Annual / Quarterly Financial Statement • Apr 27, 2018
Annual / Quarterly Financial Statement
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 (audited)
| Combined Statement of Income - F-3 |
|---|
| Combined Statement of Comprehensive Income - F-4 |
| Combined Balance Sheet - F-5 |
| Combined Statement of Change in Net Asset Value - F-6 |
| Combined Statement of Cash Flows - F-7 |
| Notes to the Combined Financial Statements - F-8 |
| 1- Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates - F-8 |
| 2- New Accounting Pronouncements - F-28 |
| 3- Business Segment and Related Information - F-30 |
| Notes to the Combined Income Statement - F-31 |
| 4- General and Administrative Expenses - F-31 |
| Restructuring - F-31 5- |
| Notes to the Combined Balance Sheet - F-32 |
| 6- Financial Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value through Profit or Loss - F-32 |
| 7- Financial Instruments carried at Fair Value - F-33 |
| Fair Value of Financial Instruments not carried at Fair Value - F-38 8- |
| Financial Assets Available for Sale - F-40 9- |
| 10- Equity Method Investments - F-40 |
| 11- Contractual Obligations and Commitments - F-42 |
| 12- Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - F-43 |
| 13- Other Assets and Other Liabilities - F-48 |
| Provisions - F-49 14- |
| Additional Notes - F-51 |
| 15- Employee Benefits - F-51 |
| Income Taxes - F-64 16- |
| 17- Related Party Transactions - F-66 |
| 18- Information on Subsidiaries - F-68 |
| 19- Structured Entities - F-69 |
| 20- Supplementary Information to the Combined Financial Statements - F-74 |
| 21- Risk Framework - F-75 |
Due to rounding, numbers presented throughout this document may not add up precisely to the totals provided and percentages may not precisely reflect the absolute figures.
| DWS Group SE - Combined Financial Statements | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 |
| in Em. | Notes | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management fees and other recurring fees | 2,195 | 2,140 | 2,263 | |
| Performance and transaction fees and other non recurring fees | 1 તેણ | 213 | 248 | |
| Net commissions and fees from asset management | 2,391 | 2,353 | 2,511 | |
| Interest and similar income | 55 | 67 | 106 | |
| Interest and similar expense | (19) | (31) | (13) | |
| Net interest income | 36 | 36 | 03 | |
| Net gains (losses) from assets available for sale | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| Net gains (losses) on financial assets/liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | 46 | 12 | (93) | |
| Net income (loss) from equity method investments | 42 | 39 | 34 | |
| Other Income (loss) | (6) | (26) | 27 | |
| Total net interest and noninterest income | 2,509 | 2,415 | 2,576 | |
| Compensation and benefits | (772) | (713) | (860) | |
| Restructuring activities | (6) | (46) | ||
| General and administrative expenses | 4 | (947) | (1,010) | (1,084) |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total noninterest expenses | (1,725) | (1,769) | (1,943) | |
| Profit (loss) before tax | 783 | 647 | 633 | |
| Income tax expense | (149) | (195) | (175) | |
| Net income (loss) | 634 | 452 | 458 | |
| Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 0 | (0) | ||
| Net income (loss) attributable to DWS Group shareholders and additional net asset value components |
633 | 452 | 459 |
| in Em. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income recognized in the income statement | 634 | 452 | 458 |
| Other comprehensive income | |||
| Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss | |||
| Remeasurement gains (losses) related to defined benefit plans, before tax | ব | વર્ત | (5) |
| Total of income tax related to items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss | (1) | (8) | |
| Items that are or may be reclassified to profit or loss | |||
| Financial assets available for sale | |||
| Unrealized net gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax | (3) | 0 | (21) |
| Realized net (gains) losses arising during the period (reclassified to profit or loss), before tax | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Derivatives hedging variability of cash flows | |||
| Unrealized net gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Realized net (gains) losses arising during the period (reclassified to profit or loss), before tax | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Assets classified as held for sale | |||
| Unrealized net gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Realized net (gains) losses arising during the period (reclassified to profit or loss), before tax | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Foreign currency translation | |||
| Unrealized net gains (losses) arising during the period, before tax | (20) | (0) | (11) |
| Realized net (gains) losses arising during the period (reclassified to profit or loss), before tax | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Equity method investments | |||
| Net gains (losses) arising during the period | (16) | 16 | 2 |
| Total of income tax related to items that are or may be reclassified to profit or loss | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (30) | રેરે | (26) |
| Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 604 | 507 | 432 |
| Attributable to : | |||
| Noncontrolling interests | 1 | 0 | (0) |
| DWS Group shareholders and additional net asset value components | 603 | 507 | 432 |
| in €m. | Notes | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Jan 01, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets: | |||||
| Cash and interbank balances | 8 | 3,317 | 4,017 | 4,666 | 3,666 |
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | |||||
| Trading assets | 6,7 | 1,296 | 3,882 | 4,918 | 5,549 |
| Positive market values from derivative financial instruments | 6,7 | 37 | 80 | 11 | 79 |
| Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 6,7 | 574 | 592 | 665 | 665 |
| Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 6 | 1,907 | 4,558 | 5,594 | 6,293 |
| Financial assets available for sale | 9 | 362 | 316 | 307 | 307 |
| Equity method investments | 10 | 212 | 205 | 183 | 165 |
| Loans | 8 | 307 | 446 | 294 | 88 |
| Property and equipment | 6 | 10 | 18 | 20 | |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets | 12 | 3,624 | 3,914 | 3,795 | 3,481 |
| Other assets | 8,13 | 1,338 | 1,724 | 1,690 | 2,324 |
| Assets for current tax | 16 | 24 | 51 | 35 | । ਤੇ |
| Deferred tax assets | 16 | 131 | 124 | 145 | 165 |
| Total assets | 11,226 | 15,363 | 16,729 | 16,522 | |
| Liabilities and Net asset value: | |||||
| Deposits | 3 | 6 | 0 | 281 | |
| Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | |||||
| Trading liabilities | 6,7 | 14 | 16 | 42 | 37 |
| Negative market values from derivative financial instruments | 6,7 | 125 | 182 | 63 | 131 |
| Investment contract liabilities | 6,7 | 574 | 592 | 665 | 665 |
| Total financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | 6 | 713 | 791 | 770 | 832 |
| Other short-term borrowings | 8 | 107 | 313 | 323 | 351 |
| Other liabilities | 8,13 | 3,507 | 7,095 | 8,820 | 8,756 |
| Provisions | 14 | કર્ | 189 | 102 | ર્ર્સ |
| Liabilities for current tax | 16 | 177 | 59 | 100 | 32 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 16 | 264 | 416 | 402 | 457 |
| Long-term debt | 8 | ತಿ | 3 | 25 | 36 |
| Total liabilities | 4,860 | 8,871 | 10,541 | 10,801 | |
| Net investment attributable to the Deutsche Bank Group | 6,360 | 6,479 | 6,180 | 5,710 | |
| Noncontrolling interests | 6 | 13 | 8 | 12 | |
| Net asset value | 6,366 | 6,492 | َ , 188 | 5,721 | |
| Total liabilities and Net asset value | 11,226 | 15,363 | 16,729 | 16,522 |
| in Em. | Net investment attributable to Deutsche Bank Group |
Noncontrolling interests |
Net Asset Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 5,710 | 12 | 5,721 |
| Total comprehensive income, net of tax | 432 | (0) | 432 |
| Net funding received from / (provided to) Deutsche Bank Group | 38 | 0 | 38 |
| Exchange rate changes/other | 0 | (3) | (3) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 6,180 | 8 | 6,188 |
| Total comprehensive income, net of tax | 507 | 0 | 507 |
| Net funding received from / (provided to) Deutsche Bank Group | (208) | (208) | |
| Exchange rate changes/other | 0 | ||
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 6,479 | 13 | 6,492 |
| Total comprehensive income, net of tax | 603 | 604 | |
| Net funding received from / (provided to) Deutsche Bank Group | (722) | (722) | |
| Exchange rate changes/other | 0 | (7) | (7) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | 6,360 | 6 | 6,366 |
| in €m. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income / (loss) | 634 | 452 | 458 |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||
| Adjustments to reconcile profit for the period to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||
| Restructuring activities | 6 | 46 | (1) |
| Gain on sale of financial assets available for sale, equity method investments, and other | 16 | 8 | (6) |
| Income taxes, net | 149 | 195 | 175 |
| Impairment, depreciation and other amortization and accretion | 35 | 27 | 29 |
| Share of net income from equity method investments | (43) | (39) | (39) |
| Income adjusted for noncash charges, credits and other items | 796 | 690 | ele |
| Adjustments for net change in operating assets and liabilities: | |||
| Interest-earning time deposits with central banks and with banks w/o central banks | 1,098 | (622) | (174) |
| Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 19 | 72 | 0 |
| Loans | 156 | (159) | (209) |
| Other assets | 421 | (તેર) | 293 |
| Deposits | (2) | 12 | (287) |
| Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss and investment contract liabilities | (19) | (72) | (0) |
| Other short term borrowings | (207) | (27) | (21) |
| Other liabilities | (3,754) | (1,906) | 25 |
| Senior long-term debt | (0) | (21) | (12) |
| Trading assets and liabilities, pos. and neg. market values from derivative financial instruments, net | 2,575 | 1,045 | 627 |
| Other, net | (163) | 71 | (264) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 920 | (1,013) | 889 |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||
| Proceeds from: | |||
| Sale of financial assets available for sale | 23 | રેતે | દિવે |
| Sale of equity method investments | 5 | ||
| Purchase of: | |||
| Financial assets available for sale | (87) | (41) | (62) |
| Equity method investments | (1) | (2) | (1) |
| Property and equipment | (1) | (2) | (4) |
| Other, net | 6 | 29 | I d |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (55) | 42 | 42 |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||
| Cash dividends paid to DWS shareholders | |||
| Net change in noncontrolling interests | (8) | 5 | (3) |
| Net funding from/(to ) DB Group | (502) | (297) | (80) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (510) | (292) | (8.) |
| Net effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 40 | 0 | (11) |
| Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | રેતેર | (1,262) | 830 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 2,153 | 3,415 | 2,585 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | 2,547 | 2,153 | 3,415 |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities including | |||
| Income taxes paid (received), net | (2) | 89 | 84 |
| Interest paid | 22 | 29 | । ਤੇ |
| Interest and dividends received | 62 | 72 | 115 |
| Cash and cash equivalents comprise (1) | |||
| Interbank balances (w/o central banks) | 2,547 | 2,153 | 3,415 |
| Total | 2,547 | 2,153 | 3,415 |
1) The total cash and interbank balance as shown in the combined balance shoct of € 3,3 billion as of December 31, 2017 (2016) include € 27 million as of December 31, 2017 (2016: € 681 million) from guaranteed finds beld ficturary. Time deposits of € 770million as of December 31, 2017, € 1.864 million as of December 31, 2016 and € 1,251 million as of December 31, 2015 are not considered in the cash and cash equivalents.
In 2017, Deutsche Bank Group announced its plan to separate its asset management division into a new subsidiary and list the shares of this subsidiary on the stock exchange.
DWS Group SE, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (the "Company") was created to as the parent company of the separated Deutsche Bank Asset Management business (hereafter referred to as the "DWS Group").
To enact the separation, the individual legal entities that comprise the Deutsche Bank Asset Management business ("the Deutsche Bank Asset Management entities") were identified. These comprise both DWS Group specific legal entities ("Asset Management dedicated entities"; "AM dedicated entities") and Deutsche Bank Group legal entities where both asset management services and non-asset management services are provided ("shared entities"). The separation consists of the share capital of the AM dedicated entities to the Company (via share deal), as well as the transfer to the company of the relevant assets and liabilities that relate to the asset management services of the shared entities (via asset sale). These transfers have been completed in stages, however a number of AM dedicated entities and shared entities were not able to be legally transferred to the DWS Group until after the start of 2018.
Given that the transfer of the Deutsche Bank Asset Management business to the DWS Group was not completed as at December 31, 2017, the Directors prepared the financial statements of DWS Group on a combined basis.
DWS is expected to be regulated as a CRR investment firm, as outlined in Art. 95 & 98 of the Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investments Regulation (CRR)), during the first quarter 2018.
Pursuant to E.U. Prospectus Regulation No. 809/2004, an issuer's listing prospectus must include historical financial information covering the previous three fiscal years. At the of issuance, the DWS Group has a "complex financial history" as defined in E.U. Prospectus Regulation No. 211/2007.
The Company is the parent company of the DWS Group. As of December 31, 2017, the DWS Group comprised 89 AM dedicated entities and funds and the assets and liabilities from 39 shared entities which have been economically allocated to the DWS Group. DWS Group primarily operates under the commercial name DWS (please refer to "Legal entities and structured in the combined financial statements and notes"). DWS is a global asset manager with €700 billion of assets under management as at December 31, 2017 and a diverse product offering that spans traditional active strategies, as well as alternatives and bespoke solutions. DWS Group has a global footprint and a scaled presence in key markets across the world.
Combined financial statements of the DWS Group as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 (with comparative information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, including opening balances as of January 1, 2015) have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), as endorsed by the European Union ("EU"). All IFRS standards whose application was mandatory for the year ended December 31, 2017 have been applied consistently for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. All Deutsche Bank Group Asset Management related operations will be transferred to DWS Group SE. Given that DWS Group SE is an entity that control the other entities within DWS Group, first time combined financial statements have been prepared for the DWS Group in accordance with IFRS 1 'First-Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS 1").
In particular, DWS Group has applification provisions set out in IFRS 1.D16(a). As such, the combined financial statements of the DWS Group reflect the Deutsche Bank Asset Management entities as was historically included in the consolidated financial statements of the Deutsche Bank Group. The same accounting policies and measurement principles as were applied by the individual Deutsche Bank Asset Management entities and operating their financial information for inclusion in the IFRS consolidated financial statements of the Deutsche Bank Group have been used for the preparation of the DWS Group combined financial statements.
As consolidated financial statements previously were not required to be prepared for DWS Group, the reconciliations envisaged in principle pursuant to IFRS 1.24 are not required.
The combined financial statements combined statement of income, combined statement of comprehensive income, combined balance sheet, combined statement of change in net asset value, combined statement of cash flows and notes to the combined financial statements for each of the periods presented.
IFRS does not provide guidance for the preparation of financial information on a combined basis nor for business combinations involving entities under common control. As such, IAS 8.10 requires management to use judgment in developing a suitable accounting policy. In making this judgment, IAS 8.12 requires management to consider the most recent pronouncements of other standard-setting bodies that use a similar conceptual framework to developing standards, other accounting literature and accepted industry practices.
In preparing the combined financial statements, the principles underlying the consolidation procedures of IFRS 10 'Consolidated Financial Statements' ("IFRS 10") have been applied with the result that all balances and transactions between the Deutsche Bank Asset Management entities have been elimin the combined financial statements. Balances and transactions between the DWS Group and the remainder of the Deutsche Bank Group are classified as related party transactions. No subsequent adjustments have been made to these transactions on the basis that they were originally entered into at an arm's length basis.
The combined financial statements are presented in millions of euros ("€") except when otherwise indicated cost basis as modified by the revaluation of financial liabilities, including derivative instruments at fair value through profit or loss.
The scope of combination for the combined financial statements of DWS Group for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was determined on economic principles considering actual and expected legal transfer of AM dedicated entities and AM related assets and liabilities recorded in shared entities.
The structure of the scope of combination of the DWS Group can be summarized as follows:
Where an AM dedicated entity, or the assets and liabilities of a shared entity which have been economically allocated to the DWS Group, have already legally transferred to DWS Group as at December 31, 2017, they are included in the scope of combination as if the transfer had taken place with effect from January 1, 2015 by applying book value accounting based on rules for business combinations under common control. Where these transfers have yet to take place, they are included in the scope of combination with effect from January 1, 2015.
Regarding the scope of legal entities included in the combined financial statements please refer to "Legal entities and structured entities considered in the combined financial statements and notes".
The separate financial results of each AM dedicated entity (comprising their assets, liabilities, income and expenses) are included in the combined financial statements.
For the purposes of the combined financial statements, the relevant assets, liabilities, income and expenses of the shared entities were economically allocated to the DWS Group, based upon whether they had been economically allocated to the Asset Management division within the Deutsche Bank Group. As a result, the combined financial statements only include the assets, liabilities and expenses of the shared entities to the extent that they have been concluded to be economically necessary to run the asset management business, together with the related revenue. The assets and liabilities of the shared entities that have been, or are expected to be, transferred to the DWS Group prior to IPO, have been identified on the same basis. To the extent that the shared entities include separately identifiable economic activities that either have not been, or are not expected to the DWS Group, the results of these activities have been excluded from the combined financial statements.
The combined financial statements are prepared in euro, which is the presentation currency of the DWS Group. Various entities within the DWS Group use a different functional currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates.
An entity records foreign currency income, expenses, gains and losses in its functional currency using the rates prevailing at the dates of recognition.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the entity's functional currency are translated at the period end closing rate. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the translation and settlems are recognized in the combined statement of income as net gains (losses) on financial assets/liabilities at fair value through profit or loss in order to alien the translation amounts with those recognized from foreign currency related transactions (derivatives) which economically hedge these monetary assets and liabilities.
Nonmonetary items that are measured at historical cost are translated using the at the date of the transaction. Translation differences on nomonetary items which are held at fair value through profit or loss are recognized in the profit or loss. Translation differences on available for sale nonmonetary items (equity securities) are included in other and recognized in the combined statement of item is sold as part of the overall gain or loss on sale of the item.
For purposes of translation into presentation currency, assets, liabilities and equity of foreign operations are translated at the period end closing rate and items of income and expense are translated into euros at the rates prevailing on the dates of the transactions, or average rates of exchange where these approximate actual rates. The exchange differences arising on the translation of a foreign operation are included in other comprehensive income. For foreign operations that are subsidiaries, the amount of exchange differences attributable to any non-controlling interests is recognized in non-controlling interests.
Currency Translation Adjustments (CTA) reflected in net asset value are the result of legal entities held by parent companies with a different functional currency. Post legal transfer CTA will be calculated for entities showing a different local functional currency than DWS Group SE as parent company.
The combined financial statements reflect the pension obligations and corresponding plan assets which are allocated to the DWS Group. The obligations and plan assets have been valued on the basis of expert actuarial opinions. Depending on the legal jurisdiction of the legal entity, operations to be transferred to the DWS-Group include a combination of only active employees and both active employees and retirees. The liabilities were calculated on an individual member basis.
Tax balances included within the combined statements are recognized in accordance with IAS 12 (Income Taxes). Income taxes were determined using the separate tax return approach, under the entities comprising the DWS Group were separate tax payers. This implies that both current and deferred taxes for both AM dedicated and shared entities within the group are calculated separately, and the recoverability of deferred tax assets is assessed on this basis.
If in previous periods a current tax expense (benefit) arising from the separate tax return approach did not result in current tax liabilities (assets) at the DWS Group, but was paid by Deutsche Bank Group as the responsible taxpayer, the respective amounts are presented as funding received fo) Deutsche Bank Group in the Combined Statement of changes in Net Asset Value.
The income taxes actually paid by DWS Group are presented in the Combined Statement of Cash Flows.
For the purposes of the combined financial statements, the net assets value of the DWS Group consists of the net investment attributable to the Deutsche Bank Group. For all periods presented, any payments received from the Deutsche Bank Group have been treated as withdrawals from or contributions to the net investment attributable to the Deutsche Bank Group. As such, where payments have been made by the DWS Group to the DWS Group to the Deutsche Bank Group in the course of the legal transfer of AM dedicated entities and liabilities of the AM dedicated entities that have been economically allocated to the DWS Group, such payments are presented as withdrawals from the net investment attributable to the Deutsche Bank Group.
The capital structure of the DWS Group at the initial public offering will differ from that shown in the combined financial statements.
