AI assistant
DYNAMIC METALS LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2024
Oct 8, 2024
64809_rns_2024-10-08_458cfe71-9f5a-4ad9-956b-7658bf2d58c1.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 9 October 2024
AT COGNAC WEST
HIGHLIGHTS
-
191 additional soil samples taken at priority gold prospect, Cognac West where two anomalies were recently identified[1] .
-
A new strong gold anomaly with peak assay of 2.1g/t gold (2.1ppm) in soils discovered.
-
Further assay results from rock chip samples and mapping anticipated to be returned shortly.
-
Exploration contractor engaged to commence infill soil sampling mid-October.
-
Dynamic well-funded for exploration after receiving $4M from Mineral Resources as part of the Widgiemooltha lithium joint venture[2] .
Dynamic Metals Limited ( ASX: DYM ) (“ Dynamic ” or “the Company ”) is pleased to provide an update on gold exploration activities at the Cognac West prospect, part of the Widgiemooltha Project where the Company is applying a systematic and methodical approach to gold target generation.
In September, the Company announced the first results from soil sampling completed at the Cognac West prospect where two strong gold anomalies were identified[1] . Dynamic recently returned to the prospect to complete additional sampling with the aim to fill in gaps where samples were missing from the first soil program and extend soil sampling lines to the east where the anomaly remained open.
Several high-grade results were returned from soil samples spaced at 50 to 100m intervals on line 6504900N, including:
-
2.1ppm Au (2,100ppb Au) in SP4408
-
0.49ppm Au (490ppb Au) in SP4407
-
0.22ppm Au (220ppb Au) in SP4406
All significant results greater than 0.025ppm Au (25ppb Au) from both programs are attached in Appendix A and Appendix B.
Managing Director, Karen Wellman commented:
"The latest findings from our gold exploration at the Cognac West prospect reinforce our measured approach of systematic exploration, integrating historical data with recent soil sampling to enhance and define exploration targets.
We are optimistic that these promising results, combined with our location adjacent to leading gold producers, emphasize the potential for major discoveries within our tenure.
By consistently incorporating high-quality geological data into our analysis, we are building a robust foundation for future exploration and eagerly anticipate starting drilling activities on these targets in early 2025."
T 61 8 6558 0637 . E [email protected]
==> picture [456 x 457] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1. Cognac West prospect area with DYM gold soil sampling results coloured by Au ppm. High grade soil sample results SP4407 and SP4408 highlighted.
Background
The Cognac West prospect area has been subject to near surface historic exploration dating back to the 1970s including soil sampling and shallow drilling, with historic data sets often incomplete and limited to gold assays only. A peak historic drill hole gold assay from the 1990s includes 1m @ 91.3g/t from 41m in JSA025[3] . Consequently, Dynamic has begun gathering new, high-confidence data as part of the Company’s systematic approach to exploration.
For the first step in this process, Dynamic completed a soil sampling program over an area approximately 3km long and 2km wide and collected samples every 50m along 200m spaced east-west lines. The area subject to soil sampling is structurally complex with interpreted second order structures around a late felsic intrusion that is approximately 500m to the east of the major structure in the area, the Republican Thrust.
704 soil samples were taken and analysed for gold and a multielement suite. Two areas of +0.025ppm (25ppb) gold anomalism were defined by the soil sampling with significant results reported in Appendix B. The Company returned to the prospect in early October 2024 to extend soil sampling lines to the east and in areas where previous soil samples had been insufficient, and these results are the focus of this announcement.
Next Steps
Assay results from rock chip sampling and geological mapping undertaken at the prospect are expected in the next fortnight.
A contractor has been engaged to complete infill soil sampling on 100m spaced lines, with 25m between samples, with work anticipated to commence by mid-October. These results will assist in defining drill targets for testing early 2025.
Released with the authority of Dynamic Metals’ Board of Directors.
