Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

EAGLE MOUNTAIN MINING LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2022

Jul 10, 2022

64839_rns_2022-07-10_8c46ccdc-42de-49e7-9ec2-f18f29b35c82.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX Announcement 11 July 2022

==> picture [161 x 69] intentionally omitted <==

Mineralisation Extended to Far Eastern Talon in

Previously Undrilled Area

Highlights

  • Good mineralisation intersected in three of five holes drilled to the far east side of Talon

  • Results of this far eastern Talon drilling include :

  • 24.5m at 1.68% Cu, 14.68 g/t Ag and 0.34g/t Au (WT-22-121)

  • 13.2m at 1.75% Cu, 14.51g/t Ag and 0.37g/t Au (WT-22-121)

  • 14.5m at 1.57% Cu, 14.77 g/t Ag and 0.1g/t Au including

    • 6.3m at 2.86% Cu, 30.70g/t Ag and 0.21g/t Au (WT-22-119)
  • 4.9m at 6.61% Cu, 70.19 g/t Ag and 0.43 g/t Au (WT-22-125)

  • The mineralised zones outlined above are interpreted to connect with outcropping mineralisation at surface

  • Further results from four holes pending in the far eastern Talon area

  • Large diameter (PQ) drilling is being undertaken at Talon to collect metallurgical testwork samples and to infill the known resource

Commenting on the mineralisation at the eastern Talon, Eagle Mountain Mining CEO, Tim Mason, said:

“These latest results are likely to improve our anticipated Mineral Resource Estimate update and our strategy to work towards re-opening the Oracle Ridge Copper Mine.

Recommissioning of the existing underground mine will be a key milestone for the Company and will lead to faster and less expensive drilling compared to drilling from surface, due to shorter hole lengths, along with invaluable access for future works and study requirements.”

Eagle Mountain Mining Limited (ASX: EM2 ) ( Eagle Mountain , or the Company ) is pleased to provide an update on its 100% owned Oracle Ridge Copper Mine Project ( Oracle Ridge , or the Project ) in Arizona, USA.

Resource Expansion Results

Results for 12 resource expansion holes have been received (Table 1, Attachment 1) which continue to support the potential growth of the March 2022 Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) at a 1% copper cut-off grade. Key observations from the new drill holes are presented below.

==> picture [595 x 143] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

AUS REGISTERED OFFICE
Ground Floor, 22 Stirling Highway
Nedlands WA 6009
ACN: 621 541 204
CONTACT ASX: EM2
E: [email protected] eaglemountain.com.au
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [771 x 376] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 – Plan view of the mine area showing holes with new assays received. Selected results shown, refer to Attachment 1 for all assay results. Drill holes used to define the JORC Resource have been omitted for clarity. The points shown represent the approximate midpoint of each intercept.

eaglemountainmining.com.au

ASX:EM2

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Eastern Talon

Maiden results from the far eastern Talon Target have been received with strong copper mineralisation intersected in three of five holes (Figures 1 and 2).

Results include:

  • 24.5m at 1.68% Cu, 14.68 g/t Ag and 0.34g/t Au and 13.2m at 1.75% Cu, 14.51g/t Ag and 0.37g/t Au across two zones in drill hole WT-22-121. This is the easternmost hole drilled in the target with mineralisation open to the east, where it is expected to daylight, and to the south.

  • 14.5m at 1.57% Cu, 14.77 g/t Ag and 0.1g/t Au, including 6.3m at 2.86% Cu, 30.70g/t Ag and 0.21g/t Au in drill hole WT-22-119.

  • 4.9m at 6.61% Cu, 70.19 g/t Ag and 0.43 g/t Au, including 1.5m at 11.15% Cu, 121g/t Ag and 0.27g/t Au from drill hole WT-22-125.

  • WT-22-128 and WT-22-123 returned no significant intersections and only minor mineralisation respectively.

This eastern Talon target was considered highly prospective due to its magnetic geophysical signature, similar to other strongly mineralised areas at Oracle Ridge, and the presence of historical workings along the eastern boundary of the magnetic anomaly at the surface. Due to the steep terrain, this target was not drilled by previous explorers. Following substantial earthworks to establish a suitable drilling platform, Eagle Mountain has successfully completed the first drilling program into this target which returned highly encouraging results.

==> picture [494 x 298] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 – Far East Talon – East-west cross-section including drill holes WT-22-119, WT-22-121, and WT-22-125, showing mineralised intersections and relationships with nearby drill holes and local geology (refer Figure 1 and ASX announcement 1 December 2021).

ASX:EM2

Eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [204 x 248] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [190 x 247] intentionally omitted <==

Photos 1 and 2 – Copper mineralisation outcropping near the area interpreted to connect with hole WT-22-121. Refer to Figure 2.

Talon

Expansion drilling at the Talon continues to deliver strong results including:

  • 15.8m at 1.94% Cu, 16.26g/t Ag and 0.28g/t Au (including 1.4m at 8.08% Cu, 65.10g/t Ag and 0.77g/t Au) and 8m at 1.80% Cu, 22.32g/t Ag and 0.32g/t Au in drill hole WT-22-116. The drill hole was completed in the southern Talon area. The area between WT-22-116 and WT-22-119 (see Figure 1) approximately 200 metres to the east lacks any historical drilling and has recently been tested with several holes. Assay results are pending.

  • 13.7m at 1.97% Cu, 25.69g/t Ag and 0.39g/t Au and 5.6m at 1.57% Cu, 28.06g/t Ag, and 1.33g/t Au in drill hole WT-22-126, completed in the eastern Talon to the southeast of WT-21-06 (12.7m at 3.96% Cu, 49.11g/t Ag and 1.38g/t Au). The area to the east of this hole remains open.

  • 12.3m at 1.62% Cu, 24.57g/t Ag, and 0.28g/t Au including 5.9m at 2.67% Cu, 44.58g/t Ag and 0.48g/t Au in drill hole WT-22-124, completed in the eastern Talon, approximately 60 metres to the south of WT-22-126. The area to the east of this hole remains open with assays awaited for two recently completed holes.

  • 6.7m at 1.47% Cu, 11.02g/t Ag, and 0.07g/t Au in drill hole WT-22-120, completed in the northern Talon in an area where mineralisation appears less continuous.

