the customer or provide a voucher or flight transfer if requested. easyJet make an estimate of the proportion of this liability which will never be claimed by customers and recognises this as income.
Some of the compensation payments made to customers (in respect of flight delays) are offset against revenues recognised up to the amount of the flight, with the excess compensation being recorded within expenses.
Revenue from easyJet plus cards is recognised evenly over time in line with when the performance obligations are expected to arise. Revenue from easyJet plus cards for the current financial year totalled £14 million (2020: £22 million).
easyJet has two operating segments, being its Airline business, which operates easyJet's route network, and the Holidays business, which sells holiday packages. The Chief Operating Decision Maker has been assessed as the easyJet plc Board, which receives regular reporting on the Airline and Holidays results in order to make resource allocation decisions. Presentation of separate segmental reporting is included in note 8.
Geographic revenue is allocated on the following bases:
• revenue earned from customers is allocated according to the location of the first departure airport on each booking; and • commission revenue earned from partners is allocated according to the domicile of each partner.
Passenger revenue recognised within the Airline segment includes intra-segment sales of flights to the Holidays segment. Passenger revenue is recognised in the Airline segment when the flight takes place.
easyJet operates a voluntary policy to compensate for every tonne of carbon and carbon equivalents (collectively 'carbon') emitted from fuel used for all its flights, by investing in projects which will mean there is one tonne less in the atmosphere - whether by reducing carbon by physically removing it from the air or by avoiding the release of additional carbon.
easyJet purchases Verified Emission Reductions (VERs) arising from Gold Standard or Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) accredited projects to offset the carbon emitted from flights. The cost of purchasing VERs is recognised in the income statement when the flight occurs with a corresponding carbon offsetting liability. This is measured using the purchase price of VERs on a First In First Out basis where they have already been purchased, then a weighted average of expected future purchases where sufficient future VER purchase commitments are already in place. If there are insufficient future commitments, a market value would be used. At present there is excess VER commitments when compared to the current liability. VERs are recorded as an asset at historic cost when delivery into the easyJet registry account has taken place and not subsequently revalued. At regular intervals the VERs are retired to settle the obligation, at which point the VER asset and carbon offsetting liability are derecognised.
Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from the revaluation of monetary assets and liabilities have historically been classified as nonheadline items. During the year it was concluded that these gains and losses would be more appropriately classified as headline items, as they are considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the business.
Due to the immaterial value in the prior year, no reclassification has been made in the comparative year.
The initial charges for discontinuation of hedge accounting applied to derivative financial instruments entered before the Covid-19 pandemic are still recognised as non-headline items, however any on-going fair value movements from these derivative financial instruments will now be classified as headline items due to easyJet's ability to manage those positions.
Government grants are recognised where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received. Loans provided and/or guaranteed by governments that represent market rates of interest are recorded at the amount of the proceeds received and recognised within borrowings. All existing loans are considered to be at market value. Grants that compensate the Group for expenses incurred are recognised in the income statement in the relevant financial statement line on a systematic basis in the periods in which the expenses are recognised to present the net expense to the Group.
Within the financial statements on pages 170 to 212, a number of APMs have been disclosed which the Directors consider key to assessing underlying performance. Refer to the glossary for a list of APMs disclosed in the financial statements, including definitions and reconciliations to IFRS measures.
A number of amended standards became applicable during the current reporting period. The Group did not have to change its accounting policies or make retrospective adjustments as a result of adopting these standards. The amendments that became applicable for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2020, and did not have a material impact were:
There are no standards that are issued but not yet effective that would be expected to have a material impact on the Group in the current or future reporting periods and on foreseeable future transactions.
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Although these amounts are based on management's best estimates, events or actions may mean that actual results ultimately differ from those estimates, and these differences may be material. The estimates and the underlying assumptions are reviewed regularly.
The following are the critical judgements, apart from those involving estimations (which are dealt with separately below), that the Directors have made in the process of applying the Group's accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised and presented in the financial statements.
The Group seeks to present a measure of underlying performance which is not impacted by material non-recurring items or items which are not considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the business. This measure of profit is described as 'headline' and is used by the Directors to measure and monitor performance. The excluded items are referred to as 'non-headline' items.
Non-headline items may include impairments, amounts relating to acquisitions and disposals, expenditure on major restructuring programmes, litigation and insurance settlements, the income or expense resulting from the initial recognition of sale and lease back transactions, fair value adjustments on financial instruments and other particularly significant or unusual non-recurring items. Items relating to the normal trading performance of the business will always be included within the headline performance.
Judgement is required in determining the classification of items between headline and non-headline. In line with Financial Reporting Council (FRC) guidance, easyJet has not attempted to identify additional non-headline items as a direct or indirect result of Covid-19, other than those items which clearly meet our existing definition of non-headline, such as hedge discontinuation, restructuring and asset impairment. See 'Voluntary change in accounting policy' note above for changes in classifications in the year.
Judgement has been applied in consolidating easyJet Switzerland S.A. as a subsidiary on the basis that the Company exercises a dominant influence over the undertaking. A non-controlling interest has not been reflected in the consolidated financial statements on the basis that holders of the remaining 51% of the shares have no entitlement to any dividends from that holding and the Company has an option to acquire those shares for a pre-determined minimal consideration.
Due to the amount of cancelled flights, easyJet continues to offer customers the option to accept vouchers in lieu of cash refunds. The liability for vouchers is classified as other payables until the voucher is redeemed against a future booking when it is reclassified to unearned revenue. Breakage may occur if customers do not redeem their voucher prior to expiry and would be recognised in revenue. The liability has been recorded in full as no vouchers have yet expired, and due to the significant level of flight cancellations as a result of the pandemic impact there is not sufficient historical data available to reliably estimate the amount of vouchers that will not be used prior to expiry. To date no vouchers have expired as the vouchers have had the expiry dates extended to ensure customers have the maximum opportunity to utilise their vouchers. Applying breakage at 10% would result in a c. £20 million reduction to the liability.
Judgement is required when determining if sale and leaseback proceeds and lease rentals are at fair value. The sale and leaseback transactions completed in the year have been assessed with reference to external valuations specific to the easyJet fleet and deemed to be at fair value. The accounting treatment would have been different if the transactions had not been at fair value (see leases accounting policy).
On 19 May 2020, easyJet announced that it had been the target of a cyber-attack from a highly sophisticated source. The email addresses and travel details of approximately 9 million customers were accessed and for a very small subset of customers (2,208), credit card details were accessed.
The cyber-attack continues to be under investigation by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). As the cyber-attack took place before the United Kingdom left the European Union, the Group expects the ICO to be investigating on behalf of all EU data protection authorities as lead supervisory authority under the GDPR. Any penalty or enforcement action will need to be reviewed and approved by the other EU data protection authorities under the GDPR's cooperation process. In addition, in May 2020, a class action claim was filed in the UK High Court by a law firm representing a class of affected customers and claims have also been commenced or threatened in certain other courts and jurisdictions.
Judgement has been applied in assessing the merit, likely outcome and potential impact on the Group of the continued investigation by the ICO, group action and other claims. These are still subject to a number of significant uncertainties and therefore the Group is unable to assess the likely outcome or quantum of the claims as at the date of these financial statements.
The following critical accounting estimates involve a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or are areas where assumptions are significant to the financial statements. The critical accounting estimates concerned are the major sources of estimation uncertainty that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next year.
The most critical estimate required for the provision is considered to be the expected costs of the heavy maintenance checks at the time they are expected to occur. Other estimates also impacting the provision include the future utilisation of the aircraft, the condition of the aircraft, the lifespan of life-limited parts and the rate used to discount the provision.
easyJet incurs liabilities for maintenance costs in respect of aircraft leased during the term of the lease. These arise from legal and constructive contractual obligations relating to the condition of the aircraft when it is returned to the lessor. To discharge these obligations, easyJet will also normally need to carry out one heavy maintenance check on each of the engines and the airframe during the lease term.
The bases of all estimates are reviewed at least annually, and when information becomes available that is capable of causing a material change to an estimate, such as renegotiation of end of lease return conditions, increased or decreased aircraft utilisation, or changes in the cost of heavy maintenance services. Given the much increased uncertainty in forecasting future maintenance requirements, and the associated judgemental nature of the assumptions applied in determining the maintenance provision, management believe that a reasonable combination of changes to these estimates could result in a material movement to the carrying value of the provision. A 5% movement in the estimated cost of final maintenance events would result in a £24 million movement to the provision.
The recoverable amount of goodwill and landing rights has been determined based on value in use calculations for the whole airline route network cash generating unit. The value in use is determined by discounting future cash flows to their present value. When applying this method, easyJet relies on a number of key estimates including the ability to meet its strategic plans, future fuel prices, the ability to pass on cost price increases to the customer, exchange rates, long-term economic growth rates for the principal countries in which it operates, and its pre-tax weighted average cost of capital. Strategic plans incorporate estimations of the future impact of climate change on easyJet, this includes the future financial impact within cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbon-offsetting, the future estimated price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage.
Fuel price and exchange rates continue to be volatile in nature but the assumptions used assume the ability to pass these on to the customer (see Note 10 for plausible scenarios). In addition, assumptions over the recovery of customer demand levels could have a significant effect on the impairment assessment performed. Due to the uncertainty created by the Covid-19 pandemic, there remains a risk that further waves of the pandemic could affect our markets, leading to further travel restrictions being imposed. These uncertainties could have an effect on future impairment or useful economic life assessments performed.
The Swiss pension scheme meets the requirements under IAS 19 to be recognised as a defined benefit pension scheme and the net pension obligation is recognised in the statement of financial position. The measurement of scheme assets and obligations are calculated by an independent actuary in line with IAS 19. The financial and demographic assumptions used in the calculation are determined by management following consultation with the independent actuary with consideration of external market movements and inputs. The calculation is most sensitive to movements in the discount rate applied to the future obligation and a sensitivity analysis is included in note 19.
easyJet is exposed to financial risks including fluctuations in exchange rates, jet fuel prices and interest rates. Financial risk management aims to limit these market risks with selected derivative hedging instruments being used for this purpose. The Group holds a number of derivatives and financial instruments including foreign currency forward contracts, jet fuel forward and option contracts and crosscurrency interest rate swap contracts. easyJet's policy is not to speculatively trade derivatives but to use the instruments to hedge anticipated exposure. Given the inherently complex nature of this area, the Finance Committee (a committee of the Board) oversees the Group's treasury and funding policies and activities.
easyJet incurs liabilities for amounts payable to customers who make claims in respect of flight delays and cancellations, and refunds of air passenger duty or similar charges, for which claims could be made up to 6 years after the event. Estimates include passenger claim rates, the value of claims made and the period of time over which claims will be made. The bases of all estimates are reviewed at least annually and also when information becomes available that is capable of causing a material change to the estimate. A 5% movement in the estimated customer claim rate would result in a £1 million movement to the provision.
As a result of the reduced flying programme throughout the year, the Group's near-term exposures for jet fuel and foreign currency were reduced, causing a proportion of derivatives previously hedge accounted for to be discontinued from a hedge relationship. A net charge of £26 million has been recognised as a non-headline item in the income statement primarily due to the discontinuation in the year of hedge accounting for impacted derivatives. In assessing whether future exposures are still expected to occur, easyJet made estimates as at 30 September 2021 regarding its jet fuel consumption requirements and expected future foreign currency cash flows. These estimates used assumptions based on the expected recovery of customer demand and subsequent flying schedule as at that date. See note 25 for details of the split between headline and non-headline for hedge discontinuation.
Aircraft asset recoverable amounts have been tested for impairment based on value in use at the airline route network cash generating unit level as described in the goodwill section above. Strategic plans incorporate estimations of the future impact of climate change on easyJet, this includes the future financial impact within cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbon-offsetting, the future estimated price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage. The recoverable amounts exceed the carrying values as at 30 September 2021.
Aircraft are depreciated over their useful economic life to their residual values in line with the property, plant and equipment accounting policy. A review has been performed during the current financial year and the useful economic life and residual value amounts for aircraft and capitalised maintenance have been revised in line with the latest information available. This included the expected useful economic life estimate for CEO aircraft revised from 23 years to 18 years in line with expected usage and the residual value for aircraft revised based on reports obtained from independent aircraft valuation experts. The revised estimates led to a net accelerated depreciation of the fleet on a prospective basis from 1 July 2021. The changes increased the depreciation charge by c.£13 million in the financial year 2021. This increase is expected to annualise at £47 million in financial year 2022. The change in depreciation charge is non-cash.
However, in light of the global pandemic, the longer-term impact on the airline industry is currently uncertain and the market for aircraft transactions has also slowed. Should future demand fall significantly below current expectations there could be a risk that the recoverable amount for some aircraft assets falls below their current carrying value or that residual values are subject to significant deterioration.
The deferred tax asset balances include £425 million (2020: £275 million) arising on full recognition of the UK trading tax losses accumulated at the statement of financial position date. The Group has concluded that these deferred tax assets will be fully recoverable against the unwind of taxable temporary differences and future taxable income based on the long term strategic plans of the Group. Where applicable the financial projections used in assessing future taxable income are consistent with those used elsewhere across the business for example in the assessment of the carrying value of goodwill. These assessments include the expected impact of climate change on easyJet and the future financial impact within cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbon-offsetting, the future estimated price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage.
The tax losses for which a deferred tax asset has been recognised are expected to be utilised within the next eight years, based on probable forecast future taxable income. Probable forecast future taxable income includes an incremental and increasing risk weighting to represent higher levels of uncertainty in future periods.
The loss utilisation has been stress tested by assessing probable future taxable income for the next five years, based on the same risk weightings to those applied above, but assuming no profit growth from the end of a five year forecast period. The resultant reduction in forecast taxable profit calculated on this basis would extend the tax loss utilisation period by two years.
The tax losses can be carried forward indefinitely and have no expiry date.
In September 2019 the IASB issued the first accounting amendment to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 related to the upcoming IBOR reform and to address the impact that the current uncertainty could have when applying specific hedge accounting requirements on applicable hedge relationships. In particular, the amendment provides temporary relief to allow hedge accounting to continue during the transition period before IBOR based hedge items or instruments are amended as a result of the reform being completed.
The Group early adopted this amendment in the financial year ending September 2020, applying it retrospectively to accounting relationships that existed before the start of the current reporting period. The impacts of IBOR reform on the Group is assessed as being limited, with this amendment only applicable to one hedge relationship as at 30 September 2021.
Specifically the amendment impacts the fair value hedge relationship on one of the Group's Eurobonds, where a cross-currency interest rate swap (with a Sterling notional of £379 million, maturity of February 2023 and a fair value of £53 million in an asset position) is used to swap the fixed interest coupon of the Euro denominated debt into a floating interest rate, reset quarterly using future expected GBP LIBOR. In assessing hedge effectiveness on a prospective basis for this relationship, the Group has continued to assume that the GBP-LIBOR related interest cash flows on the swap are not altered by IBOR reform and the hedge continues to be highly effective.
Furthermore, hedge accounting did not need to be discontinued during the period of IBOR-related uncertainty as the Group has taken the relief available in Phase 1 to separately identify the risk component at the initial hedge designation and not on an ongoing basis.
In August 2020, IASB also issued Phase 2 amendments which are effective from 1 January 2021. This looked to address issues around the updating of hedge designations and documentation following the adoption of alternative benchmark rates. The Group is not adopting these amendments currently due to continued uncertainty over IBOR transition. Therefore, no amendments have been made to the hedged item and/or hedging instruments in the 2021 financial year.
In October 2020 the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) released its IBOR fallback protocol to aid the IBOR transition. In June 2021 the Group signed up to this protocol as part of its approach to the transition.