For further information on the Company and our projects, please visit: www.dynamicmetals.com.au
CONTACT
Karen Wellman Fiona Marshall Managing Director White Noise Communications [email protected] [email protected] +61 8 6558 0637 +61 400 512 109
REFERENCES
Additional details including JORC 2012 reporting tables, where applicable, can be found in the following releases lodged with ASX and referred to in this announcement:
-
Dynamic Metals ASX Announcement 19/09/2024: “Widgiemooltha Gold Exploration Update”
-
Dynamic Metals ASX Announcement 15/07/2024: “Landmark Lithium Focused JV with Mineral Resources Complete”
-
Information sourced from Coleman Resources Pty Ltd Annual Report for E15/1427 1 May 2017; publicly available through WAMEX
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENT
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mrs Karen Wellman. Mrs Wellman is an employee of the Company and a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mrs Wellman has sufficient experience relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration, and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves.’ Mrs Wellman consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT
This document may contain certain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include but are not limited to statements concerning Dynamic Metals Limited’s (Dynamic’s) current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry in which Dynamic operates, and beliefs and assumptions regarding Dynamic’s future performance. When used in this document, the words such as “anticipate”, “could”, “plan”, “estimate”, “expects”, “seeks”, “intends”, “may”, “potential”, “should”, and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Dynamic believes that its expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the control of Dynamic and no assurance can be given that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements.
ABOUT DYNAMIC METALS
Dynamic Metals (ASX: DYM) is a dedicated exploration company focused on advancing an underexplored portfolio of minerals critical to decarbonisation and the growing battery metals market.
Dynamic’s flagship project, Widgiemooltha, covers an extensive area of ~800km[2] extending between Norseman and Kambalda. The Widgiemooltha region is highly prospective for nickel and gold and more recently emerged in significance for its lithium mineralisation and prospectivity. In July 2024, Dynamic completed a binding joint venture and farm-in agreement with Mineral Resources Limited (ASX: MIN) (MinRes), whereby Dynamic sold 40% of its lithium rights on the Widgiemooltha Project for $5m. MinRes can increase its interest to 65% by spending $15m and then to 80% by sole funding to a Decision to Mine.
In addition to Widgiemooltha, Dynamic holds an extensive portfolio of exploration tenure in Western Australia, including several joint venture positions in Western Australia where other parties are funding ongoing exploration to earn an interest in the project. These projects are prospective for gold, nickel, lithium, iron ore and diamonds.
DYNAMIC METALS CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Share Price: $0.21/share Cash 30/6/2024 : $2.92M (Pre-MinRes payment)
==> picture [271 x 367] intentionally omitted <==
Shares on Issue: 49M Market Cap : $10.3M
==> picture [65 x 64] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [79 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [55 x 61] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [58 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [69 x 61] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [55 x 61] intentionally omitted <==
Portfolio of Exposure to global Substantial Team has On-ground Attractive future-facing decarbonisation exploration extensive activities valuation and critical minerals and battery targets generated experience and complete and leverage to projects in metals thematic across Au, Li, Ni, successful track drilling exploration Australia Cu and PGE record commenced success
==> picture [251 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
ANNEXURE A
Significant soil sample results from Dynamic’s Cognac West prospect. Significant results are defined as greater than 0.025ppm/25ppb. Coordinates are MGA Zone 51.
| SampleID | Coordinates (MGA Z51) | Coordinates (MGA Z51) | Coordinates (MGA Z51) | Au | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northing | Easting | (g/t) | |||
| SP4393 | 6504900 | 393050 | 0.037 | ||
| SP4394 | 6504900 | 393100 | 0.22 | ||
| SP4398 | 6504900 | 393300 | 0.031 | ||
| SP4400 | 6504900 | 393400 | 0.025 | ||
| SP4406 | 6504900 | 393700 | 0.22 | ||
| SP4407 | 6504900 | 393800 | 0.49 | ||
| SP4408 | 6504900 | 393850 | 2.1 | ||
| SP4409 | 6504900 | 393900 | 0.078 | ||
| SP4412 | 6504700 | 391850 | 0.025 | ||
| SP4413 | 6504700 | 391900 | 0.029 | ||
| SP4415 | 6504700 | 392000 | 0.032 | ||
| SP4416 | 6504700 | 392050 | 0.033 | ||
| SP4418 | 6504700 | 392150 | 0.054 | ||
| SP4420 | 6504700 | 392300 | 0.087 | ||
| SP4453 | 6504500 | 392100 | 0.028 | ||
| SP4506 | 6503100 | 394200 | 0.06 | ||
| SP4516 | 6503300 | 394050 | 0.054 | ||
| SP4517 | 6503300 | 394100 | 0.03 |
ANNEXURE B
Previously reported significant soil sample results from Dynamic’s Cognac West prospect. Significant results are defined as greater than 0.025ppm/25ppb. Coordinates are MGA Zone 51.