Northern Mine Area

Thin mineralised horizons continue to be intersected in the northern part of the Oracle Ridge mine, just to the north of the main mine area. Results for four holes have been received which are expected to moderately expand future MREs in this area. Results include:

  • 9m at 2.03% Cu, 14.49g/t Ag and 0.01g/t Au in WT-22-109

  • 6.2m at 1.57% Cu, 35.60g/t Ag and 0.02g/t Au in WT-22-113

Mineralisation remains open to the north.

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Western Mine Area

One expansion hole in the Western Mine area returned 5.6m at 3.79% Cu, 11.22g/t Ag, and 0.05g/t Au (WT22-127, Figure 3). Interestingly this is one of the westernmost mineralised intersections encountered at Oracle Ridge since the 1970s. This new intersection remains open to the west and the area shows a structural complexity that needs to be unravelled by further drilling.

Table 1 – Summary of Significant Resource Expansion results above 1% Copper cut-off grade

Hole ID From To Width Cu Ag Au
[m] [m] [m] [%] [g/t] [g/t]
WT-22-109 136.6 145.6 9.0 2.03 14.49 0.01
including 140.7 141.6 0.9 6.30 46.80 0.03
WT-22-113 149.2 155.4 6.2 1.57 35.60 0.02
WT-22-116 204.1 219.9 15.8 1.94 16.26 0.28
including 213.8 215.2 1.4 8.08 65.10 1.42
259.0 267.0 8.0 1.80 22.32 0.32
including 259.0 260.1 1.1 4.95 72.80 1.11
WT-22-119 235.9 236.4 0.5 1.23 5.54 0.03
247.5 253.8 6.3 2.86 30.7 0.21
256.2 257.4 1.2 1.3 9.12 0.07
within 247.5 262 14.5 1.57 14.77 0.10
WT-22-120 362.7 369.4 6.7 1.47 11.02 0.07
WT-22-121 212.3 236.8 24.5 1.68 14.68 0.34
244.1 257.3 13.2 1.75 14.51 0.37
within 212.3 257.3 45.0 1.48 12.67 0.30
WT-22-123 206.5 207.9 1.4 1.07 8.12 0.13
WT-22-124 266.3 272.2 5.9 2.67 44.58 0.48
including 267.8 268.3 0.5 6.33 98.00 1.17
within 259.9 272.2 12.3 1.62 24.57 0.28
WT-22-125 266.1 271.0 4.9 6.61 70.19 0.43
including 266.1 267.6 1.5 11.15 121.00 0.27
WT-22-126 261.3 275.0 13.7 1.97 25.69 0.39
284.0 289.6 5.6 1.57 28.06 1.33
WT-22-127 190.7 196.3 5.6 3.79 11.22 0.05
including 192.5 195.2 2.7 5.15 14.87 0.07
WT-22-128 NSI, No Significant Intersections

Note – intercepts shown are downhole widths and not true widths

Resource Infill Results

Talon

Infill drilling at the Talon returned strong results in drill hole WT-22-114, at the north-eastern end of the anomaly with the best results including:

  • 6.7m at 2.47% Cu, 17.46g/t Ag and 0.35g/t Au

  • 14m at 2.05% Cu, 18.60g/t Ag and 0.26g/t Au

The previous results are part of a broader intersection of 53.1m at 1.26% Cu, 12.50g/t Ag, and 0.19g/t Au.

  • They are located approximately 40 metres east of WT-21-06 (12.7m at 3.96% Cu, 49.11g/t Ag, and 1.38g/t Au)[1] and approximately 60 metres northwest of WT-22-126 as discussed in the Resource Expansion drilling section above.

WT-22-118 returned no significant intersection (above the 1% Cu cut-off). The hole was drilled in the northern Talon near WT-22-120, in an area where mineralisation is proving less continuous than expected.

  • 1 refer ASX announcement 31 March 2021

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Northern Mine Area

Results for two infill holes have been received north of the main mine area, proximal to WT-22-109 and WT22-113:

  • 4.5m at 1.43% Cu, 40.83g/t Ag and 0.02g/t Au in WT-22-115

  • 5.8m at 1.31% Cu, 10.20g/t Ag and 0.01g/t Au in WT-22-117

  • Drilling in this area has been deprioritised due to lower grades and widths than anticipated.

Western Mine Area

Two infill holes were drilled at the southern end of the Western Mine Area (Figure 3):

  • 13.7m at 2.20% Cu, 28.97g.t Ag and 0.18g/t Au in drill hole WT-22-129

  • 0.7m at 3.15% Cu, 13.45g/t Ag and 0.21g/t Au within a thicker zone of approximately 15 metres of discontinuous, low-grade mineralisation (WT-22-131)

Results from these new holes suggest that mineralisation in the area is lower grade and moderately thinner than expected from previous results. This is likely to result in an MRE downgrade for this area.

==> picture [518 x 294] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3 – East-west cross-section including drill holes WT-22-127, WT-22-129, and WT-22-131, showing mineralised intersections and relationships with nearby drill holes and local geology (refer Figure 1 and ASX announcements 1 December 2021 and 25 May 2020).

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Table 2 – Summary of significant Resource Infill results above 1% Copper cut-off grade

Hole ID From To Width Cu Ag Au
[m] [m] [m] [%] [g/t] [g/t]
WT-22-114 268.5 272.5 4.0 1.61 15.00 0.26
279.4 286.1 6.7 2.47 17.46 0.35
296.0 310.0 14.0 2.05 18.60 0.26
314.0 321.6 7.6 1.24 22.24 0.26
within 268.5 321.6 53.1 1.26 12.50 0.19
WT-22-115 95.5 100.0 4.5 1.43 40.83 0.02
WT-22-117 102.1 107.9 5.8 1.31 10.20 0.01
WT-22-118 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
WT-22-129 249.3 263.0 13.7 2.20 28.97 0.18
WT-22-131 232.8 233.5 0.7 3.15 13.45 0.21

Note – intercepts shown are downhole widths and not true widths

Golden Eagle

Eagle Mountain’s technical team completed its preliminary review of drilling results from the Golden Eagle prospect, located less than two kilometres east of the Oracle Ridge mine. Drilling commenced at the Golden Eagle following favourable results from surface exploration work including geological mapping, sampling and geophysical surveys (refer announcement 23 August 2021).