During the year a LIBOR transition working group was formed to consider wider impacts on the business of changes. Key areas that this group reviewed included existing supplier contracts, debt financing, leases, inter-company loan agreements and discount rates. No material impacts were identified as part of this review.
There are no other standards that are issued but not yet effective that would be expected to have a material impact on the Group in the current or future reporting periods and on foreseeable future transactions.
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Interest receivable and other financing income | ||
| Interest income | 1 | (11) |
| Hedge discontinuation (1) | (74) | (106) |
| Net exchange gains on monetary assets and liabilities (2) | (10) | – |
| (83) | (117) | |
| Interest payable and other financing charges | ||
| Hedge discontinuation (1) | 92 | 411 |
| Interest payable on bank and other borrowings | 75 | 36 |
| Interest payable on lease liabilities | 42 | 24 |
| Other interest payable | – | 15 |
| Net exchange losses on monetary assets and liabilities | – | 5 |
| 209 | 491 | |
| Net finance charges | 126 | 374 |
See Note 25 for details of the split between headline and non-headline for hedge discontinuation.
Included within net exchange gains on monetary assets and liabilities is a £15 million loss (2020: £13 million loss) relating to the fair value loss on USD foreign
exchange derivatives designated as fair value through profit and loss.
The following have been included in arriving at loss before tax:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation of property, plant and equipment | ||
| Owned assets | 234 | 256 |
| Right of use assets | 222 | 229 |
| Loss on disposal of intangibles | – | 19 |
| Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 30 | 11 |
| Gain on sale and leaseback | (65) | (38) |
The sale of EU ETS assets in the prior year resulted in a remeasurement of the EU ETS liability which reduced 2020 fuel costs by £33 million.
During the year easyJet incurred fees payable for the audit of the Group and individual financial statements from easyJet's auditors and their associates (including foreign partners) totalling £1.1 million (2020: £0.8 million). In addition, easyJet incurred audit-related non-audit services fees of £0.2 million (2020: audit-related fees of £0.1 million) from its auditors. This includes the fee of £0.1 million (2020: £0.1 million) in respect of the half year review performed. During the year other assurance related non-audit services fees of £1.2 million were also incurred in relation to work associated with the rights issue in September 2021. The rights issue assurance work, where PwC acted as the Reporting Accountant, was one-off in nature and only commenced following approval from the FRC as the work resulted in the 70% fee cap being exceeded.
The average monthly number of people employed by easyJet was:
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number | Number | |
| Flight and ground operations | 11,480 | 13,581 |
| Sales, marketing and administration | 909 | 985 |
| 12,389 | 14,566 |
Employee costs for easyJet were:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Wages and salaries | 472 | 690 |
| Social security costs | 69 | 77 |
| Pension costs | 67 | 77 |
| Share-based payments | 15 | 18 |
| 623 | 862 |
Included in the pension costs is £7 million (2020: £6 million) related to pension schemes treated as a defined benefit scheme under IAS 19.
Included in employee costs for 2021 is a benefit of £61 million from the release of restructuring provisions within non-headline (2020: £123 million restructuring costs). Refer to note 5 for further details.
The amounts received under government 'Furlough' schemes offset the employee costs in the Income statement. Refer to note 27 for further details.
Key management compensation was:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Short-term employee benefits | 6 | 6 |
| Share-based payments | 2 | – |
| 8 | 6 |
The Directors of easyJet plc and the other members of the Airline Management Board are easyJet's key management as they have collective authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the business. Emoluments paid or payable to the Directors of easyJet plc were:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Remuneration | 3 | 2 |
| 3 | 2 |
Details of Directors' remuneration are disclosed in the Directors' remuneration report on pages 130 to 153.
An analysis of the amounts presented as non-headline is given below:
| Year ended 30 September 2021 £ million |
Year ended 30 September 2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Sale and leaseback gain | (65) | (38) |
| Restructuring (release)/charge | (61) | 123 |
| Impairment | – | 37 |
| Recognised in operating loss | (126) | 122 |
| Fair value adjustment and hedge discontinuation | 26 | 311 |
| Statement of financial position foreign exchange charge | – | 5 |
| Total non-headline (credit)/charge before tax | (100) | 438 |
| Tax charge/(credit) on non-headline items | 58 | (84) |
| Total non-headline (credit)/charge after tax | (42) | 354 |
During the year, easyJet completed the sale and leaseback of 7 A319 (2020: 17), 24 A320 (2020: 9) and 4 A321 (2020: 7) and 2 engines (2020: nil). The Income Statement impact of the 35 aircraft and 2 engine sale and leasebacks was a £79 million gain (2020: £45 million gain) recognised in Other income offset by a £14 million loss (2020: £7 million loss) recognised in Other costs.
The prior year net gain of £38 million has been reclassified on the face of the Income statement to present £45 million of gains within Other income and £7 million of losses within Other costs. There is no net impact on EBITDAR or the loss before tax.
As a result of the ongoing restructuring programme and continuing negotiations with unions, restructuring provisions have been remeasured throughout the year. As a result of this, a credit of £61 million (2020: £123 million of costs) has been recognised as nonheadline within Other costs where the initial expense was recognised. As at 30 September 2021 there were unpaid amounts of £18 million (2020: £101 million) for those consultations which have not been finalised and settled.
In 2020 due to lower forecasted customer demand, the Group reassessed the fleet capacity and utilisation requirements leading to 34 leased aircraft being permanently removed from commercial service. These assets were not utilised again before being returned to the lessor at the end of their existing lease term and therefore did not generate any further economic benefit. As a result, an impairment charge of £37 million was recognised in 2020 for these aircraft and was categorised as non-headline in the income statement, along with an equivalent reduction within right of use assets.
This relates to hedge accounting ineffectiveness for items currently held in fair value and cash flow hedge relationships, and the cumulative fair value of derivatives at the time of being discontinued from a previous hedge accounting relationship.
In accordance with IFRS 9, hedge effectiveness testing is performed on a regular, periodic basis. For cash flow hedges this includes an assessment of highly probable future cash exposures with the amount compared to the notional of derivatives held in a hedge relationship. In the 2021 financial year, due to the reduced commercial flying, easyJet was in an over-hedged position from both a jet fuel and FX perspective. As the forecast exposures were no longer expected to occur, these previously hedged amounts no longer qualify for hedge accounting. In the 2021 financial year, cumulative fair value movement of a £25 million loss (2020: £311 million loss) related to these discontinued derivatives held in Other Comprehensive Income was immediately recorded in the income statement. Subsequent fair value movement of a £30 million gain on these discontinued derivatives was recognised as a headline item.
Additionally, fair value adjustments of £1 million (2020: £nil) were recorded during the period related to hedge ineffectiveness on hedges of foreign currency denominated borrowings that continue to be effective hedge relationships. This hedge ineffectiveness arises as the value of hedged items are adjusted for changes in fair value attributable to the hedged risks, which are not perfectly offset by the fair value change on the hedging instruments due to factors such as in counterparty credit risk, cash flow timing or amount changes.
This relates to foreign exchange gains or losses arising from the re-translation of monetary assets and liabilities held in the statement of financial position, which have been reclassified as headline items in the current year (see Voluntary change in policy section of note 1). A £9 million gain was recognised as a headline item (2020: £5 million charge recognised as non-headline).
Tax on loss on ordinary activities
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Current tax | ||
| Adjustments in respect of UK tax for prior years | 5 | (1) |
| Foreign tax | 4 | 6 |
| Total current tax charge | 9 | 5 |
| Deferred tax | ||
| Temporary differences relating to property, plant and equipment | (36) | 41 |
| Other temporary differences | (189) | (275) |
| Adjustments in respect of prior years | 7 | (1) |
| Remeasurement of opening balances due to change in tax rates | 31 | 36 |
| Total deferred tax credit | (187) | (199) |
| Total tax credit | (178) | (194) |
| Effective tax rate | 17.2% | 15.3% |
The tax for the year is lower than (2020: lower than) the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK as set out below:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Loss before tax | (1,036) | (1,273) |
| Tax credit at 19.0% (2020: 19.0%) | (197) | (242) |
| Expenses not deductible for tax purposes | 2 | 1 |
| Share-based payments | 2 | (1) |
| Adjustments in respect of prior years - current tax | 5 | (1) |
| Adjustments in respect of prior years - deferred tax | 7 | (1) |
| Difference in applicable rates for current and deferred tax | (54) | – |
| Attributable to rates other than standard UK rate | 2 | 1 |
| Change in substantively enacted tax rate | 31 | 36 |
| Movement in provisions | (1) | (1) |
| IFRS 16 restricted gain | 25 | 14 |
| Total tax credit | (178) | (194) |
Current tax payable at 30 September 2021 amounted to £2 million (2020: £7 million receivable). This is related to tax payable in other European jurisdictions.
During the year ended 30 September 2021, net cash tax received amounted to £1 million (2020: £13 million).
The Finance Act 2016 included legislation to reduce the main rate of UK corporation tax from 20% to 19% from 1 April 2017 and to 17% from 1 April 2020. The rate reduction to 17% was subsequently reversed by the Finance Act 2020, such that the main rate of UK corporation tax from 1 April 2021 remains at 19%. The Finance Act 2021 confirmed an increase of UK corporation tax rate from 19% to 25% with effect from 1 April 2023 and this was substantively enacted by the statement of financial position date and therefore included in these financial statements. Temporary differences have been remeasured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to apply when the liability is settled or the asset realised.
Tax on items recognised directly in other comprehensive income/(loss) or shareholders' equity:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Charge/(credit) to other comprehensive income/(loss) | ||
| Deferred tax on change in fair value of cash flow hedges | (93) | 56 |
| Deferred tax on post-employment benefit | (4) | – |
The net deferred tax (asset)/liability in the statement of financial position is as follows:
| Accelerated capital allowances £ million |
Short-term timing differences £ million |
Fair value (gains)/ losses £ million |
Share-based payments £ million |
Post employment benefit obligation £ million |
Trading loss £ million |
Total £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2020 | 386 | (7) | (43) | (2) | (8) | (275) | 51 |
| Charged/(credited) to income statement |
(13) | (19) | 1 | (1) | (5) | (150) | (187) |
| Charged to other comprehensive loss | – | – | 93 | – | 4 | – | 97 |
| At 30 September 2021 | 373 | (26) | 51 | (3) | (9) | (425) | (39) |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and it is the intention to settle these on a net basis.
| Accelerated capital allowances £ million |
Short-term timing differences £ million |
Fair value (gains)/losses £ million |
Share-based payments £ million |
Post employment benefit obligation £ million |
Trading loss £ million |
Total £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2019 | 308 | (1) | 14 | (8) | (8) | – | 305 |
| Charged/(credited) to income statement |
78 | (6) | – | 5 | – | (275) | (198) |
| Charged/(credited) to other comprehensive income |
– | – | (57) | 1 | – | – | (56) |
| At 30 September 2020 | 386 | (7) | (43) | (2) | (8) | (275) | 51 |
Basic loss per share has been calculated by dividing the total loss for the year by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year after adjusting for shares held in employee benefit trusts.
On 9 September 2021 the Company invited its shareholders to subscribe to a rights issue of 301,260,394 ordinary shares at an issue price of 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held, with such shares issued on 28 September 2021. As a result of this rights issue in September 2021, the comparative loss per share has been restated having applied the relevant bonus factor to the calculator of the weighted average number of shares.
The rights issue resulted in £1,235 million of gross proceeds. Shares totalling 280.2 million were taken up by existing shareholders (93%) with the remaining rump of 21.0 million shares being underwritten. As at 30 September 2021, there were £91 million of proceeds outstanding, which have been subsequently received.
To calculate diluted loss per share, the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue has been adjusted to assume conversion of all dilutive potential shares. Share options granted to employees where the exercise price is less than the average market price of the Company's ordinary shares during the year are considered to be antidilutive potential shares. Where share options are exercisable based on performance criteria and those performance criteria have been met during the year, these options are included in the calculation of dilutive potential shares. The calculation of diluted earnings per share does not assume conversion, exercise, or other issue of potential ordinary shares that would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share.
Headline basic and diluted loss per share are also presented, based on headline loss for the year. For details on share capital and the rights issue in the year, please refer to note 20.
Loss per share is based on:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Headline loss for the year | (900) | (725) |
| Total loss for the year | (858) | (1,079) |
| 2021 million |
2020 Restated million |
|
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to calculate basic loss per share | 539 | 484 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to calculate diluted loss per share | 539 | 484 |
| Loss per share | 2021 million |
2020 Restated million |
| Basic | (159.0) | (222.9) |
| Diluted | (159.0) | (222.9) |
| Headline loss per share | 2021 million pence |
2020 Restated million pence |
| Basic | (166.9) | (149.7) |
| Diluted | (166.9) | (149.7) |
Segmental Analysis:
| Year ended 30 September 2021 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Airline £ million |
Holidays £ million |
Transactions £ million |
Group £ million |
| 1,424 | 41 | (7) | 1,458 |
| (1,595) | (50) | 7 | (1,638) |
| (371) | – | – | (371) |
| (582) | (3) | – | (585) |
| (1,124) | (12) | – | (1,136) |
| 100 | – | – | 100 |
| (1,024) | (12) | – | (1,036) |
| Intergroup |
| Year ended 30 September 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intergroup | ||||
| Airline £ million |
Holidays £ million |
Transactions £ million |
Group £ million |
|
| Revenue | 2,995 | 18 | (4) | 3,009 |
| Operating costs excl fuel | (2,520) | (45) | 4 | (2,561) |
| Fuel | (721) | – | – | (721) |
| Ownership costs | (562) | – | – | (562) |
| Headline loss before tax | (808) | (27) | – | (835) |
| Non-headline items | (441) | 3 | – | (438) |
| Total loss before tax | (1,249) | (24) | – | (1,273) |
The intergroup transaction column represents intercompany revenues from Airline to holidays which are recorded at arm's length and are eliminated on consolidation. Individual cost lines are not reported separately as these are not key metrics reported to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM). Assets and liabilities are not allocated to individual segments and are not separately reported to or reviewed by the CODM, and therefore these have not been disclosed. Interest income and expenditure are not allocated to segments as this activity is driven by the central treasury function which manages the cash position of the Group.
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 413 | 1,154 |
| Southern Europe | 619 | 1,065 |
| Northern Europe | 411 | 740 |
| Other | 15 | 50 |
| 1,458 | 3,009 |
Geographical revenue is allocated according to the location of the first departure airport on each booking.
Southern Europe comprises countries lying wholly or mainly south of the border between Italy and Switzerland, plus France.
easyJet holidays revenue is generated wholly from the United Kingdom.
easyJet's non-current assets comprise its fleet of 183 (2020: 215) owned and 125 (2020: 127) leased aircraft, giving a total fleet of 308 at 30 September 2021 (2020: 342). In addition to this easyJet was storing 12 aircraft under power by the hour agreements (2020: nil). 27 aircraft (2020: 29) are registered in Switzerland, 119 (2020: 125) are registered in Austria and the remaining 174 (2020: 188) are registered in the United Kingdom.