AM dedicated entities wheelegal transfer to the DWS Croup has already been o
| Serial | First time | Period of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Name | combination | divestiture | Country, City |
| 1 | Active Asset Allocation Growth 80 Protect EUR | 12/2016 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 2 | Active Asset Allocation Growth 80 Protect USD | 12/2016 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 3 | DB Immobilienfonds 4 GmbH & Co. KG i.L. | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 4 | DB Immobilienfonds 5 Wieland KG | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 5 | DB Vita S.A. | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 6 | DBRE Global Real Estate Management IA, Ltd. | 01/2015 | Cayman Islands, George Town | |
| 7 | DBRE Global Real Estate Management IB, Ltd. | 01/2015 | ||
| Cayman Islands, George Town | ||||
| 8 | DeAM Capital Protect 2014 | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 9 | DeAM Capital Protect 2019 | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 10 | DeAM Capital Protect 2024 | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 11 | DeAM Capital Protect 2029 | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 12 | DeAM Capital Protect 2034 | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 13 | DeAM Capital Protect 2039 | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 14 | DeAM Capital Protect 2044 | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 15 | DeAM Capital Protect 2049 | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 16 | Deutsche Alternative Asset Management (Global) Limited | 01/2015 | United Kingdom, London | |
| 17 | Deutsche Alternative Asset Management (UK) Limited | 01/2015 | United Kingdom, London | |
| 18 | Deutsche Asset Management (Asia) Limited | 01/2015 | Singapore, Singapore | |
| 19 | Deutsche Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited | 01/2015 | Hong Kong, Hong Kong | |
| 20 | Deutsche Asset Management (Japan) Limited | 01/2015 | Japan, Tokyo | |
| 21 | Deutsche Asset Management (Korea) Company Limited | 01/2015 | South Korea, Seoul | |
| 22 | Deutsche Asset Management (UK) Limited | 01/2015 | United Kingdom, London | |
| 23 | Deutsche Asset Management Group Limited | 01/2015 | United Kingdom, London | |
| 24 | Deutsche Asset Management International GmbH | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 25 | Deutsche Asset Management Investment GmbH | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 26 | Deutsche Asset Management S.A. | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 27 | Deutsche Asset Management Schweiz AG | 04/2017 | Switzerland, Zurich | |
| 28 | Deutsche Asset Management Shanghai Investment Company Limited | 01/2015 | China (PRC), Shanghai | |
| 29 | Deutsche Bank Best Allocation - Protect 80 | 12/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 30 | Deutsche Bank Best Allocation - Protect 90 | 05/2016 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 31 | Deutsche Grundbesitz-Anlagegesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 32 | Deutsche Institutional Money plus | 01/2015 | 12/2017 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 33 | Deutsche Institutional USD Money plus | 01/2015 | 12/2017 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 34 | Deutsche Invest I CROCI Flexible Allocation | 01/2016 | 01/2017 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 35 | Deutsche Invest I Real Assets Income | 01/2016 | 12/2017 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| રેણે | DI Deutsche Immobilien Baugesellschaft mbH (merged per 09/2017 with No. 66 RREEF | |||
| Management GmbH) | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | ||
| 37 | DI Deutsche Immobilien Treuhandgesellschaft mbH | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 38 | DWS (CH) - Pension Garant 2017 | 01/2015 | Switzerland, Zurich | |
| ਤੇਰੇ | DWS Dividende Garant 2016 | 01/2015 | 09/2016 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 40 | DWS Garant 80 ETF-Portfolio | 04/2016 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 41 | DWS Garant 80 FPI | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 42 | DWS Garant Top Dividende 2018 | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| ਕੰਤ | DWS Global Protect 80 II | 01/2015 | 09/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 44 | DWS Group SE | 05/2017 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| ર્વાર | DWS Holding & Service GmbH | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 46 | DWS Institutional Rendite 2017 | 01/2015 | 12/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 47 | DWS Life Cycle Balance II | 01/2016 | 06/2017 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 48 | DWS Megatrend Performance 2016 | 01/2015 | 10/2016 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 49 | DWS Performance Rainbow 2015 | 01/2015 | 08/2016 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 50 | DWS Rendite Garant 2015 | 01/2015 | 10/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 21 | DWS SachwertStrategie Protekt Plus | 01/2015 | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 52 | DWS Rendite Garant 2015 II | 01/2015 | 07/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 53 | DWS Vorsorge Premium Balance Plus | 01/2016 | 06/2017 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 54 | DWS World Protect 90 | 08/2016 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| રેકે | DWS Zeitwert Protect | |||
| 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |||
| રુ | European Value Added I (Alternate G.P.) LLP | 02/2015 | United Kingdom, London | |
| 57 | Leonardo Secondary Opportunities Fund III (Alternate GP of GP), LP | 12/2016 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 58 | Leonardo Secondary Opportunities Fund III (Alternate GP), LP | 12/2016 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| રતે | Leonardo Secondary Opportunities Fund III (GP) Limited | 12/2016 | Cayman Islands, George Town | |
| 60 | Leonardo Secondary Opportunities Fund III (Limited Partner) Limited | 12/2016 | Cayman Islands, George Town | |
| 61 | Leonardo Secondary Opportunities III (SLP GP) Limited | 12/2016 | United Kingdom, Edinburgh | |
| 62 | Leonardo Secondary Opportunities III SLP, LP | 12/2016 | United Kingdom, Edinburgh | |
| ર્ણ્વ ઉત્તર પિટિન કર્યું હતું. જિલ્લાના પાસની વસ્તર પ્રતિષ્ટ કર્યું છે રેન્ડિયા વિસ્તારમાં આવેલું એક ગામનાં છે તે છે છે. આ ગામનાં છે તે છે છે. આ ગામનાં લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય | PEIF II SLP Feeder, L.P. | 12/2016 | United Kingdom, Edinburgh | |
| ed | RREEF European Value Added I (G.P.) Limited | 01/2015 | United Kingdom, London | |
| 65 | RREEF Investment GmbH | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 66 | RREEF Management GmbH | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 67 | RREEF Spezial Invest GmbH | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| ୧୫ | Vermögensfondmandat Flexible (80% teilgeschützt) | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| રત | WEPLA Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 70 | Whale Holdings S.à r.l. | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| Serial | First time | Period of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Name | combination | divestiture | Country, City |
| 71 | Charitable Luxembourg Two S.à r.l. | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 72 | DB Commodity Services LLC | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 73 | DBRE Global Real Estate Management US IA, L.L.C. | 02/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 74 | DBRE Global Real Estate Management US IB, L.L.C. | 02/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 75 | DBX Advisors LLC | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 76 | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | ||
| DBX Strategic Advisors LLC | ||||
| 77 | Deutsche Alternative Asset Management (France) SAS | 01/2015 | France, Paris | |
| 78 | Deutsche AM Distributors, Inc. | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 79 | Deutsche AM Service Company | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 80 | Deutsche AM Trust Company | 01/2015 | United States of America, Salem | |
| 81 | Deutsche Asset Management S.G.I.I.C., S.A. | 01/2015 | Spain, Madrid | |
| 82 | Deutsche Asset Management US Holding Corporation | 08/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 83 | Deutsche Asset Management USA Corporation | 10/2016 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 84 | Deutsche Cayman Ltd. | 01/2015 | Cayman Islands, George Town | |
| કર્ | Deutsche CROCI U.S. Fund | 04/2015 | 12/2016 | United States of America, Boston |
| 86 | Deutsche Emerging Markets Frontier Fund | 01/2015 | 07/2017 | United States of America, Baltimore |
| 87 | Deutsche European Equity Fund | 01/2015 | 09/2015 | United States of America, Baltimore |
| 88 | Deutsche Far Eastern Asset Management Company Limited | 01/2015 | Republic of China Taiwan, Taipei | |
| 89 | 01/2015 | |||
| Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. | United States of America, Wilmington | |||
| 90 | Deutsche Investments Australia Limited | 01/2015 | Australia, Sydney | |
| d I | Deutsche Limited Maturity Quality Income Fund | 10/2015 | 11/2017 | United States of America, Boston |
| 92 | Deutsche MLP & Energy Infrastructure Fund | 03/2015 | 12/2015 | United States of America, Boston |
| ਰੇਤੋ | Deutsche Short Duration High Income Fund | 12/2017 | United States of America, Boston | |
| 94 | Deutsche Ultra-Short Investment Grade Fund | 10/2015 | United States of America, Boston | |
| તેર | Deutsche X-trackers Dow Jones Hedged International Real Estate ETF | 04/2015 | 05/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| તેણ | Deutsche X-trackers Japan JPX-Nikkei 400 Hedged Equity ETF | 08/2015 | 05/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 97 | Deutsche X-trackers MSCI Australia Hedged Equity ETF | 08/2015 | 05/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| ది 8 | Deutsche X-trackers MSCI Spain Hedged Equity ETF | 08/2015 | 05/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| дд | Deutsche X-trackers Regulated Utilities ETF | 01/2015 | 09/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 100 | Deutsche X-trackers S&P Hedged Global Infrastructure ETF | 04/2015 | 05/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 101 | Dynamic Infrastructure Securities Fund LP | 10/2016 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 102 | G.O. IB-US Management, L.L.C. | 05/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 103 | IVAF (Jersey) Limited | 01/2015 | Jersey, St. Helier | |
| 104 | IVAF I Manager, S.à r.l. | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 105 | Leonardo Charitable 1 Limited | 01/2015 | Cayman Islands, George Town | |
| 106 | MEF I Manager, S. à r.l. | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg | |
| 107 | RoPro U.S. Holding, Inc. | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 108 | RREEF America L.L.C. | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 100 | RREEF Fund Holding Co. | 02/2017 | Cayman Islands, George Town | |
| 110 | RREEF Management L.L.C. | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 111 | Xtrackers Barclays International Corporate Bond Hedged ETF | 10/2016 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 112 | Xtrackers Barclays International Treasury Bond Hedged ETF | 10/2016 | 09/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 113 | Xtrackers Emerging Markets Bond - Interest Rate Hedged ETF | 03/2015 | 06/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 114 | Xtrackers Eurozone Equity ETF | 08/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 115 | Xtrackers FTSE Developed Ex US Comprehensive Factor ETF | 11/2015 | 09/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 116 | Xtrackers FTSE Emerging Comprehensive Factor ETF | 04/2016 | 12/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 117 | Xtrackers Germany Equity ETF | 08/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 118 Xtrackers High Yield Corporate Bond - Interest Rate Hedged ETF | 03/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | ||
| 119 Xtrackers Investment Grade Bond - Interest Rate Hedged ETF | 03/2015 | 04/2016 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 120 Xtrackers Japan JPX-Nikkei 400 Equity ETF | 06/2015 | 09/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 121 | Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF | 01/2015 | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 122 Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 08/2015 | 05/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 123 Xtrackers MSCI Asia Pacific ex Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 01/2015 | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 124 Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 08/2015 | 04/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 125 Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Small Cap Hedged Equity ETF | 08/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | ||
| 126 | Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets High Dividend Yield Hedged Equity ETF | 08/2015 | 10/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 127 Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF | 01/2015 | 02/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 128 | Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone High Dividend Yield Hedged Equity ETF | 08/2015 | 12/2017 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 129 Xtrackers MSCI Mexico Hedged Equity ETF | 01/2015 | 05/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 130 Xtrackers MSCI South Korea Hedged Equity ETF | 01/2015 | 02/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 131 Xtrackers MSCI United Kingdom Hedged Equity ETF | 01/2015 | 02/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 132 Xtrackers Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor ETF | 11/2015 | 05/2016 | United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 133 | Xtrackers Russell 2000 Comprehensive Factor ETF | 06/2016 | 12/2016 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 134 Xtrackers Solactive Investment Grade Subordinated Debt ETR | 01/2015 | 09/2015 United States of America, Wilmington |
| Serial | first time | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Name | combination Country, City | |
| 135 DB Beteiligungs-Holding GmbH | 12/2016 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 136 DB CAPAM GmbH (merged per 08/2016 with No. 25 Deutsche Asset Management International GmbH) | 01/2015 | Germany, Cologne | |
| 137 DB Finanz-Holding GmbH (merged per 04/2017 with No. 135 DB Beteiligungs-Holding GmbH) | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt | |
| 138 | DB Global Technology Inc. | 01/2015 United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 139 | DB Investment Partners Inc. | 01/2015 United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 140 | DB Overseas Holdings Limited | 01/2015 | United Kingdom, London |
| 141 | DB USA Core Corporation | 01/2015 United States of America, West Trenton | |
| 142 | DB USA Corporation | 01/2015 United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 143 | DBAH Capital LLC | 01/2015 United States of America, Wilmington | |
| 144 | DBOI Global Services (UK) Limited | 01/2015 | United Kingdom, London |
| 145 | DBOI Global Services Private Limited | 01/2015 | India, Mumbai |
| 146 | DBR Investments Co. Limited | 01/2015 | Cayman Island, George Town |
| 147 | DEBEKO Immobilien GmbH & Co Grundbesitz OHG | 01/2015 | Germany, Eschborn |
| 148 | Deutsche Australia Limited | 01/2015 | Australia, Sydney |
| 149 | Deutsche Bank (Suisse) SA | 01/2015 | Switzerland, Geneva |
| 150 | Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft | 01/2015 | Germany, Frankfurt |
| 151 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Amsterdam | 01/2015 | Netherland, Amsterdam | |
| 152 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Cayman Islands | 01/2015 | Cayman Island, George Town | |
| 153 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Dubai (DIFC) | 01/2015 United Arab Emirates, Dubai | ||
| 154 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Hongkong | 01/2015 | Hong Kong, Hong Kong | |
| 155 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale London | 01/2015 | United Kingdom, London | |
| 156 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Mailand | 01/2015 | Italy, Milan | |
| 157 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale New York | 01/2015 | United States of America, New York | |
| 158 | Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Paris | 01/2015 | France, Paris |
| 159 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Singapur | 01/2015 | Singapore, Singapore | |
| 160 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Stockholm | 01/2015 | Sweden, Stockholm | |
| 161 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Wien | 01/2015 | Austria, Vienna | |
| 162 | Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. | 01/2015 | Luxembourg, Luxembourg |
| 163 | Deutsche Bank S.A. - Banco Alemão | 01/2015 | Brazil, Sao Paulo |
| 164 | Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. | 01/2015 | United States of America, Wilmington |
| 165 | Deutsche Bank Sociedad Anonima Espanola | 01/2015 | Spain, Madrid |
| 166 | Deutsche Bank Società per Azioni | 01/2015 | Italy, Milan |
| 167 | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | 01/2015 | United States of America, New York |
| 168 | Deutsche CIB Centre Private Limited | 01/2015 | India, Mumbai |
| I ed | Deutsche Group Services Pty Limited | 01/2015 | Australia, Sydney |
| 170 | Deutsche Knowledge Services Pte. Ltd. Manila Branch | 01/2015 | Philippines, Taguig City |
| 171 | Deutsche Securities Inc. | 01/2015 | Japan, Tokyo |
| 172 | Greenwood Properties Corp. | 01/2015 | United States of America, New York |
| 173 | Merlin XI | 01/2015 | Cayman Island, George Town |
| 174 OAM Köln GmbH (merged per 09/2016 with No. 176 Sal. Oppenheim jr. & Cie. AG & Co. KGaA) | 01/2015 | Germany, Cologne | |
| 175 Oppenheim Fonds Trust GmbH | 01/2015 | Germany, Cologne | |
| 176 | Sal. Oppenheim jr. & Cie. AG & Co. KGaA | 01/2015 | Germany, Cologne |
As noted within the 'Principles of combined statements' section above, in preparing the combined financial information that is included within the combined financial statements, management in determining the separately identifiable economic activities that have not been, or are not expected to be, transferred to the DWS Group.
Management has also exercised judgment in determining the relevant pension and tax balances that relate to the DWS Group in each of the years ended 31 December 2017, 2016 and 2015 which are considered in further detail below. As such, the combined financial information does not necessarily reflect the financial position and results of the DWS Group that would have occurred if the DWS Group had existed as a separate legal group in each of the reporting periods presented.
The following accounting policies are important to the portrayal of DWS Group's reported amounts of income, expenses, assets, liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the reporting date and require DWS Group's management's most subjective or complex judgments and the use of assumptions, often as a result of the need to effects of matters that are inherently uncertain and susceptible to changenent bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience, where applicable and other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, uncertainty about these could result in outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the asset or liability affected in the future. Management cannot offer any assurance that the actual results with these estimates and assumptions, and these critical accounting estimates or assumptions could change from period, or could involve estimates where management could have reasonably used another estimate in the relevant accounting period. The most critical accounting policies, which reflect significant management estimates and judgment to determine amounts in the Combined Financial Statements, are as follows:
· the determination of fair value (see " Financial Assets and Liabilities.")
· the impairment of goodwill and other intangibles (see "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets")
The following is a description of the significant accounting policies adopted by DWS Group. These policies have been consistently applied for 2017, 2016 and 2015 to the combined financial statements. In preparing the combined financial statements, the principles underlying the consolidation procedures of IFRS 10 "Consolidated Financial Statements' ("IFRS 10") have been applied with the result that all balances and transactions between the Bank Asset Management entities have been eliminated within the combined financial statements. Balances and transactions between the remainder of the Deutsche Bank Group are classified as related party transactions. No subsequent adjustments have been made to these transactions on the basis that they were originally entered into at an arm's length basis. Hence, when referring to "consolidated" for significant accounting policies this refers to combination rather than consolidation.
The Group's subsidiaries are those entities which it directly or indirectly controls. Control over an entity is evidenced by the Group's ability to exercise its power in order to affect any variable returns that the Group is exposed to through its involvement with the entity.
When assessing whether to consolidate an entity, the Group evaluates a range of control factors, namely:
Where voting rights are relevant, the Group is deemed to have control where it holds, directly or indirectly, more than half of the voting rights over an entity unless that another investor has the practical ability to unilaterally direct the relevant activities.
Potential voting rights that are deemed to be substantive are also considered when assessing control.
Likewise, the Group also assesses existence of control the majority of the voting power but has the practical ability to unilaterally direct the relevant activities or its exposure to the variability of returns is different from that of other investors.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and are that control ceases.
The Group reassesses the consolidation status at every quarterly reporting date. Therefore, any changes in the structure leading to a change in one or more of the control factors, require reassessment when they occur. This includes changes in decision making rights, changes in contractual arrangements, changes in the financing, ownership or capital structure as well as changes following a trigger event which was anticipated in the original documentation.
All intercompany transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated.
Consistent accounting policies are applied throughout the Group for the purposes of consolidation. Issuances of a subsidiary's stock to third parties are treated as non-controlling interests. Profit or loss attributable to non-controlling interests are reported sparately in the Combined Statement of Income and Combined Statement of Comprehensive Income.
At the date that control of a subsidiary is lost, the Group a) derecognizes the assets (including attributable of the subsidiary at their carrying amounts, b) derecognizes the carrying amount of any non-controlling interests in the former subsidiary, c) recognizes the fair value of the consideration of the shares of the shares of the subsidiary, d) recognizes any investment retained in the former subsidiary at its fair value and e) recognizes any resulting difference of the above items as a gain or loss in the income statement. Any amounts recognized in other comprehensive income in relation to that subsidiary would be reclassified to the Combined Statement of Income or transferred directly to retained by other IFRSS.
An associate is an entity in which the Group has significant influence, but not a controlling interest, over the operating and financial management policy decisions of the entity. Significant influence is generally presumed when the Group holds between 20% and 50% of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered in
assessing whether the Group has significant influence. Among the other factors that are considered in determining whether the Group has significant influence are representation on the board of directors (supervisory board in the case of German stock corporations) and material intercompany transactions. The existence of these factors could require the equity method of accounting for a particular investment even though the Group's investment is less than 20% of the voting stock.
Investments in associates are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Group's share of associates is adjusted to conform to the accounting policies of the Group's share in the associate's profits and losses resulting from intercompany sales is eliminated on consolidation.
If the Group previously held an equity interest in an entity (for example, as available for sale) and significant influence, the previously held equity interest is remessured to fair value and any gain or loss is recognized in the Combined Statement of Income. Any amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income associated with the equity interest would be reclassified to the Combined Statement of Income at the Group gains significant influence, as if the Group had disposed of the previously held equity interest.
Under the equity method of accounting, the Group's investments in associates and jointly controlled entities are initially recorded at cost including any directly related transaction acquiring the associate, and subsequently increased (or decreased) to reflect both the Group's pro-rata share of the post-acquisition net income (or loss) of the associate or jointly controlled entity and other movements included directly in the associate or jointly controlled entity. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of an associate or a jointly controlled entity is included in the investment (net of any accumulated impairment loss). As goodwill is not reported separately it is not specifically tested for impairment. Rather, the entire equity method investment is tested for impairment at each balance sheet date.
If there is objective evidence of impairment test is performed by compaine the investment's recoverable amount. which is the higher of its value in use and fair value less costs to sell, with its carrying amount. An impairment loss recognized in prior periods is only reversed if there has been a change in the investment's recoverable anount since the last imparment loss was recognized. If this is the carrying amount of the investment is increased to its higher recoverable amount.
At the date that the Group ceases to have significant influence over the associate or jointly controlled entity the Group recognizes a gain or loss on the disposal of the equity method investment equal to the difference between the sum of the fair value of any retained investment and the proceeds from disposing of the associate and the carrying amount of the investment. Amounts recognized in prior periods in other comprehensive income in relation to the associate are accounted for on the same basis as would have been required if the investee had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities.
Critical Accounting Estimates - As the assessment of whether there is objective evidence of impairment may require significant management judgment and the estimates for impairment could change from period based on future events that may or may not occur, the Group considers this to be a critical accounting estimate.
The DWS Group is a global asset manager offering traditional active strategies as well as alternatives and bespoke solutions for its clients. The Group earns management fees with different products carrying different fee rates arising from trust and other fiduciary activities that result in the segregated holding or investing of assets on behalf of individuals, trusts, retirement benefit plans, and others.
Management fees are recognized as and when the service is performed mainly as a percentage of AuM and are generally received on a monthly or quarterly basis. Net management fees consist of gross management fees and other cost-related fees, including administrative service fees, net of distribution fees paid. The total level of management fees depends on the client and product mix.
Performance fees are paid to DWS Group companies primarily for fund management services based on the fund's performance relative to a benchmark / target return or the realized appreciation of the fund's investments. Fees from securities lending transactions as well as variable performance fees based on specific contractual terms are further components of the performance fees position for DWS Group. Performance fees will not be recognized income statement until it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulated revenue will not occur.
For expenses incurred in relation to businesses where is driven on a commission basis and for which income is reported as commission income in the combined financial statements, such expenses are to be presented on a net basis. Subsequently all expenses that incurred on a per transaction basis and are directly related and incremental to the income are presented net in net commissions and fee income from Asset Management in the combined financial statements.
The Group classifies its financial assets and liabilities into the following categories: financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, loans, financial assets available for sale ("AFS") and other financial liabilities. Appropriate classification of financial assets and liabilities is determined at the of initial recognition or when reclassified in the Combined Balance Sheet.
Financial instruments classified at fair value through profit or loss and financial assets classified as AFS are recognized or derecognized on trade date, which is the date on which the Group commits to purchase or issue or repurchase the financial liability.
The Group classifies certain financial liabilities as either held for trading or designated at fair value through profit or loss. They are carried at fair value and presented as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, respectively. Related realized gains and losses are included in net gains (losses) on financial assets/liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. Interest earning assets such as trading loans and debt securities and dividends on equity instruments are presented in interest and similar income from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss.
Trading Assets and Liabilities - Financial instruments are classified as held for trading if they have been originated, acquired or incurred principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing them in the near term, or they form part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern profit-taking. Trading assets include debt and equity securities and derivatives held for trading liabilities consist primarily of derivative liabilities and short positions.
Financial Instruments Designated at Fair Value through Profit or Loss - Certain financial assets and liabilities that do not meet the definition of trading assets and liabilities are designated at fair value through profit or loss using the fair value ontion. To be designated at fair value through profit or loss, financial assets and liabilities must meet one of the following criteria: (1) the designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency; (2) a group of financial assets or liabilities or both is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy: or (3) the instrument contains one or more embedded derivatives unless: (a) the embedded derivative does not significantly modify the cash flows that otherwise would be required by the clear with little or no analysis that separation is prohibited. In addition, the fair value option to be designated only for those financial instruments for which a reliable estimate of fair value can be obtained.
Financial assets that are not classified as at fair value through profit or loss or loans are classified as AFS is initially recognized at its fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the financial asset. The amortization of premiums and accretion of discount are recorded in net interest income. Financial as AFS are carried at fair value with the changes in fair value reported in other comprehensive income, unless the asset is subject to a fair value hedge, in which case changes in fair value resulting from the risk being hedged are recorded in other income. For monetary financial assets classified as AFS (debt instruments), changes in carrying amounts relating to changes in foreign exchare recognized in the Combined Statement of Income and other changes in carrying amount are recognized in other comprehensive income as indicated above. For financial as AFS that are nonmonetary items (equity instruments), the gain or loss that is recognized in other comprehensive income includes any related foreign exchange component.
Realized gains and losses are reported in net gains (losses available for sale. Generally, the weighted-average cost method is used to determine the cost of financial asses. Unrealized gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive income are transferred to the Statement of Income on disposal of AFS asset and reported in net gains (losses on financial assets available for sale.
In the case of equity investments classified as AFS, objective evidence of impairment includes a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the investment below cost. In the case of debt securities classified as AFS, impairment is assessed based on the same criteria as for loans.
If there is evidence of impairment, any amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income are recognized in the combined statement of income for the period, reported in net gains (losses available for sale. This imparment loss for the period is determined as the difference between the acquisition cost (net of any principal repayments and amortization) and current fair value of the asset less any impairment previously recognized in the Combined Statement of Income.