Encouraging initial assays and visual observations from the drill core (refer announcement 28 October 2021) prompted the Company to complete 13 drill holes across two geological systems. The first system was interpreted as prospective for gold mineralisation. The second system was considered prospective for base metals mineralisation. Both geological systems are quite different to the skarn mineralisation at the Oracle Ridge Mine and both settings have historical workings.

Final assay results were received after several months due to long delays at the laboratory as well as the large number of samples collected. Drillholes at Golden Eagle were sampled from top to bottom in order to collect the best possible geochemical dataset resulting in sizable batches of samples submitted to the laboratory. Assay results have been reviewed internally as well as in conjunction with external consultants who aided the technical team in interpreting the complex dataset, the alteration styles observed and the potential link between copper mineralisation at Oracle Ridge and Golden Eagle.

While these studies have not been fully completed, few assays returned reportable gold or copper values and are presented in Table 3. At this stage, the rock lithology, structural orientation and alteration observed in the drill core are quite different from that expected from the surface mapping and sampling program.

Table 3 – Summary of Significant Assay Results from Golden Eagle

Hole ID From To Width Cu Ag Au
[m] [m] [m] [%] [g/t] [g/t]
GE-21-02 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-04 107.0 108.0 1.0 0.03 0.90 2.00
GE-21-05 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-06 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-07 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-08 41.6 43.6 2.0 0.11 5.10 5.00
GE-21-09 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-10 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-11 160.0 160.6 0.6 1.00 19.30 0.06
GE-21-12 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-13 No Significant Intersection(NSI)

Note – intercepts shown are downhole widths and not true widths

ASX:EM2

Eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Once final results from the technical studies are received the Company will assess if further work is required at Golden Eagle including a potential ground geophysical survey using the Induced Polarization method. This method is effective in deciphering the location of disseminated sulphides such as those associated with some of the mineralisation at Golden Eagle.

Next steps

Surface drilling activities continue to focus on Resource Expansion drilling and Metallurgical drilling. The latter program has commenced at the Talon with two large diameter holes currently planned. Metallurgical studies will be completed on core collected from these holes to ascertain the processing characteristics of the mineralisation. This will be the first time that such studies have been completed in the Talon area.

Underground activities are ramping up with contractors expected to commence the refurbishment of the underground infrastructure in the next two to three weeks following finalisation of arrangements with the contractor.

- Ends -

This ASX announcement was authorised for release by the Board of Eagle Mountain Mining Limited.

For further information please contact:

Tim Mason Mark Pitts Jane Morgan Chief Executive Officer Company Secretary Investor and Media Relations [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT

The information in this document that relates to new Exploration Activities is based on information compiled by Mr Fabio Vergara and Mr Brian Paull who are both Members of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM) and have sufficient experience relevant to the activity which they are undertaking to qualify as a Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code 2012). Mr Vergara is the Chief Geologist and Mr Paull is the Director of Exploration of Eagle Mountain Mining Limited and both consent to the inclusion in this document of the information in the form and context in which it appears. Mr Vergara and Mr Paull hold shares and options in Eagle Mountain Mining Limited.

Where the Company references historic exploration results including technical information from previous ASX announcements including 25 May 2020, JORC Table 1 disclosures are included within them. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in those announcements, and all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the results within those announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed. In addition, the form and context in which the Competent Persons findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original reports.

The information in this report that relates to historic production results was prepared and first disclosed under a pre-2012 edition of the JORC Code. The data has been compiled but NOT validated by Eagle Mountain geologists. At this stage, Eagle Mountain is unable to conclude that the production data is reliable. However,

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

nothing has come to the attention of Eagle Mountain that causes it to question the accuracy or reliability of the historic production results and the various source reports.

ABOUT EAGLE MOUNTAIN MINING

Eagle Mountain is a copper-gold explorer focused on the strategic exploration and development of the Oracle Ridge Copper Mine and the highly prospective greenfields Silver Mountain Project, both located in Arizona, USA.

Arizona is at the heart of America’s mining industry and home to some of the world’s largest copper discoveries such as Bagdad, Miami and Resolution, one of the largest undeveloped copper deposits in the world.

Follow the Company’s developments through our website and social media channels:

==> picture [42 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

Linkedin

==> picture [42 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [37 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

Twitter EM2 Website

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Attachment 1

Summary table of recent drill holes at Oracle Ridge

Hole ID Easting Northing Elevation Dip Azimuth Depth
[m] [m] [m] [◦] [◦] [m]
WT-22-87 524560 3592300 2108 57 238 326.7
WT-22-88 524071 3592956 2180 75 185 229.8
WT-22-89 524372 3595479 2193 85 137 356.6
WT-22-90 524556 3592292 2105 67 175 352.4
WT-22-91 524071 3592856 2180 65 177 268.2
WT-22-92 524071 3592961 2180 69 149 245.1
WT-22-93 524071 3592961 2178 35 135 356.6
WT-22-94 524555 3592291 2106 63 197 351.9
WT-22-95 524072 3592963 2183 77 128 348.7
WT-22-96 524555 3592291 2106 58 213 353.0
WT-22-97 524071 3592964 2180 66 120 260.3
WT-22-98 524069 3592959 2183 69 092 283.5
WT-22-99 524437 3592417 2152 71 205 365.2
WT-22-100 524554 3592292 2105 52 227 338.6
WT-22-101 523940 3593328 2050 69 238 227.7
WT-22-102 523940 3593327 2048 81 175 215.2
WT-22-103 524555 3592290 2104 51 205 365.2
WT-22-104 523941 3593325 2049 73 120 288.8
WT-22-105 524555 3592290 2104 47 217 301.1
WT-22-106 524437 3592417 2151 68 180 392.6
WT-22-107 523940 3593326 2047 57 098 322.2
WT-22-108 524560 3592300 2108 61 151 331.3
WT-22-109 523942 3593326 2048 66 088 269.7
WT-22-110 523942 3593326 2048 54 193 396.8
WT-22-111 523951 3593328 2045 56 078 310.3
WT-22-112 524560 3592300 2108 46 190 413.6
WT-22-113 523951 3593328 2045 61 063 278.6
WT-22-114 524551 3592296 2103 68 011 339.2
WT-22-115 523941 3593327 2050 68 047 298.1
WT-22-116 524554 3592292 2105 69 152 317.6
WT-22-117 523937 3593321 2052 84 350 214.5
WT-22-118 524519 3592579 2094 58 237 344.4
WT-22-119 524641 3592290 2077 58 089 299.3
WT-22-120 524519 3592579 2094 50 243 386.8
WT-22-121 524641 3592290 2077 49 090 332.2
WT-22-122 524560 3592300 2108 76 117 Abandoned
WT-22-123 524641 3592290 2077 55 099 289.0
WT-22-124 524560 3592300 2108 77 075 312.4
WT-22-125 524641 3592290 2077 56 079 302.7
WT-22-126 524560 3592300 2108 72 036 322.2
WT-22-127 523851 3592717 2280 54 203 326.8
WT-22-128 524641 3592290 2077 50 075 324.9
WT-22-129 523850 3592714 2279 52 155 340.8
WT-22-130 524640 3592289 2077 79 239 265.5
WT-22-131 523852 3592716 2280 51 170 340.8