No dividend was paid in the year ending 30 September 2021. An ordinary dividend of 43.9 pence per share, or £174 million, in respect of the year ended 30 September 2019 was paid in the year ended 30 September 2020.
| Other intangible assets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwill £ million |
Landing rights £ million |
Computer software £ million |
Total £ million |
|
| Cost | ||||
| At 1 October 2020 | 365 | 168 | 96 | 264 |
| Additions | – | – | 9 | 9 |
| Disposals | – | – | (5) | (5) |
| At 30 September 2021 | 365 | 168 | 100 | 268 |
| Amortisation | ||||
| At 1 October 2020 | – | – | 32 | 32 |
| Charge for the year | – | – | 24 | 24 |
| Disposals | – | – | (5) | (5) |
| At 30 September 2021 | – | – | 51 | 51 |
| Net book value | ||||
| At 30 September 2021 | 365 | 168 | 49 | 217 |
| At 1 October 2020 | 365 | 168 | 64 | 232 |
| Other intangible assets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwill £ million |
Landing rights £ million |
Computer software £ million |
Total £ million |
|
| Cost | ||||
| At 1 October 2019 | 365 | 132 | 100 | 232 |
| Additions | – | 36 | – | 36 |
| Transfer from property, plant and equipment | – | – | 37 | 37 |
| Disposals | – | – | (41) | (41) |
| At 30 September 2020 | 365 | 168 | 96 | 264 |
| Amortisation | ||||
| At 1 October 2019 | – | – | 36 | 36 |
| Charge for the year | – | – | 18 | 18 |
| Disposals | – | – | (22) | (22) |
| At 30 September 2020 | – | – | 32 | 32 |
| Net book value | ||||
| At 30 September 2020 | 365 | 168 | 64 | 232 |
| At 1 October 2019 | 365 | 132 | 64 | 196 |
Included within computer software, were are internally generated intangibles of £8 million (2020: £7 million).
The recoverable amount of goodwill and other assets with indefinite expected useful lives has been determined based on value in use calculations for the airline route network cash generating unit, which holds these assets.
Pre-tax cash flow projections have been derived from the strategic plan presented to the Board for the period up to 2026, using the following key assumptions:
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-tax discount rate (derived from weighted average cost of capital) | 11.3% | 8.5% |
| Fuel price (US dollars per metric tonne) | 696 | 450 |
| Long-term economic growth rate | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Exchange rates: | ||
| US dollar | 1.35 | 1.29 |
| Euro | 1.16 | 1.10 |
| Swiss franc | 1.26 | 1.19 |
The discount rate has been calculated based on the capital asset pricing model using external inputs where relevant and the current debt structure of the Group. The change in discount rate year on year reflects the change in gearing of the group and the change in tax rate. Both fuel price and exchange rates are volatile in nature. Exchange rates and fuel price are based on spot rates as at 30 September 2021. The increase year on year (see in the table above) reflects the change in underlying fuel prices, however in preparing its assessment management have assumed that fuel uplifts from a 2019 baseline can be recovered, with any increase in costs being passed on to customers. Operating margins are sensitive to significant changes in the timing and ability of increases to be passed through to the customer.
Cash flow projections beyond the forecast period have been extrapolated using an estimated average of long-term economic growth rates for the principal countries in which easyJet operates. The future impact of climate change on the business has been incorporated into strategic plans, including the estimated financial impact within the base case cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbonoffsetting, the future estimated price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage.
The headroom during the year has decreased primarily due to the increase in the pre-tax discount rate.
Stress testing has been performed on key inputs to the value in use calculation, including the assumptions listed above and the strategic plan used as the base for the calculation. The impairment model is sensitive to a sustained significant adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates and forecast operating profits to the extent that no other compensating action is taken. It has been assumed that any significant future fuel price increase would be recovered through revenue pass through. Individual scenarios that have been deemed reasonably probable do not give rise to an impairment. These scenarios include +/-5% on Euro and USD rates, +100 bps increase in weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and a reduced long term growth rate of 1%.
| 30 September | 30 September | |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | |
| £ million | £ million | |
| Carbon offsetting VER | 15 | 6 |
| EU and UK ETS permits | 125 | 6 |
| 140 | 12 |
| Owned assets | Right of use assets held under | leasing arrangements | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aircraft and spares £ million |
Land and Buildings £ million |
Other £ million |
Aircraft and spares £ million |
Other £ million |
Total £ million |
|
| Cost | ||||||
| At 1 October 2020 | 5,520 | 44 | 44 | 1,692 | 37 | 7,337 |
| Additions | 112 | – | 28 | 148 | 8 | 296 |
| Transfers | 64 | – | – | (64) | – | – |
| Aircraft sold and leased back | (795) | – | (15) | 559 | – | (251) |
| Disposals | (99) | – | (2) | – | – | (101) |
| At 30 September 2021 | 4,802 | 44 | 55 | 2,335 | 45 | 7,281 |
| Accumulated depreciation and impairment | ||||||
| At 1 October 2020 | 1,187 | – | 12 | 1,062 | 23 | 2,284 |
| Charge for the year | 227 | – | 7 | 216 | 6 | 456 |
| Transfers | 23 | – | – | (23) | – | – |
| Aircraft sold and leased back | (120) | – | – | – | – | (120) |
| Disposals | (74) | – | – | – | – | (74) |
| At 30 September 2021 | 1,243 | – | 19 | 1,255 | 29 | 2,546 |
| Net book value | ||||||
| At 30 September 2021 | 3,559 | 44 | 36 | 1,080 | 16 | 4,735 |
| At 1 October 2020 | 4,333 | 44 | 32 | 630 | 14 | 5,053 |
| Aircraft and spares £ million |
Land and Buildings £ million |
Other £ million |
Aircraft and spares £ million |
Other £ million |
Total £ million |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,720 | 34 | 76 | 1,298 | 34 | 7,162 |
| 559 | – | 100 | 64 | 3 | 726 |
| 107 | 10 | (41) | – | (37) | |
| (851) | – | – | 371 | – | (480) |
| (15) | – | – | – | (34) | |
| 5,520 | 44 | 44 | 1,692 | 37 | 7,337 |
| 1,147 | – | 18 | 818 | 16 | 1,999 |
| 251 | – | 5 | 222 | 7 | 485 |
| 15 | – | – | (15) | – | – |
| – | – | – | 37 | – | 37 |
| (220) | – | – | – | – | (220) |
| (6) | – | – | – | (17) | |
| 1,187 | – | 12 | 1,062 | 23 | 2,284 |
| 4,333 | 44 | 32 | 630 | 14 | 5,053 |
| 4,573 | 34 | 58 | 480 | 18 | 5,163 |
| Owned assets | (113) (19) (11) |
Right of use assets held under leasing arrangements |
The net book value of aircraft includes £132 million (2020: £281 million) relating to advance and option payments for future deliveries. This amount is not depreciated.
As at 30 September 2021, easyJet was contractually committed to the acquisition of 101 (2020: 101) Airbus 320 family aircraft, with a total estimated list price* of US\$ 12.31 billion (2020: US\$ 12.16 billion) before escalations and discounts for delivery in financial years 2022 (8 aircraft), 2023 (7 aircraft) and 2024 (18 aircraft).
The 'Other' categories comprise of leasehold improvements, computer hardware, leasehold property and fixtures, fittings and equipment and work in progress in respect of tangible and intangible projects.
Assets of £934 million are pledged as security for the drawn portion of the UKEF backed facility (2020: £1,066 million pledged as security for the Revolving Credit Facility and term loans).
* Airbus no longer publishes list prices. The estimated list price is based on the last available list price published in January 2018 and escalated by Airbus' standard escalation from January 2018 to January 2021 of 7.3% (or 2.38% CAGR).
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| £ million | £ million | |
| Lessor maintenance contributions | 75 | 92 |
| Deferred consideration and deposits held by aircraft lessors | 60 | 41 |
| 135 | 133 |
Lessor maintenance contribution assets arise to compensate easyJet for the delivery of a mid-life aircraft, where a lessor has agreed to make a contribution to easyJet's maintenance costs to reflect the cycles already flown by the aircraft at the point it is delivered to easyJet. Depending on the contract terms, payment will be made either at the maintenance event date or at the lease return date. This has not been considered for impairment as the leased aircraft held by easyJet exceeds the value of the contribution due.
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 45 | 22 |
| Less provision for loss allowance | (1) | (4) |
| 44 | 18 | |
| Prepayments | 93 | 84 |
| Accrued income | 5 | 1 |
| Recoverable supplemental rent (pledged as collateral) | - | 10 |
| Other receivables | 149 | 80 |
| 291 | 193 |
Within the provision for loss allowance, £4 million (2020: £4 million) has been charged to the income statement, with £1 million (2020: £1 million) being utilised in the 2021 financial year.
Within other receivables, an amount of £91 million is due from the rights issue funding (2020: £nil).
Information about the impairment of trade receivables and the Group's exposure to credit risk can be found in note 25..
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents (original maturity less than three months) | 3,536 | 2,284 |
| Money market deposits (original maturity more than three months) | – | 32 |
| Current restricted cash | 13 | 14 |
| Non-current restricted cash | 1 | 5 |
| 3,550 | 2,335 |
Carrying value is not significantly different from fair value.
Restricted cash comprises:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amount held in escrow accounts for legal cases | 4 | 5 |
| ATOL Licence non-pooled account | 9 | 14 |
| Cash held as bank guarantee collateral | 1 | – |
| 14 | 19 |
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trade payables | 217 | 323 |
| Accruals | 556 | 379 |
| Taxes and social security | 25 | 33 |
| Other payables | 330 | 507 |
| 1,128 | 1,242 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined | Unearned £ million |
Other £ million |
Unearned £ million |
Other £ million |
| Opening contract liabilities | 614 | 397 | 1,094 | 8 |
| Revenue deferred during the year | 1,639 | – | 2,430 | – |
| Revenue recognised during the year | (1,409) | – | (2,910) | – |
| Additional contract liability during the year | – | 361 | – | 1,271 |
| Reduction in contract liability during the year | – | (475) | – | (898) |
| Foreign exchange impact during the year | – | (6) | – | 16 |
| Closing contract liabilities | 844 | 277 | 614 | 397 |
Other contract liabilities consist of amounts transferred from unearned revenue to other payables due to the cancellation of flights. This liability includes customer vouchers outstanding and amounts where customers have not yet requested a refund, voucher or flight transfer.
| Current £ million |
Non-current £ million |
Total £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| At 30 September 2021 | |||
| Eurobonds | – | 2,303 | 2,303 |
| Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) | 300 | – | 300 |
| Commercial Paper (UK Export Finance) | – | 764 | 764 |
| 300 | 3,067 | 3,367 | |
| Current £ million |
Non-current £ million |
Total £ million |
|
| At 30 September 2020 | |||
| Eurobonds | – | 1,356 | 1,356 |
| Drawn down amounts on Revolving Credit Facility | 387 | – | 387 |
| Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) | 600 | – | 600 |
| Bank loans | – | 388 | 388 |
| 987 | 1,744 | 2,731 |
Amounts above are shown net of issue costs or discounted amounts which are amortised at the effective interest rate over the life of the debt instruments.
On 7 January 2016, the UK Listing Authority approved a prospectus relating to the establishment of a £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme of easyJet plc. Under this programme, on 9 February 2016 easyJet plc issued notes amounting to €500 million for a seven-year term with a fixed annual coupon rate of 1.750%. On 18 October 2016 easyJet plc issued additional notes amounting to €500 million for a seven-year term with a fixed annual coupon rate of 1.125%. On 11 June 2019 easyJet plc issued additional notes amounting to €500 million for a six-year term with a fixed annual coupon rate of 0.875%.
The three €500 million Eurobonds issued on 9 February 2016, 18 October 2016 and 11 June 2019 are discussed within note 25.
On 10 February 2015 easyJet signed a \$500 million Revolving Credit Facility which was due to mature in February 2022. On 9 April 2020 easyJet fully drew down this \$500 million Revolving Credit Facility, secured against aircraft assets. This was repaid in January 2021.
On 6 April 2020 easyJet issued a £600 million Commercial Paper through the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF). This is an unsecured, short-term paper issued at a discount, of which £300 million was repaid in March 2021 and the remaining £300 million was repaid in November 2021. On 16 April 2020 easyJet secured two term loans with separate counterparty banks for £200 million and \$245 million respectively. Both loans were secured against aircraft assets and were due to mature in February 2022, but have since been repaid as set out below.
In January 2021 easyJet entered into a new five-year term loan facility of \$1.87 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported by a partial guarantee from UK Export Finance under their Export Development Guarantee scheme. easyJet drew down \$1.05 billion from the UKEF backed facility in January, utilising these funds to repay and cancel the fully drawn \$500 million Revolving Credit Facility and repaying term loans of \$245 million and £200 million.
easyJet issued a €1.2 billion seven year bond with an annual coupon of 1.875% in March 2021, under its Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) Programme. The bond was issued out of easyJet FinCo B.V registered in the Netherlands and was guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited (EACL) and easyJet plc.
On 9 September 2021 easyJet signed a \$400 million Revolving Credit Facility with a minimum four-year term, which was undrawn as at 30 September 2021.
easyJet holds aircraft under leasing arrangements that are recognised as right of use assets and lease liabilities, with remaining lease terms ranging up to 10 years. easyJet is contractually obliged to carry out maintenance on these aircraft, and the cost of this is provided based on the number of flying hours and cycles operated. Further details are given in note 1.
Information in respect of right of use assets, including the carrying amount, additions and depreciation, are set out in note 11 to these financial statements. Information in respect of the carrying value and interest arising on lease liabilities is set out in note 24 and note 2 respectively. A maturity analysis of lease liabilities is set out below.
easyJet also enters into short-term leases and low-value leases which are not recognised as right of use assets and lease liabilities. The expense recognised in the period in relation to these leases is disclosed below.
| Year ending | Year ending | |
|---|---|---|
| 30 September | 30 September | |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
| Amounts recognised in the statement of cash flows | £ million | £ million |
| Capital payments | (261) | (230) |
| Interest payments | (41) | (20) |
| Lease liabilities | 30 September 2021 £ million |
30 September 2020 £ million |
|---|---|---|
| Maturity analysis - contractual undiscounted cash flows | ||
| Less than one year | (251) | (238) |
| One to five years | (730) | (382) |
| More than five years | (316) | (160) |
| (1,297) | (780) |
| 30 September | 30 September | |
|---|---|---|
| Lease liabilities included in the statement of financial position | 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
| Current | (189) | (224) |
| Non-current | (890) | (486) |
| Total | (1,079) | (710) |
| Amounts recognised in income statement | Year ending 30 September 2021 £ million |
Year ending 30 September 2020 £ million |
|---|---|---|
| Interest on lease liabilities | 42 | 24 |
| Expenses relating to low-value leases | 5 | 6 |
| Expenses relating to short-term wet leases | (14) | 17 |
| 33 | 47 |
The £14 million credit recognised as Expenses relating to short term wet leases relates to the release of an accrual recognised in financial year 2020 which was no longer required.
| Maintenance provisions £ million |
Provisions for customer claims £ million |
Restructuring £ million |
Other provisions £ million |
Total provisions £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2020 | 597 | 39 | 101 | 2 | 739 |
| Exchange adjustments | (23) | - | (3) | – | (26) |
| Credited to income statement | (20) | (14) | (65) | – | (99) |
| Charged income statement | 71 | 4 | – | 12 | 87 |
| Related to aircraft sold and leased back | 132 | - | – | – | 132 |
| Unwinding of discount | (20) | - | – | – | (20) |
| Utilised | (187) | (8) | (15) | – | (210) |
| At 30 September 2021 | 550 | 21 | 18 | 14 | 603 |
Maintenance provisions comprise of maintenance costs arisen from legal and constructive obligations relating to the condition of the aircraft when returned to the lessor. Provisions for customer claims comprise amounts payable to customers who make claims in respect of flight delays and cancellations, and refunds of air passenger duty or similar charges. Restructuring and other provisions include amounts in respect of potential liabilities for employee-related matters and litigation which arose in the normal course of business.
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Current | 183 | 407 |
| Non-current | 420 | 332 |
| 603 | 739 |
The split of the current/non-current maintenance provision is based on the current expected maintenance event timings. If actual aircraft usage varies from expectation the timing of the utilisation of the maintenance provision could result in a material change in the classification between current and non-current.
Maintenance provisions are expected to be utilised within 12 years. Provisions for customer claims, restructuring, and other provisions could be fully utilised within one year from 30 September 2021 and therefore are classified as current.