When an AFS debt security is impaired, any subsequent decreases in the Combined Statement of Income as it is considered further impairment. Any subsequent increases are also recognized in the Combined Statement of Income until the asset is no longer considered impaired. When the AFS debt security recovers to at least amortized cost it is no longer considered impaired and subsequent changes in fair value are reported in other comprehensive income.
Reversals of impairment losses on equity investments classified as AFS are not reversed through the Combined Statement of Income; increases in their fair value after impairment are recognized in other comprehensive income.
Critical Accounting Estimates - Because the assessment of objective evidence of impairment requires significant management judgment and the estimate of impairment could change from period based upon future events that may or may not occur, the Group considers the impairment of Financial Assets classified as Available for Sale to be a critical accounting estimate.
Loans include originated and purchased non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and which are not classified assets at fair value through profit or loss or financial assets AFS. On a regular basis the Group assesses whether there is objective evidence of impairment. If the loans are determined then a loan loss allowance is recognized with a corresponding charge to the provision for credit losses of such loan loss allowances established after their initial recognition are included in the provision for credit losses ine. Subsequent improvements in the credit quality of such loans for which no loss allowance had been recognized immediately through an adjustment to the current carrying value and a corresponding gain is recognized in interest income.
Except for financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
Financial liabilities include long-term and short-term debt issued which are initially measured at fair value, which is the consideration received, net of transaction costs incurred.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an arm's length transaction between market participants at the measurements that are quoted in active markets is determined using the quoted prices where they represent those at which regularly and recently occurring transactions take place.
Critical Accounting Estimates – The Group uses valuation techniques to establish the fair value of instruments where prices quoted in active markets are not available. There possible, parameter inputs to the valuation techniques are based on observable data derived from prices of relevant instruments traded in an active market. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which will depend on the instrument or market and the instrument's complexity.
In reaching estimates of fair value management judgment needs to be exercised. The areas requiring significant management judgment are identified, documented and reported to senior management as part of the valuation control process and the standard monthly reporting cycle. The specialist model valuation control groups focus attention on the areas of subjectivity and judgment.
The level of management judgment required in establishing fair value of financial instruments for which there is a quoted price in an active market is usually minimal. Similarly, there is little subjectivity or judgment required valued using valuation models which are standard across the industry and where all parameter inputs are quoted in active markets.
Where no market data is available for a particular instrument then pricing inputs are determined by assessing other relevant sources of information such as historical data, fundamental analysis of the transaction and proxy information from similar transactions, and making appropriate adjustments to reflect the actual instrument being valued and current market conditions. Where different valuation techniques indicate a range of possible fair values for an instrument thas to decide what point within the range of estimates appropriately represents the fair valuation adjustments may require the exercise of management judgment to achieve fair value.
Under IFRS, the financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are required to be disclosed according to the valuation method that are used to determine their fair value. Specifically, segmentation is required between those valued using quoted market prices in an active market (level 1), valuation techniques based on observable parameters (level 2) and valuation techniques using significant unobservable parameters (level 3). Management judgment is required in determining the category to which certain instruments should be allocated. This specifically arises when the valuation is determined by a number of parameters, some of which are observable and others are not. Further, the classification of an instrument can change in market liquidity and therefore price transparency.
The Group provides a sensitivity analysis of the impact upon the level 3 financial instruments of using a reasonably possible alternative for the unobservable paramination of reasonably possible alternatives requires significant management judgment.
For financial instruments measured at amortized cost (which includes loans, deposits and short and long term debt) the Group discloses the fair value. Generally there is limited or no trading activity in these instruments and therefore the fair value determination requires significant management judgment.
For further discussion of the valuation methods and quantitative disclosures with respect to the determination of fair value, please refer to Note 8 "Financial Instruments carried at Fair Value" and Note 9 "Fair Value of Financial Instruments not carried at Fair Value".
Derivatives are generally used to manage exposures to interest rate, foreign currency, credit and other market price risks, including exposures arising from forecast transactions. All freestanding contracts that are considered derivatives for accounting purposes are carried at fair value on the Combined Balance Sheet regardless of whether they are held for trading purposes.
Derivatives are also used for guarantee contracts which do not qualify as a financial guarantee contract is a contract that requires the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due in accordance with the original or modified terms of a debt instrument.
The changes in fair value on derivatives held for trading are included in net gains (losses) on financial assets/liabilities at fair value through profit or loss.
A financial asset is considered for derecognition when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire, or the Group has either transferred the contractual right to receive the cash flows from that asset, or has assumed an obligation to pay those cash flows to one or more recipients, subject to certain criteria.
The Group derecognizes a transferred financial asset if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.
In transactions in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a financial asset are neither retained, the Group derecognizes the transferred asset if control over that asset is not retained, i.e., if the transferee has the practical ability to sell the transferred asset. The rights and obligations retained in the transfer are recognized separately as assets and liabilities, as appropriate. If control over the asset is retained, the Group continues to recognize the asset to the extent of its continuing involvement, which is determined by the extent to which it remains exposed to changes in the transferred asset.
The derecognition criteria are also applied to the transfer of part of an asset as a whole, or to a group of similar financial assets in their entirety, when applicable. If transferring a part of an asset, such part must be a specifically identified cash flow, a fully proportionate share of the asset, or a fully proportionate share of a specifically identified cash flow.
If an existing financial asset is replaced by another asset from the same counterparty on substantially different terms of the financial asset are substantially modified (due to forbearance measures or otherwise), the existing financial asset is derecognized and a new asset is recognized. Any difference between the respective carrying amounts is recognized in the Combined Statement of Income.
A financial liability is derecognized when the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires. If an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same on substantially different terms of the existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognized in the Combined Statement of Income.
Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries and represents the excess of the aggregate of the cost of an acquisition and any noncontrolling interests in the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired at the date of the acquisition.
For the purpose of calculating goodwill, fair values of acquired assets, liabilities are determined by reference to market values or by discounting expected future cash flows to present value. This discounting is either performed using market rates or by using risk-free rates and risk-adjusted expected future cash flows. Any noncontrolling interest in the aquiree is measured either at fair value or at the noncontrolling interests' proportionate share of the acquiree's identifiable net assets (this is determined for each business combination).
Goodwill on the acquisition of subsidiaries is capitalized and reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if there are indications that impairment may have occurred.
If goodwill has been capitalized and an operation is disposed of, the attributable goodwill is included in the carrying amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on its disposal.
Intangible assets are recognized separately from goodwill when they are separable or arise from contractual or other legal rights and their fair value can be measured reliably. Intangible assets that have a finite useful life are stated at cost less any accumulated
amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Customer-related intangible assets that have a finite are amortized over periods of between 1 and 20 years on a straight-line basis based on their expected useful life. These assets are tested for impairment and their useful lives reaffirmed at least annually.
Certain intangible assets have an indefinite useful life and hence are not amortized, but are tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.
Costs related to software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized if it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group and the cost can be measured reliably. Capitalized costs are amortized using the method over the asset's useful life which is deemed to be either three, five or ten years. Eligible costs for materials and services, as well as payroll and payroll-related costs for employees directly associated with an internal-use software project. Overhead costs, as well as costs incurred during the research phase or after software is ready for use, are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software costs are tested for impairment either annually if still under development or when there is an indication of impairment once the software is in use.
Critical Accounting Estimates - The determination of the impairment assessment of non-financial assets requires estimates based on quoted market prices of comparable businesses, present value or other valuation techniques, or a combination thereof. necessitating management to make subjective judgments and assumptions. Because these estimates and assumptions could result in significant differences to the amounts reported if underlying circumstances were to change, the Group considers these estimates to be critical.
The quantitative disclosures are provided in Note 12 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets".
Provisions are recognized if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, if it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the obligation.
The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation as of the balance sheet date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted at the present value of the expenditure expected to be required to settle the obligation, using a pre-tax rate that reflects the current of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. The provision due to the passage of time is recognized as interest expense.
When some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected from a third party (for example, because the obligation is covered by an insurance policy), an asset is recognized if it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received.
Critical Accounting Estimates - The use of estimates is important in determining provisions for potential losses that may arise from litigation, regulatory proceedings and uncertain income tax positions. The Group estimates and provides for potential losses that may arise out of litigation, regulatory proceedings and uncertain income tax positions to the extent that such losses are probable and can be estimated, in accordance with IAS 37, "Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets" or IAS 12, "Income Taxes", respectively. Significant judgment is required in making these estimates and the Group's final liabilities may ultimately be materially different.
Contingencies in respect of legal matters are subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of individual matters is not predicable with assurance. Significant judgment is required in assessing probability and making estimates in respect of contingencies, and the Group's final liability may ultimately different. The Group's total liability in respect of litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings is determined on a case-by-case basis and represents an estimate of probable losses after considering, among other factors, the progress of each case, the Group's experience of others in similar cases, and the opinions and views of legal counsel. Predicting the outcome of the Group's litigation matters is inherently difficult, particularly in cases in which claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages. See Note 15 "Provisions" for information on the Group's judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings.
The Group recognizes the current and deferred tax consequences of transactions that have been included financial statements using the provisions of the respective jurisdictions' tax laws. Current and deferred taxes are recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that the tax relates to ieens that are recognized directly in equity or other case the related tax is recognized either directly in equity or other comprehensive income accordingly.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and their respective tax bases, unused tax losses and unused tax credits. Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available against which those unused tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences can be utilized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured based on the tax rates that are expected to apply in the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Current tax assets and liabilities are offset when (1) they arise from the same tax reporting entity or tax group of reporting entities, (2) the legally enforceable right to offset exists and (3) they are intended to be settled net or realized simultaneously.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when the legally enforceable right to offset and liabilities exists and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxing authority on either the same tax reporting entity or tax group of reporting entities.
Deferred tax liabilities are provided on taxable temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries, branches and associates and interests in joint ventures except when the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group and it is probable that the difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred income tax assets are provided on deductible temporary differences arising from such investments only to the extent that it is probable that the differences will reverse in the foreseable future and sufficient taxable income will be against which those temporary differences can be utilized.
Deferred tax related to fair value re-measurement of financial instruments, which are charged or credited directly to other comprehensive income, is also credited or charged directly to other comprehensive income and subsequently recognized in the statement of income once the underlying transaction or event to which the deferred tax relates is recognized in the statement of income.
Critical Accounting Estimates - In determining the amount of deferred tax assets, the Group uses historical tax capacity and profitability information and, if relevant, forecasted operating results based upon approved business plans, including a review of the eligible carry-forward periods, available tax planning opportunities and other relevant considerations. The Group re-evaluates regularly its estimate related to deferred tax assets about future profitability.
The Group believes that the accounting estimate to the deferred tax assets is a critical accounting estimate because the underlying assumptions can change from period and requires significant management judgment. For example, tax law changes or variances in future projected operating performance could result in a set. If the Group was not able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to its deferred tax assets would be charged to income tax expense or directly to equity in the period such determination was made. If the Group was to recognize previously unrecognized deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to its deferred tax asset would be credited to income tax expense or directly to equity in the period such determination was made.
For further information on the Group's deferred taxes (including quantitative disclosures on recognized deferred tax assets) see Note 16 "Income Taxes".
Noncontrolling interests are shown in the combined balance sheet as a separate component of net asset value, which is distinct from the Group's shareholders' net asset value. The net income attributable to noncontrolling interess is separately disclosed on the face of the combined statement of income. Changes in the ownership interest in subsidiaries which a change of control are treated as transactions between equity holders and are reported in capital ("APIC") within net asset value.
Property and equipment includes own-use properties, leasehold improvements, furniture and software (operating systems only). Own-use properties are carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Depreciation is generally recognized using the straight-line method over the assets. The range of estimated useful lives is 25 to 50 years for property and 3 to 10 years for furniture and equipment (including initial improvements to purchased buildings). Leasehold improvements are capitalized and subsequently depreciated on a straight-line basis over the tease and the estimated useful life of the improvement, which generally ranges from 3 to 18 years. Depreciation of property and equipment is included in general and administrative expenses. Maintenance and repairs are also charged to general and administrative expenses. Gains and losses on disposals are included in other income.
Property and equipment are assessed for any indication of impairment at each quarterly reporting date. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount, which is the higher of fair value in use, must be estimated and an impairnent charge
is recorded to the extent the recoverable amount is less than its carrying amount. Value in use is the future cash flows expected to be derived from the recognition of impairment of an asset, the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to reflect the asset's revised carrying amount. If an impairment is later reversed, the depreciation charge is adjusted prospectively.
Properties leased under a finance lease are capitalized as assets in property and equipment and depreciated over the terms of the leases.
The DWS Group enters into lease contractly for offices and branches undershort- or mid-term agreements. The terms and conditions of these contracts are assessed and the leases are classified as operating leases according to their economic substance at inception of the lease.
Assets held under finance leases are initially recognized on the balance sheet at an amount equal to the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation. The used in calculating the present value of the minimum lease payments is either the interest rate implicit in the lease, if it is practicable to determine, or the incremental borrowing rate. Contingent rentals are recognized as an expense in the periods in which they are incurred.
Operating lease rentals payable are recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, which commences when the lessee controls the physical use of the property. Lease incentives are treated as a reduction of rental expensed over the lease term on a straight-line basis. Contingent rentals arising leases are recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.
Deutsche Bank Group made grants of share-based compensation under DB Equity Plan. DWS Group participates in the DB Equity Plan under the rules established for Deutsche Bank Group.
Share-based payment transactions where Deutsche Bank AG as parent company grants Deutsche Bank AG Shares to the employees of DWS Group are classified as equity-settled transactions reflected in the combined financial statements of DWS Group as Deutsche Bank AG has the obligation to settle the shares.
The substance of the Deutsche Bank's share award programs is that Deutsche Bank AG makes a capital contribution to DWS Group, and that DWS Group makes a share-based payment to its employees in exchange for services. Compensation cost related to the grant of parent company awards to employees of DWS Group are recognized financial statements as compensation expense with a corresponding credit to net asset value. The compensation expense based on the fair value of the awards (and adjusted for expected forfeitures) is amortized over the requisite substantial service period of the award.
For share awards, the fair value is the quoted market price of the present value of the expected dividends from Deutsche Bank AG that will not be received by the employee and adjusted for the effect, if any, of restrictions beyond the vesting date. In case an award is modified such that its fair value immediately after modification exceeds its fair value immediately prior to modification, a remeasurement takes place and the resulting increase in fair value is recognized as additional compensation expense in the combined financials of DWS Group.
Compensation expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the period in which employees perform services to which the awards relate or over the period of the tranches for those awards delivered in tranches. Estimates of expected forfeitures are periodically adjusted in the event of actual forfeitures or for changes in expectations. The timing of expense recognition relating to grants which, due to early retirement provisions, include a nominal but non-substantive service period are accelerated by shortening the amortization period of the expense from the date when the employee meets the eligibility criteria for the award, and not the vesting date. For awards that are delivered in tranche is considered a separate award and amortized separately.
If there are recharge arrangement in place to compensate Deutsche Bank AG for the cost of acquiring the shares to settle its obligation, DWS Group recognizes a corresponding liability that is accrued over the respective service/vesting period.
From the perspective of DWS Group, the recharge forms part of the net capital contribution received in respect of the share-based payment transaction. As DWS Group recognizes a capital contribution as part of the sharebased payment transaction, DWS Group recognizes its reimbursement of the contribution to Deutsche Bank Group Service (as administrator of Deutsche Bank group wide award process) as an adjustment of that capital contribution. DWS Group therefore recognizes a recharge liability with a corresponding debit in net asset value.
The liabilities incurred are re-measured at the end of each reporting period until recognizing any gains and losses in net asset value.
The Group provides a number of pension plans. In addition plans, there are retirement benefit plans accounted for as defined benefit plans. The assets of all the Croup's defined contribution plans are held in independently administered funds. Contributions are generally determined as a percentage of salary and are expensed based on employee services rendered, generally in the year of contribution.
All retirement benefit plans accounted for as defined benefit plans are valued using the projected unit-credit method to determine the present value of the defined benefit obligation and the related service costs. Under this method, the determination is based on actuarial calculations which include assumptions salary increases and interest and interest and inflation rates. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive in equity in the period in which they occur. The majority of the Group's benefit plans is funded.
In addition, the Group maintains unfunded contributory post-employment medical plans for a number of current and retired employees who are mainly located in the United States. These plans pay stated percentages of eligible medical and dental expenses of retirees after a stated deductible has been met. The Group funds these plans on a cash basis are due. Analogous to retirement benefit plans these plans are valued using the projected unit-credit method. Actuarial zains and losses are recognized in full in the period in which they occur in other comprehensive income and presented in equity.
Refer to Note 15 "Employee Benefits' for further information on the accounting for pension benefits and other post-employment benefits.
Termination benefits arise when employment is terminated by the Group before the normal retirement ate or whenever an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. The Group recognizes termination benefits as a liability and an expense if the Group is demonstrably committed to a detailed formal plan without realistic possibility of withdrawal. In the case of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy, termination benefits are measured based on the number of employees expected to accept the offer. Benefits falling due in more than twelve months after the end of the reporting period are discounted to their present value. The discount rate is determined by reference to market yields on high-quality corporate bonds.
For purposes of the combined statement of cash flows, the Group's cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. Such investments include cash and balances at demand deposits with banks (including those from guaranteed funds which are consolidated under IFRS even though the underlying assets belong to the investors).
The Group's assignment of cash flows to the operating or financing category depends on the business model ("management approach"). For the Group the primary operating activity is to manage financial liabilities.
The amounts shown in the combined statement of cash flows do not precisely match the movements in the combined balance sheet from one period to the next as they exclude non-cash items such as movements due to foreign exchange translation and movements due to changes in the group of consolidated companies.
Movements in balances carried at fair value through profit or loss represent all changes affecting the carrying value. This includes the effects of market movements and outflows. The movements in balances carred at fair value are usually presented in operating cash flows.
Non-Participating Investment Contracts ("Investment Contracts") – These contracts do not contain significant insurance risk or discretionary participation features and therefore are not considered under IFRS 4. These are measured and reported consistently with other financial liabilities, which are classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss.
All of the Group's investment contracts are unit-linked. These contract liabilities are determined using current unit prices multiplied by the number of units attributed to the contract holders as of the balance sheet date.
As this amount represents fair value, the liabilities have been classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. Deposits collected under investment contracts are accounted for as an adjustment contract liabilities. Investment income attributable to investment contracts is included in the combined statement contract claims reflect the excess of amounts paid over the account balance released. Investment contract policyholders are charged fees for policy administration, investment management, surrenders or other contract services.
The financial assets for investment contracts are recorded at fair value, and offsetting changes in the fair value of the corresponding financial liabilities, recorded in profit or loss.
The following accounting pronouncements were not effective as of December 31, 2017 and therefore have not been applied in preparing these financial statements.
In July 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments", which replaces IAS 39, "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement". IFRS 9 introduces new requirements on how an entity should classify and measure financial assets, replaces the current rules for impairment of financial assets and aments for hedge accounting. The standard also requires entities to provide users of financial statements with more informative and relevant disclosures. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The standard has been endorsed by the EU. Due to the fiduciary nature of the business the standard does not have a material impact on the Group's combined statements.
IFRS 9 requires that an entity's business model and a financial instrument's contractual cash flows will determine its classification and measurement in the financial statements. Upon initial recognition each financial asset will be classified as either fair value through profit or loss ('FVTPL'), amortized cost, or fair value through other comprehensive income ('FVOCI'). As the requirements under IFRS 9 are different than the assessments under the existing IAS 39 rules, some differences to the classification and measurement of financial assets under IAS 39 are expected, including whether to elect the fair value option on certain assets. The classification and measurement of financial liabilities remain largely unchanged under IFRS 9 from current requirements.
In 2016, the Deutsche Bank Group made an initial determination of business models and assessed the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets to determine the potential classification and measurement changes as a result of IFRS 9. As a result of the analysis performed thus far by DB Group, DWS Group has identified that mainly available for sale assets are expected to be measured at fair value through P&L. Most of the financial assets are already reflected under Financial Assets through profit and loss and therefore no change in classification is expected. However, as per current interpretation most of the financial assess available for sale are expected to be reclassified in 1st quarter 2018 to fair value through P&L (€ 316 million) with an expected movement of the related other comprehensive income to retained earnings (€ 39 million) within the net asset value of the combined financial statements.
The impairment requirements of IFRS 9 apply to finat are measured at amortized cost or FVOC1, and off balance sheet lending commitments such as loan commitments and financial guarantees (hereafter collectively referred to in this note as financial assets).
The determination of impairment losses and allowance will move from an incurred credit loss model, whereby credit losses are recognized when a defined loss event occurs under IAS 39, to an expected loss model under IFRS 9, where provisions are taken upon initial recognition of the financial asset (or the date that the Group becomes a party to the loan commitment or financial guarantee), based on expectations of potential credit losses at that time under IFRS 9. Currently, the DWS Group does not expect a significant impact.
IFRS 9 also incorporates new hedge accounting rules that intend to align hedge accounting with risk management practices. Generally, some restrictions under current rules have been removed and a greater variety of hedged teens become available for hedge accounting . IFRS 9 includes an accounting policy choice to defer the adoption of IFRS 9 hedge accounting and to continue with IAS 39 hedge accounting. DWS Group, in line with DB Group has decided to exercise this accounting policy choice and therefore will not adopt IFRS 9 hedge accounting as of the effective date of IFRS 9.
In October 2017, the IASB issued an amendments", which allows to measure particular pre-payable financial assets with so-called negative compensation (also known as two way break clauses) at amortised cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income if the prepayment anount substantially represents unpaid principal and interest and reasonable compensation. Reasonable compensation may be positive. Prior to this amendment financial assets with this negative compensation feature would have failed the solely payments of principal and interest test and be mandatorily measured af fair value through profit or loss. The amendment will be effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The amendment will not have a material impact on the Group's combined financial statements. The amendments have yet to be endorsed by the EU.
In May 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 15, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers", which specifies how and when revenue is recognized, but does not impact income recognition related to financial instruments in scope of IAS 39/IFRS 15 replaces several other IFRS standards and interpretations that currently govern revenue recognition under IFRS and provides a single, principles-based five-step model to all contracts with customers. The standard also requires entities to provide users of financial statements with more informative and relevant disclosures. IFRS 15 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The standard has been endorsed by the EU.
The Group will apply IFRS 15 starting January 1, 2018 using the cumulative effect method. Based on the assessment performed for IFRS 15 the Group estimates that the current accounting practice for net commissions and fees from asset management is already compliant to IFRS 15 regarding timing and measurement. In line with the Group's current accounting practice performance-based fees will only be recognized once it is highly probable that no significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue will occur.
The presentation of the individual components of net commission and fees from asset management might change depending on the final interpretation of IFRS 15. In case the final interpretation of the individual components, Group will applying such change accordingly.