| SampleID | Coordinates (MGA Z51) | Coordinates (MGA Z51) | Au | SampleID | Coordinates (MGA Z51) | Coordinates (MGA Z51) | Au | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northing | Easting | (g/t) | Northing | Easting | (g/t) | |||
| SP3750 | 6505300 | 392850 | 0.026 | SP4120 | 6503700 | 393750 | 0.025 | |
| SP3751 | 6505300 | 392900 | 0.032 | SP4122 | 6503700 | 393850 | 0.025 | |
| SP3752 | 6505300 | 392950 | 0.041 | SP4129 | 6503500 | 392000 | 0.04 | |
| SP3755 | 6505300 | 393100 | 0.037 | SP4130 | 6503500 | 392050 | 0.026 | |
| SP3756 | 6505300 | 393150 | 0.027 | SP4131 | 6503500 | 392100 | 0.025 | |
| SP3792 | 6505100 | 392750 | 0.095 | SP4132 | 6503500 | 392150 | 0.026 | |
| SP3821 | 6504900 | 392000 | 0.036 | SP4133 | 6503500 | 392200 | 0.038 | |
| SP3826 | 6504900 | 392250 | 0.031 | SP4134 | 6503500 | 392250 | 0.027 | |
| SP3828 | 6504900 | 392350 | 0.033 | SP4135 | 6503500 | 392300 | 0.068 | |
| SP3838 | 6504900 | 392850 | 0.025 | SP4152 | 6503500 | 393150 | 0.059 | |
| SP3870 | 6504700 | 392250 | 0.04 | SP4153 | 6503500 | 393200 | 0.039 | |
| SP3906 | 6504500 | 391850 | 0.042 | SP4154 | 6503500 | 393250 | 0.066 | |
| SP3907 | 6504500 | 391900 | 0.032 | SP4155 | 6503500 | 393300 | 0.04 | |
| SP3908 | 6504500 | 391950 | 0.026 | SP4156 | 6503500 | 393350 | 0.042 | |
| SP3926 | 6504500 | 392850 | 0.043 | SP4157 | 6503500 | 393400 | 0.056 | |
| SP3950 | 6504300 | 391850 | 0.063 | SP4158 | 6503500 | 393450 | 0.03 | |
| SP3951 | 6504300 | 391900 | 0.12 | SP4160 | 6503500 | 393550 | 0.041 | |
| SP3952 | 6504300 | 391950 | 0.053 | SP4162 | 6503500 | 393650 | 0.042 | |
| SP3953 | 6504300 | 392000 | 0.033 | SP4164 | 6503500 | 393750 | 0.042 | |
| SP3955 | 6504300 | 392100 | 0.025 | SP4165 | 6503500 | 393800 | 0.099 | |
| SP3956 | 6504300 | 392150 | 0.027 | SP4166 | 6503500 | 393850 | 0.136 | |
| SP3958 | 6504300 | 392250 | 0.029 | SP4167 | 6503500 | 393900 | 0.033 | |
| SP3959 | 6504300 | 392300 | 0.031 | SP4202 | 6503300 | 393450 | 0.028 | |
| SP3995 | 6504100 | 391900 | 0.028 | SP4203 | 6503300 | 393500 | 0.061 | |
| SP3996 | 6504100 | 391950 | 0.025 | SP4204 | 6503300 | 393550 | 0.037 | |
| SP3999 | 6504100 | 392100 | 0.039 | SP4207 | 6503300 | 393700 | 0.107 | |
| SP4001 | 6504100 | 392200 | 0.028 | SP4208 | 6503300 | 393750 | 0.119 | |
| SP4014 | 6504100 | 392850 | 0.039 | SP4209 | 6503300 | 393800 | 0.074 | |
| SP4018 | 6504100 | 393050 | 0.027 | SP4210 | 6503300 | 393850 | 0.067 | |
| SP4038 | 6503900 | 391850 | 0.031 | SP4246 | 6503100 | 393450 | 0.146 | |
| SP4039 | 6503900 | 391900 | 0.052 | SP4247 | 6503100 | 393500 | 0.06 | |
| SP4043 | 6503900 | 392100 | 0.042 | SP4248 | 6503100 | 393550 | 0.028 | |
| SP4044 | 6503900 | 392150 | 0.028 | SP4249 | 6503100 | 393600 | 0.07 | |
| SP4045 | 6503900 | 392200 | 0.048 | SP4250 | 6503100 | 393650 | 0.057 | |
| SP4080 | 6503900 | 393950 | 0.038 | SP4251 | 6503100 | 393700 | 0.051 | |
| SP4081 | 6503900 | 394000 | 0.027 | SP4252 | 6503100 | 393750 | 0.05 | |
| SP4084 | 6503700 | 391950 | 0.03 | SP4253 | 6503100 | 393800 | 0.057 | |
| SP4085 | 6503700 | 392000 | 0.038 | SP4254 | 6503100 | 393850 | 0.029 | |
| SP4088 | 6503700 | 392150 | 0.037 | SP4255 | 6503100 | 393900 | 0.025 | |
| SP4089 | 6503700 | 392200 | 0.056 | SP4256 | 6503100 | 393950 | 0.039 | |
| SP4090 | 6503700 | 392250 | 0.062 | SP4289 | 6502900 | 393400 | 0.029 | |
| SP4091 | 6503700 | 392300 | 0.083 | SP4290 | 6502900 | 393450 | 0.06 | |
| SP4098 | 6503700 | 392650 | 0.027 | SP4291 | 6502900 | 393500 | 0.034 | |
| SP4112 | 6503700 | 393350 | 0.054 | SP4299 | 6502900 | 393900 | 0.027 | |
| SP4113 | 6503700 | 393400 | 0.047 |
ANNEXURE C
JORC Code 2012 Edition Section 1 Soil Sampling Techniques and Data
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut | • | Soil samples were collected at a depth of 30 |
| Techniques | channels, random chips, or specific | cm below surface and sieved in the field to | |
| specialised industry standard | <2mm, achieving a sample weight of | ||
| measurement tools appropriate to the | approximately 200g. | ||
| minerals under investigation, such as down | |||
| hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF | |||
| instruments, etc). These examples should | |||
| not be taken as limiting the broad meaning | |||
| of sampling. | |||
| • Include reference to measures taken to | |||