Due to the minimum guarantees in place under Swiss law, the Swiss pension plan meets IAS 19 requirements to be treated as a defined benefit plan under IAS 19 despite the scheme having many attributes akin to a defined contribution scheme. The Swiss Federal Council requires that a guaranteed minimum interest rate must be achieved (currently 1%), plus a guaranteed minimum conversion rate to be applied to accumulated pension on retirement (currently 6.8%). These guarantees mean that the scheme is accounted for as a defined benefit scheme under IAS 19. The scheme remains open to new employees.
The easyJet portion of the current service costs and the net interest cost are charged to the consolidated income statement in the year in which they relate. Net interest is determined by multiplying the net defined benefit liability by the discount rate at the start of the annual reporting period, adjusted for any contributions and benefit payments in the period. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and the consolidated balance reflects the net surplus or deficit at the statement of financial position date.
The defined benefit obligation is calculated using the projected unit credit method. This reflects service rendered by employees to the dates of valuation and incorporates actuarial assumptions including discount rates used in determining the present value of benefits, projected rates of remuneration growth and mortality rates. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows using yields of high-quality corporate bonds. Management base the discount rate on the bond yield on the Swiss bond market over 15 to 20 years, reflecting the currency in which the benefits will be paid, and maturity terms approximating to the terms of the related pension obligation.
The key financial assumptions used to calculate the Swiss scheme liabilities under IAS 19 as at 30 September were:
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Discount rate | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Salary increase | 1.00% | 1.00% |
| Demographic assumptions | BVG 2020 GT | BVG 2015 GT |
The demographic assumptions including mortality assumptions used for the liability calculation are based on the most recent BVG 2020 tables (2020: BVG 2015 tables). These tables are based on the experience during the period 2015 to 2019 on 15 of the largest autonomous Swiss pension plans and are considered to be the best estimate available to management.
The scheme asset values are sensitive to market conditions. The scheme liabilities are sensitive to actuarial assumptions used to determine the scheme obligations. Significant changes in these assumptions could potentially have a material impact in the consolidated statement of financial position. The main assumptions are the discount rate, the rate of salary increase and the life expectancy rate. The following table provides an estimate of the potential impact on the pension scheme of changing these assumptions::
| Increase / (decrease) in defined benefit obligation |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | ||
| Discount rate | +0.5% | (6.6%) | (7.3%) |
| -0.5% | +7.6% | 8.5% | |
| Salary increase | +0.5% | +1.0% | 1.1% |
| -0.5% | (0.9%) | (1.0%) | |
| Life expectancy | + 1 year | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| - 1 year | (0.6%) | (0.7%) |
easyJet has an affiliation contract with Swiss Life Collective BVG Foundation. The assets of all affiliated companies are pooled which diversifies the associated risk and the scheme assets represent the share in this Foundation. The Collective controls the asset management, is exposed to the risk and guarantees the savings capitals under the contract in place. The Board of Trustees with the elected employees' and employers' representatives decide the investment strategy. The current agreement is fully insured by Swiss Life, which means that all underfunding, investment and longevity risks are transferred from easyJet to Swiss Life over the term of the policy i.e. over the term of the policy when members retire, all payments are the liability of the pension scheme.
The amounts recognised in the consolidated income statement are as follows:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Current service costs defined benefit | 8 | 9 |
| Interest cost on net defined benefit obligation | – | 1 |
| Interest income on defined benefit asset | – | (1) |
| Past service costs | (1) | – |
| Plan curtailment gain* | – | (3) |
| Net defined benefit cost recognised in the income statement | 7 | 6 |
* The curtailment was recognised as a result of restructuring and was presented as a non-headline item in the income statement.
Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income/(loss):
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Actuarial gain | (3) | (2) |
| Return on plan assets | (2) | (1) |
| Recognised in the statement of other comprehensive income | (5) | (3) |
Movement in net deficit in the year:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Net deficit of the plan at 1 October | 45 | 47 |
| Net defined benefit cost recognised in the income statement | 7 | 6 |
| Net defined benefit gain recognised in other comprehensive income/(loss) | (5) | (3) |
| Company contributions | (7) | (7) |
| Foreign exchange | (3) | 2 |
| Statement of financial position net deficit as at 30 September | 37 | 45 |
The prepayment represents cash paid over to Swiss Life in advance and not yet utilised in the pension scheme; this amount is consistent year on year.
Expected employer cash contribution from the Company in the 2022 financial year is expected to be CHF 8 million (2020: CHF 8 million). Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation are as follows:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Present value of obligation at 1 October | 153 | 147 |
| Current service cost | 8 | 9 |
| Member contributions | 4 | 4 |
| Interest costs on defined benefit obligation | – | 1 |
| Contributions paid by plan participants | 4 | 2 |
| Benefit payments from scheme assets | (4) | (5) |
| Past service cost | (1) | – |
| Plan curtailment | – | (3) |
| Plan settlement | – | (5) |
| Actuarial gain arising from financial adjustments | – | (2) |
| Actuarial gain arising from experience adjustments | (3) | – |
| Foreign exchange | (9) | 5 |
| Present value of obligation at 30 September | 152 | 153 |
Changes in the fair value of the scheme assets are as follows:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Fair value of the scheme asset as at 1 October | 108 | 100 |
| Interest income on the defined benefit plan assets | – | 1 |
| Contributions paid by Company | 7 | 7 |
| Contributions paid by employees | 4 | 4 |
| Contributions paid by plan participants | 4 | 2 |
| Benefits paid from plan assets | (4) | (5) |
| Return on plan assets | 2 | 1 |
| Plan settlement | – | (5) |
| Foreign exchange | (6) | 3 |
| Fair value of the pension assets as at 30 September | 115 | 108 |
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Number of active participants | 987 | 1,043 |
| Average age of active insured members in years | 40 | 39 |
| Average time remaining before active employees reach final age in years | 9 | 10 |
| Average active life expectancy in years | 53 | 54 |
| Average years of service in years | 9 | 8 |
The weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation of the Swiss pension scheme is 15 years (2020: 16 years).
The assets held do not have a quoted market price as are within the affiliation contract with Swiss Life Collective BVG Foundation.
Expected benefit payments during fiscal year ending 30 September:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 year | 8 | 7 |
| 2 years | 11 | 8 |
| 3 years | 11 | 9 |
| 4 years | 11 | 7 |
| 5 years | 13 | 9 |
| 6 up to 10 years | 53 | 38 |
| Number | Nominal value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 million |
2020 £ million |
2021 million |
2020 £ million |
|
| Authorised | ||||
| At 30 September | ||||
| Ordinary shares of 27 2 /7 pence each * |
– | 458 | – | 125 |
| Allotted, called up and fully paid | ||||
| At 30 September | 758 | 457 | 207 | 125 |
* At the AGM held on 23 December 2020, the shareholders of the Company approved the amendments to the Articles of Association which included removal of Authorised Share Capital to bring the share capital authorities in line with the market practice and to provide flexibility to allot more shares.
On 9 September 2021 the Company invited its shareholders to subscribe to a rights issue of 301,260,394 ordinary shares at an issue price of 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held, with such shares issued on 28 September 2021.
The rights issue resulted in £1,235 million of gross proceeds. Shares totalling 280.2 million were taken up by existing shareholders (93%) with the remaining rump of 21.0m shares being underwritten. As at 30 September 2021, there were £91 million of proceeds outstanding, which have been subsequently received.
In June 2020, easyJet successfully raised net proceeds of £409 million through an equity placing of new shares.
easyJet's employee benefit trusts hold the following shares. The cost of these has been deducted from retained earnings:
| 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of shares (million) | 2 | 2 |
| Cost (£ million) | 18 | 27 |
| Market value at year end (£ million) | 11 | 11 |
easyJet operates the following share incentive schemes, all of which are equity settled. The change in the number of awards outstanding and weighted average exercise prices during the year, and the number exercisable at each year end were as follows:
| Grant date | 1 October 2020 million |
Granted million |
Rights issue million |
Forfeited million |
Exercised million |
30 September 2021 million |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Term Incentive Plan | ||||||
| 19 December 2016 | 0.1 | – | – | (0.1) | – | – |
| 19 December 2017 | 0.5 | – | – | (0.5) | – | – |
| 19 December 2018 | 1.1 | – | 0.2 | (0.3) | (0.1) | 0.9 |
| 19 December 2019 | 0.8 | – | 0.1 | (0.3) | – | 0.6 |
| 29 December 2020 | – | 0.5 | 0.1 | – | – | 0.6 |
| Restricted Stock Unit | ||||||
| 29 December 2020 - 2 year | – | 0.3 | – | – | – | 0.3 |
| 29 December 2020 - 3 year | – | 0.8 | 0.1 | – | – | 0.9 |
| Restricted Share Plan | ||||||
| 19 December 2016 | 0.1 | – | – | – | – | 0.1 |
| Save As You Earn scheme | ||||||
| 1 July 2017 | 0.7 | – | – | (0.7) | – | – |
| 1 July 2018 | 0.2 | – | – | (0.1) | – | 0.1 |
| 1 July 2019 | 2.2 | – | 0.3 | (0.6) | – | 1.9 |
| 1 August 2020 | 4.9 | – | 0.8 | (0.4) | – | 5.3 |
| 1 August 2021 | – | 2.9 | 0.5 | – | – | 3.4 |
| Share Incentive Plans | 4.8 | – | 0.6 | (0.4) | (0.6) | 4.4 |
| 15.4 | 4.5 | 2.7 | (3.4) | (0.7) | 18.5 |
The plan is open, by invitation, to Executive Directors and senior management, and provides for annual awards of Performance Shares worth up to 250% of salary each year. The vesting of these shares is dependent on return on capital employed (ROCE), earnings per share (EPS) and/or total shareholder return (TSR) targets compared to FTSE-ranked companies at the start of the performance period. All awards have a three-year vesting period. 2021 awards are assessed on performance conditions measured over the three financial years ended 30 September 2023.
The plan is given to Executive Directors, and both senior and middle management, which provides for annual awards of Performance Shares worth up to 75% of salary each year. All awards have a two or three year vesting period of which the vesting conditions are continued employment.
The scheme is open to all employees on the UK payroll. Participants may elect to save up to £500 per month under a three-year savings contract. An option is granted by the Company to buy shares at a discount of 20% from market price at the time of the grant. At the end of the savings period, the option becomes exercisable for a period of six months. Employees who are not paid through the UK payroll may participate in the scheme under similar terms and conditions, albeit without the same tax benefits.
The plan is open to all employees on the UK payroll. Participants may invest up to £1,800 of their pre-tax salary each year to purchase Partnership Shares in easyJet. For each Partnership Share acquired, easyJet purchases a matching share up to a maximum value of £1,500 per annum. Employees must remain with easyJet for three years from the date of purchase of each Partnership Share in order to qualify for the Matching Share, and for five years for the shares to be transferred to them tax free. The employee is entitled to dividends on shares purchased, and to vote at shareholder meetings. With effect from 1 April 2020, easyJet ceased contributing a Matching Share to the scheme as a result of the cash constraints on the business.
Subject to Company performance, easyJet also issues free shares to UK employees under an approved share incentive plan of up to £3,000 per annum in value. There is a similar unapproved free shares scheme for international employees.
The fair value of grants under the Save As You Earn scheme are calculated by applying the Binomial Lattice option pricing model. The fair value of grants under the TSR based Long Term Incentive Plan is estimated under the Stochastic model (also known as the Monte Carlo model). The fair value of grants under all other schemes is the share price on the date of grant. The following assumptions are used:
easyJet undertook a Rights Issue in the year which had a dilutive effect on the share price. To compensate for the dilution in value, the number of options in each scheme was increased. At the date of modification, the Rights Issue was non beneficial to individuals as the option number increased by the same factor the share price decreased and therefore there are no incremental changes to the fair values.
| Grant date | Share Price £ |
Exercise Price £ |
Expected volatility % |
Option Life years |
Risk-free interest rate % |
Fair Value £ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Term Incentive Plan | ||||||
| 19 December 2016 - ROCE | 10.43 | – | – | – | – | 10.43 |
| 19 December 2016 - TSR | 10.43 | – | 35% | 3.0 | 1% | 5.21 |
| 19 December 2017 - ROCE | 13.77 | – | – | – | – | 13.77 |
| 19 December 2017 - EPS | 13.77 | – | – | – | – | 13.77 |
| 19 December 2017 - TSR | 13.77 | – | 34% | 3.0 | 1% | 6.89 |
| 19 December 2018 - EPS | 10.78 | – | – | – | – | 10.78 |
| 19 December 2018 - TSR | 10.78 | – | 47% | 3.0 | 1% | 5.39 |
| 19 December 2019 - EPS | 14.29 | – | – | – | – | 14.29 |
| 19 December 2019 - TSR | 14.29 | – | 53% | 3.0 | 1% | 7.15 |
| 29 December 2020 - TSR | 8.63 | – | 61% | 3.0 | – | 4.32 |
| Restricted Stock Unit | ||||||
| 29 December 2020 - RSU | 8.60 | – | – | – | – | 8.60 |
| Restricted Share Plan | ||||||
| 29 December 2016 | 10.43 | – | – | – | – | 10.43 |
| Save As You Earn scheme | ||||||
| 1 July 2017 | 12.11 | 9.7 | 31% | 3.5 | – | 2.84 |
| 1 July 2018 | 17.43 | 13.9 | 30% | 3.5 | 1% | 4.41 |
| 1 July 2019 | 10.03 | 8.0 | 33% | 3.5 | 1% | 2.70 |
| 1 August 2020 | 6.65 | 6.7 | 49% | 3.5 | – | 1.95 |
| 1 August 2021 | 9.53 | 7.6 | 59% | 3.5 | 1% | 3.96 |
Share price for LTIPs is the closing share price from the last working day prior to the date of grant.
Exercise price for the Save As You Earn scheme is set at a 20% (2020: 0%) discount from the share price at grant date.
Expected volatility is based on historical volatility over a period comparable to the expected life of each type of option.
Levels of early exercises and forfeitures are estimated using historical averages unless this is deemed unreasonable, in which case judgement is used.
The weighted average fair value of Matching Shares granted under the Share Incentive Plan during the year was £nil (2020: £12.51).
For grants under the Save As You Earn scheme, the dividend yield assumption is calculated based on the actual yield at the date of grant. For the options granted in 2021, the dividend yield assumption was 3% (2020: 2.5%, 2019: 4.5%, 2018: 3.2%, 2017: 4.2%).
The total share-based payment expense recognised for the year was £16 million (2020: £18 million). The share-based payment liability as at 30 September 2021 was £45 million (2020: £42 million).