In January 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16, "Leases", which introduces a single lessee accounting model and requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases with a term of more than 12 months, unless the of low value. A lessee is required to recognize a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying leased and a lease liability representing its obligation to make lease payments. There will be only minor changes to the current accounting for lessors. The standard also requires entities to provide users of financial statements with more informative and relevant disclosures. IFRS 16 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. DB Group is currently assessing the impact of IFRS 16. The standard has been endorsed by the EU.
The Group operates a single business segment on asset management for reporting and controlling purposes.
The DWS Executive Board sets the strategy for DWS Group and its individual parts. DWS Group manages its business across different client segments, distribution chamels and products with a centrally driven sales force servicing all of the business units / products and negotiating prices with clients. Due to the largely shared infrastucture and support services (such as marketing, product strategy, product development, finance), there is limited ability to differentiate pricing based on these costs.
DWS therefore has only one single business segment within the meaning of IFRS 8 as this is how the DWS Executive Board and the "Chief Operating Decision Maker" (CODM) will review the results of AM and make strategic management decisions over investments and resource allocation for DWS Group.
The term "Chief Operating Decision Maker" (CODM) identifies a function, not necessarily a manager with a specific title. Although an entity cannot have more than one CODM, the CODM can be a group of persons. [IFRS 8.7]
Generally, an operating segment manager who is directly accountable to and maintains regular contact with the CODM to discuss operating activities, financial results, or plans for the segment. The term 'segment manager' also identifies a function, not necessary a single manager with a specific title [IFRS 8.9].
The operating model of an operating segment needs to show a certain degree of autonomy. This means that the segment manager and the staff of the segment need to have sufficient expertise in the products and the business of the operating segment in order to take informed decisions.
The following table presents total net interest and noninerest income by geographic area for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. respectively.
| in €m. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 984 | 862 | 955 |
| EMEA excluding Germany | 876 | 796 | 729 |
| Americas | 528 | 604 | 727 |
| APAC | 121 | 153 | 165 |
| Combined interest and noninterest income | 2,509 | 2,415 | 2,576 |
| in Em. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| General and administrative expenses: | |||
| IT costs | (117) | (155) | (136) |
| Professional service fees | (89) | (97) | (89) |
| Communication and data services | (57) | (61) | (52) |
| Occupancy, furniture and equipment expenses | (୧୯୮) | (79) | (80) |
| Banking and transaction charges | (194) | (197) | (193) |
| Marketing expenses | (41) | (28) | (36) |
| Travel and representation expenses | (37) | (40) | (39) |
| Service relationships | (276) | (219) | (283) |
| Other expenses | (୧୫) | (134) | (176) |
| Total general and administrative expenses | (947) | (1,010) | (1,084) |
| in €m. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Restructuring - Staff related | (6) | (46) | 6 |
| thereof: | |||
| Termination Benefits | (4) | (36) | 6 |
| Retention Acceleration | (2) | (9) | (0) |
| Social Security | (0) | (1) | (0) |
| Restructuring - Non Staff related | 0 | 0 | (4) |
| Total Net Restructuring Charges | (6) | (46) |
Provisions for restructuring amounted to € 9 million as of December 31, 2017, € 12 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The current provisions for restructuring are expected to be utilized in the at two years (please refer to note 14 "Provisions").
| in Em. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets classified as held for trading: | |||
| Trading assets: | |||
| Trading securities | 1,296 | 3,885 | 4,918 |
| Total trading assets | 1,296 | 3,885 | 4,918 |
| Positive market values from derivative financial instruments | 37 | 80 | 11 |
| Total financial assets classified as held for trading | 1,333 | 3,965 | 4,930 |
| Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss: | |||
| Other financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 574 | 592 | 665 |
| Total financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 574 | 592 | 665 |
| Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 1,907 | 4,558 | 5,594 |
| in Em. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
| Financial liabilities classified as held for trading: | |||
| Trading liabilities: | |||
| Trading securities | 14 | 16 | 42 |
| Total trading liabilities | 14 | 16 | 42 |
| Negative market values from derivative financial instruments | 125 | 182 | 63 |
| Total financial liabilities classified as held for trading: | 139 | ] તેતે | 105 |
| Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss: | |||
| Investment contract liabilities | 574 | 592 | 665 |
| Total financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss | 574 | 592 | 665 |
| Total financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | 713 | 791 | 770 |
All financial asset/liabilities classes shown in note 7 are reflected at fair value in the combined financial statements.
The Group reports the assets excluding cash and inters of the consolidated guaranteed mutual funds of € 1.2 billion as of December 31, 2017 (€ 3.8 billion as of December 31, 2016 and € 4.9 billion as of December 31, 2015) as trading assets. The fund assets belong to investors and the Group consolidates under IFRS 10 even though not being an investor. The change in fair value of the guaranteed contracts are shown under negative market values from derivatives (€ 89 million in 2016 and € 49 million in 2015). It includes guarantee contracts which do not qualify as financial guarantee (please refer to "Derivatives" under "Significant Accounting Policies").
DWS Group has designated the assess from the investment contracts and the respective investment contract liabilities (€ 74 million in 2017, € 592 million in 2016, € 665 million in 2015) under the fair value option to avoid accounting mismatch. Changes in market conditions include performance of the related investment funds (2017: €26 million, 2015: € 29 million) and are fully attributable to the change in the corresponding investment contracts.
The Valuation Methods and Controls of DWS Group follows the control framework of Deutsche Bank Group.
The Group has an established valuation control which governs internal control standards, methodologies, and procedures over the valuation process.
Prices Quoted in Active Markets - The fair value of instruments that are quoted in active markets are determined using the quoted prices where they represent prices at which regularly and recently occurring transactions take place.
Valuation Techniques - The Group uses valuation techniques to establish the fair value of instruments where prices, quoted in active markets, are not available. Valuation techniques used for financial instruments include modeling techniques, the use of indicative quotes for proxy instruments, quotes from recent and less regular transactions and broker quotes.
For some financial instruments a rate or other than a price, is quoted. Where this is the case then the market rate or parameter is used as an input to a valuation model to determine fair value. For some instruments, modeling techniques follow industry standard models, for example, discounted cash flow analysis and standard option pricing models. These models are dependent upon estimated future cash flows, discount factors and volatility levels.
Frequently, valuation models require multiple parameter inputs. Where possible, parameter inputs are or are derived from the prices of relevant instruments traded in active markets. Where observable data is not available for parameter inputs, then other market information is considered. For example, indicative broker quotes and consensus pricing information are used to support parameter inputs where they are available. Where no observable information is available to support parameter inputs then they are based on other relevant sources of information such as prices for similar transactions, historic data, economic findamentals, and research information, with appropriate adjustment to reflect the terms of the actual instrument being valued and current market conditions.
Validation and Control - Deutsche Bank Group has an independent specialized valuation control group within the Finance function which governs and develops the valuation control framework and manages the valuation control processes. The mandate of this specialist function includes the performance of the independent valuation control process for all businesses, including DWS Group, the continued development of valuation control methodologies and techniques, as well as devising and governing the formal valuation control policy framework. Special attention of this independent valuation control group is directed to areas where management judgment forms part of the valuation process.
Results of the valuation control process are collected and analyzed as part of a standard monthly reporting cycle. Variances of differences outside of preset and approved tolerance levels are escalated both within the DWS Group Finance function and Senior Business Management for review, resolution and, if required, adjustment.
For instruments where fair value is determined from valuation models, the assumptions and techniques used within the models are independently validated by an independent specialist model validation group that is part of the Deutsche Bank Group's Risk Management function.
The financial instruments caried at fair value have been categorized under the IFRS fair value hierarchy as follows:
Level 1 - Instruments valued using quoted prices in active markets where the fair value can be determined directly from prices which are quoted in active, liquid markets and where the instrument observed in the market is representative of that being priced in the Group's inventory.
These include: debt and equity securities traded on active, liquid exchanges.
Level 2 - Instruments valued with valuation techniques using observable market data are instruments where the fair value can be determined by reference to similar instruments trading in active markets, or where a technique is used to derive the valuation but where all inputs to that technique are observable.
These include: many less-liquid debt and equity securities
Level 3 - Instruments valued using valuation techniques using market data which is not directly observable are instruments where the fair value cannot be determined directly by reference to market-observable information, and some other pricing technique must be employed. Instruments classified in this category have an element which is unobservable and which has a significant impact on the fair value.
These include some private equity placements and fund investments.
| Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Em | Quoted prices in active market (Level 1) |
Valuation technique observabile parameters (Level 2) |
Valuation technique unobservabile parameters (Level 3) |
Quoted prices in active market (Level 1) |
Valuation technique observable parameters (Level 2) |
Valuation technique uno bservable parameters (Level 3) |
Quated prices in active market (Level 1) |
Valuation technique observable parameters (Level 2) |
Valuation technique unobservable parameters (Level 3) |
| Financial assets held at fair value: | |||||||||
| Trading assets | 106 | 1,173 | 542 | 3,343 | 0 | ਹੈ ਕੋ 8 | 3,936 | 34 | |
| Trading socurities | 106 | 1.173 | 542 | 3,343 | 948 | 3.936 | 34 | ||
| Positive market values from derivative financial instruments | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 80 | U | 0 | ||
| Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 574 | 0 | 0 | 592 | 0 | 0 | ર્ભરેસ | 0 |
| Financial assets available for sale | 0 | 84 | 278 | 0 | 56 | 260 | () | 54 | 253 |
| Total financial assets held at fair value | 106 | 1,868 | 294 | રને 3 | 4,071 | 261 | ಕ್ಕಿ 8 | 4,666 | 287 |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value: | |||||||||
| Trading liabilities | 0 | 16 | 42 | ||||||
| Trading securities | 16 | 0 | 42 | ||||||
| Negative market values from derivative financial instruments | 0 | 43 | 81 | 0 | 100 | 73 | 47 | ||
| Investment contract liabilities | 0 | 574 | 0 | 0 | 592 | 0 | 0 | 665 | |
| Total financial liabilities held at fuir value | 14 | 617 | 81 | 17 | 701 | 74 | 42 | 712 | 15 |
The following is an explanation of the valuation techniques used in establishing the fair value of the different types of financial instruments that DWS Group trades.
Guaranteed Funds - the assets are reflected under trading assets and valuation prepared by the consoliated guaranteed fund and includes relevant IFRS adjustments if applicable.
Guaranteed Retirement Accounts - DWS Group manages guaranteed retirement accounts which provide a full or partial notional guarantee at maturity. This guarantee is not considered as financial guarantee but as derivative (please refer to "Derives" under "Significant Accounting Policies"). Depending on the account and guarantee level and on the maturity of the accounts are invested in dedicated government bond fixed duration or in one equity target fund. The valuation of accounts rely therefore onto the valuation of the underlying target funds. The accounts shortfall is calculated with option pricing models using Monte-Carlo simulations including the behavioural risk of the client starting 2016. For 2015 a corresponding present value model including the behavioural risk of the client had been applied.
Equity Securities - Where there are no recent transactions then fair value may be determined from the last market price adjusted for all changes in risks and information since that date. Where a close proxy instrument is quoted in an active market then fair value is determined by adjusting the proxy value for differences in the instruments. Where close proxies are not available then fair value is estimated using more complex modelling techniques include discounted cash flow models using current market rates for credit, interest, liquidity and other risks. For equity securities may also include those based on earnings multiples.
Investment Contract Liabilities - Assets reflected under Financial Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss which are linked to the investment contract liabilities that are owned by the investment contract obliges the Group to use these assets (to settle these liabilities). Therefore, the fair value of investment contract liabilities is determined by the fair value of the underlying assets based on the published fund price.
Financial Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value categorized in this level of the fair value hierarchy are valued based on one or more unobservable parameters.
Financial Assets Available for Sale include unlisted equity instruments where is no close proxy and the market is very illiquid.
| Dec 31, 2017 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in €m. | Balance, beginning of year |
Total guins (1) 405801 |
Purchases | Sales | Seltle- ments |
Transfers into Level 3 |
Transfers oul of Level 3 |
Balance, end of year |
| Financial assets held at fair value: | ||||||||
| Trading securities | 0 | (8) | 0 | 0 | (3) | 28 | 0 | 17 |
| Financial assets available for sale | 260 | (28) | રે રે | (7) | 0 | 0 | (0) | 278 |
| Total financial assets held at fair value | 261 | (37) | ਟੇਤੇ | (7) | (3) | 28 | (0) | 294 |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value: | ||||||||
| Negative market values from derivative financial instruments | 73 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81 |
| Total financial liabilities held at fair value | 74 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81 |
| Dec 31, 2016 | ||||||||
| in Em. | Balanca, beginning of year |
Total guins/ losses (1) |
Purchases | Sales | Settle- ments |
Transfers into Level 3 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |
Balance, end of year |
| Financial assets held at fair value: | 0 | |||||||
| Trading securities | 34 | 59 | 0 | (93) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Financial assets available for sale | 253 | 22 | 23 | (36) | (1) | 0 | (0) | 260 |
| Total financial assets held at fair value | 287 | 81 | 53 | (129) | (1) | 0 | (0) | 261 |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value: | ||||||||
| Negative market values from derivative financial instruments | 15 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1) | 73 |
| Total financial liabilities held at fair value | 15 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1) | 74 |
| Dec 31, 2015 | ||||||||
| in Em. | Balance, beginning of year |
Total guins/ losses (1) |
Purchases | Sales | Settle- ments |
Transfers Into Level 3 |
Transfers out of Level 3 |
Balance, end of year |
| Financial assets held at fair value: | ||||||||
| Trading securities | 139 | (106) | (4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | |
| Financial assets available for sale | 234 | 20 | 12 | (25) | 0 | 11 | 0 | 253 |
| Total financial assets held at fair value | 373 | (82) | 16 | (28) | 11 | 287 | ||
| Financial liabilities held at fair value: | ||||||||
| Negative market values from derivative financial instruments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Total financial liabilities held at fair value | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
(1) The total gains and losses on available for sale in (oss) of € (20) million as of December 31, 2017 (2016 € 20 million and 2015. € 24 million and 2015. € 24 million and 2 in other comprehensive incoment asset value, before tax and a gain of E (8) million and 2015 (4) million and 2015: (4) million and 2015: (4) million hecognized in the income statement presented in net gains (losses) on financial assets available for sale.
Where the value of financial instruments is dependent on unobservable parameter inputs, the precise level for these parameters at the balance sheet date might be drawn from a range of reasonably possible allernatives. In preparing the financial statements, appropriate levels for these unobservable input parameters are chosen so that they are consistent with prevailing market evidence.
Our sensitivity calculation of unobservable parameters for Level 3 aligns to the approach used to assess valuation uncertainty for Prudent Valuation purposes. This utilizes exit price analysis for the relevant assets and liabilities.
The Group has no potential impact from the relative uncertainty in the fair value of financial instruments for which valuation is dependent on unobservable parameters as exit price is used in preparing financial statements.
The range of values shown below represents the highest and lowest inputs used to value the exposures within Level 3.
As of December 31, 2017 (December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 respectively) the fair value of the assets available for sale and other investments are based on the net asset value of the underlying asset.
For other derivatives, the rancellation rate is mainly driven by the different distribution channels and product types.
| Dec 31, 2017 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fair value | ||||||
| in Em (unless stated otherwise) |
Assets | Liabilitics | Valuation technique(s) | Significant unobservable input(s) (Level 3) |
Range | |
| Financial instruments held at fair value - held for trading, designated at fair value | ||||||
| and available-for-sale: | ||||||
| Equity securities | 245 | 0 | ||||
| Held for trading | 17 | 0 | Market approach | Price per net asset value | 100% | 100% |
| Available-for-sale | 228 | Market approach | Price per net asset value | 100% | 100% | |
| Other financial instruments | ನ್ನೂ | 0 | Market approach | Price per net asset value | 100% | 100% |
| Total non-derivative financial instruments held at fair value | 294 | 0 | ||||
| Financial instruments held at fair value: | ||||||
| Market values from derivative financial instruments: | ||||||
| Other derivatives | 0 | 81 | Option pricing model | Cancellation rate | 0% | 14% |
| Total market values from derivative financial instruments | 0 | 81 | ||||
| Doc 31, 2016 | ||||||
| Fair value | ||||||
| in Em. (unless stated otherwise) |
Assets | Liabilities | Valuation technique(s) | Significant unobservable input(s) (Level 3) |
Range | |
| Financial instruments held at fair value - held for trading, designated at fair value and available-for-sale: |
||||||
| Equity securities | 225 | 0 | ||||
| Available-for-sale | 225 | Market approach | Price per net asset value | 100% | 100% | |
| Other financial instruments | રેરે | 0 | Market approach | Price per net asset value | 100% | 100% |
| Total non-derivative financial instruments held at fair value | 261 | 0 | ||||
| Financial instruments held at fair value: | ||||||
| Market values from derivative financial instruments: Other derivatives |
0 | 73 | Cancellation rate | 0% | 14% | |
| 0 | Option pricing model | |||||
| Total market values from derivative financial instruments | 74 | |||||
| Dec 31, 2015 | ||||||
| Fair value | ||||||
| in em. (unless stated otherwise) |
Assets | Liabilities | Valuation technique(s) | Significant unobservable mput(s) (Level 3) |
Range | |
| Financial instruments held at fair value - held for trading, designated at fair value and available-for-sale: |
||||||
| Debt securities and other debt obligations | ਤੇ ਦੱ | 0 | ||||
| Held for trading | ਤੇ ਕੰ | 0 | Price based | Price | 100% | 100% |
| Equity securities | 234 | 0 | ||||
| Available - for-sale | 234 | Market approach | Price per net asset value | 100% | 100% | |
| Other linancial instruments | 19 | 0 | Market approach | Price per net asset value | 100% | 100% |
| Total non-derivative financial instruments held at fair value | 287 | 0 | ||||
| Financial instruments held at fair value: | ||||||
| Market values from derivative financial instruments: | ||||||
| Other derivatives | 0 | 15 | Present Value Model | Cancellation rate | 4% | 21% |
The unrealized gains or losses on Level 3 Instruments are not due parameters. Many of the parameter inputs to the valuation of instruments in this level of the hierarchy are observable and the gain or loss is partly due to movements in these observable parameters over the period. The unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 instruments of assets available for sale are included in other comprehensive income whereas the unrealized gains and losses on financial assets/liabilities at fair value through profit and loss are included in net gains (losses) from financial assets/liabilities held at fair value in profit and loss as shown in the table below.
| in Em. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets held at fair value: | |||
| Trading securities | (8) | 0 | (106) |
| Financial assets available for sale | 5 | ર્ષ્ઠ | 6 |
| Total financial assets held at fair value | (3) | 6 | (100) |
| Financial liabilities held at fair value: | |||
| Negative market values from derivative financial instruments | 8 | ਵੇਰੇ | 0 |
| Total financial liabilities held at fair value | 8 | ਵੇਰੇ | 0 |
| Total | 5 | હર | (100) |
The valuation techniques used to establish fair value for the Group's financial instruments which are not carried at fair value in the balance sheet and their respective IFRS fair value hierarchy categorization with those outlined in Note 7 "Financial Instruments carried at Fair Value".
Other financial instruments not caried at fair value are not managed on a fair value basis, for example, loans and deposits. For these instruments fair values are calculated for disclosure purposes only and do not impact the balance shatement. Additionally, since the instruments generally do not trade there is significant management judgment required to determine these fair values.
Short-term financial instruments – The carrying value represents a reasonable estimate of fair value for the following classes of financial instruments which are predominantly short-term:
| Assets | Liabilities | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and Interbank balances (w/o central banks) | Deposits | |
| Other Assets | Other short-term borrowings | |
| Other liabilities |
For longer-term financial instruments within these categories, fair value is determined by discounting contractual cash flows using rates which could be earned for assets with similas and credit risks and, in the case of liabilities, rates at which the liabilities with similar remaining maturities could be issued, at the balance sheet date.
Other short-term borrowings
Other financial liabilities
Long-term debt
Dec 31, 2017 Valuation Valuation Ouoted techni technique
unobservable
paraments
technique
observable prices in
active market
(Level 1) parameters
(Level 2) in €m. Carrying value Fair value Financial assets: 0 Cash and Interbank balances 3,317 3,317 3,317 Loans 307 0 307 0 Other financial assets 1,115 1,115 0 1,115 Financial liabilities: 3 3 0 3 Deposits 107 107 0 107 Other short-term borrowings Other financial liabilities 2,459 2,459 283 2,175 Long-term debt 3 3 0 3 Dec 31, 2016 Valuat ion Valuation Quoted
technique
observalble
paraments
(Level 2) technique
nobservalole
parameters
(Level 3) in €m Carrying value Fair value Financial assets: Cash and Interbank balances 4,017 4,017 0 4,016 0 Loans 446 446 0 Other financial assets 1,154 1,154 0 1,154 Financial liabilities: 0 Deposits 6 6 6 313 0 313 Other short-term borrowings 313 Other financial liabilities 5,922 5,922 151 5,771 Long-term debt 3 3 0 3 Dec 31, 2015 Valuation Valuation Quoted techni unobservable technique observable prices in
active market
(Level 1) parameters
(Level 3) parameters
(Level 2) in €m. Carrying value Fair value Financial assets: Cash and Interbank balances 0 4,666 4,666 4,666 Loans 294 294 0 0 Other financial assets 1,152 1,152 0 1,152 Financial liabilities: Deposits 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
294
446
307
Other financial liabilities include liabilities from guaranteed funds of December 31, 2017 (2016: € 4.7 billion and € 6.6 billion as of Dec 31, 2015) which belong to the investors and the Group consolidates though not being an investor.
323
25
7,537
323
7,537
25
0
0
214
323
25
7,324
The loans are mainly to DB Group with short term maturities. The loans shown in 2015 and 2016 include in addition a loan to an unconsolidated structured entity (2016: € 257 million) to invest in US debt which has been repaid in October 2017.
| in Em. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt securities: | |||
| Total debt securities | 36 | 23 | 22 |
| Equity securities: | |||
| Equity shares | 68 | 68 | 82 |
| Investment certificates and mutual funds | 83 | ર્ડક | ਵਪ |
| Total equity securities | 152 | 124 | 137 |
| Other equity interests | 174 | 170 | 149 |
| Total financial assets available for sale | 362 | 316 | 307 |
The net gains (losses) on financial assets available for sale are € 0.2 million for the year ending December 31, 2017 (€ 0.8 million for the year ending December 31, 2016 and € 3.2 million for the year ending December 31, 2015). Impairment losses included in net gains (losses) on financials assets available for sale are € 1.2 million for the year ending December 31, 2017, € 0.2 million for the year ending December 31, 2016 and € 1.5 million for the year ending December 31, 2015.