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

WT-22-132 524636 3592286 2077 65 184 297.5
WT-22-133 523851 3592716 2280 48 105 325.5
WT-22-134 524633 3592286 2077 57 191 269.6
WT-22-135 524642 3592289 2077 49 155 325.2
WT-22-136 523849 3592716 2279 47 239 323.1
WT-22-137 523849 3592716 2279 49 188 409.4
WT-22-138 524642 3592289 2077 47 120 306.9
WT-22-139 524431 3593348 2081 70 263 301.5
WT-22-140 524642 3592289 2078 54 147 258.5
WT-22-141 524606 3592186 2059 51 145 285.0
WT-22-142 524641 3592288 2081 79 9 276.8
WT-22-143 524606 3592187 2059 48 163 276.8
WT-22-144 524644 3592288 2078 48 122 291.7
WT-22-145 524640 3592288 2076 67 19 280.7
WT-22-146 524607 3592187 2059 48 129 279.8
WT-22-147 524643 3592289 2079 66 155 310.3
WT-22-148 524607 3592187 2059 54 117 262.4
WT-22-149 524644 3592291 2079 56 130 272.8
WT-22-150 524607 3592186 2060 63 127 307.2
WT-22-151 524643 3592290 2077 64 123 279.8
WT-22-152 524606 3592186 2059 48 191 303.9
WT-22-153 524642 3592289 2077 67 88 282.6
WT-22-154 524641 3592288 2077 60 64 269.8
WT-22-155 524607 3592187 2060 57 180 306.3
WT-22-156 524640 3592287 2077 70 55 307.2
WT-22-157 524606 3592187 2060 45 177 300.2
WT-22-158 524640 3592287 2077 61 41 286.2
WT-22-159 524606 3592187 2059 60 157 335.3
WT-22-160 524642 3592289 2079 74 180 Inprogress
WT-22-161 524554 3592294 2106 65 30 357.5
WT-22-162 524605 3592188 2061 68 185 Inprogress
GE-21-01 527468 3593409 1497 65 035 261.5
GE-21-02 527468 3593409 1497 60 002 249.9
GE-21-03 527468 3593409 1497 76 002 295.7
GE-21-04 527468 3593409 1497 64 065 253.3
GE-21-05 527468 3593408 1497 50 260 309.4
GE-21-06 528007 3593650 1485 80 180 487.7
GE-21-07 526940 3593290 1559 60 45 639.2
GE-21-08 526940 3593290 1559 83 45 526.1
GE-21-09 526939 3593291 1559 50 340 624.8
GE-21-10 526822 3593288 1562 45 190 449.6
GE-21-11 526566 3593264 1592 47 0 478.8
GE-21-12 526577 3593249 1592 60 0 548.6
GE-21-13 526564 3593262 1594 85 355 276.5

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Summary table of recent diamond drill hole intersections at Oracle Ridge

Note - All reported intervals are downhole widths.

Hole ID From To Width Cu Ag Au
WT-22-87 Assayspending
WT-22-88 Assayspending
WT-22-89 No significant intersections(NSI)
WT-22-90 145.0 147.0 2.0 2.47 20.28 0.36
159.5 170.1 10.6 2.63 17.97 0.39
including 165.1 165.9 0.8 7.88 51.10 1.08
178.3 180.1 1.8 2.08 23.80 0.48
205.2 206.5 1.3 7.46 51.70 1.71
267.9 268.9 1.0 1.87 15.60 0.62
271.5 278.1 6.6 2.09 18.33 0.69
WT-22-91 102.4 104.5 2.1 1.01 7.97 0.13
147.8 148.9 1.1 1.48 15.55 0.39
179.7 181.8 2.1 1.52 8.32 0.28
197.2 198.8 1.6 1.10 8.72 0.21
203.0 207.0 4.0 1.77 10.60 0.16
WT-22-92 159.7 161.0 1.3 1.01 14.85 0.35
198.5 199.8 1.3 1.18 10.60 0.23
206.4 207.1 0.7 1.37 8.91 0.17
WT-22-93 255.2 255.7 0.5 4.34 44.00 0.24
264.3 274.1 9.8 2.78 31.57 0.48
including 273.4 274.1 0.7 10.05 140.00 1.90
281.1 284.3 3.2 1.22 18.66 0.23
305.3 306.0 0.7 1.04 1.97 0.81
316.7 319.4 2.7 1.29 13.59 0.16
330.3 331.1 0.8 4.91 11.30 0.13
337.6 341.5 3.9 2.06 21.44 0.28
WT-22-94 126.1 127.7 1.6 1.16 9.56 0.22
191.0 208.0 17.0 2.34 18.35 0.61
213.0 214.5 1.5 1.51 10.95 0.62
217.6 238.9 21.3 3.28 26.16 0.76
245.0 246.3 1.3 1.73 14.85 0.53
within 191.0 246.3 55.3 2.16 17.15 0.54
WT-22-95 Assayspending
WT-22-96 121.1 125.6 4.5 2.76 32.85 0.36
165.5 166.7 1.2 1.06 7.97 0.36
WT-22-97 181.6 186.1 4.5 2.92 29.14 0.66
WT-22-98 183.9 184.7 0.8 7.72 83.10 2.45
within 181.8 185.3 3.5 3.08 32.09 0.92
WT-22-99 149.7 150.6 0.9 2.23 34.40 0.52
202.2 210.4 8.2 2.42 18.07 0.42
226.1 229.3 3.2 2.30 21.13 0.64
234.5 242.6 8.1 2.08 19.70 0.46
248.3 262.9 14.6 2.83 27.54 0.51
including 248.3 254.1 5.8 4.85 49.26 0.89
including 260.1 262.9 2.8 4.27 37.28 0.71
within 202.2 262.9 60.7 1.56 14.15 0.32
270.8 271.5 0.7 1.94 18.55 0.43
277.2 278.1 0.9 1.14 7.79 0.31
286.3 287.5 1.2 1.06 10.95 0.16
WT-22-100 107.4 108.1 0.7 1.04 7.92 0.21