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating loss | (910) | (899) |
| Adjustments for non-cash items: | ||
| Depreciation | 456 | 485 |
| Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangibles | 30 | 30 |
| Gain on sale and leaseback | (65) | (38) |
| Amortisation of intangible assets | 24 | 18 |
| Share-based payments | 16 | 17 |
| Impairment | – | 37 |
| Changes in working capital and other items of an operating nature: | ||
| (Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables | (8) | 101 |
| (Increase)/decrease in current intangible assets | (74) | 46 |
| (Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables | (187) | 173 |
| Increase/(decrease) in unearned revenue | 232 | (455) |
| Post-employment benefit contributions | (7) | – |
| (Decrease)/increase in provisions | (294) | 150 |
| Decrease in other non-current assets | 24 | 9 |
| Increase/(decrease) in derivative financial instruments | 9 | (215) |
| Decrease in non-current deferred income | (1) | (1) |
| 1 October 2020 £ million |
Fair value and foreign exchange £ million |
New debt raised in the year £ million |
Other loan issue costs £ million |
Net cash flow £ million |
30 September 2021 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,284 | (73) | – | – | 1,325 | 3,536 |
| Money market deposits | 32 | – | – | – | (32) | – |
| 2,316 | (73) | – | – | 1,293 | 3,536 | |
| Eurobond | (1,356) | 24 | (971) | – | (2,303) | |
| Drawn down amounts on Revolving Credit Facility | (387) | – | – | – | 387 | – |
| Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) | (600) | – | – | – | 300 | (300) |
| Bank loans | (388) | 76 | (833) | 23 | 358 | (764) |
| Lease liabilities | (710) | 63 | (693) | – | 261 | (1,079) |
| (3,441) | 163 | (2,497) | 23 | 1,306 | (4,446) | |
| Net debt | (1,125) | 90 | (2,497) | 23 | 2,599 | (910) |
Cash used in operations (755) (542)
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities, together with the carrying value at each reporting date, are as follows:
| Amortised cost Held at fair value |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 30 September 2021 | Financial assets £ million |
Financial liabilities £ million |
Fair value hedge £ million |
Cash flow hedge £ million |
Other financial instruments £ million |
Other (1) £ million |
Carrying Value £ million |
Fair Value £ million |
|
| Other non-current assets | 135 | – | – | – | – | – | 135 | 135 | |
| Trade and other receivables |
178 | – | – | – | – | 113 | 291 | 291 | |
| Trade and other payables | – | (826) | – | – | – | (302) | (1,128) | (1,128) | |
| Derivative financial instruments |
– | – | 53 | 153 | (3) | – | 203 | 203 | |
| Restricted cash | 14 | – | – | – | – | – | 14 | 14 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents |
1,932 | – | – | – | 1,604 | – | 3,536 | 3,536 | |
| Eurobonds (2) | – | (2,303) | – | – | – | – | (2,303) | (2,380) | |
| Other Borrowings (2) | – | (1,064) | – | – | – | – | (1,064) | (1,064) | |
| Lease liabilities | – | (1,079) | – | – | – | – | (1,079) | N/A | |
| Equity investments (3) | – | – | – | – | 30 | – | 30 | 30 |
| Amortised cost | Held at fair value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 30 September 2020 | Financial assets £ million |
Financial liabilities £ million |
Fair value hedge £ million |
Cash flow hedge £ million |
Other financial instruments £ million |
Other (1) £ million |
Carrying Value £ million |
Fair Value £ million |
| Other non-current assets | 133 | – | – | – | – | – | 133 | 133 |
| Trade and other receivables |
53 | – | – | – | – | 140 | 193 | 193 |
| Trade and other payables | – | (837) | – | – | – | (405) | (1,242) | (1,242) |
| Derivative financial instruments |
– | – | 82 | (310) | (99) | – | (327) | (327) |
| Restricted cash | 19 | – | – | – | – | – | 19 | 19 |
| Money market deposits | 32 | – | – | – | – | – | 32 | 32 |
| Cash and cash equivalents |
1,467 | – | – | – | 817 | – | 2,284 | 2,284 |
| Eurobonds (2) | – | (1,356) | – | – | – | – | (1,356) | (1,173) |
| Other Borrowings (2) | – | (1,375) | – | – | – | – | (1,375) | (1,375) |
| Lease liabilities | – | (710) | – | – | – | – | (710) | N/A |
| Equity investments (3) | – | – | – | – | 33 | – | 33 | 33 |
Information presented for the current year ended 30 September 2021 and comparative year ended 30 September 2020, is presented in accordance with IFRS 9.
Amounts disclosed in the 'Other' column are items that do not meet the definition of a financial instrument. They are disclosed to facilitate reconciliation of the
carrying values of financial instruments to line items presented in the statement of financial position.
The equity investment of £30 million (2020: £33 million) represents a 13.2% shareholding in a non‐listed entity, The Airline Group Limited. Valuation movements are designated as being fair valued through other comprehensive income due to the nature of the investment being held for strategic purposes. No dividend was received during the year (2020: £2 million).
Where available the fair values of financial instruments have been determined by reference to observable market prices where the instruments are traded. Where market prices are not available, the fair value has been estimated by discounting expected future cash flows at prevailing interest rates and by applying year end exchange rates (excluding The Airline Group Limited equity investment).
The fair values of the four Eurobonds are classified as level 1 of the IFRS 13 'Fair Value Measurement' fair value hierarchy (valuations taken as the closing market trade price for each respective Eurobond as on 30 September 2021). Apart from the equity investment, the remaining financial instruments for which fair value is disclosed in the table above, and derivative financial instruments, are classified as level 2.
The fair values of derivatives are calculated using observable market forward curves (e.g. forward foreign exchange rates, forward interest rates or forward jet fuel prices) and discounted to present value using risk free rates. The impacts of counterparty credit, crosscurrency basis and market volatility are also included where appropriate as part of the fair valuation.
The equity investment is classified as level 3 due to the use of forecast dividends which are discounted to present value. Though there are other level 2 inputs to the valuation, the discounted cash flow is a significant input which is not based on observable market data. The fair value is assessed at each reporting date based on the discounted cash flows and two other valuations calculated using a market approach and level 2 inputs. The fair value of £30 million was determined on this basis by an external valuation firm as at 30 September 2021 (2020: £33 million), representing a reduction of £3 million from the prior year which was recognised in other comprehensive income. If the level 3 forecast cash flows were 10% higher or lower the fair value would not increase/decrease by a significant amount.
The fair value measurement hierarchy levels have been defined as follows:
| At 30 September 2021 | Quantity million |
Non-current assets £ million |
Current assets £ million |
Current liabilities £ million |
Non-current liabilities £ million |
Total £ million |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Designated as cash flow hedges | ||||||
| US dollar | 804 | 1 | 7 | (10) | (1) | (3) |
| Euro | 442 | – | 3 | (12) | – | (9) |
| Swiss franc | 56 | – | 1 | – | – | 1 |
| Jet fuel | 1 | 25 | 172 | – | – | 197 |
| Cross-currency interest rate swaps | 888 | – | – | – | (33) | (33) |
| Designated as fair value hedges | ||||||
| Cross-currency interest rate swaps | 379 | 53 | – | – | – | 53 |
| Designated as fair value through profit or loss | ||||||
| US dollar | 762 | 7 | 2 | (8) | (3) | (2) |
| Euro | 79 | – | – | (1) | – | (1) |
| 86 | 185 | (31) | (37) | 203 |
| At 30 September 2020 | Quantity million |
Non-current assets £ million |
Current assets £ million |
Current liabilities £ million |
Non-current liabilities £ million |
Total £ million |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Designated as cash flow hedges | ||||||
| US dollar | 376 | 1 | 2 | (2) | (2) | (1) |
| Euro | 668 | 1 | 5 | (6) | (7) | (7) |
| Swiss franc | 188 | – | – | (4) | (2) | (6) |
| South African rand | 26 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Jet fuel | 2 | 1 | – | (228) | (71) | (298) |
| Cross-currency interest rate swaps | 888 | 3 | – | – | – | 3 |
| Designated as fair value hedges | ||||||
| Cross-currency interest rate swaps | 379 | 82 | – | – | – | 82 |
| Designated as fair value through profit or loss | ||||||
| US dollar | 600 | 1 | 1 | (8) | (3) | (9) |
| Euro | 432 | – | 11 | (3) | – | 8 |
| Swiss francs | 197 | – | – | (4) | – | (4) |
| Jet | 1 | – | 2 | (97) | – | (95) |
| 89 | 21 | (352) | (85) | (327) |
For foreign currency forward contracts, quantity represents the absolute gross nominal value of currency contracts held, disclosed in the contract foreign currency. The cross-currency interest rate swap contracts are presented at the Sterling notional amount. For jet fuel derivative contracts quantity represents absolute contracted metric tonnes.
The majority of foreign exchange and jet fuel transactions designated as a cash flow hedge are expected to occur on various dates within the next 18 months. Accumulated gains and losses resulting from these transactions are deferred in the hedging reserve. They will be recognised in the income statement in the periods that the hedged transactions impact the income statement. Where the gain or loss is included in the initial amount recognised following the purchase of an aircraft, recognition in the income statement is over a period of up to 23 years in the form of depreciation of the purchased asset.
Amounts related to USD and EUR foreign exchange derivatives held at fair value through profit and loss (e.g. not held in a hedge accounting relationship) form part of the Group's statement of financial position retranslation risk management strategy.
Fair valuation movements on these derivatives are recognised in the income statement and offset foreign exchange movements on the corresponding notional amount of the statement of financial position monetary liabilities held in USD and EUR. These trades are all expected to occur on various dates within the next 36 months. Interest rate swap contracts are designated and qualify as either fair value or cash flow hedges to minimise volatility in the income statement.
As at 30 September 2021 there were no active US dollar, Euro, Swiss franc or Jet derivatives discontinued from a hedge accounting relationship.
The Group maintains cross-currency interest rate swap contracts on a proportion of fixed rate debt issuance as part of the approach to currency and interest rate risk management. The cross-currency interest rate swap contracts are designated and qualify as either fair value or cash flow hedges to minimise volatility in the income statement.
The following derivative financial instruments are subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting agreements:
| At 30 September 2021 | Gross Amount £ million |
Amount not set off £ million |
Net amount £ million |
|---|---|---|---|
| Derivative financial instruments | |||
| Assets | 271 | (52) | 219 |
| Liabilities | (68) | 52 | (16) |
| 203 | – | 203 | |
| At 30 September 2020 | Gross Amount £ million |
Amount not set off £ million |
Net amount £ million |
| Derivative financial instruments | |||
| Assets | 110 | (71) | 39 |
| Liabilities | (437) | 71 | (366) |
| (327) | – | (327) |
All financial assets and liabilities are presented gross on the face of the statement of financial position as the conditions for netting specified in IAS 32 'Financial Instruments: Presentation' are not met.
easyJet is exposed to financial risks including fluctuations in exchange rates, jet fuel prices and interest rates. Financial risk management aims to limit these market risks with selected derivative hedging instruments being used for this purpose. easyJet's policy is not to speculatively trade derivatives but use the instruments to hedge anticipated exposure and gain cash flow certainty. easyJet reduces its exposure to market risk by using derivatives as any gains and losses arising are offset by the outcome of the underlying exposure being hedged.
The Board is responsible for setting financial risk and capital management policies and objectives which are implemented by the treasury function on a day to day basis. The policy outlines the approach to risk management and also states the instruments and time periods which the treasury function is authorised to use in managing financial risks. The policy is regularly reviewed to ensure best practice.
easyJet's normal rolling foreign exchange and commodity hedging policies have been reduced in order to mitigate the potential for further over hedging. Throughout the year easyJet has continued to hedge a proportion of its future lease liability payments using USD foreign exchange derivatives.
Capital employed comprises shareholders' equity, borrowings (including amounts related to IFRS 16 lease liability), cash and money market deposits (excluding restricted cash).
Consequently, the capital employed at the end of the current and prior year and the return earned during those years were as follows:
| Headline Non-headline Total Headline Non-headline Total £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million £ million Shareholders' equity 1,899 – 1,899 2,639 – 2,639 Borrowings 2,731 – 2,731 3,367 – 3,367 Lease liabilities 710 – 710 1,079 – 1,079 Cash and money market deposits (excluding restricted cash) (2,316 ) – (2,316 ) (3,536 ) – (3,536 ) Capital employed 3,024 – 3,024 3,549 – 3,549 Reported operating (loss)/profit (775 ) (124) (899 ) (1,036 ) 126 (910 ) Tax rate 19 % 19 % Adjusted operating profit after tax (628 ) (100) (728 ) (839 ) 102 (737 ) (19.9 )% Return on capital employed (23.0 )% (25.5 )% (22.4 )% |
2021 | 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Return on capital employed is calculated by dividing the adjusted operating (loss)/profit after tax by the average of the opening and closing capital employed.
The objective of easyJet's liquidity risk management is to ensure sufficient cash is available to meet future liabilities as they fall due and ensure access to cost effective funding in various markets.
easyJet's policy has consistently been to hold significant liquidity to mitigate the impact of potential business disruption events. easyJet has undertaken swift and decisive action to raise c.£7 billion in liquidity since the beginning of the pandemic, from a diversified range of funding sources including debt and equity.
Liquidity raised in the year includes:
The Group continues to monitor liquidity to ensure it maintains adequate levels of cash. easyJet continues to have access to various funding markets and a large fleet of unencumbered aircraft assets as sources of additional liquidity.
Throughout the year easyJet had a target minimum liquidity requirement to cover the higher of unearned revenue and £2.6 million per 100 seats in the fleet. In assessing this liquidity metric any undrawn credit facilities need to be taken into consideration. Total cash (excluding restricted cash) and money market deposits at 30 September 2021 was £3,536 million (2020: £2,316 million) with total liquidity at £4,442 million. Surplus funds are invested in high quality short-term liquid instruments, mainly money market funds, bank deposits and tri-party repos. During the 2022 financial year, a new liquidity policy will be introduced to maintain minimum liquidity of at least unearned revenue plus £500 million. easyJet would have been in compliance with this policy throughout the 2021 financial year.
The maturity profile of financial liabilities and derivatives based on undiscounted cash flows and contractual maturities is as follows:
| At 30 September 2021 | Within 1 year £ million |
1-2 years £ million |
2-5 years £ million |
Over 5 years £ million |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borrowings principal and interest | 358 | 488 | 1,762 | 1,070 |
| Trade and other payables | 1,128 | - | - | - |
| Lease liabilities | 251 | 239 | 491 | 317 |
| FX & jet derivative contracts - receipts | (1,354) | (313) | (159) | - |
| FX & jet derivative contracts - payments | 1,230 | 291 | 155 | - |
| Cross-currency swap contracts - receipts | (16) | (446) | (872) | - |
| Cross-currency swap contracts - payments | 30 | 405 | 914 | - |
| At 30 September 2020 | Within 1 year £ million |
1-2 years £ million |
2-5 years £ million |
Over 5 years £ million |
| Borrowings principal and interest | 1,018 | 418 | 1,384 | – |
| Trade and other payables | 837 | – | – | – |
| Lease liabilities | 278 | 174 | 332 | 160 |
| FX & jet derivative contracts - receipts | (1,482) | (493) | (89) | – |
| FX & jet derivative contracts - payments | 1,871 | 657 | 93 | – |
| Cross-currency swap contracts - receipts | (17) | (17) | (1,392) | – |
The maturity profile has been calculated based on spot rates for the US dollar, Euro, Swiss franc and jet fuel at close of business on 30 September each year.
Cross-currency swap contracts - payments 33 33 1,396 –
easyJet is exposed to credit risk arising from cash and money market deposits, derivative financial instruments and trade and other receivables. Credit risk management aims to reduce the risk of default by setting limits on credit exposure to counterparties based on their respective credit ratings. Credit ratings also determine the maximum period of investment when placing funds on deposit. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is equal to the carrying value of its financial assets, excluding tri-party repos, which are securitised by high quality, investment grade financial assets.
Counterparties for cash investments and derivatives contracts are required to have a long-term credit rating of A- or better at contract inception from either Moody's, Standard & Poor's or Fitch (except where there is a specific regulatory, contractual requirement or a bank guarantee from an A- rated entity). Exposures to these counterparties are regularly reviewed and, if the long-term credit rating falls below A- management will make a decision on remedial action to be taken.