Investments in associates and jointly controlled entities are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
DWS Group holds interests in 6 (2016: 6, 2015: 7) associates and 1 (2016: 1) joint arrangement. One Associate is considered to be material for DWS Group, based on Group's income from the investee.
| Investment | Principal place | Nature of | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|
| of business | Relationship | percentage | |
| Harvest Fund Management Co., LTD | Shanghai, China |
Strategic Investment |
30% |
Significant influence is derived by holding percentage and 2 out of 9 representatives on the board of directors.
| in €m. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total net revenues | 496 | 514 | 534 |
| Net income | 141 | 120 | 138 |
| Other comprehensive income | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Total comprehensive income | 141 | 122 | 142 |
| Total assets | 1,030 | 1,285 | 1,370 |
| Total liabilities | 429 | 721 | 861 |
| Net assets of the equity method investee | 601 | 564 | 509 |
| in €m. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net assets of the equity method investee | 601 | 564 | 509 |
| Groups ownership percentage on the investee's equity | 30% | 30% | 30% |
| Groups share of net assets | 180 | 169 | 153 |
| Goodwill | 16 | 17 | 17 |
| Intangible Assets | 6 | ર્ભ | ನ |
| Other adjustments | 3 | A | 2 |
| Carrying amount | 205 | 196 | 175 |
The share in net income from Harvest Fund was € 43 million in 2017 (2016: € 40 million and 2015: € 39 million).
| in Em. | Dec 31. 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount of all associates that are individually immaterial to the Group | |||
| Aggregated amount of the Group's share of profit (loss) from continuing operations | |||
| Aggregated amount of the Group's share of total comprehensive income | 0) | 0) |
The net income (loss) from equity method investment include an impairment loss of € 1 million in 2016 and € 5 million in 2015).
| Dec 31, 2017 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractual obligations and Commitments | Payment due by period |
||||
| in Em. | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years |
| Long-term debt obligations | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Operating lease obligations | 42 | 21 | 20 | 1 | 0 |
| Purchase obligations | II3 | 26 | 60 | 23 | 4 |
| Total Contractual Obligations | 161 | 48 | 83 | ટર | 4 |
| Contingent Receivables | ਤੇ ਵ | ||||
| Contingent Liabilities | 46 | ||||
| Dec 31, 2016 | |||||
| Contractual obligations and Commitments | Payment due by period |
||||
| in Em. | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years |
| Long-term debt obligations | 12 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Operating lease obligations | 75 | ટર્ | 44 | 6 | 0 |
| Purchase obligations | 153 | 37 | ર્ રે | 62 | 0 |
| Total Contractual Obligations | 241 | 63 | 101 | 71 | 6 |
| Contingent Receivables | 36 | ||||
| Contingent Liabilities | 43 | ||||
| Dec 31, 2015 | |||||
| Contractual obligations and Commitments | Payment due by period |
||||
| in €m. | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years |
| Long-term debt obligations | 34 | 22 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Operating lease obligations | 70 | 18 | રે રે | 17 | 0 |
| Purchase obligations | 110 | 30 | 23 | 57 | 0 |
| Total Contractual Obligations | 215 | 71 | 60 | 78 | 6 |
| Contingent Receivables | 49 | ||||
| Contingent Liabilities | 49 |
Purchase Obligations include future payments mainly for technology services and asset management services.
DWS Group leases the majority of its offices and branches under short- or mid-term agreements. Most of the lease contracts are made under usual terms and conditions, which means they include options to extend amount of time, price adjustment clauses and escalation clauses in line with general office rental market conditions. However, the lease agreements do not include any clauses that impose any restriction on the DWS's ability to pay dividends, engage in debt financing transactions or enter into further lease agreements.
In 2017, the rental payments for lease and sublease agreements amounted to € 19 million and 2015: € 17 million). This included charges of € 16 million and 2015: € 15 million) for minimum lease payments and of € 3 million (2016: € 3 million and 2015: € 3 million) for contingent rents as well as € 0 million and 2015: € 0 million and 2015: € 0 million) related to sublease rentals received.
Contingent receivables relate to guarantees given by DB Group for management fee receivables. Contingent liabilities mainly relate to unfunded commitments for the Group being investor in a fund.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, as well as gross amounts and accumulated impairment losses of goodwill, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, are shown below.
| in Em. | Total |
|---|---|
| Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 2,735 |
| Exchange rate changes/other | 202 |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 2,937 |
| Gross amount of goodwill | 2,937 |
| Accumulated impairment losses | 0 |
| Balance as of January 1, 2016 | 2,937 |
| Exchange rate changes/other | 62 |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 2,999 |
| Gross amount of goodwill | 2,999 |
| Accumulated impairment losses | 0 |
| Balance as of January 1, 2017 | 2,999 |
| Exchange rate changes/other | (230) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | 2,768 |
| Gross amount of goodwill | 2,768 |
| Accumulated impairment losses | 0 |
In 2017, changes in goodwill mainly relate to Foreign Exchange rate changes of € (230) million, 2015 € 202 million).
The Goodwill impairment test for the CGU Deutsche Asset Management is part of the goodwill impairment test of Deutsche Bank Group.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter by comparing the CGU with its carrying amount. In addition, in accordance with IAS 36, the Group tests goodwill whenever a triggering event is identified. The recoverable amount is the higher of the CGU's fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use.
The annual goodwill impairment test conducted in 2017 did not result in an impairment loss on the CGU as the recoverable anounts was higher than the respective carrying amounts (2016 nil, 2015 nil)
Certain political or global risks for the Asset Management industry such as a return of the European sovereign debt crisis, uncertainties regarding the implementation of already adopted regulation as well as a slowdown of GDP growth may negatively impact the performance forecast and, thus, could result in an impairment of goodwill in the future.
The carrying amount of a primary CGU within Deutsche Bank Group is derived using a capital allocation model from Deutsche Bank Group. The allocation uses the Deutsche Bank Group's total equity at the date of valuation, including Additional Tier 1 Notes ("AT1 Notes"), which constitute unsecured and subordinated notes of Deutsche Bank group and which are classified as Additional equity components in accordance with IFRS. Total equity is adjusted for an add-on adjustment for goodwill attributable to non-controlling interests.
Within the capital allocation, Deutsche Bank Group shareholder's equity (adjusted for nonintegrated investments) is allocated to the primary CGUs of which Deutsche Asset Management is one in a two-step process, which is aligned with both the determination of the recoverable amount and the current equity allocation framework of Deutsche Bank Group. The two step approach works as follows: Allocation of Deutsche Bank Group shareholders' equity using a solvency-based key first, until the target CET 1 ratio (CRR/CRD 4 on a fully loaded basis) is met, and then, if applicable, incremental capital allocation to consider the leverage ratio requirements. The solvency-based allocation contains the assignment of intangible assets in line with its regulatory treatment. Further, it comprises equity allocations based on the CGU's relative share of risk-weighted assets, on capital deduction items as well as on regulatory reconciliation items. In the second step, if applicable, the CGUs receive equity allocations based on their pro-rata leverage ratio exposure measure relative to the Group. Additionally, non-controlling interests (plus the add-on adjustment for goodwill attributable to non-controlling interests) are considered in the carrying amounts of the respective primary CGUs. The AT1 Notes are allocated to the primary CGUs in proportion to their specific leverage ratio shortfall being a function of Deutsche Bank's target leverage ratio, the CGU's leverage ratio exposure measure and the allocated CET 1 capital.
The net asset value shown in the combined balance sheet of DWS Group supports the Group not resulting to an impairment loss in 2017 (2016 and 2015 respectively).
Deutsche Bank Group determines the recoverable anounts of its primary CGUs like Deutsche Asset Management on the basis of fair value less costs of disposal (Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy) and employs a discounted cash flow (DCF) model, which reflects the specifics of the banking business and its regulatory environment. The model calculates the present value of the estimated future earnings that are distributable to shareholders after fulfilling the regulatory capital requirements. The recoverable amounts also include the fair value of the ATI Notes, allocated to the primary CGUs consistent to their treatment in the carrying amount.
The DCF model uses earnings projective capitalization assumptions (with capital ratios increasing from current levels to a Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio being comfortably above 13 % and a leverage ratio of 4.5 % in the medium term, both under fully loaded definitions) based on five-year financial plans, which are discounted to their present value. Estimating future earnings and capital requirements involves judgment and the consideration of past and current performances as well as expected developments in the respective markets, and in the overall macroeconomic and regulatory environments. Earnings projections beyond the initial five-year period are, where applicable, adjusted to derive a sustainable level. In case of a going concern, the cash flow to equity is assumed to increase by or converge towards a constant long-term growth rate of up to 3.2% (2016: 2.8%). This is based on projected revenue forecasts of the CGUs as well as expectations for the development of gross domestic product and inflation, and is captured in the terminal value.
The DCF value of a CGU is sensitive to the earnings projections, to the discount rate (cost of equity) applied and, to a much lesser extent, to the long-term growth rates applied had been determined based on the capital asset pricing model and comprise a risk-free interest rate, a market risk premium and a factor covering the systematic market risk (beta factor). The values for the risk-free interest rate, the market risk premium and the beta factors are determined using external sources of information. CGU-specific beta factors are determined based on a respective group of peer companies. Variations in all of these components might impact the discount rates. For DWS Group SE 10 % (2016: 9.9%, 2015: not available due to structural changes in Deutsche Bank Group) was used.
Management determined the values for the key assumptions in the following table based on a combination of internal and external analysis. Estimates for efficiency and the cost reduction program are based on progress made to date and scheduled future projects and initiatives.
| Description of key assumptions | events/circumstances that could have a negative effect | |
|---|---|---|
| Deutsche Asset Management |
- Deliver strong investment product performance - Expand product suite in growth areas (e.g., alternatives, multi-asset, passive, ESG investment schemes) while rationalizing non-core strategies Consistent net flows leveraging market share leadership in Germany and the rest of Europe and continued growth in Asia/Pacific and Americas Diversification of intermediary coverage towards high growth channels and deployment of digital solutions to serve new channels - Further efficiency through improved core operating processes, platform optimization and product rationalization Anticipated margin compression from regulation (MIFID II) |
- Challenging market environment and volatility unfavorable to our investment strategies Unfavorable margin development and adverse competition levels in key markets and products beyond expected levels - Business/execution risks, e.g., under achievement of net flow targets from market uncertainty, loss of high quality client facing employees, lower than expected efficiency gains - Uncertainty around regulation and its potential implications not yet anticipated |
| Internally generated intangible |
Total other intangible |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unamortized | Purchased intangible assets | Amortized | assets Amortized |
assets | |||||
| in Em. | Retail investment management agreements |
Other | Total unamortized purchased intangible assets |
Customer- related intangible assets |
Contract- based intangible assets |
Software and other |
Total amortized purchased intangible assets |
Software | |
| Cost of acquisition/manufacture: | |||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 951 | l | 952 | 105 | 20 | 114 | 239 | 18 | 1,209 |
| Additions Exchange rate changes |
0 110 |
0 0 |
0 110 |
0 12 |
0 0 |
0 1 |
0 14 |
27 0 |
27 124 |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 Additions Disposals Transfers Exchange rate changes |
1,061 0 0 0 ਤੇ ਤੇ |
1 0 0 0 0 |
1,062 0 0 0 33 |
117 0 0 0 4 |
20 0 0 0 0 |
115 0 (10) 0 0 |
253 0 (10) 0 4 |
વર્સ 49 0 0 0 |
1,360 49 (10) 1 37 |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 Additions Changes in the group of consolidated companies Exchange rate changes |
1,094 0 0 (131) |
1 0 0 (0) |
1,095 0 0 (131) |
121 0 0 (14) |
20 0 0 0 |
106 0 (5) (0) |
247 0 (5) (15) |
તેરે 68 0 (0) |
1,436 68 (5) (147) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | ਰੇਵਤ | 0 | 963 | 106 | 20 | 101 | 227 | 162 | 1,353 |
| Accumulated amortization and impairment: | |||||||||
| Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 240 | 0 | 240 | 80 | 11 | 114 | 205 | 7 | 452 |
| Amortization for the year Exchange rate changes |
0 28 |
0 0 |
0 28 |
6 9 |
2 0 |
0 1 |
8 11 |
3 0 |
12 39 |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 Amortization for the year Disposals Exchange rate changes |
268 0 0 8 |
0 0 0 0 |
268 0 0 8 |
તેરૂ 6 0 3 |
13 2 0 0 |
115 0 (10) 0 |
224 8 (10) 4 |
10 9 0 0 |
502 17 (10) 12 |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 Amortization for the year Changes in the group of consolidated |
276 0 |
0 0 |
276 0 |
105 6 |
15 4 |
106 0 |
226 9 |
19 18 |
521 27 |
| companies Exchange rate changes |
0 (33) |
0 0 |
0 (33) |
0 (13) |
0 0 |
(5) (0) |
(5) (13) |
0 (0) |
(5) (47) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | 243 | 0 | 243 | و8 | 19 | 101 | 217 | 37 | 498 |
| Carrying amount: | |||||||||
| As of December 31, 2015 | 793 | 1 | 794 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 29 | રે રે | 858 |
| As of December 31, 2016 | 818 | 1 | 818 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 21 | 75 | 915 |
| As of December 31, 2017 | 719 | 0 | 720 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 125 | 855 |
In 2017, amortizing other intangible assets increased by a net € 38 million. Main components of this development included net increases in internally generated intangible assets of € 50 million, which represent the capitalization of expenses incurred in conjunction with the development of self-developed own-used software. These were offset by amortization expenses of € 9 million, related to the scheduled asset consumption of customer related and contract based intangible assets.
During 2016, the main changes in amortizing other intangible assets included disposal of intangible asses of € 10 million and the net increase of self-developed own-used software of € 40 million net of amortization.
In 2015, the main changes in amortizing other intangible assets increase in internally generated own-used software of € 24 million net of amortization.
The amortization of intangibles is reflected under general and administrative expenses in the combined Statement of Income.
Other intangible assets with finite useful lives are generally amortized over their useful lives based on the straight-line method.
| Useful lives in | |
|---|---|
| Internally generated intangible assets: Software |
years up to 10 |
| Purchased intangible assets: | |
| Customer-related intangible assets | up to 20 |
| Contract-based intangible assets | up to 8 |
| Other | up to 80 |
Within this asset class, the Group recognizes certain contract-based intangible assets, which are deemed to have an indefinite useful life.
In particular, the asset class comprises the below detailed investment related to retail mutual funds. Due to the specific nature of these intangible assets, market prices are ordinarily not observable and, therefore, the Group values such assess based on the income approach, using a post-tax DCF methodology.
Retail investment managements - These assets, amounting to € 719 million, relate to the Group's U.S. retail mutual fund business. Retail investment managements are contracts that give DWS Investments the exclusive right to manage a variety of mutual funds for a specified period. Since these contracts are easily renewal is minimal, and they have a long history of renewal, these agreements are not expected to have a foreseable limit on the contract period. Therefore, the rights to manage the associated assets under management are expected to generate cash flows for an indefinite period of time. This intangible asset was recorded at fair value based upon a valuation provided by a third party at the date of acquisition of Zurich Scudder Investments, Inc. in 2002.
The recoverable amount of the asset of € 719 million) was calculated as fair value less costs of disposal using the multi-period excess earnings method and the fair value measurement was categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierachy. The key assumptions in determining the fair value less costs of disposal include the asset mix, the flows forecast and the effective fee rate. The discount rates (cost of equity) applied in the calculation were 10.5 % in 2016 and 11.0 % in 2015. The reviews of the valuation for the years 2017, 2016 and 2015 neither resulted in any impairment nor a reversal of prior impairnents.
| in €m. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other assets: | |||
| Brokerage and securities related receivables | |||
| Cash/margin receivables | 4 | 6 | |
| Receivables from unsettled regular way trades | 464 | 419 | 274 |
| Total brokerage and securities related receivables | 468 | 425 | 275 |
| Accrued interest receivable | 4 | ੇ | 11 |
| Other | 866 | 1,289 | 1,404 |
| Total other assets | 1,338 | 1,724 | 1,690 |
| in €m. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
| Other liabilities: | |||
| Brokerage and securities related payables | |||
| Cash/margin payables | 0 | (0) | 0 |
| Payables from unsettled regular way trades | 481 | 398 | 280 |
| Total brokerage and securities related payables | 481 | 398 | 280 |
| Accrued interest payable | 0 | (0) | |
| Other | 3,026 | 6,696 | 8,540 |
| Total other liabilities | 3,507 | 7,095 | 8,820 |
For further details on other liabilities please refer to Note on Financial Instruments not carried at Fair Value".
Other Liabilities include the liabilities of the consolidated guaranteed funds of C 1.3 billion as of December 31, 2017, € 4.7 billion as of December 31, 2016 and € 6.6 billion as of December 31, 2015.
| in Em. | Operational Risk |
Civil Litigations | Regulatory Enforcement |
Restructuring- Staff Related |
Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | ર્દ્રક | |
| New provisions | 49 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 78 |
| Amounts used | (0) | (2) | 0 | (2) | (13) | (18) |
| Unused amounts reversed | 0 | 0 | 0 | (4) | (10) | (14) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 102 |
| New provisions | 1 | 131 | 4 | 25 | 17 | 178 |
| Amounts used | (4) | (0) | 0 | (d) | (19) | (32) |
| Unused amounts reversed | (45) | (1) | 0 | (5) | (9) | (60) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 3 | 130 | 4 | 12 | 39 | 189 |
| New provisions | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 40 | 52 |
| Amounts used | (2) | (126) | 0 | (6) | (11) | (145) |
| Unused amounts reversed | (1) | 0 | (2) | (0) | (4) | (7) |
| Effects from exchange rate fluctuations/Unwind of discount | 0 | (3) | 0 | (0) | (0) | (4) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 67 | જિન્દ |
Operational provisions arise out of operational risk and exclude civil litigation and regulatory enforcement provisions, which are presented as separate classes of provisions.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. The definition used for the purposes of determining operations differs from the risk management definition, as it excludes risk of loss resulting from civil litigations or regulatory enforcement purposes, operational risk includes legal risk, as payments to customers, counterparties and regulatory bodies in civil litigations or regulatory enforcement matters constitute loss events for operational shortcomings, but excludes business and reputational risk.
Civil Litigation provisions arise out of current or proceedings alleging non-compliance with contractual or other legal or regulatory responsibilities, which have result in demands from customers, counterparties or other parties in civil litigations.
Regulatory Enforcement provisions arise out of current or potential claims or proceedings alleging non-compliance with legal or regulatory responsibilities, which have result in an assessment of fines or penalties by governmental regulatory agencies, self-regulatory organizations or other enforcement authorities.
Restructuring provisions arise out of restructuring activities. The Group aims to enhance its long-term competitiveness through reductions in costs, duplication and complexity in the years ahead. For details see Note 5 "Restructuring".
Other provisions include several specific items arising from a variety of different circumstances, including a provision for a right to tender on a closed-end fund.
The Group recognizes a provision for potential loss only when there is a present obligation a pass event that is probable to result in an economic outflow that can be reliable estimate cannot be made for such an obligation, no provision is recognized and the obligation is deemed a contingent liabilities also include possible obligations for which the possibility of future economic outflow is more but less than probable. Where a provision has been taken for a particular claim, no contingent liability is recorded; for matters consisting of more than one claim, however, provisions may be recorded for some claims, and contingent liabilities (or neither a provision nor a contingent liability) may be recorded for others.
In deternining for which of the claims the possibility of a loss is probable but more than remote, and then estimating the possible loss for those claims, the Group takes into consideration a number of factors, including but not limited to the nature of the claim and its underlying facts, the procedural posture and litigation history of each case, rulings by the courts or tribunals, the Group's experience and the experience of others in similar cases (to the extent this is known to the Group), prior settlement discussions, settlements by others in similar cases (to the extent this is known to the Group), available indemnities and the opinions and views of legal counsel and other experts.
The provisions the Group has recognized for civil litigation and regulatory enforcement matters as of December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are set forth in the table above. For some matters for which the Group believes an outflow of funds is probable, no provisions were recognized as the Group could not reliably estimate the amount of the potential outflow.
The Group may settle litigation or regulatory proceedings or investigations prior to a final judgment or determination of liability. It may do so to avoid the cost, management efforts or negative business, regulational consequences of continuing to contest liability, even when the Group believes it hability. It may also do so when the potential consequences of failing to prevail would be disproportionate to the costs of settlement. Furthermore, the Group may, for similar reasons, reimburse counterparties for their losses even in situations where it does not believe that it is legally compelled to do so.
Set forth below is a description of civil litigation for which the Group has taken a material provision in 2016.
European Value Added Fund (EVAF) Litigation – It refers to a legal matter related to the EVAF fund brought against the Manager by the General Partner (GP) which was settled by virtue of a binding settlement deed on 2 January 2017. A further oosts payment may be required if the GP is not able to recover VAT on the costs element but total costs have been capped at € 8 million.
The Group has 52 ongoing/anticipated defendant litigation or regulatory matters which are not expected to have a significant impact on the Group's financials.
Deutsche Bank Group (DB Group) made grants of share-based compensation under the DB Equity Plan. This plan represents a contingent right to receive Deutsche Bank common shares after a specified period of time. The award recipient is not entitled to receive dividends during the vesting period of the award.
The share awards granted under the terms and conditions of the DB Equity Plan may be forfeited fully or partly if the recipient voluntarily terminates employment before the end of the relevant vesting usually continues after termination of employment in cases such as redundancy or retirement.
In countries where legal or other restrictions hinder the delivery of shares, a cash plan variant of the DB Equity Plan was used for granting awards.
DWS Group participates in the DB Equity Plan under the rules established for DB Group.
The following table sets forth the basic terms of these share plan of DB Group.
| Grant year(s) | Deutsch Bank Equity Plan | Vesting schedule | Early retirement provisions |
Eligibility | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Annual Award | 1/4: 12 months 1/4: 24 months 1/4: 36 months 1/4: 48 months |
1 1 1 1 |
Yes | Select employees as annual performance-based compensation |
||
| Or cliff vesting after 54 months |
1 | Yes | 2 | Members of DB Management Board or of Senior Management Group |
|||
| Retention/New Hire Annual Award -Upfront |
Individual specification Vesting immediately at grant |
3 | Yes No |
Select employees to attract and retain the best talent Regulated employees |
|||
| Retention Award | র্বা | 1/2: 48 months 1/2: 60 months |
5 5 |
Yes | Material Risk Takers (MRTs) | ||
| Cliff vesting after 36 months |
Yes | Non-Material Risk Takers (non-MRTs) | |||||
| 2016 | Annual Award | 1/4: 12 months 1/4: 24 months 1/4: 36 months 1/4: 48 months |
1 1 1 1 |
Yes | Select employees as annual performance-based compensation |
||
| Or cliff vesting after 54 months |
1 | Yes | 2 | Members of DB Management Board or of Senior Management Group |
|||
| Retention/New Hire Annual Award - Upfront |
Individual specification Vesting immediately at grant |
3 | Yes No |
Select employees to attract and retain the best talent Regulated employees |
|||
| Key Position Award (KPA) | 6 | Cliff-vesting after 4 years | 3 | Yes | Select employees as annual retention | ||
| 2015/ 2014/ 2013 |
Annual Award | 1/3: 12 months 1/3: 24 months 1/3: 36 months |
1 1 |
Yes | Select employees as annual performance-based compensation |
||
| Or cliff vesting after 54 months |
1 | Yes | 2 | Members of DB Management Board or of Senior Management Group |
|||
| Retention/New Hire | Individual specification | Yes | Select employees to attract and retain the best talent | ||||
| Annual Award - Upfront | Vesting immediately at grant |
7 | No | Regulated employees |
1 For members of DB Management Board or of the Senior Management Group and all other regulated employees a futher retection period of six morths applies.