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID From To Width Cu Ag Au
161.2 162.5 1.3 1.47 12.70 0.23
235.1 239.3 4.2 1.86 15.91 0.56
242.5 244.0 1.5 1.40 12.65 1.15
WT-22-101 No significant intersections
WT-22-102 96.2 97.6 1.4 1.75 7.45 0.01
WT-22-103 120.1 120.6 0.5 1.30 9.81 0.14
125.5 125.9 0.4 1.51 14.35 0.19
128.9 130.1 1.2 1.26 10.90 0.14
152.5 153.1 0.6 1.37 12.65 0.16
WT-22-104 118.0 119.1 1.1 1.37 13.35 0.03
WT-22-105 Assayspending
WT-22-106 149.3 150.1 0.8 1.18 7.13 0.09
171.0 172.2 1.2 1.24 12.00 0.18
173.3 175.4 2.1 1.87 19.40 0.24
270.5 280.2 9.7 1.27 10.17 0.33
287.3 298.1 10.8 1.67 12.56 0.72
including 295.3 298.1 2.8 3.52 26.24 1.40
within 270.5 298.1 27.6 1.18 9.11 0.43
303.5 307.2 3.7 1.45 12.39 0.36
313.6 314.7 1.1 2.24 27.62 0.81
within* 270.5 314.7 44.2 0.96 7.77 0.34
324.2 324.8 0.6 1.68 16.65 0.05
348.5 349.7 1.2 2.96 30.30 0.76
356.4 356.9 0.5 1.13 9.22 0.31
361.5 369.5 8.0 1.62 16.45 0.40
WT-22-107 175.2 175.8 0.6 1.26 10.60 0.10
192.9 194.1 1.2 1.33 9.18 0.01
306.7 307.4 0.7 1.60 25.10 0.03
WT-22-108 290.5 292.0 1.5 1.39 22.90 0.33
294.4 295.8 1.4 1.13 15.99 0.20
303.5 305.7 2.2 1.59 16.26 0.48
312.2 313.3 1.1 1.15 10.00 0.14
313.9 317.4 3.5 2.04 5.11 0.07
WT-22-109 136.6 145.6 9.0 2.03 14.49 0.01
including 140.7 141.6 0.9 6.30 46.80 0.03
WT-22-110 Assayspending
WT-22-111 Assayspending
WT-22-112 179.0 179.9 0.9 1.03 12.35 0.36
184.0 192.9 8.9 1.53 14.11 0.34
206.1 207.8 1.7 1.98 6.71 0.08
214.0 216.0 2.0 2.10 18.74 0.53
223.0 226.7 3.7 1.38 7.02 0.15
261.0 262.6 1.6 1.89 16.50 0.20
283.5 285.9 2.4 1.17 10.39 0.22
298.6 299.8 1.2 1.99 43.63 0.35
319.7 320.5 0.8 1.77 13.95 0.22
329.0 338.4 9.4 1.35 14.88 0.23
349.3 349.9 0.6 5.66 35.80 0.02
WT-22-113 149.2 155.4 6.2 1.57 35.60 0.02
WT-22-114 193.5 195.6 2.1 1.20 7.41 0.23
250.2 250.8 0.6 1.75 21.70 0.17
268.5 272.5 4.0 1.61 15.00 0.26
279.4 286.1 6.7 2.47 17.46 0.35
296.0 310.0 14.0 2.05 18.60 0.26
314.0 321.6 7.6 1.24 22.24 0.26
within 268.5 321.6 53.1 1.26 12.50 0.19
WT-22-115 95.5 100.0 4.5 1.43 40.83 0.02

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID From To Width Cu Ag Au
WT-22-116 174.3 175.9 1.6 1.48 13.35 0.34
204.1 219.9 15.8 1.94 16.26 0.28
including 204.1 205.0 0.9 6.17 61.40 0.77
including 213.8 215.2 1.4 8.08 65.10 1.42
238.6 239.6 1.0 1.74 13.60 0.50
259.0 267.0 8.0 1.80 22.32 0.32
including 259.0 260.1 1.1 4.95 72.80 1.11
286.0 288.6 2.6 3.60 53.97 0.68
including 287.8 288.6 0.8 6.09 98.00 1.14
WT-22-117 102.1 107.9 5.8 1.31 10.20 0.01
156.0 156.5 0.5 1.28 14.30 0.03
160.2 160.6 0.4 4.45 40.60 0.04
WT-22-118 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
WT-22-119 235.9 236.4 0.5 1.23 5.54 0.03
247.5 253.8 6.3 2.86 30.7 0.21
256.2 257.4 1.2 1.3 9.12 0.07
261.5 262 0.5 1.24 2.41 0.02
within 247.5 262 14.5 1.57 14.77 0.10
WT-22-120 362.7 369.4 6.7 1.47 11.02 0.07
WT-22-121 212.3 236.8 24.5 1.68 14.68 0.34
244.1 257.3 13.2 1.75 14.51 0.37
within 212.3 257.3 45.0 1.48 12.67 0.30
WT-22-122 Assayspending
WT-22-123 206.5 207.9 1.4 1.07 8.12 0.13
WT-22-124 259.9 260.9 1.0 1.06 11.75 0.18
262.1 263.8 1.7 1.45 12.59 0.18
266.3 272.2 5.9 2.67 44.58 0.48
including 267.8 268.3 0.5 6.33 98.00 1.17
within 259.9 272.2 12.3 1.62 24.57 0.28
WT-22-125 164.9 165.4 0.5 1.66 12.60 0.19
266.1 271.0 4.9 6.61 70.19 0.43
including 266.1 267.6 1.5 11.15 121.00 0.27
including 270.2 271.0 0.8 9.15 92.70 0.26
WT-22-126 245.3 246.8 1.5 3.06 30.96 2.02
including 245.3 245.7 0.4 2.36 22.60 6.15
254.7 255.7 1.0 1.23 12.65 0.25
261.3 275.0 13.7 1.97 25.69 0.39
284.0 289.6 5.6 1.57 28.06 1.33
WT-22-127 190.7 196.3 5.6 3.79 11.22 0.05
including 192.5 195.2 2.7 5.15 14.87 0.07
including 192.5 193.0 0.5 7.32 14.65 0.06
WT-22-128 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
WT-22-129 249.3 263.0 13.7 2.20 28.97 0.18
WT-22-130 Assayspending
WT-22-131 232.8 233.5 0.7 3.15 13.45 0.21
WT-22-132 Assayspending
WT-22-133 Assayspending
WT-22-134 Assayspending
WT-22-135 Hole inprogress
WT-22-136 Hole inprogress
WT-22-137 Assayspending
WT-22-138 Assayspending
WT-22-139 Assayspending
WT-22-140 Assayspending
WT-22-141 Assayspending
WT-22-142 Assayspending
WT-22-143 Assayspending