The credit ratings of counterparties that easyJet holds financial assets with are as follows:
| At 30 September 2021 | A- and above £ million |
Below A- £ million |
Unrated/ Other £ million |
£ million |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | ||||
| Trade receivables | – | – | 291 | 291 |
| Other non-current assets | – | – | 135 | 135 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 219 | – | - | 219 |
| Restricted cash | 14 | – | - | 14 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 3,534 | 2 | - | 3,536 |
| Total | 3,767 | 2 | 426 | 4,195 |
| At 30 September 2020 | A- and above £ million |
Below A- £ million |
Unrated/ Other £ million |
£ million |
| Financial assets | ||||
| Trade receivables | – | – | 53 | 53 |
| Other non-current assets | – | – | 133 | 133 |
| Derivative financial instruments | 39 | – | – | 39 |
| Restricted cash | 19 | – | – | 19 |
| Money market deposits | 32 | – | – | 32 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,281 | 3 | – | 2,284 |
| Total | 2,371 | 3 | 186 | 2,560 |
At the end of each reporting date easyJet recognises a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost. In establishing the appropriate amount of loss allowance to be recognised, easyJet applies either the general approach or the simplified approach, depending on the nature of the underlying group of financial assets.
The general approach is applied to the impairment assessment of refundable lease deposits and other refundable lease contributions, restricted cash, money market deposits, and cash and cash equivalents (excluding money market funds held at fair value through profit or loss). Under the general approach easyJet recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the 12-month expected credit losses, unless the credit risk on the financial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition, in which case a loss allowance is recognised at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses. At 30 September 2021 this was considered immaterial. This is due to easyJet's strict policy of investing only with counterparties who hold a high, investment grade credit standing (except in specific circumstances) as detailed in the tables above.
The simplified approach is applied to the impairment assessment of trade and other receivables. Under the simplified approach easyJet always recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses using the historic loss methodology to calculate an impairment provision.
At 30 September 2021 trade receivables had a total loss allowance of £1 million (2020: £4 million). The exposure to individual customer's credit risk is reduced as no individual customer accounts for a substantial amount of the total revenue and most payments for flight tickets are collected in advance of the service being provided.
The majority of easyJet's exposure to currency arises from fluctuations in the USD, EUR and CHF exchange rates which can significantly impact easyJet's financial results and cash flows. The aim of the foreign currency risk management is to reduce the impact of these exchange rate fluctuations.
Significant currency exposures in the income statement are managed through the use of currency forward contracts entered into cash flow hedge relationships, in line with the Board approved policy. Throughout the year the policy stated that easyJet hedged between 65% - 85% of the next 12 months' forecast surplus operating cash flows on a rolling basis, and 45% - 65% of the following 12 months' forecast surplus operating cash flows on a rolling basis (excluding those related to easyJet holidays).
Following the launch of easyJet holidays the Group separately manages foreign exchange risk related to forecast cash out flows on package holiday costs.
The foreign exchange hedging programmes for operational activities have continued at reduced levels due to uncertainty in exposures.
Significant currency exposures relating to the acquisition cost or sale proceeds of aircraft are also managed through the use of FX forward contracts where up to 90% of the next 18 months' forecast requirement may be hedged.
Significant currency exposures relating to foreign currency denominated Eurobond issuances are managed through the use of cross-currency interest rate swap contracts where deemed appropriate. These hedges are designated as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges.
easyJet has substantial borrowings and other monetary liabilities denominated in USD and EUR, which are largely offset by holding USD and EUR cash and money market deposits. FX forward contracts are also used to manage foreign exchange translation risk. These are classified as fair value through profit or loss (e.g. not designated in a hedge relationship). During the year easyJet decided to use EUR lease liabilities to hedge a proportion of its EUR Revenue receipts in a cash flow hedge relationship. Revaluations of these EUR liabilities are held in reserves and released on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreement through profit or loss.
Management may take action to hedge other currency exposures as deemed appropriate.
The gross notional of transactions in a hedge relationship that occurred during the financial year to manage the foreign currency risk and the resulting gains and losses were as follows:
| 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Notional | Gain/(loss) | |
| USD | 380 | (4) |
| EUR | 200 | 7 |
| CHF | 61 | 1 |
The objective of capital management is to ensure that easyJet is able to continue as a going concern whilst delivering shareholder expectations of a strong capital base as well as returning benefits for other stakeholders.
On the 30 September 2021, easyJet held long-term corporate credit ratings from both Standard & Poor's (BBB-) and Moody's (Baa3).
easyJet plc established a £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme on 7 January 2016. Subsequently easyJet plc has issued three bonds under this programme and easyJet FinCo B.V. has issued one bond. All four bonds under this scheme are guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited, easyJet plc and easyJet FinCo B.V.
In February 2016, easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.750%. At the same time the Group entered into three cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a Sterling floating rate exposure. All three swaps pay floating interest (three-month LIBOR plus a margin) quarterly, receive fixed interest annually, and have maturities matching the Eurobond. The Group designated all three cross-currency interest rate swaps as a fair value hedge of the interest rate and currency risks on the €500 million Eurobond. The swaps are measured at fair value through profit or loss with any gains or losses being taken immediately to the income statement (except where related to timing differences related to cross-currency basis amortisation). The carrying value of the Eurobond is adjusted for changes in fair value attributable to the risks being hedged. This net carrying value differs to the swap's fair value depending on movements in the Group's credit risk and cross-currency basis. The carrying value of the fixed rate Eurobond net of the cross-currency interest rate swap at 30 September 2021 was £380 million. This value does not include capitalised set-up costs incurred in the issuing of the bond.
The lifetime fair value adjustment to the bond hedge item in the statement of financial position was £(53) million. During the year, fair value adjustments totalled £28 million which was offset by materially equal and opposite movements on the hedging instruments. Movements related to the hedging of foreign exchange in the year were £25 million gain with the remaining fair value movements relating to the hedging of interest risk.
In October 2016 easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.125%. Shortly after the issuance of the €500 million bond the Group entered into three cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a Sterling fixed rate exposure. The cross-currency interest rate swaps were executed on 8 November 2016 with settlement and notional exchange occurring on 14 November 2016. All three swaps pay fixed interest semi-annually, receive fixed interest annually, and have maturities matching the Eurobond. The Group designated all three cross-currency interest rate swaps as a cash flow hedge of the currency risk on the €500 million Eurobond. The cross-currency interest rate swaps are measured at fair value with the effective portion taken through the statement of comprehensive income. The element of the fair value generated by the change in the spot rate is recycled to the income statement from the statement of comprehensive income to offset the revaluation of the Eurobond. The carrying value of the fixed rate Eurobond net of the cross-currency interest rate swap at 30 September 2021 was £447 million. This value does not include capitalised set-up costs incurred in the issuing of the bond.
In June 2019 easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 0.875%. At the same time the Group entered into three cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a Sterling fixed rate exposure. All three swaps pay fixed interest semi-annually, receive fixed interest annually, and have maturities matching the Eurobond. The Group designated all three cross-currency interest rate swaps as a cash flow hedge of the currency risk on the €500 million Eurobond. The cross-currency interest rate swaps are measured at fair value with the effective portion taken through the statement of comprehensive income. The element of the fair value generated by the change in the spot rate is recycled to the income statement from the statement of comprehensive income to offset the revaluation of the Eurobond. The carrying value of the fixed rate Eurobond net of the crosscurrency interest rate swap at 30 September 2021 was £446 million. This value does not include capitalised set-up costs incurred in the issuing of the bond.
The weighted average GBP interest rate hedged for the three bonds was 2.30% with a weighted average GBP/EUR foreign exchange hedge rate of 1.19.
In March 2021 easyJet FinCo B.V. issued a €1,200 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited and easyJet plc. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.875%. As at year end this was not hedged.
Interest rate cash flow risk arises on floating rate borrowings and cash investments.
Interest rate risk management policy aims to provide certainty in a proportion of financing while retaining the opportunity to benefit from interest rate reductions. Borrowings are issued at either fixed or floating interest rates repricing every three to six months. A significant proportion of the US dollar debt liabilities are matched with US dollar cash assets by value. Operating leases are a mix of fixed and floating rates. Of the 137 aircraft operating leases in place at 30 September 2021 (2020: 124), 95% were based on fixed interest rates and 5% were based on floating interest rates (2020: 90% fixed, 10% floating).
The Group is exposed to commodity risk in the form of jet fuel requirements and Carbon Emissions Trading System schemes (EU-ETS, CH-ETS & UK-ETS) price risk.
The objective of the fuel price risk management policy is to provide protection against sudden and significant increases in jet fuel prices, thus mitigating volatility in the income statement in the short term. Throughout the year the policy stated that easyJet hedged between 65% and 85% of estimated exposures up to 12 months in advance, and hedged between 45% and 65% of estimated exposures from 13 up to 24 months in advance. Jet fuel derivatives are entered into a cash flow hedge relationship against the future forecasted jet fuel usage. Treasury strategies and actions will be driven by the need to meet treasury, financial and corporate objectives.
The fuel hedging programme has continued throughout the year at reduced levels due to uncertainty in exposures.
The volume of effective hedge transactions that occurred during the financial year to manage the jet commodity price risk was 0.6 million metric tonnes. This resulted in a £39 million loss (2020: £77 million) (£37 million in relation to release from the Cashflow Hedge Reserve, and £2 million in relation to release from Cost of Hedging) in the fuel line within the Income Statement.
The Group has a regulatory requirement to comply with EU-ETS, CH-ETS & UK-ETS on an annual basis to the relevant environmental agencies. easyJet is required to purchase carbon allowances on the open market to fulfil this requirement and is exposed to price movements that can introduce cash flow volatility. To mitigate this exposure easyJet will purchase its requirement on a spot or forward basis in line with Board approved policy to hedge up to 95% of anticipated exposure up to 24 months out. easyJet holds allowances for 100% of all ETS obligations for calendar year 2021.
Contracts maturing in the year were not classified as financial instruments as they fell within the own use provision under IFRS 9.
Financial assets and liabilities affected by market risk include borrowings, deposits, trade and other receivables, trade and other payables and derivative financial instruments. The following analysis illustrates the sensitivity of changes in relevant foreign exchange rates, interest rates and fuel prices. It should be noted that the analysis reflects the impact on profit or loss after tax for the year and other comprehensive income on financial instruments in a cash flow hedge relationship held at the reporting date. The sensitivities are calculated based on all other variables remaining constant. The analysis is considered representative of easyJet's exposure over the next 12 month period.
The sensitivity analysis is based on easyJet's financial assets and liabilities and financial instruments held as at 30 September 2021.
The currency exchange rate analysis assumes a +/-10% change in both US dollar and Euro exchange rates.
The interest rate analysis assumes a 1% increase in interest rates over the next 12 months.
The fuel price analysis assumes a 10% increase in fuel price over the next 12 months.
| Currency rates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 30 September 2021 | US dollar +10%(1) £ million |
US dollar - 10%(2) £ million |
Euro +10%(1) £ million |
Euro -10%(2) £ million |
Interest rates 1% increase £ million |
Fuel price 10% Increase £ million |
| Income statement impact: gain/(loss) | (43) | 35 | 42 | (34) | 28 | – |
| Impact on other comprehensive income: increase / (decrease) |
75 | (61) | 5 | (4) | – | 57 |
| Currency rates | ||||||
| US dollar +10%(1) £ million |
US dollar - 10%(2) £ million |
Euro +10%(1) £ million |
Euro -10%(2) £ million |
Interest rates 1% increase £ million |
Fuel price 10% Increase £ million |
|
| At 30 September 2020 | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million |
| Income statement impact: gain/(loss) | (13) | 10 | 11 | (9) | 18 | 8 |
| Impact on other comprehensive income: increase/(decrease) |
(1) | 1 | (48) | 39 | – | 46 |
GBP weakened
GBP strengthened
The Market risk sensitivity analysis has been calculated on spot rates for the US dollar, EUR and jet fuel at close of business on 30 September each year.
Details of major hedging arrangements at the reporting date are set out below broken down by the notional maturity of hedge instruments and average rates.
| Within | Greater than |
|---|---|
| Hedge instrument (notional in millions) one year |
one year |
| Jet fuel hedged notional 1 |
1 |
| Average hedge rate 498 |
481 |
| USD foreign exchange hedged notional 463 |
63 |
| Average hedge rate 1.34 |
1.34 |
| EUR foreign exchange hedged notional 470 |
– |
| Average hedge rate 1.12 |
– |
| CHF foreign exchange hedged notional 55 |
– |
| Average hedge rate 1.21 |
– |
Notional expressed in the GBP contractual leg for currencies and metric tonnes for jet fuel
Hedge effectiveness testing on all relationships is performed at each reporting date. Whilst the critical terms matching of the Group's hedge relationships means that any ineffectiveness should be minimal it can be driven by factors such as material changes in credit risk, price fixing basis (in the case of jet fuel) or changes in the timings of the hedged cash flows.
Due to the reduced flying programme easyJet became over-hedged on both jet fuel and FX exposures. Where the forecasted future exposure was no longer expected to occur, the hedge relationship was discontinued and all gains or losses related to the hedge instrument transferred immediately to the income statement within non-headline. These amounts totalled a net £25 million loss in the year.
Any subsequent fair value movements on these discontinued trades was recognised in headline. These amounts totalled a net £30 million gain in the year. In addition, following the discontinuation of hedge accounting easyJet entered into derivatives to close out a proportion of over-hedged positions. These derivatives were traded in an 'equal and opposite' direction to the discontinued trades to economically close out these positions and totalled a net loss of £23 million. These have been included within the total headline fair adjustment value resulting in a net £7 million gain.
All hedge relationships where the underlying exposure is still anticipated to occur continue to exhibit a strong economic hedge relationship as the changes in fair value of hypothetical hedged items is materially offset by the changes in the fair value of hedging instruments.
Additionally, fair value adjustments of £1 million (2020: £nil) were recorded during the period related to hedge ineffectiveness on hedges of foreign currency denominated borrowings that continue to be effective hedge relationships.
easyJet is involved in a number of disputes and litigation which arose in the normal course of business. The likely outcome of these disputes and litigation cannot be predicted, and in complex cases reliable estimates of any potential obligation may not be possible.
On 19 May 2020, easyJet announced that it had been the target of a cyber-attack from a highly sophisticated source. The email addresses and travel details of approximately 9 million customers were accessed and for a very small subset of customers (2,208), credit card details were accessed.
The cyber-attack continues to be under investigation by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). As the cyber-attack took place before the United Kingdom left the European Union, the Group expects the ICO to be investigating on behalf of all EU data protection authorities as lead supervisory authority under the GDPR. Any penalty or enforcement action will need to be reviewed and approved by the other EU data protection authorities under the GDPR's cooperation process. In addition, in May 2020, a class action claim was filed in the UK High Court by a law firm representing a class of affected customers and claims have also been commenced or threatened in certain other courts and jurisdictions.
The merit, likely outcome and potential impact on the Group of the continued investigation by the ICO, group action and other claims are still subject to a number of significant uncertainties and therefore the Group is unable to assess the likely outcome or quantum of the claims as at the date of these financial statements.
At 30 September 2021 easyJet had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds totalling £72 million (2020: £120 million), of which £43 million (2020: £89 million) expires within one year. The fair value of these instruments at each year end was negligible.
No amount is recognised in the statement of financial position in respect of any of these financial instruments as it is not probable that there will be an outflow of resources.
As part of the commitment to voluntary carbon offsetting, easyJet currently has contractual commitments to purchase Verified Emission Reductions worth £11 million (2020: £29 million) in total until December 2022.
During the years ended 30 September 2020 and 2021, easyJet Airline Company Limited utilised of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme implemented by the UK government, where those employees designated as being 'furloughed workers' are eligible to have 80 per cent of their wage costs paid up to a maximum amount of £2,500 per month. In the same period, easyJet Group (companies) utilised similar schemes provided by governments in Portugal, Germany, Netherlands, France, Italy and Switzerland. The total amount of such relief received by the Group amounted to £134 million (2020: £116 million) and is offset within employee costs in the income statement. There are no unfulfilled conditions or contingencies relating to these schemes.