2 Early retirement provisions do not apply to members of DB Management Board.
3 For all regulated employees share delivery after a further retention period of twelve months.
Retertion Award is subject to an additional shis sward proportion only vers in the event that the Bank's share price reaches a certains harget price prive prive prive priv vesting.
For MRTs share delivery after a retention period of 12 months.
A prelefined proportion of the individual s KPA is subject to an aning this award proportion only wess in the event that the Bank's share price reacles a certain share target price prior to vesting.
For manbers of DB Management Board share a retention period of three years. For all other regulated and othery after a retention priod of is in nouts.
Furthermore, DB Group offers a broad-based employee share ownership plan entitled Global Share Purchase Plan ("GSPP"). The GSPP offers employees in specific countries the opportunity to purchase Deutsche Bank shares over one
year. At the end of the purchase cycle, the bank matches the acquired stock in a ratio of one to one up to a maximum of ten free shares, provided that the employee remains at Deutsche Bank Group for another year. In total, about 662 DWS Group staff from 5 countries enrolled in the eighth cycle that began in November 2016.
DB Group has other local share-based compensation plans where DWS Group participate, none of which, individually or in the aggregate, are material to the combined financial statements.
The following table shows the outstanding share award units as of the respective dates for DWS Group, which represent a contingent right to receive Deutsche Bank common shares after a specified period of time. It also includes the cash plan variant of the DB Equity Plan.
| Share units (in thousands) |
Weighted- average grant date fair value per unit |
|
|---|---|---|
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 982 | €30.16 |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 2.199 | €24.36 |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | 2.887 | €19.57 |
As of December 31, 2017, the grant volume of outstanding share awards was approximately € 93 million and 2015: € 77 million). Thereof, € 47 million and 2015: € 60 million) had been recognized as compensation expense in the reporting year or prior to that. Hence, compense for deferred share-based compensation not yet recognized amounted to € 46 million as of December 31, 2017 (€ 24 million as of December 31, 2016 and € 17 million as of December 31, 2015).
In addition to the amounts shown in the table above, approximately 0.1 and 0.8 million shares were issued to plan participants in February and March 2017 and 0.3 million shares in February 2016, resulting from the vesting of DB Equity Plan awards granted in prior years.
DB Group sponsors a number of post-employment benefit plans on behalf of its employees, both defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans. The Group's plans are accounted for based on the nature and substance of the plan. Generally, for defined benefit plans the value of a participant's accrued benefit is based on each employee's remuneration and length of service; contributions to defined contribution plans are typically based on a percentage of each employee's remuneration. The rest of this note focuses predominantly on DB Group's defined benefit plans in which DWS Group participates.
DB Group's defined benefit plans which are applicable for DWS Group are primarily described on a geographical basis, reflecting differences in the nature and risks of benefits, as well as in the respective regulatory environments. In particular, the requirements set by local regulators can vary significantly and determine the design and financing of the benefit plans to a certain extent. Key information is also shown based on participant status, which provides a broad indication of the maturity of DWS Group's obligations.
| Dec 31, 2017 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Germany | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
APAC | Total |
| Defined benefit obligation related to | ||||
| Active plan participants | 209 | 19 | 4 | 233 |
| Participants in deferred status | 03 | 2 | 0 | તેર |
| Participants in payment status | 68 | 0 | 0 | ୧୫ |
| Total defined benefit obligation | 371 | 21 | বা | 397 |
| Fair value of plan assets | 311 | 20 | 332 | |
| Funding ratio (in %) | 84 | 97 | 23 | 84 |
| Dec 31, 2016 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Germany | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
APAC | Total | ||
| Defined benefit obligation related to | ||||||
| Active plan participants | 196 | 6 | 5 | 208 | ||
| Participants in deferred status | 88 | 2 | 0 | 90 | ||
| Participants in payment status | 71 | 0 | 71 | |||
| Total defined benefit obligation | 355 | 8 | 5 | 369 | ||
| Fair value of plan assets | 294 | 302 | ||||
| Funding ratio (in %) | 83 | દર્શ્વ | ાર્ ર | 82 |
| Dec 31, 2015 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| in €m. | Germany | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
APAC | Total |
| Defined benefit obligation related to | ||||
| Active plan participants | 157 | 6 | 5 | 168 |
| Participants in deferred status | 71 | 0 | 72 | |
| Participants in payment status | 60 | 0 | 0 | 60 |
| Total defined benefit obligation | 288 | ಗ | 300 | |
| Fair value of plan assets | 257 | 265 | ||
| Funding ratio (in %) | 89 | 100 | 20 | 88 |
The majority of DWS Group's defined benefit plan obligations relate to Germany. Within the other countries, the largest obligations relate to Luxembourg. In Germany and some continental European countries, post-employment benefits are usually agreed on a collective basis with respective employee works or their equivalent. The Group's main pension plans are governed by boards of trustees, fiduciaries or their equivalent.
Post-employment benefits can form an imployee's total remuneration. DB Group's approach is that their design shall be attractive to employees in the respective market, but sustainable for the longer term. At the same time, DB Group tries to limit its risks related to provision of such benefits. Consequently DB Group has moved to offer defined contribution plans in many locations over recent years.
In the past DB Group typically offered pension plans based on final pay prior to retirement. These types of benefits still form a significant part of the pension obligations for participants in deferred and payment status. Currently, in Germany and Luxembourg, the main defined benefit pension plans for acive staff are cash account type plans where DB Group credits an annual amount to individuals' accounts based on an employee's current salary. Dependent on the accounts increase either at a fixed interest rate or participate in market movements of certain underlying investments to limit the investment risk for DB Group. Sometimes, in particular in Germany, there is a guaranteed benefit amount within the plan rules, e.g. payment of at least the amounts contributed. Upon retirement, beneficiaries may usually opt for conversion of the accumulated account balance into an annuity. This conversion is often based on market conditions and mortality assumptions at retrement. Same is applicable for DWS Group.
The following amounts of expected benefit payments from DWS Group's defined benefits attributable to employees' past and estimated future service, and include both amounts paid from DB Group's external pension trusts and parid directly by DWS Group in respect of unfunded plans.
| in Em. | Germany | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
APAC | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual benefit payments 2017 | ||||
| Benefits expected to be paid 2018 | 6 | 8 | ||
| Benefits expected to be paid 2019 | 7 | 9 | ||
| Benefits expected to be paid 2020 | 8 | 10 | ||
| Benefits expected to be paid 2021 | g | 11 | ||
| Benefits expected to be paid 2022 | 10 | 12 | ||
| Benefits expected to be paid 2023 - 2027 | 64 | 2 | 3 | ਦਰੇ |
| Weighted average duration of defined benefit | ||||
| obligation (in years) | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
In the United Kingdom and the U.S., some employees participate in a defined benefit plan sponsored by another entity of Deutsche Bank Group, such as retirement benefit plans as well as post-employment medical plans. Generally the risk affiliated to the plan is within the sponsoring entity while the employing entities are just obliged to pay for costs incurred for the respective employees within the sponsoring entity.
In Germany, DWS Group is a member of the BVV together with other financial institutions. The BVV offers retirement benefits to eligible employees in Germany as a complement benefit promises of the Group. Both employers and employers and employees contribute on a regular basis to the BVV. The BVV provides annuities of a fixed amount to individuals on retirement and inceases these fixed amounts if surplus assets arise within the plan. According to legislation in Germany, the employer is ultimately liable for providing the benefits to its employees. An increase in benefits may also arise due to additional obligations to retires for the effects of inflation. BVV is a multi-employer defined benefit plan. However, in line with industry practice, the Group accounts for it as a defined contribution plan since insufficient is available to identify assets and liabilities relating to the Group's current and former employees, primarily because the BVV does not fully allocate plan assets to beneficiaries nor to member companies. According to the BVV's most recent disclosures, there is no current deficit in the plan that may affect the amount of future Group contributions. Furthermore, any plan surplus energing in the future will be distributed to the plan treduce future Group contributions. In June 2016, the BVV's Annual General Meeting approved a reduction in benefits from future contributions for certain groups of employees. Similar to other participating companies, the Group committed to make up for reduced benefit levels by increasing contributions to the BVV from January 1, 2017. A corresponding labor agreement has been signed with the German works council.
Deutsche Bank Group maintains a Pensions Risk Committee to oversee its pension and related risks on a global basis. This Committee meets quarterly, reports directly to the Senior Executive Compensation Committee and is supported by the Pensions Operating Committee. These committees oversee the pensions and related risks for DWS Group as well.
Within this context, DB Group develops and maintains guidelines for governance and risk management, including funding, asset allocation and actuarial assumption setting. In this regard, risk management and control of risks for DB Group related to market developments (e.g., interest rate, creatit spread, price inflation), asset investment, regulatory or legislative requirements, as well as monitoring demographic changes (e.g., longevity). Especially during and after acquisitions or changes in the external environment (e.g., legislation, topics such as the general plan design or potential plan amendments are considered. Any plan changes follow a process requiring approval by DB Group Human Resources. To the extent that pension plans are funded, the assets held mitigate some of the liability risks, but introduce investment risk.
In key pension countries, DB Group's largest post-employment benefit plan risk exposures relate to potential changes in credit spreads, interest rates, price inflation and longevity, although these have been partially mitigated through the investment strategy adopted.
Overall, DB Group seeks to minimize the impact of pensions on DB Group's financial position from market movements, subject to balancing the trade-offs involved in financing post-employment benefits, regulatory capital and constraints from local funding or accounting requirements, DB Group measures its pension risk exposures on a regular basis using specific metrics developed by DB Group for this purpose.
DB Group including DWS Group maintains various external pension trusts to fund the majority of its defined benefit plan obligations. DB Group's funding policy is to maintain coverage of the defined benefit obligation by plan assets within a range of 90 % to 100% of the obligation, subject to meeting any local statutory requirements. DB Group has also determined that certain plans should remain unfunded, although their funding approach is subject to periodic review, e.g. when local regulations or practices change. Obligations for DB Group's unfunded plans are accrued on the balance sheet.
For most of the externally funded defined benefit plans there are local minimum funding requirements. DB Group can decide on any additional plan contributions, with reference to DB Group's funding policy. In most countries DB Group expects to receive an economic benefit from any plan surpluses of plan assets compared to defined benefit obligations, typically by way of reduced future contributions. Given the broadly fully funded position and the investment strategy adopted in DB Group's key funded defined benefit plans, any minimum funding requirements that may apply are not expected to place any material adverse cash strain in the short term. With reference to DB Group's funding policy, DB Group considers not re-claiming benefits paid from DB Group's assets as an equivalent to making cash contributions into the external pension trusts during the year. DWS Group's funding policy.
December 31 is the measurement date for all plans are valued by independent qualified actuaries using the projected unit credit method. A Group policy provides guidance to ensure consistency globally on setting actuarial assumptions which are finally determined by DB Group's Pensions Operating Committee.
The key actuarial assumptions applied in determining the defined benefit obligations at December 31 are presented below in the form of weighted averages
| Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
APAC | Germany | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
APAC | Germany | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
APAC | ||
| Discount rate (in %) | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 26 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 3.3 | |
| Rate of price inflation (in %) | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 3.6 | 5.1 | |
| Rate of nominal increase in future compensation levels (in %) |
2.3 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 4.6 | 5.8 | |
| Rate of nominal increase for pensions in payment (in %) |
1.7 | 1.7 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 0 | |
| Assumed life expectancy at age 65 |
||||||||||
| For a male aged 65 at measurement date |
19.3 | 20.1 | 0 | 19.1 | 19.1 | 0 | 19.1 | 23.4 | 0 | |
| For a female aged 65 at measurement date |
23.3 | 23.5 | 0 | 23.2 | 23.2 | 0 | 23.2 | 25.5 | 0 | |
| For a male aged 45 at measurement date |
21.9 | 22.5 | O | 21.8 | 21.8 | 0 | 21.8 | 25.1 | 0 | |
| For a female aged 45 at measurement date |
25.8 | 25.7 | 0 | 25.7 | 25.7 | 0 | 25.7 | 27.4 | 0 | |
| Mortality tables applied | ||||||||||
| Richttsfeln Heubeck 2005G |
Richttafeln Heubeck 2005G |
Country specific tables |
Richttafeln Heubeck 2005G |
Richttafeln Heubeck 2005G |
Country specific tables |
Richttafeln Heubeck 2005G |
Richttafeln Heubeck 2005G |
Country specific tables |
For DB Group's most significant plans in the key countries, the discount rate used at each measurement date is set based on a high quality corporate bond yield curve - derived based on bond universe information sourced from reputable third-party index and data providers and rating agencies - reflecting the timing, amount and currency of the future expected benefit payments for the respective plan. For longer durations where limited bond information is available, reasonable yield curve extrapolation methods are applied using respective actual swap rates and cread assumptions. Consistent discount rates are used across all plans in each currency zone, based on the assumption applicable for DB Group's largest plan(s) in that zone. For plans in the other countries, the discount rate is based on high quality corporate or government bond yields applicable in the respective currency, as appropriate at each measurement date with a duration broadly consistent with the respective plan's obligations. Same is applicable for DWS Group.
In 2017 DB Group including DWS group moved to a more standardized, simpler approach to set its discount rate used to value its defined benefit plans in the Eurozone; similar approaches are generally accepted and are already used for DB Group's other major pension plans in the United Kingdom and the United States. The refinement resulted in no change in the discount rate and so no effect on DWS Group's Combined Statement of Comprehensive Income in 2017.
The price inflation assumptions in the eurozone are set with reference to market measures of inflation swap rates in those markets at each measurement date. For other countries, the price inflation assumptions are typically based on long term forecasts by Consensus Economics Inc.
The assumptions for the increases in future compensation levels and for increases to pensions in payment are developed separately for each plan, where relevant. Each is set based on the price inflation assumption and reflecting DB Group's reward structure or policies in each market, as well as relevant local statutory and plan-specific requirements.
Among other assumptions, mortality assumptions can be significant in measuring DWS Group's obligations under its defined benefit plans. These assumptions have been set in accordance with current best practive countries. Future potential improvements in longevity have been considered and included where appropriate.
| 2017 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Germany | UK | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
Americas | APAC | Total |
| Change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation: | ||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | 355 | 0 | 8 | 0 | રે રેતે | |
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Profit & Loss | ||||||
| Current service cost | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
| Interest cost | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | б |
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | ||||||
| Actuarial gain or loss arising from changes in financial assumptions | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) | 1 |
| Actuarial gain or loss arising from changes in demographic assumptions | 0 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | (0) |
| Actuarial gain or loss arising from experience | (7) | 0 | 1 | 0 | (0) | (6) |
| Cash flow and other changes | ||||||
| Contributions by plan participants | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Benefits paid | (6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1) | (7) |
| Payments in respect to settlements | 0 | 0 | (1) | 0 | 0 | (1) |
| Exchange rate changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) | (0) |
| Other | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | (0) | 53 |
| Balance, end of year | 371 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 4 | 397 |
| thereof: | ||||||
| Unfunded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Funded | 371 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 393 |
| Change in fair value of plan assets: | ||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | 295 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 303 | |
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Profit & Loss | ||||||
| Interest income | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | 0 | 5 | 0 | (0) | 2 | |
| Return from plan assets less interest income Cash flow and other changes |
(3) | |||||
| Contributions by the employer | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Benefits Paid | (6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) | (6) |
| Payments in respect to settlements | 0 | 0 | (1) | 0 | 0 | (1) |
| Other | 13 | 0 | 8 | 0 | (0) | 20 |
| Balance, end of year | 312 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 333 | |
| Funded status, end of year | (59) | 0 | (1) | 0 | (3) | (63) |
| Change in irrecoverable surplus (asset ceiling) | ||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | () | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in irrecoverable surplus | 0 | 0 | (2) | 0 | 0 | (2) |
| Balance, end of year | 0 | |||||
| (59) | 0 | (2) | 0 | (3) | (65) | |
| Net asset (liability) recognized |
1 Transfers between subsidiaries
2 Thereof €11 million recognised in Other assets and €76 million in Other liabilities
As of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017
| 2016 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Germany | UK | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
Americas | APAC | Total |
| Change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation: | ||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | 288 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 301 |
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Profit & Loss | ||||||
| Current service cost | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Interest cost | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | ||||||
| Actuarial gain or loss arising from changes in financial assumptions | 32 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
| Actuarial gain or loss arising from experience | 2 | 0 | (0) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Cash flow and other changes | ||||||
| Contributions by plan participants | ||||||
| Benefits paid | (6) | 0 | (0) | 0 | 0 | (e) |
| Acquisitions/Divestitures | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Other | 13 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (1) | 10 |
| Balance, end of year | 354 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 368 |
| thereof: | ||||||
| Unfunded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Funded | 354 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 364 |
| Change in fair value of plan assets: | ||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | 257 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 264 |
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Profit & Loss | ||||||
| Interest income | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | ||||||
| Return from plan assets less interest income | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | (0) | 12 |
| Cash flow and other changes | ||||||
| Contributions by the employer | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Benefits Paid 1 | (6) | 0 | (0) | 0 | 0 | (() |
| Acquisitions/Divestitures | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Exchange rate changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) | (0) |
| Other | 13 | 0 | (0) | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| Balance, end of year | 294 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 302 |
| Funded status, end of year | (60) | 0 | (1) | 0 | (5) | (୧୧) |
| Change in irrecoverable surplus (asset ceiling) | ||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Exchange rate changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) | (0) |
| Balance, end of year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net asset (liability) recognized | (60) | 0 | (1) | 0 | (5) | (66) |
1 For funded plans only
2 Thereof €10 million recognised in Other assets and €76 million in Other liabilities
| in Ern. | Germany | UK | EM EA (excl. Germany & UK) |
Americas | APAC | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation: | ||||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | 294 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 305 | ||
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Profit & Loss | ||||||||
| Current service cost | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | l l | ||
| Interest cost | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | ||
| Past service cost and gain or loss arising from settlements | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | 0 | (0) | ||
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | ||||||||
| Actuarial gain or loss arising from changes in financial assumptions |
(16) | 0 | (1) | 0 | (0) | (16) | ||
| Cash flow and other changes | ||||||||
| Contributions by plan participants | ||||||||
| Benefits paid | (6) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | (e) | ||
| Acquisitions/Divestitures | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Other | (0) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Balance, end of year | 288 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 301 | ||
| thereof: | ||||||||
| Unfunded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | ||
| Funded | 288 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 296 | |||
| Change in fair value of plan assets: | ||||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | 264 | 0 | ર્ભ | 0 | 271 | |||
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Profit & Loss | ||||||||
| Interest income | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | ||
| Defined benefit cost recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | ||||||||
| Return from plan assets less interest income | (12) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | (12) | ||
| Cash flow and other changes | ||||||||
| Contributions by the employer | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | ||
| Benefits paid | (6) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | (() | ||
| Acquisitions/Divestitures | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Exchange rate changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) | (0) | ||
| Other | (0) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Balance, end of year | 258 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 265 | ||
| Funded status, end of year | (32) | 0 | (1) | 0 | (4) | (38) | ||
| Change in irrecoverable surplus (asset ceiling) | ||||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Exchange rate changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (0) | (0) | ||
| Balance, end of year | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
DB Group's investment objective is to protect DB Group from adverse in the funding position of its defined benefit pension plans on key financial metrics, with a primary focus on immunizing the plans' IFRS funded status, while taking into account the plans' impact on other metrics, such as regulatory capital and local profit & loss accounts. Investment managers managers managers manage pension assets in line with investment mandates or guidelines as agreed with the pension plans' trustees.
To achieve the primary objective of immunizing the IFRS funded status of key defined benefit plans, DB Group applies a liability driven investment (LDI) approach. Risks from mismatches between fluctuations in the present value of the defined benefit obligations and plan assets due to capital market movements are minimized, subject to balancing relevant trade-offs. This is achieved by allocating plan assets closely to the market risk factor exposures of the pension liability to interest rates, credit spreads and inflation. Thereby, plan assets broadly reflect the underlying risk profile and currency of the pension plans where a full LDI approach may impact adversely other key financial metrics important to DB Group's overall financial position, DB Group may deviate from this primary investment strategy. In 2015, DB Group decided to adjust temporarily the investment strategy for the German main pension plan assets by reducing the interest rate and credit spread hedges. DB Group closely monitors this divergence from the primary investment strategy and has put in place governance mechanisms to ensure a regular review of the deviation from the LDI approach.
Where the desired hedging level for these risks cannot be achieved with physical instruments (i.e. corporate and government bonds), derivatives are employed. Derivative overlays mainly include interest rate, inflation swaps and credit default swaps. Other
instruments are also used, such as interest rate futures and options. In practice, a completely hedged approach is impractical, for instance because of insufficient market depth for ultra-long-term corporate bonds, as well as liquidity and cost considerations. Therefore, plan assets contain further asset categories to create long-term return enhancement and diversification benefits such as equity, real estate, high yield bonds or emerging markets bonds.
The following table shows the asset allocation of DWS Group's funded defined benefit plans to key asset classes, i.e. exposures include physical securities in discretely managed portfolios and underlying asset allocations of any commingled funds used to invest plan assets.