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [129 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Hole ID From To To Width Width Cu Cu Ag Ag Ag Au
WT-22-144 Assayspending
WT-22-145 Assayspending
WT-22-146 Assayspending
WT-22-147 Assayspending
WT-22-148 Assayspending
WT-22-149 Assayspending
WT-22-150 Assayspending
WT-22-151 Assayspending
WT-22-152 Assayspending
WT-22-153 Assayspending
WT-22-154 Assayspending
WT-22-155 Assayspending
WT-22-156 Assayspending
WT-22-157 Assayspending
WT-22-158 Assayspending
WT-22-159 Assayspending
WT-22-160 Hole inprogress
WT-22-161 Assayspending
WT-22-162 Hole inprogress
GE-21-01 200.4 202.0 1.6 0.02 0.50 0.91
GE-21-02 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-03 236.8 258.0 21.2 0.11 1.86 1.88
including 250.0 258.0 8.0 0.20 3.79 3.80
and 236.8 244.0 7.2 0.09 0.83 1.26
GE-21-04 107.0 108.0 1.0 0.03 0.90 2.00
GE-21-05 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-06 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-07 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-08 41.6 43.6 2.0 0.11 5.10 5.00
GE-21-09 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-10 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-11 160.0 160.6 0.6 1.00 19.30 0.06
GE-21-12 No Significant Intersection(NSI)
GE-21-13 No Significant Intersection(NSI)

*Reported at 0.6% Cu cut-off grade

a Result just below reporting cut-off included for completeness and relevance b Below detection

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

Attachment 2

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

==> picture [202 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or •Diamond drilling. Nominal sampling interval of 3m adjusted as
techniques specific specialised industry standard measurement tools required for local geological conditions. Core was sawn and half-
appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as downhole core was crushed, pulverised and split to produce a
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These representative sample for assaying.
examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of •For WT-series drilling, samples returning weighted average Cu ≥
sampling. 1% are reported in the announcement. Wider intercepts are
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample reported using a 0.6% Cu cut-off grade.
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement •For GE-series drilling, samples returning weighted average Au ≥
tools or systems used. 0.5g/t or Cu ≥ 1% are reported in the announcement.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to •Visual results presented are based on geological observations,
the Public Report. and for WT-series drilling consider the copper content of different
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would sulphide species at a 0.6% Cu nominal cut-off.
be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30
g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be
required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent
sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types
(eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
Drilling Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air
•Diamond drilling completed by Boart Longyear using an LF-90 drill
techniques blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, rig.
triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or •Core is HQ3 and PQ3
other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
•Downhole deviation surveys are performed approximately every
30.5m (100 feet)
•The core is oriented with a Boart Longyear TruecoreTMsystem to
allow measurement ofstructural information.
Drill sample Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample •Core recoveries are recorded by the drillers at the rig and verified
recovery recoveries and results assessed. by Company’s personnel during core logging
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure •To maximise sample recovery and core quality drilling is
representative nature of the samples. performed with a “triple tube” set up where two splits are inserted
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade in the barrel to minimize core displacement and core loss.
and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential •No relationship has been determined between sample recoveries
loss/gainof fine/coarse material. and grade.
ASX:EM2 eaglemountainmining.com.au

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and •A quick log is completed on site and detailed logging is performed
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate at the Company’s facility in Tucson.
Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical •Logging is both qualitative and quantitative in nature. Portable
studies. XRF and magnetic susceptibility measurements are taken at
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or regular intervals on the core.
costean, channel, etc) photography. •Core is photographed after mark-up, before sampling, wet and dry
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections •100% of the relevant intersections is logged.
_logged. _
Sub-sampling If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core •For all GE series holes (Golden Eagle) holes and WT series holes
techniques and taken. (Wedgetail) up to WT-21-73, the core is sawn in half by ALS
sample If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and Minerals or Skyline Assayers and Laboratories at their Tucson
preparation whether sampled wet or dry. facilities. Half of the core is bagged and sent for assaying while
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the the other half is left in the core box for future reference.
sample preparation technique. •Commencing with drill hole WT-21-74, holes are cut using a
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to Company-owned automatic core saw. Half of the core is bagged
maximise representivity of samples. and sent for assaying while the other half is left in the core box for
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the
future reference.
in situ material collected, including for instance results for field •A cut line is drawn by a geologist to guide sawing and sampling of
duplicate/second-half sampling. intervals where sample bias might occur (e.g. mineralised vein at
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the small angle to core axis).
material being sampled. •ALS Minerals or Skyline Assayers and Laboratories conducted all
preparation work: samples were weighed, dried, crushed and
crushed to better than 70% passing 2mm; sample was split with a
riffle splitter and a split of up to 250g pulverised to better than 85%
passing 75µm.
•Duplicates are used to assess the sampling representativeness.
When duplicates are collected the core is quartered: one quarter
is sent to the laboratory as the primary sample, the other quarter
is sent to the laboratory as the duplicate and the remaining half of
the core is left in the box for future reference.
•Sample sizes are considered appropriate to the grain size of the
materialbeing sampled.
Quality of assay The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and •ALS Minerals assay methods: ME-MS61 (48 element four acid
data and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is ICP-MS) and Au-AA23 (Au 30g charge Fire Assay with Atomic
laboratory tests considered partial or total. Absorption finish). The technique is considered a near total digest
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, of relevant minerals. Above detection samples are re-assayed
etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including with Au-GRA21, Ag-OG62, Cu-OG62, Pb-OG62, Zn-OG62
instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors •Skyline Assayers and Laboratories methods: TE-5 (47 element