On 6 April 2020, easyJet issued a commercial paper through the Covid Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) implemented by the UK government. Under the CCFF, easyJet received £600 million, with interest incurred at the prevailing market rate. The facility is classified within borrowings in the statement of financial position. On 5 March 2021 easyJet repaid £300 million of the CCFF liability, with the remaining £300 million was repaid in November 2021.
On 8 January 2021 easyJet signed a five-year term loan facility of \$1.87 billion, underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported by a partial guarantee from UK Export Finance under their Export Development Guarantee Scheme. The Export Development Guarantee scheme for commercial loans is available to qualifying UK companies, does not carry preferential rates or require state aid approval, and contains some restrictive covenants including dividend payments, however these are compatible with easyJet's existing dividend policy.
The Company licenses the easyJet brand from easyGroup Limited ('easyGroup'), a wholly owned subsidiary of easyGroup Holdings Limited, an entity in which easyJet's founder, Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou, holds a beneficial controlling interest. The Haji-Ioannou family concert party shareholding (being easyGroup Holdings Limited and Polys Holding Limited) holds, in total, approximately 15.27% of the issued share capital of easyJet plc as at 30 September 2021.
Key management personnel who were existing shareholders were part of the rights issue that took place during the year, the issue price was 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held.
Under the Amended Brand Licence signed in October 2010 and approved by the shareholders of easyJet plc in December 2010, an annual royalty of 0.25% of total revenue is payable by easyJet to easyGroup. The full term of agreement is 50 years.
easyJet and easyGroup established a fund to meet the annual costs of protecting the 'easy' (and related marks) and the 'easyJet' brands. easyJet contributes up to £1 million per annum to this fund and easyGroup contributes £100,000 per annum. If easyJet contributes more than £1 million per annum, easyGroup will match its contribution in the ratio of 1:10 up to a limit of £5 million contributed by easyJet and £500,000 contributed by easyGroup.
Three side letters have been entered into: (i) a letter dated 29 September 2016 in which easyGroup consented to easyJet acquiring a portion of the equity share capital in Founders Factory Limited; (ii) a letter dated 26 June 2017 in which the easyJet's permitted usage of the brand was slightly extended; and (iii) a letter dated 2 February 2018 in which easyGroup agreed that certain affiliates of easyJet have the right to use the brand.
The amounts included in the income statement, within other costs, for these items were as follows:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Annual royalty | 4 | 8 |
| Brand protection (legal fees paid through easyGroup to third parties) | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 9 |
At 30 September 2021, £0.1 million (2020: £0.1 million) of the above aggregate amount was included in trade and other payables.
At 30 September 2021 £5.3 million (2020: £8.5 million) is due from related parties and is included within trade and other receivables.
On 18 November 2021, the remaining £300 million Commercial paper issued through the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) was repaid.
On 29 November 2021, a firm commitment was agreed with Airbus in respect of an additional 19 aircraft with deliveries between financial years 2025 and 2028. This results in 118 firm Airbus A320 NEO family aircraft outstanding orders on this date. The 19 firm deliveries consist of:
| As at 30 September |
As at 30 September |
|
|---|---|---|
| Notes | 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
| Non-current assets | ||
| Investments in subsidiary undertakings c |
999 | 983 |
| Deferred tax asset | 2 | 4 |
| 1,001 | 987 | |
| Current assets | ||
| Other receivables | 91 | 4 |
| Amounts due from subsidiary undertakings | 3,594 | 2,709 |
| Derivative financial instruments with subsidiary undertakings | 53 | 85 |
| 3,738 | 2,798 | |
| Current liabilities | ||
| Amounts due to subsidiary undertakings | (9) | (2) |
| Borrowings e |
(300) | (600) |
| Other payables | (37) | (12) |
| (346) | (614) | |
| Net current assets | 3,392 | 2,184 |
| Non-current liabilities | ||
| Borrowings e |
(1,285) | (1,356) |
| Derivative financial instruments with subsidiary undertakings | (33) | – |
| (1,318) | (1,356) | |
| Net assets | 3,075 | 1,815 |
| Shareholders' equity | ||
| Share capital | 207 | 125 |
| Share premium | 2,166 | 1,051 |
| Hedging reserve | (5) | (15) |
| Retained earnings | 707 | 654 |
| Total equity | 3,075 | 1,815 |
The financial statements on pages 213 to 218 were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 30 November 2021 and signed on behalf of the Board.
In accordance with Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company is exempt from the requirement to present its own income statement and statement of comprehensive income. The Company's profit for the year was £37 million (2020: £35 million). Included in this amount are dividends received of £30 million (2020: £30 million), which are recognised when the right to receive payment is established.
JOHAN LUNDGREN KENTON JARVIS Director Director
| Share Capital £ million |
Share premium £ million |
Hedging reserve £ million |
Cost of hedging £ million |
Retained earnings £ million |
Total £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2020 | 125 | 1,051 | (19) | 4 | 654 | 1,815 |
| Profit for the year | – | – | – | – | 37 | 37 |
| Other comprehensive income | – | – | 10 | – | – | 10 |
| Total comprehensive income | – | – | 10 | – | 37 | 47 |
| Share incentive schemes | ||||||
| Net proceeds from rights issue | 82 | 1,115 | – | – | – | 1,197 |
| Movement in reserves for employee share schemes | – | – | – | – | 16 | 16 |
| At 30 September 2021 | 207 | 2,166 | (9) | 4 | 707 | 3,075 |
| Share Capital £ million |
Share premium £ million |
Hedging reserve £ million |
Cost of hedging £ million |
Retained earnings £ million |
Total £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 1 October 2019 | 108 | 659 | (15) | 8 | 776 | 1,536 |
| Profit for the year | – | – | – | – | 35 | 35 |
| Other comprehensive loss | – | – | (4) | (4) | – | (8) |
| Total comprehensive income | – | – | (4) | (4) | 35 | 27 |
| Dividends paid | – | – | – | – | (174) | (174) |
| Share incentive schemes | ||||||
| Proceeds from shares issued | 17 | 392 | – | – | – | 409 |
| Movement in reserves for employee share schemes | – | – | – | – | 17 | 17 |
| At 30 September 2020 | 125 | 1,051 | (19) | 4 | 654 | 1,815 |
On 9 September 2021 the Company invited its shareholders to subscribe to a rights issue of 301,260,394 ordinary shares at an issue price of 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held, with such shares issued on 28 September 2021.
The rights issue resulted in £1,235 million of gross proceeds. Shares totalling 280.2 million were taken up by existing shareholders (93%) with the remaining rump of 21.0 million shares being underwritten. As at 30 September 2021, there were £91 million of proceeds outstanding, which have been subsequently received. Costs of £38 million were incurred on the rights issue.
No ordinary dividend in respect of the year ended 30 September 2021 is to be proposed.
An ordinary dividend of 43.9 pence per share, or £174 million, in respect of the year ended 30 September 2019 was paid in the year ended 30 September 2020.
The disclosures required in respect of share capital are shown in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.
| Year ended 30 September |
Year ended 30 September |
|
|---|---|---|
| Note | 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
| Cash flows from operating activities | ||
| Cash generated from/(used in) operations (excluding dividends) f |
57 | (20) |
| Interest received | 41 | 39 |
| Interest paid | (35) | (36) |
| Dividends received | 30 | 30 |
| Dividends paid | – | (174) |
| Tax credit/(charge) | 4 | (5) |
| Net cash generated from/(used in) operating activities | 97 | (166) |
| Cash flows from investing activities | ||
| Capital contribution to subsidiaries | – | (20) |
| Loans to subsidiaries | (879) | (855) |
| Cash used in investing activities | (879) | (875) |
| Cash flows from financing activities | ||
| Net proceeds from issue of ordinary share capital | 1,144 | 409 |
| Proceeds from drawdown of bank loans and other borrowings | – | 600 |
| Repayment of bank loans and other borrowings | (371) | – |
| Net cash generated from financing activities | 773 | 1,009 |
| Effect of exchange rate | 9 | 32 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning and end of year | – | – |
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
The Company's principal activity is that of a holding company for a group of companies engaged in providing low-cost European flights and holidays.
The significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of these Company financial statements are the same as those set out in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements with the addition of the following.
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis; details of going concern are provided on pages 74 to 77.
Investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost, less any provision for impairment. Where subsidiary undertakings incur charges for sharebased payments in respect of share options and awards granted by the Company, a capital contribution in the same amount is recognised as an investment in subsidiary undertakings with a corresponding credit to shareholders' equity.
Estimates are required for assessing whether the Company's investment carrying values are impaired. This requires estimation of the investment 'value in use', which requires an assessment of the future cash flows which are expected to arise from the investments held in addition to applying other suitable assumptions. These assumptions primarily align to those disclosed in note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. This represents a critical accounting estimate for the Company.
Receivables are recognised initially at fair value, and subsequently at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less any expected credit losses.
In accordance with Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company is exempt from the requirement to present its own income statement and statement of comprehensive income. The Company's profit for the year was £37 million (2020: £35 million). Included in this amount are dividends received of £30 million (2020: £30 million), which are recognised when the right to receive payment is established.
The Company has eight employees at 30 September 2021 (2020: eight). These employees are the Non-Executive Directors of easyJet plc; their remuneration is paid by easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Executive Directors of easyJet plc are employed and paid by easyJet Airline Company Limited. Details of Directors' remuneration are disclosed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements and in the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 130 to 153.
Investments in subsidiary undertakings were as follows:
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| At 1 October | 983 | 945 |
| Capital contributions to subsidiaries | 16 | 38 |
| At 30 September | 999 | 983 |
During the year £16 million (2020: £18 million) capital contributions of share awards (as explained in note a above) was provided to Group companies. No other cash contributions were made during the year (2020: £20 million).
A full list of Group companies is detailed below.
| Country of incorporation | Principal activity | Percentage of ordinary shares held |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| easyJet Airline Company Limited (2) | England and Wales | Airline operator | 100 |
| easyJet Switzerland S.A. (3) | Switzerland | Airline operator | 49* |
| easyJet Sterling Limited (1) (4) | Cayman Islands | Aircraft trading and leasing | 100 |
| easyJet Leasing Limited (1) (4) | Cayman Islands | Aircraft trading and leasing | 100 |
| easyJet UK Limited (2) | England and Wales | Airline operator | 100 |
| easyJet Europe Airline GmbH (6) | Austria | Airline operator | 100 |
| easyJet FinCo B.V. (5) | Netherlands | Financing company | 100 |
| easyJet MT Limited (8) | Malta | Insurance | 100 |
| easyJet HQ Holdings Limited (2) (7) | England and Wales | Holding company | 100 |
| easyJet HQ Limited (2) (7) | England and Wales | Development of building projects | 100 |
| easyJet HQ Development Limited (2) (7) | England and Wales | Development of building projects | 100 |
| easyJet Holidays Holdings Limited (2) | England and Wales | Holding company | 100 |
| easyJet Holidays Limited (2) | England and Wales | Tour operator | 100 |
| easyJet Holidays Transport Limited (2) | England and Wales | Air transport | 100 |
Although these companies are Cayman Islands incorporated they have always been, and continue to be, UK tax resident.
Hangar 89, London Luton Airport, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU2 9PF
5 Route de l'Aeroport, Meyrin, CH-1215 Geneve 15, Switzerland 4. Governor's Square, West Bay Road, Lime Tree Bay Road, UNIT # 2-105 , PO Box 1982, Grand Cayman KY1-1104, Cayman Islands
Westerdoksdijk 423, 1013BX Amsterdam, Netherlands
Wagramer Stasse 19, 11.Stock IZD Tower, 1220 Wien, Austria.
These UK entities are all 100% owned by the Group and are dormant subsidiary entities. They are exempt from the requirement to prepare individual financial statements by virtue of s394A of the Companies Act 200, exempt from audit by virtue of s479A of the Companies Act 200 and exempt from filing with the registrar by virtue of s448A of the Companies Act 2006.
Newly incorporated in the 2021 financial year
* The Company has a 49% interest in easyJet Switzerland S.A. with an option to acquire the remaining 51%. The option is automatically extended for a further year on a rolling basis, unless the option is terminated by written agreement prior to the automatic renewal date. easyJet Switzerland S.A. is a subsidiary on the basis that the Company exercises a dominant influence over the undertaking. A non-controlling interest has not been reflected in the consolidated financial statements on the basis that holders of the remaining 51% of the shares have no entitlement to any dividends from that holding and the Company has an option to acquire those shares for a predetermined minimal consideration. The Company has 100% of voting rights for all other subsidiaries.
In February 2016, easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.750%. At the same time the Group entered into three cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a floating rate Sterling exposure.
In October 2016 easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.125%. At the same time the Group entered into three cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a Sterling fixed rate exposure.
In June 2019 easyJet plc issued a €500 million a bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 0.875%. At the same time the Group entered into three cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a fixed rate Sterling exposure.
On 6 April 2020 easyJet issued a £600 million Commercial Paper through the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF). This is an unsecured, short term paper issued at a discount, of which £300 million was repaid in March 2021 and the remaining £300 million was repaid in November 2021.
For further details please refer to note 24 of the consolidated financial statements.
| At 30 September 2021 | Current £ million |
Non-current £ million |
Total £ million |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eurobond | – | 1,285 | 1,285 |
| Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) | 300 | – | 300 |
| 300 | 1,285 | 1,585 | |
| At 30 September 2020 | Current £ million |
Non-current £ million |
Total £ million |
| Eurobond | – | 1,356 | 1,356 |
| Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) | 600 | – | 600 |
600 1,356 1,956
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Profit for the year | 37 | 35 |
| Adjustments for: | ||
| Net finance and other similar income | (6) | (4) |
| Unrealised foreign exchange differences | – | (1) |
| Tax credit | (2) | – |
| Dividends received | (30) | (30) |
| Operating cash flows before movement in working capital | (1) | – |
| Changes in working capital: | ||
| Increase in trade and other debtors | (33) | – |
| Increase in trade and other payables | 25 | 12 |
| Increase in amounts due from subsidiary undertakings | (16) | (4) |
| Increase in amounts due to subsidiary undertakings | 7 | – |
| Increase/(decrease) in derivative financial instruments | 75 | (28) |
| 57 | (20) |
The Company has given a formal undertaking to the Civil Aviation Authority to guarantee the payment and discharge of all liabilities of easyJet Airline Company Limited, a subsidiary of the Company. The guarantee is required for that company to maintain its operating licence under Regulation 3 of the Licensing of Air Carriers Regulations 1992.
The Company has issued a guarantee in favour of easyJet Airline Company Limited, a subsidiary undertaking, in relation to the processing of credit card transactions, and also in respect of hedging transactions carried out according to treasury policy.
The Company has guaranteed the contractual obligations of easyJet Airline Company Limited and easyJet Leasing Limited, both subsidiary undertakings, in respect of its contractual obligations to Airbus SAS in respect of the supply of Airbus 320 family aircraft.
On 8 January 2021 the Company guaranteed the contractual obligations of easyJet Airline Company Limited, a subsidiary undertaking, in respect of a \$1.87 billion term loan facility, from which easyJet Airline Company Limited drew down \$1.05 billion on the 22 January 2021. This facility is due to expire in January 2026.
On 3 March 2021 the Company guaranteed the contractual obligations of easyJet FinCo B.V, a subsidiary undertaking, in respect of a €1.2 billion bond issuance under the Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) Programme. The bond has a coupon of 1.875% and matures in March 2028.
The Company has guaranteed the contractual obligations of easyJet Airline Company Limited, a subsidiary undertaking, in respect of a \$400 million Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility was agreed on 9 September 2021, for a minimum of four and a maximum of six years.
The Company has guaranteed the repayment of borrowings that financed the acquisition of aircraft by subsidiary undertakings. The Company has also guaranteed the payment obligations for the lease of aircraft by subsidiary undertakings.