Asset amounts in the following table include both "quoted" (i.e. Level 1 assets in accordance with IFRS 13 - amounts invested in markets where the fair value can be determined directly from prices which are quoted in active, liquid markets) and "other" (i.e. Level 2 and 3 assets in accordance with IFRS 13) assets.
| Doo 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec31, 2015 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Germany | EM EA (graph Gecmany & UK) |
APAC | Total | Germury | EM EA (esal. Germany & UK) |
APAC | Total | Gennany | EMEA (und. Germany & UK) |
APAC | Total |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 43 | 45 | 21 | 22 | 21 | 22 | ||||||
| Equity instruments | 42 | 31 | S | 28 | 29 | |||||||
| Investment-grade bonds | 0 | |||||||||||
| Government | 59 | द | 0 | 63 | 75 | 2 | 0 | 77 | 91 | 2 | 0 | 93 |
| Non-government bonds | 6 | 0 | 0 | 136 | 140 | 106 | 110 | |||||
| Non-investment-grade bonds | ||||||||||||
| Government | 131 | 3 | 0 | 134 | ్రా | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Non-government bonds | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| Stractured products | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ಗ | 0 | 0 | ર |
| Alternatives | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| Real estete | 8 | 2 | 0 | 10 | e | 0 | 0 | 6 | ಳು | () | 0 | ಲ್ |
| Commodities | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Private equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Oma | દ્વેર | 0 | 62 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Derivatives (Market Value) | a | 0 | ||||||||||
| Interest sale | (29) | (1) | 0 | (29) | (7) | 0 | 0 | (7) | (11) | 0 | 0 | (11) |
| Credit | (6) | (0) | 0 | (6) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Inflation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (3) | 0 | 0 | (3) | (4) | 0 | 0 | (4) |
| Forsign exchange | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | (1) | 0 | 0 | (1) | I | 0 | 0 | |
| Other | 0 | 0 | (1) | (1) | ||||||||
| Total frair value of plan assots | 312 | 20 | 333 | 294 | 7 | - | 302 | 256 | 7 | 265 |
The following table sets out DWS Group's funded defined benefit plan assets only invested in "quoted" assets in accordance with IFRS 13.
| 31-Doc - 17 | Dex: 31, 2016 | 31-Dax-15 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Ern | Germany | EM EA (ascl. Geomany & UK) |
APAC | Total | Germany | EMEA (encl. Germany & UK) |
APAC | Total | Gennany | EM EA (excl. Germany & UX) |
APAC | Total |
| Cash and case base bass as a | 43 | 2 | 0 | તેનું | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | ||
| Equity instruments | 42 | 2 | 0 | 43 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 14 |
| Investment-grade bonds | ||||||||||||
| Government Non-government boads |
27 0 |
2 | 0 0 |
29 0 |
26 47 |
0 0 |
27 48 |
42 49 |
0 | 43 50 |
||
| Non-in vestment-grade bouds | 0 | |||||||||||
| Government Non-government boads |
0 | 0 0 |
0 0 |
0 0 |
1 | 0 0 |
0 0 |
0 | 0 0 |
0 | ||
| Stractured products Alternatives |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ു | 0 | 0 | 2 | ୍ୟ | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Real estate Other |
0 | 0 C |
0 0 |
0 0 |
71 | 0 0 |
0 0 |
2 | ਤੇ | 0 0 |
0 | రా ર્યુ |
| Derivatives (Market Value) Interest rate Inflation |
0 | 0 | 0 0 |
0 | ୍ୟ ପ୍ର | 0 | 0 | (2) 119 |
ತ್ರಿ ತ | () 0 |
0 | ලි ම |
| Total fair value of quoted plan assets | 112 | 0 | 117 | 101 | 103 | 119 | 122 | |||||
All the remaining assets are invested in "other" assets, the majority of which are invested in Level 2 assets in accordance with IFRS 13, being primarily investment-grade corporate bonds. A relatively small is in Level 3 assets in accordance with IFRS 13, being primarily real estate, insurance policies and derivative contracts.
The following tables show the asset allocation of the "quoted" and other defined benefit plan assets by key geography in which they are invested.
| Dec 31, 2017 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in €m. | Germany | United Kingdom |
United States |
Other Eurozone |
Other developed countries |
Emerging markets |
Total |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 0 | 42 | 46 | ||||
| Equity instruments | 12 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 43 |
| Government bonds (investment-grade and above) Government bonds |
22 | 0 | 18 | ર્ભ | 16 | 63 | |
| (non-investment-grade) Non-government bonds |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | б | 7 | |
| (investment-grade and above) | 8 | 11 | 50 | રેરે | ਹੇ | 2 | 135 |
| Subtotal | 43 | 13 | 66 | 121 | 26 | 26 | 295 |
| Share (in %) | 15 | C | 22 | 41 | 0 | 9 | 100 |
| Other asset categories | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 |
| Fair value of plan assets | 43 | 13 | દર્ | 121 | 26 | 26 | 333 |
| Dec 31, 2016 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Germany | United Kingdom |
United States |
Other Eurozone |
Other developed countries |
Emerging markets |
Total 21 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | (1) | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 1 | |
| Equity instruments | ತ | 2 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 32 |
| Government bonds (investment-grade and above) Government bonds |
12 | 30 | 7 | 16 | 3 | 9 | 77 |
| (non-investment-grade) Non-government bonds |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| (investment-grade and above) Non-government bonds |
8 | 30 | 40 | 48 | 12 | 2 | 140 |
| (non-investment-grade) | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Structured products | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |||
| Subtotal | 24 | 68 | 68 | 88 | 22 | 17 | 287 |
| Share (in %) | 8 | 24 | 24 | 31 | 8 | 6 | 100 |
| Other asset categories | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Fair value of plan assets | 24 | 68 | 68 | 88 | 22 | 17 | 302 |
| Dec 31, 2015 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Germany | United Kingdom |
United States |
Other Eurozone |
Other developed countries |
Emerging markets |
Total |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 0 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 22 | |
| Equity instruments | 4 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 29 |
| Government bonds (investment-grade and above) Government bonds |
27 | 28 | 8 | 21 | 3 | 7 | 93 |
| (non-investment-grade) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Non-government bonds (investment-grade and above) Non-government bonds |
6 | 27 | 32 | 30 | 13 | 1 | 109 |
| (non-investment-grade) Structured products |
0 0 |
1 2 |
2 | 2 | 0 0 |
0 0 |
6 5 |
| Subtotal | 38 | 63 | રેર | 74 | 22 | 12 | 266 |
| Share (in %) | 14 | 24 | 21 | 28 | 8 | 5 | 100 |
| Other asset categories | O | 0 | (1) | ||||
| Fair value of plan assets | 38 | 63 | રહ્ | 74 | 22 | 12 | 265 |
Plan assets at December 31, 2017 include derivative transactions with a negative market value of around € 27 million. There is neither a material amount of securities issued by DWS Group assets included in the fair value of plan assets. The plan assets do not include any real estate which is used by DWS Group.
In addition, DWS Group estimates and allows for uncertain income tax positions which may have an impact on DWS Group's plan assets. Significant judgment is required in making these estimates and DWS Group's final liabilities may ultimately be materially different.
DWS Group's defined benefit obligations are sensitive to changes in capital market conditions and actuarial assumptions. Sensitivities to capital market movements and key assumption changes are presented in the following table. Each market risk factor or assumption is changed in isolation. Sensitivities of the defined benefit obligations are approximated using geometric extrapolation
methods based on plan durations for the respective assumption. Duration is a risk measure that indicates the broad sensitivity of the obligations to a change in an underlying and provides a reasonable approximation for small to moderate changes in those assumptions.
For example, the discount rate duration is derived from the defined benefit obligation to a change in the discount rate based on information provided by the local actuaries of the resulting duration is used to estimate the remeasurement liability loss or gain from changes in the discount rate. For other approach is used to derive the respective sensitivity results.
For defined benefit pension plans, changes in capital market conditions will impact the plan obligations wa actuarial assumptions mainly discount rate and price inflation rate - as well as the plan assets. Where DWS Group applies a LDI approach, the overall exposure to changes is reduced. Consequently, to aid understanding of DWS Group's risk exposures related to key capital market movements, the net impact of the defined benefit obligations and plan assets due to a change of the related market risk factor or underlying actuarial assumption is shown; for sensitivities to changes in actuarial assumptions that do not impact the plan assets, only the impact on the defined benefit obligations is shown.
Asset-related sensitivities are derived for DB Group's major plans which are applicable to DWS Group by using risk sensitivity factors determined by DB Group's Market Risk Management function. These sensitivities are calculated based on information provided by the plans' investment managers and extrapolated linearly to reflect the approximate change of the plan assets' market value in case of a change in the underlying risk factor.
The sensitivities illustrate plausible variations over time in capital market movements and key actuarial assumptions. DWS Group is not in a position to provide a view on these capital market or assumption changes. While these sensitivities illustrate the overall impact on the funded status of the changes shown, the significance of the range of reasonable possible alternative assumptions may different plans that comprise the aggregated results. Even though plan assess and plan obligations are sensitive to similar risk factors, actual changes in plan assets and obligations may not fully offset each other due to imperfect correlations between market risk factors and actuarial assumptions. Caution should be used when extrapolating these sensitivities due to non-linear effects that changes in capital market conditions and have on the overall funded status. Any management actions that mitigate the inherent risks in the post-employment defined benefit plans are not reflected in these sensitivities.
Sensitivity analyses have been refined for discount rates and credits spreads to 50 basis points to reflect the low level of several key financial assumptions. For consistency, sensitivities shown for December 31, 2015 have been adjusted accordingly.
| Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in €m. | Germany | APAC | Germany | APAC | Germany | APAC | |
| Discount rate (-50 bp): | |||||||
| (Increase) in DBO | (26) | (1) | (26) | (1) | (22) | (1) | |
| Discount rate (+50 bp): | |||||||
| Decrease in DBO | 24 | 1 | 24 | 1 | 20 | 1 | |
| Rate of price inflation (-50 bp):1 | |||||||
| Decrease in DBO | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| Rate of price inflation (+50 bp):1 | |||||||
| (Increase) in DBO | (5) | 0 | (5) | 0 | (4) | 0 | |
| Rate of real increase in future compensation levels (-50 bp): |
|||||||
| Decrease in DBO, net impact on funded status | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Rate of real increase in future compensation levels (+50 bp): |
|||||||
| (Increase) in DBO, net impact on funded status | (1) | 0 | (2) | 0 | (1) | 0 | |
| Longevity improvements by 10 %:2 | |||||||
| (Increase) in DBO, net impact on funded status | (5) | 0 | (5) | 0 | (4) | 0 |
I Incorporates sensitivity to changes in nominal increase for pensions in payment to the price inflation assumption
2 Estimated to be equivalent to an increase of around 1 year in overall life expectancy
The following table shows expected cash flows for post-employment benefits in 2018, including contributions to DWS Group's external pension trusts in respect of funded plans, direct payment to beneficiaries in respect of unfunded plans, as well as contributions to defined contribution plans.
| 2018 | |
|---|---|
| in Em. | Total |
| Expected contributions to | |
| Group internal defined benefit plan assets | 9 |
| Defined benefit plan assets sponsored by another company of Deutsche | |
| Bank Group | 0 |
| BVV | 3 |
| Other defined contribution plans | 11 |
| Expected benefit payments for unfunded defined benefit plans | |
| Expected total cash flow related to post-employment benefits | 24 |
The following table presents a breakdown of specific expenses according to the requirements of IAS 19 and IFRS 2 respectively.
| in Em. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expenses for defined benefit plans: | |||
| Service cost | 10 | 18 | 12 |
| Net interest cost (income) | 1 | ||
| Total expenses defined benefit plans | 11 | 19 | 13 |
| Expenses for defined contribution plans: | |||
| BVV | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Other defined contribution plans | 11 | 10 | 10 |
| Total expenses for defined contribution plans | 14 | 12 | 12 |
| Total expenses for post-employment benefit plans | 25 | 31 | 25 |
| Employer contributions to mandatory German social security pension plan | 11 | 10 | 10 |
| Expenses for share-based payments: | |||
| Expenses for share-based payments, equity settled | 14 | 14 | 9 |
| Expenses for share-based payments, cash settled | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Expenses for cash retention plans | 12 | 9 | 10 |
| Expenses for severance payments | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| in € m. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current tax expense (benefit): | |||
| Tax expense (benefit) for current year | 259 | 197 | 205 |
| Adjustments for prior years | 0 | 0 | |
| Total current tax expense (benefit) | 259 | 198 | 205 |
| Deferred tax expense (benefit): | |||
| Origination and reversal of temporary difference, unused tax losses and tax credits | (36) | 7 | (15) |
| Effect of changes in tax law and/or tax rate | (୧୯) | (8) | |
| Adjustments for prior years | (5) | (2) | (16) |
| Total deferred tax expense (benefit) | (110) | (3) | (30) |
| Total income tax expense (benefit) | 149 | 195 | 175 |
Total current tax expense includes benefits from previously unrecognized tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, which reduced the current tax expense by € 1 million in 2017. In 2016 and 2015 these effects reduced the current tax expense by € 1 million and by € 2 million respectively.
Total deferred tax benefit includes benefits from previously unrecognized tax losses (tax credits/deductible temporary differences) and the reversal of previous write-downs of deferred tax assets and expenses arising from write-downs of deferred tax assets, which reduced the deferred tax benefit by € 4 million in 2017. In 2016 these effects reduced the deferred tax benefit by € 14 million and increased the deferred tax benefit by € 9 million in 2015.
On December 22, 2017, the US President signed into law the new tax law, known as the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (TCJA). `Effect of changes in tax law and/or tax rate" mainly reflects the beneficial impact of the reduction in the federal tax rate from 35% to 21% and amounts to € 66 million.
| in € m. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expected tax expense (benefit) at domestic income tax rate of 31 % | 243 | 200 | 198 |
| Foreign rate differential | (23) | 9 | |
| Tax-exempt gains on securities and other income | (4) | (25) | (8) |
| Loss (income) on equity method investments | (5) | (5) | (5) |
| Nondeductible expenses | 12 | 8 | |
| Changes in recognition and measurement of deferred tax assets1 | 3 | 12 | (12) |
| Effect of changes in tax law and/or tax rate | (69) | (7) | |
| Otherl | (8) | (8) | |
| Actual income tax expense (benefit) | 149 | 195 | 175 |
1 Current and defered tax expense(benefit) reflected in the line ine ine ine ine ine ine ine ine inensementenent of defered ax assess "and "Other".
The domestic income tax rate, including corporate tax, solidarity surcharge, and trade tax, used for calculating deferred tax assets and liabilities was 31 % for 2017, 2016 and 2015.
| in € m. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Actuarial gains/losses related to defined benefit plans | (1) | (9) | 1 |
| Financial assets available for sale: | |||
| Unrealized net gains/losses arising during the period | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| Net gains/losses reclassified to profit or loss | 0 | 0 | |
| Income taxes (charged) credited to other comprehensive income | 6 | (7) | 6 |
| Other income taxes (charged) credited to equity | 0 | 1 | |
| Major components of the Group's gross deferred tax assets and liabilities | |||
| in € m. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
| Deferred tax assets: | |||
| Unused tax losses | 20 | 34 | 42 |
| Deductible temporary differences: | |||
| Trading activities | 42 | 52 | 68 |
| Property and equipment | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Other assets | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Securities valuation | 14 | 8 | 11 |
| Allowance for loan losses | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Other provisions | 39 | 41 | 48 |
| Other liabilities | 23 | 51 | 43 |
| Total deferred tax assets pre offsetting | 173 | 193 | 225 |
| Deferred tax liabilities: | |||
| Taxable temporary differences: | |||
| Trading activities | 4 | 6 | 13 |
| Other assets | 191 | 332 | 328 |
| Securities valuation | 7 | 2 | 11 |
| Other provisions | 90 | 127 | 126 |
| Other liabilities | 14 | 19 | 4 |
| Total deferred tax liabilities pre offsetting | 306 | 486 | 482 |
| in € m. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presented as deferred tax assets | 131 | 124 | 145 |
| Presented as deferred tax liabilities | 264 | 416 | 402 |
| Net deferred tax liabilities | 133 | 292 | 257 |
The change in the balance of deferred tax liabilities does not equal the deferred tax expense/(benefit). This is due to (1) deferred taxes that are booked directly to equity, (2) the effects of exchange on tax assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than euro, (3) the acquisition and disposal of ordinary activities and (4) the reclassification of deferred tax assets and liabilities which are presented on the face as components of other assess and liabilities.
| in € m. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016- | Dec 31, 20151 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not expiring | (155) | (130) | (167) |
| Expiring in subsequent period | 0 | ||
| Expiring after subsequent period | (5) | (14) | (10) |
| Unused tax losses | (160) | (144) | (177) |
1 Amounts in the table refer to unused tax losses for federal income tax purposes.
Deferred tax assets were not recognized on these it is not probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences can be utilized.
As of December 31, 2017 the Group recognized deferred tax assets of € 1 million; 2015: € 2 million; 2015: € 2 million) respectively, that exceed deferred tax liabilities in entities which have suffered a loss in either the current or preceding period. This is based on management's assessment that it is probable that the respective entities will have taxable profits against which the unused tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences can be utilized. Generally, in determining the amounts of deferred tax assess to be recognized, management uses historical profitability information and, if relevant, forecasted operating results, based upon approved business plans, including a review of the eligible cary-forward periods, tax planning opportunities and other relevant considerations.
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to directly control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial or operational decisions. The Group's related parties include:
Key management personnel are those persons having and responsibility for planing, directing and controlling the activities of Deutsche Bank, directly or indirectly. The Group considers the Management Board and of the Supervisory Board of the parent company to constitute key management personnel for purposes of IAS 24.
| in Em. | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term employee benefits | ||
| Post-employment benefits | 0 | |
| Other long-term benefits | 0 | |
| Termination benefits | 0 | |
| Share-based payment | 0 | |
| Total key management compensation |
Among the Group's transactions with key management personnel as of December 31, 2017 were loans and commitments of € 0 million and deposits of € 3 million. As of December 31, 2016, the Group's transactions with key management personnel were loans and commitments of € 0 million and deposits of € 2 million.
DB Group has taken over compensation expense for Board members for 2017 and 2016 respectively.
Transactions between DWS Group and its subsidiaries meet the definition of related party transactions. If these transactions are eliminated on consolidation, they are not disclosed as related party transactions between DWS Group and Deutsche Bank AG and Deutsche Bank Group entities, its associated companies and their respective subsidiaries also qualify as related party transactions.
DWS Group has no transactions in 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively with joint ventures and associates.
Transactions with Deutsche Bank AG ank Group entities and subsidiaries are presented combined in the below table:
| 2017 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| in €m. | Sales 1 | Purchases | Receivables | Liabilities |
| DB A G | (60) | (80) | 1,381 | 101 |
| Other DB companies | (183) | (208) | 1,898 | તેણ્રે |
| 2016 | ||||
| in Em. | Sales 1 | Purchases | Receivables | Liabilities |
| DB A G | (127) | (54) | 1,244 | રેવે |
| Other DB companies | (157) | (137) | 2,272 | 1,418 |
| 2015 | ||||
| in Em. | Sales 1 | Purchases | Receivables | Liabilities |
| DB A G | (130) | (140) | 1,146 | 42 |
| Other DB companies | (190) | (206) | 2,104 | 1,493 |
1 include expenses following the netting method to related parties (please refer to: "Net commissions and fees from asset management")
Under IFRS, certain post-employment benefit plans are considered related parties. The Group has business relationships with a number of its pension plans pursuant to which it provides financial services to these plans, including investment management services. The Group's pension funds may hold or trade Deutsche Bank shares or securities.
| in Em. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other assets | |||
| Fees paid from plan assets to asset managers of the Group | |||
| Market value of derivatives with a counterparty of the Group | (27) | (23) | (26) |
| Notional amount of derivatives with a counterparty of the Group | 333 | 237 | 294 |
Please refer to Note 1 Principles of Combined Financial Statements
Statutory, contractual or regulatory requirements as well as protective rights of non-controlling interests might restrict the ability of the Group to access and transfer assets freely to or from other entities within the Group and to settle liabilities of the Group.
The following restrictions impact the Group's ability to use assets:
| Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in €m. | Total assets |
Restricted assets |
Total assets |
Restricted assets |
Total assets |
Restricted assets |
| Interest-earning deposits with banks | 3,004 | 142 | 3.638 | 718 | 4,204 | 1,470 |
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 1,907 | 1,882 | 4,558 | 4,547 | 5,594 | 5,534 |
| Financial assets available for sale | 362 | 22 | 316 | 307 | 27 | |
| Loans | 307 | 446 | 294 | |||
| Other | 5,647 | 46 | 6,406 | 354 | 6,328 | 378 |
| Total | 11,226 | 2,093 | 15,363 | 5,636 | 16,729 | 7,408 |
The Group engages in various business activities with structured entities which are designed to achieve a specific business purpose. A structured entity is one that has been set up so that any voting rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls the entity. An example is when voting rights relate only to administrative tasks and the relevant activities are directed by contractual arrangements.
A structured entity often has some or all of the following features or attributes:
The principal uses of structured entities are to provide clients with access to specific portfolios of assets and liquidity. Structured entities may be established as corporations. Structured entities generally finance the purchase of assets.
Structured entities are consolidated when the relationship between the Group and the structured entities indicate that the structured entities are controlled by the Group, as discussed in Note 1 "Significant Accounting Estimates". The most significant judgment in determining if the group has control of a structured entity is the chermination that the Group exercise its power as agent rather than a principal in respect of fund manager typically has the power over the funds through investment management and other agreements. However, the Group determines as to whether the fund manager is acting primarily as a principal or as an agent. In assessing whether the Group is an agent or a principal, it considers a number of factors, including the scope of its decision-making activities, rights held by investor and others, remuneration it is entitled to and its exposure to variable returns. The Group does not consolidate funds when it deemed to be an agent or when another third party investor has the ability to direct the activities of the fund.
The Group has contractual arrangements to the following consolidated structured entities.
The Group provide guarantees to funds consolidated by the Group under IFRS 10 due to the fact it has power (being the asset manager) and it is exposed to variable returns (especially via the guarantee). As of December 31, 2017 the notional value of the guarantee provided by the group to such funds was € 1.2 billion (2016: € 4.4 billion and 2015: € 6.4 billion).
These are structured entities which are not consolidated because the Group does not control them through voting rights, contract, funding agreements, or other means.
The Group's interests in unconsolidated structured entities refer to contractual involvement that exposes the Group to variability of returns from the performance of the structured entities. Examples of interests in unconsolidated structured entities include debt or equity investments (seed capital and co-investments), receivables from asset management fees (shown in other assets) guarantees and certain derivative instruments in which the Group is absorbing variability of returns from the structured entities.
Below is a description of the Group's interest in unconsolidated structured entities by type.
The Group set up a structured note vehicle with the primary objective to realize investing in US debt of economic infrastructure companies. The note was fully repaid in Oct 2017. In 2017 the Group only invested in a debt securitization classified as assets available for sale.
The Group receives the mandate to establish structured entities to accommodate client requirements in specific assets. In addition, a group entity may act as fund manager or some other capacity and provide seed capital or act as co-investor to group sponsored funds. This category mainly includes open-ended funds and closed-end funds.
The Group does not hold any investment in associates or joint venture which meet the definition of a structured entity.
The Group earns management fees and, occasionally, performance-based fees for its investment service in relation to funds and mandates. Any trading revenue as a result of derivatives with structured entities is recognized in 'Net gains/losses on financial assets/liabilities held at fair value through profit and loss'. The net commission and fees from asset management and the entire Net gains (losses) from assets available for sale and net gains (losses) on financial assets/liabilities at fair value through profit or loss relates to structured entities.