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
applied and their derivation, etc. multi acid digestion with ICP-MS) and FA-01 (Au Fire Assay with
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,
Atomic Absorption finish). The technique is considered a near
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable total digest of relevant minerals.
levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been •Certified Reference Material (CRM), blanks and duplicates were
established. inserted/collected at a ratio of 1:10 with a minimum of 1 CRM per
assays batch. CRMs are inserted at intervals never exceeding 20
samples. Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been
established.
•Before releasing results from geological observations (e.g. visual
mineralisation), the Company adopts the following QA/QC
procedures:
o
Core is dispatched to the laboratory and cut. Samples are
bagged, crushed and pulverised (sample preparation)
o
After sample preparation is finalised, a sub-sample is returned
to the Company while assays are being completed at the
laboratory
o
Returned sub-samples are analysed with the Company’s
portable XRF instrument
o
Portable XRF readings are compared with the visual logs
o
Visual results are approvedfor release to themarket
Verification of The verification of significant intersections by either independent or •Significant intersections have been verified by Company’s
sampling and alternative company personnel. Principal Geologist
assaying The use of twinned holes. •No twinned holes reported
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data •Logging and sampling data are collected using tablet computers
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. and Logchief software to ensure data integrity. The data is
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. transferred weekly to the Datashed database after further data
validation by the database manager
•No assay adjustment performed
Location of data Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and
•NAD83 Arizona State Plane Central (International feet). Data is
points down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations presented in NAD83 UTM Zone 12N (meters)
used in Mineral Resource estimation. •National Elevation Dataset. Horizontal resolution of approximately
Specification of the grid system used. 10m and vertical resolution of 1m
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. •Drill holes are located with a hand-held GPS with an estimated
horizontal accuracy of ±5m. Collar location is subsequently
recaptured using a DGPS system with an estimated accuracy of
±0.5m
Data spacing and Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. •The data spacing of the new drilling results reported is insufficient
distribution Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the appropriate for Mineral Resource estimation
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
• _Whether sample compositing has been applied. _
Orientation of Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of •The relationship between drilling orientation and orientation of key
data in relation to possible structures and the extent to which this is known, mineralised structures is yet to be determined
geological considering the deposit type.
structure If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation
of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. •Core boxes are collected at the drill rig by Company personnel
and transported to the Tucson logging facility. After logging the
core is delivered by Company personnel to ALS Minerals’ Tucson
facilitiesforcutting, sampling, sample preparationand assaying.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and •No audits or reviews of sampling techniques have been
_data. _ completed.

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

  • Criteria JORC Code explanation Mineral tenementType, reference name/number, location and ownership including and land tenure agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint status ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

  • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

Commentary

  • The Oracle Ridge Mine Project (Project) is located in the Marble Peak area, approximately 30 kilometres by air northeast of Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A. It is located in Sections 17, 18, 19 and 20 of Township 11 South, Range 16 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian of the U.S. cadastral system. The geographical coordinates are approximately Latitude 32º28' North, Longitude 110º41' West.

  • The Project is 100% owned by Eagle Mountain Mining Limited through its Arizona subsidiaries Wedgetail Operations LLC (100%) and Wedgetail Holdings LLC (100%).

  • The Project consists of four main areas: Oracle Ridge, OREX, Golden Eagle and Red Hawk.

  • Oracle Ridge (including historical Tailings Storage Facility)

  • Oracle Ridge comprises 57 Patented Mining Claims and 45 Unpatented Mining Claims within the Coronado National Forest (United States Forest Service).

  • 100% of the mineral rights starting from 15.2m (50 feet) below surface are owned by Wedgetail Operations LLC

  • In 2009, the surface rights for the area necessary for potential mining access (e.g. portals), processing facilities and offices have been secured by an industrial property lease. Under the agreement, Wedgetail Operations LLC leases the surface rights to the project for the purpose of carrying out its exploration, potential development and mining. The lease has an initial term of three years and is renewable for nine additional extensions of three years each.

  • A separate surface access agreement is in place to allow access to drill sites and drill pads construction.

  • The mineral rights of Patented Claims at Oracle Ridge are likely to have a reversionary interest to Marble Mountain Ventures, which occurs on 18 February 2025, unless the Company exercises its Extension Option upon which the Company’s interests in the mineral rights are extended to 18 February 2040.

  • There is a 3% net smelter returns royalty on the future sale of any metals and minerals derived from the Oracle Ridge mine.

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
OREX
•The OREX area is covered by 93 Unpatented Mining Claims
within the Coronado National Forest (United States Forest
Service).
•100% of the mineral rights are owned by Wedgetail Operations
LLC
•The OREX area is also partly covered by Patented Mining Claims
controlled by Pima County. The Company has an agreement in
place for non-ground disturbing exploration work to occur on Pima
County’s Patented Mining Claims. The Company does not
currently control the Mineral Rights over Pima County’s claims
Golden Eagle
•The Golden Eagle area is covered by 3 Patented Mining Claims
and 32 Unpatented Mining Claims within the Coronado National
Forest (United States Forest Service).
•100% of the mineral rights are owned by Wedgetail Operations
LLC
•The Golden Eagle area is also partly covered by Patented Mining
Claims controlled by Pima County. The Company has an
agreement in place for non-ground disturbing exploration work to
occur on Pima County’s Patented Mining Claims. The Company
does not currently control the Mineral Rights over Pima County’s
claims
Red Hawk
•The Red Hawk area is covered by 24 Unpatented Mining Claims
within the Coronado National Forest (United States Forest
Service).
•100% of the mineral rights are owned by Wedgetail Operations
LLC
•The land tenure is secure at the time of reporting and there are no
known impediments to obtaining permits to operateinthe area.
Exploration done Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Oracle Ridge
by other parties •The Oracle Ridge Mining District was discovered in 1873. In 1881,
an 18 tonne per day copper smelter was erected at nearby
Apache Camp. The ore for this smelter was supplied from the
Hartman, Homestake, Leatherwood, Stratton, Geesman and other
small mines in the area.