The Company has guaranteed certain letters of credit issued on behalf of subsidiary undertakings.
easyJet plc has given a formal undertaking to the Civil Aviation Authority to guarantee the payment and discharge of all liabilities of easyJet Holidays Limited. The guarantee is required for easyJet Holidays Limited, easyJet Airline Company Limited and easyJet Holidays Transport Limited to maintain its ATOL's under The Civil Aviation (Air Travel Organisers' Licensing) Regulations 2012. easyJet plc has also issued guarantees in favour of easyJet Holidays Limited and easyJet Airline Company Limited relating to processing of credit card transactions; and brand licence agreement with easyGroup Limited.
No amount is recognised in the Company statement of financial position in respect to any of these guarantees as it is not probable that there will be an outflow of resources.
Transactions with subsidiary undertakings, which principally relate to the provision of funding within the Group, are carried out on an arm's length basis. Outstanding balances are placed on intercompany accounts with no specified credit period, are unsecured, and bear market rates of interest.
For full details of transactions and arrangements with easyJet's largest shareholder, see note 28 of the consolidated financial statements.
On 18 November 2021, the remaining £300 million Commercial paper issued through the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) was repaid.
| 2021 (as reported) £ million |
2020 (as reported) £ million |
2019 (restated) £ million |
2018 (as reported) £ million |
2017 (restated) £ million |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||
| Revenue | 1,458 | 3,009 | 6,385 | 5,898 | 5,047 |
| Total EBITDAR | (425) | (358) | 970 | 839 | 709 |
| Headline EBITDAR | (551) | (273) | 970 | 961 | 733 |
| Total operating (loss)/profit | (910) | (899) | 466 | 463 | 404 |
| Headline operating (loss)/profit | (1,036) | (777) | 466 | 595 | 428 |
| Total (loss)/profit before tax | (1,036) | (1,273) | 430 | 445 | 385 |
| Headline (loss)/profit before tax | (1,136) | (835) | 427 | 578 | 408 |
| Total (loss)/profit after tax | (858) | (1,079) | 349 | 358 | 305 |
| Headline (loss)/profit after tax | (900) | (725) | 349 | 466 | 325 |
| Basic total (loss)/earnings per share - pence | (159.0) | (222.9) | 88.6 | 90.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic headline (loss)/earnings per share - pence | (166.9) | (149.7) | 88.7 | 118.3 | 82.5 |
| Diluted total (loss)/earnings per share - pence | (159.0) | (222.9) | 87.8 | 90.2 | 76.8 |
| Diluted headline (loss)/earnings per share - pence | (166.9) | (149.7) | 87.8 | 117.4 | 81.9 |
| Ordinary dividend per share - pence | – | – | 43.9 | 58.6 | 40.9 |
| Statement of financial position | |||||
| Non-current assets | 5,608 | 5,910 | 6,044 | 4,994 | 4,237 |
| Current assets | 4,165 | 2,563 | 2,119 | 1,999 | 1,734 |
| Current liabilities | (2,677) | (3,826) | (2,668) | (2,060) | (1,670) |
| Non-current liabilities | (4,457) | (2,748) | (2,510) | (1,700) | (1,499) |
| Net assets | 2,639 | 1,899 | 2,985 | (3,233) | 2,802 |
| Net (debt)/cash | |||||
| Operating activities | (1,035) | (776) | 761 | 961 | 663 |
| Investing activities | 719 | 23 | (863) | (906) | (515) |
| Financing activities (excluding movements in | |||||
| borrowings and money market deposits) | (1) | (22) | (9) | (21) | (10) |
| Loan issue costs | 23 | – | 6 | (1) | 6 |
| Fair value and foreign exchange gains/(losses) | (64) | (66) | (86) | 6 | – |
| Net (decrease)/increase in net (debt)/cash | (390) | (841) | (191) | 39 | 144 |
| Key performance indicators | |||||
| Headline return on capital employed | (25.5)% | (19.9)% | 11.4% | 14.6% | 11.9% |
| Net (debt)/cash | (910) | (1,125) | (326) | 396 | 357 |
| Airline total (loss)/profit before tax per seat (£) | (36.33) | (22.66) | 4.1 | 4.68 | 4.45 |
| Airline headline (loss)/profit before tax per seat (£) | (39.87) | (14.68) | 4.07 | 6.07 | 4.71 |
| Airline revenue per seat (£) | 50.54 | 54.35 | 60.81 | 61.94 | 58.23 |
| Airline total cost per seat (£) | (86.87) | (77.01) | 56.71 | 57.26 | 53.78 |
| Airline headline cost per seat (£) | (90.41) | (69.03) | 56.74 | 55.87 | 53.52 |
| Airline total cost per seat excluding fuel (£) | (73.72) | (63.92) | 43.23 | 44.82 | 41.53 |
| Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel (£) | (77.25) | (55.94) | 43.26 | 43.43 | 41.27 |
| Seats flown (millions) | 28.2 | 55.1 | 105.0 | 95.2 | 86.7 |
See note 1 to the 2019 financial statements for details of the change in accounting policy.
See note 1 to the 2017 financial statements for details of the change in accounting policy.
| Non-headline items | Material non-recurring items or items which are not considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the business (See note 1a) |
|---|---|
| Headline loss before tax | A measure of underlying performance which is not impacted by material non-recurring items or items which are not |
considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the business.
| Year ended 30 September 2021 |
Year ended 30 September 2020 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Statutory loss before tax | (1,036) | (1,273) |
| Total non-headline (credit)/charge before tax (see note 5) | (100) | 438 |
| Headline loss before tax | (1,136) | (835) |
| EBITDAR | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation and aircraft rental. |
|---|---|
| Headline EBITDAR | Earnings before non-headline items, interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation and aircraft rental. |
| Year ended 30 September 2021 £ million |
Year ended 30 September 2020 £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Statutory operating loss | (910) | (899) |
| Add back: | ||
| Aircraft dry leasing | 5 | 1 |
| Depreciation | 456 | 485 |
| Amortisation of intangible assets | 24 | 18 |
| EBITDAR | (425) | (395) |
| Non-headline (credit)/charge within operating profit (see note 5) | (126) | 122 |
| Headline EBITDAR | (551) | (273) |
Net debt Total cash less borrowings and lease liabilities. (Cash includes money market deposits but excludes restricted cash).
| 2021 Total £ million |
2020 Total £ million |
|
|---|---|---|
| Borrowings | 3,367 | 2,731 |
| Lease Liabilities | 1,079 | 710 |
| Cash and money market deposits (excluding restricted cash) | (3,536) | (2,316) |
| Net debt | 910 | 1,125 |
| Return on Capital | Operating profit, less tax at the prevailing UK corporation tax rate at the end of the financial year, divided by |
|---|---|
| employed (ROCE) | average capital employed (shareholder equity less net cash/debt). |
| Headline return on capital | Operating profit less non-headline items, less tax at the prevailing UK corporation tax rate at the end of the financial |
| employed (ROCE) | year, divided by average capital employed (shareholder equity less net cash/debt). |
| 2021 | 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total £ million |
Total £ million |
||
| Shareholders' equity | 2,639 | 1,899 | |
| Net debt | 910 | 1,125 | |
| Capital employed | 3,549 | 3,024 | |
| Reported operating (loss)/profit | (910) | (899) | |
| Tax rate | 19% | 19% | |
| Adjusted operating profit after tax | (737) | (728) | |
| Return on capital employed | (22.4)% | (23.0)% | |
| Reported operating (loss)/profit | (910) | (899) | |
| Non-headline (credit)/charge within operating profit (see note 5) | (126) | 122 | |
| Headline Reported operating (loss)/profit | (1,036) | (777) | |
| Tax rate | 19% | 19% | |
| Adjusted headline operating profit after tax | (839) | (629) | |
| Headline return on capital employed | (25.5)% | (19.9)% | |
| Basic headline (loss)/earnings per share – pence |
Total headline loss for the year divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year after adjusting for shares held in employee benefit trusts. |
Diluted headline (loss)/earnings per share - pence
Diluted headline (loss)/earnings per share, the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue is adjusted to assume conversion of all dilutive potential shares.
| 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Restated | |
| £ million | £ million | |
| Total loss for the year | (858) | (1,079) |
| Total non-headline (credit)/charge before tax (see note 5) | (100) | 438 |
| Tax impact of non-headline items | 58 | (84) |
| Headline Loss | (900) | (725) |
| 2021 £ million |
2020 £ million |
|
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to calculate basic loss per share | 539 | 484 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to calculate diluted loss per share | 539 | 484 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |
| Headline loss per share Basic |
pence (166.9) |
pence (149.7) |
Constant currency measures These performance measures are calculated by comparing 2021 financial year performance translated at the 2020 financial year effective exchange rate, excluding foreign exchange gains and losses in statement of financial position revaluations.
| Aircraft dry / | Dry leasing arrangements relate solely to the provision of an aircraft. Wet leasing arrangements relate to the |
|---|---|
| wet leasing | provision of aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance. |
| Aircraft owned/leased at end of year |
Number of aircraft owned or on lease arrangements of over one month's duration at the end of the period. |
| ATC | Air Traffic Control |
| Available seat kilometres | |
| (ASK) | Seats flown multiplied by the number of kilometres flown. |
| Average adjusted | |
| capital employed | The average of opening and closing capital employed. |
| Hours of service for aircraft, measured from the time that the aircraft leaves the terminal at the departure airport to | |
| Block hours | the time that it arrives at the terminal at the destination airport. |
| Capital employed | Shareholders' equity less net cash/debt. |
| Cash collateralisation | The process of pledging cash to serve as a lender's protection against a borrower's default. |
| CCFF | Covid Corporate Financing Facility |
| Cost per ASK | Revenue less profit before tax, divided by available seat kilometres. |
| Cost per seat | Revenue less profit before tax, divided by seats flown. |
| Cost per seat, excluding fuel |
Revenue, less profit before tax, plus fuel costs, divided by seats flown. |
| CRM | Customer Relationship Management |
| CSAT | Customer Satisfaction |
| A weighted average of responses of surveys sent to customers who experienced either an on-time, delayed, | |
| CSAT | severely delayed or cancelled flight. |
| Gearing | Net cash/debt divided by the sum of shareholders' equity and adjusted net cash/debt. |
| Load factor | Number of passengers as a percentage of number of seats flown. The load factor is not weighted for the effect of varying sector lengths. |
| Normalised operating | |
| profit after tax | Reported operating profit, less tax at the prevailing UK corporation tax rate at the end of the financial year. |
| OEM | Original Equipment Manufacturer |
| Operated aircraft | |
| utilisation | Average number of block hours per day per aircraft operated. |
| Administrative and operational costs not reported elsewhere, including some employee costs, compensation paid to | |
| Other costs | passengers and the profit or loss on the disposal of property plant and equipment. |
| Other income | Includes insurance receipts, compensation, dividends received and gains on sale and leaseback transactions. |
| Passengers | Number of earned seats flown. Earned seats comprises seats sold to passengers (including no-shows), seats provided for promotional purposes and seats provided to staff for business travel. |
| Profit before tax per seat | Profit before tax divided by seats flown. |
| RCF | Revolving Credit Facility |
| Revenue | The sum of passenger revenue and ancillary revenue. |
| Revenue passenger | |
| kilometres (RPK) | Number of passengers multiplied by the number of kilometres those passengers were flown. |
| Revenue per ASK | Revenue divided by available seat kilometres. |
| Revenue per seat | Revenue divided by seats flown. |
| SAF | Sustainable Aviation Fuel |
| Seats flown | Seats available for passengers. |
| Sector | A one-way revenue flight |
| UKEF | UK Export Finance |
| VCS | Verified Carbon Standard |
The Company's share register is maintained by our registrar, Equiniti. Shareholders with queries relating to their shareholding should contact Equiniti directly using one of the methods listed below:
Equiniti Limited Aspect House Spencer Road Lancing West Sussex BN99 6DA
Telephone: 0371 384 2577* Telephone (outside UK): +44 121 415 7047 Online: help.shareview.co.uk Website: www.equiniti.com
* Lines are open Monday to Friday 8.30am to 5.30pm, excluding bank holidays
Shareholders can manage their holdings online or elect to receive shareholder documentation/communication in electronic form by registering at www.shareview.co.uk. Some of the benefits of having a Shareview portfolio are:
Shareholders who have elected to receive electronic communication but require a paper copy of any of the Company's shareholder documentation, or wish to change their instructions, should contact Equiniti directly using one of the methods listed above.
The Board currently intends to hold the AGM on 10 February 2022 at 11.00am, subject to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic and any UK Government guidance on social distancing, non-essential travel or public gatherings. The arrangements for the Company's 2022 AGM and details of the resolutions to be proposed, together with explanatory notes, will be set out in the Notice of AGM to be published on the Company's website. Guidance on whether physical attendance by shareholders will be possible will be determined nearer the time of the AGM.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 1 Embankment Place London WC2N 6RH
Hangar 89 London Luton Airport Luton Bedfordshire LU2 9PF
Telephone: 01582 525019 Registered in England & Wales under number 03959649
You can access the corporate website at https://corporate.easyjet.com. The corporate website provides useful information including annual reports, results announcements and share price data, as well as background information about the Company and current issues. Shareholders are encouraged to sign up to receive email notification of results and press announcements as they are released by registering at https://corporate.easyjet.com/investors
Details of our share price data and other share price tools are available at https://corporate.easyjet.com/investors
Should the Company pay any dividends, they can be paid quickly and securely directly into your bank account instead of being dispatched to you by cheque. You may also choose to have your dividends reinvested in further shares of the Company through our Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) (terms and conditions apply). To arrange either of these options, simply call Equiniti on the number provided. Alternatively, you can manage your dividend payment choices by registering with Shareview at www.shareview.co.uk.
Shareholders who only have a small number of shares whose valuation makes it uneconomic to sell them may wish to consider donating them to charity through ShareGift, the independent charity share donation scheme (registered charity no. 1052686). Further information may be obtained from ShareGift on 020 7930 3737 or at sharegift.org
Fraud is on the increase and many shareholders are targeted every year. If you have any reason to believe that you may have been the target of a fraud, or attempted fraud in relation to your shareholding, please contact Equiniti immediately.
Printed by Park Communications on FSC® certified paper.
Park works to the EMAS standard and its Environmental Management System is certified to ISO 14001.
This publication has been manufactured using 100% offshore wind electricity sourced from UK wind.
100% of the inks used are vegetable oil based, 95% of press chemicals are recycled for further use and, on average 99% of any waste associated with this production will be recycled and the remaining 1% used to generate energy.
This document is printed on Galerie Satin paper made of material from well-managed, FSC®-certified forests and other controlled sources.
Designed and produced by Black Sun plc
Antonia Antoniou, Jane Ashton, Justin Baker, Tasneem Baiyat, Sruti Bajoria, Michael Barker, Meena Bhatia-Ahir, Maxwell Bruce, Gail Butler, Phil Chastell, Lou Darley, Claire Dickinson, Jonathan Diec, Alex Field, James Fisher, Matt Garner, Kenton Jarvis, Matt Landsman, Alex Larkin, Ryan Mynard, Paul Robbins, Zarina Sabir, Ryan Simmons, Chris Sominka, Ben Souter, Ben Matthews, Julie Morris, Adam Mould, Anthony Pallant, Liz Perry, Ryan Purvis, Megan Quiddington, Mark Ramsden, Raminder Shergill, Adrian Talbot, Kieran Talwar, Tim Taylor, Lisa Tsavalos, Jessica Vaughan, Lucy Walker, James Whittingham, Holly Younger and all of our employees across the network.
Hangar 89 London Luton Airport Luton Bedfordshire LU2 9PF
www.easyJet.com
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.