The maximum exposure to loss is determined by considering the interest in the unconsolidated structured entity. The maximum exposure for financial assets designated at fair value through profit and loss, financials assets available for sale, loans and other assets is reflected by their carrying value in the combined balance sheet. The maximum exposure for derivatives under IFRS 12, as interpreted by the Group, is reflected by the notional amounts of £ 7.8 billion as of December 31, 2016 € 7.6 billion and December 31, 2015 € 12.1 billion). Such amounts or their development do not reflect the economic risks faced by the Group because they do not take into account the effects of collateral or economic hedges nor the probability of such losses being incurred. Off balance sheet commitments (unfunded commitments to funds) are reflected with their outstanding committed amount at reporting date. The total maximum exposure is calculated by adding total off-balance sheet exposure and notional amounts of derivatives.
The following table shows, by type of structured entity (mandates and funds are combined financials, separate view is not available), the carrying amounts of the Group's interests recognized in the combined financial statement and the maximum exposure.
| Dec 31, 2017 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Securiti- zations |
Mandates and Funds |
Total |
| Assets | |||
| Cash and central bank balances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interbank balances (w/o central banks) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 591 | 591 |
| Trading assets | 0 | 17 | 17 |
| Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 574 | 574 |
| Financial assets available for sale | 16 | 346 | 362 |
| Loans | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other assets | 0 | ୧୧୪ | 669 |
| Total assets | 16 | 1,606 | 1,622 |
| Liabilities | |||
| Total financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 81 | 81 |
| Negative market values (derivative financial instruments) | 0 | 81 | 81 |
| Notional amount of derivatives | 0 | 7,788 | 7,788 |
| Total liabilities | 0 | 81 | 81 |
| Off-balance sheet exposure | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Maximum Exposure | 16 | 9,439 | 9,455 |
| Dec 31, 2016 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Securiti- zations |
Mandates and Funds |
Total |
| Assets | |||
| Cash and central bank balances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interbank balances (w/o central banks) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 620 | 620 |
| Trading assets | 0 | 28 | 28 |
| Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 592 | 592 |
| Financial assets available for sale | 0 | 316 | 316 |
| Loans | 257 | 0 | 257 |
| Other assets | 0 | 629 | 629 |
| Total assets | 257 | 1,565 | 1,822 |
| Liabilities | |||
| Total financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 73 | 73 |
| Negative market values (derivative financial instruments) | 0 | 73 | 73 |
| Notional amount of derivatives | 0 | 7,592 | 7,592 |
| Total liabilities | 0 | 73 | 73 |
| Off-balance sheet exposure | 0 | ਪਤੇ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤੋਂ ਤ | ਧੰਤੇ |
| Maximum Exposure | 257 | 9,200 | 9,457 |
| Dec 31, 2015 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| in Em. | Securiti- zations |
Mandates and Funds |
Total |
| Assets | |||
| Cash and central bank balances | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interbank balances (w/o central banks) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 665 | 665 |
| Trading assets | 0 | 0 | (0) |
| Positive market values (derivative financial instruments) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 665 | 665 |
| Financial assets available for sale | 0 | 307 | 307 |
| Loans | 181 | 0 | 181 |
| Other assets | 0 | 555 | 555 |
| Total assets | 181 | 1,527 | 1,707 |
| Liabilities | |||
| Total financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Negative market values (derivative financial instruments) | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Notional amount of derivatives | 0 | 12,056 | 12,056 |
| Total liabilities | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Off-balance sheet exposure | 0 | 49 | 49 |
| Maximum Exposure | 181 | 13,632 | 13,812 |
The primary source of income is from management fees which is mainly based on AuM, therefore, any change in the AuM will impact the revenue capacity of the Group to a risk if the AuM declines assuming no change in margin.
The Group manages the total volume of € 700 billion Assets under Management (AuM) as of December 31, 2017. Asset under Management (AuM) is defined as (a) assets we hold on behalf of customer for investment purposes and/or (b) client assets that are
managed by DWS Group on a discretionary or advisory basis. Auth represents both collective investments (Mutual Funds, Exchange-Traded Funds, etc) and separate client mandates.
AuM is measured at current market value based on the local regulatory rules for the calculation of the total AuM in their funds and mandates which might differ from the fair value rules applicable under IFRS. Measurable daily for most retail products but may only update monthly or even quarterly for some products. While AuM do not consider the assets in the holding in Harvest, they do include seed capital and any committed capital on which the Group earn management fees.
Changes in AuM from one period to another are predominantly driven by three major components: net flows, foreign exchange impacts, and performance.
Net flows represent the net invested or withdrawn by investors within a specific reporting period. This can be broken down into gross inflows (cash invested) and gross outflows (cash withdrawn).
FX impact represents the currency movement of products denominated in local currencies against the Euro. It is calculated by applying the change in FX rate to the ending period assets and is calculated on a monthly basis. As of December 31, 2017, 57% of total AuM was denominated in Euro, 35% was denominated in U.S. dollars, 2% was denominated in Swiss Francs, GBP and JPY respectively and the remaining 2% was denominated in other currencies. The FX exposure is broadly unchanged over the past periods.
Performance primarily represents the underlying performance of the assets, which is driven by market effects (equity indices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates) and fund manager performance.
The table below breaks down the changes in AuM for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 by net flows, foreign currency impact, performance, and other.
| in Eba | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance as of Dec 31, 2017 |
Active Equity |
Active FI |
Active Multi Asset |
Active SQI |
Active Cash |
Passive | Alternatives | Total AuM |
| Opening AuM | 92 | 263 | વસ્ત | 53 | (2 | 98 | 74 | 689 |
| Net flows | (2) | (3) | II | (2) | II | 0 | IQ | |
| FX impact | (3) | (17) | (1) | (0) | (3) | (7) | (5) | (36) |
| Performance | d | द | 2 | (1) | 11 | 3 | 29 | |
| Other | 0 | (1) | 0 | 0 | (0) | |||
| Closing AuM | તે ર | 247 | 60 | 52 | ਵੇਂ ਕੇ | 115 | 71 | 700 |
| Balance as of Dec 31, 2016 |
Active Equity |
Active FI |
Active Multi Asset |
Active SQI |
Active Cash |
Passive | Alternatives | Total AuM |
| Opening AuM | 90 | 271 | 47 | હત | 75 | 104 | 74 | 714 |
| Net flows | (2) | (16) | 0 | (4) | (9) | (a) | 0 | (39) |
| FX impact | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | ||
| Performance | 3 | 6 | 2 | (1) | ાર | |||
| Other | (0) | 0 | (0) | (2) | 0 | (3) | (5) | |
| Closing AuM | 92 | 263 | ਕੰਡ | 53 | 63 | 98 | 74 | 689 |
| Balance as of Dec 31, 2015 |
Active Equity |
Active FI |
Active Multi Asset |
Active SQI |
Active Cash |
Passive | Alternatives | Total AuM |
| Opening AuM | 82 | 270 | 34 | 50 | 70 | 76 | 76 | ୧୧୫ |
| Net flows | (1) | (16) | 13 | ਦ | (2) | 26 | (5) | 19 |
| FX impact | 3 | 18 | 0 | 0 | ণ | ਦ | 34 | |
| Performance | 7 | (1) | (0) | (0) | 2 | (3) | (1) | 3 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | (0) | 0 | 0 |
| Closing AuM | 90 | 271 | 47 | ਦੇ ਪੈ | 75 | 104 | 74 | 714 |
DWS Group did not provide non-contractual support during the year to unconsolidated structured entities.
The Group consider itself a sponsor of a structured entity when it is exposed to litigation and reputation risks from its involvement with a structured entity in which the Group does not have an interest. During the year, the Group did not sponsor any of the unconsolidated structured entities.
| in Em. | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staff costs: | |||
| Wages and salaries | (669) | (601) | (748) |
| Social security costs thereof: those relating to pensions |
(104) (20) |
(111) (25) |
(112) (21) |
| Total | (772) | (713) | (860) |
As of December 31, 2017 the effective staff employed was 3,901 (December 31, 2016: 3,860 and December 31, 2015 3,877). Parttime staff is included in these figures proportionately.
The average number of effective staff employed in 2017 was 3,808 (2016: 3,590). An average of 2,345 (2016: 2,425 and 2015: 2,248) staff members worked outside Germany.
This note describes the Asset Management objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk, including the management of capital. The risk management function as of December 31, 2017 was performed by Deutsche Bank Group for the whole Deutsche Bank Group of which Asset Management was a business included in this note refer to the Deutsche Bank Group risk management framework, governance and processes. Where is a reference to Asset Management, this refers to the Asset Management business division of the Deutsche Bank Group. As of December 31, 2017 DWS Group formed part of the Asset Management division.
The Asset Management division is exposed to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:
Deutsche Bank Group operates a distinct risk management model. The business lines, including Asset Management, and service providing infrastructure areas are the "owners" of the risks. Oversight responsibility and policy framework are with the independent. risk and control infrastructure functions of Deutsche Bank Group. Group Audit provides assurance on the control environment and its effectiveness.
Core risk management responsibilities are with the Management Board Group and delegated to senior risk managers and senior risk management committees responsible for execution and oversight.
The risk strategy is approved by the Management Board on an annual basis and is defined based on the Risk Appetite and the Strategic and Capital Plan in order to align iss, capital and performance targets. Group defines Asset Management's risk appetite, setting up regulatory capital limits, which are monitored at the Asset Management Risk Council on a monthly basis. Cross-risk analysis reviews are conducted across the Deutsche Bank Group to validate that sound risk management practices and a holistic awareness of risk exist.
Reputational risk is implicitly covered in our economic capital framework, primarily within operational and strategic risk. Monitoring, stress testing tools and escalation processes are in place for key capital thresholds and metrics. Systems, processes and policies are critical components of our risk management capability.
Deutsche Bank Group's operations throughout the world are regulated and supervised by relevant authorities in each of the jurisdictions in which Deutsche Bank conducts business. Such regulation focuses on licensing, capital adequacy, risk concentration, conduct of business as well as organizational and reporting requirements. The European Central Bank (the "ECB") in connection with the competent authorities which joined the Single Supervisory Mechanism via the Joint Supervisory Team act in cooperation as Deutsche Bank's primary supervisors to monitor Deutsche Bank's compliance with the German Banking Act and other applicable laws and regulations as well as the CRR/CRD 4 framework and respective implementations into German law.
Several layers of management at the Deutsche Bank Group provide cohesive risk governance between the business lines, where Asset Management sits:

The following functional committees are central to the management of risk at Deutsche Bank:
Deutsche Bank Group Treasury function manages solvency, capital at Group level and locally in each region. Treasury implements Deutsche Bank Group's capital strategy, which itself is developed by the Group Risk Committee and approved by the Management Board, including issuance and capital instruments, hedging of capital ratios against foreign exchange swings, limit setting for key financial resources, design of book equity allocation, and regional capital planning. Deutsche Bank Group is fully committed to maintaining its sound capitalization both from an economic and regulatory perspective. Deutsche Bank Group continuously monitors and adjusts its overall capital demand and supply in an effort to achieve an appropriate balance of the economic and regulatory considerations at all times and from all perspectives.
Throughout 2017, Asset Management was fully integrated into the DB Group Capital Management process which inter alia included divisional limit setting and regional capital planning as further desction. Asset Management established a dedicated AM Treasury function as part of its CFO organization. AM Treasury will going forward assume certain responsibilities for Capital Management in the DWS Group.
Usage of key financial resources is influenced through the following governance processes and incentives. Target resource capacities are reviewed in our annual strategic plan in line with our CET 1 and Leverage Ratio ambitions. In a quarterly process, the Group Risk Committee approves divisional resource limits for Total Capital Demand and leverage exposure, including for Asset Management that are based on the strategic plan but adjusted for market conditions and the short-term outlook. Limits are enforced through a close monitoring process and an excess charging mechanism. Asset Management monitors and manages the exposure on a monthly basis in the Asset Management Risk Council.
Overall regulatory capital requirements are driven by the higher of Deutsche Bank Group's CET 1 ratio (solvency) and leverage ratio (leverage) requirements. In terms of order for the internal capital allocation, solvency-based allocation comes first, then an incremental leverage-driven allocation methodology utilizes a two-step approach: Allocation of
Shareholders Equity is solvency-based first until the externally communicated target of a 12.5 % CET 1 solvency ratio is met, and then incremental leverage capital is allocated based on pro-rata leverage exposure of divisions to satisfy the externally communicated target of a 4.5 % leverage ratio, if required. The allocation thresholds are reviewed as and when externally communicated targets for the CET 1 or leverage ratio are adjusted. In our performance measurement, our methodology also applies different rates for the cost of equity for each of the business segments, reflecting in a more differentiated way the earnings volatility of the individual business models. This enables improved performance management and investment decisions.
Regional capital plans covering the capital needs of Deutsches and subsidiaries across the globe are prepared on an annual basis and presented to the Group Investment Committee. Most of the subject to legal and regulatory capital requirements, including the Asset Management regulated entities. In developing, implementing and testing Deutsche Bank Group capital and liquidity, such legal and regulatory requirements are fully taken into account.
Further, Treasury is represented on the Invest Committee of the largest Deutsche Bank pension fund which sets the investment guidelines. This representation is intended to ensure that pension liabilities, thus protecting the Groups capital base.
Credit risk arises from all transactions where actual, contingent or potential claims against any counterparty, boriower, obligor or issuer (which we refer to collectively as "counterparties") exist, including those claims that the Group plan to distribute. Asset Management maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of its financial assets.
For Asset Management the credit exposure raises mainly for cash and cash equivalent positions, which are mainly cash deposits placed with Deutsche Bank (current external rating of Deutsche Bank as provided by Moody's is P-2).
A breakdown of the total cash and bank balances by receiving entity is shown below:
| in € bn. | Dec 31, 2017 - Dec 31, 2016 - Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and bank balances | 3.3 | 4.0 | 4.7 |
| thereof: | |||
| DB AG and other DB companies | 29 | 2.9 | 27 |
| Non DB Group companies |
Loans mainly consist of short-term cash pool held at DB Group by receiving entity as shown below:
| in € bn. | Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Loans | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| thereof: | |||
| DB AG and other DB companies Non DB Group companies |
0.3 0.0 |
0.2 0.2 |
0.1 0.2 |
Other Assets amount to €1.3 billion as per December 31, 2017, €1.7 billion as per December, 2016 and €1.7 billion as per December 2015. Main components are short-term receivables from asset management business activities and short-term pending items (security spot transactions, settled within 5 days after the transaction). There are no concerns over the credit quality of these assets and no significant level of default is expected.
The majority of the derivatives are predominately settled with Deutsche Bank and no significant level of default is expected.
Asset Management has no collateral held as security and only limited other credit enhancement via derivative margins.
Market risk is defined as the potential for change in the of financial instruments due to changes in market prices. Asset Management is exposed to nontrading market risk, which includes interest rate risk, credit as well as credit spread risk, and investment risk mainly on its seed investments, co-investments, as well as market risk arising from derivatives guaranteeing certain levels of the net asset value to be returned to investors at certain dates.
Asset Management manages guaranteed retirement accounts ("Riester Products") and guaranteed funds, which provide a full or partial notional guarantee at maturity. Riester guaranteed retirement accounts are voluntary private pension schemes in Germany that are government subsidized. The Group is exposed to a fall in the value of the underlying fund or account below the guaranteed amount at the maturity date.
The guaranteed funds are managed using Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPP) strategies and techniques, which use a rule based exposure allocation mechanism into highly rated assets, depending on market levels. A daily allocation mechanism between the two components limits the downside risk. Guaranteed products may invest into a wide range of equity and fixed income securities as well as other instruments outlined in the product documentation.
The risk for the Group as guarantor is that we have to compensate the funds if the market values of such products at their respective guarantee dates are lower than the guaranteed levels. This exposure is continuously monitored under different stress scenarios and portfolio contribution and cancelation simulations and is shown as a derivative.
Asset Management has direct equity co-investments primarily in structured entities that invest in a variety of asset classes, including (but not limited to), equities, fixed income, commodities and other alternative asset classes which may include real estate, infrastructure, private equity and hedge funds. To a lesser extent, Group has direct investments in debt securities.
Co-investments are made to ensure an alignment of interest with the management of the respective funds, frequently a market requirement, regulatory required or contractually required for risk retention"). Main investments subject to market price risk include private equity and real assess investments, hedge funds of funds as well as mutual funds.
Seed investment is deployed to build marketable track records for new products initiated by the Group. It executes an economical hedging program to minimize the profitl of the seed investments portfolio. Hedges are typically comprised of exchange traded futures or Exchange Traded Funds ("ETFs"), and other hedging instruments such as OTC derivatives. The economical hedging activity seeks to materially reduce market risks including (but not limited to) equity, interest rate, currency and commodity risk associated with seed investments, however cannot fully eliminate these risks.
The following financial assets are mainly exposed to market risk:
| in € bn. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading assets | 1.3 | ਤੇ ਤੇ 3 3 3 3 3 3 | ਧ |
| Financial assets of consolidated funds | 1.2 | 3.8 | 4 9 |
| Seed/Co-investments | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Financial Assets available for sale | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Seed/Co-investments | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Unfunded Commitments to structured entities * | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
*relates to committed Co-investments as reflected in note 11
The following financial liabilities are mainly exposed to market risk:
| in € bn. | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative Market Value for Derivatives mainly for Guaranteed funds |
The expected sensitivity for profit (loss) before tax is €33m and is principally driven by the interest rate effect on guaranteed funds and insignificant sensitivities on Seed investment driven by historical analyzes of the movement in asset value.
Foreign exchange risk arises from our nontrading asset and liability positions, denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the respective entity. The majority of this foreign exchange risk is economically hedged via the value-at-risk figures in the trading books. The remaining risks that have not been transferred are mitigated through match funding the investment in the same currency, therefore only residual risk remains in the portfolios. Small exceptions to above approach follow the general monitoring and reporting process, as outlined for the trading portfolio.
Asset Management is subject to both translational and transactional foreign currency risks.
The reporting currency of the Group is the Euro. A significant portion of revenues is generated in currencies other than the Euro. Where revenues in non-Euro currencies do not increase or decrease or decreases in the level of expenses, we are subject to transactional foreign currence changes in cost to income ratios and profitability that are larger than we otherwise would if all revenues and expenses were generated or incurred in Euro.
These foreign exchange exposures are continuously monitored, and managed as follows:
Based on the sensitivity analyzes of the cash position at December 31, 2017, two thirds of the 3.3 Euro billion cash and interbank balances were held in Euro currency, followed by positions held in British Sterling (17%) and US Dollar (14%). A 10% simultaneous weakening or strengthening of all currencies held against the Euro would reduce or increase our cash and interbank balances by 0.1 br with a corresponding effect in profit (loss) before tax.
Liquidity risk is the risk arising from our potential inability to meet all payment obligations when they come due or only being able to meet these obligations at excessive costs. The objective of Deutsche Bank Group's liquidity risk management framework is to ensure that Deutsche Bank Group can fulfil its payment obligations at all times and can manage liquidity and funding its risk appetite. The framework considers relevant and significant drivers of liquidity risk, whether on balance sheet.
Deutsche Bank Group Treasury is manage the overall liquidity and funding position of Deutsche Bank Group, with Deutsche Bank Group Liquidity Risk Control acting as an independent control for reviewing the liguidity risk framework, proposing the risk appetite to GRC and the validation of Liquidity Risk models which are developed by Deutsche Bank Group Treasury, to measure and manage the Deutsche Bank Group's liquidity risk profile.
Deutsche Bank Group Treasury manages liquidity and funding, in accordance with the Management Board-approved risk appetite across a range of relevant metrics, and implements a number of tools to monitor these and ensure compliance. In addition, Deutsche Bank Group Treasury works closely in conjunction with Liquidity Risk Control ("LRC"), and the business, including Asset Management, to analyze and underlying liquidity characteristics of the business portfolios. These parties are engaged in regular and frequent dialogue to understand changes in the Bank's position arising from business activities and market circumstances.
Dedicated business targets are allocated to ensure the Bank Group meets its overall liquidity and funding appetite. The Management Board is informed of performance against the risk appetite metrics, via a weekly Liquidity Scorecard. As part of the annual strategic planning process, Deutsche Bank projects the key liquidity and funding metrics based on the underlying business plans to enan is in compliance with its risk appetite. Asset Management established a dedicated AM Treasury function as part of its CFO organization. AM Treasury will going forward assume certain responsibilities for Liquidity Risk Management in the DWS Group.
Asset management has cash and balances (excluding consolidated funds and other offsetting items) of €3.3bn as per December 31, 2017 (€3.3 billion as per December 31, 2016 and €3.3 billion as per December 31, 2015). These cash and bank balances are mainly within Deutsche Bank Group and provide Asset Management with adequate liquidity.
The other liabilities in the DWS Group (excluding consolidated funds and other offsetting items) amount to €1.8 billion as per December 31, 2017 (€2.1 billion as per December 31, 2016 and €2.1 billion as per December 31, 2015) are mainly repayable within one year or on demand and are fully covered by cash and bank balances
We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements prepared by DWS Group SE, Frankfurt/Main, (the "Company") for the Asset Management division of Deutsche Bank Group (the "DB Group") as described in Note 1 of the notes to the combined financial statements, comprising the combined income statement, the combined statement of comprehensive income, the combined balance sheet, the combined statement of cashflow, the combined statement of change in net asset value and the notes to the combined financial statements for the business years from 1 January to 31 December 2017, 1 January to 31 December 2016 and 1 January to 31 December 2015. The preparation of the combined financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as adopted by the EU, is the responsibility of the Company's management, in particular the basis of preparation setting out the basis for determining the entities to be included in the combined financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the combined financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit of the combined financial statements in accordance with Section 317 HGB ("Handelsgesetzbuch: German Commercial Code") and German generally accepted standards for the audit of financial statements promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (Institute of Public Auditors in Germany) (IDW). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit such that misstatements materially affecting the presentation of the net assets, financial position and results of operations in the combined financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework are detected with reasonable assurance. Knowledge of the business activities and the economic and legal environment of the Asset Management division of DB Group and expectations as to possible misstatements are taken into account in the determination of audit procedures. The effectiveness of the accounting-related internal control system and the evidence supporting the disclosures in the combined financial statements are examined primarily on a test basis within the framework of the audit includes assessing the annual financial statements of those entities included in the combined financial statements, the determination of entities to be included in the combined financial statements, the accounting and combination principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the combined financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our audit has not led to any reservations.
In our opinion, based on the findings of our audit, the combined financial statements give a true and fair view of the net assets, financial position and the results of operations of the Asset Management division of DB Group in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as adopted by the EU.
Without modifying our opinion, we draw attention to the fact that, as described in Note 1 the Asset Management division of DB Group has not operated as a separate group of entities. These combined financial statements are, therefore, not necessarily indicative of results that would have occurred if the Asset Management division of DB Group had been a separate stand-alone group of entities during the years presented or of future results of the Asset Management division of DB Group.
Frankfurt/Main, 22 February 2018 KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Kuppler Wirtschaftsprüfer German Public Auditor Hommel Wirtschaftsprüfer German Public Auditor
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.