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
•Phelps Dodge Copper Company (Phelps Dodge) entered the
District in 1910 and undertook considerable development and
exploration work.
•Continental Copper, Inc began exploring in the District in the
1950s. Continental leased the property in 1968 with an option to
purchase and undertook a large exploration and development
program. This was the first time there was a large scale
assessment of the mineralisation.
•Union Miniere began a new exploration program in April 1980. In
1984, a feasibility study for an 1,814 short ton per day operation
was completed.
•In October 1988, South Atlantic Ventures acquired Union
Miniere's interest and entered into a 70-30 partnership with
Continental to develop the mine. Minproc Engineers Inc. was
contracted to supervise the confirmatory metallurgical test work. A
detailed design was started in November 1989 on a column
flotation plant. Construction of the facility commenced in April
1990 and the first ore was processed through the plant on March
3, 1991. The capacity of the mill was initially set at 771 short ton
per day. The mill capacity was later expanded to approximately
1,000 short ton per day.
•The mine closed in 1996. Production records show that
approximately 1,200,000 short tons were milled since
commencement of the operation.
•Between 2009 and 2015 the project was owned by Oracle Ridge
Mining, a TSX-V listed company, which drilled approximately 130
surface and underground holes.
Golden Eagle
•Small scale mining occurred in the Golden Eagle area in the first
half of the 1900s focussed on gold. The largest operation was the
Sanderson Mine. The mine is part of the Golden Eagle
mineralised system but is located outside the Company’s
landholding. It reported smelter returns between 1936 and 1941
averaging 0.4 Oz/short ton Au (13.7 g/t Au), 0.65 Oz/ton Ag (22.3
g/t Ag) and 0.46% Cu (small tonnage).
•Oracle Ridge mining conducted exploration at Golden Eagle in the
mid-1990s. A geophysical magnetic survey was flown over the
area. Few magnetic anomalies, postulated to be magnetite-rich

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
skarn were tested by reconnaissance drilling. Results were not
deemed sufficiently encouraging and no further drilling was
conducted in the area.
OREX
•Details of historical (pre-1980s) exploration and mining activities in
the OREX area are not known. Few small-scale workings were
found during mapping.
•In 1980 a Joint Venture between Gulf Minerals Corporation and
W.R. Grace Company completed mapping of the area and drilled
7 holes. Results of the program were reviewed by Oracle Ridge
Mining Partners and summarised in an internal communication in
1992.
Red Hawk
•No historical exploration nor mining activities are known for the
RedHawkarea
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Oracle Ridge
•The deposit is classified as copper dominated skarn. Minerals
representative of both prograde and retrograde skarn
development are present, the former being represented by
diopside and garnets, the latter by epidote, magnetite and chlorite.
•Copper dominated mineralisation generally contain chalcopyrite
and bornite. The deposits are most commonly associated with
Andean-type plutons intruded in older continental-margin
carbonate sequences. The associated intrusive rocks are
commonly porphyritic stocks, dikes and breccia pipes of quartz
diorite, granodiorite, monzo-granite and tonalite composition,
intruding carbonate rocks, calcareous-volcanic or tuffaceous
rocks. The deposits shapes vary from stratiform and tabular to
vertical pipes, narrow lenses, and irregular zones that are
controlled by intrusive contacts.
•The copper rich skarn deposits at Oracle Ridge are found in
conformable lens along the contact with the Leatherwood
Granodiorite or associated with faults and shear zones which
intersect the Leatherwood. These have acted as feeders into the
reactive carbonate horizons. The latter can form a “Christmas
Tree” type shape.
Golden Eagle
•Based onearly stage explorationdrilling,interpretationofthe

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
deposit type for Golden Eagle is ongoing. The majority of elevated
gold and base metals (copper, lead, zinc) from drill results are
hosted within granitic rocks. These granites are bounded by what
are interpreted to be younger intrusive rocks to the east and
schists to the west.
•The gold-rich system is proximal to the lithological contact
between the granites and younger intrusion. Although not visible
in core, the gold is coincident with increased brecciation and
oxidation. The base metal or polymetallic system occurs within the
granites and occuras disseminations andveinlets.
Drill hole A summary of all information material to the understanding of the •See body of announcement including Attachment 1.
Information exploration results including a tabulation of the following information
for all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in
metres) of the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from
the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should
_clearly explain why this is the case. _
Data aggregation In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, •For WT-series drilling, exploration results are reported as
methods maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high weighted averages of assays equal or above a 1% copper cut-off.
grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be Lower grade intersections are reported as weighted averages of
stated. assays equal or above a 0.6% copper cut-off. Intersections start
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade and end at a sample at or exceeding the specified cut-off.
results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used •For GE-series drilling, exploration results are reported as
for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples weighted averages of assays equal or above a 0.5g/t gold cut-off
of such aggregations should be shown in detail. or 1% copper cut-off. Intersections start and end at a sample at or
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values exceeding the specified cut-off.
_should be clearly stated. _ •Nometalequivalentsreported
Relationship These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of •All intervals reported are down hole length. True widths are not
between Exploration Results. known at this stage.
mineralisation If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
widths and angle is known, its nature should be reported.
intercept lengths If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au

==> picture [128 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true
_width not known’). _
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of •See body of announcement
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being
reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of
_drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. _
Balanced Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not •All exploration results obtained so far have been reported.
reporting practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades
and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
_Exploration Results. _
Other substantive Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be •No other meaningful and material exploration data beyond this
exploration data reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; and previous ASX announcements by the Company
geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;
_potential deleterious or contaminating substances. _
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral •Further work will include interpretation of logging and assay
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). results when they become available. Additional drill holes will be
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, completed at Oracle Ridge in the coming weeks.
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

ASX:EM2

eaglemountainmining.com.au