| ensure sample representivity and the | |||
| appropriate calibration of any | |||
| measurement tools or systems used. | |||
| • Aspects of the determination of | |||
| mineralisation that are Material to the | |||
| Public Report. | |||
| • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work | |||
| has been done this would be relatively | |||
| simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was | |||
| used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg | |||
| was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for | |||
| fire assay’). In other cases more | |||
| explanation may be required, such as | |||
| where there is coarse gold that has | |||
| inherent sampling problems. Unusual | |||
| commodities or mineralisation types (eg | |||
| submarine nodules) may warrant | |||
| disclosure of detailed information. | |||
| Drilling | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open- | • | Not applicable as no drilling undertaken. |
| Techniques | hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, | ||
| sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple | |||
| or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- | |||
| sampling bit or other type, whether core is | |||
| oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | |||
| Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing core | • | Not applicable as no drilling undertaken. |
| recovery | and chip sample recoveries and results | ||
| assessed. | |||
| • Measures taken to maximise sample | |||
| recovery and ensure representative nature | |||
| of the samples. | |||
| Whether a relationship exists between sample | |||
| recovery and grade and whether sample bias | |||
| may have occurred due to preferential | |||
| loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | |||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been | • | Field observations were recorded at each |
| geologically and geotechnically logged to a | sample point for soils and rock chips. | ||
| level of detail to support appropriate | • | There are no drilling results so no drill core or | |
| Mineral Resource estimation, mining | drill chips. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||||
| studies and metallurgical studies. | |||||||
| • Whether logging is qualitative or | |||||||
| quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, | |||||||
| channel, etc) photography. | |||||||
| • The total length and percentage of the | |||||||
| relevant intersections logged. | |||||||
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether | • | Soil samples were dry when taken. | ||||
| techniques | quarter, half or all core taken. | • | Soil samples were sieved in the field to <2mm. | ||||
| and sample preparation |
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. |
• • • • |
Samples pulverized to <75um at the laboratory. Multi-element analysis for 36 elements undertaken by aqua regia digest followed by ICP-AES. Gold was assayed via 50g fire assay with AAS finish. Sample size considered appropriate for first pass exploration. |
||||
| • Measures taken to ensure that the | |||||||
| sampling is representative of the in situ | |||||||
| material collected, including for instance | |||||||
| results for field duplicate/second-half | |||||||
| sampling. | |||||||
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to | |||||||
| the grain size of the material being | |||||||
| sampled. | |||||||
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of | • | Samples were submitted to ALS Laboratories | ||||
| assay data | the assaying and laboratory procedures | in Perth. | |||||
| and | used and whether the technique is | • | No standards were submitted by Dynamic. | ||||
| laboratory | considered partial or total. | • | Field duplicates were taken at a rate of 1/50 | ||||
| tests | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the |
• | during soil sampling. Standards were used by ALS at 1/10, blanks |
||||
| parameters used in determining the | were 1/20 and duplicates at 1/25. | ||||||
| analysis including instrument make and | |||||||
| model, reading times, calibrations factors | |||||||
| applied and their derivation, etc. | |||||||
| • Nature of quality control procedures | |||||||
| adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, | |||||||
| external laboratory checks) and whether | |||||||
| acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of | |||||||
| bias) and precision have been established. | |||||||
| Verification of | • The verification of significant intersections | • | Field checking of anomalies has been | ||||
| sampling and | by either independent or alternative | completed by staff. | |||||
| assaying | company personnel. | • | Sampling personnel movements are logged | ||||
| • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. |
• • |
via GPS. Results are stored as reported by the laboratory. No adjustments to assay data have been made. |
|||||
| • Discuss any adjustment to assay data | |||||||
| Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to | • | Locations are reported in metres GDA94 MGA | ||||
| data points | locate drill holes (collar and down-hole | Zone 51. | |||||
| surveys), trenches, mine workings and | |||||||
| 9 | |||||||
| dynamicmetals.com.au |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||
| other locations used in Mineral Resource | • | Sample locations surveys using handheld | ||||
| estimation. | GPS. | |||||
| • Specification of the grid system used. | ||||||
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic | ||||||
| control. | ||||||
| Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration | • | Soil sampling occurred on lines spaced 200m | |||
| and | Results. | apart, with samples taken every 50m on the | ||||
| distribution | • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and |
• • |
line. This is considered appropriate for early stage gold exploration. No compositing has been applied. No Mineral Resources have been estimated. |
|||
| Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and | ||||||
| classifications applied. | ||||||
| • Whether sample compositing has been | ||||||
| applied. | ||||||
| Orientation of | • Whether the orientation of sampling | • | There is not enough information to make | |||
| data in | achieves unbiased sampling of possible | assumptions regarding orientation of | ||||
| relation to | structures and the extent to which this is | potential mineralised structures. | ||||
| geological | known, considering the deposit type. | |||||
| structure | • If the relationship between the drilling | |||||
| orientation and the orientation of key | ||||||
| mineralised structures is considered to | ||||||
| have introduced a sampling bias, this | ||||||
| should be assess and reported if material. | ||||||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample | • | Samples were placed in bulka bags and | |||
| security | security. | freighted directly to ALS in Kalgoorlie by DYM | ||||
| field personnel. | ||||||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of | • | No audits have been completed at this stage. | |||
| reviews | sampling techniques and data. | |||||
| 10 | ||||||
| dynamicmetals.com.au |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location and | • |
E 15/1753 is 100% owned by Dynamic Metals Limited. |
| tenement | ownership including agreements or | Mineral Resources Limited have purchased 40% | |
| and land | material issues with third parties such as | interest in the lithium rights in E15/1753, Dynamic | |
| tenure status | joint ventures, partnerships, overriding | Metals retains 100% of the remaining rights including | |
| royalties, native title interests, historical | gold | ||
| sites, wilderness or national park and | • | No royalty interest is applicable. | |
| environmental settings. | |||
| • The security of the tenure held at the time of | |||
| reporting along with any known | |||
| impediments to obtaining a licence to | |||
| operate in the area. | |||
| Exploration | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of | • | Exploration has been undertaken by several |
| done by other | exploration by other parties. |
companies over time including but not limited to | |
| parties | WMC and Avoca Mining. | ||
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of | • | Historic exploration has primarily been for gold and |
| mineralisation. | nickel. | ||
| Drill hole | • A summary of all information material to the | • |
Not applicable as no drilling is being reported in this |
| Information | understanding of the exploration results | announcement. | |
| including a tabulation of the following | |||
| information for all Material drill holes: | |||
| • easting and northing of the drill hole collar | |||
| • elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation | |||
| above sea level in metres) of the drill hole | |||
| collar | |||
| • dip and azimuth of the hole | |||
| • down hole length and interception depth | |||
| • hole length. | |||
| • If the exclusion of this information is justified | |||
| on the basis that the information is not | |||
| Material and this exclusion does not detract | |||
| from the understanding of the report, the | |||
| Competent Person should clearly explain | |||
| why this is the case. | |||
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | • | Significant results reported in Appendix A and B are |
| aggregation | averaging techniques, maximum and/or | above 0.025g/t. No top-cutting has been applied. | |
| methods | minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of | • | No weighted averages or assumptions on metal |
| high grades) and cut-off grades are usually | equivalents have been made. | ||
| Material and should be stated. | |||
| • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate | |||
| short lengths of high grade results and | |||
| longer lengths of low grade results, the | |||
| procedure used for such aggregation should | |||
| be stated and some typical examples of | |||
| such aggregations should be shown in | |||
| detail. | |||
| • The assumptions used for any reporting of | |||
| metal equivalent values should be clearly | |||
| stated. |
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | |||||
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly | • | Not enough information is known to comment on | ||||
| between | important in the reporting of Exploration | relationship of grade and geometry of potential | |||||
| mineralisation | Results. | mineralisation. | |||||
| widths and intercept lengths |
• If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
||||||
| • If it is not known and only the down hole | |||||||
| lengths are reported, there should be a clear | |||||||
| statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole | |||||||
| length, true width not known’). | |||||||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) | • |
See main body of announcement. | ||||
| and tabulations of intercepts should be | |||||||
| included for any significant discovery being | |||||||
| reported These should include, but not be | |||||||
| limited to a plan view of drill hole collar | |||||||
| locations and appropriate sectional views. | |||||||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all | • | All results have been reported as g/t or ppm Au. | ||||
| reporting | Exploration Results is not practicable, | • | Soil samples are reported above 0.025g/t Au as that is | ||||
| representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of |
• | deemed material to early stage gold exploration. All soil samples are shown on diagram in body of announcement. |
|||||
| Exploration Results. | |||||||
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and | • | No additional observations at this time. | ||||
| substantive | material, should be reported including (but | ||||||
| exploration | not limited to): geological observations; | ||||||
| data | geophysical survey results; geochemical | ||||||
| survey results; bulk samples – size and | |||||||
| method of treatment; metallurgical test | |||||||
| results; bulk density, groundwater, | |||||||
| geotechnical and rock characteristics; | |||||||
| potential deleterious or contaminating | |||||||
| substances. | |||||||
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further | • | Infill soil sampling will be used to infill the identified | ||||
| work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth | gold anomalies. | ||||||
| extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | • | Preparations for permitting for drilling initiated. | |||||
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | |||||||
| possible extensions, including the main | |||||||
| geological interpretations and future | |||||||
| drilling areas, provided this information is | |||||||
| not commercially sensitive. | |||||||
| 12 | |||||||
| dynamicmetals.com.au |